Environmental Assessment and Draft Land Protection Plan for The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Assessment and Draft Land Protection Plan for The Environmental Assessment and Draft Land Protection Plan Proposed Dakota Grassland Conservation Area North Dakota, South Dakota June 2011 Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service North Dakota Wetland Management Districts South Dakota Wetland Management Districts Region 6, Mountain-Prairie Region Division of Refuge Planning 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 300 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 303 /236 8145 CITATION U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Environmental Assessment and Draft Land Protection Plan: Proposed Dakota Grassland Con- servation Area. Lakewood, Colorado: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain–Prairie Region. 129 p. Contents Summary ....................................................................................... V Abbreviations .................................................................................... VII ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) EA Chapter 1—Purpose and Need for Action ...................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................. 1 Proposed Project Area .......................................................................... 2 Proposed Action .............................................................................. 4 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action .............................................................. 5 Decisions to Be Made .......................................................................... 5 Issues Identified and Selected for Analysis ........................................................... 6 Related Actions and Activities .................................................................... 6 National Wildlife Refuge System and Authorities ...................................................... 8 EA Chapter 2—Alternatives ..................................................................... 11 Alternative A (No Action) ........................................................................ 11 Alternative B (Proposed Action) ................................................................... 12 Alternatives Considered but Not Studied ............................................................ 12 EA Chapter 3—Affected Environment ............................................................. 15 Physical Environment. 15 Biological Environment ......................................................................... 18 Cultural Resources ............................................................................ 27 Socioeconomic Environment ..................................................................... 29 EA Chapter 4—Environmental Consequences ..................................................... 31 Effects on the Physical Environment ................................................................ 31 Effects on the Biological Environment ............................................................... 32 Effects on Cultural Resources .................................................................... 35 Effects on the Socioeconomic Environment ........................................................... 35 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts .................................................................... 37 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources ................................................. 37 Short-Term versus Long-Term Productivity ............................................................ 37 Cumulative Impacts ............................................................................ 38 EA Chapter 5—Coordination and Environmental Review ............................................ 41 Agency Coordination ........................................................................... 41 Contaminants and Hazardous Materials ............................................................. 41 National Environmental Policy Act ................................................................. 41 Strategic Habitat Conservation ................................................................... 42 Landscape Conservation Cooperatives .............................................................. 45 EA Glossary ................................................................................... 47 EA Appendixes A–Requests for Use or Modification of Easement Properties .......................................... 49 B–Public Scoping Report ....................................................................... 79 C–List of Preparers ........................................................................... 89 D–Species Lists .............................................................................. 91 IV EA and Draft LPP—Proposed Dakota Grassland Conservation Area EA Bibliography ................................................................................ 107 EA Figures 1. Map of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America ............................................... 2 2. Map of the boundary of the proposed Dakota Grassland Conservation Area ............................ 3 3. Map of ecoregions in the proposed Dakota Grassland Conservation Area .............................. 16 4. Map of the North American breeding ranges of 27 grassland birds ................................... 26 5. Graphic of the elements of strategic habitat conservation .......................................... 42 6. Chart of evaluation criteria for acquiring wetland conservation easements ............................. 43 7. Chart of evaluation criteria for acquiring grassland conservation easements ........................... 44 8. Graph of percentage of public scoping comments, by category, about the proposed Dakota Grassland Conservation Area .......................................................................... 84 EA Table 1. Priority bird species of the Prairie Pothole Region ................................................. 23 DRAFT LAND PROTECTION PLAN (LPP) Draft LPP Chapter 1—Introduction and Project Description ......................................... 111 Priorities and Objectives ........................................................................ 112 Ecosystem Management and Landscape Conservation .................................................. 112 Strategic Habitat Conservation ................................................................... 114 Threats to and Status of the Resources ............................................................. 117 Draft LPP Chapter 2—Proposed Action and Alternatives ............................................ 119 Easement Terms and Requirements ................................................................ 119 Project Costs ................................................................................. 120 Protection Alternatives ......................................................................... 121 Acquisition Funding Alternatives .................................................................. 124 Draft LPP Chapter 3—Coordination ............................................................... 129 Sociocultural Considerations ..................................................................... 129 Draft LPP Figures A. Map of the boundary of the proposed Dakota Grassland Conservation Area ............................ 113 B. Graphic of the elements of strategic habitat conservation .......................................... 114 C. Chart of evaluation criteria for acquiring wetland conservation easements ............................. 125 D. Chart of evaluation criteria for acquiring grassland conservation easements ........................... 126 Draft LPP Table A. Priority bird species of the Prairie Pothole Region ................................................. 115 Summary The first part of this volume is an environmental Although one of the most altered, the Prairie assessment, documenting the purpose, issues, al- Pothole Region is one of the most important, migra- ternatives, and analysis for the proposed Dakota tory bird habitats in the Western Hemisphere with Grassland Conservation Area. The draft land pro- its ability to produce and sustain tremendous num- tection plan presents an overview of the Service’s bers of waterfowl. The large-scale change in land proposed management approach to wildlife and as- use is rapidly expanding into the remaining quality sociated habitats, easement priorities, public uses, habitat for breeding birds. At the current rate of interagency coordination, public outreach, and other grassland conversion, an estimated one-half of the operations. remaining native prairie in the Prairie Pothole Re- The uniqueness of the proposed Dakota Grass- gion will be converted to other uses in only 34 years. land Conservation Area lies in the millions of depressional wetlands that constitute one of the richest wetland systems on Earth—the Prairie Pot- hole Region. The prairie potholes and surround- Proposed Dakota Grassland ing grasslands are highly productive and support a Conservation Area myriad of wetland and grassland birds along with large numbers of spring and fall migrants. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is proposing to establish the Dakota Grassland Conservation Area in the eastern parts of North Dakota and South The Prairie Pothole Region Dakota, which cover all counties north and east of the Missouri River except those in the existing Da- Once vast grassland, the Prairie Pothole Region is kota Tallgrass Prairie Wildlife Management Area. now largely an agricultural system dominated by The Service would conserve wetland and grassland cropland
Recommended publications
  • Butterflies of Ontario & Summaries of Lepidoptera
    ISBN #: 0-921631-12-X BUTTERFLIES OF ONTARIO & SUMMARIES OF LEPIDOPTERA ENCOUNTERED IN ONTARIO IN 1991 BY A.J. HANKS &Q.F. HESS PRODUCTION BY ALAN J. HANKS APRIL 1992 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION PAGE 1 2. WEATHER DURING THE 1991 SEASON 6 3. CORRECTIONS TO PREVIOUS T.E.A. SUMMARIES 7 4. SPECIAL NOTES ON ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA 8 4.1 The Inornate Ringlet in Middlesex & Lambton Cos. 8 4.2 The Monarch in Ontario 8 4.3 The Status of the Karner Blue & Frosted Elfin in Ontario in 1991 11 4.4 The West Virginia White in Ontario in 1991 11 4.5 Butterfly & Moth Records for Kettle Point 11 4.6 Butterflies in the Hamilton Study Area 12 4.7 Notes & Observations on the Early Hairstreak 15 4.8 A Big Day for Migrants 16 4.9 The Ocola Skipper - New to Ontario & Canada .17 4.10 The Brazilian Skipper - New to Ontario & Canada 19 4.11 Further Notes on the Zarucco Dusky Wing in Ontario 21 4.12 A Range Extension for the Large Marblewing 22 4.13 The Grayling North of Lake Superior 22 4.14 Description of an Aberrant Crescent 23 4.15 A New Foodplant for the Old World Swallowtail 24 4.16 An Owl Moth at Point Pelee 25 4.17 Butterfly Sampling in Algoma District 26 4.18 Record Early Butterfly Dates in 1991 26 4.19 Rearing Notes from Northumberland County 28 5. GENERAL SUMMARY 29 6. 1990 SUMMARY OF ONTARIO BUTTERFLIES, SKIPPERS & MOTHS 32 Hesperiidae 32 Papilionidae 42 Pieridae 44 Lycaenidae 48 Libytheidae 56 Nymphalidae 56 Apaturidae 66 Satyr1dae 66 Danaidae 70 MOTHS 72 CONTINUOUS MOTH CYCLICAL SUMMARY 85 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinator–Friendly Parks
    POLLINATOR–FRIENDLY PARKS How to Enhance Parks, Gardens, and Other Greenspaces for Native Pollinator Insects Matthew Shepherd, Mace Vaughan, and Scott Hoffman Black The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, Portland, OR The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation is an international, nonprofit, member–supported organiza- tion dedicated to preserving wildlife and its habitat through the conservation of invertebrates. The Society promotes protection of invertebrates and their habitat through science–based advocacy, conservation, and education projects. Its work focuses on three principal areas—endangered species, watershed health, and pollinator conservation. Copyright © 2008 (2nd Edition) The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. 4828 SE Hawthorne Boulevard, Portland, OR 97215 Tel (503) 232-6639 Fax (503) 233-6794 www.xerces.org Acknowledgements Thank you to Bruce Barbarasch (Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation District, OR) and Lisa Hamerlynck (City of Lake Oswego, OR) for reviewing early drafts. Their guidance and suggestions greatly improved these guide- lines. Thank you to Eric Mader and Jessa Guisse for help with the plant lists, and to Caitlyn Howell and Logan Lauvray for editing assistance. Funding for our pollinator conservation program has been provided by the Bradshaw-Knight Foundation, the Bullitt Foundation, the Columbia Foundation, the CS Fund, the Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund, the Dudley Foundation, the Gaia Fund, NRCS Agricultural Wildlife Conservation Center, NRCS California, NRCS West National Technical Support Center, the Panta Rhea Foundation, the Richard and Rhoda Goldman Founda- tion, the Turner Foundation, the Wildwood Foundation, and Xerces Society members Photographs We are grateful to Jeff Adams, Scott Bauer/USDA–ARS, John Davis/GORGEous Nature, Chris Evans/ www.forestryimages.com, Bruce Newhouse, Jeff Owens/Metalmark Images, and Edward S.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies Benefit from Native Herb
    Applegater Spring 2019 13 BIRD EXPLORER Difficult ID of juvenile Bald and Golden Eagles BY PETER J. THIEMANN Eagles are more visible in late winter A mature Bald Eagle is easily The Bald Eagle is a closely related cousin seen them both and early spring as they often congregate identified by its white head and tail. to the Eurasian Sea Eagle, which looks on winter kills Peter J. Thiemann near open water where waterfowl is There is nothing “bald” about our Bald similar, but without a white head. in Yellowstone present. In southern Oregon, there are Eagle, which is really a misnomer. A far The ranges of Bald and Golden Eagles National Park. Here in southern Oregon two species of eagles: the Golden Eagle more appropriate name would be Sea overlap, so it is possible to see them I was fortunate to capture a unique and the Bald Eagle, our National Bird. Eagle due to its association with water. together and competing for prey. I have image of a large juvenile female Bald Eagle with a male Golden Eagle. A close look will show the head size difference with that enormous beak on the Bald and larger talons on the Golden. This comparison is very helpful, as juvenile Bald Eagles are often mistaken for Golden Eagles because they don’t yet have a white head or tail, which come, for both sexes, around age three to four. I posted the juxtaposition of the two eagle species online and received many comments, including some from viewers asking about cross-species relations.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Use This Checklist
    How To Use This Checklist Swallowtails: Family Papilionidae Special Note: Spring and Summer Azures have recently The information presented in this checklist reflects our __ Pipevine Swallowtail Battus philenor R; May - Sep. been recognized as separate species. Azure taxonomy has not current understanding of the butterflies found within __ Zebra Swallowtail Eurytides marcellus R; May - Aug. been completely sorted out by the experts. Cleveland Metroparks. (This list includes all species that have __ Black Swallowtail Papilio polyxenes C; May - Sep. __ Appalachian Azure Celastrina neglecta-major h; mid - late been recorded in Cuyahoga County, and a few additional __ Giant Swallowtail Papilio cresphontes h; rare in Cleveland May; not recorded in Cuy. Co. species that may occur here.) Record you observations and area; July - Aug. Brush-footed Butterflies: Family Nymphalidae contact a naturalist if you find something that may be of __ Eastern Tiger Swallowtail Papilio glaucus C; May - Oct.; __ American Snout Libytheana carinenta R; June - Oct. interest. females occur as yellow or dark morphs __ Variegated Fritillary Euptoieta claudia R; June - Oct. __ Spicebush Swallowtail Papilio troilus C; May - Oct. __ Great Spangled Fritillary Speyeria cybele C; May - Oct. Species are listed taxonomically, with a common name, a Whites and Sulphurs: Family Pieridae __ Aphrodite Fritillary Speyeria aphrodite O; June - Sep. scientific name, a note about its relative abundance and flight __ Checkered White Pontia protodice h; rare in Cleveland area; __ Regal Fritillary Speyeria idalia X; no recent Ohio records; period. Check off species that you identify within Cleveland May - Oct. formerly in Cleveland Metroparks Metroparks. __ West Virginia White Pieris virginiensis O; late Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae (PDF)
    CURRICULUM VITAE Steven J. Taylor April 2020 Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903 [email protected] Cell: 217-714-2871 EDUCATION: Ph.D. in Zoology May 1996. Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois; Dr. J. E. McPherson, Chair. M.S. in Biology August 1987. Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas; Dr. Merrill H. Sweet, Chair. B.A. with Distinction in Biology 1983. Hendrix College, Conway, Arkansas. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: • Associate Research Professor, Colorado College (Fall 2017 – April 2020) • Research Associate, Zoology Department, Denver Museum of Nature & Science (January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020) • Research Affiliate, Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (16 February 2018 – present) • Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2005 – present) • Department of Animal Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (March 2016 – July 2017) • Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology (PEEC), School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (December 2011 – July 2017) • Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (2005 – July 2017) • Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign (2004 – 2007) PEER REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS: Swanson, D.R., S.W. Heads, S.J. Taylor, and Y. Wang. A new remarkably preserved fossil assassin bug (Insecta: Heteroptera: Reduviidae) from the Eocene Green River Formation of Colorado. Palaeontology or Papers in Palaeontology (Submitted 13 February 2020) Cable, A.B., J.M. O’Keefe, J.L. Deppe, T.C. Hohoff, S.J. Taylor, M.A. Davis. Habitat suitability and connectivity modeling reveal priority areas for Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) conservation in a complex habitat mosaic.
    [Show full text]
  • Nr 222 Native Tree, Shrub, & Herbaceous Plant
    NR 222 NATIVE TREE, SHRUB, & HERBACEOUS PLANT IDENTIFICATION BY RONALD L. ALVES FALL 2014 NR 222 by Ronald L. Alves Note to Students NOTE TO STUDENTS: THIS DOCUMENT IS INCOMPLETE WITH OMISSIONS, ERRORS, AND OTHER ITEMS OF INCOMPETANCY. AS YOU MAKE USE OF IT NOTE THESE TRANSGRESSIONS SO THAT THEY MAY BE CORRECTED AND YOU WILL RECEIVE A CLEAN COPY BY THE END OF TIME OR THE SEMESTER, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST!! THANKING YOU FOR ANY ASSISTANCE THAT YOU MAY GIVE, RON ALVES. Introduction This manual was initially created by Harold Whaley an MJC Agriculture and Natural Resources instruction from 1964 – 1992. The manual was designed as a resource for a native tree and shrub identification course, Natural Resources 222 that was one of the required courses for all forestry and natural resource majors at the college. The course and the supporting manual were aimed almost exclusively for forestry and related majors. In addition to NR 222 being taught by professor Whaley, it has also been taught by Homer Bowen (MJC 19xx -), Marlies Boyd (MJC 199X – present), Richard Nimphius (MJC 1980 – 2006) and currently Ron Alves (MJC 1974 – 2004). Each instructor put their own particular emphasis and style on the course but it was always oriented toward forestry students until 2006. The lack of forestry majors as a result of the Agriculture Department not having a full time forestry instructor to recruit students and articulate with industry has resulted in a transformation of the NR 222 course. The clientele not only includes forestry major, but also landscape designers, environmental horticulture majors, nursery people, environmental science majors, and people interested in transforming their home and business landscapes to a more natural venue.
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio (New Series) #12, Some O
    (NEW Dec. 3, PAPILIO SERIES) 2008 GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION AND NEW TAXA OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLIES, ESPECIALLY FROM COLORADO By James A. Scott & Michaels. Fisher, with some parts by David M. Wright, Stephen M. Spomer, Norbert G. Kondla, Todd Stout, Matthew C. Garhart, & Gary M. Marrone Introduction and Abstract Michael Fisher is currently updating the 1957 book Colorado Butterflies, by F. Martin Brown, J. Donald Eff, and Bernard Rotger (Fisher 2005a, 2005b, 2006). This project has emphasized the necessity of naming certain butterflies in Colorado and vicinity that are distinctive, but currently have no name, as part of our goal of applying correct species/ subspecies names to all Colorado butterflies. Eleven of those distinctive butterflies are named here, in the genera Anthocharis, Neominois, Asterocampa, Argynnis (Speyeria), Euphydryas, Lycaena, and Hesperia. New life histories are reported for species or subspecies of Neominois & Oeneis & Euphydryas & Lycaena that were recently described or recently elevated in status. Lycaena jlorUs differs in hostplant, egg morphology, and somewhat in a seta on 151 -stage larvae. We also report the results ofresearch elsewhere in North America that was needed to determine which of the current subspecies names should be applied to other butterflies in Colorado, in the genera Anthocharis, Neominois, Apodemia, Callophrys, At/ides, Euphilotes, PlebeJus, Polites, & Hylephila. This research has added additional species to the total of Colorado butterflies. Nomenclatural problems in Colorado Lycaena & Calloph1ys are settled with lectotypes and designations of type localities and two pending petitions to suppress toxotaxa. Difficulties with the ICZN Code in properly applying names to clines are explored, and new terminology is given to some necessary biological solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER of The
    \N ENTO °i NEWSLETTER of the 1968 NISConSin Entomological Society Volume 17, Number 2 Les Ferge, Editor May 1990 NEXT MEETING ON MAY 14 The next meeting of the Wisconsin Entomological Society will be. at the home of Les and Carol Ferge, 7119 Hubbard Avenue, Middleton, WI, on Monday evening, May 14, beginning at 5:30 PM. A buffet supper will be served. Hubbard Avenue is two blocks south of University Avenue in Middleton, and can be reached from University Avenue via Park Street or Parmenter Street. This will be an informal get-together, featuring a mini-workshop on moth collecting techniques and equipment, including blacklighting and sugar baiting. Time will be available for viewing the Lepidoptera collection, and identifying any Lepidoptera specimens that may be brought in. PRESIDENT'S NOTES Phil Pellitteri I do not remember a year when insects have gotten more press. Between the expected Mormon Cricket plague in Nevada, the grasshoppers in western Minnesota, coca-eating caterpillars, Gypsy Moth in Door County, and Deer Ticks, there is a lot of ink flowing. This presents an interesting opportunity to those of us who enjoy insects on a less dramatic level. In Extension, we like to call it a "teachable moment." Normally, the press or even the general public has little interest in the insect world, but when some natural phenomenon becomes so visible that it can't be ignored, interest levels peak. The first step, of course, is to answer their questions as to what is going on, but once you have their attention, you can expand on the subject and introduce such concepts as insect diversity and ecology, to let people know who really is the most successful form of life on this earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Polygonia, Nymphalis and Related Butterflies (Lepidoptera
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society (2001), 132: 441–468. With 8 figures doi:10.1006/zjls.2000.0268, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Phylogeny of Polygonia, Nymphalis and related butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): a total- evidence analysis SO¨ REN NYLIN1∗, KLAS NYBLOM1, FREDRIK RONQUIST2, NIKLAS JANZ1, JOSEPH BELICEK3 and MARI KA¨ LLERSJO¨ 4 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; 2Department of Systematic Zoology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden; 315004-96 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; 4Molecular Systematics Laboratory, Natural History Museum, Stockholm, Sweden Received April 2000; accepted for publication July 2000 We investigated the phylogeny of butterflies in the tribe Nymphalini sensu Harvey 1991, comprising the genera Vanessa, Cynthia, Bassaris, Aglais, Inachis, Nymphalis, Polygonia, Kaniska, Antanartia, Hypanartia, Symbrenthia, Mynes and Araschnia. Evidence from the mitochondrial gene nd1, the nuclear gene ‘wingless’ and from morphology/ ecology/behaviour were used separately and combined to analyse relationships. Phylogenies based on the different types of data agreed in many aspects of basic topology. We show that an analysis of only wing pattern characters (based on Nijhout’s homology system) results in a topology broadly similar to the one resulting from analysis of the complete matrix. We found support for a monophyletic Nymphalini, where Hypanartia may be the sister clade to all other genera. Mynes, Symbrenthia and Araschnia together seem to form another basal clade. Evidence presented gives only moderate support for a monophyletic Vanessa in the wide sense, including also Cynthia and Bassaris, but strong support for the monophyly of the largely holarctic clade Aglais + Inachis + Nymphalis + Polygonia + Kaniska + Roddia.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies (Lepidoptera) on Hill Prairies of Allamakee County, Iowa: a Comparison of the Late 1980S with 2013 Nicole M
    114 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 47, Nos. 3 - 4 Butterflies (Lepidoptera) on Hill Prairies of Allamakee County, Iowa: A Comparison of the Late 1980s With 2013 Nicole M. Powers1 and Kirk J. Larsen1* Abstract In the late 1980s, several hundred butterflies were collected by John Nehnevaj from hill prairies and a fen in Allamakee County, Iowa. Nehnevaj’s collection included 69 species, 14 of which are currently listed in Iowa as species of greatest conservation need (SGCN). The goal of this study was to revisit sites surveyed in the 1980s and survey three additional sites to compare the species present in 2013 to the species found by Nehnevaj. A primary objective was to document the presence of rare prairie specialist butterflies (Lepidoptera), specifi- cally the ottoe skipper (Hesperia ottoe W.H. Edwards; Hesperiidae), which was thought to be extirpated from Iowa. Twelve sites were surveyed 4 to 7 times between June and September 2013 using a meandering Pollard walk technique. A total of 2,860 butterflies representing 58 species were found; eight of these species were SGCN’s, including the hickory hairstreak (Satyrium caryaevorum McDunnough; Lycaenidae), and Leonard's skipper (Hesperia leonardus Harris; Hesperiidae), species not collected in the 1980s, and the ottoe skipper and Balti- more checkerspot (Euphydryas phaeton Drury; Nymphalidae), both species also found by Nehnevaj. Species richness for the sites ranged from 14 to 33 species, with SGCNs found at 11 of the 12 sites. Significant landscape changes have occurred to hill prairies in Allamakee County over the past 25 years. Invasion by red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) has reduced hill prairie an average of 55.4% at these sites since the 1980s, but up to 100% on some of the sites surveyed by Nehnevaj.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Index to Volume 118 Compiled by Leslie Cody Abies balsamea, 46,95,124,251,268,274,361,388,401,510,530 confines, 431 lasiocarpa, 191,355,584 thomsoni, 431 Abrostola urentis, 541 Agelaius phoeniceus, 201 Acanthopteroctetes bimaculata, 532 Agelaius phoeniceus, Staging in Eastern South Dakota, Spring Acanthopteroctetidae, 532 Dispersal Patterns of Red-winged Blackbirds, 201 Acasis viridata, 539 Aglais milberti, 537 Acer,52 Agonopterix gelidella, 533 negundo, 309 Agriphila ruricolella, 536 rubrum, 41,96,136,136,251,277,361,508 vulgivagella, 536 saccharinum, 41,124,251 Agropyron spp., 400,584 saccharum, 361,507 cristatum, 300 spicatum, 362 pectiniforme, 560 Achigan à grande bouche, 523 repens, 300 à petite bouche, 523 sibiricum, 560 Achillea millefolium, 166 Agrostis sp., 169 Achnatherum richardsonii, 564 filiculmis, 558 Acipenser fulvescens, 523 gigantea, 560 Acipenseridae, 523 Aira praecox, 177 Acleris albicomana, 534 Aix sponsa, 131,230 britannia, 534 Alaska, Changes in Loon (Gavia spp.) and Red-necked Grebe celiana, 534 (Podiceps grisegena) Populations in the Lower Mata- emargana, 535 nuska-Susitna Valley, 210 forbesana, 534 Alaska, Interactions of Brown Bears, Ursus arctos, and Gray logiana, 534 Wolves, Canis lupus, at Katmai National Park and Pre- nigrolinea, 535 serve, 247 obligatoria, 534 Alaska, Seed Dispersal by Brown Bears, Ursus arctos,in schalleriana, 534 Southeastern, 499 variana, 534 Alaska, The Heather Vole, Genus Phenacomys, in, 438 Acorn, J.H., Review by, 468 Alberta: Distribution and Status, The Barred Owl, Strix varia Acossus
    [Show full text]