An Overview of Genetic Modification in New Zealand 1973–2013: the First Forty Years

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Overview of Genetic Modification in New Zealand 1973–2013: the First Forty Years September 2013 Report 16 2058 An Overview of Genetic Modification in New Zealand 1973–2013 The first forty years Project 2058: Report 16 September 2013 ŶKǀĞƌǀŝĞǁŽĨ'ĞŶĞƟĐ DŽĚŝĮĐĂƟŽŶŝŶ EĞǁĞĂůĂŶĚϭϵϳϯʹϮϬϭϯ dŚĞĮƌƐƚĨŽƌƚLJLJĞĂƌƐ This report forms part of Project 2058, ƚŚĞ/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ͛ƐŇĂŐƐŚŝƉƉƌŽũĞĐƚ Title An Overview of Genetic Modification in New Zealand 1973–2013: The First Forty Years Published Copyright © McGuinness Institute Limited, 30 September 2013 ISBN 978-1-972193-35-8 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-972193-36-5 (PDF) This document is available at www.mcguinnessinstitute.org and may be reproduced or cited provided the source is acknowledged. Prepared by The McGuinness Institute, as part of Project 2058 Authors Wendy McGuinness and Renata Mokena-Lodge Research team Niki Lomax, Hannah Steiner and Grace White For further information McGuinness Institute Phone (04) 499 8888 Level 2, 5 Cable Street PO Box 24222 Wellington 6142 New Zealand www.mcguinnessinstitute.org Disclaimer The McGuinness Institute has taken reasonable care in collecting and presenting the information provided in this publication. However, the Institute makes no representation or endorsement that this resource will be relevant or appropriate for its readers’ purposes and does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time for any particular purpose. The Institute is not liable for any adverse consequences, whether they be direct or indirect, arising from reliance on the content of this publication. Where this publication contains links to any website or other source, such links are provided solely for information purposes and the Institute is not liable for the content of such website or other source. Publishing This publication has been produced by companies applying sustainable practices within their businesses. The body text is printed on ECO100 paper, manufactured from 100% waste paper in a chlorine-free process. The cover is printed on Mondi Color Copy, which is FSC certified. The McGuinness Institute is grateful for the work of Creative Commons, which inspired our approach to copyright. This work is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 New Zealand Licence. To view a copy of this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/nz Contents Appendices_____________________________________________________________________________5 Foreword ______________________________________________________________________________1 Executive Summary _____________________________________________________________________2 The First Forty Years of GM: By the Numbers _____________________________________________6 1. Introduction ________________________________________________________________________8 1.1 Differentiating Data, Information and Knowledge ____________________________________ 10 1.2 Definition of Genetic Modification ________________________________________________ 10 1.3 Position Statement _____________________________________________________________ 11 1.4 Limitations ___________________________________________________________________ 12 2. ERA I: The Journey Toward the Royal Commission 1973–2000 ___________________________13 2.1 The New Tool: 1973–1990 _______________________________________________________ 13 2.2 The Development of the HSNO Act: 1990–1996 _____________________________________ 14 2.3 The Public Protest: 1996–2000 ___________________________________________________ 15 2.4 The Birth of the Royal Commission _______________________________________________ 16 3. ERA II: The Royal Commission 2000–2001 ____________________________________________17 3.1 The Purpose___________________________________________________________________ 17 3.2 The Establishment of the Royal Commission ________________________________________ 17 3.3 The Process ___________________________________________________________________ 17 3.4 The Four Key Findings __________________________________________________________ 18 3.5 Going Forward: The Two-pronged Approach _______________________________________ 19 4. ERA III: The Response to the Royal Commission 2001–2008 _____________________________20 4.1 The Government’s Initial Response: 2001 ___________________________________________ 20 4.2 The International Science Community’s Response: 2001 _______________________________ 21 4.3 Industry Response: 2001–2004 ____________________________________________________ 21 4.4 New Zealand Society for Risk Management: 2001 ____________________________________ 22 4.5 ‘Corngate’ and the General Election: 2002 __________________________________________ 23 4.6 The Public Response: 2001–2008 _________________________________________________ 23 4.7 The Institute’s Review of the Forty-nine Recommendations of the Royal Commission: 2008 24 5. ERA IV: Institutional Change 2008–2013 ______________________________________________30 5.1 Legislation ____________________________________________________________________ 30 5.2 Central Government Institutions__________________________________________________ 31 5.3 Local Government Institutions ___________________________________________________ 38 5.4 Crown Research Institutes _______________________________________________________ 39 5.5 Non-governmental Organisations _________________________________________________ 40 5.6 Review Body _________________________________________________________________ 42 5.7 Strategy Bodies ________________________________________________________________ 43 5.8 International Treaties ___________________________________________________________ 44 5.9 The Situation in 2013 ___________________________________________________________ 45 6. Crown Research Institutes ___________________________________________________________47 6.1 AgResearch ___________________________________________________________________ 49 6.2 Scion _________________________________________________________________________ 52 6.3 Plant & Food __________________________________________________________________ 55 6.4 Five Principles for Effective Public Investment by CRIs _______________________________ 56 7. Observations, Recommendations and Reflections _______________________________________59 7.1 Observations __________________________________________________________________ 59 7.2 Recommendations ______________________________________________________________ 67 7.3 Reflections ____________________________________________________________________ 93 Abbreviations _________________________________________________________________________98 Glossary _____________________________________________________________________________100 References ___________________________________________________________________________105 &ŝŐƵƌĞƐ Figure 1: The strategic spectrum identified by the Commissioners _______________________________ 18 Figure 2: Institutional change over the last five years _______________________________________ 32, 66 Figure 3: Indoor GMO approved applications by financial year (decisions made by IBSCs) 1998/99–2011/12 _______________________________________________________________ 60 Figure 4: Indoor GMO approved applications by financial year (decisions made by ERMA/EPA) 1998/99–2011/12 _______________________________________________________________ 60 Figure 5: Approved applications for GM outdoor experiments by calendar year 1988–2013 ___________ 61 Figure 6: Approved applications for GM outdoor experiments by entity since the implementation of the HSNO Act 1998–2013 _____________________________________________________ 61 Figure 7: Approved GM outdoor experiments by entity since the implementation of the HSNO Act 1998–2013 ___________________________________________________________ 62 Figure 8: Incidents resulting from indoor experiments by financial year 2004–2012 _________________ 63 Figure 9: Incidents resulting from outdoor experiments by application code 1998–2013 ______________ 64 Figure 10: Incidents resulting from a breach of border security that have been inquired into by MPI from 2000–2013 ____________________________________________________________ 64 Figure 11: FSANZ GM food and fibre decisions by product type 2000–2013 (as at June 2013) _________ 65 Tables Table 1: The nine strategic GM crop recommendations of the Royal Commission __________________ 26 Table 2: The four major strategic institutional recommendations of the Royal Commission __________ 28 Table 3: Summary of 2011/12 CRI financial results ___________________________________________ 49 ƉƉĞŶĚŝĐĞƐ Note: Appendices to this report are provided in a separate document available from the Institute's website. Appendix 1: Timeline of key events as at August 2013 Appendix 2: The Warrant establishing the Royal Commission Appendix 3: The Royal Commission public engagement process Appendix 4: The Royal Commission recommendations not implemented or partially implemented as at 2008 Appendix 5: Moratoria on genetically modified organisms Appendix 6: Genetic modification legislation and standards Appendix 7: Significant legal judgements Appendix 8: Indoor GMO decisions under the HSNO Act 1996 by financial year 1998–2012 Appendix 9: Outdoor experiments by application code 1988–June 2013 Appendix 10: Approved outdoor experiments under the HSNO Act 1996 by entity 1998–June 2013 Appendix 11: Amendments to controls under Section 67A of the HSNO Act 1996 as at June 2013 Appendix 12: Funding for outdoor experiments by application as at June 2013 Appendix 13: Crown funding, expenditure and application fees by financial year 1998–2012
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2013/14
    ANNUAL REPORT 2013/14 HAMILTON’S 2013/14 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM YOUR MAYOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE 2 YOUR COUNCIL 3 OUR VISION FOR HAMILTON 5 COUNCIL'S BOOKS ARE IN GOOD SHAPE 8 SERVICE PERFORMANCE 14 ARTS AND RECREATION: Libraries, pools, Hamilton Zoo, Waikato Museum, 16 theatres, sports parks, arts promotion, indoor recreation CITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: Planning guidance and compliance, 23 city planning CITY PROSPERITY: Economic development, strategic property investment, 26 Claudelands, Waikato Stadium, Seddon Park CITY SAFETY: Animal control, building control, environmental health and 29 public safety COMMUNITY SERVICES: Emergency management, community investment, 33 housing, cemeteries, crematorium DEMOCRACY: Governance, civic functions, partnership with Maaori 38 PARKS AND OPEN SPACES: Amenity parks, Hamilton Gardens, natural areas, 42 streetscapes SOLID WASTE: Rubbish and recycling collection, waste minimisation, landfill 46 site management STORMWATER: Stormwater network, catchment management 48 TRANSPORTATION: Transport network, travel demand management, 50 parking management WASTEWATER: Wastewater collection, treatment and disposal 56 WATER SUPPLY: Treatment, storage, distribution, demand management 59 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 62 Statement of Comprehensive Income 63 Statement of Changes in Equity 63 Statement of Financial Position 64 Statement of Cash Flows 65 Notes to the Financial Statements 66 Funding Impact Statements 115 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 128 INFORMATION ON COUNCIL CONTROLLED ORGANISATIONS 133 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 140 AUDIT REPORT 141 H A M I L T O N C I T Y C O U N C I L From your MAYOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE We are pleased to report that in 2013/14 Decisions released in July 2014 have resulted in a Council has continued to deliver on its number of changes to rules around development.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Scientific Research Entities in New Zealand: Cawthron Institute As a Case Study – Peter Hodder
    New Zealand Science Review Vol 75 (1) 2018 Cawthron Institute science and meth contamination science and policy experiments and conservation Association Awards for 2018 Official Journal of the New Zealand Association of Scientists ISSN 0028-8667 New Zealand Science Review Vol 75(1) 2018 Official Journal of the New Zealand Association of Scientists P O Box 1874, Wellington www.scientists.org.nz A forum for the exchange of views on science and science policy Editor: Allen Petrey Contents Production Editor: Geoff Gregory In this issue .................................................................................................................................................1 President’s column – Craig Stevens ..........................................................................................................2 Articles Independent scientific research entities in New Zealand: Cawthron Institute as a case study – Peter Hodder ......................................................................................................................................3 Science and evidence informing policymaking in New Zealand: The meth contamination story – Anne Bardsley ..................................................................................................................................17 Podcasts – Putting science and policy on the same wavelength How scientists can make themselves heard by policymakers..........................................................19 What do policymakers think of scientists?........................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Insert Committee Name
    STRATEGY AND POLICY COMMITTEE 22 MAY 2008 REPORT 8 (1215/52/IM) COMMUNITIES FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION FORUM, HAMILTON, 2 APRIL 2008 1. Purpose of Report To report on the attendance of the Mayor and Councillors’ Ahipene-Mercer and Wade-Brown at the ‘Communities for Climate Change Protection’ Forum in Hamilton on 2 April 2008. 2. Recommendations It is recommended that the Committee: 1. Receive the information. 3. Background The Communities for Climate Protection New Zealand (CCP–NZ) programme aims to empower local Councils to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from their operations and communities. CCP-NZ is supported by the International Council for Local Environment Initiatives (ICLEI) and is part of the international Cities for Climate Protection campaign. Since CCP-NZ was launched in 2004, Councils representing over 80% of the country’s population, including Wellington City Council, have joined the programme. The second national Forum for Communities for Climate Protection was hosted by Hamilton City Council on Wednesday 2 April 2008 at Le Grand Hotel Conference Centre. Mayor Bob Simcock opened the Forum, which was attended by over 100 delegates including representatives from 30 New Zealand councils1. 4. Discussion The Forum was broken into five sessions: • Global view • New Zealand carbon neutrality 1 CCP-NZ Participant councils: Auckland City, Auckland Regional, Carterton District, Christchurch City, Dunedin City, Environment Canterbury, Environment Waikato Regional, Franklin District, Greater Wellington Regional, Hamilton City, Hawke’s Bay Regional, Kapiti Coast District, Manukau City, Masterton District, Nelson City, New Plymouth District Council, North Shore City, Papakura District, Porirua City, Rodney District, Rotorua District, South Waikato District, Waipa District, Waitakere City, Wellington City Other councils: Environment Bay of Plenty, Hutt City, Otorohanga District, Taupo District, Tauranga City, Western Bay of Plenty District (not currently CCP-NZ) • Parallel interactive workshops • Big picture approaches • Plenary sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Green Party and Foreign Troop Deployments: Views, Values and Impacts
    New Zealand's Green Party and Foreign Troop Deployments: Views, Values and Impacts By Simon Beuse A Thesis Submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Political Science School of History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations Victoria University of Wellington 2010 Content List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 2 New Zealand‘s Foreign Affairs .......................................................................................... 9 2.1 Public Perceptions ....................................................................................................... 9 2.2 History ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Key Relationships ...................................................................................................... 11 2.4 The Nuclear Issue ...................................................................................................... 12 2.5 South Pacific .............................................................................................................. 14 2.6 Help in Numbers: The United Nations ...................................................................... 15 2.7 Defence Reform 2000
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Literature Review
    Measuring Media Coverage of Electricity Public Policy in New Zealand for the period 2006-2007 : A new approach Jeanette Susan Elley A thesis submitted to Auckland University of Technology in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) 2014 Institute of Public Policy Faculty of Culture and Society Primary Supervisor : Marilyn J. Waring Second Supervisor: L. Grant Duncan Contents Contents 2 List of Figures 5 List of Tables 10 List of Example Articles 11 Attestation of Authorship 12 Acknowledgements 13 Abstract 14 Chapter 1 – Introduction 16 1.1 Overview 16 1.2 Fields of Investigation 20 1.3 Chapter Guide 23 Chapter 2 – Literature Review 24 2.1 Introduction 24 2.2 Media Context 24 2.3 Political Economy and Electricity 53 2.4 Comparable Studies 83 2.5 Conclusion 100 Chapter 3 – Categorisation Framework 102 3.1 Introduction 102 3.2 Constructing the Categorisation Framework 103 3.3 Issues Affecting the Electricity Sector 119 3.4 Combined Influences on Electricity Sector Policy 126 3.5 Comparisons with Other Models 128 3.6 Conclusion 140 2 Chapter 4 – Research Design 142 4.1 Introduction 142 4.2 Methodology 144 4.3 Research Process 159 4.4 Categorisation 181 4.5 Key Indicators 213 4.6 Processing Features 227 4.7 Article Selection 256 4.8 Conclusion 272 Chapter 5 – Data 273 5.1 Overview 273 5.2 Topic Set Results 279 5.3 Case Study Results 309 5.4 Parameter Set Results 328 5.5 Conclusion 351 Chapter 6 – Discussion 355 6.1 Introduction 355 6.2 Addressing Thesis Questions 356 6.3 Case Study Analysis 363 6.4 Other
    [Show full text]
  • Public Leadership—Perspectives and Practices
    Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Edited by Paul ‘t Hart and John Uhr Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/public_leadership _citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Public leadership pespectives and practices [electronic resource] / editors, Paul ‘t Hart, John Uhr. ISBN: 9781921536304 (pbk.) 9781921536311 (pdf) Series: ANZSOG series Subjects: Leadership Political leadership Civic leaders. Community leadership Other Authors/Contributors: Hart, Paul ‘t. Uhr, John, 1951- Dewey Number: 303.34 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by John Butcher Images comprising the cover graphic used by permission of: Victorian Department of Planning and Community Development Australian Associated Press Australian Broadcasting Corporation Scoop Media Group (www.scoop.co.nz) Cover graphic based on M. C. Escher’s Hand with Reflecting Sphere, 1935 (Lithograph). Printed by University Printing Services, ANU Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2008 ANU E Press John Wanna, Series Editor Professor John Wanna is the Sir John Bunting Chair of Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences at The Australian National University. He is the director of research for the Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG).
    [Show full text]
  • Where Our Voices Sound Risky Business See More Seymour
    Where Our Voices Sound Risky Business See More Seymour Helen Yeung chats with Mermaidens (not the Jordan Margetts takes on Facebook, the Herald Meg Williams delves deep on a dinner date with Harry Potter kind) and that office sex scandal the ACT Party Leader [1] ISSUE ELEVEN CONTENTS 9 10 NEWS COMMUNITY NORTHLAND GRAVE A CHOICE VOICE ROBBING? An interview with the strong Unfortunately for Split Enz, it women behind Shakti Youth appears that history does repeat 13 14 LIFESTYLE FEATURES SHAKEN UP MORE POWER TO THE PUSSY Milkshake hotspots to bring more than just boys to your A look into the growing yard feminist porn industry 28 36 ARTS COLUMNS WRITERS FEST WRAP-UP BRING OUT THE LIONS! Craccum contributors review Mark Fullerton predicts the some literary luminaries outcomes of the forthcoming Lions Series [3] 360° Auckland Abroad Add the world to your degree Auckland Abroad Exchange Programme Application Deadline: July 1, 2017 for exchange in Semester 1, 2018 The 360° Auckland Abroad student exchange programme creates an opportunity for you to complete part of your University of Auckland degree overseas. You may be able to study for a semester or a year at one of our 130 partner universities in 25 countries. Scholarships and financial assistance are available. Come along to an Auckland Abroad information seminar held every Thursday at 2pm in iSPACE (level 4, Student Commons). There are 360° of exciting possibilities. Where will you go? www.auckland.ac.nz/360 [email protected] EDITORIAL Catriona Britton Samantha Gianotti The F-Word Margaret Atwood’s 1985 dystopian novel The in a later interview that the show is “obvious- ain’t about race, man.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2013 © May 2014
    ANNUAL REPORT 2013 © May 2014 The MacDiarmid Institute of Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology PO Box 600 Wellington New Zealand [email protected] www.macdiarmid.ac.nz ISSN 2324-4445 (print) ISSN 2324-447 (online) A note about the title: Making the Invisible, Visible. This year’s report title references a successful nanotechnology public art exhibition called Art of the Invisible hosted by the Institute in 2013. It also plays on the idea that MacDiarmid Institute scientists frequently explore and investigate (and make visible) matter and objects that are so small, they seem invisible. THE MACDIARMID INSTITUTE IMPACT IN 2013 4 for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology ANNUAL REPORT 2013 ABOUT THE MACDIARMID INSTITUTE 6 FOREWORD 10 SCIENTIFIC EXCELLENCE 12 TURNING FICTION INTO FACT 30 LEADERSHIP 34 THE PHOTON FACTORY SHOOTS AND SCORES 44 INSPIRATION 48 FISH EYES AND MILK POWDER 58 ADVANCEMENT OF NEW ZEALAND 62 LETTING THE SCIENCE LEAD THE WAY 72 GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE 76 DIRECTORY 90 4 THE MACDIARMID INSTITUTE MACDIARMID INSTITUTE HIGHLIGHTS The MacDiarmid Institute’s strategic plan is implemented Scientific leadership and collaboration results in IMPACT IN 2013 successful grant applications, ground-breaking research, commercialisation opportunities and outcomes and research awards ENGAGEMENT THE MACDIARMID INSTITUTE’S WITH MĀORI SCIENTISTS AND PASIFIKA ACCESS STATE- OF-THE ART COMMUNITIES TECHNOLOGY INCREASES & EQUIPMENT The MacDiarmid Institute’s stories and vision is conveyed through channels such as the mainstream and social media Scientific Leading scientists excellence is from New Zealand recognised and throughout the externally in world are supported reports such through a range of as the latest new and existing CoRE report initiatives CONTRIBUTION TO THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW ZEALAND IS REALISED THROUGH The MacDiarmid Institute is named after New Zealand chemist Alan MacDiarmid who was one of three SCIENCE COMMERCIALISATION AND recipients to win the Nobel Prize for chemistry in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of Understanding Between the New Zealand National Party and the Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand
    Memorandum of Understanding Between The New Zealand National Party and The Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand Purpose The National Party and the Green Party wish to work together to develop policy and legislation in areas of common interest. The purpose of this MoU is to establish a framework within which the Parties can engage in such areas as are identified from time to time. Principles The following principles underpin this working relationship: • Both Parties are fully independent and retain their rights to vote and speak on all issues as they see fit • The intent of both Parties is to establish a good faith working relationship • This agreement is not based on any prerequisite policy commitments Framework To facilitate a working relationship in identified policy areas, the National Party agrees to provide the Green Party: • Access to Ministers and appropriate departmental officials for briefings and advice • Input into the Ministerial decision making process, including Cabinet papers The Green Party agrees: • To consider facilitating government legislation via procedural support on a case by case basis Both Parties agree: • To keep the details of working discussions confidential until negotiations are concluded, whether the result ends in agreement or not • To facilitate this joint working relationship, the leadership of both Parties will meet at least quarterly to monitor progress, assess the overall relationship and to agree areas where joint work will occur • To review this MoU yearly to assess its effectiveness and determine whether it should continue John Key Jeanette Fitzsimons Russel Norman Leader Co-Leader Co-Leader Memorandum of Understanding Signed 8 April 2009 1 Appendix Areas of agreed work will include: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Term Plan 2018-2028
    ISSN 1173-4477 Napier City Council Long Term Plan 2018-2028 Adopted 29 June 2018 Napier City Council Phone: 06 835 7579 215 Hastings Street Email: [email protected] Private Bag 6010 Website: napier.govt.nz Napier 4142 Contents Other Rating Matters �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������166 Fees and Charges ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������166 Mayor’s Message ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Indicative Rates ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������167 2018-2028 Long Term Plan �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 Examples of Rates for 2018/19 ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������169 Napier City ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 Financial Prudence Benchmarks ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������170 Strategic Priorities ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 9 Council Controlled Organisations �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������174
    [Show full text]
  • I Green Politics and the Reformation of Liberal Democratic
    Green Politics and the Reformation of Liberal Democratic Institutions. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the University of Canterbury by R.M.Farquhar University of Canterbury 2006 I Contents. Abstract...........................................................................................................VI Introduction....................................................................................................VII Methodology....................................................................................................XIX Part 1. Chapter 1 Critical Theory: Conflict and change, marxism, Horkheimer, Adorno, critique of positivism, instrumental reason, technocracy and the Enlightenment...................................1 1.1 Mannheim’s rehabilitation of ideology and politics. Gramsci and social and political change, hegemony and counter-hegemony. Laclau and Mouffe and radical plural democracy. Talshir and modular ideology............................................................................11 Part 2. Chapter 2 Liberal Democracy: Dryzek’s tripartite conditions for democracy. The struggle for franchise in Britain and New Zealand. Extra-Parliamentary and Parliamentary dynamics. .....................29 2.1 Technocracy, New Zealand and technocracy, globalisation, legitimation crisis. .............................................................................................................................46 Chapter 3 Liberal Democracy-historical
    [Show full text]
  • In Today's World We Need…
    G.38 GNS SCIENCE ANNUAL REPORT 2014 IN TODAY’S WORLD WE NEED… GNS Science Annual Report 2014 1 G.38 TO MEET THE DIVERSE AND CHANGING SOCIETAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC CHALLENGES PLACED UPON US. Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to section 17 of the Crown Research Institutes Act 1992 2 GNS Science Annual Report 2014 GNS Science Annual Report 2014 1 THROUGH THE GREAT WORK OF OUR SCIENTISTS, WE MEET THESE CHALLENGES EVERY DAY TO PROTECT OUR ENVIRONMENT AND MAKE NEW ZEALAND A SAFER, MORE PROSPEROUS PLACE TO LIVE. CONTENTS 02 DIGGING DEEP 32 Natural Hazards 04 DEALING WITH PRESSURE 38 Engineering Geology 06 KEEPING IT CLEAN 42 Geology and Past Climates 08 Chairman and Chief Executive’s Review 47 Organisational Structure 12 Statement of Core Purpose 48 Board of Directors 13 Staff Awards, Honours and Distinctions 50 Management Team 14 Vision Ma-tauranga 53 Performance Indicators 15 Stakeholder Survey Findings 56 Corporate Governance 16 Being a Good Employer 58 Report of the Directors 18 Energy and Minerals 59 Financial Statements 24 Groundwater 80 Directory 28 Isotopes and Ion-Beam Technology 2 GNS Science Annual Report 2014 GNS Science Annual Report 2014 3 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS REVENUE BY SECTOR OUTCOME AREAS AFTER TAX PROFIT Geology and 8.7% Past Climates $4.0m Energy and 28.6% Minerals Hazards 47.2% $1.8m $1.5m $1.1m Groundwater 6.0% $1.0m Engineering 2.6% Environment 6.9% Geology and Materials 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 REVENUE SOURCES TOTAL ASSETS Technology 9.3% GeoNet 11.8% transfer – overseas $53.6m $51.0m $49.7m $47.8m
    [Show full text]