SOUTH LAKELAND DISTRICT COUNCIL Valuation Bands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SOUTH LAKELAND DISTRICT COUNCIL Valuation Bands Appendix A SOUTH LAKELAND DISTRICT COUNCIL Valuation Bands BAND A BAND B BAND C BAND D BAND E BAND F BAND G BAND H £117.09 £136.60 £156.12 £175.63 £214.66 £253.69 £292.72 £351.26 CUMBRIA COUNTY COUNCIL Valuation Bands BAND A BAND B BAND C BAND D BAND E BAND F BAND G BAND H £774.33 £903.39 £1032.44 £1161.50 £1419.61 £1677.72 £1935.83 £2323.00 POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER Valuation Bands BAND A BAND B BAND C BAND D BAND E BAND F BAND G BAND H £136.44 £159.18 £181.92 £204.66 £250.14 £295.62 £341.10 £409.32 COUNCIL TAX FOR EACH PART OF THE DISTRICT Valuation Bands PARISH BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND A B C D E F G H £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ ALDINGHAM 1041.54 1215.14 1388.72 1562.32 1909.50 2256.68 2603.86 3124.64 ALLITHWAITE UPPER 1054.39 1230.13 1405.85 1581.59 1933.05 2284.52 2635.98 3163.18 ANGERTON 1043.32 1217.21 1391.09 1564.98 1912.75 2260.52 2608.30 3129.96 ARNSIDE 1051.10 1226.28 1401.46 1576.65 1927.02 2277.38 2627.75 3153.30 BARBON 1035.96 1208.63 1381.28 1553.95 1899.27 2244.59 2589.91 3107.90 BEETHAM 1041.47 1215.05 1388.63 1562.21 1909.37 2256.52 2603.68 3124.42 PARISH BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND A B C D E F G H £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ BLAWITH & 1037.18 1210.04 1382.90 1555.77 1901.50 2247.22 2592.95 3111.54 SUBBERTHWAITE BROUGHTON EAST 1044.56 1218.66 1392.75 1566.85 1915.04 2263.23 2611.41 3133.70 BROUGHTON WEST 1043.32 1217.21 1391.09 1564.98 1912.75 2260.52 2608.30 3129.96 BURTON IN KENDAL 1042.22 1215.93 1389.63 1563.34 1910.75 2258.16 2605.56 3126.68 CARTMEL FELL 1043.74 1217.71 1391.66 1565.62 1913.53 2261.45 2609.36 3131.24 CASTERTON 1059.19 1235.73 1412.25 1588.79 1941.85 2294.92 2647.98 3177.58 CLAIFE 1038.00 1211.01 1384.00 1557.01 1903.01 2249.01 2595.01 3114.02 COLTON 1041.89 1215.54 1389.19 1562.84 1910.14 2257.43 2604.73 3125.68 CONISTON 1050.28 1225.34 1400.38 1575.43 1925.52 2275.62 2625.71 3150.86 CROOK 1043.34 1217.24 1391.12 1565.02 1912.80 2260.58 2608.36 3130.04 CROSTHWAITE & LYTH 1034.86 1207.35 1379.82 1552.30 1897.25 2242.21 2587.16 3104.60 DENT 1053.98 1229.64 1405.30 1580.97 1932.30 2283.62 2634.95 3161.94 DOCKER 1027.86 1199.17 1370.48 1541.79 1884.41 2227.03 2569.65 3083.58 DUNNERDALE 1043.32 1217.21 1391.09 1564.98 1912.75 2260.52 2608.30 3129.96 EGTON WITH NEWLAND 1036.63 1209.41 1382.17 1554.95 1900.49 2246.04 2591.58 3109.90 FAWCETT FOREST 1027.86 1199.17 1370.48 1541.79 1884.41 2227.03 2569.65 3083.58 FIRBANK 1027.86 1199.17 1370.48 1541.79 1884.41 2227.03 2569.65 3083.58 GARSDALE 1038.12 1211.14 1384.16 1557.18 1903.22 2249.26 2595.30 3114.36 GRANGE-OVER-SANDS 1075.44 1254.69 1433.92 1613.17 1971.65 2330.13 2688.61 3226.34 GRAYRIGG 1032.10 1204.12 1376.13 1548.15 1892.18 2236.21 2580.25 3096.30 HAVERTHWAITE 1045.08 1219.26 1393.44 1567.62 1915.98 2264.34 2612.70 3135.24 HAWKSHEAD 1047.56 1222.15 1396.74 1571.34 1920.53 2269.71 2618.90 3142.68 HELSINGTON 1051.11 1226.30 1401.48 1576.67 1927.04 2277.41 2627.78 3153.34 PARISH BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND A B C D E F G H £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ HEVERSHAM 1045.45 1219.70 1393.93 1568.18 1916.66 2265.15 2613.63 3136.36 HINCASTER 1027.86 1199.17 1370.48 1541.79 1884.41 2227.03 2569.65 3083.58 HOLME 1049.31 1224.20 1399.08 1573.97 1923.74 2273.51 2623.28 3147.94 HUGILL 1040.22 1213.60 1386.96 1560.34 1907.08 2253.82 2600.56 3120.68 HUTTON ROOF 1033.86 1206.17 1378.48 1550.79 1895.41 2240.03 2584.65 3101.58 KENDAL 1048.68 1223.47 1398.24 1573.03 1922.59 2272.15 2621.71 3146.06 KENTMERE 1047.06 1221.58 1396.08 1570.60 1919.62 2268.64 2617.66 3141.20 KILLINGTON 1027.86 1199.17 1370.48 1541.79 1884.41 2227.03 2569.65 3083.58 KIKRBY IRELETH 1035.32 1207.88 1380.43 1552.99 1898.10 2243.21 2588.31 3105.98 KIRKBY LONSDALE 1058.86 1235.35 1411.82 1588.30 1941.25 2294.21 2647.16 3176.60 LAKES 1055.33 1231.22 1407.11 1583.00 1934.78 2286.55 2638.33 3166.00 LAMBRIGG 1027.86 1199.17 1370.48 1541.79 1884.41 2227.03 2569.65 3083.58 LEVENS 1040.26 1213.64 1387.01 1560.39 1907.14 2253.89 2600.65 3120.78 LONGSLEDDALE 1027.86 1199.17 1370.48 1541.79 1884.41 2227.03 2569.65 3083.58 LOWER ALLITHWAITE 1050.00 1225.01 1400.00 1575.01 1925.01 2275.01 2625.01 3150.02 LOWER HOLKER 1041.76 1215.39 1389.01 1562.64 1909.89 2257.14 2604.40 3125.28 LOWICK 1039.40 1212.64 1385.87 1559.11 1905.58 2252.05 2598.51 3118.22 LUPTON 1045.46 1219.71 1393.95 1568.20 1916.69 2265.18 2613.66 3136.40 MANSERGH 1027.86 1199.17 1370.48 1541.79 1884.41 2227.03 2569.65 3083.58 MANSRIGGS 1036.63 1209.41 1382.17 1554.95 1900.49 2246.04 2591.58 3109.90 MEATHOP AND ULPHA 1037.85 1210.83 1383.80 1556.78 1902.73 2248.68 2594.63 3113.56 MIDDLETON 1027.86 1199.17 1370.48 1541.79 1884.41 2227.03 2569.65 3083.58 MILNTHORPE 1045.69 1219.98 1394.25 1568.54 1917.10 2265.67 2614.23 3137.08 NATLAND 1039.48 1212.73 1385.97 1559.22 1905.71 2252.20 2598.70 3118.44 PARISH BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND A B C D E F G H £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ NETHER STAVELEY 1040.22 1213.60 1386.96 1560.34 1907.08 2253.82 2600.56 3120.68 NEW HUTTON 1031.32 1203.22 1375.10 1546.99 1890.76 2234.54 2578.31 3093.98 OLD HUTTON & 1044.00 1218.01 1392.00 1566.01 1914.01 2262.01 2610.01 3132.02 HOLMESCALES OSMOTHERLEY 1036.63 1209.41 1382.17 1554.95 1900.49 2246.04 2591.58 3109.90 OVER STAVELEY 1040.22 1213.60 1386.96 1560.34 1907.08 2253.82 2600.56 3120.68 PENNINGTON 1031.75 1203.71 1375.67 1547.63 1891.55 2235.46 2579.38 3095.26 PRESTON PATRICK 1041.24 1214.78 1388.32 1561.86 1908.94 2256.02 2603.10 3123.72 PRESTON RICHARD 1055.34 1231.23 1407.12 1583.01 1934.79 2286.57 2638.35 3166.02 SATTERTHWAITE 1046.11 1220.47 1394.81 1569.17 1917.87 2266.58 2615.28 3138.34 SCALTHWAITERIGG 1039.82 1213.13 1386.43 1559.74 1906.35 2252.96 2599.56 3119.48 SEDBERGH 1049.28 1224.16 1399.04 1573.92 1923.68 2273.44 2623.20 3147.84 SEDGWICK 1065.18 1242.72 1420.24 1597.78 1952.84 2307.90 2662.96 3195.56 SKELSMERGH 1039.82 1213.13 1386.43 1559.74 1906.35 2252.96 2599.56 3119.48 SKELWITH 1044.79 1218.93 1393.05 1567.19 1915.45 2263.72 2611.98 3134.38 STAINTON 1038.97 1212.14 1385.29 1558.46 1904.78 2251.11 2597.43 3116.92 STAVELEY IN CARTMEL 1037.81 1210.78 1383.75 1556.72 1902.66 2248.59 2594.53 3113.44 STRICKLAND KETEL 1048.78 1223.59 1398.38 1573.18 1922.77 2272.37 2621.96 3146.36 STRICKLAND ROGER 1048.78 1223.59 1398.38 1573.18 1922.77 2272.37 2621.96 3146.36 TORVER 1050.92 1226.07 1401.22 1576.38 1926.69 2276.99 2627.30 3152.76 ULVERSTON 1052.70 1228.16 1403.60 1579.06 1929.96 2280.86 2631.76 3158.12 UNDERBARROW 1045.12 1219.31 1393.49 1567.68 1916.05 2264.42 2612.80 3135.36 URSWICK 1037.80 1210.78 1383.74 1556.71 1902.64 2248.58 2594.51 3113.42 WHINFELL 1027.86 1199.17 1370.48 1541.79 1884.41 2227.03 2569.65 3083.58 PARISH BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND A B C D E F G H £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ WHITWELL & SELSIDE 1027.86 1199.17 1370.48 1541.79 1884.41 2227.03 2569.65 3083.58 WINDERMERE 1047.64 1222.26 1396.86 1571.47 1920.68 2269.90 2619.11 3142.94 WITHERSLACK 1037.85 1210.83 1383.80 1556.78 1902.73 2248.68 2594.63 3113.56 Appendix B COUNCIL TAX SCHEDULE FOR EACH PARISH IN THE DISTRICT ISSUING A PRECEPT AND THE COUNCIL TAX FOR SOUTH LAKELAND DISTRICT COUNCIL Valuation Bands PARISH BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND A B C D E F G H ALDINGHAM 130.77 152.57 174.36 196.16 239.75 283.34 326.93 392.32 ALLITHWAITE UPPER 143.62 167.56 191.49 215.43 263.30 311.18 359.05 430.86 ANGERTON 132.55 154.64 176.73 198.82 243.00 287.18 331.37 397.64 ARNSIDE 140.33 163.71 187.10 210.49 257.27 304.04 350.82 420.98 BARBON 125.19 146.06 166.92 187.79 229.52 271.25 312.98 375.58 BEETHAM 130.70 152.48 174.27 196.05 239.62 283.18 326.75 392.10 BLAWITH & 126.41 147.47 168.54 189.61 231.75 273.88 316.02 379.22 SUBBERTHWAITE BROUGHTON EAST 133.79 156.09 178.39 200.69 245.29 289.89 334.48 401.38 BROUGHTON WEST 132.55 154.64 176.73 198.82 243.00 287.18 331.37 397.64 BURTON IN KENDAL 131.45 153.36 175.27 197.18 241.00 284.82 328.63 394.36 CARTMEL FELL 132.97 155.14 177.30 199.46 243.78 288.11 332.43 398.92 CASTERTON 148.42 173.16 197.89 222.63 272.10 321.58 371.05 445.26 CLAIFE 127.23 148.44 169.64 190.85 233.26 275.67 318.08 381.70 COLTON 131.12 152.97 174.83 196.68 240.39 284.09 327.80 393.36 CONISTON 139.51 162.77 186.02 209.27 255.77 302.28 348.78 418.54 CROOK 132.57 154.67 176.76 198.86 243.05 287.24 331.43 397.72 CROSTHWAITE & LYTH 124.09 144.78 165.46 186.14 227.50 268.87 310.23 372.28 DENT 143.21 167.07 190.94 214.81 262.55 310.28 358.02 429.62 DUNNERDALE 132.55 154.64 176.73 198.82 243.00 287.18 331.37 397.64 EGTON WITH NEWLAND 125.86 146.84 167.81 188.79 230.74 272.70 314.65 377.58 GARSDALE 127.35 148.57 169.80 191.02 233.47 275.92 318.37 382.04 PARISH BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND BAND A B C D E F G H GRANGE-OVER-SANDS 164.67 192.12 219.56 247.01 301.90 356.79 411.68 494.02 GRAYRIGG 121.33 141.55 161.77 181.99 222.43 262.87 303.32 363.98 HAVERTHWAITE 134.31 156.69 179.08 201.46 246.23 291.00 335.77 402.92 HAWKSHEAD 136.79 159.58 182.38 205.18 250.78 296.37 341.97 410.36 HELSINGTON 140.34 163.73 187.12 210.51 257.29 304.07 350.85 421.02 HEVERSHAM 134.68 157.13 179.57 202.02 246.91 291.81 336.70 404.04 HOLME 138.54 161.63 184.72 207.81 253.99 300.17 346.35 415.62 HUGILL 129.45 151.03 172.60 194.18 237.33 280.48 323.63 388.36 HUTTON ROOF 123.09 143.60 164.12 184.63 225.66 266.69 307.72 369.26 KENDAL 137.91 160.90 183.88 206.87 252.84 298.81 344.78 413.74 KENTMERE 136.29 159.01 181.72 204.44 249.87 295.30 340.73 408.88 KIKRBY IRELETH 124.55 145.31 166.07 186.83 228.35 269.87 311.38 373.66 KIRKBY LONSDALE 148.09 172.78 197.46 222.14 271.50 320.87 370.23 444.28 LAKES 144.56 168.65 192.75 216.84 265.03 313.21 361.40 433.68 LEVENS 129.49 151.07
Recommended publications
  • Revision of Coniston Parish Plan 2017
    REVISION OF CONISTON PARISH PLAN 2017 1 CONTENTS Background & Reason for Revision of Current Parish Plan 3 Update on Existing Parish Plan (2011/12) 4 - 8 Issues Identified from Survey Results with Action Plans:- Place 9 Walking 10 - 11 Transport 12 Car Parking 13 - 14 Highways 15 Housing 16 - 18 Living in Coniston 19 - 21 Future 22 – 23 Conclusion 24 Appendix – Contact details for local organisations 25 Useful Information 26 Occupancy restrictions in Coniston & Torver 27 - 28 2 BACKGROUND Location Coniston is a village in the county of Cumbria within the southern part of the Lake District National Park beside Coniston Water, the third longest lake in the Lake District. Coniston grew as a farming village and to serve local copper and slate mines. During the Victorian era it developed as a tourist location partially through the construction of a branch of the Furness Railway which closed in the late 1950’s / early 1960’s. Today, Coniston is a popular tourist resort with a thriving village community. The nearest large villages are Hawkshead 4 miles away and Ambleside 8 miles away. Local knowledge suggests that nearly 60% of the housing stock in Coniston is owned as a second home or let as holiday housing. There is a good range of local services and social amenities with a primary and secondary school, fire station, post office and shops with basic supplies. The main employment locally is based around agricultural and tourism with many other local businesses. Coniston has wide range of social and recreational opportunities. The population of the Parish is 928 (Census 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Early Christian' Archaeology of Cumbria
    Durham E-Theses A reassessment of the early Christian' archaeology of Cumbria O'Sullivan, Deirdre M. How to cite: O'Sullivan, Deirdre M. (1980) A reassessment of the early Christian' archaeology of Cumbria, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7869/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Deirdre M. O'Sullivan A reassessment of the Early Christian.' Archaeology of Cumbria ABSTRACT This thesis consists of a survey of events and materia culture in Cumbria for the period-between the withdrawal of Roman troops from Britain circa AD ^10, and the Viking settlement in Cumbria in the tenth century. An attempt has been made to view the archaeological data within the broad framework provided by environmental, historical and onomastic studies. Chapters 1-3 assess the current state of knowledge in these fields in Cumbria, and provide an introduction to the archaeological evidence, presented and discussed in Chapters ^--8, and set out in Appendices 5-10.
    [Show full text]
  • International Passenger Survey, 2008
    UK Data Archive Study Number 5993 - International Passenger Survey, 2008 Airline code Airline name Code 2L 2L Helvetic Airways 26099 2M 2M Moldavian Airlines (Dump 31999 2R 2R Star Airlines (Dump) 07099 2T 2T Canada 3000 Airln (Dump) 80099 3D 3D Denim Air (Dump) 11099 3M 3M Gulf Stream Interntnal (Dump) 81099 3W 3W Euro Manx 01699 4L 4L Air Astana 31599 4P 4P Polonia 30699 4R 4R Hamburg International 08099 4U 4U German Wings 08011 5A 5A Air Atlanta 01099 5D 5D Vbird 11099 5E 5E Base Airlines (Dump) 11099 5G 5G Skyservice Airlines 80099 5P 5P SkyEurope Airlines Hungary 30599 5Q 5Q EuroCeltic Airways 01099 5R 5R Karthago Airlines 35499 5W 5W Astraeus 01062 6B 6B Britannia Airways 20099 6H 6H Israir (Airlines and Tourism ltd) 57099 6N 6N Trans Travel Airlines (Dump) 11099 6Q 6Q Slovak Airlines 30499 6U 6U Air Ukraine 32201 7B 7B Kras Air (Dump) 30999 7G 7G MK Airlines (Dump) 01099 7L 7L Sun d'Or International 57099 7W 7W Air Sask 80099 7Y 7Y EAE European Air Express 08099 8A 8A Atlas Blue 35299 8F 8F Fischer Air 30399 8L 8L Newair (Dump) 12099 8Q 8Q Onur Air (Dump) 16099 8U 8U Afriqiyah Airways 35199 9C 9C Gill Aviation (Dump) 01099 9G 9G Galaxy Airways (Dump) 22099 9L 9L Colgan Air (Dump) 81099 9P 9P Pelangi Air (Dump) 60599 9R 9R Phuket Airlines 66499 9S 9S Blue Panorama Airlines 10099 9U 9U Air Moldova (Dump) 31999 9W 9W Jet Airways (Dump) 61099 9Y 9Y Air Kazakstan (Dump) 31599 A3 A3 Aegean Airlines 22099 A7 A7 Air Plus Comet 25099 AA AA American Airlines 81028 AAA1 AAA Ansett Air Australia (Dump) 50099 AAA2 AAA Ansett New Zealand (Dump)
    [Show full text]
  • The National and Community Averages Being 228 And
    19 . 5 . 75 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 128/231 COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 28 April 1975 concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive No 75/268/EEC (United Kingdom ) (75/276/EEC ) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, 75% of the national average (£ 1 072 and £ 1 436 respectively); Having regard to the Treaty establishing the Euro­ pean Economic Community ; Whereas the index relating to the low population density referred to in Article 3 ( 4) ( c ) of Directive Having regard to Council Directive No 75/268/ No 75/268/EEC does not exceed 36 inhabitants per EEC (*) of 28 April 1975 on mountain and hill square kilometre ( the national and Community farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas , averages being 228 and 168 inhabitants per square and in particular Article 2 ( 2 ) thereof ; kilometre respectively ; whereas the minimum propor­ tion of the working population engaged in agriculture as a percentage of the total working population is Having regard to the proposal from the Commission ; 19% ( the national and Community averages being 3-08 and 9-58 % respectively); Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament ; "Whereas the nature and level of the abovementioned indices, utilized by the Government of the United Having regard to the Opinion of the Economic and Kingdom to define the areas notified to the Commis­ Social Committee ( 2 ); sion , corresponds to the characteristics of less favoured farming areas referred to in Article 3 (4) of Whereas the United
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Cumbrian Churches
    EXPLORING CUMBRIAN CHURCHES The visitor to Cumbria must not expect to find the large and stately parish churches of, say, East Anglia or Wessex. More typical of this area are the little friendly whitewashed churches of the dales, built late in the middle ages or in the seventeenth century, as plain and straightforward as the men who made them. Few buildings survive from before the Norman Conquest, although there are many interesting pieces of Anglo-Saxon and Viking age sculpture including two of the finest crosses in England, at Bewcastle and Gosforth. However, it is a great area of Norman churches; time and again you will find the heavy pillars and rounded arches typical of the twelfth and early thirteenth centuries. Due to the wars with Scotland which began in 1297 there was little cash to spare for church building in the Decorated and Perpendicular styles, although there are glorious exceptions in Carlisle Cathedral and Cartmel Priory. Eighteenth century prosperity gave the towns some fine new churches, as at Whitehaven, Workington and Penrith. Cumbria did not escape the Victorian passion for church rebuilding -indeed the poverty of earlier years meant there was essential work for the Victorians to do. The primary function of all churches, whether pre- Norman or present day, is as a place of worship; and it is hoped that visitors will spare some time from admiring the structure of the buildings to join the local congregations at their services. Carlisle The Cathedral is a small cathedral for a small diocese - but for all that, a fine building.
    [Show full text]
  • HERITAGE at RISK REGISTER 2009 / NORTH WEST Contents
    HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / NORTH WEST Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK 6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 2008 20 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 Contents Key to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / NORTH WEST HERITAGE AT RISK IN THE NORTH WEST Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / NORTH WEST We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Fay Writes...UVHS Is Proud to Introduce Vici!
    Mr Fay writes.... It is hard for me to believe that I am now in my eighth year as UVHS is Proud to Introduce Vici! Headteacher at UVHS. What a brilliant experience I have had. There was excitement in the air at Ulverston Victoria The school is in exceptional condition thanks to the hard High School on Tuesday 15th March during the Year 8 work of teachers, students, parents and governors. Such assembly. is our popularity across the Furness Peninsula, we are once Mr Taylor welcomed Sue Robinson the community fund again massively raiser for Cumbria from ‘Guide Dogs for the Blind’ who over-subscribed in gave a grateful speech to the students for their hard work Year 7 for 2016/17 last July in the Charity Walk. and we have had a record number of applications for our 6th Form next year. The effect of the new buildings is being felt by all of our community and as I write this the sun is shining! What more could a Headteacher ask for? Well, quite a lot actually...... I am not a person to be easily satisfied and I believe that our brilliant school still has further potential and that last year’s examination results, whilst representing a good stride, were still but a stepping stone on the journey of where this, once, sleeping giant should be travelling. If one thinks “job done” then the only route of travel is backwards! We must keep striving to improve Her message focused on thanks but emphasised that every the learning opportunities for all our students and, particularly, hour another person in the UK goes blind and the money for those who are identified as being in some way disadvantaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 27 2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton GCB KBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Professor Michael Chisholm Mr R R Thornton CB DL Sir Andrew Vheatley CBE To the Ht Hon Merlyn Rees, MF Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOK FUTURE ULECTOHAL ARRANGEMENTS FOK THE SOUTH LAKELAND DISTRICT IN THE COUNTY Ot1 CUMBRIA 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for South Lakeland district in accordance with the requirements of Section 63 of, and Schedule 9'to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in Section 60(1) and (2) of the T972 Act, notice was given on 19 August 1974 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the South Lakeland District Council, copies of which were circulated to Cumbria County Council, parish councils and parish meetings in the district, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 020328 Dcr.Doc
    DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND REGULATION COMMITTEE 28 March 2002 A Report by the Assistant Director (Development Control) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Application No 5/01/9028 District South Lakeland Applicant United Utilities Parish Broughton West Dawson House Liverpool Road, Great Sankey Date of Receipt 6 December 2000 Warrington ____________________________________________________________________________________________ PROPOSAL Proposed wastewater treatment works with associated access road and landscaping Land to the north of Foxfield Farm, Foxfield, Broughton in Furness ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0 RECOMMENDATION 1.1 That the Appropriate Assessment set out in Appendix 1 is confirmed. 1.2 That planning permission is granted subject to the conditions in Appendix 2 to this report. 2.0 THE PROPOSAL 2.1 This is the first of four applications on this agenda which together constitute Phase 2 of the scheme to improve water quality in the Duddon Estuary. Phase 1 involved proposals for a treatment works and associated pumping stations around Soutergate and Kirkby which Committee determined last year. This application is for the major element of this phase of the scheme, the provision of a wastewater treatment works (WwTW). Sewage would be pumped to the site from pumping stations at Station House, Foxfield (application 5/01/9029) and at Greety Gate, near Broughton in Furness (application 5/02/9004). The fourth element proposes the provision of a package plant, at Skelly Crags, Foxfield (application 5/02/9003), as it is not possible to transfer flows across the railway to the proposed treatment works. 2.2 The proposed treatment works would be located on a low hill 300m to the west of the A595 and 400m north west of the village of Foxfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of James Holme
    Descendants of James Holme Generation 1 1. JAMES1 HOLME . He married (1) ISABEL BARWICK in 1692 in Witherslack or Beetham, Westmorland, England. James Holme and Isabel Barwick had the following children: i. THOMAS2 HOLME was born on 01 Apr 1705 in Ulverston, Lancashire, England (bapt.) (of Osmotherley). He died. He married Mary Garner on 23 May 1732 in St. Mary, Ulverston, Lancashire, England (Both of Osmotherley). 2. ii. NICHOLAS HOLME was born on 12 Nov 1710 in Ulverston, Lancashire, England (bapt.) (of Osmotherley). He died. He married Elizabeth Strickland, daughter of Reynold Strickland and Beatrice, on 01 Jul 1741 in Lancaster, Lancashire by licence. She was born about 1716. She died in Apr 1792 in of Ould House Beck.. iii. JAMES HOLME was born on 16 Oct 1715 in Ulverston, Lancashire, England (bapt.) (of Osmotherley). Generation 2 2. NICHOLAS2 HOLME (James1) was born on 12 Nov 1710 in Ulverston, Lancashire, England (bapt.) (of Osmotherley). He died. He married Elizabeth Strickland, daughter of Reynold Strickland and Beatrice, on 01 Jul 1741 in Lancaster, Lancashire by licence. She was born about 1716. She died in Apr 1792 in of Ould House Beck.. Nicholas Holme and Elizabeth Strickland had the following child: 3. i. GEORGE3 HOLME was born on 09 Jun 1753 in of "Cringle Myer" Colton, Lancashire, England (bapt.). He died in Sep 1831 in of Bowness, Westmorland, England. He married Isabella Hellen, daughter of John Hellen and Ann Holme, on 05 Jun 1781 in St. Martin, Windermere, Westmorland. She was born on 20 Feb 1757 in of Strickland Kettle, Burneside (bapt.).
    [Show full text]
  • Dagnall, R., 1994 (Autumn), 'SCPR Guide: Stickland Ketel', Society for Clay Pipe Research Newsletter, 44, 11
    NEWSLE'T"T'EIZ 44 Autumn 1994 Skipton, North Yorkshire The Craven Museum, Town lIall, I1igh Street, Skipton, North SCPR GUIDE: STRICKLAND KETEL Yorkshire, 13D23 1AII, te! 01756794079 April-Sept: weekdays 10-5 (closed Tues), Sat 10-12 & 1-5, Sun 2-5 ROD Dagnall Oct-March: weekdays 1.30-5 (closed Tues) Sat 10-12 & 1.30-4.30, Sun closed. As mentioned in SCPR Newsletter 43, I am able to provide further Admission free information on the entry for Tolson Hall, Strickland Ketel, in Cumbria. Display: 2 long stem plain bowls; 1 cadger - Crystal Palace with flag on Tolson Hall lies in the village of Burneside in the parish of Strickland top; 1 cadger - plain bowl, spiral decoration on stem; 1 cutty; 2 19th­ Ketel, two miles north-west of Kendal. It is a private house, the century plain bowls (1 stem marked - unreadable); 5 decorated lead residence of Mr James Anthony Cropper. tobacco boxes or jars; sundry smokers' requisites. Excavated from a well in the town: 1 complete churchwarden; 1 half wig The details given in the SCPR Guide, taken from a published paper by curler. Adrian Oswald (1970, 233 and p1.209a) are repeated in his later volume Recovered from local lead mines: 1 whole pipe and 2 part pipes - (1975, 30-1) in which he illustrates a glass pane depicting clay tobacco MINERS PIPE; 1 bowl only - with thorns; 2 bowl only - leaf decoration pipes and the inscription to seams; 1 small bowl and 4in. stem - single figure of a boxer on one side (reverse unseen), caption reads: 'End of bare fist prize fighting 1860 God by this means TOM SAYERS J .C.HEENAN.
    [Show full text]