DOCSLIB.ORG

Ontario, Then Down the St. Lawrence to Montreal. All Three Forces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ontario, Then Down the St. Lawrence to Montreal. All Three Forces Ontario, then down the St. Lawrence to Montreal. All three forces combined at Montreal on August 29th and began the siege of the city, which surrendered on September 9th, ending the hostilities in Canada. In 1761 Britain was forced to open peace negotiations because of the great cost of the war, and these were concluded in 1762 by the Treaty of Paris, proclaimed in March of the following year. One of the prizes to fall to Britain, one which could hardly be for- saken in view of Wolfe’s death and his subsequent adoration by the populace, was Canada. However, not everyone approved of this. One criticism, which was to prove justified, was the observation of John Russell, the Fourth Duke of Bedford, who was Britain’s chief negotiator, that it was only the American colonists’ fear of the French in Canada that made them susceptible to any measure of control, and that once the threat was removed, the chances of a revolt by the colonists would increase.1 THE KITTANNING EXPEDITION As has been shown, in the spring of 1754 the immediate consequence of Washington’s attack on the French at Great Meadows had been the capture of the Ohio Company’s fort, which had been renamed Fort Duquesne. From this post the French commandant of the Fort pro- posed an expedition against Fort Necessity, and here he called the leaders of bands of Hurons, Abenakis, Iroquois, Nipissings, Algonquins, Ottawas, and Delawares to assist him in this venture. The Delawares in particular had real cause to hate the English, having been driven from their homes in eastern Pennsylvania short- ly before. The following year, which saw the failure of the Duke of Cumberland’s strategic plan for North America, the Delawares, under their leaders Shingas and Captain Jacobs, aided and incited by the French, began a series of raids on the settlements of west- ern Pennsylvania during the fall. In the winter of 1755-56, four forts were built and garrisoned for the defense of these settle- ments. These were Forts George, sometimes called Patterson’s Fort, Granville, Shirley, and Lyttleton. During the new year the attacks were resumed and garrisons were placed at McDowell’s Mill and at a fort at Carlisle. Matters came to a head in July, with the destruction of Fort Granville. A band of some sixty Indians appeared before the fort and called on the defenders to come out and give battle; a week later they returned with Captain Jacobs and fifteen Frenchmen, and on the 30th the fort was captured. Lieutenant Edward Armstrong, temporarily in command, was killed, as was one other soldier. Twenty-two others, together with a few civilians, were captured, and the fort was set alight.2 As a result of this attack it became clear that it was necessary to strengthen the defenses of western Pennsylvania and also to launch a punitive expedition against the Indians in order to raise the morale of the province and to deflate that of the In- dians. This task was given to Lieutenant Colonel John Armstrong. Armstrong had been appointed to the command of the Second Battal- ion of the Provincial Pennsylvania Regiment on May llth of that year. This battalion, sometimes called the Western Battalion, was made up of the garrisons of the posts of western Pennsylvania, and comprised seven companies.’ These were his own at Carlisle, those of Captains Ward and George Armstrong at Fort George, Cap- tain Mercer’s at Fort Shirley, Captain Hamilton’s at Fort Lyttle- ton, and those of Captains Potter and Steel at McDowell’s Mill. The nominal strength of each company was three officers - a cap- tain, lieutenant, and ensign - and fifty men, though they were not all up to strength. With the approval and consent of Robert Hunter Morris~ the Governor of the Province until August 19, when he was succeeded by William Deny, Colonel Armstrong planned his attack on the Delawares. With the assistance of people who had escaped from the Indians, the Colonel learned that Shingas and Captain Jacobs were encamped at Kittanning on the Alleghany River. He was assisted in particular by one John Baker, who was to serve as a volunteer in the expedition in Captain Mercer’s company, and who was killed in the attack.3 It was planned that Colonel Armstrong would take five companies on the expedition. These were his own and those of Captains Ward, Mercer, Hamilton, and Potter. It was also planned that he should engage what volunteers he could to make up the strength of the force. In fact it is clear from the casualty list appended to his official report of the expedition, and from other sources, that men from all seven companies accompanied him on the expedi- tion. The order was given for the force to rendezvous at Fort Shirley, and each company or detachment made its own way there between August 20 and August 29. Forts George and Shirley were abandoned, though small garrisons were left behind at Forts Lyttleton and Morris, and at Carlisle and McDowell’s Mill. There is no list or muster of the names of the soldiers and volunteers who accompanied Armstrong on the expedition, but all accounts agree that they numbered about three hundred officers and men.4 The main force got under way on Monday, August 30, but they were preceded by a small party with whom they joined up at Beaver Dams, a few miles from Franks Town on the north branch of the Juniata. The precise date is not clear; there are discrepancies among the accounts, but it was probably on September 3. Before leaving Fort Shirley, Armstrong ordered the removal of the gates from the fort since the inhabitants of the valley for whose protection it had been built had all abandoned their settlements. By Sunday evening (September 5) the battalion was within fifty miles of the Indian village, having followed an old trail used by Indian tra- ders, which came out on the Alleghany River near Kittanningo On the 6th it was decided that someone should be sent to reconnoiter the village. Accordingly, an officer, two soldiers, and a scout or "pilot," as they were then called, were dispatched to see what they could discover~ That day the column apparently marched about twenty ~iles, and the next morning it met up with the returning scouts.~ Their efforts appear to have been of little value as the Colonel was to report: "The Day following We met them on their Return & they i~form’d us that the Roads were entirely clear of the Enemy and that they had the greatest Reason to believe they were not discover’d But from the rest of the Intelligence they gave it appear’d that they had not been nigh enough the Town either to perceive the true Situation of it, the Number of the Enemy, or what Way it might be most advantageously attack’d."6 That day the column continued its march towards the village, in- tending to get as near to it as possible so that the attack could be made at dawn the following morning. However, at about nine or ten o’clock that evening, while they were, so they believed, about six miles from the village, one of the scouts came in with a report that two or three Indians were encamped on the road a few perchese away, w~ereupon the Colonel ordered a general retreat for about one hundred perches. The scout went back to have ~Editor’s Note: a variable unit of measurment, usually a rod (16 I/2 feet). 8 another look and returned and confirmed the accuracy of his first report. In fact it was hopelessly incorrect, and his mistake was to have a tragic consequence. It was decided that it was not advisable to attack the group, nor wait until they had fallen asleep before passing them.7 In his report the Colonel observed: "... it was propos’d that we shou’d immediately set and cut them off, but this was thought too hazardous if but one of the Enemy had escap’d It wou’d have been a Means of discovering the whole Design; and the Light of the Moon on which depended our advantageously posting our Men and attacking the T~n wou’d not admit of staying until the Indians fell asleep; ...,, 8 It was decided, therefore, that a small group should be left behind to watch the Indians and attack them at daybreak. Lieu- tenant James Hogg of Captain Armstrong’s company was detailed for this duty together with twelve men, and also the scouts who had discovered the group. During the morning the battalion had pla- ced the bulk of its stores on scaffolds out of sight and reach of animals. Now they left the horses and other unnecessary im- pedimenta with the lieutenant and left the road to avoid the dan- ger of giving a warning of their presence to the Indians. They headed across country for the village and were guided by the noise of the village, rather than by their scouts. In this way, after crossing several hills and valleys, the front of the column came ~ithin one hundred perches of the southern end of the vil- lage. The time was about three in the morning and the advanced members of the column settled down for the remainder of the night. The advanced companies had made the descent from the last hill over- looking the village, but the rear three were still coming up. At the south end of the village the Colonel was alarmed by a piercing whistle from a warrior in the corn field on the east bank of the river flanking the village.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Granville, This Map of Day Lewistown, Pa
    Like "The French Letter" found at Fort Granville, this map of the site near present- day Lewistown, Pa., remains a mystery. It was probably done in the late 18th century! but its creator is not known. 154 Pittsburgh History, Winter 1996/97 The Fall of Fort Granville, q 'The French Letter,' <X Gallic Wit on the Pennsylvania Frontier, 1756 James P. Myers, Jr. EVENTS DESCRIBED as "momentous" or "dramatic" often seem to inspire a singleness or simplicity of response by those affected orby those who interpret the events. The mind tries to make sense HISTORICALof things byignoring complexities and subtleties that undermine simple, overwhelming emotional responses. Historians, as well,seek continuities which reinforce their culture's belief inthe cause-and-effect ofhistory. Incidents that seem "to make no sense" are frequently omitted from historical accounts. An historiographic tradition which owes so much to Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, and even Scots- Irish attitudes does not equip most commentators to deal well withfigures nurtured on other values and perspec- tives. Until recent times, for example, most American and English historians have largely ignored the ways in which Native American attitudes and cultures helped to shape the continent's history. 1 Similarly, the bloody record of 18th-century border warfare illustrates how the received historical tradition assesses French actions while tending to ignore the culture and attitudes which underlie those deeds. James P. Myers,Jr., a professor ofEnglish at Gettysburg College, teaches English Renaissance and Irishliterature. Interested in the contributions of the Irish, Scots-Irish, and Anglo-Irish to colonial Pennsylvania history, he is exploring and writing on the 1758 Forbes expedition against FortDuquesne.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C
    The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C. Hale Sipe One cannot travel far in Western Pennsylvania with- out passing the sites of Indian towns, Delaware, Shawnee and Seneca mostly, or being reminded of the Pennsylvania Indians by the beautiful names they gave to the mountains, streams and valleys where they roamed. In a future paper the writer will set forth the meaning of the names which the Indians gave to the mountains, valleys and streams of Western Pennsylvania; but the present paper is con- fined to a brief description of the principal Indian towns in the western part of the state. The writer has arranged these Indian towns in alphabetical order, as follows: Allaquippa's Town* This town, named for the Seneca, Queen Allaquippa, stood at the mouth of Chartier's Creek, where McKees Rocks now stands. In the Pennsylvania, Colonial Records, this stream is sometimes called "Allaquippa's River". The name "Allaquippa" means, as nearly as can be determined, "a hat", being likely a corruption of "alloquepi". This In- dian "Queen", who was visited by such noted characters as Conrad Weiser, Celoron and George Washington, had var- ious residences in the vicinity of the "Forks of the Ohio". In fact, there is good reason for thinking that at one time she lived right at the "Forks". When Washington met her while returning from his mission to the French, she was living where McKeesport now stands, having moved up from the Ohio to get farther away from the French. After Washington's surrender at Fort Necessity, July 4th, 1754, she and the other Indian inhabitants of the Ohio Val- ley friendly to the English, were taken to Aughwick, now Shirleysburg, where they were fed by the Colonial Author- ities of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • William A. Hunter Collection ,1936-1985 Book Reviews, 1955-1980
    WILLIAM A. HUNTER COLLECTION ,1936-1985 BOOK REVIEWS, 1955-1980 Subject Folder Carton "The Susquehanna By Carl Cramerl',Pennsylvania Magazine 1 1 -of History and Biography, Vol. LXXIX No.3, July 1955. &@$a-is "American Indian and White Relations --to 1830...11 By 1 William N. Fenton, et. al., Pennsylvania Magazine -of History -& Biography LXXXI, No.4, Oct. 1957. "Tecumseh, Vision of Glory by Glenn Tucker, "Ethnohistory 1 Vol. 4, No.1, winter, 1957. "Colonists from Scotland... by I.C.C.Graham,ll The New 1 York Historical Society Quarterly, Vol. XLI, ~c47 Oct., 1957. "Banners --in the Wilderness.. .. by H. T.W.Coleman," Pennsylvania History Vol.XXIV, No. 1: January 1957. "War Comes to Quaker Pennsylvania by Robert L.D. Davidson," 1 Pennsylvania~a~azine-of History and Biography, Vol.LXXI1, No.3, July 1958. "Indian Villages --of the Illinois Country.Historic Tribes By Wayne C. Temple."American Antiquity. Vol. XXIV No. 4: April 1, 1959. "Braddock's Defeat by Charles Hamilton." Pennsylvania History Vol. XXVII, No. 3: July, 1960. "American Indians, by William T. Hogan." Pennsylvania 1 Magazine -of History and Biography, Vol. LXXXV, No. 4:0ct.1961. "The Scotch-Irish: A Social History, by James G. Pennsylvania ~istory,Vol.XXX, No.2, April 1963. -----"Indians of the Woodlands ....By George E. Hyde" Pennsylvania 1 Magazine of History and Biography LXXXVII, NO.~: July, 1963. "George ----Mercer of the Ohio Company, By Alfred P. James", 1 Pennsylvania -History Vol. XXX, No. 4, October 1964. "The Colonial --Wars, 1689-1762, by Howard H. Peckham" 1 Pennsylvania Magazine -of Historx and Biography, LXXXVIII, No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commemoration of Colonel Crawford and the Vilification of Simon Girty: How Politicians, Historians, and the Public Manipulate Memory
    THE COMMEMORATION OF COLONEL CRAWFORD AND THE VILIFICATION OF SIMON GIRTY: HOW POLITICIANS, HISTORIANS, AND THE PUBLIC MANIPULATE MEMORY Joshua Catalano A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2015 Committee: Andrew Schocket, Advisor Rebecca Mancuso ii ABSTRACT Andrew Schocket, Advisor In 1782, Colonel William Crawford led a force of a few hundred soldiers in a campaign to destroy the Indian forces gathered on the Sandusky Plains in present day Ohio. Crawford was captured by an enemy party following a botched offensive and was taken prisoner. After being tried, Crawford was brutally tortured and then burned alive in retaliation for a previous American campaign that slaughtered nearly one hundred peaceful Indians at the Moravian village of Gnadenhutten. This work analyzes the production, dissemination, and continual reinterpretation of the burning of Crawford until the War of 1812 and argues that the memory of the event impacted local, national, and international relations in addition to the reputations of two of its protagonists, William Crawford and Simon Girty. iii For Parker B. Brown iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank both members of my committee, Andrew Schocket and Rebecca Mancuso, for their continuous support, critique, and feedback. Their flexibility and trust allowed me to significantly change the overall direction and composition of this work without sacrificing quality. Ruth Herndon’s encouragement to explore and interrogate the construction and dissemination of historical narratives is evident throughout this work. I am also in debt to Christie Weininger for bringing the story of Colonel Crawford to my attention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795 Richard S. Grimes West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grimes, Richard S., "The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4150. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4150 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730-1795 Richard S. Grimes Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Girty, the White Indian
    B. Geo. Washington Ranck. G529r [Simon] Girty, the White Indian. (1886; 1955 rept.) ILLINOIS HISTORICAL SURVEY U.S. -920 GIP2TV5-fati. The White Indian Qriy.ihc untitle \nSxn Qwrq«y.\M2ck Prepared by the Staff of the Public Library of Fort Wayne and Allen County 1955 One cf a ftbtorical scries, ifti* pampfclet is published under ifte direction of % governing Boards 4 tte Public library of Tort Wayne and Qllcn County, }Tbs5adie. <Kj/k%^,s »0f-IPUM5f-M-M{ITyW^WAyffl "'*«**•"; grin^* aTiS^er, 5WxW ,x 4 %se/>^ CJcfcmer, Jic«Za/y -^v PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARP FOR ALLEN COUNTY % members oflfrbBoard mchiddfc mmbmofiteBcaid^fek^^ citizen* clwsai|jvm QlknCouitty<rabi&'tfte corjwaleCity offaiWayne -- o — . «~ •, 7 1 • Bfct- ;r- wH ^2>x CAjoj-Us 9?ey/)o/a/s ff2n. G/enn f/eruterson . 3. 6 52^ FOREWORD Simon Girty, known as "the Great Renegade, " was despised and hated by the frontier settlers in the Old Northwest during and after the Revolutionary War. His conduct was characterized by savage malignity and atrocious acts of cruelty toward the white race. The following account originally appeared in the MAGAZINE OF AMERICAN HISTORY, volume XV, March, 1886. George W. Ranck signed the article. The Boards and the Staff of the Public Library of Fort Wayne and Allen County reprint the article verbatim in the hope that it will be interesting and informative to Library patrons Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/girtywhiteindianOOranc Though Simon Girty was one of the most unique and lurid characters that ever figured in the annals of the West ; though the part he played among the Indian tribes was frequently important and sometimes con- spicuous, and though his life was a tragic romance from the cradle to the grave, yet all that was known of him for more than a hundred years from the time that he first made himself feared and hated was comprised in a few widely scattered fragments written entirely by his enemies and dis- figured by errors and inconsistencies.
    [Show full text]
  • © 2015 Robert Daiutolo, Jr. All RIGHTS RESERVED
    © 2015 Robert Daiutolo, Jr. All RIGHTS RESERVED GEORGE CROGHAN: THE LIFE OF A CONQUEROR by ROBERT DAIUTOLO, JR. A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School—New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History Written under the direction of Jan Lewis and approved by _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October, 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION George Croghan: The Life of a Conqueror By ROBERT DAIUTOLO, JR. Dissertation Director: Jan Lewis This dissertation integrates my own specifying paradigm of “situational frontier” and his- torian David Day’s generalizing paradigm of “supplanting society” to contextualize one historical personage, George Croghan, who advanced the interests of four eighteenth-cen- tury supplanting societies—one nation (Great Britain) and three of its North American colonies (Pennsylvania, New York, and Virginia)—in terms of three fields of endeavor, trade, diplomacy, and proprietorship. Croghan was an Irish immigrant who, during his working life on the “situational frontiers” of North America, mastered the intricacies of intercultural trade and diplomacy. His mastery of both fields of endeavor enabled him not only to create advantageous conditions for the governments of the three colonies to claim proprietorship of swaths of Indian land, but also to create advantageous conditions for himself to do likewise. The loci of his and the three colonies’ claims were the “situa- tional frontiers” themselves, the distinct spaces where particular Indians, Europeans, and Euro-Americans converged in particular circumstances and coexisted, sometimes peace- fully and sometimes violently. His mastery of intercultural trade and diplomacy enabled him as well to create advantageous conditions for Great Britain to claim proprietorship in the Old Northwest (present-day Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana, and Illinois) and for himself to do likewise.
    [Show full text]
  • I a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts And
    “ALL THE NATIONS TO THE SUN SETTING” GEORGE CROGHAN, EXTENDING THE LIMITS OF EMPIRE IN BRITISH NORTH AMERICA A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Liberal Studies By Jeffrey Michael Zimmerman, M.B.A. Georgetown University Washington, D.C. December 28, 2015 i ©2015 by Jeffrey Michael Zimmerman All Rights Reserved ii “ALL THE NATIONS TO THE SUN SETTING” GEORGE CROGHAN, EXTENDING THE LIMITS OF EMPIRE IN BRITISH NORTH AMERICA Jeffrey Michael Zimmerman, MBA Chair: Ronald M. Johnson, PhD ABSTRACT George Croghan was a mid-eighteenth-century British Indian agent. Born in Ireland, he came to America and settled in Pennsylvania in 1741. As an Ohio Valley fur trader he pushed far enough west to invite destruction of his Great Miami River depot by New France in 1752. Over time he befriended Shawnee, Ohio Huron and Miami Indians. Indian Department Superintendent Sir William Johnson rewarded his countryman’s effectiveness by appointing him western deputy. Britain’s victory in the French and Indian War added Illinois to Croghan’s responsibilities. General Lord Jeffrey Amherst led Britain’s war efforts; he was replaced by General Thomas Gage, under whom Croghan had served at Braddock’s Defeat. Pontiac’s War ensued; Gage and Johnson relied on Croghan, who knew the Ottawa leader, to end it. However, Croghan’s focus became blurred by land speculation. Several western land schemes crafted by Croghan and Philadelphia financier Samuel Wharton either failed or were cut short by the American Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • French & Indian War Bibliography 3.31.2017
    BRITISH, FRENCH, AND INDIAN WAR BIBLIOGRAPHY Detre Library & Archives, Heinz History Center 1. ALL MATERIALS RELATED TO THE BRITISH, FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR (APPENDIX A not included) 2. FORTS/FORTIFICATIONS 3. BIOGRAPHY/AUTOBIOGRAPHY 4. DIARIES/PERSONAL NARRATIVES/LETTERS 5. SOLDIERS/ARMS/ARMAMENTS/UNIFORMS 6. INDIAN CAPTIVITIES 7. INDIAN HISTORY AND CULTURE 8. FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR HISTORIES 9. PONTIAC’S CONSPIRACY/LORD DUNMORE’S WAR 10. FICTION 11. ARCHIVAL APPENDIX A (Articles from the Western Pennsylvania Historical Magazine and Pittsburgh History) 1. ALL MATERIALS RELATED TO THE BRITISH, FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR A Brief History of Bedford Village; Bedford, Pa.; and Old Fort Bedford. • Bedford, Pa.: H. K. and E. K. Frear, 1961. • qF157 B25 B853 1961 A Brief History of the Colonial Wars in America from 1607 to 1775. • By Herbert T. Wade. New York: Society of Colonial Wars in the State of New York, 1948. • E186.3 N532 No. 51 A Brief History of the King’s Royal Rifle Corps. • Edited by Sir Edward T. H. Hutton. Winchester: Printed by Warren and Son, Ltd., 1912. • UA652 K5 H9 A Charming Field For An Encounter: The Story of George Washington’s Fort Necessity. • By Robert C. Alberts. National Park Service, 1975. • E199 A33 A Compleat History of the Late War: Or Annual Register of Its Rise, Progress, and Events in Europe, Asia, Africa and America. • Includes a narrative of the French and Indian War in America. Dublin: Printed by John Exshaw, M.DCC.LXIII. • Case dD297 C736 A Country Between: The Upper Ohio Valley and Its Peoples 1724-1774.
    [Show full text]
  • Commerce and Conflict on Central Pennsylvania's Colonial Frontier: Archaeology at Forts Shirley and Lyttelton
    Commerce and Conflict on Central Pennsylvania’s Colonial Frontier: Archaeology at Forts Shirley and Lyttelton Jonathan A. Burns Bookend Seminar, December 3, 2013 Jonathan Burns is Lecturer in Anthropology and Archaeology at Juniata College and at Penn State University, and founder and member of the Board of Directors of the nonprofit research and education organization AXIS Research, Inc. ’m excited to share Pennsylvania’s rich colonial history and the work I’ve been doing through the I Penn State archaeological field school as well as an archaeology survey class we’ve started here at Juniata College. One of the things I’d like to point out about archaeology is that it’s not just the duty of one person to see all this data through the process of discovery and make all the interpretations; rather, it takes an interdisciplinary team of people working together with different specialties and understandings to make this all come together and to understand the material culture and the context from which it is recovered. I want to highlight significant local archaeological sites. We have right here in our backyard, in this county and surrounding counties, excellent archaeological sites dating from ten thousand years ago, all the way through the colonial era and into the 1800s and the Industrial Revolution. It really just depends on what your interests happen to be as to where to start looking for material evidence here in the Commonwealth. Throughout my career, I’ve been interested in Native Americans and the effects that European colonization had on them—so this first site is one that I’m very fortunate to have investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Texture of Contact: European and Indian Settler Communities on the Iroquoian Borderlands, 1720-1780
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2002 The texture of contact: European and Indian settler communities on the Iroquoian borderlands, 1720-1780 David L. Preston College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Preston, David L., "The texture of contact: European and Indian settler communities on the Iroquoian borderlands, 1720-1780" (2002). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623399. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-2kj3-rx94 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reproduced with with permission permission of the of copyright the copyright owner. owner.Further reproductionFurther reproduction prohibited without prohibited permission. without permission. THE TEXTURE OF CONTACT: EUROPEAN AND INDIAN SETTLER COMMUNITIES ON THE IROQUOIAN BORDERLANDS, 1720-1780 A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by David L. Preston 2002 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ©Copyright by David L. Preston All Rights Reserved 2002 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. .APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of D o cto r o f Philosophy David L Preston Approved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plight and the Bounty: Squatters, War Profiteers, and the Transforming Hand of Sovereignty in Indian Country, 1750-1774
    The Plight and the Bounty: Squatters, War Profiteers, and the Transforming Hand of Sovereignty in Indian Country, 1750-1774 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Melissah J. Pawlikowski Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Dr. John L. Brooke, Advisor Dr. Lucy Murphy Dr. Margaret Newell Copyright by Melissah J. Pawlikowski 2014 Abstract “The Plight and the Bounty: Squatters, War Profiteers & the Transforming Hand of Sovereignty in the Indian Country, 1750-1774” explores the creation of a European & Indian commons in the Ohio Valley as well as an in-depth examination of the network of interethnic communities and a secondary economic system created by refugee Euroamerican, Black, and Indian inhabitants. Six elements of creolization—the fusion of language, symbols, and legal codes; the adoption of material goods; and the exchange of labor and knowledge—resulted in ethnogenesis and a local culture marked by inclusivity, tolerance, and a period of peace. Finally this project details how, in the absence of traditional power brokers, Indians and Europeans created and exchanged geopolitical power between local Indians and Euroamericans as a method of legitimizing authority for their occupation of the Ohio Valley. ii Vita 2005 ............................................................... B.A., History, University of Pittsburgh 2007 ..............................................................
    [Show full text]