DOCSLIB.ORG

The Event for Remote Operations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Event for Remote Operations THE REMOTE EVENT FOR REMOTE OPERATIONS Episode I — July 8-9, 2020 Episode II — August 18-19, 2020 REMOTELY PILO TED EDITION PARTNER PROSPECTUS WE’RE GOING REMOTE The 5th Annual FAA UAS Symposium has transformed into the Remotely Piloted Edition and will continue to explore the diverse issues that are currently impacting the industry. The symposium team has taken the on-site experience and reimagined it in a digital world with three primary focuses — education, networking and the UAS Support Center. The program includes all content originally planned for the in-person event, as well as networking breaks throughout the agenda for structured and organic engagement. The UAS Support Center (previously the Resource Center) will also be staffed on the digital platform with the ability to review relevant information as well as schedule 1-on-1 meetings with FAA representatives. A TWO-EPISODE EVENT: July 8–9, 2020 August 18–19, 2020 Learn more at auvsi.org/FAASymposium REACH YOUR AUDIENCE As a partner of the symposium, you will gain visibility and multiple opportunities throughout the day to promote your company’s brand, products and services directly to the users, leaders, and innovators in the UAS community. Only a limited number of high- impact partner and exhibitor opportunities are being made available. WHO WILL ATTEND: JOB ROLE Government Relations/Legal 49% Corporate Management 32% Training and Educator 30% Engineering 27% R&D 26% Consultant 16% Remote Pilot 15% C-Level Executive 14% Analyst 14% MARKETS Public Safety 51% Oil/Gas 29% Cinematography 14% Transportation/Delivery 50% Industrial 28% Healthcare 13% Mapping/Surveying 48% Photography 27% Real Estate 12% Defense/Security 47% Construction 26% Content/Media 10% Natural Resource Inspections 40% Management 23% Counter UAS 39% Consumer/Hobbyist 21% Energy/Power/Utilities 38% Telecom/Wireless 19% Agriculture 30% Mining 18% ORGANIZATION TYPE 4% Military 7% (Uniformed + Civilian) Public Safety 24% Government Agency 9% (Non-Defense) Academic/ Educational 14% Manufacturer 21% Service Provider 21% Other WHO ATTENDS Accenture Consumer Technology Association Mid-Atlantic Aviation Partnership Air Traffic Control Association Deloitte Consulting, LLP The MITRE Corporation Airbus Group, Inc. Department of Defense (DoD) NASA AiRXOS Dominion Energy Perkins Coie, LLP Amazon The Dow Chemical Company Shell American Airlines Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Southern Company AT&T Exelon Corporation State Farm Bell Exxon Mobil Corporation Uber Advanced Technologies Group BGE an Exelon Company Federal Bureau of Investigation United States Postal Service BNSF Railway FedEx UPS Boeing Defense, Space and Security FLIR Systems, Inc. Verizon CACI General Dynamics Mission Systems The Walt Disney Company CNN IBM Corporation Wing Collins Aerospace Intel Corporation Comcast Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Con Edison Lockheed Martin Corporation Learn more at auvsi.org/FAASymposium WAYS TO ENGAGE PARTNER LEVELS Thought Influencer Stakeholder BENEFITS Leader Thought Leadership through speaking opportunities on a panel session at the event Thought Leadership Interview (Questions provided by event organizer, pre-recorded and aired during content transitions, interviews to be spliced together and provide the industry with multiple viewpoints on same industry topics) Pending Availability Hangout/Roundtable Discussion hosted by Partner Promotion in a post-event email Virtual booth (Includes partner profiles and company description within the virtual platform) Access to view attendees and connect directly within the platform Logo recognition in “Position 1” run-of-site (Rotating) Logo recognition in “Position 2” run-of-site (Rotating) Logo recognition • Attendee registration confirmation • Event website • Social media • Thank You Partners slide Full Conference Registration(s) 3 2 1 Investment* $10,000 $6,000 $3,500 Quantity Available 6 5 25 *Investment and quantity is per episode. Sponsor both episodes and receive a 5% discount! UPGRADE (Available for Episode II in August) Targeted banner ads, based on registrant demographics Add’l charge Add’l charge Add’l charge QUESTIONS? AUVSI is here to help you get engaged, find valuable opportunities, and make important and impactful connections with our virtual attendees at the FAA UAS Symposium — Remotely Piloted Edition. Contact us today to get involved. PAUL SEMPLE Companies A – L +1 916.880.5225 [email protected] WES MORRISON Companies M – Z +1 571.243.8010 [email protected] REMOTELY PILO TED EDITION.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Partner Resumes
    John L. Gronski Major General, USA (Ret.) [email protected] 610-463-5492 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Served for over 40 years in the United States Army on active duty and in the Pennsylvania National Guard retiring at the rank of Major General. Currently a Senior Mentor – Highly Qualified Expert for the U.S. Army Mission Command Training Program, an adjunct fellow with the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA), president of Leader Grove Consulting, LLC, and an independent national security analyst focusing on transatlantic issues. Holds a top secret security clearance. • Key military operational leadership experience includes from 2016 to 2019 served on active duty as United States Army Europe, Deputy Commanding General, Army National Guard assisting the Commanding General in leading over 30,000 Soldiers. Commanded the 28th Infantry Division, leading 15,000 Soldiers from 2012 to 2016. Deployed to Ramadi, Iraq in 2005 and 2006 as a brigade commander leading a force of over 5,400 U.S. service members and 5,000 Iraqi Soldiers during combat operations. Deployed to the central region of Europe between 2002 and 2003 as a brigade commander leading a force of approximately 2,000 Soldiers. In 2000 was assigned for one year as the Military Liaison Team Chief in the Republic of Lithuania. Commanded National Guard infantry units at every level from company to division. • In the civilian sector, led diverse teams as a management consultant for over 13 years. Provided oversight and leadership to implementation teams responsible for planning and executing large complex projects in Fortune 500 companies. Served as an executive coach for senior business leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Solid Performance WHY Caterpillar?
    2012 YEAR IN REVIEW ROCK SOLID Potential | Position | Plan | People | Performance In a global marketplace filled with shifting dynamics, our customers count on Caterpillar as a dependable source of products, services and solutions to meet their needs. This strategy is the stabilizing force behind our business. Today, we’re as confident of our rock solid strength as at any time in our history. ROCK SOLID 2012 Year in Review Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements in this 2012 Year in Review relate to future events and expectations and are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “will be,” “will,” “would,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “project,” “intend,” “could,” “should” or other similar words or expressions often identify forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding our outlook, projections, forecasts or trend descriptions. These statements do not guarantee future performance, and we do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements. Caterpillar’s actual results may differ materially from those described or implied in our forward-looking statements based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to: (i) global economic conditions and economic conditions in the industries and markets we serve; (ii) government monetary or fiscal policies and infrastructure spending; (iii) commodity or component
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing Reports Second-Quarter Results
    Boeing Reports Second-Quarter Results ▪ Continued progress on global safe return to service of 737 MAX ▪ Revenue of $17.0 billion, GAAP earnings per share of $1.00 and core (non-GAAP)* earnings per share of $0.40 ▪ Operating cash flow of ($0.5) billion; cash and marketable securities of $21.3 billion ▪ Commercial Airplanes backlog grew to $285 billion and added 180 net orders Table 1. Summary Financial Results Second Quarter First Half (Dollars in Millions, except per share data) 2021 2020 Change 2021 2020 Change Revenues $16,998 $11,807 44% $32,215 $28,715 12% GAAP Earnings/(Loss) From Operations $1,023 ($2,964) NM $940 ($4,317) NM Operating Margin 6.0 % (25.1) % NM 2.9 % (15.0) % NM Net Earnings/(Loss) $567 ($2,395) NM $6 ($3,036) NM Earnings/(Loss) Per Share $1.00 ($4.20) NM $0.09 ($5.31) NM Operating Cash Flow ($483) ($5,280) NM ($3,870) ($9,582) NM Non-GAAP* Core Operating Earnings/(Loss) $755 ($3,319) NM $402 ($5,019) NM Core Operating Margin 4.4 % (28.1) % NM 1.2 % (17.5) % NM Core Earnings/(Loss) Per Share $0.40 ($4.79) NM ($1.12) ($6.49) NM *Non-GAAP measure; complete definitions of Boeing’s non-GAAP measures are on page 6, “Non-GAAP Measures Disclosures." CHICAGO, July 28, 2021 – The Boeing Company [NYSE: BA] reported second-quarter revenue of $17.0 billion, driven by higher commercial airplanes and services volume. GAAP earnings per share of $1.00 and core earnings per share (non-GAAP)* of $0.40 primarily reflects higher commercial volume and lower period costs (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • F. Robert Van Der Linden CV
    Curriculum Vitae F. Robert van der Linden Aeronautics Department National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] 202-633-2647 (Office) Education Ph.D. (Modern American, Business and Military History) The George Washington University. 1997. M.A. (American and Russian History) The George Washington University. 1981. B.A. (History) University of Denver, 1977. Member Phi Beta Kappa Present Position Curator of Air Transportation and Special Purpose Aircraft, Aeronautics Division, National Air and Space Museum (NASM), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Primary Responsibilities Research and Writing Currently at work on "The Struggle for the Long-Range Heavy Bomber: The United States Army air Corps, 1934-1939. This book examines the fight between the Army Air Corps, the Army, and the Navy over the introduction of a new generation of long-range heavy bombers during the interwar period. Questions of cost, of departmental responsibility, and of the relationship between business and industry, all play key roles in the search for this elusive aircraft and ultimately which military branch controls the air. Underlying all of these issues is the question of whether or not the United States needs a separate, independent air force. Also researching a book on the creation of Transcontinental & Western Air (TWA). This business history will trace the story of this important airline from its creation in 1930 from the ambitious but unprofitable Transcontinental Air Transport, formed by Clement Keys with technical assistance from Charles Lindbergh, and parts for the successful Western Air Express of Harris Hanshue through World War II and its reorganization as Trans World Airlines under Howard Hughes.
    [Show full text]
  • Exelon Illinois Nuclear Fleet Audit
    Redacted Version Exelon Illinois Nuclear Fleet Audit Findings and Recommendations Prepared for Illinois Environmental Protection Agency April 14, 2021 AUTHORS Divita Bhandari Max Chang Philip Eash-Gates Jason Frost Steve Letendre, PhD Jackie Litynski Cheryl Roberto Andrew Takasugi Jon Tabernero Rachel Wilson 485 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 3 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 617.661.3248 | www.synapse-energy.com Redacted Version This page left intentionally blank Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. Exelon Illinois Nuclear Fleet Audit 1 Redacted Version CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... I 1. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................... 1 1.1. Summary of Illinois Plants ......................................................................................... 1 1.2. Historical Revenues .................................................................................................. 2 1.3. Separation of Exelon................................................................................................. 8 2. METHODOLOGY......................................................................................... 8 2.1. Monte Carlo Analysis ................................................................................................ 9 2.2. EnCompass Modeling ..............................................................................................14 3. RESULTS: BYRON AND DRESDEN...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Visualization at Boeing: Past, Present, Future
    Engineering, Operations & Technology Information Technology Visualization:Acquiring Information using Past Visual, Analytics Present, and Future at Boeing Dave Kasik Senior Technical Fellow The Boeing Company Dave Kasik and [email protected] Senesac The Boeing Company June, 2011 BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company. Copyright © 2011 Boeing. All rights reserved. A Bit About Us Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information Technology . Dave: . Involved in comppgputer graphics since 1969 . Boeing Senior Technical Fellow . ACM Distinguished Scientist . Stand-in on starship bridges . Known around Boeing as – A curmudgeon about virtual reality in the immersive, stereo sense – An a dvoca te for augmen te d rea lity – Leading proponent and expert for broad use of visualization for geometric and non-geometric data . Chr is: . Involved in computer graphics since 1990 . Boeing Senior Architect . Specialty - being able to apply technology to real world problems . Passion is to simplify complex problems Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved. 2 Why Are We Here? Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information Technology . Boeing builds astounding aerospace products . We require hugely varied technology, ranging from . Basic physics to . Networking (on-board & conventional) to . Computing (real-time systems & traditional) to . Material science to . Natural language analysis to . Basically, you name it, we have it . Boeing generates terror -by tes of data . Has worked with advanced visual analysis techniques to gain more insight from our data Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved. 3 Outline Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information Technology . Motivation . Past: Give a quick Boeing history of projects that changed computer graphics . Present: Stress current 3D use cases in Boeing . FtFuture: How is compu ter grap hics evol living t o address industrial needs? Copyright © 2012 Boeing.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Years. After They Separated, They Engaged in Four Years of Litigation Over the Distribution of Approximately $200,000 of Property
    I IL_EC COURT OF APPEALq D1V1S10'i4, TI 201 L; MAR 1 1 AN S: 40 S ` E IFF M 1-i3N ON Y ON 1'' Y IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTO DIVISION II In re the Marriage of: No. 43788 -1 - II JEANNE MARIE HARRIS, Appellant, MA ROGER DUANE KELL, UNPUBLISHED OPINION LEE, J. — Jeanne Marie Harris and Roger Duane Kell were married for approximately five years. After they separated, they engaged in four years of litigation over the distribution of approximately $200,000 of property. The trial court primarily awarded the parties their separate property and entered a judgment distributing less than $ 50, 000 in additional assets between the parties. Harris appeals. We affirm the trial court. In addition, due to the intransigent nature of Harris' s appeal, we grant Kell' s request for attorney fees. FACTS Harris and Kell married on May 3, 2003. Kell was an electrician working out of the union hall. He also owned several rental properties. Harris was a Vancouver city councilwoman and she owned a consulting business. After the parties married, they lived together in Harris' s home. No. 43788 -1 - II During the marriage, Kell worked as an electrician for several companies including Kraft and Boeing. Harris ran for county commissioner, but lost. Later she opened an Allstate Insurance agency. Although both parties contributed to household expenses ( Harris paid the mortgage and Kell paid for utilities), they primarily kept their finances separate. During this period, Harris was incurring large amounts of credit card debt. Harris and Kell separated on May 31, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • 04/26/2016 Summary of Meeting Held with Exelon Generation Company
    ~~\\ B£Gui ~(_,\... -1)'. .,. 01>,_ p '• '6 UNITED STATES i ;: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION "'c;, ~. Jlllll' ;),,ff WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 "'/41") ... v-0 * ** • ._ May 1 0 , 2 0 1 6 LICENSEE: Exelon Generation Company, LLC FACILITY: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF APRIL 26, 2016, MEETING WITH EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC TO DISCUSS A POTENTIAL FUTURE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY RECAPTURE POWER UPRATE LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 (CAC NOS. MF7532 AND MF7533} On April 26, 2016, a Category 1 public meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) at NRC Headquarters, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss a potential future measurement uncertainty recapture (MUR) power uprate license amendment request (LAA) for the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3. The meeting notice and agenda, dated April 11, 2016, are available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at Accession No. ML 16102A 104. A list of attendees is enclosed. Background Nuclear power plants are licensed to operate at a specified maximum core thermal power, often called rated thermal power (RTP). Title 1O of the Code of Federal Regulations (1 O CFR) Part 50, Appendix K, "ECCS [Emergency Core Cooling System] Evaluation Models," formerly required licensees to assume that the reactor had been operating continuously at a power level at least 1.02 times the RTP level when performing loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and ECCS analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Exelon Nuclear Fact Sheet Exelon Nuclear, a Division of Exelon Generation, Is Headquartered in Kennett Square, Pa
    Exelon Nuclear Fact Sheet Exelon Nuclear, a division of Exelon Generation, is headquartered in Kennett Square, Pa. and operates the largest U.S. fleet of carbon-free nuclear plants with more than 17,800 megawatts of capacity from 21 reactors at 12 facilities in Illinois, Maryland, New York and Pennsylvania. Dave Rhoades is President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear. There are more than 10,000 nuclear professionals working in Exelon Generation’s nuclear division. These professionals implement industry best practices to ensure safe, reliable operation throughout Exelon’s nuclear fleet. Exelon believes that clean, affordable energy is the key to a brighter, more sustainable future. Exelon’s nuclear power plants account for approximately 60 percent of Exelon’s power generation portfolio. Nuclear power plants are critical to the stability of the U.S. electrical grid because they can produce an uninterrupted flow of electricity for extended periods. This uninterrupted flow supplies the necessary level of baseload electricity for the grid to operate around-the-clock. Exelon’s nuclear stations Braidwood Generating Station Braceville, Illinois Byron Generating Station Byron, Illinois Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Lusby, Maryland Clinton Power Station Clinton, Illinois Dresden Generating Station Morris, Illinois FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Scriba, New York Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Ontario, New York LaSalle County Generating Station Marseilles, Illinois Limerick Generating Station Pottstown, Pennsylvania Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Scriba, New York Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Delta, Pennsylvania Quad Cities Generating Station Cordova, Illinois Updated: January 2021 .
    [Show full text]
  • Will Exelon Cut the Cord with Comed?
    REAL ESTATE: The “Crayola House” on Wisconsin’s shoreline is for sale. PAGE 27 BOOZE: Spirit Hub aims to get craft spirits to the masses. PAGE 3 CHICAGOBUSINESS.COM | OCTOBER 5, 2020 | $3.50 Will Exelon cut the cord with ComEd? estimated earnings, Exelon’s It’s a move Wall Street has applauded elsewhere in the power industry stock price is at a multiple that But ComEd’s admissions in for nancial success. badly trails its utility peers, which BY STEVE DANIELS July that it engaged in a bribery Now Wall Street is wondering average about 16 times. Exelon’s More and more, Exelon looks scheme over nearly a decade to why Exelon, unlike virtually ev- stock has fallen 21 percent this like the last man standing in its win lucrative legislation in the ery major electricity company in year, while the Standard & Poor’s industry—and not in a good way. Illinois Capitol—coupled with the U.S., isn’t uncoupling its - Utilities Index is down 7 percent. e Chicago-based nuclear repeated requests for ratepayer nancially struggling power plants e valuation implies that inves- power giant and parent of Com- bailouts from Exelon’s unregu- from its healthy utilities, which tors ascribe essentially no value monwealth Edison long has lated arm that once pledged fe- along with ComEd include mo- to Exelon’s merchant arm even maintained that owning regulat- alty to market forces—make this nopoly power-delivery compa- Exelon CEO Chris Crane though the company projects it ed utilities like ComEd alongside marriage look rocky at best.
    [Show full text]
  • Few Changes for Open Enrollment in 2021
    Special Section: SPEEA/Boeing open enrollment Nov. 3-24 Prof and Tech contracts Take health assessment by Nov. 24 to avoid monthly fee PEEA members and their covered spouses who do not complete the online health assessment by Nov. 24 will be Sassessed a non-compliance fee of $20 per month per person. This does not apply to dependents. The assessment is available through the Step by Step link on Boeing’s Worklife. Once Few changes for open you’ve located the health assessment link, you will be directed to a Vida portal. enrollment in 2021 Reasons for assessment By Jason Collete $3,600/$7,200. The percentage Boeing Boeing encourages participation for SPEEA Contract Administrator and Benefits contributes to your HSA remains the same. individuals to become more aware of their Coordinator • Anyone may be covered by the health-risk factors. Addressing risk factors Advantage+ plan. But not everyone is early is a way to potentially lower the health- pen enrollment, the time period each eligible to establish and fund a tax-free care costs for the employee and the company. year when employees can change their HSA account. Ensure you understand In addition to raising awareness of potential medical plans, is Nov. 3-24 at The the rules at OBoeing Company. illnesses, the lowered health-care costs www.healthequity.com/boeing. directly affect the company’s bottom line, When reviewing the annual open enrollment • Because the Advantage+ plan uses the because the majority of medical plans are information from Boeing, keep the following exact same network as the Traditional self-funded by Boeing.
    [Show full text]
  • EXELON CORPORATION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN (Full Title of the Plan)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 11-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission File Number 1-16169 EXELON CORPORATION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN (Full title of the Plan) EXELON CORPORATION (a Pennsylvania Corporation) 10 South Dearborn Street P.O. Box 805379 Chicago, Illinois 60680-5379 (312) 394-7398 (Name of the issuer of the securities held pursuant to the Plan and the address of its principal executive offices) Table of Contents EXELON CORPORATION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN INDEX TO FORM 11-K Page No. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 1 Financial Statements: Statements of Net Assets Available for Benefits as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 2 Statement of Changes in Net Assets Available for Benefits for the Year Ended December 31, 2007 3 Notes to Financial Statements 4 - 13 Supplemental Schedule: Schedule of Assets (Held at End of Year) as of December 31, 2007, Schedule H, Part IV, Item 4i of Form 5500 14 Note: All other schedules of additional information required by the Department of Labor’s Rules and Regulations for Reporting and Disclosure under ERISA have been omitted because they are not applicable. Exhibit Index 15 Signatures 16 Exhibits 17 Table of Contents REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Participants and the Administrator of the Exelon Corporation Employee Savings Plan: We have audited the accompanying statements of net assets available for benefits of the Exelon Corporation Employee Savings Plan (the “Plan”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statement of changes in net assets available for benefits for the year ended December 31, 2007.
    [Show full text]