Exelon Nuclear Fact Sheet Exelon Nuclear, a Division of Exelon Generation, Is Headquartered in Kennett Square, Pa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Exelon Nuclear Fact Sheet Exelon Nuclear, a division of Exelon Generation, is headquartered in Kennett Square, Pa. and operates the largest U.S. fleet of carbon-free nuclear plants with more than 17,800 megawatts of capacity from 21 reactors at 12 facilities in Illinois, Maryland, New York and Pennsylvania. Dave Rhoades is President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear. There are more than 10,000 nuclear professionals working in Exelon Generation’s nuclear division. These professionals implement industry best practices to ensure safe, reliable operation throughout Exelon’s nuclear fleet. Exelon believes that clean, affordable energy is the key to a brighter, more sustainable future. Exelon’s nuclear power plants account for approximately 60 percent of Exelon’s power generation portfolio. Nuclear power plants are critical to the stability of the U.S. electrical grid because they can produce an uninterrupted flow of electricity for extended periods. This uninterrupted flow supplies the necessary level of baseload electricity for the grid to operate around-the-clock. Exelon’s nuclear stations Braidwood Generating Station Braceville, Illinois Byron Generating Station Byron, Illinois Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Lusby, Maryland Clinton Power Station Clinton, Illinois Dresden Generating Station Morris, Illinois FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Scriba, New York Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Ontario, New York LaSalle County Generating Station Marseilles, Illinois Limerick Generating Station Pottstown, Pennsylvania Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Scriba, New York Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Delta, Pennsylvania Quad Cities Generating Station Cordova, Illinois Updated: January 2021 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Nuclear Power Reactors in California
Nuclear Power Reactors in California As of mid-2012, California had one operating nuclear power plant, the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant near San Luis Obispo. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) owns the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, which consists of two units. Unit 1 is a 1,073 megawatt (MW) Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) which began commercial operation in May 1985, while Unit 2 is a 1,087 MW PWR, which began commercial operation in March 1986. Diablo Canyon's operation license expires in 2024 and 2025 respectively. California currently hosts three commercial nuclear power facilities in various stages of decommissioning.1 Under all NRC operating licenses, once a nuclear plant ceases reactor operations, it must be decommissioned. Decommissioning is defined by federal regulation (10 CFR 50.2) as the safe removal of a facility from service along with the reduction of residual radioactivity to a level that permits termination of the NRC operating license. In preparation for a plant’s eventual decommissioning, all nuclear plant owners must maintain trust funds while the plants are in operation to ensure sufficient amounts will be available to decommission their facilities and manage the spent nuclear fuel.2 Spent fuel can either be reprocessed to recover usable uranium and plutonium, or it can be managed as a waste for long-term ultimate disposal. Since fuel re-processing is not commercially available in the United States, spent fuel is typically being held in temporary storage at reactor sites until a permanent long-term waste disposal option becomes available.3 In 1976, the state of California placed a moratorium on the construction and licensing of new nuclear fission reactors until the federal government implements a solution to radioactive waste disposal.
[Show full text]
Partner Resumes
John L. Gronski Major General, USA (Ret.) [email protected] 610-463-5492 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Served for over 40 years in the United States Army on active duty and in the Pennsylvania National Guard retiring at the rank of Major General. Currently a Senior Mentor – Highly Qualified Expert for the U.S. Army Mission Command Training Program, an adjunct fellow with the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA), president of Leader Grove Consulting, LLC, and an independent national security analyst focusing on transatlantic issues. Holds a top secret security clearance. • Key military operational leadership experience includes from 2016 to 2019 served on active duty as United States Army Europe, Deputy Commanding General, Army National Guard assisting the Commanding General in leading over 30,000 Soldiers. Commanded the 28th Infantry Division, leading 15,000 Soldiers from 2012 to 2016. Deployed to Ramadi, Iraq in 2005 and 2006 as a brigade commander leading a force of over 5,400 U.S. service members and 5,000 Iraqi Soldiers during combat operations. Deployed to the central region of Europe between 2002 and 2003 as a brigade commander leading a force of approximately 2,000 Soldiers. In 2000 was assigned for one year as the Military Liaison Team Chief in the Republic of Lithuania. Commanded National Guard infantry units at every level from company to division. • In the civilian sector, led diverse teams as a management consultant for over 13 years. Provided oversight and leadership to implementation teams responsible for planning and executing large complex projects in Fortune 500 companies. Served as an executive coach for senior business leaders.
[Show full text]
Policy Brief Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
OCTOBER 2008Policy Brief ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Nuclear Energy Today Can nuclear Introduction energy help make Nuclear energy has been used to produce electricity for more than half a development century. It currently provides about 15% of the world’s supply and 22% in OECD sustainable? countries. The oil crisis of the early 1970s provoked a surge in nuclear power plant orders How safe is and construction, but as oil prices stabilised and even dropped, and enough nuclear energy? electricity generating plants came into service to meet demand, orders tailed off. Accidents at Three Mile Island in the United States (1979) and at Chernobyl How best to deal in Ukraine (1986) also raised serious questions in the public mind about nuclear with radioactive safety. waste? Now nuclear energy is back in the spotlight as many countries reassess their energy policies in the light of concerns about future reliance on fossil fuels What is the future and ageing energy generation facilities. Oil, coal and gas currently provide of nuclear energy? around two-thirds of the world’s energy and electricity, but also produce the greenhouse gases largely responsible for global warming. At the same For further time, world energy demand is expected to rise sharply in the next 50 years, information presenting all societies worldwide with a real challenge: how to provide the energy needed to fuel economic growth and improve social development while For further reading simultaneously addressing environmental protection issues. Recent oil price hikes, blackouts in North America and Europe and severe weather events have Where to contact us? also focused attention on issues such as long-term price stability, the security of energy supply and sustainable development.
[Show full text]
Exelon Illinois Nuclear Fleet Audit
Redacted Version Exelon Illinois Nuclear Fleet Audit Findings and Recommendations Prepared for Illinois Environmental Protection Agency April 14, 2021 AUTHORS Divita Bhandari Max Chang Philip Eash-Gates Jason Frost Steve Letendre, PhD Jackie Litynski Cheryl Roberto Andrew Takasugi Jon Tabernero Rachel Wilson 485 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 3 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 617.661.3248 | www.synapse-energy.com Redacted Version This page left intentionally blank Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. Exelon Illinois Nuclear Fleet Audit 1 Redacted Version CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... I 1. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................... 1 1.1. Summary of Illinois Plants ......................................................................................... 1 1.2. Historical Revenues .................................................................................................. 2 1.3. Separation of Exelon................................................................................................. 8 2. METHODOLOGY......................................................................................... 8 2.1. Monte Carlo Analysis ................................................................................................ 9 2.2. EnCompass Modeling ..............................................................................................14 3. RESULTS: BYRON AND DRESDEN...................................................................
[Show full text]
04/26/2016 Summary of Meeting Held with Exelon Generation Company
~~\\ B£Gui ~(_,\... -1)'. .,. 01>,_ p '• '6 UNITED STATES i ;: NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION "'c;, ~. Jlllll' ;),,ff WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 "'/41") ... v-0 * ** • ._ May 1 0 , 2 0 1 6 LICENSEE: Exelon Generation Company, LLC FACILITY: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF APRIL 26, 2016, MEETING WITH EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC TO DISCUSS A POTENTIAL FUTURE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY RECAPTURE POWER UPRATE LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 (CAC NOS. MF7532 AND MF7533} On April 26, 2016, a Category 1 public meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and representatives of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) at NRC Headquarters, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss a potential future measurement uncertainty recapture (MUR) power uprate license amendment request (LAA) for the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3. The meeting notice and agenda, dated April 11, 2016, are available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at Accession No. ML 16102A 104. A list of attendees is enclosed. Background Nuclear power plants are licensed to operate at a specified maximum core thermal power, often called rated thermal power (RTP). Title 1O of the Code of Federal Regulations (1 O CFR) Part 50, Appendix K, "ECCS [Emergency Core Cooling System] Evaluation Models," formerly required licensees to assume that the reactor had been operating continuously at a power level at least 1.02 times the RTP level when performing loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and ECCS analyses.
[Show full text]
Nuclear Power Summary – Licensing Actions August 2020
NUCLEAR POWER SUMMARY – LICENSING ACTIONS AUGUST 2020 Congressional Legislative Action: o August 2020: • The American Nuclear Infrastructure Act of 2020, which was heard by the Senate’s Committee on Environment and Public Works on August 5, 2020, will enable U.S. international leadership, preserve America’s uranium supply chain, reduce carbon emissions, and strengthen our economic, energy, and national security. • The Nuclear Energy Leadership Act (NELA), included in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2021, was passed by the Senate on July 23, 2020. NELA will help facilitate the path to market for advanced reactors by allowing the federal government to be an early adopter of commercialized technologies; providing for needed scientific research facilities; demonstrating advanced reactor concepts; breaking down fuel availability barriers when the market cannot; and training the next generation of nuclear scientists. • The Nuclear Energy for the Future Act (HR 6796), which was introduced to the House on May 8, 2020, builds on the Nuclear Energy Innovation Capabilities Act (NEICA) to provide full authorization for the Versatile Test Reactor. • The Nuclear Energy Research and Development Act (HR 6097) was passed by the House Science, Space, and Technology Subcommittee on Energy on March 12, 2020 and forwarded to the full Committee. This act would authorize many programs within the Office of Nuclear Energy, including further research and development on the existing fleet of reactors, advanced reactors, hybrid energy systems, and advanced fuels. • The Integrated Energy Systems Act of 2019 (S 2702), which was heard by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on December 17, 2019, would direct the Department of Energy to establish an integrated energy systems research, development, and demonstration program.
[Show full text]
Will Exelon Cut the Cord with Comed?
REAL ESTATE: The “Crayola House” on Wisconsin’s shoreline is for sale. PAGE 27 BOOZE: Spirit Hub aims to get craft spirits to the masses. PAGE 3 CHICAGOBUSINESS.COM | OCTOBER 5, 2020 | $3.50 Will Exelon cut the cord with ComEd? estimated earnings, Exelon’s It’s a move Wall Street has applauded elsewhere in the power industry stock price is at a multiple that But ComEd’s admissions in for nancial success. badly trails its utility peers, which BY STEVE DANIELS July that it engaged in a bribery Now Wall Street is wondering average about 16 times. Exelon’s More and more, Exelon looks scheme over nearly a decade to why Exelon, unlike virtually ev- stock has fallen 21 percent this like the last man standing in its win lucrative legislation in the ery major electricity company in year, while the Standard & Poor’s industry—and not in a good way. Illinois Capitol—coupled with the U.S., isn’t uncoupling its - Utilities Index is down 7 percent. e Chicago-based nuclear repeated requests for ratepayer nancially struggling power plants e valuation implies that inves- power giant and parent of Com- bailouts from Exelon’s unregu- from its healthy utilities, which tors ascribe essentially no value monwealth Edison long has lated arm that once pledged fe- along with ComEd include mo- to Exelon’s merchant arm even maintained that owning regulat- alty to market forces—make this nopoly power-delivery compa- Exelon CEO Chris Crane though the company projects it ed utilities like ComEd alongside marriage look rocky at best.
[Show full text]
EXELON CORPORATION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN (Full Title of the Plan)
Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 11-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission File Number 1-16169 EXELON CORPORATION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN (Full title of the Plan) EXELON CORPORATION (a Pennsylvania Corporation) 10 South Dearborn Street P.O. Box 805379 Chicago, Illinois 60680-5379 (312) 394-7398 (Name of the issuer of the securities held pursuant to the Plan and the address of its principal executive offices) Table of Contents EXELON CORPORATION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN INDEX TO FORM 11-K Page No. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 1 Financial Statements: Statements of Net Assets Available for Benefits as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 2 Statement of Changes in Net Assets Available for Benefits for the Year Ended December 31, 2007 3 Notes to Financial Statements 4 - 13 Supplemental Schedule: Schedule of Assets (Held at End of Year) as of December 31, 2007, Schedule H, Part IV, Item 4i of Form 5500 14 Note: All other schedules of additional information required by the Department of Labor’s Rules and Regulations for Reporting and Disclosure under ERISA have been omitted because they are not applicable. Exhibit Index 15 Signatures 16 Exhibits 17 Table of Contents REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Participants and the Administrator of the Exelon Corporation Employee Savings Plan: We have audited the accompanying statements of net assets available for benefits of the Exelon Corporation Employee Savings Plan (the “Plan”) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statement of changes in net assets available for benefits for the year ended December 31, 2007.
[Show full text]
Chicago's Largest Publicly Traded Companies | Crain's Book of Lists
Chicago’s Largest Publicly Traded Companies | Crain’s Book of Lists 2018 Company Website Location Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. www.walgreensbootsalliance.com Deerfield, IL Boeing Co. www.boeing.com Chicago, IL Archer Daniels Midland Co. www.adm.com Chicago, IL Caterpillar Inc. www.caterpillar.com Peoria, IL United Continental Holdings Inc. www.unitedcontinental-holdings.com Chicago, IL Allstate Corp. www.allstate.com Northbrook, IL Exelon Corp. www.exeloncorp.com Chicago, IL Deere & Co. www.deere.com Moline, IL Kraft Heinz Co. www.kraftheinz-company.com Chicago, IL Mondelez International Inc. www.mondelez-international.com Deerfield, IL Abbvie Inc. www.abbvie.com North Chicago, IL McDonald’s Corp. www.aboutmcdonalds.com Oak Brook, IL US Foods Holding Corp. www.USfoods.com Rosemont, IL Sears Holdings Corp. www.searsholdings.com Hoffman Estates, IL Abbott Laboratories www.abbott.com North Chicago, IL CDW Corp. www.cdw.com Lincolnshire, IL Illinois Tool Works Inc. www.itw.com Glenview, IL Conagra Brands Inc. www.conagrabrands.com Chicago, IL Discover Financial Services Inc. www.discover.com Riverwoods, IL Baxter International Inc. www.baxter.com Deerfield, IL W.W. Grainger Inc. www.grainger.com Lake Forest, IL CNA Financial Corp. www.cna.com Chicago, IL Tenneco Inc. www.tenneco.com Lake Forest, IL LKQ Corp. www.lkqcorp.com Chicago, IL Navistar International Corp. www.navistar.com Lisle, IL Univar Inc. www.univar.com Downers Grove, IL Anixter International Inc. www.anixter.com Glenview, IL R.R. Donnelly & Sons Co. www.rrdonnelly.com Chicago, IL Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. www.jll.com Chicago, IL Dover Corp. www.dovercorporation.com Downers Grove, IL Treehouse Foods Inc.
[Show full text]
Nuclear Energy: Statistics Dr
Nuclear Energy: Statistics Dr. Elizabeth K. Ervin Civil Engineering Today’s Motivation The more people learn about nuclear power, the more supportive they are of it { 73% positive in Clean and Safe Energy Coalition survey in 2006. Nuclear power plants produce no controlled air pollutants, such as sulfur and particulates, or greenhouse gases. { The use of nuclear energy helps keep the air clean, preserve the earth's climate, avoid ground-level ozone formation, and prevent acid rain. One of the few growing markets { Jobs, capital… { 2006: 36 new plants under construction in 14 countries, 223 proposed. Worried about Nuclear Power Plants? Dirty Bombs? Radon? U.S. civilian nuclear reactor program: 0 deaths Each year, 100 coal miners and 100 coal transporters are killed; 33,134 total from 1931 to 1995. Aviation deaths since 1938: 54,000 “That’s hot.” { Coal-fired plant releases 100 times more radiation than equivalent nuclear reactor { Three Mile Island released 1/6 of the radiation of a chest x-ray { Despite major human mistakes, 56 Chernobyl deaths Nuclear power plants: 15.2% of the world's electricity production in 2006. 34% of EU 20% France: 78.1% 16 countries > 25% of their electricity 31 countries worldwide operating 439 nuclear reactors for electricity generation. U.S. Nuclear There are 104 commercial nuclear power plants in the United States. They are located at 64 sites in 31 states. { 35 boiling water reactors { 69 pressurized water reactors { 0 next generation reactors Nuclear already provides 20 percent of the United State’s electricity, or 787.2 billion kilowatt-hours (bkWh) Electricity demands expected to increase 30% nationally by 2030.
[Show full text]
Fusion Power Capital Cost Study
FUSION POWER CAPITAL COST STUDY . ARPA-E's ALPHA program seeks to create and systems, sensitivity analysis found that power demonstrate tools to aid in the development of systems comprised 5-20% of the total direct cost new, lower-cost pathways to fusion power and to (which includes reactor core, structures and site, enable more rapid progress in fusion research turbine plant, etc.). and development. Assuming we achieve excess energy production from a fusion core, a next . The up-front capital costs of a fusion power critical step is to understand the capital costs plant, as with many other power plant associated with a fusion power plant. An initial approaches, are likely to hinge heavily upon the capital cost study was performed by Bechtel scale of the plant and the balance of plant National’s power plant cost team, augmented by components. For example, if one treats fusion members of the fusion community who have like fission by borrowing its scaling factor of published in fusion cost estimating (Woodruff roughly 0.55, these 150 MWe designs might 1 Scientific and Decysive Systems). The study scale to $2-6 per Watt at a 1 GWe scale. was based upon four conceptual designs for a Conclusions: fusion core and present-day standard components for the balance of plant (heat . First, we conclude it is best to aggressively exchanger, turbines, etc). The cost study team pursue multiple options for the fusion core in did not attempt to compose a levelized cost of light of the cost study finding that the economics electricity (LCOE) for a fusion power plant given of a fusion plant are relatively insensitive to the juxtaposition of the conceptual nature of the which of the four fusion approaches is chosen.
[Show full text]
FEDERAL REGISTER INDEX January–October 2019
FEDERAL REGISTER INDEX January–October 2019 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ground Water Protection at Uranium In Situ Recovery Facilities – 574 RULES ( Jan 31); 6979 ( Mar 1) Access Authorization and Fitness-for-Duty Determinations – 43667 ( Aug 22) Harmonization of Transportation Safety Requirements with IAEA Adjustment of Civil Penalties for Inflation for Fiscal Year 2019 – 2433 ( Feb 7) Standards – 14898 ( Apr 12) Advanced Power Reactor 1400 (APR1400) Design Certification – 23439 List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: ( May 22) Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Cask System, Certificate of Compliance No. 1014, Amendment No. 13 – 6086 ( Feb 26) Advanced Power Reactor 1400 Design Certification – 41885 ( Aug 16) Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Multipurpose Canister Cask System, Clarification of Export Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Facilities, Certificate of Compliance No. 1014, Amendment No. 14 – 52815 Equipment, and Non-Nuclear Materials – 12483 ( Apr 2) ( Oct 3) Final State Agreement: Holtec International Storage, Transport and Repository 100 Storage Vermont: Discontinuance of Certain Commission Regulatory Authority System, Certificate of Compliance No. 1008, Amendment No. within the State – 51365 ( Sep 30) 3 – 43729 ( Aug 22) List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: NAC International NAC-UMS Universal Storage System, Certificate of Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Cask System, Certificate of Compliance Compliance No. 1015, Amendment No. 7 – 21728 ( May 15) No. 1014, Amendment No. 13 – 6055 ( Feb 26); 16201 ( Apr 18) Measurement Standards Used at U.S. Nuclear Power Plants – 21727 Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Multipurpose Canister Cask System, ( May 15) Certificate of Compliance No. 1014, Amendment No. 14 – 52747 Measurement Standards Used at U.S. Nuclear Power Plants; ( Oct 3) Correction – 33710 ( Jul 15) Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Multipurpose Canister Cask System, Certificate of Compliance No.
[Show full text]