William Poel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

William Poel William Poel EDWARD M. MOORE FT would be difficult to exaggerate the debt that all of Shake­ spearian owe to William Poel. It can easily be argued, as William Archer did, that scenic Shakespeare had reached such extremes by the turn of the last century that a reaction Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/sq/article/23/1/21/5100337 by guest on 29 September 2021 was inevitable, and it is not difficult to find forces alive at the end of the century that would have ended the established vogue even if Poel had never lived and had never formed the Elizabethan Stage Society. It is also true that Poel's direct influence hardly spread beyond London. Nevertheless, the fact remains that it was Poel who first demonstrated that the whole conception behind the current methods of staging Shakespeare was radically wrong, demonstrated this fact not by criticism alone but by what Shaw later referred to as "desperate experiments".1 It is further true that the later producers who did finally overturn spectacular Shakespeare—from Gran- ville-Barker to Bridges-Adams and Nugent Monck—were directly indebted to him. As it turns out, Poel is actually a rather difficult person to come to terms with. Pie was so radically right in the main things he did, and so persevering against the forces of the theater that he opposed, that one hates to have to qualify one's praise. Moreover, he fought virtually single-handedly for the first twenty-five years of his professional career; Shaw's was almost the only im­ portant critical voice raised in his favor, and at the time Shaw's patronage was probably at least as much a handicap as a blessing. And yet, so eccentric and single-minded was Poel that, as much as one hates to admit it, there was a good bit of justification in Archer's charge (made, however, for all the wrong reasons) that Poel was a "non-scenic Beerbohm Tree".2 Unfortunately, Poel got worse as he went on, and his last productions, coming at a time when he was at last getting the recognition he deserved, were indeed little better than Beer­ bohm Tree's, if for different reasons. But we begin at least with his virtues, which can hardly be overestimated. He saw that something was radically wrong with the staging of Shakespeare's plays, and he devoted his whole life to reforming the principles behind current staging practices. Poel entered the theater relatively late in life, having had no professional training before he joined Charles Mathew's company in 1876 at die age of twenty-four. He seems to have entered the theater from the begin­ ning for the sole purpose of reforming it. Pie first saw Irving in 1873, and immediately detested what he saw; he found Irving's acting "unwholesome" in stirring up emotion with no resolution; the celebrated third act of The Bells, 1 In the "Forward" to Cymbeline Refinished (1937), Complete Plays with Prefaces (New York, 1963), IV, 781. 2 The Nation, 5 July 1913, pp. 535-536. 22 SHAKESPEARE QUARTERLY Mathias' death scene, seemed to him "false to art and to good sense".3 Of Irv- ing's Richard III in 1877, he wrote in his diary: He appears to aim at creating an effect by working his scene up to a strik­ ing picture upon which the curtain may fall. This is a modern practice that I much dislike as it is sensational and stagey.4 The impetus behind Poel's intended reform was rather awkwardly religious and utilitarian. Again from his diary, a year before: Where would those large numbers that never enter a church get their in­ Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/sq/article/23/1/21/5100337 by guest on 29 September 2021 struction of what is right and wrong, of the misery of crime and the bless­ ings of virtue, if not from the stage?5 His dissatisfaction with the "sensational and stagey" soon led him to question the whole method of staging Shakespeare. He was, especially at first, primarily interested in seeing Shakespeare's text put on the stage: his early work did no more than attack the acting versions then current. In 1879 he founded The Elizabethans, a group of "professional ladies and gentlemen whose efforts are specially directed toward creating a more general taste for the study of Shake­ speare",6 and in 1881 he got F. J. Furnivall to assist him in arranging a per­ formance of the 1603 quarto of Hamlet, and to invite him (Poel) to give a talk to the New Shakspere Society on current acting editions of Hamlet? The Elizabethans had toured the provinces during the summer of 1879, giving costume recitals of scenes from various plays. But the Hamlet was to be a full production, in which Poel himself would play the Prince, and Maud Holt (later Lady Tree) would be engaged to play Ophelia. The rest of the cast were amateurs. The performance was given without scenery and without music; Poel did use a curtain (though there were no intervals), and did not attempt any kind of Elizabethan stage—he did not even use an upper or inner stage. As his lec­ ture to the New Shakspere Society and several letters to the press indicate, he was not at this time concerned with attempting to simulate Elizabethan stage conventions at all; he was only concerned with showing how radically wrong nineteenth-century acting versions were from a standpoint of text alone. For example, in the lecture he is led to such considerations as the following: The second scene [of act two] is called 'A Room in the Castle' both in the Globe and acting editions. Might it not be an exterior scene? It is true that Polonius remarks 'Here in the lobby,' but the line next to this in the first quarto suggests that he is pointing to some place off the scene, for lie adds 'There let Ophelia walk,' and Ophelia is on the stage. An exterior scene would, in my opinion, give more meaning to the words 'Will you walk out of the air, my lord?' and to Hamlet's speech, 'This most excellent canopy the air,' etc. The scene of a palace garden or cloister could be well intro­ duced in a play so full of interiors.8 Similarly, Poel has a good deal to say in favor of having an interval to show 3 Robert Spcaight, William Poel and the Elizabethan Revival (Cambridge, Mass., 1954), p. 20. 4 Spcaight, p. 32. 5 Spcaight, pp. 36-37. 6 Spcaight, p. 46. 7 Reprinted in Sha\espeare in the Theatre (London, 1913), pp. 156-176. 8 Shakespeare in the Theatre, pp. 161-162. WILLIAM POEL 23 that time has passed between some scenes, such as between the fourth and fifth scenes of Act Four "to allow of Laertes' return from France".9 Poel would later have known such considerations to be irrelevant to the Elizabethan stage, and, indeed, to be more in character coming from Irving's pen than his own. It seems rather strange, moreover, that Poel should perform the First Quarto of Hamlet to demonstrate his dissatisfaction with contemporary acting editions; certainly out of the corpus of Shakespeare's plays a better choice could have been made with which to begin his revolution in the production of Shakespeare, to say nothing of the Second Quarto or Folio versions of Hamlet Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/sq/article/23/1/21/5100337 by guest on 29 September 2021 itself. But Poel was convinced that the First Quarto was a pirated first draft of "*• Shakespeare's play, and, as he wrote in The Era a week after the production, he thought it represented "more truly his dramatic conception than either Quarto II or our stage versions."10 Furnivall shared this view, and not only did the production take place under his auspices, but it was Furnivall who arranged the text. The later text, they felt, was more "literary"—they could not deny the mutilation of the dialogue in the 1603 quarto—but less dramatic. Forty years later Poel was still of this same opinion; in 1922 he contributed a note to Notes and Queries maintaining that the First Quarto was a cut and rearranged version of the prompt-book made by an actor for touring perform­ ances.11 In his lecture, Poel argued for playing the Second Quarto, but for cut­ ting it down in accordance with the dramatic structure of Quarto One. For, as he later wrote, the Second Quarto "though more artistically suited as the framework of Hamlet's irregular mind, [is] too subtle and elaborate to be effective on the public stage".12 Poel was reacting against the sentimental Prince who usurped the play on stage, but his reaction led him to a great many eccentric opinions, and we shall see later what he did to the Second Quarto when he produced it in 1914. The performance was by no means a success. I know of no one who praised either the acting or the production; the former was amateurish, the latter crude. Though there was no scenery, Poel did attempt effects with lighting; the first scene was played in darkness, but at Horatio's "in russet mantle clad" the gas lights were suddenly turned up,13 producing what must have been a ludicrous effect. The performance became important later because it was Poel's first production, and marked the beginning of his attempt to restore Shake­ speare to an Elizabethan stage.
Recommended publications
  • THE ALCHEMIST THROUGH the AGES an Investigation of the Stage
    f [ THE ALCHEMIST THROUGH THE AGES An investigation of the stage history of Ben Jonson's play by JAMES CUNNINGHAM CARTER B.Sc., University of British Columbia, 196 8 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT. OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of English We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA October 1972 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date 27 QclAtt ii ABSTRACT THE ALCHEMIST THROUGH THE AGES An Investigation of the Stage History of Ben Jonson's Play This study was made to trace the stage history of The Alchemist and to see what effect theatrical productions can have in developing critical awareness of Jonson's dramatic skill in this popular play. Therefore an attempt has been made to record all performances by major companies between 1610 and 197 0 with cast lists and other pertinent information about scenery/ stage action and properties. The second part of the thesis provides a detailed analysis of four specific productions considered in light of their prompt books, details of acting and production, and overall critical reception.
    [Show full text]
  • Ph.D. THESIS Ewa Błasiak
    UNIVERSITY OF WROCŁAW Faculty of Letters Ph.D. THESIS Ewa Błasiak The Return of the Morality Play in Anglophone Drama of the First Half of the Twentieth Century Supervisor prof. dr hab. Ewa Kębłowska-Ławniczak Co-supervisor dr Marcin Tereszewski Wrocław 2020 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Ewa Kębłowska-Ławniczak, for her mentorship, guidance and constant support throughout the writing process. I am grateful for her patience, encouragement and the time she devoted to helping me develop this project. I would also like to thank her for being an extraordinary academic teacher, for it was the intellectual challenge of her English Literature classes which I attended as a first-year undergraduate student that inspired me to undertake further studies in this direction. I wish to extend my gratitude to my co-supervisor, Doctor Marcin Tereszewski, for the attention he gave to this thesis and for his invaluable suggestions. I am also grateful to the entire Institute of English Studies at the University of Wrocław for providing me with a stable and stimulating academic environment during all the years I spent there as an undergraduate and postgraduate student. I wish to thank all my teachers and lecturers for instilling in me curiosity and equipping me with skills which proved indispensable in working on this thesis. 3 4 Contents Introduction: Within and Beyond the Middle Ages ........................................ 7 Modern reception and assessment of the Middle Ages .................................................... 12 The notion of medievalism ............................................................................................... 18 Part I: The Return of the Morality Play Tradition to Contemporary British, European and American Drama and Its Reception .......................
    [Show full text]
  • ROMANTIC CRITICISM of SHAKESPEARIAN DRAMA By
    ROMANTIC CRITICISM OF SHAKESPEARIAN DRAMA By JOHN g,RAWFORD Associate of Arts Texarkana College Texarkana, Texas 1956 Bachelor of Science in Education Ouachita Baptist University Arkadelphia, Arkansas 1959 Master of Science in Education Drake University Des Moines, Iowa 1962 Submitted to the faculty of .the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION May, 1968 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY OCT 24 1968 ROMANTIC CRITICISM OF SHAKESPEARIAN DRAMA Thesis Approved: Thesis Adviser \ f ,A .. < \ Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I should like to· thank anumber·of people who helped me in many different ways during· the·preparation· of .this dissertation, notably Dr. David· S. Berkeley,·major adviser, who-lent words of encouragement, guidance, understanding, and patience; but also my committee members, Dr. Darrel Ray·, Pr~ Judson Milburn, and· .Dr~- Loyd Douglas; and. the Oklahoma State University library staff, especially Miss Helen Donart and Mrs • .:fosephine Monk. iii TABLE-OF CONTENTS Chap tel' Page. I. INTRODUCTION •••• 1 II. HAMLET .••• . ' . .. ... 29 III. ANTONY -~ CLEOPATRA • • • • . • • . • • • It • . • • . • .• • a1 ·IV. HENRYV· . ,. ". .• . 122 V. THE· MERCHANT ·QE. VENICE .- . "' . 153 VI. CONCLUSION • • ' . -. ,. 187 BIBLIOGRAPHY • • • • · • . .. 191 iv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Of all the so-called schools of Shakespearian criticism, the Romantic has been and continues to be one of the most influential. Per- haps this is true merely because of the impor~ance which the Romantic School places upon the genius of the subj~ct, for all schools of criti- cism recognize Shakespeare's ability at creating effective drama. A more accurate answer, however, probably lies in the fact that "romanti- cism" has a broad base and encompasses so very much.
    [Show full text]
  • The Return of Elizabeth: William Poel's Hamlet and the Dream Of
    ঃਆઽࢂ෈ٷணপ࠙ 제16권 1호 (2008): 201-220 The Return of Elizabeth: William Poel’s Hamlet and the Dream of Empire Yeeyon Im (Yonsei University) 1. Translation and Authenticity There would be no dispute that few works of art have been ‘translated’ more widely than some plays in the Shakespeare canon. With a Shakespeare play, translation does not confine itself to language alone; its theatrical mode also undergoes a transformation when it is staged in a new cultural environment. Odd it may sound, Shakespeare has been translated even in England. It was Harley Granville-Barker who first emphasized the temporal distance between Shakespeare’s plays and the modern audience that needs to be translated: “The literature of the past is a foreign literature. We must either learn its language or suffer it to be translated”(7). Elizabethan plays “are like music written to be performed upon an 202 Yeeyon Im instrument now broken almost beyond repair”(9). Shakespeare’s plays, their putative universality notwithstanding, underwent changes and adaptations to suit the demands of different times. Shakespeare was ‘translated’ in terms of theatre as well. Anachronism was essential on the Elizabethan stage, which accommodated the fictional world of drama as well as the reality of the audience’s everyday life through presentation and representation. Elizabethan anachronism gave way to a more accurate representation of the dramatic world in the illusionist proscenium stage of the Victorian age. At present, modern directors are at liberty to ‘translate’ Shakespeare’s plays virtually in any period and style as they wish; it took an iconoclastic experimental spirit to break with the long‐standing Victorian tradition of archaeologically correct and pictorially spectacular staging.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02152-5 - The Tempest: Updated edition Edited by David Lindley Frontmatter More information THE NEW CAMBRIDGE SHAKESPEARE general editor Brian Gibbons associate general editor A. R. Braunmuller, University of California, Los Angeles From the publication of the first volumes in 1984 the General Editor of the New Cambridge Shakespeare was Philip Brockbank and the Associate General Editors were Brian Gibbons and Robin Hood. From 1990 to 1994 the General Editor was Brian Gibbons and the Associate General Editors were A. R. Braunmuller and Robin Hood. THE TEMPEST The Tempest is one of the most suggestive, yet most elusive of all Shakespeare’s plays, and has provoked a wide range of critical interpretations. It is a magical romance, yet deeply and problematically embedded in seventeenth-century debates about authority and power. In this updated edition, David Lindley has thoroughly revised the introduction and reading list to take account of the latest directions in criticism and performance. Including a new section on casting in recent productions, Lindley’s introduction explores the complex questions this raises about colonisation, racial and gender stereotypes, and the nature of the theatrical experience. Careful attention is also given to the play’s dramatic form, stagecraft, and use of music and spectacle, to demonstrate its uniquely experimental nature. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02152-5 - The Tempest: Updated edition Edited
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Shakespeare Theater Is Chicago’S Professional Theater Dedicated Timeline 12 to the Works of William Shakespeare
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 1 Art That Lives 2 Bard’s Bio 3 The First Folio 4 Shakespeare’s England 4 The English Renaissance Theater 6 Barbara Gaines Criss Henderson Courtyard-style Theater 8 Artistic Director Executive Director On the Road: A Brief History of Touring Shakespeare 9 Chicago Shakespeare Theater is Chicago’s professional theater dedicated Timeline 12 to the works of William Shakespeare. Founded as Shakespeare Repertory in 1986, the company moved to its seven-story home on Navy Pier in 1999. Shakespeare’s “Macbeth” In its Elizabethan-style courtyard theater, 500 seats on three levels wrap around a deep thrust stage—with only nine rows separating the farthest Dramatis Personae 14 seat from the stage. Chicago Shakespeare also features a flexible 180-seat The Story 15 black box studio theater, a Teacher Resource Center, and a Shakespeare Act-by-Act Synopsis 15 specialty bookstall. Something Borrowed, Something New: Shakespeare’s Sources 17 Now in its twenty-eighth season, the Theater has produced nearly the entire 1606 and All That 18 Shakespeare canon: All’s Well That Ends Well, Antony and Cleopatra, Shakespeare, Tragedy and Us 20 As You Like It, The Comedy of Errors, Cymbeline, Hamlet, Henry IV A Scholar’s Perspective: Hereafter 21 Parts 1 and 2, Henry V, Henry VI Parts 1, 2 and 3, Henry VIII, Julius What the Critics Say 23 Caesar, King John, King Lear, Love’s Labor’s Lost, Macbeth, Measure Why Teach Macbeth? 34 for Measure, The Merchant of Venice, The Merry Wives of Windsor, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Much Ado About Nothing, Othello, Pericles, A Play Comes to Life Richard II, Richard III, Romeo and Juliet, The Taming of the Shrew, A Look Back at Macbeth in Performance 38 The Tempest, Timon of Athens, Troilus and Cressida, Twelfth Night, Dueling Macbeths Erupt in Riots! 42 The Two Gentlemen of Verona, The Two Noble Kinsmen, and The A Conversation with the Director 43 Winter’s Tale.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: EARLY
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: EARLY INNOVATIONS IN SHAKESPEAREAN PERFORMANCE: LUDWIG TIECK, WILLIAM POEL, AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS TO THE NAZARENES AND PRE-RAPHAELITES Natalie Marie Tenner, Doctor of Philosophy, 2012 Directed By: Professor Franklin J. Hildy Department of Theatre and Performance Studies This dissertation attempts to reanalyze the Elizabethan stage work of Ludwig Tieck and William Poel through a historically cultural lens, instead of within the frame of Shakespearean performance. Connecting these men personally and idealogically to two artistic groups, the Nazarenes and the Pre-Raphaelites, reveals, through their respective productions of A Midsummer Night’s Dream and Measure for Measure, their positions as Romantic artists in changing societies. The German Romantics used their art to progress towards a unified German nation. Tieck, who knew Novalis, the Schlegel brothers, and Schleiermacher, exhibited more political awareness than he is usually give credit for. His production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream on an attempted recreation of an Elizabethan stage can be read as a theatrical event in which Tieck displayed, both by product and by procedure, his ideal nation in which all classes are connected intellectually and culturally, but at the same time understand the specific role they must fill in society. Poel’s production of Measure for Measure on an Elizabethan stage, when viewed in relation to Pre-Raphaelite thought, reveals a tension in Poel’s work between his pristine Victorian aesthetic and his appreciation for the flawed human being. This manifested itself in Poel’s producing a play with sexually explicit and morally difficult themes, which he then heavily cut to soften some of the discomfort.
    [Show full text]
  • English Productions of Measure for Measure on Stage and Screen
    English Productions of Measure for Measure on Stage and Screen: The Play’s Indeterminacy and the Authority of Performance Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Department of English and Creative Writing Lancaster University March, 2016 Rachod Nusen Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own work, and has not been submitted in substantially the same form for the award of a higher degree elsewhere. Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Alison Findlay. Without her advice, kindness and patience, I would be completely lost. It is magical how she could help a man who knew so little about Shakespeare in performance to complete this thesis. I am forever indebted to her. I am also indebted to Dr. Liz Oakley-Brown, Professor Geraldine Harris, Dr. Karen Juers-Munby, Dr. Kamilla Elliott, Professor Hilary Hinds and Professor Stuart Hampton-Reeves for their helpful suggestions during the annual, upgrade, mock viva and viva panels. I would like to acknowledge the Shakespeare Centre Library and Archive, the National Theatre Archive, the Shakespeare’s Globe Library and Archives, the Theatre Collection at the University of Bristol, the National Art Library and the Folger Shakespeare Library on where many of my materials are based. Moreover, I am extremely grateful to Mr. Phil Willmott who gave me an opportunity to interview him. I also would like to take this opportunity to show my appreciation to Thailand’s Office of the Higher Education Commission for finically supporting my study and Chiang Mai Rajabhat University for allowing me to pursue it.
    [Show full text]
  • Or, When Did Tamburlaine Become Black?  El Viaje Teatral De Tim Ūr, O ¿Cuándo Se Volvió Negro Tamburlaine?
    Tim ūr’s theatrical journey: Or, when did Tamburlaine become black? El viaje teatral de Tim ūr, o ¿Cuándo se volvió negro Tamburlaine? Linda McJannet Bentley University, United States ABSTRACT RESUMEN Reviews of modern productions of Marlowe’s Las reseñas de las producciones modernas del Tamburlaine often note a three-hundred-year Tamburlaine de Marlowe a menudo dan cuenta del hiatus between a recorded performance in paréntesis de trescientos años que existió entre una 1641, just before the closing of the theatres, representación de la obra de la que se tiene noticia and Tyrone Guthrie’s revival at the Old Vic in en 1641, justo antes del cierre de los teatros, y su 1951. While the statement is mostly true with recuperación a manos de Tyrone Guthrie en el Old respect to Marlowe’s play, Tamerlane or Vic en 1951. Aunque esta afirmación es Timūr Lenk and the Ottoman emperor fundamentalmente cierta en lo tocante a la obra de Bayazid I (Marlowe’s Bajazeth) had Marlowe, Tamerlane o Tim ūr Lenk, junto con el important theatrical incarnations in the 1700s emperador otomano Bayazid I (el Bajazeth de before they declined into parody in the 1800s. Marlowe) tuvieron importantes encarnaciones en el When Marlowe’s play was revived in the teatro en el siglo XVIII, antes de degradarse y modern era, the main characters reclaimed convertirse en parodia en el siglo XIX. Cuando la their dignity, but they also acquired markers obra de Marlowe fue recuperada en la época of racial, ethnic, or religious otherness that moderna los personajes principales recobraron su had not been prominent earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Measure for Measure"
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1994 Comic potential of "Measure for Measure" Russell John Banham The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Banham, Russell John, "Comic potential of "Measure for Measure"" (1994). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1828. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1828 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of Montana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. ** Please check "Yes " or "No " and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission Author's Signature Date. _ Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. THE COMIC POTENTIAL OF "MEASURE FOR MEASURE" by Russell John Banham B.A., St. John's University -- New York, 1976 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 1994 Approved by Chairman, Thesis Committee Dean, Graduate School Date UMI Number: EP34734 All rights reserved INFORIVIATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Theatrical Practice and Cultural Context. (2006) Directed by Russ Mcdonald
    FALOCCO, JOE, Ph.D. Elizabethan Staging in the Twentieth Century: Theatrical Practice and Cultural Context. (2006) Directed by Russ McDonald. 433 pp. This study examines some of the major figures involved in the rediscovery of early modern staging conventions. Despite the wide variety of approaches employed by William Poel, Nugent Monck, Tyrone Guthrie, and the founders of the new Globe, I perceive a common philosophical underpinning to their endeavors. Rather than indulging in archaism for its own sake, they looked backward in a progressive attempt to address the challenges of the twentieth century. My history begins with an introduction in which I establish the ideological position of the Elizabethan revival as the twentieth-century heir to Pre-Raphaelitism. The first chapter is on William Poel and urges a reexamination of the conventional view of Poel as an antiquarian crank. I then devote chapters to Harley Granville Barker and Nugent Monck, both of whom began their careers with Poel. Barker’s critical writing, I argue, has been largely responsible for the Elizabethan revival’s reputation as an academic and literary phenomenon. Monck, on the other hand, took the first tentative steps toward an architectural reimagining of twentieth-century performance spaces, an advance which led to Tyrone Guthrie’s triumphs in Elizabethan staging. Guthrie learned from Monck and Barker as these men had learned from Poel. This lineage of influence, however, did not directly extend to the new Globe. The Globe also differs from the subjects of my other chapters because it doesn’t represent the effort of a single practitioner but instead incorporates the contributions of a group of scholars and architects.
    [Show full text]
  • SETTING the SCENE: DIRECTORIAL USE of ANALOGY in TWENTIETH-CENTURY AMERICAN SHAKESPEARE PRODUCTIONS by LAWRENCE RONALD TATOM B
    SETTING THE SCENE: DIRECTORIAL USE OF ANALOGY IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY AMERICAN SHAKESPEARE PRODUCTIONS by LAWRENCE RONALD TATOM B.A., California State University Sacramento, 1993 M.F.A., University of North Carolina – Greensboro, 1996 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Theatre 2011 This thesis entitled: Setting the Scene: Directorial Use of Analogy in Twentieth-Century American Shakespeare written by Lawrence Ronald Tatom has been approved for the Department of Theatre. _________________________________ Oliver Gerland, Associate Professor __________________________________ James Symons, Professor Date___________________ The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of the scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. IRC protocol # 0902.28 Tatom, Lawrence Ronald (Ph.D., Theatre) Setting the Scene: Directorial Use of Analogy in Twentieth-Century American Shakespeare Productions. Thesis directed by Associate Professor Oliver Gerland This dissertation charts the historical development of the use of analogy by stage directors in twentieth-century American Shakespeare productions. Directorial analogy, the technique of resetting a play into a new time, place or culture that resembles or echoes the time, place or culture specified by the playwright, enables directors to emphasize particular themes in a play while pointing out its contemporary relevance. As the nineteenth century ended, William Poel and Harley Granville-Barker rejected the pictorial realism of the Victorian era, seeking ways to recreate the actors-audience relationship of the Elizabethan stage.
    [Show full text]