General Anesthetic Actions on GABAA Receptors Paul Garcia, Emory University Scott E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Anesthetic Actions on GABAA Receptors Paul Garcia, Emory University Scott E General Anesthetic Actions on GABAA Receptors Paul Garcia, Emory University Scott E. Kolesky, Emory University Andrew Jenkins, Emory University Journal Title: Current Neuropharmacology Volume: Volume 8, Number 1 Publisher: Bentham Science Publishers | 2010-03, Pages 2-9 Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF Publisher DOI: 10.2174/157015910790909502 Permanent URL: http://pid.emory.edu/ark:/25593/fkg4m Final published version: http://www.eurekaselect.com/71259/article Copyright information: ©2010 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/), which permits distribution, public display, and publicly performance, distribution of derivative works, making multiple copies, provided the original work is properly cited. This license requires credit be given to copyright holder and/or author. Accessed September 28, 2021 5:01 PM EDT 2 Current Neuropharmacology, 2010, 8, 2-9 General Anesthetic Actions on GABAA Receptors Paul S. Garcia, Scott E. Kolesky and Andrew Jenkins* Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Emory University, School of Medicine, Rollins Research Center #5013, 1510 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta GA, USA Abstract: General anesthetic drugs interact with many receptors in the nervous system, but only a handful of these inter- actions are critical for producing anesthesia. Over the last 20 years, neuropharmacologists have revealed that one of the most important target sites for general anesthetics is the GABAA receptor. In this review we will discuss what is known about anesthetic – GABAA receptor interactions. Keywords: GABAA Receptor, General Anesthetic, Isoflurane, Desflurane, Sevoflurane, Propofol, Etomidate, Barbiturates. INTRODUCTION administered drugs interact with key sites on cellular pro- teins in the body which results directly in the alteration in the General anesthetics have been used to relieve pain and function of these proteins, in the present case, neuronal pro- suffering in surgical patients for almost 170 years. Prior to teins that control how information is conveyed through the their discovery, surgery was a traumatic and barbaric affair, nervous system. yet today, it is accepted as a routine and essential part of modern medicine. It is curious therefore, that despite the It is noteworthy that the study of general anesthesia as a technological advances that have been made in perioperative whole, has not immediately lent itself to being accessible to medicine and surgical techniques, the pharmacologic thera- traditional pharmacology; anesthesia is a clinical state where peutics administered by anesthesiologists to render patients a myriad of behavioral endpoints are caused by a group of unconscious, continue to be used without a precise under- drugs that bear no physical resemblance to one another. standing of how they generate the anesthetized state. Nevertheless, it appears that GABAARs are incredibly ac- commodating and possess several binding sites that interact Fortunately, over the last two decades, the intensive use with many of the currently used general anesthetics. Moreo- of the tools of modern molecular pharmacology and neuro- ver, these interactions obey many of the basic principles of science has enabled investigators to understand better than rational pharmacology; the effects of drug on protein are ever before how anesthetic chemicals can alter the function concentration dependent, they are subject to the “ceiling ef- of the nervous system. In this review, we will carefully de- fect”, they are allosteric in nature, the effects are dependent fine what we mean by “anesthesia” and then we will focus on the temperature of the preparation, some compounds ex- on how the currently used anesthetic agents modulate the hibit stereoselectivity and depending on the anesthetic, they function of the GABA receptor (GABA R), the most abun- A A appear to modulate the efficacy and/or the apparent affinity dant fast inhibitory neurotransmitter receptor in the CNS. of the receptor for its endogenous ligand. At the outset, we would like to emphasize that this re- In the following sections, we will define what we under- view is neither historical nor is it exhaustive. We do not in- stand to be “general anesthesia” and how anesthetic drugs tend to review the interaction of every drug used by anesthe- interact with native and mutant GABA Rs. siologists in the Operating Room, past or present, with every A critical binding site in the body. The purpose of this review WHAT IS GENERAL ANESTHESIA? is to summarize some of the key findings that we feel have When Oliver Wendell Holmes first coined the term advanced our understanding of how the currently used gen- eral anesthetic drugs interact with their neuronal targets. The anæsthesia in 1846, the word, which literally means a lack of sensation, was used to describe a patient who after inhaling history of anesthetic pharmacology is rich and has played a ether vapor, underwent surgery without any apparent suffer- critical role in our understanding of the anesthetized state ing. Widespread use of the technique and this term followed, and the reader is encouraged to read previous reviews if they describing a state where one or more chemicals were sys- are interested in reviewing the action of disused anesthetics temically administered to “anesthetize” patients, permitting such as halothane, chloroform or ether. Neither shall we dwell on discarded theories of anesthetic action. It is the fer- humane surgery to occur. Arguably one of the greatest breakthroughs in medical history, it is interesting that this vent view of the authors that general anesthesia is no differ- essential component of modern medicine has developed ent from any other pharmacological process: exogenously without a rational theory consistent with modern pharmacol- ogy that accounts for the molecular mechanisms of these *Address correspondence to this author at the Departments of Pharmacol- drugs in the human body. ogy and Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Rollins Research Center #5013, 1510 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta GA, 30322-3090, One reason for this is that after more than 160 years of USA; Tel: 404-727-3910; Fax: 404-712-2585; E-mail: [email protected] routine clinical use, there is still no consensus on what singu- 1570-159X/10 $55.00+.00 ©2010 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. General Anesthetic Actions on GABAA Receptors Current Neuropharmacology, 2010, Vol. 8, No. 1 3 larly defines the anesthetized state. During general anesthe- THEORY OF GENERAL ANESTHETIC ACTION sia, a myriad of events occur in the body that alter motor responses, cognition, sensation and autonomic control. A At the cellular level, anesthetics alter the behavior of neurons, by interacting directly with a small number of ion patient will go from being anxious, to unconscious and im- channels. Under normal conditions, these specialized mem- mobile and back to awake and in light of this, there contin- brane proteins are activated by chemical signals or changes ues to be a debate on which of these effects, or what combi- in the membrane environment. Upon activation, channels nation of these effects are the critical determinants of general change the electrical excitability of neurons by controlling anesthesia. the flow of depolarizing (excitatory) or hyperpolarizing (in- The seminal work by Eger et al. [64], set the benchmark hibitory) ions across the cell membrane via an ion channel in understanding anesthetic actions for almost 50 years. The that is integral with the receptor that senses the initial signal. definition of the Minimum Alveolar Concentration (MAC) General anesthetics primarily act by either enhancing inhibi- places great emphasis on anesthetic induced immobility, as a tory signals or by blocking excitatory signals. It is important read-out for sensation, and less emphasis on processes not to note that none of the current clinical general anesthetics directly linked to the sensation of acute pain and their asso- are selective for a single ion channel. At clinical concentra- ciated motor reflexes. Subsequent research has demon- tions, every anesthetic modulates the function of two or more strated, perhaps not unsurprisingly, that the key sites in the types of channels in the central nervous system. Thus, each nervous system that determine MAC are found in the spinal different anesthetic agent alters neuronal activity by acting in cord [3] and interestingly, may not be critically dependent on differing degrees at multiple sites. GABA Rs [73]. Nevertheless, although MAC may not have A GENERAL ANESTHETICS AND THEIR TARGETS revealed information on the cerebral sites of anesthetic ac- tion and anesthetic actions on sensory processing, one of the Currently, there are 5 inhalational and 5 intravenous an- great benefits of the MAC studies was to define a set of drug esthetics used to induce or maintain general anesthesia: Inha- concentrations that are appropriate for use in in vitro studies lational: Nitrous Oxide, Isoflurane, Sevoflurane, Desflurane on potential molecular targets, a giant leap forward for mo- and Xenon. Intravenous: Propofol, Etomidate, Ketamine, lecular pharmacologists interested in understanding how Methohexital and Thiopental. These 10 general anesthetic these drugs induce anesthesia. drugs are often accompanied by sedative benzodiazepines: midazolam, diazepam and lorazepam. For many decades after the inception of general anesthe- sia,
Recommended publications
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 De Juan Et Al
    US 200601 10428A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 de Juan et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 25, 2006 (54) METHODS AND DEVICES FOR THE Publication Classification TREATMENT OF OCULAR CONDITIONS (51) Int. Cl. (76) Inventors: Eugene de Juan, LaCanada, CA (US); A6F 2/00 (2006.01) Signe E. Varner, Los Angeles, CA (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 424/427 (US); Laurie R. Lawin, New Brighton, MN (US) (57) ABSTRACT Correspondence Address: Featured is a method for instilling one or more bioactive SCOTT PRIBNOW agents into ocular tissue within an eye of a patient for the Kagan Binder, PLLC treatment of an ocular condition, the method comprising Suite 200 concurrently using at least two of the following bioactive 221 Main Street North agent delivery methods (A)-(C): Stillwater, MN 55082 (US) (A) implanting a Sustained release delivery device com (21) Appl. No.: 11/175,850 prising one or more bioactive agents in a posterior region of the eye so that it delivers the one or more (22) Filed: Jul. 5, 2005 bioactive agents into the vitreous humor of the eye; (B) instilling (e.g., injecting or implanting) one or more Related U.S. Application Data bioactive agents Subretinally; and (60) Provisional application No. 60/585,236, filed on Jul. (C) instilling (e.g., injecting or delivering by ocular ion 2, 2004. Provisional application No. 60/669,701, filed tophoresis) one or more bioactive agents into the Vit on Apr. 8, 2005. reous humor of the eye. Patent Application Publication May 25, 2006 Sheet 1 of 22 US 2006/0110428A1 R 2 2 C.6 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,264,917 B1 Klaveness Et Al
    USOO6264,917B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,264,917 B1 Klaveness et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 24, 2001 (54) TARGETED ULTRASOUND CONTRAST 5,733,572 3/1998 Unger et al.. AGENTS 5,780,010 7/1998 Lanza et al. 5,846,517 12/1998 Unger .................................. 424/9.52 (75) Inventors: Jo Klaveness; Pál Rongved; Dagfinn 5,849,727 12/1998 Porter et al. ......................... 514/156 Lovhaug, all of Oslo (NO) 5,910,300 6/1999 Tournier et al. .................... 424/9.34 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (73) Assignee: Nycomed Imaging AS, Oslo (NO) 2 145 SOS 4/1994 (CA). (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 19 626 530 1/1998 (DE). patent is extended or adjusted under 35 O 727 225 8/1996 (EP). U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. WO91/15244 10/1991 (WO). WO 93/20802 10/1993 (WO). WO 94/07539 4/1994 (WO). (21) Appl. No.: 08/958,993 WO 94/28873 12/1994 (WO). WO 94/28874 12/1994 (WO). (22) Filed: Oct. 28, 1997 WO95/03356 2/1995 (WO). WO95/03357 2/1995 (WO). Related U.S. Application Data WO95/07072 3/1995 (WO). (60) Provisional application No. 60/049.264, filed on Jun. 7, WO95/15118 6/1995 (WO). 1997, provisional application No. 60/049,265, filed on Jun. WO 96/39149 12/1996 (WO). 7, 1997, and provisional application No. 60/049.268, filed WO 96/40277 12/1996 (WO). on Jun. 7, 1997. WO 96/40285 12/1996 (WO). (30) Foreign Application Priority Data WO 96/41647 12/1996 (WO).
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Tariff Schedule 2
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. ABACAVIR 136470-78-5 ACIDUM LIDADRONICUM 63132-38-7 ABAFUNGIN 129639-79-8 ACIDUM SALCAPROZICUM 183990-46-7 ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACIDUM SALCLOBUZICUM 387825-03-8 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ACIFRAN 72420-38-3 ABAPERIDONUM 183849-43-6 ACIPIMOX 51037-30-0 ABARELIX 183552-38-7 ACITAZANOLAST 114607-46-4 ABATACEPTUM 332348-12-6 ACITEMATE 101197-99-3 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ACITRETIN 55079-83-9 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ACIVICIN 42228-92-2 ABETIMUSUM 167362-48-3 ACLANTATE 39633-62-0 ABIRATERONE 154229-19-3 ACLARUBICIN 57576-44-0 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ACLATONIUM NAPADISILATE 55077-30-0 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ACODAZOLE 79152-85-5 ABRINEURINUM 178535-93-8 ACOLBIFENUM 182167-02-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ACONIAZIDE 13410-86-1 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ACOTIAMIDUM 185106-16-5 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9
    [Show full text]
  • Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization
    No. 31874 Multilateral Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organ ization (with final act, annexes and protocol). Concluded at Marrakesh on 15 April 1994 Authentic texts: English, French and Spanish. Registered by the Director-General of the World Trade Organization, acting on behalf of the Parties, on 1 June 1995. Multilat ral Accord de Marrakech instituant l©Organisation mondiale du commerce (avec acte final, annexes et protocole). Conclu Marrakech le 15 avril 1994 Textes authentiques : anglais, français et espagnol. Enregistré par le Directeur général de l'Organisation mondiale du com merce, agissant au nom des Parties, le 1er juin 1995. Vol. 1867, 1-31874 4_________United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 1995 Table of contents Table des matières Indice [Volume 1867] FINAL ACT EMBODYING THE RESULTS OF THE URUGUAY ROUND OF MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS ACTE FINAL REPRENANT LES RESULTATS DES NEGOCIATIONS COMMERCIALES MULTILATERALES DU CYCLE D©URUGUAY ACTA FINAL EN QUE SE INCORPOR N LOS RESULTADOS DE LA RONDA URUGUAY DE NEGOCIACIONES COMERCIALES MULTILATERALES SIGNATURES - SIGNATURES - FIRMAS MINISTERIAL DECISIONS, DECLARATIONS AND UNDERSTANDING DECISIONS, DECLARATIONS ET MEMORANDUM D©ACCORD MINISTERIELS DECISIONES, DECLARACIONES Y ENTEND MIENTO MINISTERIALES MARRAKESH AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ACCORD DE MARRAKECH INSTITUANT L©ORGANISATION MONDIALE DU COMMERCE ACUERDO DE MARRAKECH POR EL QUE SE ESTABLECE LA ORGANIZACI N MUND1AL DEL COMERCIO ANNEX 1 ANNEXE 1 ANEXO 1 ANNEX
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Toxicity of Isoflurane, Halothane, Fluroxene and Diethyl Ether in Human Volunteers
    COMPARATIVE TOXICITY OF ISOFLURANE, HALOTHANE, FLUROXENE AND DIETHYL ETHER IN HUMAN VOLUNTEERS WENDELL C. STEVENS, M.D., E.I. ECEn, u, M.D., THOMAS A. JoAs, M.D., THOMAS H. CnOMWELL, M.D., ANNE WHITE, M.A., AND WILLIAM M. DOLAN, M.D. INTRODUCTION ALTHOUC~ SEVEnAL STUDIES have examined the hepatorenal iniury that may occur in man following exposure to anaesthetic drugs, most are tainted by the presence of other medications, the concomitant stress imposed by the operation or the prior existence of hepatic or renal disease. Other studies have failed to measure anaes- thetic dose (alveolar or arterial concentrations) and the duration of anaesthetic exposure, although such measurements are necessary to quantitate the imposed time-dose stress. During our studies of the effects of various anaesthetics on cardiorespiratory function 1-7 we also evaluated the effects of these anaesthetics on subsequent hepatic and renal function. These measurements were made in healthy, young human volunteers and were uncomplicated by prior medication or concomitant operation. Anaesthesia was prolonged and at times profound. We present the results of the hepatic, renal and haematological studies in the following report. The findings suggest that small but significant differences exist among anaesthetics in their abilities to produce adverse effects. However, the changes seen were minimal, even with those agents which caused abnormalities. METHODS Many of the details of the methods used in this study have been described previously and only additions or deviations from prior protocols will be noted. 1-7 Briefly, studies were made on healthy volunteers between 21 and 30 years of age.
    [Show full text]
  • Caenorhabditis Elegans (Genetics/Mutations/Anesthesia) PHIL G
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 87, pp. 2%5-2969, April 1990 Medical Sciences Multiple sites of action of volatile anesthetics in Caenorhabditis elegans (genetics/mutations/anesthesia) PHIL G. MORGAN*t, MARGARET SEDENSKY*, AND PHILIP M. MENEELY* *Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106; tFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98104 Communicated by Harold Weintraub, January 22, 1990 (receivedfor review November 2, 1989) ABSTRACT The mechanism and site(s) of action of vola- low doses of anesthetic the animals become "excited," tile anesthetics are unknown. In all organisms studied, volatile moving more than animals not exposed to anesthetics. As the anesthetics adhere to the Meyer-Overton relationship-that anesthetic concentrations are increased, the animals next is, a in-n plot of the oil-gas partition coefficients versus the become very uncoordinated, and at higher doses they are potencies yields a straight line with a slope of -1. This immobilized. When removed from the anesthetics the nem- relationship has led to two conclusions about the site of action atodes quickly regain mobility and return to their normal of volatile anesthetics. (i) It has properties similar to the lipid phenotype. Mutations in two genes, unc-79 and unc-80, used to determine the oil-gas partition coefficients. (a) All confer altered responses to volatile anesthetics, in addition to volatile anesthetics cause anesthesia by affecting a single site. In an altered motor phenotype. When not in the presence of Caenorhabditis elegans, we have identified two mutants with anesthetics, both these mutants are described as "fainters." altered sensitivities to only some volatile anesthetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Stembook 2018.Pdf
    The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]
  • I (Acts Whose Publication Is Obligatory) COMMISSION
    13.4.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities L 97/1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 578/2002 of 20 March 2002 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Nomenclature in order to take into account the new scope of that heading. Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Commu- nity, (4) Since more than 100 substances of Annex 3 to the Com- bined Nomenclature, currently classified elsewhere than within heading 2937, are transferred to heading 2937, it is appropriate to replace the said Annex with a new Annex. Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Com- mon Customs Tariff (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2433/2001 (2), and in particular Article 9 thereof, (5) Annex I to Council regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 should therefore be amended accordingly. Whereas: (6) This measure does not involve any adjustment of duty rates. Furthermore, it does not involve either the deletion of sub- stances or addition of new substances to Annex 3 to the (1) Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 established a goods nomen- Combined Nomenclature. clature, hereinafter called the ‘Combined Nomenclature’, to meet, at one and the same time, the requirements of the Common Customs Tariff, the external trade statistics of the Community and other Community policies concerning the (7) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accor- importation or exportation of goods.
    [Show full text]
  • And Anticonvulsant Effects of Anesthetics (Part I)
    ANESTH ANALG 303 1990:70:30>15 Review Article Pro- and Anticonvulsant Effects of Anesthetics (Part I) Paul A. Modica, MD, Rene Tempelhoff, MD, and Paul F. White, rhD, MD Key Words: ANTICONVULSANTS. BRAIN, PRO- An epileptic seizure has been defined as a sudden AND ANTICONWLSANTS. COMPLICATIONS, alteration of central nervous system (CNS) function CONVULSIONS. TOXICITY, CONVULSIONS. resulting from a high-voltage electrical discharge. This discharge may arise from an assemblage of Part I neurons in either cortical or subcortical tissues. The Introduction spread of this excitatory activity to the subcortical, Inhalation anesthetics Volatile agents thalamic, and brainstem centers corresponds to the Enflurane tonic phase of the seizure and loss of consciousness Halothane (1). In contrast, myoclonic activity refers to a series of Isoflurane rhythmic or arrhythmic muscular contractions (2). Investigational volatile agents Depending on the electroencephalographic (EEG) Nitrous oxide findings, myoclonus is divided into epileptic and Intravenous analgesics nonepileptic activity (3). Nonepileptic myoclonus Opioid (narcotic) analgesics originates from the brainstem or spinal cord and is Meperidine due to either loss of cortical inhibition (4)or to im- Morphine paired function of spinal interneurons (3,5). Without Fentanyl and its analogues EEG monitoring, it is extremely difficult to determine Summary whether abnormal-appearing seizurelike muscle Part I1 movements are due to epileptiform activity or non- Introduction epileptic myoclonia. Intravenous anesthetics Many anesthetic and analgesic drugs have been Sedative-hypnotics reported to cause seizure activity clinically (Table 1, Barbiturates A). Interestingly, many of these same drugs have also Etomidate been shown to possess anticonvulsant properties Benzodiazepines (Table 1, B). In an effort to explain deficiencies with Ketamine Guedel's original stages of anesthesia, Winters and Propofol colleagues (67) proposed a multidirectional contin- Local anesthetics uum of anesthetic states (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetic Analysis and Molecular Docking
    Neurochemical Research (2019) 44:2147–2155 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-019-02852-y ORIGINAL PAPER The Binding Mechanisms and Inhibitory Efect of Intravenous Anesthetics on AChE In Vitro and In Vivo: Kinetic Analysis and Molecular Docking Mesut Işık1 Received: 15 April 2019 / Revised: 25 June 2019 / Accepted: 29 July 2019 / Published online: 5 August 2019 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), which have an important role in the prevention of excessive AChE activity and β-amyloid (Aβ) formation are widely used in the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The inhibitory efect of anesthetic agents on AChE was determined by several approaches, including binding mechanisms, molecular docking and kinetic analysis. Inhibitory efect of intravenous anesthetics on AChE as in vitro and in vivo have been discovered. The midazolam, propofol and thiopental have shown competitive inhibition type (midazolam > propofol > thiopental) and Ki values were found to be 3.96.0 ± 0.1, 5.75 ± 0.12 and 29.65 ± 2.04 µM, respectively. The thiopental and midazolam showed inhibition efect on AChE in vitro, whereas they showed activation efect in vivo when they are combined together. The order of binding of the drugs to the active site of the 4M0E receptor was found to be midazolam > propofol > thiopental. This study on anesthetic agents that are now widely used in surgical applications, have provided a molecular basis for investigating the drug-enzyme interactions mechanism. In addition, the study is important in understanding the molecular mechanism of inhibitors that are efective in the treatment of AD.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,261,537 B1 Klaveness Et Al
    USOO626.1537B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,261,537 B1 Klaveness et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jul.17, 2001 (54) DIAGNOSTIC/THERAPEUTICAGENTS 5,632,983 5/1997 Tait et al.. HAVING MICROBUBBLES COUPLED TO 5,643,553 * 7/1997 Schneider et al. .................. 424/9.52 ONE OR MORE VECTORS 5,650,156 7/1997 Grinstaff et al. ..................... 424/400 5,656.211 * 8/1997 Unger et al. .......................... 264/4.1 5,665,383 9/1997 Grinstaff et al. (75) Inventors: Jo Klaveness; Pál Rongved; Anders 5,690,907 11/1997 Lanza et al. .......................... 424/9.5 Høgset; Helge Tolleshaug, Anne 5,716,594 2/1998 Elmaleh et al. Naevestad; Halldis Hellebust; Lars 5,733,572 3/1998 Unger et al.. Hoff, Alan Cuthbertson; Dagfinn 5,780,010 7/1998 Lanza et al. Levhaug, Magne Solbakken, all of 5,846,517 12/1998 Unger. Oslo (NO) 5,849,727 12/1998 Porter et al.. 5,910,300 6/1999 Tournier et al. .................... 424/9.34 (73) Assignee: Nycomed Imaging AS, Oslo (NO) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (*) Notice: This patent issued on a continued pros ecution application filed under 37 CFR 2 145 505 4/1994 (CA). 19 626 530 1/1998 (DE). 1.53(d), and is subject to the twenty year 0 727 225 8/1996 (EP). patent term provisions of 35 U.S.C. WO91/15244 10/1991 (WO). 154(a)(2). WO 93/20802 10/1993 (WO). WO 94/07539 4/1994 (WO). Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this WO 94/28873 12/1994 (WO).
    [Show full text]