Evolutionary Studies of the New Zealand Coastal Mosquito Opifex Fuscus (Hutton) I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolutionary Studies of the New Zealand Coastal Mosquito Opifex Fuscus (Hutton) I EVOLUTIONARY STUDIES OF THE NEW ZEALAND COASTAL MOSQUITO OPIFEX FUSCUS (HUTTON) I. MATING BEHAVIOUR by ELISABETH SLOOTEN and DAVID M. LAMBERT1)2) (Marine Research Laboratory, R.D. Leigh, and Department of Zoology, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland, New Zealand) (With2 Figures) (Acc.1-XI-1982) Introduction An understanding of the selective pressures that produced the diversity of animal reproductive behaviour is one of the major goals of evolutionary biology. Clearly, deviations from random mating caused by differences in reproductive behaviour can have a profound effect on the genetic com- position of populations. Insects exhibit a remarkable diversity of sophisticated and complex forms of mating behaviour, and are particularly suitable for studies of this kind due to the rapid turnover rate of most insect populations. The swarming and mating flight of Diptera, typical of most mosquito species, has been reviewed by DowNES (1969). There has been some controversy over the function of swarming in mosquitoes (e.g. BATES, 1949; NIELSEN & HAEGER, 1960; HADDOW & CORBET, 1961; DOWNES, 1969). On the one hand it has been claimed that it has an epigamic function and is associated with mating, on the other that its original function has been lost or is unknown. Certainly in many Anophelines, swarming appears to be associated with mating, defining a time and place in which males and virgin females of the same species are brought into close proximity (e.g. CHARLWOOD & JONES, 1980). The mating behaviour of Opifex fuscus described here is an unusual and interesting variation on the typical mosquito mating system outlined 1) Thanks are due to Brian MCARDLEand Steve DAWSONwho read and criticized the manuscript, and to Heather SILYN-ROBERTSwho took the Scanning Electron Micrographs. The research was partly funded by the Auckland University Research Committee Grant number 114Z129. 2) For reprint requests please write to D.M.L. 158 above. Mating aggregations occur, not in flight, but on the water surface of the pools from which the adults emerge. Opifex fuscus is an endemic New Zealand mosquito which inhabits ex- posed rocky coasts on both the North and South Islands. The coastal en- vironment is an uncommon habitat for mosquitoes. Less than 5% of all described mosquito species regularly breed in brackish water (O'MEARA, 1979). Females lay their eggs in pools above high-tide level, the salinity of which ranges from about twice as saline as seawater to almost fresh, depending on weather conditions and height on the shore. Larvae and pupae are free swimming in these pools and come to the surface to breathe at regular intervals. Opifex fuscus (Hutton) is considered by BELKIN (1968) to be descended from the same stock as Aedes (Nothoskusea) chathamicus (Dumbleton) and Aedes (Halaedes) australis (Erichson). He argues that many of the features of Opifex represent the most primitive condition found in the tribe Aedini and are annectent with the other tribes. Because the more striking primitive and derived features are found in fuscus, it is retained in a separate monotypic genus. The species has a most unusual mating system. Both sexes mate ex- tremely early in adult life. Male mosquitoes are capable of sexual activity as soon as the terminal segments of the abdomen have rotated a minimum of 135 degrees (PROVOST et al., 1961), although they do not necessarily use this capability immediately. In Op£ex fuscus rotation takes 5 to 6 hours, one of the fastest rates of terminalia rotation recorded (PROVOST et al., 1961; HAEGER & PROVOST, 1965; O'MEARA, 1979), and start searching for mates 6 to 24 hours after emergence (PROVOST & HAEGER, 1967). The males of a few other species are known to rotate their terminalia at similar rates, for example Deinocerites cancer and Culiseta inornata (PROVOST et al., 1961), but these are certainly exceptions to the rule. Early mating is taken to an even greater extreme in Opifex females which mate at the time of emergence. Males spend most of their adult life on the water surface of rock pools searching for and attempting to grasp pupae which are close to emergence. The only other mosquito species in which males have been described to grasp and guard pupae in a similar way is Deinocerites cancer (PROVOST & HAEGER, 1967). This species does not appear to be par- ticularly closely related to Op£ex fuscus. Deinocerites cancer is classified in the tribe Culicini. A small number of brief descriptions of the mating behaviour of Opifex fuscus have appeared over 60 years (KIRK, 1923; MARKS, 1958; .
Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Mosquitoes in Tribe Aedini 925
    FORUM Classification of Mosquitoes in Tribe Aedini (Diptera: Culicidae): Paraphylyphobia, and Classification Versus Cladistic Analysis HARRY M. SAVAGE Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, P.O. Box 2087, Fort Collins, CO 80522 J. Med. Entomol. 42(6): 923Ð927 (2005) Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jme/article/42/6/923/886357 by guest on 29 September 2021 ABSTRACT Many mosquito species are important vectors of human and animal diseases, and others are important nuisance species. To facilitate communication and information exchange among pro- fessional groups interested in vector-borne diseases, it is essential that a stable nomenclature be maintained. For the Culicidae, easily identiÞable genera based on morphology are an asset. Major changes in generic concept, the elevation of 32 subgenera within Aedes to generic status, and changes in hundreds of species names proposed in a recent article demand consideration by all parties interested in mosquito-borne diseases. The entire approach to Aedini systematics of these authors was ßawed by an inordinate fear of paraphyletic taxa or Paraphylyphobia, and their inability to distinguish between classiÞcation and cladistic analysis. Taxonomists should refrain from making taxonomic changes based on preliminary data, and they should be very selective in assigning generic names to only the most important and well-deÞned groups of species. KEY WORDS Aedini classiÞcation, Aedes, Ochlerotatus, paraphylyphobia, mosquito classiÞcation MANY MOSQUITO SPECIES IN the tribe Aedini, a cosmo- In this communication, I brießy review taxonomic politan group represented by 11 genera and Ϸ1,239 categories in a zoological classiÞcation, the Interna- species, are important vectors of human and animal tional Code of Zoological Nomenclature (the Code), diseases, and many others are of considerable eco- the development of generic concept within the Cu- nomic importance as nuisance or pest species.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Insects
    UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography Technical Report Title Marine Insects Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1pm1485b Author Cheng, Lanna Publication Date 1976 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Marine Insects Edited by LannaCheng Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla, Calif. 92093, U.S.A. NORTH-HOLLANDPUBLISHINGCOMPANAY, AMSTERDAM- OXFORD AMERICANELSEVIERPUBLISHINGCOMPANY , NEWYORK © North-Holland Publishing Company - 1976 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,without the prior permission of the copyright owner. North-Holland ISBN: 0 7204 0581 5 American Elsevier ISBN: 0444 11213 8 PUBLISHERS: NORTH-HOLLAND PUBLISHING COMPANY - AMSTERDAM NORTH-HOLLAND PUBLISHING COMPANY LTD. - OXFORD SOLEDISTRIBUTORSFORTHEU.S.A.ANDCANADA: AMERICAN ELSEVIER PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC . 52 VANDERBILT AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10017 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Marine insects. Includes indexes. 1. Insects, Marine. I. Cheng, Lanna. QL463.M25 595.700902 76-17123 ISBN 0-444-11213-8 Preface In a book of this kind, it would be difficult to achieve a uniform treatment for each of the groups of insects discussed. The contents of each chapter generally reflect the special interests of the contributors. Some have presented a detailed taxonomic review of the families concerned; some have referred the readers to standard taxonomic works, in view of the breadth and complexity of the subject concerned, and have concentrated on ecological or physiological aspects; others have chosen to review insects of a specific set of habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Insects
    AQUATIC INSECTS Challenges to Populations This page intentionally left blank AQUATIC INSECTS Challenges to Populations Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society’s 24th Symposium Edited by Jill Lancaster Institute of Evolutionary Biology University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK and Robert A. Briers School of Life Sciences Napier University Edinburgh, UK CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Offi ce CABI North American Offi ce Nosworthy Way 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 617 395 4056 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org CAB International 2008. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Royal Entomological Society of London. Symposium (24th : 2007 : University of Edinburgh) Aquatic insects : challenges to populations : proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society’s 24th symposium / edited by Jill Lancaster, Rob A. Briers. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-84593-396-8 (alk. paper) 1. Aquatic insects--Congresses. I. Lancaster, Jill. II. Briers, Rob A. III. Title. QL472.R69 2007 595.7176--dc22 2008000626 ISBN: 978 1 84593 396 8 Typeset by AMA Dataset, Preston, UK Printed and bound in the UK by Cromwell Press, Trowbridge The paper used for the text pages in this book is FSC certifi ed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mosquitoes of New Zealand and Their Animal Disease Significance
    The mosquitoes of New Some mosquito-borne animal pathogens do occur in Zealand and their animal New Zealand but this country is considered free from any that are economically significant. disease significance However, there is a threat of new species of exotic mosquitoes Mosquito type and distribution and/or exotic Species present: Of the 3,500 mosquito species recognised mosquito-borne (1) worldwide , New Zealand has only 16 (Table 1), four of which are pathogens becoming introduced. Culex quinquefasciatus, Aedes australis and Aedes established here. notoscriptus are considered to have been introduced in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries(2) (3) (4). Aedes Peter Holder camptorhynchus has recently established in Napier and is the subject of an eradication campaign. The remaining 12 species are indigenous. contact, vector competence (the efficiency of a particular mosquito to transmit a given pathogen), mosquito abundance, and feeding Distribution: The distribution of mosquito species within New behaviour(12) all influence transmission. In addition, there may be Zealand is shown in Table 1. Culex pervigilans is the most wide regional intra-specific variation in vector competence, as well as (2) spread mosquito species in New Zealand and it utilises a wide variation in the ‘compatibility’ of various strains of a pathogen with (5) (6) range of larval habitats . Most of our remaining mosquitoes have a vector. restricted distributions and/or habitats. Cx quinquefasciatus and Ae notoscriptus have remained apparently stable around their Endemic diseases original sites of introduction in Northland and Auckland from their Mosquitoes appear to transmit very few diseases in New Zealand times of introduction (around 1830 and 1900 respectively) until the (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquito Systematics Vol. Lo(3) 1978 301 Comparative Structure of The
    Mosquito Systematics vol. lO(3) 1978 301 Comparative Structure of the Labiohypopharynx of Fourth Stage Mosquito Larvae (Diptera: Culicidae), with Comments on Larval Morphology, Evolution and Feeding Habits* Ralph E. Harbach Department of Entomology North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27650 ABSTRACT. The labiohypopharynges of 62 species of fourth stage culicid larvae representing 3 genera of the Dixinae, 2 of the Chaoborinae and all but one (Fica%ia) of the 34 genera recognized by Knight and Stone (1977) have been studied with the light and scanning electron microscopes. The structure of the labiohypopharynx is described and illustrated for at least one species of each genus examined. Phylogenetic relationships are discussed in regard to larval morphology and feeding behavior. INTRODUCTION This paper concludes a series of comparative studies on the mouthparts of fourth stage culicid larvae. Knight (1971) examined the anatomy of the mandi- bles, determined the homologies of the mandibular substructures and developed a structural terminology "suitable for use in taxonomic studies." A similar study was conducted on the maxillae by Knight and Harbach (1977). The comparative examination of the labiohypopharynx made by Harbach and Knight (1977b) paved the way for the present paper. Although the structural interpretation presented herein is basically the same as that given by these authors, a new terminology has been devised which reflects a more refined in- terpretation of structure and conforms more closely to that applied to other insects. The references cited by Harbach and Knight should be consulted for a comprehensive introduction to the literature on the morphology of the labio- hypopharynx.
    [Show full text]
  • A Stable Classification of Tribe Aedini That Balances Utility with Current Knowledge of Evolutionary Relationships
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Making Mosquito Taxonomy Useful: A Stable Classification of Tribe Aedini that Balances Utility with Current Knowledge of Evolutionary Relationships Richard C. Wilkerson1*, Yvonne-Marie Linton1,2,3,4, Dina M. Fonseca5, Ted R. Schultz1, Dana C. Price5, Daniel A. Strickman6 1 Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, United States of America, 2 Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit, Museum Support Center, Smithsonian Institution, Suitland, Maryland, United States of America, 3 Department of Entomology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America, 4 Faculty of Preventative Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America, 5 Entomology Department, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America, 6 Global Health Program, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America OPEN ACCESS * [email protected] Citation: Wilkerson RC, Linton Y-M, Fonseca DM, Schultz TR, Price DC, Strickman DA (2015) Making Mosquito Taxonomy Useful: A Stable Classification of Tribe Aedini that Balances Utility with Current Abstract Knowledge of Evolutionary Relationships. PLoS ONE The tribe Aedini (Family Culicidae) contains approximately one-quarter of the known spe- 10(7): e0133602. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133602 cies of mosquitoes, including vectors of deadly or debilitating disease agents. This tribe Editor: Zhong-Jian Liu, The National Orchid contains the genus Aedes, which is one of the three most familiar genera of mosquitoes. Conservation Center of China; The Orchid Conservation & Research Center of Shenzhen, During the past decade, Aedini has been the focus of a series of extensive morphology- CHINA based phylogenetic studies published by Reinert, Harbach, and Kitching (RH&K).
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Culicidae), Based on Morphological Characters
    Available online at www.easletters.com Entomology and Applied Science ISSN No: 2349-2864 Letters, 2014, 1, 4:22-50 Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Psorophora Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Culicidae), based on morphological characters Jonathan Liria 1 and Juan-Carlos Navarro 2 1Laboratorio Museo de Zoología, Facultad Experimental de Ciencias y Tecnología, Universidad de Carabobo, Valencia, Venezuela 2Laboratorio de Biología de Vectores, Instituto de Zoología y Ecología Tropical. Universidad Central de Venezuela. Caracas DC, Venezuela Correspondence: [email protected] (Received: 14/8/14 ) (Accepted:5/9/14) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Psorophora were examined based on a cladistic analysis of 66 morphological characters (fourth instar larvae, pupae, males and females) of 29 species available from the 45 species reported in the genus, representing the three subgenera. The ingroup species were: five Psorophora (10 spp total, 50%), seven Grabhamia (15 spp total, 47%) and twelve Janthinosoma (20 spp total, 60%). Two Culicini genera (Culex and Toxorhynchites), two Aedini genera (Aedes and Haemagogus), and one Mansoniini (Mansonia) were used as outgroups and sister groups respectively. A parsimony analysis using TNT resulted in 11 trees, each with 164 steps (CI = 0.66 and RI = 0.83). The analysis indicated that Aedini (Haemagogus, Aedes and Psorophora), is monophyletic group that includes Mansonia titillans (Mansoniini), suggesting natural inclusion of the Mansoniini tribe into Aedini. The genus Psorophora is monophyletic, supported by 3 synapomorphies: larvae with presence of trident-like scales in segment VIII; female with tergo and sternum VIII with rod-like structure and male genitalia with few teeth on the sternite process on segment X.
    [Show full text]
  • Vi'. Coelomomyces Pathogens of Culicidae
    VI'. COELOMOMYCES PATHOGENS OF CULICIDAE Jessica M. Castillo and Donald W. Roberts Boyce Thompson Institute Tower Road, Cornell University Ithaca, New York 14853, USA 53 54 r'. ON~ V4.4 E _" .0 0 044 0 . 0 0 C., 44-4 5 Co 4 co 0 " S0 C o- ' 4 " - 0 o - r 0 54 CUo 4 0 % 4.4rH rZ _" 0 00 Oo 2C-o4- "4 _ 0 _ 0 o44c co - 4_>o Z 0 54 "3 0"4 o "4 "4Ai "4 "-'C - 000 0 0 0 54 0 3 a z 40 U _U> coZU4 0- 00 0 v.4 '. 4 > 00 . ~~ ~ ~ i4 @: CO 440 0 0 .4 0 0 P0 0 * 5"4 "4 54 coXz 4 4o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~cco la "414 4i4 '.440 co04C @"-O >'~~ co4C coC. co o < 0 tl.% %-.le - c CU0 0 : CY C '. '0 0S4. 00 o '4" N 0i 54 0 00 l :" 4 '0 H~H"4 0 0 CU "4 0 cn uz~~zcn H X uz Sz '.40 0 CO2 ZlN CO CO Z co H C ~~ ~~ H * I 0RQ 9 So C ,, X~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~do ,, "4 CJ , 4) ;+ 04-r~~~~~~~4C040Uo4 C1 O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~% 0 H ~ ~ ~ ~ U U 0 0 0 0P .~C " co40 %0 00 44 H' 0 co '.4 c0 ax 04- : e : z 000X>: 0 '.4 104 j jIg' CU ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~$40 0 0 < $ 0 0 0 CU00 01 0 C o4i4. 4.104- 0iC 4.i 4.' 0 4 coObeU > : triRl: { 14 "4 > -X1"-4 !r':1 CU | 4 = 4 0C. 0W'. i 44 coCU 0+ c 11:C Cd "44i0co co.1~0 co -c~o U co ' C .0 c0o0CU 55 o Un I- 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mosquito Taste System and Disease Control PERSPECTIVE
    PERSPECTIVE The mosquito taste system and disease control PERSPECTIVE Lisa S. Baika and John R. Carlsona,1 Edited by John G. Hildebrand, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, and approved November 18, 2020 (received for review August 4, 2020) Mosquitoes are a widely diverse group of organisms, comprising ∼3,500 species that live in an enormous range of habitats. Some species are vectors of diseases that afflict hundreds of millions of people each year. Although understanding of mosquito olfaction has progressed dramatically in recent years, mosquito taste remains greatly understudied. Since taste is essential to feeding, egg laying, and mating decisions in insects, improved understanding of taste in mosquitoes could provide new mechanistic insight into many aspects of their behavior. We provide a guide to current knowledge in the field, and we suggest a wealth of opportunities for research that are now enabled by recent scientific and technological advances. We also propose means by which taste might be exploited in new strategies for mosquito control, which may be urgently needed as the geographical ranges of vector species increase with climate change. mosquito | vector biology | taste Mosquitoes are remarkably diverse in terms of their Mosquitoes are also vectors of pathogens causing morphology, the environments that they inhabit, the human diseases. Although only a small fraction of hosts upon which they feed, and the behaviors that mosquito species is anthropophilic and bites humans, they exhibit (Fig. 1). Mosquitoes have been on Earth they have an enormous impact on global health for over 200 million years and comprise ∼3,500 spe- (Fig. 2). These species collectively spread diseases to cies.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Classification of Aedini
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2004? 2004 1423 289368 Original Article J. F. REINERT ET AL. PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION OF AEDINI Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 142, 289–368. With 7 figures Phylogeny and classification of Aedini (Diptera: Culicidae), based on morphological characters of all life stages JOHN F. REINERT1*, RALPH E. HARBACH2 and IAN J. KITCHING2 1Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1600/1700 SW, 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608–1067, USA 2Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Received December 2003; accepted for publication May 2004 Higher-level relationships within Aedini, the largest tribe of Culicidae, are explored using morphological characters of eggs, fourth-instar larvae, pupae, and adult females and males. In total, 172 characters were examined for 119 exemplar species representing the existing 12 genera and 56 subgenera recognized within the tribe. The data for immature and adult stages were analysed separately and in combination using equal (EW) and implied weighting (IW). Since the classification of Aedini is based mainly on adult morphology, we first tested whether adult data alone would support the existing classification. Overall, the results of these analyses did not reflect the generic classifi- cation of the tribe. The tribe as a whole was portrayed as a polyphyletic assemblage of Aedes and Ochlerotatus within which eight (EW) or seven (IW) other genera were embedded. Strict consensus trees (SCTs) derived from analyses of the immature stages data were almost completely unresolved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plasticity of Extracellular Fluid Homeostasis in Insects Klaus W
    © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2016) 219, 2596-2607 doi:10.1242/jeb.129650 REVIEW The plasticity of extracellular fluid homeostasis in insects Klaus W. Beyenbach* ABSTRACT the hemolymph continuously in motion, from metabolizing cells to In chemistry, the ratio of all dissolved solutes to the solution’s volume the epithelial surfaces and back (Fig. 1A). yields the osmotic concentration. The present Review uses this Living in the internal environment of the hemolymph, insects chemical perspective to examine how insects deal with challenges have the freedom to inhabit diverse external environments, aquatic to extracellular fluid (ECF) volume, solute content and osmotic and terrestrial. Moreover, insects exhibit considerable capacity for concentration (pressure). Solute/volume plots of the ECF dealing with water deficiencies and excesses. For example, (hemolymph) reveal that insects tolerate large changes in all three of tenebrinoid beetles can survive the loss of as much as 90% of these ECF variables. Challenges beyond those tolerances may be their ECF (Zachariassen and Einarson, 1993). At the other extreme, ‘corrected’ or ‘compensated’. While a correction simply reverses the the kissing bug Rhodnius prolixus takes on more than 10 times its challenge, compensation accommodates the challenge with changes body weight in a single blood meal (Buxton, 1930). Although the in the other two variables. Most insects osmoregulate by keeping ECF ingested blood is initially in the transcellular compartment, the volume and osmotic concentration within a wide range of tolerance. lumen of the gut, most of it passes through the ECF before excretion. Other insects osmoconform, allowing the ECF osmotic concentration This Review examines the regulation of the ECF in insects using – to match the ambient osmotic concentration.
    [Show full text]