DOCSLIB.ORG

Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Bowdoin National Wildlife Refuge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Bowdoin National Wildlife Refuge Glossary ac—Acre. canopy—Layer of foliage, generally the uppermost accessible—Pertaining to physical access to areas layer, in a vegetative stand; midlevel or under- and activities for people of different abilities, es- story vegetation in multilayered stands. Canopy pecially those with physical impairments. closure (also canopy cover) is an estimate of the A.D.—Anno Domini, “in the year of the Lord.” amount of overhead vegetative cover. adaptive resource management—The rigorous appli- CCP—See comprehensive conservation plan. cation of management, research, and monitoring CFR—See Code of Federal Regulations. to gain information and experience necessary to cfs—Cubic feet per second. assess and modify management activities. It is a cm—Centimeter. process that uses feedback from research, moni- CO2—Carbon dioxide. toring, and evaluation of management actions to Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)—Codification of the support or modify objectives and strategies at general and permanent rules published in the Fed- all planning levels. It is also a process in which eral Register by the Executive departments and the Service carries out policy decisions within a agencies of the Federal Government. Each volume framework of scientifically driven experiments to of the CFR is updated once each calendar year. test predictions and assumptions inherent in man- Compact—Montana House Bill Number 717–Bill to agement plans. Analysis of results helps managers Ratify Water Rights Compact. determine whether current management should Compact Commission—Montana Reserved Water continue as is or whether it should be modified to Rights Compact Commission. achieve desired conditions. compatibility determination—See compatible use. alternative—Reasonable way to solve an identified compatible use—Wildlife-dependent recreational use problem or satisfy the stated need (40 CFR 1500.2); or any other use of a refuge or district that, in the one of several different means of accomplishing ref- sound professional judgment of the Director of the uge and district purposes and goals and contribut- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, will not materially ing to the Refuge System mission (“Draft Fish and interfere with or detract from the fulfillment of Wildlife Service Manual” 602 FW 1.5). the mission of the Refuge System or the purposes amphibian—Class of cold-blooded vertebrates that of the refuge or district (“Draft Fish and Wildlife includes frogs, toads, and salamanders. Service Manual” 603 FW 3.6). A compatibility de- annual—Plant that flowers and dies within 1 year of termination supports the selection of compatible germination. uses and identified stipulations or limits necessary BAER—Burned Area Emergency Response. to ensure compatibility. BAR—Burned Area Rehabilitation. comprehensive conservation plan (CCP)—Document baseline—Set of critical observations, data, or infor- that describes the desired future conditions of the mation used for comparison or a control. refuge or district and provides long-range guid- biological control—Organisms or viruses used to con- ance and management direction for the refuge trol invasive plants or other pests. manager to accomplish the purposes of the refuge biological diversity, biodiversity—Variety of life and or district, contribute to the mission of the Ref- its processes including the variety of living organ- uge System, and meet other relevant mandates isms, the genetic differences among them, and the (“Draft Fish and Wildlife Service Manual” 602 FW communities and ecosystems in which they oc- 1.5). cur (“Fish and Wildlife Service Manual” 052 FW concern—See issue. 1.12B). The National Wildlife Refuge System’s cool-season grass—Grass that begins growth ear- focus is on indigenous species, biotic communities, lier in the season and often becomes dormant in and ecological processes. summer; grasses that germinate at lower tem- biotic—Pertaining to life or living organisms; caused, peratures. Examples of cool-season grasses in the produced by, or comprising living organisms. refuge complex are western wheatgrass, needle breeding habitat—Environment used by migratory and thread, and green needlegrass. birds or other animals during the breeding season. 184 Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Bowdoin National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Montana conservation—Management of natural resources to and operate an artificial lake or raise the water prevent loss or waste; actions may include preser- of a natural lake or stream—by means of dams, vation, restoration, and enhancement. dikes, fills, ditches, spillways, and other struc- conservation easement—Perpetual agreement en- tures—for water conservation, drought relief, tered into by a landowner and the Service by which migratory birds, and other wildlife conservation a landowner gives up or sells one or more of the purposes. rights on their property for conservation purposes, easement, refuge—Easement signed by the land- with terms set by the Service. In return for a owner granting the Service the right to control single lump-sum payment, the landowner agrees hunting and trapping, to maintain a wildlife con- not to drain, burn, level, or fill habitats covered by servation demonstration unit, and to maintain a the easement. Conservation easements generally closed refuge and reservation for migratory birds prohibit the cultivation of grassland and wetland and other wildlife. habitats while still permitting the landowner tra- EC—Electrical conductivity. ditional grazing uses. A single-habitat conservation ecosystem—Dynamic and interrelating complex of easement is often referred to as either a wetland plant and animal communities and their associated easement or a grassland easement. nonliving environment; a biological community, coordination area—Wildlife management area made together with its environment, functioning as a available to a State by a “cooperative agreement unit. For administrative purposes, the U.S. Fish between the United States Fish and Wildlife Ser- and Wildlife Service has designated 53 ecosystems vice and the State fish and game agency pursuant covering the United States and its possessions. to section 4 of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination These ecosystems generally correspond with wa- Act (16 U.S.C. 664); or (B) by long-term leases tershed boundaries and their sizes and ecological or agreements pursuant to the Bankhead–Jones complexity vary. Farm Tenant Act (50 Stat. 525; 7 U.S.C. 1010 et ecotype—Subspecies or race that is especially seq.).” States manage coordination areas, but they adapted to a particular set of environmental con- are part of the Refuge System. CCPs are not re- ditions. quired for coordination areas. emergent—Plant rooted in shallow water and having cover, cover type, canopy cover—Present vegetation most of the vegetative growth above water such of an area; also see canopy. as cattail and hardstem bulrush. cultural resources—Remains of sites, structures, or endangered species, Federal—Plant or animal spe- objects used by people in the past. cies listed under the Endangered Species Act of dense nesting cover (DNC)—Composition of grasses 1973, as amended, that is in danger of extinction and forbs that allows for a dense stand of vegeta- throughout all or a significant portion of its range. tion that protects nesting birds from the view of endangered species, State—Plant or animal species predators, usually consisting of one to two species in danger of becoming extinct or extirpated in a of wheatgrass, alfalfa, and sweetclover. particular State within the near future if factors DEQ—Montana Department of Environmental Quality. contributing to its decline continue; species with district—See wetland management district a population at a critically low level or having district purpose—See purpose of the refuge. habitat that has been degraded or depleted to a disturbance—Significant alteration of habitat struc- significant degree. ture or composition from natural causes such as environmental assessment (EA)—Concise public docu- wildfire or human-caused activities and develop- ment, prepared in compliance with the National ment such as timber harvest and road building. Environmental Policy Act, that briefly discusses DNC—See dense nesting cover. the purpose and need for an action and alterna- DNRC—Montana Department of Natural Resources tives to such action and that provides sufficient and Conservation. evidence and analysis of impacts to determine drawdown—Manipulating the water level in an im- whether to prepare an environmental impact poundment to allow for the natural drying-out statement or finding of no significant impact (40 cycle of a wetland. CFR 1508.9). duck, dabbling—Duck that mainly feeds on vegetable EPA—U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. matter by upending on the water surface or by evapoconcentration—Concentration of chemical con- grazing and only rarely dives. stituents in a liquid due to evaporative processes. duck, diving—Duck that mainly feeds by diving extinction—Complete disappearance of a species through the water. from the earth; no longer existing. EA—See environmental assessment. extirpation—Extinction of a population; eradication of easement, flowage—Easement signed by the land- a species within a specified area. owner granting the Service the right to maintain °F—Temperature in degrees Fahrenheit. GLOSSARY 185 fauna—Vertebrate and invertebrate animals in an goal—Descriptive, open-ended, and often broad area. statement of desired future conditions that con- Federal trust resource—Resource managed by one veys a purpose but does
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • IP Athos Renewable Energy Project, Plan of Development, Appendix D.2
    APPENDIX D.2 Plant Survey Memorandum Athos Memo Report To: Aspen Environmental Group From: Lehong Chow, Ironwood Consulting, Inc. Date: April 3, 2019 Re: Athos Supplemental Spring 2019 Botanical Surveys This memo report presents the methods and results for supplemental botanical surveys conducted for the Athos Solar Energy Project in March 2019 and supplements the Biological Resources Technical Report (BRTR; Ironwood 2019) which reported on field surveys conducted in 2018. BACKGROUND Botanical surveys were previously conducted in the spring and fall of 2018 for the entirety of the project site for the Athos Solar Energy Project (Athos). However, due to insufficient rain, many plant species did not germinate for proper identification during 2018 spring surveys. Fall surveys in 2018 were conducted only on a reconnaissance-level due to low levels of rain. Regional winter rainfall from the two nearest weather stations showed rainfall averaging at 0.1 inches during botanical surveys conducted in 2018 (Ironwood, 2019). In addition, gen-tie alignments have changed slightly and alternatives, access roads and spur roads have been added. PURPOSE The purpose of this survey was to survey all new additions and re-survey areas of interest including public lands (limited to portions of the gen-tie segments), parcels supporting native vegetation and habitat, and windblown sandy areas where sensitive plant species may occur. The private land parcels in current or former agricultural use were not surveyed (parcel groups A, B, C, E, and part of G). METHODS Survey Areas: The area surveyed for biological resources included the entirety of gen-tie routes (including alternates), spur roads, access roads on public land, parcels supporting native vegetation (parcel groups D and F), and areas covered by windblown sand where sensitive species may occur (portion of parcel group G).
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Clickbook Booklet
    Checklist of the Vascular Flora of Plum Canyon, Anza-Borrego Desert State Park # Family Scientific Name (*) Common Name #V #Pls Lycopods 1 Selagi Selaginella bigelovii Bigelow's spike-moss 99 2 Selagi Selaginella eremophila desert spike-moss 99 Ferns 3 Pterid Cheilanthes covillei beady lipfern 2 13 4 Pterid Cheilanthes parryi woolly lipfern 5 99 5 Pterid Cheilanthes viscida sticky lipfern 1 6 Pterid Notholaena californica ssp. californica^ California cloak fern 1 7 Pterid Pellaea mucronata var. mucronata bird's-foot fern 1 Gymnosperms 8 Cupres Juniperus californica California juniper 1 99 9 Ephedr Ephedra aspera Mormon tea 2 99 10 Ephedr Ephedra californica desert tea 2 Eudicots 11 Acanth Carlowrightia arizonica Arizona carlowrightia 15 12 Acanth Justicia californica chuparosa 7 99 13 Amaran Amaranthus fimbriatus fringed amaranth 99 14 Apiace Apiastrum angustifolium wild celery 2 15 Apiace Lomatium mohavense Mojave lomatium 8 16 Apocyn Matelea parvifolia spearleaf 1 16 Acamptopappus sphaerocephalus var. 17 Astera goldenhead 1 sphaerocephalus 18 Astera Adenophyllum porophylloides San Felipe dogweed 2 99 19 Astera Ambrosia dumosa burroweed 1 99 20 Astera Ambrosia salsola var. salsola cheesebush^ 1 99 21 Astera Artemisia ludoviciana ssp. albula white mugwort 25 22 Astera Baccharis brachyphylla short-leaved baccharis 70 23 Astera Bahiopsis parishii Parish's viguiera 2 99 24 Astera Bebbia juncea var. aspera sweetbush 1 99 California spear-leaved 25 Astera Brickellia atractyloides var. arguta 11 brickellia 26 Astera Brickellia frutescens shrubby brickellia 1 40 27 Astera Chaenactis carphoclinia var. carphoclinia pebble pincushion 5 28 Astera Chaenactis fremontii Fremont pincushion 1 99 29 Astera Encelia farinosa brittlebush 1 99 30 Astera Ericameria brachylepis boundary goldenbush^ 99 31 Astera Ericameria paniculata blackbanded rabbitbrush 20 32 Astera Eriophyllum wallacei var.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern California Edison
    PROPOSED GENERAL RETAIL STORE PROJECT DRAFT GENERAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT LANDERS, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USGS 7.5’ YUCCA VALLEY NORTH QUADRANGLE TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, SECTION 27 APN 0629-051-62 Prepared for Owner/Applicant: Dynamic Development Company, LLC 1725 21st Street Santa Monica, CA 90404 Office: (310) 315-5411 x 119 Contact: Jon Tanury Project Manager Prepared by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 3120 Chicago Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, California 92507 Office: (951) 369-8060 Principal Investigator: John F. Green, Biologist Biologists Who Performed Fieldwork On-Site: John F. Green February 2013 AMEC Project No. 1355400526 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 2.1 Project and Property Description ......................................................................... 1 3.0 METHODS ...................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Literature Review and Records Search ............................................................... 2 3.2 General Biological Resources Assessment ......................................................... 2 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 3 4.1 Literature Review and
    [Show full text]
  • ASTERACEAE Christine Pang, Darla Chenin, and Amber M
    Comparative Seed Manual: ASTERACEAE Christine Pang, Darla Chenin, and Amber M. VanDerwarker (Completed, April 17, 2019) This seed manual consists of photos and relevant information on plant species housed in the Integrative Subsistence Laboratory at the Anthropology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara. The impetus for the creation of this manual was to enable UCSB graduate students to have access to comparative materials when making in-field identifications. Most of the plant species included in the manual come from New World locales with an emphasis on Eastern North America, California, Mexico, Central America, and the South American Andes. Published references consulted1: 1998. Moerman, Daniel E. Native American ethnobotany. Vol. 879. Portland, OR: Timber press. 2009. Moerman, Daniel E. Native American medicinal plants: an ethnobotanical dictionary. OR: Timber Press. 2010. Moerman, Daniel E. Native American food plants: an ethnobotanical dictionary. OR: Timber Press. Species included herein: Achillea lanulosa Achillea millefolium Ambrosia chamissonis Ambrosia deltoidea Ambrosia dumosa Ambrosia eriocentra Ambrosia salsola Artemisia californica Artemisia douglasiana Baccharis pilularis Baccharis spp. Bidens aurea Coreopsis lanceolata Helianthus annuus 1 Disclaimer: Information on relevant edible and medicinal uses comes from a variety of sources, both published and internet-based; this manual does NOT recommend using any plants as food or medicine without first consulting a medical professional. Achillea lanulosa Family: Asteraceae Common Names: Yarrow, California Native Yarrow, Common Yarrow, Western Yarrow, Mifoil Habitat and Growth Habit: This plant is distributed throughout the Northern Hemisphere. It is native in temperate areas of North America. There are both native and introduced species in areas creating hybrids. Human Uses: This plant has a positive fragrance making it desired in gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH HAIWEE DAM NO. 2 PROJECT Biological Resources Assessment
    APPENDIX E Biological Resources Assessment This page intentionally left blank. NORTH HAIWEE DAM NO. 2 PROJECT Biological Resources Assessment June 2017 Prepared by Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Watershed Resources Group NORTH HAIWEE DAM NO. 2 PROJECT Biological Resources Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................. 2 1.3 PROJECT OVERVIEW................................................................................................. 4 1.3.1 NORTH HAIWEE DAM NUMBER 2 ......................................................................... 4 1.3.2 LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCT REALIGNMENT ............................................................ 7 1.3.3 CACTUS FLATS ROAD REALIGNMENT .................................................................. 7 1.4 BORROW SITES ........................................................................................................ 8 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................................................................ 8 2.1 REGIONAL SETTING .................................................................................................. 8 2.2 LOCAL SETTING ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forty-First Breeding Bird Census
    Forty-first Breeding Bird Census Edited by Willet T. Van Velzen In keepingwith the trend of the past few The total numberof speciesrecorded per plot years,this year'stotal of 179 censusreports is rangedfrom 0 to 66 andaveraged 19.6. an all-time record, representing35 states/ Typicalof pastyears, 52% of the studies were provinces.An amazing total of 48 censuses new, 65% havebeen done 1 or 2 yearsand 81% werereported from California, more than twice have been done from 1 to 5 times. the numbergenerally reported for the highest Two weather factors were frequently men- state total in other years. West Virginia was tionedas affectingthe resultsof thisyear's cen- secondhighest, with 13 censuses,and North sus; the extreme drought conditions that Dakota third, with 11. occurredthroughout much of the Midwest and In additionto havingthe highesttotal, this West and the severe winter weather of 1976-77, year's censuscovered the greatestvariety of which apparentlydecimated populations of habitatsever studied by the BreedingBird Cen- speciessuch as the CarolinaWren in muchof sus.The widerange of newhabitats sampled in its northernrange throughoutthe East. It will Californiaalone represents a uniquevariety of be interestingto follow the recoveryof these desertand scrub types. birds in followingyears. A tremendousamount of effort was givento A specialword of thanksis extendedto all thisyear's census, totaling 4630 man-hoursof thoseworkers who took suchcare in preparing censuswork alone, not to mention the addi- their manuscriptsand submittedthem ahead tionaltime spentin settingup and measuring of the deadline date. plots.This effort,averaging 25.6 hoursper cen- The deadlinefor 1978is September1. susplot, was appliedto a total area of 2704 hectaresof habitat(an averageof 14.9 ha/plot).
    [Show full text]
  • Full Issue, Vol. 56 No. 2
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 56 Number 2 Article 16 4-29-1996 Full Issue, Vol. 56 No. 2 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation (1996) "Full Issue, Vol. 56 No. 2," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 56 : No. 2 , Article 16. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol56/iss2/16 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. T H E GREAT BASIN naturalistNATURALtstIST A VOLUME 56 n2na 2 APRIL 1996 BRIGHAM YOUNG university GREAT BASIN naturalist editor assistant editor RICHARD W BAUMANN NATHAN M SMITH 290 MLBM 190 MLBM PO box 20200 PO box 26879 brigham young university brigham young university provo UT 84602020084602 0200 provo UT 84602687984602 6879 8013785053801 378 5053 8013786688801 378 6688 FAX 8013783733801 378 3733 emailE mail nmshbllibyuedunmshbll1byuedu associate editors MICHAEL A BOWERS PAUL C MARSH blandy experimental farm university of center for environmental studies arizona virginia box 175 boyce VA 22620 state university tempe AZ 85287 J R CALLAHAN STANLEY D SMITH museum of southwestern biology university of department of biology new mexico albuquerque NM university of nevada las vegas mailing address box 3140 hemet CA 92546 las vegas NV 89154400489154 4004 JEFFREY J JOHANSEN PAUL T TUELLER
    [Show full text]
  • Amargosa River Expert Bioblitz April 7-9 , 2017 Final Report
    Amargosa River Expert BioBlitz April 7-9th, 2017 Final Report Photo credit: Janine Knapp Please cite this document as: Parker, S.S., B.S. Cohen, N. Fraga, B. Brown, J. Cole, W. Chatfield-Taylor, K. Guadalupe, G.B. Pauly, D. Cooper, and M. Ordeñana. 2017. Amargosa River Expert BioBlitz. Unpublished Report. The Nature Conservancy. Los Angeles, California. 50 pp. ii Report Contributors: Sophie S. Parker The Nature Conservancy [email protected] Brian S. Cohen The Nature Conservancy [email protected] Naomi Fraga Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden [email protected] Brian Brown Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] Jeffrey Cole Pasadena City College [email protected] Will Chatfield-Taylor [email protected] Kevin Guadalupe Nevada Department of Wildlife [email protected] Gregory B. Pauly Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] Daniel Cooper Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. [email protected] Miguel Ordeñana Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County [email protected] iii Acknowledgements We thank our agency partners at the Bureau of Land Management, particularly C. Otahal, who co-organized the Amargosa River BioBlitz. We also thank the Amargosa Conservancy for supporting the collection efforts, and private land owners B. Brown of China Ranch and S. Sorrells of Shoshone Village for hosting volunteers on their property. iv Table of Contents I. Introduction and Context: Amargosa Watershed Conservation .............................................. 1 II. What is an Expert BioBlitz? ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report By Dr. Terri Hildebrand Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT and Dr. Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting, Kanab, UT Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement # H1200-09-0005 1 May 2012 Prepared for Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Southern Utah University National Park Service Mojave Network TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Introduction . 4 Study Area . 6 History and Setting . 6 Geology and Associated Ecoregions . 6 Soils and Climate . 7 Vegetation . 10 Previous Botanical Studies . 11 Methods . 17 Results . 21 Discussion . 28 Conclusions . 32 Acknowledgments . 33 Literature Cited . 34 Figures Figure 1. Location of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 5 Figure 2. Ecoregions and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 8 Figure 3. Soil types and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 9 Figure 4. Increase in the number of plant taxa confirmed as present in Grand Canyon- Parashant National Monument by decade, 1900-2011 . 13 Figure 5. Southern Utah University students enrolled in the 2010 Plant Anatomy and Diversity course that collected during the 30 August 2010 experiential learning event . 18 Figure 6. 2010-2011 collection sites and transportation routes in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 22 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Tables Table 1. Chronology of plant-collecting efforts at Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument . 14 Table 2. Data fields in the annotated checklist of the flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Appendices A, B, C, and D) .
    [Show full text]
  • HYMENOCLEAS ARE AMBROSIAS (COMPOSITAE) Author(S): John L
    HYMENOCLEAS ARE AMBROSIAS (COMPOSITAE) Author(s): John L. Strother and Bruce G. Baldwin Source: Madroño, Vol. 49, No. 3 (JULY-SEPTEMBER 2002), pp. 143-144 Published by: California Botanical Society Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41425458 Accessed: 10-03-2020 22:41 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41425458?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms California Botanical Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Madroño This content downloaded from 146.244.88.155 on Tue, 10 Mar 2020 22:41:18 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Madroño, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 143-144, 2002 HYMENOCLEAS ARE AMBROSIAS (COMPOSITAE) John L. Strother University Herbarium, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-2465 [email protected] Bruce G. Baldwin Jepson Herbarium and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-2465 Abstract Inclusion of Hymenoclea within the taxonomie circumscription of Ambrosia necessitates new combi- nations: Ambrosia monogyra, A. xplatyspina, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Caliente Range Checklist-03Jun19
    Checklist1 of Vascular Flora of the Caliente Range San Luis Obispo County, California (3 June 2019) David J. Keil Robert F. Hoover Herbarium Biological Sciences Department California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, California Scientific Name Common Name Family Rare n Abronia pogonantha desert sand-verbena NYCTAGINACEAE o n Acanthomintha obovata subsp. cordata heart-leaved thorn-mint LAMIACEAE 4.2 v n ❀ Achyrachaena mollis blow wives ASTERACEAE v n Acmispon brachycarpus shortpod deervetch FABACEAE v n Acmispon maritimus var. maritimus coastal deer-vetch FABACEAE v 1 Please notify the author of additions or corrections to this list ([email protected]). Some of the native plants on this list were introduced to the preserve as a part of site management and restoration. ❀ — See Wildflowers of San Luis Obispo, California, second edition (2018) for photograph. Most are illustrated in the first edition as well; old names for some species in square brackets. n — California native i — exotic species, introduced to California, naturalized or waif. v — documented by one or more specimens (Consortium of California Herbaria record; specimen in OBI; or collection that has not yet been accessioned). Some of these species are historical records and no longer occur at Sweet Springs. o — observed during field surveys; no voucher specimen known R—California Rare Plant Rank Scientific Name Common Name Family Rare n ❀ Acmispon strigosus strigose deer-vetch FABACEAE o n Acmispon wrangelianus California deervetch FABACEAE v n Agoseris heterophylla var. cryptopleura annual mountain-dandelion ASTERACEAE v n Agoseris retrorsa spear-leaved mountain- ASTERACEAE v dandelion i Ailanthus altissima tree of heaven SIMAROUBACEAE v n Allenrolfea occidentalis iodine bush CHENOPODIACEAE v n Allium diabolense Diablo onion ALLIACEAE v n Allium howellii var.
    [Show full text]