<<

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.42.10.904 on 1 October 1979. Downloaded from

Journal ofNeurology, Neurosurgery, andPsychiatry, 1979, 42, 904-909

-Adrenoreceptor antagonists in essential tremor

D. JEFFERSON, P. JENNER, AND C. D. MARSDEN From the University Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry and King's College Hospital Medical School, London

S U M M A R Y Three different 8-adrenoreceptor antagonists-, sotalol, and - were compared in a double-blind study with placebo in nine patients with essential tremor. All three drugs produced an equal reduction in standing pulse rate but atenolol was less effective in reducing tremor than propranolol and sotalol. These results suggest that the reduction in tremor produced by fi-adrenoreceptor antagonists is mediated by an effect on peripheral 9,-adrenoreceptors.

Several studies have shown that the I8- Patients and methods adrenoreceptor antagonist propranolol reduces the amplitude of essential tremor (Winkler and Nine patients with essential tremor were studied. Young, 1971; Dupont et al., 1973; Morgan et al., The diagnosis of essential tremor was made on the 1973; Tolosa and Loewenson, 1975; Young et al., basis of a characteristic postural tremor of the Protected by copyright. 1975; Jefferson et al., 1979). The mechanism of this upper limbs without other neurological abnor- pharmacological effect is unknown, since pro- malities. All patients had normal thyroid, cardiac, pranolol may act on peripheral (Marsden et al., renal, and hepatic function. The main clinical 1967) or central nervous system 8-adrenoreceptors features of the nine patients are presented in (Myers et al., 1975; Day et al., 1977; Taylor et al., Table 1. 1978) blocking both 8I and P32 sites. Furthermore, Propranolol (Inderal), sotalol (Sotacor), atenolol propranolol possesses a membrane stabilising (Tenormin), and placebo were given orally in a ("-like") effect (Morales-Aguilera and randomised double-blind trial, each drug or Vaughan Williams, 1965) which may contribute placebo being taken for two weeks before the to its therapeutic action in essential tremor. degree of tremor was assessed clinically. Optimum The past decade has witnessed the introduction doses of propranolol for each individual were of several 3-adrenoreceptor antagonists which established before the random phase of the trial may be useful in investigating the precise site and and ranged from 60-160 mg per day, in divided mode of action of propranolol in essential tremor. doses. Equivalent doses of sotalol and atenolol These alternative /8-adrenoreceptor antagonists were used according to the ratios propranolol= differ from propranolol in various ways and may, 1, sotalol= I, and atenolol=2. Individual daily for example, be devoid of membrane stabilising doses of sotalol ranged from 80-240 mg and of http://jnnp.bmj.com/ activity or may be cardioselective, blocking pre- atenolol from 50-100 mg. Propranolol was ad- dominantly 131-receptors. Some of these drugs also show poor penetration of the blood-brain barrier, Table 1 Clinical details of nine patients with essential with little or no central nervous system activity. tremor In the present study, the effect of propranolol in essential tremor has been compared with the effect Patient Age Sex Family Length of (yr) history history of a cardioselective 8-adrenoreceptor antagonist (yr)

(atenolol), and with a nonselective P-antagonist on October 6, 2021 by guest. 1 73 F - 10 which possesses no membrane stabilising activity 2 66 M - 16 and which enters the brain with difficulty 3 44 F - 6 (sotalol). 4 45 F + 30 5 31 F + 17 Address for reprint requests: Professor C. D. Marsden, University 6 57 F - 4 Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry and King's College 7 72 F - 6 Hospital, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF. 8 59 M - 34 9 56 F + 30 Accepted 17 April 1979 904 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.42.10.904 on 1 October 1979. Downloaded from

,8-Adrenoreceptor antagonists in essential tremor 905 ministered three to four times daily, sotalol thrice n =9 daily, and atenolol twice daily. The order of 100 administration of the three drugs was randomised. Clinical assessment was performed within two 90 to four hours of the previous oral dose of drug or of each two weeks of medica- 0 placebo at the end EU5: tion. Measurements were made by the same ._ 80 examiner (DJ) in the same surroundings and at m approximately the same time of day. After a 10 minute period of rest in the supine position, 70t the supine and standing pulse rate and blood lx pressure were measured. Tremor was assessed .10 60 objectively by scoring the degree of tremor of the 0n outstretched hands and by rating tests of hand- C test writing, drawing, and a timed performance IL 50 which involved threading rings onto a peg, as S described elsewhere (Jefferson et al., 1979). The scores obtained in individual tests were added 40 to give a total objective tremor score. Each patient P Pr S A P Pr S A was invited to assess the severity of his or her manual tremor at each visit by marking a linear Supine Standing analogue scale (subjective tremor score) and to Fig. 1. Mean pulse rate (±I SEM) in nine patients comment on the overall subjective effects of the with essential tremor during treatment with placebo previous two weeks of medication. (P), propranolol (Pr), sotalol (S), and atenolol (A). Protected by copyright. Drug compliance was monitored by counting Using Student's t test for paired data, both supine the number of tablets which remained in the con- and standing pulse rates are reduced compared with two week The placebo by propranolol, sotalol, and atenolol tainer at the end of each period. (PO.J) between responses of pulse rate and blood pressure to the the of the different drugs. different treatment schedules were compared using effects the Student's t test for paired data. A non- parametric statistical method (Wilcoxon's test of sotalol (P>0.1). The mean supine diastolic blood paired differences) was used to compare the objec- pressure during treatment with sotalol was reduced tive tremor scores on the different drugs with compared with placebo (P<0.05) but did not those on placebo, which were also subjected to differ significantly from the effect of propranolol analysis of variance with linear contrast. or atenolol (P>0. 1). The mean standing diastolic blood pressure was not reduced significantly by Results any of the three drugs when compared with placebo (P>0. 1). Drug compliance, as judged by tablet counting, was excellent throughout the study, and no patient TREMOR complained of side effects during the different All three 13-adrenoreceptor antagonists produced http://jnnp.bmj.com/ periods of medication. a reduction in the total objective tremor score when compared with placebo (Table 2) (P<0.01- PULSE RATE AND BLOOD PRESSURE (FIGS. 1 AND 2) 0.02). Sotalol and propranolol produced the same All drugs caused a reduction in the supine reduction in objective tremor score but atenolol (P<0.001) and standing (P<0.001) pulse rate reduced the mean tremor score by a smaller when compared with placebo. There was no dif- amount compared with sotalol and propranolol. ference between the effects of the individual drugs, When the patients' subjective tremor scores suggesting that all three were producing a similar (Table 3) were examined using Wilcoxon's test, on October 6, 2021 by guest. degree of blockade of cardiac chronotropic P,- atenolol was no better than placebo in reducing adrenoreceptors. tremor (P>0. 1) whereas sotalol produced a Both sotalol and atenolol reduced the mean definite subjective improvement (P<0.05) and pro- supine and standing systolic blood pressure com- pranolol nearly did (P<0.1). However, analysis of pared with placebo (P<0.05) but there was no variance with linear contrast showed sotalol and difference between the mean systolic pressures propranolol to be more effective than atenolol. during treatment with propranolol, atenolol, and Although none of the patients, when directly J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.42.10.904 on 1 October 1979. Downloaded from

906 D. Jefferson, P. Jenner, and C. D. Marsden

1501

140 Fig. 2. Mean (I1 SEM) supine and standing systolic and nP9 diastolic blood pressures in nine 130 patients with essential tremor during treatment with placebo (P), propranolol (Pr), sotalol E 120 (S), and atenolol (A). Using E Student's t test for paired data, supine and standing systolic 110 'A blood pressure are reduced compared with placeboi during 100 treatment with sotalol (P

Table 2 Changes in objective tremor score during Table 3 Changes in patients' subjective tremor scores treatment with placebo, propranotol, sotalol, and during treatment with placebo, propranolol, sotalol, atenolol and atenolol Patient Placebo Propranolol Sotalol Atenolol Patient Placebo Propranolol Sotalol Atenolol 1 17 11 11 14 1 7 8.5 7 10 2 17 10 12 12 2 10 9 4 9.5 3 1 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 4 9 7 6 4 4 2.5 3.5 3.5 3 5 8 4 3 8 5 7 3 3 4.5 6 13 8 6 12 6 9.5 5 7 10 7 18 14 16 15 7 10 6 8.5 9 8 5 3 1 1 8 4 2 0.5 1 9 8 2 4 6 9 6 3 4 6.5 Mean score 10.7 6.6 6.8 8.1 Mean score= 6.2 4.4 4.2 5.9 ±I SEM 1.98 1.55 1.71 1.81 + ISEM 1.17 0.99 0.97 1.32 (Maximum tremor score=25) (Maximum tremor score= 10)

Tremor is reduced compared with placebo during treatment with Tremor is subjectively reduced compared with placebo during treat- http://jnnp.bmj.com/ propranolol (P <0.01), sotalol (P <0.01), and atenolol (P <0.02). ment with sotalol (P < 0.05). Atenolol is no betterthan placebo (P >0.1) There is no difference between the effect of the three drugs (P>0.01) and is less effective than sotalol (P <0.05). Propranolol is just not using Wilcoxon's test, but analysis of variance with linear contrast different from placebo (P <0.1) and atenolol (P <0.1). Analysis of shows atenolol to be less effective than propranolol and sotalol variance with linear contrast shows that the response to propranolol (P < 0.05), which have equivalent action (P>0.1). and sotalol are similar (P>0.1), but atenolol is less effective than these two drugs (P < 0.02). asked, complained of side effects during any of the periods of medication, six of the nine patients Discussion commented that, during the period in which they on October 6, 2021 by guest. had been taking atenolol, the drug appeared to be There have been few studies on the effect of dif- having no effect, and two patients said that they ferent 13-adrenoreceptor antagonists on essential felt more alert while taking atenolol than during tremor. Teravainen et al. (1977) compared the the other three treatment periods. When asked effects of propranolol and in essential which drug they thought controlled their tremor tremor and found that propranolol produced a best, four favoured propranolol, four sotalol, and greater beneficial effect than pindolol. It was sug- only one patient chose atenolol. gested from the above study that the membrane J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.42.10.904 on 1 October 1979. Downloaded from

f3-Adrenoreceptor antagonists in essential tremor 907 stabilising property of propranolol might be muscle which is produced by sympathomimetic responsible for the difference between the effects drugs is blocked by propranolol and butoxamine of the two drugs, since pindolol has no membrane (a fl2-adrenoreceptor antagonist) but not by stabilising activity of clinical importance (Gibson, , which blocks predominantly l,8- 1974). The difference between the effects of the adrenoreceptors (Dunlop and Shanks, 1968; two drugs, however, might also be explained on Barrett et al., 1973). A direct action of the basis of the intrinsic sympathomimetic action on extrafusal muscle fibres may not, however, be of pindolol (Gibson, 1974) since, in the study of the only mechanism by which physiological Teravainen et al., pindolol produced an increase tremor is enhanced. There is indirect evidence in tremor amplitude compared with placebo. that adrenaline also acts on muscle spindles in man In the present study, no difference was detected such as to increase spindle firing (Hodgson et al., between the effects of propranolol and sotalol on 1969), an action that may well contribute to the either subjective or objective tremor. Since sotalol increased tremor produced by the drug. has no clinical membrane stabilising activity Young et al. (1975) have argued against the (Stanton et al., 1965), it is likely that the beneficial importance of peripheral P3-adrenoreceptors in effect of propranolol in essential tremor is un- essential tremor because they found that intra- related to a membrane stabilising action. Other arterial or intravenous propranolol blocked the clinical studies have confirmed that sotalol reduces augmentation of essential tremor produced by essential tremor (Rangel-Guerra, 1974; Rinne and , but had no effect on the amplitude Kaitaniemi, 1974). Further evidence that the of the underlying tremor; however, long-term membrane stabilising action of propranolol is oral propranolol reduced the amplitude of essential unimportant in clinical practice comes frorm the tremor. In contrast, McAllister et al. (1977) in vitro studies of Coltart and Meldrum (1970) showed that propranolol given in larger doses who showed that the membrane stabilising effect intravenously did reduce the amplitude of un- Protected by copyright. of propranolol occurs at a minimum blood pro- stimulated essential tremor, suggesting that the pranolol concentration of 10 ng/l (38.6 pmol/l) negative results of Young et al. were caused by which is approximately 100 times greater than the low plasma propranolol concentrations. level associated with near maximum inhibition of In the present study, atenolol produced less exercise-induced tachycardia (Coltart and Shand, reduction in tremor than either propranolol or 1970). It is, therefore, reasonable to conclude that sotalol, despite producing the same reduction in the mechanism of action of propranolol in supine and standing pulse rate as these drugs. essential tremor is related to its 3-adrenoreceptor Objective assessment of tremor showed that antagonistic properties. atenolol produced an effect between that of While the site of the 18-adrenoreceptors respon- placebo and that of propranolol or sotalol, and sible for the action of propranolol in essential the difference between the effects of the latter tremor remains undetermined, there is strong drugs and atenolol just reached statistical evidence that peripheral structures are important significance. The patient's subjective assessment in determining the amplitude of physiological of tremor indicated that sotalol was superior to tremor. Marsden et al. (1967) have shown that, in atenolol, which was the least favoured of all man, the /8-adrenoreceptors associated with three drugs. These findings suggest that atenolol physiological hand and finger tremor are situated may be less effective in relieving essential tremor http://jnnp.bmj.com/ in the forearm, since the enhanced tremor which than propranolol or sotalol in doses which have is produced by an infusion of isoprenaline into the an equipotent cardiac chronotropic (,j3-adreno- brachial artery is blocked immediately by the ) effect. Several studies have shown that intra-arterial injection of propranolol. It has been atenolol produces greater blockade of f3,- shown that adrenaline reduces the tension and (cardioreceptors) than 182-adrenoreceptors in vitro degree of fusion of incomplete tetanic contrac- (Barrett et al., 1973; Conway et al., 1976; Cole- tions of slow-contracting skeletal muscle in cat man and Somerville, 1977) and in vivo in animals (Bowman and Zaimis, 1958) and man (Marsden and man (Singh et al., 1975; Vilsvik and on October 6, 2021 by guest. and Meadows, 1970), and it has been suggested Schaanning, 1976; Decalmer et al., 1978). The that this effect is responsible, at least in part, for present findings, therefore, suggest that 12- the enhancement of physiological tremor which adrenoreceptor antagonism may be the occurs during adrenaline infusion. Subsequently mechanism of the therapeutic action of 1- Bowman and Nott (1970) showed that the reduc- adrenoreceptor antagonists in essential tremor. tion in the tension and degree of fusion of in- Whether this effect is mediated via peripheral or complete tetanic contractions of the cat soleus central nervous system receptors is uncertain but

D J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.42.10.904 on 1 October 1979. Downloaded from

908 D. Jefferson, P. Jenner, and C. D. Marsden animal experiments have shown that, unlike pro- lands, D. J., and Simpson, W. T. (1976). Human pranolol, both sotalol (Garvey and Ram, 1975) pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on atenolol (CI 66,082), a new cardioselective /3- and atenolol (Day et al., 1977) do not achieve Journal of significant concentrations in the central nervous adrenoceptor blocking drug. British Since Clinical Pharmacology, 3, 267-272. system after chronic oral administration. Day, M. D., Hemsworth, B. A., and Street, J. A. sotalol produced a similar effect on tremor to (1977). The central uptake of /8-adrenoceptor propranolol in the present study, it may be sug- antagonists. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, gested that it is the peripheral effect of these 29, Supplement, 52P. drugs which is of greater importance in reducing Decalmer, J. B. S., Chatterjee, S. S., Cruickshank, the amplitude of essential tremor. J. M., Benson, M. K., and Sterling, G. M. (1978). In conclusion, the present study of a small Beta-blockers and . British Heart Journal, number of patients with essential tremor has 40, 184-189. in tremor produced by Dunlop, D., and Shanks, B. G. (1968). Selective shown that the reduction blockade of adrenoreceptor beta-receptors in the propranolol is not the result of a membrane heart. British Journal of Pharmacology, 32, 201- stabilising action since 18-adrenoreceptor antago- 218. nists with (propranolol) and without (sotalol) this Dupont, E., Hansen, H. J., and Dalby, M. A. (1973). property were equally effective in reducing tremor Treatment of benign essential tremor with pro- amplitude. Evidence has also been provided that pranolol. A cta Neurologica Scandinavica, 49, 75- the beneficial effect of /8-adrenoreceptor antagonists 84. in this condition is the result of a peripheral Garvey, H. L., and Ram, N. (1975). Comparative P2-adrenoreceptor action on either muscle fibres antihypertensive effects and tissue distribution of or or both. ,/- blocking drugs. Journal of Phar- spindles, macology and Experimental Therapeutics, 194, 220- like to express our thanks to Jane 233. Protected by copyright. We would Gibson, D. G. (1974). Pharmacodynamic properties Moffatt, King's College Hospital, London, for of 8- blocking drugs in man. arranging the double-blind randomisation of this Drugs, 7, 8-38. trial. We also thank Miss Elizabeth Paul, Hodgson, H. J. F., Marsden, C. D., and Meadows, statistician, Institute of Neurology, for carrying J. C. (1969). The effect of adrenaline on the out the statistical analysis. response to muscle vibration in man. Journal of Physiology (London), 202, 98-99P. References Jefferson, D., Jenner, P., and Marsden, C. D. (1979). The relationship between plasma propranolol con- Barrett, A. M., Carter, J., Fitzgerald, J. D., Hull, centration and the relief of essential tremor. Journal R., and Le Count, D. (1973). A new type of cardio- of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 42, selective adrenoceptive blocking drug. British 831-837. Journal of Pharmacology, 48, 340P. Marsden, C. D., Foley, T. H., Owen, D. A. L., and Bowman, W. C., and Zaimis, E. (1958). The effects McAllister, R. G. (1967). Peripheral adrenergic of adrenaline, noradrenaline and isoprenaline on receptors concerned with tremor. Clinical Science, skeletal muscle contractions in the cat. Journal of 33, 53-65. Physiology (London), 144, 92-107. Marsden, C. D., and Meadows, J. C. (1970). The Bowman, W. C., and Nott, M. W. (1970). Actions of effect of adrenaline on the contraction of human some sympathomimetic bronchodilator and beta- muscle. Journal of Physiology (London), 207, 429- http://jnnp.bmj.com/ adrenoceptor blocking drugs on contractions of the 448. cat soleus muscle. British Journal of Pharmacology, McAllister, R. G., Markesbery, W. R., Ware, R. W., 38, 37-49. and Howell, M. A. (1977). Suppression of essential Coleman, A. J., and Somerville, A. R. (1977). The tremor by propranolol: correlation of effect with selective action of p-adrenoreceptor blocking drug plasma level and intensity of beta-adrenergic drugs and the nature of f13 and 82 adrenoceptors. blockade. Annals of Neurology, 1, 160-166. British Journal of Pharmacology, 59, 83-93. Morales-Aguilera, A., and Vaughan Williams, E. M. The effect The effects on cardiac muscle of beta- Coltart, D. J., and Meldrum, S. J. (1970). (1965). on October 6, 2021 by guest. of propranolol on the human and canine trans- receptor antagonists in relation to their activity as membrane action potential. British Journal of local anaesthetics. British Journal of Pharmacology, Pharmacology, 40, 148P. 24, 332-333. Coltart, D. J., and Shand, D. G. (1970). Plasma pro- Morgan, M. H., Hewer, R. L., and Cooper, R. (1973). pranolol levels in the quantitative assessment of Effect of the beta adrenergic blocking agent pro- ,f-adrenergic blockade in man. British Medical pranolol on essential tremor. Journal of Neurology, Journal, 3, 731-734. Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 36, 618-624. Conway, F. J., Fitzgerald, J. D., McAinsh, J., Row- Myers, M. G., Lewis, P. J., Reid, J. L., and Dollery, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.42.10.904 on 1 October 1979. Downloaded from

,8-Adrenoreceptor antagonists in essential tremor 909 C. T. (1975). Brain concentration of propranolol Taylor, E. A., Carroll, D., and Turner, P. (1978). in relation to hypotensive effect in the rabbit with CSF/plasma ratios of propranolol in man. British observations on brain propranolol levels in man. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 6, 447P. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Teravainen, M. D., Larsen, A., and Fogelholm, M. D. Therapeutics, 192, 327-335. (1977). Comparison between the effects of pindolol Rangel-Guerra, R. (1974). Treatment of benign and propranolol on essential tremor. Neurology essential tremor with a beta-adrenergic blocking (Minneapolis), 27, 439-442. agent (sotalol). Excerpta Medica, 341, 62-66. Tolosa, E. S., and Loewenson, R. B. (1975). Essential Rinne, U. K., and Kaitaniemi, P. (1974). Sotalol in the tremor: treatment with propranolol. Neurology treatment of essential tremor. Excerpta Medica, (Minneapolis), 24, 1041-1044. 341, 56-61. Vilsvik, J. S., and Schaanning, J. (1976). The effect Singh, B. N., Nisbet, H. D., Harris, E. A., and of atenolol on ventilatory and cardiac function in Whitlock, R. M. (1975). A comparison of the asthma. British Medical Journal, 2, 453-455. actions of ICI 66,082 and propranolol on cardiac Winkler, G. F., and Young, R. R. (1971). The control and peripheral beta-adrenoreceptors. European of essential tremor by propranolol. Transactions of Journal of Pharmacology, 34, 75-86. the American Neurological Association, 96, 66-68. Stanton, H. C., Kirchgessnes, T., and Parmenter, K. Young, R. R., Growdon, J. H., and Shahani, B. T. (1965). Cardiovascular pharmacology of two new (1975). Beta-adrenergic mechanisms in action beta adrenergic receptor antagonists. Journal of tremor. New England Journal of Medicine, 293, Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 149, 950-953. 172-182. Protected by copyright. http://jnnp.bmj.com/ on October 6, 2021 by guest.