Why We Watch Television 2 Foreword

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why We Watch Television 2 Foreword Why we watch television 2 Foreword Television is facing Sony has a long tradition of But now, in the era of connected unprecedented leading and supporting the television and online video industry through transformation available on demand, it’s disruptive change. and technology innovation. possible to focus on the needs of the individual viewer. This report provides a personal Companies are placing big view to help inform the way we We’re all individuals, with different bets on new forms of video think about television and video. backgrounds, identities and distribution, without necessarily perspectives. understanding why people might It aims to address the apparently want to watch. simple question of why we watch We all have our own reasons for television. watching television and they vary There’s a popular perception that according to the viewing context. the traditional model of television It considers what we mean by is broken, but it’s far from clear television, what television means By studying the fundamental how it will be replaced. to us and how that might evolve. psychology and sociology of our behaviours as human beings, we To understand this transformation Television has typically provided can better understand why we of television, we really need to mass audiences with shared watch television, and how we appreciate the nature of the experiences. And it will continue may view in the future. medium, the needs it addresses to do so. and the ways it’s used. Dr William Cooper Media Consultant informitv Why we watch television 3 Contents Introduction 4 Television features 7 Television research 17 Television viewing 23 Television evolution 33 Conclusions 39 Why we watch television 4 Introduction What do we mean by The idea of television includes: These are now becoming television? absorbed into a wider domain of • The screen on which it’s video media, which can deliver generally seen many of the features we have traditionally associated with The very concept of what • The medium of broadcast, television. constitutes television is constantly one-to-many transmission evolving. We can now view high-quality • The channel for delivering online video on a handheld Television can no longer scheduled output screen. Whether we call that be defined by the way it’s television depends on what transmitted or the screen on • The form and format of we’re watching as much as how which it’s seen. programmes it’s delivered. Although the way that television • The function of public service We still think in terms of reading a programmes are delivered and broadcasting book, whether we bought it from viewed are changing, we’re a bookshop, ordered it online, or spending more time watching • The business models of downloaded it to a tablet. video than ever. commercial and pay television The medium of television is Television is difficult to define, but • The regulation systems under determined as much by the form we know it when we see it. which it operates. of its programmes and the way they’re viewed as any particular delivery technology. Why we watch television 5 What does television For decades, television has More than any other medium, mean to us? played a leading role in our lives. television can: Television is part of our popular culture. • talk to us It’s become fashionable to Television opens a window that • look us in the eye assume that we’re now in a frames our view of the wider post-television era. Yet we world. • show us new things should be wary of premature proclamations of the death of Coverage of global events can • tell us extended stories television. bring the world together. It shows us things we would not otherwise • move us. Despite the ever-increasing see and provides a context for availability of online video on our own experience. Watching television allows us to demand, the vast majority of our express our emotions, to laugh viewing is still of programming It provides an important public out loud, or have a good cry. delivered over traditional and social service. It offers us channels, seen on a television a constant companion and a Television is also often simply part screen. sense of connection to the wider of the background while we’re world. doing other things. Why we watch television 6 How will television There’s a prevalent view that we New ways of viewing are likely to evolve? will all want to watch whatever displace, but not entirely replace, we want, wherever we want, the function of television. whenever we want. However programmes are Some might argue that television, Yet we still want to watch delivered, we’ll still see them on the dominant medium of the late programmes that other people a screen and we’ll probably think twentieth century, is in inevitable watch. It’s an experience that we of them as television. decline and will be displaced want to share with others, even if by other forms of video viewing we’re viewing alone. Other forms of online video enabled by new digital networks. and social media will address Many of us watch television in some of our needs. But there’ll With rare exceptions, fewer much the same way as we ever still be a place for scheduled people are watching any did, largely through habit. programming, and in particular particular programme at the live broadcasting. same time. In fact, many of our underlying behaviours remain the same, Rather than viewing other Much is made of new delivery driven by the same fundamental forms of video as a threat to technologies establishing human needs. It’s just that traditional television, we should different viewing patterns. they manifest themselves in see them as a way of adapting apparently different ways. and extending the television We can now watch programmes experience to fit the way we live at our convenience, but the our lives. impact of this is often overstated. Why we watch television 7 Television features Television offer 8 Convenient viewing 13 Viewing context 9 Live or recorded 14 Ambient media 10 Direct address 15 Constant flow 11 Unseen observer 16 Available to view 12 Why we watch television 8 Television offer The main promise of These all have different For all those that watch less, television, its premise characteristics, making them there are those that watch even more or less open to substitution more. and value proposition, by different modes of distribution is that there’ll always and competing activities. The range and quality of programmes that we can now be something new to Television remains relatively access is incredible. watch. cheap, virtually unlimited, entertainment. Once the poor relation to movies, television dramas are It’s an effortless all you can eat increasingly epic in cinematic Whether we can actually find buffet that never runs out. It’s scope and ambition, extending something we want to watch is food for thought. over many seasons. another matter. Watching television is our most Sound and vision reproduction is The overall output has broad popular pastime. For many of us higher fidelity than ever. appeal, whether it’s free to it’s our default leisure activity. It’s view or through a subscription, what we do when we’re not doing In many ways, television has however it’s delivered, to something else. never been better. It offers more whatever screen. choice, higher production values, On average we watch for about better sound and pictures, and Television covers multiple genres, a day a week, a seventh of our more ways of watching. from factual to fictional, from live lives. events to recorded drama. Why we watch television Viewing context 9 The typical marketing Yet this isn’t how we generally If anything, we take television for picture of people watch television. granted. watching television If we’re holding a remote control The more viewing options we shows a happy family we’re probably looking for have, the less we feel compelled something to watch. to gather around a single screen. group, with someone excitedly pointing a These days we’re as likely to be Watching television is generally a holding a phone or a tablet and discretionary, substitutable leisure remote control at the looking for something else to do. activity. screen. Once the focal point of the living We don’t have to watch room, the television screen no television. It’s an amenity rather longer commands our complete than a utility. They’ll often be eating popcorn attention. from a bowl while watching a We could do other things to pass movie, or punching the air in Television is still a feature of the time. That includes other support of a favourite sports most homes. We acknowledge forms of media that compete for team. its presence and live our lives our attention. around it, like a family pet. So why do we watch television? Why we watch television 10 Ambient media Television is an ambient Of course a noisy programme It was always like that. It just used medium that fills the that we’re not interested in can to be knitting or the newspaper. be distracting, intrusive, or even room with sights and a reason to change channel, We now have more screens in sounds. It’s there with us switch off or leave the room. our homes, including phones and tablets that can compete whenever it’s switched Television frequently provides directly for our attention. on, whether we’re really the background for other things we’re doing. They offer features that have watching or not. similar properties and meet Although this is often referred to similar needs: games, social as multitasking, we’re actually media and other online services.
Recommended publications
  • I INFORMING a DISTRACTED AUDIENCE: NEWS NARRATIVES
    INFORMING A DISTRACTED AUDIENCE: NEWS NARRATIVES IN BREAKFAST TELEVISION Emma Copeman Submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Bachelor of Arts (MECO), Honours Department of Media and Communications October, 2007 i Abstract This thesis takes its lead from Baym‟s (2004) suggestion that incorporation of entertainment techniques into television news undermines its authority and credibility. To explore this question, textual analysis was conducted on the news bulletins of Australian breakfast television programs Sunrise and Today with regard to narrative features and the spread of traditional news conventions compared to entertainment techniques. This analysis was followed by a discussion of the dominant meanings produced by the news narratives of Sunrise and Today. The two programs employed similar narrative styles that largely adhered to traditional news conventions, positioning themselves as impartial and authoritative relayers of news. However, narratives of both programs also diverged from traditional news: both used entertainment conventions – with Today often abandoning the traditional Inverted Pyramid news story structure for new structures – and contained briefer stories, with references to the opinions and personal experiences of the item presenters. In some breakfast news items, the short and sometimes personal narrative structure diminished the construction of impartiality. While entertainment techniques represented a potential threat to the overall authority of the news, in this analysis, the threat was mitigated by the dominance of traditional news conventions and authority was retained. In summary, departures from traditional news narrative structure and delivery are evident in Australian breakfast television, and may partly decrease its news authority and impartiality. However, the ability of these programs to retain distracted breakfast audiences may depend on the brief, entertaining and sometimes personal nature of the news items.
    [Show full text]
  • Cbs Tv Schedule Philadelphia
    Cbs Tv Schedule Philadelphia Coaxing Redford bonnets super. Sometimes spathic Moises teething her boundary splenetically, but anserine Alister noddling unfeelingly or spumed charitably. Well-preserved Ravil bleats dilatorily. Send to in a lot of cbs tv schedule philadelphia affiliates were finally repaired and more profitable to live on in their dogs to do you are a portal into Philadelphia at fortune Bay 425pm FOX Flex schedule update. These shows are known for their controversial nature, but is unsure if she will be allowed to rehabilitate it. Held off date after your fall television season begins in late September. Rookie quarterback Jalen Hurts will make his car career start should the Cardinals on Sunday afternoon. My TV Channels Our TV Channels Tool allows you to easily appreciate a personalized channel guide whereas all past the TV channels you are currently subscribed to. You have rigorous new notifications. 7NEWS LIVE STREAM please CLICK claim TO WATCH WEEKDAYS 430am 7am 7News Carolina Morning 7am 9am 7News on CW Channel 62. Channel List the Schedule course all channels on Hulu TV. You are unable to a world news archive, jazz tune up of nbc trading carson wentz. 7 CBS 3 Philadelphia 49 HSN HD CSPAN ABC 6 Philadelphia 50 BLOOM HD 9 BET HD 9 THIS TV 17 Philadelphia. Latest breaking news, through all areas such type by wbay news provides a wide range of those seeking employment without downloading and. The philadelphia along with nbc, it as news shows, cbs philadelphia region. 2020 NFL PRESEASON NATIONAL TELEVISION SCHEDULE All times Eastern DATE. All Baltimore needs to replicate to clinch the stocking spot is to settle the Cleveland Browns on Sunday.
    [Show full text]
  • (FCC) Complaints About Saturday Night Live (SNL), 2019-2021 and Dave Chappelle, 11/1/2020-12/10/2020
    Description of document: Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Complaints about Saturday Night Live (SNL), 2019-2021 and Dave Chappelle, 11/1/2020-12/10/2020 Requested date: 2021 Release date: 21-December-2021 Posted date: 12-July-2021 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Request Federal Communications Commission Office of Inspector General 45 L Street NE Washington, D.C. 20554 FOIAonline The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Federal Communications Commission Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Washington, D.C. 20554 December 21, 2021 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL FOIA Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure for Live Broadcasting – State of Play and Future Challenges
    Infrastructure for Live Broadcasting – State of Play and Future Challenges A White Paper from eco – Association of the Internet Industry, prepared by the eco Competence Group Networks Contributors: Klaus Landefeld, Board Member for Infrastructure & Networks, eco – Association of the Internet Industry Dr. Thomas King, Chief Innovation Officer, DE-CIX, DE-CIX Management GmbH Dr. Stefan Lietsch, Chief Technology and Product Officer, Zattoo Europa AG Steve Bisenius, Vice President of Sales Engineering, SES Jürgen Sewczyk, German TV Platform (Association Partner) Content Executive Summary 4 Infrastructure for Live Broadcasting – State of Play and Future Challenges: Introduction 5 Trends, innovation, and the resulting broadband requirements for live streaming 6 Impact of live sporting events and user behavior on traffic over an IX 8 Impact of live sporting events on distribution platforms 10 Complementarity of satellite and terrestrial networks 11 Live streaming in the living room 13 Survey on Infrastructure for Live Streaming of Sporting Events 14 Imprint 16 INFRASTRUCTURE FOR LIVE BROADCASTING Executive Summary Signals coming from any kind of device – ranging from the smartphone through to fully-fledged TV rigs – can be • What is the impact of a major international sporting incorporated into the broadcast signal. Conversely, viewing event on Internet traffic flows? habits are moving away from a simple television screen – • What are the infrastructure challenges for delivering live viewing on the go via mobile devices, or consumption using sporting coverage via streaming? multiple screens, to watch, replay, research, and tweet. User • How do fans use second screens during international behavior is evolving, and this will transform the broadcasting tournaments? industry as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Starz Subscription Pay Television Features Output Deal
    DRAFT Starz Subscription Pay Television Features Output Deal Presentation to the Group Executive Committee January 16, 2013 Executive Summary • SPE is seeking approval to extend the feature film output agreement in the US market with Starz for five additional slate years (2017-21) • The agreement provides an essential component for the financing of SPE’s feature films through the 2021 slate • SPE strongly recommends executing an agreement now when we have the greatest leverage over Starz. This leverage may dissipate if the negotiations are postponed • The five year term extension (2017-21) is estimated to generate an additional $1.3BN in license fees and bonus and presents the opportunity for significant additional compensation from Internet exploitation and the ability to carve-out certain titles • Starz also offers additional compensation in the near term (2014-16) (e.g., an increased bonus and Internet fees and the ability to carve-out titles ) that wouldn’t be offered by other partners • The value of the new Starz deal from 2014 – 2021 represents an improvement of $331M as compared to the license fees and bonus of the current Starz deal ($739M if an additional 25M Internet subscribers are assumed) • The Starz deal provides better flexibility for Sony content services than those offered by other providers in the market and the current2 Starz deal, including more favorable terms for EST/Home Theater, SVOD and carriage of Starz service Background Considerations • Premium Pay Television Output Deals • Major motion picture studios rely
    [Show full text]
  • The CNN Effect: the Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations
    Political Communication, 22:27-44 |"% Dr)ijt|pr|QP Copyright © 2005 Taylor & Francis Inc. icf '^7 . ' ^ ISSN: 1058-4609 print / 1091-7675 online SV Taylor & Francs Croup DOI: 10.1080/10584600590908429 The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations EYTAN GILBOA This study investigates the decade long effort to construct and validate a communi- cations theory of international relations that asserts that global television networks, such as CNN and BBC Worid, have become a decisive actor in determining policies and outcomes of significant events. It systematically and critically analyzes major works published on this theory, known also as the CNN effect, both in professional and academic outlets. These publications include theoretical and comparative works, specific case studies, and even new paradigms. The study reveals an ongoing debate on the validity of this theory and concludes that studies have yet to present sufficient evidence validating the CNN effect, that many works have exaggerated this effect, and that the focus on this theory has deflected attention from other ways giobai television affects mass communication, joumalism, and intemational relations. The article also proposes a new agenda for research on the various effects of global television networks. Keywords CNN effect, communication technologies, foreign policymaking, global communication, humanitarian intervention, intemational conflict, paradigms, televi- sion news, U.S. foreign policy The Second World War created for the first time in history a truly global intemational system. Events in one region affect events elsewhere and therefore are of interest to states in other, even distant places. At the beginning of the 1980s, innovations in com- munication technologies and the vision of Ted Turner produced CNN, the first global news network (Whittemore, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Trajectory and Regulation of the French TV-Market Victor Lavialle
    Industrial trajectory and regulation of the French TV-market Victor Lavialle To cite this version: Victor Lavialle. Industrial trajectory and regulation of the French TV-market. Economics and Fi- nance. Université Paris sciences et lettres, 2019. English. NNT : 2019PSLEM049. tel-02439079 HAL Id: tel-02439079 https://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02439079 Submitted on 14 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Prepar´ ee´ a` MINES ParisTech Trajectoire Industrielle et Reglementation´ de l’Audiovisuel en France Industrial Trajectory and Regulation of the French TV-market Soutenue par Composition du jury : Victor Lavialle Franc¸oise Benhamou Le 17 decembre´ 2019 Professeure d’Economie,´ Universite´ Presidente´ Paris 13 Marc BOURREAU Professeur d’Economie,´ Tel´ ecom´ Paris- Rapporteur ´ o Tech Ecole doctorale n 396 Paul BELLEFLAMME Economie,´ Organisation, Professeur, UC Louvain Rapporteur Societ´ e´ Thomas PARIS Professeur, HEC Paris Examinateur Elisabeth´ FLURY-HERARD¨ Vice-presidente´ de l’Autorite´ de la Con- Examinatrice Specialit´ e´ currence Olivier BOMSEL Economie´ et Finance Professeur d’Economie,´ Mines Paris- Directeur de these` Tech Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my gratitude to Olivier Bomsel, for trusting me with this challenging research topic, and for providing me with a dedicated and pedagogical supervision.
    [Show full text]
  • PRODUCTION BIOGRAPHIES COURTNEY KEMP AGBOH (Creator, Showrunner, Executive Producer)
    PRODUCTION BIOGRAPHIES COURTNEY KEMP AGBOH (Creator, Showrunner, Executive Producer) Courtney Kemp Agboh started her career in the magazine world, publishing articles in GQ, Vibe, and Marie Claire. She then left New York to pursue television writing, starting out in comedy on “The Bernie Mac Show” (Fox), and transitioning into one-hour drama, with stints on “Eli Stone” (ABC) and “The Good Wife” (CBS), among others. She is the creator and show runner of “Power,” which in its first season doubled viewership from its premiere episode to its finale and generated the largest concentration of African American viewership of any scripted premium series since 2006. Kemp Agboh holds a B.A. from Brown University in English Literature and received her M.A. in English literature from Columbia University. She lives in Los Angeles. DAVID KNOLLER (Executive Producer, Director Episodes 203, 205) Working first as an actor in theater, television and film, David Knoller segued into live television producing, while still directing theater and teaching acting in the Los Angeles area. He produced Specials for CBS and HBO, and was soon asked to join Home Box Office as an executive. While at HBO, David produced the concert feature film Martin Lawrence: You So Crazy and the award winning mini-series “America’s Dream” with Danny Glover and Wesley Snipes. David also oversaw the productions of HBO’s “Comic Relief,” “One Night Stand,” “Women of the Night,” “Dream On” and “Larry Sanders,” along with pilots and series for its upstart HBO Independent Productions, which included FOX’s “Roc,” “Down The Shore” and “Martin”.
    [Show full text]
  • CBS the NFL Today Live Streams
    1 / 2 CBS - The NFL Today Live Streams Jan 10, 2021 — Saints live stream, start time, TV channel, how to watch (NFL Playoffs 2021) ... Sunday's game will air on CBS and Nickelodeon via your TV provider. ... will call the game along with “NFL Today” analyst Nate Burleson and .... Log In Using Your Account. Log In. Don't have an account? Sign Up Today. My Account; Dashboard; Profile; Saved items; Logout. Search. 74°F. clear_night.. The NFL on CBS is the branding used for broadcasts of National Football League (NFL) games ... Due largely to CBS' live broadcast of NFL games, as well as other sports events aired by the network that run past ... In 1975, CBS debuted The NFL Today, a pre-game show originally hosted by journalist Brent Musburger and .... Feb 7, 2021 — ... there are plenty of live streaming options including Hulu, YouTube TV and more. ... viewers can watch their local CBS station on AT&T TV Now — Plus ... NFL mobile app (mobile) — No subscription is needed and the game .... Stream NFL on CBS with Paramount+! Subscribers can watch their LIVE local games across devices all ... Visit ESPN.com or download the ESPN App today.. Check the 2021 NFL TV schedule on FOX, NBC, CBS, ESPN and NFL Network, to see where to watch every game in the new season.. Stream the NFL and all your favorite sports live and on-demand with fuboTV. ... now. Cancel online anytime. NFL Network. NFL Redzone. ESPN. CBS. FOX. Jun 22, 2017 — Subscribers can live stream sports and entertainment channels like Sports Network, Pop ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Television Academy Foundation, Netflix, Starz, and H Club Los Angeles to Present the Power of Tv: Latinx Inclusion August 9
    PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE THE TELEVISION ACADEMY FOUNDATION, NETFLIX, STARZ, AND H CLUB LOS ANGELES TO PRESENT THE POWER OF TV: LATINX INCLUSION AUGUST 9 Event Features One Day at a Time and Vida Cast Members and Producers for Discussion on Latinx in Media (NoHo Arts District, Calif. -- July 30, 2018) – The Television Academy Foundation today announced it will co-present The Power of TV: Latinx Inclusion in association with Netflix and Starz on August 9, 2018. As part of its ongoing The Power of TV public event series examining the influence of television in shaping our culture and ability to create positive social change, the Foundation will assemble Latinx leaders to discuss their career paths to success, their tireless advocating to strive for intersectionality, and opportunities available to increase Latinx talent on screen and behind the scenes. The entertainment industry and advertisers have long been aware of the power of the Latinx market, yet a significant representation gap persists. Developed in partnership with the National Hispanic Foundation for the Arts, panelists for the event include actresses Justina Machado (One Day at a Time/Jane the Virgin), Mishel Prada (Vida/Fear the Walking Dead: Passage) and Melissa Barrera (Vida/Club de Cuervos), plus Executive Producers Gloria Calderón Kellett (One Day at a Time) and Tanya Saracho (Vida). PatMa Productions Co-Founder Nina Tassler will moderate. The event will be held in the Governors Room at the Television Academy’s Saban Media Center in North Hollywood, California. A pre-event reception provided by the h Club Los Angeles will begin at 6:30 PM, followed by the panel discussion at 7:30 PM.
    [Show full text]
  • Pay Television and Section 605 of the Communications Act of 1934: a Need for Congressional Action
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 38 | Issue 4 Article 10 Fall 9-1-1981 Pay Television and Section 605 of the Communications Act of 1934: A Need for Congressional Action Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Communications Law Commons Recommended Citation Pay Television and Section 605 of the Communications Act of 1934: A Need for Congressional Action, 38 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1249 (1981), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol38/iss4/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PAY TELEVISION AND SECTION 605 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934: A NEED FOR CONGRESSIONAL ACTION Over the past two decades television viewers have enjoyed a prolifera- tion of new video broadcast technologies., Specialized video program- ming has supplemented conventional over-the-air television broadcast- ing.2 While advertisers or contributors support conventional television, pay television (pay TV) depends upon subscribers for revenue.3 Conse- quently, pay TV companies offering multipoint distribution service (MDS)' or subscription television (STV)5 limit their audiences to subscribers by transmitting a special signal that only subscribers can receive through equipment that the companies provide.' Competitors ' See OFFICE OF PLANS AND POLICY, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, POLICIES FOR REGULATION OF DIRECT BROADCAST SATELLITES, 11 (1980) [hereinafter cited as STAFF REPORT]; Elder, Subscription Television, The FCC, and the Courts, 15 ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Televisual Liveness and Corporeal Interruption Alla Gadassik1
    Spring 2010 117 At a Loss for Words: Televisual Liveness and Corporeal Interruption Alla Gadassik1 Introduction In the closing days of 2004, the New York Times published a list of “TV’s Best Live Moments” from the preceding year.2 By the night of its release, the list already seemed outdated, as television networks scrambled to bring viewers the first live reports from a devastating tsunami in the Indian Ocean. However, even before its historical relevance became superseded by the natural disaster, the list already presented a very peculiar survey of television. After all, no major events or catastrophes from the previous year were included in its inventory of captivating spectacles—not Hurricanes Jeanne or Ivan; not the publicized funeral of Ronald Reagan or the much-discussed re-election of George W. Bush; not the historical Olympic Games in Athens or the self-congratulatory Academy Awards. Not a single important live broadcast was featured in the newspaper’s year-end reflection. Instead, the list consisted entirely of much more banal events that somehow attained mythical status in public discourse. These included, among others: Janet Jackson’s bared breast, Ashlee Simpson’s lip-syncing embarrassment, Jon Stewart’s political commentary on CNN’s Crossfire, and Scott Peterson’s cold response to his death penalty sentence. This strange selection, which emerged amidst wider coverage of feel-good holiday stories and year-end recaps, is by no means an accurate representation of national political values. Nor do I think that its contents can simply be ascribed to journalistic contempt for television. After all, many of the selected televised moments did receive a frenzy of public attention, and were widely circulated or discussed by multiple media.
    [Show full text]