Cbs Tv Schedule Philadelphia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Retrospective Analysis of Vertical Mergers in Multichannel Video Programming Distribution Markets: the Comcast-NBCU Merger
PHOENIX CENTER FOR ADVANCED LEGAL & ECONOMIC PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES 5335 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 440 Washington, D.C. 20015 Tel: (+1) (202) 274-0235 • Fax: (+1) (202) 318-4909 www.phoenix-center.org Lawrence J. Spiwak, President 16 March 2018 VIA EMAIL Douglas Rathbun Competition Policy and Advocacy Section Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Room 3413 Washington, DC 20530 RE: USDOJ Roundtable on Antitrust Consent Decrees Dear Mr. Rathbun: The Department announced that it intends to hold a public roundtable on April 26, 2018 which will focus on antitrust consent decrees, including the regulatory nature of consent decrees that involve behavioral remedies. To help inform the discussion, please find attached a copy of a recent Phoenix Center paper entitled A Retrospective Analysis of Vertical Mergers in Multichannel Video Programming Distribution Markets: The Comcast-NBCU Merger. In this paper, Phoenix Center Chief Economist Dr. George S. Ford presents a retrospective analysis of the price effects of the Comcast-NBCU merger. In particular, Dr. Ford conducts an econometric analysis of data on the prices paid for programming by multichannel video programing distributors (“MVPDs”) before and after the transaction and finds no evidence that Comcast’s programming prices rose after the merger. The analysis covers general interest programming, news channels, and national and regional sports networks. Given these results, Dr. Ford concludes that there is either a lack of a net positive effect on incentives to raise programming prices above competitive levels following the vertical merger or that the behavioral remedies placed on the Comcast-NBCU merger were effective. -
I INFORMING a DISTRACTED AUDIENCE: NEWS NARRATIVES
INFORMING A DISTRACTED AUDIENCE: NEWS NARRATIVES IN BREAKFAST TELEVISION Emma Copeman Submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Bachelor of Arts (MECO), Honours Department of Media and Communications October, 2007 i Abstract This thesis takes its lead from Baym‟s (2004) suggestion that incorporation of entertainment techniques into television news undermines its authority and credibility. To explore this question, textual analysis was conducted on the news bulletins of Australian breakfast television programs Sunrise and Today with regard to narrative features and the spread of traditional news conventions compared to entertainment techniques. This analysis was followed by a discussion of the dominant meanings produced by the news narratives of Sunrise and Today. The two programs employed similar narrative styles that largely adhered to traditional news conventions, positioning themselves as impartial and authoritative relayers of news. However, narratives of both programs also diverged from traditional news: both used entertainment conventions – with Today often abandoning the traditional Inverted Pyramid news story structure for new structures – and contained briefer stories, with references to the opinions and personal experiences of the item presenters. In some breakfast news items, the short and sometimes personal narrative structure diminished the construction of impartiality. While entertainment techniques represented a potential threat to the overall authority of the news, in this analysis, the threat was mitigated by the dominance of traditional news conventions and authority was retained. In summary, departures from traditional news narrative structure and delivery are evident in Australian breakfast television, and may partly decrease its news authority and impartiality. However, the ability of these programs to retain distracted breakfast audiences may depend on the brief, entertaining and sometimes personal nature of the news items. -
Sports Publishing Fall 2018
SPORTS PUBLISHING Fall 2018 Contact Information Editorial, Publicity, and Bookstore and Library Sales Field Sales Force Special Sales Distribution Elise Cannon Skyhorse Publishing, Inc. Two Rivers Distribution VP, Field Sales 307 West 36th Street, 11th Floor Ingram Content Group LLC One Ingram Boulevard t: 510-809-3730 New York, NY 10018 e: [email protected] t: 212-643-6816 La Vergne, TN 37086 f: 212-643-6819 t: 866-400-5351 e: [email protected] Leslie Jobson e: [email protected] Field Sales Support Manager t: 510-809-3732 e: [email protected] International Sales Representatives United Kingdom, Ireland & Australia, New Zealand & India South Africa Canada Europe Shawn Abraham Peter Hyde Associates Thomas Allen & Son Ltd. General Inquiries: Manager, International Sales PO Box 2856 195 Allstate Parkway Ingram Publisher Services UK Ingram Publisher Services Intl Cape Town, 8000 Markham, ON 5th Floor 1400 Broadway, Suite 520 South Africa L3R 4T8 Canada 52–54 St John Street New York, NY, 10018 t: +27 21 447 5300 t: 800-387-4333 Clerkenwell t: 212-581-7839 f: +27 21 447 1430 f: 800-458-5504 London, EC1M 4HF e: shawn.abraham@ e: [email protected] e: [email protected] e: IPSUK_enquiries@ ingramcontent.com ingramcontent.co.uk India All Other Markets and Australia Penguin Books India Pvt. Ltd. General International Enquiries Ordering Information: NewSouth Books 7th Floor, Infinity Tower C Ingram Publisher Services Intl Grantham Book Services Orders and Distribution DLF Cyber City, Phase - III 1400 Broadway, -
Why We Watch Television 2 Foreword
Why we watch television 2 Foreword Television is facing Sony has a long tradition of But now, in the era of connected unprecedented leading and supporting the television and online video industry through transformation available on demand, it’s disruptive change. and technology innovation. possible to focus on the needs of the individual viewer. This report provides a personal Companies are placing big view to help inform the way we We’re all individuals, with different bets on new forms of video think about television and video. backgrounds, identities and distribution, without necessarily perspectives. understanding why people might It aims to address the apparently want to watch. simple question of why we watch We all have our own reasons for television. watching television and they vary There’s a popular perception that according to the viewing context. the traditional model of television It considers what we mean by is broken, but it’s far from clear television, what television means By studying the fundamental how it will be replaced. to us and how that might evolve. psychology and sociology of our behaviours as human beings, we To understand this transformation Television has typically provided can better understand why we of television, we really need to mass audiences with shared watch television, and how we appreciate the nature of the experiences. And it will continue may view in the future. medium, the needs it addresses to do so. and the ways it’s used. Dr William Cooper Media Consultant informitv Why we watch television 3 Contents Introduction 4 Television features 7 Television research 17 Television viewing 23 Television evolution 33 Conclusions 39 Why we watch television 4 Introduction What do we mean by The idea of television includes: These are now becoming television? absorbed into a wider domain of • The screen on which it’s video media, which can deliver generally seen many of the features we have traditionally associated with The very concept of what • The medium of broadcast, television. -
Stream Name Category Name Coronavirus (COVID-19) |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ---TNT-SAT ---|EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 SD |EU|
stream_name category_name Coronavirus (COVID-19) |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ---------- TNT-SAT ---------- |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 FULL HD 1 |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 2 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 2 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 2 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 3 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 3 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 3 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 4 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 4 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 4 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 5 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 5 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 5 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE O SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE O HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE O FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT M6 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT M6 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT M6 FHD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT PARIS PREMIERE |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT PARIS PREMIERE FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TMC SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TMC HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TMC FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TMC 1 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT 6TER SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT 6TER HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT 6TER FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CHERIE 25 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CHERIE 25 |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CHERIE 25 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ARTE SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ARTE FR |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT RMC STORY |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT RMC STORY SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ---------- Information ---------- |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TV5 |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TV5 MONDE FBS HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CNEWS SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CNEWS |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CNEWS HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT France 24 |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE INFO SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE INFO HD -
(FCC) Complaints About Saturday Night Live (SNL), 2019-2021 and Dave Chappelle, 11/1/2020-12/10/2020
Description of document: Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Complaints about Saturday Night Live (SNL), 2019-2021 and Dave Chappelle, 11/1/2020-12/10/2020 Requested date: 2021 Release date: 21-December-2021 Posted date: 12-July-2021 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Request Federal Communications Commission Office of Inspector General 45 L Street NE Washington, D.C. 20554 FOIAonline The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Federal Communications Commission Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Washington, D.C. 20554 December 21, 2021 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL FOIA Nos. -
Infrastructure for Live Broadcasting – State of Play and Future Challenges
Infrastructure for Live Broadcasting – State of Play and Future Challenges A White Paper from eco – Association of the Internet Industry, prepared by the eco Competence Group Networks Contributors: Klaus Landefeld, Board Member for Infrastructure & Networks, eco – Association of the Internet Industry Dr. Thomas King, Chief Innovation Officer, DE-CIX, DE-CIX Management GmbH Dr. Stefan Lietsch, Chief Technology and Product Officer, Zattoo Europa AG Steve Bisenius, Vice President of Sales Engineering, SES Jürgen Sewczyk, German TV Platform (Association Partner) Content Executive Summary 4 Infrastructure for Live Broadcasting – State of Play and Future Challenges: Introduction 5 Trends, innovation, and the resulting broadband requirements for live streaming 6 Impact of live sporting events and user behavior on traffic over an IX 8 Impact of live sporting events on distribution platforms 10 Complementarity of satellite and terrestrial networks 11 Live streaming in the living room 13 Survey on Infrastructure for Live Streaming of Sporting Events 14 Imprint 16 INFRASTRUCTURE FOR LIVE BROADCASTING Executive Summary Signals coming from any kind of device – ranging from the smartphone through to fully-fledged TV rigs – can be • What is the impact of a major international sporting incorporated into the broadcast signal. Conversely, viewing event on Internet traffic flows? habits are moving away from a simple television screen – • What are the infrastructure challenges for delivering live viewing on the go via mobile devices, or consumption using sporting coverage via streaming? multiple screens, to watch, replay, research, and tweet. User • How do fans use second screens during international behavior is evolving, and this will transform the broadcasting tournaments? industry as a whole. -
The CNN Effect: the Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations
Political Communication, 22:27-44 |"% Dr)ijt|pr|QP Copyright © 2005 Taylor & Francis Inc. icf '^7 . ' ^ ISSN: 1058-4609 print / 1091-7675 online SV Taylor & Francs Croup DOI: 10.1080/10584600590908429 The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relations EYTAN GILBOA This study investigates the decade long effort to construct and validate a communi- cations theory of international relations that asserts that global television networks, such as CNN and BBC Worid, have become a decisive actor in determining policies and outcomes of significant events. It systematically and critically analyzes major works published on this theory, known also as the CNN effect, both in professional and academic outlets. These publications include theoretical and comparative works, specific case studies, and even new paradigms. The study reveals an ongoing debate on the validity of this theory and concludes that studies have yet to present sufficient evidence validating the CNN effect, that many works have exaggerated this effect, and that the focus on this theory has deflected attention from other ways giobai television affects mass communication, joumalism, and intemational relations. The article also proposes a new agenda for research on the various effects of global television networks. Keywords CNN effect, communication technologies, foreign policymaking, global communication, humanitarian intervention, intemational conflict, paradigms, televi- sion news, U.S. foreign policy The Second World War created for the first time in history a truly global intemational system. Events in one region affect events elsewhere and therefore are of interest to states in other, even distant places. At the beginning of the 1980s, innovations in com- munication technologies and the vision of Ted Turner produced CNN, the first global news network (Whittemore, 1990). -
PRODUCTION BIOGRAPHIES COURTNEY KEMP AGBOH (Creator, Showrunner, Executive Producer)
PRODUCTION BIOGRAPHIES COURTNEY KEMP AGBOH (Creator, Showrunner, Executive Producer) Courtney Kemp Agboh started her career in the magazine world, publishing articles in GQ, Vibe, and Marie Claire. She then left New York to pursue television writing, starting out in comedy on “The Bernie Mac Show” (Fox), and transitioning into one-hour drama, with stints on “Eli Stone” (ABC) and “The Good Wife” (CBS), among others. She is the creator and show runner of “Power,” which in its first season doubled viewership from its premiere episode to its finale and generated the largest concentration of African American viewership of any scripted premium series since 2006. Kemp Agboh holds a B.A. from Brown University in English Literature and received her M.A. in English literature from Columbia University. She lives in Los Angeles. DAVID KNOLLER (Executive Producer, Director Episodes 203, 205) Working first as an actor in theater, television and film, David Knoller segued into live television producing, while still directing theater and teaching acting in the Los Angeles area. He produced Specials for CBS and HBO, and was soon asked to join Home Box Office as an executive. While at HBO, David produced the concert feature film Martin Lawrence: You So Crazy and the award winning mini-series “America’s Dream” with Danny Glover and Wesley Snipes. David also oversaw the productions of HBO’s “Comic Relief,” “One Night Stand,” “Women of the Night,” “Dream On” and “Larry Sanders,” along with pilots and series for its upstart HBO Independent Productions, which included FOX’s “Roc,” “Down The Shore” and “Martin”. -
CBS the NFL Today Live Streams
1 / 2 CBS - The NFL Today Live Streams Jan 10, 2021 — Saints live stream, start time, TV channel, how to watch (NFL Playoffs 2021) ... Sunday's game will air on CBS and Nickelodeon via your TV provider. ... will call the game along with “NFL Today” analyst Nate Burleson and .... Log In Using Your Account. Log In. Don't have an account? Sign Up Today. My Account; Dashboard; Profile; Saved items; Logout. Search. 74°F. clear_night.. The NFL on CBS is the branding used for broadcasts of National Football League (NFL) games ... Due largely to CBS' live broadcast of NFL games, as well as other sports events aired by the network that run past ... In 1975, CBS debuted The NFL Today, a pre-game show originally hosted by journalist Brent Musburger and .... Feb 7, 2021 — ... there are plenty of live streaming options including Hulu, YouTube TV and more. ... viewers can watch their local CBS station on AT&T TV Now — Plus ... NFL mobile app (mobile) — No subscription is needed and the game .... Stream NFL on CBS with Paramount+! Subscribers can watch their LIVE local games across devices all ... Visit ESPN.com or download the ESPN App today.. Check the 2021 NFL TV schedule on FOX, NBC, CBS, ESPN and NFL Network, to see where to watch every game in the new season.. Stream the NFL and all your favorite sports live and on-demand with fuboTV. ... now. Cancel online anytime. NFL Network. NFL Redzone. ESPN. CBS. FOX. Jun 22, 2017 — Subscribers can live stream sports and entertainment channels like Sports Network, Pop .. -
Televisual Liveness and Corporeal Interruption Alla Gadassik1
Spring 2010 117 At a Loss for Words: Televisual Liveness and Corporeal Interruption Alla Gadassik1 Introduction In the closing days of 2004, the New York Times published a list of “TV’s Best Live Moments” from the preceding year.2 By the night of its release, the list already seemed outdated, as television networks scrambled to bring viewers the first live reports from a devastating tsunami in the Indian Ocean. However, even before its historical relevance became superseded by the natural disaster, the list already presented a very peculiar survey of television. After all, no major events or catastrophes from the previous year were included in its inventory of captivating spectacles—not Hurricanes Jeanne or Ivan; not the publicized funeral of Ronald Reagan or the much-discussed re-election of George W. Bush; not the historical Olympic Games in Athens or the self-congratulatory Academy Awards. Not a single important live broadcast was featured in the newspaper’s year-end reflection. Instead, the list consisted entirely of much more banal events that somehow attained mythical status in public discourse. These included, among others: Janet Jackson’s bared breast, Ashlee Simpson’s lip-syncing embarrassment, Jon Stewart’s political commentary on CNN’s Crossfire, and Scott Peterson’s cold response to his death penalty sentence. This strange selection, which emerged amidst wider coverage of feel-good holiday stories and year-end recaps, is by no means an accurate representation of national political values. Nor do I think that its contents can simply be ascribed to journalistic contempt for television. After all, many of the selected televised moments did receive a frenzy of public attention, and were widely circulated or discussed by multiple media. -
Breaking Television News: Is Social Media Coverage You Can Count On?
University of the Incarnate Word The Athenaeum Theses & Dissertations 5-2016 Breaking Television News: Is Social Media Coverage You Can Count On? Eileen Canosa Teves University of the Incarnate Word, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://athenaeum.uiw.edu/uiw_etds Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, and the Journalism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Teves, Eileen Canosa, "Breaking Television News: Is Social Media Coverage You Can Count On?" (2016). Theses & Dissertations. 7. https://athenaeum.uiw.edu/uiw_etds/7 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Athenaeum. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Athenaeum. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BREAKING TELEVISION NEWS: IS SOCIAL MEDIA COVERAGE YOU CAN COUNT ON? by EILEEN C. TEVES A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the University of the Incarnate Word in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD May 2016 ii Copyright by Eileen C. Teves 2016 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Doctor of Business Administration program has been a very rewarding experience. I am honored to be a part of history at the University of the Incarnate Word H-E-B School of Business & Administration, as the first graduate in the inaugural DBA program. I am grateful for everyone who has helped me reach this point of my destination. I want to first thank the participants involved in this study. Their involvement enabled me to insert the last piece of the puzzle, and possibly help launch innovative solutions in improving our industry.