DOCSLIB.ORG

Diptera Families MS FINAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diptera Families MS FINAL The Diptera Families of British Columbia The Diptera Families of British Columbia G.G.E. Scudder and R.A. Cannings March 31, 2006 G.G.E. Scudder and R.A. Cannings Printed 04/25/06 Coleoptera Families of British Columbia Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 Order Diptera Description................................................................................................................3 Keys to Order Diptera and Families.................................................................................................6 Family Descriptions .......................................................................................................................26 Suborder NEMATOCERA............................................................................................................26 Infraorder TIPULOMORPHA .......................................................................................................26 Family TANYDERIDAE (Primitive Crane Flies) [Fig. 1]............................................................26 Family TIPULIDAE (Crane Flies) [Fig. 2]....................................................................................26 Infraorder BLEPHARICEROMORPHA .......................................................................................27 Family BLEPHARICERIDAE (Net-winged Midges) [Fig. 3]......................................................27 Family DEUTEROPHLEBIIDAE (Mountain Midges) [Fig. 4]....................................................28 Infraorder AXYMIOMORPHA.....................................................................................................29 Family AXYMYIIDAE (Axymyiid Flies) [Figs.5] .......................................................................29 Infraorder BIBIONOMORPHA.....................................................................................................29 Family PACHYNEURIDAE (Pachyneurid Gnats) [Fig. 6]...........................................................29 Family BIBIONIDAE (March Flies) [Fig. 7] ................................................................................30 Family MYCETOPHILIDAE (Fungus Gnats) [Fig. 8] .................................................................31 Family SCIARIDAE (Dark-winged Fungus Gnats) [Fig. 9] .........................................................32 Family CECIDOMYIIDAE (Gall Midges) [Fig. 10].....................................................................32 Infraorder PSYCHODOMORPHA................................................................................................33 Family PSYCHODIDAE (Moth and Sand Flies) [Fig. 11] ...........................................................33 Family TRICHOCERIDAE (Winter Crane Flies) [Fig. 12]..........................................................33 Family ANISOPODIDAE (Wood Gnats) [Fig. 13].......................................................................34 Family SCATOPSIDAE (Minute Black Scavenger Flies) [Fig. 14] .............................................35 Family CANTHYLOSCELIDAE (Canthyloscelid Flies) [Fig. 15]...............................................35 Infraorder PTYCHOPTEROMORPHA.........................................................................................36 Family PTYCHOPTERIDAE (Phantom Crane Flies) [Fig. 16]....................................................36 Infraorder CULICOMORPHA.......................................................................................................36 Family DIXIDAE (Dixid Midges) [Fig. 17]..................................................................................36 Family CHAOBORIDAE (Phantom Midges) [Fig. 18].................................................................37 Family CULICIDAE (Mosquitoes) [Fig. 19].................................................................................38 Family THAUMALEIDAE (Solitary Midges) [Fig. 20]...............................................................39 Family SIMULIIDAE (Black Flies) [Fig. 21] ...............................................................................39 Family CERATOPOGONIDAE (Biting Midges, No-See-Ums) [Fig. 22]....................................41 Family CHIRONOMIDAE (Chironomid Midges) [Fig. 23].........................................................42 Suborder BRACHYCERA.............................................................................................................44 Infraorder XYLOPHAGOMORPHA.............................................................................................44 Coleoptera Families of British Columbia Family XYLOPHAGIDAE (Xylophagid Flies) [Fig. 24]..............................................................44 Infraorder STRATIOMYOMORPHA ...........................................................................................45 Family XYLOMYIDAE (Xylomyid Flies) [Fig. 25].....................................................................45 Family STRATIOMYIDAE (Soldier Flies) [Fig. 26]....................................................................45 Infraorder TABANOMORPHA.....................................................................................................46 Family RHAGIONIDAE (Snipe Flies) [Fig. 27]...........................................................................46 Family PELECORHYNCHIDAE (Pelecorhynchid Flies) [Fig. 28]..............................................47 Family OREOLEPTIDAE (Oreoleptid Flies) [Fig. 29].................................................................48 Family ANTHERICIDAE (Athericid Flies) [Fig. 30]...................................................................49 Family TABANIDAE (Horse Flies and Deer Flies) [Fig. 31].......................................................49 Infraorder MUSCOMORPHA .......................................................................................................51 Superfamily NEMESTRINOIDEA................................................................................................51 Family NEMESTRINIDAE (Tangle-veined Flies) [Fig. 32].........................................................51 Family ACROCERIDAE (Small-headed Flies) [Fig. 33]..............................................................52 Superfamily ASILOIDEA..............................................................................................................53 Family THEREVIDAE (Stiletto Flies) [Fig. 34]...........................................................................53 Family SCENOPINIDAE (Window Flies) [Fig. 35].....................................................................54 Family MYDIDAE (Mydid Flies) [Fig. 36]...................................................................................55 Family APIOCERIDAE (Flower-loving Flies) [Fig. 37]...............................................................56 Family ASILIDAE (Robber Flies) [Fig. 38]..................................................................................57 Family BOMBYLIIDAE (Bee Flies) [Fig. 39]..............................................................................59 Family HILARIMORPHIDAE (Hilarimorphid Flies) [Fig. 40]....................................................61 Superfamily EMPIDOIDEA..........................................................................................................61 Family EMPIDIDAE (Dance Flies) [Fig. 41]................................................................................61 Family DOLICHOPODIDAE (Long-legged Flies) [Fig. 42]........................................................62 Superfamily PLATYPEZOIDEA...................................................................................................63 Family PLATYPEZIDAE (Flat-footed Flies) [Fig. 43].................................................................63 Superfamily PHOROIDEA............................................................................................................63 Family LONCHOPTERIDAE (Pointed-wing Flies or spear-winged flies) [Fig. 44]....................63 Family PHORIDAE (Phorid Flies) [Fig. 45].................................................................................64 Superfamily SYRPHOIDEA..........................................................................................................65 Family SYRPHIDAE (Flower or Hover Flies) [Fig. 46]...............................................................65 Family PIPUNCULIDAE (Big-headed or Big-eyed Flies) [Fig. 47].............................................67 CALYPTRATAE...........................................................................................................................67 Superfamily MUSCOIDEA ...........................................................................................................67 Family SCATHOPHAGIDAE (Dung Flies) [Fig. 48]...................................................................67 Family ANTHOMYIIDAE (Root-Maggot Flies) [Fig. 49]...........................................................68 Family MUSCIDAE (Muscid Flies) [Fig. 50]...............................................................................70 Coleoptera Families of British Columbia Superfamily OESTROIDEA..........................................................................................................72 Family CALLIPHORIDAE (Blow Flies) [Fig. 51] .......................................................................72 Family OESTRIDAE (Bot and Warble Flies) [Fig. 52].................................................................73
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wing Polymorphism in European Species of Sphaeroceridae (Diptera)
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 17.xii.2012 Volume 52( 2), pp. 535–558 ISSN 0374-1036 Wing polymorphism in European species of Sphaeroceridae (Diptera) Jindřich ROHÁČEK Slezské zemské muzeum, Tyršova 1, CZ-746 46 Opava, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The wing polymorphism is described in 8 European species of Sphae- roceridae (Diptera), viz. Crumomyia pedestris (Meigen, 1830), Phthitia spinosa (Collin, 1930), Pteremis fenestralis (Fallén, 1820), Pullimosina meijerei (Duda, 1918), Puncticorpus cribratum (Villeneuve, 1918), Spelobia manicata (Richards, 1927), Spelobia pseudonivalis (Dahl, 1909) and Terrilimosina corrivalis (Ville- neuve, 1918). These cases seem to belong to three types of alary polymorphism: i) species with separate macropterous and brachypterous forms – Crumomyia pedestris, Pteremis fenestralis, Pullimosina meijerei; ii) species with a continual series of wing forms ranging from brachypterous to macropterous – Puncticor- pus cribratum, Spelobia pseudonivalis, Terrilimosina corrivalis; iii) similar to the foregoing type but with only slightly reduced wing in the brachypterous form – Phthitia spinosa, Spelobia manicata. The variability of venation of wing polymorphic and brachypterous species of the West-Palaearctic species of Sphaeroceridae was examined and general trends in the reduction of veins during evolution are defi ned. These trends are found to be different in Copromyzinae (C. pedestris) and Limosininae (all other species) where 6 successive stages of reduction are recognized. The fi rst case of a specimen (of Pullimosina meije- rei) with unevenly developed wings (one normal, other reduced) is described in Sphaeroceridae. Causes of the origin of wing polymorphism, variability of wing polymorphic populations depending on geographical and climatic factors, importance of wing polymorphism in the evolution of brachypterous and apterous species and the probable genetic background of wing polymorphism in European species are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Key for Mosquito Species
    ‘Reverse’ identification key for mosquito species More and more people are getting involved in the surveillance of invasive mosquito species Species name used Synonyms Common name in the EU/EEA, not just professionals with formal training in entomology. There are many in the key taxonomic keys available for identifying mosquitoes of medical and veterinary importance, but they are almost all designed for professionally trained entomologists. Aedes aegypti Stegomyia aegypti Yellow fever mosquito The current identification key aims to provide non-specialists with a simple mosquito recog- Aedes albopictus Stegomyia albopicta Tiger mosquito nition tool for distinguishing between invasive mosquito species and native ones. On the Hulecoeteomyia japonica Asian bush or rock pool Aedes japonicus japonicus ‘female’ illustration page (p. 4) you can select the species that best resembles the specimen. On japonica mosquito the species-specific pages you will find additional information on those species that can easily be confused with that selected, so you can check these additional pages as well. Aedes koreicus Hulecoeteomyia koreica American Eastern tree hole Aedes triseriatus Ochlerotatus triseriatus This key provides the non-specialist with reference material to help recognise an invasive mosquito mosquito species and gives details on the morphology (in the species-specific pages) to help with verification and the compiling of a final list of candidates. The key displays six invasive Aedes atropalpus Georgecraigius atropalpus American rock pool mosquito mosquito species that are present in the EU/EEA or have been intercepted in the past. It also contains nine native species. The native species have been selected based on their morpho- Aedes cretinus Stegomyia cretina logical similarity with the invasive species, the likelihood of encountering them, whether they Aedes geniculatus Dahliana geniculata bite humans and how common they are.
    [Show full text]
  • The Occurrence of Stalk-Eyed Flies (Diptera, Diopsidae) in the Arabian Peninsula, with a Review of Cluster Formation in the Diopsidae Hans R
    Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 160 (2017) 75–88 The occurrence of stalk-eyed flies (Diptera, Diopsidae) in the Arabian Peninsula, with a review of cluster formation in the Diopsidae Hans R. Feijen*, Ralph Martin & Cobi Feijen Catalogue and distribution data are presented for the six Diopsidae species known to occur in the Arabian Peninsula: Sphyracephala beccarii, Chaetodiopsis meigenii, Diasemopsis aethiopica, Diopsis arabica, Diopsis mayae and Diopsis sp. (ichneumonea species group). The biogeographical aspects of their distribution are discussed. Records of Diopsis apicalis and Diopsis collaris are removed from the list for Arabia as these were based on misidentifications. Synonymies involving Diasemopsis aethiopica and Diasemopsis varians are discussed. Only one out of four specimens in the D. elegantula type series proved conspecific with D. aethiopica. The synonymy of D. aethiopica and D. varians is rejected. A lectotype for Diasemopsis elegantula is now designated. D. elegantula is proposed as junior synonym of D. varians. A fly cluster of more than 80,000 Sphyracephala beccarii, observed in Oman, is described. The occurrence of cluster formations in the Diopsidae is reviewed, while a possible explanation is indicated. Hans R. Feijen*, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. [email protected] Ralph Martin, University of Freiburg, Münchhofstraße 14, 79106 Freiburg, Germany Cobi Feijen, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Introduction catalogue for Diopsidae, Steyskal (1972) only re- Westwood (1837b) described Diopsis arabica as ferred to Westwood and Hennig as far as Diopsidae the first stalk-eyed fly from the Arabian Peninsula. in Arabia was concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects Commonly Mistaken for Mosquitoes
    Mosquito Proboscis (Figure 1) THE MOSQUITO LIFE CYCLE ABOUT CONTRA COSTA INSECTS Mosquitoes have four distinct developmental stages: MOSQUITO & VECTOR egg, larva, pupa and adult. The average time a mosquito takes to go from egg to adult is five to CONTROL DISTRICT COMMONLY Photo by Sean McCann by Photo seven days. Mosquitoes require water to complete Protecting Public Health Since 1927 their life cycle. Prevent mosquitoes from breeding by Early in the 1900s, Northern California suffered MISTAKEN FOR eliminating or managing standing water. through epidemics of encephalitis and malaria, and severe outbreaks of saltwater mosquitoes. At times, MOSQUITOES EGG RAFT parts of Contra Costa County were considered Most mosquitoes lay egg rafts uninhabitable resulting in the closure of waterfront that float on the water. Each areas and schools during peak mosquito seasons. raft contains up to 200 eggs. Recreational areas were abandoned and Realtors had trouble selling homes. The general economy Within a few days the eggs suffered. As a result, residents established the Contra hatch into larvae. Mosquito Costa Mosquito Abatement District which began egg rafts are the size of a grain service in 1927. of rice. Today, the Contra Costa Mosquito and Vector LARVA Control District continues to protect public health The larva or ÒwigglerÓ comes with environmentally sound techniques, reliable and to the surface to breathe efficient services, as well as programs to combat Contra Costa County is home to 23 species of through a tube called a emerging diseases, all while preserving and/or mosquitoes. There are also several types of insects siphon and feeds on bacteria enhancing the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Resource Choice of Flower-Visiting Insects in Relation to Pollen Nutritional Quality and Land Use
    Diversity and resource choice of flower-visiting insects in relation to pollen nutritional quality and land use Diversität und Ressourcennutzung Blüten besuchender Insekten in Abhängigkeit von Pollenqualität und Landnutzung Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Technischen Universität Darmstadt zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doctor rerum naturalium genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl. Biologin Christiane Natalie Weiner aus Köln Berichterstatter (1. Referent): Prof. Dr. Nico Blüthgen Mitberichterstatter (2. Referent): Prof. Dr. Andreas Jürgens Tag der Einreichung: 26.02.2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29.04.2016 Darmstadt 2016 D17 2 Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit entsprechend den Regeln guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis selbständig und ohne unzulässige Hilfe Dritter angefertigt habe. Sämtliche aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Gedanken sowie sämtliche von Anderen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Daten, Techniken und Materialien sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher keiner anderen Hochschule zu Prüfungszwecken eingereicht. Osterholz-Scharmbeck, den 24.02.2016 3 4 My doctoral thesis is based on the following manuscripts: Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2011): Land-use intensity in grasslands: changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialization in flower-visitor networks. Basic and Applied Ecology 12 (4), 292-299. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2014): Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. Ecology 95, 466–474. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M , Blüthgen, N. (in prep.): Land-use intensification triggers diversity loss in pollination networks: Regional distinctions between three different German bioregions Weiner, C.N., Hilpert, A., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Descriptions
    FAMILY DESCRIPTIONS CAT = Although they do not contain keys, the identification references include recent cata- logues as valuable source on genera, species, distribution and references. CMPD = Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera. Lindner = Chapter in Lindner, E., Die Fliegen der Paläarktischen Region. ( ) Family names between brackets refer to names as found in the literature, not recognised here as a separate family but, as indicated, considered part of another family. et al. References with more than two authors are given as First author et al. As far as not yet outdated, the number of genera and species in Europe is largely based on the Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera, the CMPD and Fauna Europaea, the latter available online at: www.faunaeur.org (consulted was version 1.2, updated 7 March 2005). As to size, the following categories are distinguished: minute: smaller than 2 mm; small: 2- 5 mm; medium sized: 5-10 mm; large: 10-20 mm; very large: over 20 mm. Acartophthalmidae (key couplet 113; fig. 243) Systematics: Acalyptrate Brachycera; superfamily Opomyzoidea; in Europe 1 genus, Acartophthalmus, with 3 species. Characters: Minute to small (1-2.5 mm), brownish grey flies. Arista pubescent, ocelli present; Oc-bristles present; P-bris- tles strong, far apart, diverging; 3 pairs of F-bristles, curving obliquely out-backward, increasing in size, the upper pair the largest; scattered interfrontal setulae present; vibrissae absent but with a series of strong bristles near the vibrissal angle. Wing unmarked or tinged along costa; costa with a humeral break only; vein Sc complete; crossvein BM-Cu present; cell cup closed.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogen Content in Riparian Arthropods Is Most Dependent on Allometry and Order
    Wiesenborn: Nitrogen Contents in Riparian Arthropods 71 NITROGEN CONTENT IN RIPARIAN ARTHROPODS IS MOST DEPENDENT ON ALLOMETRY AND ORDER WILLIAM D. WIESENBORN U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Lower Colorado Regional Office, P.O. Box 61470, Boulder City, NV 89006 ABSTRACT I investigated the contributions of body mass, order, family, and trophic level to nitrogen (N) content in riparian spiders and insects collected near the Colorado River in western Arizona. Most variation (97.2%) in N mass among arthropods was associated with the allometric effects of body mass. Nitrogen mass increased exponentially as body dry-mass increased. Significant variation (20.7%) in N mass adjusted for body mass was explained by arthropod order. Ad- justed N mass was highest in Orthoptera, Hymenoptera, Araneae, and Odonata and lowest in Coleoptera. Classifying arthropods by family compared with order did not explain signifi- cantly more variation (22.1%) in N content. Herbivore, predator, and detritivore trophic-levels across orders explained little variation (4.3%) in N mass adjusted for body mass. Within or- ders, N content differed only among trophic levels of Diptera. Adjusted N mass was highest in predaceous flies, intermediate in detritivorous flies, and lowest in phytophagous flies. Nitro- gen content in riparian spiders and insects is most dependent on allometry and order and least dependent on trophic level. I suggest the effects of allometry and order are due to exoskeleton thickness and composition. Foraging by vertebrate predators, such as insectivorous birds, may be affected by variation in N content among riparian arthropods. Key Words: nutrients, spiders, insects, trophic level, exoskeleton, cuticle RESUMEN Se investiguo las contribuciones de la masa de cuerpo, orden, familia y el nivel trófico al con- tenido de nitógeno (N) en arañas e insectos riparianos (que viven en la orilla del rio u otro cuerpo de agua) recolectadaos cerca del Rio Colorado en el oeste del estado de Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Ÿþm I C R O S O F T W O R
    REPUBLIQUE ALGÉRIENNE DÉMOCRATIQUE ET POPULAIRE MINISTRE DE L’ENSEIGEMENT SUPÉRIEUR ET DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE Université de Blida 1 Faculté des sciences de la nature et de la vie Département de Biologie Mémoire de fin d’études élaboré en vue de l’obtention du Diplôme de Master Option: Entomologie Médicale Facteurs toxicologiques affectant le développement des insectes nécrophages Par : Dahri Hamida Fridi Imen Devant le jury : Mme.Zerkaoui A. M.A.A. Président (USDB) Mme.Ouattar F. M.C.B. Éxaminatrice (USDB) Mme. Kara-Toumi F.Z. Professeur promotrice (USDB) Melle.Taleb M. Doctorante Co-promoteur (USDB) Année universitaire 2015 -2016 DEDICACES Nous dédions ce modeste travail à : Nous chers parents pour leur soutien, leurs efforts et aides ; Nos sœurs Hanane, Nadia, Hizia, Feriel ; Nos frères Mouhamed Islem, Abdelrahim et Abdelkadar ; Nos neveux Hany et Mahdi ; Nos chers amis pour leur encouragement ; REMERCIEMENTS Tout d'abord nous remercions Dieu tout puissant pour nous avoir donné la force, le courage et la persévérance pour mener à bien ce mémoire. Au terme de ce mémoire, nous tenons à remercier toutes les personnes qui ont contribué, de près ou de loin, à son élaboration. Nous remercient énormément notre promotrice Mme Kara-Toumi F/Z Professeur au Département de Biologie des Populations et des Organismes pour son aide précieuse qui nous accompagné tout au long de notre travail, pour ses valeureux conseils et sa disponibilité. Nous tenons à remercier tout particulièrement notre Co-promotrice Melle Taleb Meriem pour nous avoir enseigné, guider et appris beaucoup de choses dans ce domaine de la criminalistique, et pour sa patience et ses innombrables efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Diptera, Opomyzoidea
    Zootaxa 1009: 21–36 (2005) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1009 Copyright © 2005 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Curiosimusca, gen. nov., and three new species in the family Aul- acigastridae from the Oriental Region (Diptera: Opomyzoidea) ALESSANDRA RUNG, WAYNE N. MATHIS & LÁSZLÓ PAPP (AR) Department of Entomology, 4112 Plant Sciences Building, University of Maryland, College Park, Mary- land 20742, United States. E-mail: [email protected]. (WNM) Department of Entomology, NHB 169, PO BOX 37012, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, United States. E-mail: [email protected]. (LP) Zoological Department, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Baross utca 13, PO BOX 137, 1431 Budapest, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract A new genus, Curiosimusca, and three new species (C. khooi, C. orientalis, C. maefangensis) are described from specimens collected in the Oriental Region (Malaysia, Thailand). Curiosimusca is postulated to be the sister group of Aulacigaster Macquart and for the present is the only other genus included in the family Aulacigastridae (Opomyzoidea). Morphological evidence is presented to document our preliminary hypothesis of phylogenetic relationships. Key words: Aulacigastridae, Diptera, systematics, Oriental Region Introduction While preparing a monograph on the family Aulacigastridae (Rung & Mathis in prep.), we discovered several specimens of enigmatic flies from Malaysia and Thailand. The speci- mens from Malaysia had been identified and labeled as “possibly Aulacigastridae.” Our subsequent study of these specimens has revealed them to be the closest extant relatives of Aulacigaster Macquart, which until now has been the only recently included genus in the family Aulacigastridae.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Diopsoidea
    Chapter 2 Diopsoidea DiopsoideaTeaching material only, not intended for wider circulation. [email protected] 2:37 Diptera: Acalyptrates DIOPSOI D EA 50: Tanypezidae 53 ------ Base of tarsomere 1 of hind tarsus very slightly projecting ventrally; male with small stout black setae on hind trochanter and posterior base of hind femur. Postocellar bristles strong, at least half as long as upper orbital seta; one dorsocentral and three orbital setae present Tanypeza ----------------------------------------- 55 2 spp.; Maine to Alberta and Georgia; Steyskal 1965 ---------- Base of tarsomere 1 of hind tarsus strongly projecting ventrally, about twice as deep as remainder of tarsomere 1 (Fig. 3); male without special setae on hind trochanter and hind femur. Postocellar bristles weak, less than half as long as upper orbital bristle; one to three dor socentral and zero to two orbital bristles present non-British ------------------------------------------ 54 54 ------ Only one orbital bristle present, situated at top of head; one dorsocentral bristle present --------------------- Scipopeza Enderlein Neotropical ---------- Two or three each of orbital and dorsocentral bristles present ---------------------Neotanypeza Hendel Neotropical Tanypeza Fallén, 1820 One species 55 ------ A black species with a silvery patch on the vertex and each side of front of frons. Tho- rax with notopleural depression silvery and pleurae with silvery patches. Palpi black, prominent and flat. Ocellar bristles small; two pairs of fronto orbital bristles; only one (outer) pair of vertical bristles. Frons slightly narrower in the male than in the female, but not with eyes almost touching). Four scutellar, no sternopleural, two postalar and one supra-alar bristles; (the anterior supra-alar bristle not present). Wings with upcurved discal cell (11) as in members of the Micropezidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Notable Invertebrates Associated with Fens
    Notable invertebrates associated with fens Molluscs (Mollusca) Vertigo moulinsiana BAP Priority RDB3 Vertigo angustior BAP Priority RDB1 Oxyloma sarsi RDB2 Spiders and allies (Arachnida:Araeae/Pseudoscorpiones) Clubiona rosserae BAP Priority RDB1 Dolomedes plantarius BAP Priority RDB1 Baryphyma gowerense RDBK Carorita paludosa RDB2 Centromerus semiater RDB2 Clubiona juvensis RDB2 Enoplognatha tecta RDB1 Hypsosinga heri RDB1 Neon valentulus RDB2 Pardosa paludicola RDB3 Robertus insignis RDB1 Zora armillata RDB3 Agraecina striata Nb Crustulina sticta Nb Diplocephalus protuberans Nb Donacochara speciosa Na Entelecara omissa Na Erigone welchi Na Gongylidiellum murcidum Nb Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata Na Hypomma fulvum Na Maro sublestus Nb Marpissa radiata Na Maso gallicus Na Myrmarachne formicaria Nb Notioscopus sarcinatus Nb Porrhomma oblitum Nb Saloca diceros Nb Sitticus caricis Nb Synageles venator Na Theridiosoma gemmosum Nb Woodlice (Isopoda) Trichoniscoides albidus Nb Stoneflies (Plecoptera) Nemoura dubitans pNotable Dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata ) Aeshna isosceles RDB 1 Lestes dryas RDB2 Libellula fulva RDB 3 Ceriagrion tenellum N Grasshoppers, crickets, earwigs & cockroaches (Orthoptera/Dermaptera/Dictyoptera) Stethophyma grossum BAP Priority RDB2 Now extinct on Fenland but re-introduction to undrained Fenland habitats is envisaged as part of the Species Recovery Plan. Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa BAP Priority RDB1 (May be extinct on Fenland sites, but was once common enough on Fenland to earn the local vernacular name of ‘Fen-cricket’.)
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) Diversity in a Patch of Costa Rican Cloud Forest: Why Inventory Is a Vital Science
    Zootaxa 4402 (1): 053–090 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4402.1.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C2FAF702-664B-4E21-B4AE-404F85210A12 Remarkable fly (Diptera) diversity in a patch of Costa Rican cloud forest: Why inventory is a vital science ART BORKENT1, BRIAN V. BROWN2, PETER H. ADLER3, DALTON DE SOUZA AMORIM4, KEVIN BARBER5, DANIEL BICKEL6, STEPHANIE BOUCHER7, SCOTT E. BROOKS8, JOHN BURGER9, Z.L. BURINGTON10, RENATO S. CAPELLARI11, DANIEL N.R. COSTA12, JEFFREY M. CUMMING8, GREG CURLER13, CARL W. DICK14, J.H. EPLER15, ERIC FISHER16, STEPHEN D. GAIMARI17, JON GELHAUS18, DAVID A. GRIMALDI19, JOHN HASH20, MARTIN HAUSER17, HEIKKI HIPPA21, SERGIO IBÁÑEZ- BERNAL22, MATHIAS JASCHHOF23, ELENA P. KAMENEVA24, PETER H. KERR17, VALERY KORNEYEV24, CHESLAVO A. KORYTKOWSKI†, GIAR-ANN KUNG2, GUNNAR MIKALSEN KVIFTE25, OWEN LONSDALE26, STEPHEN A. MARSHALL27, WAYNE N. MATHIS28, VERNER MICHELSEN29, STEFAN NAGLIS30, ALLEN L. NORRBOM31, STEVEN PAIERO27, THOMAS PAPE32, ALESSANDRE PEREIRA- COLAVITE33, MARC POLLET34, SABRINA ROCHEFORT7, ALESSANDRA RUNG17, JUSTIN B. RUNYON35, JADE SAVAGE36, VERA C. SILVA37, BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR38, JEFFREY H. SKEVINGTON8, JOHN O. STIREMAN III10, JOHN SWANN39, PEKKA VILKAMAA40, TERRY WHEELER††, TERRY WHITWORTH41, MARIA WONG2, D. MONTY WOOD8, NORMAN WOODLEY42, TIFFANY YAU27, THOMAS J. ZAVORTINK43 & MANUEL A. ZUMBADO44 †—deceased. Formerly with the Universidad de Panama ††—deceased. Formerly at McGill University, Canada 1. Research Associate, Royal British Columbia Museum and the American Museum of Natural History, 691-8th Ave. SE, Salmon Arm, BC, V1E 2C2, Canada. Email: [email protected] 2.
    [Show full text]