Emu Plains to Lapstone

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Emu Plains to Lapstone EIS 340 AA052343 F4-Western Freeway: section : Emu Plains to Lapstone: environmental impact statement NS DEPT PRIMARI IRUSTR1ES AAO5 2343 r.]IrIi ill 111T11*1111(i1I:1] STATEMENT I I Prepared by Sinclair Knight & Partners Pty Ltd I I I I I I F4 - WESTERN FREEWAY I I Section: Ernu Plains to Lapstone I I 1 I CEAT2T CF I I L I I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1 STATEM ENT I ERRATA The vehicle trips scales for Exhibits 4.3 and 4.4 have been interchanged. I The scale for Exhibit 4.3 is on Exhibit 4.4 and vice versa. The Legend for Exhibit 5.4 should have noise monitoring sites 1 depicted as dots with black lines representing noise contours. I Prepared by Sinclair Knight & Partners Pty Ltd I 1 I I F4 - WESTERN FREEWAY I I Section: Emu Plains to Lapstone I I I I I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT I STATEM ENT I I I This is to certify that this Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared in accordance with clauses 57 and 58 of the I Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation, 1980. I 'L" '~"-'L I Z R D Crooks I Manager- Environmental Services Sinclair Knight & Partners Pty Ltd L] 12 January 1987 I I TABLE OF CONTENTS I Page 1 i. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SUMMARY 1 1.1 OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT 1 1.2 THE PROPOSED EXTENSION 1 1.3 INTERACTIONS WITH THE ENViRONMENT 2 1.3.1 Traffic 2 1.3.2 Access 3 I 1.3.3 Safety 3 1.3.4 Impacts on Business 4 1.3.5 Land Use & Zoning 4 1.3.6 Landscape Values 4 I 1.3.7 Noise Effects 4 1.3.8 Other Impacts 5 I 1.4 CONCLUSION 5 2. 1NTRODUCI1ON 7 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF REPORT 7 ' 2.2 BACKGROUND TO AND OBJECTiVES OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 7 2.3 RECENT HiSTORY OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 9 2.4 STUDY APPROACH 9 2.5 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS 10 3. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 12 I 3.1 FACTORS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DEVELOPING THE PROPOSAL 12 3.2 DESIGN STANDARDS 13 I 3.3 ROUTE DESCRIPTION 13 3.4 INTERCHANGES 15 3.4.1 Russell Street Interchange 15 3.4.2 Governors Drive Interchange 15 I 3.5 ROAD REARRANGEMENTS 16 3.6 CARRIAGEWAY DESiGN 16 3.7 EARTHWORKS 17 I 3.8 MAJOR BRIDGES 18 3.9 DRAINAGE WORKS 18 3.10 LIGHTING 19 I 3.11 SIGNPOSTING 19 3.12 LAND ACQUISITION 20 3.13 CONSTRUCTION 20 3.14 CONSTRUCTION SAFEGUARDS 22 I 3.14.1 Erosion and Sedimentation Control 22 3.14.2 Restoration and Landscape Treatments 23 I I TABLE OF CONTENTS continued Page I 4. TRAFFIC IMPACTS AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT 24 4.1 EXISTING SITUATION 25 4.1.1 Existing Origin Destination Pattern 25 4.1.2 Traffic Volumes 27 4.1.3 Travel Times and Distances 27 I 4.1.4 Other Relevant Road Developments 28 4.2 IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED F4 EXTENSION 29 4.2.1 Accessibility 29 I 4.2.2 Growth in Travel Volumes 31 4.3 iMPACT ON MANAGEMENT OF OVERSIZE TRUCK LOADS 34 4.4 ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT 34 5. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATING MEASURES 37 I 5.1 LOCAL ACCESS 37 5.1.1. Vehicular Access 37 5.1.2 Bicycle Access 39 I 5.1.3 Pedestrian Access 39 5.1.4 Access for Public Transport 40 5.2 SAFETY 41 I 5.3 IMPACTS ON BUSINESS 43 5.4 IMPACTS ON LAND ZONING AND LAND USE 44 5.4.1 Zoning 44 I 5.4.2 Land Use 46 5.5 VISUAL IMPACTS 47 5.6 HERITAGE 48 5.6.1 Transport Flistory 48 I 5.6.2 Archaeology 49 5.6.3 Natural Heritage 51 5.7 NOISE AND VIBRATION 51 ' 5.7.1 Noise 51 5.7.2 Vibration 58 5.8 VEGETATION 59 60 I 5.9 UTILITY INSTALLATIONS 5.10 OTHER IMPACTS 60 5.10.1 Water Quality 60 5.10.2 Air Quality 61 I 5.11 ENERGY STATEMENT 61 6. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 62 INTRODUCTION 62 OPTION 1- ROAD OVER RAIL 63 6.16.2 6.3 OPTION 2- EXIT AND ENTRY RAMPS AT LAPSTONE 64 OPTION 3- EXIT RAMPS ONLY AT LAPSTONE 67 6.5 OPTION 4- DUAL CARRIAGEWAY OPTION 69 6.66.4 THE NO DEVELOPMENT OPTION 72 6.7 CONCLUSION 73 I TABLE OF CONTENTS continued Page 7. REFERENCES 74 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 DiRECTOR'S REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX 2 LIATSON WITH OTHER AUTHORITIES APPENDIX 3 STUDY PARTICIPANTS I I LIST OF TABLES I Page I TABLE 1.1 SUMMARY OF BENEFITS/DISBENEFITS 6 I TABLE 3.1 BRIDGE DIMENSIONS TABLE 4.1 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON NEPEAN RIVER BRIDGES 28 I TABLE 4.2 ROUTE DISTANCES AND TRAVEL TIMES 29 TABLE 4.3 EFFECT OF F4 EXTENSION ON TRAVEL TIMES 30 - BLAXLAND/PENRITH I TABLE 4.4 EFFECT OF F4 EXTENSION ON TRAVEL TIMES 31 - BLAXLAND/F4 I TABLE 4.5 ROAD TRAFFIC VOLUMES (AADT) 33 TABLE 5.1 EXISTING NOISE LEVELS 52 I TABLE 5.2 PREDICTED LI0 (18-HOUR) NOISE LEVELS 54 TABLE 6.1 COST COMPARISON - PREFERRED SCHEME AND 67 I OPTION 2 ($M) I I I I I I I I I 1 I UST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT I.I. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT 2.1 METROPOLITAN FIREEWAY SYSTEM EXHIBIT 3.1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT 3.2 LONGITUDINAL SECTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT EXHIBIT 3.3 INTERCHANGE DETAILS EXHIBIT 3.4 CARRIAGEWAY DETAILS EXHIBIT 3.5 RUSSELL STREET BRIDGE EXHIBIT 3.6 RAILWAY BRIDGE EXHIBIT 3.7 LIGHTING AND SIGNPOSTING PLAN EXHIBIT 4.1 ROAD NETWORK EXHIBIT 4.2 1986 ORIGIN - DESTINATION PATTERNS (AM PEAK) EXHIBIT 4.3 1986 ORIGIN - DESTINATION PATTERNS (PM PEAK) EXI-IIB1T4.4 FORECAST 1995 ORIGIN - DESTINATION PATTERNS (COMBINED AM AND PM PEAKS) EXHIBIT 5.1 LOCAL ACCESS EXHIBIT 5.2 LAND ZONING EXHIBIT 5.3 LAND USE EXHIBIT 5.4 NOISE MONITORING SITES EXHIBIT 5.5 VEGETATiON AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES EXHIBIT 6.1 PLAN OF OPTION 1 EXHIBIT 6.2 PLAN OF OPTION 2 EXHIBIT 6.3 PLAN OF OPTION 3 EXHIBIT 6.4 PLAN OF OPTION 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SUMMARY U 1.1 OBJECT! YES OF THE PROJECT The proposal to extend the F4 Freeway from Emu Plains to Lapstone forms an integral part of the overall plan to provide a high standard east-west road route across Sydney. The proposal, in combination with the City-West Link Road, will facilitate the safe and efficient movement of vehicles through the most heavily trafficked corridor in the metropolitan region. More specifically, the proposal will remove a hazardous section of the Great Western Highway between Emu Plains and Lapstone and improve the amenity of residents in Emu Plains who are presently adversely affected by through traffic. 1.2 THE PROPOSED EXTENSION The F4 Freeway extension has been under consideration for many years with several I options being investigated. Factors taken into account in the planning and design process included engineering design standards, traffic, access, visual amenity and I heritage conservation impacts. The preferred scheme arising from these considerations is shown on Exhibit 1.1. I Alternative schemes are addressed in Section 6 of this environmental impact I statement (EIS). The proposed development extends from the present termination point of the F4 I Freeway at Russell Street, Emu Plains to where the Great Western Highway and Governors Drive intersect at Lapstone. The overall length of construction will be 1.9 kilometres. The road easement will vary between 65 and 90 metres in width depending on the depth of cut and fill. An interchange will be provided at Russell Street with a bridge to carry Russell Street over the extended Freeway. This will facilitate exit and entry movements I while maintaining free passage along the Freeway. I nt034.eis I A second grade separated interchange will be provided at the Governors Drive/Great Western Highway intersection at Lapstone. The highway will pass over Governors Drive on a bridge. Other significant engineering aspects of the proposed development include: a substantial bridge to carry the Main Western Rail Line over the extended Freeway; a substantial earthworks embankment to carry the Freeway over Knapsack Creek; and, provision of pedestrian access beneath the extended Freeway via a culvert in the vicinity of Knapsack Creek. Earthworks will be balanced at 100,000 cubic metres of cut and fill and hence there will be no requirement to establish off-site "borrow areas" or dispose of surplus fill. 1.3 INTERACHONS WITH THE ENVIRONMENT 1.3.1 Traffic The proposed development will have a significant and primarily beneficial effect on traffic patterns and movements. In terms of access, the proposed development will increase options for accessing Penrith from the Blue Mountains and generally improve travel times. There is no evidence to suggest that vehicle loadings on Old Bathurst Road and Mitchells Pass Road will increase, in fact, they are expected to decrease slightly. in terms of traffic volumes, the major effect of the development will be to permit growth in through traffic volumes on the F4 while traffic volumes on local roads in the Emu Plains area will be reduced from what they would have been in the absence of the development. 2 nt034.eis 1.3.2 Access Impacts on both inter and intra suburban traffic access were assessed. In terms of inter-suburban access, it is concluded that the development will leave the majority of access routes unchanged or will improve them so that the nett effect will be beneficial.
Recommended publications
  • Rhodes East - Social Infrastructure and Open Space Assessment Final Report
    Rhodes East - Social Infrastructure and Open Space Assessment Final Report Client: Roberts Day, on behalf of NSW Department of Planning & Environment Date: 7 December 2016 Contact: Jenny Vozoff [email protected] 02 9387 2600 Sydney 02 9387 2600 Level 6 332 – 342 Oxford Street Bondi Junction NSW 2022 www.elton.com.au [email protected] Sydney | Canberra | Darwin ABN 56 003 853 101 Prepared by Jenny Vozoff Reviewed by Chris Manning Date 7 December 2016 Document name Social Infrastructure and Open Space Final Report 7 December 2016 Version Final v4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Precinct location and context 3 1.2 Precinct vision and objectives 4 2 PRECINCT PLANNING CONTEXT 6 2.1 Policy and planning context 6 2.2 Demographic context 21 2.2.1 Existing population 21 2.2.2 Future population 23 3 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPEN SPACE PROVISION 24 3.1.1 Regional level infrastructure 24 3.1.2 District and local level infrastructure 26 3.2 Open space and recreational facilities 30 3.3 Identified needs 31 4 FUTURE POPULATION AND PROFILE 33 4.1 The development scenario 33 4.2 Forecast dwelling yields and population 33 4.3 Demographic characteristics of future population 35 4.3.1 Characteristics of high density areas 35 4.3.2 Implications for the Rhodes East Precinct 36 5 COMMUNITY FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 38 5.1 Approach to planning social infrastructure 38 5.2 Local government community facilities 40 5.2.1 Community centres 40 5.2.2 Facilities and services for older people 44 5.2.3 Facilities for young people 44 5.2.4
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Types in NSW Historical Overviews 2006
    Bridge Types in NSW Historical overviews 2006 These historical overviews of bridge types in NSW are extracts compiled from bridge population studies commissioned by RTA Environment Branch. CONTENTS Section Page 1. Masonry Bridges 1 2. Timber Beam Bridges 12 3. Timber Truss Bridges 25 4. Pre-1930 Metal Bridges 57 5. Concrete Beam Bridges 75 6. Concrete Slab and Arch Bridges 101 Masonry Bridges Heritage Study of Masonry Bridges in NSW 2005 1 Historical Overview of Bridge Types in NSW: Extract from the Study of Masonry Bridges in NSW HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO MASONRY BRIDGES IN NSW 1.1 History of early bridges constructed in NSW Bridges constructed prior to the 1830s were relatively simple forms. The majority of these were timber structures, with the occasional use of stone piers. The first bridge constructed in NSW was built in 1788. The bridge was a simple timber bridge constructed over the Tank Stream, near what is today the intersection of George and Bridge Streets in the Central Business District of Sydney. Soon after it was washed away and needed to be replaced. The first "permanent" bridge in NSW was this bridge's successor. This was a masonry and timber arch bridge with a span of 24 feet erected in 1803 (Figure 1.1). However this was not a triumph of colonial bridge engineering, as it collapsed after only three years' service. It took a further five years for the bridge to be rebuilt in an improved form. The contractor who undertook this work received payment of 660 gallons of spirits, this being an alternative currency in the Colony at the time (Main Roads, 1950: 37) Figure 1.1 “View of Sydney from The Rocks, 1803”, by John Lancashire (Dixson Galleries, SLNSW).
    [Show full text]
  • Chain Mail Editor: Doug Stewart 9887 1478 Bicycle User Group Bike North Newsletter Number 3, Dec 1997 - Feb 1998   Freely
    The Secretary PO Box 719 Gladesville 2111 Chain Mail Editor: Doug Stewart 9887 1478 Bicycle User Group Bike North Newsletter Number 3, Dec 1997 - Feb 1998 freely. This list gives you the opportunity to ask Welcome. With the Christmas break and lots of questions or to air any views on cycling. The list other activities this issue is a fair bit later than has been quiet recently (averaging less than expected. Contributions welcome to the address one message per week) but there is no limit to [email protected] above or email to . how many messages you may receive. Please send back the form on the last page The Talk List is also available in weekly digest which covers a variety of items including form which combines all the postings in a single membership renewal. week into a single email which is sent out weekly. This allows you to see everything on the email talk list but not as it is sent. Bike North Local News To join either list email Keith Griffin at Successful Christmas Party [email protected]. Tell him whether you want to be on the News List or Despite a slight rain shower about thirty Bike the Talk List or both and if you join the Talk Northers enjoyed our second annual Christmas List, whether you want the weekly digest form. get-together on the 14th of December. The You can also mark your preference down on our purple Bike North Banner was unfurled Dear Bike North form (enclosed). between the trees at Bicentennial Park in West Pymble and then a very pleasant picnic lunch was enjoyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Since 2012
    Progress Since 2012 Name Suburb Region/District Project Type Project Description Current Status 2nd Bulk Liquids Berth Port Botany Eastern City Freight Planning approval to develop a second Bulk Liquids Completed District Berth (BLB2) at Port Botany was received in 2008. On 31 May 2011, John Holland Pty Ltd was engaged to construct the BLB2. The berth became operational in December 2013. The main products handled at the BLB are refined fuels, gases and chemicals / other bulk liquids. BLB2 comprise a steel piled pier adjacent to the existing BLB1; associated infrastructure such as marine loading arms, fire fighting equipment, onshore support facilities and pipelines from existing user sites to the new berth. The open access, multi user berth operates on a 24 hour/ 7 day per week basis. BLB2 has been designed to accommodate 120,000 dead weight tonne vessels to a maximum of 270m length overall. Abbotsford Wharf - Abbotsford Eastern City Maritime The upgrade aims to provide easier access to the wharf, Planning Wharf Upgrade District better weather protection, additional seating, improved program safety, quicker and more efficient boarding and disembarking, increased capacity and more efficient interchange with other modes of transport. Acacia Avenue Lake Munmorah Central Coast Walking and Cycling Shared Path cycleway alongside Acacia Avenue Completed cycleway Name Suburb Region/District Project Type Project Description Current Status Additional Boating Castle Cove North Maritime Planning Access Points at Middle Harbour (Investigation), Willoughby Additional Boating Penrith West Maritime Investigation and concept designs for eight passive craft Planning Access Points on the access points to the Neapean River. Nepean River (Investigation) Airds Road cycleway Leumeah Western City Walking and Cycling Shared Path cycleway alongside Airds Road Completed District Airport East Precinct Mascot Eastern City Road Roads east of the airport will be upgraded and the In-Progress District General Holmes Drive rail level crossing will be removed by constructing a road underpass.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepean River Green Bridge Transport Study
    Appendix A TfNSW – Traffic and Transport report Prepared for 29 June 2012 Transport for NSW Nepean River Green Bridge Transport Study DRAFT Creating, enhancing and sustaining the world’s built, natural and social environments. AECOM Nepean River Green Bridge D R A F T Nepean River Green Bridge Transport Study Prepared for Transport for NSW Prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 21, 420 George Street, Sydney NSW 2000, PO Box Q410, QVB Post Office NSW 1230, Australia T +61 2 8934 0000 F +61 2 8934 0001 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925 29 June 2012 60266082 AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to the latest version of ISO9001 and ISO14001. © AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (AECOM). All rights reserved. AECOM has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of AECOM. AECOM undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. This document has been prepared based on the Client’s description of its requirements and AECOM’s experience, having regard to assumptions that AECOM can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. AECOM may also have relied upon information provided by the Client and other third parties to prepare this document, some of which may not have been verified. Subject to the above conditions, this document may be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated only in its entirety.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing the Nepean River on the Western Line Between Penrith and Emu Plains
    Crossing the Nepean River on the Western Line between Penrith and Emu Plains. The Hawkesbury – Nepean River reaches in a wide arc around the whole of the metropolitan area of Sydney. There is no way out of Sydney, except for a narrow strip of land between its headwaters and the coast above Wollongong, that does not cross it. The planners of the early NSW railways, whose intended destinations were Goulburn and Bathurst faced the river crossing as their largest single constraint, at least until they tried to cross the Blue Mountains. The early railways kept to the watersheds between river valleys to avoid river crossings, but the Nepean could not be avoided. At one stage the point at which the South line would diverge from the West line was placed west of the Nepean near Emu Plains, so as to allow a single crossing to serve both lines. The South line would have been routed through Silverdale and The Oaks to Thirlmere. This was circuitous and didn’t really solve any problems for it just introduced a crossing of the Warragamba River. This ‘tributary’ is in fact the major contributor to the flow of the Nepean at Penrith and would have required a significant bridge. So the decision was made to cross the Nepean twice – at Menangle for the Great Southern Railway and at Emu Ford for the Great Western Railway. Although the Emu Plains crossing opened four years after Menangle it had taken longer to build as recurring floods disrupted work on the piers. The two bridges were more or less built at the same time, work at Emu Plains was in hand in 1862 well before Menangle opened.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSEMBLY-Death of T. W. Dalton Tuesday, 18 August, 1981 Death Of
    184 ASSEMBLY-Death of T. W. Dalton Tuesday, 18 August, 1981 Death of Thomas William Dalton, a former Member of the Legislative Assembly- Petitions-Questions without Notice-Sessional Committees (House, Library, Printing)-Governor's Speech: Address in Reply (Third Day's Debate)- Adjournment (Port Botany Hazard Survey). Mr Speaker (The Hon. Lawrence Borthwick Kclly) tool< the chair at 2.15 p.m. Mr Spealrer offered the Prayer. DEATH OF THOMAS WILLIAM DALTON, A FORMER MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Mr WRAN (Bass Hill), Premier and Treasurer [2.16!: I move: That this House extcnds to the Iamily of Thomas William Dalton, a former Member of this House, the deep sympathy of Members of the Legislative Assembly in the loss sustained by his death. Thomas Dalton served this House and the people of his electorate faithfully from 14th February, 1953, to 6th February, 1956, and from 21st March, 1959, to 23rd January, 1968. His maiden speech to this House on 19th August, 1953, set the tone for his parliamentary career. Above all, he was concerned with the problems of his electorate, centred on the then rapidly growing Sutherland district. In that speech he spolte on housing, transport and the industrial development of the Botany Bay region. It is ironical that one of the principal concerns that he expressed in his maiden speech was for home buyers following the increases in housing interest rates by the federal Government of the day. In recent years we have become accustomed to hearing of the need to tackle urban problems and to plan for future urban develop- ments.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Drive” Drive” Heritage “Penrith of Copyright ©2016
    w visitpenrith.com.au [email protected] ST MARY THORNTON VICTORIA BRIDGE EMU PLAINS 1300 736 836 736 1300 PENRITH MAGDALENE CHURCH Thornton Hall was built in 1870 Victoria Bridge is a main link PUBLIC SCHOOL : St Mary Magdalene Anglican by Thomas Smith, an alderman across the Nepean River between The original Emu Plains Public Tourism Penrith contact Drive Heritage Penrith the of copy a For HERITAGE Church and Cemetery were on Penrith’s first municipal Penrith and Emu Plains on the School was officially opened in Penrith Street, High 601 consecrated in 1840 by Australia’s council and the first publican of Great Western Highway. The August 1877 by NSW Premier Library City Penrith first Anglican bishop, William the Red Cow Hotel. It was home original bridge, opened in Sir Henry Parkes. Attached to visit: sites heritage these on information more For DRIVE Grant Broughton. The cemetery to two of Mr Smith’s sons, former 10 January 1856, was destroyed 16 this attractive stone school is the 22 4 Council. City Penrith in vests contains memorials to the Penrith mayor Thomas Richard by floods in 1857. Its successor former schoolmaster’s residence. ©2016 Copyright of “Penrith Heritage Drive” Drive” Heritage “Penrith of Copyright ©2016 Penrith is a City with a rich and colourful history pioneers of the district including Captain Phillip Gidley King, Smith and Sydney Smith, a member of Sir Henry Parkes’ ministry. was washed away in May 1860. In 1869, with John Whitton as The old school now serves as a community centre and is home to Copyright which you can see for yourself, learn about the third Governor of NSW, other members of the King family THORNTON HALL Engineer-in-Chief of the NSW Railways, the Victoria Bridge was the Nepean Family History Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Hobby's Outreach, Vol 11 No 2
    t-IOBB}!'S OlATRE-ACt-1 Blu.e Mou.ntains +-listol"'ical Sode+)! inc. PO Box 17 WENTWORTH FALLS 2782 'HOBBY'S REACH' 99 Blaxland Road WENTWORTH FALLS Hobby's Reach Phone No. 02 4757 3824 Vol.11 No.2 July/Aug 2000 MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE President Valerie Craven 4757 3433 Vice President John Glass 4757 1821 Secretary Roberta Johnstone 4757 2024 Treasurer Shirley Jones 4757 2270 Members Josephine Adam 4759 1022 Members Peter Gunton 4787 7335 Barrie Reynolds 4757 4735 Graham Wam1bath 4757 3402 SUB-COMMITTEE CO-ORDINATORS Research Officer Joan Smith 4757 4009 Curator Coral Ewan 4784 1831 Traditional Garden Josephine Adam 4759 1022 Maintenance Clyde Francis 4759 1774 Native Garden Noreen Skellam 4757 1845 HR Helpers Valerie Craven 4757 3433 Walks & Talks Josephine Adam 4759 1022 Photocopiers Michael Finlay 4757 1584 Publishing Graham Warmbath 4757 3402 Bookshop & Editor Susan Warmbath 4757 3402 Membership Secretary Elizabeth Finlay 4757 1584 Publicity Geoff Dunn 4757 3233 Diary Dates Continued Tues July 11 10 am Hobby's Reach Research Fri 14 9 am Friends of Tarella Tues 18 Hobby's Reach Research; Gardening Fri 21 9 am Friends of Tarella Sun 23 Tarella Open 10 am to 4 pm. Tues 25 Hobby's Reach Research Fri 28 9 am Friends of Tarella Tues Aug 1 Hobby's Reach Research; Gardening Fri 4 9 am Friends of Tarella Sat 5 10.30 am Meeting, Speaker - Allen Smith, Clean & Decent Part 3 Tues 8 Hobby's Reach Research Fri 11 9 am Friends of Tarella Mon 14 Excursion to Glenbrook/Lapstone Tues 15 Hobby's Reach Research; Gardening Fri 18 9 am Friends of Tarella Tues 22 Hobby's Reach Research John Whitton 1820 - 1898 Fri 25 9 am Friends of Tarella Dates for your Diary Sun 27 Tarella Open 10 am to 4 pm.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Canada Bay LGA
    Parramatta River Estuary Processes Study AECOM City of Canada Bay LGA 163 Parramatta River Estuary Processes Study – LGA Management Summaries October 2010 Parramatta River Estuary Processes Study AECOM 9.4 City of Canada Bay 9.4.1 General Description The City of Canada Bay LGA contains over 35km of shoreline which is one of the largest foreshore area that any one local government authority is responsible for. Land use is primarily low and medium density residential with significant areas dedicated to public recreation (parks along drainage reserves, golf course, wharves, and foreshore reserves) and special use (infrastructure) areas (e.g. Rivendell Child Adolescent & Family Unit, Concord Repatriation Hospital and “Yaralla House” Dame Eadith Walker Hospital) The LGA contributes a catchment area of approximately 1,847.6 ha to the estuary study area, its tributaries and embayments, excluding land draining to Homebush Bay and Iron Cove Bay catchments (refer Section 3.0), include the following: x Iron Cove Bay, downstream to Iron Cove Bridge (28.8 ha); x River South, Iron Cove Bridge to Five Dock Point (77.9 ha); x Five Dock Bay (206.1 ha); x Abbotsford Bay (47.9 ha); x Hen and Chicken Bay (849.5 ha). x Kendall Bay, including foreshore land upstream to Breakfast Point, and downstream to Cabarita Point (74.8 ha); x Majors Bay (215.5 ha); x Yaralla Bay (76.9ha); x Brays Bay, including foreshore land west to John Whitton Bridge (85.4 ha); and x Homebush Bay (75.2 ha) 9.4.2 Stormwater Management and GPTs The City of Canada Bay Council has installed a number of GPTs in various catchments within the LGA.
    [Show full text]
  • Steam Times 2 TRAINS ALIVE
    27132B Booklet27132B Trains Booklet Alive Trains 9/9/04 Alive 4:12 9/9/04 PM Page 4:12 1 PM Page 1 vantage point, acrossvantage the paddocks point, across from the the paddocks track. A birdfrom is the making track. quiteA bird is making quiteBackground NotesBackgr - Steamound T Notesimes 2 - Steam(Compiled Times September 2 (Compiled 2003) September 2003) a contribution to thea contribution sound picture to theas itsound competes picture with as theit competes plane and with the the plane and the train! As the cameratrain! zooms As the in camerato telephoto, zooms steadiness in to telephoto, decreases, steadiness but the decreases,Welcome but the to SteamWelcome Times 2to, the Steam second Times in a2 ,new the seriessecond of in video a new tapes/DVDs series of video tapes/DVDs sight and sound ofsight the twoand 38ssound remains of the atwo stirring 38s remainsexperience a stirring with which experience withlooking which at railwaylooking operations at railway in NSW, operations other States in NSW, of Australia, other States New of Zealand, Australia, New Zealand, to conclude this production.to conclude this production. the United Kingdomthe andUnited Germany, Kingdom at variousand Germany, times during at various the period times duringfrom the the period from the late 1950s to the late1970s. 1950s The to main the 1970s.subject The of themain series subject is steam of the in series normal is steam in normal ****************************************************************************************** everyday duties,everyday before theduties, final before moves the to finalfull dieselisationmoves to full and/or dieselisation and/or electrification. Steamelectrification. Times 2 looks Steam at theTimes Western 2 looks Line at thein NSW Western from Line 1957 in toNSW from 1957 to Steam TimesSteam 2 Times 2 1977, and, like the1977, TRAINS and, like ALIVE the TRAINSRailView ALIVEseries, looksRailView at theseries, operations looks at the operations from from from a trackside frompoint aof trackside view.
    [Show full text]
  • Bikenorth Home
    No 70, May 2010 Contents The "Autumn Classics" 2010 The "Autumn Classics" 2010 1 by Keith Griffin NOW OPEN - Parramatta Valley 4 Cycleway In recent years, during the famous European "Spring Classics" cycling season, an Diary Date: Bike North AGM increasing number of Bike North riders has been taking part in a parallel antipodean 4 Sunday 15th August series of Bike North Autumn Classics. Our series is unofficial, much less Not quite there yet... 5 competitive and includes several events not organised by Bike North. New! City of Sydney Cycleways 6 In fact the Autumn Classics are so unofficial as to include different events for different people, but the main ones seem to be Loop the Lake, Tour de Hills, Tour Opportunity to Cycle Sulawesi 6 de Cowra, Blayney to Bathurst Cyclosportif, Bike North Century Challenge, and Calendar perhaps the Great Hunter Cycle Challenge. While only two of these are Bike North Other Editions events, they are the two which get the greatest numbers of Bike North members participating each year. Editor:Jennifer Gilmore Importantly, each of these events is designed to encourage cyclists of all levels Production:Keith Griffin (perhaps not novice riders) to participate, which may help explain the large numbers taking part. The views expressed in Chain Mail articles are This year, as always, I was dreading the most difficult of these events, the BNCC. I those of the authors only and do not necessarily represent either the common realised some months out from the event that I would need to decide either to views shared by a majority of Bike North prepare well, or opt for a nice relaxing day sitting in a chair reading a book and members, or Bike North policy as formulated handing out jelly beans to tired cyclists at a checkpoint.
    [Show full text]