Quinquennial Evaluation 2013 - 2017 of the Institute of Oceanography HCMR SUPPLEMENTARY VOLUME
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an Assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde Biogeographic Marine Ecoregions
Zootaxa 4413 (3): 401–448 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4413.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2DF9255A-7C42-42DA-9F48-2BAA6DCEED7E Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde biogeographic marine ecoregions JOSÉ A. GONZÁLEZ University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, i-UNAT, Campus de Tafira, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8584-6731. Abstract The complete list of Canarian marine decapods (last update by González & Quiles 2003, popular book) currently com- prises 374 species/subspecies, grouped in 198 genera and 82 families; whereas the Cape Verdean marine decapods (now fully listed for the first time) are represented by 343 species/subspecies with 201 genera and 80 families. Due to changing environmental conditions, in the last decades many subtropical/tropical taxa have reached the coasts of the Canary Islands. Comparing the carcinofaunal composition and their biogeographic components between the Canary and Cape Verde ar- chipelagos would aid in: validating the appropriateness in separating both archipelagos into different ecoregions (Spalding et al. 2007), and understanding faunal movements between areas of benthic habitat. The consistency of both ecoregions is here compared and validated by assembling their decapod crustacean checklists, analysing their taxa composition, gath- ering their bathymetric data, and comparing their biogeographic patterns. Four main evidences (i.e. different taxa; diver- gent taxa composition; different composition of biogeographic patterns; different endemicity rates) support that separation, especially in coastal benthic decapods; and these parametres combined would be used as a valuable tool at comparing biotas from oceanic archipelagos. -
Illustrated Keys for the Identi¢Cation of the Pleocyemata (Crustacea: Decapoda) Zoeal Stages, from the Coastal Region of South-Western Europe
J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. (2004), 84, 205^227 Printed in the United Kingdom Illustrated keys for the identi¢cation of the Pleocyemata (Crustacea: Decapoda) zoeal stages, from the coastal region of south-western Europe Antonina dos Santos*P and Juan Ignacio Gonza¤ lez-GordilloO *Instituto de Investigac° a‹ o das Pescas e do Mar, Avenida de Brasilia s/n, 1449-006 Lisbon, Portugal. OCentro Andaluz de Ciencia y Tecnolog|¤a Marinas, Universidad de Ca¤ diz, Campus de Puerto Real, 11510öPuerto Real (Ca¤ diz), Spain. PCorresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] The identi¢cation keys of the zoeal stages of Pleocyemata decapod larvae from the coastal region of south-western Europe, based on both new and previously published descriptions and illustrations, are provided. The keys cover 127 taxa, most of them identi¢ed to genus and species level. These keys were mainly constructed upon external morphological characters, which are easy to observe under a stereo- microscope. Moreover, the presentation of detailed ¢gures allows a non-specialist to make identi¢cations more easily. INTRODUCTION nearby areas as a complement document when identifying larval stages. Identi¢cation of decapod larvae from plankton samples The order Decapoda comprises two suborders, the is not easy, principally because there are great morpholo- Dendrobranchiata and the Pleocyemata (Martin & Davis, gical changes between developmental phases, although less 2001). A key for the identi¢cation of Dendrobranchiata pronounced between larval stages. Moreover, larval larvae covering the same area of this study has been descriptions of many species are still unsuitable or even presented by dos Santos & Lindley (2001). -
Portada Resumenes SIEBM Final
LIBRO DE RESÚMENES Gijón del 2 al 5 de septiembre de 2014 XVIII SIMPOSIO IBÉRICO DE ESTUDIOS DE BIOLOGÍA MARINA Gijón (España) 2-5 Septiembre 2014 XVIII SIMPÓSIO IBÉRICO DE ESTUDOS DE BIOLOGIA MARINHA Gijón (Espanha) 2-5 Setembro 2014 Libro de resúmenes. Ríos, P.; Suárez, L.A. & Cristobo, J. (Eds.) 2014. XVIII Simposio Ibérico de Estudios de Biología Marina. Libro de resúmenes. Centro Oceanográfico de Gijón. 252 pp Edita: Centro Oceanográfico de Gijón (Instituto Español de Oceanografía) Depósito Legal: AS2943-2014 Impresión: Nortegráfico Calle Julio Verne 23 33211 Gijón Tel. 985307293 [email protected] Autores fotografías portada, contraportada y portadillas: Marcel Gil-Velasco (SEO-Birdlife) Florencio González (IEO Gijón); Lucia López (IEO Santander); Cesar Peteiro (IEO Santander); Ignacio Reguera (IEO Gijón); Ana Riesgo (Universidad Barcelona); Pilar Ríos (IEO Gijón); Francisco Sánchez (IEO Santander); Luis Angel Suarez (IEO Gijón); Xulio Valeiras (IEO Vigo); Joaquín Valencia (IEO Coruña); Jose Luis Vargas (IEO Madrid); Eva Velasco (IEO Gijón) y Javier Cristobo (IEO Gijón) XVIII Simposio Ibérico de Estudios de Biología Marina. Gijón (España), 2-5 Septiembre 2014 Queridos congresistas, Desde Barcelona 2006, el SIEBM cambió la B de bentos por la B de biología, dando de este modo cabida para un mayor número de profesionales de la biología marina que pudieran tener la posibilidad de presentar sus resultados de investigación, en una reunión científica, ya clásica después de dieciocho ediciones desde su nacimiento en San Sebastián, allá por 1979; este cambio, que muchos pensamos que ha sido un gran acierto, no debe hacer perder la esencia con qué nació, es decir, la de dar cabida a científicos noveles que presentan sus investigaciones por vez primera a la comunidad científica junto con consagrados investigadores con una dilatada experiencia. -
93 Material of This Species Was Examined from the Following Localities: Haifa Bay (Samples 98, 245), Atlit, Tantura, Caesarea (R
Vol. 7B, I9j8 L. B. HOLTHUIS and E. GOTTLIEB 93 Material of this species was examined from the following localities: Haifa Bay (samples 98, 245), Atlit, Tantura, Caesarea (rock pools, VI. 1946) and Bat Yam. The Haifa specimens were collected at depths of 22 and 29 m, respectively. The carapace lengths of the specimens varied between 4.5 and 23 mm; in two ovigerous females it was 11 and 11.5 mm, respectively. Xantho poressa is also known under the names Xantho hydrophilus (Herbst 1790) and Xantho rivulosus (Risso 1816), both of which are incorrect (see Hol- thuis 1954). The systematics of this and related species of the genus have been dealt with extensively by Drach and Forest (1953). The species inhabits the entire Mediterranean, the Black Sea and the Canary Islands. The records from the E Mediterranean are : Navarino Bay, Methone (=Modon) and Sapientza, S Greece (Guerin 1832, as Cancer cinereus), Phale- ron Bay near Athens (Athanassopoulos 1917), Bosporus (Heller 1863), Istanbul fishmarket (Ninni 1923), near Gallipoli, Sea of Marmara (OstroumorT 1896), near Khania, NW Crete (Lucas 1853, Raulin 1870), Rhodes (Santucci 1928, Tortonese 1947), Cyprus (Heller 1863), Lebanon (Drach and Forest 1953), Sidon ( =Saida), Lebanon (Monod 1931), Israel (Bodenheimer 1935, 1937), Haifa (Steinitz 1933), Caesarea, Israel (Gottlieb 1953), Egypt (Audouin 1826), Port Said (Caiman 1927), near Alexandria, Egypt (Balss 1936). In the U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C., two specimens of this species from Istanbul (IX., X. 1923, H. C. Kellers) were examined. Xantho granulicarpus Forest, 1953 Xantho? jloridus Gottlieb, 1953, p. 440. Material from the following localities has been examined: Haifa Bay (samples 98, 121, 138, 195, 385), Tantura (7.VII.1952 and 5.VII.1955, coll. -
Avances En Estudios De Biología Marina: Contribuciones Del XVIII SIEBM GIJÓN
temas de 10 OCEANOGRAFÍA temas de OCEANOGRAFÍA Avances en estudios Temas de Oceanografía, es una colección de textos de biología marina: de referencia, que el Insti- tuto Español de Oceano- contribuciones grafía (IEO) publica con el fin de mejorar la difusión de la información científica re- del XVIII SIEBM lativa a las ciencias del mar dentro de la propia comu- GIJÓN nidad científica y entre los sectores interesados en es- tos temas. Avances en estudios de biología marina: contribuciones del XVIII SIEBM GIJÓN en estudios Avances temas de Instituto Español de Oceanografía OCEANOGRAFÍA Instituto Español de Oceanografía MINISTERIO DE ECONOMÍA, INDUSTRIA Y COMPETITIVIDAD MINISTERIO DE ECONOMÍA, INDUSTRIA Y COMPETITIVIDAD Avances en estudios de biología marina: contribuciones del XVIII SIEBM GIJÓN Javier Cristobo y Pilar Ríos (Coord.) Instituto Español de Oceanografía MINISTERIO DE ECONOMÍA, INDUSTRIA Y COMPETITIVIDAD temas de OCEANOGRAFÍA10 Avances en estudios de biología marina: contribuciones del XVIII SIEBM GIJÓN Javier Cristobo y Pilar Ríos (Coord.) Fotografías de Portada: Javier Cristobo Edita: Instituto Español de Oceanografía Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad Copyright: Instituto Español de Oceanografía Corazón de María, 8. 28020 Madrid Telf.: 915 974 443 / Fax: 915 947 770 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ieo.es NIPO: 063170012 ISBN: 978-84-95877-56-7 Depósito legal: M-25857-2017 Realización, impresión y encuadernación: DiScript Preimpresión, S.L. Avances en estudios de biología marina: contribuciones del XVIII SIEBM GIJÓN Coordinación Editorial Javier Cristobo Pilar Ríos Autores Anadón, N. Hardisson, A. Antit, M. León, E. Arias, A. López Abellán, L. J. Báez, A. López-González, N. Bárcenas, P. -
Gins. Segment II Medially Inflated in Dorsal View, with Plumose Setae on Dorsal And
2002 BOYKO: WORLDWIDE REVISION OF ALBUNEIDAE 233 Fig. 75. Albunea speciosa Dana, 1852: A, ?, 9.0 mm cl, USNM 260868, neotype; B±J, ?, 10.4 mm cl, USNM 287087. A. Carapace, branchiostegite, and ocular peduncles, dorsal view. B. Ocular peduncles, dorsal view. C. Left antennule, lateral view. D. Left antenna, lateral view. E. Left mandible; mesial view. F. Left maxillule, lateral view. G. Right maxilla, lateral view. H. Left maxilliped I, lateral view. I. Right maxilliped II, lateral view. J. Left maxilliped III, lateral view. Scale 5 1.6 mm (B, E, F), 2.2 mm (I), and 3.3 mm (A, C, D, G, H, J). gins. Segment II medially in¯ated in dorsal gose with long plumose setae; long plumose view, with plumose setae on dorsal and ven- setae on dorsal and ventral margins. tral margins, and scattered on ventrolateral Antenna (®g. 75D) with segment V ap- third of surface. Segment I wider than long, proximately three times longer than wide, unarmed; dorsal third of lateral surface ru- with long plumose setae on dorsal and ven- 234 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 272 tral margins; ¯agellum with ®ve or six arti- wide, with long simple setae on dorsal mar- cles, long plumose setae on dorsal, ventral, gin. Merus approximately three times longer and distal margins. Segment IV expanded than wide, margins parallel, with simple se- distally, with long plumose setae on dorsal, tae on ventrolateral margin and plumose se- ventral, and distal margins, and row of setae tae on dorsolateral margin. Basis-ischium in- on dorsolateral margin. -
The Marine Crustacea Decapoda of Sicily (Central Mediterranean Sea
Ital. J. Zool., 70. 69-78 (2003) The marine Crustacea Decapoda of Sicily INTRODUCTION (central Mediterranean Sea): a checklist The location of Sicily in the middle of the Mediter with remarks on their distribution ranean Sea, between the western and eastern basins, gives the island utmost importance for faunistic studies. Furthermore, the diversity of geomorphologic aspects, substratum types and hydrological features along its CARLO PIPITONE shores account for many different habitats in the coastal CNR-IRMA, Laboratorio di Biologia Marina, waters, and more generally on the continental shelf. Via Giovanni da Verrazzano 17, 1-91014 Castellammare del Golfo (TP) (Italy) E-mail: [email protected] Such diversity of habitats has already been pointed out by Arculeo et al. (1991) for the Sicilian fish fauna. MARCO ARCULEO Crustacea Decapoda include benthic, nektobenthic Dipartimento di Biologia Animate, Universita degli Studi di Palermo, and pelagic species (some of which targeted by artisan Via Archirafi 18, 1-90123 Palermo (Italy) and industrial fisheries) living over an area from the in- tertidal rocks and sands to the abyssal mud flats (Brusca & Brusca, 1996). Occurrence, distribution and ecology of Sicilian decapods have been the subject of a number of papers in recent decades (Torchio, 1967, 1968; Ariani & Serra, 1969; Guglielmo et al, 1973; Cavaliere & Berdar, 1975; Grippa, 1976; Andaloro et al, 1979; Ragonese et al, 1990, Abstract in 53° congr. U.Z.I.: 21- -22; Pipitone & Tumbiolo, 1993; Pastore, 1995; Gia- cobbe & Spano, 1996; Giacobbe et al, 1996; Pipitone, 1998; Ragonese & Giusto, 1998; Rinelli et al, 1998b, 1999; Spano, 1998; Spano et al, 1999; Relini et al, 2000; Pipitone et al, 2001; Mori & Vacchi, 2003). -
Additional Findings of Albunea Carabus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Decapoda, Anomura, Hippoidea) in Italian Waters
ISSN: 0001-5113 ACTA ADRIAT., SHORT COMMUNICATION AADRAY 60(1): 91 - 98, 2019 Additional findings of Albunea carabus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Decapoda, Anomura, Hippoidea) in Italian waters Bruno ZAVA1, 2, Gianni INSACCO2 and Maria CORSINI-FOKA3* 1Wilderness studi ambientali, via Cruillas 27, 90146 Palermo, Italy 2Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, via degli Studi 9, 97013 Comiso (RG), Italy 3Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Oceanography, Hydrobiological Station of Rhodes, Cos Street, 85100 Rhodes, Greece *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] The first findings of the anomuran Albunea carabus (Linnaeus, 1758) from the southeastern coa- sts of Sicily are documented, improving knowledge on the distribution of this poorly known species around the island and in the Mediterranean Sea. The distribution of records in the whole basin is updated. Key words: Crustacea, Anomura, Albunea carabus, Sicily, Mediterranean Sea INTRODUCTION the first time from the Aegean waters (CORS- INI-FOKA & KALOGIROU, 2013) and along the The sand crab Albunea carabus (Linnaeus, Egyptian Mediterranean coasts (ABDELSALAM 1758) (Decapoda, Anomura, Hippoidea) is the & RAMADAN, 2017), widening noticeably the single species of the family Albuneidae living knowledge of the geographical distribution of in the Mediterranean Sea. It is known from the this sand crab in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea, Few scattered findings of A. carabus have mainly from its western coasts, such as those been documented from Italy: in the Tyrrhenian of Italy, Spain, Algeria, Tunisia (BOYKO, 2002; Sea, namely along the coasts of Lazio (MON- PEREIRA et al., 2008). The species was considered CHARMONT, 1969), also along the northeastern rare in the past, especially in the eastern part of coasts of Sicily, at Mortelle, Messina, four the Mediterranean, but recent records confirmed specimens, and the western coasts of Calabria, the “apparent rarity” of A. -
Biodiversity in Central Mediterranean Sea Nunziacarla Spanò and Emilio De Domenico
Chapter 6 Biodiversity in Central Mediterranean Sea Nunziacarla Spanò and Emilio De Domenico NunziacarlaAdditional information Spanò is available and Emilio at the endDe ofDomenico the chapter Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68942 Abstract The Central Mediterranean Sea is an area that connects the western and the eastern Mediterranean Sea where migratory fluxes of marine organisms are very peculiar. The high biodiversity of these areas is owed to particular hydrological and geomorphologi‐ cal characteristics (Messina Strait and Sicily Channel). The morphology of the Strait of Messina resembles a funnel with the narrow end to the North and the largest one to the South, and its underwater profile can be compared to a mountain whose opposite sides have markedly different slopes. The great biodiversity that characterizes this ecosystem is linked to the particular hydrology of the area. The Sicily Channel (or Strait of Sicily) is a wide water body located between southern Sicily and northern African coasts and repre‐ sents the transition between the Western (WMED) and the Eastern (EMED) basins of the Mediterranean Sea. Morphologically, the Strait of Sicily belongs to the continental shelf with some other sub‐units, as basins, seamounts and ‘banks’. The bottoms are generally irregular and canyons are present. Mediterranean Sea has been divided into different biogeographic districts that present great variability in water parameters and biocenosis too. This chapter resumes the main physical, chemical and biological properties of the Central Mediterranean Sea. Keywords: biodiversity, Central Mediterranean Sea, Strait of Messina, Sicily Channel, biogeography 1. -
A Massive Record of the Rare 'Mole Crab' Albunea Carabus (Decapoda
BULLETIN OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALTA (2017) Vol. 9 43 4th International Congress on Biodiversity “Man, Natural Habitats and Euro-Mediterranean Biodiversity”, Malta, 17-19th November 2017 A massive record of the rare ‘mole crab’ Albunea carabus (Decapoda: Anomura: Hippoidea) along the sandy coasts of Catania Danilo SCUDERI1*, Alberto VILLARI2 & Massimiliano ANGELICO2 Amongst the Crustacea, the Decapoda (which include crayfish, crabs, lobsters, prawns, and shrimp) represent a highly diverse group adapted to many different marine and freshwater environments. Members of the Superfamily Hippoidea are commonly referred to as mole crabs. This group includes three families of which one, Albuneidae, is represented in the Mediterranean basin by only one species, the mole crab, Albunea carabus (Linnaeus, 1758). This species prefers sandy bottoms, where it borrows in littoral sites exposed to high hydrodynamic processes. Along the Mediterranean coasts and Atlantic Ocean, it appears to be a well-established and distributed species, even if its findings have always been based on very few specimens from single localities. The only exception was a rare case in the Atlantic, where a number of massive findings were reported. During the Winter of 2017, thousands of specimens of this ‘mole crab’ were found beached, mostly still alive, along the sandy coasts of Catania (eastern Sicily). Marine birds, and stray dogs preyed on them. This environment is characterised by a homogeneous bottom of fine sand, and freshwater affluxes come from numerous rivers and torrents with strong water currents in certain places. Based on this beaching of Albunea carabus, this communication reports the first massive record of this species in the Mediterranean. -
С. S. R a F I N E S Q U E a S a C a R C I N O L O G I S T , a N a N N O T a T E D C O M P I L a T I O N O F T H E I N F O R
С. S. RAFINESQUE AS A CARCINOLOGIST, AN ANNOTATED COMPILATION OF THE INFORMATION ON CRUSTACEA CONTAINED IN THE WORKS OF THAT AUTHOR by L. B. HOLTHUIS I. INTRODUCTION In the last tens of years more and more attention has been paid to the much neglected and ignored publications written by the eccentric early American naturalist Constantine Samuel Rafinesque. Until now, however, Rafinesque's work in the field of carcinology has received but little attention from modern authors. In 1905 Ortmann (1905, p. 107) pointed out that the name Astacus limosus Rafinesque, 1817, is older than the name Astacus affinis Say, 1817, for the same species, and that consequently the former name has to be used. In the same year Richardson (1905, p. 10) replaced the invalid generic name Ligia Fabricius, 1798, by Ligyda Rafinesque, 1815. M. J. Rathbun (1937, p. 63) substituted the generic name Thelxiope Rafi- nesque, 1814, for the name Homola Leach, 1815. Finally, in 1949 Hubricht & Mackin (1949, p. 334) dropped the generic name Mancasellus Harger, 1876, in favour of Lirceus Rafinesque, 1820, at the same time changing the species name Mancasellus macrourus Garman, 1890, to Lirceus fontinalis Rafinesque, 1820. I know of no other names given by Rafinesque to Crus- tacea that have been adopted by modern authors, though many of the names given by him to genera and species of that group antedate names which now are currently in use. Since the acceptance of most of Rafinesque's valid generic and specific names would greatly upset the stability of carcinological nomenclature, the present author has submitted to the International Com- mission on Zoological Nomenclature a proposal in which is asked the suppression of those of Rafinesque's Decapod and Stomatopod names that might cause undesirable nomenclatorial confusion. -
Decapod Crustacean Fauna of the Aegean Sea: New Information, Check List, Affinities
Senckenbergiana marit. | 22 | (3/6) | 217—244 | Frankfurt am.AfeiSrT5~5. 1992 Senckenberg am Meer 463. Decapod Crustacean Fauna of the Aegean Sea: New Information, Check List, Affinities. With 2 Text-Figures and 4 Tables. ATHANASIOS KOUKOURAS & COSTAS DOUNAS & MICHAEL TURKAY & ELENI VOULTSIADOU-KOUKOURA. Abstract. [KOUKOURAS, A. & DOUNAS, C. & TURKAY, M. & VOULTSIADOU-KOUKOURA, E. (1992): Decapod crustacean fauna of the Aegean Sea: New information, check list, affinities. — Senckenbergiana marit. 22 (3/6): 217-244, 2 figs, 4 tabs.; Frankfurt a. M.] The examination of certain decapod crustacean collections from the Aegean Sea and the review of the relevant literature showed that the number of the species known from this area is 231. Seven of these species are reported for the first time from the eastern Mediterranean and three from the Aegean Sea. For the 19 more interesting species found, information on their distribution and their habitat is given. The numbers of decapods known from the entire Mediterranean, the Adriatic Sea, the coast of Israel and the Black Sea, according to the existing literature, are estimated. The affinities among the decapod faunas of the above areas are estimated by the coefficient of CHEKANOWSKI together with the number of species common to each pair of areas. The most strongly related fauna to that of the Aegean Sea is the fauna of the Adriatic. The fauna of the coast of Israel is more related to that of the coast of Cyprus although their degree of affinity is lower than that between Adriatic and Aegean. The two pairs of areas have an affinity with each other of about 60 %.