Gins. Segment II Medially Inflated in Dorsal View, with Plumose Setae on Dorsal And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gins. Segment II Medially Inflated in Dorsal View, with Plumose Setae on Dorsal And 2002 BOYKO: WORLDWIDE REVISION OF ALBUNEIDAE 233 Fig. 75. Albunea speciosa Dana, 1852: A, ?, 9.0 mm cl, USNM 260868, neotype; B±J, ?, 10.4 mm cl, USNM 287087. A. Carapace, branchiostegite, and ocular peduncles, dorsal view. B. Ocular peduncles, dorsal view. C. Left antennule, lateral view. D. Left antenna, lateral view. E. Left mandible; mesial view. F. Left maxillule, lateral view. G. Right maxilla, lateral view. H. Left maxilliped I, lateral view. I. Right maxilliped II, lateral view. J. Left maxilliped III, lateral view. Scale 5 1.6 mm (B, E, F), 2.2 mm (I), and 3.3 mm (A, C, D, G, H, J). gins. Segment II medially in¯ated in dorsal gose with long plumose setae; long plumose view, with plumose setae on dorsal and ven- setae on dorsal and ventral margins. tral margins, and scattered on ventrolateral Antenna (®g. 75D) with segment V ap- third of surface. Segment I wider than long, proximately three times longer than wide, unarmed; dorsal third of lateral surface ru- with long plumose setae on dorsal and ven- 234 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 272 tral margins; ¯agellum with ®ve or six arti- wide, with long simple setae on dorsal mar- cles, long plumose setae on dorsal, ventral, gin. Merus approximately three times longer and distal margins. Segment IV expanded than wide, margins parallel, with simple se- distally, with long plumose setae on dorsal, tae on ventrolateral margin and plumose se- ventral, and distal margins, and row of setae tae on dorsolateral margin. Basis-ischium in- on dorsolateral margin. Segment III with completely fused, with plumose setae on long plumose setae on ventral margin. Seg- margins. Exopod one-fourth longer than mer- ment II short, widening distally, with plu- us, ¯agellum with one article. mose setae on margins; antennal acicle long, Maxilliped III (®g. 75J) dactylus evenly thin, not exceeding distal margin of segment rounded; with long plumose setae on margins IV, with long plumose setae on dorsal mar- and lateral surface. Propodus with longitu- gin. Segment I rounded proximally, ¯attened dinal median row of plumose setae on lateral ventrolaterally, with long plumose setae on surface; margins with plumose setae. Carpus margins; lateral surface with acute spine dor- slightly produced onto propodus; lateral sur- sally, with low semicircular dorsolateral lobe face with row of plumose setae ventromedi- ventrodistal to spine; segment with ventro- ally; plumose setae on margins. Merus un- mesial antennal gland pore. armed, with plumose setae on margins. Ba- Mandible (®g. 75E) incisor process with sis-ischium incompletely fused, without cris- one tooth; cutting edge with one tooth. Palp ta dentata. Exopod two-segmented: proximal three-segmented, with plumose setae on mar- segment small; distal segment styliform, ta- gins and long, thick, simple setae arising pering, approximately one-third length of from bend in second segment. merus, with plumose setae on margins; with- Maxillule (®g. 75F) distal endite proxi- out ¯agellum. mally narrow, widening to in¯ated distal end, Pereopod I (®g. 76A) dactylus curved and with thick simple setae on distal margin. tapering; lateral and mesial surfaces smooth; Proximal endite with thick simple setae on dorsal margin with long plumose and short distal margin. Endopodal external lobe trun- simple setae; ventral margin with short sim- cate distally and curled under; internal lobe ple setae. Propodal lateral surface with nu- reduced with three thick setae at distolateral merous short, transverse rows of setose ru- margin. gae; dorsal margin unarmed; ventral margin Maxilla (®g. 75G) exopod evenly rounded, distally produced into acute spine; cutting with plumose setae along distal margin. Sca- edge lacking teeth, lined with long plumose phognathite bluntly angled on posterior lobe, setae; dorsal margin with long plumose setae, with plumose setae. ventral margin with short simple setae. Car- Maxilliped I (®g. 75H) epipod with plu- pus with dorsodistal angle produced into mose setae on distal margin and on distola- strong corneous-tipped spine, dorsal margin teral surface. Endite tapered distally and sub- with few large and small spines posteriorly equal to ®rst segment of exopod. Exopod along distal third; dorsal and distal margins with two segments: proximal segment nar- with long plumose setae; lateral surface with row, margins parallel, margins with plumose small distal rugose area, with few transverse setae; distal segment spatulate, approximate- setose ridges on distal half of surface; mesial ly as long as wide, broadest medially, mar- surface smooth with few scattered rows of gins with long plumose setae. Endopod ¯at- long plumose setae, margins with long plu- tened and elongate, reaching to distal end of mose setae. Merus unarmed; lateral surface proximal exopodal segment, with plumose with scattered transverse rows of long plu- setae on margins. mose setae, margins with long plumose se- Maxilliped II (®g. 75I) dactylus evenly tae; mesial surface with few short rows of rounded, length equal to width, with thick setae; proximal quarter of mesial surface simple setae distally. Propodus one-half wid- with decalci®ed window. Basis-ischium in- er than long, with plumose setae on dorsal completely fused, unarmed. Coxa unarmed. margin and long simple setae on distal mar- Pereopod II (®g. 76B) with dactylus gin. Carpus not strongly produced dorsodis- smooth; with base to heel straight, heel tally, approximately two times longer than smoothly rounded, heel to tip with rounded, 2002 BOYKO: WORLDWIDE REVISION OF ALBUNEIDAE 235 Fig. 76. Albunea speciosa Dana, 1852: A±E, ?, 10.4 mm cl, USNM 287087; F, ?, 9.0 mm cl, USNM 260868, neotype; G, /, 14 mm cl, USNM 287087. A. Right pereopod I, lateral view. B. Right pereopod II, lateral view. C. Right pereopod III, lateral view. D. Right pereopod IV, lateral view. E. Abdominal somites I±VI, dorsal view. F. Telson of ?, dorsal view. G. Telson of /, dorsal view. Scale 5 3.0 mm (F, G), 4.0 mm (A±D), and 4.2 mm (E). broad indent, tip acute, tip to base broadly face; distal and ventral margins with long convex; lateral surface smooth, with several plumose setae; dorsolateral surface as nar- small tufts of short setae in generally straight row, oblique, ¯attened shelf, with short setae line across medioproximal surface, several on dorsal margin and long plumose setae on widely spaced submarginal tufts of short se- ventral margin; mesial surface with elevated, tae dorsodistally; mesial surface smooth, curved, setose ridge from ventral junction ventral margin with long plumose setae, dor- with dactylus almost to ventral proximal sal margin with short simple setae and patch junction with carpus; decalci®ed region just of long plumose setae at base. Propodus with distal to junction with carpus. Carpus slightly dorsal surface smooth, ventral margin in¯at- produced dorsodistally; lateral surface nearly ed and rounded; oblique row of long plu- smooth, with irregular, interrupted row of ru- mose setae on distal margin of lateral sur- gae and submarginal elevated ridge ventrally, 236 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 272 rugae and ridge with long plumose setae; imally; lateral surface smooth, ventral mar- dorsodistal projection with mat of short setae gin with long plumose setae, dorsal margin on lateral surface; margins with long plu- with short simple setae; mesial surface with mose setae; mesial surface smooth, with long dorsal decalci®ed region, demarcated ven- plumose setae in scattered patches on surface trally by longitudinal elevated ridge with row and on margins. Merus with few scattered of short setae; with setose punctae ventral to setae on lateral surface and margins; mesial decalci®ed window. Propodus expanded dor- surface nearly smooth, with few setae and sally and ventrally; ventral expansion ex- decalci®ed area on proximal fourth near ceeds ventral margin of dactylus, margin junction with basis-ischium. Basis-ischium with long plumose setae; dorsal expansion incompletely fused and unarmed. Coxa with with row of long plumose setae medially; lat- one small spine on anterior margin. eral and mesial surfaces smooth. Carpus not Pereopod III (®g. 76C) dactylus with base produced dorsodistally; lateral and mesial to heel straight, heel broadly rounded and surfaces smooth; dorsal margin with short low, heel to tip with broad, evenly rounded simple and long plumose setae; ventral mar- indent, tip acute, tip to base smoothly convex gin with short simple setae. Merus with scat- to straight; lateral surface smooth, with sev- tered short transverse rows of setae on lateral eral small tufts of short setae in generally surface, dorsal and ventrodistal margins with straight line across medioproximal surface, long plumose setae; mesial surface with large dorsodistal margin with tufts of short setae; decalci®ed window proximoventrally. Basis- ventromesial margin with long plumose se- ischium incompletely fused and unarmed. tae, dorsal margin with short simple and plu- Coxa unarmed. mose setae; mesial surface smooth, with plu- Abdomen (®g. 76E) with somite I approx- mose setae proximally at junction with pro- imately as long as wide, widest posteriorly; podus. Propodus not in¯ated dorsoventrally; dorsal surface with anterior margin straight; lateral surface smooth, with long plumose se- posterior margin straight, with elevated sub- tae distally, simple setae on dorsal margin marginal row of short setae; small transverse and long plumose setae on ventral margin; decalci®ed windows laterad of segment me- dorsolateral
Recommended publications
  • Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an Assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde Biogeographic Marine Ecoregions
    Zootaxa 4413 (3): 401–448 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4413.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2DF9255A-7C42-42DA-9F48-2BAA6DCEED7E Checklists of Crustacea Decapoda from the Canary and Cape Verde Islands, with an assessment of Macaronesian and Cape Verde biogeographic marine ecoregions JOSÉ A. GONZÁLEZ University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, i-UNAT, Campus de Tafira, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8584-6731. Abstract The complete list of Canarian marine decapods (last update by González & Quiles 2003, popular book) currently com- prises 374 species/subspecies, grouped in 198 genera and 82 families; whereas the Cape Verdean marine decapods (now fully listed for the first time) are represented by 343 species/subspecies with 201 genera and 80 families. Due to changing environmental conditions, in the last decades many subtropical/tropical taxa have reached the coasts of the Canary Islands. Comparing the carcinofaunal composition and their biogeographic components between the Canary and Cape Verde ar- chipelagos would aid in: validating the appropriateness in separating both archipelagos into different ecoregions (Spalding et al. 2007), and understanding faunal movements between areas of benthic habitat. The consistency of both ecoregions is here compared and validated by assembling their decapod crustacean checklists, analysing their taxa composition, gath- ering their bathymetric data, and comparing their biogeographic patterns. Four main evidences (i.e. different taxa; diver- gent taxa composition; different composition of biogeographic patterns; different endemicity rates) support that separation, especially in coastal benthic decapods; and these parametres combined would be used as a valuable tool at comparing biotas from oceanic archipelagos.
    [Show full text]
  • Concluding Remarks
    Concluding Remarks The bulk of secretory material necessary for the encapsulation of spermatozoa into a spermatophore is commonly derived from the male accessory organs of re­ production. Not surprisingly, the extraordinary diversity in size, shape, and struc­ ture of the spermatophores in different phyla is frequently a reflection of the equally spectacular variations in the anatomy and secretory performance of male reproductive tracts. Less obvious are the reasons why even within a given class or order of animals, only some species employ spermatophores, while others de­ pend on liquid semen as the vehicle for spermatozoa. The most plausible expla­ nation is that the development of methods for sperm transfer must have been in­ fluenced by the environment in which the animals breed, and that adaptation to habitat, rather than phylogeny, has played a decisive role. Reproduction in the giant octopus of the North Pacific, on which our attention has been focussed, pro­ vides an interesting example. During copulation in seawater, which may last 2 h, the sperm mass has to be pushed over the distance of 1 m separating the male and female genital orifices. The metre-long tubular spermatophore inside which the spermatozoa are conveyed offers an obvious advantage over liquid semen, which could hardly be hauled over such a long distance. Apart from acting as a convenient transport vehicle, the spermatophore serves other purposes. Its gustatory and aphrodisiac attributes, the provision of an ef­ fective barrier to reinsemination, and stimulation of oogenesis and oviposition are all of great importance. Absolutely essential is its function as storage organ for spermatozoa, at least as effective as that of the epididymis for mammalian spermatozoa.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrated Keys for the Identi¢Cation of the Pleocyemata (Crustacea: Decapoda) Zoeal Stages, from the Coastal Region of South-Western Europe
    J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. (2004), 84, 205^227 Printed in the United Kingdom Illustrated keys for the identi¢cation of the Pleocyemata (Crustacea: Decapoda) zoeal stages, from the coastal region of south-western Europe Antonina dos Santos*P and Juan Ignacio Gonza¤ lez-GordilloO *Instituto de Investigac° a‹ o das Pescas e do Mar, Avenida de Brasilia s/n, 1449-006 Lisbon, Portugal. OCentro Andaluz de Ciencia y Tecnolog|¤a Marinas, Universidad de Ca¤ diz, Campus de Puerto Real, 11510öPuerto Real (Ca¤ diz), Spain. PCorresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] The identi¢cation keys of the zoeal stages of Pleocyemata decapod larvae from the coastal region of south-western Europe, based on both new and previously published descriptions and illustrations, are provided. The keys cover 127 taxa, most of them identi¢ed to genus and species level. These keys were mainly constructed upon external morphological characters, which are easy to observe under a stereo- microscope. Moreover, the presentation of detailed ¢gures allows a non-specialist to make identi¢cations more easily. INTRODUCTION nearby areas as a complement document when identifying larval stages. Identi¢cation of decapod larvae from plankton samples The order Decapoda comprises two suborders, the is not easy, principally because there are great morpholo- Dendrobranchiata and the Pleocyemata (Martin & Davis, gical changes between developmental phases, although less 2001). A key for the identi¢cation of Dendrobranchiata pronounced between larval stages. Moreover, larval larvae covering the same area of this study has been descriptions of many species are still unsuitable or even presented by dos Santos & Lindley (2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 30 Svsn.Pdf
    c/o Museo di Storia Naturale Fontego dei Turchi, S. Croce 1730 30135 Venezia (Italy) Tel. 041 2750206 - Fax 041 721000 codice fiscale 80014010278 sito web: www.svsn.it e-mail: [email protected] Lavori Vol. 30 Venezia 31 gennaio 2005 La Società Veneziana di Scienze Naturali si è costituita a Venezia nel Dicembre 1975 Consiglio Direttivo Presidente della Società: Giampietro Braga Vice Presidente: Fabrizio Bizzarini Consiglieri (*) Botanica: Linda Bonello Maria Teresa Sammartino Didattica, Ecologia,Tutela ambientale: Giuseppe Gurnari Maria Chiara Lazzari Scienze della Terra e dell’Uomo: Fabrizio Bizzarini Simone Citon Zoologia: Raffaella Trabucco Segretario Tesoriere: Anna Maria Confente Revisori dei Conti: Luigi Bruni Giulio Scarpa Comitato scientifico di redazione: Giovanni Caniglia (Direttore), Fabrizio Bizzarini, Giampietro Braga, Paolo Canestrelli, Corrado Lazzari, Francesco Mezzavilla, Alessandro Minelli, Enrico Negrisolo, Michele Pellizzato Direttore responsabile della rivista: Alberto Vitucci Iniziativa realizzata con il contributo della Regione Veneto Il 15 ottobre 1975 il tribunale di Venezia autorizzava la pubblicazione della rivista scientifica “Lavori” e nel gennaio del 1976 la Società Veneziana di Scienze Naturali presentava ai soci il primo numero della rivista che conteneva 13 con- tributi scientifici. In ordine alfabetico ne elenchiamo gli autori: Lorenzo Bonometto, Silvano Canzoneri, Paolo Cesari, Antonio Dal Corso, Federico De Angeli, Giorgio Ferro, Lorenzo Munari, Helio Pierotti, Leone Rampini, Giampaolo Rallo, Enrico Ratti, Marino Sinibaldi e Roberto Vannucci. Nasceva così quell’impegno editoriale che caratterizza da allora la nostra società non solo nel puntuale rispetto dei tempi di stampa, entro il primo trimestre di ogni anno, del volume degli atti scientifici: “Lavori”, ma anche nelle altre pub- blicazione.
    [Show full text]
  • Portada Resumenes SIEBM Final
    LIBRO DE RESÚMENES Gijón del 2 al 5 de septiembre de 2014 XVIII SIMPOSIO IBÉRICO DE ESTUDIOS DE BIOLOGÍA MARINA Gijón (España) 2-5 Septiembre 2014 XVIII SIMPÓSIO IBÉRICO DE ESTUDOS DE BIOLOGIA MARINHA Gijón (Espanha) 2-5 Setembro 2014 Libro de resúmenes. Ríos, P.; Suárez, L.A. & Cristobo, J. (Eds.) 2014. XVIII Simposio Ibérico de Estudios de Biología Marina. Libro de resúmenes. Centro Oceanográfico de Gijón. 252 pp Edita: Centro Oceanográfico de Gijón (Instituto Español de Oceanografía) Depósito Legal: AS2943-2014 Impresión: Nortegráfico Calle Julio Verne 23 33211 Gijón Tel. 985307293 [email protected] Autores fotografías portada, contraportada y portadillas: Marcel Gil-Velasco (SEO-Birdlife) Florencio González (IEO Gijón); Lucia López (IEO Santander); Cesar Peteiro (IEO Santander); Ignacio Reguera (IEO Gijón); Ana Riesgo (Universidad Barcelona); Pilar Ríos (IEO Gijón); Francisco Sánchez (IEO Santander); Luis Angel Suarez (IEO Gijón); Xulio Valeiras (IEO Vigo); Joaquín Valencia (IEO Coruña); Jose Luis Vargas (IEO Madrid); Eva Velasco (IEO Gijón) y Javier Cristobo (IEO Gijón) XVIII Simposio Ibérico de Estudios de Biología Marina. Gijón (España), 2-5 Septiembre 2014 Queridos congresistas, Desde Barcelona 2006, el SIEBM cambió la B de bentos por la B de biología, dando de este modo cabida para un mayor número de profesionales de la biología marina que pudieran tener la posibilidad de presentar sus resultados de investigación, en una reunión científica, ya clásica después de dieciocho ediciones desde su nacimiento en San Sebastián, allá por 1979; este cambio, que muchos pensamos que ha sido un gran acierto, no debe hacer perder la esencia con qué nació, es decir, la de dar cabida a científicos noveles que presentan sus investigaciones por vez primera a la comunidad científica junto con consagrados investigadores con una dilatada experiencia.
    [Show full text]
  • An Illustrated Key to the Malacostraca (Crustacea) of the Northern Arabian Sea. Part VI: Decapoda Anomura
    An illustrated key to the Malacostraca (Crustacea) of the northern Arabian Sea. Part 6: Decapoda anomura Item Type article Authors Kazmi, Q.B.; Siddiqui, F.A. Download date 04/10/2021 12:44:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/34318 Pakistan Journal of Marine Sciences, Vol. 15(1), 11-79, 2006. AN ILLUSTRATED KEY TO THE MALACOSTRACA (CRUSTACEA) OF THE NORTHERN ARABIAN SEA PART VI: DECAPODA ANOMURA Quddusi B. Kazmi and Feroz A. Siddiqui Marine Reference Collection and Resource Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan. E-mails: [email protected] (QBK); safianadeem200 [email protected] .in (FAS). ABSTRACT: The key deals with the Decapoda, Anomura of the northern Arabian Sea, belonging to 3 superfamilies, 10 families, 32 genera and 104 species. With few exceptions, each species is accompanied by illustrations of taxonomic importance; its first reporter is referenced, supplemented by a subsequent record from the area. Necessary schematic diagrams explaining terminologies are also included. KEY WORDS: Malacostraca, Decapoda, Anomura, Arabian Sea - key. INTRODUCTION The Infraorder Anomura is well represented in Northern Arabian Sea (Paldstan) (see Tirmizi and Kazmi, 1993). Some important investigations and documentations on the diversity of anomurans belonging to families Hippidae, Albuneidae, Lithodidae, Coenobitidae, Paguridae, Parapaguridae, Diogenidae, Porcellanidae, Chirostylidae and Galatheidae are as follows: Alcock, 1905; Henderson, 1893; Miyake, 1953, 1978; Tirmizi, 1964, 1966; Lewinsohn, 1969; Mustaquim, 1972; Haig, 1966, 1974; Tirmizi and Siddiqui, 1981, 1982; Tirmizi, et al., 1982, 1989; Hogarth, 1988; Tirmizi and Javed, 1993; and Siddiqui and Kazmi, 2003, however these informations are scattered and fragmentary. In 1983 McLaughlin suppressed the old superfamily Coenobitoidea and combined it with the superfamily Paguroidea and placed all hermit crab families under the superfamily Paguroidea.
    [Show full text]
  • 93 Material of This Species Was Examined from the Following Localities: Haifa Bay (Samples 98, 245), Atlit, Tantura, Caesarea (R
    Vol. 7B, I9j8 L. B. HOLTHUIS and E. GOTTLIEB 93 Material of this species was examined from the following localities: Haifa Bay (samples 98, 245), Atlit, Tantura, Caesarea (rock pools, VI. 1946) and Bat Yam. The Haifa specimens were collected at depths of 22 and 29 m, respectively. The carapace lengths of the specimens varied between 4.5 and 23 mm; in two ovigerous females it was 11 and 11.5 mm, respectively. Xantho poressa is also known under the names Xantho hydrophilus (Herbst 1790) and Xantho rivulosus (Risso 1816), both of which are incorrect (see Hol- thuis 1954). The systematics of this and related species of the genus have been dealt with extensively by Drach and Forest (1953). The species inhabits the entire Mediterranean, the Black Sea and the Canary Islands. The records from the E Mediterranean are : Navarino Bay, Methone (=Modon) and Sapientza, S Greece (Guerin 1832, as Cancer cinereus), Phale- ron Bay near Athens (Athanassopoulos 1917), Bosporus (Heller 1863), Istanbul fishmarket (Ninni 1923), near Gallipoli, Sea of Marmara (OstroumorT 1896), near Khania, NW Crete (Lucas 1853, Raulin 1870), Rhodes (Santucci 1928, Tortonese 1947), Cyprus (Heller 1863), Lebanon (Drach and Forest 1953), Sidon ( =Saida), Lebanon (Monod 1931), Israel (Bodenheimer 1935, 1937), Haifa (Steinitz 1933), Caesarea, Israel (Gottlieb 1953), Egypt (Audouin 1826), Port Said (Caiman 1927), near Alexandria, Egypt (Balss 1936). In the U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C., two specimens of this species from Istanbul (IX., X. 1923, H. C. Kellers) were examined. Xantho granulicarpus Forest, 1953 Xantho? jloridus Gottlieb, 1953, p. 440. Material from the following localities has been examined: Haifa Bay (samples 98, 121, 138, 195, 385), Tantura (7.VII.1952 and 5.VII.1955, coll.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate ID Guide
    11/13/13 1 This book is a compilation of identification resources for invertebrates found in stomach samples. By no means is it a complete list of all possible prey types. It is simply what has been found in past ChesMMAP and NEAMAP diet studies. A copy of this document is stored in both the ChesMMAP and NEAMAP lab network drives in a folder called ID Guides, along with other useful identification keys, articles, documents, and photos. If you want to see a larger version of any of the images in this document you can simply open the file and zoom in on the picture, or you can open the original file for the photo by navigating to the appropriate subfolder within the Fisheries Gut Lab folder. Other useful links for identification: Isopods http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-33/htm/doc.html http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-48/htm/doc.html Polychaetes http://web.vims.edu/bio/benthic/polychaete.html http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-34/htm/doc.html Cephalopods http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-44/htm/doc.html Amphipods http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-67/htm/doc.html Molluscs http://www.oceanica.cofc.edu/shellguide/ http://www.jaxshells.org/slife4.htm Bivalves http://www.jaxshells.org/atlanticb.htm Gastropods http://www.jaxshells.org/atlantic.htm Crustaceans http://www.jaxshells.org/slifex26.htm Echinoderms http://www.jaxshells.org/eich26.htm 2 PROTOZOA (FORAMINIFERA) ................................................................................................................................ 4 PORIFERA (SPONGES) ............................................................................................................................................... 4 CNIDARIA (JELLYFISHES, HYDROIDS, SEA ANEMONES) ............................................................................... 4 CTENOPHORA (COMB JELLIES)............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Avances En Estudios De Biología Marina: Contribuciones Del XVIII SIEBM GIJÓN
    temas de 10 OCEANOGRAFÍA temas de OCEANOGRAFÍA Avances en estudios Temas de Oceanografía, es una colección de textos de biología marina: de referencia, que el Insti- tuto Español de Oceano- contribuciones grafía (IEO) publica con el fin de mejorar la difusión de la información científica re- del XVIII SIEBM lativa a las ciencias del mar dentro de la propia comu- GIJÓN nidad científica y entre los sectores interesados en es- tos temas. Avances en estudios de biología marina: contribuciones del XVIII SIEBM GIJÓN en estudios Avances temas de Instituto Español de Oceanografía OCEANOGRAFÍA Instituto Español de Oceanografía MINISTERIO DE ECONOMÍA, INDUSTRIA Y COMPETITIVIDAD MINISTERIO DE ECONOMÍA, INDUSTRIA Y COMPETITIVIDAD Avances en estudios de biología marina: contribuciones del XVIII SIEBM GIJÓN Javier Cristobo y Pilar Ríos (Coord.) Instituto Español de Oceanografía MINISTERIO DE ECONOMÍA, INDUSTRIA Y COMPETITIVIDAD temas de OCEANOGRAFÍA10 Avances en estudios de biología marina: contribuciones del XVIII SIEBM GIJÓN Javier Cristobo y Pilar Ríos (Coord.) Fotografías de Portada: Javier Cristobo Edita: Instituto Español de Oceanografía Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad Copyright: Instituto Español de Oceanografía Corazón de María, 8. 28020 Madrid Telf.: 915 974 443 / Fax: 915 947 770 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ieo.es NIPO: 063170012 ISBN: 978-84-95877-56-7 Depósito legal: M-25857-2017 Realización, impresión y encuadernación: DiScript Preimpresión, S.L. Avances en estudios de biología marina: contribuciones del XVIII SIEBM GIJÓN Coordinación Editorial Javier Cristobo Pilar Ríos Autores Anadón, N. Hardisson, A. Antit, M. León, E. Arias, A. López Abellán, L. J. Báez, A. López-González, N. Bárcenas, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/30/2021 06:17:11PM Via Free Access 106 S.K
    Contributions to Zoology, 72 (2-3) 105-109 (2003) SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague Cretaceous and Cenozoic decapod crustaceans of Jamaica ³ Stephen+K. Donovan¹Roger+W. Portell² & Joe+S.H. Collins 'Department ofPalaeontology, NationaalNatuurhistorisch Museum, Postbus 9517, NL-2300 RA Leiden, The 2 Netherlands; Florida Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 117800, University of Florida, Gainesville, 3 Florida 32611-7800, USA; Department ofPalaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England, and 8, Shaw’s Cottages, Perry Rise, Forest Hill, London SE23 2QN, England Keywords:: Jamaica, Cretaceous, Cenozoic, Crustacea, Decapoda Abstract Morris (1993) and new, but as yet undescribed, collections mentioned below. In the last decade, a rebirth in interest of Jamaican fossil crustaceans has occurred. A of known material is summary provided together with some indications ofthe directions that Overview of material future studies should take. The range of depositional settings shown by the decapod-bearing units studied the authors Introduction by pre- cludes any suggestion of a recurrent mode of pres- ervation. carapaces are rare, except in The have renaissance in the Complete past ten years seen a the Lower Miocene Montpelier Formation, where study of the fossil shrimps and crabs of Jamaica. a diverse faunahas been collected within slide blocks Previously, the only publications on the island’s of scleractinian corals. derived from a trio Withers Although decapod crustaceans were a ofpapers by shallow-water setting, they are preserved in deep- (1922, 1924, 1927), which described taxa from the water chalks (Portell & Collins, in press), with a Upper Cretaceous and Eocene. After this flurry of depositional depth in excess of 200 m (Underwood activity in the 1920s, Jamaican fossil shrimps and & in Of interest here crabs Mitchell, press).
    [Show full text]
  • En La Nomenclatura De Taxones Paleontológicos Y Zoológicos
    Bol. R. Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat., 114, 2020: 177-209 Desenfado (e incluso humor) en la nomenclatura de taxones paleontológicos y zoológicos Casualness (and even humor) in the nomenclature of paleontological and zoological taxa Juan Carlos Gutiérrez-Marco Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC, UCM) y Área de Paleontología GEODESPAL, Facultad CC. Geológicas, José Antonio Novais 12, 28040 Madrid. [email protected] Recibido: 25 de mayo de 2020. Aceptado: 7 de agosto de 2020. Publicado electrónicamente: 9 de agosto de 2020. PALABRAS CLAVE: Nombres científicos, Nomenclatura binominal, CINZ, Taxonomía, Paleontología, Zoología. KEY WORDS: Scientific names, Binominal nomenclature, ICZN, Taxonomy, Paleontology, Zoology. RESUMEN Se presenta una recopilación de más de un millar de taxones de nivel género o especie, de los que 486 corresponden a fósiles y 595 a organismos actuales, que fueron nombrados a partir de personajes reales o imaginarios, objetos, compañías comerciales, juegos de palabras, divertimentos sonoros o expresiones con doble significado. Entre las personas distinguidas por estos taxones destacan notablemente los artistas (músicos, actores, escritores, pintores) y, en menor medida, políticos, grandes científicos o divulgadores, así como diversos activistas. De entre los personajes u obras de ficción resaltan los derivados de ciertas obras literarias, películas o series de televisión, además de variadas mitologías propias de las diversas culturas. Los taxones que conllevan una terminología erótica o sexual más o menos explícita, también ocupan un lugar destacado en estas listas. Obviamente, el conjunto de estas excentricidades nomenclaturales, muchas de las cuales bordean el buen gusto y puntualmente rebasan las recomendaciones éticas de los códigos internacionales de nomenclatura, representan una ínfima minoría entre los casi dos millones de especies descritas hasta ahora.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Crustacea Decapoda of Sicily (Central Mediterranean Sea
    Ital. J. Zool., 70. 69-78 (2003) The marine Crustacea Decapoda of Sicily INTRODUCTION (central Mediterranean Sea): a checklist The location of Sicily in the middle of the Mediter­ with remarks on their distribution ranean Sea, between the western and eastern basins, gives the island utmost importance for faunistic studies. Furthermore, the diversity of geomorphologic aspects, substratum types and hydrological features along its CARLO PIPITONE shores account for many different habitats in the coastal CNR-IRMA, Laboratorio di Biologia Marina, waters, and more generally on the continental shelf. Via Giovanni da Verrazzano 17, 1-91014 Castellammare del Golfo (TP) (Italy) E-mail: [email protected] Such diversity of habitats has already been pointed out by Arculeo et al. (1991) for the Sicilian fish fauna. MARCO ARCULEO Crustacea Decapoda include benthic, nektobenthic Dipartimento di Biologia Animate, Universita degli Studi di Palermo, and pelagic species (some of which targeted by artisan Via Archirafi 18, 1-90123 Palermo (Italy) and industrial fisheries) living over an area from the in- tertidal rocks and sands to the abyssal mud flats (Brusca & Brusca, 1996). Occurrence, distribution and ecology of Sicilian decapods have been the subject of a number of papers in recent decades (Torchio, 1967, 1968; Ariani & Serra, 1969; Guglielmo et al, 1973; Cavaliere & Berdar, 1975; Grippa, 1976; Andaloro et al, 1979; Ragonese et al, 1990, Abstract in 53° congr. U.Z.I.: 21- -22; Pipitone & Tumbiolo, 1993; Pastore, 1995; Gia- cobbe & Spano, 1996; Giacobbe et al, 1996; Pipitone, 1998; Ragonese & Giusto, 1998; Rinelli et al, 1998b, 1999; Spano, 1998; Spano et al, 1999; Relini et al, 2000; Pipitone et al, 2001; Mori & Vacchi, 2003).
    [Show full text]