<<

HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO HELSINGFORS UNIVERSITET UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI MAATALOUS-METSÄTIETEELLINEN TIEDEKUNTA AGRIKULTUR-FORSTVETENSKAPLIGA FAKULTETEN FACULTY OF AND FORESTRY

Markku Yli-Halla Environmental Science 00014 University of Helsinki UPDATE OF WRB SOIL CLASSES IN Finland Åge Nyborg Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute 1431 Ås FINLAND: EXPRESSION OF WETNESS Norway

Cambisols are restricted to medium-textured INTRODUCTION glacial tills or fine , often showing weak a) b) In the cool and humid climate prevailing in podzolization. According to earlier surveys, Finland, wetness of the soil is a permanent more coarse-textured , mostly under constraint to agriculture and 86% of field area forest vegetation, are dominated by Histic, is artificially drained. This self-evident soil Gleyic and Haplic . After these characteristic has not been expressed in the revisions, the Soil Database of Finland at scale WRB [1] names of Finnish soils in the Soil 1:250,000 properly reflects the moisture Geographical Database of (SGDE) at regime attributable to the humid climate. scale 1:1000 000, or in the Soil Database of Finland at scale 1:250 000 [2]. Until today, most soils of Finland have been classified as Vertic , and the medium-textured soils as Eutric/Dystric d) Cambisols, none expressing the inherent c) wetness. Yet, according to Soil Taxonomy, the same soils have been classified as Aquepts or Aquic subgroups of [3]. In Norway soil mapping is actively carried out in the field. There the most common agricultural soils are and (Fig. 1), expressing the stagnic colour pattern at the reference group level, and Luvisols and , where the prefixes gleyic and Fig. 3. A Luvic (a), stagnic colour stagnic appear frequantly. Considering the pattern in a fine (b), a Vertic Luvic nearly similar geological history and climatic containing wedge-shaped aggregates conditions in south-eastern Norway and (c) and a broken clod of clay with a stagnic Southern Finland, a hypothesis was made that Fig. 1. Soils in south-eastern Norway. colour pattern (d). the same soils occur in these two Nordic areas.

Literature SOIL EXCURSION [1] IUSS Working Group WRB. 2007. WRB 2006, first update 2007. World Soil Resources A soil excursion was arranged in 2012 to Reports 103. investigate the major mineral agricultural soils [2] Lilja, H., Nevalainen, R. 2007. Developing of southern Finland and harmonize soil a digital for Finland. Developments in classification between the two countries. Fig. 2. Weak albeluvic tonguing in a Luvic 31: 67-74. Planosol (Albic Ruptic Clayic). [3] Yli-Halla, M., Mokma, D.L. 2001. Soils in an agricultural landscape of Jokioinen, south- SIGNS OF WETNESS Table 1. Generalized classification of mineral western Finland. Agricultural and Food Almost all investigated soils of Finland had a soils of Finland. Science in Finland 10: 33-43. stagnic colour pattern. Most clay soils were Stagnosols, in the lowest positions also . Stagnic colour pattern was common also in soils with sand over clay, classifying as Planosols. Clay eluviation and some albeluvic tonguing were observed, but the limitations in our database prevent delineating Albeluvisols. Fine soils were poorly developed, falling into Stagnic Regosls instead of Eutric/Dystric Cambisols in SDGE. After this revision,