Quantization of magnetic flux and electron-positron pair creation Mehmet Emre Tasgin Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Hacettepe University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey and [email protected] and [email protected] (Dated: June 23, 2021) − An electron-positron (e e+) pair is created in vacuum above a critical electric field strength Ecrt which is quite large in the laboratory scale. The photon, thus the field, annihilates in the pair creation process. Here, we question if the pair creation (at E = Ecrt) introduces a boundary condition in the electromagnetic state, e.g., similar to the one in angular or linear momentum. We show that introduction of such a reasonable condition yields approximately the well-known magnetic flux quanta which normally one obtains using different arguments. In 1951, Swinger showed that a strong static electric a lattice, with a is the spatial periodicity and N is the field can create an electron-positron (e−e+) pair from number of sites.) We note that, the operatorsx ˆ andp ˆ, or the quantum electrodynamics (QED) vacuum [1, 2]. The φˆ and Lˆz, are canonically conjugate to each other [23]. ∞ 2 pair creation probability 1/n exp( nπEswg/E) ˆ ˆ ∝ Pn=1 − Similarly, electric E and magnetic H field operators for the lightest charged particle —electron— has an expo- are also canonically conjugate to each other for a given nential dependence on the electric field strength Eswg = electromagnetic mode [24]. In quantum optics, one can 3 18 mec /e¯h 1.3 10 V/m, where me is the electron represent the electromagnetic (EM) quantum state in the ≃ −×+ mass [3]. The e e pair production probability is appre- E field basis —named as the q-representation [24]— as ciable for electric field strengths E E . ∼ swg well as using the the Fock or coherent state bases. For Developments in the X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) instance, in the vacuum state the probability for a partic- technology pawed the way to the generation of electric 2 2 2 ular field strength E to occur is ψ(E) exp( E /εk) field strengths as large as EXFEL 0.1 Eswg in the | | ∝ −1/2 ∼ × hω¯ k laboratories [4]. This made the direct production of for a mode of frequency ωk. Here, εk = 2Vǫ0 and − the e e+ pairs from vacuum a hot topic in the past V is the quantization volume. Thus, in analogy withp ˆ two decades [5–17]. Further (improved) theoretical stud- and Lˆz, one can represent the magnetic field operator as ies (e.g., Refs. [14, 15]) showed that field strengths in ˆ . h¯ ωkc ∂ Hy = i V ∂Ex for a given mode. dimensions of Ecrt 0.1 Eswg can also achieve appre- In this paper, we raise the following question. Is it − + ∼ × ciable e e pair creation [4–8, 10, 11]. Pair creation, possible that magnetic flux quantization phenomenon — taking place at the critical field strength, annihilates the normally obtained using totally different arguments— is photon thus wipes out the electric field. somehow connected with the take place of e−e+ pair cre- A second phenomenon, which looks not connected with ation above a critical electric field strength? More explic- the Schwinger pair creation process at the present, is the itly, does annihilation of the photon (so the electric field) quantization of the magnetic flux in charged superfluids, above a critical field strength E = Ecrt introduce the i.e., superconductors (SCs) [18]. The flux quantization EM wavefunction an analogous boundary condition, e.g., r 1/2 iθ(r) appears, because the wavefunction ψ( )= n e gov- like ψ(0) = ψ(Ecrt) ? In this work, we obtain a magnetic erning the superfluid Cooper pairs must be single valued flux quantum ΦEcrt using the pair creation as a boundary at each contour, i.e., ψ(θ =0)= ψ(θ =2π). A wavefunc- r condition. The flux quantum we obtain from the pair cre- r 1/2 iθ( ) −15 2 tion of the same form, ψ( )= n e , appears also for ation condition ΦEcrt 2.3 10 T m is quite close to ∼ × × −15 other superfluid media [19], e.g., Bose-Einstein conden- the well-known magnetic flux quanta Φ0 2.0978 10 arXiv:2106.11353v1 [hep-ph] 21 Jun 2021 sates [20], where quantization phenomena take place due T m2 obtained in a superconducting loop≃ using another× to a similar condition 1. condition× ψ(θ =0)= ψ(θ =2π) [18]. A quantization phenomenon appears between canoni- Flux quantization due to pair-creation.— We use cally conjugate operators. Quantization of angular mo- . plain arguments for obtaining the ΦEcrt . Rephrasing ˆ h¯ ∂ − + mentum, Lz = i ∂φ , is a constraint which has to be ourselves, an EM quantum state creates an e e pair satisfied by an arbitrary system. It occurs due to the in the QED vacuum above the critical field strength single valuedness of the wavefunction under azimuthal Ecrt 0.1 Eswg [5–9, 14, 15]. The photon, thus the rotations, i.e., ψ(φ=0)= ψ(φ =2π). A similar condition, field,∼ is annihilated× when the pair is created. This phe- ψ(x = 0) = ψ(x = L), quantizes the linear momen- nomenon is possible to introduce a boundary condition . h¯ ∂ ˆ tum (ˆp = i ∂x ) in an optical cavity, condensed matter on the electric field. Thus, a quantity including the Hy physics [18], or optical lattices [22]. (Here, L = Na in operator, which is canonically conjugate to Eˆx, is pos- sible to be quantized. The first guess, naturally, is the magnetic flux. So, we calculate the quantity 1 The collective behavior of constituent particles [21] in these sys- ωkc 2π tems enables a single wavefunction description of the system. ΦEcrt = µ0HyA = n µ0 ¯hA (1) × V Ecrt 2 within the pair creation region. Here, n = 0, 1, 2... is 0.1√2Eswg in their studies. Using this value as the an integer and V is the quantization volume in which boundary condition, we obtain a magnetic flux quan- the pair production takes place. A is the approximate tum Φ = n 1.7 10−15 T m2 which is slightly Ecrt × × × area the Hy field faces within the pair creation region. below the Φ0. We further note that our calculation re- In QED, the complementary (its Hermitian conjugate, or garding the flux quantum also includes imprecise esti- the reverse) process takes place simultaneously: electron- mates which actually necessitates careful QED calcula- positron annihilation creates a photon in the region mea- tions. For instance, we calculate the magnetic flux simply sured with a Compton wavelength [15, 25–27] 2. using the area A, which we refer as the one in which pair The flux quantization due to the pair creation can be creation/annihilation takes place. It is similar for using re-expressed as L λcomp. ∼While the match between the two calculations employ- ¯hωkc 2π ing such “large” and “small” numbers is impressive, it ΦEcrt = n µ0 . (2) can also be a coincidence. Nevertheless, taking into ac- × L Ecrt count that the match between the two fluxes relies on a − + We consider a photon frequency —for the one annihilated reasonable condition —e e pair creation above Ecrt— in the pair creating process— which matches the pair it deserves further investigations. We emphasize that 2 even a 1-order of magnitude match between the two phe- energy ¯hωk 2mec . We also use the Compton wave- length of the∼ annihilated photon (or the generated one in nomena would be engrossing enough for triggering fur- ther studies. the reverse process) for the length L λcomp = h/2mec. ∼ Consequences.— We discuss that the well-known Hence, for Ecrt 0.1 Eswg, we obtain a magnetic flux quantum of ∼ × magnetic flux quantization is possible to occur also due to the e−e+ pair creation process. This phenomenon may − refashion our understanding on the nature of the space, Φ = n 2.3 10 15 T m2 (3) Ecrt × × × fields and charged particles. For instance, such an obser- vation may relate the azimuthal feature of the universe, using the pair creation condition on the electric field. i.e., ψ(θ =0)= ψ(θ =2π), the elementary charge q =2e, This is quite close to the magnetic flux quanta and the pair creation phenomenon (above Ecrt) to each − other in a further research. Φ = h/2e =2.068 10 15 T m2 (4) 0 × × If the phenomenon we present is not a coincidence, the result we obtain makes one of the universal parameters, one obtains from the condition ψ(θ =0)= ψ(θ =2π) in like mass or charge of an electron, depend on the other a closed loop of a charged superfluid [28]. ones. This is like, what happens after one realizes the 2 Brief discussions.— We also need to mention that µ0ǫ0 = 1/c relation. One can express magnetic perme- − + 2 studies on e e pair creation phenomenon show devi- ability as µ0 =1/c ǫ0. ations between different models or depending on the ap- Acknowledgments.— We gratefully thank Vural proximations used [11–15, 29, 30]. For instance, some of G¨okmen for his motivational support and Bayram Tekin the works (e.g., Refs. [9, 10]) employ the field E and Ceyhun Bulutay for the scientific support. crt ∼ [1] Julian Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum po- [5] Reinhard Alkofer, MB Hecht, Craig D Roberts, larization,” Physical Review 82, 664 (1951). SM Schmidt, and DV Vinnik, “Pair creation and an [2] Martin Reuter, Michael G Schmidt, and Christian Schu- x-ray free electron laser,” Physical Review Letters 87, bert, “Constant external fields in gauge theory and the 193902 (2001). spin 0, 12, 1 path integrals,” Annals of Physics 259, 313– [6] CD Roberts, SM Schmidt, and DV Vinnik, “Quantum 365 (1997).