DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2106.11353V1 [Hep-Ph] 21 Jun 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2106.11353V1 [Hep-Ph] 21 Jun 2021 Quantization of magnetic flux and electron-positron pair creation Mehmet Emre Tasgin Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Hacettepe University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey and [email protected] and [email protected] (Dated: June 23, 2021) − An electron-positron (e e+) pair is created in vacuum above a critical electric field strength Ecrt which is quite large in the laboratory scale. The photon, thus the field, annihilates in the pair creation process. Here, we question if the pair creation (at E = Ecrt) introduces a boundary condition in the electromagnetic state, e.g., similar to the one in angular or linear momentum. We show that introduction of such a reasonable condition yields approximately the well-known magnetic flux quanta which normally one obtains using different arguments. In 1951, Swinger showed that a strong static electric a lattice, with a is the spatial periodicity and N is the field can create an electron-positron (e−e+) pair from number of sites.) We note that, the operatorsx ˆ andp ˆ, or the quantum electrodynamics (QED) vacuum [1, 2]. The φˆ and Lˆz, are canonically conjugate to each other [23]. ∞ 2 pair creation probability 1/n exp( nπEswg/E) ˆ ˆ ∝ Pn=1 − Similarly, electric E and magnetic H field operators for the lightest charged particle —electron— has an expo- are also canonically conjugate to each other for a given nential dependence on the electric field strength Eswg = electromagnetic mode [24]. In quantum optics, one can 3 18 mec /e¯h 1.3 10 V/m, where me is the electron represent the electromagnetic (EM) quantum state in the ≃ −×+ mass [3]. The e e pair production probability is appre- E field basis —named as the q-representation [24]— as ciable for electric field strengths E E . ∼ swg well as using the the Fock or coherent state bases. For Developments in the X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) instance, in the vacuum state the probability for a partic- technology pawed the way to the generation of electric 2 2 2 ular field strength E to occur is ψ(E) exp( E /εk) field strengths as large as EXFEL 0.1 Eswg in the | | ∝ −1/2 ∼ × hω¯ k laboratories [4]. This made the direct production of for a mode of frequency ωk. Here, εk = 2Vǫ0 and − the e e+ pairs from vacuum a hot topic in the past V is the quantization volume. Thus, in analogy withp ˆ two decades [5–17]. Further (improved) theoretical stud- and Lˆz, one can represent the magnetic field operator as ies (e.g., Refs. [14, 15]) showed that field strengths in ˆ . h¯ ωkc ∂ Hy = i V ∂Ex for a given mode. dimensions of Ecrt 0.1 Eswg can also achieve appre- In this paper, we raise the following question. Is it − + ∼ × ciable e e pair creation [4–8, 10, 11]. Pair creation, possible that magnetic flux quantization phenomenon — taking place at the critical field strength, annihilates the normally obtained using totally different arguments— is photon thus wipes out the electric field. somehow connected with the take place of e−e+ pair cre- A second phenomenon, which looks not connected with ation above a critical electric field strength? More explic- the Schwinger pair creation process at the present, is the itly, does annihilation of the photon (so the electric field) quantization of the magnetic flux in charged superfluids, above a critical field strength E = Ecrt introduce the i.e., superconductors (SCs) [18]. The flux quantization EM wavefunction an analogous boundary condition, e.g., r 1/2 iθ(r) appears, because the wavefunction ψ( )= n e gov- like ψ(0) = ψ(Ecrt) ? In this work, we obtain a magnetic erning the superfluid Cooper pairs must be single valued flux quantum ΦEcrt using the pair creation as a boundary at each contour, i.e., ψ(θ =0)= ψ(θ =2π). A wavefunc- r condition. The flux quantum we obtain from the pair cre- r 1/2 iθ( ) −15 2 tion of the same form, ψ( )= n e , appears also for ation condition ΦEcrt 2.3 10 T m is quite close to ∼ × × −15 other superfluid media [19], e.g., Bose-Einstein conden- the well-known magnetic flux quanta Φ0 2.0978 10 arXiv:2106.11353v1 [hep-ph] 21 Jun 2021 sates [20], where quantization phenomena take place due T m2 obtained in a superconducting loop≃ using another× to a similar condition 1. condition× ψ(θ =0)= ψ(θ =2π) [18]. A quantization phenomenon appears between canoni- Flux quantization due to pair-creation.— We use cally conjugate operators. Quantization of angular mo- . plain arguments for obtaining the ΦEcrt . Rephrasing ˆ h¯ ∂ − + mentum, Lz = i ∂φ , is a constraint which has to be ourselves, an EM quantum state creates an e e pair satisfied by an arbitrary system. It occurs due to the in the QED vacuum above the critical field strength single valuedness of the wavefunction under azimuthal Ecrt 0.1 Eswg [5–9, 14, 15]. The photon, thus the rotations, i.e., ψ(φ=0)= ψ(φ =2π). A similar condition, field,∼ is annihilated× when the pair is created. This phe- ψ(x = 0) = ψ(x = L), quantizes the linear momen- nomenon is possible to introduce a boundary condition . h¯ ∂ ˆ tum (ˆp = i ∂x ) in an optical cavity, condensed matter on the electric field. Thus, a quantity including the Hy physics [18], or optical lattices [22]. (Here, L = Na in operator, which is canonically conjugate to Eˆx, is pos- sible to be quantized. The first guess, naturally, is the magnetic flux. So, we calculate the quantity 1 The collective behavior of constituent particles [21] in these sys- ωkc 2π tems enables a single wavefunction description of the system. ΦEcrt = µ0HyA = n µ0 ¯hA (1) × V Ecrt 2 within the pair creation region. Here, n = 0, 1, 2... is 0.1√2Eswg in their studies. Using this value as the an integer and V is the quantization volume in which boundary condition, we obtain a magnetic flux quan- the pair production takes place. A is the approximate tum Φ = n 1.7 10−15 T m2 which is slightly Ecrt × × × area the Hy field faces within the pair creation region. below the Φ0. We further note that our calculation re- In QED, the complementary (its Hermitian conjugate, or garding the flux quantum also includes imprecise esti- the reverse) process takes place simultaneously: electron- mates which actually necessitates careful QED calcula- positron annihilation creates a photon in the region mea- tions. For instance, we calculate the magnetic flux simply sured with a Compton wavelength [15, 25–27] 2. using the area A, which we refer as the one in which pair The flux quantization due to the pair creation can be creation/annihilation takes place. It is similar for using re-expressed as L λcomp. ∼While the match between the two calculations employ- ¯hωkc 2π ing such “large” and “small” numbers is impressive, it ΦEcrt = n µ0 . (2) can also be a coincidence. Nevertheless, taking into ac- × L Ecrt count that the match between the two fluxes relies on a − + We consider a photon frequency —for the one annihilated reasonable condition —e e pair creation above Ecrt— in the pair creating process— which matches the pair it deserves further investigations. We emphasize that 2 even a 1-order of magnitude match between the two phe- energy ¯hωk 2mec . We also use the Compton wave- length of the∼ annihilated photon (or the generated one in nomena would be engrossing enough for triggering fur- ther studies. the reverse process) for the length L λcomp = h/2mec. ∼ Consequences.— We discuss that the well-known Hence, for Ecrt 0.1 Eswg, we obtain a magnetic flux quantum of ∼ × magnetic flux quantization is possible to occur also due to the e−e+ pair creation process. This phenomenon may − refashion our understanding on the nature of the space, Φ = n 2.3 10 15 T m2 (3) Ecrt × × × fields and charged particles. For instance, such an obser- vation may relate the azimuthal feature of the universe, using the pair creation condition on the electric field. i.e., ψ(θ =0)= ψ(θ =2π), the elementary charge q =2e, This is quite close to the magnetic flux quanta and the pair creation phenomenon (above Ecrt) to each − other in a further research. Φ = h/2e =2.068 10 15 T m2 (4) 0 × × If the phenomenon we present is not a coincidence, the result we obtain makes one of the universal parameters, one obtains from the condition ψ(θ =0)= ψ(θ =2π) in like mass or charge of an electron, depend on the other a closed loop of a charged superfluid [28]. ones. This is like, what happens after one realizes the 2 Brief discussions.— We also need to mention that µ0ǫ0 = 1/c relation. One can express magnetic perme- − + 2 studies on e e pair creation phenomenon show devi- ability as µ0 =1/c ǫ0. ations between different models or depending on the ap- Acknowledgments.— We gratefully thank Vural proximations used [11–15, 29, 30]. For instance, some of G¨okmen for his motivational support and Bayram Tekin the works (e.g., Refs. [9, 10]) employ the field E and Ceyhun Bulutay for the scientific support. crt ∼ [1] Julian Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum po- [5] Reinhard Alkofer, MB Hecht, Craig D Roberts, larization,” Physical Review 82, 664 (1951). SM Schmidt, and DV Vinnik, “Pair creation and an [2] Martin Reuter, Michael G Schmidt, and Christian Schu- x-ray free electron laser,” Physical Review Letters 87, bert, “Constant external fields in gauge theory and the 193902 (2001). spin 0, 12, 1 path integrals,” Annals of Physics 259, 313– [6] CD Roberts, SM Schmidt, and DV Vinnik, “Quantum 365 (1997).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Five Common Particles
    The Five Common Particles The world around you consists of only three particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons form the nuclei of atoms, and electrons glue everything together and create chemicals and materials. Along with the photon and the neutrino, these particles are essentially the only ones that exist in our solar system, because all the other subatomic particles have half-lives of typically 10-9 second or less, and vanish almost the instant they are created by nuclear reactions in the Sun, etc. Particles interact via the four fundamental forces of nature. Some basic properties of these forces are summarized below. (Other aspects of the fundamental forces are also discussed in the Summary of Particle Physics document on this web site.) Force Range Common Particles It Affects Conserved Quantity gravity infinite neutron, proton, electron, neutrino, photon mass-energy electromagnetic infinite proton, electron, photon charge -14 strong nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton baryon number -15 weak nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton, electron, neutrino lepton number Every particle in nature has specific values of all four of the conserved quantities associated with each force. The values for the five common particles are: Particle Rest Mass1 Charge2 Baryon # Lepton # proton 938.3 MeV/c2 +1 e +1 0 neutron 939.6 MeV/c2 0 +1 0 electron 0.511 MeV/c2 -1 e 0 +1 neutrino ≈ 1 eV/c2 0 0 +1 photon 0 eV/c2 0 0 0 1) MeV = mega-electron-volt = 106 eV. It is customary in particle physics to measure the mass of a particle in terms of how much energy it would represent if it were converted via E = mc2.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.1. Introduction the Phenomenon of Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy
    PRINCIPLES OF POSITRON ANNIHILATION Chapter-1 __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.1. Introduction The phenomenon of positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS) has been utilized as nuclear method to probe a variety of material properties as well as to research problems in solid state physics. The field of solid state investigation with positrons started in the early fifties, when it was recognized that information could be obtained about the properties of solids by studying the annihilation of a positron and an electron as given by Dumond et al. [1] and Bendetti and Roichings [2]. In particular, the discovery of the interaction of positrons with defects in crystal solids by Mckenize et al. [3] has given a strong impetus to a further elaboration of the PAS. Currently, PAS is amongst the best nuclear methods, and its most recent developments are documented in the proceedings of the latest positron annihilation conferences [4-8]. PAS is successfully applied for the investigation of electron characteristics and defect structures present in materials, magnetic structures of solids, plastic deformation at low and high temperature, and phase transformations in alloys, semiconductors, polymers, porous material, etc. Its applications extend from advanced problems of solid state physics and materials science to industrial use. It is also widely used in chemistry, biology, and medicine (e.g. locating tumors). As the process of measurement does not mostly influence the properties of the investigated sample, PAS is a non-destructive testing approach that allows the subsequent study of a sample by other methods. As experimental equipment for many applications, PAS is commercially produced and is relatively cheap, thus, increasingly more research laboratories are using PAS for basic research, diagnostics of machine parts working in hard conditions, and for characterization of high-tech materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 the Fundamentals of Nuclear Physics Outline Natural
    Outline Chapter 3 The Fundamentals of Nuclear • Terms: activity, half life, average life • Nuclear disintegration schemes Physics • Parent-daughter relationships Radiation Dosimetry I • Activation of isotopes Text: H.E Johns and J.R. Cunningham, The physics of radiology, 4th ed. http://www.utoledo.edu/med/depts/radther Natural radioactivity Activity • Activity – number of disintegrations per unit time; • Particles inside a nucleus are in constant motion; directly proportional to the number of atoms can escape if acquire enough energy present • Most lighter atoms with Z<82 (lead) have at least N Average one stable isotope t / ta A N N0e lifetime • All atoms with Z > 82 are radioactive and t disintegrate until a stable isotope is formed ta= 1.44 th • Artificial radioactivity: nucleus can be made A N e0.693t / th A 2t / th unstable upon bombardment with neutrons, high 0 0 Half-life energy protons, etc. • Units: Bq = 1/s, Ci=3.7x 1010 Bq Activity Activity Emitted radiation 1 Example 1 Example 1A • A prostate implant has a half-life of 17 days. • A prostate implant has a half-life of 17 days. If the What percent of the dose is delivered in the first initial dose rate is 10cGy/h, what is the total dose day? N N delivered? t /th t 2 or e Dtotal D0tavg N0 N0 A. 0.5 A. 9 0.693t 0.693t B. 2 t /th 1/17 t 2 2 0.96 B. 29 D D e th dt D h e th C. 4 total 0 0 0.693 0.693t /th 0.6931/17 C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Massless Two-Loop Two-Point Function and Zeta Functions in Counterterms of Feynman Diagrams
    The Massless Two-loop Two-point Function and Zeta Functions in Counterterms of Feynman Diagrams Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades \Doktor der Naturwissenschaften" am Fachbereich Physik der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universit¨at in Mainz Isabella Bierenbaum geboren in Landau/Pfalz Mainz, Februar 2005 Datum der mundlic¨ hen Prufung:¨ 6. Juni 2005 D77 (Diss. Universit¨at Mainz) Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Renormalization 3 2.1 General introduction . 3 2.2 Feynman diagrams and power counting . 5 2.3 Dimensional regularization . 9 2.4 Counterterms . 10 2.4.1 One-loop diagrams . 10 2.4.2 Multi-loop diagrams . 11 3 Hopf and Lie algebra 15 3.1 The Hopf algebras HR and HF G . 15 3.1.1 The Hopf algebra of rooted trees HR . 16 3.1.2 The Hopf algebra of Feynman graphs HF G . 20 3.1.3 Correspondence between HR, HF G, and ZFF . 20 3.2 Lie algebras . 24 4 The massless two-loop two-point function | an overview 27 4.1 General remarks . 27 4.2 Integer exponents νi | the triangle relation . 29 4.3 Non-integer exponents νi . 32 5 Nested sums 37 5.1 Nested sums . 38 5.1.1 From polylogarithms to multiple polylogarithms . 38 5.1.2 Algebraic relations: shuffle and quasi-shuffle . 41 5.2 nestedsums | the theory and some of its functions . 45 5.2.1 nestedsums | the general idea . 46 5.2.2 nestedsums | the four classes of functions . 48 6 The massless two-loop two-point function 53 6.1 The expansion of I^(2;5) . 53 6.1.1 Decomposition of I^(2;5) .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1202.1557V1
    The Heisenberg-Euler Effective Action: 75 years on ∗ Gerald V. Dunne Physics Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3046, USA On this 75th anniversary of the publication of the Heisenberg-Euler paper on the full non- perturbative one-loop effective action for quantum electrodynamics I review their paper and discuss some of the impact it has had on quantum field theory. I. HISTORICAL CONTEXT After the 1928 publication of Dirac’s work on his relativistic theory of the electron [1], Heisenberg immediately appreciated the significance of the new ”hole theory” picture of the quantum vacuum of quantum electrodynamics (QED). Following some confusion, in 1931 Dirac associated the holes with positively charged electrons [2]: A hole, if there were one, would be a new kind of particle, unknown to experimental physics, having the same mass and opposite charge to an electron. With the discovery of the positron in 1932, soon thereafter [but, interestingly, not immediately [3]], Dirac proposed at the 1933 Solvay Conference that the negative energy solutions [holes] should be identified with the positron [4]: Any state of negative energy which is not occupied represents a lack of uniformity and this must be shown by observation as a kind of hole. It is possible to assume that the positrons are these holes. Positron theory and QED was born, and Heisenberg began investigating positron theory in earnest, publishing two fundamental papers in 1934, formalizing the treatment of the quantum fluctuations inherent in this Dirac sea picture of the QED vacuum [5, 6]. It was soon realized that these quantum fluctuations would lead to quantum nonlinearities [6]: Halpern and Debye have already independently drawn attention to the fact that the Dirac theory of the positron leads to the scattering of light by light, even when the energy of the photons is not sufficient to create pairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacuum Energy
    Vacuum Energy Mark D. Roberts, 117 Queen’s Road, Wimbledon, London SW19 8NS, Email:[email protected] http://cosmology.mth.uct.ac.za/ roberts ∼ February 1, 2008 Eprint: hep-th/0012062 Comments: A comprehensive review of Vacuum Energy, which is an extended version of a poster presented at L¨uderitz (2000). This is not a review of the cosmolog- ical constant per se, but rather vacuum energy in general, my approach to the cosmological constant is not standard. Lots of very small changes and several additions for the second and third versions: constructive feedback still welcome, but the next version will be sometime in coming due to my sporadiac internet access. First Version 153 pages, 368 references. Second Version 161 pages, 399 references. arXiv:hep-th/0012062v3 22 Jul 2001 Third Version 167 pages, 412 references. The 1999 PACS Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme: http://publish.aps.org/eprint/gateway/pacslist 11.10.+x, 04.62.+v, 98.80.-k, 03.70.+k; The 2000 Mathematical Classification Scheme: http://www.ams.org/msc 81T20, 83E99, 81Q99, 83F05. 3 KEYPHRASES: Vacuum Energy, Inertial Mass, Principle of Equivalence. 1 Abstract There appears to be three, perhaps related, ways of approaching the nature of vacuum energy. The first is to say that it is just the lowest energy state of a given, usually quantum, system. The second is to equate vacuum energy with the Casimir energy. The third is to note that an energy difference from a complete vacuum might have some long range effect, typically this energy difference is interpreted as the cosmological constant.
    [Show full text]
  • The QED Coupling Constant for an Electron to Emit Or Absorb a Photon Is Shown to Be the Square Root of the Fine Structure Constant Α Shlomo Barak
    The QED Coupling Constant for an Electron to Emit or Absorb a Photon is Shown to be the Square Root of the Fine Structure Constant α Shlomo Barak To cite this version: Shlomo Barak. The QED Coupling Constant for an Electron to Emit or Absorb a Photon is Shown to be the Square Root of the Fine Structure Constant α. 2020. hal-02626064 HAL Id: hal-02626064 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02626064 Preprint submitted on 26 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. V4 15/04/2020 The QED Coupling Constant for an Electron to Emit or Absorb a Photon is Shown to be the Square Root of the Fine Structure Constant α Shlomo Barak Taga Innovations 16 Beit Hillel St. Tel Aviv 67017 Israel Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The QED probability amplitude (coupling constant) for an electron to interact with its own field or to emit or absorb a photon has been experimentally determined to be -0.08542455. This result is very close to the square root of the Fine Structure Constant α. By showing theoretically that the coupling constant is indeed the square root of α we resolve what is, according to Feynman, one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics.
    [Show full text]
  • The W and Z at LEP
    50YEARSOFCERN The W and Z at LEP 1954-2004 The Large Electron Positron collider made significant contributions to the process of establishing the Standard Model as the basis for matter and 5 forces, and also built a platform for physics scenarios beyond the model. The Standard Model of particle physics is arguably one of the greatest achievements in physics in the 20th century. Within this framework the electroweak interactions, as introduced by Sheldon Glashow, Abdus Salam and Steven Weinberg, are formulated as an SU(2)xll(l) gauge field theory with the masses of the fundamental particles generated by the Higgs mechanism. Both of the first two crucial steps in establishing experimentally the electroweak part of the Standard Model occurred at CERN. These were the discovery of neutral currents in neutrino scattering by the Gargamelle collab­ oration in 1973, and only a decade later the discovery by the UA1 and UA2 collaborations of the W and Z gauge bosons in proton- antiproton collisions at the converted Super Proton Synchrotron (CERN Courier May 2003 p26 and April 2004 pl3). Establishing the theory at the quantum level was the next logical step, following the pioneering theoretical work of Gerard 't Hooft Fig. 1. The cover page and Martinus Veltman. Such experimental proof is a necessary (left) of the seminal requirement for a theory describing phenomena in the microscopic CERN yellow report world. At the same time, performing experimental analyses with high 76-18 on the physics precision also opens windows to new physics phenomena at much potential of a 200 GeV higher energy scales, which can be accessed indirectly through e+e~ collider, and the virtual effects.
    [Show full text]
  • A Relativistic One Pion Exchange Model of Proton-Neutron Electron-Positron Pair Production
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1973 A Relativistic One Pion Exchange Model of Proton-Neutron Electron-Positron Pair Production William A. Peterson Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Peterson, William A., "A Relativistic One Pion Exchange Model of Proton-Neutron Electron-Positron Pair Production" (1973). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 3674. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3674 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author sincerely appreciates the advice and encouragement of Dr. Jack E. Chatelain who suggested this problem and guided its progress. The author would also like to extend his deepest gratitude to Dr. V. G. Lind and Dr. Ackele y Miller for their support during the years of graduate school. William A. Pete r son iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS • ii LIST OF TABLES • v LIST OF FIGURES. vi ABSTRACT. ix Chapter I. INTRODUCTION. • . • • II. FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM. 7 Green's Function Treatment of the Dirac Equation. • • • . • . • • • 7 Application of Feynman Graph Rules to Pair Production in Neutron- Proton Collisions 11 III. DIFFERENTIAL CROSS SECTION. 29 Symmetric Coplanar Case 29 Frequency Distributions 44 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 72 APPENDIXES •• 75 Appendix A. Notation and Definitions 76 Appendix B. Expressi on for Cross Section. 79 Appendix C.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Masses-How to Add Them to the Standard Model
    he Oscillating Neutrino The Oscillating Neutrino of spatial coordinates) has the property of interchanging the two states eR and eL. Neutrino Masses What about the neutrino? The right-handed neutrino has never been observed, How to add them to the Standard Model and it is not known whether that particle state and the left-handed antineutrino c exist. In the Standard Model, the field ne , which would create those states, is not Stuart Raby and Richard Slansky included. Instead, the neutrino is associated with only two types of ripples (particle states) and is defined by a single field ne: n annihilates a left-handed electron neutrino n or creates a right-handed he Standard Model includes a set of particles—the quarks and leptons e eL electron antineutrino n . —and their interactions. The quarks and leptons are spin-1/2 particles, or weR fermions. They fall into three families that differ only in the masses of the T The left-handed electron neutrino has fermion number N = +1, and the right- member particles. The origin of those masses is one of the greatest unsolved handed electron antineutrino has fermion number N = 21. This description of the mysteries of particle physics. The greatest success of the Standard Model is the neutrino is not invariant under the parity operation. Parity interchanges left-handed description of the forces of nature in terms of local symmetries. The three families and right-handed particles, but we just said that, in the Standard Model, the right- of quarks and leptons transform identically under these local symmetries, and thus handed neutrino does not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Fully Non-Perturbative Strong-Field Regime of QED Loi to Theory Frontier Phil H
    Understanding the Fully Non-Perturbative Strong-Field Regime of QED LoI to Theory Frontier Phil H. Bucksbaum, Gerald V. Dunnea), Frederico Fiuza, Sebastian Meurenb), Michael E. Peskin, David A. Reis, Greger Torgrimsson, Glen White, and Vitaly Yakimenko (Dated: June 2020) Abstract: Although perturbative QED with small background fields is well-understood and well-tested, there is much less understanding of QED in the regime of strong fields. At 2 3 18 the Schwinger critical field, Ec = m c /e~ ∼ 10 V/m, the vacuum becomes unstable to 2/3 pair production. For stronger fields, such that α(E/Ec) > 1, QED perturbation theory breaks down. These regimes are relevant to environments found in high-energy astrophysics and to physics in the collisions of high-energy electron and heavy ion beams. We plan to investigate problems in beam simulation and basic QED theory related to QED at strong fields, to analyze experiments that can test QED in this regime, and to explore applications to astrophysics and particle physics. Perturbative QED is characterized by the vacuum electron/positron mass scale, m ∼ MeV, a large mass gap between fermions and the massless photon, and a very small coupling constant α = e2/(4π), which facilitates the perturbative expansion. For many quantities in fundamental lepton and atomic physics, the QED perturbation expansion is extremely accurate. Indeed, the precise agreement between theory and experiment for these quantities is a triumph of modern physics [1]. This picture changes profoundly in the√ presence of very strong background fields [2–8]. The back- ground field introduces a new mass scale eE∗, where E∗ is the rest-frame electric field experienced 2 by an electron/positron with charge ∓e.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Any Anti-Particle Make a Probe?
    NEWS AND VIEWS Can any anti-particle make a probe? Positron probes (of the solid state) are already a booming business and may soon be applied to the study of liquids. Can anti-proton probes be far away? EACH new particle of matter discovered from zero to some maximum. So what is new? Two things, both in the may most immediately be of interest to The trick of making a mono-energetic same issue of Physical Review Letters (2 those with theories to check (or invent, as beam of reasonable but still low energy September). First, E. Gramsch, KG.Lynn, the case may be), but one thing is certain: usually entails some interaction with a J. Throwe and I Kanazawa, from the somebody will eventually use the particle solid within which the energy of incident Brookhaven National Laboratory, have as a probe for some purpose or another. positrons is first reduced to the average extended the use of positrons as probes And that is likely to be true even if the thermal energy, whereupon some propor­ from solids to liquids, and with surprising newly discovered particle is inherently tion of the incident particles is afterwards results (67, 1,282; 1991). The incentive unstable, or if it interacts with and is de- re-emitted by scattering, but with an en­ has been to see whether positron probes stroyed by some component of the envi- ergy that is a measure of the work function can throw light on the structure of liquids, ronment in which it finds itself. What - the potential difference between the for which purpose they have studied matters is merely that the particle should interior and the exteriorofthe solid.
    [Show full text]