Arxiv:2106.11353V1 [Hep-Ph] 21 Jun 2021

Home , Positron, QED vacuum

arXiv:2106.11353v1 [hep-ph] 21 Jun 2021 oasmlrcondition due similar place take a conden- phenomena to Bose-Einstein quantization where e.g., [20], [19], sates media superfluid other al ojgt prtr.Qatzto faglrmo- angular of Quantization mentum, operators. conjugate cally ino h aeform, same the of tion h unu lcrdnmc QD aum[,2.The probability 2]. creation [1, pair vacuum (QED) electrodynamics quantum the rigtesprudCoe ar utb igevalued single i.e., be contour, must each pairs at Cooper superfluid the erning eta eedneo h lcrcfil strength field electric the on expo- an dependence has nential —electron— particle charged lightest the for edcncet neeto-oirn( electron-positron an create can field m aoaois[] hsmd h ietpouto of production direct the made This the [4]. laboratories .. uecnutr Ss 1] h u quantization flux The wavefunction the because [18]. appears, superfluids, (SCs) charged superconductors in the flux is i.e., magnetic present, the the at of quantization process creation pair Schwinger the field. electric the the annihilates out strength, wipes field thus critical photon the at place taking e eg,Rf.[4 5)soe htfil tegh in strengths field that showed 15]) of [14, dimensions Refs. stud- (e.g., theoretical (improved) ies Further [5–17]. decades two ciable as[] The [3]. mass ibefreeti edstrengths field electric for ciable ehooypwdtewyt h eeaino electric as of large generation as the strengths to way field the pawed technology ψ hsc 1] rotclltie 2] (Here, [22]. lattices optical or [18], physics aifidb nabtaysse.I cusdet the to azimuthal due under occurs wavefunction It i.e., the rotations, of system. valuedness arbitrary single an by satisfied u (ˆ tum 1 ( esealsasnl aeucindsrpino h syste the of description th wavefunction in single [21] a particles enables constituent tems of behavior collective The e uniainpeoeo per ewe canoni- between appears phenomenon quantization A n15,Sigrsoe htasrn ttcelectric static strong a that showed Swinger 1951, In eodpeoeo,wihlosntcnetdwith connected not looks which phenomenon, second A eeomnsi h -a reeeto ae (XFEL) laser electron free X-ray the in Developments x c 3 e /e )= 0) = − p e e ¯ h − + = . e ≃ L ˆ + ar rmvcu o oi ntepast the in topic hot a vacuum from pairs h ¯ i z 1 u unawihnral n ban sn ieetargume different using obtains one normally yield which condition th reasonable quanta a to flux such similar of e.g., introduction that state, show electromagnetic the in condition E arceto rcs.Hr,w usini h arcreatio pair the if question we Here, process. creation pair ∂x arceto 48 0 1.Pi creation, Pair 11]. 10, [4–8, creation pair ∂ . = e uniaino antcflxadeeto-oirnpi cr pair electron-positron and flux magnetic of Quantization crt 3 E ψ ψ . neeto-oirn( electron-positron An na pia aiy odne matter condensed cavity, optical an in ) − ( crt ( × e x φ hc sqielrei h aoaoysae h htn thu photon, The scale. laboratory the in large quite is which h ¯ i + =0)= 10 ∂φ ∼ = ∂ arpouto rbblt sappre- is probability production pair ψ nttt fNcerSine,HcteeUiest,0680 University, Hacettepe Sciences, Nuclear of Institute 18 sacntan hc a obe to has which constraint a is , 0 1 ( L ψ . θ . 1 /,where V/m, ,qatzstelna momen- linear the quantizes ), ( ψ ∝ )= 0) = r × = ) ( φ P E E 2 = swg XFEL n ∞ n =1 1 / ψ π E a loaheeappre- achieve also can 2 1 .Asmlrcondition, similar A ). ( [email protected] e ψ /n θ ∼ ∼ iθ e ( 2 = − ( r 2 m E r 0 = ) ) exp( e . swg per lofor also appears , e e 1 + π − ari rae nvcu bv rtcleeti edstr field electric critical a above vacuum in created is pair ) steelectron the is .Awavefunc- A ). × e n . + − 1 E / arfrom pair ) nπE L 2 swg e emtEr Tasgin Emre Mehmet = iθ Dtd ue2,2021) 23, June (Dated: E ( swg r s sys- ese nthe in Na ) swg m. gov- /E in = ) and φ atc,with lattice, a V ubro ie. ent ht h prtr ˆ operators the that, note We sites.) of number and lcrmgei oe[4.I unu pis n can the in one state givenE optics, quantum a (EM) quantum electromagnetic for In the other represent [24]. each to mode conjugate electromagnetic canonically also are H oeo once ihtetk lc of place take the is with arguments— connected different somehow totally — using phenomenon obtained quantization normally flux magnetic that possible ela sn h h oko oeetsaebss For bases. partic- a state strength for coherent probability field the ular or state Fock vacuum the the in instance, the using as well o oeo frequency of mode a for bv rtclfil strength field field) electric critical the (so a photon above the explic- More of annihilation strength? does field itly, electric critical a above ation usle,a Mqatmsaecetsan creates state quantum EM an ourselves, odto.Teflxqatmw banfo h arcre- pair the Φ from condition obtain ation we quantum flux The condition. u unu Φ quantum flux Mwvfnto naaoosbudr odto,e.g., condition, like boundary analogous an wavefunction EM li ruet o bann h Φ the obtaining for arguments plain condition T il ob unie.Tefis us,ntrly sthe is quantity naturally, the guess, calculate first we So, The flux. quantized. magnetic be to sible h elkonmgei u unaΦ quanta flux magnetic well-known the nteQDvcu bv h rtclfil strength field critical the above vacuum E QED the in nteeeti ed hs uniyicuigthe including quantity a condition Thus, boundary phe- field. This a electric introduce the created. to on is possible pair is the nomenon when annihilated is field, prtr hc scnnclycnuaeto conjugate canonically is which operator, ˆ ˆ × crt y and iial,electric Similarly, nti ae,w as h olwn usin sit Is question. following the raise we paper, this In lxqatzto u opair-creation to due quantization Flux steqatzto oue hs naaoywt ˆ with analogy in Thus, volume. quantization the is edbss—ae sthe as —named basis field [email protected] m = ψ . L n naglro iermmnu.We momentum. linear or angular in one e ˆ ∼ 2 0 = (0) prxmtl h elkonmagnetic well-known the approximately s z h ¯ i L ˆ n a ersn h antcfil prtras operator field magnetic the represent can one , bandi uecnutn opuiganother using loop superconducting a in obtained (at n 0 ω z V . k r aoial ojgt oec te [23]. other each to conjugate canonically are , 1 Φ ψ c nts. × ∂E E ( ψ θ E ∂ crt ( E x E )= 0) = naa ukyand Turkey Ankara, 0 = a swg E = crt o ie mode. given a for h ed niiae nthe in annihilates field, the s crt E E stesailproiiyand periodicity spatial the is µ nti ok eoti magnetic a obtain we work, this In ? ) crt E crt 0 59 4 5.Tepoo,tu the thus photon, The 15]. 14, [5–9, sn h arceto saboundary a as creation pair the using H E nrdcsaboundary a introduces ) ∼ oocris occur to ˆ ψ y ( A 2 n magnetic and θ . ω 3 = 2 = k × Here, . n 10 π × q − [18]. ) rpeetto 2] as [24]— -representation E 15 µ | ψ 0 eation T = ( ω E V ε × k k ) E c m 0 | E ength H = 2 E ˆ crt crt 2 2 ≃ ∝ crt π sqiecoeto close quite is edoperators field Rephrasing . e 2 nrdc the introduce exp( 2 − ¯ hA . hω ¯ ǫ V 0978 —W use We .— e E x ˆ k + e 0 x − − n ˆ and N spos- is , arcre- pair e 1 × E / + sthe is 2 10 2 p /ε pair and or , − H (1) ˆ k 2 15 p y ) 2 within the pair creation region. Here, n = 0, 1, 2... is 0.1√2Eswg in their studies. Using this value as the an integer and V is the quantization volume in which boundary condition, we obtain a magnetic flux quan- the pair production takes place. A is the approximate tum Φ = n 1.7 10−15 T m2 which is slightly Ecrt × × × area the Hy field faces within the pair creation region. below the Φ0. We further note that our calculation re- In QED, the complementary (its Hermitian conjugate, or garding the flux quantum also includes imprecise esti- the reverse) process takes place simultaneously: electron- mates which actually necessitates careful QED calcula- positron annihilation creates a photon in the region mea- tions. For instance, we calculate the magnetic flux simply sured with a Compton wavelength [15, 25–27] 2. using the area A, which we refer as the one in which pair The flux quantization due to the pair creation can be creation/annihilation takes place. It is similar for using re-expressed as L λcomp. ∼While the match between the two calculations employ- ¯hωkc 2π ing such “large” and “small” numbers is impressive, it ΦEcrt = n µ0 . (2) can also be a coincidence. Nevertheless, taking into ac- × L Ecrt count that the match between the two fluxes relies on a − + We consider a photon frequency —for the one annihilated reasonable condition —e e pair creation above Ecrt— in the pair creating process— which matches the pair it deserves further investigations. We emphasize that 2 even a 1-order of magnitude match between the two phe- energyhω ¯ k 2mec . We also use the Compton wavelength of the∼ annihilated photon (or the generated one in nomena would be engrossing enough for triggering further studies. the reverse process) for the length L λcomp = h/2mec. ∼ Consequences.— We discuss that the well-known Hence, for Ecrt 0.1 Eswg, we obtain a magnetic flux quantum of ∼ × magnetic flux quantization is possible to occur also due to the e−e+ pair creation process. This phenomenon may − refashion our understanding on the nature of the space, Φ = n 2.3 10 15 T m2 (3) Ecrt × × × fields and charged particles. For instance, such an obser- vation may relate the azimuthal feature of the universe, using the pair creation condition on the electric field. i.e., ψ(θ =0)= ψ(θ =2π), the elementary charge q =2e, This is quite close to the magnetic flux quanta and the pair creation phenomenon (above Ecrt) to each − other in a further research. Φ = h/2e =2.068 10 15 T m2 (4) 0 × × If the phenomenon we present is not a coincidence, the result we obtain makes one of the universal parameters, one obtains from the condition ψ(θ =0)= ψ(θ =2π) in like mass or charge of an electron, depend on the other a closed loop of a charged superfluid [28]. ones. This is like, what happens after one realizes the 2 Brief discussions.— We also need to mention that µ0ǫ0 = 1/c relation. One can express magnetic perme- − + 2 studies on e e pair creation phenomenon show devi- ability as µ0 =1/c ǫ0. ations between different models or depending on the ap- Acknowledgments.— We gratefully thank Vural proximations used [11–15, 29, 30]. For instance, some of Gökmen for his motivational support and Bayram Tekin the works (e.g., Refs. [9, 10]) employ the field E and Ceyhun Bulutay for the scientific support. crt ∼

[1] Julian Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum po- [5] Reinhard Alkofer, MB Hecht, Craig D Roberts, larization,” Physical Review 82, 664 (1951). SM Schmidt, and DV Vinnik, “Pair creation and an [2] Martin Reuter, Michael G Schmidt, and Christian Schu- x-ray free electron laser,” Physical Review Letters 87, bert, “Constant external fields in gauge theory and the 193902 (2001). spin 0, 12, 1 path integrals,” Annals of Physics 259, 313– [6] CD Roberts, SM Schmidt, and DV Vinnik, “Quantum 365 (1997). effects with an x-ray free-electron laser,” Physical Review [3] Fran¸cois Gelis and Naoto Tanji, “Schwinger mechanism Letters 89, 153901 (2002). revisited,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 87, [7] NB Narozhny, SS Bulanov, VD Mur, and VS Popov, “e+ 1–49 (2016). e–pair production by a focused laser pulse in vacuum,” [4] Andreas Ringwald, “Pair production from vacuum at the Physics Letters A 330, 1–6 (2004). focus of an x-ray free electron laser,” Physics Letters B [8] Obulkasim Oluk, Bai-Song Xie, Muhmmad Ali Bake, 510, 107–116 (2001). and Sayipjamal Dulat, “Electron-positron pair production in a strong asymmetric laser electric field,” Frontiers of Physics 9, 157–163 (2014). [9] ZL Li, YJ Li, and BS Xie, “Momentum vortices on pairs production by two counter-rotating fields,” Physical Re- 2 One should note that here we do not study the pair production view D 96, 076010 (2017). from an XFEL where quantization volume is very different. Here, we consider an annihilation or (reverse) creation process which [10] Obulkasim Olugh, Zi-Liang Li, Bai-Song Xie, and Rein- takes place in a region of Compton wavelength dimensions. hard Alkofer, “Pair production in differently polarized 3

electric fields with frequency chirps,” Physical Review D superconductivity,” in On Superconductivity and Super- 99, 036003 (2019). fluidity (Springer, 2009) pp. 113–137. [11] Matthias Ruf, Guido R Mocken, Carsten Müller, Karen Z [20] Christopher J Pethick and Henrik Smith, Bose–Einstein Hatsagortsyan, and Christoph H Keitel, “Pair produc- condensation in dilute gases (Cambridge university press, tion in laser fields oscillating in space and time,” Physical 2008). Review Letters 102, 080402 (2009). [21] Mehmet Emre Tasgin, “Many-particle entanglement cri- [12] Christian Kohlfürst, “Effect of time-dependent inhomo- terion for superradiantlike states,” Physical Review Let- geneous magnetic fields on the particle momentum spec- ters 119, 033601 (2017). trum in electron-positron pair production,” Physical Re- [22] Oliver Morsch and Markus Oberthaler, “Dynamics of view D 101, 096003 (2020). bose-einstein condensates in optical lattices,” Reviews of [13] Christian Kohlfürst and Reinhard Alkofer, “On the ef- Modern Physics 78, 179 (2006). fect of time-dependent inhomogeneous magnetic fields [23] Jun John Sakurai, Modern quantum mechanics; rev. ed. in electron–positron pair production,” Physics Letters B (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1994). 756, 371–375 (2016). [24] Leonard Mandel and Emil Wolf, [14] SS Bulanov, VD Mur, NB Narozhny, J Nees, and Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge VS Popov, “Multiple colliding electromagnetic pulses: a University Press, 1995). way to lower the threshold of e+ e- pair production from [25] Michael Strickland, Relativistic Quantum Field Theory, Volume 1 , vacuum,” Physical Review Letters 104, 220404 (2010). 2053-2571 (Morgan and Claypool Publishers, 2019). [15] HM Fried, Y Gabellini, BHJ McKellar, and J Avan, [26] Thomas Erber, “High-energy electromagnetic conversion “Pair production via crossed lasers,” Physical Review D processes in intense magnetic fields,” Reviews of Modern 63, 125001 (2001). Physics 38, 626 (1966). [16] Christian Kohlfürst, Holger Gies, and Reinhard Alkofer, [27] GS Saakyan, “Single-photon annihilation and electron- “Effective mass signatures in multiphoton pair produc- pair creation in a medium,” SOVIET PHYSICS JETP tion,” Physical Review Letters 112, 050402 (2014). 11 (1960). [17] S Schmidt, D Blaschke, G Röpke, SA Smolyansky, [28] Stefano Liberati and Luca Maccione, “Astrophysical con- AV Prozorkevich, and VD Toneev, “A quantum kinetic straints on planck scale dissipative phenomena,” Physical equation for particle production in the schwinger mech- Review Letters 112, 151301 (2014). anism,” International Journal of Modern Physics E 7, [29] Yuval Kluger, Emil Mottola, and Judah M Eisenberg, 709–722 (1998). “Quantum vlasov equation and its markov limit,” Phys- [18] Charles Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ical Review D 58, 125015 (1998). ed. (Wiley, 2004). [30] Jochen Rau and Berndt Müller, “From reversible quan- [19] Vitaly L Ginzburg and Lev D Landau, “On the theory of tum microdynamics to irreversible quantum transport,” Physics Reports 272, 1–59 (1996).