DOCSLIB.ORG

HIGH ENERGY ASTROPHYSICS - Lecture 10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HIGH ENERGY ASTROPHYSICS - Lecture 10 PD Frank Rieger ITA & MPIK Heidelberg Wednesday 1 Pair Plasmas in Astrophysics 1 Overview • Pair Production γ + γ ! e+ + e− (threshold) • Compactness parameter • Example I: "internal" γγ-absorption in AGN (Mkn 421) • Example II: EBL & limited transparency of the Universe to TeV photons • Pair Annihilation e+ + e− ! γ + γ (no threshold) • Example: Annihilation-in-flight (energetics) 2 2 Two-Photon Pair Production Generation of e+e−-pairs in environments with very high radiation energy density: γ + γ ! e+ + e− • Reaction threshold for pair production (see lecture 9): 2 2 e1e2 − p1p2 cos θ = m1m2c + δm c (m1 + m2 + 0:5 δm) With mi = 0; ei := i=c = pi (photons) and δm = 2me: 2 4 2 4 12(1 − cos θ) = 0:5 (δm) c = 2mec 2 4 ) 12 = mec for producing e+e− at rest in head-on collision (lab frame angle cos θ = −1). 12 • Example: for TeV photon 1 = 10 eV, interaction possible with soft photons 2 2 ≥ (0:511) eV = 0:26 eV (infrared photons). 3 • Cross-section for pair-production: πr2 1 + β∗ σ (β∗) = 0 (1 − β∗2) 2β∗(β∗2 − 2) + (3 − β∗4) ln γγ 2 1 − β∗ with β∗ = v∗=c velocity of electron (positron) in centre of momentum frame, 2 and πr0 = 3σT =8. In terms of photon energies and collision angle θ (cf. above): ∗2 ∗ ∗ 2 2 ∗2 −1=2 12(1 − cos θ) = 2Ee and Ee = γ mec = mec (1 − β ) ∗ where Ee =total energy of electron (positron) in CoM frame, so 1 (1 − cos θ) = 2γ∗2m2c4 = 2m2c4 1 2 e e (1 − β∗2) s 2m2c4 ) β∗ = 1 − e 12(1 − cos θ) 4 1 + - "+" --> e + e T ! / 0.1 "" ! 0.01 1 10 100 #1 #2 (1-cos$) Figure 1: Cross-section for γγ-pair production in units of the Thomson cross-section σT as a function of 2 2 interacting photon energies (1=mec )(2=mec ) (1−cos θ). The cross-section rises sharply above the threshold 2 4 2 4 12(1 − cos θ) = 2mec and has a peak of ' σT =4 at roughly twice this value, i.e. at 12(1 − cos θ) = 4mec . 5 • At low energies, large annihilation probability of created pairs (cf. later). • Maximum of cross-section(isotropic radiation field, average of cos θ ! 0) 2 4 σγγ ' 0:25σT at 12 ' 4mec ) TeV photons interact most efficiently with infrared photons 1 TeV t := 2 ' 1 eV 1 ) produced e+e− will be highly relativistic and tend to move in direction of initial VHE γ-ray. • High-energy limit (β∗ ! 1): πr2 1 + β∗ σ (β∗) = 0 (1 − β∗2) 2β∗(β∗2 − 2) + (3 − β∗4) ln γγ 2 1 − β∗ 3σ (1 + β∗)(1 + β∗) ) σ (β∗) ! T (1 − β∗2) 2(1 − 2) + (3 − 1) ln γγ 16 (1 − β∗)(1 + β∗) ∗ 3 σT ∗2 1 σγγ(β ) ' ∗2 ln(4γ ) − 1 / 8 γ 1t ) γ-rays with 1 can interact with all photons above threshold, but cross- section decreases. 6 • Delta-function approximation for cross-section in power-law soft photon field (cf. Zdziarski & Lightman 1985): −α1 (e.g., γ-ray with 1 interacting with power-law differential energy density n(2) / 2 ; approximating interac- 2 4 tion by cross-section peak at 12 ' 2mec [head-on] and accounting for proper normalization) 2 δ σT 2 2 2mec σγγ(1; 2) ' 2 δ 2 − 3 mec mec 1 • Compare (noting δ(ax) = (1=jaj)δ(x)): 2 2 max 1 12 σT 2mec 2 2mec σγγ ∼ σT δ 2 4 − 1 = δ 2 − 4 2mec 4 1 mec 1 2 σT 2 2 2mec = 2 δ 2 − 4 mec mec 1 with 2 4 12 ' 2mec (from peak location for head − on) 7 • In general optical depth for γγ-absorption of a γ-ray photon in differential soft photon field nph(2; Ω; x) including interaction probability / (1 − cos θ): Z R Z Z 1 τγγ(1) = dx dΩ (1 − cos θ) 2 4 d2 nph(2; Ω; x) σγγ(1; 2; cos θ) 0 4π 2mec 1(1−cos θ) −α Example: For isotropic power-law soft photon field (Fν / ν ) with energy −α1 spectral index α = α1 − 1, i.e. nph(2) / 2 using δ-approximation: Z 1 2 4 σT 2mec τγγ(1) ' R d2 nph(2) 2 δ 2 − 3 2 4 mec /1 1 2 4 2 4 σT 2mec 2mec 1 α1 α ' R nph / 1 / 1 3 1 1 1 ) τγγ increase with increasing 1 (there are more targets if α > 0). 8 • Estimating optical depth for homogeneous non-relativistically moving source: L( > t) Ltσγγ τγγ(1) ' ntσγγR ' σγγ ' 3 4πRct 4πRmec with σγγ ' σT =4 and nt number density of target photons, and where last 2 equality holds for typical photon energies < t >∼ mec . ) source can be opaque for high target luminosities Lt and small sizes R • If absorbing radiation field is external to source (e.g., BLR in AGN, EBL interactions), γγ-absorption leads to exponential suppression (lect. 3): obs int −τγγ() Fν () = Fν () e 9 • If absorption is internal, i.e. happens within source, from formal solution of radiation transfer equation: (cf. lecture 3, no background source Iν(0) ' 0, and constant source function Sν := jν/αν with τν = ανR): −τν jνR −τν jνR −τν Iν(τν) ' Sν 1 − e = 1 − e = 1 − e ανR τν −τγγ() int obs int 1 − e Fν () ) Fν () ' Fν () ' for τγγ 1 τγγ() τγγ() • Compactness parameter lc for measuring relevance of internal γγ-absorption: Lγ σT lc := 3 4πR mec (Note: Sometimes, lc is defined without 4π in denominator) > > At MeV energies, τγγ ∼ 1 , lc ∼ 4. ) if lc 1, then high-energy photons are likely to be absorbed. 10 3 Example I: "Internal" γγ-absorption in AGN: Mkn 421 (d ∼ 140 Mpc) Figure 2: Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) for the BL Lac object Markarian 421 as seen by different instruments [Credits: Abdo, A. et al., ApJ 736 (2011)]. 11 • Application to Markarian 421 { assume "characteristic" numbers: 14 44 Schwarzschild rS ∼ 10 cm, LIR ∼ 10 erg/s (cf. SED), IR ∼ 1 eV ∼ 10−12 erg LIRσγγ 5 rs ) τ(VHE) ' ∼ 3 × 10 1 4πRcIR R ) IR flux from extended region R rs and/or jetted-AGN emission (variability may help to distinguish) • Note: Modification for relativistically moving source ("blob"): (1) Apparent vs intrinsic luminosity (flux enhancement by beaming, lect. 3): 4 0 Lt = D Lt (2) Short-term variability vs size of emitting region (Doppler formula): 0 0 ∆tobs = ∆t =D ) R = cD∆tobs (3) Photon energy boosting with D = 1=[γb(1 − βb cos i)]: 0 0 t = Dt , t = t=D ) Optical depth: 0 0 0 Ltσγγ Lt Lt τ ' 0 0 / 0 0 / 4 4πR ct R t D 12 4 Example II: "External" Absorption of TeV photons in the Ex- tragalactic Background Light • Extragalactic background light (EBL) = accumulated light from all galaxies (optical/UV) reprocessed by dust (infrared) ) TeV photons from a distant AGN traversing EBL will get absorbed. Figure 3: Sketch illustrating absorption of VHE gamma-rays from distant AGN by interaction with the EBL [Credits: M. Raue]. 13 Figure 4: EBL energy density in the local Universe (z = 0) with model curves to observations (data points) [Credits: J. Primack]. The EBL is usually difficult to measure due to foreground emission from within the solar system and the Milky Way. Note: λ =1 Angstroem= 10−8 cm corresponds to ν = c/λ = 3 × 1018 Hz. • TeV photons of energy 1 primarily interact with infrared photons of energy 1 TeV 2 ' 1 eV, corresponding to 1 h c 4 λ2 = = 1:2 × 10 (1=1 TeV) Angstrom = 1:2 (1=1 TeV) µ m 2 14 Figure 5: Gamma-ray flux attenuation for γ-ray photons of energy Eγ from sources at different redshifts z. The plateau between 1 and 10 TeV at low redshifts is a consequence of the mid-IR valley in the EBL spectrum [Credits: J. Primack]. • EBL spectrum and intensity depends on cosmological time (star formation history) and hence on redshift z. "Knowing" intrinsic source spectra, γγ absorption imprint can be used to diagnose EBL evolution. 15 5 Pair Annihilation Decay of e+e−-pairs into two photons (no threshold): e+ + e− ! γ + γ • Annihilation cross-section in center of momentum (CoM) frame: " # 2 ∗2 ∗ ∗ ∗ πr0 γ + 4γ + 1 ∗ p ∗2 γ + 3 σe+e−(γ ) = ln γ + γ − 1 − γ∗ + 1 γ∗2 − 1 pγ∗2 − 1 ∗ ∗ 2 2 2 with γ = E =mec lepton energy in CoM frame, r0 = e =mec (cgs) classi- 2 cal electron radius. Note: Thomson cross-section σT := 8πr0=3. • Low-energy (β∗ << 1, thermal electrons) limit: 1 2 3σT σ + − ' πr = e e β∗ 0 8β∗ ) Annihilation probability is high for leptons nearly at rest. 2 ) Decay produces two γ's very close to rest energy of electron: hν ∼ mec ) 0.511 MeV "annihilation line" 16 10 + - e + e --> "+" 1 T ! / - e + e ! 0.1 1 * " Figure 6: Cross-section σe+e− for pair annihilation in units of the Thomson cross-section σT as a function of CoM electron/positron Lorentz factor γ∗. 17 • High energy (γ∗ 1) limit: 2 πr0 ∗ σ + − ' (ln 2γ − 1) e e γ∗ Decay produces two photons, but photons have broader energy spread ) "annihilation spectrum". • If ambient density of electrons is ne, characteristic positron annihilation time scale (assuming σe+e− ∼ 3σT =8) is: 1 6 ne tann ' ∼ 4 × 10 −3 year cneσe+e− cm + + + + + + • Note: e are created in π -decay, i.e. π ! µ +νµ with µ ! e +ν¯µ+νe, the charged pion's being created in pp-collisions (lect.
Recommended publications
  • The Five Common Particles

    The Five Common Particles

    The Five Common Particles The world around you consists of only three particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons form the nuclei of atoms, and electrons glue everything together and create chemicals and materials. Along with the photon and the neutrino, these particles are essentially the only ones that exist in our solar system, because all the other subatomic particles have half-lives of typically 10-9 second or less, and vanish almost the instant they are created by nuclear reactions in the Sun, etc. Particles interact via the four fundamental forces of nature. Some basic properties of these forces are summarized below. (Other aspects of the fundamental forces are also discussed in the Summary of Particle Physics document on this web site.) Force Range Common Particles It Affects Conserved Quantity gravity infinite neutron, proton, electron, neutrino, photon mass-energy electromagnetic infinite proton, electron, photon charge -14 strong nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton baryon number -15 weak nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton, electron, neutrino lepton number Every particle in nature has specific values of all four of the conserved quantities associated with each force. The values for the five common particles are: Particle Rest Mass1 Charge2 Baryon # Lepton # proton 938.3 MeV/c2 +1 e +1 0 neutron 939.6 MeV/c2 0 +1 0 electron 0.511 MeV/c2 -1 e 0 +1 neutrino ≈ 1 eV/c2 0 0 +1 photon 0 eV/c2 0 0 0 1) MeV = mega-electron-volt = 106 eV. It is customary in particle physics to measure the mass of a particle in terms of how much energy it would represent if it were converted via E = mc2.
  • A Study of the Effects of Pair Production and Axionlike Particle

    A Study of the Effects of Pair Production and Axionlike Particle

    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Summer 8-15-2016 A Study of the Effects of Pair Production and Axionlike Particle Oscillations on Very High Energy Gamma Rays from the Crab Pulsar Avery Michael Archer Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds Recommended Citation Archer, Avery Michael, "A Study of the Effects of Pair Production and Axionlike Particle Oscillations on Very High Energy Gamma Rays from the Crab Pulsar" (2016). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 828. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/828 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Sciences at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Physics Dissertation Examination Committee: James Buckley, Chair Francesc Ferrer Viktor Gruev Henric Krawzcynski Michael Ogilvie A Study of the Effects of Pair Production and Axionlike Particle Oscillations on Very High Energy Gamma Rays from the Crab Pulsar by Avery Michael Archer A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2016 Saint Louis, Missouri copyright by Avery Michael Archer 2016 Contents List of Tablesv List of Figures vi Acknowledgments xvi Abstract xix 1 Introduction1 1.1 Gamma-Ray Astronomy............................. 1 1.2 Pulsars......................................
  • 7. Gamma and X-Ray Interactions in Matter

    7. Gamma and X-Ray Interactions in Matter

    Photon interactions in matter Gamma- and X-Ray • Compton effect • Photoelectric effect Interactions in Matter • Pair production • Rayleigh (coherent) scattering Chapter 7 • Photonuclear interactions F.A. Attix, Introduction to Radiological Kinematics Physics and Radiation Dosimetry Interaction cross sections Energy-transfer cross sections Mass attenuation coefficients 1 2 Compton interaction A.H. Compton • Inelastic photon scattering by an electron • Arthur Holly Compton (September 10, 1892 – March 15, 1962) • Main assumption: the electron struck by the • Received Nobel prize in physics 1927 for incoming photon is unbound and stationary his discovery of the Compton effect – The largest contribution from binding is under • Was a key figure in the Manhattan Project, condition of high Z, low energy and creation of first nuclear reactor, which went critical in December 1942 – Under these conditions photoelectric effect is dominant Born and buried in • Consider two aspects: kinematics and cross Wooster, OH http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Compton sections http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=22551 3 4 Compton interaction: Kinematics Compton interaction: Kinematics • An earlier theory of -ray scattering by Thomson, based on observations only at low energies, predicted that the scattered photon should always have the same energy as the incident one, regardless of h or • The failure of the Thomson theory to describe high-energy photon scattering necessitated the • Inelastic collision • After the collision the electron departs
  • 1.1. Introduction the Phenomenon of Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy

    1.1. Introduction the Phenomenon of Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy

    PRINCIPLES OF POSITRON ANNIHILATION Chapter-1 __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.1. Introduction The phenomenon of positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS) has been utilized as nuclear method to probe a variety of material properties as well as to research problems in solid state physics. The field of solid state investigation with positrons started in the early fifties, when it was recognized that information could be obtained about the properties of solids by studying the annihilation of a positron and an electron as given by Dumond et al. [1] and Bendetti and Roichings [2]. In particular, the discovery of the interaction of positrons with defects in crystal solids by Mckenize et al. [3] has given a strong impetus to a further elaboration of the PAS. Currently, PAS is amongst the best nuclear methods, and its most recent developments are documented in the proceedings of the latest positron annihilation conferences [4-8]. PAS is successfully applied for the investigation of electron characteristics and defect structures present in materials, magnetic structures of solids, plastic deformation at low and high temperature, and phase transformations in alloys, semiconductors, polymers, porous material, etc. Its applications extend from advanced problems of solid state physics and materials science to industrial use. It is also widely used in chemistry, biology, and medicine (e.g. locating tumors). As the process of measurement does not mostly influence the properties of the investigated sample, PAS is a non-destructive testing approach that allows the subsequent study of a sample by other methods. As experimental equipment for many applications, PAS is commercially produced and is relatively cheap, thus, increasingly more research laboratories are using PAS for basic research, diagnostics of machine parts working in hard conditions, and for characterization of high-tech materials.
  • Arxiv:1809.04815V2 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 28 Jan 2020

    Arxiv:1809.04815V2 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 28 Jan 2020

    Who discovered positron annihilation? Tim Dunker∗ (Dated: 29 January 2020) In the early 1930s, the positron, pair production, and, at last, positron annihila- tion were discovered. Over the years, several scientists have been credited with the discovery of the annihilation radiation. Commonly, Thibaud and Joliot have received credit for the discovery of positron annihilation. A conversation between Werner Heisenberg and Theodor Heiting prompted me to examine relevant publi- cations, when these were submitted and published, and how experimental results were interpreted in the relevant articles. I argue that it was Theodor Heiting— usually not mentioned at all in relevant publications—who discovered positron annihilation, and that he should receive proper credit. arXiv:1809.04815v2 [physics.hist-ph] 28 Jan 2020 ∗ tdu {at} justervesenet {dot} no 2 I. INTRODUCTION There is no doubt that the positron was discovered by Carl D. Anderson (e.g. Anderson, 1932; Hanson, 1961; Leone and Robotti, 2012) after its theoretical prediction by Paul A. M. Dirac (Dirac, 1928, 1931). Further, it is undoubted that Patrick M. S. Blackett and Giovanni P. S. Occhialini discovered pair production by taking photographs of electrons and positrons created from cosmic rays in a Wilson cloud chamber (Blackett and Occhialini, 1933). The answer to the question who experimentally discovered the reverse process—positron annihilation—has been less clear. Usually, Frédéric Joliot and Jean Thibaud receive credit for its discovery (e.g., Roqué, 1997, p. 110). Several of their contemporaries were enganged in similar research. In a letter correspondence with Werner Heisenberg Heiting and Heisenberg (1952), Theodor Heiting (see Appendix A for a rudimentary biography) claimed that it was he who discovered positron annihilation.
  • Chapter 3 the Fundamentals of Nuclear Physics Outline Natural

    Chapter 3 the Fundamentals of Nuclear Physics Outline Natural

    Outline Chapter 3 The Fundamentals of Nuclear • Terms: activity, half life, average life • Nuclear disintegration schemes Physics • Parent-daughter relationships Radiation Dosimetry I • Activation of isotopes Text: H.E Johns and J.R. Cunningham, The physics of radiology, 4th ed. http://www.utoledo.edu/med/depts/radther Natural radioactivity Activity • Activity – number of disintegrations per unit time; • Particles inside a nucleus are in constant motion; directly proportional to the number of atoms can escape if acquire enough energy present • Most lighter atoms with Z<82 (lead) have at least N Average one stable isotope t / ta A N N0e lifetime • All atoms with Z > 82 are radioactive and t disintegrate until a stable isotope is formed ta= 1.44 th • Artificial radioactivity: nucleus can be made A N e0.693t / th A 2t / th unstable upon bombardment with neutrons, high 0 0 Half-life energy protons, etc. • Units: Bq = 1/s, Ci=3.7x 1010 Bq Activity Activity Emitted radiation 1 Example 1 Example 1A • A prostate implant has a half-life of 17 days. • A prostate implant has a half-life of 17 days. If the What percent of the dose is delivered in the first initial dose rate is 10cGy/h, what is the total dose day? N N delivered? t /th t 2 or e Dtotal D0tavg N0 N0 A. 0.5 A. 9 0.693t 0.693t B. 2 t /th 1/17 t 2 2 0.96 B. 29 D D e th dt D h e th C. 4 total 0 0 0.693 0.693t /th 0.6931/17 C.
  • Pkoduction of RELATIVISTIC ANTIHYDROGEN ATOMS by PAIR PRODUCTION with POSITRON CAPTURE*

    Pkoduction of RELATIVISTIC ANTIHYDROGEN ATOMS by PAIR PRODUCTION with POSITRON CAPTURE*

    SLAC-PUB-5850 May 1993 (T/E) PkODUCTION OF RELATIVISTIC ANTIHYDROGEN ATOMS BY PAIR PRODUCTION WITH POSITRON CAPTURE* Charles T. Munger and Stanley J. Brodsky Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94309 .~ and _- Ivan Schmidt _ _.._ Universidad Federico Santa Maria _. - .Casilla. 11 O-V, Valparaiso, Chile . ABSTRACT A beam of relativistic antihydrogen atoms-the bound state (Fe+)-can be created by circulating the beam of an antiproton storage ring through an internal gas target . An antiproton that passes through the Coulomb field of a nucleus of charge 2 will create e+e- pairs, and antihydrogen will form when a positron is created in a bound rather than a continuum state about the antiproton. The - cross section for this process is calculated to be N 4Z2 pb for antiproton momenta above 6 GeV/c. The gas target of Fermilab Accumulator experiment E760 has already produced an unobserved N 34 antihydrogen atoms, and a sample of _ N 760 is expected in 1995 from the successor experiment E835. No other source of antihydrogen exists. A simple method for detecting relativistic antihydrogen , - is -proposed and a method outlined of measuring the antihydrogen Lamb shift .g- ‘,. to N 1%. Submitted to Physical Review D *Work supported in part by Department of Energy contract DE-AC03-76SF00515 fSLAC’1 and in Dart bv Fondo National de InvestiPaci6n Cientifica v TecnoMcica. Chile. I. INTRODUCTION Antihydrogen, the simplest atomic bound state of antimatter, rf =, (e+$, has never. been observed. A 1on g- sought goal of atomic physics is to produce sufficient numbers of antihydrogen atoms to confirm the CPT invariance of bound states in quantum electrodynamics; for example, by verifying the equivalence of the+&/2 - 2.Py2 Lamb shifts of H and I?.
  • Electron-Positron Pairs in Physics and Astrophysics

    Electron-Positron Pairs in Physics and Astrophysics

    Electron-positron pairs in physics and astrophysics: from heavy nuclei to black holes Remo Ruffini1,2,3, Gregory Vereshchagin1 and She-Sheng Xue1 1 ICRANet and ICRA, p.le della Repubblica 10, 65100 Pescara, Italy, 2 Dip. di Fisica, Universit`adi Roma “La Sapienza”, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy, 3 ICRANet, Universit´ede Nice Sophia Antipolis, Grand Chˆateau, BP 2135, 28, avenue de Valrose, 06103 NICE CEDEX 2, France. Abstract Due to the interaction of physics and astrophysics we are witnessing in these years a splendid synthesis of theoretical, experimental and observational results originating from three fundamental physical processes. They were originally proposed by Dirac, by Breit and Wheeler and by Sauter, Heisenberg, Euler and Schwinger. For almost seventy years they have all three been followed by a continued effort of experimental verification on Earth-based experiments. The Dirac process, e+e 2γ, has been by − → far the most successful. It has obtained extremely accurate experimental verification and has led as well to an enormous number of new physics in possibly one of the most fruitful experimental avenues by introduction of storage rings in Frascati and followed by the largest accelerators worldwide: DESY, SLAC etc. The Breit–Wheeler process, 2γ e+e , although conceptually simple, being the inverse process of the Dirac one, → − has been by far one of the most difficult to be verified experimentally. Only recently, through the technology based on free electron X-ray laser and its numerous applications in Earth-based experiments, some first indications of its possible verification have been reached. The vacuum polarization process in strong electromagnetic field, pioneered by Sauter, Heisenberg, Euler and Schwinger, introduced the concept of critical electric 2 3 field Ec = mec /(e ).
  • Worldline Sphaleron for Thermal Schwinger Pair Production

    Worldline Sphaleron for Thermal Schwinger Pair Production

    IMPERIAL-TP-2018-OG-1 HIP-2018-17-TH Worldline sphaleron for thermal Schwinger pair production Oliver Gould,1, 2, ∗ Arttu Rajantie,1, y and Cheng Xie1, z 1Department of Physics, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK 2Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland (Dated: August 24, 2018) With increasing temperatures, Schwinger pair production changes from a quantum tunnelling to a classical, thermal process, determined by a worldline sphaleron. We show this and calculate the corresponding rate of pair production for both spinor and scalar quantum electrodynamics, including the semiclassical prefactor. For electron-positron pair production from a thermal bath of photons and in the presence of an electric field, the rate we derive is faster than both perturbative photon fusion and the zero temperature Schwinger process. We work to all-orders in the coupling and hence our results are also relevant to the pair production of (strongly coupled) magnetic monopoles in heavy-ion collisions. I. INTRODUCTION Schwinger rate, Γ(E; T ), takes the form, 1 In non-Abelian gauge theories, sphaleron processes, X Γ(E; T ) = c h(J · A)ni; (1) or thermal over-barrier transitions, have long been un- n derstood to dominate over quantum tunnelling transi- n=0 1 tions at high enough temperatures [1{4] . The same is where E is the magnitude of the electric field and T is true, for example, in gravitational theories [5]. On the the temperature. The leading term, c0, gives the one loop other hand, sphalerons have been conspicuously absent result, that of Schwinger [6], at zero temperature.
  • Gamma-Ray Pulsars: Models and Predictions

    Gamma-Ray Pulsars: Models and Predictions

    Gamma-Ray Pulsars: Models and Predictions Alice K. Harding NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt MD 20771, USA Abstract. Pulsed emission from γ-ray pulsars originates inside the magnetosphere, from radiation by charged particles accelerated near the magnetic poles or in the outer gaps. In polar cap models, the high energy spectrum is cut off by magnetic pair production above an energy that is dependent on the local magnetic field strength. While most young pulsars with surface fields in the range B =1012 1013 G are expected to have high energy cutoffs around several GeV, the gamma-ray− spectra of old pulsars having lower surface fields may extend to 50 GeV. Although the gamma- ray emission of older pulsars is weaker, detecting pulsed emission at high energies from nearby sources would be an important confirmation of polar cap models. Outer gap models predict more gradual high-energy turnovers at around 10 GeV, but also predict an inverse Compton component extending to TeV energies. Detection of pulsed TeV emission, which would not survive attenuation at the polar caps, is thus an important test of outer gap models. Next-generation gamma-ray telescopes sensitive to GeV-TeV emission will provide critical tests of pulsar acceleration and emission mechanisms. INTRODUCTION The last decade has seen a large increase in the number of detected γ-ray pulsars. At GeV energies, the number has grown from two to at least six (and possibly nine) pulsar detections by the EGRET telescope on the Compton Gamma Ray Obser- vatory (CGRO) (Thompson 2000). However, even with the advance of imaging Cherenkov telescopes in both northern and southern hemispheres, the number of detections of pulsed emission at energies above 20 GeV (Weekes et al.
  • The W and Z at LEP

    The W and Z at LEP

    50YEARSOFCERN The W and Z at LEP 1954-2004 The Large Electron Positron collider made significant contributions to the process of establishing the Standard Model as the basis for matter and 5 forces, and also built a platform for physics scenarios beyond the model. The Standard Model of particle physics is arguably one of the greatest achievements in physics in the 20th century. Within this framework the electroweak interactions, as introduced by Sheldon Glashow, Abdus Salam and Steven Weinberg, are formulated as an SU(2)xll(l) gauge field theory with the masses of the fundamental particles generated by the Higgs mechanism. Both of the first two crucial steps in establishing experimentally the electroweak part of the Standard Model occurred at CERN. These were the discovery of neutral currents in neutrino scattering by the Gargamelle collab­ oration in 1973, and only a decade later the discovery by the UA1 and UA2 collaborations of the W and Z gauge bosons in proton- antiproton collisions at the converted Super Proton Synchrotron (CERN Courier May 2003 p26 and April 2004 pl3). Establishing the theory at the quantum level was the next logical step, following the pioneering theoretical work of Gerard 't Hooft Fig. 1. The cover page and Martinus Veltman. Such experimental proof is a necessary (left) of the seminal requirement for a theory describing phenomena in the microscopic CERN yellow report world. At the same time, performing experimental analyses with high 76-18 on the physics precision also opens windows to new physics phenomena at much potential of a 200 GeV higher energy scales, which can be accessed indirectly through e+e~ collider, and the virtual effects.
  • A Pair Production Telescope for Medium-Energy Gamma-Ray Polarimetry

    A Pair Production Telescope for Medium-Energy Gamma-Ray Polarimetry

    1 A Pair Production Telescope for Medium-Energy Gamma-Ray Polarimetry Stanley D. Hunter 1a, Peter F. Bloser b, Gerardo O. Depaola c, Michael P. Dion d, Georgia A. DeNolfo a, Andrei Hanu a, Marcos Iparraguirre c, Jason Legere b, Francesco Longo e, Mark L. McConnell b, Suzanne F. Nowicki a,f, James M. Ryan b, Seunghee Son a,f, and Floyd W. Stecker a a NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771 b Space Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 c Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Fisica, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba 5008 Argentina d Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352 e Dipartimento di fisica, Università Degli Studi de Trieste, Treste Italy f Department of Physics, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250 ABSTRACT We describe the science motivation and development of a pair production telescope for medium- energy (~5-200 MeV) gamma-ray polarimetry. Our instrument concept, the Advanced Energetic Pair Telescope (AdEPT), takes advantage of the Three-Dimensional Track Imager, a low-density gaseous time projection chamber, to achieve angular resolution within a factor of two of the pair production kinematics limit (~0.6 ° at 70 MeV), continuum sensitivity comparable with the Fermi-LAT front detector (<3 ×10 -6 MeV cm -2 s-1 at 70 MeV), and minimum detectable polarization less than 10% for a 10 mCrab source in 10 6 seconds. Keywords: gamma rays, telescope, pair production, angular resolution, polarimetry, sensitivity, time projection chamber, astrophysics 1Corresponding author at: NASA/GSFC, Code 661, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA. Tel: +1 301 286-7280; fax +1 301 286-0677, E-mail address : [email protected] phone; 2 1.