sign in sign up
<<
Home , QED vacuum, Schwinger limit

FEATURES

LUXE: COMBINING HIGH AND INTENSITY TO SPARK THE

1 2 3 l Beate Heinemann , Tom Heinzl and Andreas Ringwald – https://doi.org/10.1051/epn/2020401 l 1 DESY and Albert-Ludwigs-Universita¨t Freiburg – 2 University of Plymouth, UK – 3 DESY

The vacuum of (QED) can be viewed as a medium akin to a dielectric which can be polarised by external fields. If these are sufficiently strong, the response of the vacuum becomes nonlinear and involves phenomena such as light- by-light scattering (‘’) and, in extremis, ‘dielectric breakdown’, i.e. real pair production, if a critical field strength is exceeded. The LUXE experiment aims to realise near-critical fields through collisions of stemming from an ultra-intense optical laser with high energy or photons provided by the European XFEL linear accelerator. This set-up provides a golden opportunity to enter the uncharted territory of strong-field quantum electrodynamics in the non-perturbative regime. ©iStockPhoto

14 EPN 51/4 F ocus: Vacuum Science and Technology FEATURES

b FIG. 1: Diagrams representing basic processes of strong-field QED. (a) Light-by-light scattering of laser

photons (γL) and probe photons (γ). (b) Nonlinear γ, respectively. This diagram describes the nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair production. and its breakdown interaction of light with light, a subtle quantum effect (c) Nonlinear Faraday, Maxwell and Hertz have told us that the first analysed in [1]. Schwinger calculated its imaginary . vacuum is filled with electromagnetic fields, but it took part, which physically amounts to pair production via + – an Einstein to realise that this does not require a lu- the nonlinear Breit-Wheeler process, γ+nγL  e e , miniferous aether: Fields and their wave excitations do see Fig.1(b), and corresponds to the creation of matter not need a medium in which to propagate. Ironically, from light. with the advent of , the idea of the The regime of strengths reach-

vacuum as a medium was resurrected. It is the quan- ing or even exceeding ES is referred to as strong-field tum fields themselves, through their virtual fluctuations, QED. It may be realised by approaching highly localised which lend the vacuum properties akin to a dielectric charge distributions, for instance at a distance of 30 fm [1]. The basic phenomenon in this context is vacuum from an . Alternatively, one may probe bound polarisation: Applying a weak external field (e.g. due Coulomb systems by colliding heavy ions or by analys- to an electron), the vacuum dipoles formed by virtual ing the spectroscopy of heavy atoms, hence studying the electron pairs align and screen the electron physics at large atomic number Z [4]. High field strengths charge. A probe particle ‘diving’ into the polarisation are also relevant for the early Universe and several astro- cloud surrounding the electron will thus ‘see’ the ele- physical phenomena such as the gravitational collapse mentary charge, e, increasing with probe energy (charge of Black Holes [5], the propagation of cosmic rays [6], renormalisation). As a result, ‘perturbative QED’, based or the surface of strongly magnetised neutron stars [7], on the coupling being small (e2/4π<<1) becomes invalid and for future linear high energy e+ e –-colliders [8]. at ultra-high . Unfortunately, most suggestions above suffer either from

©iStockPhoto Alternatively, one may ask what happens if one ap- nuclear effects (at large Z) or experimental inaccessibil- plies stronger and stronger external fields. The first issue ity (astrophysics). to address is the notion of a ‘strong’ field in QED. As a relativistic quantum field theory, QED contains two fun- The LUXE experiment damental constants of nature, Planck’s constant, ℏ, and To overcome these problems, the LUXE collaboration

the , c. Combining these with the QED pa- proposes [9] to approach the critical field, ES, by exploit- rameters, e and m, the electron mass, one can form the ing recent advances in high-power laser technology and 2 3 18 QED strength, ES = m c ⁄ eℏ = 1.3 ×10 V/m. the ‘magic’ of Lorentz invariance. The increase in laser This enormous field magnitude is typical for elemen- intensity due to chirped pulse amplification (Nobel prize tary processes in QED. The associated energy balance, 2018 [10]), allows production of optical-laser fields with 2 2 eES (ℏ ⁄ mc)=mc , corresponds to an energy transfer of mc a lab-measured strength just a few orders of magnitude (the electron rest energy) over the distance of a Compton below the Schwinger field. Employing relativistic elec- 4 wavelength, ℏ ⁄ mc. The challenge, though, is to realise trons (Ee >5 GeV) a gamma factor γe >10 is reached, so

the QED field strength ES over macroscopic distances, that even at lower laser intensities the electron sees the say 1µm or larger. Sauter noted in 1931 that even in this critical field in its rest frame. classical field scenario the anti-particles of the electrons, The basic experimental ideas are the following: one the , become relevant [2]. This was further elab- can send the electrons through a tungsten converter orated by Schwinger (1951) who interpreted the appear- foil, in order to generate photons (γ) by

ance of the positrons as an instability of the QED vacuum and then collide these with the photons (γL) of the laser + – which starts to ‘spark’ with electron positron pairs [3]. beam, γ + nγL  e e , see Fig. 1 (b). Alternatively, one The vacuum thus becomes ‘conducting’ similarly to an may collide the electrons directly with the laser beam, – – insulator suffering dielectric breakdown. e +nγL  e +γ, see Fig. 1 (c). Pictorially, the situation is described in Fig.1(a) which A previous experiment (SLAC E144) has employed displays a vacuum polarisation loop forming a virtual 50 GeV electrons and a 1 TW laser to explore what is b Illustration of electron positron dipole. This dipole is exposed to the now called two-step trident pair production. This is a suc- a collision of two superimposed fields of laser and probe photons, γL and cession of the two nonlinear processes introduced above, beams

EPN 51/4 15 FEATURES F ocus: Vacuum Science and Technology

using the photons produced in nonlinear Compton scat- study the nonlinear Breit-Wheeler process in isolation tering by colliding them with the laser photons to pro- for the first . The relevant parameter in this case is 2 2 duce pairs, recall Fig.1. The observed production rates χγ = ξ×ωL ωB (ℏ ⁄ mc ) , ωL and ωB denoting the pho-

were proportional to higher-than-linear powers of the ton frequencies. At low ξ and χγ, the rate follows the laser intensity thus clearly detecting nonlinearity. The power-law (~ξ2n) based on counting the number of pho- goal of LUXE is to enter far deeper into the strong-field tons contributing in perturbation theory. In contrast,

region by using the much more powerful lasers availa- when ξ >>1 and χγ ≈1, a non-perturbative QED calcula- ble today, together with the high energy electrons from tion shows that the rate of e+ e– production is propor-

the European XFEL (EuXFEL) accelerator. This will en- tional to χγ exp(-8/3χγ). Measuring this rate will be a able probing the transition from the nonlinear to the direct experimental test of non-perturbative QED. non-perturbative regime, which may be characterised by a key parameter, the dimensionless laser amplitude, Experimental setup ξ. It is defined as the ratio of the work done by the laser The EuXFEL is designed to run with energies up to

fieldE L when ‘pushing’ an electron across a reduced laser Ee=17.5 GeV and trains of 2700 electron bunches, each wavelength and the electron rest energy. When this is typically containing 1.5×109 electrons that pass at a rate of order unity, an electron probing the laser becomes of 10 Hz. For the beam-laser interaction, one electron relativistic. There is more to this parameter, though: A bunch per bunch train is extracted using a fast kicker process involving n >1 laser photons (see again Fig. 1) magnet and guided to the interaction region hosted in contributes with a proportional a currently unused annex of the shaft at the end of the to ξn. When ξ approaches unity, all these n-photon am- linear accelerator. plitudes become equally important, and one has to sum The laser envisaged has a power of 40 TW at an initial over all of them. As higher order effects thus cease to stage and about 400 TW in a later stage. Its light will be be ‘small perturbations’ of lower order ones, the over- focused to achieve intensities of about 1020 W/cm2 in- all process becomes non-perturbative. The SLAC E144 itially (and 1021 W/cm2 later). An elaborate laser diag- experiment had ξ~0.5, still in the perturbative regime. nostics system will be designed to measure the absolute . FIG. 2: For LUXE we expect ξ >2, which takes us well into the laser intensity to better than 5%. The angle between the Sketch of the uncharted non-perturbative regime. beam and the laser will be about 20°. experimental setup The second key parameter is the quantum parameter, A schematic layout of the experiment is shown in for the γB–laser collisions. A dipole χe  2γe EL ⁄ ES (1+cosθ), where θ is the angle between Fig. 2 for the γB+nγL interactions. For this layout, pho- 4 magnet and a set the laser and particle beams. For LUXE, with γe=3×10 tons are produced through Bremsstrahlung of the of detectors (pixel from the EuXFEL beam, the genuine quantum regime, beam electrons on a tungsten foil. For e+nγ interac- tracker, calorimeters) L for the e± and γ χe >1, is reached for ξ >5. tions (Fig. 1(c)), the layout is similar, except that there detection are shown LUXE is also in the unique position to test the struc- is no converter foil, and the particle detection systems behind the IP. ture of the vacuum near the via light-by- are adapted accordingly. A γB–monitoring system after the light scattering. High-energy probe photons, γB, created tungsten foil is through bremsstrahlung will be brought into collision Expected Scientific Results also shown. with the ultra-intense laser-beam. This will allow to Compared to previous, current or planned facilities [12],

LUXE will achieve higher values of χe for the electron-la- ser collisions and will be the first to directly study pho- ton-laser collisions. The calculated rate [13] of e+ e– pairs

per laser shot for the γB+nγL process is expected to in- itially rise like a power-law, however, at ξ ~ 2, the rate increase slows down. The goal of LUXE is to measure these rates to better than 10%.

Conclusions LUXE will shed new light on the vacuum and reveal new insights into our Universe. It presents a unique opportu- nity to pioneer a novel regime of quantum physics, the strong-field regime of QED, employing one of the pre- mier European research infrastructures, the European XFEL. The goals are to observe for the first time directly + – the γγ  e e process, and to perform the first studies of the transition from the perturbative to the strong-field (non-perturbative) regime. n

16 EPN 51/4 ADVERTORIAL

About the Authors Beate Heinemann is an experimen- tal physicist. She is a leading sci- entist at DESY and a full professor at the Albert-Ludwigs-Universität -1 Freiburg. Her research interest is 2500 - 6900 cm CW the understanding of fundamental optical parametric oscillator – laws of Nature that governed the constituents of the Narrow linewidth, fully-automated tuning Universe in its early phase before stars were formed. for high resolution molecular spectroscopy She has worked on several large particle physics ex- periments, most recently the ATLAS experiment at the he DLC TOPO is the widest tuning, narrowest line- . She is also leading the LUXE width CW OPO. Remote control of all tuning actu- experiment, proposed by Andreas Ringwald, at DESY Tators enables hands-free operation over 2500 - 6900 and the European XFEL to study strong-field QED. cm-1 without realignment or optics exchanges. The TOPO is Tom Heinzl is an Associate Professor the only choice for high-resolution molecular spectroscopy (Senior Lecturer) in Theoretical of stretch vibrations. Physics at the University of Plymouth, MIR spectroscopy has never been easier. The powerful UK. His research interests are strong TOPO delivers wide tunability, narrow linewidth, and con- interactions in various guises, with a venient hands-free digital control. There are no modules to current focus on quantum electrody- exchange and no adjustments to be made by hand. Ease of namics in the presence of ultra-intense laser fields. As use and reliable performance make this CW OPO the right a theorist, he is developing (mostly) analytic methods choice for challenging applications in MIR spectroscopy to understand the nonperturbative dynamics involved. and : Andreas Ringwald is a theoretical particle physicist at DESY. He is work- ing on a broad class of theoretical, phenomenological and cosmological questions. One focus of this work is on non-perturbative processes in the of particle physics. More than a dec- ade ago, he brought up the idea to collide the EU.XFEL beam with an intense laser beam to study non-pertur- bative pair production in QED. • Molecular Spectroscopy • Quantum Optics References • Materials Testing • Biophotonics [1] W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Z. Phys. 98, 714 (1936). • Physical Chemistry • [2] F. Sauter, Z. Phys. 69, 742 (1931). Integrated Photonic Devices

[3] J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951). The revolutionary TOPO by TOPTICA stands alone as

[4] I. Pomeranchuk and Y. Smorodinsky, J. Phys. USSR 9, the only fully automated, continuous-wave, singly-resonant 97 (1945). optical parametric oscillator laser source on the market.

[5] R. Ruffini, G. Vereshchagin, and S.-S. Xue, Phys. Rept. 487, High resolution spectroscopy across 1.45 - 4.0 µm (2500 - 1 (2010). 6900 cm-1) has never been easier.

[6] A. I. Nikishov, Sov. Phys. JETP 14, 393 (1962). TOPTICA’s unique optical design enables broadly tuna- ble laser light. No module or mirror exchange is necessary. [7] C. Kouveliotou et al., Nature 393, 235 (1998). Additionally, the all-digital control electronics enable hands- [8] M. Bell and J. S. Bell, Part. Accel. 24, 1 (1988). free coarse tuning, and frequency locking. A wide mode-hop- [9] H. Abramowicz et al., arXiv:1909.00860 (2019). free tuning range up to 300 GHz (10 cm-1) enables visibility [10] https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2018/ of full spectroscopic signatures. Simultaneously, the TOPO summary/ maintains a narrow linewidth (2 MHz, 1·10-5 cm-1) giving a [12] C. N. Danson et al, High Power Laser Science and Engineering solution that reveals narrow atomic and molecular features. 7, e54 (2019). TOPTICA's OPO laser system won the Prism Awards [13] A. Hartin, A. Ringwald and N. Tapia, Phys. Rev. D 99, no. 3, 2019 for scientific lasers at Photonics West! 036008 (2019), arXiv:1807.10670. https://www.toptica.com/topo

EPN 51/4 17