Russian/Soviet Film and History HIS 350L Prof. Joan Neuberger Tth 2-3:30 [email protected] GAR 1.134 Office

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Russian/Soviet Film and History HIS 350L Prof. Joan Neuberger Tth 2-3:30 Neuberger@Mail.Utexas.Edu GAR 1.134 Office Russian/Soviet Film and History HIS 350L Prof. Joan Neuberger TTh 2-3:30 [email protected] GAR 1.134 Office Hrs: W 1-3 GAR 2.102 During the twentieth century, Russians directed some of the greatest films ever made: popular entertainment features, avant-garde experiments, radical revolutionary agitation, comedies, melodramas, and animation. In this course we will study the ways Russian filmmakers used cinema to explore the history, culture, politics, and social issues in the Soviet Union in the 20th century. The course will combine screening of films, class discussion of issues raised in these films, and written, visual, and oral presentation of students’ ideas about the films. Goals of the course include • Learning to “read” films critically and creatively • Learning to read films as primary sources • Gaining appreciation for Russian avant-garde and entertainment films • Learning about Russian revolutionary and Soviet culture through films • Learning to write concise, articulate prose • Learning to produce a video essay on some aspect of Soviet film and history. Books to Purchase: Mark Edele, The Soviet Union: A Short History Rimgaila Salys, ed. The Russian Cinema Reader, vol 1, 1908-to the Stalin Era *Readings marked with an * will be posted on Canvas Films: • Students should watch the film assigned for each week before the class on Tuesday. You have several options for viewing: • All required films are available on DVD in the Fine Arts Library on reserve. • Some films are available to stream on Kanopy (utexas.kanopy.com), or the Mosfilm website (cinema.mosfilm.ru) or as indicated by links in the syllabus. • I’ll be screening most of the films on Monday evenings in Gar 1.102 at 5:00, if you want to watch better quality prints, on a big screen, with an audience (the time is negotiable). 1. The Province of Lost Film (Lahusen, McDonald, Nikitin, 2008) 2. Battleship Potemkin (Eisenstein, 1925) 3. Aelita: Queen of Mars (Protozanov, 1924) 4. Bed and Sofa (Room, 1927) 5. Man with a Movie Camera (Vertov, 1929) 6. Chapaev (Vasilievs, 1934) 7. Circus (Aleksandrov, 1936) 8. Ivan the Terrible Parts I (1944) and II (1946/58) 9. Ivan’s Childhood (Tarkovsky, 1962) 10. Nine Days of One Year (Romm, 1961) 11. Animation: Film-Film-Film, Man in a Frame (Fedor Khitruk), Tale of Tales (Yuri Norstein) 12. Wings (Shepitko, 1966) 13. Garage (Riazanov, 1979) 14. Urga/ Close to Eden (Mikhalkov, 1991) ASSIGNMENTS: Three kinds of assignment are used in this class. 1. Very Short Weekly response papers based on the reading and screening. Each week each student must be prepared to show the class one clip from the week’s film (no more than 30 seconds) and explain how that clip illustrates or explains a significant point about the film. The clip can be related to the story, to the historical context, to the director’s style, or to a specific cinematic technique. These are intended to help you think through at least one aspect of the week’s topic and be better prepared for discussion. Write up your comments (approx. 250 words), upload them to Canvas, but speak without the text in class. 2. Video Essay. Each student will construct a 5-10 minute video essay on a theme in Soviet film history. It will be based partly on work done in class and partly on individual research. Each student will present their video essay to the class during Finals. 3. Timeline: In order to think about the connections between history and film making, students will construct timelines using Cliovis (link on Canvas). Each week students will plot 3-4 historical events and link them to 3-4 elements of that week’s film. Additional information on assignments will be distributed and discussed in class GRADING: Participation in Discussion: 20% Very Short Weekly Assignments 30% Timeline 10% Digital Exhibit/Video Essay 40%, of which: Topic and bibliography 15pts Script for 2 minute segment 15pts 2 minute segment of final project 20pts Final Script 20pts Final Project 30pts +/- are used in this class. A 93-100, A- 90-92, B+ 88-89, B 83-87, B- 80-82, C+78-79, C 73-77, C- 70-72 D 60-69, F 0-59 FLAGS: This course has a Writing flag and an Independent Inquiry flag. More info on flags here: https://ugs.utexas.edu/flags/faculty-resources/criteria COMMUNICATION: All students are required to have functioning email addresses registered with the university. Information about the course will be posted on Canvas and I will send information via Canvas’s announcements. Availability, Questions, Concerns: Office hours are for students to drop by to discuss any aspect of the course. I have scheduled office hours once a week (Weds 1-3) but I am happy to meet with you at any other time during the week. Please feel free to schedule an appointment via email. HOW TO SUCCEED IN THIS COURSE: Participation: Join in discussion. Raise questions you had while viewing or reading, or questions that occur to you during discussion. This class will be run in seminar format and you will be graded on participation. If you are naturally shy or for any other reason feel uneasy joining the discussion, please come talk to me. Attendance: Come to every class. Students are required to attend every class meeting. Absences will be excused only for documented family or medical emergencies or specific religious holidays. If you miss more than two meetings you are required to talk to me about staying in the class. Reading and Screenings: Read and view films actively and critically. Come to class prepared to discuss that week’s reading and screening. All reading should be finished before the class day listed on the syllabus. All assignments uploaded to Canvas before class. If you find yourself falling behind, please come see me or email me; PLEASE don’t just give up and disappear. Alternatively, don’t download a paper or video from the internet. We can find ways to solve any academic problem - except plagiarism, which will be prosecuted. Read on… Academic Integrity: I take academic integrity seriously. If you have any questions about plagiarism or other issues of academic dishonesty please feel free to raise such questions with me. University policies are available at: http://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/sjs Accommodations: Students with special needs (documented by the Services for Students with Disabilities Office) should notify me immediately to set up accommodations. Electronics: Laptops may be used for note checking and note taking. I do not need to tell you how tempting it is to text, tweet, shop, and so on, so: Please don’t. Also, I do not want to see your phone. Title IX makes it clear that violence and harassment based on sex and gender are Civil Rights offenses subject to the same kinds of accountability and the same kinds of support applied to offenses against other protected categories such as race, national origin, etc. If you or someone you know has been harassed or assaulted, you can find helpful resources here: http://catalog.utexas.edu/general-information/appendices/appendix-d/ http://www.cmhc.utexas.edu/vav/index.html GUNS UT Austin is obliged to follow a law that allows the concealed carry of loaded handguns in our classrooms. Course participants with a license to carry a handgun must keep it concealed and on their person in a proper holster at all times. A gun carrier who moves further than arm’s reach away from their handgun while in the classroom is in violation of the law and policy. Therefore, handguns may not be brought to the classroom in backpacks, bags, or purses, because course participants will be called on at unpredictable times to move about the room for the purposes of group work or presentations causing them to be separated from their belongings. For more on state law and UT policy, see https://campuscarry.utexas.edu/ The law bars instructors from prohibiting guns in our classrooms but I am allowed to say that I would prefer to teach in a gun-free space. And I am allowed by law to point out that my preference is not based on a naïve belief that nothing dangerous ever happens in classrooms, but is based on reliable studies that show that carrying a gun might make people feel safer but does not, in fact, make people safer. I would prefer to teach in a gun-free space because I believe that the potential for the presence of loaded, concealed guns prevents the full practice of free expression. SCREENINGS, READINGS, DISCUSSIONS, ASSIGNMENTS * indicates reading on Canvas Week 1. Th Aug 29. Intro. Cinema & History. Films as primary sources. Individual and collective viewing In class screening: The Province of Lost Film (Lahusen, McDonald, Nikitin, 2008, 46 mins) Week 2 T Sep 3 Film Form Basics & Soviet Film Basics Battleship Potemkin (Sergei Eisenstein, 1925, 82 mins) http://cinema.mosfilm.ru/films/film/1920-1929/bronenosets-potemkin-1905-god/ Read: Edele, The Soviet Union, 1-48 *Youngblood, “Soviet Silent Cinema,” in The Russian Cinema Reader, 14-31 Write: Choose 4 major historical events for your timeline. Set up your account in Cliovis on Canvas. We’ll set up each student’s individual timeline in class. Th Sep 5 Read: *Timothy Corrigan, A Short Guide to Writing About Film, 34-77, 171-72 (1-34 optional) *Neuberger, Salys, Bordwell, “Battleship Potemkin,” in Russian Cinema Reader, 107-43 Be prepared to discuss: Basic film terminology and practices: the camera, the frame, the director, the actor, film genres, technology, politics and history. How were each of these elements or techniques shaped Battleship Potemkin? Write: choose any one film practice discussed by Corrigan, describe its uses in Potemkin (250 words).
Recommended publications
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Representations of the Holocaust in Soviet cinema Timoshkina, Alisa Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 REPRESENTATIONS OF THE HOLOCAUST IN SOVIET CINEMA Alissa Timoshkina PhD in Film Studies 1 ABSTRACT The aim of my doctoral project is to study how the Holocaust has been represented in Soviet cinema from the 1930s to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • SOVIET YOUTH FILMS UNDER BREZHNEV: WATCHING BETWEEN the LINES by Olga Klimova Specialist Degree, Belarusian State University
    SOVIET YOUTH FILMS UNDER BREZHNEV: WATCHING BETWEEN THE LINES by Olga Klimova Specialist degree, Belarusian State University, 2001 Master of Arts, Brock University, 2005 Master of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, 2007 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Olga Klimova It was defended on May 06, 2013 and approved by David J. Birnbaum, Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh Lucy Fischer, Distinguished Professor, Department of English, University of Pittsburgh Vladimir Padunov, Associate Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh Aleksandr Prokhorov, Associate Professor, Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, College of William and Mary, Virginia Dissertation Advisor: Nancy Condee, Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh ii Copyright © by Olga Klimova 2013 iii SOVIET YOUTH FILMS UNDER BREZHNEV: WATCHING BETWEEN THE LINES Olga Klimova, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2013 The central argument of my dissertation emerges from the idea that genre cinema, exemplified by youth films, became a safe outlet for Soviet filmmakers’ creative energy during the period of so-called “developed socialism.” A growing interest in youth culture and cinema at the time was ignited by a need to express dissatisfaction with the political and social order in the country under the condition of intensified censorship. I analyze different visual and narrative strategies developed by the directors of youth cinema during the Brezhnev period as mechanisms for circumventing ideological control over cultural production.
    [Show full text]
  • 9781474437257 Refocus The
    ReFocus: The Films of Andrei Tarkovsky 66616_Toymentsev.indd616_Toymentsev.indd i 112/01/212/01/21 111:211:21 AAMM ReFocus: The International Directors Series Series Editors: Robert Singer, Stefanie Van de Peer, and Gary D. Rhodes Board of advisors: Lizelle Bisschoff (University of Glasgow) Stephanie Hemelryck Donald (University of Lincoln) Anna Misiak (Falmouth University) Des O’Rawe (Queen’s University Belfast) ReFocus is a series of contemporary methodological and theoretical approaches to the interdisciplinary analyses and interpretations of international film directors, from the celebrated to the ignored, in direct relationship to their respective culture—its myths, values, and historical precepts—and the broader parameters of international film history and theory. The series provides a forum for introducing a broad spectrum of directors, working in and establishing movements, trends, cycles, and genres including those historical, currently popular, or emergent, and in need of critical assessment or reassessment. It ignores no director who created a historical space—either in or outside of the studio system—beginning with the origins of cinema and up to the present. ReFocus brings these film directors to a new audience of scholars and general readers of Film Studies. Titles in the series include: ReFocus: The Films of Susanne Bier Edited by Missy Molloy, Mimi Nielsen, and Meryl Shriver-Rice ReFocus: The Films of Francis Veber Keith Corson ReFocus: The Films of Jia Zhangke Maureen Turim and Ying Xiao ReFocus: The Films of Xavier Dolan
    [Show full text]
  • New Russian Cinema
    New Russian Cinema By Christina Stojanova Fall 1998 Issue of KINEMA The transition to market economy and the dismantling of the USSR created an unprecedented crisis in Russian film industry. The awesome All Union Ministry of Cinematography (Goskino) was dismembered. This almost paramilitary institution, whose senior officials were also allegedly senior KGB officers, directed, or rather policed, the Soviet film production process with the stick of censorship, and the carrot of lucrative awards. Understandably, the censorship is not going to be sorely missed. What is missed, however, are the generous state budgets and the firm general line, drawn by the military from the Ministry, in accordance with the ever-changing Kremlin ideological vision. Distribution-wise the situation in Russian cinema followed the pattern characteristic for the other post- communist countries. American films, kept for so long beyond the ideological pale, took over the repertoire, occupying around 75% of the programming time, with a tendency to reach 85% during the next decade. In the Russian Federation, the number of film theatres has dwindled from 3,000 to 1,500, and continues to fall. After the production boom from the early 1990s (300 films for 1991-92 alone), the figure has stabilised around 50-60 per year. To say that the government has entirely ceased to finance Russian cinema will be wrong. But the traditional mismanagement of state funding, the need to support an enormous army of redundant administrators, and pay salaries to non-working, tenured film-makers, renders government funding far from sufficient vis-à-vis runaway inflation and constantly rising costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing the Past: Perestroika Documentary Memory Of
    VISUALIZING THE PAST: PERESTROIKA DOCUMENTARY MEMORY OF STALIN-ERA TRAUMA by Erin Rebecca Alpert B.A. in Global Studies, College of William and Mary, 2007 M.A. in Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh, 2009 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2014 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Erin Alpert It was defended on May 12, 2014 and approved by Nancy Condee, Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures David Birnbaum, Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures Jeremy Hicks, Reader, Queen Mary University of London, Department of Russian Dissertation Advisor: Vladimir Padunov, Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures ii Copyright © by Erin Alpert 2014 iii VISUALIZING THE PAST: PERESTROIKA DOCUMENTARY MEMORY OF STALIN-ERA TRAUMA Erin Alpert, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2014 The main goal of this dissertation is to look at how, during perestroika, documentary breaks away from the traditional notions of the genre in order to reexamine and redefine traumatic events from the Stalinist period. The first chapter examines the nuances of three critical terms: “documentary,” “collective memory,” and “cultural trauma.” I then turn to a historical approach, exploring how political culture and technology affected the content, production, and screening of documentaries, first discussing the time leading up to perestroika and then the massive changes during the glasnost era. In the final chapters, I argue that there are three primary approaches the films examined in this project take to understanding the past.
    [Show full text]
  • No List of Political Assets
    Slavistische Beiträge ∙ Band 248 (eBook - Digi20-Retro) Jerry T.Heil No List of Political Assets The Collaboration of Iurii Olesha and Abram Room on "Strogii Iunosha" [A Strict Youth (1936)] Verlag Otto Sagner München ∙ Berlin ∙ Washington D.C. Digitalisiert im Rahmen der Kooperation mit dem DFG-Projekt „Digi20“ der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek, München. OCR-Bearbeitung und Erstellung des eBooks durch den Verlag Otto Sagner: http://verlag.kubon-sagner.de © bei Verlag Otto Sagner. Eine Verwertung oder Weitergabe der Texte und Abbildungen, insbesondere durch Vervielfältigung, ist ohne vorherige schriftliche Genehmigung des Verlages unzulässig. «Verlag Otto Sagner» ist ein Imprint der Kubon & Sagner GmbH. Jerry T. Heil - 9783954791941 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 03:46:41AM via free access 00050392 Sl a v is t ic h e B eiträge BEGRÜNDET VON ALOIS SCHMAUS HERAUSGEGEBEN VON HEINRICH KUNSTMANN PETER REHDER JOSEF SCHRENK REDAKTION PETER REHDER Band 248 VERLAG OTTO SAGNER MÜNCHEN Jerry T. Heil - 9783954791941 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 03:46:41AM via free access 00050392 JERRY T. HEIL NO LIST OF POLITICAL ASSETS: The Collaboration of lurii Olesha and Abram Room “ Strogii lunosha” [A Strict Youth (1936)] VERLAG OTTO SAGNER • MÜNCHEN 1989 Jerry T. Heil - 9783954791941 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 03:46:41AM via free access ISBN 3-87690-449-8 © Verlag Otto Sagner, München 1989 Abteilung der Firma Kubon & Sagner, München Jerry T. Heil - 9783954791941 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 03:46:41AM via free access Acknowledgments The research that led to this essay (and others) was made possible by a grmt from the International Research and Exchanges Board (IREX)f Princeton, New Jersey, an agency partially funded by the United States' N a tia ia l Endowment fo r the H um anities, W ashington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Cinema
    Soviet Cinema: Film Periodicals, 1918-1942 Where to Order BRILL AND P.O. Box 9000 2300 PA Leiden The Netherlands RUSSIA T +31 (0)71-53 53 500 F +31 (0)71-53 17 532 BRILL IN 153 Milk Street, Sixth Floor Boston, MA 02109 USA T 1-617-263-2323 CULTURE F 1-617-263-2324 For pricing information, please contact [email protected] MASS www.brill.nl www.idc.nl “SOVIET CINemA: Film Periodicals, 1918-1942” collections of unique material about various continues the new IDC series Mass Culture and forms of popular culture and entertainment ENTERTAINMENT Entertainment in Russia. This series comprises industry in Tsarist and Soviet Russia. The IDC series Mass Culture & Entertainment in Russia The IDC series Mass Culture & Entertainment diachronic dimension. It includes the highly in Russia comprises collections of extremely successful collection Gazety-Kopeiki, as well rare, and often unique, materials that as lifestyle magazines and children’s journals offer a stunning insight into the dynamics from various periods. The fifth sub-series of cultural and daily life in Imperial and – “Everyday Life” – focuses on the hardship Soviet Russia. The series is organized along of life under Stalin and his somewhat more six thematic lines that together cover the liberal successors. Finally, the sixth – “High full spectrum of nineteenth- and twentieth Culture/Art” – provides an exhaustive century Russian culture, ranging from the overview of the historic avant-garde in Russia, penny press and high-brow art journals Ukraine, and Central Europe, which despite in pre-Revolutionary Russia, to children’s its elitist nature pretended to cater to a mass magazines and publications on constructivist audience.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Coversheet Thesis
    Eleanor Rees The Kino-Khudozhnik and the Material Environment in Early Russian and Soviet Fiction Cinema, c. 1907-1930. January 2020 Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Slavonic and East European Studies University College London Supervisors: Dr. Rachel Morley and Dr. Philip Cavendish !1 I, Eleanor Rees confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Word Count: 94,990 (including footnotes and references, but excluding contents, abstract, impact statement, acknowledgements, filmography and bibliography). ELEANOR REES 2 Contents Abstract 5 Impact Statement 6 Acknowledgments 8 Note on Transliteration and Translation 10 List of Illustrations 11 Introduction 17 I. Aims II. Literature Review III. Approach and Scope IV. Thesis Structure Chapter One: Early Russian and Soviet Kino-khudozhniki: 35 Professional Backgrounds and Working Practices I. The Artistic Training and Pre-cinema Affiliations of Kino-khudozhniki II. Kino-khudozhniki and the Russian and Soviet Studio System III. Collaborative Relationships IV. Roles and Responsibilities Chapter Two: The Rural Environment 74 I. Authenticity, the Russian Landscape and the Search for a Native Cinema II. Ethnographic and Psychological Realism III. Transforming the Rural Environment: The Enchantment of Infrastructure and Technology in Early-Soviet Fiction Films IV. Conclusion Chapter Three: The Domestic Interior 114 I. The House as Entrapment: The Domestic Interiors of Boris Mikhin and Evgenii Bauer II. The House as Ornament: Excess and Visual Expressivity III. The House as Shelter: Representations of Material and Psychological Comfort in 1920s Soviet Cinema IV.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Cinematic Culture
    Russian Culture Center for Democratic Culture 2012 The Russian Cinematic Culture Oksana Bulgakova Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/russian_culture Part of the Film and Media Studies Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, and the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Repository Citation Bulgakova, O. (2012). The Russian Cinematic Culture. In Dmitri N. Shalin, 1-37. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/russian_culture/22 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Article in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Article has been accepted for inclusion in Russian Culture by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Russian Cinematic Culture Oksana Bulgakova The cinema has always been subject to keen scrutiny by Russia's rulers. As early as the beginning of this century Russia's last czar, Nikolai Romanov, attempted to nationalize this new and, in his view, threatening medium: "I have always insisted that these cinema-booths are dangerous institutions. Any number of bandits could commit God knows what crimes there, yet they say the people go in droves to watch all kinds of rubbish; I don't know what to do about these places." [1] The plan for a government monopoly over cinema, which would ensure control of production and consumption and thereby protect the Russian people from moral ruin, was passed along to the Duma not long before the February revolution of 1917.
    [Show full text]
  • Article A.Zawistowski
    An Outstanding Work in the Service of Propaganda: the Case of Mikhail Romm's The Dream Prof. Andrzej Zawistowski Can the story of September 1939 be told without mentioning soldiers, weapons or war? Can aggression be shown as historical justice? Can a propaganda film using the narrative of Stalinist propaganda, move and enchant an audience today? Historians wish to believe that they have a monopoly on speaking about the past. In reality, however, it is popular culture that has the greatest influence on creating an image of past years. Hundreds, sometimes thousands, of people reach for the works of historians. At the same time, a picture created by a novel or a film reaches tens or even hundreds of millions of people. That is why today the most famous of the 'Righteous Among the Nations' is Oskar Schindler, the protagonist of Steven Spielberg's film. For many Poles who grew up in the 1970s and 1980s, the Second World War is associated with television characters from that era: a tank crew identified by tactical number 102 and an agent codenamed J-23. Such examples are numerous. Films give history a face. They are evocative, arouse sympathy or antipathy and remain in the memory as a symbol. Cinema and history In 2016 the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation recommended that schools take part in '100 lectures: the history of home cinema for school pupils'. For this project, a list of 100 Soviet and Russian feature films recognized as classics was prepared. Each of these films was enriched with a brief introduction in which people from contemporary Russian cinema, such as directors, actors and critics, introduced students to the world of a particular film.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Cinema from Potemkin to Putin
    University of Texas at Austin Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures REE 325 / CL 323: Russian Cinema from Potemkin to Putin Fall 2015 Instructor: Petre Petrov Monday, Wednesday 3.00-4.30pm Office: BUR 476 JES A303A Email: [email protected] Office hours: TBA Office tel. #: 512-232-9230 Course Description and Format The course is intended as a general introduction to the history of Russian-Soviet film. It will survey prominent cinematic texts from the early days of filmmaking in Russia to the present. In viewing and discussing these films, we will also be following the course of Russian social and cultural history. The goal, thus, is not only to acquaint you with major achievements of Russian cinema, but to use these as a gateway to mapping the broader territory of Russian culture over a turbulent century. The course fulfills the basic Russian, East European, and Eurasian studies requirement and counts toward the GS (global studies) flag requirement. It has no special prerequisites for enrollment, apart from interest in Russian cinema and culture and commitment to shaping and sharing your thoughts. Prior familiarity with Russian culture and knowledge of Russian are a plus, but by no means a must. The class meets two times per week, with lecture on Mondays and film discussion on Wednesdays. For most weeks, homework assignments combine reading (50pp, on average), viewing (two films), and writing (a short film response or review). Required Readings: • Peter Kenez, Cinema and Soviet Society: From the Revolution to the Death of Stalin. NY: I.B. Tauris, 2008. • Scanned materials available through Canvas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Severe Young Man [Строгий Юноша] USSR, 1936 Black-And-White, 97 Min Russian with English Subtitles Director: Abram
    character is portrayed with what can only be regarded (at least today) a healthy dose of irony. The film was a true collaboration between the scriptwriter, Iurii Olesha, and the director Abram Room for whom the script was specifically written. Both men were extremely talented creative individuals who despite their seemingly earnest attempts could never quite find a comfortable fit between their works and the ideological demands of the times. Indeed, Room made A Severe Young Man in Ukraine not by choice, but because he was working in A Severe Young Man professional exile from Moscow as punishment [Строгий юноша ] for various “mistakes” made in his previous films. Room’s best work was often daringly USSR, 1936 provocative, and even those of his films that Black-and-white, 97 min received wide distribution were often vilified by Russian with English Subtitles the critics. Olesha, for his part, was a successful Director: Abram Room playwright and prose writer throughout the Script: Iurii Olesha 1920s, but his best works, while on the surface Cinematography: Iurii Ekel'chik ideologically correct, contained in their deeper Art Direction: Morits Umanskii and texture disturbingly discordant notes. His Vladimir Kaplunovskii literary output decreased after 1928 and, as a Composer: Gavriil Popov writer, he fell largely silent after 1934. The two Sound: Aleksandr Babii and Andrei men shared a common vision for A Severe Demidenko Young Man and the resulting film contributed to Cast: Iurii Iur'ev, Ol'ga Zhizneva, Dmitrii the shame of both in equal measure in 1936. Dorliak, Maksim Shtraukh, Valentina The film’s content makes no Serova, Georgii Sochevko, Irina Volodko concessions to the usual expectations of Soviet Production: Ukrainfil'm audiences of the 1930s.
    [Show full text]