DOCSLIB.ORG

9781474437257 Refocus The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
9781474437257 Refocus The ReFocus: The Films of Andrei Tarkovsky 66616_Toymentsev.indd616_Toymentsev.indd i 112/01/212/01/21 111:211:21 AAMM ReFocus: The International Directors Series Series Editors: Robert Singer, Stefanie Van de Peer, and Gary D. Rhodes Board of advisors: Lizelle Bisschoff (University of Glasgow) Stephanie Hemelryck Donald (University of Lincoln) Anna Misiak (Falmouth University) Des O’Rawe (Queen’s University Belfast) ReFocus is a series of contemporary methodological and theoretical approaches to the interdisciplinary analyses and interpretations of international film directors, from the celebrated to the ignored, in direct relationship to their respective culture—its myths, values, and historical precepts—and the broader parameters of international film history and theory. The series provides a forum for introducing a broad spectrum of directors, working in and establishing movements, trends, cycles, and genres including those historical, currently popular, or emergent, and in need of critical assessment or reassessment. It ignores no director who created a historical space—either in or outside of the studio system—beginning with the origins of cinema and up to the present. ReFocus brings these film directors to a new audience of scholars and general readers of Film Studies. Titles in the series include: ReFocus: The Films of Susanne Bier Edited by Missy Molloy, Mimi Nielsen, and Meryl Shriver-Rice ReFocus: The Films of Francis Veber Keith Corson ReFocus: The Films of Jia Zhangke Maureen Turim and Ying Xiao ReFocus: The Films of Xavier Dolan Edited by Andrée Lafontaine ReFocus: The Films of Pedro Costa: Producing and Consuming Contemporary Art Cinema Nuno Barradas Jorge ReFocus: The Films of Sohrab Shahid Saless: Exile, Displacement and the Stateless Moving Image Edited by Azadeh Fatehrad ReFocus: The Films of Pablo Larraín Edited by Laura Hatry ReFocus: The Films of Michel Gondry Edited by Marcelline Block and Jennifer Kirby ReFocus: The Films of Rachid Bouchareb Edited by Michael Gott and Leslie Kealhofer-Kemp ReFocus: The Films of Andrei Tarkovsky Edited by Sergey Toymentsev edinburghuniversitypress.com/series/refocint 66616_Toymentsev.indd616_Toymentsev.indd iiii 112/01/212/01/21 111:211:21 AAMM ReFocus: The Films of Andrei Tarkovsky Edited by Sergey Toymentsev 66616_Toymentsev.indd616_Toymentsev.indd iiiiii 112/01/212/01/21 111:211:21 AAMM Edinburgh University Press is one of the leading university presses in the UK. We publish academic books and journals in our selected subject areas across the humanities and social sciences, combining cutting-edge scholarship with high editorial and production values to produce academic works of lasting importance. For more information visit our website: edinburghuniversitypress.com © editorial matter and organization Sergey Toymentsev, 2021 © the chapters their several authors, 2021 Edinburgh University Press Ltd The Tun—Holyrood Road 12 (2f) Jackson’s Entry Edinburgh EH8 8PJ Typeset in 11/13 Ehrhardt MT by IDSUK (DataConnection) Ltd, and printed and bound in Great Britain A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 1 4744 3723 3 (hardback) ISBN 978 1 4744 3725 7 (webready PDF) ISBN 978 1 4744 3726 4 (epub) The right of the contributors to be identified as authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and the Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 (SI No. 2498). 66616_Toymentsev.indd616_Toymentsev.indd iivv 112/01/212/01/21 111:211:21 AAMM Contents List of Figures vii Notes on Contributors ix Introduction: Refocus on Tarkovsky 1 Sergey Toymentsev Part I Backgrounds Introduction 13 1. Tarkovsky’s Childhood: Between Trauma and Myth 15 Evgeniy Tsymbal 2. Trava-Travlya-Trata: Tarkovsky’s Psychobiography à la Lettre 30 Andrei Gornykh 3. Does Tarkovsky Have a Film Theory? 46 Sergey Toymentsev Part II Film Method Introduction 67 4. The Child’s Eye View of War in Ivan’s Childhood 69 Sara Pankenier Weld 5. The Truth of Direct Observation: Andrei Rublev and the Documentary Style of Soviet Cinema in the 1960s 85 Zdenko Mandušić 6. Temporality and the Long Take in Stalker 102 Donato Totaro 7. Framing Infinity in Tarkovsky’s Nostalghia 119 Yelizaveta Goldfarb Moss 8. Approaching the Irreal: Realistic Sound Design in Andrei Tarkovsky’s Films 135 Julia Shpinitskaya 66616_Toymentsev.indd616_Toymentsev.indd v 112/01/212/01/21 111:211:21 AAMM vi CONTENTS Part III Theoretical Approaches Introduction 153 9. Andrei Tarkovsky, Or the Thing from Inner Space 155 Slavoj Žižek 10. Wounds of the Past: Andrei Tarkovsky and the Melancholic Imagination 178 Linda Belau and Ed Cameron 11. The Flesh of Time: Solaris and the Chiasmic Image 195 Robert Efird 12. Cinema as Spiritual Exercise: Tarkovsky and Hadot 209 Anne Eakin Moss 13. Memory and Trace 225 Mikhail Iampolski Part IV Legacy Introduction 241 14. Zvyagintsev and Tarkovsky: Influence, Depersonalization, and Autonomy 242 Lisa Ryoko Wakamiya 15. Von Trier and Tarkovsky: From Antithesis to Counter-sublime 257 Sergey Toymentsev and Anton Dolin Index 275 66616_Toymentsev.indd616_Toymentsev.indd vvii 112/01/212/01/21 111:211:21 AAMM Figures I.1 Monument to Andrei Tarkovsky and Andrei Rublev’s characters in Suzdal 2 I.2 Monument to Andrei Tarkovsky, Gennady Shpalikov, and Vasily Shukshin at the entrance to the All-Union State Institute of Cinematography, Moscow 3 2.1 Replica of Tarkovsky’s childhood house in Mirror 32 4.1 Ivan with Kholin and Galtsev in Ivan’s Childhood 76 4.2 Ivan in burned ruins in Ivan’s Childhood 76 4.3 Final photograph of Ivan after capture in Ivan’s Childhood 78 5.1 Watching the Jester’s performance in Andrei Rublev 87 5.2 Watching the persecution of pagan peasants in Andrei Rublev 92 6.1 Minimalism in the long take: opening camera position in Stalker 104 6.2 Minimalism in the long take: closing camera position in Stalker 104 6.3 Creation time in the long take: opening camera position in Stalker 109 6.4 Creation time in the long take: closing camera position in Stalker 110 6.5 Color and surprise “infects” the city in Stalker 114 7.1 The final static shot in Nostalghia 120 7.2 Outside landscape spilling into Domenico’s house through the window frame in Nostalghia 125 8.1 The Tokyo sequence in Solaris 136 8.2 The Stargate sequence in 2001: A Space Odyssey 136 11.1 Hari with the photograph of her prototype in Solaris 201 12.1 Gorchakov’s wife in the dream sequence in Nostalghia 220 12.2 Gorchakov’s family in the dream sequence in Nostalghia 220 66616_Toymentsev.indd616_Toymentsev.indd vviiii 112/01/212/01/21 111:211:21 AAMM viii FIGURES 14.1 Brueghelian landscape in Mirror 251 14.2 Brueghelian landscape in Loveless 251 15.1 She lying in the grass in Antichrist 268 15.2 Stalker lying in the grass in Stalker 268 66616_Toymentsev.indd616_Toymentsev.indd vviiiiii 112/01/212/01/21 111:211:21 AAMM Notes on Contributors Linda Belau is Professor in the Department of Literature and Cultural Studies and Director of the Film Studies Program at the University of Texas- Rio Grande Valley. She is the co-editor of Topologies of Trauma: Essays on the Limits of Knowledge and Memory (2001), Special Issue editor of Postmodern Culture (2002), Special Issue editor of Women Writers (2010), and the author of several articles on film studies and film theory, psychoanalysis, theories of trauma, and cultural studies. Ed Cameron is Professor of Literary and Film Studies in the Department of Literature and Cultural Studies at the University of Texas-Rio Grande Valley. He is the author of The Psychopathology of the Gothic Romance (2010). He is also the author of numerous articles linking psychoanalysis, film studies, and cul- tural critique. He has most recently published on the films of Federico Fellini, Harmony Korine, David Lynch, Todd Haynes, and Steve McQueen. Anton Dolin is a Russian journalist, film critic, and scholar. He is the chief editor of Iskusstvo kino, one of the earliest film magazines in Europe. He regu- larly writes film reviews for the journal Afisha and the site Afisha—Vozdukh. He has repeatedly received awards from the Russian Guild of Film Scholars and Critics for his contributions in film scholarship. Among his books are Lars von Trier: Kontrol’nye rabolty, analiz, interv’iu (2004), Takesi Kitano: Detskie gody (2006), Ulovka XXI (2010), German: Interv’iu, esse, stsenarii (2011), and Jim Jarmusch: Stikhi i muzyka (2019). Robert Efi rd is Associate Professor of Russian at Virginia Tech. He extensively published on Tarkovsky and Russian cinema in CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, Slavic and East European Journal Studies, Russian and Soviet Cinema, Journal of Narrative Theory, Transnational Cinemas, and others. 66616_Toymentsev.indd616_Toymentsev.indd iixx 112/01/212/01/21 111:211:21 AAMM x NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS Andrei Gornykh is Professor of Media Studies at the European Humanities University in Vilnius, Lithuania. He received his PhD in Philosophy from Saint Petersburg State University. He is the author of two monographs: Formalism: From Structure to Text and Beyond (2003) and Media and Society (2012). His research interests are in visual and cultural studies, critical theory, psychoanaly- sis, film theory, and visual anthropology. He is the author of a number of creative works, such as popular science films for TV, educational DVD, and video. Mikhail Iampolski is Professor of Comparative Literature and Russian and Slavic Studies at New York University. He has authored many books and articles on film and visual representation, including The Memory of Tiresias: Intertextuality and Film (1998). Zdenko Mandušić is Assistant Professor in the Department of Slavic Lan- guages and Literatures at the University of Toronto. He received his PhD in Slavic Languages and Literatures and Cinema and Media Studies from the University of Chicago. His dissertation entitled “Camerawork: Soviet Film Experience and Visual Poetics After Stalin” investigates how Soviet films of the Post-Stalinist period communicated cultural values through cinemato- graphic techniques, how formal elements organized viewer perception of these values, and how these formal elements were conceptualized.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to "Solaris" Translated from Polish by Lech Keller Stanislaw Lem Is Unquestionably One of the Greatest Authors of SF in the Global History of This Genre
    Acta Polonica Monashiensis Volume 2 Number 2 December 2002 Wojciech Kajtoch Introduction to "Solaris" Translated from Polish by Lech Keller Stanislaw Lem is unquestionably one of the greatest authors of SF in the global history of this genre. Thus inclusion of his works to the reading list1 is certainly a gesture, which acknowledges the reality. One could also regard this inclusion as an ennoblement of a genre, so far virtually ignored by the school administration because of its "lowly" origin (i.e. Verne's fantastic novels, targeted mostly for young people, and American "pulp" SF magazines of the 1930s). There are also different claims, namely that "Solaris" (and this novel is virtually unanimously regarded as the best work of Lem, the work, which introduced his works to the list of "must-read" books), is not really SF. The main reason is that "Solaris" can be read and interpreted as a psychological novel, thus in this context Lem is a "real", i.e. "mainstream" writer, actually not much interested in science and technology. In short: Lem is strictly speaking a "high brow" writer, rather than a "lowly" SF writer. It should be also noted the lack of regard to the cultural background (or its arbitrary selection), which was frequent in the interpretation of the post-Second World War literature, and common in the Polish secondary schools habit of reading every literary text as a direct reflection and appraisal of the real world. This way we have compiled a catalogue of the dangers threatening analysis of "Solaris', as it is done at the classes of Polish literature.
    [Show full text]
  • CELEBRATING FORTY YEARS of FILMS WORTH TALKING ABOUT 39 Years, 2 Months, and Counting…
    5 JAN 18 1 FEB 18 1 | 5 JAN 18 - 1 FEB 18 88 LOTHIAN ROAD | FILMHOUSECinema.COM CELEBRATING FORTY YEARS OF FILMS WORTH TALKING ABOUT 39 Years, 2 Months, and counting… As you’ll spot deep within this programme (and hinted at on the front cover) January 2018 sees the start of a series of films that lead up to celebrations in October marking the 40th birthday of Filmhouse as a public cinema on Lothian Road. We’ve chosen to screen a film from every year we’ve been bringing the very best cinema to the good people of Edinburgh, and while it is tremendous fun looking back through the history of what has shown here, it was quite an undertaking going through all the old programmes and choosing what to show, and a bit of a personal journey for me as one who started coming here as a customer in the mid-80s (I know, I must have started very young...). At that time, I’d no idea that Filmhouse had only been in existence for less than 10 years – it seemed like such an established, essential institution and impossible to imagine it not existing in a city such as Edinburgh. My only hope is that the cinema is as important today as I felt it was then, and that the giants on whose shoulders we currently stand feel we’re worthy of their legacy. I hope you can join us for at least some of the screenings on this trip down memory lane... And now, back to the now.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterotopia of the Film Solaris Directed by Andrei Tarkovski
    Heterotopia of the film Solaris directed by Andrei Tarkovski Nicolae Sfetcu April 17, 2019 Sfetcu, Nicolae, "Heterotopia of the film Solaris directed by Andrei Tarkovski", SetThings (April 17, 2019), DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15910.68169, MultiMedia Publishing (ed.), URL = https://www.setthings.com/en/heterotopia-of-the-film-solaris-directed-by-andrei-tarkovski/ Email: [email protected] This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/. A partial translation of: Sfetcu, Nicolae, "Filmul Solaris, regia Andrei Tarkovsky – Aspecte psihologice și filosofice", SetThings (2 iunie 2018), MultiMedia Publishing (ed.), DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24928.17922, URL = https://www.setthings.com/ro/e-books/filmul-solaris-regia-andrei-tarkovsky-aspecte- psihologice-si-filosofice/ Heterotopia of the film Solaris directed by Andrei Tarkovski Jonathon Rosenbaum notes that Tarkovsky's Solaris, (Andrei Tarkovsky 1972) unlike Lem's novel, (Lem 2012) is rather anti-science fiction than science fiction. (Rosenbaum 1990, 60) Rosenbaum suggests that while the film is denying our archetypal space travel, the main concern is the psychological investigation of Kris Kelvin, while trying to rediscover a lost humanity in the face of technology and science. (Duffy 2003) As Tarkovsky noted, ”l am interested above all in the character who is capable of sacrificing himself and his way of life - regardless of whether that sacrifice is made in the name of spiritual values, or for the sake of someone else, or of his own salvation, or of all these things together.” (Andrey Tarkovsky 1996, 217) Andrew Tarkovsky's Solaris (1972) film can also be approached through the philosophy of mind, of key questions in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Condenser’ in Eldar Ryazanov’S Irony of Fate VOL
    ESSAY Soviet Bloc(k) Housing and the Self-Deprecating ‘Social Condenser’ in Eldar Ryazanov’s Irony of Fate VOL. 113 (MARCH 2021) BY LARA OLSZOWSKA A completely atypical story that could happen only and exclusively on New Year's Eve. – Eldar Ryazanov, Irony of Fate, 1976. Zhenya lives in apartment № 12 of unit 25 in the Third Builder Street, and so does Nadia, only that she lives in Leningrad, whereas Zhenya lives in Moscow. After a heavy drinking session at the bathhouse with friends on New Year’s Eve, Zhenya accidentally gets on a flight to Leningrad one of his friends had booked for himself. Still intoxicated on arrival, he gives his address to a taxi driver and arrives “home”. He lets himself into Nadia’s flat with his key – even their locks match – and falls asleep. When Nadia wakes him, the comical love story between the two takes center stage and the coincidence of their matching housing blocks seems to be little more than a funny storytelling device. Upon further examination it is far more significant. The misleading epigraph at the start of Eldar Ryazanov’s Irony of Fate quoted above links the ludicrous events that follow to the date on which they unfold. On New Year’s Day 1976, the film was first broadcast to television audiences across the Soviet Union, telling an extraordinary tale in a very ordinary place. This “atypical story” is not really a result of the magic of New Year’s Eve alone, but more so a product of its setting: a Soviet apartment in a Soviet housing block in a socialist city.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinema and Politics
    Cinema and Politics Cinema and Politics: Turkish Cinema and The New Europe Edited by Deniz Bayrakdar Assistant Editors Aslı Kotaman and Ahu Samav Uğursoy Cinema and Politics: Turkish Cinema and The New Europe, Edited by Deniz Bayrakdar Assistant Editors Aslı Kotaman and Ahu Samav Uğursoy This book first published 2009 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2009 by Deniz Bayrakdar and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-0343-X, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-0343-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Images and Tables ......................................................................... viii Acknowledgements .................................................................................... ix Preface ........................................................................................................ xi Introduction ............................................................................................. xvii ‘Son of Turks’ claim: ‘I’m a child of European Cinema’ Deniz Bayrakdar Part I: Politics of Text and Image Chapter One ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable Mentions Movies- LIST 1
    The Honorable mentions Movies- LIST 1: 1. A Dog's Life by Charlie Chaplin (1918) 2. Gone with the Wind Victor Fleming, George Cukor, Sam Wood (1940) 3. Sunset Boulevard by Billy Wilder (1950) 4. On the Waterfront by Elia Kazan (1954) 5. Through the Glass Darkly by Ingmar Bergman (1961) 6. La Notte by Michelangelo Antonioni (1961) 7. An Autumn Afternoon by Yasujirō Ozu (1962) 8. From Russia with Love by Terence Young (1963) 9. Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors by Sergei Parajanov (1965) 10. Stolen Kisses by François Truffaut (1968) 11. The Godfather Part II by Francis Ford Coppola (1974) 12. The Mirror by Andrei Tarkovsky (1975) 13. 1900 by Bernardo Bertolucci (1976) 14. Sophie's Choice by Alan J. Pakula (1982) 15. Nostalghia by Andrei Tarkovsky (1983) 16. Paris, Texas by Wim Wenders (1984) 17. The Color Purple by Steven Spielberg (1985) 18. The Last Emperor by Bernardo Bertolucci (1987) 19. Where Is the Friend's Home? by Abbas Kiarostami (1987) 20. My Neighbor Totoro by Hayao Miyazaki (1988) 21. The Sheltering Sky by Bernardo Bertolucci (1990) 22. The Decalogue by Krzysztof Kieślowski (1990) 23. The Silence of the Lambs by Jonathan Demme (1991) 24. Three Colors: Red by Krzysztof Kieślowski (1994) 25. Legends of the Fall by Edward Zwick (1994) 26. The English Patient by Anthony Minghella (1996) 27. Lost highway by David Lynch (1997) 28. Life Is Beautiful by Roberto Benigni (1997) 29. Magnolia by Paul Thomas Anderson (1999) 30. Malèna by Giuseppe Tornatore (2000) 31. Gladiator by Ridley Scott (2000) 32. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring by Peter Jackson (2001) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy Fool in Late Tarkovsky
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Nebraska, Omaha Journal of Religion & Film Volume 18 | Issue 1 Article 45 3-31-2014 The olH y Fool in Late Tarkovsky Robert O. Efird Virginia Tech, [email protected] Recommended Citation Efird, Robert O. (2014) "The oH ly Fool in Late Tarkovsky," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 18 : Iss. 1 , Article 45. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol18/iss1/45 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The olH y Fool in Late Tarkovsky Abstract This article analyzes the Russian cultural and religious phenomenon of holy foolishness (iurodstvo) in director Andrei Tarkovsky’s last two films, Nostalghia and Sacrifice. While traits of the holy fool appear in various characters throughout the director’s oeuvre, a marked change occurs in the films made outside the Soviet Union. Coincident with the films’ increasing disregard for spatiotemporal consistency and sharper eschatological focus, the character of the fool now appears to veer off into genuine insanity, albeit with a seemingly greater sensitivity to a visionary or virtual world of the spirit and explicit messianic task. Keywords Andrei Tarkovsky, Sacrifice, Nostalghia, Holy Foolishness Author Notes Robert Efird is Assistant Professor of Russian at Virginia Tech. He holds a PhD in Slavic from the University of Virginia and is the author of a number of articles dealing with Russian and Soviet cinema.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Representations of the Holocaust in Soviet cinema Timoshkina, Alisa Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 REPRESENTATIONS OF THE HOLOCAUST IN SOVIET CINEMA Alissa Timoshkina PhD in Film Studies 1 ABSTRACT The aim of my doctoral project is to study how the Holocaust has been represented in Soviet cinema from the 1930s to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • SOVIET YOUTH FILMS UNDER BREZHNEV: WATCHING BETWEEN the LINES by Olga Klimova Specialist Degree, Belarusian State University
    SOVIET YOUTH FILMS UNDER BREZHNEV: WATCHING BETWEEN THE LINES by Olga Klimova Specialist degree, Belarusian State University, 2001 Master of Arts, Brock University, 2005 Master of Arts, University of Pittsburgh, 2007 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Olga Klimova It was defended on May 06, 2013 and approved by David J. Birnbaum, Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh Lucy Fischer, Distinguished Professor, Department of English, University of Pittsburgh Vladimir Padunov, Associate Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh Aleksandr Prokhorov, Associate Professor, Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, College of William and Mary, Virginia Dissertation Advisor: Nancy Condee, Professor, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh ii Copyright © by Olga Klimova 2013 iii SOVIET YOUTH FILMS UNDER BREZHNEV: WATCHING BETWEEN THE LINES Olga Klimova, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2013 The central argument of my dissertation emerges from the idea that genre cinema, exemplified by youth films, became a safe outlet for Soviet filmmakers’ creative energy during the period of so-called “developed socialism.” A growing interest in youth culture and cinema at the time was ignited by a need to express dissatisfaction with the political and social order in the country under the condition of intensified censorship. I analyze different visual and narrative strategies developed by the directors of youth cinema during the Brezhnev period as mechanisms for circumventing ideological control over cultural production.
    [Show full text]
  • CFP Refocus: the Films of Andrei Tarkovsky
    H-Announce CFP ReFocus: The Films of Andrei Tarkovsky Announcement published by Sergei Toymentsev on Wednesday, August 3, 2016 Type: Call for Publications Date: November 30, 2016 Location: United States Subject Fields: Art, Art History & Visual Studies, Cultural History / Studies, Film and Film History, Humanities, Russian or Soviet History / Studies ReFocus: The Films of Andrei Tarkovsky Andrei Tarkovsky (1932 -1986) is a renowned Russian filmmaker whose work, despite an output of only seven feature films in twenty years, has had a profound influence on international cinema. Famous for languid pacing, long takes, dreamlike imagery, spiritual depth and philosophical allegories, most of his films have gained cult status among cineastes and are often included in various kinds of ranking polls and charts dedicated to the "best movies ever made." Thus, for example, the British Film Institute's "50 Greatest Films of All Time" poll conducted for the film magazine Sight & Sound in 2012 honors three of Tarkovsky's films: Andrei Rublev (1966) is ranked at No. 26, Mirror (1974) at No. 19, and Stalker (1979) at No. 29. Beginning with the late 1980, Tarkovsky's highly complex cinema has continuously attracted scholarly and critical attention in film studies by generating countless hermeneutic challenges and possibilities for film scholars. Almost all intellectual vogues and methodologies in humanities, whether it's feminism, psychoanalysis, poststructuralism, diaspora studies or film-philosophy, have left their interpretative trace on the reception of his work. This ReFocus anthology on Andrei Tarkovsky invites chapter proposals of 200-400 words that would take yet another look at the director's legacy from interdisciplinary perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Cinematic Retrospective of Director Andrei Tarkovsky This Summer at MAD
    Full Cinematic Retrospective of Director Andrei Tarkovsky this Summer at MAD Andrei Tarkovsky, Sculpting in Time presents the work of the revolutionary director and includes screenings—all on 35 mm—of all seven feature films and a behind-the-scenes documentary Stalker, 1976. Andrei Tarkovsky. New York, NY (June 8, 2015)—The Museum of Arts and Design presents a full cinematic retrospective of Andrei Tarkovsky’s work this summer with its latest cinema series, Andrei Tarkovsky, Sculpting in Time, from July 10 through August 28, 2015. Over the course of just seven feature films, Tarkovsky produced a poetic and enigmatic body of work that expanded the possibilities of cinema as an art form and transformed a wide range of genres including science fiction, war stories, film essays and historical dramas. Celebrating the legacy of this revolutionary director, the retrospective includes screenings of Tarkovsky’s seven feature films on 35 mm, as well as a behind-the-scenes documentary that reveals the process behind his groundbreaking practice and cinematic achievements. “Few directors have had as large of an influence on cinema as Andrei Tarkovsky,” says Jake Yuzna, MAD’s Director of Public Programs. “Working under censorship and with little support from the Soviet Union, Tarkovsky fought fiercely for his conceptualization of cinema as a singular and vital art form. Reconsidering the role of films in an age of increasing technology, Tarkovsky saw cinema as not merely a tool for communicating information, but as ‘a moral barometer in a sea of competing narratives.’” 2 COLUMBUS CIRCLE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019 P 212.299.7777 F 212.299.7701 MADMUSEUM.ORG Premiering on July 10 with Tarkovsky’s science fiction classic, Solaris, the retrospective showcases the director’s distinctive and influential aesthetic, characterized by expressive, sweeping takes, the evocative use of landscapes, and his method of “sculpting in time” with a camera.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable Mentions Movies – LIST 3
    The Honorable mentions Movies – LIST 3: 1. Modern Times by Charles Chaplin (1936) 2. Pinocchio by Hamilton Luske et al. (1940) 3. Late Spring by Yasujirō Ozu (1949) 4. The Virgin Spring by Ingmar Bergman (1960) 5. Charade by Stanley Donen (1963) 6. The Soft Skin by François Truffaut (1964) 7. Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? by Mike Nichols (1966) 8. Dog Day Afternoon by Sidney Lumet (1975) 9. Love Unto Death by Alain Resnais (1984) 10. Kiki's Delivery Service by Hayao Miyazaki (1989) 11. Bram Stoker's Dracula by Francis Ford Coppola (1992) 12. Léon: The Professional by Luc Besson (1994) 13. Princess Mononoke by Hayao Miyazaki (1997) 14. Fight Club by David Fincher (1999) 15. Rosetta by Jean-Pierre Dardenne, Luc Dardenne (1999) 16. The Ninth Gate by Roman Polanski (1999) 17. O Brother, Where Art Thou? by Ethan Coen, Joel Coen (2000) 18. The Return Andrey Zvyagintsev (2003) 19. The Sea Inside by Alejandro Amenábar (2004) 20. Broken Flowers by Jim Jarmusch (2005) 21. Climates by Nuri Bilge Ceylan (2006) 22. The Prestige by Christopher Nolan (2006) 23. The Class by Laurent Cantet (2008) 24. Mother by Bong Joon-ho (2009) 25. Shutter Island by Martin Scorsese (2010) 26. The Tree of Life by Terrence Malick (2011) 27. The Artist by Michel Hazanavicius (2011) 28. Melancholia by Lars von Trier (2011) 29. Hugo by Martin Scorsese (2011) 30. Twice Born by Sergio Castellitto (2012) 31. August Osage county by John Wells (2013) 32. 12 Years a Slave by Steve McQueen (2013) 33. The Best Offer by Giuseppe Tornatore (2013) 34.
    [Show full text]