DOCSLIB.ORG

Hillsboro Airport Wildlife Hazard Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hillsboro Airport Wildlife Hazard Management Plan Hillsboro Airport Wildlife Hazard Management Plan Updated January 2015 Submitted by: Nick Atwell FAA Qualified Airport Biologist Per AC 105/5200-36A Contributing Aviation Wildlife Technicians: John Hilterbrand, Casey Kaffka, Alex Lauber, and Erick Shore This page intentionally left blank. ii << Signature on File >> << Signature on File >> << Signature on File >> Airport Certification Manual Reference The Port of Portland has completed a Wildlife Hazard Assessment and a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP) for Hillsboro Airport (HIO) that conforms with 14 CFR Part 139.337. While HIO is not a Part 139 certified airport, the Port decided to address the wildlife hazard issues at HIO using the same Part 139 compliant model developed at PDX. The HIO WHMP will be reviewed on a periodic basis to determine the effectiveness of the program. Appropriate changes will be made as the need arises. This review will take place annually. v This page intentionally left blank. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Purpose and Application ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1. National Perspective.................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2. Local Perspective .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.3. WHMP Objectives and Principles ........................................................................................... 3 1.2. Wildlife Hazard Assessment ........................................................................................................ 3 1.2.1. Wildlife Strikes ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2. Wildlife Species of Concern ...................................................................................................... 5 1.3. WHMP Administration ................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.1. Review and Revision ................................................................................................................... 6 2 APPLICABLE LAWS, REGULATIONS AND POLICIES ............................................................................ 10 2.1. FAA Requirements ........................................................................................................................ 10 2.1.1. Airport Grant Assurances ....................................................................................................... 10 2.1.2. AC 150/5200-33B ..................................................................................................................... 11 2.2. Other Applicable Federal Regulations ........................................................................................ 12 2.2.1. National Environmental Policy Act .................................................................................... 12 2.2.2. Clean Water Act, Section 404 ................................................................................................ 12 2.2.3. Endangered Species Act (16 USC 1531-1543, Endangered Species Act of 1973, As Amended)............................................................................................................................................ 12 2.2.4. Migratory Bird Treaty Act ...................................................................................................... 13 2.2.5. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act ............................................................................... 13 2.2.6. Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act ................................................... 14 2.2.7. Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management ........................................................ 14 2.3. State Of Oregon Regulations............................................................................................................ 14 2.3.1. Oregon Removal Fill Law ........................................................................................................ 14 2.3.2. Oregon Endangered Species Act .......................................................................................... 15 2.3.3. Oregon Administrative Rules 635-43-0000 to 0045 [Scientific Taking Permit] 15 2.3.4. Oregon Administrative Rules 635-043-051 to 0115 [Take or Harass Wildlife Permit] ....................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.3.5. Oregon Administrative Rules 837-12-305 to 370 [Agricultural Fireworks Permit] ....................................................................................................................................................... 16 vii 2.3.6. Oregon Revised Statute, ORS 836.623 .............................................................................. 16 2.3.7. State Planning Regulations .................................................................................................... 17 2.4. Local Regulations ................................................................................................................................. 17 2.4.1. Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards ...................................... 17 2.4.2. City of Hillsboro, Significant Natural Resources Overlay .......................................... 18 2.4.3. City of Hillsboro, Habitat Friendly Development ......................................................... 20 2.4.4. City of Hillsboro, 7.08.010 Discharge of Weapons ....................................................... 20 2.5. Permits ..................................................................................................................................................... 20 2.6. Port of Portland Goals, Policies and Procedures ..................................................................... 22 2.6.1. Port Mission Statement: .......................................................................................................... 22 2.7. Discussion of Port Policies ............................................................................................................... 24 3 PROGRAM ORGANIZATION, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................................ 26 3.1. Program Organization ...................................................................................................................... 26 3.2 Roles and Responsibilities of the Airports Operations Manager ...................................... 27 3.3. Roles and Responsibilities of other Port Staff.......................................................................... 27 3.3.1. General Aviation Manager ...................................................................................................... 27 3.3.2. Aviation Wildlife Manager ..................................................................................................... 28 3.3.3. General Aviation Operations Supervisor ......................................................................... 29 3.3.4. Aviation Wildlife Technicians (or outside contract resources) .............................. 30 3.4. Roles and Responsibilities of Other Port Departments ....................................................... 31 3.4.1. HIO Maintenance Staff ............................................................................................................. 31 4 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES ................................................................................................................ 32 4.1. Risk Evaluation Process .................................................................................................................... 32 4.2. Zone Concept ......................................................................................................................................... 32 4.2.1. Primary Zone ............................................................................................................................... 33 4.2.2. Secondary Zone .......................................................................................................................... 33 4.3. Management Area Strategies .......................................................................................................... 38 4.4. General Operational Strategies ...................................................................................................... 42 4.5. Project Evaluation ............................................................................................................................... 43 4.5.1. Project Screening for Proposed Development ............................................................... 43 4.5.2. Monitoring and Evaluation .................................................................................................... 44 5 RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES AND PROTOCOLS ...................................................................... 46 5.1. Wildlife Control Procedures .......................................................................................................... 46 5.1.1. Personnel & Communications ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capital Improvement Program Chapter Seven Port of Portland
    PORT OF PORTLAND Chapter Seven CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CHAPTER SEVEN PORT OF PORTLAND CAPITALCAPITAL IMPROVEMENTIMPROVEMENT PROGRAMPROGRAM The analyses conducted in the previous chapters evaluated airport development needs based upon safety, security, potential aviation activity, and operational efficiency. Through these analyses, a plan for the use and development of the airport was defined. The purpose of this chapter is to identify the projects to implement the proposed plan for the use and development of Hillsboro Airport, and those capital needs required to operate and maintain the airport in a safe and environmentally acceptable manner. The presentation of the financial plan and its feasibility has been organized into two sections. First, funding sources on the federal and local levels are identified and discussed. Second, the airport's capital needs, costs, and funding eligibility are presented in narrative and tabulated form. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUNDING Financing capital improvements at the airport will not rely exclusively upon the financial resources of the Port of Portland (Port). Capital improvement funding is available at the federal level for many airport projects. The following discussion outlines the key sources for capital improvement funding. 7-1 FEDERAL GRANTS entitlement. For eligible general avia- tion airports, Vision 100 provides up to Through federal legislation over the $150,000 of funding each year. As a years, various grants-in-aid programs general aviation airport, Hillsboro Air- have been established to develop and port does not qualify for the commercial maintain a system of public airports service entitlement; however, it does throughout the United States. The qualify for the annual $150,000 enti- purpose of this system and its federally- tlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Airport Reports
    Table of Contents – Individual Airport Reports Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 2.1 Oregon Aviation Plan 2007 ( OAP 2007 ) Study Components 2.1.a State Aviation System Plan 2.1.b State Aviation Master Plan 2.1.c State Aviation Economic Impact Study 2.2 Overall Study Goals & Objectives 2.3 Airport Functional Roles 2.4 Performance Measures 2.5 Summary Chapter 3 3.1 General Airport Description and Location 3.2 Existing Airport Facilities 3.2.a Airside Facilities 3.2.b Landside Facilities 3.2.c Support Facilities 3.3 Current and Forecast Demand 3.3.a Forecasting Approach 3.4 Survey Responses 3.4.a Community Information 3.4.b Economic Development 3.4.c Airport Development and Use 3.4.d Air Shuttle 3.5 Summary Chapter 4 4.1 Airport Facility and Service Needs 4.1.a Recommendations Based on Performance Criteria 4.1.b General Observations and Recommendations 4.1.c Airport Capital Improvement Program 4.1.d Other Potential Improvements for Consideration 4.2 Definition of Airport System Role 4.3 Economic Impact Analysis 4.3.a Contribution of Airport to the Economy of Oregon Figures Chapter 3 3.1 Location Map Tables Chapter 2 2.1 Public-Use Airports in Oregon 2.2 OAP 2007 Recommended Airport Classification Chapter 3 3.1 Summary of Aviation Projections Chapter 4 4.1 Economic Contribution of Airport to the Oregon Economy Individual Airport Reports – Volume II Albany Municipal Airport Chehalem Airpark Alkali Lake State Airport Chiloquin State Airport Arlington Municipal Airport Christmas Valley Airport Ashland Municipal-Sumner Parker Field Columbia Gorge
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Newport Airport Committee Will Hold a Meeting at 2:00 P.M., On
    The City of Newport Airport Committee will hold a meeting at 2:00 P.M., on Tuesday, September 15, 2015 in Conference Room A in the Newport City Hall, 169 SW Coast Highway, Newport, Oregon 97365. The meeting location is accessible to persons with disabilities. A request for an interpreter for the hearing impaired, or for other accommodations for persons with disabilities, should be made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to Peggy Hawker, City Recorder 541.574.0613. The City of Newport Airport Committee reserves the right to add or delete items as needed, change the order of the agenda, and discuss any other business deemed necessary at the time of the work session and/or meeting. CITY OF NEWPORT AIRPORT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Tuesday September 15, 2015 2:00 P.M. I. Call to Order II. Roll call III. Approval of minutes from August 11, 2015 meeting IV. Continued: Discussion of RFP for Airport/FBO Operational Services V. Air charter service VI. Call for Airport Improvement Projects VII. Operations report VIII. Committee comments. IX. Public comments X. Develop next agenda XI. Adjournment August 11, 2015 2:00 PM Newport, Oregon The City of Newport Airport Committee met on the above date in Conference Room A of Newport City Hall. In attendance were Committee members: Committee chair Jeff Bertuleit, committee members Susan Painter, Mark Watkins, Ralph Grutzmacher, and Gary Baker; Debra Smith has previously submitted her resignation from the committee due to time constraints and therefore was not in attendance, and Ken Brown was absent. Also in attendance were: City Manager Spencer Nebel, City Attorney Steve Rich, City Council liaison Ralph Busby, and Committee staff Bob Fuller (Public Works).
    [Show full text]
  • Market Rent Study - Improved Air Side Sites Roberts Field - Redmond Municipal Airport 2522 SE Jesse Butler Circle Redmond, Oregon 97756
    Market Rent Study - Improved Air Side Sites Roberts Field - Redmond Municipal Airport 2522 SE Jesse Butler Circle Redmond, Oregon 97756 Date of Inspection – May 7, 2019 Prepared For: Zachary Bass Airport Director Redmond Municipal Airport 2522 SE Jesse Butler Circle Redmond, Oregon 97756 Prepared By: Jeremy L. Cowan Bratton Appraisal Group LLC 25 NW Hawthorne Avenue Bend, Oregon 97703 EXPERTS IN REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS 25 NW Hawthorne Ave. May 15, 2019 Bend, Oregon 97703 Zachary Bass, Airport Director Redmond Municipal Airport 2522 SE Jesse Butler Circle Dana Bratton, MAI Redmond, Oregon 97756 Mike Caba, MAI Jeremy Cowan Cal Gabert RE: Market Rent Study of Air Side Sites Located at Roberts Field – Nancy Gabert, SRA Redmond Municipal Airport Dear Mr. Bass: At your request, I have completed a market rent study of the property identified above and provided the results within this document. The purpose and intended use of this rent study is to estimate the annual fair market rent for improved air side properties located at the Redmond Municipal Airport. The effective date of value is May 7, 2019. This rent study has been written to conform with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) set forth by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation and adopted by the State of Oregon Appraiser Certification and Licensure Board. In the course of research, I have completed a physical inspection of the subject property, as well as a study of comparable rentals. Note that comparable ground leases located at airports outside of the Central Oregon region have not all been physically inspected by the appraiser; however, I have viewed Google maps of the individual airports.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION Airport Master Plan Update Aurora State Airport
    Chapter One: INTRODUCTION Airport Master Plan Update Aurora State Airport This update to the 2000 Airport Master Plan was undertaken to assess the role of the Aurora State Airport (Airport), evaluate the Airport's capabilities, forecast future aeronautical activity for the next 20 years, and plan for the timely development of any new or expanded Airport facilities needed to accommodate future aviation activity. The owner and operator of the Airport, the Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA), obtained and matched a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to fund this study. ODA has organized a Planning Advisory Committee (PAC), representing Airport users and neighbors, to participate in the planning process. In addition to six PAC meetings, public involvement in the master plan update includes a website to disseminate information and gather comments and questions, and five open houses for the general public. The purpose of this first draft chapter of the Airport Master Plan Update (Plan) is threefold: • to summarize major issues that the Plan should address • to identify goals for the planning process and for the future development of the Airport • to determine the Airport’s current and future role within the system of airports GOALS Goals for the master plan update were a subject of the first PAC meeting held on July 22, 2010. The common themes of PAC members’ statements have been synthesized and are presented below. The goals are divided between two categories – goals for the planning process and goals for the master plan itself. Planning Process Goals The goals for the planning process should guide the conduct of the ODA, ODA’s consultants, and the PAC throughout the development of the master plan update.
    [Show full text]
  • Troutdale Airport Master Plan Shaping Our Future Planning Advisory Committee Final Report June 2016
    TROUTDALE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN SHAPING OUR FUTURE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT JUNE 2016 May 11, 2016 Port of Portland Executive Director, Troutdale Airport: Shaping Our Future was a complete airport master plan process that went above and beyond. While the master plan followed many of the traditional steps characteristic of an airport master plan, it also explored a broader range of issues important to the Port, City and greater region. Before the process began, the Port of Portland recognized that Troutdale Airport was a valued community asset on an unsustainable path. At the same time, the Port identified a local community need for increased economic opportunities. This master plan process was exceptional in that it not only addressed the airport resources required to continue serving aviation needs, it also evaluated how Troutdale Airport could sustainably serve local community needs as a whole for the next 20 years. The Port of Portland invited a group of 23 stakeholders – representing diverse values of economic, environmental and social sustainability – to create a project advisory committee (PAC) charged with providing input and recommendations for the master plan process. From the spring of 2014 to the spring of 2016, I worked with these outstanding individuals and the Port to develop our recommendations on the Troutdale Airport Master Plan. As a PAC, we were given the opportunity to provide input on planning documents and engage in rigorous discussion about Troutdale Airport’s role in the future. Our recommendations were also informed by community input collected from stakeholder meetings and public involvement activities prior to key project milestones.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON AVIATION PLAN Economic Impact Statement
    OREGON AVIATION PLAN Economic Impact Statement 2014 for NPIAS Airports Photo courtesy of City of Redmond Municipal Airport OREGON AVIATION PLAN Economic Impact Statement 2014 for NPIAS Airports The 2014 Oregon Aviation Plan Economic Impact Other modes of transportation cannot compete Study (2014 OAP EIS) is presented by the Oregon with aviation’s ability to move people and products Department of Aviation (ODA) and addresses the to where they are most needed safely, quickly and OVERVIEW economic contribution of aviation by Federal Avia- efficiently. Airports are a key component of the tion Administration (FAA) National Plan of Integrat- state’s infrastructure, allowing Oregon businesses ed Airport Systems (NPIAS) airports to the Oregon to do business at a global scale, creating econom- state economy, updating the most recent study, ic growth and opportunity that reaches far outside which was completed in 2007. the airport property. Airports are a key asset to Oregon commerce, Economic impacts of airports include on-airport providing transportation, employment and real economic activities, as well as spending off-airport estate for commercial and industrial develop- by visiting air travelers and those employed by ment, in addition to being infrastructure essential on-airport businesses. This executive summary to emergency response, medical evacuation, fire presents totals for the state and the five state protection and freight transport. NPIAS airports regions as defined by the Oregon Department of contribute more than $8.7 billion to the Oregon Transportation (ODOT). The economic impact of economy annually and provide Oregon businesses individual airport studies and the methodology and residents with just in time shipments of the used to complete the analysis are presented in the goods that keeping Oregon’s businesses moving.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Environmental Assessment
    Hillsboro Airport Parallel Runway 12L/30R Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment Volume 2 of 2 (Appendices G and I) Prepared for: Federal Aviation Administration Prepared by: For Further Information: Ms. Janell Barrilleaux Ms. Marla Harrison U.S. Department of Transportation Port of Portland Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 3529 1601 Lind Ave SW, Suite 315 Portland, OR 97208 Renton, WA 98057 (503) 415-6833 (425) 227-2611 February, 2014 PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Cover: base map: Google Stock photos: Bigstock.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Hillsboro Airport Parallel Runway 12L/30R Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment Chapter Name Page Volume 1 of 2 1 Introduction and Background 1 2 Approach Used in Preparing the Supplemental Environmental Assessment 5 3 Forecasts 7 a. Original Environmental Assessment/2005 Hillsboro Master Plan Forecast 7 b. New Forecasts 7 4 Project Need and Timing 13 a. Project Need 13 b. Project Timing 15 5 Affected Environment 17 6 Environmental Consequences 25 a. Aircraft Noise and Land Use Compatibility 26 b. Air Quality 28 c. Secondary (Induced) Impacts 31 d. Climate 32 e. Cumulative Impacts 32 Appendix A Court Decision A-1 B Unconstrained Forecasts B-1 C Constrained Forecasts C-1 D Remand Forecasts D-1 E Air Quality Technical Memo E-1 F Port of Portland Hillsboro Airport Lead Study F-1 Volume 2 of 2 G Comments and Responses to Comments Received on Draft Supplemental EA G.1 G.1-1 G.2 G.2-1 G.3 G.3-1 G.4 G.4-1 G.5 G.5-1 G.6 G.6-1 G.7 G.7-1 G.8 G.8-1 G.9 G.9-1 G.10 G.10-1 H Port of Portland Certification
    [Show full text]
  • Future Role of Hillsboro Airport Chapter Two Port of Portland
    PORT OF PORTLAND Chapter Two FUTURE ROLE OF HILLSBORO AIRPORT CHAPTER TWO PORT OF PORTLAND FUTUREFUTURE ROLEROLE OFOF HILLSBOROHILLSBORO AIRPORTAIRPORT The purpose of this chapter of the Airport Master Plan is to analyze the feasibility of alternative roles for Hillsboro Airport within the context of the Portland metropolitan system of airports and State of Oregon system of airports. This analysis provides a foundation for the Port of Portland to determine, specifically and ideally, what Hillsboro Airport's role should be through 2025. This involves considering the probability and viability of supporting scheduled commercial air service and/or air cargo activity at Hillsboro Airport. HILLSBORO AIRPORT'S EXISTING ROLE The role for Hillsboro Airport is defined within both state and federal aviation plans. At the national level, Hillsboro Airport is defined as a reliever airport in the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). Reliever airports are specially designated general aviation airports intended to reduce congestion at large commercial service airports. This reliever role is usually accomplished, not by accommodating commercial flights, but by providing an attractive option for the myriad of non-commercial, general aviation aircraft operations that urban areas generate. Hillsboro Airport is classified as a reliever for Portland International Airport (PDX). In this role, Hillsboro Airport is intended to preserve capacity at PDX by offering an alternative operating area for general
    [Show full text]
  • Aurora State Airport Constrained Operations Runway Justification Study
    AURORA STATE AIRPORT – CONSTRAINED OPERATIONS RUNWAY JUSTIFICATION STUDY AURORA STATE AIRPORT CONSTRAINED OPERATIONS RUNWAY JUSTIFICATION STUDY DRAFT AURORA STATE AIRPORT – CONSTRAINED OPERATIONS RUNWAY JUSTIFICATION STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT AURORA STATE AIRPORT – CONSTRAINED OPERATIONS RUNWAY JUSTIFICATION STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this study is to review the current runway length requirements and activity at the Aurora State Airport compared to the assumptions made in the approved 2012 Airport Master Plan to consider if the eligibility threshold for a runway extension has been met. An analysis of aviation activity at the Airport has identified 349 based aircraft. 10.8% of the aircraft based at the Airport are jet aircraft. The Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) began collecting data in October 2015 and has identified 48,459 Airport operations in 2016 and 58,597 Airport operations in 2017. The confirmed TAF numbers are 44,292 and 54,999 respectively. FAA Traffic Flow Management Systems Counts (TFMSC) operations data presented by Aircraft Design Group identified at least 860 annual operations by C and D aircraft on average from 2009 to 2018. Additional analysis of the TFMSC data indicates there have been 599 average annual operations by aircraft requiring 5,901 feet or more of runway length. However, the majority of these operations (70%) are conducted by aircraft that require 6,000 feet or more of runway during given conditions. On average there are 415 annual operations per year by aircraft that require 6,000 feet or more of runway. A constrained operations Airport user survey was distributed as part of this study. The survey identified 645 constrained annual operations from a variety of aircraft and aircraft operators.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Natural Resource Plan
    AIRPORTS POLICY 28, AIRPORTS: It is the policy of Washington County to protect the function and economic viability of existing public use airports, while ensuring public safety and compatibility between airport uses and surrounding land uses for public use airports identified by the Oregon Department of Aviation (DOA). Introduction Changes in state law passed in 1995 and 1997 require local jurisdictions to adopt an airport planning program for certain airports described in ORS 836.600 et. Seq. The Aeronautics Division of the Oregon Department of Transportation (now the Department of Aviation/DOA) and the Department of Land Conservation and Development together developed Airport Planning Rules (OAR 660-013) and identified certain public and private use airports that would be subject to these rules, based on the parameters set forth in the statute. The DOA manages the list of identified airports, which is subject to amendment through a review and decision process by the state Aviation Board, pursuant to OAR 738-090. Procedures for amendment of the state airport list include public notice procedures. As necessary, the County will initiate Comprehensive Plan amendment proceedings to remain current with DOA list of all airports. Policy 17 of the Washington County 2020 Transportation Plan identifies and outlines transportation- related policies for the County’s three public use airports. The Rural/Natural Resource Plan and the Comprehensive Framework Plan for the Urban Area each outline land use related policies that address only those airports within the Washington County jurisdiction that are identified by the DOA list, with the addition of Skyport, a small public use facility located north of Cornelius.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Rent Study Roberts Field–Redmond Municipal Airport Bob
    Market Rent Study Roberts Field–Redmond Municipal Airport 2522 SE Jesse Butler Circle Redmond, Oregon 97756 Date of Inspection – May 28, 2014 Date of Report – June 2, 2014 Prepared For: Bob Noble Interim Airport Director Redmond Municipal Airport 2522 SE Jesse Butler Circle Redmond, Oregon 97756 Prepared By: Jeremy L. Cowan, Senior Vice President Dana L. Bratton, MAI Bratton Appraisal Group LLC 25 NW Hawthorne Avenue Bend, Oregon 97701 EXPERTS IN REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS 25 NW Hawthorne Ave. June 2, 2014 Bend, Oregon 97701 465 NW Elm Ave., Ste 103 Bob Noble, Interim Airport Director Redmond, Oregon 97756 Redmond Municipal Airport 2522 SE Jesse Butler Circle Dana Bratton, MAI Redmond, Oregon 97756 Mike Caba, MAI Jeremy Cowan Cal Gabert RE: Market Rent Study of Air Side Sites Located at Roberts Field – Nancy Gabert, SRA Redmond Municipal Airport, 2522 SE Jesse Butler Circle, Redmond, Gregory Jones Oregon 97756 Donald Montagner Michele Payne Deborah Schluter Dear Mr. Noble: Susan Smith Marie-France At your request, we have completed a market rent study of the property Woods Jones identified above and provided the results within this document. The purpose and intended use of this rent study is to estimate the annual fair market rent for improved air side properties located at the Redmond Municipal Airport. The effective date of value is May 28, 2014. This rent study has been written to conform with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) set forth by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation and adopted by the State of Oregon Appraiser Certification and Licensure Board.
    [Show full text]