Natural Cures and Complex Technologies PVAMU Microbiologist Raul Cuero’S Latest Target: Skin Cancer
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Douglas Dean Osheroff Papers
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8v40ww2 No online items Guide to the Douglas Dean Osheroff Papers Daniel Hartwig Stanford University. Libraries.Department of Special Collections and University Archives Stanford, California November 2013 Copyright © 2015 The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. Guide to the Douglas Dean SC1181 1 Osheroff Papers Overview Call Number: SC1181 Creator: Osheroff, Douglas D. Title: Douglas Dean Osheroff papers Dates: 1969-2003 Physical Description: 5 Linear feet Summary: Laboratory notebooks. Language(s): The materials are in English. Repository: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford, CA 94305-6064 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 725-1022 URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Information about Access The materials are open for research use. Audio-visual materials are not available in original format, and must be reformatted to a digital use copy. Ownership & Copyright All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94305-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner, heir(s) or assigns. See: http://library.stanford.edu/spc/using-collections/permission-publish. Restrictions also apply to digital representations of the original materials. Use of digital files is restricted to research and educational purposes. Cite As [identification of item], Douglas D. -
2006 DISCOVERY Magazine Feature on Mitchell
MITCHELL: MAN ON A MISSION DISCOVERY, College of Science [COVER STORY] As a senior in high school, cusp of the cosmos where It all started with a telephone call George Mitchell couldn’t Mitchell’s support—not to mention between two old friends, Mitchell the resulting Texas A&M Physics and A&M physics professor Peter learn enough about phenomenon—is concerned. McIntyre. Mitchell had been physics. Voraciously he watching a PBS special featuring pored through textbooks, What began in 2002 as a simple Hawking, in which Hawking $800,000 verbal agreement revealed that one of his greatest novels and popular science between old friends intended to disappointments in physics was magazines, reading help bring one of Mitchell’s biggest the 1993 cancellation of the Texas everything he could get his heroes, Cambridge University Superconducting Super Collider theoretical physicist Stephen (SSC) project. hands on in an effort to Hawking, to the Texas A&M campus satisfy his curiosity about has mushroomed into nearly $45 Mitchell could identify—on several matter, energy and the million in support from the Houston levels. On top of common interest petroleum engineer/real estate in fundamental physics, he realized broader mysteries of the developer and his wife, Cynthia, he and Hawking also shared universe. He even tried his and spawned a supernova-like a universal disappointment—a hand at building his own legacy, both for the Department particularly painful one for Mitchell, and for the future of fundamental because he was directly involved. telescope. physics. Although he eventually followed his brother Johnny’s footsteps “HAVING TALENTED PHYSICISTS COME TO TEXAS to Texas A&M University and the field of petroleum engineering, A&M CREATES EXCITEMENT, WHICH ATTRACTS making a career out of finding STUDENTS NOT ONLY IN PHYSICS, BUT ALSO IN oil and gas where no one else could, Mitchell never outgrew ENGINEERING AND OTHER SUBJECTS.” his fascination for physics. -
2015 Annual Report
2015 AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY ANNUAL TM ADVANCING PHYSICS REPORT TM THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY STRIVES TO Be the leading voice for physics and an authoritative source of physics information for the advancement of physics and the benefit of humanity Collaborate with national scientific societies for the advancement of science, science education, and the science community Cooperate with international physics societies to promote physics, to support physicists worldwide, and to foster international collaboration Have an active, engaged, and diverse membership, and support the activities of its units and members © 2016 American Physical Society During 2015, APS worked to institute the governance objective: “the advancement and diffusion of the knowledge changes approved by the membership in late 2014. In of physics.” APS is fully committed to the principles of OA accordance with the new Constitution & Bylaws, in to the extent that we can continue to support the production February the Board appointed our first Chief Executive of high-quality peer-reviewed journals. For many years APS Officer—Kate Kirby, the former Executive Officer—to has supported “green” OA and we have been fully compliant head the APS. Kate’s major task has been to transition with the 2013 directive from the Office of Science and the management of APS to a CEO model with a Senior Technology Policy that the publications resulting from Management Team. She appointed Mark Doyle as Chief U.S. federally funded research be accessible to the public 12 Information Officer, James Taylor as Chief Operating months after publication. Since APS is a major international Officer, and Matthew Salter as the new Publisher. -
Robert Richardson (1937-2013) Discoverer of Superfluidity in Helium-3
COMMENT OBITUARY Robert Richardson (1937-2013) Discoverer of superfluidity in helium-3. obert Richardson, along with physicist his PhD, he and his young family moved we compressed liquid helium-3 until it David Lee and myself, discovered that to Ithaca, New York, where he became a began to solidify, causing the mixture helium-3, a rare but stable isotope of postdoctoral researcher for David Lee in of liquid and solid to cool. We initially Rhelium, becomes a superfluid when cooled to the low-temperature group at Cornell Univer- (mistakenly) believed that we had pro- a minuscule fraction of a degree above abso- sity. Richardson joined the Cornell faculty in duced magnetic order in the solid helium-3, lute zero. Until that discovery, in the early at about 0.002 Kelvins. In fact, 1970s, the superfluidity effect — in which we had observed a new physical state: a liquid flows without friction — had been superfluidity in liquid helium-3. The seen only in helium-4, whose atoms are three of us shared the 1996 Nobel Prize bosons. No one had been able to produce in Physics for this discovery. the phenomenon with fermions, whose Richardson won or shared many nuclei have spin properties different from awards and honours apart from the Nobel those seen in bosons. prize, including the Sir Francis Simon The discovery astounded the physics Memorial Prize in 1976 and the Oliver E. CORNELL UNIVERSITY PHOTOGRAPHY community, which had all but given up Buckley Condensed Matter Prize in 1981. trying to produce the phenomenon in That year, he was also made a fellow of the helium-3. -
History of Dark Matter
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) History of dark matter Bertone, G.; Hooper, D. DOI 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.045002 Publication date 2018 Document Version Final published version Published in Reviews of Modern Physics Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bertone, G., & Hooper, D. (2018). History of dark matter. Reviews of Modern Physics, 90(4), [045002]. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.045002 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, VOLUME 90, OCTOBER–DECEMBER 2018 History of dark matter Gianfranco Bertone GRAPPA, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904 1098XH Amsterdam, Netherlands Dan Hooper Center for Particle Astrophysics, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA and Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA (published 15 October 2018) Although dark matter is a central element of modern cosmology, the history of how it became accepted as part of the dominant paradigm is often ignored or condensed into an anecdotal account focused around the work of a few pioneering scientists. -
OCTOBER TERM 1994 Reference Index Contents
jnl94$ind1Ð04-04-96 12:34:32 JNLINDPGT MILES OCTOBER TERM 1994 Reference Index Contents: Page Statistics ....................................................................................... II General .......................................................................................... III Appeals ......................................................................................... III Arguments ................................................................................... III Attorneys ...................................................................................... III Briefs ............................................................................................. IV Certiorari ..................................................................................... IV Costs .............................................................................................. V Judgments and Opinions ........................................................... V Original Cases ............................................................................. V Records ......................................................................................... VI Rehearings ................................................................................... VI Rules ............................................................................................. VI Stays .............................................................................................. VI Conclusion ................................................................................... -
Nanopoulos by Mcintyre
Nanopoulos by McIntyre • Reprise of my laudation of Dimitri on the occasion of his Onassis Prize • Challenge to Dimitri for a fresh chapter of colliders A laudation of Dimitri Nanopoulus by Peter McIntyre I have known Dimitri Nanopoulos since 1975. At that time we were both at Harvard University. Dimitri was working with Steven Weinberg (Nobel 1979) and I with Carlo Rubbia (Nobel 1984). Dimitri and I entered the world of elementary particle physics at the time and the place of a true revolution in science - the advent of the gauge theories to describe the world of subatomic nature. The measure of a scientist is his choice of problems. Many scientists have keen intellects and mastery of the science of the day. But a challenging problem typically takes years of effort to master, and it is therefore imperative to choose those golden problems that have the potential to make a major breakthrough in how we view nature. By this highest of standards Dimitri has shown his mettle, not once but now several times over. • In 1990 Dimitri and his colleague John Ellis at CERN showed how one could use the newly conjectured gauge field of supersymmetry to unify the couplings of the three fields of nature that are at play within the nucleus: the strong field that binds the nucleus, the weak field that mediates radioactive decay, and the electromagnetic field that binds the atom and illuminates this picture. it had seemed that the strengths of these three corners of the subnuclear world behaved differently as they evolved from the Big Bang to our world of today. -
Springer Proceedings in Physics
Springer Proceedings in Physics Volume 148 For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/361 David Cline Editor Sources and Detection of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe Proceedings of the 10th UCLA Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe, February 22-24, 2012, Marina del Rey, California Editor David Cline UCLA Physics & Astronomy Los Angeles , USA ISSN 0930-8989 ISSN 1867-4941 (electronic) ISBN 978-94-007-7240-3 ISBN 978-94-007-7241-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7241-0 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013955385 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. -
1996 Nobel Prize in Physics Holds Special Interest for BNL
Vol. 50 - No. 43 November 1, 1996 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY 1996 Nobel Prize in Physics Holds Special Interest for BNL This year’s Nobel Prize in physics lium-3 because there is a short-range — for the discovery of superfluidity in repulsion between helium-3 atoms a rare form of helium, helium-3 — has that overcomes their longer range at- a special interest for BNL. traction. Two BNL-related theoretical physi- “Since the whole subject was very cists — Victor Emery in the Physics Andrew Sessler much in our minds, it was not long Department and Lawrence Berkeley (left), Lawrence before we decided to explore the possi- National Laboratory’s (LBNL) Andrew Berkeley bilities further,” Emery recalled. Sessler, who is also a Trustee of Asso- National Can Fermions Pair? ciated Universities, Inc. — wrote a Laboratory and paper in 1960 that helped start pio- a Trustee of The two theorists considered neering experiments in the field. And, Associated whether helium-3 atoms could form in 1966, one of the Nobelists, David Universities, pairs in angular momentum states Lee of Cornell University, spent a Inc., and Victor with zero, one, two, etc., units of angu- sabbatical year at BNL, working on Emery of BNL’s lar momentum, which are labeled “s- some of the techniques later used in Physics state,” “p-state,” “d-state,” etc., in the the prize-winning research. Department language of atomic spectroscopy. The prize was won by experimen- stand outside In the simplest generalization of talists David Lee and Robert Richard- Berkner Hall, 36 the BCS theory, they found that the son, also of Cornell, and Douglas years after their optimum pairing was in the d-state Osheroff, Stanford University, for 1960 theoretical and estimated the temperature at their 1972 discovery while at Cornell paper written at which liquid helium makes the transi- that the isotope helium-3 can become Berkeley helped tion into a superfluid at about 0.08 K. -
Professor Douglas Osheroff Stanford University
Institute for Advanced Study Nobel Lecture Series How Advances in Science are Made Professor Douglas Osheroff Stanford University Abstract: How advances in science are made, and how they may come to benefit mankind at large are complex issues. The discoveries that most influence the way we think about nature seldom can be anticipated, and frequently the applications for new technologies developed to probe a specific characteristic of nature are also seldom clear, even to the inventors of these technologies. One thing is most clear: Seldom are such advances made by individuals alone. Rather, they result from the progress of the scientific community; asking questions, developing new technologies to answer those questions, and sharing their results and their ideas with others. However, there are indeed research strategies that can substantially increase the probability of one’s making a discovery, and the speaker will illustrate some of these strategies in the context of a number of well known discoveries, including the work he did as a graduate student, for which he shared the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1996. About the Speaker: Douglas Osheroff shared the Nobel Prize in Physics with David Lee and Robert Richardson for discovering the superfluidic nature of Helium-3 (3He). This discovery was made in 1971, while he was pursuing his PhD at Cornell. Professor Osheroff worked in the physical research division at Bell Laboratories for 15 years where he became head of the Low Temperature and Solid State Research Department. There, he worked in collaboration on newly discovered superfluid phases of liquid 3He, as well as studied the nature of nuclear spin order in solid 3He and made the first observations of weak localization in thin disordered metallic films. -
String Unification of Particle Physics and Cosmology
String unification of particle physics and cosmology I. Antoniadis Albert Einstein Center, University of Bern LPTHE, Sorbonne Universit´e,CNRS Paris Session in Honor of Dimitri Nanopoulos' Retirement Texas A&M University, College Station, 15 May 2019 I. Antoniadis (TexasA&M, 15 May 2019) 1 / 16 I. Antoniadis (TexasA&M, 15 May 2019) 2 / 16 I. Antoniadis (TexasA&M, 15 May 2019) 3 / 16 I. Antoniadis (TexasA&M, 15 May 2019) 4 / 16 A pleasant and fruitful collaboration Met in California in 1985 one paper in collaboration with Costas Kounnas Intensive collaboration while fellow at CERN 1986-88 Phenomenology of four-dimensional strings effective action, model building, finite temperature string cosmology and non-critical strings Continued a few years after my return in Paris Ongoing again recently ··· Here: Flipped SU(5) and linear dilaton background [10] I. Antoniadis (TexasA&M, 15 May 2019) 5 / 16 Welcome to INSPIRE, the High Energy Physics information system. Please direct questions, comments or concerns to [email protected]. HEP :: HEPNAMES :: INSTITUTIONS :: CONFERENCES :: JOBS :: EXPERIMENTS :: JOURNALS :: HELP Easy Search au antoniadis and au nanopoulos Citesummary Search Advanced Search find j "Phys.Rev.Lett.,105*" :: more Sort by: Display results: earliest date desc. - or rank by - 25 results single list Citations summary Generated on 2019-05-03 15 papers found, 15 of them citeable (published or arXiv) Citation summary results Citeable papers Published only Total number of papers analyzed: 15 15 Total number of citations: 2,681 2,681 Average citations per paper: 178.7 178.7 Breakdown of papers by citations: Renowned papers (500+) 2 2 Famous papers (250-499) 2 2 Very well-known papers (100-249) 5 5 Well-known papers (50-99) 2 2 Known papers (10-49) 3 3 Less known papers (1-9) 1 1 Unknown papers (0) 0 0 hHEP index [?] 14 14 I. -
ASPECTS of GRAND UNIFIED and STRING PHENOMENOLOGY a Dissertation by JOEL W. WALKER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies O
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M University ASPECTS OF GRAND UNIFIED AND STRING PHENOMENOLOGY A Dissertation by JOEL W. WALKER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2005 Major Subject: Physics ASPECTS OF GRAND UNIFIED AND STRING PHENOMENOLOGY A Dissertation by JOEL W. WALKER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Dimitri Nanopoulos Committee Members, Richard Arnowitt Robert Webb Stephen Fulling Head of Department, Edward Fry August 2005 Major Subject: Physics iii ABSTRACT Aspects of Grand Unified and String Phenomenology. (August 2005) Joel W. Walker, B.S., Harding University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Dimitri Nanopoulos Explored in this report is the essential interconnectedness of Grand Unified and String Theoretic Phenomenology. In order to extract a modeled connection to low-energy physics from the context of superstring theory, it is presently necessary to input some preferred region of parameter space in which to search. This need may be well filled by a parallel study of Grand Unification, which is by contrast in immediate proximity to a wealth of experimental data. The favored GUT so isolated may then reasonably transfer this phenomenological correlation to a string embedding, receiving back by way of trade a greater sense of primary motivation, and potentially enhanced predictability for parameters taken as input in a particle physics context.