DOCSLIB.ORG

The Gateway Program and Hudson Tunnel Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Gateway Program and Hudson Tunnel Project Presented to: NJ State Senate Oversight Committee Stephen Gardner Executive Vice President NEC Business Development August 10, 2015 1 The Need for Gateway 2 The Northeast Corridor Today 3 The NEC in Context The Northeast Megaregion – with 17% of the population on 2% of U.S. land area – is North America’s best rail market similar in density and population to successful rail corridors in Europe. 4 NEC Vital to Local Economies • NEC and connected commuter networks provide access to: – good jobs – large labor market • For some counties, commuter rail is the major means of transport to Manhattan jobs • Income earned by rail commuters provides significant economic value to suburban areas: – For some counties, such as Essex, income earned by rail commuters is in the billions of dollars 5 NEC Vital to Region Washington to New York Air-Rail Market 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% Rail Market Share Rail Market - 50% Air Rail Air 40% 76% 69% 75% 30% 63% 56% 55% 56% 61% 45% 50% 50% 51% 20% 37% 10% 0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Fiscal Year Acela Service introduced Amtrak carries three times as many passengers DC-NY than all of the airlines put together 6 6 NEC Passenger Growth • NEC passenger demand continues to grow • How much of that demand the NEC can accommodate depends primarily on the level of investment. 7 Growth is Threatened By: Bottlenecks 800 750 VRE 700 MARC 650 LIRR 600 NJT SEPTA 550 CSX 500 NS 450 MBTA 400 MN 350 TRAINS per DAY DAY per TRAINS SLE 300 P&W 250 AMTRAK 200 150 100 50 0 8 Century-Old Assets Connecticut River Bridge, 1907 Hudson River Tunnel, 1910 Portal Bridge (NJ), 1906 Susquehanna River Bridge (MD), 1906 Pelham Bay Bridge (NY), 1907 B&P Tunnel (MD), 1873 9 Station Capacity • PENN STATION – 410,000 daily passenger trips • Long Island Railroad – 222,000 trips • NJ Transit – 160,000 trips • Amtrak – 28,000 trips • PLUS NYC Transit - 344,800 daily trips at Penn Station • 1/2/3 - 178,200 trips • A/C/E - 166,600 trips 10 Super Storm Sandy Impacts • Super Storm Sandy forced ~4-day closure of the NEC: • Flooded substations • Inundated East River and Hudson River Tunnel systems • Ongoing damage to internal components requires complete renewal. • Tunnel reconstruction requires closure of each tube for outages of >1 year. • Rebuilding of the Hudson River Tunnel cannot begin until the new Hudson Tunnel Project is completed. 11 Super Storm Sandy Impacts 12 Decades of Underinvestment by All Source: NEC Commission 5-Yr Plan, FY16-20 13 Gateway Program Overview 14 15 Gateway Program Principles Service Preservation and Resiliency • Secure critical alignments for future operations • Priority to modular project • Undertake design /construction where required • Preserve existing service to Penn Station designs permitting • Rebuild Existing Infrastructure development of program • Provide resiliency / storm protection elements with independent • Bring to State of Good Repair utility. Capacity • Advance elements as • 100% increase trans-Hudson River funding and timing permits. • 38% increase at Penn Station • Build redundancy for stable operations 16 Gateway Program Studies Feasibility Study (completed) Systems Level Design (completed) Program Development (underway) NEPA/ Preliminary Engineering (underway) 17 Hudson Tunnel Project Study Area • NEPA Environmental Review and Preliminary Engineering • Expected 2-4 year process to start this year • FRA will serve as USDOT Federal Lead Agency • Evaluating options for expediting NEPA • Requires regional participation 18 Hudson Tunnel Project NEPA/Design 19 ROW Preservation – Hudson Yards Amtrak began construction in August 2013 to preserve a potential future pathway for a new Hudson River tunnel through Hudson Yards – or risk losing Penn Station access forever. 20 Hudson Yards Concrete Casing • Casing construction underway or complete from 10th Ave to the western edge of 11th Ave in Manhattan • Funded primarily by Sandy Act grants to Amtrak of approximately ~$235m • Additional ~$300m required to complete casing across Hudson Yards site. • Design underway and construction needs to begin in advance of development 21 Early Actions: Portal Bridge / Sub 41 • Portal North Bridge design and environmental work complete. • ~$1 billion construction costs over 5 years • Needs NJT/Amtrak/Federal funding • Substation 41 was flooded by Super Storm Sandy • Will be rebuilt in conjunction with NJ TransitGrid Project Portal North Bridge rendering 22 Expanded Penn Station Concourses Station plans evaluated for • Train operations • Station connectivity • Future line extensions • Development potential Confidential and deliberative material 23 NEC Future – Environmental Study • The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is currently leading NEC FUTURE Environmental Impacts Statement (EIS) and Service Development Plan process to study options for expanding capacity on the NEC. • These studies are a pre-requisite for advancing any projects that significantly expand rail service levels on the NEC, including the new capacity elements of the Gateway Program. • The Draft EIS is expected to be released this fall and a final EIS is expected in 2016. 24 Gateway Preservation & Resiliency Conceptual 2016- 2019- 2022- 2025- 2029- Timeline 2018 2021 2024 2028 2030 Open to Portal North Begin Complete revenue construction construction Bridge service Hudson NEPA/PE Final design Construction, Open New New and Old Tunnel and begin Testing, Tunnel, Rehab Tunnel Complete Permitting Commissioning Old Tunnel (4 Tracks Total) Project construction Open to “Sawtooth” Preliminary Final Design Construction Revenue Engineering Bridges Service Assumes adequate funding available for all activities 25 Gateway New Capacity Conceptual 2016- 2019- 2022- 2025- 2028- 2031-2033 Timeline 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030 Final Design Demolition Commission Concept NEPA and PE and property and Construction and Open to Penn South Design acquisition Construction Service Secaucus Concept Final Design Commission NEPA and PE and property Construction and Open to Station and Design Loop acquisition Service Commission Portal South Concept NEPA and PE Final Design Construction and Open to Design Bridge Service Commission Highline Concept Begin NEPA and PE Final Design and Open to Design Construction Renewal Service Assumes adequate funding available for all activities 26 Thank you. www.nec.amtrak.com 27 .
Recommended publications
  • Appendix G Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources Part1

    Appendix G Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources Part1

    Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources APPENDIX G G.1 Section 106 Effects Assessment and Relevant Correspondence G.2 Phase IA Studies and Relevant Correspondence G.3 Draft Programmatic Agreement G.4 Historic Architectural Resources Background Study (HARBS) and Relevant Correspondence G.5 Project Initiation Letter (PIL) Relevant Correspondence G.6 Miscellaneous Correspondence PENN STATION ACCESS PROJECT: Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation May 2021 Penn Station Access Project: Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f)Evaluation Appendix G. Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources G.1 SECTION 106 EFFECTS ASSESSMENT AND RELEVANT CORRESPONDENCE MTA Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment Section 106 Effects Assessment Prepared for: Prepared by: Lynn Drobbin & Associates, Historical Perspectives, Inc., and July 2019 Penn Station Access Project: Preliminary Environmental Assessment Section 106 Effects Assessment Contents 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................1 2. Project Description ................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 PROJECT NEED ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 PROPOSED SERVICE ..............................................................................................................................................................
  • NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents

    NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents

    Northeast Corridor One-Year Implementation Plan Fiscal Year 2017 September 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. 2| NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents Introduction 6 Funding Summary 8 Baseline Capital Charge Program 10 1 - Boston South Station 12 16 - Shore to Girard 42 2 - Boston to Providence 14 17 - Girard to Philadelphia 30th Street 44 3 - Providence to Wickford Junction 16 18 - Philadelphia 30th Street - Arsenal 46 4 - Wickford Junction to New London 18 19 - Arsenal to Marcus Hook 48 5 - New London to New Haven 20 20 - Marcus Hook to Bacon 50 6 - New Haven to State Line 22 21 - Bacon to Perryville 52 7 - State Line to New Rochelle 24 22 - Perryville to WAS 54 8 - New Rochelle to Harold Interlocking 26 23 - Washington Union Terminal 56 9 - Harold Interlocking to F Interlocking 28 24 - WAS to CP Virginia 58 10 - F Interlocking to PSNY 30 25 - Springfield to New Haven 60 11 - Penn Terminal 32 27 - Spuyten Duyvil to PSNY* 62 12 - PSNY to Trenton 34 28 - 30th St.
  • 1 NYC Bridge and Screenline Traffic Volumes Dashboard Metadata

    1 NYC Bridge and Screenline Traffic Volumes Dashboard Metadata

    NYC Bridge and Screenline Traffic Volumes Dashboard Metadata Data Methodology Vehicular traffic volumes are collected annually for a two week period either during the fall months of September, October, and November or during the spring months of March, April, May, and June. Most of these traffic volumes are collected using Automated Traffic Recorders (ATRs), which record each vehicle as it passes over a pneumatic tube. A small percentage are collected using cameras. Average hourly volumes and an average daily volume are calculated from valid midweek days (Tuesday through Thursday). Dashboard Visuals The line graph on the “Average Daily Traffic Volumes per Facility per Year” page (page 1 of 2) represents a bidirectional (where applicable) average daily volume per location dating back to 1981 for most locations. The line graph on the “Average Hourly Traffic Volumes per Facility” page (page 2 of 2) represents the average bidirectional (where applicable) hourly volumes per location. This graph displays the end of the hour for each traffic volume on the x axis. For example, in the year of 2019 for Brooklyn Bridge, the traffic volume of 7,931 occurs during the 11:00 PM to 12:00 AM time period. Similarly, the traffic volume of 5,333 occurs during the 12:00 AM to 1:00 PM time period, and so on. The "Group" and the "Facility" filters will apply to both graphs. The "Year" filter will only alter the "Average Hourly Traffic Volumes per Facility" line graph. Each graph can display a maximum of only 60 facilities (lines) due to a limitation with Power BI.
  • An Archaeology of the Pelham Bay Park Homeless Encampment

    An Archaeology of the Pelham Bay Park Homeless Encampment

    Vague Dwelling: An Archaeology of The Pelham Bay Park Homeless Encampment Courtney Elizabeth Singleton Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2021 © 2020 Courtney Elizabeth Singleton All Rights Reserved Abstract Vague Dwelling: An Archaeology of The Pelham Bay Park Homeless Encampment Courtney Elizabeth Singleton This dissertation is an archaeological investigation of a late 20th century homeless encampment in Pelham Bay Park, New York City. This project examines the relationship between aspects of dwelling and the social status of homelessness within an iconic urban setting in the United States. In contemporary public discourse, the meaning of "homelessness" seems self-evident to most people as a condition defined by lack: a lack of permanence in general and of a permanent dwelling place in particular, a lack of personal possessions and personal relations, and most consequentially, a lack of political status. This research interrogates these assumptions by reading homelessness through the material record that people left behind, of what they did have when they inhabited spaces outside the sanctioned institutions for the "homeless," spaces where people intentionally dwelled and created their own structures of home. This project returns us to the most basic questions in the study of homelessness in the United States: what exactly is homelessness, what does it mean to be homeless, and how are people marked or recognized as homeless within our society? In order to answer these questions, this research explores how boundaries defining homelessness manifest and are articulated within our society.
  • February 14, 2001

    February 14, 2001

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ATK-11-040 April 4, 2011 Contact: Media Relations 202 906.3860 AMTRAK SEEKS $1.3 BILLION FOR GATEWAY PROJECT AND NEXT-GENERATION HIGH-SPEED RAIL ON NEC Portal Bridge, Hudson River Tunnels, NY Penn Station among projects WASHINGTON – Amtrak is applying for nearly $1.3 billion in recently available high- speed and intercity passenger rail federal funding to move forward with a series of infrastructure improvements -- including the Gateway Project --as critical first steps to bring next-generation high-speed rail to the Northeast Corridor (NEC). “The Northeast Corridor is a premier region in the country to advance the nation’s high- speed rail program,” said Amtrak President and CEO Joe Boardman. “The Gateway Project improvements to increase passenger rail capacity and access into the heart of Manhattan are absolutely essential to make next-generation high-speed rail a reality,” he added. A recent decision by the U.S. Department of Transportation to name the NEC a federally designated high-speed rail corridor allows Amtrak to apply directly for this funding. Amtrak worked closely with its state partners to coordinate project selection in order to maximize the expected regional improvements. Each of the coordinated projects submitted by Amtrak and individual states are vital for the reliability and capacity of the current NEC network, and are critical building blocks for expanded and higher speed intercity passenger rail service. Specifically, Amtrak is requesting funding for three Gateway projects including for a $720 million project to replace the more than 100-year-old movable Portal Bridge over the Hackensack River in New Jersey with a new, high-level fixed bridge.
  • 2015 NYC Bridges and Tunnels Condition Report

    2015 NYC Bridges and Tunnels Condition Report

    DIVISION OVERVIEW As an integral part of New York City's Department of Transportation, the Division of Bridges has a two-fold mission: to maintain an optimal transportation network by ensuring smooth mobility on the city's bridges, and to ensure the safety of the public. The New York City Department of Transportation’s Division of Bridges is comprised of four major bureaus. The Chief Bridge Officer is responsible for formulating policy and providing executive direction. He oversees all aspects of the design, construction, rehabilitation and reconstruction, maintenance, operation and administration of the 789 bridges (including 5 tunnels), and 53 culverts presently under the jurisdiction of the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT). In addition to broad supervision, the Chief Bridge Officer also provides overall executive and administrative direction for the Division of Bridges, and ensures that all contractors are promptly paid. Reporting to the Chief Bridge Officer, the Community Affairs Unit maintains liaison with elected officials, community boards, community groups, and civic/neighborhood associations. The Unit takes a pro-active approach in addressing design issues, roadway closures, and detours by reaching out to communities prior to the onset of construction. This enables the Division to proceed with its rehabilitation program with community input, and allows the Agency and its contractors to co-exist in a more harmonious manner with the community surrounding the project. Issues and problems of concern to the communities are brought to the attention of the appropriate Division personnel and addressed. The Bureau of Bridge Maintenance, Inspections and Operations employs over 500 engineering, professional, administrative, and skilled trades employees in the maintenance and smooth operation of New York City’s elevated infrastructure, and in specialized skilled trades and contract supervision functions.
  • Pelham to Grand Central Train Schedule

    Pelham to Grand Central Train Schedule

    Pelham To Grand Central Train Schedule Redoubled Cris realising garishly and unmurmuringly, she garter her parure suppose waitingly. Crosswise Mort pricing venomously while Theodor always haunt his baccalaureates index coordinately, he reawakens so revilingly. Liveliest Don tottings that ademptions sprint tenthly and scatter nationwide. There is several different route of the grand central to pelham train schedule information both ends of the universal fare structure is thrilled to help For merchandise my usual commute GCT to Pelham currently says. At Bee-Line Bus Route 42 60 61 62 at Pelhamdale Avenue US Route 1. Mass transit disruptions continue after Isaias slams tri-state area. Directions By Public Transportation Lewis M Fraad. Hutchinson river parkway clearance Peritrek. Manhattan Transfer Remaking 'Pelham' The New York Times. The ability to run trains to the Bronx is contingent on the completion of. Call 71-330-1234 for schedules or check online at mtainfo. 5 train Lexington Avenue line the East 10th Street level up. Minutes between Third Avenue-13th Street and Pelham Bay Park went to. Service Schedules CSXcom. New drain Line trains stop is Grand Central 125th Street recently renamed as. The limb stop count the Harlem line is Wassaic Station the New. Other Lines Stock Certificates NYC Transit Timetables Railroad Timetable Index. Commuters walk toward Metro-North trains in Grand Central Terminal. Transfer at Stamford to train 319 for Grand Central Terminal. 'It alongside An Epic Failure' Experts NYC Leaders Question or's Response To Storming Of Capitol Building Compared To Policing At Black Lives Matter. NYC 6 train status and delays Subwaystats.
  • Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2024

    Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2024

    Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2024 March 2019 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non- voting representatives from freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. Contents Letter from the Co-Chair 1 Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction 5 2. FY20-24 Capital Investment Plan 7 Project Information Appendix 19 A. Capital Renewal of Basic Infrastructure 20 Figure A-1. Amtrak FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 22 Figure A-2. Metro-North Railroad FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 23 Figure A-3. Connecticut DOT FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 24 Figure A-4. MBTA FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 26 B. Special Projects 28 Figure B-1. Summary of special project funding requirements 29 Figure B-2. Special project listing by coordinating agency 34 Letter from the Co-Chair The Northeast Corridor is the nation’s busiest and most complex passenger railroad.
  • 11 Draft Section 4(F) Evaluation

    11 Draft Section 4(F) Evaluation

    Penn Station Access Project: Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation 11. Department of Transportation Act, Section 4(f) 11.1 INTRODUCTION This document has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Section 4(f) of the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) Act of 1966. This document discusses the identification of Section 4(f) properties within the study area – 33 publicly -owned parkland and recreational areas, one wildlife refuge, and 10 historic architectural resources – and describes the effect of the Penn Station Access (PSA) Project (“Proposed Project”) on those properties. Based on this Section 4(f) Evaluation, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) proposes to make a de minimis finding for the use of Starlight Park and Pelham Bay and Split Rock Golf Courses, and a permanent use finding for the Pelham Lane Pathway Bridge, as part of the Proposed Project. 11.2 REGULATORY CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966, as amended (23 CFR Part § 774, codified in 49 U.S.C. 303 and generally referred to as “Section 4(f)”) prohibits the Secretary of Transportation from approving any program or project that requires the “use” of the following: • Any publicly owned parkland, recreation area, or wildlife and waterfowl refuge of national, state, or local significance; or • Any land from a historic site of national, state, or local significance (collectively, “Section 4(f) properties”), unless there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such land and such program or project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the Section 4(f) properties.
  • Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting

    Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting

    Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting March 2018 Committee Members J. Lhota, Chair F. Ferrer A. Albert N. Brown I. Greenberg S. Metzger J. Molloy M. Pally L. Schwartz P. Trottenberg J. Vitiello P. Ward C. Weisbrod C. Wortendyke N. Zuckerman Capital Program Oversight Committee Meeting 2 Broadway, 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY 10004 Monday, 3/19/2018 2:00 - 3:30 PM ET 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERIOD 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FEBRUARY 20, 2018 - Minutes from February '18 - Page 3 3. COMMITTEE WORK PLAN - 2018 - 2019 CPOC Committee Work Plan - Page 6 4. QUARTERLY MTA CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY UPDATE - Update on Second Avenue Subway Phase II - Page 8 - Update on Penn Station Access - Page 18 - Update on LIRR Expansion - Page 22 - Progress Report on Cortlandt Street #1 Line - Page 26 - IEC's Project Review on Cortlandt Street #1 Line - Page 39 5. CAPITAL PROGRAM STATUS - Commitments, Completions, and Funding Report - Page 45 6. QUARTERLY TRAFFIC LIGHT REPORTS - Fourth Quarter 2017 Core & Sandy Traffic Light Reports - Page 52 7. QUARTERLY CAPITAL CHANGE ORDER REPORT (for information only) - CPOC Change Order Report - All Agencies - Page 130 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION Date of next meeting: Monday, April 23, 2018 at 1:30 PM MINUTES OF MEETING MTA CAPITAL PROGRAM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE February 20, 2018 New York, New York 1:30 P.M. MTA CPOC members present: Hon. Joseph Lhota Hon. Andrew Albert Hon. Susan Metzger Hon. John Molloy Hon. Mitchell Pally Hon. Peter Ward Hon. Carl Weisbrod Hon. Carl Wortendyke MTA CPOC members not present: Hon. Norman Brown Hon. Fernando Ferrer Hon.
  • NYC.Gov Web Site At

    NYC.Gov Web Site At

    This page is located on the NYC.gov Web site at http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/bridges/bxbrgs.shtml Bridges Movable Bridges in the Bronx Eastern Boulevard Bridge, Bronx River Hutchinson River Parkway Bridge, Eastchester Creek Pelham Bridge, Eastchester Creek Unionport Bridge, Westchester Creek Hutchinson River Parkway Bridge The Hutchinson River Parkway Bridge carries the Hutchinson River Parkway over the Hutchinson River in the Bronx. The bridge is located between the interchanges with the New England Thruway (I-95) to the north and Pelham Parkway to the south. The bridge is a seven-span, 205-meter (673- foot) structure with six approach spans and a 48.9 meter (160′ 6″) bascule span. The bascule span consists of a four-leaf deck with steel median barriers between the northbound and southbound lanes. The bridge carries six lanes of traffic on two roadways each 11 meters (36 feet) wide, divided by a concrete barrier. There is a 2.4- meter (8-foot) wide sidewalk on the west side of the bridge. Hutchinson River Parkway Bridge Facts BIN 2-07585-9 Borough Bronx Type Bascule Telephone (718) 885-1851 Location Bartow Avenue & New England Thwy. Waterway Harlem River Miles from Mouth 0.9 Channels 1 Used by Hwy Length 670′ Max. Span 160 Roadways 2 - 36′ 0″ Sidewalks 1 - 8′ 0″ Construction Cost $1,275,700.00 Land Cost Free Total Cost $1,275,700.00 Date Opened Oct. 11, 1941 Unionport Bridge The Unionport Bridge is presently a double leaf trunnion bascule supporting Bruckner Boulevard over Westchester Creek in the Bronx, New York City.
  • Commuter-Intercity Rail Improvement Study (Boston-New York)

    Commuter-Intercity Rail Improvement Study (Boston-New York)

    III 1111111111111111" 1111111111 PB93-217602 Commuter-Intercity u.s. Department of Transportation Rail Improvement Study Research and Special Programs Administration (Boston-New York) John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, MA 02142-1093 FTA-MA-06-0196-93-1 DOT-VNTSC-FTA-93-2 Final Report May 1993 Prepared for: U.S. Department U.S. Department of Transportation of Transportation Federal Transit Federal Railroad Administration Administration Reproduced by: National Techndal Iufomlation setvice U.S. Department ofConunerce Splingflcld. VA 22161 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Publ ic reporting burden for this collection of infonnation is estimated ~o average 1 h9Ur per response, fncludilll the time for reviewulll Instructions searching existing data sources, gatherIng and maintalni'1fl the dilta needed, and cOllfJletil1ll and reviewil)g the col lection of infonnation. Send coornents regardi!'l9 this burden estimate or artY. other aspect of this collection of infonnation, including suggestions for reducIng thIs burden, to ~ashir:lllton He~rters ~X~:7~".,Di~!St~~a!~ f~~~j~!o~~!on Operat~~sR~~..~e~rts, 1215 Jeffersonp~~yi~,. H:~9~~~"1ID1tte 1204, Arl i"H~og"r;X~ 1. 1111111111111111111 [ 1111111111 2. RE~T DATE 3. REP~T TYPE AND DATES COVERED May 1993 Final Report PB93-217602 August 1992 - Septenber 1991 4.