DOCSLIB.ORG

Coody Presentation In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coody Presentation In Hampton Roads Lane Closure Management Ken Coody Regional Traffic Operations Manager September 13, 2016 District Administrator Guidance • As a matter of District Policy, VDOT will not close or restrict travel at two major competing water crossings at the same time for scheduled work. • In the case of an emergency maintenance issue and there is an existing lane closure at the opposing water crossing, the emergency is dealt with appropriately. • Notification to the TOC and DDO is made immediately. • In the case of an urgent maintenance issue and there is an existing lane closure at the competing water crossing • Deputy District Administrator must approve the work, in writing. 2 District Administrator Guidance • Competing Water Crossings: • Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel and Monitor Merrimac Memorial Bridge Tunnel • Downtown Tunnel and Midtown Tunnel • James River Bridge and Monitor Merrimac Memorial Bridge Tunnel • Berkley Bridge and High Rise Bridge • High Rise Bridge and Downtown Tunnel • High Rise Bridge and Gilmerton Bridge NOTE: Work within 2 miles of a facility is considered part of the facility. 3 District Administrator Guidance • Traffic Engineering will review traffic counts and complete a traffic analysis prior to approval of a complete closure • Requires 2-4 weeks advance notice • VDOT will coordinate with localities to ensure pending road work does not conflict with a major harbor crossing closure. • Example: Coordination with City of Chesapeake to ensure the Gilmerton Bridge is available during High Rise Bridge closures. • Managers need to ensure closures do not impact major holidays or local events such as Harborfest, Neptune Festival, or graduations amongst other events. • Regional Closures are shared via: [email protected] 4 District Administrator Guidance • Early coordination is the key to ensuring conflicts are resolved. • All lane closure requests for roadwork or water crossing closures must be coordinated using the Lane Closure Advisory Management System (LCAMS). • Significant closure conflicts are deconflicted during ERO’s weekly Significant Lane Closure meeting. • The Hampton Roads District will not execute an extended harbor crossing closing for construction or maintenance work without approval of the Regional Operations Director and the Deputy District Administrator. • Upon final approval, VDOT Communications will provide public notice with an outreach campaign, for at least two weeks prior to any significant closure or work occurs. 5 Planned Lane Closures 6 Points of Interaction Lane Closure – Work Zone Management . Allowable Lane Closure Hours Document . Lane Closure Advisory Management System (LCAMS) . VaTraffic entries . Weekly Significant Lane Closure Review Meeting • Deadline – 8 a.m. Thursday week prior • Multidisciplinary meeting • Communications – notice to media . TOC activation/deactivation of lane closure (VaTraffic) . Public notification (DMS, HAR, 511, twitter, media) Traffic Engineering Services . Various review functions . Allowable hours . Maintenance of Traffic Plans TOC . ITS Subject Matter Experts . Region wide ‘eyes’ for monitoring 7 Allowable Lane Closure Hours Document Purpose – provide standard allowable hours for: . Work beyond the shoulder . Shoulder and Lane Closure Hours . Full directional closures . Ramp Closures . Managed lane closures . Process to manage work when it cannot be completed within allowable hours Adherence does not constitute approval Additional considerations . Scheduled water crossing closures expected to change traffic patterns . Expected traffic impacts (if working outside allowable hours) . Adjacent and/or nearby active work zones . Special events/holidays . Importance and/or urgency of work Allowable Lane Closure Hours Count Data Location: I-264 Eastbound From: Witchduck Rd Exit 16 To: Independence Blvd Exit 17 Data Collection Dates: Trucks 2% Single Lane Capacity 1584 Lanes 4 Traffic Volume Summer Traffic Hour of the Day Mon-Thur Volume Friday Volume Saturday Volume Sunday Volume - - 0 - 1AM 945 1209 1748 1577 1 - 2AM 489 587 1012 1063 2 - 3AM 382 465 904 968 3 - 4AM 304 353 596 572 4 - 5AM 513 525 476 418 5 - 6AM 1611 1527 788 528 6 - 7AM 3823 3686 1682 1061 7 - 8AM 5835 5787 2740 1542 8 - 9AM 6158 5603 3986 2211 9 - 10AM 5183 5447 4497 2721 10 - 11AM 5048 5543 5280 3781 11 - 12PM 5595 6065 6006 4375 12 - 1PM 5999 6895 6290 5108 1 - 2PM 6022 6504 6253 5374 2 - 3PM 6787 7264 6107 5252 3 - 4PM 8194 8336 6102 5151 4 - 5PM 8715 8076 5763 4678 5 - 6PM 8557 7864 5234 4360 6 - 7PM 6723 7045 5037 4313 7 - 8PM 4539 5658 4553 3419 8 - 9PM 3546 4411 3862 2878 9 - 10PM 3113 4047 3467 2393 10 - 11PM 2604 3694 3476 1988 11 - 12PM 1704 2800 2601 1420 Capacity Worksheet Location: I-64 Westbound From: I-264 Exit 284 To: Indian River Rd Exit 286 Data Collection Dates: Trucks 3% Single Lane Capacity 1576 Lanes 4 Traffic Volume Non Summer Traffic Hour of the Day Mon-Thur Volume Friday Volume Saturday Volume Sunday Volume - - 0 - 1AM 579 2116 1177 1166 1 - 2AM 296 2224 653 739 2 - 3AM 234 2585 643 665 3 - 4AM 252 2836 374 388 4 - 5AM 374 3461 360 253 5 - 6AM 1080 4189 615 341 6 - 7AM 3207 4797 1196 656 7 - 8AM 4867 5377 2030 1111 8 - 9AM 4608 4649 2595 1520 9 - 10AM 3506 3742 2885 2230 10 - 11AM 3235 3324 3331 2725 11 - 12PM 3563 3332 3839 3097 12 - 1PM 3873 3559 4163 3672 1 - 2PM 4155 3292 4110 3573 2 - 3PM 5160 3859 4242 3507 3 - 4PM 6658 3782 4225 3494 4 - 5PM 6224 3568 4168 3518 5 - 6PM 5619 3063 3865 3266 6 - 7PM 4699 2487 3691 2855 7 - 8PM 3159 2139 3185 2451 8 - 9PM 2525 2041 2620 1883 9 - 10PM 2081 2311 2317 1523 10 - 11PM 1451 2387 1915 1181 11 - 12PM 1010 2254 1669 871 Sample page from ALCH document Lane Closure Precedence • Average 500 Planned Lane Closures every week. • Critically important to the agency and the motoring public that we effectively manage this work load, from the multi-million dollar construction project to the simple drain cleaning, so that it all gets accomplished. • In VDOT there are two basic types of Lane Closures • Planned • Emergency 12 Lane Closure Precedence • Work in Hampton Roads is best described as fitting into various “buckets” • Emergency Work: Work that if not done “will result” in damage to the motorist vehicle or infrastructure. This work can and should be done immediately. • Urgent Work: Work that if not done “may result” in damage to the motorist vehicle or infrastructure. This work should be scheduled and accomplished as soon as possible, preferably within 24 hours. • Contractual Obligated Work: Work that if not accomplished “on-time, on- budget” will result in penalties. • Weather Dependent Work: Work that is dependent on the temperature and clear/dry conditions. • Routine Maintenance Work: Work that is routine in nature that can be rescheduled and moved around without undue risk. It should be noted that this work though considered routine is as important as other work and if not accomplished could result in severe consequences. 13 Lane Closure Precedence • Lane Closures entered that conflict with other work scheduled will show up as pending • Results in an automated email being sent to the requestor, the POC for the work in conflict and the System Administrator • Must then be de-conflicted before either is allowed to work • The de-confliction starts with the two requestors and moves up the management chain until it is resolved 14 Lane Closure Advisory Management System http://www.openlcams.com/ 15 Significant Lane Closure Participants 16 Significant Lane Closure Spreadsheet 17 Lane Closure Report 18 19 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HAMPTON ROADS CLOSURES on WATER CROSSINGS, INTERSTATES and OTHER NOTABLE DETOURS for the Week of March 21-27
    RELEASE: IMMEDIATE March 19, 2021 CONTACT: Media Line: 757-956-3032 [email protected] HAMPTON ROADS CLOSURES ON WATER CROSSINGS, INTERSTATES AND OTHER NOTABLE DETOURS For the week of March 21-27 NOTE: This list covers full closures of interstates, ramps, bridges and primary roads, and lane closures at the bridge-tunnels and the Berkley, Coleman, High Rise and James River bridges. *Scheduled closures are subject to change based on weather conditions and other factors.* ​For information on the many other lane closures necessary for maintenance and construction throughout Hampton Roads, visit 511Virginia.org, download the 511VA smartphone app, or dial 511. Bridges & Tunnels: Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel, I-64: Single-lane closures westbound on: March 26 from 9 p.m. to 7 am. March 27 from 10 p.m. to 9 a.m. Monitor-Merrimac Memorial Bridge-Tunnel, I-664: Alternating, single-lane closures northbound on March 21-25 from as early as 8 p.m. to 5 a.m. Mobile, single-lane closures northbound on March 23 from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. High Rise Bridge, I-64: Alternating, mobile, double-lane closures in both directions on March 22-25 from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. Berkeley Bridge, I-264: Single-lane closure westbound on March 25 from 7 p.m. to midnight. James River Bridge, Route 17: Alternating, mobile, singe-lane closures in both directions on March 22 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Alternating, mobile, singe-lane closures southbound March 23 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth River Crossings Study
    EElizabethlizabeth RivRiverer CCrrossingsossings SStudytudy T08-07 June 2008 HAMPTON ROADS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Chesapeake Poquoson * Clifton E. Hayes, Jr. * Charles W. Burgess, Jr. Gloucester County Portsmouth * Lane B. Ramsey * Douglas L. Smith Hampton Suffolk * Randall A. Gilliland * Selena Cuffee-Glenn Isle Of Wight County Virginia Beach * Stan D. Clark * Louis R. Jones James City County Williamsburg * Bruce C. Goodson * Jackson C. Tuttle, Ii Newport News York County * Joe S. Frank * James O. McReynolds Norfolk * Paul D. Fraim Hampton Roads Planning District Commission * Dwight L. Farmer, Executive Director/Secretary Transportation District Commission Of Hampton Roads * Michael S. Townes, President/Chief Executive Officer Virginia Department Of Transportation * Dennis W. Heuer, District Administrator - Hampton Roads District Williamsburg Area Transport * Mark D. Rickards, Executive Director Federal Highway Administration Robert Fonseca-Martinez, Division Administrator - Virginia Division Federal Transit Administration Letitia A. Thompson, Regional Administrator, Region 3 Federal Aviation Administration Terry Page, Manager, Washington Airports District Office Virginia Department Of Aviation Randall P. Burdette, Director Virginia Port Authority Jerry A. Bridges, Executive Director *Voting Member PROJECT STAFF Dwight L. Farmer Executive Director/Secretary Camelia Ravanbakht HRMPO Deputy Executive Director Robert B. Case Principal Transportation Engineer Andy C. Pickard Senior Transportation Engineer Marla K. Frye Administrative
    [Show full text]
  • South Norfolk Jordan Bridge (“SNJB”) Is a 5,372 Ft Fixed Bridge That Connects the City of Chesapeake to the City of Portsmouth Over the Elizabeth River In
    TOLL REVENUE NEW BUILD / REPLACEMENT SOUTH NORFOLK PRIVATIZATION PRIVATE FINANCING UNSOLICITED BID JORDAN BRIDGE CHESAPEAKE, VA The South Norfolk Jordan Bridge (“SNJB”) is a 5,372 ft fixed bridge that connects the City of Chesapeake to the City of Portsmouth over the Elizabeth River in Virginia. The City of Chesapeake had decommissioned the original Jordan Bridge in November 2008. An unsolicited proposal submitted by United Bridge Partners (“UBP”) to replace the Jordan Bridge with a new, privately owned bridge was approved by the City of Chesapeake in January 20091 by executing an Acquisition and Development Agreement (“ADA”) between UBP and the City of Chesapeake. As part of the ADA, UBP assumed responsibility to demolish the existing Jordan Bridge, aquired the right of way and easments associated with the bridge, and the right to toll, design, construct, finance, operate and assume ownership of a new bridge and associated tolling facilities on the SNJB. The construction of the SNJB was reported to be privately financed. Project revenue on the SNJB comes from tolls, set by the private operator with no defined limit, which are collected electronically on the bridge2. Note: the facts of this case study were reviewed by UBP. We have provided Chesapeake footnotes to describe instances where UBP disputes information in the public domain. BACKGROUND + PROJECT DRIVERS The Elizabeth River Corridor between Midtown Tunnel and High Rise Bridge in southern eastern Virginia near the Chesapeake Bay serves approximately 250,000 Figure 1: Elizabeth River Crossings. vehicle trip crossings per weekday. It is a growing corridor that primarily serves Source: Pickard, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Projects in Virginia Beach
    Hampton Roads 2034 Long-Range Transportation Plan TTRANSPORTATIONRANSPORTATION PPROJECTROJECT PPRIORITIESRIORITIES ProjectProject InformationInformation GuideGuide TPO TTPORANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION T 11-01 June 2011 HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION Dwight L. Farmer Executive Director/Secretary VOTING MEMBERS: CHESAPEAKE JAMES CITY COUNTY PORTSMOUTH Alan P. Krasnoff Bruce C. Goodson Kenneth I. Wright GLOUCESTER COUNTY NEWPORT NEWS SUFFOLK Christian D. Rilee McKinley Price Linda T. Johnson HAMPTON NORFOLK VIRGINIA BEACH Molly J. Ward Paul D. Fraim William D. Sessoms, Jr. ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY POQUOSON WILLIAMSBURG Stan D. Clark W. Eugene Hunt, Jr. Clyde Haulman YORK COUNTY Thomas G. Shepperd, Jr. MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA SENATE The Honorable John C. Miller The Honorable Yvonne B. Miller MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES The Honorable G. Glenn Oder The Honorable John A. Cosgrove TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT COMMISSION OF HAMPTON ROADS Philip A. Shucet, President/Chief Executive Officer WILLIAMSBURG AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY Mark D. Rickards, Executive Director VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Dennis W. Heuer, District Administrator – Hampton Roads District VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Amy Inman, Manager of Transit Planning VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY Jerry A. Bridges, Executive Director HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION NON-VOTING MEMBERS: CHESAPEAKE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY NORFOLK SUFFOLK William E. Harrell W. Douglas Caskey Marcus Jones Selena Cuffee-Glenn GLOUCESTER COUNTY JAMES CITY COUNTY POQUOSON VIRGINIA BEACH Brenda G. Garton Robert C. Middaugh J. Randall Wheeler James K. Spore HAMPTON NEWPORT NEWS PORTSMOUTH WILLIAMSBURG Mary Bunting Neil A. Morgan Kenneth L. Chandler Jackson C. Tuttle YORK COUNTY James O. McReynolds FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION Irene Rico, Division Administrator – Virginia Division Letitia A.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Breeding Peregrine Falcons on Bridges
    INVESTIGATION OF BREEDING PEREGRINE FALCONS ON BRIDGES THE CENTER FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY Investigation of breeding peregrine falcons on bridges Bryan D. Watts, PhD Marian U. Watts The Center for Conservation Biology College of William and Mary & Virginia Commonwealth University Recommended Citation: Watts, B. D. and M. U. Watts. 2017. Investigation of breeding peregrine falcons on bridges. The Center for Conservation Biology. Technical Report Series, CCBTR-17-01. College of William and Mary & Virginia Commonwealth University, Williamsburg, VA. 38 pp. Project Partners: Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Transportation Research Council Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Dominion Power College of William and Mary Virginia Commonwealth University The Center for Conservation Biology Front Cover: Female peregrine falcon with eggs in nest box on the James River Bridge. Photo by Bryan Watts. The Center for Conservation Biology is an organization dedicated to discovering innovative solutions to environmental problems that are both scientifically sound and practical within today’s social context. Our philosophy has been to use a general systems approach to locate critical information needs and to plot a deliberate course of action to reach what we believe are essential information endpoints. Table of Contents Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ___________________________________________________________________________________ 3 BACKGROUND
    [Show full text]
  • Hampton Roads Long‐Range Transportation Plan: List of Projects
    Hampton Roads Long‐Range Transportation Plan: List of Projects Approved and Adopted July 21, 2016 Updated October 18 , 2018 REGIONAL PRIORITY PROJECTS The following section contains the HRTPO Board Approved project sequencing of the Regional Priority Projects based on project readiness for inclusion in the 2040 Long‐Range Transportation Plan. Planned funding sources for these projects include: the Hampton Roads Transportation Fund (HRTF), HRTAC/HRTF Bonds, HRTAC Toll Revenues, and SMART SCALE (formerly House Bill 2) High‐Priority Projects Program forecasted revenues between 2016‐2040. 1 Sequencing Based on Project Readiness • I-64 Peninsula Widening I • I-64/I-264 Interchange II • I-64 Southside Widening/High-Rise Bridge - Phase 1 III • I-64/Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel Widening • I-64 Southside Widening/High-Rise Bridge - Phase 2 IV • Bowers Hill Interchange • I-64/Fort Eustis Blvd Interchange V • US Route 460/58/13 Connector Approved by the HRTPO Board at its February 18, 2016 Meeting. 2 Estimated Estimated Group Project YOE* Cost Opening Year I-64 Peninsula Widening Segment 1 $123 Million 2017 Segment 2 $190 Million 2019 Segment 3 $311 Million 2022 I I-64/I-264 (including Witchduck Rd Interchange) Phase 1 $157 Million 2019 Phase 2 $190 Million 2021 Phase 3 Study $10 Million 2018 I-64 Southside Widening (including High Rise Bridge) II Phase 1 $600 Million 2021 Hampton Roads Crossing $3 Million Regional Connectors Study 2020 III (+ $4 Million Contingency) I-64/Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Widening $3.8 Billion 2024 I-64 Southside Widening
    [Show full text]
  • Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences
    Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 3: Affected Environment & Environmental Consequences 3.15 INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 3.15.1 Regulatory Context and Methodology NEPA legislation does not mention indirect or cumulative impacts; however, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing NEPA address federal agency responsibilities applicable to indirect and cumulative considerations, analysis, and documentation requirements (40 CFR 1508.25) for the environmental consequences section of an EIS (40 CFR 1502.16) (FHWA, 2014). In addition to CEQ’s regulations, indirect and cumulative effects assessment is conducted in accordance with the requirements and processes outlined in 23 CFR Part 771, FHWA Interim Guidance: Indirect and Cumulative Impacts in NEPA (2003), FHWA Position Paper on Secondary and Cumulative Impact Assessment (1992), FHWA’s Questions and Answers on Considering Indirect and Cumulative Impacts in the NEPA Process (2015), the Transportation Research Board’s (TRB) National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 466: Desk Reference for Estimating the Indirect Effect of Proposed Transportation Projects (TRB, 2002), NCHRP Project 25-25 Task 22: Land Use Forecasting for Indirect Impacts Analysis (TRB, 2005), NCHRP Project 25-25 Task 11: Secondary/Indirect and Cumulative Effects Analysis (TRB, 2006), as well as CEQ’s Considering Cumulative Effects under the National Environmental Policy Act (1997) and Guidance on the Consideration of Past Actions in Cumulative Effects Analysis (2005). CEQ defines indirect effects as “…effects which are caused by the action and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable (40 CFR 1508.8[b]). Indirect effects may include growth-inducing effects and other effects related to induced changes in the pattern of land use, population density or growth rate, and related effects on air and water and other natural systems, including ecosystems” (40 CFR 1508.8[b]).
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Review of Special Structures
    COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW SPECIAL STRUCTURES Stephen C. Brich, P.E., Commissioner of Highways November 20th, 2019 Special Structures - Introduction 2018 Report to General Assembly Robert O. Norris Bridge 2019 Developed a Statewide, Systematic Long-Term Plan • Looks ahead 50 years and includes operations . Critical to ensuring mobility • Based on consistent classification and life-cycle approach • Based on several workshops (Districts/ Facility Managers/ Central Office) • Will be a living document that will be maintained and updated annually • Presented today to inform you of important economic and budget considerations Virginia Department of Transportation 3 Special Structures – Inventory • Risk/Complexity • Maintenance Cost Defined By: • Importance Long Detours, High Traffic, Economic Significance (Shipping and Vehicular), Access to Vital Facilities (Military and Ports) Virginia Department of Transportation 4 Special Structures – Original Build George P. Coleman Memorial Bridge Berkley Bridge Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Virginia Department of Transportation 5 Special Structures – Current State Managed by Public Private Partnership . Pocahontas Parkway (Rt 895): through 2105 . Elizabeth River Tunnel (Midtown): through 2069 . Elizabeth River Tunnel (Downtown): through 2069 • Required funding not included in plan • VDOT responsible for the facility costs (e.g. maintenance, operations and replacement) once the concession agreement ends Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Project . HRBT Approaches . I-64 over Willoughby • Existing tunnel - not included
    [Show full text]
  • Hampton Roads Regional Bridge Study
    HamptonHampton RRoadsoads RRegionalegional BridgeBridge StudStudyy 20122012 UpdUpdaatete the heartbeat of H MPTON RO DS T P O November 2012 T12-14 HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION Dwight L. Farmer Executive Director/Secretary VOTING MEMBERS: CHESAPEAKE JAMES CITY COUNTY PORTSMOUTH Alan P. Krasnoff Mary K. Jones Kenneth I. Wright GLOUCESTER COUNTY NEWPORT NEWS SUFFOLK Christopher A. Hutson McKinley Price Linda T. Johnson HAMPTON NORFOLK VIRGINIA BEACH Molly J. Ward Paul D. Fraim William D. Sessoms, Jr. ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY POQUOSON WILLIAMSBURG Delores Dee-Dee Darden W. Eugene Hunt, Jr. Clyde Haulman YORK COUNTY Thomas G. Shepperd, Jr. MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA SENATE The Honorable Thomas K. Norment, Jr. The Honorable Frank W. Wagner MEMBERS OF THE VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES The Honorable John A. Cosgrove The Honorable Christopher P. Stolle TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT COMMISSION OF HAMPTON ROADS William E. Harrell, President/Chief Executive Officer WILLIAMSBURG AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY Kevan Danker, Executive Director VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Dennis W. Heuer, District Administrator – Hampton Roads District VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Thelma Drake, Director VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY Vacant HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION NON-VOTING MEMBERS: CHESAPEAKE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY NORFOLK SUFFOLK WILLIAMSBURG Amar Dwarkanath W. Douglas Caskey Marcus Jones Selena Cuffee-Glenn Jackson C. Tuttle GLOUCESTER COUNTY JAMES CITY COUNTY POQUOSON VIRGINIA BEACH YORK COUNTY Brenda G. Garton Robert C. Middaugh J. Randall Wheeler James K. Spore James O. McReynolds HAMPTON NEWPORT NEWS PORTSMOUTH Mary Bunting Neil A. Morgan Brannon Godfrey FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION Irene Rico, Division Administrator, Virginia Division Brigid Hynes-Cherin, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 3 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION Jeffrey W.
    [Show full text]
  • I-64 Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Expansion
    I‐64 Hampton Roads Bridge‐Tunnel Expansion Industry Forum | April 3, 2017 Aubrey L. Layne, Jr. Virginia Secretary of Transportation William D. Sessoms, Jr. Mayor, City of Virginia Beach Hampton Roads Transportation Accountability Commission Chair Welcome 2 Linda T. Johnson Mayor, City of Suffolk Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Chair Hampton Roads Regional Project Support 3 Charles A. Kilpatrick Commissioner of Highways Virginia Department of Transportation Commonwealth of Virginia Project Support 4 John F. Malbon Commonwealth Transportation Board Member Hampton Roads Transportation Accountability Commission Member Regionally Significant Projects 5 Garrett W. Moore Chief Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation Project Delivery 6 James S. Utterback Hampton Roads District Administrator Virginia Department of Transportation District and Project Overview 7 Hampton Roads District Legend District Complex District Overview Interstate Maintenance • 9 Counties/12 Cities/2 Islands Residency Office • Over 830 positions Area Headquarters • Over 10,000 Total Lane Miles Bridge Crew Equipment Shops Tunnels/Facilities • I-64 Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel • I-664 Monitor Merrimac Memorial N Bridge-Tunnel • Jamestown-Scotland Ferry • Transportation Operations Center Major Bridges • James River Bridge • High Rise Bridge • Berkley Bridge • Coleman Bridge • Willoughby Bay Bridge Residencies • Accomac • Franklin • Williamsburg 8 8 Major Projects in Delivery I-64 Southside Widening & High Rise Bridge Phase 1 I-64/264 Interchange Phase
    [Show full text]
  • HAMPTON ROADS CLOSURES on WATER CROSSINGS, INTERSTATES and OTHER NOTABLE DETOURS for the Week of June 28 to July 4
    RELEASE: IMMEDIATE June 26, 2020 CONTACT: Media Line: 757-956-3032 [email protected] HAMPTON ROADS CLOSURES ON WATER CROSSINGS, INTERSTATES AND OTHER NOTABLE DETOURS For the week of June 28 to July 4 NOTE: This list covers full closures of interstates, ramps, bridges and primary roads, and lane closures at the bridge-tunnels and the Berkley, Coleman, High Rise and James River bridges. *Scheduled closures are subject to change based on weather conditions and other factors.* ​For information on the many other lane closures necessary for maintenance and construction throughout Hampton Roads, visit 511Virginia.org, download the 511VA smartphone app, or dial 511. Bridges & Tunnels: Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel, I-64: Alternating, single-lane closures westbound from June 29 to July 1 from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. HRBT Expansion Project: For lane closures and project updates related to the HRBT Expansion Project, visit HRBTExpansion.org. Berkley Bridge, I-264: Alternating, mobile, single-lane closures in both directions on June 30 from 9:30 a.m. to noon. I-64 Widening Segment III Project, York County: Single-lane closures on I-64 east and west from Route 199 Lightfoot exit (exit 234) to Route 199/Humelsine Parkway (exit 242) June 28-July 2, starting as early as 7 p.m. to 5 a.m. A consecutive, long-term lane closure under traffic signal control on Colonial Parkway at the I-64 overpass continues. A consecutive, long-term full ramp closure on Route 143 Merrimac Trail north to I-64 west continues. Traffic will follow detour signage in place directing motorists to the Route 143 south on-ramp to I-64 west during the closure.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    Transportation Goals The City will: • Achieve a safe, efficient, economical and multi-modal transportation system, including non-motor vehicle modes and public transportation, while recognizing that pressures for increased motor vehicle travel will continue. • Balance the priorities of motor vehicles with those of bicycles and pedestrians in the design of roadways and land use patterns so that most residents have the General Overview choice to walk and bicycle The City’s transportation system and level of conveniently to shopping, schools and recreation. accessibility has a major influence on economic development and on the basic function and form of • Coordinate land use and the City. It also has the potential to generate public facilities development adverse impacts on the community if not carefully with the transportation integrated into its fabric. Thus, long-range system in order to ensure transportation planning is a key element in safety, efficiency and organizing and directing the future growth of the City convenience. of Chesapeake. In the context of comprehensive planning, land use and transportation must be • Provide adequate transportation facilities and recognized as complementary components of the services that meet the City’s City’s overall planning process. adopted service standards. Master Transportation Plan • Provide adequate Chesapeake’s transportation system is composed of transportation access to the roadways, public transit, trails, waterways, railways, City’s waterways. trucking, and airports. Each mode of transportation • Coordinate the City’s and all elements within each perform a specific role transportation system with in the system, and should be appropriately the regional transportation coordinated to provide various levels of accessibility network to promote to areas and sites within the City.
    [Show full text]