DOCSLIB.ORG

(Iowa City, Iowa), 1976-01-26

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Iowa City, Iowa), 1976-01-26 , I Carter's oh tion disillusions deProsse their By RANDY KNOPER "I feel this Is a weB stand," she said. binned abortion) before it was atrIcken Washington, D.C. hNdquarters, said no ca1Ied Carter "undecided" on I c:qa. ooverinl ltIndIan JeVeJ'II 1IIueI. She mentioned the JeVeJ'II propouIJ by by the Supreme Court," and does not one knows what Carter means when he stitutiona1 amendment. It Included his In Its last lllue before the callClllell, It AlIt. Newt EdItor aIIo prtnted Cart.er'. comment flvorlng 1t wasn't a major iaIue In Iul week's IlM!mbers 0( Congress for an amendment "favor a conatitutional arnendmenl to says he favors a statute restricting abor­ pcllltion on a restrIctini Itatute, and the . Iowa Democratic ca\lCllleS, but apparen­ to the U.S. Ccnstltutlon that would over­ CMlpletely prohibit all abortions or · to tions. combination probably caUled CatholIc a law rettrlctlng 1bortionI. Uy a late-breaking abortion controversy throw the Supreme Court declIion authorize state option, .. bit "would flvor He said Shriver hid been burt In lOme voters to think he favon a Human ute Peter Dubee, the Mirror'. editor, said made at least one Iowa City pro-.bortion allowing .bortiCllS, and said, "I would a more restricted general statute or law cruciaJ Catholic cmvnunltiel because 0( Amendment, Draynesald. he lot the CUIIIIIIIi late, aDd didD't have Y1Ur change her side, and made an­ \ike to have as a president a penon wbo to provide uniformity or d\scoUrIge abor­ the Catholic press, particularly the Iowa "I'm not uying that we IoIt the elec­ time to cbeck it out. but .w It DOW U ti·abortion voters in Iowa Catholic com· would oppoae an anti-abortion amend­ tions," Catholic Conference Newsletter. tion because ci the abortion laue," "mialelcllDK.·' perbapl11ot.::ure." JDlJlIties chanse theirs as well . ment, but would be cloee to Carter's His Des Moines headquarters said he I>rayne uld. "Gov. Carter had TIle controversy centered around for­ views on other Issues." doesn't favor the right-to-life ' c0n­ Prior to the caueu&el, the newsletter out-organlzed everybody. One iIIue 01 "Carter la jlllt DOW bein& pinned down mer Georgi. Gov. Jirruny Carter's stand She said she now leans toward ArIzma stitutional amendment, partlally hid slngled out the iIIue ci abortion and abortion didn't tum it 1I'OIIId. But it COlt by the national sn- (on abortion), " he on the issue. Rep. Morris Udall or former Oklahoma because abortiCllS may be neceaary if had listed the C8IId1dates' positions. a considerable number 01 votes in the Slid. "ShrIver has had to dea1 with it sin­ At Iowa City's 23rd precinct callCllS, Sen. Fred Harris, who support the court the mother's life is In clanpr, and Shriver's long-standini position - that Catholic precincts." ce the IJe&iMInI. " Councilperson Carol deProsse. a former decision and consider the choice for an because a statute or law has I better he is personally opposed to abortion, but 11m McCarthy, the editor of the In Carter's Del MoInes headquarters, Carter supporter, went uncommitted. abortion to be a woman's right. chance of passing than a constitutional does not favor I constitutional amend­ newsletter, laid he had heard "several campalp worker BIll Ryenon uld, "In Her reason, she said, was that she had According to Carter's Del Moines cam­ amendment. ment - was included. AIao included was commenta by Carter that he wu un­ the \at week ci the campaIcn, everybody neard a radio broadcast earlier in the paign headquarters, the candidate "is This stand, oppoein& an amendment 1 quote from ShrIver when he was In decided, but that he mlllht favor I was ukIng about abortion." He said day linking Carter with an anti-abortion personally oppoeed to abortion, but will rut favoring a "law or statute," has Iowa City In November; he said he was Hwnan ute Amendment. I still don't there were a lot 01 rumors about what stand. uphold the Supreme Court decision and caused cries (rom aeveral quarters, not opposed to a woman's right to have know where he standi on it. .. He refilled Carter bad ~y said on varIoua She said she had heard conflicting in­ will uphold the law IlltiJ it is chanaed. " especially Sargent Shriver, the only an abortion - probably his !DOlt a~ to comment any further on the newsletter Issues, "and we don't mow where they formation about Carter's position, but it In a Jan. 16 press release, Carter said Catholic candidate, that Carter is being palling quote In the eyes 01 the p~life article. came from . People .y IOIne thlnp that appeared, "he feels that abortion is ''the government ItIould do nothing to en­ misleading, courtin8 the antI-abortion faction, and one that was "obvlolllly The Catholic MIrror, the Del Moines they are not authorized to aay becaUlt morally wrong, but he would support it as courage" abortion, acIdinI that he "per­ people while keeping his liberals. taken out 0( comext," Drayne said. Diocese newspaper, hid been pub1llhlna they don't have the Imow\edse. We have far as it is upheld by the Supreme Court. sonally favored the Georgia law (which Richard Drayne, from Shriver's On the other band. the lIeWIIIetter I series of Irtle," 01\ the candidatea, no way to control It. " "Iowa', Weather 1fIHJIE alternative newspaper" Colder tanperatures under partly lIIftly skies will peel Iowa Citlans today u we dI& out from the IC­ cwnu\lted lIIOWfall ci Swlday. Hillbs will be In the 201, lows tonIIbt In the teena. Vol. 108, No. 134 Monday, January 26, 1976 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 10' Citizen feels ticket unfair, notes unticketed violations By BRIAN HILL than 18 Inches from the curb," he said as "straighten out" the interpretations of Staff Writer he struggled to remember the violation the codes. A man who is seeking equal justice for number. But then the tan Pinto Im­ Another ruling that came from "a local parking violations In Iowa City led the mediately behind the Sprite attracted his Johnson County DIstrict Court decision," way, notebook In hand, past curbside attention because it was parked within prohibits enforcement of yellow curbings autos temporarily abandoned for week­ five feet of a fire hydrant. Neither of around fire plugs or anywhere else, ac­ day classes and jobs. these cars had been ticketed, either. cording to Strand. "This Is just one of the areas l've been He said he plans to use the evidence He said he is personally In favor o( let­ checking," he said, pausing beside he's collecting at some stage In the a~ ting motorists know of any restricted Capitol Street, immedialely west of the peal of his ticket "to attempt to show the parking areas through the use of signs. Johnson County Court House. Cars lined discrepancies In our municipal laws. "It's too much to ask an officer to get both sides of it in the desperation of "I mean, why should my car be out of his car and measure 30 feet back bumper-to-bumper commuter havoc for ticketed for a minor violation under 6.16 from every intersection (or an Illegally several blocks. Meters or parking sights and all these others are Ignored. I think parked vehicle," he said. "But it's also were nowhere to be seen. the public has a right to know about these unfair to ask motorists to do th is. Since receiving a ticket last Tuesday things." "Ignorance of the law is no excuse, but from one of the city's police for what he Thomas received the $5 ticket after we can't always expect motorists to know considers an unfair reason , Bill Thomas, parking his car In a driveway, between unless signs or some other type of war­ who calls himself "an unemployed the sidewalk and street, while he helped ning Is used, h he added. teacher," has been cruising and beating perform a two· hour maintenance job on City Traffic Engineer James Breckte\l the streets to record and photograph un­ the nearby vehicle ci a friend . agreed, but said budgeting and ticketed violations. He is only looking lor After finishing, "I went into my bud­ aesthetics may often hinder the number those that fall I.IIder chapter 6.16 of the dy's house (next to the driveway) to wash of signs posted In an area. city code. This section, the one he sup­ my hands just for five mlnutes. When I "If we oversign, people won't use posedly violated, Lists stopping, standing came out, there was this cop writing out a them, and then they lose their effec­ and assorted parking no-nos for autos. ticket ... tIveness," he said. "Now here - just look at that will you. The ticket did not specify which section Bill Thomas wooden, "How am I su~ Parked right next to the stop sign. A of 6.16 was violated "even though I think posed to know what is law and what Isn't clear violation of 6.16.2E of the city ii's for blocking the private driveway of - especially without the signs? And how Photo by Lawrence Frank code." (No parking within 30 feet a~ my friend ," so he has been searching lor could Ifind out about what is classified as proaching any stop sign or traffic all infractions under this chapter for his mitigating circumstances i( I'm concer­ Winter treat signaL) defense. ned," heasked. Thomas instantly whipped open his The major violations found on the Strand said that "pollee of(ieers are notebook to check that he had recorded Capitol Street check were for parking too only as good as the pubjic that supports the car's make, its localion and license close to stop signs and fire plugs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Peace Corps, What Shape Shall It Take?
    PROSPECTS OF MANKIND: EPISODE 207: THE PEACE CORPS, WHAT SHAPE SHALL IT TAKE? March 5, 1961 Description: ER hosts a discussion on new legislation to create a Peace Corps and the objectives of the Peace Corps program. Participants: ER, John F. Kennedy, Sargent Shriver, Senteza Kajubi (identified on screen as “Senteca Kajubi”), Samuel Hays, Hubert Humphrey [Theme music begins 00:19] [Title Sequence:] [Text overlaid on Prospects of Mankind logo] National Educational Television / Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt / Prospects of Mankind [Bob Jones:] [Voice over] From Washington, DC, National Educational Television presents the WGBH- TV production: Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt, Prospects of Mankind. [Image of the White House] [Bob Jones:] [Voice over] On the day President Kennedy issued an executive order creating a Peace Corps, Mrs. Roosevelt went to the White House to discuss it with him. [Theme music ends 0:47 ] [ER:] Mr. President, you’re very kind indeed to give us a few words of introduction to the program, Prospects of Mankind, which is to be on the Peace Corps, which is one of your great interests. I would like to know how you originally thought of this. It seems to carry out your appeal for everyone to be of service in your inaugural address, but how did you come to invention--to think of it first? [John F. Kennedy:] Well, of course, it had been discussed by uh a good many Americans, and this idea of uh particularly young Americans using their uh desire for service for the uh benefit of mankind uh. Congressman [Henry] Reuss in the House, Senator [Hubert] Humphrey, and the others have been talking a good deal about it.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of American Political Parties
    Synopsis of American Political Parties FEDERALISTS DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLICANS Favored strong central gov't emphasized states' rights Social order & stability important Stressed civil liberties & public trust "True patriots vs. the subversive rabble" "Rule of all people vs. the favored few" "Loose" constructionists "Strict" constructionists Promoted business & manufacturing Encouraged agrarian society Favored close ties with Britain Admired the French Strongest in Northeast Supported in South & West Gazette of the United States (John Fenno) National Gazette (Philip Freneau) Directed by Hamilton (+ Washington) Founded by Jefferson (+ Madison) First Two-Party System: 1780s-1801 During most of George Washington's presidency, no real two-party political system existed. The Constitution made no provision whatever for political parties. While its framers recognized that reasonable disagreement and organized debate were healthy components in a democratic society, creation of permanent factions was an extreme to be avoided. (The consensus among the founding fathers was that political parties were potentially dangerous because they divided society, became dominated by narrow special interests, and placed mere party loyalty above concern for the common welfare.) Hence, to identify Washington with the Federalist Party is an ex post facto distinction. Accordingly, Washington's first "election" is more accurately described as a "placement"; his second election was procedural only. The first presidential challenge whereby the citizenry genuinely expressed choice between candidates affiliated with two separate parties occurred in 1896, when John Adams won the honor of following in Washington's footsteps. The cartoon above shows the infamous brawl in House of Representatives between Democratic-Republican Matthew Lyon of Vermont and Federalist Roger Griswold from Connecticut.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund Muskie
    Edmund Muskie Folder Citation: Collection: Records of the 1976 Campaign Committee to Elect Jimmy Carter; Series: Noel Sterrett Subject File; Folder: Edmund Muskie; Container 89 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Carter-Mondale%20Campaign_1976.pdf -~ MUSKIE News RUSSELL OFFICE BUILDING • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510 • TELEPHONE (202) 224-5344 CONTACT: Bob Rose FOR P.ELEASE PM Is 'IUESDAY Al From February 3, 1976 MUSIGE INIIDDUCES SPENDING REFORM BILL Sen. Edmund S. Muskie, D-Maine, introduced today (Tuesday) legislation to improve the degree of control Congress exercises over the federal bureaucracy by requiring Virtually every federal program to receive a formal review and reauthori- zation at tl.aast once every four years. The 11 Goverrnnent Econany and Spending Reform Act of 1976 11 would also require so-called zero-based review of the programs. Original cosponsors of the bill are Sens. William V. Roth Jr., R-Del. _, a.uu. John Glenn, r...... Ohio. ·· n ••• Government inefficiency is becoming today's number one villain," Musld.e said in a speech prepared for the Senate. :1Horror stories about bureaucratic .~ungling make good copy, and Pm Sti:;.'"'e that all of us ·at one time or another have ::heen guilty of taking a ride on some well-intentioned government worker's mistake. \)But I think the time has passed when the American people will be satisfied .. with such press release exclamations of outrage. lliey P.re ready for hard evidence and real results that prove we are serious about maldng governnent more productive.!~··: he said. Muskie said he submitted the legislation 11 not as a suggestion that· :we ab~ don our commitment to solving the nation's problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Succession
    Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Congressional Materials Twenty-Fifth Amendment Archive 10-6-2004 Presidential Succession Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the House Committee on the Judiciary, 108th Congress Subcommittee on the Constitution; Committee on the Judiciary. House of Representatives. United States. Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ twentyfifth_amendment_congressional_materials Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Subcommittee on the Constitution; Committee on the Judiciary. House of Representatives. United States., "Presidential Succession Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the House Committee on the Judiciary, 108th Congress" (2004). Congressional Materials. 1. http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/twentyfifth_amendment_congressional_materials/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Twenty-Fifth Amendment Archive at FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Congressional Materials by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRESIDENTIAL SUCCESSION ACT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION OCTOBER 6, 2004 Serial No. 110 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.house.gov/judiciary U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 96-287 PDF WASHINGTON : 2004 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY F.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Corps' Enduring Charter
    PEACE CORPS' ENDURING CHARTER Loret M. Ruppe* Peace Corps has recently celebrated its twenty-fifth birthday. Its success during the past quarter century is due most directly to the selfless work of more than 100,000 Volunteers who have served the needs of the people of over ninety developing countries. Its longevity as a program, however, also arises from the foresight of President John F. Kennedy in proposing, and the Congress in enacting, in 1961, enabling legislation that has stood the test of time. It is, therefore, most appropriate that the United States Congress' role in chartering and maintaining the Peace Corps be acknowledged in this Issue celebrating the two-hundredth anniversary of the Constitution and the Congress. In 1960, presidential candidate John F. Kennedy sounded the call to the Peace Corps. Standing on the steps of the Student Union, he asked University of Michigan students: How many of you are willing to spend 10 years in Africa or Latin America or Asia working for the U.S. and working for freedom? How many of you [who] are going to be doctors are willing to spend your days in Ghana? Technicians or engineers: how many of you are willing to work in the Foreign Service and spend your lives travelling around the world? On your willingness to do that, not merely to serve one or two years in the service, but on your willingness to contribute part of your life to this country I think will depend the answer whether we as a free society can compete. I think we can, and I think Americans are willing to contribute.
    [Show full text]
  • SARGENT SHRIVER's LIFE AS an ENGAGED CATHOLIC and AS an ACTIVE LIBERAL Dissertation Submitted to T
    INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATOR: SARGENT SHRIVER’S LIFE AS AN ENGAGED CATHOLIC AND AS AN ACTIVE LIBERAL Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Daniel E. Martin UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio May 2016 INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATOR: SARGENT SHRIVER’S LIFE AS AN ENGAGED CATHOLIC AND AS AN ACTIVE LIBERAL Name: Martin, Daniel E. APPROVED BY: ______________________________________ Anthony B. Smith, Ph.D. Committee Chair ______________________________________ Sandra Yocum, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________________ Cecilia A. Moore, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________________ David J. O’Brien, Ph.D. Committee Member ii ABSTRACT INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATOR: SARGENT SHRIVER’S LIFE AS AN ENGAGED CATHOLIC AND AS AN ACTIVE LIBERAL Name: Martin, Daniel Edwin University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Anthony B. Smith This dissertation argues that Robert Sargent Shriver, Jr.’s Roman Catholicism is undervalued when understanding his role crafting late 1950s and 1960s public policies. Shriver played a role in desegregating Chicago’s Catholic and public school systems as well as Catholic hospitals. He helped to shape and lead the Peace Corps. He also designed many of the programs launched in President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty. Shriver’s ability to produce new policies and agencies within a broader structure of governance is well known. However, Shriver’s Catholicism is often neglected when examining his influence on key public policy initiatives and innovations. This dissertation argues that Shriver’s Roman Catholic upbringing formed him in such a way as to understand the nature of large bureaucracies and to see possibilities for innovation within an overarching structure.
    [Show full text]
  • The President's Panel and the Public Policy Contributions of Eunice
    The President’s Panel and The Public Policy Contributions of Eunice Kennedy Shriver Deborah M. Spitalnik, Ph.D. Professor of Pediatrics Executive Director, The Boggs Center June 2011 Suggested citation for this document: Spitalnik, D. (2011). The President’s Panel and The Public Policy Contributions of Eunice Kennedy Shriver. New Brunswick, NJ: The Elizabeth M. Boggs Center on Developmental Disabilities. A University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Service Liberty Plaza 335 George Street P.O. Box 2688 New Brunswick, NJ 08903-2688 Phone: (732) 235-9300 Fax: (732) 235-9330 TDD Users: Dial 711 for New Jersey Relay Website: http://rwjms.umdnj.edu/boggscenter The President’s Panel and The Public Policy Contributions of Eunice Kennedy Shriver AUTHOR’S NOTE: The language utilized in this paper includes the historical term “mental retardation”, which is no longer acceptable professional terminology or appropriate language. Where this outmoded term is used it is in the context of accurately reflecting previous sources, and not meant to be either stigmatizing or hurtful, but rather a reflection of the historical period being described. Eunice Kennedy Shriver was born on July 10, 1921, the third daughter and fifth child of Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy and Joseph P. Kennedy. After earning a BS in Sociology from Stanford University in 1943, she worked in the Special War Problems Division of the State Department, headed a juvenile delinquency project of the Department of Justice, and worked as a social worker with incarcerated women and in juvenile courts. In 1953 she married Robert Sargent Shriver.1 Out of dedication to Rosemary Kennedy, the Kennedy’s second daughter, a woman with intellectual disabilities and in memory of their first son Joe Jr., killed in World War II, the Kennedy family established the Joseph P.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Succession: an Overview with Analysis of Legislation Proposed in the 109Th Congress
    Order Code RL32969 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Presidential Succession: An Overview with Analysis of Legislation Proposed in the 109th Congress June 29, 2005 Thomas H. Neale Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Presidential Succession: An Overview with Analysis of Legislation Proposed in the 109th Congress Summary Whenever the office of President of the United States becomes vacant due to “removal ... death or resignation” of the chief executive, the Constitution provides that “the Vice President shall become President.” When the office of Vice President becomes vacant for any reason, the President nominates a successor, who must be confirmed by a majority vote of both houses of Congress. If both of these offices are vacant simultaneously, then, under the Succession Act of 1947, the Speaker of the House of Representatives becomes President, after resigning from the House and as Speaker. If the speakership is also vacant, then the President Pro Tempore of the Senate becomes President, after resigning from the Senate and as President Pro Tempore. If both of these offices are vacant, or if the incumbents fail to qualify for any reason, then cabinet officers are eligible to succeed, in the order established by law (3 U.S.C. §19, see Table 3). In every case, a potential successor must be duly sworn in his or her previous office, and must meet other constitutional requirements for the presidency, i.e., be at least 35 years of age, a “natural born citizen,” and for 14 years, a “resident within the United States.” Succession provisions are derived from the Constitution, statutory law, and political precedents of the past two centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington: Mrs. FDR's Prospects of Mankind TV Program, March 5, 1961
    Hotel Raleigh, 12th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, W a.<;hington 4, D.C. Sterling 3-5300 PROSPECTS OF MANKIND on "The Peace Corps: What Shape Shall It Take?" With special introduction by President John F. Kennedy and Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt Presented by WTTG, Washington (March ll, 8 P • .M.) and WNEW-TV, New York (March 12, 7:30P.M.) Mrs. Roosevelts guests on panel discussion are: R. Sargent Shriver Senator Hubert Humphrey Professor Samuel Hayes Senteca Kajubi "Prospects of Mankind" is produced for National Educational Television by WGBH-TV and is offered by Metropolitan Broadcasting as a public service. COMPLETE TRANSCRIPT OF PEACE CORPS PROGRAM WITHOUT EDITING - - .411 INTRODUCTORY DISCUSSION BY MRSo ROOSEVELT AND PRESIDENT KENNEDY R: Mro President, you are very kind indeed to give us a few words of intro­ duction to the program "Prospects of Mankind'' which is to be on the Peace Corps, which is one of your great interests. I would .like to know how you originally thought of this. It seems to carry out your appeal for everyone to be of service in your Inaugural Address, but how did you come to think of it first? K: Well, of course it had been discussed by a good many Americans, this idea, par ticularly young Americans, using their desire for service for the bene­ fit of r:1ankind. Congressman Reuss in the House, Senator Humphrey, and others had been talking a good deal about it, and I felt during the fall that it should h e a matter to which we should address outselves. We have now organized it and we hope by the end of this year to have between 500 and 1, 000 young men and women, though perhaps later on we can go to all ages, in service around the world, in the service of peace, so that I am very hope­ ful that t his would do a good deal for other countries, but would also do something for our own people.
    [Show full text]
  • Orville L. Freeman Interviewer: Charles T
    Orville L. Freeman Oral History Interview – JFK#1, 7/22/1964 Administrative Information Creator: Orville L. Freeman Interviewer: Charles T. Morrissey Date of Interview: July 22, 1964 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 16 pages Biographical Note Orville L. Freeman, Governor of Minnesota (1954-1961), U.S. Secretary of Agriculture (1961-1969), and builder of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, discusses Hubert H. Humphrey’s campaign against John F. Kenney for the presidential nomination, concerns the public had with Kennedy’s voting on farm issues as a senator, and also his Catholicism and later joining the Kennedy administration, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed September 18, 1972, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Caucus Results
    ELECTIONS 377 CAUCUS RESULTS Democrats Note: Delegate strength figures are projections by the Iowa Democratic Party of the percentage of state convention delegates each candidate controlled as a result of strength shown at the caucuses. In 1972 and 1976, the Iowa Democratic Party also projected the national delegates won based on the strength shown at the caucuses. In 1984 and 1988, the News Election Service (N.E.S.) also conducted straw polls. Since both the Iowa Democratic Party and N.E.S. results depend on volunteer reporting, the results are never complete. In 1992, a N.E.S. straw poll was not conducted. In all years, information was never reported from some precincts. 1972 Delegate Strength National Delegates Won Uncommitted ......................................................... 35.8% ................................................................18 Edmund Muskie .................................................... 35.5% ................................................................18 George McGovern ................................................ 22.6% ................................................................10 Others .................................................................... ....7%.............................................................. .0 Hubert Humphrey ................................................ 1.6% ..................................................................0 Eugene McCarthy ................................................ 1.4% ...................................................................0
    [Show full text]
  • RESOLVED, Executive Orders and Other Unilateral Presidential Directives Undermine Distribute Democracy Or
    12 RESOLVED, Executive orders and other unilateral presidential directives undermine distribute democracy or post, PRO: Gene Healy CON: Andrew Rudalevige “Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Kind of cool.” That is how Clinton aide Paul Begala, in 1998, memorably describedcopy, the appeal of executive orders and other unilateral presidential directives, such as proclamations, national security directives, and presidential memoranda. These unilateral orders are especially cool if you are a second-termnot president facing a recalcitrant Congress controlled by the other party, as Bill Clinton did. And Barack Obama too. At the outset of his second term, Obama pledged that “When Congress isn’t acting, I’ll act onDo my own.” And he did. In 2014, for instance, Obama issued Executive Order- 13658, which raised the minimum wage of employees of government contractors by almost 40 percent, to $10.10 an hour. Republicans howled in protest. “Mr. President we are a nation of laws & we are supposed to follow our #Constitution,” tweeted Kentucky senator Rand Paul. “YouProof do not get to ‘act alone.’” Obama’s defenders countered that the president was not behaving any differently than his predecessors. One of the earliest of George W. Bush’s nearly three hundred executive orders included an order (Executive Order Draft13202) prohibiting federal dollars from going to construction projects in which a contractor had signed a “project labor agreement” with a labor union. This sort of executive unilateralism is hardly a recent invention. Back in 1840, Martin Van Buren sought to secure working class political support by issuing Copyright ©2017 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
    [Show full text]