14 Stratégies Nucléaires Support De Cours
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
N° 4301 Assemblée Nationale
N° 4301 ______ ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE CONSTITUTION DU 4 OCTOBRE 1958 QUATORZIÈME LÉGISLATURE Enregistré à la Présidence de l’Assemblée nationale le 14 décembre 2016. RAPPORT D’INFORMATION DÉPOSÉ en application de l’article 145 du Règlement PAR LA COMMISSION DE LA DÉFENSE NATIONALE ET DES FORCES ARMÉES en conclusion des travaux d’une mission d’information (1) sur les enjeux industriels et technologiques du renouvellement des deux composantes de la dissuasion ET PRÉSENTÉ PAR MM. JEAN-JACQUES BRIDEY ET JACQUES LAMBLIN, Députés. —— (1) La composition de cette mission figure au verso de la présente page. La mission d’information sur les enjeux industriels et technologiques du renouvellement des deux composantes de la dissuasion est composée de : – MM. Jean-Jacques Bridey et Jacques Lamblin, rapporteurs ; – MM. Jean-Jacques Candelier, Nicolas Dhuicq, Mme Geneviève Fioraso, MM. Francis Hillmeyer, Philippe Meunier, et Mme Marie Récalde, membres. — 3 — SOMMAIRE ___ Pages INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 7 PREMIÈRE PARTIE : POURQUOI RENOUVELER LES MOYENS DE LA DISSUASION NUCLÉAIRE ? ........................................................................... 11 I. CONSERVER LA PUISSANCE, PROTÉGER LA NATION ................................... 11 A. LA DISSUASION PARTICIPE DE LA GRANDEUR DE LA FRANCE .......... 11 1. L’héritage dissuasif ................................................................................................. 11 2. La dissuasion aujourd’hui -
NATO and NATO-Russia Nuclear Terms and Definitions
NATO/RUSSIA UNCLASSIFIED PART 1 PART 1 Nuclear Terms and Definitions in English APPENDIX 1 NATO and NATO-Russia Nuclear Terms and Definitions APPENDIX 2 Non-NATO Nuclear Terms and Definitions APPENDIX 3 Definitions of Nuclear Forces NATO/RUSSIA UNCLASSIFIED 1-1 2007 NATO/RUSSIA UNCLASSIFIED PART 1 NATO and NATO-Russia Nuclear Terms and Definitions APPENDIX 1 Source References: AAP-6 : NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions AAP-21 : NATO Glossary of NBC Terms and Definitions CP&MT : NATO-Russia Glossary of Contemporary Political and Military Terms A active decontamination alpha particle A nuclear particle emitted by heavy radionuclides in the process of The employment of chemical, biological or mechanical processes decay. Alpha particles have a range of a few centimetres in air and to remove or neutralise chemical, biological or radioactive will not penetrate clothing or the unbroken skin but inhalation or materials. (AAP-21). ingestion will result in an enduring hazard to health (AAP-21). décontamination active активное обеззараживание particule alpha альфа-частицы active material antimissile system Material, such as plutonium and certain isotopes of uranium, The basic armament of missile defence systems, designed to which is capable of supporting a fission chain reaction (AAP-6). destroy ballistic and cruise missiles and their warheads. It includes See also fissile material. antimissile missiles, launchers, automated detection and matière fissile радиоактивное вещество identification, antimissile missile tracking and guidance, and main command posts with a range of computer and communications acute radiation dose equipment. They can be subdivided into short, medium and long- The total ionising radiation dose received at one time and over a range missile defence systems (CP&MT). -
Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 214/Monday, November 5, 2018
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 214 / Monday, November 5, 2018 / Notices 55401 including a description of the likely notwithstanding any other provisions of Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D). respondents, proposed frequency of law, no person shall generally be subject Michel Smyth, response, and estimated total burden to penalty for failing to comply with a Departmental Clearance Officer. may be obtained free of charge from the collection of information that does not RegInfo.gov website at http://www. display a valid Control Number. See 5 [FR Doc. 2018–24153 Filed 11–2–18; 8:45 am] reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_ CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The DOL BILLING CODE 4510–26–P nbr=201801-1218-004 or by contacting obtains OMB approval for this Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693– information collection under Control DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 4129, TTY 202–693–8064, (these are not Number 1218–0110. The DOL notes that toll-free numbers) or sending an email existing information collection Office of Workers’ Compensation _ _ to DOL PRA [email protected]. requirements submitted to the OMB Programs Submit comments about this request receive a month-to-month extension by mail to the U.S. Department of Labor- while they undergo review. New Energy Employees Occupational OASAM, Office of the Chief Information requirements would only take effect Illness Compensation Program Act of Officer, Attn: Departmental Information upon OMB approval. For additional 2000, as Amended Compliance Management Program, substantive information about this ICR, Room N1301, 200 Constitution Avenue see the related notice published in the AGENCY: Office of Workers’ NW, Washington, DC 20210; or by Federal Register on March 30, 2018 (83 Compensation Programs, Labor email: [email protected]. -
Assemblée Nationale Constitution Du 4 Octobre 1958
N° 260 —— ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE CONSTITUTION DU 4 OCTOBRE 1958 DOUZIÈME LÉGISLATURE Enregistré à la Présidence de l'Assemblée nationale le 10 octobre 2002. AVIS PRÉSENTÉ AU NOM DE LA COMMISSION DE LA DÉFENSE NATIONALE ET DES FORCES ARMÉES, SUR LE PROJET DE loi de finances pour 2003 (n° 230) TOME II DÉFENSE DISSUASION NUCLÉAIRE PAR M. ANTOINE CARRE, Député. —— Voir le numéro : 256 (annexe n° 40) Lois de finances. — 3 — S O M M A I R E _____ Pages INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 5 I. — UNE DISSUASION GARDANT UNE PLACE CENTRALE DANS LES STRATEGIES DE DEFENSE, MAIS DONT LE ROLE EVOLUE........................................................................................ 7 A. LA DISSUASION NUCLEAIRE AMERICAINE : UNE VOLONTE DE FLEXIBILITE ACCRUE .................................................................................................................................... 7 B. UNE INQUIETANTE PROLIFERATION BALISTIQUE ET NUCLEAIRE ................................... 10 C. LA DISSUASION NUCLEAIRE FRANÇAISE : UNE POSTURE ADAPTEE A L’EVOLUTION DE LA MENACE .............................................................................................. 15 1. Une dissuasion nécessaire pour faire face à l’imprévisible ........................................ 15 2. Un outil d’ores et déjà adapté ......................................................................................... 16 II. — UN BUDGET 2003 PERMETTANT LA POURSUITE DE LA MODERNISATION -
N° 256 4 Partie ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE
Document mis en distribution le 23 octobre 2002 N° 256 4ème partie ______ ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE CONSTITUTION DU 4 OCTOBRE 1958 DOUZIÈME LÉGISLATURE Enregistré à la Présidence de l'Assemblée nationale le 10 octobre 2002 RAPPORT FAIT AU NOM DE LA COMMISSION DES FINANCES, DE L’ÉCONOMIE GÉNÉRALE ET DU PLAN SUR LE PROJET DE loi de finances pour 2003 (n° 230), PAR M. GILLES CARREZ, Rapporteur Général, Député. —— ANNEXE N° 40 DÉFENSE Rapporteur spécial : M. FRANÇOIS d’AUBERT Député ____ Lois de finances. — 3 — SOMMAIRE — Pages 1ERE PARTIE DU RAPPORT INTRODUCTION AVANT-PROPOS : OU EN EST L’EUROPE DE LA DEFENSE 2EME PARTIE DU RAPPORT II.– LES DÉPENSES D’ÉQUIPEMENT : UN PILOTAGE AMELIORE 3EME PARTIE DU RAPPORT III.– L’ENVIRONNEMENT DES FORCES 4EME PARTIE DU RAPPORT IV.– L’EXECUTION DES GRANDS PROGRAMMES ......................................................5 A.– LA DISSUASION...................................................................................................5 1.– Les crédits transférés au commissariat à l’énergie atomique ..............7 2.– La force océanique stratégique ..........................................................10 a) Les sous-marins.........................................................................................10 b) Les missiles balistiques..............................................................................12 3.– La composante aéroportée ................................................................13 B.– COMMUNICATION ET RENSEIGNEMENT........................................................14 -
Environmental Restoration Program MOUND
._. I s MOUND /. i i! I : “’ Al Environmental Restoration Program MOUND Environmental Restoration Program VlOUND MOUND PLANT POTENTIAL RELEASE SITE PACKAGE I Notice of Public Review Period hgram The following potential release site (PRS) packages will be available for public review ir he CERCLA Public Reading Room, 305 E. Central Ave., Miamisburg, Ohio beginning lune 17, 1997. Public comment will be accepted on these packages from June 17, 1997, .hroughJuly 18, 1997. PRS 30: Building 27 Propane Tank PRS 129/130: Former Solvent Storage Sites PRS 241: Soil Con@mination- - Main Hill Parking Lot Area PRS 307: Soil Contamination -.Buil.ding 29 PRS 318: PCB Tramformer and Capacitor Locations PRS 320-325: Former Sites -:Dayton Uqits 1-4/Dayton WarehousYScioto Facility PRS 383: Soil Contbination PRS 408: Soil Contz@&tion - “Prism” oil Queslionscan be referred to Mound’s Community Relations at (937) 8654140. 1 PRS 320/321/322/323/324/325 PUBLIC RELEASE Available for comment. The Mound Core Team P.O. Box 66 Miamisburg, Ohio 45343-0066 AUG 2 0 1997 - Miamisburg Mound Community Improvement Corporation 720 Mound Road COS Building 422 1 Miamisburg, Ohio 45342-67 14 . Dear Mr. Bird: The Core Team, consisting of the U.S. Department of Energy Miamisburg Environmental Management Project (DOE-MEMP), U.S. Envirommtal Protection Agency (USEPA), and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA), appreciatesthe input provided by the public stakeholdersof the Mound facility. The public stakeholdershave significantly contributed to the forward progress that has been made on the entire releaseblock strategy for establishing the - safety of the Mound property prior to its return to public use after remediation and residual risk evaluation. -
RG 326 Atomic Energy Commission Oak Ridge Operations Office
LOC:BO1 5/32/6-B0 15/34/7 Archives Accession: 72C2386 Job NO.4"-326-87-06 RG 326 Atomic Energy Commission Oak Ridge Operations Office Research and Development Div. Corres. Files 1947-1963 Entry 033 Boxes 1-129 . 7- AE~UES O 1. TRANSFER - OF 4. CURRENT LOCATION OF RECORM aSF 136 ATTACHE0 Declassified Correspondence Files of the Research and Development SEPARATE SHEET(S) Divi slon . 1947-1 963 ATTACHED a 5- B. EST. VOLUME C. ARE RECORDS SUUECT TO PRIVACY ACT? (If I*& 0. SPECIFIC RESTRlCTlOW TO BE IMPOSE0 (Indud. urnfiution.nd , dL. umcy system nu" ard T.R. roluao and -0 cu. (1. cu. mtr. cite -;uta or ~OIen i auaoriru nrcb rr~Lrku0~) numbor for moct nernc notla and alas copy) 5 U.S.C. 552(bp6) authorizes the with- ' DOE-33s ' DOE-4P 5 DOE-46, DOE-48, DOE-51, DOE-52, holding of personnel and medical files and b* similar files the disclosure of which would 47 'eR* No* 64 (April ** 1982) (applicable pages attached) constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion DOE-1 324.2 RS/16,5. a. i P- .. -? . .. .. .-- .- ... ... _... .. I;, .. .. E .~ cf W a .. CL C c % 2 ..... L w- Cu- rdaJ aJ nmx cn c;? ... W7JOU cum ........ n m aC ma .. cfp: .- .. -_.... .. .. ........ .. .... * ..... NO11 'i; 31UlLlnY - ....... -7 ...'I - . -. t ... 4e 3ca .... .- - ..... ' ;" ; . UUh Lb .-. , u ram - ...- w aJ7 ........ <'< ' ... ..I -: ..... ~ .- . 1. .. .' . .- -. ~ ....... - .... d .. d .. : . c - -..- .. .. ... ...... .. .. .-... i-- d -_ ? INVE~~TORY 1 Budget/Acct./Finance 1 Budget - General Policy Jan-June 1950 2 Budget - General Policy July-Dec. 1950 3 Budget Change Requests .. 4. -
Air University Review: March-April 1973, Vol XXIV, No.3
UNITED STATES AI R FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY REVIEW AIR U N I V E R S IT Y THE PSOFESSIONA1 JOURNALreview OF THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE T he Impa c t of Locxstics upon Stratecy........................................................................................2 Maj. Gen. Jonas L. Blank, USAF T he Transformation of World Poutics.................................................................................. 22 The Honorable Curtis W. Tarr U.N. Pea c ekeepinc and U.S. National Sec u r ity................................................................ 28 Dr. Raymond J. Barrett E pit .aph to the Lady—30 Yea r s After .............................................................................................. 41 William G. Holder T he “New ” C iv il -M il it a r y Rel a t io n s: R et r o spec t and Prospect....................................51 Dr. Adrian Preston Ho r sesh o e Najl.............................................................................................................................................54 Brigadier General Heinz Waldheeker, Luftwaife T he Need for Mil it a r y O fficers as Strategic Thinkers..................................................... 56 Lt. Col. Riehard D. Besley, USAF Air Force Review B est Hit 72—NATO’s Southern Rec ion Fig h t e r Wea pon s Meet ........................65 Lt. Col. Harold A. Susskind, USAF Human Co mmun ic a t io n s and Air Force Supervision.......................................................78 Dr. Sterling K. Gerber Books and Ideas R e VISIONISM AND THE CoLD W.A R.....................................................................................................85 -
Télécharger Au Format
N° 02/2017 recherches & documents janvier 2017 Impact économique de la filière industrielle « Composante océanique de la Dissuasion » Volet 2 HÉLÈNE MASSON, STÉPHANE DELORY WWW . FRSTRATEGIE . ORG Édité et diffusé par la Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique 4 bis rue des Pâtures – 75016 PARIS ISSN : 1966-5156 ISBN : 978-2-911101-95-3 EAN : 9782911101953 WWW.FRSTRATEGIE.ORG 4 B I S , RUE DES P ATURES 7 50 16 P ARIS TÉL.01 43 13 77 77 FAX 01 43 1 3 77 78 SIRET 394 095 533 00045 TVA FR74 394 095 533 CODE APE 7220Z FONDATION RECONNUE D'UTILITÉ PUBLIQUE – DÉCRET DU 26 FÉVRIER 1993 Impact économique de la filière industrielle « Composante océanique de la Dissuasion ». Volet 2. Plan 1. Fondamentaux politiques, budgétaires et industriels 5 1.1. Politique de dissuasion 6 1.2. Cinq décennies d’effort de la Nation 10 1.3. Conception, production, mise en œuvre, et entretien de l’outil de dissuasion : le choix de 12 l’indépendance et de l’autonomie 1.4. La France dans le cercle restreint des États producteurs et opérateurs de SNLE et de MSBS 12 2. Des filières industrielles atypiques 14 2.1. Maîtrise d’ouvrage et maîtrise d’œuvre : une gouvernance originale 14 2.1.1. L’organisation Cœlacanthe 14 2.1.2. Maîtrise d’œuvre industrielle : quatre chefs de file 15 2.2. Entre exigences de performances et contraintes liées au domaine Dissuasion 18 2.3. Spécificité et criticité des compétences 18 2.3.1. Principaux domaines techniques 18 2.3.2. Savoir-faire en matière de conception et de développement 22 2.3.3. -
Taking Stock WORLDWIDE NUCLEAR DEPLOYMENTS 1998
Taking Stock WORLDWIDE NUCLEAR DEPLOYMENTS 1998 BY William M. Arkin Robert S. Norris Joshua Handler NRDC Nuclear Program MARCH 1998 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. 1200 New York Ave., NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20005 202/289-6868 VOICE 802-457-3426 (Arkin) 202-289-2369 (Norris) FAX 202-289-1060 INTERNET [email protected] [email protected] Worldwide Nuclear Deployments 1998 i © Copyright, Natural Resources Defense Council, 1998 ii TAKING STOCK Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Methodology . 4 Arms Control and Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 6 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) . 6 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START II) . 7 The Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty . 8 Unilateral Initiatives . 8 Future Nuclear Deployments . 11 The United States . 14 Nuclear History . 16 Nuclear Organization . 19 Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 24 Russia . 26 Nuclear Organization . 29 Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 33 Britain . 39 France . 42 China . 45 Appendix A: Locations of U.S. Nuclear Weapons, by Type . 53 Appendix B: U.S. Nuclear Weapons by Location . 55 Appendix C: U.S. Nuclear Weapons, Location Profiles . 56 By State California . 56 Colorado . 57 Georgia. 58 Louisiana . 59 Missouri . 60 Montana . 61 Nebraska . 61 Nevada . 62 New Mexico. 63 North Dakota . 65 Texas . 68 Virginia . 70 Washington . 70 Wyoming . 72 Overseas by Country Belgium . 72 Germany . 73 Greece . 76 Italy . 77 The Netherlands . 78 Turkey . 78 United Kingdom . 79 Appendix D: Location of Russian Nuclear Weapons, by Type . 81 Appendix E: Russian Nuclear Weapons by Location . 84 Appendix F: British Nuclear Weapons by Type and Location . 88 Appendix G: French Nuclear Weapons by Type and Location . -
Appendix 12A. World Nuclear Forces, 2007
Appendix 12A. World nuclear forces, 2007 SHANNON N. KILE, VITALY FEDCHENKO and HANS M. KRISTENSEN I. Introduction Eight nuclear weapon states possessed roughly 11 530 operational nuclear weapons as of January 2007 (see table 12A.1). Several thousand nuclear weapons are kept on high alert, ready to be launched within minutes. If all nuclear warheads are counted— operational warheads, spares, and those in both active and inactive storage—the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan and Israel together possessed an estimated total of more than 26 000 warheads.1 A ninth state, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, or North Korea), demonstrated a nuclear weapon capability when it carried out a nuclear test explosion in 2006, but whether it has developed any operational nuclear weapons is not known. All of the five legally recognized nuclear weapon states, as defined by the 1968 Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (Non-Proliferation Treaty, NPT),2 appear determined to remain nuclear weapon powers for the foreseeable future and are in the midst of or have plans for modernizing their nuclear forces. Russia and the USA are in the process of reducing their operational nuclear forces from cold war levels as a result of two bilateral treaties: the 1991 Treaty on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (START I Treaty) and the 2002 Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty (SORT).3 The USA plans to reduce its total stockpile by almost half by 2012. It also intends to begin production of new nuclear warheads for the first time since the end of the cold war. -
Maize Treatments Production Value, Income M1 M2 M3 M4 $/Ha
Table S1. Costs of variable inputs, including seed, hopper seed treatments, (inoculant for conventional soybean and SaBrex for organic crops), starter fertilizer, N fertilizer, herbicide, and fungicide in conventional and/or organic soybean in 2017 and 2018, maize in 2017, and wheat in 2018. Input Conventional Organic $ Soybean Seed/140,000 84.50 (including seed treatment) 52.50 Seed Treatment 52.25/g (Cell-Tech inoculant) 200/g (SaBrex) Herbicide 295/L (Glyphosate) - Fungicide 2170/L (Fluxapyroxad + Pyraclostrobin) - Maize Seed/80,000 335 (including seed treatment) 245 Seed Treatment 200/g (SaBrex) Starter Fertilizer 460/tonne (Mg) 325/tonne (Mg) Side-dress N 1.10/kg N 12.76/kg N Herbicide 288/L (Glyphosate) Wheat Seed/bag 31 (including seed treatment) 24 Seed Treatment 200/g (Sabrex) Starter Fertilizer 480/tonne (Mg) 330/tonne (Mg) Herbicide 276/mL (thifensulfuron + tribenuron) Top-dress N 1.09/kg N 13.05/kg N Fungicide 1325/L (Prothioconazole + Tebuconazole) Table S2. Income, selected production costs, and returns above selected production costs for conventional maize with recommended management (M1) and high input management (M2) and organic maize with recommended management (M3) and high input management (M4) in a soybean-wheat/red clover-maize- soybean rotation, and conventional maize with recommended management (M5) and high input management (M6) and organic maize with recommended management (M7) and high input management (M8) in a maize-soybean-maize-soybean rotation at a Cornell University Research Farm in central New York, USA