© 2019 Jialin Mao ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

© 2019 Jialin Mao ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2019 Jialin Mao ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CHARACTERIZATION OF POLYMER ARCHITECTURES AND SEQUENCES BY MULTI-STAGE MASS SPECTROMETRY A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Jialin Mao May, 2019 CHARACTERIZATION OF POLYMER ARCHITECTURES AND SEQUENCES BY MULTI-STAGE MASS SPECTROMETRY Jialin Mao Dissertation Approved: Accepted: _________________________________ _________________________________ Advisor Department Chair Dr. Chrys Wesdemiotis Dr. Christopher J. Ziegler _________________________________ ________________________________ Committee Member Dean of the College Dr. Wiley J. Youngs Dr. Linda Subich _________________________________ ________________________________ Committee Member Executive Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Adam W. Smith Dr. Chand Midha _________________________________ _________________________________ Committee Member Date Dr. Aliaksei Boika _________________________________ Committee Member Dr. Toshikazu Miyoshi ii ABSTRACT This dissertation focuses on the characterization of polymer architectures and sequences by tandem and multi-stage mass spectrometry (MS2 and MSn) as well as ion mobility mass spectrometry (IM-MS). The experiments described in this dissertation utilized matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) and electrospray ionization (ESI) as ionization techniques and collisionally activated dissociation (CAD), electron transfer dissociation (ETD), and laser-induced fragmentation (LIFT) as ion activation and dissociation techniques. Polymers studied include an 8-shaped polystyrene, star-branched polyethers, monodisperse sequence-defined POSS-functionalized polyesters, and poly(t- butyl methacrylate). A well-defined 8‑shaped polystyrene was characterized by MALDI-MS, MALDI- MS2, and IM-MS. 8-shaped polymers could have inter and intra isomers which cannot be distinguished by single stage mass spectrometry. MALDI-MS2 of 8‑shaped polystyrene showed specific fragment species that can only be produced by the inter isomer, thus confirming the existence of the inter isomer. The degree of branching and the length of individual branches of a set of mikto- and homo-arm star polyethers were studied by MALDI-MS2 and ESI-MS2. The number of fragment distributions combined with the mass to charge ratios of the fragment ions iii gave conclusive evidence for the number of branches in the star polyethers and the corresponding branch lengths. A set of monodisperse, sequence-defined, and POSS-functionalized polyester copolymers were analyzed by MALDI-MS2. Isomeric oligomers with different sequences were readily distinguished by their different fragmentation patterns. Oligomers up to hexamers were successfully sequenced based on the specific backbone fragment species observed. The backbone connectivity of poly(t-butyl methacrylate) (PtBMA) was investigated by tandem and multistage mass spectrometry. The results showed that ETD- MS2 and ETD-CAD-MS3 enable backbone C-C bond cleavages and, thus, provides the chain connectivity information needed to characterize end groups and acrylate (co)polymer sequences. The studies presented in this dissertation emphasize the capability of mass spectrometry as a powerful technique for the characterization of architectures and sequences of a variety of synthetic polymers. iv DEDICATION To my family, without your endless love and support, I couldn’t have completed this. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor Dr. Chrys Wesdemiotis for his permanent guidance, support, and valuable influence in my doctoral research. I extend my gratitude to my committee members Dr. Wiley J. Youngs, Dr. Adam W. Smith, Dr. Aliaksei Boika and Dr. Toshikazu Miyoshi for their guidance and valuable insight to elevate the quality of my research. I would like to thank all my former and current group members: Dr. Lydia Cool, Dr. Ahlam Alawiat, Dr. Nick Alexander, Dr. Sahar Sallam, Dr. Selim Gerislioglu, Michelle Kushnir, Ivan Dolog, Dr. Kevin Endres, Savannah Snyder, Jason O’Neil, Kayla Williams-Pavlantos, Chen Du and Benqian Wei for their support, friendship and helpful discussions. I would like to thank my collaborators: Dr. Qiming He in Dr. Mark D. Foster’s group, Dr. Wei Zhang, Zhiwei Lin, Xueyan Feng, Bo Ni in Dr. Stephen Z.D. Cheng’s group, Yusheng Chen in Dr. Matthew Becker’s group, and Dr. Scott M. Grayson, for their input, suggestions and great collaborations. I would like to thank you husband, Dr. Wenbin Yin, and my Parents, Guozhang Mao and Jinping Zhang, for their support. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... xi LIST OF SCHEMES....................................................................................................... xvii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ xx CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................... 1 II. MASS SPECTROMETRY BACKGROUND ............................................................... 5 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Inlet System ............................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Ion Source ................................................................................................................. 6 2.3.1 Electrospray Ionization (ESI) ............................................................................. 7 2.3.2 Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI) .................................. 11 2.4 Mass Analyzers ....................................................................................................... 13 2.4.1 Quadrupole Mass Analyzer .............................................................................. 14 2.4.2 Time-of-Flight (ToF) Mass Analyzer ............................................................... 16 2.4.3 Quadrupole/Time-of-Flight (Q/ToF) Mass Analyzer ....................................... 19 2.4.4 Quadrupole Ion Trap (QIT) Mass Analyzer ..................................................... 20 vii 2.5 Ion Detector ............................................................................................................. 23 2.6 Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry (IM-MS) ............................................................. 24 2.7 Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) ................................................................... 27 III. MATERIALS AND INSTRUMENTATION ............................................................... 30 3.1 Materials .................................................................................................................. 30 3.2 Instrumentation ........................................................................................................ 31 3.2.1 MALDI ToF/ToF Mass Spectrometer .............................................................. 31 3.2.2 Synapt HDMS Quadrupole/Time-of-Flight (Q/ToF) Mass Spectrometer ....... 32 3.2.3 Bruker HCT Ultra Quadrupole Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer .......................... 34 IV. MALDI TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY (MALDI-MS2) AND .............................................................................................................. 36 4.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 36 4.2 Materials and methods ............................................................................................ 38 4.2.1 8-Shaped Polystyrene ....................................................................................... 38 4.2.2 Mass Spectrometry ........................................................................................... 38 4.3 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................ 41 4.3.1 Characterization of 8-Shaped Polystyrene by MALDI-ToF/ToF-MS ............. 41 4.3.2 Advanced Isomer Characterization Using Mass Spectrometry ........................ 43 4.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 55 viii V. ELUCIDATING BRANCHING TOPOLOGY AND BRANCH ........................................................................................................... 56 5.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 56 5.2 Materials and methods ............................................................................................ 58 5.2.1 Mass Spectrometry ........................................................................................... 58 5.2.2 Star-Branched Polyethers ................................................................................. 60 5.3 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................ 61 5.3.1 Two-Arm Mikto-Star (2-kDa and 750-Da PEG Arms) .................................... 65 5.3.2 Two-Arm Homo-Star (2-kDa PEG Arms) ....................................................... 74 5.3.3 Three-Arm Homo-Star (2-kDa PEG Arms) ..................................................... 75 5.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Recent Progress in Laser Analytics
    KOLUMNE 417 CHIMIA 44 (1990) Nr.I~ (Ikzem""r) Chimia 44 (/990) 417 424 <&') Schll'ei=. Chemiker- Verhand; ISSN 0009 4293 Recent Progress in Laser Analytics Analytical methods are on their way to mass spectrometry (MS). In 1946, William penetrate the biological sciences. In this E. Stephens (University of Pennsylvania in trend, laser technology plays an important Philadelphia) described a mass spectrome- role, especially in the form of laser-desorp- ter with time dispersion, followed by the tion mass spectrometry (LD-MS). ion velocitron of A.E. Cameron and D.£. The remarkable progress made in this Eggers. These devices represented early field is nicely demonstrated by a statement forms of the time-of-flight mass spectrom- made in 1986 by Frank H. Field, a specialist eter (TOF-MS) first described by the Swiss in the mass spectrometric investigation of R. Keller in 1949. biomolecules and Professor at Rockefeller The first commercially successful TOF- University in New York. Citing Professor MS was introduced by Bendix Corpora- In dieser Kalwnne schreibl Field: 'The mass region of real interest for tion, and it was based on the design re- Prof Dr. H. M. Widmer proteins lies between 40000 and 100000 ported in 1955 by William C. Wile)' and Forse/lUng Analylik Da, and one can only speculate as to l. H. McLaren (Bendix Aviation Corpom- Ciha-Geigy AG. FO 3.2 CH 4{)()2 Basel whether such monster gaseos ions could be tion). In these early days of TOF-MS, the regelmiissig eigene Meinungsarlike/ oder liidl Giiste produced. My personal feeling is that to do ions were generated by electron impact ein.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Mass Spectrometry for Proteins by Martha M
    Chemical Education Today Report: Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 2002 Using Mass Spectrometry for Proteins by Martha M. Vestling The 2002 Chemistry Nobel Prize has mass spectrom- etrists everywhere celebrating. It recognizes work that put large proteins—10,000 Da and larger—into mass spectrom- eters. In order to obtain a mass spectrum of a protein, the protein must go through an ion source and an analyzer to reach the detector (see Figure 1). Half of the 2002 Nobel Prize was shared by Koichi Tanaka and John B. Fenn for ob- taining mass spectra of large biomolecules. To do this, they used two different innovations in ion source design that were developed in the 1980s. For their award winning experiments, Tanaka used laser desorption ionization while Fenn used electrospray ionization. These two techniques became com- mercially available in the early 1990s and have revolutionized the way mass spectrometry is done. Both laser desorption ionization and electrospray ioniza- tion can be used with all sorts and sizes of molecules, most of which could not be analyzed by mass spectrometry fifteen years Figure 2. Common ion types for mass spectrometry. ago. For example, small peptides char when heated and need derivatization for analysis with gas chromatography/mass spec- diameter) in glycerol, ethanol, and acetone and deposited on trometry (GCMS). Both laser desorption and electrospray eas- the sample holder. After vacuum drying, the holder was in- ily produce protonated peptide ions. Sugars like sucrose serted into a time-of-flight mass spectrometer where a nitro- caramelize when heated and without derivatization are not gen laser (337 nm) was fired at the sample spot.
    [Show full text]
  • Microarray-Based Mass Spectrometry for Mammalian Cell Culture Monitoring in Biotechnological Production Processes
    Research Collection Doctoral Thesis Microarray-based mass spectrometry for mammalian cell culture monitoring in biotechnological production processes Author(s): Steinhoff, Robert F. Publication Date: 2016 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-010750104 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library DISS. ETH NO. 23665 Microarray-based mass spectrometry for mammalian cell culture monitoring in biotechnological production processes A thesis submitted to attain the degree of DOCTOR OF SCIENCES of ETH ZURICH (Dr. sc. ETH Zurich) presented by Robert Friedrich Steinhoff M.Sc. in Chemistry, Technical University Munich (TUM) born on 06.05.1985 citizen of Lindau (Bodensee), Germany accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Renato Zenobi, examiner Prof. Dr. Massimo Morbidelli, co-examiner 2016 ii Acknowledgements Dear reader, The present work on microarray MALDI mass spectrometry has been accomplished in the years 2012 to 2016 at ETH Zurich in the lab of Prof. Zenobi. The excellent infrastructure within ETH Zurich has been the fruitful foundation for this thesis. I am thankful to Prof. Renato Zenobi, who accepted me to work in his lab, firstly as a master student and later as PhD- student within the European Marie Curie initial training network ISOLATE. I am deeply grateful to my parents, my brother, my grandmas, my aunts – hereof especially aunt Gabriela Konietzko who always encouraged and supported me - my uncles, my cousins and their families for their endless understanding and support throughout my education.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry Nobel Prize 2002 Goes to Analytical Chemistry
    CHEMISTRY NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS 2002 73 CHIMIA 2003, 57, No. 1/2 Chimia 57 (2003) 73–73 © Schweizerische Chemische Gesellschaft ISSN 0009–4293 Chemistry Nobel Prize 2002 Goes to Analytical Chemistry K. Wüthrich J.B. Fenn K. Tanaka October 2002 was a great month for complexes, the ribosome, or even intact 2nd Japan–China Joint Symposium on Swiss science with Kurt Wüthrich of the viruses by using ESI. Fenn did his original Mass Spectrometry, and published them in ETH Zürich winning the Chemistry Nobel work on ESI while a professor at Yale Uni- 1988 (Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. prize 2002. The other half of the 2002 versity in the early 1980s. Coming from the 1988, 2, 151–153). In his original work, Chemistry Nobel prize went jointly to field of molecular beams, he was following Tanaka and his coworkers used a sample John B. Fenn of the Virginia Common- up on earlier (but unsuccessful) work by preparation where the analyte is mixed with wealth University (Richmond, USA) and to Malcolm Dole to produce gas-phase ions ultrafine cobalt powder and glycerol as a Koichi Tanaka of Shimadzu Corp. (Kyoto, from very large molecules. Fenn’s experi- vacuum-stable binding medium. When ir- Japan), who independently developed tech- ence with molecular beam methods helped radiated with a pulse from a low energy ni- niques to ionize large molecules for study him to succeed where the earlier research in trogen laser, the metal particles heat up rap- by mass spectrometry. This recognition for this direction had failed. Because electro- idly, releasing glycerol and intact analyte the development of analytical methods for spray ionization produces multiply charged molecules into the gas phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Milestones Mass Spectrometry October 2015
    October 2015 www.nature.com/milestones/mass-spec MILESTONES Mass Spectrometry Produced with support from: Produced by: Nature Methods, Nature, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Chemical Biology and Nature Protocols MILESTONES Mass Spectrometry MILESTONES COLLECTION 4 Timeline 5 Discovering the power of mass-to-charge (1910 ) NATURE METHODS: COMMENTARY 23 Mass spectrometry in high-throughput 6 Development of ionization methods (1929) proteomics: ready for the big time 7 Isotopes and ancient environments (1939) Tommy Nilsson, Matthias Mann, Ruedi Aebersold, John R Yates III, Amos Bairoch & John J M Bergeron 8 When a velocitron meets a reflectron (1946) 8 Spinning ion trajectories (1949) NATURE: REVIEW Fly out of the traps (1953) 9 28 The biological impact of mass-spectrometry- 10 Breaking down problems (1956) based proteomics 10 Amicable separations (1959) Benjamin F. Cravatt, Gabriel M. Simon & John R. Yates III 11 Solving the primary structure of peptides (1959) 12 A technique to carry a torch for (1961) NATURE: REVIEW 12 The pixelation of mass spectrometry (1962) 38 Metabolic phenotyping in clinical and surgical 13 Conquering carbohydrate complexity (1963) environments Jeremy K. Nicholson, Elaine Holmes, 14 Forming fragments (1966) James M. Kinross, Ara W. Darzi, Zoltan Takats & 14 Seeing the full picture of metabolism (1966) John C. Lindon 15 Electrospray makes molecular elephants fly (1968) 16 Signatures of disease (1975) 16 Reduce complexity by choosing your reactions (1978) 17 Enter the matrix (1985) 18 Dynamic protein structures (1991) 19 Protein discovery goes global (1993) 20 In pursuit of PTMs (1995) 21 Putting the pieces together (1999) CITING THE MILESTONES CONTRIBUTING JOURNALS UK/Europe/ROW (excluding Japan): The Nature Milestones: Mass Spectroscopy supplement has been published as Nature Methods, Nature, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Publishing Group, Subscriptions, a joint project between Nature Methods, Nature, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Chemical Biology and Nature Protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • STATUS and FUTURE TRENDS of the MINIATURIZATION of MASS SPECTROMETRY Richard R.A
    STATUS AND FUTURE TRENDS OF THE MINIATURIZATION OF MASS SPECTROMETRY Richard R.A. Syms*1 1EEE Dept., Imperial College London, London, UK ABSTRACT structures: the quadrupole filter and the quadrupole ion An overview of mass spectrometers incorporating trap. RF quadrupoles are workhorse instruments, with miniaturization technology is presented. A brief history of applications ranging from residual gas analysis to space conventional mass spectrometry is given, followed by a exploration. Related components such as RF ion guides summary of the status of miniaturized systems. are used for ion transport, while collision cells are used Applications for miniature/portable systems are reviewed, for ion cooling and fragmentation. In 1978, Richard Yost and opportunities and challenges are discussed. and Chris Enke introduced the triple quadrupole, in which the first quadrupole is used for initial mass analysis, a INTRODUCTION second for collision-induced dissociation, and the third for The development of microelectromechanical systems analysis of the resulting fragments, enabling so-called over the last 30 years has been dramatic, and MEMS now tandem mass spectrometry. The quadrupole ion trap was impact on most industrial sectors. Specific materials, developed commercially for Finnegan by Raymond device configurations and packaging have been developed March in 1983, and the linear quadrupole trap (which has for each application domain, and MEMS are available as an increased trapping volume) by Jae Schwartz in 2002. commodity items such as accelerometers or laboratory Other milestones include the development of the Fourier instruments such as atomic force microscopes. Until transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer by recently, one area that stubbornly resisted miniaturization Alan Marshal and Melvin Comisarow in 1976, and the was mass spectrometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of MALDI Mass Spectrometry in Natural Products Analysis
    Reviews 671 Application of MALDI Mass Spectrometry in Natural Products Analysis Authors Ricardo Silva 1, Norberto Peporine Lopes1, Denise Brentan Silva 1, 2 Affiliations 1 Núcleo de Pesquisa em Produtos Naturais e Sintéticos (NPPNS), Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil 2 Laboratório de Produtos Naturais e Espectrometria de Massas (LAPNEM), Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde (CCBS), Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande, MS, Brazil Key words Abstract DHAP: 2,5-dihydroxyacetophenone l" MALDI ! DHB: 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid l" dereplication This article presents the utility of mass spectrom- DIT: dithranol l" natural products etry with a MALDI ionization source in natural EI: electron ionization l" fragmentation products analysis. The advantages and drawbacks FAB: fast atom bombardment l" data processing of this technique for natural products analyses FT: Fourier transform will be presented and discussed. In addition, the IAA: trans-3-indoleacrylic acid structural determination of secondary metabo- ICR: ion cyclotron resonance lites using MALDI‑MS/MS will be explored, which IMS: imaging mass spectrometry received May 3, 2015 can guide MALDI experimental methods and IT: ion trap revised March 1, 2016 stimulate new research in this area. Finally, sev- LDI: laser desorption/ionization accepted March 2, 2016 eral important approaches for MALDI data pro- LiDHB: lithium 2,4-dihydroxybenzoate Bibliography cessing will be discussed. HABA: 2-(4-hydroxyphenylazo)benzoic
    [Show full text]
  • CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION FRANZ HILLENKAMP Transcript Of
    CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION FRANZ HILLENKAMP Transcript of Interviews Conducted by Michael A. Grayson at University of Münster Münster, Germany on 20 August 2012 (With Subsequent Corrections and Additions) ACKNOWLEDGMENT This oral history is one in a series initiated by the Chemical Heritage Foundation on behalf of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. The series documents the personal perspectives of individuals related to the advancement of mass spectrometric instrumentation, and records the human dimensions of the growth of mass spectrometry in academic, industrial, and governmental laboratories during the twentieth century. This project is made possible through the generous support of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION Center for Oral History FINAL RELEASE FORM This document contains my understanding and agreement with the Chemical Heritage Foundation and the American Society for Mass Spectrometry with respect to my participation in the audio- and/or video- recorded interview conducted by Michael Grayson on 20 August 2012. I have read the transcript supplied by the Chemical Heritage Foundation. 1. The recordings, transcripts, photographs, research materials, and memorabilia (collectively called the “Work”) will be maintained by the Chemical Heritage Foundation and the American Society for Mass Spectrometry and made available in accordance with general policies for research and other scholarly purposes. 2. I hereby grant, assign, and transfer to the Chemical Heritage Foundation and the American Society for Mass Spectrometry all right, title, and interest in the Work, including the literary rights and the copyright, except that I shall retain the right to copy, use, and publish the Work in part or in full until my death.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Karasfor Their Discovery of MALDI
    199- .{WARD FOR A DISTINGUISHED CONTRIBUTION IN MASS SPECTRO}IETRY Franz Hillenkamp and Michael Karasfor their discovery of MALDI The ASMS Award \LA.LDI has revolu- for a Distinguished Con- tionized the anal1'sis of tribution in Mass protehs. peptides and Spectrometry recognizes oligonucleotides. It a focused singular has spa*'ned the devel- achievement in or con- opment of practical and tribution to fundamental efficient new or applied mass spectro- instruments which metry. The 1997 award have been embraced is presented to Professor for use in biological Franz Hillenkamp, and biochemical re- University of Miinster, search. The develop- Franz Hillenkamp and Professor Michael Michael Karas ment of MALDI has Karas, University of tulfilled the long Frankfurt, for their discovery of matrix-assisted laser standing promise of mass spectrometry as a useful tool in the desorption ionization (MALDD. solution of biological problems. It has changed the face of MALDI has fundamentally changed much of the modern biological and macro-molecular mass spectrometry. methodology used in biochemistry, biology, polymer The award will be formally presented at 5:15 pm on chemistry and other areas dealing with large molecules. Thursdav. June 5. 1997 at the 45'h ASMS Conference. Previous Award Recipients 1990 Ronald D. Macfarlane, Plasma Desorption lonization 1994 Donald F. Hunt, I{egative lon Chemical lonization l99l Michael Barber, Fast Atom Bombqrdment lonization 1995 Keith R. Jenniags, Collision Induced Dissociation 1992 John B. Fenn, Electrosproy lonization 1996 Burnaby Munson and Frank Field, Chemical I onizat i on Mas s Snec tr ometrv 1993 Christie G. Enke and Richard A.Yost, Triple Quadrup o le Mas s Sp ec tr omet er THE 1997 BIEMANN MEDAL (INAUGURAL AWARD) The Biemann Medal multiply-charged anions.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestone 18
    MILESTONES MILESTONE 18 compare the solids tryptophan and nicotinic acid (another small organic molecule) with liquid matrices that had been developed for Enter the matrix FAB-MS. They obtained mass spectra for three ‘medium-sized’ antibiotics (stachyose, By the early 1980s, mass spectrometry was a erythromycin and gramicidin S) and achieved well-established laboratory technique for the significantly better results—less fragmentation characterization of small organic molecules and a more intense signal from the parent ion— (Milestone 7). But larger ones—particularly with the solid than with the liquid matrices. biological molecules, such as proteins, DNA More promising results also came when and complex carbohydrates—were proving to analyzing vitamin B12 in a nicotinic acid matrix: be a challenge. Because mass analysis relies on no desorption was observed without a matrix, the detection of ionized species in the gas and there were solubility problems when using phase, the key problem was imparting sufficient the liquid matrices. Evidence was mounting that energy to these large molecules to send them a solid, UV-adsorbing small-molecule matrix into the gas phase without destroying them. might be the tool needed to obtain mass Although some progress had been made using spectra of large proteins. fast atom bombardment (FAB) and On the other side of the world, Koichi Tanaka 252Cf-plasma desorption (see Milestone 2), at and colleagues from the Shimadzu Corporation the time the gold standard was the CO2 laser in Japan were working on a similar problem, and desorption of organic molecules with masses in 1988, they published the mass spectra of up to 1,000 daltons—so the world of proteins several proteins and synthetic polymers was largely inaccessible.
    [Show full text]
  • MALDI-Tof Mass Spectrometry for Fungal Identification
    Journal of Fungi Review A Moldy Application of MALDI: MALDI-ToF Mass Spectrometry for Fungal Identification Robin Patel 1,2 1 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-507-538-0579; Fax: +1-507-284-4272 2 Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rochester, MN 55905, USA Received: 15 November 2018; Accepted: 25 December 2018; Published: 3 January 2019 Abstract: As a result of its being inexpensive, easy to perform, fast and accurate, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS) is quickly becoming the standard means of bacterial identification from cultures in clinical microbiology laboratories. Its adoption for routine identification of yeasts and even dimorphic and filamentous fungi in cultures, while slower, is now being realized, with many of the same benefits as have been recognized on the bacterial side. In this review, the use of MALDI-ToF MS for identification of yeasts, and dimorphic and filamentous fungi grown in culture will be reviewed, with strengths and limitations addressed. Keywords: MALDI-ToF MS; yeast; fungus 1. Background and Introduction The concept of using mass spectrometry for bacterial identification was suggested by Catherine Fenselau and John Anhalt in 1975 [1], but at the time, intact proteins were not analyzable due to fragmentation during the mass spectrometry (MS) process, with mass spectrometric analysis of intact proteins only becoming possible a decade later. In 1985, Koichi Tanaka described a “soft desorption ionization” technique allowing mass spectrometry of biological macromolecules achieved using ultrafine metal powder and glycerol; for his discovery, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Spectral Analysis and Quantitation in Maldi-Ms Imaging
    SPECTRAL ANALYSIS AND QUANTITATION IN MALDI-MS IMAGING A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE FACULTY OF BIOLOGY, MEDICINE AND HEALTH 2019 SOMRUDEE DEEPAISARN SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES DIVISION OF INFORMATICS, IMAGING AND DATA SCIENCES ‘Blank page’ 2 Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................. 22 Declaration ........................................................................................................ 23 Copyright Statement .......................................................................................... 24 Acknowledgement ............................................................................................. 25 Chapter 1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 26 1.1 Important Concepts ........................................................................................ 26 1.2 Aims and Objectives ....................................................................................... 31 1.3 Thesis Overview .............................................................................................. 32 1.4 List of Outputs ................................................................................................ 35 Chapter 2 Background I: Mass Spectrometry Instrumentation and Applications 37 2.1 Fundamentals of Mass Spectrometry ............................................................ 38 2.1.1 General
    [Show full text]