DOCSLIB.ORG

Centrica CR Review 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Centrica CR Review 2011 Corporate Responsibility Performance Review 2 011 Building trust Introduction – Overview 02 Introduction 2011 was a challenging year. But our integrated business model proved resilient and our people delivered a strong result British Gas service engineer Introduction – Chief Executive’s review 03 Chief Executive’s In the UK, wholesale gas commodity prices due to factors that are impacting the wider rose by 30% during 2011, driven by global energy sector as well as British Gas. review factors including instability in the Middle East and North Africa and the Fukushima nuclear Retail price increases, driven by the As an energy company, 2011 was a challenging year. disaster. In North America, Direct Energy faced wholesale market, coincided with pressure we recognise that our But our integrated business difficult market conditions for the retail energy on household income for many of our business activities impact supply business and continued low gas customers due to the economic downturn. the communities we serve model proved resilient and power prices in our core markets. In the UK, although bills were actually lower and the environments and our people delivered than the previous year, the scale of unit price in which we operate. a strong result. Despite these challenges we made increases driven by factors outside the direct Understanding and good progress implementing our strategy. control of energy suppliers has resulted managing these impacts We continued our programme of investment in public frustration with a consequent will help contribute in diverse energy supplies and low carbon erosion of trust in the energy sector. towards strong, healthy generation, moving closer to producing first societies and sustainable power at our Lincs offshore wind farm in late We are acutely aware that the poor environments for current 2012. 1.7m vulnerable households benefited in economic climate in the UK is impacting and future generations. 2011 from British Gas initiatives that included a household budgets and that any increase Our corporate responsibility discounted tariff, interest free loans and payment in energy prices will cause hardship for approach drives our ability assistance, household grants and free energy some and be poorly received by many. to deliver our business efficiency advice. We have expanded into new We therefore need to do what we can strategy in a sustainable markets in North America, nearly doubling to provide affordable energy. manner. our customer base in the US North East. One of the most significant ways we help Sam Laidlaw Chief Executive Public perceptions of the energy sector customers manage their energy costs is by are different in North America and the UK. making their homes more energy efficient. In North America, wholesale gas prices have Over the past five years we’ve helped to remained low and Direct Energy has seen a insulate more than 2.5m customer homes healthy improvement in customer satisfaction, in the UK. We continued to promote the as measured by net promoter scores. In the energy efficiency measures that reduce UK, British Gas also saw improving customer bills and also help to cut carbon emissions. satisfaction scores, as well as decreases in And, through our Carbon Emissions customer complaints. Despite these operational Reduction Target obligation we delivered improvements, our brand is less well trusted more than 14.6m tonnes of lifetime carbon than before. Research indicates this is savings in 2011. British Gas was the first Introduction – Chief Executive’s review 04 We’ve embarked on a programme of £500m of internal efficiency savings to be a leaner business and support our competitive position in challenging markets energy company to offer free insulation pricing and strive to explain energy prices tax and regulatory frameworks; and an to our entire customer base and has now more clearly. British Gas launched the Honest improvement in public understanding of the extended this offer still further to customers Conversation in 2011 to explain the factors economics of energy prices leading to a of our partner organisations. behind energy prices to UK consumers restoration of trust in our industry. Centrica and raise the quality of the debate. Not has a central role to play in steering the UK We’ve also embarked on a programme only are commodity costs increasing due towards a future of affordable, secure of £500m of internal efficiency savings to to worldwide growth in demand for oil and and environmentally responsible energy. help minimise operating costs and enable gas, but also more locally, the third party us to continue to offer competitive prices costs we are obliged to pay for transportation, In North America, the precise challenges and products. Regrettably this required distribution and the environmental levies to are different, but our aims are the same – the loss of some 760 jobs in 2011 support renewables and encourage carbon to seek opportunities to grow our business and I am grateful for the co-operation reduction are an increasing component of in a sustainable manner. We will continue and professionalism shown by all of the bill. We look to the Government and the to work with determination to achieve our employees during this process. Regulator to help foster a realistic discussion this wherever we operate. Our people play a vital role in achieving with the British people about energy prices and our goals and the quality of service to the need for major investment to pay for future I look forward to reporting our progress which we aspire. We continue to invest in energy security and lower carbon emissions. to you next year and welcome feedback their careers to develop the skills we need. on our efforts to date. In 2011, we invested more than £20m A significant level of investment is required in our academies and apprenticeships. in the UK energy industry – an estimated £200bn by 2020 – to provide energy security We cannot shield our customers from and lower carbon emissions. Two factors the long-term trend towards higher energy are critical to making this viable: a profitable Sam Laidlaw prices, but we remain committed to fair energy sector operating within stable Chief Executive Introduction – Our approach 05 Our approach Stakeholder engagement and a list of the assured KPIs at Navigating We engage with stakeholders to identify www.centrica.com/CRassurance. our reporting We must understand the impacts we have their concerns, explore solutions and manage on society and the environment. We do relationships. We highlight key engagements Materiality this through engaging with stakeholders, in 2011 throughout this report. We also have Our materiality criteria measures the We have changed the way listening to their concerns, and assessing a Stakeholder engagement summary for concern stakeholders have on an issue we report. Rather than publish our impacts and risks. We have strong 2011 available, which outlines stakeholder in general, combined with the potential all information in one document, governance processes to oversee our concerns and how we responded to them. impact that issue may have on our business. at one time, we now report activities and employ an independent, Based on this, we prioritised 11 issue areas, information in four ways: third-party to review our performance. each of which includes a range of individual Assurance 2011 progress We want stakeholders to be confident issues. The graph below outlines these This document reports 2011 in the performance we report. So we issues across three categories: watch list, Governance progress on our strategic Our Corporate Responsibility Committee asked Deloitte LLP to conduct external significant and priority. and material issues (CRC) oversees progress against our assurance on our most material metrics. CR strategy and activities. The CRC Deloitte used the International Standard This document covers our activities on the Metrics met three times in 2011. For more on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 priority and significant issues in 2011, and Our data centre contains all information on committee activities to provide limited assurance on 14 non- refers back to our website where additional our financial and non-financial and topics discussed in 2011, visit financial key performance indicators. information is available on these. We will performance metrics our Governance performance summary. See Deloitte’s assurance statement report progress on our watch list issues on our website through performance updates. Performance updates We will share updates Risk management about projects and initiatives Material issues Centrica Managing the risks to our business in the Responsibility section prioritisation is essential to achieve our strategic at www.centrica.com/cr Vulnerable customers Nuclear Priority objectives. We continue to work to embed Customer trust Climate change social and environmental risk management Background and approach Environment Safety into our existing business risk processes Our CR web pages outline how we approach our key Significant and procedures, to ensure these risks Doorstep selling Energy supply are effectively managed. issues from climate change Community relations to supply chain Watch list The social and environmental risks that are Supply chain Business ethics most significant to our business are included JOIN THE ENERGY DEBATE in the Risks and Uncertainties summary in Visit our News and Views social Increasing stakeholder concern Increasing our 2011 Annual Report and Accounts. media platform.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download a Copy
    Cover image: Courtesey of EDF Energy — www.edfenergy.com/energy CONTENTS... 1 AT A GLANCE... 2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ENERGY... 4 BENEFITS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY... 5 WHAT THE PUBLIC THINK... 6 HOW NUCLEAR CREATES ENERGY... 7 HOW A REACTOR WORKS... 8 THE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE... 9 MANAGING WASTE... 10 RADIATION EXPLAINED... 12 NUCLEAR AROUND THE WORLD... 14 UK NUCLEAR SITES... 16 NUCLEAR NEW BUILD... 17 NEW BUILD IN NUMBERS... 18 LOOKING TO THE FUTURE... 19 DECOMMISSIONING... 20 CAREERS IN NUCLEAR... 21 FUTHER INFORMATION... AT A GLANCE... Nuclear is a major part of our energy mix. Today it accounts for 21% of electricity generated in the UK and has been providing secure low carbon electricity for over 60 years. Low carbon energy, including There are 15 nuclear power and renewables, nuclear power account for almost 51% of the reactors operating UK’s generation electricity mix across eight sites in the UK In 2016 nuclear energy avoided 22.7 million metric tonnes of CO2 emissions in the UK BEIS,Digest of UK Energy Statistics 2018 That’s equivalent to taking around a third of all cars in the UK off the road Civil nuclear contributes over £6 billion to the jobs in the UK civil nuclear sector UK economy as much as aerospace manufacturing 12,159 Women in civil nuclear 1,981 People on apprenticeships Three quarters of the public 914 believe nuclear should be part People on graduate schemes of the clean energy mix Jobs Map figures generated from participating NIA members 1 This simple timeline charts some of the key people, events and legislation A BRIEF HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ENERGY..
    [Show full text]
  • 5810 GA Low Carbon Report
    housing a low carbon society an ODPM leadership agenda on climate change “green alliance... Housing a Low Carbon Society An ODPM leadership agenda on climate change by Joanna Collins Published by Green Alliance, May 2006, £15 Artwork and print by Upstream – www.upstream.coop Printed on Revive Silk – 75 per cent post-consumer waste. ISBN 0 9549757 8 2 © Copyright Green Alliance 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Green Alliance. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purposes of private research or study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licenses issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. This book is sold subject to condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it was published and without a similar condition including the condition being imposed on subsequent purchaser. Green Alliance 36 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 0RE tel: 020 7233 7433 fax: 020 7233 9033 email: [email protected] website: www.green-alliance.org.uk Green Alliance is a registered charity number 1045395 Company Limited by guarantee, registered number 3037633 Green Alliance Green Alliance is one of the UK’s foremost environmental groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Behavioural Energy Use Advice
    City of Wakefield Metropolitan District Council Home Energy Conservation Act Further Report 2012-2013 Initial Report to Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change 1 Contents Page: 1 HECA summary 3 2 Introduction to HECA 3 3 Wakefield’s geography and deprivation 4 4 Wakefield’s housing stock 4 5 Wakefield’s build types 5 6 Wakefield’s socio-economic background 5 7 Fuel poverty and excess winter deaths in the Wakefield district 6 8 Wakefield Affordable Warmth Strategy 2007-2010 7 9 Greener Homes, Healthier Homes: An Action Plan for Affordable 9 Warmth 2011-2016 10 Wakefield Affordable Warmth Action Plan 2013-2014 10 11 Supporting evidence: domestic gas and electricity consumption data 11 12 HECA achievements to date for the Wakefield district 12 13 HECA planned activity for the Wakefield district 2013-2014 14 2 1. HECA summary On the 26 July 2012 the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change issued new guidance to English Energy Conservation Authorities (ECAs) setting out their obligations pursuant to the Home Energy Conservation Act (HECA) 19951. The City of Wakefield Metropolitan District Council (WMDC) is an ECA. This document represents WMDC’s submitted initial Home Energy Conservation Act (HECA) report to the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change for March 2013. 2. Introduction The guidance sets out requirements for ECAs to report on the energy conservation measures it considers practicable, cost-effective and likely to result in significant improvement in the energy efficiency of residential accommodation in their areas. The significant improvements can result from measures which take advantage of financial assistance from central Government initiatives such as Green Deal, Energy Company Obligation (ECO) and the Renewable Heat Incentive and which have been developed using area based/street by street roll out involving local communities and partnerships.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Production
    Coal Production A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK 1 2 Summary of coal production entered on entity worksheets 3 Richard Heede 4 Climate Mitigation Services 5 22-May-13 6 7 8 1850s 1860s 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 9 Coal 10 11 12 13 1 Alpha Natural Resources, USA 14 15 2 Anglo American, UK 16 17 3 Arch Coal Company, USA 18 19 4 British Coal Corporation, UK 20 21 5 BP Coal, UK 22 23 6 BHP Billiton, Australia 24 25 7 China, Peoples Republic 26 27 8 Coal India, India 28 29 9 ConocoPhillips, USA 30 31 10 Consol Energy, USA 0.03 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0 0 32 33 11 Cyprus Amax, USA 34 35 12 Czechoslovakia 36 37 13 Czech Republic + Slovakia 38 39 14 ExxonMobil, USA 40 41 15 FSU (Former Soviet Union) 42 43 16 Kazakhstan 44 45 17 Kerr-McGee Coal (Anadarko), USA 46 47 18 Kiewit Mining Group, USA 48 49 19 Luminant, USA 50 51 20 Massey Energy, USA 52 53 21 Murray Coal, USA 54 55 22 North American Coal Corp., USA 56 57 23 North Korea 58 59 24 Occidental, USA 60 61 25 Peabody Energy, USA 62 63 26 Pittsburgh & Midway Coal (Chevron) 64 65 27 Poland 66 67 28 Rio Tinto, Australia 68 69 29 RAG (Ruhrkohle AG), Germany 70 71 30 Russian Federation (not including FSU) 72 73 31 RWE, Germany 74 75 32 Sasol, South Africa 76 77 33 Singareni Collieries Company, India 78 79 34 UK Coal, UK 80 81 35 Ukraine 82 83 36 Westmoreland Coal, USA 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 84 85 37 Xstrata, Switzerland
    [Show full text]
  • Citywide Climate Change Strategy & Action Plan 2010
    Citywide Climate Change Strategy & Action Plan 2010 - 2020 Delivering Newcastle’s Sustainable Community Strategy Foreword We realise the need for a citywide climate change strategy, one that provides a comprehensive response to the threats and opportunities that we face. We also recognise the urgent need to secure a low carbon future and prepare for a changing climate. I’m proud to say the strategy goes much further than before. It raises our ambitions and sets out how we plan to deliver against national and European commitments. At the heart of the strategy is our Sustainable Energy Action Plan that sets out a scenario to reduce our carbon emissions, and makes us confident enough to commit to our Newcastle Climate Change Declaration, adopted by the full Council in March 2010. The strategy also contains plans to adapt to the impacts of a changing climate. These will help us to seize the opportunities that a low carbon future presents, and to protect our heritage and citizens into a sustainable future. We all have a part to play, from our day-to-day actions and efforts to live in a low carbon future, to the development, delivery and uptake of physical measures to minimise our impact on the environment. This presents significant economic opportunities for our City. However, we cannot do this without understanding and preparing to live with the inevitable risks of a changing climate. Although the strategy lays the foundations for these actions, achieving our goals will not be easy. In this time of austerity we need to be bold in our choices and strong in our convictions, so that we make the decisions necessary for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Gbh Xmas Menu A4 06 1
    Hinkley Point News from EDF Energy July 2009 Site Nomination Update EDF Energy recently nominated to Government an area of land adjacent to the existing Hinkley Point nuclear power stations for the development of new nuclear power. The aerial plan shows the full extent of the land that has been nominated. Not all of this land will be required for the development of new nuclear power, and not all of it will necessarily be needed during the construction process. Nominated Land Area Detailed feasibility and design work is currently underway to determine the precise location of the power station and associated buildings. This work will also determine the exact boundaries of the land needed for the construction period. Land used temporarily during the construction process will be restored afterwards. EDF Energy has also nominated sites for Area of land nominated by EDF Energy for new nuclear build new nuclear build in Dungeness (Kent), Hartlepool (Teesside), Heysham Further details of our nomination of development can be obtained from (Lancashire) and Sizewell (Suffolk). land for new nuclear power www.nuclearpowersiting.decc.gov.uk . Next Steps After reviewing the nominations and received and the draft NPS will be EDF Energy is committed to consultation initial comments on new nuclear build, amended as appropriate and the list of and keeping local people informed at all the Government will produce a draft sites will be finalised. stages through the development Nuclear National Policy Statement process. (NPS), which will include a list of Once they have undertaken their own potential sites. There will be public public consultation, developers of sites For an outline timeline for future consultation on this in Autumn 2009 confirmed to be strategically suitable in consultation on the development of new and it will be scrutinised by Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Cerrejón Coal Mine Colombia
    Cerrejón coal mine Colombia Sectors: Coal Mining Active This profile is actively maintained Send feedback on this profile By: BankTrack Created before Nov 2016 Last update: May 19 2021 Contact: Alex Scrivener, Policy Officer, Global Justice Now Project website Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Sectors Coal Mining Location Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Website http://www.cerrejon.com/site/ About Cerrejón coal mine The Cerrejón coal mine in La Guajira, Colombia, is the largest in Latin America and one of the largest in the world. Its steady expansion since its founding in 1976 has led to the destruction of whole villages populated by local indigenous and Afro-Colombian people. The extracted coal is almost exclusively for export to rich countries with local people seeing few benefits. The mine is owned by three giant UK-listed mining companies: BHP Billiton, Anglo American and Glencore. All of which receive billions of pounds in finance from UK banks and pension funds. Roche, Chancleta, Tamaquitos, Manantial, Tabaco, Palmarito, El Descanso, Caracoli, Zarahita, Patilla. These are the names of just some of the communities that have been devastated or simply wiped off the map by the Cerrejón mining project. Latest developments Anglo American to exit from Cerrejon shareholding, BHP Group to follow Feb 25 2021 Glencore leaving, passing mining contracts to Republic of Colombia Feb 4 2021 Impacts Social and human rights impacts While the Cerrejón mining company's promotional material gives the impression that it is helping the displaced communities, the reality is that the mining company has used underhand tactics to buy off individuals and sow internal division within the communities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Last Chance for Coal Making Carbon Capture and Storage a Reality
    a last chance for coal making carbon capture and storage a reality foreword by Rt Hon Margaret Beckett MP Jon Gibbins & Hannah Chalmers David Hawkins Graeme Sweeney Jules Kortenhorst Linda McAvan MEP Alain Berger Ruud Lubbers Frances O’Grady Mike Farley Matthew Lockwood Ben Caldecott & Thomas Sweetman Keith Allott Karla Hill & Tim Malloch Sheryl Carter compiled and edited by Chris Littlecott This publication is part of Green Alliance’s climate change theme (www.green-alliance.org.uk/climatechange), which is kindly supported by Shell. Green Alliance’s work on the financing of CCS demonstration projects is kindly supported by BP. The views expressed in this publication remain those of the individual authors alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Green Alliance or its sponsors. Acknowledgments Many thanks to all those who have advised and assisted in the preparation of this publication, particularly Rebecca Collyer, Mark Johnston and Jesse Scott. Special thanks are due to Catherine Beswick, Karen Crane, Maureen Murphy, Rebekah Phillips and Faye Scott for their invaluable editorial input. a last chance for coal making carbon capture and storage a reality Edited by Chris Littlecott ISBN 978-1-905869-15-2 © Green Alliance 2008 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Green Alliance. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purposes of private research or study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licenses issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • From 'Greenest Government Ever' to 'Get Rid of All the Green Crap': David Cameron, the Conservatives and the Environment
    This is a repository copy of From ‘greenest government ever’ to ‘get rid of all the green crap’: David Cameron, the Conservatives and the environment. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/85469/ Version: Submitted Version Article: Carter, Neil Thomas orcid.org/0000-0003-3378-8773 and Clements, Ben (2015) From ‘greenest government ever’ to ‘get rid of all the green crap’: David Cameron, the Conservatives and the environment. British Politics. 204–225. ISSN 1746-918X https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.16 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ From ‘Greenest government ever’ to ‘get rid of all the green crap’: David Cameron, the Conservatives and the Environment by Neil Carter (University of York) and Ben Clements (University of Leicester) Published in British Politics, early online April 2015. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copy-edit version of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of the Green Investment Bank: Costs and Benefits, Rationale and Value for Money
    The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money Report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills Final report October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 2 Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Vivid Economics would like to thank BIS staff for their practical support in the review of outputs throughout this project. We would like to thank McKinsey and Deloitte for their valuable assistance in delivering this project from start to finish. In addition, we would like to thank the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), the Carbon Trust and Sustainable Development Capital LLP (SDCL), for their valuable support and advice at various stages of the research. We are grateful to the many individuals in the financial sector and the energy, waste, water, transport and environmental industries for sharing their insights with us. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors and not those of BIS or any other party, and the authors take responsibility for any errors or omissions. An appropriate citation for this report is: Vivid Economics in association with McKinsey & Co, The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money, report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 3 Executive Summary The UK Government is committed to achieving the transition to a green economy and delivering long-term sustainable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Regarding Future of Hartlepool Power Station November 2017
    Position regarding future of Hartlepool Power Station November 2017 This position statement has been prepared based on information available on EDF Energy’s website, NuLeAF (Nuclear Legacy Advisory Forum) website and information provided from officers within Hartlepool Borough Council. Background The nuclear power station in Hartlepool is managed by EDF Energy; it is capable of supplying energy to over 2 million homes in the UK. The power station started energy generation in 1983 and the estimated end of generation date is 2024. The current site employs approximately 530 people full time and a further 200 full time contract partners. Many of the nuclear power stations currently in operation across the UK are coming to the end of their operational lifespan and nuclear investment plan is underway. Whilst the current end of generation dates of these sites are not set in stone, there is probably little scope for any significant further extension of the operating lifetime of the power stations. EDF Energy is currently developing three new nuclear power stations (Hinkley Point C, Sizewell C and Bradwell B). More will be required in the future to replace aging power stations. Decommissioning In relation to decommissioning of the site, EDF gave the following overview of the three key phases at a recent NuLeAF meeting has drawn up decommissioning plans which divide into three phases: 1. Pre-closure transition and defueling (the defueling period is likely to take 3-4 years). 2. Site surveillance and Care & Maintenance 3. Reactor decommissioning and final site clearance. From start to finish this covers a period of approximately 100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour's Zero-Based Review
    Labour’s Zero-Based Review Interim Report Number 15: Department for Energy and Climate Change Labour’s Zero-Based Review Interim Report No.15 DEPARTMENT FOR ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE FOREWORD The leader of the Labour Party, Ed Miliband, and the Shadow ChanCellor, Ed Balls, have made Clear that departmental budgets will be cut not only in 2015-16, but each year until we have achieved our promise to balanCe the books. Across every part of the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), we need to take a tighter approach to finanCial management of taxpayers’ money, and reform the framework within which the energy market operates so that it is fair for bill payers. Under the Tory’s failing plan, energy bills have risen, and energy Companies have failed to pass on falling wholesale Costs. Record numbers of families with children Cannot afford to heat their homes. Investors face unCertainty and indeCision about the future of our energy system. And the mismanagement of taxpayers’ money, such as through the Government’s poor-value Green Deal Home Improvement Fund, and the NuClear Decommissioning Authority’s budget, have seen tens of millions of pounds wasted. Britain needs a government that will stand up to the energy Companies to deliver fairer prices and a better deal for bill payers. A government that is serious about tackling the sCandal of fuel poverty and cold homes. And a government that is putting in place the vital reforms neCessary for investment in the low Carbon future of our energy system, and to deliver value for money for the taxpayer.
    [Show full text]