DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Energy Bill: Pre–Legislative Scrutiny

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee Draft Energy Bill: Pre–legislative Scrutiny First Report of Session 2012-13 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 24 May, 12, 19 and 26 June, 3 July, and 10 July 2012 Published on Monday 23 July 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/parliament.uk/ecc. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume. The Report of the Committee, the formal minutes relating to that report, oral evidence taken and some or all written evidence are available in a printed volume. Additional written evidence may be published on the internet only. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Sarah Hartwell-Naguib (Clerk), Jenny Bird (Senior Committee Specialist), Dr Stephen Allen (Committee Specialist), Luanne Middleton (Inquiry Manager), Áine Ní Bhreasail (Committee Specialist), Dr Patsy Richards (Committee Specialist), Katie Phelan (Senior Committee Assistant), Jonathan Olivier Wright (Committee Assistant), Danielle Nash (Administrative Assistant), and Nick Davies (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Energy and Climate Change Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 2569; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] List of additional written evidence 1 Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) Ev w1 2 Alex Henney Ev w3 3 Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) Ev w8 4 EEF Ev w11 5 Stag Energy Ev w14 6 RSPB Ev w26 7 Global Warming Foundation Policy Ev w28 8 Statoil UK Limited Ev w29 9 Carbon Capture and Storage Association Ev w31,175 10 Chris March Ev w33 11 Andrew ZP Smith Ev w34 12 Greenpeace Ev w37 13 Association for the Conservation of Energy Ev w50 14 Co-operatives UK Ev w50 15 2Co Energy Ev w52 16 Which? Ev w54 17 Aquamarine Power Ev w58 18 Nuclear Industry Association (NIA) Ev w61 19 Confederation of UK Coal Producers (CoalPro) Ev w62 20 Barrie Murray Ev w64 21 Drax Power Ltd Ev w66 22 Peter Jones, OBE, Ecolateral Ltd Ev w69 23 Institute for Public Policy Research Ev w71 24 Energy UK Ev w74 25 Scottish Renewables Ev w79 26 Somerset County Council, Sedgemoor District Council & West Somerset Council Ev w84 27 ABB Ev w86 28 Statkraft Ev w89 29 Banks Group Ltd Ev w94 30 Air Products Ev w98 31 Combined Heat & Power Ev w101 32 Calor Gas Ltd Ev w106 33 Tom Greatrex MP, Shadow Energy Minister Ev w108 34 Oil & Gas UK Ev w110 35 DONG Energy Ev w112 36 Ofgem Ev w115 37 Electricity Storage Network Ev w118 38 National Energy Action Ev w120 39 Engineering the Future Ev w126 40 Dr David Toke Ev w130 41 Seajacks Ev w133 42 Andrew Mackay Ev w134 43 Greater London Authority Ev w137 44 Energy Technologies Institute Ev w139 45 Energy Action Scotland Ev w142 46 European Climate Foundation Ev w143 47 Nuclear Free Local Authorities Steering Committee Ev w148 48 Balfour Beatty plc Ev w154 49 Nuclear Industry Safety Director’s Forum Ev w159 50 REG Windpower Ltd Ev w161 51 TUC Clean Coal Task Group Ev w163 52 Climatechangematters Ltd Ev w165 53 Wood Panel Industries Federation Ev w166 54 Vestas Wind Systems Ev w167 55 Prospect Ev w170 56 British Ceramic Confederation Ev w173 57 KTI Energy Ltd Ev w178 58 Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) Ev w179 cobber Pack: U PL: COE1 [SO] Processed: [19-07-2012 16:06] Job: 022338 Unit: PG01 Source: /MILES/PKU/INPUT/022338/022338_w059_021819_w039_michelle_Draft Energy Bill DPM ECC DPRRC.xml Energy and Climate Change Committee: Evidence Ev w1 Written evidence Written evidence submitted by the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) Introduction and Summary 1. We welcome the opportunity to submit evidence to the Energy and Climate Change Committee on pre- legislative scrutiny of the draft Energy Bill. As a leading environmental charity, the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) has worked to promote and protect the beauty, tranquillity and diversity of rural England since our formation in 1926. Climate change poses a major threat to the countryside which is why we support the Government’s commitment to largely decarbonise the power sector by 2030 and reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2050. Low-cost and low environmental impact options for achieving these targets should be prioritised including reducing energy demand, increasing energy efficiency and improving interconnection between the UK and mainland Europe.1 We recognise that these measures alone will not go far enough which is why we support the sensitive development of renewable and low-carbon energy with low environmental impacts. 2. CPRE recognises that unlocking low-carbon investment will require changing market conditions to allow new technologies to compete alongside fossil fuels. These changes will not only affect the economics of renewable technologies but also the quantity, mix and broad location of new infrastructure. We are concerned to ensure, therefore, that the draft Energy Bill enables the Government to achieve its ambition of providing secure and affordable low-carbon energy while minimising impact to the wider environment by focusing not only on the quantity, but the quality, of development. Our comments are focused primarily on those parts of the Bill which cause greatest concern in this regard. We are particularly concerned that there is a lack of attention given to: — wider environmental issues; — demand reduction measures; and — reducing the need for grid infrastructure. 3. In order to maintain and enhance the beauty, tranquillity and diversity of England’s land, coast and sea, we believe that mechanisms enshrined within the draft Energy Bill should aim to minimise the environmental impact of the development of renewable and low-carbon energy and associated infrastructure. Wider Environmental Issues 4. Electricity market reform (EMR) mechanisms outlined in the draft Energy Bill will not only change market conditions for sustainable energy sources they will also determine the quantity, mix and broad location of a great deal of the large infrastructure required to achieve decarbonisation of our energy supply. Current proposals for the Feed-in Tariff Contracts-for-Difference (FIT CfD), for example, pose risks insofar as they may incentivise oversupply of energy infrastructure which might increase pressure to site energy generation infrastructure in inappropriate locations. We believe that it is imperative, therefore, that the draft Energy Bill incorporates wider environmental sustainability criteria, as well as greenhouse gas emissions reductions, into the outcomes it delivers. If FIT CfDs, for example, are able to specify plant location and the location of supply,2 we want the Government to ensure that the criteria for siting new generation is guided by strict environmental standards, including those enshrined within the planning system, with the aim of minimising the impact on the landscape, seascape and wildlife. Demand Reduction Measures 5. In our initial submission to the EMR consultation in 2011 we urged the Government to place demand- side measures—including short term demand response to assist with short term balancing, long term managed energy reduction to reduce total energy consumption, and distributed generation (D3)—at the heart of EMR. At that time it was clear that EMR proposals were heavily biased in favour of supply-side measures. This was a concern for CPRE because failing to reduce consumption dramatically would mean much more infrastructure would be required to decarbonise,3 increasing pressure on the extent, beauty and tranquillity of the natural environment. Moreover, there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that the Government is unlikely to reach its climate change targets if it focuses solely on supply-side and dismisses demand-side measures. Deployment rates for supply-side measures are often exaggerated because in reality there are multiple factors which slow down expected delivery rates. Demand-side measures by contrast can offer a quicker and cheaper 1 European Climate Foundation’s report, “Roadmap 2050: a practical guide to a prosperous, low-carbon Europe” accessible from their website (http://www.roadmap2050.eu/). 2 Keay, M, 2012. Death by a thousand regulations: The new energy bill, The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, [online] Available at:<http://www.oxfordenergy.org/2012/05/death-by-a-thousand-regulations-the-new-energy-bill/> [Accessed 07 June 2012]. 3 HM Government, 2010.
Recommended publications
  • Lewis Wave Power Limited

    Lewis Wave Power Limited

    Lewis Wave Power Limited 40MW Oyster Wave Array North West Coast, Isle of Lewis Environmental Statement Volume 1: Non-Technical Summary March 2012 40MW Lewis Wave Array Environmental Statement 1. NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction This document provides a Non-Technical Summary (NTS) of the Environmental Statement (ES) produced in support of the consent application process for the North West Lewis Wave Array, hereafter known as the development. The ES is the formal report of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) undertaken by Lewis Wave Power Limited (hereafter known as Lewis Wave Power) into the potential impacts of the construction, operation and eventual decommissioning of the development. 1.2 Lewis Wave Power Limited Lewis Wave Power is a wholly owned subsidiary of Edinburgh based Aquamarine Power Limited, the technology developer of the Oyster wave power technology, which captures energy from near shore waves and converts it into clean sustainable electricity. Aquamarine Power installed the first full scale Oyster wave energy convertor (WEC) at the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) in Orkney, which began producing power to the National Grid for the first time in November 2009. That device has withstood two winters in the harsh Atlantic waters off the coast of Orkney in northern Scotland. Aquamarine Power recently installed the first of three next-generation devices also at EMEC which will form the first wave array of its type anywhere in the world. 1.3 Project details The wave array development will have the capacity to provide 40 Megawatts (MW), enough energy to power up to 38,000 homes and will contribute to meeting the Scottish Government’s targets of providing the equivalent of 100% of Scotland’s electricity generation from renewable sources by 2020.
  • Aquamarine Power – Oyster* Biopower Systems – Biowave

    Aquamarine Power – Oyster* Biopower Systems – Biowave

    Wave Energy Converters (WECs) Aquamarine Power – Oyster* The Oyster is uniquely designed to harness wave energy in a near-shore environment. It is composed primarily of a simple mechanical hinged flap connected to the seabed at a depth of about 10 meters and is gravity moored. Each passing wave moves the flap, driving hydraulic pistons to deliver high pressure water via a pipeline to an onshore electrical turbine. AWS Ocean Energy – Archimedes Wave Swing™* The Archimedes Wave Swing is a seabed point-absorbing wave energy converter with a large air-filled cylinder that is submerged beneath the waves. As a wave crest approaches, the water pressure on the top of the cylinder increases and the upper part or 'floater' compresses the air within the cylinder to balance the pressures. The reverse happens as the wave trough passes and the cylinder expands. The relative movement between the floater and the fixed lower part is converted directly to electricity by means of a linear power take-off. BioPower Systems – bioWAVE™ The bioWAVE oscillating wave surge converter system is based on the swaying motion of sea plants in the presence of ocean waves. In extreme wave conditions, the device automatically ceases operation and assumes a safe position lying flat against the seabed. This eliminates exposure to extreme forces, allowing for light-weight designs. Centipod* The Centipod is a Wave Energy Conversion device currently under construction by Dehlsen Associates, LLC. It operates in water depths of 40-44m and uses a two point mooring system with four lines. Its methodology for wave energy conversion is similar to other devices.
  • Coal Production

    Coal Production

    Coal Production A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK 1 2 Summary of coal production entered on entity worksheets 3 Richard Heede 4 Climate Mitigation Services 5 22-May-13 6 7 8 1850s 1860s 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 9 Coal 10 11 12 13 1 Alpha Natural Resources, USA 14 15 2 Anglo American, UK 16 17 3 Arch Coal Company, USA 18 19 4 British Coal Corporation, UK 20 21 5 BP Coal, UK 22 23 6 BHP Billiton, Australia 24 25 7 China, Peoples Republic 26 27 8 Coal India, India 28 29 9 ConocoPhillips, USA 30 31 10 Consol Energy, USA 0.03 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0 0 32 33 11 Cyprus Amax, USA 34 35 12 Czechoslovakia 36 37 13 Czech Republic + Slovakia 38 39 14 ExxonMobil, USA 40 41 15 FSU (Former Soviet Union) 42 43 16 Kazakhstan 44 45 17 Kerr-McGee Coal (Anadarko), USA 46 47 18 Kiewit Mining Group, USA 48 49 19 Luminant, USA 50 51 20 Massey Energy, USA 52 53 21 Murray Coal, USA 54 55 22 North American Coal Corp., USA 56 57 23 North Korea 58 59 24 Occidental, USA 60 61 25 Peabody Energy, USA 62 63 26 Pittsburgh & Midway Coal (Chevron) 64 65 27 Poland 66 67 28 Rio Tinto, Australia 68 69 29 RAG (Ruhrkohle AG), Germany 70 71 30 Russian Federation (not including FSU) 72 73 31 RWE, Germany 74 75 32 Sasol, South Africa 76 77 33 Singareni Collieries Company, India 78 79 34 UK Coal, UK 80 81 35 Ukraine 82 83 36 Westmoreland Coal, USA 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 84 85 37 Xstrata, Switzerland
  • Technology Feature: the Oyster 16

    Technology Feature: the Oyster 16

    ISSUE Technology Feature: The Oyster 16 April 2013 Featuring: Aquamarine Power In the latest edition of our newsletter, LRI interviewed Martin McAdam, CEO at Aquamarine Power. Their wave-powered energy converter - Oyster - is among the leading technologies in About Us the UK’s burgeoning marine energy sector. A commercial scale demonstration project is currently operational, and the sites for GreenTechEurope.com Aquamarine Power’s prospective wave farms have been secured (GTE) is a production of and fully permitted. The company is currently looking for London Research corporate equity investors to provide £30m to complete their International (LRI), a global commercialisation program. research and consulting firm with expertise in the Sooner than you think: utility scale marine energy The Oyster wave power device is a buoyant, hinged flap energy, environment, and Who is Aquamarine Power? which is attached to the seabed at depths of between 10 infrastructure sectors. GTE Aquamarine Power is an Edinburgh based wave and 15 metres, around half a kilometre from the shore. is a video-based energy technology and project developer which technology platform Oyster's hinged flap - which is almost entirely underwater conducts their R&D with Queen’s University Belfast - pitches backwards and forwards in the near-shore showcasing innovative and demonstrates their technology in the Orkney waves. The movement of the flap drives two hydraulic technologies from Europe. Islands, Scotland. Their unique approach to pistons which push high pressure water onshore via a developing both the technology and the project site The GTE Newsletter subsea pipeline to drive a conventional hydro-electric is aimed at easing the obstacles within the process turbine.
  • Cerrejón Coal Mine Colombia

    Cerrejón Coal Mine Colombia

    Cerrejón coal mine Colombia Sectors: Coal Mining Active This profile is actively maintained Send feedback on this profile By: BankTrack Created before Nov 2016 Last update: May 19 2021 Contact: Alex Scrivener, Policy Officer, Global Justice Now Project website Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Sectors Coal Mining Location Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Website http://www.cerrejon.com/site/ About Cerrejón coal mine The Cerrejón coal mine in La Guajira, Colombia, is the largest in Latin America and one of the largest in the world. Its steady expansion since its founding in 1976 has led to the destruction of whole villages populated by local indigenous and Afro-Colombian people. The extracted coal is almost exclusively for export to rich countries with local people seeing few benefits. The mine is owned by three giant UK-listed mining companies: BHP Billiton, Anglo American and Glencore. All of which receive billions of pounds in finance from UK banks and pension funds. Roche, Chancleta, Tamaquitos, Manantial, Tabaco, Palmarito, El Descanso, Caracoli, Zarahita, Patilla. These are the names of just some of the communities that have been devastated or simply wiped off the map by the Cerrejón mining project. Latest developments Anglo American to exit from Cerrejon shareholding, BHP Group to follow Feb 25 2021 Glencore leaving, passing mining contracts to Republic of Colombia Feb 4 2021 Impacts Social and human rights impacts While the Cerrejón mining company's promotional material gives the impression that it is helping the displaced communities, the reality is that the mining company has used underhand tactics to buy off individuals and sow internal division within the communities.
  • A Last Chance for Coal Making Carbon Capture and Storage a Reality

    A Last Chance for Coal Making Carbon Capture and Storage a Reality

    a last chance for coal making carbon capture and storage a reality foreword by Rt Hon Margaret Beckett MP Jon Gibbins & Hannah Chalmers David Hawkins Graeme Sweeney Jules Kortenhorst Linda McAvan MEP Alain Berger Ruud Lubbers Frances O’Grady Mike Farley Matthew Lockwood Ben Caldecott & Thomas Sweetman Keith Allott Karla Hill & Tim Malloch Sheryl Carter compiled and edited by Chris Littlecott This publication is part of Green Alliance’s climate change theme (www.green-alliance.org.uk/climatechange), which is kindly supported by Shell. Green Alliance’s work on the financing of CCS demonstration projects is kindly supported by BP. The views expressed in this publication remain those of the individual authors alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Green Alliance or its sponsors. Acknowledgments Many thanks to all those who have advised and assisted in the preparation of this publication, particularly Rebecca Collyer, Mark Johnston and Jesse Scott. Special thanks are due to Catherine Beswick, Karen Crane, Maureen Murphy, Rebekah Phillips and Faye Scott for their invaluable editorial input. a last chance for coal making carbon capture and storage a reality Edited by Chris Littlecott ISBN 978-1-905869-15-2 © Green Alliance 2008 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Green Alliance. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purposes of private research or study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licenses issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency.
  • The Economics of the Green Investment Bank: Costs and Benefits, Rationale and Value for Money

    The Economics of the Green Investment Bank: Costs and Benefits, Rationale and Value for Money

    The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money Report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills Final report October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 2 Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Vivid Economics would like to thank BIS staff for their practical support in the review of outputs throughout this project. We would like to thank McKinsey and Deloitte for their valuable assistance in delivering this project from start to finish. In addition, we would like to thank the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), the Carbon Trust and Sustainable Development Capital LLP (SDCL), for their valuable support and advice at various stages of the research. We are grateful to the many individuals in the financial sector and the energy, waste, water, transport and environmental industries for sharing their insights with us. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors and not those of BIS or any other party, and the authors take responsibility for any errors or omissions. An appropriate citation for this report is: Vivid Economics in association with McKinsey & Co, The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money, report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 3 Executive Summary The UK Government is committed to achieving the transition to a green economy and delivering long-term sustainable growth.
  • Roussely Report: Saving French Nuclear Industry with Outrageous Measures

    Roussely Report: Saving French Nuclear Industry with Outrageous Measures

    SEPTEMBER 3, 2010 | No. 715 ROUSSELY REPORT: SAVING FRENCH NUCLEAR INDUSTRY WITH ROUSSELY REPORT: SAVING FRENCH NUCLEAR INDUSTRY OUTRAGEOUS MEASURES WITH OUTRAGEOUS After France's failure to win the contract for four nuclear power MEASURES 1 plants in the United Arab Emirates, President Sarkozy ordered a OLKILUOTO BLOCKADE 2 report on the French nuclear industry. The outline of the Roussely report (named after Francois Roussely, a former EDF president), HAUNTED BY HISTORY: NUCLEAR NEW BUILD IN dated June 16, was made public –in French- by the Elysée Palace BRITAIN 4 on 27 July 2010 NUCLEAR ENERGY (715.6078) Sortir du nucleaire - In the the claims made by Areva, the merchant DECREASES WORLD report, author Francois Roussely of nuclear plants. Roussely points out the STABILITY AND INCREASES recognizes the scale of the problems inadequate performance of the French INEQUALITY 7 facing the French nuclear industry: lack nuclear reactors: “whereas global of export competitiveness, falling average nuclear plant availability has MORE PLUTONIUM DESTINED domestic load factor, delays and cost significantly increased during the last 15 FOR WIPP? 7 overruns in EPR construction projects. years, nuclear plant availability in France PROLONGING NUCLEAR has seen a marked decrease in the last POWER WILL HINDER French nuclear industry: disastrous few years.” RENEWABLES 8 economic and industrial results The failure of the EPR is such, according IN BRIEF 9 The Roussely report recognizes the scale to Roussely, that “it is the credibility, and of the setbacks experienced by Areva therefore the very existence” of the and EDF at the EPR reactor construction French nuclear industry which is at stake.
  • Who Pays? Consumer Attitudes to the Growth of Levies to Fund Environmental and Social Energy Policy Objectives Prashant Vaze and Chris Hewett About Consumer Focus

    Who Pays? Consumer Attitudes to the Growth of Levies to Fund Environmental and Social Energy Policy Objectives Prashant Vaze and Chris Hewett About Consumer Focus

    Who Pays? Consumer attitudes to the growth of levies to fund environmental and social energy policy objectives Prashant Vaze and Chris Hewett About Consumer Focus Consumer Focus is the statutory Following the recent consumer and consumer champion for England, Wales, competition reforms, the Government Scotland and (for postal consumers) has asked Consumer Focus to establish Northern Ireland. a new Regulated Industries Unit by April 2013 to represent consumers’ interests in We operate across the whole of the complex, regulated markets sectors. The economy, persuading businesses, Citizens Advice service will take on our public services and policy-makers to role in other markets from April 2013. put consumers at the heart of what they do. We tackle the issues that matter to Our Annual Plan for 2012/13 is available consumers, and give people a stronger online, consumerfocus.org.uk voice. We don’t just draw attention to problems – we work with consumers and with a range of organisations to champion creative solutions that make a difference to consumers’ lives. For regular updates from Consumer Focus, sign up to our monthly e-newsletter by emailing [email protected] or follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/consumerfocus Consumer Focus Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 8 Background ..............................................................................................................
  • Members Directory | World Coal Association

    Members Directory | World Coal Association

    Become a member Search Coal Reducing CO2 emissions Environmental protection Sustainable societies About WCA News & opinion Resources Members area Members Directory The World Coal Association is the global network for the coal industry. Information on all WCA members is available in this B E C O M E A M E M B E R directory. Corporate Member Anglo American Arch Coal Inc Aurizon Banpu BHP Billiton Bowie Resource Partners Caterpillar Global Mining China National Coal Group Glencore Joy Global Karakan Invest LLC Vostsibugol Mitsubishi Development Pty Ltd Orica Ltd Peabody Energy Rio Tinto Energy (MDP) Shenhua Group Corporation Limited Whitehaven Coal Limited Xcoal Energy and Resources Associate Member Andi Assocarboni Associação Brasileira de Carvão Association of British Mining Mineral Equipment Companies (ABMEC) China National Coal Association Coal Association of Canada (CAC) Coal Association of New Zealand Coallmp - Association of Uk Coal Importers Fossil Fuel Foundation German Coal Association (GSVt) Indonesian Coal Mining Association Iranian Mines & Mining Industries (APBI-ICMA) Development & Renovation Organization (IMIDRO) Japan Coal Energy Center (JCOAL) Minerals Council of Australia Mongolian Coal Association National Mining Association (NMA) Queensland Resources Council (QRC) Shaanxi Institute of Geological Survey Svenska Kolinstitutet MOU Coal Utilization Research Council European Association for Coal and VGB Powertech e.V. (CURC) Lignite (EURACOAL) World Coal Association Helpful links Explore Email. [email protected] Reducing CO2 emissions F I N D U S O N Tel. +44 (0) 20 7851 0052 Platform for Accelerating Coal Efficiency Fax. +44 (0) 20 7851 0061 Carbon capture, use and storage Contact us About WCA T H E J O U R N A L O F T H E C O A L I N D U S T R Y Terms & Conditions Media information Cookie policy Unless otherwise specified, images courtesy of Accessibility Shutterstock © 2015 World Coal Association.
  • Aquamarine Power Response

    Aquamarine Power Response

    Strengthening strategic and sustainability considerations in Ofgem’s decision making Aquamarine Power’s response 1. Introduction “With a quarter of the UK’s generating capacity shutting down over the next ten years as old coal and nuclear power stations close, more than £110bn in investment is needed to build the equivalent of 20 large power stations and upgrade the grid. In the longer term, by 2050, electricity demand is set to double, as we shift more transport and heating onto the electricity grid. Business as usual is therefore not an option.i” Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2010 The coming decades will see a radical shift in the way in which electricity is generated and how it is paid for, and we welcome this discussion paper. We believe marine energy – wave and tidal power – offers a potential new energy source which can make a significant contribution to the UK and global energy mix in the decades ahead. But we are concerned the current charging regime fails to take account of the particular economic challenges faced by these early stage technologies, and as a consequence there is a danger that wave and tidal energy will be ‘locked out’ of any future energy scenario. This would mean UK consumers would miss out on a new form of energy which has the potential to drive down consumer bills in the long term, and also that UK would miss out on a major economic opportunity to become a global leader in new technologies. As project Discovery stated, the lowest domestic fuel bills would be likely to be realised under the ‘Green Stimulus’ scenario in which the UK reaches its 2020 renewable energy targetii.
  • Carbon Disclosure Project 2011

    Carbon Disclosure Project 2011

    CDP 2011 Investor CDP 2011 Information Request Carbon Disclosure Project Centrica Module: Introduction Page: Introduction 0.1 Introduction Please give a general description and introduction to your organization About Centrica Our vision is to be the leading integrated energy company in our chosen markets. We source, generate, process, store, trade, save and supply energy and provide a range of related services. We secure and supply gas and electricity for millions of homes and business and offer a range of home energy solutions and low carbon products and services. We have strong brands and distinctive skills which we use to achieve success in our chosen markets of the UK and North America, and for the benefit of our employees, our customers and our shareholders. In the UK, we source, generate, process and trade gas and electricity through our Centrica Energy business division. We store gas through Centrica Storage and we supply products and services to customers through our retail brand British Gas. In North America, Centrica operates under the name Direct Energy, which now accounts for about a quarter of group turnover. We believe that climate change is one of the single biggest global challenges. Energy generation and energy use are significant contributors to man-made greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, a driver of climate change. As an integrated energy company, we play a pivotal role in helping to tackle climate change by changing how energy is generated and how consumers use energy. Our corporate responsibility (CR) vision is to be the most trusted energy company leading the move to a low carbon future.