DOCSLIB.ORG

Roussely Report: Saving French Nuclear Industry with Outrageous Measures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Roussely Report: Saving French Nuclear Industry with Outrageous Measures SEPTEMBER 3, 2010 | No. 715 ROUSSELY REPORT: SAVING FRENCH NUCLEAR INDUSTRY WITH ROUSSELY REPORT: SAVING FRENCH NUCLEAR INDUSTRY OUTRAGEOUS MEASURES WITH OUTRAGEOUS After France's failure to win the contract for four nuclear power MEASURES 1 plants in the United Arab Emirates, President Sarkozy ordered a OLKILUOTO BLOCKADE 2 report on the French nuclear industry. The outline of the Roussely report (named after Francois Roussely, a former EDF president), HAUNTED BY HISTORY: NUCLEAR NEW BUILD IN dated June 16, was made public –in French- by the Elysée Palace BRITAIN 4 on 27 July 2010 NUCLEAR ENERGY (715.6078) Sortir du nucleaire - In the the claims made by Areva, the merchant DECREASES WORLD report, author Francois Roussely of nuclear plants. Roussely points out the STABILITY AND INCREASES recognizes the scale of the problems inadequate performance of the French INEQUALITY 7 facing the French nuclear industry: lack nuclear reactors: “whereas global of export competitiveness, falling average nuclear plant availability has MORE PLUTONIUM DESTINED domestic load factor, delays and cost significantly increased during the last 15 FOR WIPP? 7 overruns in EPR construction projects. years, nuclear plant availability in France PROLONGING NUCLEAR has seen a marked decrease in the last POWER WILL HINDER French nuclear industry: disastrous few years.” RENEWABLES 8 economic and industrial results The failure of the EPR is such, according IN BRIEF 9 The Roussely report recognizes the scale to Roussely, that “it is the credibility, and of the setbacks experienced by Areva therefore the very existence” of the and EDF at the EPR reactor construction French nuclear industry which is at stake. sites in France and Finland: “the In the face of this, Roussely uses all credibility of both the EPR model and the available means to recommend various French nuclear industry's ability to build equally outrageous “emergency new reactors has been severely eroded measures”. by the difficulties encountered at the Finnish construction site of Olkiluoto and Passing the cost onto the consumer at the site of the third tranche of the and misuse of public funding Flamanville plant.” At fault is the “complexity of the EPR” which “without Roussely recommends “a moderate but doubt hinders its construction and regular increase of electricity tariffs, consequently impacts on its cost.” opening the way towards financing the renewal of nuclear installations”. Is By stating that “the nuclear industry must nuclear power too costly? That's no become sufficiently competitive to attract problem, the consumer can pay. By private investment”, Roussely admits becoming "regular", the tariff increase is that the nuclear industry has so far unlikely to remain "moderate" for any never been competitive nor length of time... economically efficient, in contrast with 1 Roussely proposes the diversion of Chernobyl cost, in euros and in human [...] is an essential condition for some of the funding available for lives? developing the civilian nuclear industry”. renewable energy to benefit the Roussely points out that “[nuclear nuclear industry. Given the economic constraints, waste] is the most convincing argument Roussely gives little thought to the against nuclear power for 60 to 70% of The uranium used in nuclear plants is a appalling working conditions of the French people”. finite mineral resource and is non- 20,000 external workforce employed by renewable: nuclear power is a fossil 600 subcontracting firms. Last May, Yet there is no solution to the serious energy as much as oil and coal. Yet eight temporary workers were forced to problem of nuclear waste, some of Roussely suggests “taking firm political go on strike at the CEA site at which remains dangerous for hundreds action to ensure that all multilateral Carradache: they were not being paid of thousands of years. Roussely lets slip funds for renewable energy should also and had to buy their own radioactive a telling confession: “a list of realistic be available to the nuclear industry”. protection gear! Yet Roussely only specifications” is yet to be drawn up for proposes a working conditions “charter”, the nuclear waste burial site at Bure, Savings at the expense of safety i.e. a non-binding list of commitments due to become operational in 2015. So left to the goodwill of companies... Roussely admits in veiled terms that The Roussely report confirms a all the fine words uttered for years by dangerous trend: the reduction of safety Gagging a cautious French Safety the French National Radioactive and security requirements in the face of Authority Waste Management Agency ANDRA economic constraints: “Continually are not “realistic”. increasing safety requirements cannot Roussely calls for a reduction in the be the only rational way forward”. scope of the Autorité de Sûreté Thus, one shall not be surprised that Roussely calls for the optimal Nucléaire (ASN) in favor of the Roussely is panicking to such an extent realignment between safety government: “the government must that he addresses all the industry's requirements and economic constraints. define a balanced modus vivendi with players: “It is now essential that ANDRA This politically correct jargon means that the ASN, it must re-establish a determines as a matter of urgency the safety requirements are governed by sovereignty which it shouldn't relinquish detailed operational plans being set up the industry’s criteria of profitability and to an independent authority.” This is for 2015 in relation to the deep disposal profit. “Safety indeed, but only if we can clearly a way to reduce the small margin centre. To achieve this, it is proposed afford it!” of autonomy available to the official that ANDRA urgently involves EDF, organization controlling the nuclear AREVA and the CEA (French Atomic Nuclear energy is not “attractive enough industry. Energy and Alternative Energies for private investment”, so the Although very muted, criticisms from the Commission) in defining the best construction of new reactors is not a ASN remain an embarrassment for possible specifications for the deep foregone conclusion. Roussely Areva and EDF: “events with very disposal center and its completion.” recommends an increase in the lifespan limited effects [i.e. incidents and design of French nuclear power stations to 60 errors documented by the ASN] should An English translation of the published years, when they were designed to not result in undeserved suspicion of summary of the Roussely report is operate for 30! The oldest French [nuclear] technology as a whole.” available at: http://www.psr.org/nuclear- reactors have already experienced bailout/resources/roussely-report-france- incidents far more numerous than the The Roussely report confirms the fact nuclear-epr.pdf average across nuclear installations as that the government sees the ASN as a a whole. To pretend they can operate useful alibi, a tool to “reassure” the Source and contact: Sortir du for another 30 years is therefore a high- population. Does the French Safety nucleaire, 9, rue Dumenge, 69317 Lyon risk strategy, totally irresponsible. Authority only have authority in name? Cedex 04, France. Several hundred million euros would be Email: [email protected] needed to repair each reactor, which Making nuclear waste acceptable to Web: www.sortirdunucleaire.org would still be cheaper than the 5 billion the public required to (maybe) build an EPR. And how much would a major accident like Roussely admits that “public acceptance OLKILUOTO BLOCKADE Saturday August 28 was the day of the first publicly announced blockade of a nuclear site in Finland ever. More than 100 activists from Finland and other countries did several blockades on the roads to the nuclear power plant. While a bigger blockade with picnics, sit-ins and other activities closed the entry to the main access road to the NPP blockading also several times the highway passing this place, smaller action groups showed up at many points on the roads to the power station. 2 NUCLEAR MONITOR 715 (715.6079) Olkiluoto blockade - The only besides the streets. Rumors said area around Olkiluoto is owned by the police could not prevent most of the that (para-)military and special riot police atomic industry the prohibited area is actions, although they closed a huge forces were stationed at the plant and in small and public is allowed to use the area of public roads for everyone who the forests close to the power station. forests very close to the power station. was not a resident or a nuclear power There were also police on the water plant worker. Even media had no access around the peninsula on which the plant People made music, had talks with local to that region. However, activists used is located, some people reported. people, showed banners to the cars on the forests to reach the forbidden area Actually, most blockaders just saw a few the highway next to the blockade, and successfully blockaded many roads police units at the main access road discussed about nuclear power and for up to nine hours. junction to the highway and at important chances to fight against it and had junctions of smaller access roads to the picnics, coffee and cakes. Cars leaving While smaller action groups had spread plant, where they had street barricades the nuclear area were usually allowed to over the region closed for public by the to stop public from reaching this public pass the blockade as well as police for that day and did several area. ambulances or other emergency cars. In blockades with sit-ins and lock-ons, a the beginning the police forced people bigger group of more than 50 activists In Finland's countryside "everyone's to let a few trucks pass, too. But later, blockaded the access from the highway right" is ruling - private property owners when the blockade had been completely E8 to the main road to the nuclear of land can't prohibit anyone to go to the established and the smaller blockades power plant (NPP) Olkiluoto for some 9 forests, camp there, have camp fire etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Energy Bill: Pre–Legislative Scrutiny
    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee Draft Energy Bill: Pre–legislative Scrutiny First Report of Session 2012-13 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 24 May, 12, 19 and 26 June, 3 July, and 10 July 2012 Published on Monday 23 July 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Pays? Consumer Attitudes to the Growth of Levies to Fund Environmental and Social Energy Policy Objectives Prashant Vaze and Chris Hewett About Consumer Focus
    Who Pays? Consumer attitudes to the growth of levies to fund environmental and social energy policy objectives Prashant Vaze and Chris Hewett About Consumer Focus Consumer Focus is the statutory Following the recent consumer and consumer champion for England, Wales, competition reforms, the Government Scotland and (for postal consumers) has asked Consumer Focus to establish Northern Ireland. a new Regulated Industries Unit by April 2013 to represent consumers’ interests in We operate across the whole of the complex, regulated markets sectors. The economy, persuading businesses, Citizens Advice service will take on our public services and policy-makers to role in other markets from April 2013. put consumers at the heart of what they do. We tackle the issues that matter to Our Annual Plan for 2012/13 is available consumers, and give people a stronger online, consumerfocus.org.uk voice. We don’t just draw attention to problems – we work with consumers and with a range of organisations to champion creative solutions that make a difference to consumers’ lives. For regular updates from Consumer Focus, sign up to our monthly e-newsletter by emailing [email protected] or follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/consumerfocus Consumer Focus Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................... 4 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 8 Background ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Corporate Responsibility Report 2007
    Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Index Page number Welcome 2 Performance Summary 2007 3 Managing our Responsibilities Our Approach 6 Governance 7 Environment 8 Stakeholder Engagement 11 Scope 12 Benchmarking and Recognition 13 Our 12 Impacts 15 Provision of Energy 16 Health and Safety 25 Customer Experience 35 Climate Change and Emissions to Air 43 Waste and Resource Use 52 Biodiversity 62 Sites, Siting and Infrastructure 70 Employment Experience 75 Customers with Special Circumstances 88 Community 94 Procurement 107 Economic 113 Assurance Statement 116 Page 1 of 118 www.scottishpower.com/CorporateResponsibility.asp Corporate Responsibility Report 2007 Welcome 2007 was a landmark year for our business with the successful integration of ScottishPower and IBERDROLA. The new enlarged IBERDROLA Group ended 2007 as one of the worlds largest electricity companies by market capitalisation. Through the friendly integration, now successfully completed, we have reinforced our shared commitment to Corporate Responsibility. Our reporting year has been aligned to IBERDROLA so going forward we will be working on a calendar year basis. Achieving Scottish Business in the Community Large Company of the Year in 2007 was an important endorsement for ScottishPowers work and to our commitment to environmental and social issues. During 2007, we have announced significant investments in sustainable generation projects and environmental technologies; increased our 2010 target for delivery of wind energy projects in the UK to 1,200 MW and established partnerships that will help secure Scotlands place as the world leader in marine energy. In addition, we announced the UKs largest energy crop project and embarked on a major study into cleaner coal generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Energy Electrical Architecture
    Marine Energy Electrical Architecture Report 1: Landscape Map and Literature Review September 2015 Marine Energy Electrical Architecture PN000083-LRT-006 Document History Field Detail Report Title Marine Energy Electrical Architecture Report Sub-Title Report 1: Landscape Map and Literature Review Client/Funding CORE Status Public Project Reference PN000083 Document Reference PN000083-LRT-006 Prepared Revision Date Checked by Approved by Revision History by R0 April 2015 Alan Mason Stephanie Hay Rachel Hodges First Release August R1 Alan Mason Stephanie Hay Rachel Hodges Second Release 2015 Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is for general information and is provided by TNEI. Whilst we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, neither ORE Catapult nor TNEI make any representations or warranties of any kind, express, or implied about the completeness, accuracy or reliability of the information and related graphics. Any reliance you place on this information is at your own risk and in no event shall ORE Catapult or TNEI be held liable for any loss, damage including without limitation indirect or consequential damage or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from reliance on same. ORE Catapult Marine Energy Electrical Architecture PN000083-LRT-006 Contents 1 Executive summary ................................................................................................ 5 2 Introduction............................................................................................................. 8 3 MEC Overview......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Centrica Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2010 65
    Governance // Independent Auditors’ Report to the members of Centrica plc Opinion on other matter prescribed by the Companies Independent Auditors’ Act 2006 In our opinion the information given in the Directors’ Report for the Report to the members financial year for which the Group Financial Statements are prepared of Centrica plc is consistent with the Group Financial Statements. Matters on which we are required to report by exception We have nothing to report in respect of the following: Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion: certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit. We have audited the Group Financial Statements of Centrica plc for the year ended 31 December 2010 which comprise the Group Under the Listing Rules we are required to review: Income Statement, the Group Statement of Comprehensive the Directors’ statement, set out on page 48, in relation to going Income, the Group Balance Sheet, the Group Statement of concern; Changes in Equity, the Group Cash Flow Statement and the related notes. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the part of the Corporate Governance Report relating to the their preparation is applicable law and International Financial Company’s compliance with the nine provisions of the June 2008 Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union. Combined Code specified for our review; and certain elements of the report to shareholders by the Board on Respective responsibilities of Directors directors’ remuneration.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the United States District Court for the Northern
    Case 6:17-cv-00264-FJS-ATB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARTIN FORTE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 6:17-CV-0264 (FJS/ATB) v. ) ) CLASS ACTION DIRECT ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, a ) Delaware Limited Liability Company, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) Defendant. ) ) Class Action Complaint Plaintiff brings this consumer protection class action in his individual capacity, and on behalf of a class of persons defined below, against Direct Energy Services, LLC (“Defendant,” “DES,” or the “Company”), and hereby alleges the following with knowledge as to his own acts, and upon information and belief as to all other acts: INTRODUCTION 1. For decades, the prices paid by consumers for their electricity and gas were strictly regulated. However, in 1996, the New York legislature opened New York’s energy market to “competition,” whereby consumers could choose from a variety of companies selling residential energy in addition to traditional utilities like Consolidated Edison. Taking advantage of the deregulation in New York and other states, companies like Defendant (called energy services companies, or “ESCOs”) jumped into the market and began to grow rapidly. 2. Defendant has fueled its rapid expansion not by providing a good service for a fair price, but rather by developing and using deceptive and unlawful marketing and sales practices that often result in its energy customers paying far more than they would have paid had they stayed with their traditional energy suppliers. And regardless of any savings, or lack thereof, 1 Case 6:17-cv-00264-FJS-ATB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 2 of 21 DES fails to conspicuously disclose its variable rate pricing structure, in violation of New York law.
    [Show full text]
  • Centrica Annual Report 2009
    Centrica plc Centrica plc Company registered in England and Wales No. 3033654 Registered office: Millstream, Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Accounts and Annual Report Berkshire SL4 5GD www.centrica.com 2009 Annual Report and Accounts 2009 Centrica plc Centrica plc Company registered in England and Wales No. 3033654 Registered office: Millstream, Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Accounts and Annual Report Berkshire SL4 5GD www.centrica.com 2009 Annual Report and Accounts 2009 Financial Index Highlights Accounting policies 28, 68-82, 153-154 Financial instruments UK: British Gas, Centrica Energy and Centrica Storage Acquisitions, business combinations 2, 4, 11, 12, 14, 28, 70-71, 74, 139-142 derivative 78, 111-114 Directors’ Report – Business Review The new Alternative Formats 164 fair value 78, 119-123 Our Performance North America: Direct Energy Assets and liabilities 27, 64, 160 hedge accounting 78, 114 shape of Auditors Financial Review IFC, 27-28 Revenue‡ Operating Profit* ‡ Employees‡ re-appointment 44 Five-year record 160 Centrica: remuneration 97 Fixed fee service contracts 148 Centrica’s main operations are in the UK report to the members of Centrica plc 60, 151 FSA (Financial Services Authority) 12, 24, 71 We’re restructuring 8% 1% 15% Awards 5, 12, 25, 26 Fuel poverty 12, 24, 30 9% Balance Sheet Gas and liquids reserves 81, 159 and North America. We have two types of the business to meet 28% 4% Company, notes 152-158 Gas Balancing Alerts 6, 17 57% 55% Group 64 Gas exploration 6, 14-15 the modern demands 28% business – downstream and upstream.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012JRC Wind Status Report
    2012 JRC wind status report Technology, market and economic aspects of wind energy in Europe Roberto Lacal Arántegui, main author. Teodora Corsatea and Kiti Suomalainen, contributing authors. 2012 Report EUR 25647 EN Cover picture: Sunset at a wind farm. © Jos Beurskens. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy and Transport Contact information Roberto Lacal Arántegui Address: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport. Westerduinweg 3, NL-1755 LE Petten, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +31 224 56 53 90 Fax: +31 224 56 56 16 http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu This publication is a Reference Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC77895 EUR 25647 EN ISBN 978-92-79-27955-3 (pdf) ISBN 978-92-79-27956-0 (print) ISSN 1831-9424 (online) ISSN 1018-5593 (print) doi:10.2790/72493 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013 © European Union, 2013 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Centrica Annual Report 2012
    Centrica plc plc Centrica Annual Report and Accounts 2012 INTEGRATED ENERGY CENTRicA PLC Registered office: Millstream, Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire SL4 5GD Company registered in England Annual Report and Accounts 2012 and Wales No. 3033654 centrica.com Centrica plc Annual Report and Accounts 2012 Centrica plc Annual Report and Accounts 2012 INTEGRATED ENERGY IS WHAT WE DO. It means constantly exploring new ways to source, procure and generate an affordable supply of energy. It means integrating innovation and technology into the home, giving our customers access to energy and services, whenever they need it. It means working with governments, regulators and partners to make the right things happen at the right time. Most important of all, it means empowering our customers to take control of their energy needs as we work towards a low carbon future. INTEGRATED ENERGY FROM CENTRicA. This report is printed on Revive 100 Silk which is made from 100% recycled post- consumer fibre that is Totally Chlorine Free. This paper has been independently certified according to the rules of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC®). ONLINE Designed and produced by INTEGRATED ENERGY Photography by David Hares, Mike What it means to us How we achieve it Abrahams, Igor Emmerich, Charlie Fawell Disclaimer and David Partner. This Annual Report and Accounts does not constitute an invitation to underwrite, subscribe for, or otherwise acquire or dispose of any Centrica shares or other securities. Printed by CPI Colour Limited Use your smartphone or tablet This Annual Report and Accounts contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to the financial ISO14001, FSC certified and CarbonNeutral®.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsidies and External Costs in Electric Power Generation: a Comparative Review of Estimates
    Subsidies and External Costs in Electric Power Generation: A comparative review of estimates Lucy Kitson Peter Wooders Tom Moerenhout September 2011 www.iisd.org/gsi © 2011 The International Institute for Sustainable Development © 2011 The International Institute for Sustainable Development Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development. About IISD The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change and energy, and management of natural and social capital, as well as the enabling role of communication technologies in these areas. We report on international negotiations and disseminate knowledge gained through collaborative projects, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries, better networks spanning the North and the South, and better global connections among researchers, practitioners, citizens and policy-makers. IISD’s vision is better living for all—sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably. IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and Environment Canada, and from the Province of Manitoba. The Institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies, foundations and the private sector. Head Office 161 Portage Avenue East, 6th Floor, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3B 0Y4 Tel: +1 (204) 958-7700 | Fax: +1 (204) 958-7710 | Web site: www.iisd.org About GSI GSI is an initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).
    [Show full text]
  • 2012JRC Wind Status Report
    2012 JRC wind status report Technology, market and economic aspects of wind energy in Europe Roberto Lacal Arántegui, main author. Teodora Corsatea and Kiti Suomalainen, contributing authors. 2012 Report EUR 25647 EN Cover picture: Sunset wind farm. © Jos Beurskens. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy and Transport Contact information Roberto Lacal Arántegui Address: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport. Westerduinweg 3, NL-1755 LE Petten, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +31 224 56 53 90 Fax: +31 224 56 56 16 http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu This publication is a Reference Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC77895 EUR 25647 EN ISBN 978-92-79-27956-0 (print) ISBN 978-92-79-27955-3 (pdf) ISSN 1018-5593 (print) ISSN 1831-9424 (online) doi:10.2790/72509 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2013 © European Union, 2013 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Centrica Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2010
    Centrica plc Registered office: Millstream, Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire SL4 5GD Company registered in England Report Annual and Wales No. 3033654 www.centrica.com and Accounts and 2010 Annual Report and Accounts 2010 Transporting personnel to the North Sea platforms UK: British Gas, Centrica Energy and Centrica Storage North America: Direct Energy PERFORMANCE ‡ ‡ ‡ Revenue Operating Profit* Employees 10% 16% 26% 7% 1% HIGHLIGHTS 4% 57% 51% 79% 1% Centrica’s main operations are in the UK and North America. 32% We have two types of business – downstream and upstream. 16% Downstream UK Upstream UK Storage UK North America Operating ◊ ‡ Adjusted earnings Group revenue Dividend per share Revenue‡ profit*‡ £m £m pence £m £m Downstream UK 1,297 14.30 22,423 21,963 1,111 12.80 1,122 20,872 12.20 Residential energy supply We are the biggest energy supplier in Britain’s domestic market. 8,355 742 11.57 911 9.92 Residential services We are Britain’s largest operator in the installation and maintenance of 16,065 15,893 707 domestic central heating and gas appliances. 1,464 241 Business energy supply We are Britain’s leading supplier of energy and related services and services to businesses. 2,906 233 06 07 08 09 10 06 07 08 09 10 06 07 08 09 10 Upstream UK With assets primarily in the UK and Norwegian continental shelf, our Financial highlights 2010 2009 Upstream gas and oil activities include gas and oil production, development and exploration. 864 581 ‡ Revenue £22.42bn £21.96bn We own and operate eight gas fired power stations, have a leading position Adjusted operating profit*‡ £2,390m £1,857m Power generation in offshore wind and a 20% stake in British Energy’s nuclear fleet.
    [Show full text]