DOCSLIB.ORG

Labour's Zero-Based Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Labour's Zero-Based Review Labour’s Zero-Based Review Interim Report Number 15: Department for Energy and Climate Change Labour’s Zero-Based Review Interim Report No.15 DEPARTMENT FOR ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE FOREWORD The leader of the Labour Party, Ed Miliband, and the Shadow ChanCellor, Ed Balls, have made Clear that departmental budgets will be cut not only in 2015-16, but each year until we have achieved our promise to balanCe the books. Across every part of the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), we need to take a tighter approach to finanCial management of taxpayers’ money, and reform the framework within which the energy market operates so that it is fair for bill payers. Under the Tory’s failing plan, energy bills have risen, and energy Companies have failed to pass on falling wholesale Costs. Record numbers of families with children Cannot afford to heat their homes. Investors face unCertainty and indeCision about the future of our energy system. And the mismanagement of taxpayers’ money, such as through the Government’s poor-value Green Deal Home Improvement Fund, and the NuClear Decommissioning Authority’s budget, have seen tens of millions of pounds wasted. Britain needs a government that will stand up to the energy Companies to deliver fairer prices and a better deal for bill payers. A government that is serious about tackling the sCandal of fuel poverty and cold homes. And a government that is putting in place the vital reforms neCessary for investment in the low Carbon future of our energy system, and to deliver value for money for the taxpayer. This interim Zero-Based Review highlights just some of the ways in which we will do this. These examples have been guided by our principles to: • Stand up for bill payers; • Tackle fuel poverty and cold homes; • SeCure greater investment in energy; and • Ensure value for money across every part of the Department of Energy and Climate Change, including tackling the UK’s long-term nuClear waste effiCiently and effeCtively. It was a Labour Government, through the Energy Act 2008, that legislated to ensure that new nuClear power station operators have secure finanCing arrangements in place to meet the full Costs of deCommissioning and waste management. But the UK Continues to face a legacy of nuClear waste built up over many deCades. Tackling this safely and effeCtively will remain an absolute priority under a Labour Government. However, we must ensure that the NuClear Decommissioning Authority, in managing such an important programme of work, and at such Considerable cost to the taxpayer, is able to demonstrate value for money. We highlight £38 million of potential annual savings from the Department of Energy and Climate Change, in addition to one-off savings of £10 million over the Parliament, and there could be scope for Considerably more. This represents just a sample of our work to find savings and efficiencies across Government. The next Labour Government will balanCe the books and deliver a surplus on the current budget and falling national debt as soon as possible in the next Parliament. There will be no additional borrowing for day-to-day spending. Labour will finish the job where this Government has failed. Caroline Flint MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change Chris Leslie MP, Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury 1 LABOUR’S ZERO-BASED REVIEW The Zero-Based Review is a root and branCh analysis of every pound the Government spends. It will help the next Labour Government to ruthlessly prioritise public spending and deliver service reform and improvements, rather than just salami-slicing budgets and watching services deteriorate, as has been the practiCe under this Government. This process is intended not only to reveal the current Government’s Costly errors and skewed priorities but will require the Labour Party to grasp opportunities to deliver reformed public services which are valued and justifiable; which provide value for money and quality services that meet the needs and demands of the public who use them; and which Can both make savings and secure economiC growth. Fundamentally reviewing current Government spending is a neCessary step in preparing for office. Last year Ed Balls MP, the Shadow ChanCellor, announCed that Labour would conduct a detailed review of every pound the Government spends, in order to help prepare ourselves for the Challenges that the next administration will face. We set out the principles of our Zero-Based Review in a Phase 1 discussion document in December 2013. Since the beginning of the year, Chris Leslie MP, Shadow Chief SeCretary to the Treasury, has been examining detailed departmental expenditure as part of our first round of the Zero- Based Review, analysing every budget and exploring public service reform and redesign in detail with each Shadow team. This process has been guided by the following five principles: • We will use public money more efficiently – and seek efficiencies in every area of government spending; • We will use all departmental budgets to strengthen the economy – supporting growth, job Creation, innovation and exports; • We will ensure greater fairness in the impact of spending – and will prioritise spending that prevents future problems; • At the same time as inCreasing efficiency, the quality and experience of public service must improve – offering the speed, simpliCity and responsiveness that people now expect; and • We will strengthen accountability and transparency across government – with Clear efficiency inCentives for all departments. No department has been exempt from this process, including any areas that we may choose to proteCt or ring-fence, beCause efficiency will be neCessary across all areas of spending. Our work for Phase 1 of our Zero-Based Review has been informed by the wide range of 2 reports which have Contributed to the Labour Party’s Policy Review: the Armitt Review of long-term infrastruCture planning; the LoCal Government Innovation TaskforCe; the Stevens Review of policing and crime; and the Adonis Growth Review, to mention just a few. Labour will Continue to expose waste, mismanagement and poor deCision making by David Cameron’s Government, as well as inCrease the sCrutiny of each departmental balanCe sheet over the months to come. We will Complete our Zero-Based Review with our first Spending Review in government, but this early work is CruCial to inform the policy choices we will make. As Ed Miliband and Ed Balls have outlined, the next Labour Government will be about big reforms, not big spending. 3 FAILURES OF THE TORY-LED APPROACH TO ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE The current Government has repeatedly failed to stand up to the big energy Companies and demand a better deal for consumers, tackle fuel poverty and cold homes, secure greater investment in energy, and ensure value for money from every part of the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), including tackling the UK’s long-term nuClear waste effiCiently and effeCtively. Failing to stand up for bill payers • Household energy bills are up by £300 a year Compared to 2010 – and have inCreased twiCe as fast as inflation, four times faster than wages, and faster than almost any other economy in the developed world1. • David Cameron has promised on 17 separate oCCasions to force the energy Companies, in law, to put all consumers on the lowest tariff. Yet he has failed to take action, with three out of four families still not on their supplier’s Cheapest tariff, and households being overCharged by an average £180 per year2. • Despite wholesale gas prices falling by an estimated 20 per cent since December 2013, energy Companies have passed on Cuts of just 1-5 per cent to bill payers in recent months, and only on their gas bills. In Opposition, David Cameron said “you have to give the regulator the teeth to order that those reduCtions are made, and that is what we will do”3. Yet six years later, the Government has refused to act, and voted twiCe against Labour’s proposals to give the energy regulator the power to cut energy prices when wholesale Costs fall4. • It is essential that consumers get value for money from the smart meter programme, which will be paid for by bill payers. The House of Commons’ Energy and Climate Change Committee agreed that a lack of leadership by this Government has led to delays which threaten to inCrease the £10.9 billion Costs of the programme, and delay progress against the target for all homes and businesses to have smart meters installed by 20205. Failing to tackle fuel poverty and cold homes • There are over one million families with children who Cannot afford to heat their homes – the highest level ever recorded. Fuel poverty is projeCted to inCrease to 2.3 million 1 House of Commons library, based on figures from the Department of Energy and Climate Change. 2 Department of Energy and Climate Change, Quarterly domestiC energy customer numbers, and analysis of suppliers’ tariffs. 3 David Cameron, Cameron Direct (Bedford), 8 September 2009. 4 Opposition Day debates on energy priCe regulation were held on 18 June 2014, and 14 January 2015. 5 House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee, MarCh 2015, Smart meters: progress or delay. 4 households, and the fuel poverty gap – the difference between people’s bills and what they Can afford – was estimated to have inCreased to £480 last year6. • Under this Government, only around 60 per cent of the money available under the Energy Company Obligation (ECO) goes to households on low incomes or living in fuel poverty. The number of homes getting loft and Cavity wall insulation has fallen by two- thirds since 20107. • By February 2015, just over 5,000 households in Britain had energy measures installed under the Government’s pay-as-you-save energy efficiency scheme, the Green Deal8 – far short of the Government’s target of 10,000 by the end of 20139.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From 'Greenest Government Ever' to 'Get Rid of All the Green Crap': David Cameron, the Conservatives and the Environment
    This is a repository copy of From ‘greenest government ever’ to ‘get rid of all the green crap’: David Cameron, the Conservatives and the environment. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/85469/ Version: Submitted Version Article: Carter, Neil Thomas orcid.org/0000-0003-3378-8773 and Clements, Ben (2015) From ‘greenest government ever’ to ‘get rid of all the green crap’: David Cameron, the Conservatives and the environment. British Politics. 204–225. ISSN 1746-918X https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.16 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ From ‘Greenest government ever’ to ‘get rid of all the green crap’: David Cameron, the Conservatives and the Environment by Neil Carter (University of York) and Ben Clements (University of Leicester) Published in British Politics, early online April 2015. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copy-edit version of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of the Green Investment Bank: Costs and Benefits, Rationale and Value for Money
    The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money Report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills Final report October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 2 Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Vivid Economics would like to thank BIS staff for their practical support in the review of outputs throughout this project. We would like to thank McKinsey and Deloitte for their valuable assistance in delivering this project from start to finish. In addition, we would like to thank the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), the Carbon Trust and Sustainable Development Capital LLP (SDCL), for their valuable support and advice at various stages of the research. We are grateful to the many individuals in the financial sector and the energy, waste, water, transport and environmental industries for sharing their insights with us. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors and not those of BIS or any other party, and the authors take responsibility for any errors or omissions. An appropriate citation for this report is: Vivid Economics in association with McKinsey & Co, The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money, report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 3 Executive Summary The UK Government is committed to achieving the transition to a green economy and delivering long-term sustainable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performance of the Department of Energy & Climate Change 2012-13
    DEPARTMENTAL OVERVIEW The performance of the Department of Energy & Climate Change 2012-13 NOVEMBER 2013 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Amyas Morse, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 860 staff. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice help government improve public services, and our work led to audited savings of almost £1.2 billion in 2012. Contents Introduction Aim and scope of this briefing 4 Part One About the Department 5 Part Two Recent NAO work on the Department 24 Appendix One The Department’s sponsored bodies at 1 April 2013 29 Appendix Two Results of the Civil Service People Survey 2012 30 Appendix Three Publications by the NAO on the Department since April 2011 32 Appendix Four Cross-government reports of relevance to the Department since April 2011 34 Links to external websites were valid at the time of publication of this report. The National Audit Office is not responsible for the future validity of the links.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyndall Centre Briefing Note 40
    Review of the Fourth Carbon Budget - Call for Evidence www.theccc.org.uk/call-for-evidence Question and Response form When responding please provide answers that are as specific and evidence-based as possible, providing data and references to the extent possible. Please limit your response to a maximum of 400 words per question. Questions for consideration: A. Climate Science and International Circumstances The Committee’s advice assumes a climate objective to limit central estimates of temperature rise to as close to 2C as possible, with a very low chance of exceeding 4C by 2100 (henceforth referred to as “the climate objective”). This is broadly similar to the UNFCCC climate objective, and that of the EU. In order to achieve this objective, global emissions would have to peak in the next few years, before decreasing to roughly half of recent levels by 2050 and falling further thereafter. The UNFCCC is working toward a global deal consistent with such reductions, to be agreed by 2015. Earlier attempts (e.g. at Copenhagen in 2009, before the fourth budget was recommended or legislated) have failed to achieve a comprehensive global deal to limit emissions. It is difficult to imagine a global deal which allows developed countries to have emissions per capita in 2050 which are significantly above a sustainable global average, implying the need for emissions reductions in the UK of at least 80% from 1990 levels by 2050. The EU has not yet agreed a package beyond 2020, but the European Commission is consulting on a range of issues relating to development of climate and energy targets for 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • The Renewable Energy Review May 2011
    The Renewable Energy Review May 2011 Preface The Committee on Climate Change (the Committee) is an independent statutory body which was established under the Climate Change Act (2008) to advise UK and devolved administration governments on setting and meeting carbon budgets, and preparing for climate change. Setting carbon budgets In December 2008 we published our first report, Building a low-carbon economy – the UK’s contribution to tackling climate change, containing our advice on the level of the first three carbon budgets and the 2050 target; this advice was accepted by the Government and legislated by Parliament. In December 2010, we set out our advice on the fourth carbon budget, covering the period 2023-27, as required under Section 4 of the Climate Change Act; the Government will propose draft legislation for the fourth budget in Spring of 2011. We will provide advice on inclusion of international aviation and shipping in carbon budgets in Spring 2012, drawing on analysis of shipping emissions and a bioenergy review to be published later in 2011. Progress meeting carbon budgets The Climate Change Act requires that we report annually to Parliament on progress meeting carbon budgets; to date we have published two progress reports (October 2009, June 2010) and will publish our third report in June 2011. Advice requested by Government We provide ad hoc advice in response to requests by the Government and the devolved administrations. Under a process set out in the Climate Change Act, we have advised on reducing UK aviation emissions, Scottish emissions reduction targets, UK support for low-carbon technology innovation, and design of the Carbon Reduction Commitment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition Lecture Notes in Energy
    Lecture Notes in Energy 73 Manfred Hafner Simone Tagliapietra Editors The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition Lecture Notes in Energy Volume 73 Lecture Notes in Energy (LNE) is a series that reports on new developments in the study of energy: from science and engineering to the analysis of energy policy. The series’ scope includes but is not limited to, renewable and green energy, nuclear, fossil fuels and carbon capture, energy systems, energy storage and harvesting, batteries and fuel cells, power systems, energy efficiency, energy in buildings, energy policy, as well as energy-related topics in economics, management and transportation. Books published in LNE are original and timely and bridge between advanced textbooks and the forefront of research. Readers of LNE include postgraduate students and non-specialist researchers wishing to gain an accessible introduction to a field of research as well as professionals and researchers with a need for an up-to-date reference book on a well-defined topic. The series publishes single- and multi-authored volumes as well as advanced textbooks. **Indexed in Scopus and EI Compendex** The Springer Energy board welcomes your book proposal. Please get in touch with the series via Anthony Doyle, Executive Editor, Springer ([email protected]) More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/8874 Manfred Hafner • Simone Tagliapietra Editors The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition Editors Manfred Hafner Simone Tagliapietra Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Milan, Italy Milan, Italy ISSN 2195-1284 ISSN 2195-1292 (electronic) Lecture Notes in Energy ISBN 978-3-030-39065-5 ISBN 978-3-030-39066-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39066-2 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATE CHANGE Introduction
    CLIMATE CHANGE Introduction CC0. Introduction page CC0.1: Introduction [maximum 5000 characters] About The supply of energy and related services is fundamental to people’s lives and society’s progress - from keeping homes warm and well-lit to fuelling industrial processes. As an international energy and services company focused on satisfying the changing needs of our customers, we have a vital role in society. Our 38,800 employees work hard at every stage of the energy value chain - from sourcing and generating to servicing and supplying energy in our chosen markets. We serve our 28 million customer accounts through strong brands with distinctive capabilities which include British Gas in the UK, Bord Gáis Energy in the Republic of Ireland and Direct Energy in North America. Our impact on climate change We recognise that fossil fuels are a significant contributor to climate change, which is one of society’s greatest global challenges. We believe that we can play an important role tackling energy’s environmental impact and contribute positively to carbon emission reduction targets set at a national and international level. We are therefore committed to minimising carbon emissions from the energy we generate and supply as well as those created from customer consumption. Our direct carbon emissions under scope 1 include those from sources we own or control such as power generation, gas production and storage as well as emissions arising from our property, fleet and travel. Indirect carbon emissions under scope 2 come from electricity purchased and consumed across our offices and assets. Scope 3 emissions are those we do not produce but are the result of the products and services provided, such as electricity and gas sold to customers from wholesale markets alongside the products and services purchased to run our business.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C
    Global warming of 1.5°C An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty Summary for Policymakers Edited by Valérie Masson-Delmotte Panmao Zhai Co-Chair Working Group I Co-Chair Working Group I Hans-Otto Pörtner Debra Roberts Co-Chair Working Group II Co-Chair Working Group II Jim Skea Priyadarshi R. Shukla Co-Chair Working Group III Co-Chair Working Group III Anna Pirani Wilfran Moufouma-Okia Clotilde Péan Head of WGI TSU Head of Science Head of Operations Roz Pidcock Sarah Connors J. B. Robin Matthews Head of Communication Science Officer Science Officer Yang Chen Xiao Zhou Melissa I. Gomis Science Officer Science Assistant Graphics Officer Elisabeth Lonnoy Tom Maycock Melinda Tignor Tim Waterfield Project Assistant Science Editor Head of WGII TSU IT Officer Working Group I Technical Support Unit Front cover layout: Nigel Hawtin Front cover artwork: Time to Choose by Alisa Singer - www.environmentalgraphiti.org - © Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The artwork was inspired by a graphic from the SPM (Figure SPM.1). © 2018 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Revised on January 2019 by the IPCC, Switzerland. Electronic copies of this Summary for Policymakers are available from the IPCC website www.ipcc.ch ISBN 978-92-9169-151-7 Introduction Chapter 2 ChapterSummary 1 for Policymakers 6 Summary for Policymakers Summary for Policymakers SPM SPM Summary SPM for Policymakers Drafting Authors: Myles R.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Disclosure Project 2011
    CDP 2011 Investor CDP 2011 Information Request Carbon Disclosure Project Centrica Module: Introduction Page: Introduction 0.1 Introduction Please give a general description and introduction to your organization About Centrica Our vision is to be the leading integrated energy company in our chosen markets. We source, generate, process, store, trade, save and supply energy and provide a range of related services. We secure and supply gas and electricity for millions of homes and business and offer a range of home energy solutions and low carbon products and services. We have strong brands and distinctive skills which we use to achieve success in our chosen markets of the UK and North America, and for the benefit of our employees, our customers and our shareholders. In the UK, we source, generate, process and trade gas and electricity through our Centrica Energy business division. We store gas through Centrica Storage and we supply products and services to customers through our retail brand British Gas. In North America, Centrica operates under the name Direct Energy, which now accounts for about a quarter of group turnover. We believe that climate change is one of the single biggest global challenges. Energy generation and energy use are significant contributors to man-made greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, a driver of climate change. As an integrated energy company, we play a pivotal role in helping to tackle climate change by changing how energy is generated and how consumers use energy. Our corporate responsibility (CR) vision is to be the most trusted energy company leading the move to a low carbon future.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Democratic Representation Can Select Committees Influence a Company’S Environmental, Social and Governance Credentials?
    Climate Change and Democratic Representation Can Select Committees influence a company’s environmental, social and governance credentials? Stanley Kwong 2 Executive Summary The House of Commons Select Committees (Committees) are a group of MPs from different political parties tasked with examining policy issues, holding the government and companies to account, and making proposals for new laws. An area where Committee assertiveness is particularly evident is in relation to topics concerning sustainability. This is in part driven by large scale environmental disasters that warranted Committee investigation. For example, inquiries concerning BP’s oil rig catastrophe (by the Energy and Climate Change Committee) and Volkswagen’s diesel emissions scandal (by the Environmental Audit Committee) drew widespread public and media interest. Public awareness on climate change issues has further elevated Committee work in this area, with a particular emphasis on scrutinising companies that hold poor sustainability practices that affect wider society. From an economic perspective this is typical of a negative externality, with Professor Stern (2008) calling global warming ‘the greatest market failure of all time’. However, the climate crisis may be more pronounced than a solely economic failure. In particular, it may also highlight fundamental deficiencies and systemic failures in the governance of liberal democracies. In this context, the emergence of mechanisms of deliberative democracy, such as the Climate Assembly UK, have grown in popularity as formats that aim to cultivate citizen representation and participation. Nevertheless, the public continue to look to elected representatives for action, particularly on the gap that remains on private sector company oversight. This is where the Committees’ distinctive investigative approach can be a key component in driving forward the climate dialogue, by adding a unique layer of public and investigative pressure on companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Saving Trust Submission: Bright Blue Energy Efficiency Inquiry
    24 May 2016 Energy Saving Trust submission: Bright Blue energy efficiency inquiry The Energy Saving Trust is pleased to submit evidence as part of Bright Blue’s research project on home energy efficiency. We are the leading, impartial sustainable energy organisation. We work on behalf of governments and businesses across the UK providing services in the area of data, assurance, consumer engagement, advice and grant administration. For the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) the Energy Saving Trust delivers the telephone-based Energy Saving Advice Service in England and Wales. We also undertake other research and awareness-raising work for DECC on a project-by-project basis. In Scotland we are the principal delivery partner of the Scottish Government for home energy efficiency. We run comprehensive local and national advice and grants programmes across Scotland. Energy Saving Trust does a significant amount of work on EU projects and policy: we undertake work for the European Commission and frequently collaborate with energy agencies and other NGOs as a part of this. Public engagement on energy is at the heart of our work. In total each year the Energy Saving Trust handles just under half a million energy efficiency advice calls on behalf of UK and Scottish governments. We have a unique relationship with the public around energy saving and renewable energy and our response reflects that. Your Questions 1. Why did the Green Deal fail? In particular, what mistakes were made in the design of the finance mechanism and the communication of the scheme? 2. What aspects of the Green Deal scheme should be retained in a future policy? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • MCA Climate Action Plan
    13 51 6 Al Sb C Aluminium Solar cells Antimony Carbon 27 29 79 Co Cu Au Cobalt Copper Gold Batteries 26 3 25 Fe Li Mn Hydrogen Iron Lithium Manganese 12 28 41 Mg Ni Nb Magnesium CCUS Nickel Niobium 50 92 30 Sn U Zn Tin Uranium Zinc EV & hybrids Nuclear Mineral Wind Rare earth energy sands energy elements Copyright © 2020 Minerals Council of Australia CLIMATE ACTION PLAN PREAMBLE minerals.org.au Supporting ongoing climate action by Australia’s minerals industry The MCA and all of its Sustained climate action across all nations is 4. Accelerated development of the This 2020-2023 plan furthers the minerals well as taking a lead on commodity stewardship required to reduce the risks of human-induced minerals required for a low emissions sector’s public commitment to addressing looking at global procurement practices, circular members are taking serious climate change and to support world-wide future including aluminium, copper, nickel, climate change on an ongoing basis consistent economy, and traceability of commodities action on climate change decarbonisation as we transform to a lower zinc, iron, uranium, base metals, lithium, with the MCA’s climate statement. It outlines a through their lifecycle. emissions future. minerals sands, and rare earths series of actions focused on three key themes: and are committed to the Practical and cost-effective options are already Our sector improves the lives of millions of 5. Global and domestic partnerships 1. Support developing technology pathways to being developed and put into action across the Paris Agreement and its goal people in Australia and overseas through the with governments, regulators, customers, achieve significant reductions in Australia’s minerals value chain.
    [Show full text]