Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan

December 2020

Indonesia: Flood Management in Selected River Basins Sector project Ciujung River Embankment Development Subproject - Civil Works 03 (CW03) – Part 1

Prepared by the Ministry of Public Works and Housing through Directorate General of Water Resources for the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 30 October 2020) Currency unit – Indonesian rupiah (IDR) IDR1.00 = USD 0.000067 USD1.00 = IDR 14,926.5

ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AH – Affected Household AP – Affected Person BAPPEDA – Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Provincial/District Development Planning Agency) BBWS 3CIS – Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai (River Basin Center) Cidanau - Ciujung - Cidurian DGWR – Directorate General of Water Resources LAR – Land Acquisition and Resettlement LARP – Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan LRP – Livelihood Restoration Program MPWH – Ministry of Public Works and Housing

NOTES

(i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Indonesia and its agencies ends on 31 December. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2011 ends on 31 December 2011. (ii) (ii) In this report, "$" refers to United States dollars

This Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ADB – Asian Development Bank AH – Affected Household AP – Affected Person BAPPEDA – Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Provincial/District Development Planning Agency) BPN – Badan Pertanahan Nasional (National Land Agency) BBWS 3CIS – Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai (River Basin Center) Cidanau - Ciujung - Cidurian CBFRM – Community-Based Flood Risk Management CPMU – Central Project Management Unit COI – Corridor of Impact DGWR – Directorate General of Water Resources DMS – Detailed Measurement Survey EA – Executing Agency EMA – External Monitoring Agency FGD – Focus Group Discussion FMSRBSP – Flood Management in Selected River Basins Sector Project GRM – Grievance Redress Mechanism IA – Implementing Agency IOL – Inventory Of Losses LAIT – Land Acquisition Implementation Team LAR – Land Acquisition and Resettlement LARP – Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan LRP – Livelihood Restoration Program MAPPI – Masyarakat Profesi Penilai Indonesia (Indonesian Professional Appraiser Association) MPWH – Ministry of Public Works and Housing OPD – Organisasi Perangkat Daerah (Regional Apparatus Organization) PIB – Public Information Booklet PIU – Project Implementation Unit PPAT – Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (Land Deed Official) RCS – Replacement Cost Study RRCS – Rapid Replacement Cost Study SAH – Severely Affected Household SAP – Social Action Plan SES – Socio-economic Survey SPS – Safeguard Policy Statement VAH – Vulnerable Affected Household

GLOSSARY Affected Persons – Refers to any person or persons, customary community, (APs) private or public institution who are physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and/or economically displaced (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihood) as result of i) acquisition of land; ii) restriction on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. The affected populations are parties who control or possess an object land acquisition. Affected Household – Refers to all the APs residing under one roof and operating as (AH) a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by a project or any of its components. Census of Affected – The census is a count of all APs irrespective of their titled or Persons non-titled land ownership status. Its purpose is to accurately document the number of affected persons and to create an inventory of their losses (IOL) finalized on the basis of a Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS). A census describes the persons who are displaced, their livelihoods and income sources, and what they are likely to lose because of the project. Compensation – Refers to payment in cash or in-kind for an asset or resource that is acquired or affected by the Project at the time the asset needs to be replaced. All compensation is based on the principle of replacement cost, which is the method of valuing assets to replace the loss at current market rates, plus any transaction costs such as administrative charges, taxes, registration and titling costs. Construction Works – A construction works zone shall be a designated zone defined Zone during detailed design and clearly identified during the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) updating that will divide the canal/river into convenient stretches for construction implementation Corridor of Impact – Area, which is impacted by civil works in the implementation of the subproject. It is important in two particular respects: (a) Legally as the area within which AHs will be entitled to compensation and other measures for any loss of land, structures or land use and occupation and of livelihoods and (b) Operationally as the agreed and demarcated area within which construction activities will take place. Cut-off date – Refers to the data set to determine eligibility for compensation and assistance under the subproject. The cut-off date for eligibility for this subproject was set on 25 February 2020 which is the date of determination location determined by this subproject. Any people who encroach into the project area, or any of its subprojects after the cut-off date will not be entitled to compensation or any other assistance under the subproject.

Detailed – This activity involves the finalization and/or validation of the Measurement results of the IOL, severity of impacts, and list of APs done Survey during the preparation of this LARP based on the detailed engineering design of the subproject. The DMS will be carried out by the Land Acquisition Implementation Team led by land offices. Eligibility Refers to any person who has settled in the Project area before the cut-off date that suffers from (i) loss of shelter, (ii) loss of assets (land, space above and below the surface of the land, buildings, plant, and objects related to the land) and/or or ability to access such assets, permanently or temporarily, or (iii) other losses that can be appraised such as transaction costs, interest, on loss of residual land, loss of income sources or livelihood regardless of relocation, profession shift, and other types of loss stated by the assignor, will be entitled to compensation and/or assistance. Entitlement – Refers to a range of measures comprising compensation, relocation cost, income rehabilitation assistance, transfer assistance, income substitution/business restoration, etc. which are due to the APs, depending on the type and severity of their losses, and are sufficient to restore their economic and social base. Income Restoration – Refers to rehabilitating productive livelihood of severely affected households (SAHs) and vulnerable affected households (VAHs) to enable income generation equal to or, if possible, better than earned by AHs before the resettlement or of pre-project levels.. Inventory of Losses – This is the process where all fixed assets (i.e., land used for residence, commerce, agriculture, including ponds; dwelling units; stalls and shops; secondary structures, such as fences, tombs, wells; trees with commercial value; etc.) and sources of income and livelihood inside the subproject right- of-way are identified, measured, their owners identified, their exact location pinpointed, and their replacement costs estimated. Additionally, the severity of impact to the affected assets and the livelihood and productive capacity of APs will be determined. Land Acquisition and – A time-bound action plan that includes objectives, Resettlement Plan principles, entitlements, specific activities, responsibilities of concerned agencies, groups and individuals, and budget for addressing the displacement of people from assets, sources of incomes, homes, and communities towards reconstructing their disrupted lives and improving or restoring their standards of living to at least pre- displacement levels. The draft LARP is prepared based on the census/IOL and a socio-economic survey (SES) and will be updated if ant update of the detailed engineering design.

Relocation – The physical displacement of an AP from his/her pre-project

iii

place of residence and/or business. Relocation – Support provided to persons who are physically displaced by a Assistance project. It may include transportation, transitional assistance (food, shelter, and social service) that is provided to the APs in connection with their relocation. Replacement Cost – Replacement cost involves replacing an asset, including land, at a cost prevailing at the time of its acquisition. This

includes fair market value, transaction costs, interest accrued, transitional and restoration costs, and any other applicable payments, if any. Depreciation of assets and structures should not be considered for replacement cost. Where there are no active market conditions, the affected persons and host populations will be consulted with to obtain adequate information about recent land transactions, land value by types, land titles, land use, cropping patterns and crop production, availability of land in the project area and region, and other related information. This will also include collecting baseline data on housing, house types, and construction materials. Severely Affected – Those who experience significant/major impacts due to (i) Persons losses of 10% or more of their total productive land, assets and/or income sources due to the subproject; and/or (ii) relocation due to insufficient remaining residential land to rebuild. Vulnerable Groups – These are distinct groups of APs who might suffer more or face the risk of being further marginalized due to the project and specifically include: (i) households that are headed by women, (ii) household heads with disabilities, iii) households falling under the regional poverty line, and (iv) elderly household heads, (v) landless households, (vi) People without legal title to land, and (vii) indigenous people or customary communities.1

1 This definition is in line with Law No. 39/1999 (Article 5 elucidation) on Human Rights. Vulnerable populations include the elderly, children, the poor, pregnant women and people with disabilities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS ...... 1 ABBREVIATIONS ...... i GLOSSARY ...... i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 1 I. PROJECT AND SUBPROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ...... 1 1.1. Project Description ...... 1 1.2. Ciujung River Embankment Development Subproject ...... 2 II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUSITION AND RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS ...... 5 2.1. Measures Taken to Minimize Negative Impacts ...... 5 2.2. Summary of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts...... 5 2.2.1. Impact on Lands ...... 8 2.2.2. Impact on Houses and Other Structures...... 16 2.2.3. Impact on Crops and Trees ...... 20 2.2.4. Impact on Business ...... 26 2.2.5. Impact on Public Assets ...... 28 2.2.5. Impact on Vulnerable Households ...... 29 2.2.6. Other Impacts ...... 31 2.2.7. Summary of Impacts ...... 32 III. SOCIO ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE ...... 35 3.1. Socio-economic Profiles of Affected Villages...... 35 3.2. Socio-economic Profiles of Affected Households ...... 36 3.3. Impacts on Livelihood ...... 51 3.4. Gender Analysis ...... 52 IV. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, AND CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION...... 54 4.1. Key Stakeholders ...... 54 4.2. Consultation and Participation Mechanisms Across the Project Cycle ...... 55 4.3. Public Consultation and Participation during the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan Preparation ...... 55 4.4. Information Disclosure ...... 58 4.5. Public Consultation, Participation and Information Disclosure during LARP Implementation ...... 58 V. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM...... 60 5.1. General Flow of Grievance Redress ...... 60 5.2. Specific Grievances ...... 60 VI. LEGAL FRAMEWORK...... 64 6.1. National and Local Policy Framework ...... 64 6.2. ADB Safeguard Policy...... 68 6.3. Comparison of Government Laws and Regulations with ADB Policy ...... 69 6.4. Principles of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Policy for the Subproject ...... 73 6.5. Unanticipated Impacts ...... 74 VII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCES AND BENEFITS ...... 75 7.1. Project Eligibility and Entitlements ...... 75 7.2. Special Assistance for Vulnerable Groups and Severely AHs ...... 88

7.3. Strategy to Address Gender Issues ...... 88 VIII. RELOCATION OF HOUSING AND SETTLEMENTS ...... 89 IX. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM ...... 92 9.1. Objectives of the LRP/SAP ...... 92 9.2. Livelihood Restoration Supports ...... 92 9.3. Administrative Logistics ...... 95 X. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN ...... 99 10.1. Budget for Resettlement Activities ...... 99 10.2. Source and Flow of Funds ...... 104 XI. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ...... 105 11.1.Implementation Arrangements ...... 105 11.2.Capacity Assessment and Capacity Building Needs ...... 109 XII. INDICATIVE SCHEDULE ...... 111 XIII. MONITORING AND REPORTING ...... 112 13.1.Internal Monitoring ...... 112 13.2.External Monitoring ...... 114

LIST OF TABLES Table 1: List of Affected Villages ...... 2 Table 2: Number of Potentially Affected Households and Affected Persons by the Subproject ...... 7 Table 3: Scope of Impacts on Land Disaggregated by Village ...... 8 Table 4: Impacts on Private Lands Owned by Individuals or Households Disaggregate by Type of Land 10 Table 5: Impacts on Land Owned by Institutions ...... 11 Table 6: Severity of Households Impacts...... 14 Table 7: Vulnerability of Households Losing 10% or more of Productive Assets of the Households ...... 15 Table 8: Categorization of Affected Main Structures ...... 16 Table 9: Impacts on Main Structures by Ownership ...... 16 Table 10: Scope of Impacts on Main Structures ...... 18 Table 11: Impacts on Secondary Structures ...... 20 Table 12: Impact on Crops ...... 21 Table 13: Quantity of Affected Fruit Trees by Type ...... 23 Table 14: Quantity of Affected Timber Trees ...... 24 Table 15: Impact on Business ...... 27 Table 16: Impact on Public Assets ...... 29 Table 17: Number of Vulnerable Households ...... 30 Table 18: Number of Vulnerable Households by Vulnerability Group ...... 31 Table 19: Summary of Impacts ...... 32 Table 20: Total Population, Gender Ratio and Population Density by Village ...... 35 Table 21: Serang Regency Education Indicators for 2018-2019 ...... 35 Table 22: Gender of The Respondents ...... 36 Table 23: Household Size and Gender Distribution of Surveyed Households ...... 37 Table 24: Age Distribution of the Heads of Affected Households ...... 37 Table 25: Age Distribution of the Household Members of Affected Households...... 38 Table 26: Ethnicity of Surveyed Household Members ...... 39 Table 27: Education Levels of Surveyed Household Heads ...... 41 Table 28: Education Levels of Surveyed Household Members ...... 42 Table 29: Occupations of Surveyed Household Heads ...... 43 Table 30: Average Monthly Household Income of Surveyed Households ...... 44 Table 31: Average Monthly Income of Surveyed Households ...... 45 Table 32: Average Monthly Income Per Capita by Occupation ...... 45 Table 33: Average Monthly Expenditure of Surveyed Households by Category ...... 46

iii

Table 34: Types of Sanitation Facilities ...... 46 Table 35: Households Drinking Water Source ...... 47 Table 36: Households Bath Water Source ...... 48 Table 37: Information Sources on the Subproject ...... 49 Table 38: Perceptions of Surveyed Households of Impact on Livelihood ...... 49 Table 39: Surveyed Households Owning At Least One Item of Assets ...... 50 Table 40: Average Distance to the Nearest Public Facilities ...... 51 Table 41: Impact on Livelihood ...... 51 Table 42: Percentage of Male and Female Members Participating in Activities of the Surveyed Households ...... 53 Table 43: Number of Participants in Public Consultation during Planning and Preparation Stages...... 55 Table 44: Gaps between ADB and Government Policies Related to Compensation, Assistance, and Resettlement ...... 70 Table 45: Entitlement Matrix ...... 77 Table 46: Number of Relocated Households ...... 89 Table 47: Focus Group Discussions About Needs Assessment of Affected Households During SAP Preparation ...... 93 Table 48: Estimated Manpower Requirement for Construction Phase ...... 94 Table 49: Summary of Social Action Plan (SAP) ...... 96 Table 50: Estimated Budget for LARP Implementation ...... 101 Table 51: Main Institutions of Local Government and Their Roles in the LAR implementation...... 108 Table 52: Indicative Schedule of Land Acquisistion and Resettlement Activities ...... 111 Table 53: Suggested Monitoring Parameters and Indicators ...... 112

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Subproject Location ...... 3 Figure 2: Location of Affected Land Areas ...... 3 Figure 3: Cross Plan Profile of Typical Land Embankment ...... 4 Figure 4: Profile of a Typical Cross Plan Land Embankment and Concrete Parapet ...... 4

LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1: Template Internal Monitoring and Evaluation ...... 117 Appendix 2: IOL Questionnaire Template ...... 121 Appendix 3: Socio-Economic Survey Questionnaire ...... 133 Appendix 4: LARP Workshop Documentation ...... 144 Appendix 5: LARP Workshops List of Attendees ...... 142 Appendix 6: PCM / FGD I Documentation ...... 157 Appendix 7: PCM / FGD I Minutes of Meeting ...... 161 Appendix 8: PCM / FGD I List of Attendance ...... 165 Appendix 9: PCM / FGD II Documentation ...... 168 Appendix 10: PCM / FGD II Minutes of Meeting ...... 174 Appendix 11: PCM / FGD II List of Attendees ...... 178 Appendix 12: List of Participants PCM 2018 ...... 181 Appendix 13: MOM FGDs SAP Need Assesment ...... 182 Appendix 14: Public Information Booklet (PIB) ...... 220 Appendix 15: Community Complaint Form ...... 224 Appendix 16: Livelihoods Restoration Program ...... 225 Appendix 17: Gender Focal Point FMSRB ...... 231 Appendix 18: External Monitoring Indicator ...... 233

Appendix 19: Disclosure of LARP on Newspaper ...... 234 Appendix 20: Summary of Consultation Activities Conducted during LARP Preparation ...... 238 Appendix 21: Summary of Public Consultation Meetings Conducted during LARP Preparation ...... 246 Appendix 22: LARP Workshop – Location Determination ...... 250 Appendix 23: Indegenous Peoples Impact Screening Checklist ...... 277 Appendix 24: TOR – Replacement Cost Study (Appraiser) ...... 280 Appendix 25: Template for IOL & SES Questionnaire for Impact Due to Construction Activites ………..284 Appendix 26: Relocation Options …………………………………………………….………………………...292 Appendix 27: Vulnerable Affected Households …………………………………………….………………....294 Appendix 28: Severely Affected Household ………………………………………………….……………… 303 Appendix 29: Governor Decree on Location Determination of CW03 …………………………………….. 326

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Project Description. The Flood Management in Selected River Basins Sector Project (FMSRSP) (the Project) will support the Government of Indonesia (the Government) and river based communities to better manage and mitigate flood risks. Project interventions will include (i) enhance data, information, knowledge base and institutional coordination for management of floods; (ii) upgrade or develop water management infrastructure; (iii) reduce erosion and improve watershed condition; and (iv) prepare communities to manage floods. The main beneficiaries will be floodplain communities in flood prone areas along the Cidanau-Ciujung-Cidurian (3 Cis) and Ambon – Seram river basin territories (RBTs), respectively located in Banten and Maluku Provinces. The Ciujung River Embankment Development subproject has been selected as one out of structural subprojects as the core subproject of the Project.

2. Subproject Description. The Directorate General of Water Resources (DGWR) of the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MPWH) through the Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai (River Basin Center) Cidanau - Ciujung - Cidurian (BBWS 3CIS) of Banten Province has planned to continue the construction of embankments along the Civil works 03 package (CW 03), approximately from the line of the CW 01 package on the right side and CW 02 package on the left side. According to the design of the subproject, a total length of 11.54 km m of river embankment consisting of 6.83 km on the left side and 4.71 km on the right side will be improved. The project will also make adjustment of drainage inlet structure and drains and implementation of inspection road made of concrete slabs. subproject will be implemented in eight (8) affected villages of Kragilan sub-district and Kibin sub-district in Serang Regency, Baten Province.

3. This Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) has been prepared based on the final engineering design. The Inventory of Losses (IOL) for 6 out 8 affected villages conducted in 2018 and April 2019 and additional IOL for the remaining villages in July 2020; Socio-economic Survey (SES) on affected households (AHs) was carried out in 2018 and updated in May-July 2020 and results of a series off consultations with affected people and stakeholders conducted from May 2018 to March 2020. The IOL data may change following the Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) carried out by the land acquisistion implementation team (LAIT) for the basis of compensation payment. This final data on the DMS will be reported either in the LARP implementation report or semi annual monitoring report. In the case there is significant change of project design, the LARP will be updated following the revised engineering design.

4. Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impact. According to the IOL results, a total area of 1,079,910 m2 of land will be permanently acquired for the subproject. The affected land consists of 1,042,081 m2 of land owned by 511 households (2,128 persons) and 37,829 m2 of land owned institutions,i.e. 2 villages government, DGWR, 1 State Owned Entreprise (SOE)’s land and 8 private companies. The affected private land comprises of 971,790 m2 of agricultural land owned by 466 households (1,934 persons) and 70,291 m2 of residential land owned by 47 households (198 persons). A total of 757 households (2,840 persons) will be affected by land acquisition for the subproject including (i) 511 AHs (2,128 persons) with permanent loss of private land; (ii) 155 AHs (613 persons) with loss of crops, trees.

2 Unit of # Impacts Quantificati Quantity No. of AHs No. of APs on Affected Households and Affected A Persons A-1 Total affected households 757 2,840 i. Land Owners (loss of private land only) 686 percel 511 2,128 ii. Land Users (sharecroppers and 156 616 informal settlers) iii. Tenant (rent rooms in the leasing 8 14 house) iv. Employee 82 82 B Total Land Required for Acquisition m2 1,079,910 511 2,128

B-1 Land owned by Institutions m2 37,829 2 Villages Village Land Parcel 6 ’s Office DGWR’s land Parcel 2 SOE’s land Parcel 1 PT. PDAM Private Companies Land Parcel 14 8 companies B-2 Private land m2 1,042,081 511 2,128 C Houses and Other Structures C-1 Main structures Number 65 56 235 - Houses Number 29 25 101 - House-cum-shops Number 3 2 11 - Stand-alone shops Number 33 29 123 C-2 Secondary structures Number 68 33 124 - Communities Number 65 30 124 - Private companies Number 3 3 D Crops and Trees Crops (chilim pumpkin, paddy, cassava, D-1 m2 19,958 48 203 eggplant, cucumber, etc.)

D-2 Trees Number 489 2,041 5,903 E Vulnerable Households Number 2202 857 E-1 Poor households 63 233 E-2 Female Headed Households 45 156 E-3 Disabled Headed Households 2 4 E-4 Elderly Headed Households 20 68 E-5 Landless 156 620 F Severe Loss 667 2,744

2 No of vulnerable HH with multiple vulnerability catagory

F-1 Total relocated households Number 563 235 Households losing 10% or more of their F-2 Number 511 2,128 total productive income or landholding Household will lose 10% or more of their F3 Number 156 616 income source G Severe-Vulnerable Households 106 416 Vulnerable households losing 10% or E-1 more of total production landholding of the Number 71 267 household E-2 Vulnerable relocated households Number 35 149 G Income Loss Households with partial impact on structures losing income during the period G-1 Number 0 0 of business disruption while the remaining structure is being repaired Households with full impact on structures G-2 losing income for the period of relocation Number 31 134 and re-establishment of business - Fully affected house-cum-shops Number 2 11 - Fully affected shops Number 29 123 Permanent loss of income of employees working for affected business since the G-3 shop owners would stop doing business Number 82 82 after relocation to change to other occupations H Impacts on Public Assets Number 19 10 owners

5. Other than land - they are all are sharecroppers; (iii) 8 AHs (14 persons) who are renting affected houses for living; (iv) 1 AH (3 persons) informal settlers; (v) 39 AHs (165 persons) have a bussines will be affected permanently; and (vi). 82 employees including 38 working for 28 affected shops and 44 hired labores of 3 shuttled boats will loss their income permanently.

6. Among these 757 AHs, 667 households (2.744 persons) are considered as severely affected households (SAHs) and will be entitled to participate in the Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP). Among 667 severely AHs, 511 AHs (2.128 persons) are legal land owners who will lose 10% or more of their total production landholding, 155 AHs (613 persons) are sharecroppers and 1 AH (3 persons) are informal settlers who will lose 10% or more of their income source. There are 65 structures4 owned by 56 AHs to be impacted that include 29 houses, 3 (owned by 2 AHs) house-cum-shops, and 33 (owned by 29 AHs) on stand-alone shops. These 56 households (235 persons) are required to relocate as their structures are fully affected or partially affected but the remaining portion of the structure is not sufficient to stay or do business.

7. There are 220 AHs (857 persons) considered as vulnerable affected households (VAHs), of which 45 female-headed households, 60 poor households, 2 households headed by people with disabilities, 20 households headed by the elderly with no

3 All relocated structures are on the affected private land, so in total there are 667 severely AHs includes relocated households. 44 All relocated structures/displaced AHs are also land owners that lose 10% or more their landholdings, so number of severely AHs are still 667 HHs in total.

other means of support, and 156 landless households. It is noted that 58 households fall into two or three vulnerability groups.

8. The IOL results also indicate the construction activities of the subproject will cause impacts on 65 affected main structures (29 houses, 3 house-cum-shops and 33 shops) owned by 56 AHs (235 persons) and secondary structures such as hunt and garage. A total of 1,958 m² of crops owned by 48 households and a total of 59,903 numerous types of fruit trees and timber trees owned by 489 households (2,041 persons) will be affected by land acquisition for the subproject. Additionally, public assets including mosque, village roads, electric poles, telecommunication, poles, etc. in some affected villages will be also affected by land acquisition for the subproject.

9. With the aforementioned impacts, the subproject is categorized as Category A for Involuntary Resettlement as per the Safeguard Policy Statement of ADB (2009). The table below summarizes land acquisition and resettlement (LAR) impacts caused by the subproject following the IOL results.

10. Socio-economic Information and Profile. A SES was carried out in April 2019 and updated in May and July 2020 on 757 AHs (2,840 persons) in all eight (8) affected villages. The SES was conducted to obtain socio-economic profiles of the AHs regarding demographic profile, education, labor, livelihoods, income, expenditure, asset ownership, living conditions, access to public facilities, and to record their perceptions of the subproject.

11. Consultation, Participation, and Information Disclosure. Series of consultation have been carried out during LARP preparation with the AHs, local communities, local governments of Serang Regency, Kragilan and Kibin sub-districts as well as 8 affected villages and other relevant stakeholders from May 2018 to March 2020. A total of 35 public consultation meetings were held with participation of 753 persons, of whom women accounted for 23.77%. The information shared and discussed with the meeting participants included: (i) the engineering design of the subproject; (ii) the scope of LAR impacts by the subproject (based on the result of the IOL); (iii) the principles of LAR applied for the subproject (cut-off date definition, principles, eligibility, proposed entitlements); (iv) proposals for income restoration activities of the AHs and communities; (v) preferences for relocation; (vi) the proposed implementation schedule for land acquisition, compensation, assistance and civil works; (vii) the proposed Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM); and (viii) mechanism for consultation with and participation of APs, communities and other stakeholders in LARP preparation, implementation and monitoring. In addition, 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) were also conducted with 3 groups of relocated households, 56 of households who will lose 10% or more than 10% of the production landholding of the household. The results of consultation, participation, and information dissemination to the affected persons and stakeholders in the LARP preparation process are also incorporated into this document. A Project Information Booklet (PIB) which includes key information such as subproject description, scope of land acquisition of the subproject, cut-off date definition, proposed entitlements on compensation, assistance and resettlement, proposed GRM and indicate implementation schedule of LAR and civil works was prepared and distributed to all the meeting participants as well as posted in the accessible places such as village office and sub-district office. All of the meeting participants were aware of the subproject-related information and supported the subproject information.

12. Grievance Redress Mechanism. In principle, objection to any aspect of the subproject and LAR will be addressed through consultations to reach an agreement and settlement and sought to be resolved as much as possible at the sub-project level. relevant institutions, such as provincial/regency/subdistricts and villages governments will be involved in addressing the grievance. When the grievance cannot be addressed, it will be resolved through litigation procedures as set forth in Law No. 2/2012 and Presidential regulation No.71/2012. Grievance acceptance and redress mechanism will ensure cultural and gender sensitivities of the entitled parties. The GRM was consulted with and agreed by the AHs during the public consultation meetings and documented in the PIBs delivered to the AHs. Complainants will be exempted from all administrative and legal fees that might be incurred in the resolution of grievances and complaints.

13. Legal Framework. The legal and policy framework for involuntary resettlement applied for the subproject has been prepared based on relevant laws and regulations of the Government related to LAR, particularly Law No. 2 of 2012 concerning land acquisition for development of public interest and its implementing regulations and the ADB’s SPS (2009). The objectives of the subproject resettlement policy are to avoid and if not avoidable minimize involuntary resettlement and customary communities’ impacts, mitigate and compensate for adverse impacts, restore livelihoods, and improve the living standards of the VAHs.

14. Entitlement, Eligibility, and Assistance. The cut-off date for eligibility for this subproject was set on 25 February 2020 which is the date of determination location determined by the Governor of Banten for land acquisition area of the subproject. Any person who encroaches into the subproject area after the cut-off date will not be entitled to compensation or any assistance under the subproject. The cut-off date has been made known to all the APs, affected communities and organizations. An entitlement matrix and its applications are provided in this LARP. It covers the compensation and types of assistance to be provided to APs who will be affected by acquisition of their land and appropriate assistances for the SAHs and VAHs. The entitlement matrix has been developed in consultation with the APs, local authorities and relevant agencies during the LARP preparation.

15. Relocation of Housing and Settlement. According to the results of public consultations conducted in March 2020, all of 56 AHs (235 persons) including 27 house/house-cum-shop owners and 29 shop owners who are required physical displacement preferred to get cash compensation for affected land and on-land assets and self-relocate to other places. Currently they have not exactly determined where they will move, waiting information on the amount of compensation. Cash compensation given will be include compensation of affected asset, moving allowance and transitional allowance.

16. Livelihood Restoration and Rehabilitation Program. There are 668 households (2.744 persons) including 667 SAHs and 220 VAHs are eligible to participate in the LRP of the subproject. During public consultation meetings and FGDs, eligible households have been consulted about the proposed activities under the LRP. Detailed needs assessment of eligible AHs will be conducted during LRP implementation. . The LRP is expected to be implemented since 2021.

17. Resettlement Budget and Financing Plan. The total cost for LARP implementation for the subproject is estimated at IDR 358,402,741,509 or USD 24,011,975 . The

budget for payment of compensation, assistance and resettlement comes from the DGWR which will be allocated in 2021 fiscal year while the budget related to the LRP implementation will be the responsibility of the local government of Serang Regency and will be allocated in the period of 2021-2025.

18. Institutional Arrangement. The DGWR is the Executing Agency (EA) of the subproject that is responsible for overall coordination, policy directions, and administration, including those related to social safeguards. The subproject Implementing Agency (IA) is the BBWS 3CIS who will establish a Project Implementation Unit (PIU) headed by a manager (PIU head). The Serang Land Office with its Land Acquisition Implementation Team (LAIT) is responsible for implementation of land acquisition activities. The Banten Provincial Government and the Serang Regency Government are responsible for land acquisition preparation including issuance of subproject location determination by the Governor.

19. Monitoring and Reporting. In order to help ensure that the agreed LARP is implemented as planned, monitoring of resettlement activities will be carried out, internally by the DGWR and BBWS 3CIS and externally by an external resettlement monitoring agency (EMA). The objectives, scope, frequency of monitoring and reporting mechanism are presented in the LARP.

20. Indicative implementation schedule of LARP implementation. This LARP will be implementated in January 2021. Disbursement of compensation and assistance payment is planned from March 2021 starts from a section along 8.91 km where the Location Determination has been issued. Payment for the remaining section along 2.67 km scheduled to be provided on October 2021 after issuance of location determination.

I. PROJECT AND SUBPROJECT DESCRIPTIONS

1.1. Project Description

1. The Flood Management in the Selected River Basin Sector Project (FMSRB) will support the Gowvernment of Indonesia and communities to better manage and mitigate flood risks. The Project aims to shift from project-oriented flood control centered on structural measures, to process-oriented Flood Risk Management (FRM) that provides a well-balanced mix of non-structural interventions, institutional and capacity building, and structural works to mitigate the negative of floods. Project interventions will (i) enhance data, information, knowledge base and institutional coordination for management of floods; (ii) upgrade or develop water management infrastructure; (iii) reduce erosion and improve watershed condition; and (iv) prepare communities to manage floods. The main beneficiaries will be floodplain communities in flood prone areas along the Cidanau-Ciujung Cidurian (3CIS) and Ambon – Seram river basin territories (RBTs), respectively located in Banten and Maluku Provinces. Those river basins are characterized by different flood typologies that represent a range of flood issues within and outside Java Island.

2. In the working area of the Cidanau-Ciujung-Cidurian River Region (BBWS 3CIS), which is mostly in the Banten Province area, there are several very strategic rivers, one of which is the Ciujung River which passes through two administrative regions namely Lebak Regency and Serang Regency.

3. To get the maximum benefit from the river and reduce or eliminate losses caused by poor maintenance of the river conditions, it is necessary to regulate the river which includes protection, development, use, repair and control of the river. In addition to achieving the objectives of river management, it is necessary to develop river areas by building dams, flood control, river management and repair, and river maintenance. For this reason, the Directorate General of Water Resources of the Ministry of Public Works through the Cidanau-Ciujung-Cidurian River Basin Agency in Banten Province has planned to continue the construction of phase II river embankments (package 3) along approximately 6.83 km (4.71 km + 2.13 km) on the left sides and 4.71 km (4.70 km + 0.55 km) on the right sides of the river from the deadline for the CW 01 package in Nagara Village and CW 02 in Dukuh Village.

4. The construction of the Ciujung Embankment will require land acquisition from local residents and public and private companies. To minimize and explain the negative impacts caused by land acquisition, the Cidanau-Ciujung-Cidurian River Basin Agency (BBWS 3CIS) conducted a study and consulted with affected residents (APs) embankment development for a better solution. This study prepares all documents relating to land acquisition and resettlement (LARP).

5. Preparation of Land Acquisition Planning (LARP) Development Documents for the Ciujung River Embankment at CW 03 location is to prepare a comprehensive reports related to land acquisition and resettlement of people and other parties (companies) whose land will be used for embankment construction, includes identification of assets affected and formulated the compensation and other assistance to be provided to the affected households. The Objectives and Targets to be achieved are to support the creation of harmony and suitability in the implementation of embankment development, particularly in the case of land acquisition.

1.2. Ciujung River Embankment Development Subproject 6. The Ciujung River Embankment Development Subproject has been developed to overcome the flooding that often occurs in Serang regency due to the overflow of the Ciujung River, which affects not only the houses but also inundates the Tangerang – Merak Toll Road. The transportation of the Java-Sumatra traffic was disrupted by the flooding.

7. The subproject is a follow-up program of the works under Package 1 and Package 2 of Ciujung River Embankment Development. Under this subproject, a total length of 11.54 km of river embankment consisting of 6.83 km on the left side and 4.71 km on the right side will be improved. In the dike construction site plan in this work, previously there is an old levee already built by BBWS 3CIS, so that this work is an improvement of the existing embankment. In addition, the sub project include; (i) adjustment of drainage inlet structure and drains; (ii) implementation of inspection road made of concrete slabs (3.00 m wide, 0.30 m thick).

8. The embankment development requires land acquisition in eight (8) villages in Kibin and Kragilan sub-districts of Serang Regency in Banten province. The list of the affected villages is shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1: List of Affected Villages

No Villages Sub-districts 1 Nagara Kibin 2 Cijeruk Kibin 3 Tambak Kibin 4 Ciagel Kibin 5 Sukamaju Kibin 6 Dukuh Kragilan 7 Undar Andir Kragilan 8 Kragilan Kragilan

9. The location of the subproject is illustrated in Figure 1 and the areas of land to be acquired for the subproject are shown in Figure 2.

Source: Banten Province Map Figure 1: Subproject Location

Source: CW03 LARP Survey, 2019 Figure 2: Location of Affected Land Areas

10. The embankment specifications in the Ciujung River Dike Development Program Watershed under this subproject are flood discharge probability once in 25 years (Q25) to hold water pressure up to approximately 350 cubic meters per second. The improved embankment will have a height of 0.5 – 2.00 meters from the existing embankment. The layouts of the typical land embankment are presented in The Consultant Design, 2020

11. Figure 3 and

12. Figure 4.

Source: The Consultant Design, 2020 Figure 3: Cross Plan Profile of Typical Land Embankment

Source: The Consultant Design, 2020

Figure 4: Profile of a Typical Cross Plan Land Embankment and Concrete Parapet

II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUSITION AND RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS

2.1. Measures Taken to Minimize Negative Impacts

13. In designing the river works, the design team optimized the trace for the dyke to minimize impact on land and at the same time allowing enough space to accommodate flood water to minimize adverse impacts of the subproject on LAR, the following efforts have been taken:

▪ The design team developed a 2-dimensional hydrodynamic model to test various scenarios for infrastructure development. As such the final design is considered as the most optimal to minimize land acquisition.

▪ Based on consultations with APs and stakeholders, the project team made some adjustments of the engineering design to minimize the impacts of public utlilities including gas pipe. According to agreement with the State Gas Company, the engineering design of the gas pipe uses a retaining wall and bore pile. The use of bore pile is intended as not to disturb the position of gas pipe in the ground.

▪ The application of retaining wall, parapet, and bore pile will have an impact on reducing land requirement and involuntary resettlement.

2.2. Summary of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts

14. The IOL was conducted in two batches. The first IOL was conducted from March to August 2018 for 21 villages except for Ciagel Village by PT. Geodynamics Consultant. In 2020, an additional IOL was carried out to identify the land acquisition impacts of additional 2 km including Undar Andir Village, Sukamaju Village, and Kragilan Village and to update any changes in the result of the first IOL conducted in 2018. This LARP covers the LAR impacts caused by the development of the river embankment sections with a total length of 11.54 km including 6.83 km on the left side and 4.71 km on the right side and it includes inspection road and adjustment of drainage inlet structure and drans. The scope of impacts will be used as a reference and verified during detailed measurment survey (DMS) by the LAIT established by Serang Regency Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (KATR/BPN). The IOL data may change following the DMS carried out by the Land Acquisistion Implementation Team led by the Serang Regency land office (Serang KATR/BPN), and this changes will be reported in the LARP implementation report or semi annual monitoring report. If there are changes in the design later, the LARP will be updated following the updated detailed design.

15. Based on the subproject screening referring to the IBRD Indigenous People map, and the list of Indigenous Peoples territories issued by Badan Registrasi Wilayah Adat (BRWA) there are no indigenous peoples in the sub-project area. The screening checklist is in Appendix 23.

16. According to the IOL results, the river embankment development (construction of dike, adjustment of drainage inlet structure and drains, and inspection road) will permanently acquire a total of 709 land parcels with a total of 1,079,910 m2 of land of various categories. The affected land includes 1,042,081 m2 of private land and 37,829 m2 of land owned by institutions. The IOL team identified 65 main structures including 29 houses, 3 house-cum-shops and 33 shops and other secondary

structures as well as 59,903 trees of various kinds and 19,958 m2 of crops will be also affected.

17. There are 757 AHs (2,840 persons) consisting of 511 landowners (2,128 persons), 155 sharecroppers (613 persons), 1 informal settlers (3 persons) and 8 households (14 persons) who are renting the affected house in 8 villages of 2 subdistricts, and 82 employees. Of 757 AHs, 667 households (2.744 persons) are considered as severely affected households (SAHs) and will be entitled to participate in the LRP. The 667 SAHs comprise 511 AHs (2.128 persons) who are legally owners of land and will lose 10% or more of their total landholding; 155 AHs (613 persons) who are sharecroppers and 1 AH (3 persons) as informal settlers who will lose 10% or more of their income source; and 56 are physically displaced AHs5. The 56 physically displaced households comprise 25 AHs (101 persons) with loss of houses, 2 AHs (11 persons) with loss of house-cum-shops and 29 AHs (123 persons) with impact on stand alone shops. Regarding vulnerability, 220 out of 757 AHs are categorized as VAHs.

18. Of the 709 parcels of land, the majority are located in Dukuh Village (40.1%), Cijeruk Village (30.0%) and the rest are scattered in 6 other villages. Detail losses and number of AHs will be described below.

55 All relocated structures/displaced AHs are also land owners that lose 10% or more their landholdings, so number of severely AHs are still 667 HHs in total.

Table 2: Number of Potentially Affected Households and Affected Persons by the Subproject No. Land Users affected Land owner (Sharecroppers + Tenants Total Employees Sub- land No Villages Informal Sectors) districts parcels No. Household Person Household Person Household Person Household Person Person

1 Nagara Kibin 59 59 256 59 256

2 Cijeruk Kibin 213 160 677 50 205 210 882

3 Tambak Kibin 8 8 41 38 156 71 197 25

4 Ciagel Kibin 13 9 46 11 36 20 82 5 Sukamaju Kibin 41 37 148 1 3 8 14 55 165 9 6 Dukuh Kragilan 284 178 734 39 150 0 265 884 48 Undar 7 Kragilan 88 59 221 16 63 75 284 Andir 8 Kragilan Kragilan 3 1 5 1 3 2 8 Total 709 511 2,128 156 616 8 14 757 2,758 82 Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses, 2018, updated in 2020

2.2.1. Impact on Lands

19. A total of 1,079,910 m2 of land will be permanently acquired by the subproject including 1,042,081 m2 of private land owned by 511 households (2,128 persons) and 37,829 m2 of lands owned by institutions. Table 3 shows the scope of impacts on land disaggregated by village.

Table 3: Scope of Impacts on Land Disaggregated by Village

Private Land (Land Owned by Grand Total Affected Land Land Owned by Institutions Individuals or Households) (m2) Villages No. of No. of No. of affected Affected area Affected area Affected area affected affected parcels (m2) (m2) (m2) parcels parcels Nagara 59 57,999 0 - 59 57,999 Cijeruk 210 362,785 3 5,126 213 367,911 Tambak 8 60,199 8 60,199 Ciagel 10 5,985 3 7,418 13 13,403 Sukamaju 39 7,115 2 6,617 41 13,732 Dukuh 283 391,083 1 315 284 391,398 Undar Andir 76 156,054 12 12,205 88 168,259 Kragilan 1 862 2 6,148 3 7,009 Total 686 1,042,081 23 37,829 709 1,079,910 Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses, 2018, updated in 2020

20. The affected private land comprises 971,790 m2 of agricultural land of 466 households (1,934 persons) and 70,291 m2 of residential land of 47 households (198 persons), There is 2 AHs own residensial as well as agricultural land. As the figure shown in

21. Table 4, agricultural land occupies the largest land area among the total area of affected private land at 93.25% while the affected residential land accounts for only 6.75%. The IOL results indicated that on average each AH owns an area of 2,085 m2 of agricultural land and an area of 1,495 m2 of residential land. Most of the affected agricultural land (0.06%) is being used for paddy plantation while a small proportion of the land (99.94%) is with cassava and a variety of vegetables planted on. Among 511 affected land owners with 2,128 persons are those who have formal legal rights or eligible to be recognized as a titled land, 156 households (616 persons) are land users, 8 renting households with 14 persons who are houses.

Table 4: Impacts on Private Lands Owned by Individuals or Households Disaggregate by Type of Land

Agricultural Land Residential land and Business Total Affected Private Land No. of No. of No. of Affected No. of Affected No. of No. of Villages No. of AHs No. of AHs No. of AHs Area APs Area APs Area m2 APs Parcels (househo Parcels (househo Parcels (househo (m2) (person) (m2) (person) (person) ld) ld) ld) Nagara 59 57,,999 59 256 0 0 0 0 59 57,999 59 256

Cijeruk 210 362,785 160 677 0 0 0 0 210 362,785 160 677

Tambak 2 1,845 2 9 6 58,353 6 32 8 60,199 8 41

Ciagel 6 6 28 4 4 18 10 5,985 9 46 3,816 2,169 Sukamaju 1 250 1 4 38 6,865 36 147 39 7,115 37 148

Dukuh 283 391,083 178 734 0 0 0 283 391,083 178 734 0 Undar Andir 75 153,150 59 221 1 2,904 1 4 76 15,054 59 221

Kragilan 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 862 1 5 862 Total 637 971,790 466 1,934 49 70,291 47 198 686 1,042,081 511 2,128 Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses, 2018, updated in 2020

22. According to the IOL results, the river embankment development will also cause land acquisition of 37,829.41 m2 of land owned by institutions or ompanies including 2,947.63 m2 of DGWR’s land as a project proponent6, 5,710.07 m2 of village goevrnment land, 637.80 m2 of States Owned Entreprise’s (SOE)’s land and 28,533.91 m2 of land owned by 8 private companies. Table 5 below presents detail land owned by institutions.

Table 5: Impacts on Land Owned by Institutions

Total affected land State Owned Enterprise State-owned Land* Land owned by Private Companies Owned by Land Intitusions Villages No. of No. of No. of No. of Area Status of Area Parcel Parcel Owners Parcel Owners Area (m2) Parcel Area (m2) (m2) land use (m2) s s s s Nagara Cijeruk 1 1,724.00 Village PT. SCTK 2,765.00 2 4,489.00 Land 1 1 PDAM 637.80 637.80 Tambak Ciagel 1 PT. Sekawan 5,000.00 1 5,000.00 Maju Pesat 1 PT. Gunung Salju 918.00 1 918.00 1 PT Univenus 1,500.00 1 1,500.00 Sukamaju 1 PT. Cipta Paperia 4,862.00 1 4,862.00 1 PT Univenus 1,755.00 1 1,755.00 Dukuh 1 PT Setia 315.00 1 315.00 Undar 1 2,113.32 Unused Andir 1 834.31 Unused 1 400.00 Village 1 PT Inti Bangun Road 3,079.82 3 5,593.14 1 269.87 Village 1 PT Inti Bangun Road 242.41 3 1,346.59 1 1,116.22 Plantation 1 PT Inti Bangun by Kujen 1,170.54 2 2,286.76

1 1,340.74 Plantation 1 PT. Inti Bangun by Kasah 553.15 2 1,893.89

1 859.24 Unused 1 PT. Inti Bangun 225.36 2 1,084.60 Kragilan 1 Ciujung River Park 3,480.96 1 3,480.96 1 Ciujung River Park 2,666.67 1 2,666.67 Total 8 8,657.70 - 1 - 637.80 14 - 28,533.91 22 37,829.41 Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses, 2018, updated in 2020; * state owned land consist of DGWR’s land and land owned by village government.

23. Among the 47 AHs whose residential land will be acquired for the subproject 37 AHs (160 persons) will have residential land fully affected while other 10 households (38 persons) will have residential land partially affected and 464 households have no residential on the affected land.

6 no need to be acquired since the land is belong to project proponent already

24. The IOL results showed that 667 households (2,744 persons) including 511 legal land owners (2,128 persons) will lose 10% or more of their total landholding , while 155 sharecroppers (613 persons) and 1 informal settler (3 persons) will lose 10% or of their income source a result of land acquisition by the subproject. Of these 667 households, 6 households (24 persons) would lose between 10%-30% of their total production landholding of the household, 11 households (44 persons) would lose between 31%-70%; 4 households (20 persons) would lose beetwen more than 70%- 99%, and 490 AHs would lose of 100% of their total production landholding. During the consultation meetings, other AHs confirmed that their remaining land is economically viable for continued cultivation.

25. Table 6 below presents the severity of impacts on production land of the Ahs.

Table 6: Severity of Households Impacts

Households losing 10% or more of total productive assets of the households (*) Villages 10%–30% 31%–69% 70%-99% 100% Total Household Person Household Person Household Person Household Person Household Person Legal land owners 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 256 59 256

Sharecroppers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nagara Informal settler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Subtotal 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 256 59 256

Legal land owners 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 677 160 677

Sharecroppers 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 205 50 205 Cijeruk Informal settler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Subtotal 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 677 160 677 Tambak Legal land owners 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 41 8 41

Sharecroppers 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 156 38 156

Informal settler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Subtotal 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 41 8 41

Legal land owners 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 46 9 46

Sharecroppers 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 36 11 36 Ciagel Informal settler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Subtotal 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 46 9 46

Legal land owners 6 24 10 39 4 20 17 65 37 148

Sharecroppers 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 Sukamaju Informal settler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Subtotal 5 6 24 10 39 4 20 17 65 37 148

Legal land owners 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 734 178 734

Dukuh Sharecroppers 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 150 39 150

Informal settler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Subtotal 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 734 178 734

Legal land owners 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 221 59 221

Sharecroppers 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 63 16 63 Undar Andir Informal settler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Subtotal 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 734 178 734

Legal land owners 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kragilan Sharecroppers Informal settler 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 Subtotal 8 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 5 Legal land 6 24 11 44 4 20 490 2,040 511 2,128 owners 0 0 0 0 0 0 156 155 613 Total Sharecroppers Informal settler 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 GRAND TOTAL 6 24 11 44 4 20 647 2,043 667 2,744 Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020.

Table 7: Vulnerability of Households Losing 10% or more of Productive Assets of the Households

Households losing 10% or more of total productive assets of the households (*)

10%–30% 31%–69% 70%-99% 100% Total

Household Person Household Person Household Person Household Person Household Person

Vulnerable households 1 2 2 10 68 255 71 267

Non-vulnerable households 5 22 9 34 4 20 422 1,785 440 1,861

Grant total 6 24 11 44 4 20 490 2,040 511 2,128 Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020.

2.2.2. Impact on Houses and Other Structures

26. Main Structures. The subproject will impact 65 main structures with an area of 6,105 m2 owned by 56 households (235 persons). The affected main structures include 3,482 m2 of 29 houses, 299 m2 of 3 house-cum-shops and 2,325 m2 of 33 stand-alone shops. It is noted that the area of affected main structures is calculated considering all the floors of the affected structures. The IOL team observed the construction materials of the affected structures and classified them into 3 categories including 35 permanent structures (accounting for 53.85%), 5 semi-permanent structures (constituting 7.69 %) and 25 temporary structures (38.46%).

27.

28. Table 8 below presents the categorization of the affected main structures.

Table 8: Categorization of Affected Main Structures

No. of Percentage Affected No. of Type of Construction Materials affected No. Of AHs of Main Categories Area APs main (household) Structures Roof Wall Floor (m2) (person) structures (%) Permanent Tile Brick Ceramic 35 3,753 30 121 53.85% Semi- Tin, Brick_Wood Concrete 5 339 5 18 7.69% permanent Asbestos Non- thatch, Used - 25 2,013 24 104 38.46% permanent tarpaulin wood/Bamboo Total 65 6,105 56 235 100.00% Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020.

29. Regarding ownership of the affected main structures, Table 9 indicates that 65 structures (6,105 m2) are owned by 56 private land owners, there are 3 AHs that owns both permanent and non-permanent buildings.

Table 9: Impacts on Main Structures by Ownership

Semi- Non- Structure Owners Permanent Total permanent permanent Private land owners No. of affected structures 35 5 25 65 Affected area (m2) 3,753.33 339 2012.94 6105.27 No. of AHs 30 5 24 56 No. of Aps 121 18 104 235 Tenants No. of affected structures 0 0 0 0 Affected area (m2) 0 0 0 0 No. of AHs 0 0 0 0 No. of Aps 0 0 0 0 Companies No. of affected structures 0 0 0 0 Affected area (m2) 0 0 0 0 No. of affected companies 0 0 0 0 Total No. of affected structures 35 5 25 65 Affected area (m2) 3,753.33 339 2,012.94 6,105.27 No. of AHs 30 5 24 56 No. of APs 121 18 104 235

Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020.

30. As a result of land acquisition by the subproject, a total of 56 households (235 persons) whose 65 structures will be physically displaced, consisting of 22 whose houses/house-cum-shops will be fully affected and 10 households whose houses will be partially affected but the remaining portion is not sufficient to stay. The impact on the structures will also result in displacement of 33 stand alone shops (owned by 29 AHs). In addition, there are 8 tenants who rented rooms in the 3 boarding houses (out of 65 structures) shall find another room to be rented. .

Table 10: Scope of Impacts on Main Structures

Houses House-cum-shops Stand-alone Shops Total

Villages

Total Total Total Total

to stay stay to to stay stay to to stay stay to to stay stay to

Fully affected affected Fully affected Fully affected Fully

to do business to business do to do business to business do

Partially affected but the the but Partially affected the but affected Partially the but affected Partially the but affected Partially the but affected Partially the but affected Partially

remaining area is not sufficient sufficient not is area remaining sufficient not is area remaining sufficient not is area remaining

Cijeruk Structure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Household 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Person 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tambak Structure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 23 23 2 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,891.94 0 0 1,891.94 1,891.94 Household 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 22 22 Person 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 0 0 93 93 Ciagel Structure 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 m 541.50 0 0 541.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 541.50 Household 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Person 18 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18

Sukamaju Structure 12 0 9 21 2 1 3 9 0 0 9 33 299.0 m2 1,444,00 0 945.00 2,389.00 189.00 0 110.00 418.00 0 0 418.00 3,106.00 0 Household 12 0 8 20 2 0 0 2 6 0 0 6 28

Houses House-cum-shops Stand-alone Shops Total

Villages

Total Total Total Total

to stay stay to to stay stay to to stay stay to to stay stay to

Fully affected affected Fully affected Fully affected Fully

to do business to business do

Partially affected but the the but affected Partially the but affected Partially the but affected Partially the but affected Partially the but affected Partially the but affected Partially

remaining area is not sufficient sufficient not is area remaining sufficient not is area remaining sufficient not is area remaining

remaining area is still sufficient sufficient still is area remaining remaining area is still sufficient sufficient still is area remaining remaining area is still sufficient sufficient still is area remaining Person 50 0 29 79 12 0 0 12 27 0 0 27 117 Dukuh Structure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Household 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Person 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Undar Structure 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Andir 2 m 551.00 0 0 551.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 551.00 Household 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Person 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Kragilan Structure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.00 0 0 15.00 15.00 Household 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Person 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 3 Total Structure 20 0 9 29 2 0 1 3 33 0 0 33 65 299.0 m2 2,536.50 0.00 945.00 3,481.50 189.00 0 110.00 2,324.94 0 0 2,324.94 6,105.44 0 Household 17 0 8 25 2 0 0 2 29 0 0 29 56 Person 72 0 29 101 11 0 0 11 123 0 0 123 235 Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020. Note : One AP/AH as an owner of house cum shop is also owner of relocated house; three AHs/APs as owner of relocated shops also as owner of relocated house. There is 1 household own 2 relocated shops.

31. Secondary Structures. According to the IOL conducted in 2020, the river embankment development will also affect 9 types of secondary structures (consist of hunt, public toilet, water machine house, cage, garage, storage, fence, and grave) of 33 households with 124 persons as shown in Table 11.

Table 11: Impacts on Secondary Structures

Water Households having Public Prayer Hunt Machine Cage Garage Storage Fence Grave secondary structures Toilet Room Villages house affected7

2 2 2 m2 m2 m m m m2 m Unit m2 Household Person Nagara 79.00 ------3 13 Cijeruk 141.20 ------1 - 7 31 Tambak ------0 0 Ciagel 365.16 30.00 16.00 3.00 - - - - - 9 33 Sukamaju 18.00 - - 34.00 7.00 4,872.00 80.00 - - 5 22 Dukuh 146.00 - - 503.00 - - - 2 - 4 13 Undar Andir 538.00 ------4 153.00 16 59 Kragilan ------0 0 Total 1,287.36 30.00 16.00 540.00 7,00 4,872.00 80.00 7 153.00 33 124 Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020.

2.2.3. Impact on Crops and Trees

32. The IOL team recorded that there are 19,958 m2 of crops such as cassava, pumpkin, eggplant, lengkuas and paddy (

33.

34.

7 A household whose have more than one type of secondary structures affected should be counted once.

35. Table 12). There is almost no paddy because the affected land is rain-fed soils which are only planted with vegetables in the rainy season.

Table 12: Impact on Crops Total Households having crops Types of Affected crops (m2) affected affected Villages crops No. of Chili Pumpkin Paddy Paria Cassava Eggplant Cucumber Lengkuas Serai 2 No. of APs (m ) AHs Nagara 0 60 0 0 10 60 0 0 0 130 6 25

Cijeruk 3,810 0 0 0 7,424 400 0 0 0 11,634 15 66

Tambak 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ciagel 50 0 0 0 98 0 0 10 60 218 4 18

Sukamaju 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 6

Dukuh 0 0 0 0 280 100 0 0 0 380 5 24

Undar Andir 525 261 600 60 5,692 270 0 182 3 7,593 17 76

Kragilan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 4,388 321 600 60 13,504 830 0 192 63 19,958 48 215 Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020.

36. A total of 55,427 trees will be cut down including 40,448 fruit trees and 19,455 timber trees. All trees are owned by 489 households (2,041 people) and no trees are owned by the public or the community.

37. Table 13 shows different kinds of affected fruit trees. Most of the them are bananas trees (48.00%), followed by coconut (10.51%) and melinjo (10.17%). The tree owners revealed that most of the fruits harvested from the trees (estimated at 80%) are for home consumtion only while a small proportion are for sale. Regarding timber trees, the IOL team recorded there are 29 types of timber trees available on the land to be acquired. Among the affected timber trees are some with high economic value including albazia, bamboo, burflower tree, teak, and hibiscus tiliaceus. Dukuh village is the village which has the largest number of affected timber trees. Table 14 shows the number of affected timber trees disaggregated by type of tree.

Table 13: Quantity of Affected Fruit Trees by Type

Village Types of Nagara Cijeruk Tambak Ciagel Sukamaju Dukuh Undar Andir Kragilan Total tree L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S

Asem 267 120 100 1,031 648 47 4 1 37 7 1 2,263

Avocado 5 2 3 9 3 22

Banana 3,962 2,848 532 89 6 2,692 2 35 46 46 1,487 258 59 3,879 2,177 1,164 132 19,414

Breadfruit 3 2 5

Ceremai 5 1 6

Cerry 0 3 0 11 20 54 2 8 76 5 2 1 182 Chinese 333 149 144 668 565 37 8 94 60 57 2,115 Petai Chocolate 10 2 292 31 12 23 2 0 372

Coconut 5 2 0 43 114 111 423 233 42 30 15 35 1 2,449 284 87 201 91 77 8 4,251

Coffee 5 5

Durian 12 0 0 5 32 6 1 28 1 2 87

Guava 12 1 3 7 217 37 4 32 10 14 337

Jackfruit 0 26 2 40 10 3 1 689 141 28 52 27 25 3 1,047

Jengkol 136 23 4 163

Kecapi 7 0 0 7

Kedongdong 0 4 0 8 7 6 5 147 26 5 128 227 75 638

Longan 1 33 9 7 2 52

Mango 7 0 0 0 19 7 13 2 2 2 4 3 241 50 11 19 38 16 3 2 439

Melinjo 60 30 5 1 1 3,230 291 134 157 173 32 4,114

Noni 5 1 3 2 11

Orange 2 3 1 6

Village Types of Nagara Cijeruk Tambak Ciagel Sukamaju Dukuh Undar Andir Kragilan Total tree L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S

Papaya 0 1 0 94 38 12 3 100 3 1,318 184 71 908 441 98 6 3,277

Petai 0 2 0 11 1 926 125 33 76 17 5 1,196

Rambutan 33 21 2 3 1 1 220 38 5 50 2 12 388

Sirsak 1 1 0 2

Star Fruit 2 2 1 33 4 2 3 2 49

TOTAL 612 271 244 5,756 4,253 738 795 319 62 2,769 188 39 46 77 54 11,450 1,507 456 5,776 3,296 1,585 147 8 0 40,448 Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020. Notes: L = large, M=medium, S = small (Based on the 2016 Regional Regulation of Serang Regency, the criteria for categorization are based on age, are: (i) Small <2 years; Medium 2-5 years; and Large> 5 years.

Table 14: Quantity of Affected Timber Trees

Village Total Types of Nagara Cijeruk Tambak Ciagel Sukamaju Dukuh Undar Andir Kragilan tree L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S

Albizia 2 2 1 46 23 36 12 0 1107 94 49 28 15 9 1,424

Angsana 2 23 23 47 12 11 118

Asahan 12 1 13

Bamboo 241 48 62 1256 750 500 13 283 700 50 188 9 1797 1180 384 100 7,561

Bayur 7 32 16 4 4876 291 146 52 2 8 5,434

Benda 10 10

Cincau 1 1

Droak 12 12

Gempol 4 6 60 45 4 1 7 7 11 27 6 4 182 Burflower 58 27 12 134 37 25 33 10 1 13 1 2 1 608 84 23 38 3 1,110 tree Katimaha 10 18 15 43

Village Total Types of Nagara Cijeruk Tambak Ciagel Sukamaju Dukuh Undar Andir Kragilan tree L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S L M S

Kenanga 121 66 66 415 242 63 185 31 9 1,198

Kepuh 6 6

Kiarang 1 1

Laban 2 2 4

Lo 9 3 4 1 26 4 47

Madang 15 1 16

Mahoni 3 25 1 72 4 3 2 7 2 119

Poksor 1 35 37 1 47 30 11 19 1 69 41 11 303

Putat 13 3 16

Randu 2 14 8 2 369 53 19 69 13 9 558

Rubber 2 11 10 14 1 95 9 4 1 4 151

Salam 2 1 8 3 14

Senggon 92 92

Serut 6 2 8

Teak 71 66 5 89 8 6 3 5 253

Trambesi 7 7 Hibiscus 11 8 616 69 32 10 2 5 753 Tiliaceus Wuni 1 1

TOTAL 424 144 145 1,942 1,308 764 177 66 26 396 15 24 710 3 50 8,212 663 285 2,217 1,315 469 - 100 - 19,455 Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020. Notes: L = large; M= medium; S = small (Based on the 2016 Regional Regulation of Serang Regency, the criteria for categorization are based on age, are: (i) Small <2 years; Medium 2-5 years; and Large> 5 years.

2.2.4. Impact on Business

38. There are 42 business run by 39 households (165 persons) that will have their business disrupted by the land acquistion. All of those 39 households are doing business in their own structures. The households with impact on business are 9 owners of 11 grocery shops, 21 households engaged in 22 waste treatment, 1 owner of a motorcycle storage, 3 households have 3 leasing houses, 1 owner of refill water, 1 owner of chips industry, and 3 owners of the shuttle boats carrying goods and people across the river. There are 82 employees consist of 44 persons work in crosssing boat business, 4 persons in chips industry, 30 persons in waste treatment, and 4 persons in refill water.

Table 15: Impact on Business

Owners Tenants* Type of Business Rent No Village Employee Crossing Waste Chips Grocery Refill Motorcycle Household Person Household Person House Boat *) treatment Industry Shops Water storage /Room 1 Dukuh 3 13 0 0 44 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Undar 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Andir 3 Kragilan 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 Nagara 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Cijeruk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Tambak 20 83 0 0 25 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 Ciagel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Sukamaju 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 3 15 8 14 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Total 39 165 8 14 82 3 21 1 11 3 1 1

Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020 Note: *i) 8 tenants rented room in three lesing house.

39. There are only one out of the 39 households whose business is formally registered and 38 households whose business is unregistered.

40. Due to the subproject implementation, 35 shops operating directly their business in their own houses/shops will be fully dismantled and required to be relocated to another place. and 1 house-cum-shops partially affected but the remaining area is not sufficient to stay also required to be relocated to another place. The affected shop owners opined that it would take them about 6 months to move to a new shop and re-establish their business in a new place and they will lose their income during the period. The SES results showed that the affected shops' average daily income at USD 334.99 per month per household.

41. Regarding 3 households renting out their houses or business who will be relocated due to full loss of houses, the monthly household income from house leasing is about USD 64.76 per household per month. The consultations with the AHs revealed that they expected to continue their leasing in the place where they will self-relocate after 6 months. As a result of the displacement, 8 households that rented room in those three leasing households have to find another place to rent to continue their business.

42. The river embankment development will cause permanent impacts on 3 owners of the shuttle boats who transport people and merchandises to cross the river. On average, their daily earnings from the affected business is USD127.29 per household per day. They still haven’t decided a substitude livelihood. 43. At the time of conducting the IOL, there are 82 employees including 38 working for 23 affected shops and 44 working on the shuttle boats who will lose their income due to the land acquisition by the subproject. The consultations conducted in September 2020 with the affected shop owners recorded that 38 hired laborers will be permanently affected due to the relocation of their shops to new places and it was estimated that the employees’ income would be disrupted in 4 months. 44 workers hired by the shuttle boat owners will lose their income temporarily or permanently. On average, their monthly salary is USD118.62 per person per month.

2.2.5. Impact on Public Assets

44. The development of the river embankment will impact one mosque made from permanent buildings with an area of 153 m2 in Undar Andir village; and Cijeruk village; one paving block village road section with a total length of 1,385 m in Undar Andir village; a public toilet with an area of 30 m2 in Ciagel Village. Additionally, there are also other public utilities in Undar Andir, Kragilan, Cijeruk and Ciagel villages including two electricity poles, (2) gas pipes (60 m), one phone pole, one pump house, one clean water treatment, two sutet towers.

Table 16: Impact on Public Assets

Clean Mosque / Village Public Electric Gas Phone Pump water Sutet Villages Mushola Road Toilet ity pole pipe pole house treatme tower nt Dukuh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Undar 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 Andir Kragilan 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Nagara 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cijeruk 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2

Tambak 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ciagel 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

Sukamaju 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 637 m2 2.765 1.385 m 30 m2 1 unit (made m2 2 unit (made (made (made of 60 m 1 Unit of Affected (made (made of 153 m2 of of Steel, (made (made of Perman area/length of stone stell paving masonry Concrete of steel) stell) ent masonr frame) block) ) ) building y) s) 1 1 No. of 1 (Village 1 (Village (Village 1 (PT. 1 (PT. 1 (PT. 1 (PT. 1 (PT. affected Governm (PT.PLN Govern Govern PGN) Telkom) PDAM) SCTK) PLN owners ent) ) ment) ment) Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020. PT. PLN (State Electricity Company); PT. PGN (National Gas Company); PT. PDAM ( Local Water Company); PT Telkom (Telecommunication Compay); PT. SCTK (Sarana Catur Tirta Kelola).

2.2.5. Impact on Vulnerable Households

45. As outlined in Law no. 39/1999 (Elucidation of Article 5) concerning Human Rights vulnerable people include parents, children, the poor, pregnant women and people with disabilities. For the purposes of this document, this is a group that has an increasingly marginalized risk because of the subproject and specifically includes: (i) households headed by women, (ii) heads of households with disabilities, (iii) households that are below the poverty line8, (iv) elderly household heads, (v) land less, (vi) people without legal title to land (non-land rights holders), and (vii) indigenous people or customary communities (if any). According to the IOL and SES results conducted in 2018-2019 and updated in 2020, 220 AHs (857 persons) are considered as VAHs. Most of the VAHs are found in Cijeruk village with 70 AHs, followed by Dukuh Village with 53 AHs, Tambak Village with 39 AHs, Undar Andir Village with 23 AHs, Ciagel Village with 15 AHs, Sukamju Village with 14 AHs, Nagara Village with 5 AHs, and Kragilan Village with only 1 AH. These VAHs consist of 162 households (637 persons) who fall into one vulnerability group, 51 households (200 persons) who fall into two vulnerability groups, and 7 households (20 persons) that fall into three or more than three vulnerability groups (

8 The poverty line regulated by Central Statistics Agency Serang Regency in 2018 is IDR 294,829 (equivalent to USD19.75) per capita or IDR. 1,120,350 (equivalent to USD 75.05 ) per month. During the SES, the list of the poor AHs was consulted with and confirmed by village leaders and local authority.

46. Table 17).

47. Regarding vulnerability groups, Table 18 shows that among the VAHs, 63 households (233 persons are poor), 45 households (156 persons) are headed by a female with dependents, 2 households (4 persons) are headed by the disabled people with no other means of support, 20 households (68 persons) are headed by the elderly person with no other means of support, and 156 households (620 persons) are landless. The 156 households without land including (i) 1 household informal settlers who occupied land owned by private companies to do business and (ii) 155 farmer households who do not own production land so that these households have land in the COI to cultivate crops. None of the households affected by the subproject are categorized as Indigenous Peoples.

Table 17: Number of Vulnerable Households

Households who fall Households who fall Households who fall into three or more into one vulnerability into two vulnerability Total = (1) + (2) + (3) three vulnerability Villages groups (1) groups (2) groups (3) Household Person Household Person Household Person Household Person

Land owners 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nagara 3 13 2 8 0 0 5 21

Cijeruk 56 225 12 48 2 5 70 278

Tambak 25 103 13 52 1 2 39 157

Ciagel 14 54 0 0 1 3 15 57

Sukamaju 9 35 3 13 0 0 12 48

Dukuh 37 142 15 62 1 2 53 206

Undar Andir 16 63 6 17 1 5 23 85

Kragilan 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 3

Subtotal 1 160 635 51 200 7 20 218 855

Tenants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nagara 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cijeruk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tambak 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ciagel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sukamaju 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2

Dukuh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Undar Andir 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kragilan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Subtotal 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2

Nagara 3 13 2 8 0 0 5 21

Cijeruk 56 225 12 48 2 5 70 278

Tambak 25 103 13 52 1 2 39 157

Ciagel 14 54 0 0 1 3 15 57

Sukamaju 11 37 3 13 0 0 14 50

Dukuh 37 142 15 62 1 2 53 206

Undar Andir 16 63 6 17 1 5 23 85

Kragilan 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 GRAND TOTAL 162 637 51 200 7 20 220 857 Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020.

Table 18: Number of Vulnerable Households by Vulnerability Group

Household Household s headed Household Female headed by – by the s headed headed the Indigineou Poor elderly by children Landless household disabled s people household person with no household Total9 s with person household s with no other s dependent with no s other means of s means of means of support support support Hous Per Hous Per Hous Per Hous Per Hous Per Hous Per Hous Per Hous Per ehold son ehold son ehold son ehold son ehold son ehold son ehold son ehold son Nagar 5 21 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 a Cijeru 15 55 16 59 2 4 4 13 0 0 0 0 50 207 70 278 k Tamb 14 50 1 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 38 156 39 157 ak Ciage 1 4 1 3 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 13 46 15 57 l Suka 9 33 4 12 0 0 4 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 50 maju Duku 14 54 14 53 0 0 5 21 0 0 0 0 36 139 53 206 h Undar 4 13 6 16 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 0 18 69 23 85 Andir Kragil 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 3 an 63 233 45 156 2 4 20 68 0 0 0 0 156 620 220 857 Total Source: The Consultant, Inventory of Losses results 2018, updated in 2020.

48. From the IOL results, 56 physically displaced households (235 persons), 8 tenant who rented rooms and 71 households out of 511 who will lose more than 10% of total production landholding of the household are categorized VAHs. In other words, 220 VAHs (857 persons) include 135 SAHs and 85 marginally affected households.

2.2.6. Other Impacts

49. Impacts during development of the river embankment, including temporary impacts on land for setting up labor camps and concentrating of construction materials (if

9 Households may fall into more than one type of vulnerability factor. The total numbers of VAHs shown in the table are the sum of unique VAHs and not the sum of vulnerability factors experienced by the households.

any), are to be determined during the next subproject phase. Any temporary impact on land or non-land assets owned by households and local communities etc. caused by the contractor during construction is the responsibility of the contractor. If cash payment is needed, because the contractor causes the impact that is beyond what was already compensated within the COI, then it should be at full replacement cost, and as per the entitlement matrix in the report. The updated LARP will be attached to the Bidding document to the extent that it concerns impact on people. The contractor will conduct a detailed survey to identify any impact caused during the construction phase using questionnaire attached in the Appendix 25.

50. Any new APs that are found from any section of the river embankment during the embankment development shall be entitled to the same or upgraded entitlements as those of the APs in this LARP. None of the entitlements provided under this LARP can be downgraded in any updated LARP after completion of the detailed engineering design of the subproject.

2.2.7. Summary of Impacts

Table 19: Summary of Impacts

Unit of # Impacts Quantificati Quantity No. of AHs No. of APs on Affected Households and A Affected Persons A-1 Total affected households 757 2,840 i. Land Owners

Permanent loss of private land Number 686 511 2,128 only parcels ii. Land Users - Sharecroppers 155 613 - Informal settlers 1 3 iii. Tenant households 8 14 iv. Employee 82 82 Total Land Required for B m2 511 2,128 Acquisition 1,079,910

B-1 Land owned by Institutions m2 37,829 2 Villages Village Land Parcel 6 ’s Office land (no need to be DGWR’s Parcel 2 MPWH acquired)

9 Private Companies Land Parcel 15 companies B-2 Private land m2 1,042,081 511 2,128 C Houses and Other Structures C-1 Main structures Number 65 56 235

- Houses Number 29 25 101 - House-cum-shops Number 3 2 11 - Stand-alone shops Number 33 29 123 C-2 Secondary structures (xxx, xxx) Number 68 33 124 - Communities Number 65 30 124 - Private companies Number 3 3 D Crops and Trees Crops (chilim pumpkin, paddy, D-1 cassava, eggplant, cucumber, m2 19,958 48 203 etc.) D-2 Trees Number 5,903 489 2,041 E Vulnerable Households Number 22010 857 E-1 Poor households 63 233 E-2 Female Headed Households 45 156 E-3 Disabled Headed Households 2 4 E-4 Elderly Headed Households 20 68 E-5 Landless 156 620 F Severe Loss 667 2,744 F-1 Total relocated households Number 5611 235 Households whose houses are fully or partially affected but the Number 25 101 remaining area is not sufficient to remain Households whose house-cum- shops are fully or partially Number 2 11 affected but the remaining area is not sufficient to remain Stand Alone Shops are fully or partially affected but the Number 29 123 remaining area is not sufficient to remain Households losing 10% or more F-2 of their total productive income or Number 667 2,744 landholding

- Legal land owners Number 2,128 511 Household will lose 10% or more F3 of their income source - Sharecroppers Number 155 613 - Informal Settlers Number 1 3 G Severe-Vulnerable Households 106 416 Vulnerable households losing G-1 10% or more of total production Number 71 267 landholding of the household

10 No of vulnerable HH with multiple vulnerability catagory 11 All relocated structures are on the affected private land, so in total there are 667 severely AHs includes relocated households.

G-2 Vulnerable relocated households Number 35 149 H Income Loss Households with partial impact on structures losing income H-1 during the period of business Number 0 0 disruption while the remaining structure is being repaired Households with full impact on structures losing income for the H-2 Number 31 134 period of relocation and re- establishment of business - Fully affected house-cum-shops Number 2 11 - Fully affected shops Number 29 123 Permanent loss of income of employees working for affected business since the shop owners H-3 Number 82 82 would stop doing business after relocation to change to other occupations I Impacts on Public Assets 19 Community of Undar - Mosque Number 1 Andir village Individualy of Dukuh, Cijeruk, - Graves Number 7 Undar Andir Village Community of Undar - Village road Number 1 Andir village Community - Public toilet Number 1 of Ciagel village - Electricity poles Number 2 PT PLN - Gas pipes Number 2 PT PGN - Phone pole Number 1 PT Telkom - Pump house Number 1 PT PDAM - Clean water treatment Number 1 PT SCTK - Sutet tower Number 2 PT PLN

III. SOCIO ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE

3.1. Socio-economic Profiles of Affected Villages

51. Serang is a regency in Banten Province which is a buffer zone of the capital of Banten Province. Topographically, Serang Regency is a lowland and mountainous region with an altitude of 0-1778 m above sea level. Most plains have a height of less than 500 meters. Kibin and Kragilan are two out of 29 sub-districts in the regency.

52. According to Kibin Subdistrict & Kragilan Subdistrict Figure in 2019, among eight (8) affected villages in the subproject area, Tambak Village has the largest population of 15,983 residents, followed by Kragilan village with 11,283 residents and Cijeruk village with 8,691 residents. The most densely populated village is Tambak Village with the population density of 7,835 people per km2, and the most sparsely populated village is Undar Andir Village with 1,006 people per km2. Gender distribution in the affected villages is uneven with male population 11.48% lower than female population for the 8 villages. In particular, Tambak village has the lowest sex ratio at 0.38 as female population account for approximately 72.73% while male population occupy only 27.27%.

53. Table 20 provides further demographics information of the affected villages.

Table 20: Total Population, Gender Ratio and Population Density by Village

Sub- Area Total population Gender Population/ Villages district (Km2) Ratio Km2 Male Female Total Nagara 3.14 2,604 2,135 4,739 1.22 1,509 Cijeruk 3.73 4,389 4,302 8,691 1.02 2,330 Kibin Tambak 2.04 4,359 11,624 15,983 0.38 7,835 Ciagel 2.13 3,682 4,304 7,986 0.86 3,749 Sukamaju 2.40 1,877 1,635 3,512 1.15 1,463 Dukuh 2.98 2,103 2,033 4,136 1.03 1,388 Kragilan Undar Andir 3.40 1,702 1,718 3,420 0.99 1,006 Kragilan .,72 5,730 5,553 11,283 1.03 3,033 Total 23.54 26,446 33,304 59,750 7.68 22,314 Source: Subdistricts of Kibin and Kragilan in Figures 2019

54. In terms of education statistics, Table 21 shows that overall, improvements in the quality of education and participation rates were recorded from 2018 to 2019 especially in terms of literacy.

Table 21: Serang Regency Education Indicators for 2018-2019

Year Description 2018 2019 Quality of Population Education Literacy rate (percentage) 12.,37 12.58

Year Description 2018 2019 Average length of school (year) 6.69 6.87 Average level of school education

7 – 12 years old 99.78 95.02 Aged 13-15 years 96.61 96.67 Ages 16-18 years 64.87 89.65 Source: Serang Regency in figures, 2019

3.2. Socio-economic Profiles of Affected Households

55. A Socio-economic Survey (SES) was carried out in April 2019 and updated in May – July 2020 in all the eight (8) villages. A total of 757 AHs (equivalent to 2,840 persons) were surveyed by household questionnaires. Objectives of the SES are to obtain socio-economic profiles of the 757 AHs regarding demographic profile, education, labor, livelihoods, income, expenditure, asset ownership, living conditions, access to public facilities, and to record their perceptions of the subproject.

56. Of total respondents, 126 respondents are women (accounting for 16.6%) and 631 are men (representing 83.4%) (Table 21). The majority of the male respondents (89.4%) are affected household heads while the remaining (10.6%) are household members (sons or brothers of household heads). The 45 (36.0%) out of 126 female respondents are female headed households, 42 (33.0 %) are wives of household heads and the remaining are daughter or other relatives who live in AHs house (sister or parents).

Table 22: Gender of The Respondents

No. of Respondents Villages Male Female Total Nagara 43 16 59 Cijeruk 181 29 210 Tambak 58 13 71 Ciagel 18 2 20 Kragilan 34 21 55 Dukuh 227 38 265 Undar Andir 69 6 75 Sukamaju 1 1 2 Total 631 126 757 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

57. With regards to the educational attainment of the respondents, 54.0% of the respondents graduated from elementary schools, 21.0% graduated from junior high schools, 16.0% completed senior high schools, 4.0% completed higher education such as colleges and bachelors while 8% did not attend any school. Regarding

ethnicity, 98.0% of the respondents were Javanese and the remaining 2.0% were Sundanese.

Population

58. Table 22 below shows data associated with household sizes and gender distribution of household heads and household members of the surveyed AHs. Most of the surveyed AHs (94.1%) are headed by males while a very small percentage of the AHs (5.9%) are headed by females. There are 2,840 people living in the 757 AHs, of which 52.0% are males and 48.0% are females. Average surveyed household size is 3.8 persons per household. Of the household sizes across the affected villages, Nagara village has the highest average household size at 4.3 persons/household.

Table 23: Household Size and Gender Distribution of Surveyed Households

Average household Gender of household heads No. of family members size Sub- Villages (persons/ district household) Male Female Total Male Female Total

Kibin Nagara 57 2 59 145 111 256 4.3

Kibin Cijeruk 194 16 210 442 440 882 4.2

Kibin Tambak 70 1 71 114 108 222 3.1

Kibin Ciagel 19 1 20 43 39 82 4.1

Kibin Sukamaju 51 4 55 97 77 174 3.2

Kragilan Dukuh 251 14 265 490 442 932 3.5

Kragilan Undar Andir 69 6 75 145 139 284 3.8

Kragilan Kragilan 1 1 2 2 6 8 4.0

Total Number 712 45 757 1,478 1,362 2840 3.8

% 5.9 100 52.0 48.0 94.1 100 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

59. The SES results indicated that none of the surveyed household heads are aged under 15 years old. Most of the household heads (97.5%) are of working age while only 2.5% are the elderly population who are those aged over 65 years old. Table 24 below shows the age distribution of heads of the AHs.

Table 24: Age Distribution of the Heads of Affected Households

Age Group Sub- Working age Villages Children and young Elderly population districts population (15-65 (<15 years old) (Over 65 years old) years old)

Number % Number % Number %

Kibin Nagara 0 0 59 100.0 0 0

Kibin Cijeruk 0 0 206 98.1 4 1.9

Age Group Sub- Working age Villages Children and young Elderly population districts population (15-65 (<15 years old) (Over 65 years old) years old)

Kibin Tambak 0 0 70 98.6 1 1.4

Kibin Ciagel 0 0 19 95.0 1 5.0

Kragilan Sukamaju 0 0 51 92.7 4 7.3

Kragilan Dukuh 0 0 260 98.1 5 1.9

Kragilan Undar Andir 0 0 71 94.7 4 5.3

Kragilan Kragilan 0 0 2 100.0 0 0

Total 0 0 738 97.5 19 2.5 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

60.

61. Table 25 below shows the age distribution of the surveyed household members. Across the eight affected villages, the proportion of the working age population accounts for 65.04% whilst those of the children and young adolescent group and aged population represent at 23.59% and 11.37%, respectively. The dependency ratio is calculated at 34.96%, which means that there are 0.54% dependent persons per every working-age persons.

Table 25: Age Distribution of the Household Members of Affected Households.

Age Group

Sub- Children and Working age Elderly Villages Total districts Gender young (<15 years population (15-65 population (Over

old) years old) 65 years old)

Number % Number % Number % Number % Male 28 0.99 96 3.38 21 0.74 145 5.11 Nagara Female 19 0.67 62 2.18 30 1.06 111 3.91 Male 121 4.26 289 10.18 32 1.13 442 15.56 Cijeruk Female 133 4.68 256 9.01 51 1.80 440 15.49 Male 19 0.67 88 3.10 7 0.25 114 4.01 Kibin Tambak Female 21 0.74 67 2.36 20 0.70 108 3.80 Male 8 0.28 26 0.92 9 0.32 43 1.51 Ciagel Female 13 0.46 22 0.77 4 0.14 39 1.37 Male 20 0.70 60 2.11 17 0.60 97 3.42 Sukamaju Female 16 0.56 49 1.73 12 0.42 77 2.71 Male 115 4.05 336 11.83 39 1.37 490 17.25 Dukuh Female 103 3.63 298 10,49 41 1.44 442 15.56 Kragilan Male Undar 31 1.09 97 3.42 17 0.60 145 5.11 Andir Female 23 0.81 93 3.27 23 0.81 139 4.89

Age Group Sub- Villages districts Gender Children and Working age Elderly Total

young (<15 years population (15-65 population (Over old) years old) 65 years old) Male 0 0.00 2 0.07 0 0.00 2 0.07 Kragilan Female 0 0.00 6 021 0 0.00 6 0.21 Male 342 12.04 994 35.00 142 5.00 1,478 52.04 Total Female 328 11.55 853 30.04 181 6.37 1,362 47.96 Total 670 23.59 1,847 65.04 323 11.37 2,840 100.00 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

Religion and Ethnicity

62. Regarding ethnicity, Javanese predominate in the subproject area with a total of 734 houdeholds of occupying 96.96% of while there are 20 Sundanese (representing 2.64%) and 3 Lampung (constituting 0.4%) in Cijeruk, Ciagel and Dukuh villages. All of the AHs (100%) are Muslims. In general, the AHs in the affected villages live in a homogeneous society. The ethnic groups have been staying in the subproject area for a long time. Approximately 85.0% of AHs have been living in their villages for more than 20 years, followed by those residing in the villages for 10-20 years at 12.0%. The AHs who have been living in their villages for 5-10 years and less than 5 years occupy 2.5% and 0.5%, respectively.

Table 26: Ethnicity of Surveyed Household Members

Ethnicity No Sub-districts Villages Javanese Sundanese Lampung 1 Kibin Nagara 59 0 0

2 Kibin Cijeruk 200 10 0

3 Kibin Tambak 71 0 0

4 Kibin Ciagel 19 1 0

5 Kibin Sukamaju 55 0 0

6 Kragilan Dukuh 253 9 3

7 Kragilan Undar Andir 75 0 0

8 Kragilan Kragilan 2 0 0

Total 734 20 3

% 96.96% 2.64% 0.40% Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

Education Level

63. All of the surveyed household heads attended school and are literate. Over a half of the surveyed household heads (60.8%) graduated from elementary schools, 17.3% completed junior high schools, and 13.1% graduated from high schools. A small percentage of the household heads (0.4%) completed higher education. However,

8.5% reported that they did not complete elementary education. Table 27 below summarizes the different levels of education attained by the 757 household heads.

Table 27: Education Levels of Surveyed Household Heads

Highest Educational Attainment Not Sub- Graduated Graduated Villages Gender Completed Graduated Graduated districts Never School Junior High higher Elementary Elementary High School School education School No % No % No % No % No % No %

Kibin Nagara 59 0 0.00 10 1.32 34 4.49 12 1.59 3 0.40 0 0.00

Male 0 0.00 9 1.19 33 4.36 12 1.59 3 0.40 0 0.00

Female 0 0.00 1 0.13 1 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.,00 0 0.00

Kibin Cijeruk 210 0 0.00 21 2.77 159 21.00 17 2.25 13 1.72 0 0.00

Male 0 0.00 17 2.25 149 19.68 15 1.98 13 1.72 0 0.00

Female 0 0.00 4 0.53 10 1.32 2 0.26 0 0.00 0 0.00

Kibin Tambak 71 0 0.00 5 0.66 33 4.36 21 2.77 12 1.59 0 0.00

Male 0 0.00 5 0.66 32 4.23 21 2.77 12 1.59 0 0.00

Female 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Kibin Ciagel 20 0 0.00 0 0.00 12 1.,59 6 0.79 2 0.26 0 0.00

Male 0 0.00 0 0.00 11 1.45 6 0.79 2 0.26 0 0.00

Female 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Kibin Sukamaju 22 0 0.00 3 0.40 18 2.38 14 1.85 19 2.51 1 0.13

Male 0 0.00 1 0.13 17 2.25 13 1.72 19 2.51 1 0.13

Female 0 0.00 2 0.26 1 0.13 1 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00

Kragilan Dukuh 265 0 0.00 19 2.51 161 21.27 47 6.21 37 4.89 1 0.13

Male 0 0.00 15 1.98 154 20.34 44 5.81 37 4.89 1 0.13

Female 0 0.00 4 0.53 7 0.92 3 0.40 0 0.00 0 0.00

Kragilan Undar Andir 75 0 0.00 5 0.66 43 5.68 14 1.85 12 1.59 1 0.13

Male 0 0,00 5 0.66 41 5.42 12 1.59 10 1.32 1 0.13

Female 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.26 2 0.26 2 0.26 0 0.00

Kragilan Kragilan 2 0 0.00 1 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 0 0.00

Male 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 0 0.00

Female 0 0.00 1 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Total 757 0 0.00 64 8.45 460 60.77 131 17.31 99 13.08 3 0.40

Male 0 0.00 52 6.87 437 57.73 123 16.38 96 12.68 3 0.40

Female 0 0.00 12 1.59 23 3.04 8 1.06 3 0.26 0 0.00 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

64.

65. Table 28 below provides further information on education levels of surveyed household members. According the surveyed household members (32.68%) graduated from high schools, 31.73% graduated elementery schools, 18.38 graduated junior high school, 9.12% not completed elementary school and 3.30% completed higher education.

Table 28: Education Levels of Surveyed Household Members

Highest Educational Attainment Sub- Not Completed Graduated Graduated Villages Gender Graduated Graduated High districts Never School Elementary Junior High higher Elementary School School School education No % No % No % No % No % No %

Kibin Nagara 13 0.46 25 0.88 61 2.15 47 1.65 98 3.45 12 0.42

Male 4 0.14 14 0.49 38 1.34 26 0.92 54 1.90 9 0.32

Female 9 0.32 11 0.39 23 0.,81 21 0.74 44 1.55 3 0.11

Kibin Cijeruk 38 1.34 83 2.92 300 10.56 164 5.77 260 9.15 37 1,30

Male 21 0.74 32 1.13 179 6.30 73 2.57 121 4.26 16 0.56

Female 17 0.60 51 1.80 121 4.26 91 3.20 139 4.,89 21 0.74

Kibin Tambak 5 0.18 18 0.63 130 4.58 26 0.92 42 1.48 1 0.04

Male 3 0.11 13 0.46 55 1.94 21 0.74 21 0.74 1 0.04

Female 2 0.07 5 0.18 75 2.64 5 0.18 21 0.74 0 0.00

Kibin Ciagel 3 0.11 7 0.25 25 0.88 22 0.77 23 0.81 2 0.07

Male 1 0.04 3 0.11 14 0.49 12 0.42 12 0.42 1 0.04

Female 2 0,07 4 0.14 11 0.39 10 0.35 11 0.39 1 0.04

Kibin Sukamaju 10 0.35 11 0.39 18 0.63 28 0.99 95 3.35 12 0.42

Male 3 0.11 9 0.32 17 0.60 20 0.70 41 1.44 7 0.25

Female 7 0.25 2 0.07 1 0.04 8 0.28 54 1.90 5 0.18

Kragilan Dukuh 46 1.62 76 2.68 311 10.95 177 6.23 304 10.70 18 0.63

Male 19 0.67 35 1.23 166 5.85 82 2.89 175 6.16 13 0,46

Female 27 0.95 41 1.44 145 5.11 95 3.35 129 4.54 5 0.18

Kragilan Undar Andir 24 0.85 38 1.34 56 1.97 54 1.90 105 3.70 7 0.25

Male 15 0.53 17 0.60 25 0.88 22 0.77 62 2.18 4 0.14

Female 9 0.32 21 0.74 31 1.09 32 1.13 43 1.51 3 0.11

Kragilan Kragilan 0 0,.0 1 0.04 0 0.00 4 0.14 1 0.04 2 0.07

Male 0 0,00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.07 0 0.00 0 0.00

Female 0 0.00 1 0.04 0 0.00 2 0.07 1 0.04 2 0.07

Total 139 4.89 259 9.12 901 31.73 522 18.38 928 32.68 91 3.20

Male 66 2.32 123 4.33 494 17.39 258 9.08 486 17,11 51 1.80

Female 73 2.57 136 4.79 407 14.33 264 9.30 442 15,56 40 1.41 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

Occupations

66. Table 29 shows that the surveyed household heads have a variety of occupations. Due to low educational levels and lack of skills and quailifications levels, most of the surveyed household heads have unskilled occupations. Nearly a half of surveyed household heads are farmers with 49.1%. Their work depends on the agricultural land although most of their agricultural land is rain-fed land which is productive only during the wet season. Traders and hired farm workers occupy 16.1% and 11.0%, respectively. There is a small proportion of the household heads employed in service occupations (drivers, civil servants, hired labor).

Table 29: Occupations of Surveyed Household Heads

Occupations Sub- Employee Others(Civil district Villages working in Farmer Farm workers Trader Driver Services House wife Servants, s private Hired Labor company No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No %

Kibin Nagara 3 0.40 42 5.55 6 0.79 1 0.13 2 0.26 0 0.00 5 0.66 0 0.00

Kibin Cijeruk 7 0.92 77 10.17 33 4.36 70 9.25 3 0.40 0 0.00 4 0.53 16 2.11

Kibin Tambak 0 0.00 16 2.11 5 0.66 24 3.17 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.13 25 3.30

Kibin Ciagel 3 0.40 5 0.66 11 1.45 1 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Kibin Sukamaju 23 3.04 0 0.00 0 0.00 19 2.51 2 0.26 0 0.00 1 0.13 10 1.32

Kragilan Dukuh 6 0.79 182 24.04 14 1.85 5 0.66 3 0.40 3 0.40 3 0.40 49 6.47

Kragilan Undar Andir 3 0.40 50 6.61 14 1.85 1 0.13 0 0.00 5 0.66 0 0.00 2 0.26

Kragilan Kragilan 1 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Total 46 6.08 372 49.14 83 10.96 122 16.12 10 1.32 8 1.06 14 1.85 102 13.47 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

67. Regarding occupations of surveyed household members, the 2020 SES results indicate that they are engaged in numerous occupations including farmers, business owners, employees working in private companies, government employees, and hired laborers . Of 44 employed household members, the most occupation is employees working for small enterprises, accounting for 5.81% of the total employed persons. This is followed by farmers (5.94%) and hired laborers (4.62%). Business owners represent at 3.30% of the total employed household members. The proportion of the remaining occupations (including housewives, civil servants and drivers) is lower than that of the other occupations, at 1.98% in total.

68.

69. Table 30:30 shows average monthly incomes of the surveyed households in the eight (8) affected villages. The median household income for the surveyed households within the villages is IDR 2,745,183.00 per household. The income gap among the affected villages is not considerable. Among the affected villages, the surveyed households in Kragilan village have the highest average monthly income with IDR 4,650,000.00/household/month while the median household income in Nagara village is the lowest IDR 1,757,407.00/household/month.

Table 30: Average Monthly Household Income of Surveyed Households

Average monthly income of surveyed Sub-districts Villages households (IDR per household) Kibin Nagara 1,757,407.00 Kibin Cijeruk 2,837,864.00 Kibin Tambak 2,878,571.00 Kibin Ciagel 2,095,000.00 Kibin Sukamaju 4,053,704.00 Kragilan Dukuh 1,783,588.00 Kragilan Undar Andir 1,905,333.00 Kragilan Kragilan 4,650,000.00

2,745,183.00 Total Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

70. Based on the amounts of household incomes provided by the surveyed households, the household income levels are divided into 5 ranges including: (i) less than IDR 1.12 million/month; (ii) IDR 1.12 million/month to IDR 2 million/month; (iii) IDR 2 million/month to IDR 3 million/month; (iv) IDR 3 million/month to IDR 4 millon/month; and (v) more than 4 million per month. Over a half of the surveyed households (53.10%) have an average monthly income in the range of IDR 1.12 million to IDR 2 million/month/household. Households’ earning between IDR 2 million to IDR 3 million/month accounts for 23.78 %. There are 2.91% of the surveyed households having the monthly household income more than IDR 4 million/month. 8.32% of the surveyed households were considered poor because their income was below the poverty line. Table 31 below presents household income ranges in the affected villages.

Table 31: Average Monthly Income of Surveyed Households

Income (Million) (IDR) Sub- No Village district < 1.12* 1,12 – 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 > 4

1 Kibin Nagara 5 39 12 5 0 2 Kibin Cijeruk 15 65 74 52 7 3 Kibin Tambak 14 19 22 7 2 4 Kibin Ciagel 1 10 6 3 0 5 Kibin Sukamaju 9 12 13 21 9 6 Kragilan Dukuh 14 203 37 0 3 Undar 7 Kragilan 4 53 16 2 0 Andir 8 Kragilan Kragilan 1 1 0 0 1 Total 63 402 180 90 22 % 8,32% 53,10% 23,78% 11,89% 2,91% *) Poverty line is Rp. 1,120,350 , so the household with average monthly income less Rp. 1,120,350 are categorize as poor household Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

71. Regarding individual incomes by occupation, business owners are reported to gain the highest average monthly income with IDR 5,000,000.00/person/month. The second highest average monthly income IDR 4,300,000.00/person/month belongs to workers in private companies. Employees working for government agencies earn a stable average monthly income of IDR 4,000,000.00/person/month while drivers have their average monthly income at IDR 2,500,000.00/person/month and hired laborers at IDR 2,000,000.00/person/month. Farmers has lower average monthly incomes compared to other occupations, with the lowest median monthly income of IDR 1,500,000.00/person/month. Table 32 below presents data on individual incomes by occupations.

Table 32: Average Monthly Income Per Capita by Occupation

Occupations Average Monthly Income Per Capita (IDR/person/month) Farmers 1,500,000 Business owners 5,000,000 Employees working in private companies 4,300,000 Employees working in government agencies 4,000,000 Hired laborers 2,000,000 Drivers 2,500,000 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

72. Regarding expenditures, on average the surveyed households spent IDR 3,000,000,00/household/month. The table below illustrates the percentage of household expenditures on different items, for instance, housing, food, education,

healthcare, utilities, funeral and dowry, clothes and other miscellaneous household items such loan interests or transportation cost. It is obvious that the major spending of all the surveyed households was on food, accounting for 62.79% of the surveyed households’ expenses. The second highest expense is for housing (8.14%), followed by expenditure associated with education (6.98%). The proportion of education expenses is 6.98% while spending on healthcare contributes 5.81% of the total household expenditure. The rest are proportion of utilities; funeral and dowry; and others contributes 4.65% each.

Table 33: Average Monthly Expenditure of Surveyed Households by Category

Expenditure Items % of Households’ Expenses Housing 11.67% Food 50.00% Education 10.00% Utilities (water, electricity) 6.67% Healthcare 6.67% Funeral and dowry 5.00% Clothes 3.33% Others (Transportation, etc) 6.67% Total 100% Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

73. During the SES, 487 surveyed households mentioned that their monthly expenses occasionally exceeded their income mainly but helped by income of family members sometimes. As a result of the gap between income and expenditure, these households had to use their savings, borrow money from relatives or take out loans. 224 households indicate that the money they can save after paying for living expenses is insignificant. The SES results further show that 60 households were indebted with an range debt amount of IDR 500,000 – 1,500,000/household. They reported that they borrowed money for a variety of purposes such as food consumption (50.00%), production development (43.33%), health check and treatment (6.67%).

Health and Sanitation

74. The most common type of toilet facilities used by the surveyed households in the subproject area is indoor toilet with a septic tank (accounting for 72.1% of total surveyed households. This is followed by outdoor toilets with a septic tank with 12.5%. Approximately 8.1% of the households reported that they are using public toilets with septic tanks. It is noted that 1.5% of the surveyed households are using toilets flowed to the river and the remaining 5.8% have no sanitation facility - open defecation on the rivers, which has implications for river management and community sanitation as the activities might spread infectious diseases in the area.

Table 34: Types of Sanitation Facilities

Sub- Types of Toilets Villages districts Indoor toilet Outdoor toilet Toilet Public toilet River

with septic with septic flowed to with septic tanks tanks the river tanks No % No % No % No % No %

Kibin Nagara 51 86.4 0 0 0 0 4 6.8 4 6.8

Kibin Cijeruk 180 85.7 15 7.1 0 0 10 4.8 5 2.4

Kibin Tambak 42 59.2 0 0 11 15.5 18 25.4 0- 0-

Kibin Ciagel 14 70.0 0 0 0 0 6 30.0 0- 0-

Kibin Sukamaju 54 98.2 1 1.8 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kragilan Dukuh 134 50.6 79 29.8 0 0 17 6.4 35 13.2 Undar 0 0 0 0 Kragilan 69 92.0 6 8.0 0 0 Andir Kragilan Kragilan 2 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 546 72.1 95 12.5 11 15.5 61 8.1 44 5.8 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

75. For drinking and cooking water sources, many of the surveyed households (98.94%) use safe drinking water while 1,06% of the households use unsafe drinking water the River. The SES results indicate 4..9% of the surveyed households use water from Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (PDAM-Local Water Company) as their main source of drinking water. Nearly one-third of the surveyed households (29.7%) access water from shallow wells and 3.0% use water from public hydrants. In addition, 19.3% responded that they buy water to refill their water bottles and there is still a small percentage of the surveyed households who are those using water from the river at 1.1%.

Table 35: Households Drinking Water Source

Types of Drinking Water

Sub- Water supplied Public Villages Refill water Shallow wells River districts by PDAM hydrants

No % No % No % No % No %

Kibin Nagara 39 66.1 10 16.9 9 15.3 1 1.7

Kibin Cijeruk 190 90.5 - 15 7.1 5 2.4 -

Kibin Tambak 49 69.0 19 26.8 3 4.2 -

Kibin Ciagel 14 70.0 6 30.0 0 - -

Kibin Sukamaju 1 1.8 - 45 81.8 9 16.4 -

Kragilan Dukuh 38 14.3 15 5.7 23 8.7 182 68.7 7 2.6 Undar Kragilan 23 30.7 7 9.3 28 37.3 17 22.7 - Andir Kragilan Kragilan 1 50.0 1 50.0 - - -

Total 355 46.9 23 3.0 146 19.3 225 29.7 8 1.1 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020 *PDAM = Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (Local Water Company)

76. As most of the area has been covered by PDAM services, over a half of the surveyed households (55.5%) use water from PDAM for bathing and washing, 33.0% use water from shallow wells. There are still 10.8% of the surveyed households who

use river water for bathing including those related to local community habits. The remaining households use rainwater stored in water tanks, water deep wells and public hydrants at 0.7% in total.

Table 36: Households Bath Water Source

Types of Bathing Water

Sub- Water supplied by Villages Shallow wells River Others districts PDAM

No % No % No % No %

Kibin Nagara 50 84.7 - 9 15.3 -

Kibin Cijeruk 158 75.2 47 22.4 5 2.4 -

Kibin Tambak 40 56.3 10 14.1 21 29.6 -

Kibin Ciagel 20 100.0 0 - - -

Kibin Sukamaju 1 1.8 50 90.9 - 4 7.3

Kragilan Dukuh 107 40.4 121 45.7 37 14.0 - Undar Kragilan 43 57.3 22 29.3 10 13.3 - Andir Kragilan Kragilan 1 50.0 - - 1 50.0

Total 420 55.5 250 33.0 82 10.8 5 0.7 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

77. General health status information of the surveyed households was also obtained during the SES. It is reported that surveyed household members suffered from a few minor and major diseases in last 12 months. These diseases are common fever, coughs, respiratory diseases, skin infections, stomach aches and diarrhea. The most visited medical care establishments by the sick in Ciujung are public health centers/ puskesmas or health clinics (97.7%), paramedics (2%), and the rest go directly to the hospital which is located in average of 14 km to seek medical treatment and health advice.

Participation in Activities

78. Like villages in Indonesia, especially in the province of Banten which is thick with nuances of diversity, religious activities are always carried out routinely in each village. Such as weekly recitation and incidental recitation. This has the potential to disseminate information to the public and community consultation facilities including the Ciujung embankment program.

79. Community activities related to infrastructure generally revolve around the construction of roads and drainage, environmental hygiene programs, and assistance to build houses for families or couples. Women and men usually participate in these activities where men generally provide labor and women help in food preparation. Moreover, encouraged by the existence of Village Funds whose use is carried out in a participatory manner.

Perceptions of the Subproject and Preferences on Compensation of Affected Households

80. With regards to the community knowledge about the subproject, all of the respondents (100%) said they were aware of the subproject information supported the river embankment development because they were disseminated information by the BBWS, village leaders and consultants and attended public consultation meetings regarding land acquisition, compensation and assistance under the subproject. BBWS 3CIS, local government, village leaders and consultants have carried out public outreach and consultation to the community about the plan of building embankments and land acquisition. Table 37 below presents the numbers and percentages of the surveyed households who perceived the subproject by source of information.

Table 37: Information Sources on the Subproject

Sub- Village leaders Consultation Meetings Neighbor Villages districts Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female

Kibin Nagara 33 26 7 25 17 8 1 0 1

Kibin Cijeruk 140 129 11 70 52 18 0 0 0

Kibin Tambak 39 30 9 32 28 4 0 0 0

Kibin Ciagel 16 16 0 4 2 2 0 0 0

Kibin Sukamaju 36 32 4 19 2 17 0 0 0

Kragilan Dukuh 169 158 11 96 69 27 0 0 0 Undar Kragilan 69 63 6 5 5 0 1 0 1 Andir Kragilan Kragilan 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

503 455 48 252 175 77 2 0 2 Total 66.4 60.1 6.3 33.3 23.1 10.2 0.3 0 0.3 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

81. Approximately 96.7% of the surveyed households perceived that there would be impacts on their livelihoods. However, most of them considered the impacts as minor while the 4.78% AHs stated that they would suffer from severe impacts due to physical displacement and loss of production land. The remaining surveyed households (3.3%) stated that there would be no impacts on their livelihoods since they have enterprise-based livelihoods and wage-based livelihoods – they work at factories or run business outside the subproject area.

Table 38: Perceptions of Surveyed Households of Impact on Livelihood

Sub- Yes No Do not know Villages districts Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female

Kibin Nagara 59 43 16 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kibin Cijeruk 210 181 29 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kibin Tambak 71 58 13 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kibin Ciagel 20 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kibin Sukamaju 31 21 10 24 13 11 0 0 0

Kragilan Dukuh 265 227 38 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub- Yes No Do not know Villages districts Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female

Kragilan Undar Andir 75 69 6 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kragilan Kragilan 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

No 732 617 115 24 13 11 0 0 0 Total % 96.7 81.5 15.2 3.2 1.7 1.5 0 0 0 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

82. All of the 757 surveyed households preferred for cash compensation for affected land and on-land assets and expected to be provided with cash assistance for income restoration and skills training programs by the subproject. All of AHs who will be required to physically displace opted to self-relocate (See Appendix 26).

Asset Ownership

83. Household asset ownership of the surveyed households is summarized in Table 39. A majority of surveyed households own basic home assets, such as televisions, radios, cassette players and mobile phones for communication and access to information, motorcycles and bicycles for transportation; gas cookers, rice cookers for cooking, and refrigerators for food preservation. A few households own high value assets such as cars (1.19% of the surveyed households owning cars). Of 757 surveyed households, 529 households use handphones for ease of communication.

Table 39: Surveyed Households Owning At Least One Item of Assets

Households Owning At Least One Item Of Home Assets Types of Assets No. % Bicycle 3 0.40 Landline telephone 0 0 Hand phone 529 69.88 Radio 7 0.92 Television set 734 96.96 Cassette player 0 0 Sewing machine 7 0.92 Motorcycle 591 78.07 Car 9 1.19 Truck 0 0 Refrigerator 131 17.31 Gas cooker 756 99.87 Electric stove or rice cooker 756 99.87 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

84. Table 40: shows the average distance from the houses of the surveyed households to the nearest public facilities including health establishments, educational establishments, markets, etc. Kindergartens, primary schools, medical service units

and pharmacy facilities are available within the affected villages while hospitals, center markets as well as high schools are located in the subdistrict centres.

Table 40: Average Distance to the Nearest Public Facilities

Health establishments (km) Educational establishments (km) Others

Villages ty

village village

school school

Market Market

school/ school/

College College

hospital hospital

Medical Medical

Township Township Township

Universi

Pharmacy Pharmacy

Secondary Secondary

High school school High

Headquarter Headquarter

Private clinic clinic Private

Kindergarten Kindergarten

service units in in units service Primary school school Primary

Nagara 4 16 3 4 1 1 3 10 21 7 40

Cijeruk 2 13 3 2 1 1 5 8 19 5 28

Tambak 3 13 2 3 1 1 4 6 15 4 24

Ciagel 2 13 2 2 1 1 4 6 14 4 23

Sukamaju 2 12 2 2 1 1 4 4 15 2 24

Dukuh 3 16 3 3 1 1 8 8 19 5 40

Undar Andir 3 14 3 3 1 1 7 6 18 3 28

Kragilan 3 12 3 3 1 1 3 3 15 2 24

Average 3 14 3 3 1 1 5 6 17 4 29 Source: The Consultant, Socio-economic Survey results April 2019, updated in May-July 2020

Poverty

85. Among the surveyed households, 63 households (accounting for 8.3% of total surveyed households) are categorized as poor households since their houdeholds monthly income is below the Serang Regency poverty line. Of this 63 households, 33 are male-headed households and 30 are female-headed households. The poor households stated during the SES that reasons of their poverty include (i) lack of production land; (ii) lack of skills and qualifications required for well-paid jobs; and (iii) less of capital.

3.3. Impacts on Livelihood

86. Potential impacts on livelihood of local people in the subproject area were identified in consultation with the AHs and local communities as shown in the table below.

Table 41: Impact on Livelihood

No Type of Impact Substantial Impact Nature of Impact 1 Causes of 511 legal land owners who have land - This impact is temporary for landowners choosing based livelihoods will be affected because because they can buy land in other areas. livelihood / other their agricultural land will be partially activities acquired by the subproject. 35 households (149 persons) will This impact is temporary for landowners experience in impact on business as they because they can buy land and open have to move their business to other businesses / work in other areas. places

No Type of Impact Substantial Impact Nature of Impact 156 households (616 persons) who are The impact is temporary, because they landless farmers will experience changes / have to find and cultivate new land in loss of their livelihoods, because they lose embankment areas or other areas. their arable land.

2 Changes and There will be a decline in the value of This impact is temporary for landowners, declines in agricultural products of 511 households because they can buy land in other areas. revenue/ (2.128 persons) who have agricultural land Decrease in acquired income 3 owners of shuttle boats have permanent This impact is permanent for 3 owners of impact on their income during business shuttle boats because they can not open disruption. businesses / work in other areas

155 landless farmers will lose their land- The impact is temporary and they must find based livelihood as they have no land to new land to work on. cultivate.

3.4. Gender Analysis

87. Among the surveyed household members, women account for 48.0% and 63% of the women are of working age, compared to 67% of the men. Among employed household members, women make up 33% whilst men occupy 77%.

88. From the figures shown in Table 25, it was calculated that there are 65 dependent people12 for every 100 persons of working age. Since women are the major caregivers to the young and older persons, with the high dependency ratio, there is a heavy burden to women. Regarding education level, literacy of females is slightly lower compared to that of males. Among the surveyed household members, 95.53% of the male household members know how to speak, read and write in Bahasa while 94.64% of the women do. There are considerable differences between highest educational attainment of males and those of females. According to the SES result, a large percentage of women (32.45%) completed elementary education while the largest proportion of men graduated from elementary school (32.88%). A very small percentage of female household members achieved higher education – this means that women in the surveyed households are mainly unskilled laborers.

89. From the data obtained through the SES, it is calculated that average monthly income of female-headed households is 1,422,222 than to that of male-headed households (IDR 2,383,848 per household). Regarding income per capita, male laborers are paid at IDR 100,000/person/day while female laborers are paid at lower rate (IDR 80,000/person/day).

90. The participants in the FGDs revealed that there are no legal or customary and cultural obstacles for women to own land, houses or other properties in the affected villages. It was reported during the SES that most of the household decision-making of the surveyed households regarding financial matters, education, healthcare, purchasing home assets, day to day activities and social functions and marriages tend to be made byMen. Table 42 shows the gender division of labour within the surveyed households.

12 Those are at ages where they are likely to depend on others for their care and wellbeing (ages 0-17) and 60 and above.

Table 42: Percentage of Male and Female Members Participating in Activities of the Surveyed Households

Activities Male Female Both No 573 151 33 Financial matters % 75.69 19.95 4.36 No 631 126 0 Education of child % 83.36 16.64 0 No 306 381 70 Health care of child % 40.42 50.33 9.25 No 586 126 45 Purchase of assets % 77.41 16.64 5.94 No 220 526 11 Day to day activities % 29.06 69.48 1.45

On social functions and No 534 121 102 marriages % 70.54 15.98 13.47 Source: The Consultant; Socio-economic Survey, September 2019, updated in March 2020

91. The implementation of the subproject could affect differently on men and women. It was recorded during the FGDs with affected women that the women are often more vulnerable than men in adapting the loss of land acquisition and resettlement as well as change of livelihood. Further gender analysis will be presented in a stand-alone Gender Action Plan.

IV. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, AND CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION

4.1. Key Stakeholders

92. Stakeholders involved in the LARP preparation, updating, implementation and monitoring of the subproject are described as follows.

93. Affected Persons. People who are directly affected by land acquisition activities include (i) land owners; (ii) structure owners (both households and enterprises); (iii) tree/crop owners; (iv) business owners who are operating business in the affected houses/shops/shuttle boats; (v) sharecroppers who are cultivating on the affected agricultural land; (vi) tenants who are renting house from affected households; and (vii) employees who are working for the affected business.

94. Religious/Social Groups. Leading local figures in Ciujung, whether they represent social, religious, cultural and even political interests, also consist of important local stakeholders near the Ciujung land acquisition corridor because of the influence they have in shaping the perceptions and opinions of the society at large and the APs.

95. National Government Agencies. The three main implementing agencies for the subproject consist of the Directorate General of Water Resources of the Ministry of Public Works and Housing, where the Project is directly connected through the River and Coastal Directorate and where the Central Project Management Unit (CPMU) will be submitted. In addition, the Ministry of Home Affairs (Kemendagri) Directorate General of Regional Development, and the Directorate General of Agricultural Infrastructure Facilities of the Ministry of Agriculture represent other major national institutions with technical, supervisory, coordination and monitoring roles in their regional agency partners.

96. Regional Institutions. In addition, there are some key regional stakeholder institutions: (i) Cidanau-Ciujung-Cidurian River Region (BBWS 3CIS). The most prominent regional agency is the Ciujung river basin authority, termed BBWS 3CIS which is the implementing agency of the subproject. (ii) Local Governments. Regional governments with direct interests and responsibilities for assisting in preparation and implementation of land acquisition and resettlement arrangements, likewise represent strategic regional entities and institutions with direct influence and involvement in multiple components of the Project related interventions. These include provincial government and most importantly district (kabupaten) level government, in addition to lower level sub-district (kecamatan) and village (desa) governments. The regional (provincial, kabupaten) branches of the National Land Agency, or BPN (Badan Pertahanan Nasional), play strategic roles in implementing land acquisition activities for the development of public interest including land measuring, negotiation of compensation form, compensation payment, and transfer of acquired land to agency needing the land/project proponent. Under the 2012 updated Land Acquisition in the Public Interest law and follow-up guidelines, the head of the province based BPN chairs the land acquisition committees set up to facilitate land acquisition on projects within the public domain and interest. (iii) Local Government. The Provincial Governments of Banten and Serang Regency have direct responsibility for overseeing land acquisition and

resettlement activities in their jurisdiction. These bodies consist of Bappeda, Water Resources or Irrigation Service, Agriculture Service and potentially also Forest Service in watersheds. (iv) Civil Society. Civil society groups such as NGOs (Riung Hijau, Rekonvasi Bumi, Palapa) and other environmentally oriented social institutions have a role to play as a complement to local civil society groups. (v) Media. Regional and sub-regional media (newspapers, magazines, television and radio), as well as local government (provincial, district) information and official media units, through their role in disseminating information from the preparatory stage of land acquisition to project implementation. Sufficient regional media influential namely Radar Banten, RRI Banten, Banten TV. For disclosure of Location Determination for the CW 03 package, BBWS 3CIS has disseminated the information via newspapers such as “Banten Raya”, “Cilegon Raya”, “Banten Kini”, and “Indopos”. 4.2. Consultation and Participation Mechanisms Across the Project Cycle

97. Meaningful consultations are carried out with relevant parties/APs, host communities and concerned groups. Meaningful consultation is a process that (i) starts early in the project preparation phase and is carried out on an ongoing basis throughout the project cycle; (ii) provide relevant and adequate information that is understandable and easily accessible to APs in a timely manner; (iii) is undertaken in an atmosphere free from intimidation or coercion; (iv) gender inclusive and responsive, and adapted to the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable groups; and (v) enables the incorporation of all relevant views of APs and other stakeholders into decision making, such as project design, mitigation measures, benefit sharing and development opportunities, and implementation problems. Particular attention will be provided to the needs of vulnerable groups and ensure their participation.

98. Various consultation activities have been conducted with AHs and communities during the preparation of this LARP including (i) community consultation and dissemination of information about the subproject; (ii) meetings with AHs and affected communities/organizations; (iii) separate FGDs with affected women; and (iv) SES on all the AHs. The mechanisms for meaningful consultation will be also utilized to consult with AHs, affected communities and companies as well as concerned groups during LARP updating, if required and implementation.

4.3. Public Consultation and Participation during the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan Preparation

99. During the LARP preparation, a series of public consultation meetings were conducted with participations of APs, village leaders and local authorities by Serang Regency Bappeda, BBWS 3CIS and Geodynamics Consultant from May 2018 to February 2020. A total of 23 public consultation meetings were organized and a total of 753 people participated in the meetings, of whom women accounted for 24%.

Table 43: Number of Participants in Public Consultation during Planning and Preparation Stages

No. of public No. of meeting participants Date consultation meetings Male Female Total Planning Stage (Preparation of LARP)

No. of public No. of meeting participants Date consultation meetings Male Female Total First round 19 May 2018 to 2 6 125 42 167 June 2018 Second round 1 April 2019 to 21 15 408 121 529 May 2019 Third round 11 and 19 2 41 16 57 February 2020 Total 23 574 179 753 Preparation Stage 16 January to 6 12 521 126 647 March 2020

100. There are three round of public consultation was conducted at the planning stage of land acquistion/preparation of LARP. The first round of public consultation was held from 19 May 2018 to 2 June 2018 with a total of 6 public consultation meetings (one meeting for each affected village). The attendees comprise of the representatives of Ahs, Village leaders and staff. The meetings were held before the IOL and SES implementation to inform the AHs about the subproject introduction, stages and scope of land acquisition by the subproject, the schedule of the IOL and SES, and roles and responsibilities of institutional stakeholders related to land acquisition and resettlement of the subproject.

101. The second round of public consultation was conducted from 1 April 2019 to 21 May 2019 including two meetings at the community level (one in Kibin sub-district and one in Kragilan sub-district) and one meeting at district government level. The attendees comprise representatives of AHs, the sub-district governments, village leaders and representatives of institutions and organizations in the affected villages and of affected sub-districts. The information shared and discussed with the meeting participants included: (i) the design of the subproject; (ii) the scope of land acquisition and resettlement impacts by the subproject (based on the IOL results); (iii) the principles of land acquisition and resettlement applied for the subproject (principles, cut-off date definition, eligibility, proposed entitlements); (iv) the proposed implementation schedule for land acquisition, compensation, assistance, relocation and civil works; (v) proposed income restoration/livelihood development activities by the AHs; (vi) the proposed GRM for community complaints related to land acquisition and embankment construction; and (vii) mechanism for consultation with and participation of affected people, communities and other stakeholders in LARP preparation, implementation and monitoring.

102. A third round of public consultation was undertaken from 11 and 19 February 2020 including two public consultation meetings. The issues discussed during the meetings were: (i) Impacts of flooding on local communities (frequency, duration of inundation etc.); (ii) proposed interventions under the subproject; (iii) scope of LAR impacts caused by the subproject on households and communities in the subproject area; (iv) identification of indigenous peoples, heritage sites (cultural, religious), nature reserves etc. who may be affected by land acquisition; (v) livelihood restoration/ enhancement activities proposed by APs; (vi) capacity and needs of AHs in income/livelihood restoration (vii) proposed GRM to address complaints related to LAR raised by local people; (vii) procedures for the implementation of LAR; and (viii) indicative implementation schedule of LAR and civil works.

103. In addition, 12 FGDs were held in the affected villages with combine groups (women, SAHs, and VAHs). A total of 350 people attended the FGDs, of whom women account for 18.29%. The FGDs were conducted to (i) gain an understanding of socio-economic profiles of the groups and local communities; (ii) consult with the APs about how their livelihoods/income would be impacts by land acquisition by the subproject; (iii) explore the potential and needs of the communities for income restoration; and (iv) record their proposed income restoration activities.

104. Series consultations was continued during preparation stages, prior to location determination was issued. There was 10 consultations undertaken from 16 January to 4 March 2020 that all lead by the preparation team established by the Governor of Banten Province. The main objective of the consultation is to obtain agreement from the community that the location to be used for project purposes. The informastion shared and discussed was includes (i). purpose and objectives of the development plan, (ii). stages and indicative schedule of the land acquistion and resettlement, (iii). indicative schedule for the development plan, (iv). estimation land area to be acquired, (v). object of land acquistion and form of compensation. Location determinaton was issued by Governor Banetn on February, 27 2020.

105. All of the consultation meetings were conducted in Bahasa Indonesia and were held at affected villages where the river embankment will be developed. It is noted that a small percentage of the Ahs are Sundanese, however, all these Ahs can communicate with each other in Bahasa Indonesia. The PIBs were provided to all the meeting participants and posted in the accessible places such as Village Office and Sub-District Office. The minutes of the meetings are enclosed ini Appendix 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11; and 13, and list of meeting participants are enclosed in Appendix 12 and both English and Bahasa versions of the PIB are attached in Appendix 14.

106. The details about the consultation activities conducted during planning and preparation stages, including venue, date, number of meeting participants, concerns, suggestions, and opinions of the Ahs are shown in the Appendix 20 and 21. Concerns and suggestions provided during the consultations are incorporated in the LARP document.

107. Consultation will be continued over the course of the implementation stage in relation to land acquisition, implementation of livelihood restoration program and subproject construction. The consultation shall also include negotiations of type and amount of compensation with APs/AHs for assets and income losses.. At these meetings the following shall be disclosed to the attendees, and all records of attendance and discussions shall be maintained and disclose (i). An orientation the subproject designs, schedule of implementation, and identification/introduction of focal/contact persons; (ii). Probable benefits, adverse impacts, and mitigating measures to be taken, (iii). grievance process, (iv). subsequent schedule of meetings and activities, i.e.,conduct of DMS-SES; (v). results of social assessment, DMS/SES otherwise known as results of inventory and identification of ownership, (vi). entitlements/ compensation packages and other forms of assistance, and (vii). valuation methods per result of independent appraiser study.

4.4. Information Disclosure

108. Location Determination no. 596/Kep.99-Huk/2020, on February 27, 2020 issued by the Governor of Banten Province was disclosed to local communities by being posted in a newspaper “Cilegon Metropolis” & “Banten Kini”, and widely disseminated during public consultation meetings conducted in March 2020.

109. A Project Information Booklet (PIB) containing relevant information such as the subproject description, scope of LAR of the subproject, entitlements on compensation, assistance, and resettlement, proposed GRM, and implementation schedule of LAR activities and civil works was prepared. Copies of the PIB in Bahasa Indonesia were distributed to the APs, local Governments (Village and Kecamatan), and other relevant stakeholders during the public consultation meetings. In addition, the PIBs were made available at accessible places such as the subproject office, sub-district offices, and village offices. Both English and Bahasa versions of the PIB are attached in Appendix 14 of this document. The PIB update will be carried out following the updated LARP and disclosed to the APs.

110. The approved draft LARP and updated LARP, if any will be made available in English, Bahasa Indonesia, and where necessary the prevailing local language. Notices to meetings and other subproject activities/updates will be made accessible in public places such as offices of the affected villages and sub-districts are required to be disclosed. The final LARP will be made available at the subproject office and accessible to the APs and stakeholders and uploaded to the websites of ADB and MPWH prior to subproject appraisal. In addition, new or updated LARP and corrective action plans prepared during subproject implementation are required to be disclosed.

4.5. Public Consultation, Participation and Information Disclosure during LARP Implementation

111. During LARP implementation, consultations to be conducted by the BBWS and LAIT will focus on (i) identification and detailed measurement of affected land and non-land assets; (ii) disclosure of DMS results; and (iii) objection stage meeting.

▪ Asset Identification and Inventory. The main objective of the LAIT is to describe the process of carrying out identification and inventory activities in all affected villages to all parties who meet the requirements by the Land Procurement Team in the subproject area.

▪ Disclosure of DMS results. It will be carried out by the LAIT in the 8 affected villages. The LAIT outlines the results of identification and inventory including the list of AHs, affected communities and affected companies. The list is announced and posted at the sub-district and village offices.

▪ Objection Stage Meeting. After 14 days since the list of AHs, affected communities and affected companies is announced, APs can raise their objections to the identification and DMS results. All the objections raised by the APs will be discussed by LAIT and LAIT will conduct re-identification and re-measurement of the affected land and/or on-land assets where necessary.

112. Consultation / deliberation will be held to determine the form of compensation based on compensation assessment. During the consultation / deliberation, the head

of LAIT shall propose the amounts of compensation and assistance13. The AHs will be invited to the consultation meetings no later than 5 (five) working days prior to the date of the consultation meeting. Lists of the meeting participants should be recorded. If no agreement is reached during the meetings, another public consultation meeting can be held but no later more than 30 working days from submission of the valuation results by the appraiser to the chair of the Land Acquisition Implementation Committee. Consultations can be held in several groups given the number of AHs, time and place. Further consultations regarding LRP will be conducted with the involvement of AHs, village leaders, local governments of Serang Regency and affected sub-districts and other concerned agencies.

113. Additionally, monitoring reports of the LARP implementation will be uploaded on ADB website for disclosure and made available at the subproject office, offices of affected sub-districts and affected villages for public access upon request.

13 Compensation for affected assets will be at replacement cost based on the prevalent market rates and that it will be determined based on the replacement cost study conducted by a professional appraiser.

V. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

114. In principle, objection to any aspect of the subproject including acquisition will be addressed through consultations to reach an agreement and settlement and sought to be resolved as much as possible at sub-projects level. Relevant institutions, such as the Project Implementation Unit (PIU), provincial / district / city, subdistricts and villages governments will be involved in addressing the objection. When the grievance cannot be addressed, it will be resolved through litigation procedures as set forth in Law No. 2/2012 and Presidential regulation No.71/2012. There is no fee charged to the complainant. Grievance acceptance and redress mechanism will ensure cultural and gender sensitivities of the entitled parties.

5.1. General Flow of Grievance Redress

115. The APs through their facilitator or representative may bring the complaints to the village leaders and/or customary leaders who will bring it to the subproject site office. Specifically, (i) the AP can narrate his or her discontent to the community leader; (ii) the leader prepares an official report for documentation purposes and attempts to address and resolve the grievance at community level; and (iii) if the AP is satisfied with the resolution, there is no need to elevate the issue. If the grievance cannot be addressed at the village level, the village leader will submit the complaint to subproject management on-site.

116. Subproject staff from the safeguards units will assist the complainant in registering their complaints with subproject management and preparing their specific grievances. The Project Manager will consider the complaint and within 15 working days convey a decision to the complainant. These staff, along with local government district officials, will assist management in reviewing and addressing the complaint. The subproject district officers will record/keep a file of the complaint. The project staff will facilitate communication between the complainant and the project management.

5.2. Specific Grievances

117. There are specific mechanisms for different grievances as upheld by Law 2/2012: (i) grievance on subproject location confirmation and results of inventory of assets; and (ii) grievance on compensation rate. The Land Acquisition Implementation Team (LAIT) keeps records of complaints and disputes handled.

118. Grievances on subproject location determination. The following grievance procedures are as follows. (i) A public consultation meeting about the subproject shall be held within sixty (60) working days. If within a sixty (60) working day period from the public consultation meeting there is still an AP objecting to the planned location of development, a public consultation shall be repeated by engagement of the objecting party within thirty (30) working days. If in the second public consultation there are still APs objecting to the planned location of the subproject, DGWR shall report such an objection to the Governor. (ii) The Governor shall establish a team to make a study of the grievance. The study findings of the team shall be made by a recommendation whether the

objection to the planned location of the project is accepted or rejected within fourteen (14) working days of the receipt of the application by the governor. The governor upon the recommendation shall issue a letter of the acceptance or rejection of objections to the planned location of development. Should objection to the planned location of the subproject be rejected, the governor shall confirm the location of development. Should the objection to the planned location of the subproject be accepted, the governor shall notify DGWR to submit the planned location of development elsewhere. (iii) Where upon the confirmation of the location of the subproject there is still a grievance raised by the AP, the aggrieved AP may file a lawsuit to the Local State Administrative Court (LSAC) within 30 working days since the issuance of the location confirmation. (iv) The LSAC shall accept or reject the lawsuit within 30 working days of receipt of the lawsuit. (v) If the aggrieved AP is not satisfied with the LSAC decision, the AP may file the complaint for cassation with the Supreme Court within 14 working days. (vi) The Supreme Court must issue a decision within 30 working days of the receipt of the petition for cessation. This final and binding court decision shall be the basis to determine whether the land acquisition for the subproject will be continued or not.

119. Grievances on Results of IOL. The announcement of the results of the inventory identification shall include the subjects of title, size, location, and map of the subproject area. The grievance procedures to be followed are: (i) An aggrieved AP may file the objection/grievance to the LAIT within 14 working days since the announcement of the IOL results. (ii) If the grievance is accepted, the LAIT shall verify and revise the land maps and/or nominative list. (iii) Verification and revision shall be made no later than 14 working days since the receipt of the grievance. (iv) In case of different calculation of inventory and identification results and verification, the revision shall be set out into an inventory and identification revised report. (v) If the grievance on inventory and identification results are rejected, the LAIT shall prepare a rejection report.

120. Grievances on Compensation Rate. Based on the 2012 Law, an aggrieved AP many bring the grievance/complaint related to identification of land acquisition objects and compensation rates directly to the LAIT or land agency through the informal leader who will submit it to the LAIT either in writing or relay it verbally. The LAIT together with the land agency and the informal leader will attempt to seek consensus to achieve an acceptable settlement with the aggrieved AP. (i) In case there is no agreement on the form and/or amount of compensation during consultation, an aggrieved AP may bring the grievance/complaint to the local district court no later than 14 working days since from the signing of deliberation forum report. If within 14 working days, there is no grievance filled by the APs to the court, BBWS 3CIS will deposit the compensation to the District Court. (ii) The district court shall decide the forms and/or amount of compensation not later than 30 working days since receipt of the objections. (iii) If the aggrieved AP rejects the decision of the district court, she/he can propose

cassation to the Supreme Court no later than 14 working days. (iv) The Supreme Court must grant verdict (final decision) no later than 30 working days since the receipt of the cessation.

121. Other Grievances. Grievances related to subproject construction and resettlement issues, which are not covered by the GRMs in Law No.2/2012 and the President of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation No. 71/2012, as objections related to construction activities and other issues such as resettlement, such as access restrictions, the redress mechanisms are as follows: (i) An aggrieved AP may bring any complaint either directly to the subproject staff, contractors or the village head or local community leader who will bring the appeal to GRM Focal Persons14 in the subproject office. The GRM Persons will facilitate resolution of any complaints/grievance with involvement from the sub project manager (PPK), subdistrict office,village office and/or community leader and within 15 working days from complaint received. (ii) If the aggrieved AP is not satisfied with the resolution taken, GRM Focal Persons will bring the complaint/grivance to Head of BBWS 3CIS to seek resolution. Head of BBWS 3 CIS has 14 working days to resolved the complaints/grievance (iii) If the aggrieved entitled partiy is not satisfied with the decision or handling of the complaint, he/she may bring the grievance, either in writing or verbally to the Bupati within a period of 14 days from the issuance of the resolution. (iv) The Bupati will decide on the complaint within a period of 30 days by requesting for opinions from (i). The aggrieved enttled party, (ii). BBWSC 3 CIS, (iii) other relevant stakeholders, i.e. Serang Regency ATR/BPN, BLHD Serang Regency (v) If after 30 working days, no decision to the complaint is made or if the aggrieved AH is not satisfied with the decision taken by the Bupati, the AH may bring the complaint/case to the governor. The governor will decide on the complaint within a period of 30 working days. The opinions of (i) the aggrieved AP; (ii) the Provincial or District ATR/BPN and (iii) other concerned entity may be required for decision. The governor’s decision on the complaint will be delivered to the aggrieved AP, the LAIT, and other concerned entity. (vi) If the aggrieved AP is not satisfied with the action taken by The Governor on the complaint, she/he may file the complaint to the court for final adjudication.

122. GRM focal persons will record complaints received, investigations and subsequent actions and report monthly to the subproject manager (PPK) and will also includes in the project progress report. APs will be encouraged to use the above GRM. However, the GRM does not impede access to the country’s j udicial or administrative remedies by APs, at any stage, they so wish.

123. If efforts to resolve disputes using the project level grievance procedures remain unresolved or unsatisfactory, complainants can directly send their concerns or complaints with ADB (Transport and Communications Division, Southeast Asia Department) through the Indonesia Resident Mission (xxx, Tel xxx). If the complainants are still not satisfied with the results, as a last resort, they can directly contact the ADB Office of the Special Project Facilitator that is responsible for the

14 BBWS 3CIS has appointed GRM focal persons in September 2020 to handle any complaint related to project, includes land acquisition and compensations. GRM focal persons consist of three field staff of the PPK

problem-solving function of ADB’s Accountability Mechanism15. The Office of the Special Project Facilitator procedure can proceed based on the Accountability Mechanism in parallel with the subproject implementation.

15 Complainants can send their concerns to the Office of the Special Project Facilitator using the information at: http://www.adb.org/accountability-mechanism.

VI. LEGAL FRAMEWORK 6.1. National and Local Policy Framework 124. Indonesia enacted a new land acquisition low for development in the public interest - Law No. 2/2012 and its implementing regulations including (i) Presidential Regulation No. 71/2012, Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 40/2014 concerning Amendment to the Republic of Indonesia Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012; , Republic of Indonesia Presidential Regulation No. 99/2014 concerning Second Amendment to Republic of Indonesia Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012, Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 30/2015 concerning the Third Amendment to the Amendment. Republic of Indonesia Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012, and Republic of Indonesia Presidential Regulation No. 148/2015 concerning the Fourth Amendment to the Republic of Indonesia Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012; (ii) Head of the National Agency for Land Agency Regulation No. 5/2012; Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning / Head of National Land Agency Number 6 of 2015 concerning Amendment to Decree of Head of National Land Agency Number 5 of 2012 Concerning Technical Guidelines for Land Procurement; Instruction of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning / Head of National Land Agency Number 2 / Ins / VIII / 2016 Regarding the Acceleration of the Implementation of Land Acquisition for the Development of Public Openness of the National Strategic Project (NSP); and (iii) Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 72/2012. The laws and regulations are issued to ensure land acquisition for development implementation in the public interest, emphasizing humanitarian, democratic and fair principles. This legal provision replaces the previous land acquisition law and its implementing regulations (Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 65 of 2006; Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 36/2005; Regulation of the Head of BPN No. 3/2007); (v) Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2016 concerning Guidelines for the Transfer Certificate and Determination of Location for the Development of Public Interest in the State Administrative Court; Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Applying for Objection and Depositing Compensation to the District Court in Land Procurement for Development in the Public Interest.

125. Law No. 2/2012 provides clear procedures and time frames for land acquisition involving all stakeholders with clear procedures and time frames. The implementation of land acquisition takes into account the balance between development interests and community interests and by providing appropriate and equitable compensation. The purpose of land acquisition is to provide land to improve the welfare and well-being of the people, the state and the community by ensuring the legal interests of those who are entitled. The provisions of the transitional law stipulate that land acquisition begins before the entry into force of the new law will be completed in accordance with the rules or regulations that apply before, while land acquisition is carried out after the entry into force of the new law will be carried out under the provisions of the law. Law No. 2/2012.

126. Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 71 of 2012 stipulates that previous regulations will continue to be applied if (i) the planning documents on land acquisition have been prepared before the law is enacted; or (ii) land acquisition will be completed prior to 31 December 2014. This project is considered as a

development in the public interest, land acquisition for the project is carried out after the land acquisition law is issued. Thus land acquisition is carried out with reference to Law No. 2/2012 and its implementing regulations. The Land Acquisition Law stipulates that the government must develop for the public interest and the land belongs to the government or regional government or State-Owned Entrepreneurship while development for the public interest is the responsibility of the government, it can cooperate with State-Owned Enterprises, Regional-Owned Enterprises, and private companies.

127. Based on Law No. 2/2012, the government must conduct land acquisition by involving all entitled parties and stakeholders. The parties that are entitled are those who control or own the object of land acquisition, including: (a) holders of land rights; (b) holders of land rights to manage; (c) nadzir for waqf land16; (d) former land owner of customary rights; (e) indigenous peoples / indigenous communities; (f) the parties occupy state land in good faith; (g) holders of land rights; and / or (h). building owners, plants or other objects related to the land. The objects of land acquisition include; (i) land; (ii) above ground and basements; (iii) plants; (iii) buildings; (iv) objects related to land; and (v) other valuation losses which include non-physical losses such as loss of business, loss of work, costs of changing locations, costs of changing professions, and loss of remaining property (residual property that is no longer feasible)17. Land acquisition is undertaken by the National Land Agency, a fair and adequate compensation will be provided to the APs. The 2012 law requires that location be determined before land acquisition. Acquisition of land for public purposes of less than 1 hectare can be done by an institution that needs land through a sale, exchange transaction or other method that is acceptable to both parties.

128. Compensation for losses in terms of land acquisition and resettlement activities as stipulated in the provisions of Law Number. 2/2012 now includes "Other valuable losses"18. Losses in the case of restrictions / restrictions or restrictions on access to natural resources such as marine-fisheries resources that can have an impact on people's economic activities are now categorized as losses by the new Law and can be assessed for compensation purposes and may be in the following forms (Article 36): (i) money; (ii) replacement land; (iii) resettlement; (iv) share ownership; or (v) other forms agreed by both parties.

129. Law No. 2/2012 and the implementing regulations apply to land acquisition activities for development in the public interest carried out by the government by providing fair and adequate compensation. Various discussions with institutions that have the authority to provide explanations about legal provisions, such as the Prosecutor's Office and the Land Agency emphasized that Law No. 2/2012 only applies to land acquisition, where the object to be acquired is the property of another party and is not owned by an institution that requires land. Acquisition of land belonging to institutions that require land is considered as land clearing. In this context, Government Regulation in lieu of Law Number. 51 of 1960 concerning the prohibition of land use without the approval of the authorized parties or their proxies.

16 Waqf – an inalienable religious endownment in Islamic law, typically donating a building or plot of land or even cash for Muslim religious or charitable purposes. The donated assets are held by a charitable trust or waqf organizer. 17 18

However, Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number. 51/1960 is deemed not to provide protection to entitled parties and is therefore not widely applied.

130. Presidential Regulation No. 71/2012 concerning of land acquisition for development in the public interest. In article 82 of this regulation, there are rules about providing compensation for: i) Land owned/controlled by government with building used actively for governance; ii) land is owned/controlled by national and local state owned enterprises; iii) village land.

131. To resolve the issue of people occupying government land or institutions (non- land rights holders or squatters), the government issued a Presidential Regulation No. 68/2018 concerning handling community social impacts in the framework of provision of land for national development.

132. Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning / head of national land agency (MASP/NLA) number 22 of 2015 concerning second amendment to regulation of head of national land agency number 5 of 2012 concerning technical guidelines for land acquisition. The MASP/NLA Regulation number 6 of 2020 concerning Implementation Provision of Presidential Regulation Number 62 of 2018 concerning the Management of Social Impacts in Land Provision for National Development. The MASP/NLA Regulation No. 4 of 2020 concerning Land Valuation. The MASP/NLA No. 20 of 2020 concerning The Procedure for Preparing Land Acquisistion Planning Document.

133. Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 1/2016 concerning Village Asset Management. The transfer of village assets in the form of land and / or buildings belonging to the village is only carried out by exchange and capital participation. The Regency / City Government together with the Village Government shall conduct an inventory and appraisal of Village assets in accordance with the provisions of statutory regulations. Valuation of village assets is carried out by Government Appraisers or Public Appraisers. The exchange of village assets in the form of land for development for the public interest is carried out in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations. The exchange is carried out after an agreement is made on the amount of compensation according to a price that benefits the village by using the fair value calculated by the appraisal staff. If the replacement land is not yet available, the replacement land can be given in the form of money first. The monetary compensation must be used to purchase replacement land of a value. Preferably the replacement land is located in a local village. If the replacement land location is not available in the local village, the replacement land can be located in one sub-district and / or village in another sub-district that is directly adjacent.

134. Banten Governor Regulation No. 11 of 2018 concerning the guidelines for the stages of land acquisition preparation for development in the public interest and the implementation of small scale land acquisition in Banten province.

135. Other relevant laws, regulations and other relevant provisions are provided below. Related to compensation and improvement of living standards i. Law No.11 / 2005 concerning the Ratification of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. This law protects people's economic, social and cultural rights including the right to life for generations and cultural protection. As stated in Article 11 of the Convention that the state recognizes the right of

everyone to an adequate standard of living for himself and his family, including adequate food, clothing and housing, and improvement of living conditions. States will take appropriate steps to ensure the realization of this right, recognizing the importance of international cooperation based on free agreement and prior information. ii. Head of BPN Regulation No. 1/2010 - regarding Land Service Standards and Regulations governing the time frame for land certification remaining after payment of compensation. iii. Presidential Decree No. 34/2003 on National Policy on Land - regulates the authority of national and regional governments on land. This stipulates that local government authority on land includes; i) conduct land acquisition for development; ii) provide compensation and benefits for land acquisition. iv. Indonesian Government Regulation No. 38/2007 concerning the distribution of state activities between the Central Government, Provincial Governments and district / city governments. Government regulations govern state activities that must be carried out by the provincial and district / city governments in relation to basic services including land issues. v. Indonesia Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 2014) concerning Land Acquisition Assessment for Development in the Public Interest. The Indonesia Professional Appraisers Society (MAPPI) formulated the standards by adopting the development of international standards (IVS 2011). Standards 204 provides guidelines for assessment of land acquisition object for compensation in land acquisition for development in the public interest. Assessment includes adequate replacement value of property and land. Assessment standards are also associated with other standards, such as scope of assignment, land property and structures valuation, farmland property valuation, valuation of property with particular business, business valuation, and inspection of cases under consideration.

Related to Water Resources Management i. Law No 7/2004 concerning Water Resources. Article 6 of Law No. 7/2004 explains that water resources are controlled by tates and are used in the interests of greater prosperity for the community in general. Water resources are managed by the central government and / or local government by recognizing the customary rights of the local customary law community and similar rights as long as they do not conflict with national interests and laws and regulations. Customary law applies to water resources if they exist and are passed through local regulations. Because of state control over water resources, water use rights are established. ii. Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 12/2012 concerning Determination of watersheds between regional and national authorities. iii. Government Regulation (PP) No. 38/2011 concerning river management; Ministry of Public Works no. 63 of 1993 concerning river banks. Regulates the use of river banks (Bantaran), rivers and Sempadan road rights and benefits derived from rivers / streams. The integrity of the riparian function is a key consideration in any review of the status quo.

Related to Vulnerability and Severity Assistance i. Law No. 11/2009 concerning Social Welfare and its implementing regulations Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 39/2012 concerning Implementation of Social Welfare.

ii. Law No. 39/1999 concerning Human Rights (Article 5, explanation), describes vulnerable groups including the elderly, children, the poor, pregnant women and disabled people. iii. (Persons who are vulnerable / severely affected are identified as early as possible through the AMDAL Social Impact Assessment as referred to in Environmental Law no. 32/2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management; Indonesian Government Regulation on Environmental Permits, Ministry of Environment Regulation No. 17/2012 on guidelines for local community participation in obtaining AMDAL and Issuance of Environmental Permits. Decree of the Head of the Environmental Impact Management Agency No. 299/1996 concerning Guidelines for Technical Assessment of Social Aspects in the preparation of Environmental Impact Analysis. iv. Presidential Regulation Number 62 Year 2018 concerning Handling of Social Impacts in the Context of Provision of Land for National Development.

6.2. ADB Safeguard Policy

136. The objective of ADB's social protection policy is to avoid involuntary resettlement whenever possible; to minimize resettlement or at least restore the livelihoods of all displaced and vulnerable people to improve the living standards of the poor and other vulnerable groups. The policy indicates four important elements in involuntary resettlement: i. Avoid the need for involuntary resettlement by exploring projects and designing alternatives; ii. If unavoidable, compensation for lost assets and loss of livelihoods and income from displaced / affected populations so that their livelihoods will be increased or at least the same or returned to pre-project conditions; iii. Assist in relocation including providing locations for relocation with appropriate facilities and services; and iv. Improve the living standards of the poor and other vulnerable / refugee groups.

137. The absence of ownership rights to land cannot be considered an obstacle to the right to compensation and rehabilitation in accordance with ADB Policy. All people affected by the Project, especially those who are poor, and who do not own land, must be included in the compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation package. APs and / or AHs, which cannot show claims that can be validated or recognized on the acquired land will be eligible for compensation in respect of assets that are not land only. But they will be given benefits and other benefits as given to other APs.

138. The following ADB-SPS principles regarding resettlement will be also applied to the subproject: i. Develop procedures that are transparent, consistent and fair, if land acquisition is through negotiated settlement to ensure that people who enter negotiated settlements will maintain equal or better income and livelihood status. ii. Prepare a LARP that outlines the rights of displaced persons, income and livelihood recovery strategies, institutional arrangements, a monitoring and reporting framework, a budget, and a time-bound implementation schedule. iii. Present the draft LARP, including documentation of the consultation process in a timely manner, before project appraisal, in an accessible place and form and language that can be understood by affected people and other stakeholders. iv. Delivering the final LARP and its updates to affected people and other stakeholders.

v. Monitor and evaluate resettlement outcomes, their impact on the living standards of refugees, and whether LARP objectives have been achieved taking into account the basic conditions and results of resettlement monitoring. Disclose monitoring reports.

139. ADB SPS includes the protection of Indigenous Peoples, if the project directly or indirectly affects the dignity, human rights, livelihood systems, or culture of indigenous peoples or affects territories or natural or cultural resources that are owned, used, occupied, or claimed as their ancestral domain. If the impact on Indigenous Peoples / IPs involves involuntary resettlement, SPS safeguard requirements will also regulate the resettlement framework. At the release site of the Ciujung CW embankment there are no indigenous peoples as required.

140. ADB's Policy on Gender and Development (1998) adopts gender mainstreaming as the main strategy to promote gender equality, and to ensure women's participation and that their needs are explicitly discussed in the decision making process for development activities. The new safeguard policy also reiterates the importance of including gender issues in the preparation of safeguard documents at all stages to ensure that gender issues are included, including gender-specific consultations and information disclosure. This includes special attention to guaranteeing women's assets, property and land use rights and restoring / improving their living standards; and to ensure that women will receive project benefits.

141. Another policy relating to resettlement planning and implementation is the Public Communications Policy (2011) which seeks to encourage participation and understanding of people and other stakeholders affected by ADB-assisted activities. Information about ADB-funded projects must start early in the resettlement preparation phase and continue at all stages to facilitate dialogue with APs and other stakeholders.

6.3. Comparison of Government Laws and Regulations with ADB Policy

142. The Government has improved its country system to encounter problems of land acquisition for the purposes of public interest development projects. The Law No. 2/2012 and its implementing regulations and regulations approach harmonization with the 2009 SPS ADB. This law stipulates that persons without legal titles for the land they occupy or use are entitled to compensation for repairs found thereon including compensation for losses of job and business, moving costs, etc. LARPs are required to be prepared by the EA. People affected by land acquisition are consulted and their complaints are heard and resolved in a timely manner and appropriate manner during land acquisition planning and implementation.

143. Most of the principles in Law No. 2/2012 are in line with ADB's SPS (2009). However, there are a number of differences between the laws of the Government and ADB’s SPS identified and these gaps have been addressed with relevant legal provisions, regulations and other guidelines. These gaps include the principle of compensation for buildings / structures affected without depreciation, provision of income restoration programs for SAHs and VAHs to ensure that their lives will not be worse because of the subproject, and relocation assistance for physically displaced households and transition allowance. The gaps between Indonesia legislation and

ADB’s SPS (2009) on key aspects of land acquisition and resettlement for the subproject are presented in the table below.

Table 44: Gaps between ADB and Government Policies Related to Compensation, Assistance, and Resettlement

GOI Laws: Law 2/2012, Principles Implementing Regulations & ADB Policy Project Policy Perpres 62/2018 Screening of The legal framework lacks a stand- Screen the project early Screen the sub-project to identify the project. alone screening requirement for on to identify past, involuntary resettlement impacts involuntary resettlement impacts. present, and future and risks. Sub project triggers There is no explicit stipulation for involuntary involuntary resettlement and conducting a screening and resettlement sub-project with category A as assessment of impacts when land per SPS will not be selected acquisition involves land purchase. Meaningful The legal framework provides greater Pay attention to the Meaningful consultation shall consultation protection of human rights to children, needs of vulnerable pay attention to the vulnerable the poor, and the disabled, also groups, especially groups (the poor, the landless, against discrimination to women. those below the poverty the elderly, women and children, However, it does not mandate to line, the landless, the Indigenous Peoples, and those afford special attention to the needs elderly, women and without legal title to land). of vulnerable groups and to ensure children, Indigenous Ensure their participation in their participation in consultations. Peoples, and those consultations Some key groups may not be without legal title to considered as vulnerable (e.g., land, and ensure their women, the landless, and those participation in without legal title to land consultations. Level of According to Law 2 of 2012, Compensation rate will Compensation will cover all compensation compensation will be provided based be calculated at full losses set forth in the Law 2 of and bases of on valuation of independent appraiser replacement cost to be 2012. calculation that cover (i) land; (ii) over ground determined by an and underground spaces; (iii) independent appraiser Depreciation building; (iv) plants; (v) objects related experienced in The principle of full replacement of affected to land and/or; vi) other appraisable assessing acquired cost will be applied. In case of structure loss such loss of business, jobs, assets. For involuntary involuntary resettlement, capital value change of profession, and moving resettlement, no gains tax and the costs of costs. deduction on taxes and transferring ownership, including the cost of new land certificates, administrative costs for affected lands, as well will not be deducted from the Tax incentive is provided to: (a) as depreciation in the compensation of those who will person who supports the project; (b) value of the affected lose lands. person who does not file a complaint structure will be related to project location applied. determination and/or compensation. In case there will be deduction of tax for negotiated land acquisition, the deduction should Law is silent on issue of application of be clearly consulted and agreed depreciation when calculating by the affected persons. compensation for affected structures. Valuation standard set by Compensation at full Independent appraisers’ association (MAPPI, 2018) does not apply replacement cost for affected depreciation for physical condition of structures will be determined the affected building.19 For affected based on the replacement cost

19 Indonesia Valuation Standards 306 (SPI 306). Land Acquisition Assessment For Development for the Public Interest. Code of Ethics Indonesia Appraisers and Indonesia Standard, 2015, Jakarta, Gelora Karya Bharata, 2015.

GOI Laws: Law 2/2012, Principles Implementing Regulations & ADB Policy Project Policy Perpres 62/2018 buildings, MAPPI applies solatium of a new building without any (emotional compensation) of 10% - depreciation.20 30% of the total compensation for physical loss. Compensa- Perpres 62/2018 stipulated that Compensation for Compensation for tion for land compensation should consider the affected land and non- sharecroppers be provided users (tenant cost of mobilization, cost for moving, land assets should be based on losses at replacement farmers / house rent during the transition provided at cost. croppers / period, and loss of income according replacement cost share- to valuation by independent appraisal croppers) Law 2/2012 and its elucidation, 71/2012 stipulate that owners of trees/plans are entitled for compensation of affected trees/plants. Compens- The legal framework provides Ensure displaced The principle to provide ation and compensation and assistance for persons without titles compensation for non-land assistance to displaced persons without tittle or or any recognizable assets at replacement cost will displaced any recognizable legal rights to land legal rights to land are be applied. persons unless their legitimate claims cannot eligible for without legal be proven/recognized prior to land resettlement title or any LAR implementation. However, assistance and Assistance in the form of recogniz-able application of full replacement cost compensation at livelihood restoration and legal rights for people utilizing land has been replacement cost for relocation assistance will be owned by the agency needing the loss of non-land provided land is unclear. assets

Assistance to Article 36 of Perpres 71 of 2012 Physically and Assistance in the form of non-land indicates the task of appraiser to Economically income restoration will be rights holders carry out the appraisal of the amount displaced persons are provided of compensation which includes: a. provided transitional Transitional Land; b. Space above and below the support and Transitional support and support surface of the land; c. Buildings; d. development development assistance will be Plants; e. Objects related to the assistance, such as included in the total cost born land; and/or f. Other appraisable land development, by displaced persons. Institution needing land can loss” means nonphysical loss credit facilities, equivalent to money value, for training, or address this through income example, loss due to loss of employment restoration measures business or job, cost of change of opportunities. location, cost of change of profession, and loss of value of the remaining property.).

The law and regulations stipulate on compensation for affected asset, yet do not stipulate on the assistance to the non-land rights holders and other economic loss.

There is no legal basis for additional “transitional support/allowance”..

20 Compensation will be based on i) the market value; ii) transaction costs; iii) accrued interest; iv) transition costs and repairs; v) other applicable payments.

GOI Laws: Law 2/2012, Principles Implementing Regulations & ADB Policy Project Policy Perpres 62/2018 High Risk of ▪ Not covered in new Land Law but Particular attention must Livelihoods/ income restoration Impoverish- Law No. 11/2009 on Social Welfare be given to the needs programs will be provided to ment and its implementing regulation. of poor and vulnerable SAHs and VAHs. Programs for vulnerable groups refer to Law ▪ APs that face the risk of Ministry of Social Welfare Decree No. 11/2009 and implementing No. 39/2012 states: To cover or further marginalization and impoverishment. regulations. In this law, the local identify vulnerable / severely government is responsible for impacted people by the project as addressing these issues. The early as possible it can be covered programs to be implemented in Social Impact Assessment of are included in the Social Action AMDAL as referred in Plan for APs/AHs. Environmental Law no. 32/2009 and other relevant Government SAHs and VAHs have been Regulation on Environmental identified during LARP Permits. preparation. Livelihood enhancement assistance will be provided to them through: i) social programs implemented by local governments; ii) community development programs under the subproject component. The Director General of Regional Development will facilitate the coordination of program implementation at the regional level. Public Planning for land acquisition by the The draft and agreed Pre-IOL and post-IOL disclosure Office of the Governor at preparation social safeguard consultations will be held with stage and implementation of land planning document at stakeholders and entitled parties. acquisition by BPN will be carried out TA, and the draft and The approved social safeguard by holding public meetings and agreed updated social planning document will be consultations, and results of surveys safeguard planning disclosed to entitled parties and and appraisal of affected assets will document at project other stakeholders in accessible be disclosed to the public. implementation will be forms, languages and places, disclosed to the APs and posted on the ADB website. and other stakeholders Monitoring reports during in accessible forms, implementation will likewise be languages and places. posted on the ADB website. The same will be posted on the ADB website. Monitoring of Monitoring and evaluation of the ADB requires The subproject is categorized as Project performance of land acquisition for monitoring of LARPs Category A for resettlement as Implementation public interest shall be conducted by implementation more than 200 people were the Government. undertaken by the EA severely affected. Therefore, The National Land Agency shall for resettlement external monitoring of monitor and evaluate the ownership, Category B projects resettlement is required. use and utilization of land acquisition and by an independent Therefore, procurement of results for the development in the external organizations consulting services will include public interests. for projects categorized the provision of external as Category A for monitoring consulting services involuntary resettlement.

6.4. Principles of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Policy for the Subproject

144. Bearing in mind the policy gaps between the Government and the ADB, this section lays out the purpose, principles, and procedures to be used in the preparation and implementation of the subproject, especially for addressing its adverse social impacts. The overall objective of this resettlement policy is to help ensure that AHs are not worse off because of the subproject; rather, they should be able to maintain or improve their pre-subproject living standards and income-earning capacity. The subproject will also provide an opportunity for the local population to derive benefits from it. Likewise, the subproject will serve as an occasion for the local population to participate in its planning and implementation, thereby engendering a sense of ownership over this development undertaking.

145. Based on the legal framework and equality gap analysis above, the objectives of involuntary resettlement and policy principles are set as follows: i. Screen subproject components during early stages to identify involuntary resettlement impacts and risks indicators. These impacts and risks must be minimal, so that appropriate resettlement planning should be developed precisely and accurately as a result of a social assessment. ii. Carry out meaningful consultations with entitled parties particularly living in the subproject area, and concerned civil organizations. Inform all entitled parties on restriction to access to natural resources as their sources of income, and ensure their participation in the subproject cycle. iii. Improve or at least restore the livelihood of the entitled parties/APs through (a) land based resettlement strategies or cash compensation at replacement cost for land; (b) prompt replacement of assets with access to assets of equal or higher value; (c) prompt compensation at full replacement cost for lost assets that cannot be restored; and (d) additional revenues and services through benefit sharing schemes where possible. iv. APs without title or any recognizable legal rights to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for non-land assets at replacement cost. v. Entitled parties shall be involved in resettlement planning and the LARP covers all appropriate mitigation measures to improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all entitled parties, so that the living standard of entitled parties do not become worse compared to pre-subproject levels. LARP should elaborate on their entitlements, strategy for income and livelihood restoration, including institutional arrangements, monitoring and evaluation, budgeting, and time- bound implementation schedule. Provide entitled parties with appropriate assistance considering options provided by the entitlement matrix. vi. Particular attention will be paid to women, women-headed households, the elderly and other vulnerable persons including indigenous communities. vii. Disclose a draft LARP and its updates to the entitled parties and other stakeholders in a timely manner, in an accessible place and a form and understandable language. viii. A well-defined, culturally acceptable and gender sensitive GRM will be established in order to ensure that all entitled parties grievances and complaints on any aspect of land acquisition and compensation are addressed in a timely and satisfactory manner, and that all possible avenues are available to entitled parties to air their grievances. Civil works and/or restrictions to use of

land/coastal resources will not commence unless entitled parties are fully compensated and all other entitlements provided. ix. Civil works can proceed in any given construction works zone (CWZ) when the subproject implementing agency through land acquisition implementation team has satisfactorily completed payment of compensation for affected assets and non-land assets and relocation of entitled parties to new site, if any physical relocation, in accordance with the approved resettlement plan. x. Any negotiated settlement will follow procedure in a transparent, consistence, and equitable manner principles as set forth in the resettlement framework and be confirmed through written record.

6.5. Unanticipated Impacts

146. If unanticipated involuntary resettlement impacts are identified during subproject implementation, the EA will conduct a social impact assessment on new impacts and update this LARP or formulate a new LARP that includes all applicable requirements provided in the agreed LARP depending on the extent of the changes in impacts. The social impact assessment will be carried out in accordance with the procedures established in the project resettlement framework and the entitlments will not be lower than that specified in this document.

147. The DGWR shall submit these documents (updated LARP and social impact assessment) to ADB for approval and disclosure on ADB’s website and disseminate relevant information therein to the APs and communities. Any new APs that will be identified are entitled to the same entitlements as those of other APs. The new APs will not include any occupants entering the COI or the construction are after the cut- off date.

VII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCES AND BENEFITS

7.1. Project Eligibility and Entitlements

148. Eligibility. Entitled parties/APs are those who will be permanently or temporarily affected, as a result of the project, all or part of their physical and nonphysical assets, including houses, productive land, resources such as forests, outreach lands, fishing areas , or importantly cultural sites, commercial property, rentals, income opportunities, social and cultural networks and activities. These impacts can be permanent or temporary.

149. Entitled parties identified within the project areas that are eligible for compensation, either in cash, replacement land and structures, or resettlement and other assistance under this project can be described as (i) persons with formal legal rights to land lost in its entirety or in part; (ii) persons who lost the land they occupy in its entirety or in part who have no formal legal rights to such land, but have claims to such lands or resources that are recognized or recognizable under national laws; and (iii) persons who lost the land they occupy or entirety or in part who have neither formal legal rights nor recognized or recognizable claims to such land. Compensation for the persons with category III, will given for the loss of assets other than land at replacement cost, and only if they occupied the land or structures in the project area prior to the cut off date for eligibility for resettlement assistance.

150. Cut-off Date. The cut-off date sets the time limits to determine eligibility of persons living and/or with assets or interests inside the subproject area. Should they be adversely affected, they will be entitled to compensation for their affected assets, including rehabilitation measures as needed, sufficient to assist them to improve or at least maintain their pre-project living standards, income-earning capacity and production levels. The cut-off date for eligibility for this subproject was set on 25 February 2020 which is the date of determination location determined by the Governor of Banten for land acquisition area of the Ciujung River Embankment Subproject. Only after the location of the subproject is determined, the AHs, affected communities and companies can transfer their land rights to the EA. Any person who encroaches into the subproject area after the cut-off date will not be entitled to compensation or any assistance under the subproject. The cut-off date has been made known to all the APs, affected communities and companies.

151. The LARP accommodates certain social groups that may lack the ability to restore their living conditions, livelihoods and income levels and therefore, at greater risk of poverty when their lands and assets are lost due to the project. These disadvantaged groups, such as those who do not own land, are poor, households headed by women, the elderly and people with disabilities, will receive special rehabilitation assistance and will be determined during social screening and assessment. Restoring the living conditions of vulnerable and severely affected people will be organized through local government social programs and other programs that serve the poor.

152. Entitlements. Based on the impacts identified during the IOL and harmonization of Indonesian law and the ADB’s SPS (2009), the corresponding entitlements to be provided to the AHs are presented in the entitlement matrix in

153. Table 45. The entitlements will be updated or enhanced in the updated LARP, as necessary, during the detailed engineering design stage of the subproject, but not downgraded.

Table 45: Entitlement Matrix

Types of Loss/ Basic No. Entitled Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues Impacts Implementation 1 Land 1.1 Marginal loss of Those who have formal - Cash compensation at full Law No. 2/2012, - An independent licensed agricultural land legal rights (certificates) replacement cost reflecting the Article 36 property appraiser will be (less than 10% of or those whose claims fair market value at the time of Presidential mobilized to conduct a RCS total production to their land are payment of compensation; or Regulation No. for the affected land. landholding of the recognized as full tittles land replacement of land with at 71/2012, Articles: - AHs will be given a notice household) include those who least same attributes as the 65, 77 of land acquisition 6 months (0 households, 0 occupy state land in affected land in terms of value, Indonesian in advance. persons) good faith21. productivity, location and titling. Valuation - AHs will be provided with - Transaction cost which Standards 204 tax incentives if they do not covers administration cost, (SPI 2014) file a lawsuit against the renewal of land ownership LAR-related decisions. If they documents (certificates and land file a lawsuit against the documents recognized as full LAR-related decisions and rights) for residual areas of the their grievances are resolved affected land plot. and they reach an agreement - to release the affected land, they will be also provided with tax incentives. - Transaction cost was Law no. 2/2012 calculated at 6,5% total Art. 44 compensation for agricultural Presidential land Regulation No. 71/2012 Article122

21 It is in line with with the Law No. 2/2012, Article 40, and its elucidation and the PP No. 71/2012, Article 17 – 25

Types of Loss/ Basic No. Entitled Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues Impacts Implementation 1.2 Severe loss of Those who have formal - Cash compensation at full Law No. 2/2012, - The independent agricultural land legal rights (certificates) replacement cost reflecting the Article 36 licensed property appraiser (10% or more than or those whose claims fair market value at the time of Presidential will conduct a RCS for the 10% of total to their land are payment of compensation; or Regulation No. affected land. production recognized as full tittles land replacement of land with at 71/2012, Articles: – If the remaining affected landholding of the include those who least same attributes as the 65, 77 land is no longer viable (too household) occupy state land in affected land in terms of value, Indonesian small areas or the shape is (511 households, good faith22. productivity, location and titling. Valuation difficult for cultivation or for 2.128 persons) - Transaction cost which Standards 204 housing and if the land covers administration cost, (SPI 2014) owner requests the entire renewal of land ownership plot shall be required and documents (certificates and land compensated by documents recognized as full replacement cost. rights) for residual areas of the - AHs will be given a notice affected land plot. of land acquisition 6 months - Be entitled to participate in in advance. the Livelihood Restoration Plan - AHs will be provided with (LRP). tax incentives if they do not file a lawsuit against the Law no. 2/2012 LAR-related decisions. If Art. 44 they file a lawsuit against the Presidential LAR-related decisions and Regulation No. their grievances are resolved 71/2012 and they reach an Article122 agreement to release the affected land, they will be also provided with tax incentives. - Transaction cost was calculated at 6,5% total compensation for agricultural land (in average approximately) USD 1,565 per households

22 It is in line with with the Law No. 2/2012, Article 40, and its elucidation and the PP No. 71/2012, Article 17 – 25

Types of Loss/ Basic No. Entitled Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues Impacts Implementation 1.3 Partial loss of Those who have formal - Cash compensation at full Law No. 2/2012, - The independent licensed residential land legal rights (certificates) replacement cost reflecting the Article 36 property appraiser will (10 households, 38 or those whose claims fair market value at the time of Presidential conduct a RCS for the persons) to their land are payment of compensation. Regulation No. affected land. recognized as full tittles - Transaction cost which 71/2012, Articles: - AHs will be given a notice include those who covers administration cost, 65, 77 of land acquisition 6 months occupy state land in renewal of land ownership Indonesian in advance. good faith. documents (certificates and land Valuation - AHs will be provided with documents recognized as full Standards 204 tax incentives if they do not rights) for residual areas of the (SPI 2014) file a lawsuit against the affected land plot. LAR-related decisions. If - they file a lawsuit against the LAR-related decisions and Law no. 2/2012 their grievances are resolved Art. 44 and they reach an Presidential agreement to release the Regulation No. affected land, they will be 71/2012 also provided with tax Article122 incentives. - Transaction cost which covers administration cost, renewal of land ownership documents (certificates and land documents recognized as full rights) for residual areas of the affected land plot. 1.4 Full loss of Those who have formal - Cash compensation at full Law No. 2/2012, - The independent licensed residential land or legal rights (certificates) replacement cost reflecting the Article 36 property appraiser will where partial land or those whose claims fair market value at the time of Presidential conduct a RCS for the lost but the to their land are payment of compensation for Regulation No. affected land. remaining land is recognized as full tittles entire plot; or land replacement 71/2012, Articles: - AHs will be given a notice rendered unviable include those who of land with at least same 65, 77 of land acquisition 6 months occupy state land in attributes as the affected land in Indonesian in advance. for continued use good faith. terms of value, location and Valuation - AHs will be provided with (39 households, 160 titling. Standards 204 tax incentives if they do not persons) - Transaction cost which (SPI 2014) file a lawsuit against the covers administration cost, LAR-related decisions. If renewal of land ownership they file a lawsuit against the documents (certificates and land LAR-related decisions and documents recognized as full Law no. 2/2012 their grievances are resolved

Types of Loss/ Basic No. Entitled Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues Impacts Implementation rights) for residual areas of the Art. 44 and they reach an affected land plot. Presidential agreement to release the - Regulation No. affected land, they will be 71/2012 also provided with tax Article122 incentives. - Transaction cost which covers administration cost, renewal of land ownership documents (certificates and land documents recognized as full rights) for residual areas of the affected land plot. 1.5 Government / state Land owned / controlled - Cash compensation at Presidential - Compensation will be land and Land by the government, replacement costs; OR land with Regulation provided for Land owned / owned by Private state-owned enterprises similar value or higher in terms of 71/2012 Article controlled by the government Companies (BUMN), village land, value, productivity, location and 82, 112 with buildings used actively companies land. titling. BPN Head for government; ii) land (1 SOE’s land,, 6 Regulation No. owned / controlled by village land and 14 5/2012 Article 29, national and local state- Private Companies 49 owned companies; iii) village land.) land23 - BPN transfers the acquired land owned by the government / provincial government / BUMN / regional government / village-owned company, to the EA within 60 working days after the governor / district / mayor issues the confirmation of the subproject location. 2 Loss of crops and trees

23 Article 82 of PP 71/2012

Types of Loss/ Basic No. Entitled Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues Impacts Implementation 2.1 Crops (48 Owners, regardless of - Annual crops: Cash Law no. 2/2012 - The independent licensed households, 203 land ownership status compensation will be paid based Article 33 property appraiser will persons) (with certificates or on the prevailing market rates; Presidential conduct a RCS for the recognizable rights, - Perennial crops: cash Regulation No. affected crops. informal settlers, compensation at replacement 71/2012 Article 65 - Commercial crops: refer to occupants) cost taking into account their BPN Head the income approach using productivity and age Regulation No. Discarded Cash Flow (DCF) 5/2012 Article 23, for 1 cycle 24 - Non-commercial crops: Presidential refers to the market approach Regulation No. with reference to standard 38/2007 prices issued by local Indonesian governments. Valuation - APs will be given a notice Standards 204 to harvest the crop and not (SPI 2014) plant for next season prior to site clearance 30 - 60 days in advance. 2.2 Trees (489 - Cash compensation at the Law no. 2/2012 - The independent licensed households, 2.041 current market price based on Article 33 property appraiser will persons) age, type of tree and diameter of Presidential conduct a RCS for the trunk at breast height. Regulation No. affected trees. 71/2012 Article 65 - APs will be given a notice BPN Head to harvest the crop and not Regulation No. plant for next season prior to 5/2012 Article 23, site clearance 30 - 60 days 24 in advance. Presidential Regulation No. 38/2007 Indonesian Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 2014) 3 Loss of Structures Owned by Individuals/House holds 3.1 Partially affected Owners of the affected - Cash compensation at full Law no. 2/2012 - The independent licensed main structures structure, regardless of replacement cost for the affected Article 33 property appraiser will (remaining structure tenure portion of the structure. Explanation of conduct a RCS for the

Types of Loss/ Basic No. Entitled Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues Impacts Implementation is viable for - Cash compensation for the Law No. 2/2012 affected structures. continued use) cost of repairing the remaining Article 35, 40 - No depreciation applies (0 household) portion of affected structures Presidential for the lost building. In the - Emotional compensation as Regulation No. case of SPI applies the shown in Item 6. 71/2012 Article 65 depreciation, the BPN Head depreciation and deduction Regulation No. for affected structures will be 5/2012 Article 23, given back to the AHs in the 24 premium value. Government - APs will be given a notice Regulation No. of site clearance six (6) 38/2007 months in advance. Indonesian Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 2014) 3.2 Fully affected main Owners of the affected - Cash compensation at full Law no. 2/2012 - The independent licensed structures or structure, regardless of replacement cost for the entire Article 33 property appraiser will Partially affected, tenure structure. Explanation of conduct a RCS for the but the remaining - Compensation for affected Law No. 2/2012 affected structures. area is not sufficient electricity, telephone and other Articles 33, 35, 40 - No depreciation applies to stay services based on prevailing cost Presidential for the lost building. In the (65 structures of disconnection and Regulation No. case of SPI applies the belong to 56 reinstallation. 71/2012 Article 65 depreciation, the households, 235 - Cash transportation BPN Head depreciation and deduction persons) assistance if the subproject Regulation No. for affected structures will be cannot provide the use of trucks 5/2012 Article 23, given back to the AHs in the or means of transportation to 24, 30, 31 premium value. carry goods of AHs to a new Government - APs will be given a notice place. Regulation No. of site clearance six (6) - Transitional allowance 38/2007 months in advance. shall be covered by Indonesian - If more than 50% of the compensation for emotional Valuation main structure is affected, compensation as shown in Item Standards 204 the entire structure will be 6. (SPI 2014) compensated at full Law no. 11/2009 replacement cost. on Social Welfare - If less than 50% of the main structure is affected, but it will jeopardize the stability of the residual area of the main structure, i.e.,

Types of Loss/ Basic No. Entitled Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues Impacts Implementation which is structurally unstable, the structures will be compensated at full replacement cost. - If AHs opt to relocate to a resettlement site developed by the subproject, the AHs will be consulted about the location and criteria of a suitable resettlement site including the provision of public services and facilities as well as access to employment and production - If there is a delay in the construction of the resettlement site, AHs are provided with cash assistance for temporary house rental until the completion of resettlement in a new place. - The amount of transportation assistance was estimated by the AHs during public consultations and will be finalized following the valuation by independent apprisers. House/shop tenants - Cash assistance equivalent to Explanation of - The affected tenants will (8 households, 14 12-month house rental Law No. 2/2012 be provided a notice 3 persons) Article 33 f months prior to the date on BPN Head which the affected tenant Regulation No. must move 5/2012 Article 30, 31 Indonesian Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 2014) UU no. 11 of

Types of Loss/ Basic No. Entitled Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues Impacts Implementation 2009 concerning Social Welfare 3.3 Loss of secondary Owners of the affected - Cash compensation at full - The independent licensed structures (33 structure, regardless of replacement cost for the affected property appraiser will households, 124 tenure portion of the structure. conduct a RCS for the persons) affected structures.

3.4 Loss of graves (4 Owners of the affected - Land replacement in the - The independent licensed households, 11 graves, regardless of public cemetery; property appraiser will persons) tenure - Removal cost including cost conduct a RCS for the of the ceremony affected graves. 4 Loss of Public Assets 4 SOE,2 village government, 1 privat company) 4.1 Government or State - Rebuild facilities or provide Law no. 2 of 2012 - The independent licensed enterprises / communal cash compensation to the Article 33 property appraiser will property and assets (eg. enterprises and communities to Presidential conduct a RCS for the mosques, village roads, reconstruct the affected Regulation No. affected structures. electric poles, etc.) structures agreements with 71/2012 Article 82 affected parties. 5 Loss of Income 5.1. Temporary loss of Owners of partially - Cash compensation for loss of Elucidation of - The amount will be based income affected shops or income from affected shops due to Law 2/2012, on either official evidence house-cum-shops disruption business while the Article 33f of income (such as tax regardless of their remaining structure is being Government receipts, payment slip or tenure (0 shop owners) repaired. Regulation No. similar evidence) or 38/2007 otherwise based on Indonesian assessed minimum wage in Valuation the subproject area Standards 204 multiplied by an assessed (SPI 2014) reasonable period required to carry out the repairs. - The assistance amount was estimated by local people during public consultations. It will be finalized following valuation by independent appraisers. .

Types of Loss/ Basic No. Entitled Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues Impacts Implementation 5.2 Business owners who Cash compensation equivalent to Government use river waterways for the amount of monthly income Regulation No. 38 livelihood (3 crossing from affected business multiplied of 2007 boat owners) by at least 6 months; Be entitled to participate in the LRP. 5.3 Employees of affected Cash compensation equivalent to It is estimated that their business who will the income loss during the period business will be disrupted experience temporary of business disruption. in 90 days so their loss of income due to employees will also the business disruption temporarily lose their including those working income for a maximum of for temporarily affected 90 days. ferries 5.4. Employees who will Cash compensation equivalent to The bussines was permanent loss of lost wages for six (6) months OR permanently closed income for affected assistance for job transition based owners since the shop on the costs required to change a owners would stop profession on part with previous doing bussines after professions. relocation to change to other occupation (82 persons) 6 Loss of emotional APs who lose the Additional compensation of 5% - Indonesian The percentage of emotional attachment to emotional bond with the 30% of total compensation for Valuation compensation will be based assets (solatium) affected assets (land, physical assets affected. Standards 204 on the RCS result prepared structures, and crops Transitional living allowance (SPI 2014) by the independent and trees) equivalent to 3 months of basic appraiser. (56 households 235 living expenses (at the provincial persons) poverty line per household member) 7 Compensation for Parties who are entitled Cash compensation is calculated Indonesian waiting period due to receive compensation based on the risk-free interest, Valuation to delay in the for late payment government bank interest Standards 204 compensation (SPI 2014) payment (interest) 8 Impacts on households headed by Be entitled to participate in the Law no. 2/2012, ▪ The proposed LRP is vulnerable women, (ii) heads of LRP article 33 described in more detailed households (220 households with Given the opportunity to get a job Elucidation of in Chapter IX. households, 857 disabilities, (iii) related with the project Law no. 2/2012, ▪ The suitability of persons) households that are Article 2b particular type of

Types of Loss/ Basic No. Entitled Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues Impacts Implementation below the poverty line, Law no. 11/2009 assistance for (iv) elderly household concerning Social vulnerable households heads, (v) land less, (vi) Welfare shall be decided in people without legal title Government consultation with the to land (non-land rights Regulation No. affected households, holders), and (vii) 38/2007 indigenous people or and based on their customary communities needs and priorities.

9 Temporary or permanent impacts during construction 9.1 For those who have - Payment of rent for land Contract - Land owners shall be formal legal rights affected by the contractor based documents / given a notice 30-60 days in (certificates) or those on applicable rental fees and agreements with advance before their land is whose claims to their agreements with landowners. civil works used temporarily by the land are recognized as - For productive land, the rental contractors contractor. full rights fee will not be less than the net - This provision is stated in income that will be generated the contract / agreement with from affected productive land; the civil works contractor - Compensation for affected - Temporary impacts during non-land assets including construction include activities structures, crops and trees at in the borrow pit area. replacement cost; - The land will be returned to pre-subproject condition or even better. 9.2 Those who do not have - There is no land rental costs Contract legal rights and that can during the period of impact. documents / be recognized as full - Compensation for affected agreements with ownership non-land assets including civil works structures, crops and trees at contractors replacement cost; - The land will be returned to pre-subproject condition or even better. 10 Unanticipated Those who has lost - Compensation for any impact or losses land and non-land damages to the properties, assets regardless based on prevailing formal legal rights to replacement cost. land. - Provisions of mitigating measures shall be

Types of Loss/ Basic No. Entitled Persons Entitlements Implementation Issues Impacts Implementation mitigated and documented based on project principles set forth in this RP.

7.2. Special Assistance for Vulnerable Groups and Severely AHs

154. Vulnerable sectors are different groups of people who may suffer more or face the risk of being increasingly marginalized due to the subproject. Vulnerable groups include (i) households that are headed by women, (ii) household heads with disabilities, (iii) households falling under the regional poverty line, and (iv) elderly household heads, (v) landless households, (vi) People without legal title to land (non- land rights holders, (vii) indigenous people or customary communities. VAHs and SAHs are entitled to participate in the IRP of the subproject. To deal with this problem, the Serang regency Government is involved in the form of material assistance, skills training and others through Social Action Plan (SAP) activities from several agencies. The SAP was developed in consultations with the vulnerable and severely households, and based on their needs and priorities. For more details the SAP program, planned by the Serang Regency Government for vulnerable communities in CW03, is attached. 7.3. Strategy to Address Gender Issues 155. The subproject includes the following specific actions to address gender issues as follows: a. Both women and men participated in and will continue participating in public consultation meetings during updating the LARP. b. The data obtained through the SES has been disaggregated and analyzed by gender and to 8 separate FGDs with affected women (102 persons) were conducted during LARP preparation. These activities were conducted to (i) gain insights into socio-economic profiles of affected women such as education level, occupation, income, women’s participation in decision-making and community activities; (ii) record their perceptions of the subproject, how the subproject will impact on their sources of income/livelihoods implementation, their proposal for income restoration activities and relocation preferences. c. Woman will be included in the Trainings such as: (i) Environment Awareness Training; (ii) Employment Service and Skill Training; (iii) Small and micro business improvement training; and (iv) Cultivation and improvement in fishery, livestock and agricultural production training. to be provided during LRP/SAP implementation. d. Both husband and wife will be invited to receive compensation and other allowances/assistance. e. Women will be given equal chance in getting hired for jobs related to the subproject and to receive equal remuneration for the same work as the men. f. Special measures will be taken in helping elderly, disabled and women-headed households during relocation or reconstruction of their affected shops and houses. g. Disaggregated monitoring indicators by gender will be developed for monitoring social benefits, economic opportunities, livelihood, and resettlement activities as well as in the restoration of livelihoods and living standards during post-project implementation.

156. A stand-alone Gender Action Plan has been prepared to govern the principles, requirements and gender inclusions and development, including gender issues in land acquisition and resettlement planning, implementation and monitoring.

VIII. RELOCATION OF HOUSING AND SETTLEMENTS

157. According to the IOL results, 56 AHs (235 persons) including 25 house owners and 2 house-cum-shop owners will have residential land fully affected or partially affected but the remaining area is not sufficient to stay. Relocated households have been consulted about the relocation options during LARP preparation. They are entitled to choose one out of two options (i) relocated AHs are provided with replacement land and basic infrastructures; or (ii) relocated AHs are provided with compensation and relocation assistance and self-relocate. During the IOL and consultations conducted in 2020, all 56 relocated AHs opted for self-relocation, which means that they choose to make the relocation and housing arrangements on their own initiative. Progress on self relocation will be closely monitor and included in the social monitoring report.

158. In addition, land acquisition by the subproject also requires displacement of 30 stand-alone shop owners. These affected shop owners preferred to get cash compensation for affected shops, compensation for loss of income during business interruption.

159. As mentioned in the entitlement matrix, these 56 AHs including 27 house/house-cum-shop owners and 29 shop owners are provided with moving cost and transitional allowance24 and all of them are entitled to participate in the LRP. The assistance amounts were estimated by the AHs during LARP preparation and will be finalized based on valuation of compensation by indepenent appraisers.

160. Table 46 below shows the list of relocated affected households by village based on the IOL results.

Table 46: Number of Relocated Households

Relocation Sub No Villages Name APs House- Districts House Cum- Shop Shop 1 Kibin Tambak Ipip 3 1 2 Kibin Tambak Lani 5 1 3 Kibin Tambak Jupri 4 2 4 Kibin Tambak Usman 4 1 5 Kibin Tambak Adung 4 1 6 Kibin Tambak Munirah 4 1 7 Kibin Tambak Pelor 5 1 8 Kibin Tambak Entom 7 1 9 Kibin Tambak Suki 4 1 10 Kibin Tambak Andi 5 1 11 Kibin Tambak Adi 4 1 12 Kibin Tambak Castro 2 1 13 Kibin Tambak Arkani /warung 3 1

24 Transitional allowance will be covered by compensation for emotional compensation

14 Kibin Tambak Su'eb 6 1 15 Kibin Tambak Kemi 3 1 16 Kibin Tambak Uus 6 1 17 Kibin Tambak Arsali 3 1 18 Kibin Tambak Jemani 5 1 19 Kibin Tambak Johani 3 1 20 Kibin Tambak Nimah 5 1 21 Kibin Tambak Ra'i 5 1 22 Kibin Tambak Sarman 3 1 22 93 0 0 23 23 Kibin Ciagel H. Rape'i 5 1 24 Kibin Ciagel Cholili 3 2 25 Kibin Ciagel Saeful Anwar 5 1 26 Kibin Ciagel Ihsan 5 1 4 18 5 0 0 27 Kibin Sukamaju Suhemi 7 1 28 Kibin Sukamaju Somadulloh 5 1 29 Kibin Sukamaju H. Yani 2 1 30 Kibin Sukamaju Musrafah 6 1 31 Kibin Sukamaju Sanai 3 1 32 Kibin Sukamaju Andi 4 1 33 Kibin Sukamaju Nanang 1 1 1 34 Kibin Sukamaju Fatmawati 4 1 1 35 Kibin Sukamaju Masrifah 4 1 36 Kibin Sukamaju Astoyah 3 1 37 Kibin Sukamaju Parha Dewi 5 1 1 38 Kibin Sukamaju Santimah 5 1 39 Kibin Sukamaju Saluri 3 1 40 Kibin Sukamaju Maryati 1 1 41 Kibin Sukamaju Siti Khaeriyah 4 1 42 Kibin Sukamaju Sarkani 3 1 43 Kibin Sukamaju Sainah/Eman 5 1 44 Kibin Sukamaju Rohmah 4 1 45 Kibin Sukamaju Masuri 6 1 46 Kibin Sukamaju Nurjanah 2 1 47 Kibin Sukamaju Sanim 5 1 48 Kibin Sukamaju Supinah/ Ahmad 5 1 49 Kibin Sukamaju Jamari 5 1 50 Kibin Sukamaju Royani bin Rohani 5 1 51 Kibin Sukamaju Royani bin Jupran 4 1 52 Kibin Sukamaju Jenul 4 1

53 Kibin Sukamaju Sarah/Jajang 6 1 54 Kibin Sukamaju Darsim 6 2 1 28 117 21 3 9 Undar 55 Kragilan Burhanudin 4 3 0 0 Andir 1 4 3 0 0 56 Kragilan Kragilan Nyi sarah 3 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 1 Total 56 235 29 3 33

IX. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM

161. The LRP for this LARP is prepared by the local government and technically refers to this as Social Action Plan (SAP). The SAP is a program to reduce social risks in the implementation of the subproject. The selected groups including VAHs and SAHs are targets of the program to ensure that their livelihoods are improved or at least equivalent to the pre-subproject level.

9.1. Objectives of the LRP/SAP

162. Specific objectives of the LRP/SAP are as follows: (i) Restoring income and livelihood of AHs who are living along the 7.07 km of the river embankment on the left side and 4.52 km on the right side of the Ciujung River Basin where embankment activities will be carried out (impact corridor). (ii) Improving the quality of human resources for SAHs and VAHs through the development of creative, innovative and entrepreneurial mindsets. (iii) Enhancing institutional capacity of farmers and communities. (iv) Raising awareness of healthy lifestyles for APs living in the COI area. (v) Improving the quality of the environment in the COI area.

9.2. Livelihood Restoration Supports

163. The SAP incorporates a LRP supported based on the results of the IOL and SES. This will be conducted in the form of various programs, such as economic empowerment, enhancement of institutional capacity of farmer groups, education and entrepreneurship training, business assistance during the transition period, community institutional capacity building, improvement of education quality, improvement of sanitation and environmental facilities, Hygienic and Healthy Life Behavior Improvement Program (PHBS), and others that will be carried out by Serang regency before construction activities commence. According to the IOL results, among total AHs, there are 220VAHs (854 persons) and 667 SAHs. It is noted that 220 out of SAHs are also categorized as VAHs. Therefore, 757 AHs (2,840 persons) are eligible for the LRP. The LRP consists of three main strategies: project related employment, skills training and agricultural inputs. The program will be provided to the APs with significant physical and economic displacement in the subproject. 491 households will lose 70% to 100% of their land and will be displaced. 56 households among these also lose structures and business incomes. Additionally, 155 sharecropper households, one illegal occupier household, 8 tenants and 82 employees will also be economically and/or physically displaced. Especially for 56 AHs who will do self-relocation, some of them may not be able to participate in LRP activities because it depends on the place of destination for their move.

164. The LRP for the subproject has been consulted with the AHs and discussed with the relevant Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Bappeda) and Organisasi Perangkat Daerah (OPD) designated. Eight (8) FGDs regarding needs assessment of the AHs were conducted in the affected villages from 30 June 2020 to 27 July 2020. A total of 154 people attended the FGDs, of whom 102 are women.

Table 47: Focus Group Discussions About Needs Assessment of Affected Households During SAP Preparation

Participants (M/F) Key points Remarks No Date Venue Objective Male Female 1 June 30, 2020 Serang Preparation of the 2 Discussion of the draft SAP Regency Office Social Action Plan activities and SAP activity (SAP) by the budget plans Serang Regency Consultant CS 01 Approval of the SAP budget Government and BAPPEDA plan draft FGD activity plan needs assessment for CW location 03

FGD activity plan needs assessment for CW 03 location and preparation of a list of proposed village activities from Need Assessment results 2 June 29,2020 Ciagel Village Preparation for 7 5 FGD activity need Assessment Social Action Plan for Social Action Plan 2021- activity 2025 CW 03 Location Participant: AHs

from Ciagel Village

3 July 7, 2020 Sukamaju Preparation for 17 11 FGD activity need Assessment Village Social Action Plan for Social Action Plan 2021- activity 2025 CW 03 Location Participant: AHs from Sukamaju Village 4 July 3, 2020 Cijeruk Village Preparation for 10 8 FGD activity need Assessment Social Action Plan for Social Action Plan 2021- activity 2025 CW 03 Location Participant: AHs

from Cijeruk Village 5 July 10, 2020 Nagara Village Preparation for 5 13 FGD activity need assessment Social Action Plan for Social Action Plan 2021- activity 2025 CW 03 Location Participant: AHs

from Nagara Village 6 July 22, 2020 Tambak Preparation for 8 7 FGD activity need assessment Social Action Plan for Social Action Plan 2021- activity 2025 CW 03 Location participant: AHs

from Nagara Village 7 July 24, 2020 Dukuh Village Preparation for 3 44 FGD activity need assessment Social Action Plan for Social Action Plan 2021- activity 2025 CW 03 Location participant: AHs

from Nagara Village 8 July 27, 2020 Dukuh Preparation for 2 12 FGD activity need assessment Social Action Plan for Social Action Plan 2021- activity 2025 CW 03 Location Participant: AHs from Nagara Village

165. During the FGDs, the participants raised their proposals for the LRP activities. The proposed LRP for this subproject consists of three types of supports including (i) provision of subproject-related job opportunities; (ii) provision of skills training programs; and (iii) provision of agricultural inputs and other supports.

166. Provision of Subproject-Related Job Opportunities. The Ciujung river embankment development will create employment opportunities, especially in the construction phase for the local communities along the COI area. According to the results of the SES and consultations with local communities and AHs, land-based livelihoods are dominant with 95% of AHs engaged in farming on agricultural land, followed by wage-base livelihoods at 5% of total AHs. Furthermore, 61.43% of AHs have low income (less than IDR 2,267,965 per household per month). Therefore, it would be great if they have access to alternative and/ or additional sources of income to meet their daily needs. It is estimated that there will be 130 types of unskilled laborers available in the construction phase prioritized for affected sharecroppers and employees such as security personnel, full-time construction workers, part-time construction workers (Table 53). As stipulated in the Environmental Impact Assessment for the subproject, BBWS 3CIS will require contractors to provide employment opportunities for local communities, especially for those potentially affected who do not have relevant qualifications, skills and experience.

167. In addition, as stipulated in the entitlement matrix, the APs are also entitled to get opportunity to work in the construction. BBWS 3CIS will ensure that the provision will be included in the contractor contract. The program implementation shall be reported to the Environmental Agency of Serang Regency in accordance with the requirements stated in the Environmental Impact Analysis for the subproject.

Table 48: Estimated Manpower Requirement for Construction Phase

Manpower Requirement Types of Jobs (person) Security 16 Sort, Straighten, Shine, Standardize, dan Sustain (5 S) 4 Helper 36 Flagman 10 Driver 20 Office Boy 2 Sodding 20 Digger 10 Land Clearing 12 Total 130 Source: Estimated by CS01 Consultant

168. Provision of Skills Training Program. The skills training program is prepared based on the results of the SES on APs conducted in May-July 2020, FGDs and public consultations with AHs and local communities conducted in the subproject area. The training modules will be developed based on the livelihood groups of APs working in the agricultural and non-agricultural sectors and the

modules will also be adjusted to their levels of education. There will be separate training sessions for women.

169. According to the results of consultations with Serang regency BAPPEDA and related agencies, six (6) training packages have been included in the program as follows. The training packages will be finalized before the commencement of the LRP based on consultations with the eligible APs. (i) Entrepreneurship training for APs who have to change their livelihoods with provisions of the equipment (ii) Technical training in the agriculture, animal husbandry and fisheries sectors with provisions of agricultural/animal husbandry/fishery inputs. (iii) Institutional capacity building for groups of farmers to improve agricultural production, business management, and market access; (iv) Improving micro and small businesses (v) Training skills on mechanics, sewing and handicraft skills with provisions of production material; and (vi) Joint training: entrepreneurship, technical, promotion, micro and small business improvement.

170. The skills training program will be implemented in two phases: (i) the first phase before relocation; and (ii) the second phase during the subproject implementation period as a follow-up to the activities carried out in the first phase and provide feedback on the progress of the APs after the training.

171. Provision of Agricultural Inputs and Support. Most of the APs (95%) are involved in agricultural activities, and during consultations they sought support for intensification of agricultural production, especially the development of paddy fields, seed production, post-harvest technology, small business development for agricultural and livestock products. All these demands will be supported as part of the SAP.

172. LRP was designed based on the consultations with AHs/APs during the preparation of LARP. Further consultation with the APs together with the IA and local authorities and village leaders will be conducted prior to LRP implementation to discuss the list of detailed income restoration activities, support levels for eligible households, and the list number of eligible households following the eligibility criteria who can participate in each program.

9.3. Administrative Logistics

173. Facilitation and Organization. The following are the main steps in the facilitation and organizational process of the SAP: (i) Conduct of an initial meeting to form the SAP Program Implementation Team under the coordination of Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (BAPPEDA-District Development Planning Aggency) of Serang Regency; (ii) The SAP Program Implementation Team prepares a more detailed program plan; (iii) Assignment of facilitators at the district level (5 facilitators are needed); (iv) Formation of training groups for AHs (based on distance and area); (v) The SAP Program Implementation Team submits an implementation plan to the relevant agencies in the district.

(vi) Facilitators arrange community organization meetings in all the affected villages to improve the training needs based on further inputs from AHs and prepare Training Group for the implementation of the program.

174. Source of Funds. The source of funding comes from the Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah (APBD-Local Government Budget) of Serang Regency, for the implementation of SAP in the period of 2021-2025, it is being prepared by the relevant agencies under the coordination of Serang Regency Bappeda. BAPPEDA processes budget allocations in which the local government budget planning (RAPBD) in turn requests DPRD approval. However, BBWS 3 CIS has obtained a written commitment statement from the regent of Serang for LRP/SAP CW 03 implementation with budget allocation amounting to IDR 7,050,000,000 (seven billion and fifty million rupiahs) equivalent to USD 472.330. The written commitment statement on LRP/SAP signed by Regent of Serang Regency completed with the budget and activities, dated 27 January 2021 is attached in Appendix 16.

175. Implementation Schedule. As at August 2020, the draft LRP/SAP activities for the subproject has been prepared in consultation with the APs and verified by BAPPEDA of Serang Regency. BBWS 3CIS l sents a request letter along with the draft SAP to the Regent of Serang Regency on 11 November 2020 and followed up by meetings to discuss the memorandum of agreement (MOU) for the SAP. The statement letter on the commitment of Serang Regency to allocate budget and implement the LRP (SAP) signed by the Serang Regent was issued on 27 January 2021. The SAP is expected to be implemented during the period of 2021-2025. All training activities for the first phase will be implemented in 6 months after the payment of compensation has been completed while the second phase – a follow-up to the first phase will be implemented in the next six (6) months (see Appendix 16). Both internal monitoring and external monitoring are required for the LRP implementation The LRP shall be monitored and evaluated internally using measurable indicators. For external monitoring, an independent agency will be mobilized. Both types of monitoring will operate with a defined set of indicators and methodology. Strategic lessons for the formulation and planning of future policies will be assessed based on the results of monitoring and evaluation of resettlement or relocation activities. This will be supported by an Evaluation Study on Post- Relocation Implementation, which will be carried out 6 to 12 months after the completion of all relocation activities.

176. BBWS 3 CIS will hire an experiences NGO in economic empowerment program to assist the implementation of LRP and ensure that the LRP will be properly and timely implemented in accordance with the LARP.The NGO will provide assistance to eligible APs after the training completed.

177. Table 49 below shows more details about the activities responsible agencies and estimated budget for each activity under the LRP. The budget will finalized after the need assessment households who will be able to participate in the LRP completed.

Table 49: Summary of Social Action Plan (SAP)

Responsible Estimated NO Activities Objectives Agencies budget

(Million IDR) A Planning Badan Social Action Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP) / Social Perencanaan 1. Plan (SAP) Action Plan (SAP) plans and strategies are Pembangunan 100 planning arranged for 5 years Daerah (BAPPEDA) Preparation of an organizational structure and work 2. SAP organizing BAPPEDA 100 plan for LRP / SAP implementation Preparation, facilitation and coordination for the 3. Coordination BAPPEDA 250 SAP / LRP program Program B Implementation 1. Available social Empowerment of Vulnerable Affected Households Social Affairs 750 safety nets (VAHs) and Severely Affected Households (SAHs). The program is implemented to provide direct assistance in the form of distribution of the relocation process, empowerment of VAHs, services and counseling for AHs. 2. Environment Increase changes in healthy lifestyle behavior that Department of 750 awareness will affect livelihoods, such as healthy lifestyles, the training management of household waste, garbage, Environment, improvement of environmental conditions such as Office of health drainage, drainage, development of waste decomposing plants, etc. 3. Protection and Protect and prevent AHs affected by natural Regional 750 disaster disasters by involving the community in the Disaster prevention watershed program, Management Agency Increase the Green Open Space area in the Ciujung watershed, an integrated emergency response system and early warning 4.. Employment Provide job opportunities for local communities Manpower and 750 service and Skill especially AHs, who have relevant background, transmigration Training skills and experience for project work office Providing skills for AHs to be ready for work, both for independent businesses and ready to work as a workforce 5. Training on Improve and develop ongoing AHs businesses, Industry and 1,000 improving small especially in business management aspects, trade and micro market aspects, capital aspects, etc. according to cooperative businesses needs service Provide skills provision for AHs who do not / do not have a business, especially in the analysis of business potential, business opportunities, business planning, business motivation, market access and capital. 3. Cultivation Increasing skills of farmers in cultivation and Department of 1,000 training and agricultural production, livestock and fisheries. Food and increase in Fisheries fishery, livestock Security, and agricultural Department of production Agriculture 4. Institutional Improve the institutional management capacity of Department of 500 capacity building farmer groups and business groups Food and Fisheries Resilience, Department of Agriculture, Office of

Estimated Responsible budget NO Activities Objectives Agencies (Million IDR) industrial and trade cooperatives

5. Agriculture Supporting various needs of farmers including Department of 500 support providing technical assistance in increasing Agriculture agricultural production, developing intensification of rice / secondary crops, improving post-harvest and processing agricultural products, improving / applying agricultural technology, market access, business management etc. C Monitoring and Evaluation 1 Internal Monitoring the implementation of the SAP program BAPPEDA 500 Monitoring periodically using the monitoring form provided 2 External External evaluation is carried out every 2 years by 3rd party 100 Monitoring an independent monitoring agency 3 SAP/LRP 5 SAP implementation reports are carried out BAPPEDA years report annually TOTAL 7,050

X. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN

10.1. Budget for Resettlement Activities

178. The estimated budget for the implementation of the LARP is IDR 358,402,741,509 equivalent to USD 24,011,975. The amount includes cost for compensation, assistance and resettlement, cost for LRP implementation and LRP service provider, administration cost (15%); cost for settling grievances; RCS and the external monitor as well as contingency cost (10%). Budget calculation for compensation, assistance and resettlement for the subproject presented in this LARP is based on the IOL that was completed in July 2020; entitlements of AHs which have been consulted with the AHs, affected communities and affected companies, local authorities and concerned agencies; and the result of the RRCS conducted in July 2020. FGDs and interviews conducted with concerned agencies such as village leaders, AHs, non-affected households, land buyers and land sellers who had successful land transactions in the last six months in the locals. Evidence of all successful transaction cases of land in the project township within six recently months from January 2020 to July 2020 was also collected. Market rates of crops and trees were gathered from the crop/tree owners and vendors. In addition, the Consultant conducted interviews with officers of construction material shop owners and construction companies/groups in the villages on the current cost of construction materials - including transportation costs to the locality, and construction labour costs in the villages which make up the replacement cost for affected structures. The result of the RRCS is use to calculate the budget estimates for compensation for affected land and on-land assets in this LARP. During the LARP implementation phase, valuation of lost assets and non land assets including business loss for the compensation payment will be carried out by independent appraiser. . The following are the assumptions – indicators and formula applied by the independent appraisers. (i) For land, the market prices of the land were calculated by comparing various prices of land plots within others in the same village. The indicators taken into account of the comparison include: (a) time factor, (b) location factor, (c) area, (d) dimension, and (e) physical soil condition. (ii) For houses and structures, the cost approach was applied using the indicative value of the price of the rational object of the affected structures. (a) Compensation for affected structures should be at replacement cost without any depreciation or deductions for salvaged material; (b) Solatium is to be in addition to the compensation for affected structures. (iii) For crops and trees, the independent appraisers collected market prices of various types of affected crops and trees around the affected villages and compared the surveyed prices with the prices of independent appraisers on CW01 and CW02 (2016). (iv) Solatium. The cost approach was applied using the indicative value of the price of the rational object of the affected structures. The indicators used to form the solatium are (a) residence time (length of stay in the affected structures) and (b) type of structure. The formula used is the percentage of residence time multiplied by the market price of the affected structure. (v) Transaction costs. Transaction costs refer to AHs notary fees by Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT-Land Deed Official) related to land replacement. The formula used is (a) for PPAT, market prices multiplied by 5%, (b) for notaries, market prices multiplied by 1%, and (c) Moving costs: market prices multiplied by 2%.

100

(vi) Waiting Time. This relates to the waiting time between appraisal and payment (3 months). The formula was valuation results multiplied by 1.5%. (vii) Compensation for loss of income: (a) for Crops: Annual crops, cash compensation will be paid based on the prevailing market rates. Perennial crops, cash compensation at replacement cost taking into account their productivity and age; (b) for Trees: Cash compensation at the current market price based on age, type of tree and diameter of trunk at breast height; (c) for business: business owner, cash compensation equivalent to the amount of monthly income from affected business multiplied by at least 6 months. Employees of affected business who will experience temporary loss of income due to the business disruption, Cash compensation equivalent to the income loss during the period of business disruption. Employees who will permanent loss of income for affected owners since the shop owners would stop doing bussines after relocation to change to other occupation, Cash compensation equivalent to lost wages for six (6) months or assistance for job transition based on the costs required to change a profession on part with previous professions.

179. Table 50 below presents a breakdown of the estimated budget for the LARP implementation.

101

Table 50: Estimated Budget for LARP Implementation

Average unit price Amount NO ITEMS Unit Quantity Amount (IDR) (USD per (USD) unit) A COMPENSATION, ASSISTANCE, RESETTLEMENT $20,181,663 303,076,777,677 1 COMPENSATION 1.1 Compensation for Land 217.457.791.178 m2 $19,317.44 637 $12,305,210 -Agricultural land owned by households 183,667,570,378 m2 $20,982 49 $1,028,121 -Residential land owned by households 15,345,736,700 m2 $53,727 23 $1,235,729 -Land owned by state enterprises, villages 18,444,484,100

1.2 Compensation for Main Structures $1,564,280 23,348,436,360 Unit $40,348 35 $1,412,163 -Permanent Structures 21,077,948,586 Unit $12,997 5 $64,987 -Semi-permanent Structures 969,991,200 Unit $3,485 25 $87,130 -Temporary Structures 1.300,496,574

1.3 Compensation for Secondary Structures 21,017,373,924

Unit $1,520 31 $47,123 -Hunt 703,365,156

Unit $545 3 $1,634 -Cage 24,386,700

Unit $644,872 2 $1,289,745 -Storage 19,250,733,600

Unit $309 1 $309 -Garage 4.613.700

Unit $21,060 1 $21,060 -Rice mill 314,349,000

Unit $30,760 1 $30,760 -Praying Room 459,129,168

Unit $4,824 1 $4,824 -Guadraill 72,000,000

102

Average unit price Amount NO ITEMS Unit Quantity Amount (IDR) (USD per (USD) unit)

Unit $10,535 1 $10,535 -Toilet 157,251,000

Unit $707 1 $707 -Water Machine House 10,545,600

Unit $201 7 $1,407 -Graves 21,000,000

1.3 Compensation for Crops and Trees $577,725 8,623,116,081

unit $2 $35,593 -Crops 19,958 531,259,381

unit $9 40,448 $364,343 -Fruit Trees 5,438,181,000

unit $9 19,455 $177,789 -Timber Trees 2.653,67,.700

1.4 Compensation for public assets $115,440 1,723,062,800 Unit $54,236 2 $108,473 1,619 ,062,800 -Electric Tower Unit $6,700 1 $6,700 100,000,000 -Telephone Pole Unit $134 2 $268 4,000,000 -Electric pole 1.5 Compensation for Temporary Loss of Income $85,924 1,282,500,000 Shop Owners Persons $796 35 $27,857 415,800,000 Employees Persons $708 82 $58,066 866,700.000

1.6 Compensation for Permanent Loss of Income Persons $0 0 $0 -

Shop Owners Persons $0 0 $0 -

Employees Persons $0 0 $0 - II SOLATIUM / EMOTIONAL LOSS $85,225 1,272,069,011 III ASSISTANCE $1,899,532 28,352,428,324 Transition Allowances (235 Aps equivalent to 3 months 3.1 Persons $62 235 $14,597 217,870,380 of basic living expenses

103

Average unit price Amount NO ITEMS Unit Quantity Amount (IDR) (USD per (USD) unit) 3.2 Moving Cost AHs $146 56 $8,187 122,200,000 Rental assistance for 8 renting households (291 3.3 Aps $291 8 $2,332 USD/household/month multiplied by 12 months) 34,800,000

3.4 Land certification Allowances parcels $33 709 $23,751 354,500,000 Transaction Cost parcels $2.205 709 $1,563,021 23,329,647,882 Waiting Time parcels $406 709 $287,646 4,293,410,062 B LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION PROGRAM / SAP $42.939 11 $472,330 7,050,000,000 C TOTAL DIRECT COST = (A + B) $20,777,621 310,126,777,677 D EXTERNAL MONITORING (UNDER BUDGET CS 08) - E COST FOR RCS $66,997 1,000,000. F COST FOR GRIEVANCE RESOLUTION25 $66.997 757 50,7166.73 756,947,180- G ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS = (5% OF DIRECT COST) $1,038,881 15,506,338,884 H CONTINGENCY COST (10% OF DIRECT COSTS) $2,077,762 31,012,677,768 GRAND TOTAL = (C+D+E+F+G+H) $24,011,975 358,402,741,509

25 Source The Head of Administrative Court of Bandung No: W2.TUN2/750/HK.06/8/2019 on the Litigation Advance Cost at the First Level, Appeal, Cassation and Review at Administrative Court of Bandung (Biaya Panjar Berperkara di Tingkat Pertama, Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali di PTUN Bandung)

104

10.2. Source and Flow of Funds

180. The budget for the LARP implementation will be financed by the Government. The budget for land acquisition, compensation, assistance and resettlement comes from DGWR while the budget for SAP (LRP) implementation comes from local government of Serang Regency. DGWR and BBWS will ensure that resources are made available on time for the subproject activities.

105

XI. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

11.1. Implementation Arrangements

National Level

181. Executive and Implementing Agencies. The DGWR, MPWH is the EA of the Project that will be responsible for the entire implementation, administration, and monitoring of the project, including land acquisition and resettlement activities upholding the legal provisions of Law No. 2/ 2012 and its implementation rules, while harmonizing with the ADB SPS. The river basin organizations (BBWS 3 Cis in Banten) is the IA which is responsible for the preparation of relevant social safeguard documents as well as their implementation and monitoring. DGWR, together with the Directorate of Planning and Programming as Secretary, will establish a Central Project Management Unit (CPMU) that will be responsible for the daily implementation of the subproject and safeguard, including monitoring and compliance in implementing the framework and land acquisition and resettlement planning. The BBWS will collaborate with the CPMU to address the resettlement issues as necessary. The staff under PPK Sungai dan Pantai 1 has been designated by the BBWS 3 CIS for supporting the functioning of the grievance redress mechanism. The focal persons will receive, respond, resolve and or facilitate to seek resolution of any complaints/grievance related to LAR activities, as well as document and report them to the PPK and other relevant parties.

182. Central Project Management Unit (CPMU). Central Project Management Unit is a major technical institution at the national level for the project, as well as land acquisition and resettlement activities in the DGWR, MPWH through the Directorate of River and Coast. CPMU will be under the Directorate of Planning and Programming, DGWR, plays a key role in drafting the annual budget and provide technical guidance and supervision to the RBOs in the Project implementation area, including land acquisition planning and implementation. A project implementation unit (PIU) will be set up to help implement the subproject activities and to deal with LAR aspects.

Regional Level

183. The most important regional institutional stakeholders are the provincial, district and village governments facilitating LAR activities. BBWS 3CIS closely collaborates with these institution. Lower level sub-district and village offices of the affeted villages in the sub-project area are involved in land acquiistion planning, preparation, and implementation as member of the land acquisistion preparation team and LAIT and to the extent needed, for any resettlement activities required.

184. At the planning phase of land acquisistion, the BBWS 3CIS submits the LARP to ADB for review and approval prior to compensation payment and civil works commencement. Following the government procedure of land acquisistion, the BBWS 3CIS submits the land acquisistion plan to the Banten Provincial Government for project location determination.

185. At the preparatory phase of land acquisistion, the provincial government is responsible for issuance of project location determination. In response to the proposal of the BBW 3CIS to facilitate the land acquisistion preparation and obtain

106

project location determination, three key activities have been done by the provincial government; (i) notification of development plan; (ii) initial identification of entitled parties (affected persons); (ii) public consultation to reach agreement from the affected persons/entitled parties on location of the development plan. Project location determination was issued by the Governor in June 2021.

186. In addition to land acquisistion preparation, the Bappeda planning agencies have coordinated and host inter-agency meetings regarding the LRP preparation and implementation. Relevant local government agencies of Serang Regent including Social welfare; Coperatives, Industry, and Trade; Manpower and Transmigration; Environmental services. Their functions will include capacity development in productive economic activities, community skill development, and social empowerment to the APs.

187. The regional office of the national Land Agency, or (Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertahanan Nasional(KATR/BPN), located in Serang Regency represent strategic entity for implementation of LAR activities. Due to the location of land avquisistion for project is in Serang Regency, the Governor of Banten has given the authority to carry out land acquisistion to the land office (KATR/BPN) in Serang Regency. The land office has established land acquisistion implementation team (LAIT) responsible to facilitate land acquisistion for the sub-project following procedure set forth in 2012 land acquisistion law and implementing regulations. Relevant district government agencies including agriculture agenciy, public work agency, subdistrict and village heads serve as members of the LAIT.

188. Land Acquisition Implementation Team (LAIT) is established by Serang District Land Office. The tasks and functions of the LAIT are described as follows:

• Conduct research on the legal status of land, buildings, and other assets that will be affected by land acquisition by the subproject;

• Conduct consultations with APs regarding plans, objectives, benefits and various potentially negative impacts arising from the proposed subproject;

• Conduct demarcation of the COI and conduct the DMS for all the land and on- land assets affected by the subproject;

• Calculate the amounts of compensation and assistance for affected land and affected on-land assets;

• Facilitating the implementation of activities for changing the legal status of affected land and houses;

• Assist in addressing any complaints, objections and proposals raised by APs.

189. Project Implementation Consultant (PIC). A PIC is recruited and will include a Social Safeguards/Resettlement Specialist, Social Development/Resettlement Specialist and Capacity Development Specialist. The consultant will support BBWS 3 CIS in the implementation and monitoring of LAR activities, including implementation of LRP/SAP. The current PIC structure consists of (i) CS01 responsible for supporting BBWS 3CIS in implementing the LARP and (ii) CS02 responsible for monitoring.

107

190. Detail roles and responsibilities of the PIC are as follows. • Conduct capacity assessment of the EA, IA and relevant stakeholders in dealing with LAR issues; • Provide capacity building for the EA, IA and relevant stakeholders if necessary; • Collection of technical information and input from the engineering team responsible for detailed design on the final alignment and subproject sites. • Carrying out the IOL and SES for LARP and its update if required. This SES data/information will constitute the baseline data/information to be used for LARP implementation and monitoring/evaluation including in the post-resettlement evaluation. • Carrying out necessary consultation with stakeholders. • Organizing disclosure meetings and dissemination of PIB. • Carrying out a RCS by engaging a qualified appraiser for the valuation of assets for LARP reparation. • Update the LARP during the detailed engineering design of the subproject; • Submit the LARP and its update (if required) to EA/IA and subsequently to ADB for approval; • Disclose the final LARP and updated LARP, if any; • Work closely with the EA/IA and other agencies to ensure that APs (i) receive full amounts of compensation and assistance, (ii) relocate; and (iii) are provided with LRP activities in line with entitlements specified in the final LARP before commencement of civil work in specific section; • Working with the EA/IA to establish a system to monitor social safeguards of the subproject and prepare monitoring reports. • Taking proactive action to anticipate the potential resettlement requirements of the subproject to avoid delays in implementation. • Preparation of procedures to document and record the grievances and sensitize the EA/IA on the grievance redress mechanism which includes the notification, arranging the GRC meetings and recording the grievance in a database. • Assisting the EA/IA in monitoring the implementation of the updated LARP, if required; • Consolidating and preparing semi-annual social monitoring reports for submission to ADB; • Providing recommendations and for and advising the EA/IA on corrective actions where necessary.

191. Livelihood Restoration Program Consultant. A qualified service provider (LRP consultant) will be engaged by the PIU (BBWS 3CIS) to assist the LRP eligible households in developing and implementing of the household LRP. The LRP consultant will conduct the detailed need assessment of eligible households, assist the households in preparing the LRP for the households, and assist the local government and households in implementing the LRP. Detailed tasks of the LRP consultant will:

(i) Carry out the detailed needs assessment of LRP eligible households; (ii) Discuss with the AHs, local government of Serang Regency, concerned agencies of Serang Regency and Banten Province, village leaders about the proposed income restoration activities, availability of vocational training programs provided by the local agencies in the subproject area as well as the capacity of AHs to engage in the proposed programs;

108

(iii) Coordinate with local government of Serang Regency, IA for review, and approval of the LRP; (iv) Assist the AHs for implementing specific IRP activities; (v) Regularly monitor the status of LRP implementation by LRP participating households and provide support(s) as needed; (vi) Materialize the combination the LRP with and expand the LRP activities by Serang Regency and regional funded socio-economic development/household development support programs, including supports funded by NGOs in the local.

192. External Resettlement Monitor: An external monitor will be recruited by EA to verify satisfactory implementation of the LARP.

193. The table below describes main institutions and their roles in the LAR implementation following Law No 2/2012.

Table 51: Main Institutions of Local Government and Their Roles in the LAR implementation

DURATION RESPONSIBLE NO PHASE ACTIVITIES REGULATION (WORKING INSTITUTION DAYS)

Submission of the implementation of land Governor of Banten UU No 2/2012 Ps 1 acquisition to the Regional Office of BPN / Unregulated Province 27 (1) ATR Establishment of Land Acquisition Perpres No KATR/BPN in the 2 Implementation Team (LAIT) by Regional 148/2015 Ps 49 2 Provincial level Office of BPN / ATR (4) Regional Office assignment to Head of KATR/BPN in the Perpres No 3 2 Serang BPN / ATR Provincial level 148/2015 Ps 50 Perpres No Establishment of LAIT by Head of KATR/BPN in the 4 148/2015 Ps 51 2 SerangBPN / ATR District level (3) Perpres No Establishment of the Land Acquisition Task LAIT in the District 5 148/2015 Ps. 54 2 Force level (1) UU No 2/2012 Ps. Inventory and Identification of Land 28 (2) ; Perpres 6 LAIT (Task Force) 30 Acquisition Objects by the Task Force No. 71/2012 Ps. 58 UU No 2/2012 Ps. Announcement of inventory and 29 (1) ; Perpres 7 LAIT 14 identification results No 148/2015 Ps 60 (1) UU No 2/2012 Ps. Filing objections from parties entitled to the 29 (4) ; Perpres 8 LAIT 14 results of the inventory and identification No 148/2015 Ps 61 (1) UU No 2/2012 Ps. Verification and improvement of inventory 29 (5) ; Perpres 9 LAIT 14 lists No 148/2015 Ps 61 (1)

109

DURATION RESPONSIBLE NO PHASE ACTIVITIES REGULATION (WORKING INSTITUTION DAYS)

Procurement of Appraiser / Public Appraiser Perpres No 10 LAIT 30 Services 71/2012 Ps 63 (2)

Determination of Appraiser / Public Perpres No 11 LAIT Unregulated Appraiser Services 71/2012 Ps 63 (2) Request Field Map and nominative list from Perpres No 12 appraisers to the Chairperson of Land LAIT Unregulated 71/2012 Ps 65 (2) Acquisition Implementation of Object Price Valuation by Perpres No 13 Appraiser 30 Appraisers 71/2012 Ps 65 (3) UU No 2/2012 Ps. Submission of Assessment Results of 34 (5) ; Perpres 14 Compensation by the Appraiser to the Appraiser 2 No 71/2012 Ps 66 Chairperson of Land Acquisition (2) Perpres No Invitation to the determination of the form of 15 LAIT 148/2015 Ps 69 2 compensation (3) UU No 2/2012 Ps. Implementation of deliberations on the 37 (1) ; Perpres 16 determination of the form of compensation / LAIT 30 No 71/2012 Ps 68 betita event agreement (1) Perpres No 17 Data Validation for Compensation Payment LAIT 148/2015 Ps 76 3 (2a) Perpres No Waiver of Rights / Granting Compensation 18 LAIT 148/2015 Ps 76 7 since Validation was issued (4) UU No 2/2012 Ps. Submission of price objections by entitled 38 (1) ; Perpres 19 14 parties to the District Court No 71/2012 Ps 73 (1) UU No 2/2012 Ps. 38 (2) ; Perpres 20 District Court Decision District Court 30 No 71/2012 Ps 73 (2) UU No 2/2012 Ps. Submission of Cassation to the Supreme 38 (3) ; Perpres 21 14 Court No 71/2012 Ps 73 (3) UU No 2/2012 Ps. 38 (4) ; Perpres 22 Supreme Court Decision Supreme Court 30 No 71/2012 Ps 73 (4) Source: Law No.2 /202

11.2. Capacity Assessment and Capacity Building Needs

194. The DGWR, BBWS 3CIS have been working for on-going core sub-project (Ciujung Sub-project CW01 & CW02) applying ADB SPS and Law 2/2012 and ADB- funded project and LARP preparation, updating and implementation. Some of their staff have joined training on resettlement safeguards. However, it is necessary to provide capacity building for the EA/IA staff who prepare and implement social

110

safeguards plans, the preparation team established by Governor / Mayor to prepare and determine the land acquisition location, land acquisition and implementation team formed by regional KATR/BPN, and the contractor. The capacity building program for the staff should focus on the following issues. • Involuntary resettlement principles as Indonesian legal framework and ADB’s SPS (2009). • The need to avoid, or minimize, LAR impacts by considering all technical alternatives, in particular using vacant government land where possible, and taking all possible measures in design and selection of site or alignment; The need to avoid LAR impacts on vulnerable persons; • Methodology for compensation assessment and replacement cost principles; • Data management system; • Meaningful consultation and procedures, ensuring that all planning and design interventions and decisions are taken in consultation with local communities in a gender sensitive manner and in a form and language understandable to the people residing in the subproject area;Documentation of all consultations and concerns expressed by public and their resolution; • GRM and its record; • LRP planning and implementation - ensuring that all APs are able to improve, or at least, restore their incomes and livelihood to pre-project levels. Extending assistance to vulnerable groups including affected persons who do not own property, renters, wage-earners, and those without legally recognized rights to land and property that they occupy or use. • Monitoring and evaluation

195. The Social Safeguard/Resettlement Specialist under the PIC will conduct the capacity building while the BBWS is in charge of coordinating capacity building activities.

111

XII. INDICATIVE SCHEDULE

196. The table below summarizes the various inter-related activities connected with the updating and implementation of this LARP. Time implementation consists of: (i) 8.91 km of CW 03 location where Determination of Location has been carried out; and (ii) 2.67 km of CW 03 location where Determination of Location not been carried out.

Table 52: Indicative Schedule of Land Acquisistion and Resettlement Activities

Time Implementation No. Activity 8.92 km 2.67 km

1 Final Detailed engineering design Maret 2020 Maret 2020

Submission of the LARP to ADB for review and 2 January 2021 January 2021 concurrence 3 Disclosure of the LARP January 2021 January 2021 Socialization to affected person, with LAPT (Land 4 January 2020 Maret 2021 Acqusition and Preparation Team) Identification and initial inventory of object land 5 January 2020 Maret 2021 acquisition by LAIT 6 Public Consultation February 2020 Maret 2021 7 Issuance of Location determination February 2020 April 2021 8 Demarcation of COI in the field September 2020 April 2021 9 Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) by LAIT September 2020 Mei 2021 Mobilization of a qualified appraiser to carry out 10 December 2020 July 2021 RCS 11 Compensation Payment March 2021 October 2021 12 Implementation of LRP From July 2021 From July 2021 From April to From August 2021 to 13 Relocation September 2021 April 2022 Monitoring and Evaluation 14 Internal Monitoring Semi-annualy report Semi annualy report External Monitoring Semi annualy report Semi annualy report

112

XIII. MONITORING AND REPORTING

13.1. Internal Monitoring

197. BBWS 3CIS is responsible for monitoring of progress of implementation of LARP and resettlement compliance and that the LARP has produced the desired resettlement objectives. BBWS 3CIS will be assisted by project implementation consultant in conducting monitoring and reporting.

198. The scope of Internal monitoring includes (but not limited to)

(i) Delivery of entitlements (payment of compensation including entitlements disbursed compared to the amount and category of losses specified in the entitlement matrix; timely payment of agreed transportation costs, and resettlement assistance).

(ii) Progress of income restoration activities: the number of SAHs and VAHs participating in the LRP; which activities under the LRP being carried out; effectiveness of the activities; participation and satisfaction of APs to the activities; improvement of standard of living of the Aps);

(iii) Public consultation and awareness of compensation policies. Consultations are held according to schedule including general meetings, focus group discussions, etc; Knowledge of AP rights; Translation of information disclosure in local languages;

(iv) Grievance received and handling and status (including outstanding issues);

(v) Relocation of APs;

(vi) Efectiveness of institutional arrangement and capacity building

(vii) Benefit monitoring (changes in pattern of occupation, production, resources use, income and expenditure, cost of living). Any potential problems in the restoration of living standards will be reported. Other potential monitoring indicators can be used as described in the LARF.

(viii) Status of compliance to land acquisistion and involuntary principles set forth in the LARP;

199. Internal monitoring indicators adress the specific contents of the LARP activities and entitlements matrix. Potential monitoring indicators resettlement from which specific indicators, specifically process indicators at implementation, can be developed and refined as applicable to the pertinent social safeguard planning document, are set out in Table 53.

Table 53: Suggested Monitoring Parameters and Indicators

Monitoring Suggested indicators parameters Consultation • Consultations organized as scheduled including meetings, groups, and and community activities. Grievances • Knowledge of entitlements by the APs (of customary communities, women, men, and other vulnerable groups).

113

Monitoring Suggested indicators parameters • Use of the grievance redress mechanism by the APs (of customary communities, women, men, and other vulnerable groups). • Information on the resolution of the grievances. • Information on the implementation of the social preparation phase. • Implementation of special measures for customary communities. Communicati • Number of general meetings (for customary communities, women, men, and ons and other vulnerable groups). Participation • Number of meetings exclusively with customary communities. • Percentage of women out of total participants. • Number of meetings exclusively with women. • Number of meetings exclusively with vulnerable groups. • Number of meetings between hosts and the APs. • Level of participation in meetings (of customary communities, women, men, and other vulnerable groups). • Level and adequacy of information communicated. • Information disclosure. • Translation of information disclosed in the local languages. Delivery of • Entitlements disbursed, compared with number and category of losses set Entitlements out in the entitlement matrix. • Disbursements against timelines. • Identification of APs losing land temporarily, e.g. through soil disposal, borrow pits, contractors’ camps, have been included. • Timely disbursements of the agreed transport costs, income substitution support, and any resettlement allowances, according to schedule. • Provision of replacement land plots. • Quality of new plots and issuance of land titles. • Restoration of social infrastructure and services. • Progress on income and livelihood restoration activities being implemented as set out in the livelihood restoration plan. • Affected businesses receiving entitlements, including transfer and payments for net losses resulting from lost business. Budget and • Social safeguards staff appointed and mobilized on schedule for field and Time Frame office work. • Capacity building and training activities completed on schedule. • Achieving resettlement and customary community implementation activities against the agreed implementation plan. • Funds allocation for resettlement-to-resettlement agencies on time. • Receipt of scheduled funds by resettlement offices. • Funds disbursement according to the LARP • Social preparation phase as per schedule. • Land acquisition and occupation in time for implementation. Livelihood • Number of APs under the rehabilitation programs (customary communities, Restoration women, men, and vulnerable groups). • Number of APs who received vocational training (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups). • Types of training and number of participants in each program. • Number and percentage of APs covered under livelihood programs (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups). • Number of APs who have restored their income and livelihood patterns (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups). • Number of new employment activities.

114

Monitoring Suggested indicators parameters • Extent of participation in rehabilitation programs. • Extent of participation in vocational training programs. • Degree of satisfaction with support received for livelihood programs. • Percentage of successful enterprises breaking even (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups). • Percentage of APs who improved their income (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups) • Percentage of APs who improved their standard of living (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups) • Number of APs with replacement agriculture land (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups) • Quantity of land owned/contracted by APs (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups) • Number of households with agricultural equipment • Number of households with livestock Benefit • Noticeable changes in patterns of occupation, production, and resource use Monitoring compared to the pre-project situation. • Noticeable changes in income and expenditure patterns compared to the pre-project situation. • Changes in cost of living compared to the pre-project situation. • Changes in key social and cultural parameters relating to living standards. • Changes occurred on customary communities and other vulnerable groups benefiting from the project.

200. Semi-annual monitoring reports shall be submitted by project implementation consultant to CPMU of DGWR starting from the commencement of LARP implementation, which coincides with the implementation of the DMS. The DGWR through CPMU with the support of social safeguard consultant (project implementation consultant) will prepare semi-annual monitoring reports and submit these reports to ADB for disclosure on ADB’s websites. Internal monitoring and reporting templates for semi-annual monitoring reports are attached in Appendix 1.

13.2. External Monitoring

201. The CPMU will hire an independent organization to carry out external monitoring of the LARP implementation and post-implementation evaluation. The external monitoring agency (EMA) will conduct periodic monitoring and submit semi- annual monitoring reports to the DGWR and ADB. The EMA will also conduct an evaluation study of the post-resettlement implementation six months after land acquisition, compensation, assistance and relocation of APs are fully completed by the subproject. The monitoring reports will be disclosed to the APs and posted on the ADB website. These monitoring reports will closely follow the involuntary resettlement monitoring indicators agreed at the time of LARP approval.

202. Specific tasks of the EMA to be undertaken are: (i) To verify the results of internal monitoring reports; (ii) To verify whether the overall subproject objectives are being met in accordance with the LARP, and if not suggest corrective actions; (iii) To assess the extent to which implementation of the LARP complies with ADB’s SPS; (iv) To identify problems or potential problems;

115

(v) To identify methods of responding immediately to mitigate problems and advise the EA and IA accordingly; and (vi) To verify if the livelihoods and the standard of living of APs, including those of non-titled APs, are restored or improved. (vii) To verify resettlement compliance and required action to meet the compliance if any compliance issues identified. (viii) To prepare monitoring reports and post-resettlement evaluation report in a format agreed by DGWR and ADB.

117

Appendix 1: Template Internal Monitoring and Evaluation

I. General Progress in LARP Implementation

Table 1. General Progress in Land Clearance and Handing Over of Land for Civil Works Ahs eligible for compensation and/or Land hended over for Civil AHs required to relocate assistance/allowances Work Project No. of AHs No. of AHs Total No. of AHs No. of Ahs Resettled Remaining Components / fully paid encumbrances Date Ecpected Civil Works Location No. of No. of % No. of No. of % . No. No.of . No. [Yes/No] Handed date to Contrac [District / Village Total No.of Female Total FemaleProgress Total Female Total Female Progress off IP IP off IP over 1 hand over award date AHs IP AHs Headed AHs Headed AHs Headed AHs Headed AHs AHs AHs AH AH AH AH Component A Village 1 Village 2 Component B Village 3 Village 4 Total AH = affected housholds; IP = Indigenous Peoples a. All forms of compensation, including affected assets (land/ non-land, crops, etc.) or loss of income. b. Includes all types of allowances and assistance except income restoration, which is presented separately in Section III below. c. Includes households (HHs) provided interim measures agreed in RP such as rental assistance while waiting for completion of resettlement site.

Table 2. Disbursement and Use of Funds Funds Specific Resettlement activities Timeliness of Fund Cumulative LAR Budget Source of Allocation Disbursed this funded this Reporting Period2 Disbursement Location Funds Requirement Funding1 Status Reporting Delay in targets for fund Reasons for delay Disbursement Period disbursement? (Y/N)

LAR = land acquisition and resettlement Issues Affecting Timely Land Handover [Describe issues affecting timely land clearance or handover of land for civil works such as grievances (including non-agreement to compensation), unresolved encumbrances, funding constraints, other.]

II. Resettlement Table 3: Updated Resettlement Impacts AHs with Fully Affected AHs with Fully Affected Houses AHs with Partially Affected AHs Houses Location Affected Change in Number of AHs with Fully House Built on Land Houses Of which Affected Houses Compared to Updated RP Total Eligible for Vulnerable3 Compensation

1 E.g. Central Government, Province, Loan Funds, etc. 2 E.g. Number of resettlement sites developed, number and type of community facilities constructed, number of AHs fully compensated, livelihood restoration activities implemented. 3 E.g. Number of female-headed with dependents; number of poor; number of IPs, etc. 118

Table 4: Confirmed Resettlement Preferences for Households with Fully Affected Houses # of AHs # of AHs that Can # of AHs with Fully # of AHs Opting for # of AHs Opting for Self Location Required to Rebuild on Remaining Affected Houses Replacement Land Relocation (HHs) Relocate Land

Table 5: Resettlement Solutions Implemented for Vulnerable Households Indigenous People Landless Poor Female Headed Other [add as needed] (HHs) (HHs) (HHs) HHs Rebuilt on remaining land Rebuilt on another plot of land already owned Rebuilt (e.g. moved back) out of COI but on public land Rebuilt on other person’s land (e.g. relative) Purchased replacement land elsewhere themselves Provided with plot at resettlement site Provided with replacement residential plot (nonresettlement site) Solution Pending COI = corridor of impact

Table 6: Status of Resettlement Sites # AHs living in Resettlement Actual Scheduled Current Status (briefly No. of plots No. of AHs to No. of plots # AHs # AHs relocation site Site*/ completio completion describe status of completion allocated for be allocated handed issued rebuilt as of reporting Location n date date of infrastructure, etc.) project plots over to AHs title houses period

Include also separate residential plots to be provided to AHs even if these are not included in resettlement sites. Other Remarks on Resettlement [Describe issues identified along with planned and completed remedial actions. Also provide additional information regarding delays in completing resettlement sites, if any, including actions to be taken.]

III. Income Restoration Program Status of Income Restoration Program [Provide updated details of income restoration activities to be provided, institutional/implementation arrangements, resource requirements and schedule.] Consultation with Eligible APs [What consultation activities were undertaken during the reporting period to assess needs and preferences of eligible APs? Describe how women and other vulnerable APs have been included in the consultation process.]

119

Table 7: Program Participation (Cumulative) Participation in Livelihood Restoration Activities Disaggregated by Gender and ethnicity4 of AP # of [examples provided below, revise as appropriate for specific Income Restoration Total Of which Location eligible Program] # of APs vulnerable5 APs # of APs in # of APs in # of APs # of APs in Small Agricultural Mechanic in Sewing [other] Business Training Extension Course Course Village 1 Village 2 Village 3

Table 8: Effectiveness of Income Restoration Program Activities # of APs employed in other No. of APs employed in project-related jobs as of jobs as of this monitoring No. of this monitoring period Total # of period (post-resettlement) Of which Location eligible employed (Specify type (Specify type of (Specify type of vulnerable7 APs (Specify type of (Specify type APs6 of Project Project related Project related job) of job) related job) job) job) Village 1 Village 2 Village 3

Other Remarks on Livelihood Restoration [Please describe any issues encountered and approaches taken to resolve these.]

IV. Disclosure, Consultation & Participation Table 9: Means of Disclosure of URP by Location Translated approved URP Public meeting to Target date to Location PIB disseminated to PIB posted in public disseminated to village office? present approved URP complete disclosure [Village] AHs (date/ method*) place? (yes/no) (yes/no) (date) (date) Village 1 Village 2

* Dissemination method such as handed out in public meeting, distributed house-to-house, etc.

Consultation Table 10: Consultation/Information Dissemination Meetings Conducted During Reporting Period Participants Meeting Minutes with Date Venue Consultation content [Disaggregated by gender] PMU

V. Operation of Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) Table 11: Summary of Grievance Cases by Level of GRM No. of new grievance No. of cases No. of pending grievance from Total no. of cases No. of cases Location cases for reporting progressed to next previous reporting period received resolved period level Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

4 In projects where there are IP issues 5 E.g. No. of female-headed with dependents, no. of poor; no. of IP 6 From those who participated in income restoration program 7 E.g. No. of female-headed households with dependents; no. of poor; no. of IP etc. 120

Narrative Summary of Complaints [Provide a narrative summary of the complaint case based on the type of problem and location, for example ...] [Where the settlement of the complaint results in every compulsory land / asset case obtained, provide details together with information about the relevant court or administrative decision and confirmation whether compensation and assistance funds have been placed in an account or given to APs.] VI. Other problems Problem Resolution [Provide information about the status and / or resolution of issues raised in the previous internal monitoring report; ADB monitoring; external monitoring reports, etc.] New Problems [Provide information about other new problems identified that have an impact on the implementation of the RP. This might include resource constraints, changes in the scope of impact, etc.] Institutional Issues and Capacity Training [Report the following that apply] (i) Placement of staff regarding safeguard efforts in the PMU. Activities were designed by PMU Safeguard staff during the reporting period (ii) Capacity building training provided: type and amount of training, number of staff / staff trained (gender disaggregated) (iii) Community based organization (CBO) / mass organization activities (as applicable). (iv) Adequacy of resources for PMU staff and consultants. (v) Problems in carrying out roles / responsibilities of various agencies. Temporary Impacts during Construction Work Explain temporary impacts during implementation, including the number of impacts, #AHs, location, type, etc. And the status of returning assets temporarily affected as appropriate and the agent responsible.] 121

Appendix 2: IOL Questionnaire Template

No Kuesioner : Photo AHs or Respondents

FORMULIR INVENTARISASI PEMILIK ASET (IOL QUESTIONNAIRE)

Petunjuk Pengisian Kuesioner 1. Surveyor memberi salam kepada responden dan menerangkan tujuan survei. 2. Surveyor mengisi keterangan yang diberikan responden pada kuesioner sesuai dengan cara yang sudah diinstruksikan pada saat briefing. 3. Apabila jawaban dari pernyataan sulit untuk dijabarkan secara spesifik, bisa ditulis menggunakan perkiraan yang mendekati. 4. Lingkari jawaban yang tepat untuk pertanyaan yang mempunyai beberapa jawaban dan isi dengan jawaban untuk pertanyaan yang kosong 5. Untuk pertanyaan terbuka, mohon untuk memberikan jawaban yang jelas, padat dan langsung pada inti. Lebih baik, jika dapat ditambahkan kata kunci. 6. Kuesioner ini harus diisi/diselesaikan untuk semua orang/Rumah Tangga/adat/lembaga a. yang kehilangan seluruh atau sebagian dari lahan/kebun-pertanian/perumahan mereka yang terletak di dalam batas area konstruksi komponen proyek b. yang kehilangan sebagian atau seluruh bangunan utama atau sekunder mereka (yaitu, rumah, toko, pondok, teras,pagar) c. yang kehilangan pohon atau tanaman semusim atau tanaman kayu d. yang kehilangan sebagian atau seluruh benda lain yang berkaitan dengan tanah e. yang kehilangan ruang atas dan bawah tanah f. yang mengalami kerugian lain yang dapat dinilai seperti : (i). Hilangnya pendapatan, pekerjaan dan perubahan profesi, (ii). terbatasnya akses ke daerah untuk berburu, memancing dan matapencaharian lainnya.

Identitas Surveyor 1. Nama : …………………………………….…………… 2. Tanggal Pencacahan : a. Tanggal: …….. / b. Bulan:…………… / c. Tahun: …………. 3. Waktu Pencacahan : a. Jam mulai: ……………..; b. Jam berakhir:……………; c. Lama pencacahan :…………….. menit 4. Nama Supervisor : ………………………………………………….

I. Lokasi aset terkena dampak milik pribadi (wajib diisi untuk semua aset terkena dampak milik perorangan ataupun institusi) 1. Nama* Peghuni /Pemilik Aset yang Terkena Dampak (Pihak Yang Berhak) : 7. Nama Lengkap sesuai identitas : 122

8. Nama Panggilan : No Telepon/HP (opsional) : 2. Nama responden : 3. Status responden : 9. Kepala Keluarga 10. Isteri 11. Anggota Keluarga, sebutkan...... 12. Institusi 4. Lokasi Aset: Dusun: ______Desa/Kelurahan: ______RT/ RW: ______Kecamatan: ______Koordinat GPS :

5. Jenis Aset Yang Hilang (diisi oleh surveyor diakhir survey, setelah semua pertanyaan selesai ditanyakan kepada responden) a. Tanah e. Ruang diatas dan dibawah tanah b. Bangunan Utama atau Sekunder f. Kehilangan lain yang dapat dinilai c. Tanaman Tahunan/Semusim g. Infrastruktur umum 13. Benda Lain Yang Melekat diatas Tanah

6. Yang akan digunakan untuk untuk komponen proyek berikut (pilih dan isi pada jenis proyect yang relevan saja; Jika jenis dan komponen proyek belum ada pada daftar dibawah ini, silahkan ditambahkan )

Proyek Pembangkit dan Jaringan Listrik [ ] Gandu Induk [ ] tower [ ] jaringan transmisi [ ] jalan akses [ ] pembangkit listrik [ ] Komponen Lain, sebutkan: …………………………. Proyek Geothermal [ ] well pad [ ] pembangkit listrik [ ] jalan akses [ ] jalur pipa [ ] jaringan transmisi [ ] Komponen lain, sebutkan......

Proyek Pembangunan Jalan [ ] badan jalan [ ] bahu jalan ] saluran drainase [ ] Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP) [ ] Kuari Material [ ] Komponen lain, sebutkan......

Proyek Penyediaan Air Bersih [ ] Water Treatment Plant (WTP) [ ] jaringan pipa distribusi [ ] reservoir [ ] water intake weir [ ] Komponen lain, sebutkan......

Proyek Rehabilitasi Saluran Air/Canal [ ] canal embankment [ ] disposal area [ ] Siphon [ ] saluran drainase [ ] Komponen lain, sebutkan......

Proyek Hydropower [ ] power house dan kantor [ ] bendungan utama [ ] saddle dam [ ] daerah genangan [ ] jalan akses [ ] bottom outlet & side spillway [ ] sub station [ ] Komponen lain, sebutkan......

Proyek Penanggulangan Banjir [ ] retention basin [ ] detention basin [ ] ponds [ ] tanggul [ ] drainase [ ] sheet pile [ ] disposal area [ ] Komponen lain sebutkan………………………….

Proyek Pembangunan Jaringan Irigasi 123

[ ] Bendung [ ] Bangunan sadap [ ] Saluran primer [ ] Saluran sekunder [ ] Saluran pembuang [ ] Jalan inspeksi [ ] Komponen lainnya, sebutkan **CATATAN : Jika dalam Rumah Tangga hanya terdiri dari satu orang, tulis nama orang tersebut.; Jika Rumah Tangga lebih dari satu orang, tulis nama Kepala Keluarga(KK) (lingkari kode AH); Jika institus/organisasi, tulis nama institusi atau organisasi

14. Identifikasi subproyek yang sesuai, jika survei IOL ini dilakukan untuk Proyek EWSIP (isi salah satu yang sesuai dari pilihan jawaban dibawah ini)

No Sub Project No Sub Project No Sub Project Flood Risk Management (FRM Rawa Water Supply-Source To Tap Rawa Water Supply-Source To Tap (RWS- (RWS-STT) - DGWR STT) - DGHS 1 Serang River (BBWS PJ) 1 Kertasari System (BBWS 1 Serdang Tebing Tingi RWS (BWS S II) Citarum) 2 Lusi River (BBWS PJ) 2 Lausimeme Reservoir (BWS S II) 2 Agam-Bukit Tinggi RWS (BWS S II) 3 Wulan River (BBWS PJ) 3 Jatigede and Cipanas Reservoir 3 Karian Serpong (BBWS C3) (BBWS CC) 4 Juana River (BBWS PJ) 4 Dadi Muria System (BBWS PJ) 4 Ajatapareng 5 Babakan River (BBWS CC) 5 Jragung Reservoir (BBWS PJ) 5 Kukar Bontang RWS (BWS K III) 6 Cimanuk River (BBWS CC) 6 Bener Reservoir (BBWS PJ) Bimantara -Downstrem of Kuwil Dam 6 (BWS Sulawesi I) 7 Cisanggarung River (BBWS CC) 7 Sidan Reservoir (BWS Bali) 7 Gorontalo Raya 8 Belawan River (BWS S II) 8 Tukad Unda (BWS Bali) 8 Polman Majene 9 Deli-Percut River (BWS S II) 9 Kuwil Reservoir (BWS Sulawesi I) 9 Benteng Kobema RWS (BWS Sumatera VIII) 10 Padang River (BWS S II) 11 Karangmumus River (BWS K III)

II. Informasi Kondisi Demografi dan Sosial Ekonomi (Wajib diisi untuk aset terkena dampak milik perorangan, tidak wajib diisi jika aset terkena dampak milik institusi/organisasi) A. Kepala Keluarga (isi dengan jawaban atau lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai) 1. Nama Lengkap sesuai ID : 2. Alamat : 3. Jenis Kelamin : ( lingkari pilihan 4. Umur :______tahun 5. Kondisi Fisik : (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang jawaban yang sesuai) (isi sesuai dengan usia kepala sesuai ) a. Laki Laki keluarga /pihak yang berhak) a. Normal b. Perempuan b. Cacat 6. Status Perkawinan (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai) a. Menikah , b. Single , c. Duda /Janda , d. Cerai 7. Etnik/suku: (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai 8. Kartu Identitas : (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai; ambil foto a. Jawa b. Sunda identitas yang dimiliki) c. Bugis d. Melayu a. KTP b. SIM c. Kartu Keuarga e. Lainnya, sebutkan : …………………………. d. Surat Domisli e. Tidak punya 9. Pendidikan Terakhir : ( lingkari pilihan jawaban yang 10. Pekerjaan Utama Kepala Keluarga (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai) sesuai) 1. Tidak pernah sekolah/tidak lulus SD a. Petani pemilik lahan 2. Lulus SD/MI/sederajat pertanian/perkebunan 3. Lulus SMP/MTs/sederajat b. Buruh Tani/Buruh Perkebunan 4. Lulus SMA/MA/sederajat c. Pengumpul/Tengkulak 5. Lulus akademi (D1/D2/D3) d. Pemilik usaha/pedagang 6. Lulus D4/Sarjana (S1) e. Pegawai Swasta 124

f. Pegawai Negeri 7. Lulus Pasca Sarjana (S2/S3) g. TNI/Polri h. Pensiunan i. Tidak bekerja/sedang mencari pekerjaan j. Lainnya, Sebutkan...... 11. Lama tinggal di area proyek : (isi dengan jawaban 12. Lamanya menggunakan tanah millik pemerintah/ BUMN (dengan atau yang sesuai). tanpa ijin ) ...... (tahun) ( hanya diisi jika pihak yang berhak 1. < 4 tahun menggarap atau memiliki bangunan diatas tanah milik 2. 4-9 tahun pemerintah/BUMN) 3. 10-19 tahun 4. 20-30 tahun 5. > 30 tahun

B. Pihak yang Berhak / Rumah Tangga Terkena Dampak (RTD/AH)

1. Jumlah orang yang tinggal dengan KK:...... orang 2. Jumlah anggota keluarga yang bekerja dalam keluarga tersebut:...... orang

3. Sumber mata pencaharian utama bagi seluruh keluarga 4. Total penghasilan seluruh keluarga per bulan (Rp) : ______(sebutkan ______jenis matapencaharian yang memberikan pemasukan/pendapatan terbesar; atau jenis matapencaharian (jumlahkan seluruh penghasilan dari anggota keluarga yang bekerja) yang dominan dikeluarga tersebut)

III. ASET TERKENA DAMPAK (wajib diisi oleh warga/Rumah Tangga/Lembaga/Masyarakat Adat Yang Asetnya Terkena Dampak)

A.1. Tanah/Lahan yang Dimiliki atau Dikuasai (Wajib diisi jika ada tanah/lahan yang terkena dampak proyek, jika tidak ada tanah yang terkena dampak, langsung ke pertanyaan B) (Tanyakan seluruh tanah yang dimiliki/dikuasai, baik yang terkena dampak proyek maupun tidak) Klasifikasi Bukti Satus Bentuk Bukti penggunaan b c d Luasan Sifat Dampakf Penguasaan Penguasaan Kepemilikan Kepemilikane a (isi dengan kode tanah (isi dengan (isi dengan (isi dengan Total Luasan Terkena (isi dengan kode angka jawaban (isi dengan kode kode angka kode angka kode angka Yang Dimiliki Dampak (m2) jawaban yang angka jawaban yang sesuai dari angka ajawaban jawaban yang jawaban yang yang sesuai dari (m2) pilihan jawaban yang sesuai dari sesuai dari sesuai dari sesuai dari pilihan jawaban pilihan jawaban dibawah ini) pilihan jawaban pilihan jawaban pilihan jawaban dibawah ini) dibawah ini) dibawah ini) dibawah ini) dibawah ini)

a. Klasifikasi : mengacu kepada apa yang tertulis di sertifikat tanah/buku status tanah/SPT, misalnya (1) tanah pertanian, (2) perkebunan, (3) perumahan, (4) area business/perkantoran ; (5). Lainnya, sebutkan...... b. Bentuk penguasaan : (1) Perseorangan ; (2). Badan Hukum; (3). Badan Sosial; (4). Badan Keagamaan; (5). Instansi Pemerintah; (6). Lainnya, sebutkan...... c. Bukti Penguasaan Tanah : (1). Surat ijin garapan/membuka tanah; (2). Surat sewa menyewa; (3). Akta jual beli hak atas tanah yang sudah bersertipikat yang belum dibalik nama, (4). Surat ijin menghuni, (5). Surat pernyataan penguasaan fisik; (6). Bukti tagihan listrik, telepon, atau perusahaan air minum satu bulan terakhir; (8). Lainnya, sebutkan...... d. Status Kepemilikan : (1) Pemegang hak atas tanah; (2). Pemegang hak pengelolaan; (3). Nadzir untuk tanah wakaf; (4). Pemilik tanah bekas milik adat; (5). Masyarakat 125

hukum adat; (6). Pihak yang menguasai tanah negara dengan itikad baik, (7). Pemegang dasar penguasaan atas tanah; (8). Pemilik bangunan, tanaman, atau benda lain yang berkaitan dengan tanah e. Bukti Kepemilikan : (1). Hak Milik (SHM/Girik/Letter C); ( 2). Hak Pengelolaan; (3). Hak Guna Usaha (4) Hak Guna Bangunan; (5) Hak Pakai; (6). Hak ulayat/adat/yasan ; (7) Menempati tanpa ijin dari pemilih tanah/aset; (8). Tidak bersertifikat, (10). Lainnya, sebutkan...... f. (1). Permanen; (2). Sementara ; (3). Tidak terkena dampak (jika tidak terkena dampak, lanjut ke pertanyaan A.1.3) A. 2. Jika Pihak Yang Berhak Menyewa atau Menempati Lahan Terkena Dampak Dengan Ijin dari Pemilik (Tidak wajib ditanyakan/diisi jika tanah/lahan yang terkena dampak dimilik Pihak Yang Berhak)

Dengan Perjanjian Sewa Centang kotak di bawah Alamat Pemilik Lahan ini jika tidak membayar Nama Pemilik Lahan Harga Sewa per bulan (Rp)) sewa 1. 2.

A. 3. Informasi Kepemilikan Tanah/Lahan di Luar Lokasi Proyek , dan Tidak Terkena Dampak (Wajib diisi jika pihak yang berhak mempunyai tanah diluar lokasi proyek dan tidak terkena dampak) Klasifikasi Penggunaan Tanah Lokasi Tanaha Disewakan/Tidak Pendapatan per bulan (Rp) (isi dengan kode angka (hanya diisi jika tanah tersebut jawaban yang sesuai disewakan) dari pilihan jawaban dibawah ini)

Total area (m²) a. Lokasi Tanah : (1). Di Desa yang sama; (2). Di Desa yang berbeda, dalam kecamatan yang sama; (3). Di Kecamatan berbeda, dalam Kabupaten/Kota yang sama; (4). Di Kabupaten/Kota berbeda dalam Provinsi yang sama; (5). Di Provinsi yang berbeda

B.. Ruang Atas dan Bawah Tanah8 yang Terkena Dampak (Wajib diisi/ditanyakan hanya jika ada dampak ini; jika tidak ada bisa lanjut ke pertanyaan berikutnya)

Luas ( p x l) (m2) atau Peruntukan Penggunaan a Volume (L x tinggi/ kedalaman ) (m3) Tanah yang Digunakan Ruang Atas Tanah Ruang Bawah Tanah

8 Kehilangan ruang atas tanah, meliputi hak atas permukaan bumi tempat pondasi bangunan dan hak untuk menguasai ruang udara seluas bangunan tersebut. Contoh: kehilangan ruang atas tanah akibat pembatasan penggunaan tanah untuk proyek transmisi, maka perlu diukur luasan dan kepemilikan tanahnya yang terbatasi penggunaannya. Kehilangan ruang bawah tanah meliputi hak atas permukaan bumi yang merupakan pintu masuk/keluar tubuh bumi dan hak membangun dan memakai ruang dalam tubuh bumi, serta hak milik atas bangunan yang berbentuk ruang dalam tubuh bumi. Belum ada peraturan yang secara spesifik menetapkan hak atas ruang bawah tanah. Pergub DKI Nomor 167 Tahun 2012 tentang ruang bawah tanah mengatur mengenai ruang bawah tanah dangkal dan ruang bawah tanah dalam. Pergub tersebut merupakan peraturan hukum pertama yang mengatur ruang bawah tanah. Ruang bawah tanah dangkal, yaitu ruang di bawah permukaan tanah sampai dengan kedalaman 10 m sedangkan ruang bawah tanah dalam, yaitu ruang di bawah permukaan tanah dari kedalaman di atas 10 m sampai dengan batas kemampuan penguasaan teknologi dalam pemanfaatan Ruang Bawah Tanah atau batasan sesuai ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Rata-rata klasifikasi antara ruang bawah dangkal dan dalam adalah 6 meter, tetapi beberapa negara bisa lebih seperti di Singapura sedalam 30 meter sedangkan di Jepang 40 meter di bawah permukaan tanah. 126

a. Peruntukan Penggunaan : (1). Pembangunan jaringan transmisi listrik ; (2). Pemasangan pipa air ; (3). Pemasangan pipa gas; (4). Terowongan air; (5). Mass rapid transit (MRT), (6) Lainnya, sebutkan......

C 1. Bangunan Utamaa yang ditemukan dalam lahan dan terkena dampak (Wajib diisi jika ada bangunan utama yang terkena dampak, jika tidak ada maka bisa lanjut ke pertanyaan berikutnya) (Ditanyakan pada pemilik struktur/ bangunan ; terlepas kepemilikan atau penguasaan atas tanahnya):

Jenis penggunaan d Satus Spesifikasi Aset e bangunan (isi dengan kode Kategori Terdampak Kepemilikanc Total Luas Bangunan utamab angka jawaban yang Luasan Terkena (isi dengankode angka (isi dengan kode sesuai dari pilihan Yang Dimiliki jawaban yang sesuai dari (isi dengan Dampak (m2) angka jawaban jawaban dibawah ini) (m2) pilihan jawaban dibawah ini) kode angka yang sesuai dari jawaban yang pilihan jawaban sesuai dari dibawah ini) pilihan jawaban dibawah ini

a. Definisi bangunan utama : Terlepas dari kondisi material yang digunakan, Bangunan utama adalah bangunan yang minimal memiliki empat tiang dan berdiri/dibangun tetap diatas tanah b. Jenis penggunaan bangunan : (1). Rumah Tinggal; (2). Toko/Tempat Usaha, (3). Rumah Tinggal sekaligus tempat Usaha/Toko; (4). Tidak digunakan/kosong c. Status Kepemilikan : (1). Properti pribadi/keluarga, (2). Rumah dinas; (3). Menempati dengan ijin dari pemilih tanah/aset; (4).Menempati tanpa ijin pemilik tanah/aset (5). Bangunan milik adat (6). Lainnya, sebutkan...... d. Spesifikasi Aset : (1) Tunggal, permanen; (2). Tunggal, semi permanen, (3). Tunggal, tidak permanen, (4). Kopel, permanen, (5). Kopel, semi permanen; (6). Kopel, tidak permanen, (7). Bangunan tingkat, permanen; (8). Bangunan tingkat, semi permanen; (9). Bangunan tingkat, tidak permanen e. Penilaian kategori dampak dengan mempertimbangkan stabilitas bangunan : (1).;Terkena dampak sebagian; (2). Terkena dampak seluruhnya (jika terkena dampak seluruhnya lanjut ke pertanyaan G)

C.2. Identifikasi Material Bangunan Utama yang Terkena Dampak (tentukan dari porsi material terbesar/ dominan dari bangunan yang terkena dampak)

Jenis Penggunaan Dinding Lantai Atap Bangunana 1. Rumah 1. Bata 1. Ubin 1. Sirap 2. Papan 2. Plesteran 2. Genteng semen 3. Bambu 3. Kayu 3. Seng (gedhek, lembaran anyaman 127

bambu) 4. Gaba-baga 4. Bambu 4. Asbes (lembaran anyaman daun sagu) 5. Tanah 5. Rumbia/daun sagu/dan sejenisnya

a. Jenis penggunaan bangunan sesuai dengan jawaban penggunaan bangunan pada pertanyaan C.1

C.3. Jika Bangunan Utama Yang Terkena Dampak Bukan Milik Pihak yang Berhak (AH) ( Tidak wajib diisi jika bangunan utama milik pihak yang berhak )

Membayar Sewa Bayar Sewa per bulan (Rp) Nama Pemilik Bangunan Alamat Pemilik Asli (centang pada box (Wajib diisi hanya jika yang sesuai) membayar sewa) Ya Tidak

2. Apakah penyewa memiliki rumah milik sendiri ? a. Tidak b. Punya, sebutkan lokasinya ......

C.4. Informasi Kepemilikan Bangunan Utama di Luar Lokasi Proyek yang Tidak Terkena Dampak Proyek ((Wajib diisi jika pihak yang berhak mempunyai bangunan utama diluar lokasi proyek dan tidak terkena dampak) Jenis Penggunaan Bangunan Lokasi Bangunana Disewakan / Tidak Pendapatan per bulan (Rp) (isi dengan kode (isi dengan jawaban ( hanya diisi jika disewakan) angka jawaban yang yang sesuai) sesuai dari pilihan jawaban dibawah ini) 1.

Total area (m²) a. Lokasi Bangunan : (1). Di Desa yang sama; (2). Di Desa yang berbeda, dalam kecamatan yang sama; (3). Di Kecamatan berbeda, dalam Kabupaten/Kota yang sama; (4). Di Kabupaten/Kota berbeda dalam Provinsi yang sama; (5). Di Provinsi yang berbeda.

C.5. Bangunan Sekundera yang Ditemukan Dalam Lahan yang Terkena Dampak ( Wajib diisi/ditanyakan jika ada bangunan sekunder yang terkena dampak, jika tidak ada lanjut ke pertanyaan berikutnya) Ditanyakan pada pemilik struktur/bangunan sekunder, terlepas dari status tanah yang dimiliki):

Jenis bangunan sekunder Klasifikasi bangunan terkena dampakb (isi (tipe bangunan sekunder)b Total area atau panjang bangunan Luas bangunan yang terkena dampak dengan kode angka jawaban (isi dengan kode angka (satuan diisi sesuai dengan jenis (satuan diisi sesuai dengan jenis bangunan yang sesuai dari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai dari bangunan sekunder) sekunder yang terkena dampak) jawaban dibawah ini) pilihan jawaban dibawah ini) 128

1. m2 / lm m2 / lm 2. m2 / lm m2 / lm 3. m2 / lm m2 / lm

a. Bangunan sekunder: Bangunan yang tidak bergerak dan bukan bagian dari struktur utama, seperti pagar, pintu gerbang, jalan, akses masuk ke rumah, gerbang, sumur, toilet dan dapur yang terpisah dari bangunan utama atau rumah, pondok di lahan pertanian,dll. b. Klasifikasi bangunan tergantung jenis bangunan sekunder yang terkena dampak dengan menyebutkan material bangunan sekunder yang dominan. Misal : pagar kayu, pagar besi, pagar bambu, pagar kawat; sumur bor., sumur dengan pasangan batu.

D.1. Identifikasi Tanaman Keras yang Terkena Dampak ( Wajib diisi jika ada tanaman keras yang terkena dampak proyek, jika tidak ada tanaman keras yang terkena dampak lanjut ke pertanyaan berikutnya)

Nama Pohona Jumlah Pohon Terkena Dampak per Harga Jual Per pohon (Rp) kategori b A B C A B C 1 2 3

4 a. Sebutkan nama umum dalam Bahasa Indonesia, kecuali jika tidak ada nama dalam Bahasa Indonesia b. Spesifikasi kategori : gunakan kategori sesuai dengan SK penggantian harga tanaman Kabupaten/Provinsi lokasi dampak, berbeda untuk tiap project

D.2. IdentifikasI Tanaman Buah (Wajib diisi jika ada tanaman buah yang terkena dampak proyek, jika tidak ada tanaman buah terkena dapak lanjut ke pertanyaan berikut)

Nama Tanamana Jumlah Pohon Terkena Dampak per Jumlah Produksi Per Pohon dalam Jumlah Panen selama 1 tahun Harga Jual kategori b Satu Kali Panen (kg) (...... kali) Buah per Belum Pohon Tidak Belum Pohon Tidak Belum Pohon Tidak Kg (Rp) Produktif Produktif Produktif produktif Produkti Produktif Produktif Produktif Produktif f 1 2 3 4 a. Sebutkan nama umum dalam Bahasa Indonesia, kecuali jika tidak ada nama dalam Bahasa Indonesia b. Spesifikasi kategori : (1). Belum produktif jika pohon masih muda dan belum berbuah; (2). Pohon produktif jika pohon sudah mulai berbuah, (3). Tidak produktif jika tanaman tersebut sudah tua/sudah habis masa bebuahnua. Kategori ini bisa ditanyakan kepada pihak yang berhak dan berdasarkan pengamatan

D.3. Identifikasi Tanaman Semusim (Crops) ( misal: padi, palawija, sayuran, dan sejenisnya, yang terkena dampak) (Wajib diisi jika ada tanaman semusim yang terkena dampak proyek, jika tidak ada tanaman semusim yang terkena dampak lanjut ke pertanyaan berikut)

Nama Tanaman Luas Area Jumlah panen Hasil Panen Harga Jual Gross Biaya 129

Yang Terkena Selama 1 dalam satu (Rp/Kg) income, Rp. Produksi Satu Dampak (m2) Tahun musim (Kg) (b) (a x b ) Musim Panen (...... kali) (a) (Rp)

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

E. Benda Laina Yang Ada atau Berkaitan dengan Tanah (termasuk benda keramat atau yan dikeramatkan) (Wajib diisi/ditanyakan jika ada benda lain yang berkaitan dengan tanah terkena dampak proyek) Alamat Pemilik Aset (hanya diisi jika benda Panjang atau Jumlah Jenis utilitas/benda lain yang Pemilik Aset lain yang terkena Aset Yang Terkena b terkena dampak Catatan dampak bukan milik Dampak pihak yang berhak) 1. 2. 2. a. Benda lain yang ada atau berkaitan dengan tanah baik milik pribadi maupun utilitas milik umum yang melintasi tanah perorangan yang terkena dampam; misal : jaringan irigasi, instalasi pipa air, tiang listrik, instalasi kabel telepon. Contoh lain nya adalah benda keramat atau yang dikeramatkan seperti pantak /arca suci untuk suku dayak dan makam keramat. b. Untuk benda keramat atau dikeramatkan, jelaskan fungsi/arti dari benda keramat tersebut F. Kerugian Lain Yang Bisa Dinilai ( Wajib diisi jika ada salah satu atau lebih kerugian lain yang bisa dinilai terjadi di dalam proyek yang sedang disurvey. Hanya disi pada pada jenis kehilangan yang relevan dengan proyek. Jika tidak ada kerugian lain yang bisa dinilai relevan dengan proyek, lanjut ke pertanyaan berikut). F1. Kehilangan Usaha (Wajib diisi jika ada kehilangan usaha akibat proyek, jika tidak ada lanjut ke pertanyaan berikutnya) Jumlah Tenaga Kerja b Pendapatan Durasi Durasi gangguan usaha (jika ada) Sifat Usaha Bersih Perhari beroperasi Sementara ; a (Rp) dalam 1 bulan Jenis Usaha (Menetap/Berpind sebutkan L P ah) (hari) Permanen ( berapa tutup ) lama...... (b ulan) 1. 2. a. Misalnya : toko, restoran, bengkel, apotek, cafe dll b. Jika ada tenaga kerja pada usaha yang terkena dampak tersebut, lanjutkan pendataan ke F.2.

F.2. Kehilangan Pekerjaan (Wajib diisi jika ada orang yang kehilangan pekerjaan akibat proyek, jika tidak ada lanjut ke pertanyaan berikutnya). Nama pekerja Sifat Gangguan Pekerjaan Gaji Per Bulan (Rp) Permanen Sementara, sebutkan Alih Profesi berapa lama...... (bulan) 1. 2. 3.

130

F.3. Biaya Upacara Adat ( Wajib diisi jika ada aset tanah atau non tanah yang dimiliki oleh masyarakat hukum adat, jika tidak ada lanjut ke pertanyaan berikutnya)

Jenis Biaya Perkiraan Biaya (Rp) 1. Biaya ‘perlengkapan’ untuk upacara adat (bisa diperinci sesuai dengan material yang dibutuhkan oleh masyarakay adat setempat: misal : babi/kerbau/ayam; rokok, sirih/pinang dll) 2. Biaya konsumsi pada saat upacara adat 3. Biaya untuk tokoh adat pemimpin upacara adat 4. Biaya transportasi untuk anggota masyarakat adat yang diundang 5. Biaya2 lain yang diperlukan (berbeda2 tergantung masyarakat adat setempat); sebutkan......

F.4. Biaya Pindah (Wajib diisi jika ada pihak yang berhak yang harus pindah/relokasi, jika tidak ada lanjut ke pertanyaan berikutnya)

Jenis biaya pindah Biaya Transport Pindah (Rp) Biaya Pengurusan Berkas Pindah (Rp) Biaya pindah rumah Biaya pindah usaha/business Biaya pindah sekolah anak

F. 5. Nilai atas Properti Sisa (Wajiib diisi jika ada sisa tanah atau bangunan terkena dampak yang tidak bisa digunakan untuk apapun berdasarkan informasi responden dan pengamatan dilokasi aset terkena dampak, jika tidak ada lanjut ke pertanyaan berikutnya) Jenis properti sisa (pilih satu atau Jenis Penggunaan Properti (lingkari jawaban yang sesuai) Luasan (m2) lebih yang relevan dengan proyek) Tanah a. Pemukiman b. Pertanian (sawah) c. Pertanian lahan kering (ladang) d. Perkebunan e. Lainnya, sebutkan...... Bangunan a. Rumah tinggal Utama b. Rumah tinggal dan usaha c. Bangunan usaha /toko 131

d. Lainnya, sebutkan......

F. 6. Terbatasinya Akses terhadap sumber daya atau sumber mata perncaharian (Wajib diisi jika ada akses yang terbatasi; pilih salah satu dibawah ini yang relevan, jika tidak ada lanjut ke pertanyaan berikutnya) Lokasi kegiatan Frekuensi (Berapa Bulan dalam Satu Jumlah yang Nilai produk jika dijual Kegiatan Produktif Rumah produktif (Didalam kali dalam satu Tahun Kegiatan ini dikumpulkan atau atau Jumlah Tangga atau Diluar Area Proyek) bulan atau tahun?) Dilaksanakan diproduksi Penghasilan (Rp) Hasil Hutan dan Sungai yang dikumpulkan Hewan liar* (sebutkan) 1. 2. Hasil hutan* 1. 2. Tanaman yang dikonsumsi sendiri 1. 2. Akses terhadap sumber air untuk usaha atau pertanian

Jasa Penyeberangan n/a

Contoh : binatang liar : babi hutan, burung, ular, kasuari, ikan, siput, dll ... Contoh hasil hutan : kayu, rotan, sagu

F. 7. Ringkasan Kerugian Lain Yang Bisa Dinilai (Diisi oleh surveyor setelah semua pertanyaan tentang kerugian lain yang bisa dinilai selesai ditanyakan kepada pihak yang berhak. Isi pada jenis kehilangan yang dialami oleh pihak yang berhak saja)

ii) Perkiraan Nilai Kerugian i) Jenis Kerugian Lain Absolut (Rp.) Relatif (%) dari kondisi status quo 1. Kehilangan usaha/bisnis 1. ………………………… 1. ………………………… 2. Kehilangan pekerjaan 2. …………………………… 2. ………………………… 3. Alih profesi 3. …………………………… 3. ………………………… 4. Biaya yang dibutuhkan untuk upacara adat 4. …………………………… 4. ………………………… 5. Biaya pindah 5. …………………………… 5. ………………………… 6. Nilai properti sisa 6. …………………………… 6. ………………………… a. Tanah a. a. b. b. b. Bangunan 7. Terbatasinya akses terhadap 7. …………………………… 7. ………………………… sumber daya atau sumber ke mata pencaharian 15. Sebutkan :.....

G. PILIHAN RELOKASI (hanya ditanyakan jika semua bangunan rumah atau tempat usahanya terkena dampak) 1. Jika tempat tinggal dan/atau tempat usaha anda terkena seluruhnya apakah anda bersedia pindah? (lingkari jawaban yang sesuai) a. Bersedia 132

b. Tidak , karena : (1). Dilokasi lama dekat keluarga; (2). Dekat dengan sekolah anak, (3). Dekat dengan tempat kerja; (4). Tutupnya usaha rumahan; (5). Harus beradaptasi ditempat yang baru; (6). Lainnya, sebutkan...... (jawaban bisa lebih dari satu)

2. Jika harus direlokasi, apakah sudah punya rencana atau pilihan tempat relokasi ? (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai) a. Sudah, akan pindah dan mendirikan rumah dan atau tempat usaha disisa lahan milik RTD dilokasi proyek diluar koridor dampak b. Sudah, akan pindah dan mendirikan rumah dan atau tempat usaha di lahan milik RTD yang terletak diluar area proyek (tidak terkena dampak) di Desa yang sama atau Desa lain. c. Belum, akan membeli tanah di Desa yang sama atau Desa lain dengan menggunakan uang kompensasinya d. Belum, minta dibangunkan tempat tinggal dan/atau tempat usaha pengganti e. Belum, minta disediakan lokasi/kavling pengganti dan akan membangun rumah dan atau usaha dengan uang kompensasinya f. Lainnya, sebutkan......

3. Lokasi tempat tinggal dan/atau tempat usaha baru yang diharapkan: (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai ) a. Tidak jauh dari lokasi tempat tinggal dan/atau tempat usaha saat ini. b. Terserah pihak berwenang c. Dipikirkan nanti, yang penting terjangkau dan cocok untuk tempat tinggal dan/atau usaha d. Lainnya, sebutkan: ………………………………………………

4. Jika usaha anda terkena relokasi, apa yang akan lakukan dengan usaha anda? (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai) a. Tetap melanjutkan usaha ditempat baru b. Menghentikan usaha c. Lainnya, sebutkan: ………………………………………………

Foto Aset yang Terkena Dampak Fota Aset yang Terkena Dampak 2 1 (Foto aset utama yang terkena (Foto aset utama yang terkena dampak) dampak)

Tanggal Selesai Survey......

Nama dan tanda tangan Kepala Keluarga atau Responden Nama dan tanda tangan Surveyor 133

Appendix 3: Socio-Economic Survey Questionnaire

Photo Respondent No Kuesioner : (Hanya jika SES dilakukan secara sampling atau respondennya berbeda dengan respondent saat wawancara IOL)

KUESIONER SOCIO ECONOMIC SURVEY (SES) Petunjuk Pengisian 1. Surveyor memberi salam kepada responden dan menerangkan tujuan survei. 2. Kuesioner ini harus diisi/diselesaikan untuk semua warga/Rumah Tangga yang kehilangan sebagian atau seluruh bangunan usaha, rumah tinggal, bangunan utama lainnya ,lahan pertanian dan lahan kehutanan yang terletak didalam Koridor Dampak. Jika SES dilakukan secara sampling : kuesioner tidak perlu diisi untuk WTD/RTD yang hanya terkena sebagian atau seluruh aset sekundernya, seperti pagar, salura drainase, sumur dll. (instruksi ini berlaku jika SES dilakukan secara sampling). 3. Kuesioner tidak perlu diisi untuk aset milik institusi. 4. Responden yang bisa mewakili keluarga untuk diwawancara adalah kepala keluarga (laki-laki atau perempuan), isteri atau anggota keluarga lain yang tinggal dalam rumah tersebut berusia lebih dari 17 tahun. 5. Responden harus terdiri dari 50% responden perempuan dan 50% laki laki. Untuk menjamin tercapainya persentase ini, maka nomor kuesioner ganjil diperuntukkan untuk responden laki laki dan nomor kuesioner genap diperuntukkan untuk responden perempuan. 6. Surveyor mengisi keterangan yang diberikan responden pada kuesioner sesuai dengan cara yang sudah diinstruksikan pada saat briefing. 7. Apabila jawaban dari pernyataan sulit untuk dijabarkan secara spesifik, bisa ditulis menggunakan perkiraan yang mendekati. 8. Lingkari jawaban yang tepat untuk pertanyaan yang mempunyai beberapa jawaban dan isi dengan jawaban untuk pertanyaan yang kosong. 9. Untuk pertanyaan terbuka, mohon untuk memberikan jawaban yang jelas, padat dan langsung pada inti. Lebih baik, jika dapat ditambahkan kata kunci.

Identitas Surveyor 16. Nama : …………………………………….…………… 17. Tanggal wawancara : a. Tanggal: …….. / b. Bulan:…………… / c. Tahun: …………. 18. Waktu wawancara : a. Jam mulai: ……………..; b. Jam berakhir:……………; c. Lama wawancara :…………….. menit 4. Nama Supervisor : ………………………………………………….

I. Identifikasi aset terkena dampak milik Rumah Tangga Terkena Dampak/Pihak Yang Berhak (hanya ditanyakan jika responden SES berbeda dengan responden sensus IOL ) 134

6. Nama* Peghuni /Pemilik Aset yang Terkena Dampak (Pihak Yang Berhak) : 19. Nama Lengkap sesuai identitas : 20. Nama Panggilan : No Telepon/HP (opsional) 2. Lokasi aset terkena dampak Kabupaten: Kecamatan: Desa: Dusun : RW/RT: Koordinat GPS :

3. Nama Responden : 4. Status responden : a. Kepala Keluarga ; b. Isteri ; c. Anggota Keluarga, sebutkan ......

2. Informasi Dasar tentang Kepala Keluarga Pihak Yang Behak (RTD/AH) (hanya ditanyakan jika responden SES berbeda dengan responden sensus IOL) (isi dengan jawaban atau lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai) 1. Nama Lengkap sesuai ID : 2. Alamat : 3. Jenis Kelamin : (lingkari pilihan 4. Umur :______tahun 5. Kondisi Fisik : (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai) jawaban yang sesuai) (isi sesuai dengan usia a. Normal a. Laki Laki kepala keluarga /pihak b. Cacat b. Perempuan yang berhak) 6. Status Perkawinan : (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai) a. Menikah , b. Single , c. Duda /Janda , d. Cerai 7. Etnik/suku: (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai) 8. Kartu Identitas : (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai; ambil foto a. Jawa b. Sunda identitas yang dimiliki) c. Bugis d. Melayu a. KTP b. SIM c. Kartu Keuarga e. Lainnya, sebutkan : …………………………. d. Surat Domisli e. Tidak punya 9. Pendidikan Terakhir ( lingkari pilihan jawaban yang 10. Pekerjaan Utama Kepala Keluarga (lingkari pilihan jawaban yang sesuai) sesuai) 1. Tidak pernah sekolah/tidak lulus SD a. Petani pemilik lahan 2. Lulus SD/MI/sederajat pertanian/perkebunan 3. Lulus SMP/MTs/sederajat b. Buruh Tani/Buruh Perkebunan 4. Lulus SMA/MA/sederajat c. Pengumpul/Tengkulak 5. Lulus akademi (D1/D2/D3) d. Pemilik usaha/pedagang 6. Lulus D4/Sarjana (S1) e. Pegawai Swasta

7. Lulus Pasca Sarjana (S2/S3) f. Pegawai Negeri g. TNI/Polri h. Pensiunan i. Tidak bekerja/sedang mencari pekerjaan j. Lainnya, Sebutkan......

11. Lama tinggal di area proyek : 12. Lamanya menggunakan tanah millik pemerintah/ BUMN (dengan atau (isi sesuai dengan jawaban tanpa ijin ) ...... (tahun) (hanya diisi jika pihak yang berhak yang diberikan) menggarap atau memiliki bangunan diatas tanah milik 1. < 4 tahun pemerintah/BUMN) 2. 4-9 tahun 3. 10-19 tahun 4. 20-30 tahun 135

21.5. > 30 tahun

III. Informasi Kondisi Social Ekonomi Rumah Tangga Terkena Dampak (Pihak Yang Berhak) 1. Jumlah orang yang tinggal dalam rumah tersebut (lingkari jumlah yang sesuai) : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ______(jika lebih dari 7 isi jumlah nya)

2. Jumlah Keluarga yang tinggal dalam rumah tersebut (lingkari jumlah yang sesuai) : 1 2 3 4 5

3. Informasi dasar tentang anggota keluarga yang tinggal dalam rumah bersama RTD

b Hubungan Kondisi Fisik Pendidikan Pekerjaan Utama Umur/tahun (isi dengan c d dengan KKa (isi Terakhir (isi Pekerjaan (isi Pendapatan Per (isi sesuai Jenis kode angka Anggota dengan kode dengan kode dengan kode Bulan (Rp) (hanya dengan Kelamin jawaban yang angka jawaban angka jawaban angka jawaban sesuai dari ditanyakan kepada Keluarga jawaban yang sesuai dari yang sesuai dari yang sesuai dari (L/P) pilihan anggota keluarga pilihan jawaban responden) pilihan jawaban pilihan jawaban jawaban dibawah ini dibawah ini yang bekerja) dibawah ini dibawah ini 1 2 3 5 5 6 7 8 a. Hubungan dengan KK : (1). Isteri ; (2). Anak; (3). Kakek/Nenek; (4). Cucu; (5). Keponakan ; (6). Hubungan lainnya, sebutkan...... b. Kondisi Fisik : (1). Normal ; (2). Cacat, sebutkan jenis kecacatan...... c. Pendidikan Terakhir : (1). Tidak pernah sekolah/tidak lulus SD; (2). Lulus SD/MI/sederajat; (3). Lulus SMP/MTs/sederajat; (4). Lulus SMA/MA/sederajat; (5). Lulus akademi (D1/D2/D3; (6). Lulus D4/Sarjana (S1); (7). Lulus Pasca Sarjana (S2/S3) d. Jenis pekerjaan: (1). Petani pemilik lahan pertanian/perkebunan; (2). Buruh Tani/Buruh Perkebunan ; (3). Tukang bangunan/Buruh lainnya; (4). Pengumpul/Tengkulak; (5). Pedagang/Pemilik Toko; (6). Pegawai swasta ; (7) Pegawai negeri; (8). TNI/Polri, (9). Pensiunan, (10). Tidak bekerja/mencari pekerjaan; (11) Lainnya, sebutkan...... Pertanyaan tidak perlu ditanyakan untuk anggota keluarga yang masih sekolah. 4. Jumlah anggota keluarga yang bekerja : ...... orang (diisi setelah menyelesaikan pengisian pertanyaan no 3) 5. Apabila anda mendapat bantuan dari pihak lain, sebutkan bantuan apa saja dari pihak lain yang menjadi sumber penghidupan rumah tangga, frekuensi dan jumlahnya (jawaban bisa lebih dari satu) No Jenis Bantuan Frekuensi Mendapatkan Bantuana (isi Jumlah Bantuan per frekuensi (Rp) dengan kode pilihan jawaban dibawah ini yang sesuai 1 Bantuan untuk KK miskin dari Pemerintah 22. Bantuan Langsung Tunai 23. Program Keluarga Harapan 136

24. Lainnya, sebutkan...... 2 Bantuan dari anggota keluarga yang tinggal di lokasi lain (tidak satu rumah) 3 Lainnya, sebutkan

Frekuensi bantuan : (1). Setiap bulan; (2). Setiap 3 bulan, (3). Setahun 2 kali. (4). Satu tahun sekali; (5). Lainnya, sebutkan......

6. Total pendapatan perbulan RTD 7. Rata-rata jumlah yang ditabung perbulan ( dijumlahkan dari pendapatan seluruh anggota keluarga yang 1. Rp______2. Tidak ada bekerja sesuai dengan jawaban pertanyaan no 3 dan bantuan dari pihak lain sesuai dengan jawaban pertanyaan no 5) : Rp______

8. Dalam persen, berapa rata-rata penghasilan RTD dihabiskan untuk pengeluaran berikut ini (jawaban total tidak boleh lebih dari 100 %): 1. Makanan: % ; 2. Pakaian: % ; 3. Kesehatan: ....% ; 4. Pemelihaan rumah: % ; 5. Pendidikan: %; 6. Ditabung: % 9. Perhatian terhadap kesehatan : (lingkari dengan pilihan jawaban yang sesuai ; jawaban bisa lebih dari satu) a. Penyakit yang sering diderita oleh anggota keluarga pada tahun sebelumnya (tahun lalu) : (untuk proyek penyediaan air bersih ditanyakan jenis penyakit yang sering diderita akibat mengkonsumsi air yang kurang bersih; untuk proyek pengendalian banjir ditanyakan jenis penyakit yang sering diderita akibat banjir). a. Gangguan pernapasan (ISPA) b. Malaria c. Bronchitis d. Tuberculosis (TBC) e. Penyakit Lambung f. Lainnya: ………………………….

b. Untuk penyakit yang diderita anggota keluarga pada tahun sebelumnya yang membutuhkan bantuan profesional, apakah mereka pergi ke dokter, klinik medis, atau rumah sakit a. Ya b. Tidak Kenapa? ______

c. Dimana klinik pengobatan atau Rumah Sakit terdekat dengan tempat tinggal RTD ? i. Di Desa yang sama dengan RTD ii. Di Desa lain, Kecamatan yang Sama iii. Di Kota Kabupaten iv. Di Kota Provinsi

10. Sanitasi : * pertimbangkan musim panas dan hujan (lingkari dengan pilihan jawaban yang sesuai ; jawaban bisa lebih dari satu) a. Sumber air a.1. Minum a.2. Memasak a.3. Mandi/Cuci 1. Sumur tanah milik RTD 1. Sumur tanah milik RTD 1. Sumur tanah milik RTD 2. Sumur pompa milik RTD 2. Sumur pompa milik RTD 2. Sumur pompa milik RTD 3. PDAM 3. PDAM 3. PDAM 4. Sumur tanah milik tetangga 4. Sumur tanah milik tetangga 4. Sumur tanah milik tetangga 5. Sumur pompa milik tetangga 5. Sumur pompa milik tetangga 5. Sumur pompa milik tetangga 6. Sungai/mata air 6. Sungai/mata air 6. Sungai/mata air 7. Beli dari pengecer 7. Beli dari pengecer 7. Beli dari pengecer 25. Lainnya...... 8.Lainnya...... 8. Lainnya......

b. WC yang digunakan Pihak Yang Berhak / Rumah Tangga Terkena Dampak : 1. WC dengan septic tank di dalam rumah; 2. WC di dalam rumah, saluran langsung ke sungai; (3) WC umum dengan septic tank 4. WC umum tanpa septic tank; 5. WC darurat di atas sungai/saluran air (6). Lainnya, sebutkan...... 137

c. Fasilitas untuk mandi: 1. Kamar mandi tertutup di dalam rumah; 2. Kamar mandi terbuka di halaman rumah; 3. Kamar mandi umum; 4. Sungai/saluran air; 5. Lainnya...... d. Pembuangan Sampah: 1. Dikubur dalam tanah 2. Dibakar 3. Diambil secara periodik oleh pemerintah 4. Dibuang begitu saja

11. Bahan bakar untuk penerangan (lingkari dengan pilihan jawaban yang sesuai ; jawaban bisa lebih dari satu): a. Listrik dari PLN/swasta b. Listrik dari tetangga c. Minyak Tanah d. Baterai yang bisa discharge ulang e. Generator milik sendiri f. Lainnya …………………………. Total biaya yang dikeluarkan untuk penerangan : Rp…………………per bulan (penjumlahan dari seluruh bahan bakar yang digunakan dalam rumah tangga tersebut) 12. Bahan bakar untuk memasak (lingkari dengan pilihan jawaban yang sesuai ; jawaban bisa lebih dari satu) 1. Listrik 2. Minyak tanah 3. LPG 4. Kayu 5. Arang 6. Lainnya ______13. Peralatan RT yang dimiliki ((lingkari dengan pilihan jawaban yang sesuai ; jawaban bisa lebih dari satu) a. Television b. Kulkas c. Radio/cassette recorder d. Telepon/HP e. DVD/CD player f. Oven/kompor listrik g. Kipas angin h. AC i. Mesin Cuci j. Komputer k. Lainnya : ………………………….

14. Kepemilikan kendaraan (lingkari dengan pilihan jawaban yang sesuai ; jawaban bisa lebih dari satu) a. Mobil b. Pick-up c. Truk d. Motor e. Sepeda f. Lainnya, sebutkan ______g. Tidak punya 15. Akses ke fasilitas sosial lainnya (lingkari dengan pilihan jawaban yang sesuai ; jawaban bisa lebih dari satu) 15.1. Fasilitas Pendidikan

Sekolah Dasar/MI/ Sederajat SMP/MTs/sederajat SMA/MA/sederajat Akademi/Universitas

1. Desa yang sama dengan RTD 1. Desa yang sama dengan RTD 1. Desa yang sama dengan RTD 1. Di kota Kabupaten/Kota

2. Di Desa Lain, Kecamatan yang 2. Di Desa Lain, Kecamatan yang 2. Di Desa Lain, Kecamatan yang 2. Di Kota Provinsi sama sama sama

3. Di Ibu kota Kabupaten/Kota 3. Di Ibu kota Kabupaten/Kota 3. Di Ibu kota Kabupaten/Kota Waktu tempuh dari rumah • Sebutkan • Sebutkan • Sebutkan RTD...... menit Desa/Kecam Desa/Kecam Desa/Kecam atan/ atan/ atan/ Kabupaten/ Kabupaten/ Kabupaten/ Kota : Kota : Kota : ……………… ……………… ……………… ………jika ………jika ………jika tidak satu tidak satu tidak satu desa dengan desa dengan desa dengan RTD) RTD) RTD) • Jarak dari • Jarak dari • Jarak dari rumah rumah rumah RTD...... RTD...... RTD...... km menit menit 15.2. Pasar : 1. Desa yang sama dengan RTD 2. Di Desa Lain, Kecamatan yang sama 3. Di Ibu kota Kabupaten/Kota 138

(Desa/Kecamtan/Kabupaten/Kota: ………………………….jika tidak satu desa ) . Waktu tempuh dari rumah RTD : ………menit

16. Partisipasi RTD pada Kegiatan Sosial dan Keagamaan . Tanyakan apa saja jenis kegiatan sosial kemasyarakatan dan keagamaan yang ada di lingkungan tempat tinggal RTD/pihak yang berhak dan siapa anggota keluarga yang ikut dalam kegiatan tersebut. Isi jawaban pada tabel berikut ini No Anggota Keluargaa Kegiatan Sosial Kemasyarakatanb Kegiatan Keagamaanc 1 2

3 a. Anggota Keluarga : (1). Kepala Keluarga; (2). Isteri ; (3). Anak; (4). Kakek/Nenek; (5). Cucu; (6). Keponakan ; (7). Anggota keluarga lainnya, sebutkan...... b. Kegiatan sosial/kemasyarakatan : (1). Dasawisma; (2). PKK; (3). Posyandu; (4). Karangtaruna; (5). Koperasi , (6). Dewan Masyarakat Adat, (7) Lainnya, sebutkan ...... (pilihan jawaban bisa ditambah atau dikurangi dengan kegiatan yang lebih relevan dengan lokasi proyek) c. Kegiatan Keagamaan : (1). Pengajian RT/RW; (2). Yasinan Ibu2; (3). Anggota Wali Gereja, (4). Sekolah Minggu, (5). Lainnya, sebutkan...... ( pilihan jawaban bisa ditambah atau dikurangi dengan kegiatan yang lebih relevan dengan lokasi proyek)

D. Kajian Untuk Progam Pemulihan Matapencaharian (LRP) ( Untuk semua pertanyaan di seksi D pilihan jawaban bisa lebih dari satu, lingkari jawaban yang sesuai) 1. Menurut anda, pada saat pelaksanaan proyek, manakah diantara pernyataan berikut ini yang paling sesuai menggambarkan kehidupan ekonomi/kesejahteraan anda atau keluarga anda. a. Proyek tidak berdampak langsung pada kehidupan saya. Kesejahteraan keluarga saya akan sama saja. b. Proyek memberikan penghasilan ekstra. c. Proyek ini akan menyebabkan pendapatan saya menurun. Kehidupan ekonomi keluarga saya akan memburuk.

2. Jika dimungkinkan, apakah anda tertarik terlibat atau ambil bagian dalam pelaksanaan proyek ? 139

a. Ya tertarik, untuk mendapat tambahan penghasilan b. Ya tertarik, untuk mengkompensasi penurunan penghasilan c. Tidak tertarik, alasan: ______

3. Jika tertarik, bentuk keterlibatan yang dapat anda lakukan? a. Tenaga kerja kasar konstruksi b. Tenaga kerja terampil konstruksi (tukang spesialis, mandor, supir, operator alat) c. Tenaga kerja administrasi (kurir surat, foto kopi, dan lainnya) d. Menyewakan kendaraan untuk keperluan proyek e. Membuka warung atau penyedia makan-minum untuk para pekerja f. Lainnya, sebutkan......

4. Jika anda merasa kehidupan anda akan menjadi lebih buruk setelah proyek selesai, bantuan apa yang anda harapkan akan diberikan ? a. Pelatihan peningkatan kapasitas budidaya pertanian, dengan pemberian bantuan sarana produksi pertanian dan peralatan dan pendampingan b. Pelatihan budidaya ternak, dengan pemberian bibit ternak dan pendampingan c. Pelatihan pengolahan hasil pertanian, dengan pemberian bantuan peralatan dan pemasaran d. Pelatihan pengolahan hasil peternakan, dengan pemberian bantuan peralatan dan pemasaran e. Pelatihan kewirausahaan dengan bantuan tambahan modal tunai atau dalam bentuk barang f. Pelatihan ketrampilan, seperti perbengkelan, las, menjahit, salon/make up dll g. Pemberian kredit lunak h. Beasiswa pendidikan sampai dengan lulus sekolah kejuruan i. Asuransi kesehatan j. Lainnya, sebutkan......

5. Ketrampilan lain yang dimiliki oleh kepala keluarga pihak yang berhak a. Perbengkelan b. Tukang Kayu c. Tukang batu d. Pengrajin, sebutkan jenis kerajian yang dimiliki e. Lainnya, sebutkan......

E. Partisipasi Masyarakat dan Persepsi tentang Proyek 1. Apakah anda mengetahui tentang rencana rehabilitasi proyek di Desa anda ? (Lingkari jawaban yang sesuai, pilihan jawaban bisa lebih dari satu) a. Ya Darimana atau bagaimana informasi tentang proyek tersebut anda peroleh ? 1. Pegawai Proyek (tim survey) 2. Resmi dari aparat desa/kecamatan (sebutkan: ...... ) 3. Pertemuan Desa 4. Tokoh masyarakat/agama 5. Kepala adat/suku 6. Anggota keluarga/tetangga 7. Media (radio/TV/surat kabar...... ) 8. LSM...... 9. Media sosial (Facebook, lainnya...... ) 140

10. Rumor/gosip 11. Lainnya...... b. Tidak

1. Apa manfaat yang mungkin didapat dari rencana proyek ini? (Lingkari jawaban yang sesuai, pilihan jawaban bisa lebih dari satu; alternative jawaban bisa dimodifikasi tergantung sektor /jenis proyek) a. Mendapat ganti rugi tanah dan aset lainnya b. Harga tanah akan naik setelah proyek selesai c. Terbuka nya peluang kerja atau peluang usaha baru d. Pemasaran hasil pertanian lebih baik e. Transportasi lebih lancar f. Akses ke fasilitas kesehatan, pendidikan dan ekonomi lebih baik g. Kesuburan tanah makin baik, frekuensi tanam dan panen meningkat h. Lebih mudah mendapatkan air bersih i. Tidak banjir lagi j. Lainnya, sebutkan......

2. Apa kerugian atau dampak negatif dari rencana proyek? (Lingkari jawaban yang sesuai, pilihan jawaban bisa lebih dari satu; alternative jawaban bisa dimodifikasi tergantung sektor /jenis proyek) a. Berkurangnya tanah garapan dan aset lainya b. Debu dan bising selama kegiatan konstruksi c. Berkurangnya air untuk pengairan sawah d. Terganggunya adat istidat masyarakat setempat akibat pendatang/pekerja e. Khawatir benda keramat/yang dikeramatkan akan terkena proyek f. Rumah dan atau tempat usaha harus pindah, penghasilan berkurang g. Meningkatnya kasus penyakit sexual yang menular (HIV dan lainnya) h. Meningkatnya angka kecelakaan i. Perdagangan anak atau manusia j. Lainnya, sebutkan ......

4. Bagaimana dukungan Anda terhadap proyek? (lingkari jawaban yang sesuai) a. mendukung ; b. tidak mendukung, karena ...... c. lainnya: ......

5. Dari sumber-sumber berikut ini, mana yang lebih Anda pilih sebagai pemberi informasi terkait rencana proyek ini? Lingkari jawaban yang sesuai, pilihan jawaban bisa lebih dari satu) 1. Pegawai Proyek (tim survey) 2. Resmi dari aparat desa/kecamatan (sebutkan: ...... ) 3. Pertemuan Desa 4. Tokoh masyarakat/agama 5. Kepala adat/suku 141

6. Anggota keluarga/tetangga 7. Media (radio/TV/surat kabar...... ) 8. LSM...... 9. Media sosial (Facebook, lainnya...... ) 10. Lainnya......

F. Penanganan Keluhan 1. Jika Anda memiliki keluhan atau kekhawatiran mengenai setiap aspek yang berkaitan dengan proyek, seperti akurasi inventarisasi aset Anda yang terkena dampak; jumlah atau tingkat kompensasi untuk aset Anda yang terkena dampak; kegiatan pembangunan dari kontraktor; dan lain-lain. a. Menurut Anda, kepada siapa keluhan atau kekhawatiran tersebut harus disampaikan? ______b. Dengan cara apa Anda merasa nyaman untuk menyampaikan keluhan atau kekhawatiran tersebut 1. Lisan 2. Tertulis 2. Dalam hal Anda tidak puas dengan tindakan yang diambil oleh seseorang atau institusi di mana Anda pertama kali membawa keluhan atau kekhawatiran, kepada siapa Anda ingin membawa keluhan atau masalah berikutnya untuk mendapatkan tanggapan/penyelesaian yang tepat? ______

______Nama dan tanda tangan KK atau responden Nama dan Tanda Tangan Surveyor

Tanggal Selesai Survey: ______142

Pertanyaan Tambahan (specific untuk setiap proyek) ....contoh sebagai berikut

Proyek Pengendalian Banjir (Flood Control Management)

1. Ketika daerah anda banjir, apakah rumah/tempat tinggal anda juga kebanjiran? a. Ya b. Tidak

2. Jika masuk rumah berapa kedalaman banjir dalam rumah? a. < 20 cm b. 20 cm – 50 cm c. > 50 cm – 100 cm d. > 100 cm e. > 100 cm – 200 cm f. > 200 cm

3. . Berapa lama air banjir surut? a. < 1 jam b. 1 jam c. 1 jam – 3 jam d. > 3 jam – 6 jam e. > 6 jam – 12 jam f. > 12 jam – 24 jam g. > 24 jam

3. Ketika banjir terjadi apakah anda meninggalkan rumah? a. Ya b. Tidak

4. Ke mana anda pergi (pindah sementara) selama banjir? a. Ke rumah keluarga b. Ke rumah tetangga c. Masjid/gereja terdekat d. Sekolah/gedung bertingkat terdekat e. Lainnya, sebutkan ......

6. Apa peran perempuan pada saat banjir? (jawaban bisa lebih dari satu) a. Memasak makanan b. Mengumpulkan konsumsi c. Menjaga anak d. Menjaga suami dan anak e. Lainnya, sebutkan......

7. Apa peran perempuan setelah banjir surut? (jawaban bisa lebih dari satu) a. Membersihkan rumah b. Membersihkan peralatan rumah tangga c. Lainnya, sebutkan ......

8. Apa peran laki laki pada saat banjir ? a. Mengangkut barang barang b. Menjaga keamanan c. Membersihkan rumah d. Lainnya, sebutkan.....

9. Apa kesulitan wanita ketika banjir terjadi a. Kesulitan mencari MCK 143

b. Kesulitan mencari air bersih untuk mandi dan mencuci c. Kesulitan memasak d. Kesulitan mencari perlengkapan wanita dan anak (susu) e. Lainnya, sebutkan......

144

Appendix 4: LARP Workshop Documentation

DOCUMENTATION OF CW03 WORKSHOP WORKSHOP ACTIVITIES FLOOD MANAGEMENT IN SELECTED RIVER BASINS (FMSRB) PROGRAM SERANG REGENCY

APRIL 1, 2019 NAGARA VILLAGE KIBIN DISTRICT SERANG REGENCY

145

DOCUMENTATION OF CW03 WORKSHOP WORKSHOP ACTIVITIES FLOOD MANAGEMENT IN SELECTED RIVER BASINS (FMSRB) PROGRAM SERANG REGENCY

APRIL 2 2019 DUKUH VILLAGE KRAGILAN DISTRICT SERANG REGENCY

146

DOCUMENTATION OF CW3 LARAP SOCIALIZATION WORKSHOP ACTIVITIES FLOOD MANAGEMENT IN SELECTED RIVER BASINS (FMSRB) PROGRAM SERANG REGENCY

APRIL 4, 2019 MEETING ROOM OF THE SERANG REGIONAL SECRETARIAT OFFICE

147

Appendix 5: LARP Workshops List of Attendees

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

Appendix 6: PCM / FGD I Documentation

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION I (FGD I) DUKUH, APRIL 24, 2019

158

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION I (FGD I) UNDAR ANDIR, APRIL 25, 2019

159

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION I (FGD I) TAMBAK, APRIL 25, 2019

160

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION I (FGD I) NAGARA, APRIL 26, 2019

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION I (FGD I)

CIAGEL, APRIL 26, 2019

161

Appendix 7: PCM / FGD I Minutes of Meeting

162

163

164

165

Appendix 8: PCM / FGD I List of Attendance

166

167

168

Appendix 9: PCM / FGD II Documentation

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION II (FGD II) DUKUH, MEI 17, 2019

169

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION II (FGD II) CIAGEL, MEI 21, 2019

170

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION II (FGD II) NAGARA, MEI 21, 2019

171

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION II (FGD II) UNDAR ANDIR, MEI 20, 2019

172

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION II (FGD II) TAMBAK, MEI 16, 2019

173

174

Appendix 10: PCM / FGD II Minutes of Meeting

175

176

177

178

Appendix 11: PCM / FGD II List of Attendees

179

180

181

Appendix 12: List of Participants PCM 2018

182

Appendix 13: MOM FGDs SAP Need Assesment

MINUTE OF MEETING Hari /Tanggal : Senin / 29 Juni 2020 Waktu : 10.00 – Selesai Tempat : Desa Ciagel Agenda : FGD SAP Peserta rapat : 1. Aparat Desa Ciagel 2. Warga Terkena Dampak Desa Ciagel 3. Tim CS 01 Serang

N Diskusi Action by o 1. PEMBUKAAN Pembukaan oleh Ibu Dewi menyampaikan maksud pertemuan kepada warga Desa Ciagel bahwa tahap pengukuran lahan oleh BPN akan segera dimulai oleh karena itu warga diminta untuk mulai membuat patok lahannya masing-masing, dan meinta menghitung tanamannya untuk membantu survey inventory yang diadakan. Untuk surat tanah jika tanah waris sebaiknya mulai dibuat runutan waris sehingga memudahkan jika nantinya perlu dibuatkan segel Desa. Untuk pengurusan tanah watga akan dibantu oleh Satgas desa yang dipandu oleh BPN. Penjelasan tentang proses pembebasan lahan, penetapan lokasi dan pengaduan masyarakat 2. DISKUSI Selanjutnya dikarenakan warga Desa Ciagel ada yang harus relokasi maka harus sudah memikirkan akan pindah kemana? Kemudian perkiraan biaya rekolasi berapa? Ibu Iroh/ Bpk Syaiful Anwar mengatakan bahwa beliau akan pindah ke Petir/ Kab. Pandeglang. Bapak Faisal mengatakan bahwa keluarga beliau akan pindah ke Cilegon tetapi beliau sendiri tetap di sekitar Desa Ciagel. Bapak Kholil masih belum tahu mau pindah kemana dikarenakan para santri juga kan pindah bersama. Untuk biaya pindah masih belum difikirkan berapa biayannya.

Disampaikan kepada warga bahwa setelah pengukuran aka nada pertemuan kembali di tingkat Desa, diharapkan warga dapat hadir untuk memastikan julah luasan lahan dan asset yang dimiliki. Dan jika terdapat ketidaksesuaian maka warga boleh mengajukan keberatan selama 14 hari setelah pengumuman. Begitu pula untuk menilaian harga, setelah dinilai maka aka nada pertemuan tingkat desa dan jika ada ketidak sesuaian warga boleh mengajukan keberatan selama 14 hari setelah pengumuman. JIka tidak ada laporan keberatan maka warga dianggap setuju dengan luasan dan nilai yang sedah ditetapkan. Pengaduan disampaikan ke desa kepada tim 183

N Diskusi Action by o Satgas. Disampaikan pula bahwa untuk dana pembangunan Tanggul menggunakan dana Hutang Luar negri Asian Development Bank (ADB), untuk pembebasan lahan menggunakan dana APBN sedangkan untuk kegiatan pemulihan mata pencaharian menggunakan dana APBD Kab. Serang.

Warga diminta untuk mengajukan usulan kegiatan guna pemulihan mata pencaharian pasca pemukiman kembali dan kehilangan lahan garapan, terutama untuk ibu-ibu. Ibu-ibu menginginkan bantuan permodalan untuk usaha dan keterampilan untuk usaha kecil, sementara ada warga yang memiliki kolam ikan menginginkan pelatihan ternak ikan lele dan akan membuat kelompok dengan santri.

3. PENUTUP Rapat ditutup pukul 12.00

184

DOKUMENTATION

185

186

MINUTE OF MEETING Hari /Tanggal : Jum’at / 3 July 2020 Waktu : 14.00 – 15.30 WIB Tempat : Kantor Desa Cijeruk Agenda : FGD Assesment SAP

Peserta rapat : 1. Aparat Desa Cijeruk 2. Warga Terkena Dampak Tanggul Ciujung 3. Tim CS 01 Serang

No Diskusi Action by 1. PEMBUKAAN Pembukaan disampaikan oleh Bpk. Wakil Saprudin. Disampaikan bahwa pembebasan lahan tanggul masih dalam proses dan saat ini menunggu kelanjutan kegiatan pembebasan lahan sesuai arahan BBWS dan konsultan. Menyampaikan bahwa akan ada diskusi mengenai kegiatan warga terdampak tanggul yang adakan disampaikan oleh tim konsultan. 2. MATERI Materi disampaikan oleh konsultan CS 01 (Ibu Dewi) disampaikan bahwa tahapan pembebasan lahan tanggul Ciujung saat ini sedang menunggu pengukuran dari BPN dalam waktu dekat semoga dapat terealisasi. Dana pembangunan tanggul Ciujung berasal dari LOAN Asian Development Bank(ADB), sementara anggaran pembebasan lahan berasal dari APBN dan dana untuk pemulihan mata pencaharian berasal dari APBD dengan adanya MOU antara FMSRB dan Bupati Kab. Serang. Penjealsan tentang proses pembebasan lahan, penetapan lokasi dan pengaduan masyarakat. Kegiatan social atau Social Action Plan adalah untuk memulihkan mata pencaharian warga erkena dampak tanggul yang mana lahan garapannya atau tempat usahanya atau rumahnya terkena pembebasan sehingga terjadi penurunan pendapatan. Tujuan dilakukannya program pemulihan mata pencaharian (LRP/SAP): 1. Mengembalikan mata pencaharian dan pendapatan rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) pembanguan tanggul Ciujung. 2. Meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia untuk rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) melalui pengembangan pola pikir yang kreatif, inovatif dan wirausaha. 3. Meningatkan kesejahteraan hidup yang lebih baik bagi warga terkena dampak (APs) 187

No Diskusi Action by 4. Meningkatkan kapasitas kelembagaan petani dan masyarakat. 5. Meningkatkan kesadaran akan gaya hidup sehat untuk orang-orang yang terkena dampak yang tinggal di koridor dampak. 6. Meningkatkan kualitas lingkungan di koridor area dampak. 3. DISKUSI Pada kesempatan ini tim konsultan akan mengajak warga untuk berdiskusi mengenai kegiatan social yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan warga agar manfaat kegiatan SAP ini dapat tepat guna dan tepat sasaran sesuai kebutuhan warga. Kegiatan yang diusulkan diharapkan memang sesuai kebutuhan dan bisa menambah penghasilan secara langsung. • Ibu Dewi menanyakan kegiatan apa yang ingin/ diminati warga untuk menambah penghasilan? • Pak Karyata (RT 14/RW 02) mengusulkan kegiatan ternak lele, terdapat banyak peternak ikan lele dan masih bias dikembangkan juga banyak peminatnya. • Pak Anim (RT 14/RW 02) mengusulkan kegiatan pelatihan budidaya bebek. • H. Irsyad dari kelompok tani mnengusulkan pengadaan mesin perontok padi, dan pengadaan bibit serta pupuk. • Ibu-ibu di Desa Cijeruk sebagian besar berjualan dan tidak terdapat kelompok tani perempuan. • Ibu Supiah (RT 14/RW 02) mengusulkan pelatihan menjahit. • Pelatihan untuk home industry makanan seperti nugget, bakso, (Frozen food), peminat pelatihan ini cukup banyak dari kaum ibu-ibu. (± 50 orang) • Bantuan permodalan untuk usaha dikarenakan banyak warga yang meminjam dari koperasi keliling. 4. PENYEPAKATAN Disepakati bahwa usulan dari Desa Cijeruk untuk kegiatan SAP adalah : 1. Pelatihan Budidaya Ikan air tawar (lele) 2. Pelatihan budidaya ungags (bebek) 3. Pemberian bantuan kepada kelompok tani berupa mesin perontok padi, bibit dan pupuk. 4. Pelatihan menjahit untuk ibu-ibu 5. Pelatihan makanan untuk home industry Frozen Food 6. Bantuan permodalan untuk usaha. 5. PENUTUP Rapat ditutup pukul 15.30 Rapat dihadiri oleh : 10 orang Laki-laki 8 orang Perempuan

188

DOKUMENTATION

189

LIST OF ATTENDANT

190

MINUTE OF MEETING Hari /Tanggal : Senin / 06 July 2020 Waktu : 10.00 – 12.00 WIB Tempat : Desa Sukamaju Agenda : FGD PKM dan Assesment SAP

Peserta rapat : Aparat Desa Sukamaju Warga Terkena Dampak Tanggul Ciujung Tim CS 01 Serang

No Diskusi Action by 1. PEMBUKAAN Pembukaan disampaikan oleh Bpk. Bahrudin (Sekretaris Desa ). Disampaikan bahwa pembebasan lahan tanggul Sungai Ciujung nantinya akan melewati Desa Sukamaju sepanjang lokasi tanggul lama. Sehingga beberapa rumah dan tanah warga akan terkena dan harus relokasi. Untuk lebar dan panjang taanggul yang akan dibangun akan diterangkan oleh tim konsultan yang juga akan ada diskusi mengenai kegiatan warga terdampak tanggul yang adakan disampaikan oleh tim konsultan. 2. DISKUSI 1 Materi disampaikan oleh konsultan CS 01 (Ibu Dewi) disampaikan bahwa Dana pembangunan tanggul Ciujung berasal dari LOAN Asian Development Bank(ADB), sementara anggaran pembebasan lahan berasal dari APBN juga terdapat anggaran untuk pemulihan mata pencaharian berasal dari APBD dengan adanya MOU antara FMSRB dan Bupati Kab. Serang. Penjelasan tentang proses pembebasan lahan, penetapan lokasi dan pengaduan masyarakat Untuk lebar tanggul yang akan dibangun adalah 22 m sedangkan panjang tanggul untuk Desa Sukamaju adalah 400m. Lokasi mengambil dari As tanggul lama 11 m sebelah kiri dan kanan. Sehingga pabrik Cipta Paperia juga akan terkena dampak tanggul seperti tanah warga. Pekerjaan tanggul masih belum dipastikan waktunya dikarenakan masih banyak tahapan yang harus dilakukan untuk persiapan dokumen dan lainnya. Bpk. Jenal menanyakan apakah benar PT Cipta Paperia juga kan terdampak tanggul? Jika PT. Cipta Paperia tidak terdampak tanggul maka warga tidak bersedia untuk pindah dikarenakan merasa diperlakukan berbeda oleh pemerintah. Ibu Seniah menanyakan apakah nantinya akan ada jalan untuk warga yang masih tinggal di pinggir tanggul? Ibu Parha Dewi menayakan bagaimana jika beliau keberatan untuk dibebaskan lahan rumahnya? 191

No Diskusi Action by Ibu Dewi menjawab : • PT. Cipta Paperia memang pernah memiliki surat untuk menyewa lahan tanggul, tetapi saat ini sudah tidak berlaku, sehingga PT. Cipta Paperia tetap akan terdampak tanggul Ciujung sama seperti warga. Karena penghitungan lebar tanggul adalah mulai dari As tanggul lama 12 m kiri dan kanan. • Selama pengerjaan tanggul sudah tentu memerlukan jalan akses untuk bekerja, dan ketika proyek selesa maka jalan itu akan menjadi jalan akses untuk warga. • Jika ada warga yang keberatan untuk dibebsakan maka dipersilahkan untuk mengajukan surat ke BBWS C3 dengan Sepengetahuan pihak Desa, dan akan dicari jalan terbaik untuk kedua belah pihak.

3. DISKUSI Kegiatan social atau Social Action Plan adalah untuk memulihkan mata pencaharian warga erkena dampak tanggul yang mana lahan garapannya atau tempat usahanya atau rumahnya terkena pembebasan sehingga terjadi penurunan pendapatan. Tujuan dilakukannya program pemulihan mata pencaharian (LRP/SAP): Mengembalikan mata pencaharian dan pendapatan rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) pembanguan tanggul Ciujung. Meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia untuk rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) melalui pengembangan pola pikir yang kreatif, inovatif dan wirausaha. Meningatkan kesejahteraan hidup yang lebih baik bagi warga terkena dampak (APs) Meningkatkan kapasitas kelembagaan petani dan masyarakat. Meningkatkan kesadaran akan gaya hidup sehat untuk orang-orang yang terkena dampak yang tinggal di koridor dampak. Meningkatkan kualitas lingkungan di koridor area dampak.

Pada kesempatan ini Bu Dewi mengajak warga untuk berdiskusi mengenai kegiatan social yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan warga agar manfaat kegiatan SAP ini dapat tepat guna dan tepat sasaran sesuai kebutuhan warga. Kegiatan yang diusulkan diharapkan memang sesuai kebutuhan dan bisa menambah penghasilan secara langsung. • Ibu Dewi menanyakan kegiatan apa yang ingin/ diminati warga untuk menambah penghasilan? Diharapkan usulan kegiatan yang sesuai dengan potensi setempat. • Pak Rohani mengajukan pelatihan Makanan Frozen food, seperti bakso dan Nugget 192

No Diskusi Action by • Ibu Musrafah, Fatmawati, mengajukan pelatihan donat, roti untuk menambah terampilan dan meningkatkan ekonomi keluarga. 4. PENYEPAKATAN Disepakati bahwa usulan dari Desa Sukamaju untuk kegiatan SAP adalah : Pelatihan makanan Frozen Food Pelatihan makanan Donat dan Roti 3. PENUTUP Rapat ditutup pukul 12.00 Rapat dihadiri oleh : 17 orang laki-laki dan 11 orang perempuan

DOKUMENTATION

193

LIST OF ATTENDANT

194

195

MINUTE OF MEETING Hari /Tanggal : Jum’at/ 10 Juli 2020 Waktu : 14.00 – 16.00 WIB Tempat : Desa Nagara RT 08/02 Agenda : FGD Assesment SAP

Peserta rapat : Aparat Desa Nagara Warga Terkena Dampak Tanggul Ciujung Tim CS 01 Serang

No Diskusi Action by 1. PEMBUKAAN Pembukaan disampaikan oleh Bpk. Pendi (Aparat Desa) Disampaikan bahwa pembebasan lahan tanggul masih dalam proses dan saat ini menunggu kelanjutan kegiatan pembebasan lahan sesuai arahan BBWS dan konsultan. Menyampaikan bahwa akan ada diskusi mengenai kegiatan warga terdampak tanggul yang adakan disampaikan oleh tim konsultan. 2. MATERI Pembukaan disampaikan oleh konsultan CS 01 (Bpk Anang) disampaikan bahwa tahapan pembebasan lahan tanggul Ciujung saat ini sedang menunggu pengukuran dari BPN dalam waktu dekat semoga dapat terealisasi. Dana pembangunan tanggul Ciujung berasal dari LOAN Asian Development Bank(ADB), sementara anggaran pembebasan lahan berasal dari APBN dan dana untuk pemulihan mata pencaharian berasal dari APBD dengan adanya MOU antara FMSRB dan Bupati Kab. Serang. Penjelasan tentang proses pembebasan lahan, penetapan lokasi dan pengaduan masyarakat Kegiatan social atau Social Action Plan adalah untuk memulihkan mata pencaharian warga erkena dampak tanggul yang mana lahan garapannya atau tempat usahanya atau rumahnya terkena pembebasan sehingga terjadi penurunan pendapatan. Tujuan dilakukannya program pemulihan mata pencaharian (LRP/SAP): Mengembalikan mata pencaharian dan pendapatan rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) pembanguan tanggul Ciujung. Meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia untuk rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) melalui pengembangan pola pikir yang kreatif, inovatif dan wirausaha. Meningatkan kesejahteraan hidup yang lebih baik bagi warga terkena dampak (APs) Meningkatkan kapasitas kelembagaan petani dan masyarakat. 196

No Diskusi Action by Meningkatkan kesadaran akan gaya hidup sehat untuk orang-orang yang terkena dampak yang tinggal di koridor dampak. Meningkatkan kualitas lingkungan di koridor area dampak. 3. DISKUSI Pada kesempatan ini tim konsultan (Ibu Dewi) akan mengajak warga untuk berdiskusi mengenai kegiatan social yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan warga agar manfaat kegiatan SAP ini dapat tepat guna dan tepat sasaran sesuai kebutuhan warga. Kegiatan yang diusulkan diharapkan memang sesuai kebutuhan dan bisa menambah penghasilan secara langsung. • Ibu Dewi menanyakan kegiatan apa yang ingin/ diminati warga untuk menambah penghasilan? Karena banyak ibu-ibu sekitar yang membuat sarung kasur, bantal dan service kasur apa kira-kira kegiatan pelatihan/bantuan yang dibutuhkan? • Ibu Muedah (RT 04/RW01) membutuhkan tambahan mesin jahit dan juga masih banyak ibu-ibu penjual dan belum berproduksi sendiri sehingga perlu pelatihan menjahit untuk sebagian ibu-ibu. • Bpk Sobirin (RT 08/RW02) Pelatihan budidaya kambing dan bantuan kambing. • Bpk. Karis (RT 07/RW02) Pelatihan sablon kaos dan untuk pemuda serta pengadaan mesin jahit kaos. Ada kelompok yang bias dilatih. • Ibu Ela (RT 08/RW02) Pelatihan kripik telor asain dikareanakan beliau membuat telur asin dan telur asin yang tidak laku ingin dioah kembali menjadi kerupuk telur asin ( hanya ibu ela yang memproduksi telur asin) • Pelatihan pemasaran secara online bagi ibu-ibu muda dan usaha kecil untuk menambah penghasilan keluarga. • Bantuan permodalan untuk usaha untuk menambah produksi. 4. PENYEPAKATAN Disepakati bahwa usulan dari Desa Nagara untuk kegiatan SAP adalah : Pelatihan Budidaya kambing (jika memungkinan) Pelatihan menjahit dan oengadaan mesin jahit bagi ibu-ibu pedagang dan produksi sarung Kasur. Pelatihan sablon kaos dan pengadaan mesin jahit kaos untuk pemuda. Pelatihan membuat telur asin (jika memungkinkan digabung dengan desa lainnya) Pelatihan pemasaran secara online bagi ibu-ibu muda dan usaha kecil. Bantuan permodalan untuk usaha. 3. PENUTUP Rapat ditutup pukul 16.00 197

No Diskusi Action by Rapat dihadiri oleh : 6 orang laki-laki dan 12 orang perempuan

DOKUMENTATION

198

LIST OF ATTENDANT

199

MINUTE OF MEETING Hari /Tanggal : Rabu / 22 July 2020 Waktu : 14.30 – 16.00 WIB Tempat : Desa Tambak Agenda : FGD Assesment SAP

Peserta rapat : Aparat Desa Tambak Warga Terkena Dampak Tanggul Ciujung Tim CS 01 Serang

No Diskusi Action by 1. PEMBUKAAN Pembukaan disampaikan oleh Bpk. Nono (Aparat Desa). Disampaikan bahwa pembebasan lahan tanggul masih dalam proses dan saat ini menunggu kelanjutan kegiatan pembebasan lahan sesuai arahan BBWS dan konsultan. Menyampaikan bahwa akan ada diskusi mengenai kegiatan warga terdampak tanggul yang adakan disampaikan oleh tim konsultan. 2. MATERI Materi disampaikan oleh konsultan CS 01 (Ibu Dewi) disampaikan bahwa tahapan pembebasan lahan tanggul Ciujung saat ini sedang menunggu pengukuran dari BPN dalam waktu dekat semoga dapat terealisasi. Dana pembangunan tanggul Ciujung berasal dari LOAN Asian Development Bank(ADB), sementara anggaran pembebasan lahan berasal dari APBN dan dana untuk pemulihan mata pencaharian berasal dari APBD dengan adanya MOU antara FMSRB dan Bupati Kab. Serang. Penjelasan tentang proses pembebasan lahan, penetapan lokasi dan pengaduan masyarakat Kegiatan social atau Social Action Plan adalah untuk memulihkan mata pencaharian warga erkena dampak tanggul yang mana lahan garapannya atau tempat usahanya atau rumahnya terkena pembebasan sehingga terjadi penurunan pendapatan. Tujuan dilakukannya program pemulihan mata pencaharian (LRP/SAP): Mengembalikan mata pencaharian dan pendapatan rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) pembanguan tanggul Ciujung. Meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia untuk rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) melalui pengembangan pola pikir yang kreatif, inovatif dan wirausaha. Meningatkan kesejahteraan hidup yang lebih baik bagi warga terkena dampak (APs) 200

No Diskusi Action by Meningkatkan kapasitas kelembagaan petani dan masyarakat. Meningkatkan kesadaran akan gaya hidup sehat untuk orang-orang yang terkena dampak yang tinggal di koridor dampak. Meningkatkan kualitas lingkungan di koridor area dampak. 3. DISKUSI Pada kesempatan ini tim konsultan akan mengajak warga untuk berdiskusi mengenai kegiatan social yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan warga agar manfaat kegiatan SAP ini dapat tepat guna dan tepat sasaran sesuai kebutuhan warga. Kegiatan yang diusulkan diharapkan memang sesuai kebutuhan dan bisa menambah penghasilan secara langsung. • Ibu Dewi menanyakan kegiatan apa yang ingin/ diminati warga untuk menambah penghasilan? Diharapkan usulan kegiatan yang sesuai dengan potensi setempat. • Ibu Saptinah, Nimah, Janariyah mengusulkan untuk pemberian bibit, dan pupuk bagi petani. • Bpk. Arsali , Apip mengusulkan pelatihan bubidaya ikan lele, lahan tersedia, dan peminatnya untuk berkelompok juga ada. • Sdr. Uji Sanusi Pelatihan kerajinan boneka, keset kaki, pembuatan pedding dari limbah industry. Banyak terdapat limbah yang bisa dimanfaatkan menjadi barang yang bernilai jual. 4. PENYEPAKATAN Disepakati bahwa usulan dari Desa Tambak untuk kegiatan SAP adalah : Pelatihan Budidaya Ikan air tawar (lele) Pemberian bibit, dan pupuk bagi petani. Pelatihan kerajinan boneka, keset kaki, pembuatan pedding dari limbah industry. (Bisa dikembangkan menjadi setra industry kerajinan limbah). 3. PENUTUP Rapat ditutup pukul 16.00 Rapat dihadiri oleh : 8 orang laki-laki dan 7 orang perempuan

201

DOKUMENTASI

202

LIST OF ATTENDANT

203

MINUTE OF MEETING Hari /Tanggal : Jum’at/ 24 July 2020 Waktu : 10.00 – 11.30 WIB Tempat : Desa Undar Andir RT 03/01 Agenda : FGD Assesment SAP

Peserta rapat : Aparat Desa Undar Andir Warga Terkena Dampak Tanggul Ciujung Tim CS 01 Serang

No Diskusi Action by 1. PEMBUKAAN Pembukaan disampaikan oleh Bpk. Ahmad. Disampaikan bahwa pembebasan lahan tanggul masih dalam proses dan saat ini menunggu kelanjutan kegiatan pembebasan lahan sesuai arahan BBWS dan konsultan. Menyampaikan bahwa akan ada diskusi mengenai kegiatan warga terdampak tanggul yang adakan disampaikan oleh tim konsultan. 2. MATERI Materi disampaikan oleh konsultan CS 01 (Ibu Dewi) disampaikan bahwa tahapan pembebasan lahan tanggul Ciujung saat ini sedang menunggu pengukuran dari BPN dalam waktu dekat semoga dapat terealisasi. Dana pembangunan tanggul Ciujung berasal dari LOAN Asian Development Bank(ADB), sementara anggaran pembebasan lahan berasal dari APBN dan dana untuk pemulihan mata pencaharian berasal dari APBD dengan adanya MOU antara FMSRB dan Bupati Kab. Serang. Penjelasan tentang proses pembebasan lahan, penetapan lokasi dan pengaduan masyarakat Kegiatan social atau Social Action Plan adalah untuk memulihkan mata pencaharian warga erkena dampak tanggul yang mana lahan garapannya atau tempat usahanya atau rumahnya terkena pembebasan sehingga terjadi penurunan pendapatan. Tujuan dilakukannya program pemulihan mata pencaharian (LRP/SAP): Mengembalikan mata pencaharian dan pendapatan rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) pembanguan tanggul Ciujung. Meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia untuk rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) melalui pengembangan pola pikir yang kreatif, inovatif dan wirausaha. Meningatkan kesejahteraan hidup yang lebih baik bagi warga terkena dampak (APs) 204

No Diskusi Action by Meningkatkan kapasitas kelembagaan petani dan masyarakat. Meningkatkan kesadaran akan gaya hidup sehat untuk orang-orang yang terkena dampak yang tinggal di koridor dampak. Meningkatkan kualitas lingkungan di koridor area dampak. 3. DISKUSI Pada kesempatan ini tim konsultan akan mengajak warga untuk berdiskusi mengenai kegiatan social yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan warga agar manfaat kegiatan SAP ini dapat tepat guna dan tepat sasaran sesuai kebutuhan warga. Kegiatan yang diusulkan diharapkan memang sesuai kebutuhan dan bisa menambah penghasilan secara langsung. • Ibu Dewi menanyakan kegiatan apa yang ingin/ diminati warga untuk menambah penghasilan? Diharapkan usulan kegiatan yang sesuai dengan minat potensi setempat. • Bpk Alif mengusulkan pelatihan bengkel motor pemuda, banyak anak muda yang tidak punya kerja. • Ibu Sri, Ibu Arwiyah, Ibu Supi, Ibu Sapna mengusulkan pelatihan menjahit. • Bpk Muzeni mengusulkan pelatihan budidaya bebek. • Pelatihan membuat telur asin aneka rasa. • Pelatihan Roti/Donat untuk ibu-ibu 4. PENYEPAKATAN Disepakati bahwa usulan dari Desa Undar Andir untuk kegiatan SAP adalah : Pelatihan Bengkel Motor Pelatihan menjahit Pelatihan budidaya ungags (bebek) Pelatihan pembuatan telur asin aneka rasa Pelatihan Roti/donat 3. PENUTUP Rapat ditutup pukul 11.30 Rapat dihadiri oleh : 3 laki laki dan 19 perempuan

205

DOKUMENTATION

206

LIST OF ATTENDANT

207

208

MINUTE OF MEETING Hari /Tanggal : Jum’at/ 24 July 2020 Waktu : 13.30 – 15.00 WIB Tempat : Desa Undar Andir RT 04/02 Agenda : FGD Assesment SAP

Peserta rapat : Aparat Desa Undar Andir Warga Terkena Dampak Tanggul Ciujung Tim CS 01 Serang

No Diskusi Action by 1. PEMBUKAAN Pembukaan disampaikan oleh Bpk. Damanhuri Disampaikan bahwa pembebasan lahan tanggul masih dalam proses dan saat ini menunggu kelanjutan kegiatan pembebasan lahan sesuai arahan BBWS dan konsultan. Menyampaikan bahwa akan ada diskusi mengenai kegiatan warga terdampak tanggul yang adakan disampaikan oleh tim konsultan. 2. MATERI Materi disampaikan oleh konsultan CS 01 (Ibu Dewi) disampaikan bahwa tahapan pembebasan lahan tanggul Ciujung saat ini sedang menunggu pengukuran dari BPN dalam waktu dekat semoga dapat terealisasi. Dana pembangunan tanggul Ciujung berasal dari LOAN Asian Development Bank(ADB), sementara anggaran pembebasan lahan berasal dari APBN dan dana untuk pemulihan mata pencaharian berasal dari APBD dengan adanya MOU antara FMSRB dan Bupati Kab. Serang. Penjelasan tentang proses pembebasan lahan, penetapan lokasi dan pengaduan masyarakat Kegiatan social atau Social Action Plan adalah untuk memulihkan mata pencaharian warga erkena dampak tanggul yang mana lahan garapannya atau tempat usahanya atau rumahnya terkena pembebasan sehingga terjadi penurunan pendapatan. Tujuan dilakukannya program pemulihan mata pencaharian (LRP/SAP): Mengembalikan mata pencaharian dan pendapatan rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) pembanguan tanggul Ciujung. Meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia untuk rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) melalui pengembangan pola pikir yang kreatif, inovatif dan wirausaha. Meningatkan kesejahteraan hidup yang lebih baik bagi warga terkena dampak (APs) 209

No Diskusi Action by Meningkatkan kapasitas kelembagaan petani dan masyarakat. Meningkatkan kesadaran akan gaya hidup sehat untuk orang-orang yang terkena dampak yang tinggal di koridor dampak. Meningkatkan kualitas lingkungan di koridor area dampak. 3. DISKUSI Pada kesempatan ini tim konsultan akan mengajak warga untuk berdiskusi mengenai kegiatan social yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan warga agar manfaat kegiatan SAP ini dapat tepat guna dan tepat sasaran sesuai kebutuhan warga. Kegiatan yang diusulkan diharapkan memang sesuai kebutuhan dan bisa menambah penghasilan secara langsung. • Ibu Dewi menanyakan kegiatan apa yang ingin/ diminati warga untuk menambah penghasilan? Diharapkan usulan kegiatan yang sesuai dengan minat potensi setempat. • Budidaya ikan air tawar (lele) • Kue basah ( pie, jajan pasar) • Pupuk, bibit, mesin perontok padi • Pelatihan pemasaran secara online • Pelatihan Mebulair • Pelatihan kaligrafi 4. PENYEPAKATAN Disepakati bahwa usulan dari Desa Undar Andir untuk kegiatan SAP adalah : • Budidaya ikan air tawar (lele) • Kue basah ( pie, jajan pasar) • Pupuk, bibit, mesin perontok padi • Pelatihan pemasaran secara online • Pelatihan Mebulair • Pelatihan kaligrafi 5. PENUTUP Rapat ditutup pukul 15.00

Rapat dihadiri oleh : 0 orang laki-laki dan 14 orang perempuan

210

DOKUMENTATION

211

LIST OF ATTENDANT

212

MINUTE OF MEETING Hari /Tanggal : Jum’at/ 24 July 2020 Waktu : 15.00 – 16.15 WIB Tempat : Desa Undar Andir RT 08/03 (Kp. Picon) Agenda : FGD Assesment SAP

Peserta rapat : Aparat Desa Undar Andir Warga Terkena Dampak Tanggul Ciujung Tim CS 01 Serang

No Diskusi Action by Meningkatkan kapasitas kelembagaan petani dan masyarakat. Meningkatkan kesadaran akan gaya hidup sehat untuk orang-orang yang terkena dampak yang tinggal di koridor dampak. Meningkatkan kualitas lingkungan di koridor area dampak. 3. DISKUSI Pada kesempatan ini tim konsultan akan mengajak warga untuk berdiskusi mengenai kegiatan social yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan warga agar manfaat kegiatan SAP ini dapat tepat guna dan tepat sasaran sesuai kebutuhan warga. Kegiatan yang diusulkan diharapkan memang sesuai kebutuhan dan bisa menambah penghasilan secara langsung. • Ibu Dewi menanyakan kegiatan apa yang ingin/ diminati warga untuk menambah penghasilan? Diharapkan usulan kegiatan yang sesuai dengan minat potensi setempat. • Pelatihan menjahit (kerudung/ service baju) • Pelatihan kue basah/ jajan pasar • Pelatihan Roti/donat • Bantuan bibit, pupuk dan mesin perontok padi 4. PENYEPAKATAN Disepakati bahwa usulan dari Desa Undar Andir untuk kegiatan SAP adalah : • Pelatihan menjahit (kerudung/ service baju) • Pelatihan kue basah/ jajan pasar • Pelatihan Roti/donat • Bantuan bibit, pupuk dan mesin perontok padi 5. PENUTUP Rapat ditutup pukul 16.15 Rapat dihadiri oleh : 0 laki-laki dan 11 perempuan

214

DOKUMENTATION

215

LIST OFF ATTENDANT

216

MINUTE OF MEETING Hari /Tanggal : Senin / 27 Juli 2020 Waktu : 15.00 – 16.15 WIB Tempat : Desa Dukuh Agenda : FGD Assesment SAP

Peserta rapat : Aparat Desa Dukuh Warga Terkena Dampak Tanggul Ciujung Tim CS 01 Serang

No Diskusi Action by 1. PEMBUKAAN Pembukaan disampaikan oleh konsultan CS 01 (Ibu Dewi) disampaikan bahwa tahapan pembebasan lahan tanggul Ciujung saat ini sedang menunggu pengukuran dari BPN dalam waktu dekat semoga dapat terealisasi. Setelah pengukuran oleh BPN maka aka nada penilaian oleh tim Appraisal untuk menghitung berapa nilai uang yang akan diterima. Mohon ibu-ibu dan bapak memperhatikan pada saat pengukuran dan penghitungan tanaman agar jumlahnya sesuai dengan yangn dimiliki, jika tidak sesuai silahkan mengajukan keberatan pada saat itu atau pada masa tenggang yaitu selama 14 hari setelah pengumuman. Apakah terdapat banyak makam di sekitar area tanggul? Bapak RT Salikin menjawab banyak terdapat kuburan keluarga juga ada makam yang tidak jelas warisnya. Untuk biaya pemindahan dan syukuran makam disepakati biaya Rp. 3.500.000/makam Dana pembangunan tanggul Ciujung berasal dari LOAN Asian Development Bank(ADB), sementara anggaran pembebasan lahan berasal dari APBN dan dana untuk pemulihan mata pencaharian berasal dari APBD dengan adanya MOU antara FMSRB dan Bupati Kab. Serang. Penjelasan tentang proses pembebasan lahan, penetapan lokasi dan pengaduan masyarakat Kegiatan social atau Social Action Plan adalah untuk memulihkan mata pencaharian warga terkena dampak tanggul yang mana lahan garapannya atau tempat usahanya atau rumahnya terkena pembebasan sehingga terjadi penurunan pendapatan. Tujuan dilakukannya program pemulihan mata pencaharian (LRP/SAP): Mengembalikan mata pencaharian dan pendapatan rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) pembanguan tanggul Ciujung. Meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia untuk rumah tangga terkena dampak (AHs) melalui pengembangan pola pikir yang kreatif, inovatif dan 217

No Diskusi Action by wirausaha. Meningatkan kesejahteraan hidup yang lebih baik bagi warga terkena dampak (APs) Meningkatkan kapasitas kelembagaan petani dan masyarakat. Meningkatkan kesadaran akan gaya hidup sehat untuk orang-orang yang terkena dampak yang tinggal di koridor dampak. Meningkatkan kualitas lingkungan di koridor area dampak. 2. DISKUSI Pada kesempatan ini tim konsultan (Ibu Dewi) akan mengajak warga untuk berdiskusi mengenai kegiatan social yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan warga agar manfaat kegiatan SAP ini dapat tepat guna dan tepat sasaran sesuai kebutuhan warga. Kegiatan yang diusulkan diharapkan memang sesuai kebutuhan dan bisa menambah penghasilan secara langsung. • Ibu Dewi menanyakan kegiatan apa yang ingin/ diminati warga untuk menambah penghasilan? Karena ibu-ibu dan bapak kehilangan lahan garapan maka kegiatan apa yang nantinya bisa membantu perekonomian keluarga? Tetapi dengan berkelompok. • Ibu RT menyampaikan bahwa ibu-ibu biasa bekerja/berjualan sendiri-sendiri dan tidak terbiasa berkelompok, sehingga menginginkan kegiatan yang perorangan. • Ibu Dewi menjelaskan kegiatan yang ada memang mengajak ibu-ibu untuk berkelompok bekerjasama, begitu juga dengan bapak-bapak. Apakah masih ada lahan yang akan dipakai untuk bertani/berkebun? • Ibu-ibu menjawab bahwa lahan garapan mereka sudah terkena tanggul, tanah yang ada adalah lahan pekarangan rumah. • Jika memungkinkan ibu-ibu menginginkan bibit tanaman untuk ditanam di pekarangan tetapi bisa menghasilkan seperti Jambu Bangkok. • .Untuk pemuda Pak mujahidin mengusulkan pelatihan bengkel motor. • Untuk bapak-bapak Pak RT dan Pak Mujahidin mengusulkan pelatihan budidaya ternak iken lele, dan lahan juga masih tersedia. • Modal usaha untuk menambah usaha yang sedang berjalan. 3. PENYEPAKATAN Disepakati bahwa usulan dari Desa Dukuh untuk kegiatan SAP adalah : 7. Pemberian bantuan bibit tanaman buah-buahan 8. Budidaya ikan air tawar lele 9. Pelatihan Perbengkelan motor 10. Bantuan permodalan untuk usaha. 4. PENUTUP Rapat ditutup pukul 16.15 218

No Diskusi Action by Rapat dihadiri oleh : 2 Laki-laki dan 12 perempuan

DOKUMENTATION

219

LIST OF ATTENDANT