Mr Simon Danczuk 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mr Simon Danczuk 1 Mr Simon Danczuk 1 Contents 1. Letter from Mr Paul Turner-Mitchell, 23 October 2014 2 2. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Paul Turner-Mitchell, 30 October 2014 4 3. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Simon Danczuk MP, 30 October 2014 4 4. Letter from Mr Simon Danczuk MP to the Commissioner, 18 November 2014 7 5. Letter from the Commissioner to the Registrar, 24 November 2014 8 6. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Simon Danczuk MP, 24 November 2014 9 7. Letter from the Registrar to the Commissioner, 26 November 2014 9 8. Enclosures to letter of 26 Nov ember 2014 10 9. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Simon Danczuk MP, 16 December 2014 13 10. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Simon Danczuk MP, 12 January 2015 14 11. Email from Mr Danczuk MP to the Commissioner, 14 January 2015 16 12. Email from the Commissioner’s office to Mr Danczuk MP, 14 January 2015 17 13. Email from Mr Danczuk MP’s office to the Commissioner’s office, 26 January 201517 14. Email from the Commissioner’s office to Mr Danczuk’s office, 26 January 2015 17 15. Telephone call from the Commissioner’s office to Mr Danczuk’s office, 29 January 2015 18 16. Email from Mr Danczuk MP to the Commissioner, 29 January 2015 18 17. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Danczuk MP, 2 February 2015 20 18. Extract from the Register of Members’ Financial Interests as of 6 January 2015 20 19. Email from the Commissioner’s office to Mr Danczuk MP, 16 February 2015 22 20. Email from Mr Danczuk MP to the Assistant Registrar, 20 February 2015 22 21. Transcript of oral evidence: 10 February 2015 23 Mr Simon Danczuk 2 1. Letter from Mr Paul Turner-Mitchell, 23 October 2014 I wish to make a formal complaint that the above named Member has failed to comply with the Code of Conduct and its associated rules. On or around 16 April 2014 the above named Member and his Senior Parliamentary Aide , Matthew Baker, had published a book ‘Smile for the Camera: The Double Life of Cyril Smith’ by Biteback Publishing. However, prior thereto, the Daily Mail serialised the said book with a number of consecutive front page stories. I was told by Mr Baker when he was writing the book that he co-authored that the revenue derived from both the serialisation and the royalties from publication would be split equally between himself and the Member. Upon commencement of the serialisation by the Daily Mail, Mr Baker who was a former close friend, advised me personally that the rights had been sold for substantial and significant sum of money which would be paid under contract 3 months later. In July 2014, I personally spoke with Mr Baker who advised me that they have at that juncture received collectively between them the sum of £30,000.00. The Member has, so far, refused to answer constituents regarding the said payment. Paragraph 13 of the Code of Conduct expressly provides “Members of Parliament are required to complete a registration form and submit it to the Commissioner within one month of their election to the House….After the initial publication of the Register… it is the responsibility of Members to notify changes in their registrable interests within four weeks of each change occurring.” The Member therefore in compliance with the Code, had 4 weeks to declare the payment. Having perused and considered the latest online update, to date, the Members has so far failed, refused and/or neglected to make disclosure in breach of the Code of Conduct. This Member has worked tirelessly exposing sexual abuse and pursuing the case of justice for Mr Simon Danczuk 3 the victims. He should be commended for that. However, in terms of independent enquiries and the like, he has been explicit in his views for the need for openness and transparency. Such openness and transparency must, given the Code of Conduct, apply to declarations but in this particular case, the Member must show the same openness and transparency that he is campaigning for to the actual victims himself which he has failed to do. In an interview with the online press locally at the book launch, the following question and answer was asked/given: RO “What do you intend to do with the financial proceeds from the book?” SD/MB “Some it will go to children’s charities.” http://www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/86655/cyril-smith- book-an-interview-with-authors-simon-danczuk-and-matt-baker The non-declaration of the proceeds from serialisation is a serious concern given the pledge made within the constituency that some of it would go to children’s charities. I hope the Commissioner will also be able to establish over and above the non-declaration, how much exactly of the £30,000.00 has/will be given to children’s charities, the name of the said charity or charities and the date of any payments. Victims of child abuse deserve the same openness and transparency from Mr Danczuk over his financial affairs that, for example, he is demanding of Fiona Woolf of the Chair of the Government’s independent inquiry. 23 October 2014 Mr Simon Danczuk 4 2. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Paul Turner-Mitchell, 30 October 2014 Thank you for your letter of 23 October 2014 with your complaint concerning Mr Danczuk in respect of the registration and declaration of his financial interests. I have decided to begin an inquiry into your allegation. In essence, the allegation I have accepted for investigation is that Mr Danczuk has failed to register in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests, within the 28 days determined by the House, receipt of remuneration in connection with the publication and serialisation of a book ‘Smile for the Camera’. I enclose a note which sets out the procedure I follow. I have written to the Member, enclosing a copy of your letter, to invite his comments. When I have his response, I will decide how best to proceed. Your letter of 23 October is now part of the evidence for this inquiry. While my inquiry is ongoing the information used in the inquiry has parliamentary privilege. This means it should not be disclosed, in any form, to third parties. That bar on disclosure will lapse only after the House has had the opportunity to consider it. You should not circulate the contents of our correspondence (including any emails exchanged with my office) more widely. Although I will, in the next few days, include on my parliamentary web pages the fact that I am conducting an inquiry into allegations against Mr Danczuk, I will not give progress reports during the course of my inquiry. I will be in touch again when my inquiry is complete. 30 October 2014 3. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Simon Danczuk MP, 30 October 2014 I would welcome your help on a complaint which I have received from Mr Turner-Mitchell in respect of the registration of your financial interests. Mr Simon Danczuk 5 I enclose a copy of Mr Turner-Mitchell’s letter of 23 October 2014. In essence, the allegation I have accepted for investigation is that you have failed to register in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests, within the 28 days determined by the House, receipt of remuneration in connection with the publication and serialisation of a book ‘Smile for the Camera’. The Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament approved by the House on 12 March 2012 provides in paragraph 13 as follows: “Members shall fulfil conscientiously the requirements of the House in respect of the registration of interests in the Register of Members' Financial Interests. They shall always be open and frank in drawing attention to any relevant interest in any proceeding of the House or its Committees, and in any communications with Ministers, Members, public officials or public office holders.” The rules relating to the registration of Members’ interests are set out in chapter 1 of the Guide to the Rules relating to the conduct of Members. Chapter 1 of the Guide identifies the categories of registrable interest. In the 2009 Guide, which is still current, Category 2 defines Remunerated employment, office, profession, etc. as follows: “Employment, office, trade, profession or vocation (apart from membership of the House or ministerial office) which is remunerated or in which the Member has any financial interest….” Paragraph 24 says: “All employment outside the House and any sources of remuneration which do not fall clearly within any other Category should be registered here. Members must register under this category the precise amount of each individual payment made, the nature of the work carried on in return for that payment, the number of hours worked during the period to which that payment relates and (except where disclosure of the information would be contrary to any legal or established professional duty of privacy or confidentiality) the name and address of the person, organization or company making that payment.” Mr Simon Danczuk 6 Category 3 defines Clients: “In respect of any paid employment registered in Category 1 (Directorships) and Category 2 (Remunerated employment, office, profession, etc.), any provision to clients of services should be registered under this Category. All clients to which personal services are provided should be listed together with the nature of the client’s business in each case….” Paragraph 28 says: “Members must register under this category the precise amount of each individual payment made, the nature of the work carried on in return for that payment, the number of hours worked during the period to which that payment relates and (except where disclosure of the information would be contrary to any legal or established professional duty of privacy or confidentiality) the name and address of the person, organization or company making that payment.” Mr Turner-Mitchell alleges that you and the co-author of ‘Smile for the Camera’ received approximately £30,000 in connection with the publication and serialisation rights in July 2014.
Recommended publications
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely
    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
    [Show full text]
  • Chilling Day Special Branch Swooped to Seize ANOTHER Dossier on VIP Abusers: 16 Mps' Names Mentioned in 1984 Report on Paedophile Lobby's Influence in Westminster
    Chilling day Special Branch swooped to seize ANOTHER dossier on VIP abusers: 16 MPs' names mentioned in 1984 report on paedophile lobby's influence in Westminster • Police raided newspaper offices of Don Hale, editor of Bury Messenger • He'd recently been given sensitive files by Labour politician Barbara Castle • Documents included typewritten minutes of meetings that had been held at Westminster in support of paedophile agenda • Included details of a host of Establishment figures who had apparently pledged support to their cause • Also mentioned multiple times was Tory minister Sir Rhodes Boyson, a well-known enthusiast for corporal punishment, and Education Secretary Sir Keith Joseph By Guy Adams for the Daily Mail Published: 00:59 GMT, 19 July 2014 | Updated: 20:03 GMT, 19 July 2014 X Barbara Castle: Worried about rising influence of paedophile lobby The knock on the door came early one day in the famously dry summer of 1984. It was just after 8 am, and Don Hale, the young editor of the Bury Messenger, was reading the daily papers at his desk as his reporters were beginning to arrive at the office. As Hale, then 31, answered the door, a trio of plain-clothes detectives barged in, followed by a dozen police officers in uniform. What happened next was, in Hale’s words, ‘like something out of totalitarian East Germany rather than Margaret Thatcher’s supposedly free Britain’. The detectives identified themselves as Special Branch, the division of the police responsible for matters of national security. ‘They began to flash warrant cards and bark questions,’ says Hale.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Independent Review of Two Home Office Commissioned Independent Reviews Looking at Information Held in Connection with Child Abuse from 1979-1999
    An Independent Review Of Two Home Office Commissioned Independent Reviews Looking At Information Held In Connection With Child Abuse from 1979-1999 Peter Wanless and Richard Whittam QC INDEX 1. Foreword Page 1 2. Introduction and Context Page 2 3. Executive Summary Page 7 4. Consideration of Review 1 Page 10 5. Further Home Office searches and Page 13 The Brighton Assaults File 6. Our Approach In Detail Page 16 7. Consideration of Review 2 Page 27 8. The Questions Posed In the Terms Page 31 Of Reference 9. Conclusions Page 34 10. Recommendations Page 35 Annexes A Terms of Reference B Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) – retention policy C Who we asked D What we asked E Review 1, interim and final F Review 2 G Schedule of redactions H Protocol; Police & Home Office I 114 files schedule J File pre-fixes 1 Foreword 1. The Home Secretary appointed us to conduct an independent review of two previous pieces of work commissioned by her Permanent Secretary. Review 1 had been invited to consider: What, if any, material was provided to the Department [Home Office] in relation to alleged organised child abuse; and What, if any, action was taken in relation to such allegations and whether relevant materials were passed to the police or law enforcement body to investigate; and Whether any member of Home Office staff was alleged or found to be involved or implicated in organised child abuse and what action was taken. 2. Review 2 looked into whether the Home Office ever directly or indirectly funded the Paedophile Information Exchange [PIE].
    [Show full text]
  • One Nation, Disconnected Party: the Evocation of One Nation Aimed to Unite the Nation, Instead It Highlighted the Labour Party’S Divisions
    Batrouni, D. (2017). One Nation, disconnected party: The evocation of One Nation aimed to unite the nation, instead it highlighted the Labour party’s divisions. British Politics, 12(3), 432-448. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-017-0054-8 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1057/s41293-017-0054-8 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Palgrave Macmillan at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41293-017-0054-8 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ One Nation, disconnected party The evocation of One Nation aimed to unite the nation, instead it highlighted the Labour party’s divisions. Dimitri Batrouni School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TB Abstract: This paper explores Ed Miliband’s evocation of One Nation in his 2012 Labour party conference speech. It first surveys the views of members of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) and key advisors to Miliband on One Nation, with a focus on the debates surrounding its purpose and substance. What becomes clear is the amount of confusion amongst backbenchers and shadow cabinet members of the PLP regarding its purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in His Speech to the 2012 Labour Party Conference, Ed Miliband
    In his speech to the 2012 Labour Party conference, Ed Miliband appropriated Benjamin Disraeli’s idea of ‘One Nation’ to convey his vision of a united Britain. This address was delivered against the backdrop of rising unemployment, higher public borrowing and the Conservative-Liberal Democrat government’s ongoing austerity programme (Miliband, 2012). Six months later, on 1 April 2013, the Coalition’s welfare reforms came into effect, accompanied by a storm of controversy and an increasingly punitive public discourse. While these changes were popular with some sections of the electorate, others raised concerns over the unfairness of certain measures – notably the removal of the spare room subsidy from Housing Benefit recipients of working age, a policy its critics have dubbed the ‘bedroom tax’ – and the demonisation of benefit claimants by the tabloid press. Nevertheless, both sides acknowledged that the welfare state was in need of reform. Having specified the broad ‘rhetorical context’ (Martin, 2013, pp. 10-11) that gave rise to One Nation Labour and its emergent policy programme, this article will first situate its analysis within existing scholarship on British political speech and ideological renewal. Next, it utilises Michael Freeden’s morphological approach to map and interpret the core concepts of Labour’s ideology, before identifying the ‘commonplace’ arguments and rhetorical proofs with which this standpoint provides its adherents. Among these arguments are the narratives of party traditions, ‘new times’ and national renewal, and the article examines their role in making the case for One Nation social security reform. In so doing, it locates the three narratives within the ideological and rhetorical traditions of British social democracy, and demonstrates that they coalesce in the leadership persona of Ed Miliband.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of the Black Vote in 2015
    POWER OF THE BLACK VOTE IN 2015 The Changing Face of England & Wales Parliamentary seats and their voters Sponsored by Table of Contents 3 Foreword - Simon Woolley 4-5 Executive Summary 6-7 List of Marginal Seats Measured by BME Impact 8 Voting and turnout 9 Methodology 10 BME Population 11 Individual BME Communities 12 Labour’s Challenge 13 Conservative’s Opportunity 14 Lib Dem’s Watershed 15 MP’s Vulnerable to BME Vote 16-63 Analysis of Parliamentary Seats © Operation Black Vote - August 2013 Researched, written and designed by Lester Holloway 2Assistance from Louise Alexander Changing Face of Britain Foreword lack and minority ethnic unemployment, education, Bvoters have been handed health and housing. the greatest opportunity ever What is also interesting about to effectively engage in British this data is the shift of where politics. BME political power has been. In Our groundbreaking research the past it was almost exclusively clearly shows that the BME vote in urban, inner city areas which could easily decide over 160 seats. barely changed political hands. The Coalition Government has Today this change is not only oc- governed the UK with a working curring in urban areas such as majority of just 83 seats. The data Croydon, Harrow and Ealing but that we are publishing therefore also outside urban areas, such speaks volumes; In a 168 marginal as Corby, Rossendale & Darwin, seats the BME electorate is larger Cheadle and Loughborough. than the majority in which the With this report we relish the seat was won. The BME electorate challenge to inspire an often cyni- could influence an even greater cal electorate to engage as never number of seats if, as predicted, before, and simultaneously to the election contest becomes ever inform our political leaders that tighter.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster: Investigation Report
    Allegations child sexual of abuse Westminster to linked Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report Investigation Investigation Report February 2020 February 2020 2020 Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report February 2020 A report of the Inquiry Panel Professor Alexis Jay OBE Professor Sir Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Crown copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third‑party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports CCS1219768174 02/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled‑fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. The following corrections were made to this version of the report on 29 May 2020: Page vii, paragraph 3: was amended to read ‘hand over the same documents’. Page 159 in Annex 1: profession removed, amended to read David Ford Campbell-Chalmers Contents Executive Summary v Part A: Introduction 1 A.1: Background
    [Show full text]
  • 15 October 2012 Mr Mark Prisk MP, Minister for Housing and Nick Boles MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Planning
    House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee Planning, housing and growth Oral and written evidence Monday 15 October 2012 Mr Mark Prisk MP, Minister for Housing and Nick Boles MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Planning Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 15 October 2012 HC 626-i Published on 20 December 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £14.50 The Communities and Local Government Committee The Communities and Local Government Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Communities and Local Government. Current membership Mr Clive Betts MP (Labour, Sheffield South-East) (Chair) Heidi Alexander MP (Labour, Lewisham East) Bob Blackman MP (Conservative, Harrow East) Simon Danczuk MP Rochdale (Labour, Rochdale) Bill Esterson MP (Labour, Sefton Central) Stephen Gilbert MP (Liberal Democrat, St Austell and Newquay) David Heyes MP (Labour, Ashton under Lyne) James Morris MP (Conservative, Halesowen and Rowley Regis) Mark Pawsey MP (Conservative, Rugby) John Stevenson MP (Conservative, Carlisle) Heather Wheeler MP (Conservative, South Derbyshire) George Hollingbery MP (Conservative, Meon Valley) was a member of the Committee during this inquiry. Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/parliament.uk/clg.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Maitland View
    TitleMaitland View Today, we'll see Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn swap what would be expected to be their normal campaign itineraries. The Prime Minister is touring North East, where she will accuse the Labour Party of abandoning the patriotic working class. It is expected she will deliver the speech, in a similar fashion to her other general election addresses, standing in front of a bank of suited Conservative candidates and quarantined from any members of the What have we learnt this week? general public. The Conservative are yet to hit their first Jeremy Corbyn, meanwhile, will pitch his real problem of this campaign. They foreign policy credentials at Chatham glided through the election spending House, taking on critics of his approach to scandal and remain high in the polls. All intervention and the use of nuclear this being equal, Theresa May will weapons. He will argue that he is not a returned to number 10 with an enormous pacifist and would support military action if majority. it has been sanctioned by the UN and is in accordance with international law, despite Labour, by accident or design, have got a having previously approved such action. In lot of coverage after their manifesto leak. his speech this morning, Corbyn will also The policies are popular, the leader distance himself from Donald Trump in a unpopular, and the polls stubborn. The thinly veiled jab to the Prime Minister's party divided, MPs bracing for defeat and recent visit to the US, saying "Pandering to government seeming a long way away. an erratic Trump administration will not deliver stability … So no more hand-holding Meanwhile the Liberal Democrats have with Donald Trump; a Labour government largely failed to achieve cut through, a will conduct a robust and independent surge in policies, announcements and foreign policy made in London." busy work, but little shift in the polls.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Election: Rail Commuters Hold Key to Half of Marginals Campaign for Better Transport Briefing
    2015 Election: Rail commuters hold key to half of marginals Campaign for Better Transport briefing Summary This briefing sets out the central role that rail commuters could have in deciding the outcome of the 2015 General Election. Over the last decade, successive Governments have followed a policy of raising fares by above inflation. This means ticket prices have gone up by around 45 per cent in 10 years. Using official data, Campaign for Better Transport has identified 74 marginal seats in England and Wales where there are large numbers of rail commuters. Many of these are in the wider south east, where commuters face annual fares of £4000-£5000. Political parties will be keen to appeal to rail commuters, with policies to end above inflation fares central to the debate. Background and context On current polling, the 2015 General Election will, even more than most, be won and lost in the marginal constituencies. Our research shows large numbers of rail commuters in half of the most closely contested seats, often outnumbering the size of the incumbent’s majority. Given that the cost of living looks set to be a central issue in the election, the price of rail commuting could play an important role in the outcome. Transport costs are the largest single monthly outgoing for the average household. But unlike energy, where responsibility (and therefore blame) for price increases is split between the energy companies, the regulator and the Government, with rail fares the Government is clearly responsible. It lets the rail franchises, regulates many fares and sets the rules for the rest.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge House, Knowl View and Rochdale Investigation Report April 2018
    Cambridge House, Knowl View and Rochdale Investigation Report April 2018 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 26 of the Inquiries Act 2005 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 25 April 2018 A report of the Inquiry Panel HC 954-III © Crown copyright 2018 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications ISBN 978-1-5286-0290-7 CCS0318279676 04/18 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Contents Executive Summary iii Images, maps and plans vii Part A: Introduction 1 The background to the investigation 2 Cyril Smith 3 Knowl View School 5 Reasons for investigating Rochdale and issues considered 8 Standards and terminology 10 References 10 Part B: Cambridge House 11 Background and Cyril Smith’s involvement 12 Allegations made to Lyndon Price in 1965 16 The Lancashire Constabulary investigation 1969–70 17 The Director of
    [Show full text]