Afghanistan Receives Team from National Defence College

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

AFGHAN NEWS Afghanistan receives team from National Defence College India’s National Defence College (NDC) team members with President Hamid Karzai and Ambassador Rakesh Sood. fghanistan President Hamid Karzai about the emerging role of Afghan security and National Defence College of Canada. praised the Indian education system forces and the challenges faced by them. He In the past two years, two Afghan army A and called for deeper interaction hoped that the team’s visit would lead to bet- officers have attended the prestigious NDC between India and Afghanistan to help con- ter understanding of each other. course. tinue the exchange of ideas and enrich the The NDC team also interacted with ISAF, The NDC team leader, Yoginder Kumar, experiences of each other in various fields. Kabul Military Training Center (KMTC), said, “This is the first visit by a team from Karzai was talking to a group of students Combined Security Transition Command- NDC to Afghanistan, after its admission from India’s National Defence College Afghanistan (CSTC-A), United Nations into SAARC. (NDC), at the presidential palace. “I am a Assistance Mission for Afghanistan “Our meetings with Afghan dignitaries product of the Indian education system,” (UNAMA) and Afghanistan National Army and interactions with ISAF and UNAMA Karzai said. Welcoming the NDC team to (ANA). provided us valuable insights. Each member Afghanistan, he fondly remembered his stu- The team also had a meeting with the of the team was touched by warmth and dent days at Shimla in India. Governor of Balkh Province, Noor hospitality shown by the government of The 14-member team from NDC was on a Mohmmad Atta, and visited the famous Blue Afghanistan.” five-day visit to Afghanistan from September Mosque in the city of Mazar-e-Sharif. Captain Chaiwat Muangnoi of Thailand 2, as part of a study tour to SAARC member Established in 1960 in New Delhi, NDC is Navy, a shy and quiet member of the team, countries. modelled after reputed institutions, such as was enthusiastic, when he said: “For me, the The team also called on Defence Minister the National War College of Washington, visit to Afghanistan was an experience, with General Abdul Rahim Wardak, who spoke Royal College of Defence Studies of London, unforgettable impressions.” ! 4 I N D I A R E V I E W O C T O B E R 2 0 0 7 h t t p : / / m e a k a b u l . n i c . i n.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Progress in Afghanistan Bucharest Summit2-4 April 2008 Progress in Afghanistan
© MOD NL © MOD Canada © MOD Canada Progress in Afghanistan Progress in Bucharest Summit 2-4 April 2008 Bucharest Summit2-4 Progress in Afghanistan Contents page 1. Foreword by Assistant Secretary General for Public Diplomacy, ..........................1 Jean-François Bureau, and NATO Spokesman, James Appathurai 2. Executive summary .........................................................................................................................................2 3. Security ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 • IED attacks and Counter-IED efforts 4 • Musa Qala 5 • Operations Medusa successes - Highlights Panjwayi and Zhari 6 • Afghan National Army 8 • Afghan National Police 10 • ISAF growth 10 4. Reconstruction and Development ............................................................................................... 12 • Snapshots of PRT activities 14 • Afghanistan’s aviation sector: taking off 16 • NATO-Japan Grant Assistance for Grassroots Projects 17 • ISAF Post-Operations Humanitarian Relief Fund 18 • Humanitarian Assistance - Winterisation 18 5. Governance ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 • Counter-Narcotics 20 © MOD Canada Foreword The NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) mission is approaching five years of operations in Afghanistan. This report is a
[Show full text]
Old Habits, New Consequences Old Habits, New Khalid Homayun Consequences Nadiri Pakistan’S Posture Toward Afghanistan Since 2001
Old Habits, New Consequences Old Habits, New Khalid Homayun Consequences Nadiri Pakistan’s Posture toward Afghanistan since 2001 Since the terrorist at- tacks of September 11, 2001, Pakistan has pursued a seemingly incongruous course of action in Afghanistan. It has participated in the U.S. and interna- tional intervention in Afghanistan both by allying itself with the military cam- paign against the Afghan Taliban and al-Qaida and by serving as the primary transit route for international military forces and matériel into Afghanistan.1 At the same time, the Pakistani security establishment has permitted much of the Afghan Taliban’s political leadership and many of its military command- ers to visit or reside in Pakistani urban centers. Why has Pakistan adopted this posture of Afghan Taliban accommodation despite its nominal participa- tion in the Afghanistan intervention and its public commitment to peace and stability in Afghanistan?2 This incongruence is all the more puzzling in light of the expansion of insurgent violence directed against Islamabad by the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), a coalition of militant organizations that are independent of the Afghan Taliban but that nonetheless possess social and po- litical links with Afghan cadres of the Taliban movement. With violence against Pakistan growing increasingly indiscriminate and costly, it remains un- clear why Islamabad has opted to accommodate the Afghan Taliban through- out the post-2001 period. Despite a considerable body of academic and journalistic literature on Pakistan’s relationship with Afghanistan since 2001, the subject of Pakistani accommodation of the Afghan Taliban remains largely unaddressed. Much of the existing literature identiªes Pakistan’s security competition with India as the exclusive or predominant driver of Pakistani policy vis-à-vis the Afghan Khalid Homayun Nadiri is a Ph.D.
[Show full text]
Agreement on Provisional Arrangements in Afghanistan Pending the Re-Establishment of Permanent Government Institutions
AGREEMENT ON PROVISIONAL ARRANGEMENTS IN AFGHANISTAN PENDING THE RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS The participants in the UN Talks on Afghanistan, In the presence of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Afghanistan, Determined to end the tragic conflict in Afghanistan and promote national reconciliation, lasting peace, stability and respect for human rights in the country, Reaffirming the independence, national sovereignty and territorial integrity of Afghanistan, Acknowledging the right of the people of Afghanistan to freely determine their own political future in accordance with the principles of Islam, democracy, pluralism and social justice, Expressing their appreciation to the Afghan mujahidin who, over the years, have defended the independence, territorial integrity and national unity of the country and have played a major role in the struggle against terrorism and oppression, and whose sacrifice has now made them both heroes of jihad and champions of peace, stability and reconstruction of their beloved homeland, Afghanistan, Aware that the unstable situation in Afghanistan requires the implementation of emergency interim arrangements and expressing their deep appreciation to His Excellency Professor Burhanuddin Rabbani for his readiness to transfer power to an interim authority which is to be established pursuant to this agreement, Recognizing the need to ensure broad representation in these interim arrangements of all segments of the Afghan population, including groups that have not been
[Show full text]
POLITICAL UPDATE Abdul Wardak and Bismillah Khan Mohammadi
Mara Tchalakov POLITICAL UPDATE August 16, 2012 ABDUL WARDAK AND BISMILLAH KHAN MOHAMMADI: UNPACKING AFGHANISTAN’S MINISTERIAL SHAKE-UP n an unprecedented single session of Parliament on August 4th, the Lower House dismissed the Afghan Idefense and interior ministers, Abdul Rahim Wardak and Bismillah Khan Mohammadi, following successive no-confidence votes. After weeks of alleged rocket attacks by Pakistani security forces in the border provinces, Parliament summoned the two ministers to appear before the assembly and submit to questioning over rising insecurity in the country. The heated session that resulted in their impeachment spanned the members’ concerns over rocket attacks from across the Durand Line, allegations of corruption and nepotism within the Defense and Interior Ministries, and targeted assassinations of high-profile figures across the country. The Presidential Palace was quick to announce in the wake again be able to curry favor with key allies across all major of Parliament’s decision that the two ministers would be ethnic camps and thereby encourage their dependence on asked to remain in an acting capacity until their successor(s) him. Rumors of behind-the-scenes Palace lobbying for are named; former Defense Minister Wardak nonetheless the impeachments were making the rounds even before immediately resigned following his ouster. With transition the parliamentary session began.3 The characteristics that underway, the dismissal of two such vital Cabinet posts has made both ministers such valuable allies for the President— left the international community anxiously speculating the their clout, popularity with Western interlocutors, and, in move’s impact on stability and governance in the country.
[Show full text]
Afghanistan May 2008
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT AFGHANISTAN 20 MAY 2008 UK Border Agency COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE AFGHANISTAN 20 MAY 2008 Contents Latest News EVENTS IN AFGHANISTAN FROM 1 MAY TO 20 MAY 2008 REPORTS ON AFGHANISTAN PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED SINCE 1 MAY 2008 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY........................................................................................1.01 Maps .............................................................................................. 1.08 2. ECONOMY............................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY.............................................................................................. 3.01 Overview to December 2001........................................................ 3.01 Post-Taliban.................................................................................. 3.02 Presidential election 9 October 2004 and the new Cabinet...... 3.08 Parliamentary and provincial elections 18 September 2005 .... 3.10 Afghanistan Compact 31 January 2006...................................... 3.14 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ..................................................................... 4.01 5. CONSTITUTION..................................................................................... 5.01 6. POLITICAL SYSTEM .............................................................................. 6.01 Overview ....................................................................................... 6.01 The Executive Branch.................................................................
[Show full text]
Country of Origin Information Report: AFGHANISTAN
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT AFGHANISTAN 29 AUGUST 2008 UK Border Agency COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE AFGHANISTAN 29 AUGUST 2008 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN AFGHANISTAN FROM 15 AUGUST TO 29 AUGUST 2008 REPORTS ON AFGHANISTAN PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED SINCE 15 AUGUST 2008 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY........................................................................................1.01 Maps .............................................................................................. 1.08 2. ECONOMY............................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY.............................................................................................. 3.01 Overview to December 2001........................................................ 3.01 Post-Taliban.................................................................................. 3.02 Presidential election 9 October 2004 and the new Cabinet...... 3.08 Parliamentary and provincial elections 18 September 2005 .... 3.10 Afghanistan Compact 31 January 2006...................................... 3.14 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ..................................................................... 4.01 5. CONSTITUTION..................................................................................... 5.01 6. POLITICAL SYSTEM .............................................................................. 6.01 Overview ......................................................................................
[Show full text]
Is the Multinational Intervention in Afghanistan Doomed by Hist
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Queensland eSpace Challenging Politics Conference Daryl Morini Is the International Intervention in Afghanistan Doomed by History? Exploring the Similarities, Differences and Lessons of Past Conflicts “[L]ike the astrologers and magicians whom they have succeeded [they] cast up their eyes to the clouds, and speak in immense, unsubstantiated images and similes, in deeply misleading metaphors and allegories, and make use of hypnotic formulae with little regard for experience…Thereby they throw dust in their own eyes as well as ours, obstruct our vision of the real world, and further confuse an already sufficiently bewildered public about the relations of value to fact…”1 - Isaiah Berlin, on Historical Inevitability Introduction The international intervention in Afghanistan, now in its ninth year, is doomed by historical fate. History repeats itself and Afghanistan—where foreign invasions have failed since the time of Alexander the Great—will once more bear out this historical inevitability. This matter-of-fact assertion, often tacit but at times explicit, has become a widely-accepted diagnosis of the ongoing war in Afghanistan. I will argue that this blanket critique of the international mission in Afghanistan, based on the premise that it is doomed to fail, is inherently misleading. I will offer three counter-arguments to this critique. Firstly, I will seek to demonstrate that historical inevitability is a myth, albeit a politically-useful one. Secondly, I will concede, where necessary, on some of the tactical and political similarities which such conflicts as the Vietnam War and the 1979-1989 Soviet-Afghan War shared with the current Afghan War.
[Show full text]
Country of Origin Report Afghanistan
Country of Origin Report Afghanistan March 2019 Page 1 of 124 Country of Origin Report Afghanistan| March 2019 Publication details The Hague Text by: Department for Country of Origin Information Reports (CAB) Disclaimer: The Dutch version of this report is leading. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands cannot be held accountable for misinterpretations based on the English version of the report. Page 2 of 124 Country of Origin Report Afghanistan| March 2019 Table of contents Publication details ............................................................................................2 Table of contents .............................................................................................3 Introduction ....................................................................................................5 1 Country information .................................................................................... 7 1.1 Political developments ......................................................................................7 1.1.1 Government of National Unity ...........................................................................7 1.1.2 Elections ........................................................................................................8 1.1.3 Corruption in government ............................................................................... 16 1.2 High Peace Council (HPC) ............................................................................... 17 1.2.1 Peace talks with the Taliban ...........................................................................
[Show full text]
The Participants in the UN Talks on Afghanistan. in the Presence of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Afgh
The participants in the UN Talks on Afghanistan. In the presence of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Afghanistan, Determined to end the tragic conflict in Afghanistan and promote national reconciliation, lasting peace, stability and respect for human rights in the country. Reaffirming the independence, national sovereignty and territorial integrity of Afghanistan, Acknowledging the right of the people of Afghanistan to freely determine their own political future in accordance with the principles of Islam, democracy, pluralism and social justice, Expressing their appreciation to the Afghan Mujahideen who, over the years, have defended the independence, territorial integrity and national unity of the country and have played a major role in the struggle against terrorism and oppression, and whose sacrifice has now made them both heroes of jihad and champions of peace, stability and reconstruction of their beloved homeland, Afghanistan, Aware that the unstable situation in Afghanistan requires the implementation of emergency interim arrangements and expressing their deep appreciation to His Excellency Professor Burhanuddin Rabbani for his readiness to transfer power to an interim authority which is to be established pursuant to this agreement, Recognizing the need to ensure broad representation in these interim arrangements of all segments of the Afghan population, including groups that have not been adequately represented at the UN Talks on Afghanistan, Noting that these interim arrangements are intended as a first
[Show full text]
War in Afghanistan: Strategy, Military Operations, and Issues for Congress
War in Afghanistan: Strategy, Military Operations, and Issues for Congress Steve Bowman Specialist in National Security Catherine Dale Specialist in International Security December 3, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40156 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress War in Afghanistan: Strategy, Military Operations, and Issues for Congress Summary With a deteriorating security situation and no comprehensive political outcome yet in sight, most observers view the war in Afghanistan as open-ended. By early 2009, a growing number of Members of Congress, Administration officials, and outside experts had concluded that the effort—often called “America’s other war”—required greater national attention. For the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (GIRoA), the war is both a struggle for survival and an effort to establish sustainable security and stability. For the United States, the war in Afghanistan concerns the security of Afghanistan and the region, including denying safe haven to terrorists and helping ensure a stable regional security balance. For regional states, including India and Russia as well as Afghanistan’s neighbors Pakistan and Iran, the war may have a powerful impact on the future balance of power and influence in the region. For individual members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the war may be about defeating terrorist networks, ensuring regional stability, proving themselves as contributing NATO members, and/or demonstrating NATO’s relevance in the 21st century. Since 2001, the character of the war in Afghanistan has evolved from a violent struggle against al Qaeda and its Taliban supporters to a multi-faceted counterinsurgency (COIN) effort.
[Show full text]
Province: Kabul Governor: Hajji Din Mohammad NDS Chief
Program for Culture & Conflict Studies www.nps.edu/programs/ccs Province: Kabul Governor: Hajji Din Mohammad NDS Chief: Nazar Shah Population Estimate: 3,445,000 Urban: 615,900 Rural: 2,829,100 Area in Square Kilometers: 4,462 Capital: Kabul Names of Districts: Bagrami, Chahar Asiab, Dih Sabz, Guldara, Istalif, Kabul, Kalakan, Khaki Jabbar, Mir Bacha Kot, Musayi, Paghman, Qarabagh, Shakar Dara, Surobi Composition of Population: Ethnic Groups: Religious Groups: Ethnic Groups: Tajik, Hazara, Primarily Sunni; some Pashtun: Ghilzai, Pashtun, Kuchi, Shia Shinwari, Wardak Qizilbash Total # Mosques: 3,025 Occupation of Population Major: Business, government service, Minor: Animal husbandry agriculture, skilled professionals, day labor Crops/Farming/Livestock: Wheat, potato, vegetable, corn, Cow, sheep, goats, donkeys, horses, fruit, poultry 1 Literacy Rate Total: 57% Number of Educational Colleges/Universities: 9 Universities; Kabul University, Teacher Training Institutions: 696 Colleges, Polytechnic Institutes, Institute of Health Science Number of Security January: 7 March: 3 May: 8 Incidents, Jan-Jun 2007: 24 February: 1 April: 1 June: 4 Poppy (Opium) Cultivation: 2006: 80 ha 2007: 500 ha Percent Change: 525% NGOs Active in Province: UNHCR, HAND, AMDA, WROR, ISRA, DACAR, NCA, SCA, UNICEF, NPO, CARE, MEDAir, INTERSOS, Provincial Aid Projects:2 Total PRT Projects: 107 Other Aid Projects: 1,332 Total Projects: 1,439 Planned Cost: $11,426,983 Planned Cost: $49,980,289 Planned Cost: $61,407,272 Total Spent: $9,729,006 Total Spent: $31,182,209 Total Spent: $39,911,215 Transportation: Primary Roads: Three main asphalt roads/highways connect the capital with the rest of the country; the Salang road links Kabul with the northern provinces; the Kabul-Kandahar Highway connects Kabul to the southern provinces.
[Show full text]
Afghanistan-Election
Afghan Futures survey Afghanistan’s Ethnic, Regional Divisions Produce a Dead Heat in its Presidential Race Ethnic and regional divisions drove first-round ballot choices in Afghanistan’s presidential election and point now to a dead heat in a runoff between the top two finishers, Abdullah Abdullah and Ashraf Ghani. Yet large majorities of Afghans also say they can set aside their tribal preferences and accept the ultimate winner – a hopeful sign for the country’s future. A national survey in the Afghan Futures series, conducted in mid-March by ACSOR-Surveys with design and analysis by Langer Research Associates, finds essentially a 50-50 split between Abdullah and Ghani among likely voters, with ethnic Pashtuns, who splintered in the first round, coalescing around Ghani. Abdullah counters with two-thirds support from Tajiks and Hazaras, two other key groups in the country’s tribal mix. A fourth group, Uzbeks, broadly back Ghani. Regardless of these divisions, at least seven in 10 Afghans say they’re prepared to accept either of the two runoff candidates as the country’s legitimate leader. Preliminary results from Afghanistan’s Independent Elections Commission put the first-round election April 5 at 44.9 percent for Abdullah, 31.5 percent for Ghani and 11.5 percent for Zalmay Rasul, with others in single digits. This poll, based on 2,643 face-to-face interviews in a nationwide random sample, had similar results among likely voters, 46-35-8 percent. The runoff contest tightens because likely voters who did not support either Abdullah or Ghani in the first round favor Ghani by 57-34 percent in a two-way race.
[Show full text]