Please ask for: Dorinda Guy Telephone: 01482 613416 Fax: 01482 614804 Email: [email protected] Text phone: 01482 300349 Date: Tuesday, 10 January 2017

Dear Councillor,

North Carr Area Committee

The next meeting of the North Carr Area Committee will be held at 10:00 on Wednesday, 18 January 2017 in Bespoke Centre .

The Agenda for the meeting is attached and reports are enclosed where relevant.

Please Note: It is likely that the public, (including the Press) will be excluded from the meeting during discussions of exempt items since they involve the possible disclosure of exempt information as describe in Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972.

Yours faithfully,

Democratic Services Officer for the Town Clerk

Town Clerk Services, Hull City Council, The Guildhall, AlfredPage Gelder1 of 220 Street, Hull, HU1 2AA www.hullcc.gov.uk Tel: 01482 300300

North Carr Area Committee

To: Membership: Councillors Brown, Clark P, Harrison, O’Mullane, Quinn and Webster

Officers: Jane Price, Assistant City Manager, Neighbourhoods Ken Upshall, Community Manager, Neighbourhoods (North) Dorinda Guy, Democratic Services Officer (5)

Public Set: Reference Library

Page 2 of 220

North Carr Area Committee

10:00 on Wednesday, 18 January 2017

Bespoke Centre

A G E N D A PROCEDURAL ITEMS

1 Apologies To receive apologies for those Members who are unable to attend the meeting.

2 Declarations of Interest To remind Members of the need to record the existence and nature of any Personal and Discloseable Pecuniary interest in items on the agenda, in accordance with the Member Code of Conduct.

(Members Code of Conduct - Part D1 of the Constitution)

3 Minutes of the Meeting held on 16th November 2016 7 - 16 To approve the minutes as a true and correct record.

4 Public Questions There will be a period of no more than 15 minutes during which written questions may be submitted by members of the public. Unwritten questions will be taken only at the discretion of the Chair. Questions will be answered at the meeting if possible, otherwise written replies will be sent. If required, decisions will be taken under the relevant agenda item below. As the agenda is to be considered in accordance with the Council's formal committee procedures rather than a public forum, the public present will not be able to participate in the Committee's discussions on the following items. Matters may be raised further at Forums.

NON-EXEMPT ITEMS

Page 3 of 220

5 Education Annual Report 2016 17 - 70 The briefing paper provides Members with the annual report during the autumn term setting out the citywide results of the summer examinations and statutory assessments, along with other education related matters.

6 Hull Virtual School for Looked After Children Area Committee 71 - 74 Pupil Premium Report To provide Members with the Hull Virtual School Looked After Children Pupil Premium in schools within the North Carr area.

7 Community Safety 75 - 76 To update Members on policing activities within the North Carr area.

8 Urgent Care Consultation Update 77 - 124 To update Members on the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) ‘Urgent Care' proposals as part of the wider consultation process.

9 Waste and Open Spaces Quarterly Performance Update 125 - 132 To provide a quarterly performance report relating to waste collections, recycling performance, street cleansing and grounds maintenance in the North Carr area.

10 North Carr Area Housing Performance Update 133 - 164 To provide Members with the Housing Performance update.

11 North Carr Area Funds 165 - 192 To update Members on the consolidated budget position for the North Carr are in relation to ward budgets.

12 North Carr Area Neighbourhood Management Update 193 - 196 To provide an update to the North Carr Area Committee on ward activity across the area.

13 Street Naming Decision 197 - 210 This report makes recommendations about three new street names for a new residential development of 166 houses on Kingswood Parks, Parcel H21 between Grosvenor Road and Richmond Lane, Hull.

14 Resolution List 211 - 216 To update Members on the progress of outstanding actions.

Page 4 of 220

15 Work Programme 217 - 220 To update Members on the Work Programme and provide further opportunity for Members to suggest further agenda items for discussion.

EXEMPT ITEMS

16 No Exempt Items THERE ARE NO EXEMPT ITEMS ON THIS AGENDA

Page 5 of 220

Page 6 of 220

North Carr Area Committee

16 th November, 2016

PRESENT:-

Councillor P. D. Clark (Chair), Councillor D. Brown, Councillor A. Harrison, Councillor M. H. O’Mullane and Councillor C. Quinn.

IN ATTENDANCE:- L Jamil (Strategy and Appraisals Manager) – minute 37, J. Haymes (Principal Property Manager, Property and Assets) – minute 38, A. Wilson (Parks and Open Spaces Development Manager) – minute 39 and 41, L. Woolmington (Youth Work Manager, City Wide Projects) and L. Scott (Youth and Community Development Worker) – minute 40 and A. McArthur (Assistant City Manager, Streetscene) – minute 42.

J. Price (Assistant City Manager, Neighbourhoods), K. Upshall (Community Manager - North) and D. Guy (Democratic Services Officer).

ATTE APOLOGIES :-

Councillor P. J. Webster.

Minute Description/Decision Action No. By/Deadline PROCEDURAL ITEMS 32 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Councillors O’Mullane and Harrison declared a personal interest in Members minute 37 insofar as they were Directors of Kingstown Works Limited Information (KWL).

Councillor Harrison declared a personal interest in minute 43 insofar as she was Chair of URBaN.

33 MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY 21 ST SEPTEMBER, 2016

Agreed – That with the amendment of minutes 16 and 29 to read: ‘Councillor Harrison declared a personal interest in minute..’, that the minutes of the meeting held on Wednesday 21 st September, having been printed and circulated, be taken as read and correctly recorded and be signed by the Chair.

Page 7 of 220

34 PUBLIC QUESTIONS

A resident of Hull asked the following question:

1. What can be done about pavement parking in the Kingswood area?

Members explained that Humberside Police had advised that as long as sufficient space had been left on the pavement for wheelchair and pram access then this would not be classed as causing an obstruction.

Members also advised that a trial was being undertaken in the Holderness Ward area where a complete ban on pavement parking had been introduced and it was advisable to await the outcome of the trial.

A resident of Hull asked the following question:

1. Why have Police Officers including the Police Community Support Officers stopped attending events in the North Carr area?

Members highlighted concerns in the lack of Police attendance at events in the North Carr area.

A resident of Hull asked the following questions:

1. There are several dumped mattresses and an abundance of litter on council land that have not been removed, why?

2. There are remains of several bonfires still on Cumbrian Way that have not been cleaned up?

The Assistant City Manager, Streetscene advised that he would investigate this.

Agreed – a. Assistant City Manager, a. That the Police and Crime Commissioner be invited to the next Neighbourhoods North Carr Area Committee in January 2017, and b. Assistant City b. that the dumped mattresses, litter and remains of bonfires be Manager, investigated. Streetscene

NON-EXEMPT ITEMS Non-Key Decisions 35 COMMUNITY SAFETY

No officer was in attendance to provide an update on current policing issues in the North Carr area. Page 8 of 220

36 NORTH CARR AREA URGENT CARE CONSULTATION

The City Neighbourhoods and Housing Manager submitted a briefing paper to update Members on the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) ‘Urgent Care’ proposals as part of the wider consultation process.

Discussion took place around public transport and the accessibility of Bransholme Health Centre.

Agreed –

a. Members supported option 3 to relocate the Minor Injuries Unit a-b. Director of (MIU) activity from Freedom Centre into Bransholme Health Integrated Centre. Relocate the GP ‘Out of Hours’ service from Diadem Commissioning Health Centre into Bransholme Health Centre in order to and Engagement provide a 24/7 Integrated Urgent Care Service. Work with Manager local residents on what input may need to be maintained at Freedom Centre as an alternative to the current MIU provision, based on current activity and need, and

b. that the officer provides a further update to the North Carr Area Committee in January 2017.

37 HULL HOUSING STRATEGY 2016 -2020

(Councillors O’Mullane and Harrison declared a personal interest in this item insofar as they were Directors of Kingstown Works Limited (KWL)).

The Assistant City Manager provided a report that sought the views of, and support from, the Area Committee for the key priorities proposed in the developing Housing Strategy which will cover the period 2017 – 2020.

Members were advised that only 100 responses had been received to the questionnaire from the general public in relation to the Hull Housing Strategy and that further responses would be welcomed.

Discussion took place around the need for more bunga lows to be built and that consideration should be given to the proximity of bungalows and flats on new build sites due to the different choices in lifestyle between the elderly and young. a-d. Strategy and Appraisals Agreed – Manager, Neighbourhood a. That the Committee considers and comments on the proposed and Housing Page 9 of 220

Housing Strategy’s priorities and approach, suggesting area specific actions as appropriate, and supports the Strategy’s overarching aims;

b. that the Committee reviews the list of areas identified and considers whether they are the areas which should be prioritised for renewal works and other supportive measures (e.g. targeted interventions to deal with fly-tipping or ASB), suggesting alternative streets as per the Committee’s local knowledge;

c. that the Committee agrees to receive scheduled, area appropriate, Housing Strategy updates – the regularity to be agreed once the Strategy’s action plan and governance arrangements are in place, and

d. that consideration is given to the proximity of bungalows and flats on new build sites.

38 PROPERTY DISPOSALS UPDATE

The City Property and Assets Manager provided a briefing paper which advised the Area Committee on progress made on the approved disposals and additional proposed disposals in their particular area and invited comment on these.

Members were advised that Soffam Farm Depot on Tiverton Road had been added onto the additional disposals and acquisitions list.

Discussion took place around the disrepair of the Dales Fitness Centre and members were advised that commercial negotiations were taking place with all parties involved to try and establish a Boxing Club within the Centre.

Members raised concerns around NPS securing the Dales Fitness Centre and that the Youth Club had to relocate due to health and safety issues. The officer advised that the Council did not have the funds to enable repairs to be undertaken at present.

Discussion took place around the proceeds from properties that had been let or sold via the Council and that the proposed public consultation regarding the land on Bude Road had not been actioned due to the Council waiting to hear from Netto, although there had been some interest from other commercial businesses. Members queried where the public consultation would take place regarding the land on Bude Road and recommended the use of the consultation bus.

Agreed – b. Principal a. That the briefing paper be noted, and Property Page 10 of 220 Manager,

b. that consideration be taken in using the consultation bus for Property and the public consultation regarding the land on Bude Road. Assets

39 OPEN SPACES STRATEGY

The City Streetscene Manager provided a briefing paper for consultation with the North Carr Area Committee on the draft Open Space Strategy and sought feedback from the Committee in relation to local priorities of open space both currently and in the future.

Members queried the length of time before consecrated ground could be reused and that consideration should be given to the proximity of shrubbery, trees and properties on new build sites.

Members asked whether public consultation had taken place around replacing the bus turning circle on Kesteven Way and that more pathways needed creating on the Noddle Hill Way Nature Reserve to link North Bransholme through to the Nature Reserve at the rear of Kingswood Academy.

Members requested that the spelling of ‘Cambrian’ Reference N4 on Page 109 be amended to ‘Cumbrian’.

Agreed –

a. That the briefing paper be noted;

b. that consideration is given to the proximity of shrubbery, trees b-f. Parks and and properties on new build sites; Open Spaces Development c. that the length of time before consecrated ground can be Manager reused is investigated and fed back to Members off agenda;

d. that public consultation regarding removing the bus turning circle on Kesteven Way is investigated;

e. that the officer investigates options for creating more pathways on the Noddle Hill Way Nature Reserve to link North Bransholme through to the Nature Reserve at the rear of Kingswood Academy, and

f. that the spelling of ‘Cambrian’ Reference N4 on Page 109 be amended to ‘Cumbrian’.

40 YOUTH DEVELOPMENT SERVICE TEAM UPDATE

The Youth and Community Development Workers, North Carr Locality provided a report which updated Members on the Youth Development Service for the period July to September 2016.

Page 11 of 220

Members were informed that the Youth Club had relocated due to health and safety issues because of the disrepair to the Dales Fitness Centre, although the new building did not offer the same walk in service as the Dales Fitness Centre.

Discussion took place around the maintenance of lights at the MUGA at the Dales Fitness Centre and how many youth clubs were in the North Locality area.

Members thanked the officers for their hard work and commitment. b. Youth Work Agreed – Manager, City Wide Projects a. That the report be noted, and and Youth and Community b. that the officers be thanked for their hard work and Development commitment. Worker

41 WASTE AND OPEN SPACES QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE UPDATE

The City Streetscene Manager submitted a quarterly performance report relating to waste collection, recycling performance, street cleansing and grounds maintenance in the North Carr area.

Members raised concerns regarding missed bin collections.

Agreed –

a. that the briefing paper be noted, and b. Parks and Open Spaces b. that the officer investigates the missed bin collection at the Development resident’s address provided. Manager

42 STREET CLEANSING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE

The City Streetscene Manager submitted a briefing paper which provided an overview and update on the revised zonal street cleansing and grounds maintenance programme.

The officer informed Members that they had acquired more grass cutters and the first cut would be in Spring.

Members were also advised that the new geographical zonal street cleansing and grounds maintenance schedules and maps would be circulated to Members the following week.

Discussion took place around the distance from shop fronts to pavements in relation to litter picking, which is 50 metres either way and whether fining people in areas that were renowned for litter dropping would focus people’s attention in those areas. Page 12 of 220

Members queried whether incidents reported to the Street Cleansing and Grounds Maintenance Department were prioritised, as car petrol still remained on Navenby Grove which had been reported over a week ago.

Agreed –

a. That the new geographical zonal street cleansing and grounds a-b. Assistant maintenance schedules and maps be provided off agenda, and City Manager, Streetscene b. that the car petrol on Navenby Grove be investigated.

43 NORTH CARR AREA FUNDS

(Councillor Harrison declared a personal interest in this item insofar as she was Chair of URBaN and did not take part in the discussion).

The City Neighbourhoods and Housing Manager submitted a report which updated Members on the Ward Budget Revenue and Capital unallocated funds remaining for 2016/17 for each ward and informed members of the decisions taken by the Area Committee and under delegated powers from 1 April 2016 to 28th October 2016.

The paper also sought a decision on the new and deferred (minute 29, ( d ), 21st September 2016) applications from URBaN which could not be considered under delegated powers as one ward member was a member of the board of URBaN and the application affected more than one ward.

Members were advised that the organisers of the firework display on New Year’s Eve to celebrate the New Year and the beginning of the 2017 celebrations near Hartlands Park had withdrawn their application.

Moved by Councillor Brown and seconded by Councillor Quinn.

a. That the budget balance for each Ward for the remainder of a-d. Assistant year 2016/2017 be noted; City Manager - Neighbourhoods b. that the delegated decisions taken by ward members as set out in Appendices 1 and 2 be noted;

c. that £560 is agreed from the Bransholme East Revenue Budget to support URBaN for minivan hire to transport event equipment for the Halloween, the 5th November firework display and the Festival of Lights events, and

d. that the URBaN application to host a firework display on new year’s eve to celebrate the new year and the beginning of the 2017 celebrations near Hartlands Park is no longer to be considered due to the organisers withdrawing their application. Page 13 of 220

Motion carried.

44 AREA NEIGHBOURHOOD MANAGEMENT UPDATE

The City Neighbourhoods and Housing Manager submitted a briefing paper which updated Members on aspects of work across the North Carr area including recent achievements, progress made in the area and outlined future plans in the North Carr area.

Members requested the job descriptions of the Director and the Development and Funding Manager of Achieve Potentials be provided off agenda.

Members also requested that a meeting be arranged with Achieve Potentials to discuss their concerns.

Members were advised that Achieve Potentials were aware of the youths causing trouble in the area and had been liaising with all parties concerned. That the skate park had been vandalised, however residents needed to continue to report crimes to the police so hotspots could be identified to try and alleviate the issues.

Members reiterated their concerns in the lack of Police Officer and Police Community Support Officers within the North Carr Area and invited the Police and Crime Commissioner to the next North Carr Area Committee meeting in January 2017.

Agreed –

a. That the job descriptions for the Director and Development and a-b. Community Funding Manager of Achieve Potentials be provided to Manager – North Members off agenda;

b. that a meeting be arranged with Achieve Potentials to discuss their concerns, and c. (Assistant City c. that the Police and Crime Commissioner be invited to the next Manager, North Carr Area Committee in January 2017. Neighbourhoods

45 RESOLUTION LIST

The Democratic Services Officer submitted an update on the progress of outstanding resolutions from previous meetings of the Committee.

Members queried whether the work at minute 19c had been completed by the Arboricultural Officer.

Members invited the Anti-Social Behaviour Officer to the next North Page 14 of 220

Carr Area Committee in January 2017.

Agreed –

a. That minutes 125c, 46b, 75c, 90b, 8, 12b, 18a, 18b, 18c, 21b, a-c. Democratic 21c, 21d, 22, 23c, 24b, 25b, 27c, 28a, 28b and 29d be deleted Services Officer from the list;

b. that all remaining items be retained until such time as matters are resolved;

c. that minute19c be investigated as to whether the work has been carried out by the Arboricultural Officer;

d. that the Anti-Social Behaviour Officer be invited to the next d-e. Community North Carr Area Committee meeting in January 2017 under Manager – North item North Carr Area Housing Performance Update, and

e. that the Community Manager – North investigates why the Kings Park newsletter had not been delivered in parts of the ward.

46 WORK PROGRAMME

The Democratic Services Officer submitted the Work Programme to update Members on future agenda items.

Agreed – That the Work Programme be noted.

47 URGENT ITEM

Consideration was given to the request for consideration of an urgent item on the proposed options relating to changes to the Customer Service Centre network.

Agreed – That the urgent item be agreed on the agenda.

48 EXCLUSION OF THE P RESS AND PUBLIC

Agreed – That, in accordance with the provisions of Section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act, 1972, the public (including the Press) be excluded from the meeting for the following item of business, minute 49, on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act, 1972, as it contains information relating to consultations or negotiations or contemplated consultations or negotiations, in connection with any labour relations matters arising between the council and employees of, or Office- holders under the Council and the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information because consultation has not yetPage been 15undertaken of 220 with staff and

customers potentially affected.

49 BUDGET SAVINGS PROPSALS – CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTRES

Discussion took place around the proposed options relating to changes to the Customer Service Centre network, and that the footfall had only condensed during the two day opening at the North Carr Customer Service Centre.

Members sought assurances that the Bransholme Customer Service Centre would not close permanently.

Agreed –

a. that the North Carr Area Committee wanted a Customer a-b. Assistant Service Centre presence in Bransholme to be maintained; Head Of Service, Customer b. that the North Carr Area Committee supported option 3 as set Services out in the report;

Published on Tuesday 29 th November, 2016 Start: 10.00 a.m. Finish: 11.55 a.m.

Page 16 of 220

Briefing Paper to the North Carr Area Committee Wards : Bransholme East, 18th January 2017 Bransholme West, Kings Park

Education Annual Report 2016

Briefing Paper of the Interim City Learning and Skills Manager on behalf of the Interim Corporate Director for Children, Young People and Family Services

1. Purpose of the Paper and Summary

1.1 It has been agreed that there will be an annual report during the autumn term setting out the citywide results of the summer examinations and statutory assessments, along with other education related matters. All school level information included in this report is publicly available.

1.2 The report is presented in a series of documents, attached as appendices to this summary report.

2. Background

2.1 This report is presented at a time of considerable change in the education landscape, both nationally and locally. These changes involve school structure, assessments at primary and secondary schools and wider policy directions.

2.2 The national context is still unclear in some areas; however the basic direction of travel is quite clear. The government wants all schools to become academies. Those that are underperforming or reach one of the thresholds in terms of outcomes or inspections will be required to convert. Others can choose to do so. The expectation is that schools will be part of a multi-academy trust (MAT); this is a group of, probably, up to 15 schools that have a single leader, and who work together.

2.3 The Regional Schools Commissioner (RSC) is set up to promote and deliver on this agenda. In addition the RSC has to monitor standards across all schools and has the power to intervene in both academies and maintained schools. In October 2016, we held an event in Hull for head teachers and chairs of governors. The RSC and the Interim City Manager – Learning and Skills, both spoke about the future for schools in the city, and more widely.

2.4 Hull is an unusual authority in the proportion of academies in the city. Many authorities still have the large majority of primary schools, special schools and PRUs as maintained, even if secondary schools have been keener to convert. In Hull, by Author: Page 17 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 1 of 8 April 2017, it is expected that there will only be about 20 schools who are not academies. A good number of them are at various stages of identifying their future.

2.5 More recently, the government has announced the shelving of the White Paper, Education for All, and thus the Bill that would have followed. This does respond to pressure from a range of authorities who were unhappy about the proposal to force academisation by a particular date. Whilst this may mean that good or outstanding schools will not be forced to academise, it will not make any significant difference in Hull. It also means that we may still retain some statutory responsibilities in relation to standards, even if we will not have the resource to do much about it.

2.6 Another significant piece of context is the major change to the Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) that will start to take effect from 2017/18. The current DSG has 3 blocks, the Schools block, the High Needs block and the Early Years block.

2.7 There are major changes proposed within and across the DSG. The first round of consultation on those changes happened in spring 2016 with a proposed enactment starting in 2017. The consultation proposals went into more detail on the Schools and High Needs blocks, and proposed a new block called the Central Schools block. This new block is, in part, a grant for the local authority as a contribution towards the statutory duties that remain with the LA. From 2019 the plan is for all mainstream schools to be funded on a national formula.

2.8 Recently, the new Secretary of State has announced that, as far as schools are concerned, the proposals will be delayed by a year. However the proposals covering the central schools block are planned to come into effect from April, 2017. The information so far issued does not suggest that the local authority changes in terms of Education Services Grant will be reversed.

2.9 The Early Years block consultation happened over August/September 2016 and will present us with issues in future years in terms of central spend. Again the move is towards a national funding formula for early years providers, with central spend reducing from the current 10% to 7% in 2017/18 and 5% in 2018/19.

2.10 Having said this, education is still a key and very important function of the Council. In addition to any remaining standards function, the other education duties must still be undertaken in a quality way in order that children and young people have the best opportunities. In summary the functions that the authority still has to do are set out below:

• School place planning across all sectors – this includes planning numbers across all sectors from nursery and pre-school through the compulsory school ages. The council supports the procurement but not the delivery of new places. At post 16 this includes the Area Based Reviews currently being run by DfE. • School transport – the policy, planning and funding of home to school transport. • SEND assessment and provision – this includes the work of the statutory assessment team, the educational psychology service, the SEN support services, commissioning of places and other functions from the High Needs Block. Includes commissioning the parents advice services (currently run by KIDS).

Author: Page 18 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 2 of 8 • Education of Looked after Children – including the virtual school and use of pupil premium plus. • Attendance – the education welfare team supports the statutory responsibilities relating to school attendance and prosecutions; they also fulfil duties relating to elective home education, children missing education, child employment. • Alternative provision – this includes the commissioning of places in pupil referral units (PRUs), permanent and fixed term exclusions, the whole area of the ‘Fair Access Policy’, part time placements and anything else that mean a child is not in full time schooling. • Safeguarding – education related work including Ofsted questions, unregulated settings, PREVENT, and similar. • Admissions – schools are required to work through the co-ordinated admission arrangements. Whilst academies make the decisions, we run all the administration. Also involved in in-year admissions and appeals. • Leadership – there is still a need to have senior education leadership engaging not just with headteachers, governors, and across the wider council, but also with the RSC, Ofsted and the components of the DfE • Early Years including: current statutory work on sufficiency, quality, information; recent consultation on early years funding; introduction of government initiatives eg 30 hours; early years foundation stage assessments (and whatever follows); a nursery school. • Governors –Support and Training for governing bodies/boards, as well as a traded service for clerking. • Plus a range of other statutory duties that remain with the council.

2.11 In summary, education is always going to be one of the most important services that happen within the city. Whatever happens in structural terms as far as academies are concerned, the council will still have a key leadership role in driving up aspiration and supporting schools to maximise the achievement of children and young people. The widespread economic success being delivered in and around the city needs well educated young people for the future workforce.

3. Issues for Consideration

3.1 Appendix 1 School Information – Status

This report is to list the current status of the schools in the city. Where a school is in the process of converting, this has been indicated.

It is important to note that Hull is not a typical authority in the number and percentage of schools that are academies. There are a small number of others who also have a high percentage but most authorities have a much lower number, particularly primaries. Nationally the percentage for primaries is over 20%, regionally 26% and in Hull, in September 2016, is 63% (will be over 75% by April 2017).

Thus whatever happens, a different way of working with schools is developing and will continue to develop.

Author: Page 19 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 3 of 8 3.2 Appendix 2 School Information – Numbers on Roll

This report gives information on the numbers of children in our schools. It is based on the January 2016 school census data. Schools have to submit information on their children termly to the DfE. This information is used for a variety of purposes including funding, place planning, trend population data and similar.

In this appendix school level numbers are broken down by year group and by wards. Additionally, government produces analysis of the January census data and information on the school population in Hull compared to statistical neighbours, close authorities and national is attached.

It should be noted that the September 2016 intake at reception is the largest group currently predicted. The numbers for reception for 2017 and beyond will drop a little and look as though they will plateau for a few years.

3.3 Appendix 3 Educational Achievement 2016

This report gives information on the outcome data for children in the city schools from the Early Years Foundation Stage up to GCSE level. At some levels the data is still provisional and where further releases are still to come the figures in this report may change, although experience suggests this will not be a significant change.

This was supposed to be the final year for the early years ‘Good Level of Development’, but government has now announced that it will continue for two more years, at least. This is good as our schools are closing the gap on the national average at a good rate.

There have been such significant changes in the measures used that comparison with previous years in the Key Stages 1 and 2, and at GCSE, are not possible. The levels used in primary schools have been abolished and replaced by ‘reaching the expected standard’ and ‘achieving greater depth’. It is a good reflection on our primary schools that having reached and exceeded the national average last year for the first time, this year with the harder tests; the schools have come in almost at the national average.

At GCSE the new measures of Progress 8 and Attainment 8 are the headline measures with achieving A*-C in GCSE English and Mathematics as a measure of the basics. The results listed are those issued nationally in October 2016. The final results will be published in January 2017. The results for Progress 8 show that the city schools are making as much progress as anywhere else, being on the national average. That progress should lead over time to improved attainment outcomes. The spread in the secondary tables remains an issue and the schools are working together to support the drive to close the spread, moving upwards.

3.4 Appendix 4 Ofsted Judgements

This report gives information on the last Ofsted inspection of the schools in the city. Over time the proportion of good and outstanding schools in the city has improved and this is to be applauded. As a city we would like all schools to be good or better

Author: Page 20 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 4 of 8 and there are schools that are highly likely to become good that are awaiting their inspection. The numbers refer to the Ofsted grades: 1 Outstanding; 2 Good; 3 Requires Improvement; 4 Inadequate.

It should be noted that when a school becomes an academy, it is not normally inspected for 2 to 3 years. This can mean that a school that might have changed status as a ’requires improvement’ (RI) or ‘inadequate’ school, could have to wait a long time even after it has transformed before it can reach ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’.

There is only one secondary school that is currently in an Ofsted category, a 4 on the table. The school is working hard to make progress and the RSC, with the diocese, is considering the future plans for the school. Other secondary schools that were previously in a category have improved and are either ‘RI’ on the way to ‘good’ or are ‘good’ already.

This table shows the last time the educational facility was inspected, whatever the status. This means that the primary schools shown as a 4 have all subsequently closed and re-opened as academies. This does mean that the designation closes with the school and the new academy has no designation until inspected. Therefore the city currently has no primary schools in an Ofsted category.

3.5 Appendix 5 Education Ambition

Members will recall the Education Ambition document that set out in a clear and straightforward way the 2 key ambitions for education in the city.

Firstly, all children and young people should be able to learn and develop in provision that has been judged to be ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’.

Secondly, in the key indicators of achievement and attendance in Hull, we will close the gap to national and then aim to exceed national figures.

The whole document is not reproduced in the appendix as that has not changed. The data pages have been included.

As far as the first ambition is concerned, Appendix 4 shows the progress being made. There is still further progress to be made and all the schools that are not yet good have plans to improve. These are monitored either by ourselves for maintained schools or by the academy trust for academies.

One of the comments made by Ofsted when they inspected the School Improvement service in December 2015 was that they would like to see targets included in the table, particularly for the second ambition.

With all the changes it was not realistic to set targets for the new measures in Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 4. For the others targets were set and targets have now been set at city level for 2017 and 2018, subject to consultation with schools for all the outcomes in Ambition 2.

Author: Page 21 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 5 of 8 The second table is split into two distinct groups; the top 6 measures are updated within the year concerned, they now have 2016 data. The bottom 5 runs a year behind as their government releases are timed differently. The 2016 data will not be available until March 2017. That is why they are showing 2015 data.

3.6 Appendix 6 Admissions to Primary and Secondary Schools

The local authority runs the co-ordinated admissions process for primary and secondary schools in the city. This ensures that there are common dates by which applications have to be received and common dates when parents are notified of their allocation.

The relevant admission authority is responsible for determining the oversubscription criteria which come into effect if there are more applicants than places in a particular school. As academies are their own admission authority, we now have many organisations responsible for determining the criteria. In reality, all must follow the admissions code of practice so the allowable criteria are reasonably clear. The admissions authority is also responsible for the decisions that are made in who is admitted to the school. The letter comes from the council so it is often assumed that the decision is made by the council. Only the maintained community schools have to follow the authority criteria.

Each school should have their admission arrangements on their own school website so that parents can see how likely they are to be successful in an application. The general arrangements for admissions across the city are clearly set out on the council website.

The information included in this appendix is from the September 2016 intake. The information for primary schools shows the preferences for each school.

For secondary allocation similar information is provided as well as information about flow in and out of the city as it is more significant at secondary level.

The Columns labelled 21 and 22 are where parents have not made a preference or where none of the preferences have been possible. In those cases an allocation of a place at a school with vacancies will be made.

This year there has been a positive drive to encourage parents to complete forms online. This has been largely successful with the secondary applications completed online this autumn rising from about 35% to well over 90%.

3.7 Appendix 7 Statutory Free Early Education Entitlement for Two Year Olds

This report sets out progress on delivering the two year old entitlement. It can be seen that Hull compares to regional and statistical neighbours but is below the national target. There is information about the progress of children in receipt of the two year old entitlement and their outcomes in the Early Years Foundation Stage Profile (EYFSP).

Author: Page 22 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 6 of 8 3.8 Appendix 8 Young People Not in Education, Employment and Training (NEET)

Members have had regular reports on the NEET figures. The national figures such as those included in the Ambitions document are based on the three months November, December and January. Included in this report are the most recent results for the City. These came from July 2016.

3.9 Place Planning

Place planning takes place at several different levels. For the early years, there is a requirement that the local authority produces a sufficiency audit to ensure there is an appropriate supply of child care places in the right parts of the city. This document is available on the council website. The significant challenge facing this sector, on top of the funding changes mentioned in the background section, is the implementation of the 30 hour offer for working parents. Colleagues in the early year’s team, in private and voluntary nurseries, and schools are working out the impact this may have on the current pattern of take up and what changes need to be made.

For the school sector, there has been significant work undertaken to re-establish a firm place planning framework. It had been intended to have this available some time ago, but it needed updating to take account of the 2016 data. This is almost complete and will be brought to the Scrutiny Commission.

Whilst it will go into more detail and analysis, a high level assessment of the data, plus a consideration about where pressures are indicated by parental admissions preferences, show the areas of pressure that can be seen.

In the primary phase the key pressure is in the Kingswood Park area. The recently approved enlargement of Kingswood Park School along with enlargement of Broadacre Primary School should give sufficient capacity for the next period of time. However that area will need to be kept under review in terms of how quickly houses are being built and the number that are moving in with ready families rather than future families.

Another area of primary pressure is in what is sometimes referred to as the ‘Beverley Road Corridor’ and also the lower west area south of the stadium where numbers are tight. A more detailed analysis will follow.

At secondary level the overall numbers are rising. It can be seen from the numbers in the primary schools that the Y7 cohort will continue to grow until 2023. Combine that with the improving reputation of schools that is reducing the outflow of pupils to the East Riding, this is creating pressures in the system. They will be alleviated by:

• Using schools in line with the build capacity rather than the Published Admission Number • At post 14 the University Technical College (UTC) opening in 2017 may help in overall capacity • Discussions that are taking place with secondary schools about which schools would be best placed to create additional capacity

Author: Page 23 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 7 of 8 Progress on this will be included in the school place planning documentation as it develops over the coming years, as the numbers rise. It will be helpful to have an adjustable plan within the next year or so.

4. Other Information

4.1 There is a wealth of school level information which can be found on individual school websites. The website will also contain copies of the key policies that the school will be following.

5. Next steps

5.1 This report with the key data has been produced for the Scrutiny Commission. The report will be taken to each of the Area Committees so that they can see the issues pertinent to their particular part of the city. It is intended to be a helpful reference document on a range of education issues. All information contained is in the public domain. School level data is generally available on the DfE website via the School Performance tables.

Graham Talbot, Interim City Learning and Skills Manager on behalf of Margaret Dennison, Interim Corporate Director - Children, Young People and Family Services

Contact Officer : Graham Talbot Telephone No. : 01482 616094 Officer Interests: None

Background Documents: -

Appendix 1 School Information – Status Appendix 2 School Information – Numbers on Roll Appendix 3 Educational Achievement 2016 Appendix 4 Ofsted Judgements Appendix 5 Education Ambition Appendix 6 Admissions to Primary and Secondary Schools Appendix 7 Statutory Free Early Education Entitlement for Two Year Olds Appendix 8 Young People Not in Education, Employment and Training (NEETs)

Author: Page 24 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 8 of 8 Appendix 1

Schools in Hull - Status Multi Academy Trust School Status (if appropriate) Ward Note Nursery Orchard Park & Nursery Schools cannot become McMillan Nursery Maintained N/A Greenwood academies Primary Adelaide Primary School Maintained N/A Myton Ainthorpe Primary School Academy DRET Derringham Alderman Cogan's CE Primary School Maintained N/A Southcoates East Appleton Primary School Academy ICA Bricknell Bellfield Primary School Academy HCAT Ings Biggin Hill Primary School Academy Horizon Bransholme East Bricknell Primary School Academy ICA Bricknell Consulting about joining Sirius MAT Broadacre Primary School Maintained N/A Kings Park Buckingham Primary Academy Academy ELT Drypool Bude Park Primary Academy Academy North Carr CAT Bransholme West Cavendish Primary School Maintained N/A Holderness Chiltern Primary School Academy YHCT LT St Andrews Christopher Pickering Primary School Academy ICA Pickering Cleeve Primary School Academy Horizon Bransholme West Clifton Primary School Maintained N/A Myton Collingwood Primary School Academy HCAT Myton Craven Primary Academy Academy DAT Drypool Dorchester Primary School Academy HCAT Sutton Eastfield Primary School Academy HCAT Boothferry Orchard Park & Endike Primary School Academy DRET Greenwood Endsleigh Holy Child VC Academy Academy St Cuthberts University Estcourt Primary Academy Academy DAT Southcoates West

Page 25 of 220 Multi Academy Trust School Status (if appropriate) Ward Note Francis Askew Primary School Academy ICA Newington Gillshill Primary School Maintained N/A Holderness Griffin Primary School Maintained N/A Marfleet Hall Road Academy Academy AET University Highlands Primary School Academy North Carr CAT Bransholme East Ings Primary School Maintained N/A Ings Joining YHC LT December 2016 Kingswood Park Primary School Academy North Carr CAT Kings Park Longhill Primary School Academy ICA Longhill Marfleet Primary School Maintained N/A Marfleet Maybury Primary School Academy ICA Ings Mersey Primary Academy Academy DAT Drypool Mountbatten Primary School Maintained N/A Longhill Neasden Primary School Academy ICA Ings Newington Academy Academy AET St Andrews Newland St John's Church of England Academy Academy SALT Beverley Oldfleet Primary School Maintained N/A Marfleet Paisley Primary School Maintained N/A Newington Applied for an Academy order Parkstone Primary School Maintained N/A Beverley Pearson Primary School Academy HCAT Myton Priory Primary School Academy ICA Derringham Rokeby Park Primary School Maintained N/A Pickering Sidmouth Primary School Maintained N/A Newland Southcoates Primary Academy Academy ELT Southcoates East Spring Cottage Primary School Academy Horizon Ings St Andrew's CE Primary School Maintained N/A Kings Park Orchard Park & Joining St Cuthberts RC MAT St Anthony's Catholic Primary School Maintained N/A Greenwood Applied for an Academy order Joining St Cuthberts RC MAT St Charles' Primary School Maintained N/A Myton Applied for an Academy order

Page 26 of 220 Multi Academy Trust School Status (if appropriate) Ward Note St Georges Primary School Academy YHC LT Newington St James' CE Primary School Academy SALT Sutton St Mary Queen of Martyrs Voluntary Catholic Academy Academy St Cuthberts Bransholme West St Nicholas Primary school Academy ICA University St Richard's VC Academy Academy St Cuthberts Marfleet Joining St Cuthberts RC MAT St Thomas More RC Primary School Maintained N/A Pickering Applied for Academy order St Vincent's Voluntary Catholic Academy Academy St Cuthberts Avenue Stepney Primary School Academy YHC LT Newland Stockwell Academy Academy SALT Marfleet Stoneferry Primary School Maintained N/A Holderness Sutton Park Primary School Academy HCAT Sutton Thanet Primary School Maintained N/A Longhill The Green Way Academy Academy AET University Orchard Park & The Parks Academy Academy DAT Greenwood Thoresby Primary School Academy HCAT Avenue Orchard Park & Thorpepark Academy Academy VAT Greenwood Victoria Dock Primary School Maintained N/A Drypool Wansbeck Primary School Academy HCAT Longhill Westcott Primary School Academy HCAT Holderness Wheeler Primary School Academy HCAT Holderness Wold Primary Academy Academy DRET Derringham Woodland Primary School Maintained N/A Southcoates East Secondary Archbishop Sentamu Academy Academy SALT Marfleet Hull Trinity House Academy Academy DAT Myton Kelvin Hall School Academy YHC LT Bricknell

Page 27 of 220 Multi Academy Trust School Status (if appropriate) Ward Note Kingswood Academy Academy AET Bransholme East Malet Lambert Academy TEA Holderness Consulting on joining YHC LT Newland School for Girls Maintained N/A University Applied for an Academy order Orchard Park & Sirius Academy North Academy Sirius Greenwood Sirius Academy West Academy Sirius Pickering Joining St Cuthberts RC MAT St Mary's College Maintained N/A University Applied for an Academy order The Boulevard Academy Free School N/A St Andrews The Marvell College Academy HCAT Longhill Winifred Holtby Academy Academy ICA Sutton Special Schools Bridgeview School Academy VAT Pickering Frederick Holmes Maintained N/A University Ganton School Academy ICA Pickering Northcott Special School Maintained N/A Bransholme West Oakfield Maintained N/A Marfleet Tweendykes School Academy ICA Sutton PRU/Alternative Provision Ashwell Pupil Referral Unit Academy ICA Bransholme East Aspire Academy Academy SALT Marfleet Medical Needs Academy VAT Pickering Rise Academy Maintained N/A Myton The Boulevard Centre Academy VAT Pickering Whitehouse Academy VAT Pickering

Page 28 of 220 Glossary:

AET Academies Enterprise Trust

DAT Delta Academies Trust

DRET David Ross Education Trust

ELT Education Learning Trust

HCAT Hull Collaborative Academy Trust

ICA Innovation, Creativity and Aspiration Partnership (an Umbrella Trust)

SALT Sentamu Academy Learning Trust

TEA The Education Alliance

VAT Venn Academy Trust

YHCLT Yorkshire and the Humber Co-operative Learning Trust

Page 29 of 220

Page 30 of 220 Appendix 2a

Number on Roll by Year Group School Census - January 2016

School Name NOR N1 N2 R 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 X McMillan Nursery 92 13 79 Nursery Totals 92 13 79 Adelaide Primary School 375 52 60 54 47 41 54 34 33 Ainthorpe Primary School 285 53 41 38 42 41 33 37 Alderman Cogan's CE Primary School 459 52 61 60 62 62 57 47 58 Appleton Primary School 355 1 47 48 47 48 49 48 34 33 Bellfield Primary School 244 20 19 30 30 31 30 34 22 28 Biggin Hill Primary School 633 19 59 90 63 87 86 68 90 71 Bricknell Primary School 638 95 90 91 91 94 88 89 Broadacre Primary School 329 23 26 40 45 39 40 35 41 40 Buckingham Primary School 364 23 19 52 45 49 44 39 47 46 Bude Park Primary School 259 9 21 27 43 33 23 35 38 30 Cavendish Primary School 395 58 49 60 59 60 53 56 Chiltern Primary School 473 14 61 59 59 56 60 59 51 54 Christopher Pickering Primary School 482 20 46 60 62 58 66 61 48 61 Cleeve Primary School 474 15 48 57 56 60 60 58 63 57 Clifton Primary School 289 8 26 43 43 45 38 30 29 27 Collingwood Primary School 297 12 31 44 44 45 29 30 31 31 Craven Primary School 219 29 9 30 22 28 25 22 25 29 Dorchester Primary School 360 7 43 47 43 41 45 44 44 46 Eastfield Primary School 622 91 90 88 90 90 86 87 Endike Primary School 450 7 44 53 60 60 59 59 57 51 Endsleigh Holy Child VC Academy 322 10 31 45 40 38 38 44 38 38 Estcourt Primary Academy 333 13 33 52 41 43 47 40 36 28 Foredyke Primary School 168 4 10 28 27 16 22 23 26 12 Francis Askew Primary School 370 6 41 57 57 47 46 38 41 37 Gillshill Primary School 458 60 61 61 89 65 62 60 Griffin Primary School 465 12 61 59 60 60 60 53 56 44 Hall Road Academy 362 42 50 52 44 48 43 39 44 Highlands Primary School 509 9 72 78 69 56 60 53 57 55 Ings Primary School 284 5 29 33 38 34 39 32 33 41 Kingswood Parks Primary School 391 11 69 66 67 45 36 36 38 23 Longhill Primary School 388 9 46 50 57 48 52 55 43 28 Marfleet Primary School 190 2 32 27 25 24 Page24 3120 of 22024 12 Maybury Primary School 251 9 31 30 33 31 30 30 30 27 Mersey Primary Academy 209 9 24 29 25 31 18 25 27 21 School Name NOR N1 N2 R 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 X Mountbatten Primary School 282 5 38 43 39 32 42 31 32 20 Neasden Primary School 268 3 42 24 19 37 34 41 37 31 Newington Academy 345 12 35 47 43 43 54 33 43 35 Newland St John's Church of England Academy 280 40 41 38 41 39 41 40 Oldfleet Primary School 390 11 38 51 48 49 53 47 49 44 Paisley Primary School 366 8 31 51 49 48 39 46 45 49 Parkstone Primary School 323 50 47 45 50 46 44 41 Pearson Primary School 242 6 28 31 30 28 30 29 31 29 Priory Primary School 300 59 53 49 38 46 24 31 Rokeby Park Primary School 176 3 16 25 29 19 25 20 21 18 Sidmouth Primary School 366 13 41 46 58 55 50 44 30 29 Southcoates Primary Academy 354 37 53 60 41 43 42 41 37 Spring Cottage Primary School 508 15 60 63 62 61 62 64 62 59 St Andrew's CE Primary School 635 5 72 76 81 87 79 82 74 79 St Anthony's Catholic Primary School 197 28 30 30 30 29 26 24 St Charles' Primary School 230 4 15 29 32 32 31 30 28 29 St Georges Primary School 235 3 32 28 30 26 30 27 29 30 St James' CE Primary School 228 35 28 30 28 24 29 27 27 St Mary Queen of Martyrs Primary School 361 12 40 40 44 49 39 44 52 41 St Nicholas Primary school 209 32 27 31 29 30 30 30 St Richard's VC Academy 411 18 33 57 51 49 56 60 43 44 St Thomas More RC Primary School 163 16 20 30 25 26 22 24 St Vincent's Voluntary Catholic Academy 206 30 30 30 28 30 30 28 Stepney Primary School 223 3 16 29 29 27 29 30 30 30 Stockwell Academy 363 18 40 57 45 53 46 36 35 33 Stoneferry Primary School 199 6 18 30 27 25 31 26 16 20 Sutton Park Primary School 399 9 51 50 56 45 47 49 55 37 Thanet Primary School 474 46 20 61 60 60 54 57 59 57 The Green Way Academy 411 58 59 59 60 63 61 51 The Parks Academy 318 12 36 44 46 43 46 34 27 30 Thoresby Primary School 497 10 30 72 74 75 63 58 61 54 Thorpepark Academy 488 16 60 58 60 61 63 51 60 59 Victoria Dock Primary School 355 12 37 53 45 38 52 36 42 40 Wansbeck Primary School 228 13 16 28 30 29 30 29 24 29 Westcott Primary School 242 38 40 32 33 33 22 44 Wheeler Primary School 415 6 55 60 58 60 43 57 39 37 Wold Primary Academy School 584 17 48 66 73 76 77 86 69 72 Primary Totals 24973 592 2144 3413 3353 3264 3254 3135 2972 2846 Page 32 of 220 School Name NOR N1 N2 R 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 X Andrew Marvell School 838 203 151 178 152 154 Archbishop Sentamu Academy 1484 304 288 237 261 240 88 50 16 Hull Trinity House Academy 469 121 119 119 56 54 Kelvin Hall School 1386 281 281 275 278 271 Kingswood Academy 621 155 114 115 112 125 Malet Lambert School 1485 310 300 301 295 279 Newland School for Girls 704 149 133 147 141 134 Sirius Academy North 791 185 182 158 174 92 Sirius Academy West 1537 297 289 288 290 270 64 39 St Mary's College 1840 294 276 264 254 258 320 174 The Boulevard Academy 255 121 86 48 Winifred Holtby Academy 1318 271 269 268 259 251 Secondary Totals 12728 2691 2488 2398 2272 2128 472 263 16 Bridgeview School 23 2 5 10 6 Frederick Holmes 76 4 4 5 3 8 3 4 3 4 7 3 7 4 5 5 6 1 Ganton School 165 2 2 6 13 11 5 11 14 11 16 21 11 15 17 10 Northcott Special School 119 1 1 6 6 9 9 22 16 22 15 12 Oakfield 44 9 8 7 7 13 Tweendykes School 138 138 Special Totals 565 4 6 8 10 29 25 28 29 49 42 48 50 40 20 22 16 139 Ashwell Pupil Referral Unit 37 3 10 12 6 6 Aspire Academy 94 3 21 32 38 Medical Needs 6 1 1 2 2 Rise Academy 137 1 19 117 The Boulevard Centre 21 6 9 6 Whitehouse 14 1 2 3 1 7 Pupil Referral Unit Totals 309 1 2 3 1 7 4 15 35 57 163 6 9 6 Local Authority Totals 38667 605 2227 3419 3362 3276 3286 3160 3001 2882 2744 2545 2481 2379 2331 498 294 38 139

Page 33 of 220

Page 34 of 220 Appendix 2b

Number on Roll by Ward School Census - January 2016

School Name NOR Avenue Beverley Boothferry East Bransholme West Bransholme Bricknell Derringham Drypool Yorkshire of Riding East Holderness Ings Park Kings Longhill Marfleet Myton Newington Newland Lincolnshire East North Lincolnshire North OrchardPark Greenwood & Pickering East Southcoates West Southcoates Andrews St. Sutton University Unknown McMillan Nursery 92 2 1 2 1 63 23 Nursery Totals 92 2 1 2 1 63 23 Adelaide Primary School 375 1 1 319 7 2 1 44 Ainthorpe Primary School 285 1 168 89 9 1 10 1 6 Alderman Cogan's CE Primary School 459 21 2 57 14 1 9 8 140 207 Appleton Primary School 355 16 25 200 21 34 3 2 1 2 1 4 15 2 1 28 Bellfield Primary School 244 4 2 1 8 197 12 8 1 9 2 Biggin Hill Primary School 633 436 88 5 2 3 13 1 3 1 79 2 Bricknell Primary School 638 239 5 4 319 2 2 16 1 1 3 2 4 18 4 4 14 Broadacre Primary School 329 147 19 161 1 1 Buckingham Primary School 364 1 4 263 11 4 2 2 16 2 14 44 1 Bude Park Primary School 259 1 35 205 9 1 3 3 1 1 Cavendish Primary School 395 2 11 4 1 1 30 3 199 78 5 5 2 1 1 11 9 32 Chiltern Primary School 473 2 2 1 3 21 44 10 389 1 Christopher Pickering Primary School 482 1 1 25 3 16 1 1 1 2 48 2 2 1 363 1 14 Cleeve Primary School 474 226 212 1 3 11 1 4 1 3 12 Clifton Primary School 289 12 1 5 4 2 238 15 3 1 3 5 Collingwood Primary School 297 21 4 1 1 1 2 1 241 7 2 6 7 3 Craven Primary School 219 110 3 1 6 8 1 13 76 1 Dorchester Primary School 360 1 23 98 1 3 1 2 3 228 Eastfield Primary School 622 399 2 7 19 154 2 35 4 Endike Primary School 450 5 48 1 5 4 1 2 3 249 1 131 Endsleigh Holy Child VC Academy 322 9 72 4 2 8 3 5 19 3 1 17 2 11 1 18 51 1 3 5 87 Estcourt Primary Academy 333 1 1 60 5 1 12 3 26 224 Foredyke Primary School 168 2 1 12 149 4 Francis Askew Primary School 370 13 1 2 4 156 1 168 23 1 1 Gillshill Primary School 458 6 1 7 1 364 41 5 4 29 Griffin Primary School 465 2 3 1 3 18 1 141 275 12 5 4 Hall Road Academy 362 2 6 2 4 109 1 238 Highlands Primary School 509 484 9 14 2 Ings Primary School 284 6 1 8 1 52 159 1 11 10 2 19 9 5 Kingswood Parks Primary School 391 3 4 3 1 370 2 3 3 2 Longhill Primary School 388 1 3 4 9 364 6 1 Marfleet Primary School 190 3 1 3 2 1 1 150 3 24 2 Maybury Primary School 251 2 2 9 7 101 1 128 1 Mersey Primary Academy 209 3 171 22 1 1 2 9 Mountbatten Primary School 282 1 1 1 1 51 219 8 Neasden Primary School 268 2 17 10 5 2 25 118 8 11 5 2 1 1 61 Newington Academy 345 3 3 1 2 1 4 78 1 19 233 Newland St John's Church of England Academy 280 12 83 2 1 1 3 3 1 5 1 5 104 23 1 2 2 31 Oldfleet Primary School 390 4 1 5 369 8 3 Paisley Primary School 366 11 12 3 2 2 1 15 271 2 8 1 38 Parkstone Primary School 323 208 1 2 2 2 1 10 1 83 3 10 Pearson Primary School 242 64 138 3 32 2 1 2 Priory Primary School 300 45 4 227 15 1 1 2 1 1 3 Rokeby Park Primary School 176 17 11 1 7 139 1 Sidmouth Primary School 366 54 10 2 1 17 2 1 2 2 1 8 225 13 28 Southcoates Primary Academy 354 3 3 1 Page1 1 352 of 12220 1 248 82 Spring Cottage Primary School 508 18 9 2 4 11 270 11 7 1 174 1 St Andrew's CE Primary School 635 15 29 104 2 7 9 5 2 361 1 2 15 1 1 81 St Anthony's Catholic Primary School 197 1 3 1 1 183 8 St Charles' Primary School 230 9 1 5 2 8 1 3 130 6 21 17 1 21 5 School Name NOR Avenue Beverley Boothferry East Bransholme West Bransholme Bricknell Derringham Drypool Yorkshire of Riding East Holderness Ings Park Kings Longhill Marfleet Myton Newington Newland Lincolnshire East North Lincolnshire North OrchardPark Greenwood & Pickering East Southcoates West Southcoates Andrews St. Sutton University Unknown St Georges Primary School 235 2 2 3 3 5 128 4 6 1 81 St James' CE Primary School 228 38 38 17 1 2 3 1 128 St Mary Queen of Martyrs Primary School 361 3 2 49 80 5 12 11 11 91 3 4 2 1 86 1 St Nicholas Primary school 209 34 11 14 1 1 4 2 1 14 2 62 12 1 50 St Richard's VC Academy 411 2 6 1 4 5 2 19 157 3 197 15 St Thomas More RC Primary School 163 16 1 1 24 2 11 28 2 1 45 31 1 St Vincent's Voluntary Catholic Academy 206 52 3 1 6 1 2 30 3 77 15 3 3 10 Stepney Primary School 223 24 2 1 1 2 56 1 113 16 1 1 5 Stockwell Academy 363 2 1 1 350 6 1 2 Stoneferry Primary School 199 2 3 1 1 40 3 121 4 3 3 2 9 2 4 1 Sutton Park Primary School 399 1 3 25 125 2 2 1 76 1 1 5 157 Thanet Primary School 474 3 1 5 5 14 2 404 29 3 7 1 The Green Way Academy 411 2 3 1 5 1 283 116 The Parks Academy 318 1 1 1 300 15 Thoresby Primary School 497 355 5 10 3 2 1 2 48 30 14 5 3 3 4 12 Thorpepark Academy 488 13 6 3 1 1 1 454 1 3 5 Victoria Dock Primary School 355 1 1 332 4 2 1 5 1 3 2 2 1 Wansbeck Primary School 228 1 1 2 2 215 5 2 Westcott Primary School 242 27 182 6 2 1 5 17 2 Wheeler Primary School 415 1 17 1 3 1 14 294 12 1 68 3 Wold Primary Academy School 584 64 3 1 6 440 31 1 5 16 5 8 1 2 1 Primary School Totals 24973 931 493 832 1597 1036 605 810 1150 299 1129 982 1206 1310 1774 1347 1314 737 2 1 1895 822 1035 731 987 1119 815 14 Andrew Marvell School 838 1 3 3 1 17 2 9 146 5 408 145 1 1 3 18 18 2 54 1 Archbishop Sentamu Academy 1484 2 1 1 7 6 1 87 9 15 35 6 90 568 10 3 1 10 1 429 191 7 4 Hull Trinity House Academy 469 20 7 8 14 9 3 4 41 117 18 9 33 7 14 44 21 18 3 12 4 1 12 30 10 10 Kelvin Hall School 1386 267 16 72 3 367 123 3 99 2 7 1 1 43 23 53 112 3 2 12 3 173 1 Kingswood Academy 621 1 4 1 314 95 1 8 2 1 4 102 23 3 4 14 4 2 2 5 28 2 1 Malet Lambert School 1485 2 2 1 13 9 229 5 584 308 5 24 18 5 1 2 80 113 2 82 Newland School for Girls 704 65 45 10 20 18 15 6 25 22 9 3 27 8 21 88 36 68 92 6 6 10 29 13 62 Sirius Academy North 791 22 62 1 7 2 2 4 9 2 1 10 2 57 10 54 462 6 1 1 7 7 62 Sirius Academy West 1537 10 239 2 4 6 101 5 108 2 1 1 8 2 109 386 5 1 1 7 370 6 1 155 4 3 St Mary's College 1840 109 118 42 65 48 37 14 62 218 27 38 128 20 63 115 60 87 4 216 40 43 16 49 64 155 2 The Boulevard Academy 255 2 2 4 2 1 4 1 1 23 74 2 4 1 133 1 Winifred Holtby Academy 1318 12 1 306 319 1 22 7 64 38 186 5 8 5 2 2 5 4 1 329 1 Secondary School Totals 12728 501 269 380 754 513 432 252 504 602 733 583 510 572 843 523 620 294 1 8 935 438 589 368 425 602 473 4 Bridgeview School 23 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 Frederick Holmes 76 2 6 4 2 4 13 1 1 5 7 6 3 4 5 3 2 1 2 3 2 Ganton School 165 5 3 15 4 3 6 9 2 9 2 6 1 4 12 8 13 4 25 12 7 2 5 3 5 Northcott Special School 119 2 1 3 13 9 3 3 4 6 2 3 7 10 4 4 2 6 9 3 5 9 7 4 Oakfield 44 3 2 3 1 2 2 2 3 1 2 3 7 3 4 1 3 2 Tweendykes School 138 5 2 1 19 7 1 2 4 9 8 4 4 22 7 3 2 1 9 4 5 1 1 15 2 Special School Totals 565 17 6 19 44 26 13 15 16 44 12 13 10 40 40 23 24 7 8 1 53 33 24 10 22 28 15 2 Ashwell Pupil Referral Unit 37 1 1 1 4 1 3 2 1 2 4 2 5 1 3 3 1 2 Aspire Academy 94 2 2 2 1 1 10 1 4 10 15 6 2 2 8 7 8 5 4 2 1 1 Medical Needs 6 1 2 1 1 1 Rise Academy 137 5 1 7 8 8 2 2 5 4 1 1 1 9 3 12 18 1 16 8 2 3 12 2 5 1 The Boulevard Centre 21 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 4 1 1 Whitehouse 14 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 Pupil Referral Unit Totals 309 6 1 12 12 17 3 5 19 10 1 8 2 20 20 21 30 5 33 19 15 11 22 5 10 2 Local Authority Totals 38667 1455 771 1243 2407 1592 1053 1083 1689 955 1875 1586 1730 1942 2677 1914 1989 1043 11 10 2979 1312 1663 1120 1456 1754 1336 22

Page 36 of 220

Appendix 2c

Schools, Pupils and their Characteristics January 2016 DfE publication 28th June 2016 based on the January 2016 School Census

Purpose of the Paper

To provide information on the profile of the city’s school population within the context of England level data for all schools - including regional, sub-regional and statistical neighbour comparisons where appropriate.

Background

Each year the DfE publishes a statistical first release (SFR) providing numbers of schools and pupils in schools in England using data from the corresponding January School Census. Breakdowns are given for school types as well as for pupil characteristics including free school meal eligibility, English as an Additional Language, ethnicity and special educational needs (SEN).

Detail

Pupil numbers

Between January 2015 and January 2016 the numbers of pupils in England schools increased by some 121 000 pupils. Growth in the numbers of pupils in primary schools accounted for the largest slice of the increase nationally.

• Locally, numbers changed slightly across the same timeframe – from 38 667 to 38 784.

Free School Meals Eligibility

In January 2016, across England, some 14.3 % of pupils were eligible for and claiming free school meals. This is the lowest proportion for any year since 2001, when the DfE began collecting pupil level information. This measure has firm links to the number of benefit claimants and the labour market.

• In the city, recent decreases across primary and secondary schools have been greater than those seen nationally and across statistical neighbours.

The table below, (Table 1) , provides comparative data.

Page 37 of 220

1 Table 1. Free School Meals Eligibility

City Englan SNA * Regio ER YC d n Primary 22.2% 14.5% 20.9 15.7 11.6% % % Seconda 23.1% 13.2% 19.4 14.5 10.0% ry % %

*Statistical Neighbour average

Ethnic Group

The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic origins in schools across England has been rising steadily since 2006. More recently, in the primary phase, between January 2015 and January 2016 the percentage increased from 30.4 to 31.4%, in the secondary phase – from 26.6 to 27.9%.

In the city, the proportion of minority ethnic pupils in the primary phase has increased from 7% in 2007 to 19% in 2016, in the secondary phase - from 8% to 14%.

Table 2, below, presents summary comparative data. The broad (DfE) categories of White, Mixed, Asian, Black and Chinese mask a rich underlying dataset. The additional ‘sub-white’ categories of White British and Any Other White Background have been included intentionally to illustrate the proportion of pupils of Any Other White Background in the city – these discrete populations are normally masked by the broader White category.

Table 2. Ethnic Group

All figures are percentages

Page 38 of 220

2 First Language

Nationally, between 2015 and 2016, there was an increase of 0.7% in the incidence of pupils with English as an Additional Language across both primary and secondary phases of learning.

It is important to understand that these increases are seen to be representative of a higher incidence of births as opposed to the impact of immigration. In other words - pupils now in schools that were born to non-UK born women.

Additionally, it does not follow that a child or young person’s ethnic heritage correlates directly with his or her first or ‘home’ language (sometimes referred to as ‘mother tongue’). A pupil may identify him or herself as being of Chinese ethnic heritage, for example, but may speak English as a first language.

Table 3, below presents summary comparative data across all phases of learning.

Table 3. First Language

All figures are percentages

Special Educational Needs (SEN)

At England level, the proportion of pupils with special educational needs, January 2016, was 14.4% - split between: • pupils with statements/education, health and care plans (2.8%) and • pupils in receipt of SEN support (11.6%).

Nationally, the percentage of pupils with SEN has been in decline since 2010 – principally in the SEN support group. Table 4, below, provides some comparative data.

Table 4. Special Educational Needs

All figures are percentages Page 39 of 220

3

For pupils in receipt of SEN support or with a statement /education, health and care plan, a primary need is collected.

Across England the most commonly identified primary need of pupils:

• with a statement/education heath care plan is autism – 25.9% • in receipt of SEN support is moderate learning difficulty – 24.2%

Locally, the most dominant primary need amongst pupils with a statement/ education, health and care plan is also autism . However, amongst pupils in receipt of SEN support the most common primary need is speech, language and communication needs .

The visual to the left shows the city’s distribution of primary need for the two discrete groups of pupils with special educational needs. The top line of each pair of lines refers to statements/plans.

A table containing a full description of the codes used is pasted at the end of this paper, below.

Further deviation from the national profile of primary need is seen when this level of data is considered separately for primary and secondary schools.

Cross Border Movement

Primary At January 2016 the city had 22 850 primary school pupils residing within its boundary, 96% of whom attended a school in the city (home-grown). In addition: • 981 city residents attended schools outside of the city boundary – 4.3% (exports) • 282 non-city residents attended schools in the city – 1.3% (imports)

The overall city primary school population at January 2016 was 22 151.

Secondary At January 2016 the city had 12 935 secondary school pupils residing within its boundary, 88% of whom attended a school in the city (home-grown). In addition: • 1500 city residents attended schools outside of the city boundary – 11.6% (exports) Page 40 of 220

4 • 500 non-city residents attended schools in the city – 4.2% (imports)

The overall city secondary school population at January 2016 was – 11 935

Special At January 2016 the city had 503 social school pupils residing within its boundary, 95.6% of whom attended a school in the city (home-grown).

In addition: • 22 city residents attended schools outside of the city boundary – 4.4% (exports) • 50 non-city residents attended schools in the city – 9.4% (imports)

The overall city special school population at January 2016 was – 531

Overall, at January, there were 36 110 children and young people of school age residing in the city and an overall school population of 34 422.

Looking at these notional ‘imports’ and ‘exports’ by national curriculum year group reveals some differences:

All figures are percentages

Contact Officer: Jon Ashbridge Telephone No. : 01482616038

Code/Primary Need SLD - Specific Learning Difficulty MLD - Moderate Learning Difficulty SLD - Severe Learning Difficulty PMLD - Profound & Multiple Learning Difficulty SEMH - Social, Emotional and Mental Health SLCN - Speech, Language and Communications Needs HI - Hearing Impairment VI - Visual Impairment MSI - Multi-Sensory Impairment PD - Physical Disability ASD - Autistic Spectrum Disorder OTH - Other Difficulty/Disability NSA - SEN support but no specialist assessment of type of need

Page 41 of 220

5

Page 42 of 220 Appendix 3

2016 Summary Key Stage Data

Context

This paper presents available key stage data at 30th October 2016. In some cases final data is awaiting publication by the DfE.

1. Early Years Foundation Stage Profile

At a Good Level of Development , 2016 outcomes show an improvement of 4 percentage points on the previous year. Nationally results went up by 3 points. The city has demonstrated a 14 point improvement since 2014 and continues to narrow the gap between local and national averages.

2. Phonics

2016 results at Phonics show a 4 percentage point locally on 2015. Nationally results increased by 5 points. The table below provides a three year trend at city, region and England level, together with an indication of change between 2015 and 2016. The gap between local and national averages (8 pints in 2014) is now 4 points.

3. Key Stage 1

Given the significant changes at Key Stage 1 this year, it is inappropriate to consider any historical data. Overall, provisional 2016 data for the city, when compared to regional and national outcomes, reveals some positive signs at expected standards. Challenges remain at higher standards or greater depth.

Reading Writing Maths. Combined Expected Expected Greate Expected Greate Expected + Greater + r + r + Greater Depth Depth Depth Depth City 72 18 65 11 72 15 60.8 7.1 Region 71 21 63 12 70 16 57.2 7.7 England 74 24 65 13 73 18 60.3 8.9

• At Reading , expected standard, a result of 72% places the city above the regional average and below the England average • At Writing , expected standard, 65% is above the regional average and in line with the England average • At Mathematics , expected standard, 72% is 3 percentages points above the regional average and 1 point below the England average • Early data suggests 60.8% of pupils achieved the expected standard in Reading, Writing and Mathematics combined - above the regional average and in line with the England average.

Page 43 of 220 4. Key Stage 2

Given the significant changes at Key Stage 2 it is inappropriate to consider any historical data.

Achieving Expected Standard (%) Av. Scaled Scores Read. Maths. Writ. Comb. GPS Read. Maths. City 63 69 78 52 69 101 102 Region 61 67 72 49 69 102 102 England 66 70 74 53 72 103 103

• The early city average for Reading expected standard is 63% - above the regional average and below the England average • At Mathematics , 69% is above the regional average and below the England average • At Reading, Writing and Mathematics (combined measure); the city result of 52% is above the regional average but below the England average • At Grammar, Punctuation and Spelling (GPS), 69% is in line with the regional average and below the England average • The city’s average scaled score in Reading (101) is below regional and England averages • At Mathematics, a result of 102 is in line with the regional average and below the England average.

5. Key Stage 4

Context

There have been profound changes to accountability measures at key stage 4 this year. Out of a basket of four measures, only three are reasonably comparable with previous year’s data:

• Attainment 8 (new for 2016), measures the achievement of pupils across 8 qualifications including mathematics (double weighted) and English (double weighted), three qualifications that count in the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) measure and three further qualifications that can be GCSE qualifications (including EBacc subjects) or any other approved non-GCSE qualification. The DfE published both 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 data at local authority and England level, on 13 th October 2016 - reasonably comparable with previous years

• Progress 8 (new for 2016), captures the progress pupils make from the end of primary school to the end of secondary school. It is a type of value added measure, which means that pupils’ results are compared to the results of other pupils with the same prior attainment. The greater the score, the greater the progress made by the pupils compared to the average of pupils with similar prior attainment

Page 44 of 220 • A* to C in BOTH English and Mathematics - reasonably comparable with previous years

• English Baccalaureate - reasonably comparable with previous years.

Attainment 8

A provisional city figure of 46.6 has been published; this roughly translates to a grade B. The underlying range across the city’s schools was 43.0 to 55.1. A table of 2016 summary data at school level is pastes towards the end of this report.

On 13 th October 2016 the DfE published 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 data at local and national level. The following table presents the summary data across both years:

2015 2016 Diff. City 43.1 46.6 3.5 Stat. Neighbours 45.0 46.8 1.8 Region 46.9 48.6 1.7 England 47.4 48.2 0.8

Progress 8 A provisional city figure of -0.03 has been published. The underlying range across the city’s schools was -0.29 to 0.52.

A* to C in BOTH English and Mathematics A provisional city figure of 49.8% has been published. The underlying range across the city’s schools was 35 to 81%.

2013 2014 2015 2016 City 50 48 49 49.8 Stat. Neighbours x x 52 55.3 England 60 56 56 58.7

English Baccalaureate A provisional city figure of 19.3 % has been published. The underlying range across the city’s schools was 3 to 40%.

2013 2014 2015 2016 City 13 15 14 19.3 Stat. Neighbours 17 18 18 16.6 England 23 23 23 22.8

Page 45 of 220 2016 School Summary Results (Early Published Data)

Page 46 of 220 Appendix 4

Ofsted Inspections – October 2016 a Welfare Welfare Effectiveness Quality Teaching of Outcomes for Pupils Early Provision Years Overall Effectiveness Date Date Latest of Inspection PreviousInspection - Overall LeadershipManagement and

SCHOOL Personal Behaviour Development, & McMillan Nursery Feb-13 2 2 2 1 2 1 Primary Schools Adelaide Primary School Feb-15 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 Ainthorpe Primary School Jun-15 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 Alderman Cogan's CEVA Primary School Nov-13 2 2 2 2 2 3 Appleton Primary School Jun-13 2 2 2 2 2 2 Bellfield Primary School Mar-15 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 Biggin Hill Primary School Feb-15 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Bricknell Primary School Apr-15 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Broadacre Primary School Dec-15 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Buckingham Primary Academy * Oct-13 4 4 4 3 4 2 Bude Park Primary School Jan-15 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 Cavendish Primary School Jul-14 2 2 2 2 2 3 Chiltern Primary School Jun-14 2 2 2 2 2 3 Christopher Pickering Primary School Jun-13 2 2 2 2 2 n/a Cleeve Primary School Sep-16 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 Clifton Primary School Jul-16 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Collingwood Primary School Jun-10 1 1 1 2 1 1 Craven Primary School ** Dec-12 4 4 4 3 4 3 Dorchester Primary School Jul-15 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Eastfield Primary School Jun-15 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 Endike Primary School Jun-15 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Endsleigh Holy Child RC Primary School Nov-12 2 2 2 2 2 3 Estcourt Primary School Mar-11 2 2 2 2 2 3 Francis Askew Primary School Sep-10 2 2 2 2 2 2 Gillshill Primary School Jan-11 1 1 1 1 1 1 Griffin Primary School Dec-15 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 Hall Road Academy Jun-14 2 2 2 2 2 3 Highlands Primary School Apr-12 1 1 1 1 1 2

Page 47 of 220 Ings Primary School Oct-14 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 Opened September 2014. No inspections carried out Kingswood Park Primary School yet 0.00 Longhill Primary School Sep-16 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 Marfleet Primary School Feb-15 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Maybury Primary School May-15 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 Mersey Primary School Jun-15 2 1 2 2 2 2 4 Mountbatten Primary School Jun-16 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 Neasden Primary School Jul-15 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 Newington Academy Jun-14 2 2 2 2 2 3 Newland St Johns CE VA Primary School Jul-13 2 2 2 2 2 2 Oldfleet Primary School Feb-13 2 2 2 2 2 3 Paisley Primary School Nov-12 2 2 2 2 2 3 Parkstone Primary School Mar-14 2 2 2 2 2 3 Pearson Primary School May-13 2 2 2 2 2 2 Priory Primary School Sep-10 2 2 2 1 2 2 Rokeby Park Primary School Mar-15 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 Sidmouth Primary School Jan-15 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 Southcoates Primary Academy * Jan-13 3 3 3 2 3 3 Spring Cottage Primary School Jan-11 1 1 1 1 1 1 St Andrew's CE VA Primary School Oct-13 2 2 2 2 2 3 St Anthony's Primary School Jun-16 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 St Charles' RC VA Primary School Jan-15 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 St George's Primary School Dec-15 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 St James' CE VC Primary School * Oct-13 3 3 3 2 3 2 St Mary Queen of Martyrs Voluntary Catholic Academy Mar-12 2 2 2 2 2 2 St Nicholas' Primary School Oct-11 2 3 2 2 2 2 St Richard's RC Primary School Apr-13 2 2 2 2 2 3 St Thomas More RC Primary School Jun-15 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 St Vincent's RC Primary School * Jan-13 4 4 4 3 4 3 Stepney Primary School Apr-14 2 2 2 2 2 2 Stockwell Primary School Nov-13 2 2 2 2 2 3 Stoneferry Primary School Jun-15 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 Sutton Park Primary School Jan-15 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 Thanet Primary School Jan-16 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 The Green Way Academy Jul-16 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 The Parks Primary School * Feb-13 4 4 4 3 4 3 Thoresby Primary School Jun-16 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Thorpepark Primary School Apr-13 2 2 2 2 2 2 Victoria Dock Primary School Feb-13 2 2 2 2 2 2 Wansbeck Academy Jul-15 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 Page 48 of 220 Westcott Primary School Apr-16 2 2 2 2 2 3 Wheeler Primary School Sep-16 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 Wold Primary Academy Jun-15 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 Woodland Primary School Jun-15 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 Secondary Schools Archbishop Sentamu Academy May-16 4 4 4 3 4 2 Hull Trinity House Academy Jun-16 2 2 2 2 2 2 Kelvin Hall School Feb-15 1 1 1 1 1 3 Kingswood Academy Mar-16 3 3 3 3 3 4 Malet Lambert Apr-12 2 2 2 2 2 3 Newland School For Girls Sep-14 3 3 3 2 3 3 Sirius Academy West Mar-14 1 1 1 1 1 2 Sirius Academy North Dec-15 2 1 2 2 2 4 St Mary's College Jul-10 1 1 2 1 1 2 The Boulevard Academy May-15 1 1 1 1 1 n/a The Marvell College * Dec-15 3 3 3 3 3 4 Winifred Holtby Academy Mar-15 3 3 3 3 3 3 PRU's Ashwell Pupil Referral Unit Mar-16 3 3 3 3 3 2 Opened September 2013. No inspections carried out Aspire Academy yet 0 The Boulevard Centre Jan-14 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rise Academy Dec-15 2 2 2 2 2 3 The Sullivan Centre ( Medical Needs) Feb-14 2 2 2 2 2 2 Whitehouse Unit Feb-13 1 1 1 1 1 2 Special Schools Bridgeview School Jul-14 2 1 2 2 2 2 Frederick Holmes School Sep-13 2 1 2 1 2 2 Ganton School Oct-11 1 1 1 1 1 2 Northcott School Jan-13 2 2 2 2 2 2 Oakfield School Dec-14 2 2 2 2 2 3 Tweendykes Academy Apr-16 1 1 1 1 1 1

* are schools that were Requires Improvement or Inadequate as a school but have not been inspected since becoming an academy.

** has been inspected and awaiting publication of the report

Page 49 of 220

Page 50 of 220 Appendix 5

Where are we in 2016?

Ambition 1 : All children and young people should be able to learn and develop in provision that has been judged to be ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’.

Type of Provision Number % good or better (Oct 2016)

Daycare/nursery provider - PVI 74 100%

Nursery School - maintained 1 100%

Primary School - maintained 25 69%

Primary School – academy/free 45 82%

Secondary School - maintained 3 67%

Secondary School – academy/free 9 56%

Special School - maintained 3 100%

Special School – academy/free 3 100% Pupil Referral Unit (PRU)/Alternative 1 100% Provision - maintained Pupil Referral Unit (PRU)/Alternative 5 60% Provision – academy/free 6th Form and FE College 3 100%

Page 51 of 220 Ambition 2 : In the key indicators of achievement and attendance in Hull, we will close the gap to national and then aim to exceed national figures. Hull England Target Target Target 2018 2016 2017 Early Years Foundation Stage - % achieving a good level of 65% 69% 3% below 2% below At National development (2015) National National Early Years Foundation Stage – the standard score and % 40 31.4 8% below 5% below 2% below inequality gap across the Early Learning Goals (2015) National National National Key Stage 2 - % achieving the ‘expected standard’ in reading 52% 53% New in 2016 At 1% above writing and maths (2016) National National Key Stage 2 – % achieving at a ‘high standard’ in reading writing 3% 5% New in 2016 1.5% below 1% below and maths (2016) National National Key Stage 4 - % achieving the threshold A* - C in English and 49.8% 58.7% New in 2016 5% below 2% below Maths (2016) National National Key Stage 4 – Progress 8 measure across 8 subject areas (2016) -0.03 -0.03 New in 2016 At At National National Post 16 – Level 2 qualification at aged 19 (2015) 84% 86% 3% below 1% below At National National (2015) National Post 16 – Level 3 qualification at aged 19 (2015) 44% 57% 12% below 10% below 8% below National (2015) National National Post 16 – Not in Education , Employment or Training (NEET) 6.2% 4.2% 0.5% above 1% above 0.5% above (2015) National (2015) National National Primary School Attendance (2015) 95.6% 96.0% 0.2% below 0.3 % below 0.2% below National (2015) National National Secondary School Attendance (2015) 94.3% 94.7% 0.5% below 0.3 % below 0.2% below National (2015) National National

Page 52 of 220

Page 53 of 220

Page 54 of 220 Appendix 6a

Admissions: Primary Schools – Hull parents wanting Hull schools

PREFERENCES ALLOCATIONS 1 2 3 4 21 TOTAL 1 2 3 4 21 TOTAL Adelaide Primary School 71 11 13 0 0 95 58 0 0 0 0 58 Ainthorpe Primary School 48 27 33 0 3 111 48 5 4 0 3 60 Alderman Cogan's CEVA Primary School 77 34 7 0 0 118 60 0 0 0 0 60 Appleton Primary School 46 29 17 0 0 92 39 4 1 0 0 44 Bellfield Primary School 28 16 13 0 0 57 27 1 2 0 0 30 Biggin Hill Primary School 70 28 17 0 13 128 70 1 2 0 13 86 Bricknell Primary School 123 85 36 0 0 244 87 1 0 0 0 88 Broadacre Primary School 45 36 18 0 3 102 45 8 4 0 3 60 Buckingham Primary Academy 35 19 12 0 1 67 35 1 0 0 1 37 Bude Park Primary School 26 16 12 0 12 66 26 2 0 0 12 40 Cavendish Primary School 40 90 66 1 0 197 35 22 3 0 0 60 Chiltern Primary School 62 23 17 0 0 102 57 3 0 0 0 60 Christopher Pickering Primary School 66 18 4 0 0 88 54 4 1 0 0 59 Cleeve Primary School 58 27 20 0 1 106 58 0 0 0 1 59 Clifton Primary School 37 17 13 0 1 68 37 7 0 0 1 45 Collingwood Primary School 50 27 14 0 0 91 43 1 1 0 0 45 Craven Primary Academy 25 21 11 0 0 57 25 0 0 0 0 25 Dorchester Primary School 43 16 19 0 1 79 43 1 0 0 1 45 Eastfield Primary School 122 80 48 0 0 250 90 0 0 0 0 90 Endike Primary School 65 51 34 0 0 150 52 6 1 0 0 59 Endsleigh Holy Child Voluntary Catholic 55 21 14 0 0 90 38 0 0 0 0 38 Academy Estcourt Primary School 34 26 10 0 0 70 34 2 0 0 0 36 Foredyke Primary School (now 15 7 8 0 4 34 15 0 0 0 4 19 Woodland Primary) Francis Askew Primary School 54 19 11 0 2 86 54 2 1 0 2 59 Gillshill Primary School 92 109 42 0 0 243 59 1 0 0 0 60

Page 55 of 220 PREFERENCES ALLOCATIONS 1 2 3 4 21 TOTAL 1 2 3 4 21 TOTAL Griffin Primary School 67 32 15 0 0 114 58 1 0 0 0 59 Hall Road Academy 35 15 15 0 7 72 35 6 1 0 7 49 Highlands Primary School 71 15 13 0 0 99 60 0 0 0 0 60 Ings Primary School 30 16 12 0 11 69 30 1 0 0 11 42 Kingswood Park Primary School 114 53 13 0 0 180 90 0 0 0 0 90 Longhill Primary School 57 19 12 0 0 88 49 0 1 0 0 50 Marfleet Primary School 35 12 13 0 0 60 29 0 1 0 0 30 Maybury Primary School 40 29 35 0 0 104 30 0 0 0 0 30 Mersey Primary Academy 25 17 7 0 2 51 25 1 1 0 2 29 Mountbatten Primary School 28 15 13 0 13 69 28 3 1 0 13 45 Neasden Primary School 35 16 42 0 0 93 34 2 4 0 0 40 Newington Academy 40 37 24 0 2 103 40 5 3 0 2 50 Newland St Johns CE Academy 40 26 20 0 0 86 37 3 0 0 0 40 Oldfleet Primary School 47 30 7 0 0 84 47 3 0 0 0 50 Paisley Primary School 47 19 13 0 0 79 44 6 0 0 0 50 Parkstone Primary School 49 31 13 0 0 93 45 4 1 0 0 50 Pearson Primary School 38 41 25 0 0 104 30 0 0 0 0 30 Priory Primary School 57 51 29 0 0 137 51 6 2 0 0 59 Rokeby Park Primary School 14 14 11 0 9 48 14 3 3 0 9 29 Sidmouth Primary School 32 18 20 0 25 96 32 2 1 0 25 60 Southcoates Primary Academy 41 37 34 0 7 119 41 6 3 0 7 57 Spring Cottage Primary School 85 30 35 0 0 150 60 0 0 0 0 60 St Andrew's CE VA Primary School 79 76 34 0 0 189 76 5 2 0 0 83 St Anthony's Catholic Primary School 36 16 7 0 0 59 28 2 0 0 0 30 St Charles' RC VA Primary School 23 15 13 0 4 55 23 2 1 0 4 30 St George's Primary School 39 47 31 0 0 117 29 1 0 0 0 30 St James' CE Academy 33 33 12 0 0 78 27 3 0 0 0 30 St Mary Queen of Martyrs Voluntary 43 36 35 0 0 114 39 0 1 0 0 40 Catholic Academy St Nicholas' Primary School 29 56 27 0 0 112 22 7 1 0 0 30 St Richard's Voluntary Catholic Academy 46 22 17 0 8 93 46 5 0 0 8 59 St Thomas More RC Primary School 9 9 4 1 13 36 9 2 0 1 13 25 Page 56 of 220 PREFERENCES ALLOCATIONS 1 2 3 4 21 TOTAL 1 2 3 4 21 TOTAL St Vincent's RC Primary School 23 20 20 0 2 65 23 4 0 0 2 29 Stepney Primary School 35 25 26 0 0 86 28 2 0 0 0 30 Stockwell Academy 53 19 7 0 0 79 43 2 0 0 0 45 Stoneferry Primary School 21 7 5 0 7 40 21 2 0 0 7 30 Sutton Park Primary School 58 20 28 0 0 106 57 1 2 0 0 60 Thanet Primary School 56 29 25 0 1 111 56 2 1 0 1 60 The Green Way Academy 62 24 22 0 0 108 58 2 0 0 0 60 The Parks Academy School 31 23 13 0 7 74 31 10 2 0 7 50 Thoresby Primary School 57 28 23 0 10 118 57 5 3 0 10 75 Thorpepark Primary School 82 16 17 0 0 115 58 0 1 0 0 59 Victoria Dock Primary School 58 9 6 0 0 73 58 2 0 0 0 60 Wansbeck Academy 28 24 13 0 0 65 28 2 0 0 0 30 Westcott Primary School 44 12 24 0 0 80 44 0 2 0 0 46 Wheeler Primary School 60 31 36 0 0 127 59 1 0 0 0 60 Wold Primary School 68 35 22 0 13 138 68 5 2 0 13 88 3,487 2,058 1,397 2 182 7,127 3,086 191 60 1 182 3,520

Page 57 of 220

Page 58 of 220 Appendix 6b

Admissions: Secondary Preferences and Allocations as at March 2016

Allocations Made 15/16 compared to 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 School Name 1st 1st 2nd 2nd 3rd 3rd 21 & 22 21 & 22 PAN PAN Andrew Marvell Business and 139 144 23 15 14 5 77 96 260 260 Enterprise College Archbishop Sentamu Academy 242 233 23 33 5 4 0 0 270 270 Hull Trinity House Academy 99 98 15 16 6 6 0 0 120 120 Kelvin Hall 246 257 23 9 1 4 0 0 270 270 Kingswood College of Arts 101 116 31 36 3 12 45 50 180 180 Malet Lambert School 279 293 16 3 5 4 0 0 300 300 Newland School for Girls 108 101 31 19 9 14 2 16 150 150 Sirus Academy North 93 111 16 42 12 11 128 86 250 250 Sirus Academy West 281 260 9 24 0 6 0 0 290 290 St Mary's College 263 287 6 8 1 0 0 0 240 240 The Boulevard Academy 86 104 23 14 6 2 5 0 120 120 Winifred Holtby School 249 247 19 19 2 4 0 0 270 270 2186 2251 235 238 64 72 257 250 2720 2720 St Mary's College and Kingswood have taken over PAN = increase in number on 15/16

Page 59 of 220 Preferences Expressed 15/16 compared to 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 School Name 1st 1st 2nd 2nd 3rd 3rd Andrew Marvell Business and 139 144 154 120 406 98 Enterprise College Archbishop Sentamu Academy 279 246 135 155 492 67 Hull Trinity House Academy 132 119 119 96 355 106 Kelvin Hall 341 373 253 271 715 149 Kingswood College of Arts 101 117 115 137 274 71 Malet Lambert School 378 378 289 250 841 170 Newland School for Girls 108 150 115 101 320 114 Sirius Academy North 93 111 40 82 174 53 Sirius Academy West 374 323 153 178 623 102 St Mary's College 412 462 219 274 779 158 The Boulevard Academy 86 115 59 72 190 49 Winifred Holtby School 318 315 198 207 588 101 2761 2853 1849 1943 0 1238

Page 60 of 220 2015/16 to 2016/17 Comparison of Preferences and Allocations of students residing in EAST RIDING Applying for Schools in HULL Preferences Expressed Comparison 2015/16 to Total Preferences 2016/17 Expressed 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 1st Pref 1 Pref 2 Pref 2 Pref 3 Pref 3 Pref 1 Pref 149 153 Andrew Marvell College 0 3 1 0 1 2 2 Pref 44 66 Archbishop Sentamu Academy 0 2 2 2 0 1 3 Pref 24 52 Hull Trinity House Academy 36 37 0 4 0 0 217 271 Kelvin Hall School: A Specialist Science College 35 21 5 18 2 4 Kingswood Academy 0 1 0 0 0 0 Malet Lambert School Language College 1 3 5 5 2 1 Newland School for Girls a Mathematics and Computing College 3 3 1 2 1 0 Sirius Academy North 1 0 0 0 0 0 Sirius Academy West 29 19 13 12 9 6 St Mary's College 40 63 15 22 8 11 The Boulevard 3 0 0 0 0 0 Winifred Holtby Academy 1 1 2 1 1 27 149 153 44 66 24 52

Allocations Made Comparison 2015/16 to 2016/17 Total Allocations Made 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 1st Pref 1 Pref 2 Pref 2 Pref 3 Pref 3 Pref 1 Pref 116 119 Andrew Marvell College 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 Pref 3 2 Archbishop Sentamu Academy 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 Pref 1 0 Hull Trinity House Academy 30 30 0 2 0 0 120 121 Kelvin Hall School: A Specialist Science College 23 16 1 0 0 0 Kingswood Academy 0 1 0 0 0 0 Malet Lambert School Language College 0 1 0 0 0 0 Newland School for Girls a Mathematics and Computing College 3 3 0 0 0 0 Sirius Academy North 1 0 0 0 0 0 Sirius Academy West 33 18 0 0 0 0 St Mary's College 26 46 2 0 0 0 The Boulevard 0 0 0 0 0 0 Winifred Holtby Academy 0 0 0 0 1 0 116 119 3 2 1 0 Page 61 of 220 2015/16 to 2016/17 Comparison of Preferences and Allocations of students residing in HULL Applying for Schools in EAST RIDING

Preferences Expressed Comparison 2015/16 to 2016/17 Total Preferences Expressed 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 1st Pref 1 Pref 2 Pref 2 Pref 3 Pref 3 Pref 1 Pref 199 201 Beverley Grammar School 7 3 5 5 6 3 2 Pref 363 371 Beverley High School 6 7 4 7 6 6 3 Pref 316 310 Cottingham High School 40 33 94 79 105 89 878 882 Hessle High School 30 42 117 117 49 56 Hornsea School and Language College 0 0 0 0 0 1 Longcroft School and Performing Arts College 20 11 17 29 24 14 South Holderness Technology College 39 34 46 43 48 49 South Hunsley School 10 8 18 17 19 17 Withernsea High School 1 0 0 0 0 0 Wolfreton School 46 63 62 74 59 75 199 201 363 371 316 310

Allocations Made Comparison 2015/16 to 2016/17 Total Allocations Made 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 15/16 16/17 1st Pref 1 Pref 2 Pref 2 Pref 3 Pref 3 Pref 1 Pref 191 177 Beverley Grammar School 7 3 1 2 0 1 2 Pref 70 72 Beverley High School 6 1 2 0 0 0 3 Pref 32 19 Cottingham High School 40 33 23 22 15 9 293 268 Hessle High School 30 42 14 18 3 6 Hornsea School and Language College 0 0 0 0 0 0 Longcroft School and Performing Arts College 20 11 4 14 6 1 South Holderness Technology College 39 34 7 11 1 2 South Hunsley School 2 4 0 0 0 0 Withernsea School 1 0 0 0 0 0 Wolfreton School 46 49 19 5 7 0 191 177 70 72 32 19

Page 62 of 220 Appendix 7

Update on the Statutory Free Early Education Entitlement for Two Year Olds

1. Purpose

1.1 To update Early Support and Lifelong Learning Overview and Scrutiny Commission on the Two Year Old Early Education Entitlement.

2. Background

2.1 The 15 hour early education entitlement for the most disadvantaged two year olds has been in place since September 2013 aiming to close the attainment gap between these children and their more advantaged peers.

2.2 Children are eligible if their families are in receipt of:

• Income Support • income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) • income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) • support through part 6 of the Immigration and Asylum Act • the guaranteed element of State Pension Credit • Child Tax Credit (but not Working Tax Credit) and have an annual income not over £16,190 • the Working Tax Credit 4-week run on (the payment you get when you stop qualifying for Working Tax Credit) • Working Tax Credits and earn £16,190 a year or less

Or if they

• are Looked after by a local council • have a current Statement of Special Education Needs (SEN) or an Education Health and Care plan • get Disability Living Allowance • have left care under a special guardianship order, child arrangements order or adoption order.

Currently 110 providers are registered to deliver the entitlement (1 nursery school, 4 primary academies, 1 PRU, 60 PVI settings and 44 childminders)

2.3 Only providers holding a ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’ Ofsted rating are included on the authority preferred provider list.

2.4 Once allocated children retain the place until they transition into their three and four year old entitlement.

2.5 Over the academic year 2015/16 the number of target places to be provided as set by the DfE fell from 2011 to 1771. This would suggest an increase in the number of parents accessing work or training or changes to the benefit system impacting on parents’ eligibility to receive the above benefits. Page 63 of 220

2.6 The authority childcare sufficiency assessment continues to be used to identify available places in individual wards, and areas where there is a requirement to create additional capacity.

3. Current Position

3.1 The table below shows the number of new children who have accessed the entitlement each term and not those who have been engaged over previous terms

September - January – April – August September – December March 2016 2016 October 2016 2015 938 708 489 706 applications applications applications applications 839 successful 656 successful 425 successful 611 successful 555 actually 389 actually 262 actually 338 actually funded funded funded funded 174 failed to 227 failed to 60 failed to 132 failed to access access access access

3.2 The total number of children being funded in the autumn term so far including those who have been engaged for the last 2 terms is 1412 making current uptake 80% of the target. This is above the last national uptake of 70%

3.3 Uptake remains high. The local authority attempt to contact all families who choose not to apply or being eligible decide not to take up the place. Whilst many wish to delay the child’s start for a term, a significant number of the details provided by the parents appear to be inaccurate and as a result cannot be contacted or followed up.

3.4 Children’s Centres and Health Visitors continue to support encourage known families reluctant to access their entitlement to attend Stay and Play sessions in the first instance as an initial step to taking up the offer given the opportunity to gradually build up attendance at a nursery or childminder over a period of time.

3.5 The increased number of employed practitioners has been maintained despite the reduction of places to be delivered but high staff turnover in the sector continues to be a concern, although quality in the settings remains high

3.6 Training for the practitioners continues to focus on early language and communication, mathematics and emotional well being.

3.7 The impact of training is evident in the monitoring of setting environments and staff interactions with children.

3.8 The authority have been invited to be part of the National Children’s Bureau Making it REAL project (Raising Early Achievement in Literacy). The project Page 64 of 220 focuses on building the confidence of parents in supporting their child’s early literacy development at home. Twenty schools and settings are involved in the project to date and outcomes will be part of a national evaluation.

3.9 EYFSP outcomes for those children who have previously been involved in the two year old entitlement programme have been compared with those children not involved in the programme as well as nationally. 563 two year old entitlement children were identified, 16.5% of the 2016 cohort.

% Achieving Good Level of Development Average Total Point Score 2013 2014 2015 2016 Trend 2013 2014 2015 2016 Trend 2 Year Old Entitlement Pupils 23.7 35.5 38.3 58.1 34.4 25.4 27.8 27.3 31.1 5.7 Non Entitlement Pupils 42.8 51.8 62.1 23.5 19.3 29.5 30.7 32 32.6 3.1 All Pupils 42.0 50.8 60.5 65.0 23.0 29.3 30.5 31.7 32.3 3.0 National 52.0 60.0 66.0 69.3 17.3 32.8 33.8 34.3 34.5 1.7 (please note this is LA and not published data)

3.10 The data shows outcomes for two year old entitlement programme children have improved each year, but remain below those of non programme children both in terms of percentage achieving a Good Level of Development and Average Point Score.

3.11 However, between 2013 and 2016 the rate of improvement in the number of two year old entitlement children achieving a Good level of Development is 10.9 percentage points higher than that of non programme children locally and is double the rate for all pupils nationally.

3.12 The gap between the number of two year old entitlement and non-two year old entitlement children achieving a Good Level of Development was 23.8 percentage points in 2015 and 16.3 percentage points in 2014. This has narrowed significantly to 8.1 percentage points in 2016.

3.13 Between 2013 and 2016 the Average Total Point Score for those children engaged in the two year old programme has improved at a much higher rate than that seen nationally.

3.14 Data for Pupil Groups:

Percentage Achieving a Good Level of Development 2016 All Boys Girls Gap FSM Non FSM Gap SEN Non SEN Gap EAL Non EAL Gap 2 YO Entitlement Pupils 58.1 48.6 68.3 19.7 58.7 59.0 0.3 17.8 66.9 49.1 63.2 57.7 -5.5 Non 2 YO Entitlement Pupils 66.3 60.2 73.0 12.8 58.8 68.5 9.7 19.7 69.9 50.2 52.0 69.3 17.3 All Pupils 65.0 58.7 72.6 13.9 58.7 67.5 8.8 19.1 69.4 50.3 52.8 67.2 14.4

Page 65 of 220 Average Total Point Score 2016 All Boys Girls Gap FSM Non FSM Gap SEN Non SEN Gap EAL Non EAL Gap 2 YO Entitlement Pupils 31.1 29.8 32.5 2.7 30.8 31.7 0.9 24.5 32.5 8.0 31.5 31.1 -0.4 Non 2 YO Entitlement Pupils 32.6 31.6 33.7 2.1 30.8 33.1 2.3 24.2 33.2 9.0 29.6 33.2 3.6 All Pupils 32.3 31.4 33.5 2.1 30.8 32.9 2.1 24.3 33.1 8.8 29.7 32.8 3.1

3.14 The gender gap for two year old entitlement children achieving a Good level of Development is wider than that of non entitlement children, whereas the gap between the outcomes for FSM and Non FSM two year old entitlement children (0.3 percentage points) is significantly narrower than that of non entitlement children (9.7 percentage points)

3.15 The gap between the outcomes for EAL and non EAL children involved in the two year old programme is the converse of that normally seen, with more EAL children achieving a Good Level of Development than non EAL children. This pattern is also reflected in the Average Total Points Scores of EAL programme children.

4. Strategic context

4.1 The two year old early education entitlement is a deliverable project within the ‘Ambitious Education for all children and young people in Hull 2015-18’ ‘document and continues to support employment in the Childcare sector.

4.2 Access to the entitlement has enabled children with additional and sometimes complex needs to be identified and supported at an earlier stage. Currently 23 two year olds are receiving additional 1:1 support in settings across the city.

5. Next steps

5.1 Continue to update and use The Childcare Sufficiency Assessment to maps current applications and take up by ward to ensure potential gaps in provision are identified and adequate provision is available.

5.2 Ensure targeted information is distributed to families known to meet the eligibility criteria to maximise take up.

5.3 Work with Children’s Centres and Health Visitors and the Early Years Team to ensure early intervention and engagement of all eligible and reluctant families

5.4 Continue to monitor and evaluate the implementation and impact of practitioner training on children’s learning and development in order that future training is targeted to support and ensure high quality provision for children is maintained.

5.5 Use termly progress data submitted to the authority to monitor the progress of children and follow up where this suggests improvement may be required

Page 66 of 220 6. Extension of the Early Education Entitlement

6.1 From September 2017 the early education entitlement for working parents of three and four year olds is to be doubled to 30 hours a week for 38 weeks a year.

6.2 Parents will be eligible if: • Both are working and/or • One parent in lone parent family is working (earning equivalent of 16 hours a week on National Minimum Wage including those receiving tax credits or Universal Credit) • One/ both parent/s is away on leave (parental, maternal etc.) • One/ both parent/s on Statutory sick • One parent is employed and the other parent has either substantial caring responsibilities/and or disability

6.2 Indicative numbers from the DfE suggest that around 1510 children will be eligible to access the extended hours.

6.3 The authority will hold the responsibility to check for eligibility. Unlike the two year old offer, eligibility will cease should parents circumstances change and they no longer meet the criteria.

6.4 Authority officers are working with schools and providers to try and ensure sufficient capacity is available from September 2017.

Page 67 of 220

Page 68 of 220 July 2016 Monthly Participation, NEET and Not Known Data (16-18 years old) Appendix 8

RPA – Not Cohort EET NEET Meeting the Duty 230 Face to Face interviews Known July 2016

Yr 12 Yr 13 School/College Kenworthy Other 34 179 17 July 2016 9162 8270 740 144 84.2% 8.2% 1.6% 92.7% 87.2% 314 Phone Calls with YP or significant other

243 Emails/Texts sent

Year Group June 2016 9167 8310 696 153 Y12 Y13 Y14

84.9% 7.7% 1.7% 93.4% 88.1% In Learning 92.4% 87.2% 74.2% July 2015 9562 8591 640 320 Not Known 0.9% 1.3% 2.4% 84.4% 6.9% 3.3% 95.3% 85.8% NEET 5.6% 7.8% 10.8%

June 2016 Gender 69 Joiners July 2016 696 NEET +44 25 Leavers Cohort EET NEET NK % NEET 740 NEET Male 4763 4269 390 97 8.4% Female 4399 4001 350 47 8.0%

Vulnerable Groups* Looked Teenage Care Supervised Priority after / Pregnancy SEND Parents Leaver by YOT Families In care Number 47 164 110 72 55 350 226 Statistical Neighbours NEET 14 11 30 28 13 22 52 NEET Not Known In Learning Available Hull 8.2% 1.6% 84.2% NEET Not 1 94 9 5 28 16 28 Available Statistical Neighbours Average 6.5% 4.4% 81.6% % NEET 32.6% 64.4% 36.8% 50.8% 74.5% 11.1% **35.4% England Average 4.5% 6.6% 83.6% *A young person may be in more than 1 of the above groups. Page 69 of 220 ** Unadjusted NEET figure Page 70 of 220

Briefing Paper to the North Carr Area Committee Wards : Bransholme East, Bransholme West, Kings 18 th January 2017 Park

Hull Virtual School for Looked After Children Area Committee Pupil Premium Report

Briefing Paper of the of Interim City Learning and Skills Manager on behalf of Corporate Director for Children, Young People and Family Services

The Pupil Premium Plus (notionally £1900 per child held by the Headteacher) is available in full to schools, but the amount claimed per child varies according to needs. It is paid in termly instalments.

Designated Teachers in schools are required to request Pupil Premium Plus funding for looked after children to the Virtual School Headteacher via the electronic Personal Education Plan (ePEP) system. This is by setting costed SMART targets (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timebound ) and based on each child’s academic performance. They should be set and reviewed on a termly basis, using best practice advice from Ofsted and the Virtual School. Teachers are expected to add additional comments and ratings about the child’s progress in relation to each of the SMART targets submitted.

Once a funding request has been submitted by the school, it is reviewed by the Virtual School team, who can accept, amend or decline the funding request. When agreed, the funding is sent electronically each term.

Additional funding requests can be submitted on a termly basis and these are reviewed by the Headteacher and the Virtual School Management Board.

Author: GDobbs Page 71 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 1 of 4 Count of LAC that Claims Made School made Total Cost 15-16 claims 2015-16 Ashwell Academy 5 7 £49,419.70 Biggin Hill 4 11 £6,595.00 Broadacre Primary 4 12 £4,059.00 Bude Park Academy 2 3 £5,662.00 Cleeve Primary 12 47 £57,752.24 Highlands Primary 4 5 £32,169.00 Kingswood Academy 9 20 £5,986.21 Northcott 6 12 £9,713.07 St Andrews CEVA 2 2 £800.00 Total 48 119 £172,156.22

• £127,257 was given to schools via Pupil Premium bid forms. These bid forms are not aimed directly for specific children but can be used to help an entire cohort. 17 bid forms were submitted between 5 schools in the North Carr area committee: Ashwell, Bude Park, Cleeve, Highlands and Kingswood Academy.

• Between April 2015-April 2016 the average LAC within the North Carr area committee received £3586 each in PP funding across the financial year. This allocation is larger than the £1900 per year for each LAC due to the numerous bid forms submitted across the year which are spread amongst various children, cohorts, interventions etc.

• Kingswood Parks and St Mary QOM were North Carr schools that did not submit any funding requests in the last financial year because they didn’t have any LAC on roll.

Within the ePEP system, schools North Carr Area Committee Pupil Premium Claims by type of are asked to state which category spend 2015-16 the funding request falls under. 80 70 63 The graph to the left shows what 60 type of claims the schools made, 50 38 40 with the majority being for directly 30 aiding the child’s achievement. 20 14 4 10 0 0 The Various/Bid Form is for 0 schools that have requested additional funding that aren’t specific to an individual child.

Author: GDobbs Page 72 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 2 of 4 North Carr Area Committee by Intervention Type 2015-16 £140,000 £121,458 £120,000

£100,000

£80,000

£60,000

£40,000 £18,554 £20,000 £5,369 £5,996 £5,174 £6,113 £462 £768 £1,590 £2,506 £270 £3,000 £897 £0

Between the 9 schools with LAC on roll within the North Carr area committee, the average amount claimed by £19,128 Average amount claimed by each North each school in the financial year was £19,128. Carr Area committee school April 2015- Obviously some schools have more LAC on roll than 2016 with LAC on roll others, and several bid forms were placed across the year.

The average cost of each of the 119 individual claims £1,446 was £1,446. This shows that schools are spreading Average cost per North Carr claim their targets and claims across the year and not based on 119 claims made between claiming the full £1900 at once. This total also includes April 2015- April 2016 various bid forms that schools completed across the year.

Author: GDobbs Page 73 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 3 of 4 Total Number of LAC that had PP Total number of Area Committee claims between Total £ Spent 2015-2016 Claims April 2015- April 2016 East 135 46 £84,123.27 West 97 32 £38,805.97 North 155 37 £148,825.61 North Carr 119 56 £172,156.22 Park 134 47 £68,580.27 Riverside 158 62 £118,458.33 Wyke 27 5 £4,784.59 Total 825 285 £635,734.26

The above table represents the city-wide total number of claims and money spent for LAC within the financial year 2015-16. It does not include LAC placed in other Local Authority schools, who are also eligible for Pupil Premium funding, or funding used by the Virtual School to directly support children across a number of schools and those children between placements requiring intensive support.

A single child can have several claims depending on how many targets were set out for them on the ePEP system and the amount of funding requested from each target.

Graham Talbot, Interim City Learning and Skills Manager on behalf of Corporate Director

Contact Officer : Geoff Dobbs Telephone No. : (01482) 616341

Officer Interests: None

Background Documents: -

Author: GDobbs Page 74 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 4 of 4

Briefing Paper to the North Carr Area Committee Wards : Bransholme East, Bransholme West, 18 th January 2017 King’s Park

Community Safety

Briefing Paper of the of Head of Service Community and Scrutiny Manager

1. Purpose of the Paper and Summary

The purpose of this briefing paper is to update the North Carr Area Committee on policing activities in the North Carr area.

2. Background

The local Inspector from the Humberside Police will provide a further update on any current and outstanding issues in the North Carr area.

3. Issues for consideration

That the North Carr Area Committee notes any updates provided.

4. Next steps

The ward priorities will be monitored by the Area and Neighbourhood Tasking groups at bi- monthly Tasking meetings. Neighbourhood Co-ordinators will also continue to update Ward Councillors through Member Briefing meetings.

Briefing Paper of Alex Holgate, Committee and Scrutiny Manager

Contact Officer: Dorinda Guy Telephone No. : 01482 613416

Officer Interests:- None

Background Documents: - None

Author: Page 75 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 1 of 1

Page 76 of 220

Briefing Note to the North Carr Area Committee Wards: All

18 th January 2017

North Carr Area Urgent Care Consultation

Briefing Note of the City Neighbourhoods and Housing Manager

1. Purpose of the Briefing Note and Summary

1.1 To update Members on the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) ‘Urgent Care’ proposals as part of the wider consultation process.

2. Background

2.1 The CCG commenced a formal12 week public consultation on Urgent Care Services on 15th August 2016 which closed on 6 th November 2016. The final consultation report was approved by NHS Hull CCG Board on 25th November 2016, and was presented to the Health and Wellbeing Overview and Scrutiny Committee on 9 th December 2016.

NHS England issued guidance on the development of Urgent Care Centres and the guidance states that an improved system of urgent and emergency services was required that is safe, sustainable and that provides high quality care consistently.

Previous engagement work highlighted that patients report that there is confusion on opening times, locations and what can be provided from each site due to the number of options available. This has created frustration for residents in times of urgent needs.

Surveys undertaken relating to urgent care and GP Out of Hours show that the vast majority, 92% of respondents, agreed that care or treatment should be available at all times, (including evenings and weekends) and 69% of people agreed that they would be willing to travel to another part of the city for treatment, and that they would like all of their care or treatment to be managed through a single point of contact. When asked about one thing that could be done to provide urgent/out of hours care in a way that would suit the patient or their family’s needs, the majority of comments focused on extended opening hours and out of hours care; response times; and access to services (such as location and parking availability).

The proposal was that a 24/7 integrated urgent care located at Bransholme Health Centre could meet these needs.

Page 77 of 220 Page 1 of 4 This could provide; • Increased opening hours 24 hour, 7 days per week; currently the minor injuries provision at the Freedom Centre is 9am-5pm, Monday to Friday and at Bransholme 9am-8pm, 7 days per week.

• Improved diagnostic ability, an x-ray facility will be added to the urgent care service provision at Bransholme Health Centre; there is no x-ray provision at the Freedom Centre

• Improved primary care access to x-ray for GPs

• The delivery of a service that is easy to understand for the general public in terms of access, location and presenting need

3. Key activity and its impact

The consultation as a whole achieved over 1642 primary contacts; i.e. those who completed a questionnaire, attended a public meeting or engaged at a drop in session. A total of 741 completed questionnaires were received.

The overall reach of the consultation was extensive and it is estimated that information on the proposals were seen around 1.2 million times via local media (newspaper and radio stations), via social media or on NHS Hull CCG’s website.

10,000 consultation documents were distributed to GP practices, pharmacies and other healthcare premises as well as Customer Service Centres, schools and community venues across Hull.

Residents in the areas that would experience the most change as a result of the proposed changes (HU7, HU8 and HU9) were specifically targeted; to ensure they had opportunity to have their questions answered and their views heard. Increased promotion of the consultation, drop in sessions and public meetings were held in these areas.

Based on the Equality Impact Assessment, targeted work was undertaken to promote the consultation and encourage responses from the following groups: parents of younger children, the Eastern European Community and the LGBT community.

In addition to the targeted work, public meetings were held across the City as well as general awareness raising roadshows held in local supermarkets and shopping centres.

Key stakeholders were identified and invited to give their views on the proposals and a number of briefing sessions have been held with clinicians and service providers.

The majority of people who completed the consultation questionnaire agree with the proposals to consolidate Urgent Care services into a single 24 hour a

Page 78 of 220 Page 2 of 4 day, 7 day a week, Urgent Care Centre with enhanced diagnostics located within Bransholme Health Centre. Specifically they believe that:

• Urgent care should be available 24 hours a day 7 days a week (97.41% agree or strongly agree)

• People should be seen, diagnosed and treated all in the same place (95.69% agree or strongly agree)

• Something needs to be done to reduce the pressure and waiting in Accident and Emergency (98.14% agree or strongly agree)

• The current Urgent Care Service is too complicated; it is difficult to know where to go and when. (68.82% agree or strongly agree)

The preferred option for the majority of respondents is option 2, the most popular second choice being option 1. It is clear that respondents would prefer relocating urgent care services to Bransholme rather than services remaining in their current configuration (63.78% of people 1st choice option 2)

The issues highlighted through free text responses and public sessions can be grouped into three main areas:

• The location of the Urgent Care Centre, and people’s ability to travel.

• Education and publicity, for both healthcare staff and the general public.

• Additional services, and requirements for the building and it’s environment.

The formal responses from statutory bodies and partners were largely supportive of the proposed changes to urgent care, although there were some concerns relating to those unable to travel to the new service if it is moved to the North of the city. Of those that gave a view on which option would be preferred, formal responses identified option 2 as the preferred option, ensuring that some appropriate services be maintained at the Freedom Centre.

4. Next Steps

4.1 Approved the relocation of the minor injuries unit from the Freedom Centre, and the GP out-of-hours from Diadem Health Centre to create a 24/7 urgent care centre at Bransholme Health Centre; while maintaining some health services at the Freedom centre

4.2 Begin additional engagement with the communities surrounding the Freedom Centre should be undertaken to determine what health services could be appropriately offered at the Freedom Centre.

Page 79 of 220 Page 3 of 4 4.3 Service user experience and access behaviours will be monitored. This intelligence will give insight into future service requirements.

4.4 An extensive targeted campaign aimed at both residents and health professionals advising of the new urgent care service.

Colin Hurst Engagement Manager (Patients and the Public)

Contact Officer: Colin Hurst, Engagement Manager (Patients and the Public) Telephone No. : (01482) 344814 Officer interests: None Background Documents: Urgent Care in Hull, Public Consultation Report; Nov 2016

Page 80 of 220 Page 4 of 4

Urgent Care in Hull

Public Consultation Report

November 2016 Page 81 of 220 Page 2  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

Contents

03 Executive Summary

05 Introduction

Urgent Care and the proposed changes 07 What do we have now 07 What are the proposed Changes

How we have listened 08 Methods 10 Consultation Reach

Analysis of Feedback 11 Case for change 12 Options 13 Free-text Responses 14 Formal Responses

15 Conclusion

16 Appendices i. Glossary ii. Questionnaire iii. Demographics of respondents iv. Formal responses

Page 82 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 3 Executive Summary

NHS Hull CCG has undertaken a comprehensive programme of engagement to involve the public, service users and carers, elected representatives, and other stakeholders and partners in the development of plans for Urgent Care across the City; and the development of an Urgent Care Centre located in Bransholme, in the North of the City.

The information gathered during the pre-consultation engagement phase has been used to shape the CCG’s final proposal for the development. The proposals were presented to the public and stakeholders during a 12 week period of formal consultation; this document is the report on the outcome of that consultation.

The consultation period ran from 15th August 2016 until 6th November 2016. As part of the consultation, service users and the general public were asked about their views of current urgent care services; and to what degree they agree or disagree with the proposed changes to urgent care services and the reasoning behind the proposals. Three options were presented and the participants in the consultation were asked to put them in order of preference, the options were:

1. Relocate the minor injuries unit from the Freedom Centre, and the GP out-of-hours from Diadem Health Centre to create a 24/7 urgent care centre at Bransholme Health Centre, with no health services based at the Freedom Centre.

2. Relocate the minor injuries unit from the Freedom Centre, and the GP out-of-hours from Diadem Health Centre to create a 24/7 urgent care centre at Bransholme Health Centre. Work with local residents on what health services can be developed at the Freedom Centre, based on the needs of children and families.

3. Do nothing and keep the current service locations, opening times and access times as they are, without the development of an 24/7 urgent care centre and without extended access to X-ray.

The information to support the consultation was set out in a 12 page consultation document which included a four page questionnaire. All information relating to the proposals and the questionnaire were also made available online via the CCG’s website. In addition a series of public meetings, drop in sessions, and information roadshows were held.

Key activity and its impact

 The consultation as a whole achieved over 1642 primary contacts; i.e. those who completed a questionnaire, attended a public meeting or engaged at a drop in session. A total of 741 completed questionnaires were received.

 The overall reach of the consultation was extensive and it is estimated that information on the proposals were seen around 1.2 million times via local media (newspaper and radio stations), via social media or on NHS Hull CCG’s website.

 10,000 consultation documents were distributed to GP practices, pharmacies and other healthcare premises as well as Customer Service Centres, schools and community venues across Hull.

Page 83 of 220 Page 4  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

 Residents in the areas that would experience the most change as a result of the proposed changes (HU7, HU8 and HU9) were specifically targeted; to ensure they had opportunity to have their questions answered and their views heard. Increased promotion of the consultation, drop in sessions and public meetings were held in these areas.

 Based on the Equality Impact Assessment, targeted work was undertaken to promote the consultation and encourage responses from the following groups: parents of younger children, the Eastern European Community and the LGBT community.

 In addition to the targeted work, public meetings were held across the City as well as general awareness raising roadshows held in local supermarkets and shopping centres.

 Key stakeholders were identified and invited to give their views on the proposals and a number of briefing sessions have been held with clinicians and service providers.

The majority of people who completed the consultation questionnaire agree with the proposals to consolidate Urgent Care services into a single 24 hour a day, 7 day a week, Urgent Care Centre with enhanced diagnostics located within Bransholme Health Centre. Specifically they believe that:

 Urgent care should be available 24 hours a day 7 days a week (97.41% agree or strongly agree)

 People should be seen, diagnosed and treated all in the same place (95.69% agree or strongly agree)

 Something needs to be done to reduce the pressure and waiting in Accident and Emergency (98.14% agree or strongly agree)

 The current Urgent Care Service is too complicated; it is difficult to know where to go and when. (68.82% agree or strongly agree)

 The preferred option for the majority of respondents is option 2, the most popular second choice being option 1. It is clear that respondents would prefer relocating urgent care services to Bransholme rather than services remaining in their current configuration (63.78% of people 1st choice option 2)

1. The issues highlighted through free text responses and public sessions can be grouped into three main areas:  The location of the Urgent Care Centre, and people’s ability to travel.  Education and publicity, for both healthcare staff and the general public.  Additional services, and requirements for the building and it’s environment.

 The formal responses from statutory bodies and partners were largely supportive of the proposed changes to urgent care, although there were some concerns relating to those unable to travel to the new service if it is moved to the North of the city. Of those that gave a view on which option would be preferred, formal responses identified option 2 as the preferred option, ensuring that some appropriate services be maintained at the Freedom Centre.

Page 84 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 5 Introduction

Urgent Care is when an injury or illness needs immediate care, but is not serious enough to visit an Accident & Emergency department.

NHS Hull CCG has engaged with patients and the public leading up to this formal consultation; through the People’s Panel,* and urgent care service user engagement that formed part of the Community Services Patient Experience Data Pack (2015). The insight gained from these activities has helped design the proposal for Urgent Care that NHS Hull CCG has consulted on. We have gained the following insight into the general public’s experiences and preferences relating to Urgent Care Community Services Patient Experience Data Pack 2015 Chart 1 Graph to show the importance ratings of aspects of urgent care services. (n=113)

Most important

Least important

Although chart 1 shows respondents indicated that it was important to them that Urgent Care was provided close to their home, the People’s Panel (Jan 2014) found that 69% of respondents would be willing to travel to another part of the city. Apart from “close to where I live” Chart 2 Community Services Patient Experience Data Pack 2015 the other aspects of service that Graph to compare how patients travel to urgent care services, and how people felt were most important this differs from their day to day methods. related to service provision rather (n=105) than location; seeing a doctor or healthcare professional face to face, and being seen and treated in the same place.

Urgent Care service users were asked how they travelled to service, chart 2 shows that the majority of people accessing urgent care travel by car, although some travel by public transport this does not mirror their day to day behaviour.

* The People’s Panel is a joint programme withPage Hull City85 Council.of 220 It is made up of approximately 3000 people from across Hull who are sent a questionnaire 4 times a year about different issues Page 6  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report Chart 3 Community Services Patient Experience Data Pack 2015 Graph to show all respondents preferred option. (n=118) Over 92% of People’s Panel respondents (Jan 2014) agreed that urgent care should be available at all times, including evenings and weekends.

Chart 3 shows that people would prefer to access urgent care by walk-in rather than appointment or home visit.

Following an extensive review of the existing NHS estate in Hull, Bransholme Health Centre was identified as the preferred location for an Urgent Care Centre. It was the only existing NHS building that could accommodate an x-ray facility and the staff required to deliver the service. It is on the same site as North Point Shopping Centre which has good public transport links, and has a large free car park, see chart 1 (page 5).

The goals of this consultation are;

1. To determine if the public support the following improvements to Urgent Care:  A service that is open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; reducing the existing confusion when deciding which service a person should access when they have an urgent care need.  To improve diagnostics in Urgent Care by having an x-ray facility on site; to ensure that patients are seen, diagnosed and treated in the same place where possible.  To reduce the pressure and waiting times in Accident and Emergency, by giving the public an appropriate alternative to Accident and Emergency.

2. To determine if the public support the preferred location of the proposed Urgent Care Centre by asking their preferred option:  Relocate the minor injuries unit from the Freedom Centre, and the GP out-of-hours from Diadem Health Centre to create a 24/7 urgent care centre at Bransholme Health Centre, with no health services based at the Freedom Centre.  Relocate the minor injuries unit from the Freedom Centre, and the GP out-of-hours from Diadem Health Centre to create a 24/7 urgent care centre at Bransholme Health Centre. Work with local residents on what health services can be developed at the Freedom Centre, based on the needs of children and families.  Do nothing and keep the current service locations, opening times and access times as they are, without the development of an 24/7 urgent care centre and without extended access to X-ray.

3. To identify any issues the public and stakeholders can foresee with the proposed changes

Page 86 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 7

Urgent Care and the proposed changes

What do we have now?

Minor Injuries Units A minor injuries unit (MIU) is a type of walk-in service to treat minor injuries such as strains, sprains, stitches. Currently there are two in Hull, neither have an x-ray facility.

1 Bransholme Health Centre 2 Freedom Treatment Centre Goodhart Road, HU7 4DW Preston Road, HU9 3QB Opening Opening Monday - Sunday 9am-8pm Monday – Friday 9am-5pm Including: Bank Holidays, Christmas Day, Saturdays, Sundays and Boxing Day and New Year’s Day. Bank Holidays - Closed.

GP out of hours services Provides access to a GP outside normal surgery hours, the out-of-hours period is from 6.30pm to 8.00am on weekdays and all day at weekends and on bank holidays. The GP out of hours services accessed via NHS 111.

3 Diadem Health Centre 4 Westbourne NHS Centre Diadem Grove, HU9 4AL Westbourne Avenue, HU5 3HP

Other services

5 GP walk-in centre 6 Accident and emergency (A&E) Wilberforce Health Centre, HU1 3SA Hull Royal Infirmary, HU3 2JZ Opening Opening 8 am to 8 pm, 7 days a week 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (including bank holidays) (including bank holidays) Can treat registered and non-registered patients without an appointment.  Diagram 1 shows the location of current urgent care services in Hull What are the proposed changes?

We propose to relocate the minor injuries units, and the GP out of hours service at Diadem Health Centre (services 1, 2 & 3 listed above) onto one site within an integrated urgent care centre which would offer minor injuries care and out of hours GP services 7 days a week, 24 hours a day, and better access to x-ray services within the community. This Would be based at Bransholme Health Centre. Please Note

The GP out of hours service at Westbourne NHS Centre , the GP walk in service at Wilberforce Health Centre  and Accident and Emergency at Hull Royal Infirmary  are not part of this consultation Page 87 of 220 Page 8  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

How we have listened

Methods

The consultation was supported by the printing and distribution of 10,000 copies of a 12 page consultation document (appendix ii, page 18) which was distributed to GP practices, pharmacies and other healthcare premises as well as Hull City Council Customer Service Centres and other community venues across Hull. These were also placed in existing Urgent Care Services. The consultation document contained a 4 page questionnaire and the questionnaire was also available on-line (appendix iii, page 20).

 Diagram 2 shows the number of responses to the questionnaire by postcode

The consultation was promoted at five supermarket road shows, three half page adverts in the Hull Daily Mail, and with some of the largest employers in the City; including Siemens, Sewells, BP Saltend and Greencore. The supermarket roadshows took place:

 Prospect Centre 23rd August  North Point Shopping Centre 14th September  St Stephens Shopping Centre 8th September  Asda Kingswood 18th October

Initially four public meetings were held in the following locations and times, these were promoted on the back of the consultation document as well as on flyers and posters.

 East Hull  North Hull Freedom Centre, Preston Road HU9 2QB Bransholme Methodist Church 3:00pm - 5:00pm, Thursday 25th August 1:00pm – 3:00pm, Monday 5th September

 West Hull  Central Hull Lonsdale Community Centre Kardomah, Alfred Gelder Street 2:00pm - 4:00pm, Monday 19th September 11:00am – 1:00pm, Saturday 17th September

Page 88 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 9

The aim of these sessions was to present the planned changes and improvements, and answer any questions the public may have had, in public, and encourage completion of the questionnaire. Initially two drop in sessions were also arranged, however, as the formal public meetings were not as well attended as hoped, a number of additional drop-ins were arranged making thirteen in total. Some of these sessions were planned at times when community facilities were busy with groups and activities. The aim of these sessions was to be on hand for anyone to ask questions and complete the questionnaire:

 Trinty House Academy, HU1 3BP, 4:30pm - 6:00pm, 13th September  Freedom Centre, HU9 3QB, 10:00 - 4:00pm, 5th October  Freedom Centre, HU9 3QB, 2:00pm - 7:00pm, 6th October  St Phillips Church Hall, HU9 4JG, 1:00pm - 6:00pm, 10th October  Brickworks, HU1 3SA, 1:30pm - 3:30pm 11th October  Artlink, HU5 3QP, 6:00pm - 8:00pm 13th October  Kingswood Academy, HU7 4WR, 6:00pm - 8:00pm, 17th October  Victoria Dock Village Hall, HU9 1TL, 9:30am - 12:30pm, 18th October  Unity in the Community, HU6 8AQ, 2:00pm - 5:00pm, 26th October  Gipsyville Library, HU4 6JA, 11:00am - 1:00pm, 28th October  Sirius Academy North, HU6 9BP, 6:00pm - 7:00pm, 31st October  Sirius Academy West, HU4 7JB, 6:30pm – 7:30pm, 1st November  Ings Resource Centre, HU8 0TX, 11:00am - 1:30pm, 3rd November

As the service model for the proposed Urgent Care Centre was well defined, effort was focused on completion of the questionnaire. The public meetings, drop in sessions, and supported sessions were to ensure that people were fully aware of the proposed changes and improvements; and had the opportunity to ask questions relating to the proposal, and complete the questionnaire.

Groups identified by the Equality Impact Assessment

Working with community groups that we have established links with, nine supported sessions were run for people who may find it difficult to take part in consultations, or are easily overlooked. Supported sessions were run with; BME groups, groups that support those with sensory impairment, and organisations working with older people.

For people whose first language is not English, NHS Hull CCG worked with Humber All Nations Alliance (HANA), to have all the consultation resources and questionnaire translated online, into 67 different languages.

The equality impact assessment identified three groups with protected characteristics that are high users of urgent care service or those that may find it difficult to access urgent care services. The three groups were; parents with young children, Eastern Europeans, and the LGBT community.

We promoted the consultation to parents of young children by working with primary schools across the city; by putting promotional material in the children’s book bags. We also ran a supported session with a BME Mums group and engaged with the Eastern Europeans through our ongoing work with HANA. To reach out to the LGBT community we worked through a local organisation ‘One Humber’, and also directly with LGBT groups, to share the links to the information on our website.

The distribution of respondent characteristics can be seen in appendix i (page 16)

Page 89 of 220 Page 10  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

Statutory organisations and partners

All statutory organisations in Hull and our partner organisations were written to and sent a copy of the consultation document for their comments. NHS Hull CCG has kept the Health and Wellbeing Overview and Scrutiny Commission up to date with each stage of the engagement and development of the proposed model for Urgent Care; from the initial engagement as part of the work around community services and the proposal of this consultation. NHS Hull CCG also have been in regular attendance at Local Area Committees and Area Partnership Meetings in the east of the city in the run up to, and throughout, the consultation, to keep local councillors and community partners up to date.

Consultation Reach

The estimated reach of this consultation is 1.2 million opportunities for people to read or hear about the planned changes for Urgent Care in Hull, with the call to action being to share their views by completing a questionnaire or attending one of a number of sessions across the city.

Primary Contacts The total numbers of primary contacts were 1642, this includes all the completed questionnaires (741) and all the people who attended a public meeting, drop in session, support session or engaged with us at the supermarket roadshows (901).

Traditional Media NHS Hull CCG were successful in gaining coverage about urgent care and our consultation in The Hull Daily Mail, BBC Radio Humberside, Viking FM, KCFM, and Hull Kingstown (Community) Radio. Reaching an estimated collective audience of 1.1 million people in Hull and the surrounding areas. A full breakdown of media coverage can be seen in appendix iv (page 24). Articles were also sent to local partner organisations for inclusion in internal communications.

Social Media The two primary social media routes used were Twitter and Facebook; a video of the presentation outlining the proposed changes and improvements in urgent care was shared via YouTube. A full breakdown of activity can be seen in appendix v (page 25). The potential reach via the CCG’s own social media, which is monitored by Hull CCG, is slightly over 95,000 people. We also contacted 53 partner organisations and other community groups who have a social media presence, to ask if they would share content for us. Although NHS Hull CCG cannot monitor this directly, there is a potential reach of 138,000 people, however this has not been included in the overall reach.

Page 90 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 11

Analysis of Feedback

Case for change

Charts 4 - 7 show how much respondents agree or disagree with statements relating to current urgent care services.

68.82% believe current urgent care services are too complicated, finding it difficult to know which service to use and when (chart 5); 17.01% of respondents disagree. 98.14% of respondents feel something needs to be done to reduce pressure and waiting times in Accident and Emergency, 2 people (0.29%) disagree (chart 7).

97.41% agree urgent care should be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (chart 4). 95.69% of respondents agree people should be seen, diagnosed and treated in the same place as much as possible (chart 6).

These charts demonstrate that the majority of people agree with the objectives that have informed the proposed improvements to urgent care services in Hull.

Chart 4 Chart 5 Urgent Care should be available at all times, The current out of hours and urgent care 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. services are too complicated – It is hard to (n=695) know which service to go to and when. (n=696)

Chart 6 Chart 7 People should be seen, diagnosed and treated Something needs to be done to reduce all in the same place as much as possible. pressure and waiting times in accident and (n=696) emergency (n=699)

Page 91 of 220 Page 12  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

Chart 8 Graph to show the importance ratings of aspects of urgent care services. (n=655)

Most important

Least important

Respondents were asked to place aspects of service in order of importance (chart 8). The most important aspects related to service provision; open 24 hours a day 7days a week, seeing a doctor or health professional face to face, being seen and treated in the same place, having diagnostics in the same place. Those that were rated least important from the list related to service location.

Options Chart 9 Graph to show all respondents Respondents were presented with the following preferred option. options; (n=613)

1. Relocate the minor injuries unit from the Freedom Centre, and the GP out-of-hours from Diadem Health Centre to create a 24/7 urgent care centre at Bransholme Health Centre, with no health services based at the Freedom Centre.

2. Relocate the minor injuries unit from the Freedom Centre, and the GP out-of-hours from Diadem Health Centre to create a 24/7 urgent care centre at Bransholme Health Centre. Work with local residents on what health services can be developed at the Freedom Centre, based on Chart 9 shows that option 2 is the the needs of children and families. preferred option for the majority of respondents (63.78%), the most popular 3. Do nothing and keep the current service second choice being option 1. It is clear locations, opening times and access times as that respondents would prefer relocating they are, without the development of an 24/7 urgent care services to Bransholme urgent care centre and without extended access rather than services remaining in their to X-ray. current configuration.

Page 92 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 13

Charts 10 - 12 show the results broken down by postcode; the postcode areas shown are those that will experience the largest change under the proposals.

Chart 10 Chart 11 Chart 12 Graph to show respondents from Graph to show all respondents from Graph to show all respondents from HU7 preferred option. HU8 preferred option. HU9 preferred option. (n=115) (n=80) (n=77)

Additional comments about the proposals

Respondents were asked if they had an alternative option for urgent care, or any other comments about the proposals, the full responses can be seen in appendix vii (page 27). The responses included some positive comments about the plans, suggestions about what should be provided at the Urgent Care Centre, and a number of negative comments about the proposals. The responses can be grouped into three main themes:

4. The location of the Urgent Care Centre. 5. Education and publicity. 6. Service provision and delivery.

Location There were a number of comments opposing moving existing services to Bransholme. A number of comments wanted the proposed improvements (increase opening and diagnostics) but in existing locations. This option was not offered to the public as there is not enough of a staff resource to cover three 24/7 urgent care services, nor are there enough qualified staff in the local area to recruit to the additional roles that would be required. The demand through the night in three locations would not justify three fully staffed centres. There were also requests to consolidate the services at Diadem Health Centre or the Freedom Centre, neither of these options were offered to the public as neither location could accommodate an x-ray facility and the extra staff without additional building works.

A number of comments felt other locations would be better than Bransholme, some of those felt that locations in addition to Bransholme would be required. Provision in a more central location was the most frequent suggestion; sites suggested included: Wilberforce Health Centre, Hull Royal Infirmary, Health Central (St Stephens Shopping Centre). Respondents also expressed concern at the lack of provision in the west of the city, expressing the view that people will attend A&E because it is closer.

Travel was also highlighted as an issue relating to the location of the service. A number of comments suggested that for many people taxi fares would prohibit attendance at the Urgent Care Centre, and that public transport links from the east of the city to Bransholme were poor.

Page 93 of 220 Page 14  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

Education and Publicity The need for an extensive publicity campaign notifying the public of the changes to urgent care was highlighted. It was felt that a campaign should be aimed at staff in NHS and partner organisations as well as the general public. It was suggested that the campaign should encourage people to not attend A&E inappropriately as well as identify alternatives to A&E. It was also suggested that part of the campaign should involve a leaflet to every home in the city.

Service Provision and Delivery Respondents highlighted additional requirements for the Urgent Care Centre. A number hoped that urgent mental health services would be provided at the Urgent Care Centre. Concern was raised that the service should involve appropriate triage and enough staff to avoid the delays currently experienced in A&E. The security and safety of the Bransholme site was raised as a concern, particularly as those attending the Urgent Care Centre may be in a vulnerable state. Respondents hoped that the Urgent Care Centre would be accessible for those with mobility issues, and be a dementia friendly environment. Clear signage and infant changing facilities were also highlighted as requirements.

Formal Responses

Statutory organisations and partner organisations were asked to give a formal response the proposed changes for Urgent Care Services, a list of those organisations that responded can be found in appendix vi (page 26).

The majority of responses were supportive of the plans for urgent care in Hull, and felt that the proposals aligned with NHS Hull CCG’s wider goals to improve the health of the city and services to support this. A number of partners, including those that were not entirely supportive of the proposals stated that they were looking forward to being involved in developing more integrated and improved services. The level of patient and public involvement in the development of the plans and the extent of consultation were also praised.

The particular health needs of those living in the east of the city were raised by organisations that represent and operate services for those communities. Some of these issues will be addressed by the development of the Integrated Care Centre on the David Lister School site in east Hull. Some formal responses mirrored those of the public around concerns that people may not be able to afford to travel to the new Urgent Care Centre.

Of those who gave a view on which option would be preferred, formal responses identified option 2 as the preferred option, ensuring that some appropriate services be maintained at the Freedom Centre.

Page 94 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 15

Conclusion

 The majority of respondents agree with the reasons for improving Urgent Care Services; Urgent Care Services should be available 24 hours a day 7 days a week, people should be diagnosed and treated in the same place where possible, pressure on wating times in Accident and Emergency should be reduced, and the current configuration of Urgent Care Service is confusing and difficult to navigate.

 The relocation of the minor injuries unit from the Freedom Centre, and the GP out-of-hours from Diadem Health Centre to create a 24/7 Urgent Care Centre at Bransholme Health Centre, while maintaining some health services at the Freedom Centre is the preferred option for the majority of respondents. The relocation of the minor injuries unit and the GP out-of-hours service to create an urgent care centre at Bransholme Health Centre, with no health services based at the Freedom Centre is the second most popular choice. It is clear that respondents would prefer relocating urgent care services to Bransholme rather than services remaining in their current configuration. These findings where not significantly different when looking at the results by location.

 Additional engagement with the communities surrounding the Freedom Centre should be undertaken to determine what health services could be appropriately offered at the Freedom Centre.

 There were concerns raised relating to the proposed location of the improved urgent care service these related to:  Accessibility by public transport  Security

Although we have found that service users don’t tend to travel to urgent care services by public transport, there are some that do; the concern is that those who do not have access to other forms of transport will attend Accident and Emergency rather than the Urgent Care Centre.

A number of respondents questioned the location of the proposed Urgent Care Centre; with some querying why a service is not being located more centrally in the city, or if provision in the west of the city had been considered.

 Following any changes to urgent care, access to the Urgent Care service and Accident and Emergency should be monitored to ensure a two tier system, of those who can afford to travel and those who cannot, has not been inadvertently created, and to determine if additional provision is required in other locations in the city.

 A number of respondents praised the existing urgent care services; it is recommended that following any changes to urgent care services, service user experience be monitored to ensure that the quality of service is maintained. This intelligence would also give insight into future service requirements.

 Any changes to urgent care services will require an extensive promotion aimed at both residents and health professionals.

Page 95 of 220 Page 16  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

Appendices

i. Demographics of respondents 16 ii. Consultation document 18 iii. Consultation questionnaire 20 iv. Media coverage 24 v. Social media coverage 25 vi. Formal response list 26 vii. Questionnaire free text responses 27

Appendix (i) Demographics of Respondents

Demographics roughly reflect the demographics of Hull, with the exception of gender; women are more likely to give their feedback and experience. It is recommended that the Equality Impact Assessment is revisited following the

Distribution of Service User Characteristics

Chart 13 Chart 14 Age of respondents Ethnicity of Respondents (n=583) (n=658)

Chart 16 Chart 17 Religion / Beliefs of Respondents Gender of Respondents (n=645) (n=659)

Page 96 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 17

Chart 18 Chart 19 Sexuality of Respondents Are your day to day activities limited because of a (n=649) health problem or impairment which has lasted, or is expected to last at least 12 months (n=644)

Chart 20 Do you identify with any of the following impairment groups? (n=336)

Page 97 of 220 Page 18  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

Appendix (ii) Consultation document

Page 98 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 19

Page 99 of 220 Page 20  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

Appendix (iii) Consultation Questionnaire

Page 100 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 21

Page 101 of 220 Page 22  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

Page 102 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 23

Page 103 of 220 Page 24  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

Appendix (iv) Media Coverage

Sources Hull Daily Mail (HDM): 30,000 Circulation (Readership 81,854)

114,736 Daily website unique visitors

KCFM: 79,000 Listeners in Hull & East Yorkshire area

BBC Radio Humberside: 161,000 Listeners in the Humberside region

Viking FM: 218,000 Listeners in East Riding of Yorkshire, North Lincolnshire

and North East Lincolnshire

Hull Kingstown Radio: 3,487 listeners through a downloaded app

Channel Date Description HDM Friday 15th July Urgent care centre could divert patients from HRI Page 2 Erica Daley interviewed about plans for the city’s first seven day urgent care service that would have x rays and around the clock GPs. Link to article HDM Friday 15th July We should welcome new urgent care unit Page 10 Urgent care centre cold divert patients away from HRI BBC Radio Friday 15th July Consultation for Urgent Care Centre Humberside Drive time Sue Lee interviewed for Drive Time regarding proposals/plans for Urgent Care services in Hull KCFM Tues 16th August Plans for new urgent care centre for Hull Erica Daley interviewed about the new plans for an Urgent Care Centre. Link to article BBC Radio Friday 19th August Erica Daley interviewed about the proposals for a 24 Humberside hour urgent care centre. BBC Radio Tuesday 13th September Dr Dan Roper interviewed by Andy Comfort re: urgent Humberside Drive time care centre proposals KCFM Tuesday 4th October Erica Daley interviewed about the coming Urgent Care Consultation event at the Freedom Centre. Viking FM Tuesday 4th October Erica Daley interviewed about the coming Urgent Care Consultation event at the Freedom Centre. HKR Wednesday 5th October Toni Yell interviewed about the Urgent Care Centre proposals HDM Thursday 6th October Advert for Urgent Care in Hull Page 3 Share your views HDM Monday 17th October Have your say on closure plans for Freedom Centre Website Website minor injuries unit Just 300 people have shared their views over plans which could lead to the closure of a minor injuries unit in East Hull. Link to article HDM Thursday 13th October Advert for Urgent Care in Hull Page 3 Share your views HDM Thursday 20th October Advert for Urgent Care in Hull Page 3 Share your views

Page 104 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 25

Appendix (v) Social Media Coverage (August 25 – November 6)

Twitter Facebook Tweets: 149* Posts: 21

Impressions: 81,431** Total estimated reach: Circa 14,000

Retweets: 225 Reach Paid: Circa 13,795#

Likes: 100 Reach Organic: Between 200-500##

Link Clicks: 115 Impressions: 17,878

Profile Clicks: 37 Engagements: 500###

Media Engagements: 208 Likes: 45

Details expands: 134 Link Clicks: 305

Replies: 16 Shares: 54

Notes: Notes: These figures do not include the impressions We also contacted, asked to share and or reach gained when our partners directly directly posted on 53 Facebook groups and tweeted about our Urgent Care Consultation. pages. These represented a wide range of We sent ready to post tweets, twitter images people, from mother and toddler groups to and campaign details were sent to 189 local older people’s organisations. Although we partners, community and voluntary groups cannot directly monitor this coverage, these with a request for them to post and share on groups had a possible reach of around their social media feeds. This added 138,000 people. significant additional coverage that is not represented in the above statistics.

YouTube

Urgent Care in Hull presentation video: 45 Views

* The total number of tweets we posted. This does not include tweets posted by partner organisations

** An Impression is recorded every time a tweet appears in a feed. This can mean that it is seen multiple times by the same individual.

# Our reach is the total number of individual people we have contacted. Our paid reach ensures that we have been seen by around 14,000 people.

##Because organic reach is gained from people who like our page, it’s difficult to keep a running total. We know that the un-paid for 20 posts each achieved Reaches of around 200-500 people

### This is the total number of times people engaged with our posts (Shares, likes, link clicks, etc).

Page 105 of 220 Page 26  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

Appendix (vi) Formal Response List

Formal responses were received from:

 Michelle Moran, Interim Chief Executive, Humber NHS Foundation Trust  Chris Long, Chief Executive, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust  Jacqueline Myers, Dir. Strategy and Planning, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust  Andrew Burnell, Chief Executive, City Healthcare Partnership CIC  Matt Jukes, Chief Executive, Hull City Council  Janet Clark, Chief Officer, Community Pharmacy Humber  Diana Johnson, Member of Parliament Hull North, Labour Party  Karl Turner, Member of Parliament Hull East, Labour Party  Preston Road NDC (Organisation that runs the Freedom Centre)  Labour Group, Ward Concillors: Southcoates East, Hull City Council Southcoates West Marfleet Longhill Ings

Page 106 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 27

Appendix (vii) Questionnaire Free Text Responses

Question 4 “Please put these things in order of what you think is important in an urgent care service (1 being most important, 10 being least important)”  quality care and clear treatment plan  clean tidy friendly staff, not having to pay for medical letters  in the centre of town or somewhere near the centre  i believe this to be a very difficult question to complete can be very subjective and given no context  Nice people there  Being central for everyone to access, not stuck out on a limb  Was this the best way to ask this question? I can't see healthcare professionals unless I can get there easily in an emergency!  just been there if I’m ill in the night  Disabled access for parking without steep pathways,  in the centre of town or somewhere near the centre  The above list is very prescriptive and does not allow a true set of answers.  Good disabled access  The centre should be staffed by professionals who havwe been trained to the highest of standards to mee the needs of those patients attending.  I would have put many of those things closer to 1 but it wouldn't allow me  Getting results quicker  Accessibility for disabled people, safe area.  HRI is a major trauma centre. much of our minor injuries at HRI are from drunken injuries and patients with chronic pain who say they cannot get a Gp appoint  Based on being aged 70 living on my own with no private transport.  someone calm and understanding,reassurance on contact  Central location  1 Well qualified GP or Nurse not an organisation like St John Ambulance  8 Short waiting time  Bransholme is not central, is long distance away, not bothered about face to face with someone however if I need to I wouldn't want to go that far.  Important for the service to cover all conditions and that certain x-rays are not done ie; injury of shoulder and you are referred to a and e for xray  out of hours pharmacy on site  If Bransholme would necessitate taxi fare  To be able getting an appointment with the doctor in the same day, and to be referred to specialist as soon as possible.  In East Hull it needs to be on a bus route for everyone on Holderness Road.  Clear signs! Hull royal adult A&E is impossible to find.  4 provide a proper 5 day service first the rest is irrelevant  Safe locality  Reduced waiting times  Being seen and treated in the same place, having diagnostics in the same place (X-Ray) Open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week all 1; Close to where I live, close to other health services, accessible by car and public transport, good car parking all 2.  confidence they can help (including understanding when to visit)  10 People/staff who have time to care as you would be - upset or worried panicky if for a child  Being welcoming and accessible Page 107 of 220 Page 28  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

 Simplicity!  1 good advertising & tell more numbers & answering  Not privatised must be NHS  7. Been seen quickly  has to be central no point driving past A+E  central location  People that understand my problems  Being seen and treated in the same place, having diagnostics in the same place (X-Ray), open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, close to other health services all 1; Accessible by public transport, accessible by car and good car parking all 3.  Being seen and treated in the same place, having diagnostics in the same place (X-Ray), Open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, close to other health services all 1.  more advertisement and tell numbers for answering  can see you in the day  All these things are just as important to the service. It must be be accessible to all or someone who does not have direct transport to them will go to A&E. I would have to us 2 bus routes to get to Bransholme. That's unacceptable considering I'm in need of urgent care I will go directly to A& E  West Hull needs to be factored in here, all services are usually east and north hull and this is not acceptable.  Not everyone has a car or lift-giver. There are too many services located in East Hull and too few in the West

Question 10 “Please use the space below if you have an alternative idea for urgent care.”  Educate G.P's and patients where to get appropriate care rather than all patients getting advised to go to A&E  need face to face triage with an appropriate health professional with then an agreed treatment plan- priorities needs so that people can be treated in more truely way  develop Diadem Health Centre and Bransholme discontinue Freedom as a miu, consider many who need to access facilities have no car and limited finances and mobility problems  urgent care should be readily available for all no matter who the person is, as there is not always time to get to A&E  to keep the walk-in centre and diadem centre as they are  direct or fire drunks or druggies!  provide urgent care service at HRI & treat patients on arrival to prevent A&E services being inappropriately used  Keep Diadem or Freedom open as no buses to Bransholme  Why not centralise it in the town centre? Wilberforce HC? Or make use of the BHS building  "The biggest issue with urgent care is patients turning up at A&E when clearly they do not need to be there, as they fail to see there are alternative places to go, using it as an extension of their GP surgery.  My only question would be why the proposals for the urgent care centre have suggested the current locations? Would you really get people from the West of the city travelling to the proposed new locations of the urgent care centre, as opposed to going to A&E which would be nearer? I doubt it. To counteract this is there any plans to have a GP stationed at A&E where patients can be triaged appropriately. Areas is the country that have used a GP have been successful. Also what about 'heat and treat' and 'see and treat' proposals - training more paramedics and existing ones to a higher standard who are therefore equipped to make a decision treating more people at the scene reducing the anount of conveyances to hospital. Having worked on NHSE national policy for UEC these are

Page 108 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 29

proven to have an impact. In addition, what would be done to educate the population of Hull? Despite best efforts, you are always going to get a minority living in the vicinity who will always turn up at A&E wasting resources, when there are more appropriate places for them to go. The frustrating thing is, these people would not be turned away, hence the benefit of a GP stationed there."  Allocate a nurse to the doctor on duty so patients needing dressings etc can be attended to immediately not having to wait hours after consultation  Bring Dr's back to home visits-  24/7 urgent care to also be available in West Hull/ central Hull  Urgent care should be located in easy to access area, not everyone has a car and some would have to use public transport to get to the proposed site at Branshome, which would be unacceptable  Re question 10. There's 3 choices. They are about shuffling staff around, or not. No apparent extra resource. Just moving and re forming. It will need retraining and team/staff support. I don't know what "pot" you have but it needs extra funds, staff support and training so the ultimate service is not expected to hit the ground running as so often happens. Staff are expected to deliver and develop a service (care pathways etc etc) all at once. Its too much! You end up with a much poorer service than could be provided plus quickly burnt out staff.  Locate urgent care in local areas with community services and available public information on what to do in emergency with services iincluding east and west hull  It is impossible to get appointments to see GP, when you are not well been told to ring early in morning after 8.00 am, then trying to ring with no response finally getting threw then told no oppointments, you should have appointments for poorly people surely  The one on westbourne avenue or story street are not open 24/7 to the public this i think should be.  invest more in NHS and key services  24/7 care at current places  Above doesn't apply as live in Analby  would not use any of above not in my area would go to A&E  I can't say I'm aware of West Hull options . I can't answer Qa as I'm from West Hull and all those are East which are all too far. sort West or central to please  police/perp treatment at A&E should be dealt with seperatley from normal A&E. No delays to normal A&E patient waiting times  more localised ie. West Hull East Hull North Hull.  Wast Hull again why not West Hull??  yes there need a call centre like 111 you can call and get advice ,but ive never used a centre when ive been I call the dr out of hours number ,or I call 111 .  Improve the appalling service offered at Storey Street. Centrally placed but Virgin are making a great deal of money and doing very little for it.  More doctors/NPs in health centres would see less people going to A&E to beat the queues.  Any building possible in the centre of hull or the west. Bransholme why?  to keep walworth centre and diadem centre as they are. develop & pay facilities at westbourne  Hull Royal Infirmary  More doctors to be present at a & e  Question 10 is totally irrelevant to those living in West Hull as we would not use services so far away and in many cases do not have any knowledge of the locations.  What about Wilberforce it is central and everyone knows where it is.  BRANSHOLME AS A LOCATION WILL DETER PEOPLE FROM ATTENDING OUT OF HOURS - MORE CENTRAL LOCATION IS NEEDED

Page 109 of 220 Page 30  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

 Although Bransholme is close to where I live, I think the new Health Centre off Albion Street in the city centre might be a better option for people to reach in Hull. It also has a decent car park next to it and buses run frequently to the city centre. Also, if you can't have all the necessary treatments i.e. x-rays, scanners, etc. then HRI is just down the road so you can quickly transport patients across there.  Stop closing East Riding resources so there is more pressure on Hull services.  I think what you are proposing is an excellent idea! condensing 3 different resources into 1. Not only are you saving money but providing a better Urgent care model, so that ED at HRI can treat the appropriate patients. This is what this city needs and what the ED dept needs to be able to function as it is intended to.  What about West Hull ? We have nothing here.  A&E should be a referral service only - referral by gp, miu, nhs111, or paramedics. Anyone presenting at A&E with a minor injury should be refused treatment and referred to a miu. I lived for 25 years in a country with comprehensive social health care and this above system worked perfectly. If it's urgent you ring an ambulance, if you can get yourself to A&E you can equally well get yourself to a miu. It works.  Can we not have minor injuries in one location and 24hr urgent care in another on the other side of town. Improving access for everyone.  A more central location.  "People still need to access GP out of hours - not all appointments are for 'injuries or urgent' some people just need the reassurance it's nothing serious.  I work at the hospital (non-clinical) and see people there who are just worried but can't get in at their doctors "  Have facilities in both locations so you can be treat at either place , Bransholme is difficult to get to from the east Hull area  "Could get gps to do what they used to do and actually visit patients at home.  Gp out of hours service at each practice for thir own patients and Gp can determine priority if hospital needed or appropriate to wait til working hours, gp surgeries could also have nurse or appropriate health professional to treat minor injuries etc.  Provide a mirror service in another location in Hull although this is probably not economically feasible  Staff it properly!!  Charge people who go to a&e for non urgent, stupid reasons. This is a waste of nhs funds.  Expand the paramedical service to help doctors out. Do not waste million of pounds in brand new building which is not convenient for west Hull patients.  "All the money poured into urgent care and all the different agencies who say they provide it when it is fact that people seem to want to go to HRI due to its location and the lack of trust people have with current services. Pour all that money into providing the care in the centre of town expand baker street buy diagnostics their and ensure HRI move people who are able to to that facility.  Also this isnt so clear about what youre stopping at the west side of the city as you all know where people will go if Bransholme is their only choice"  Urgent non life threatening care should be relocated to another area of the city. ERCH is great except they cannot deal with head trauma and pelvis trauma. In minor injuries at HRI the local GP's should set up a Rota so that non urgent pain can be dealt with. Many patients use A-E as a walk in centre. The reason.. they can get an xray.  Need more diagnostics rather than just x ray and ultra sound- e.g.; ecg, point of care testing, blood gas analysis etc. Ambulance services must have an accessible pathway to urgent care rather than taking to A & E. Services in the west of the city should also be merged to have one or maximum two centres. It will get more complicated once the integrated care centre opens and we simply don't have a lot of staff to run 5 different centres. There should be 1 urgent care centre in east/north ie; bransholme & 1 in west/central and the integrated care centre. Page 110 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 31

 What about using the Westbourne Centre?  Put an urgent care centre in the city centre.  There needs to be clearer information on how to gain access to the services and where they are involved  Provision, advice on a path way for mental health issues that are frequently signposted to busy A&E depts.  The location needs to be more central. I don't drive and would have to catch 2 busses to bransholme which isn't ideal if you are ill  Bransholme is miles away from so many people keep treatment central!!  People get ill in West Hull as well, what about those people who do not have access to transport who require services? Shall we just go to a & e? Bransholme or freedom centre will be two bus rides if buses are available.  Sort out real emergency in A&E instead of people coming in with a cut finger/or stupid minor ailments  111 terrible service , inexperienced , I had to spell for him , told I needed to take my elderly mother to Westbourne but had to wait Upto 2 hrs for them to ring me back ! I said I'll take her to A&E so he put the phone down on me ! Waited 3 hrs in a@e not even triaged and if we had been would have been sent to a ward immediately ... Appalling and so unfriendly and unorganised !!!  "Bransholme and Freedom Centre are too far out  Diadem would be a slightly more central and accessible site to develop"  Closing the MIU at the 2 locations suggested will not reduce the number of people who attend HRI, for people needing urgen care they will go to the place that is most easily accessible to them by public transport, taxi or car. HRI is central, everyone knows where it is, and it is not expensive to get to.  why Bransholme centre is is not central its out of the way not easy to get to from East hull  I agree with additional tools for example X Ray machinery being out in the community to prevent people going to a and e but miu should be better staffed. I believe people that present at a and e that shouldn't be there should be turned away with an alternative given.  Why Branscombe Health Centre? Could it be more central e.g city centre with bus route and good parking so that West Hull residents can access  Something is needed in the west of hull area too as alternative to hospitals  people do not act in a rational manner when faced with our emergency especially when related to health issues. the system needs to be simple, so easily understood and well publicized schools and media  Yes. Open up a minor injuries unit next door/adjacent to A&E and also a drug/alcohol sobering up unit which has access to emergency care if required. People attending A&E inappropriately, can be redirected 'down the corrida' to the most appropriate area. I am fed up of waiting in A&E and seeing how much time and money is wasted on people presenting who are drunk or drugged. It is not fair and makes a and e very violent place. If you have a central minor injuries unit e.g. On fountain street car park, it could treat patients 24/7 leaving the more severe emergencies for A&E.anyone attending who is drunk or under influence of drugs can still get treated, but by a specialist dept at minor injuries, where they can also cool down and sober up without causing further harm to themselves or anyone else. It has to be a crntral location due to the east west divide of the city. Unless more circular buses are operated at all hours. If you live in west hull it is very difficult to get to bransholme or freedom centre on public transport. Why are you focussed on 2 estates of hull? I know land is cheaper in besnsholme than the centre of town or Anlaby road, but surely accessibility is an important factor too.  Make A&E for emergency use only and turn people away and redirect to the correct service  "You will not solve the issue of urgent care particularly at Hull Royal Infirmary until the issue of social care is resolved which this government does not intend to look at. The Page 111 of 220 Page 32  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

waiting times are caused by patients requiring beds (which elderly are in waiting to be discharged) & not by people turning up with minor ailments!!!  You will change things which will cost more money and there will be no advantage to the local Hull resident. I believe more people from East Hull will attend casualty rather than Bransholme."  Urgent care should be treated as urgent! with a urgent phone number other than 999!  "Keep the M.I.U at Freedom centre + G.P out of hours+ B.H. Health centre+ X Ray facilities "  Everything is in East Hull why is there nothing in West Hull  more education to improve current location as far as possible  City centre  Relocate minor injuries to Bransholme centre, but keep out of hours at Diadem to keep it not been to busy.  create a separate 24/7 minor injuries at HRI  "Move OOH GP to Freedom Centre and keep the MIU centre there open later in combination with the OOH GP service (e.g. to midnight).  Then make an urgent care centre with x-ray at Bransholme as 24/7 alternative to A&E.  Or have an OOH GP service at HRI, so non-urgent cases that attend A&E can be dealt with appropriately. We have seen this in action at Halifax when our son was ill one evening as a toddler on a trip there. He was booked in at A&E reception and triaged to the GP area. We were seen by a Nurse Practitioner (there were approx 6 NP's and GPs there). He was prescribed antibiotics there and then. Whole thing took approx 1 hr. Why not consider something like this? Simple, but effective."  "Key urgent care facilities based and developed at hull royal that can not be closed or staff moved so closed during quiet times ...... I went to the children's a and e and it was shut until 8am and we had to sit in adults a and e which was horrific !!!!!!! "  Have a Nurse Practitioner led Urgent Care team supported by AHPs and full diagnostics. GP available if required (circa 10% of cases). 7 day service with extended hours 7am to 10pm.  ensure the public know what is available and where , I have just done 2 shifts at Branholme asa nurse practitioner and both days patients attended thinking we had xray services for one example  Older people do not always have transport adapt special taxi office to transport people to what injury unit is open  "public or NHS transport to site available as it may be difficult to visit site at 3am, for example."  Bransholme is north Hull why not develop the unit in central Hull which will mean easier access for all.  "Would like an urgent care center in central or west hull. People  Will just carry on going to A&E for that reason that the hospital is closer. They're is nothing for people in west hull. "  Organize campaign to make the government to glur more money for the NHS for Hull. Encourage more young people to study health+ social care.  One comprehensive, systematic change to clarify issues for patients - where to go at what time etc. The premise of a person needing urgent care being that they shouldn't also have to worry about what place is open at the time of their injury as well as worrying about the injury itself.  More central location in Hull would be better  Need to have Urgent Care services at both sides of Hull not just in East Hull  Alleviate pressure + waiting times at HRI. Not fair currently to staff or service users.  The space should be close to the existing facilities as much as possible to ensure that disruption is kept to a minimum.

Page 112 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 33

 Whilst there should be a full 24 hr Urgent care, why Bransholme as this seems out the way for the majority of Hull and East Riding, it should be positioned in a place easier to get to  Q10.* put the service where it is needed + accessible to all in Morill Street on Holderness Road.  Being seen.  Leave Diadem where it is.  "H- how bad is my injury?  E-Is emergency care definitely needed  L-look for your closest minor injuries  P- phone 111 for advice if your unsure  Everyone should know this! "  "Please do not relocate the MIU at The Freedom Centre. As a user of this facility I believe it is in the correct place already. If it was relocated, it would mean a much longer journey from the east side of Hull for all the people who currently use the facilities including the elderly, workers in that area and all the residents of the surrounding area. I also believe that it would be a great benefit to add a ""Treatment Room"" as over the last 6 weeks I have had to trek my 93 year old mother to every treatment room in Hull at least twice. As I have transport it has not been a major issue but for those without transport, this would have been a nightmare. It would also be nice to see the same nurses for continuity of care. Again over the last six weeks, every time we have had to change health centres, we have seen a different nurse."  Should be central - having MIU and OOD in the East isn't accessible to all  i am strongly in support of positive changes that will be beneficial to the general public  the minor injuries unit has to be created in the city centre. it is easy to access from any area in hull  use the facilities that already exist and staff them properly  scrap NHS 111 re-instate practitioner run telephone triage to reduce urgent care attendances children's services separate older adult  Locate primary care centre at hull royal. Or have direct bus service to miu from hri so people who turn up with throat infections etc don't even go through a&he. You should stop them attending but make sure they have access to the right sort of treatment. These centres are all well and good but people go to where they think they can get treated. The hospital will always be lots of people's first port of call.  "Prior questions give no real choice.  GPs should open 7 days to support the overall health model which would vastly reduce A&E for unecessary visits - this could be Nurse practitioner led - care in your local area"  "A single location will increase footfall in a&e for those residents that pass it in getting to bransholme  Reducing a&e waiting will encourage more to attend  Consideration should be made to increase triage and ability to support all levels of care in a&e or have a bransholme type centre close to A&e and town centre."  Why in East Hull and not more central location.  Have different locations around Hull depending were you live think of bus routes.  Increase provisons at exisiting locations and increase XRAY capacity at Bransholme Health Centre, generally deprived areas local people cannot access other locations as easily therfore deniying health care at the Freedom Centre would have a huge effect on local people and surrounding areas. Improve advertising so people are aware of provisions available.  Take patient to A+E hospital  "Cant have to many places as public will still go to A/E HRI 1)AE HRI only for emergencies urgent 2)Bransholme minor A/E

Page 113 of 220 Page 34  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

4)Wilberforce centre town to be kept available "  Return to HRI after re- investment, I paid for this all of my life so put it back!  Larger surgery's should have 24/7 urgent care centre's. And re equipt with X-Ray and open 24/7 pharmacy.  OOH access to Mental Health professionals All day, every day.  Agree with the principle,however, Bransholme not easily accessible using I bus, especially on a weekend.  I would like a skype based system so I can have face to face contact home in addition to current service.  Need unit in East/West North Hull.  As a 'frequent flyer' user of both Urgent & Emergency Care Services there are times in my conditions when I am in need of acute medical attention. I would guess that approximately 40% of these times I could be treated at an Urgent Care Centre to the same high standard I receive in the Accident & EmergencyDept; this figure would increase with the addition of X-ray facilities.  Improve mental health crisis team: more practitioners; better coordination with other agencies; lower case loads; better trained staff  Explore option 3 further with amended GP OOH contracts to include other health professionals.  Doctors to have more knowledge about medicine and prescribe right medicine instead of paracetemol 9 out of 10 times.  Keep miu ata the freedom centre + Bransholme health centre but have an integrated one with the out of hours gp as it may put strain on the Bransholme centre.  Perhaps luncheon clubs for those unable to cook food themselves.  Develop a centre in the west of the city to give a good service to West Hull area.  Use either Diadem or the whole of the Freedom Centre as an urgent care centre.  Relocate to an accessible location eg town centre  All the empty buildings in and around Hull, surely another centre could be based in one of them and have more staff to help people in need?? (despite cash flow???)  Why put an Xray facility in the old out of hours location + not Diadem in the first place + offer the whole service there?  Why Bransholme for Eat Hull (Hold rd) area? too far.  Think about patient and lot people don't have transport to other units.  Urgent care has to be central, no one will drive past A+E to go somewhere else.  Relocate to Endeavour . Beverley Road  I have stated 1 all 24hr urgent care at Bransholme , but have worries about the location . This is not a safe area for people to be about from after the last bus services!!!!!  Urgent care centre is needed in west Hull  I think the urgent centre is a good idea but I believe there needs to be an urgent care centre in the West of the City other wise patients will attend A&E as it is closer than attending North Hull. This would then help reduce patients presenting at A&E.  Co-location of urgent care service with HEY ED (to act as a "filter" before non-major patients enter ED and therefore start the 4 hour clock ticking) would seem sensible to very directly relieve pressure on ED.  Move everything to HRI site, this will avoid confusion about where to go out of hours  Keep both just open at night preston road and improve what we have  more centrac situation is better  Increase comms with the public and what is where and actually call it what it does  Consolidate with A&E and hospital on the same site with adequate parking  "I went and waited at an MIU for a suture in a hand wound and it was suggested I went away as they would close at 5 and they weren't sure if the nurse could do it and I would have to go to HRI anyway.

Page 114 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 35

 You need to locate a GP led MIU at HRI to deal with Minor injuries as everyone will still come here anyway as they don't want to get messed about in a unit that can't proved 24/7 comprehensive services"  "1. work more closely with HEYHT and provide OOHGP, MIU 247 on the HRI site ensuring all walk-in's are seen in such a unit and only appropriate pt. escualated to secondary care ED.  Reconsider the ""if you build it they will come"" mentality - build it where patients visit regardless e.g. HRI  2. Cross provider management of ED pressures and 4 hour, wait X% of patient will triaged as safe to transport to community MIU therefore provide patient transport to both take and return patients to alternative locations.  Extend opening hours of Storey Street Walk-in and stop them from advising patient to attend ED when nearing closing time"  "Greater provision is needed in West Hull -  Story Street is too central, and I have never been as it seems like it would be relatively inaccessible by car.  Getting in to Westbourne can be a pain, but they provide a good service. I have visited the Bransholme MIU a few times, and if there was something like that based further west, towards Hessle or Willerby, it may actually have a positive effect on A&E waiting times."  Not at the moment!  I'm not sure that Bransholme is the best place for this. Not sure what's happening in Health Central at the moment; I know the rent is ridiculous but could anything be done there? It's much more accessible from anywhere in the city.  Can't tick the question properly. Disagree strongly with moving services to Bransholme unless direct transport will be available.  Create somewhere more central or easily accessible as people in east of the city may be put off going as multiple buses to bransholme and only 1 bus needed to HRI. Also waiting area at bransholme very clostrophobic when full as no natural light.  Is there a way of using telehealth served by the most expert professionals; that way people could speak / communicate with someone before leaving home to ensure they go to the right place  3 urgent care facilities are needed, East West and North Hull with diagnostic capabilities.  Because of the number of patients who attend A&E inappropriately I think there should be an MIU on site to re-divert non-emergency attendees  Please have something to the West. The Westbourne is all very well but it is not accessible by public transport.  Have urgent care in a city centre located that way all residents in hull, east riding and barton upon humber who all used the services can get easy find the building. instead of going to a and e first. As the nhs guidelines are to the nearest unit which for the residents in hull and east riding and barton is the hull nhs service as it is in recommendation 10 mile journey for the residents above to travel. If you do not this the number of patients ring ambulances up to take them with keep increasing.

Question 11 “Please use the space below to make any further comments about the proposed changes or urgent care in general.”  Great idea to move 24/7 urgent care at Bransholme centre  focus on patients needs not targets!  Defintley needed in the Bransholme centre  was once directed by Drs receptionist to miu for minor injury by the time i arrived on the bus it was closed, so needed to be seen by own Dr next day, on any other occasion i went to freedom centre with insect bites i was told they would calm down an given no treatment even though i told them i reacted badly, later i need to see own dr for treatment for infection, drs need to be available at the units not just nurses Page 115 of 220 Page 36  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

 if you make the proposed changes there willbe lots of people who suffer due to these changes as they will not got to these new places, so i see there being a big problem and peoples health suffering due to the changes, minor injuries should be in the town centre  most elderly patients live in central and West hull and it certainly makes sense making Westbourne centre the hub for OOH care  i live on Bransholme so having this would be ideal for me, but leaving the resident on Preston road and Diadem road area is unfair they too deserve good local care!  something needs to be located in West Hull in the future  i have real concerns on people ability to access from some addresses, not all have a clear bus routes or ability to pay for taxi's to travel to one site, lots of issues need to be addressed  Detrimental to elderly like me as expensive in taxi and no buses. Would have to go to town and out again and the same coming home if you close Freedom and Diadem. Daren't go on Bransholme at night even buses are reduced there  I am very pleased as I usually have to travel to Hessle Road to elliott Chappel health centre for LymPhoedema clinic but ice got appointment this for Bransholme where I live so no more pain having to travel up there. Brilliant.  All care needs to be accessible to all  I am very disappointed that the only place you can suggest creating a combined facility is Bransholme, rather than somewhere on, or at least closer to, Holderness Road  "Right now I see it like this: The GP is there when I'm in the office. When I'm not working, there is only A&E. 111 is most likely a call centre in India.  The receptionist decides whether to see a nurse or a GP. Nurse: ""Health check? What is that? Ah, not here, you can have one in town hall""  Either don't get sick or earn enough money to be able to afford private insurance or a flight to Bangkok for checkup every year.  If neither works, make a plan when to get sick.  There seems to be a reluctance to use technical means like x-ray or MRI for diagnostics. My GP told me MRI isn't used as diagnostics tool, but only by consultants to prepare for operation. Which is a bit strange. "  It is the endless wait in A& E which is unacceptable suggest drunks and drug takers are seen eksewhere!  there is a well need to offer in hours urgent unplanned care services in West Hull is well as GP out of hours. E.G. by transforming the walk in@wilberforce because West Hull people will continue to use A&E - they won't travel to East Hull.  Hospitals and NHS centre's need more staff. A lot of problems are due to cuts and lack of training. Also population increase  Make people more aware of the current systems in place, and that they should use them instead of blocking up A & E with ailments that could be easily remedied elsewhere  West hull not included why ?? Should be alternative to a&e in West of Hull too as it is seriously not a good place to go to why not a urgent care in the city centre for all of Hull as it would be central and good public transport for all  Need to publicise and make sure that people know what constitutes urgent care and what is A&E. People just go to nearest or A&E for anything out of hours.  I hope it's a better care service for everyone  Xray and other diagnostic tests must be available to save people having to travel to HRI  More GP's not just nurse's or EMC 's  less waiting times and wider range of patient clinics  need to reduce waiting times at HRI A&E as this it is ridiculous at the moment  Why aren't you making this semce for the whole city. These are all East locations I would prefer a local semce (west)  "sometimes difficult to obtain appointment with GP if you need urgently.

Page 116 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 37

 Very poor experiences with walk in at Wilberforce.Long wait although quality of GP is acceptable"  My mother was on the penultimate day of chemo therapy often she felt ill with a fulminate infection makes by the effects of a tramadol pill taken at the start of a weekend delays & complications in 24H access contributes to late diagnosis between Sunday morning presentation of symptoms and her subsequent death is hours later at castle hill oncology dept. All treatment & oake should be 24/7:no arguments  "Urgent care.  Enable health centers with combined dr's surgeries to help individuals who may need some attention.  ie. last year I fell on Hessle rd. went to Elliot Chapel and staff were rude, I had banged my head, was confused, they told me to go to A&E"  Beds taken up by drunks is wrong leave them in the pub. Where they have bought the boozzze?  more help for the edlerly + children, disbaled  well its not good his it .but I like to know how many people use the sevice ,because people just turn up at ane,maybe more can be done telling people how to use this service ,also maybe there could use a dr on call when people are real ill ,  Why can't we have a local GP and clinical nurse service mobile nurse service for special needs - e.g. elderly  Introduce a fee for time-wasters.  Why Bransholme? Any options central Hull sometimes traffic so difficult to get to Bransholme.  need for a location West Hull  disagnostics (xray / Ulatrasond) essential on site  When you attend the childrens a & e department you are examined then wait 3 hours to get treated by a doctor on duty  Fine as they are. Keep them local  "If everything goes to Bransholme, not everyone has access to transport. Some services should be kept on the east of the city. Need"  Having used minor injuries due to fooballing son, it makes sense for there to be xray/scanning facilities there.  If this proposal is to serve Hull and the immediate surrounding area surely Bransholme is by no means an ideal location being far from central and especially a long way and possibly difficult to find for anyone from east of the city centre and esp the many who are unfamiliar with Bransholme  Seems to be very one sided and perhaps prepared to ensure that the HCCG obtain the result they want.  Good idea. I think the current system is too confusing. In the last 12 months, my wife or my daughter have needed OOH care - usually needing urgent help. Seems stupid having to ring 111, wait for a call back from a GP, for then to either send a paramedic or send us to Marlborough Ave. If we could just drive to an urgent care centre, and it was made clear what kind of injuries or classed as urgent, then I'd prefer to go there than wait for call backs, paramedics, etc. Paramedics can be out saving someone's life, rather than coming to us.  Think the new walk in centres for urgent treatment is better than going to A&E but need to have xray facilities  Urgent care is hard to understand as a concept. I work full time and often need an urgent appointment because I wait until its no longer bearable as I can't take time from work. When should urgent care be sought? Not an A&E type complaint but things such as infections, abdo pain and failing health of elderly frail relatives should be accessible from a GP surgery on the same day.  Mental Health is an urgent care issue as well. This must be 24hrs and effective.

Page 117 of 220 Page 38  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

 People need access to health services 24/7. You don't just fall ill or have mishaps during office hours. A&E is misused and over-used because there is currently little alternative.  The public need educating about proper use of emergency services. I have never gone to A&E without being referred by another agency - paramedic, gp or nhs111. I have attended miu and doctor out of hours services. It's a case of educating the public and having strict policies at A&E.  I feel that there should be more centres with access for urgent care. Perhaps there could be a rotation of GP practices for out of hours?  Not sure what is being proposed for the rest of Hull  There is obviously a need for more urgent care locally to take the pressure off A&E, but it is too confusing at the moment knowing where to go and when for what  Need a GP to see all the people who need to see their doctor but can't get an appointment at their surgery  I was very unwell recently but refused to ring doctors because I knew I would just be referred to ambulance and a& e. Luckily I am ok, but it could have worked against me.  If feels like continuing decline of NHS and another way to privately outsource services, I want my gp surgery to be contactable out of hours and advice and treatment from them as needed. Not a strange surgery and people and not easily accessible if on the other side of town etc. Provide additional funding to surgeries to enable each to operate it's own out of hours minor injury and urgent care support.  Believe it will ease A@E. X-rays definately important.  Think out of hours care should have access to your records  Why is keeping the freedom centre not an option??? You should be expanding services there too!  Too complicated and wast of resources  The proposed changes look ok in theory. The propsosed site however will not stop the patients using it as a " treat all in one place" walk in centre.  People who are genuinely ill don't mind travelling miles as long as they know they are going to get the treatment they need. We need to some how vet the people on the door as they come in who are just wasting time and resources.  Overall we get a good service but there is a lack of integration between ambulance services and urgent care services. The CCG must take action and provide leadership to integrate these two services and also have remote access to specialist care from the acute hospitals via use of technology. Example, direct access - telephone advice for urgent care practitioners by the on- call registrars or consultants from different specialties to avoid an unnecessary admission to hospital  need more support from mental health team  The wait at A&E puts me off even when I do have a sports injury. Were not aware of current MIV at Bransholme.  There needs to be a person to cover the health professionals when they need their breaks especially there is a real bad emergency with the elderly or a minor i.e. head injury  Whilst I believe there needs to be radical changes and improvements to urgent health care services. I do hope your proposal is not expected to meet the needs of the whole of Hull and that the intended is to develop the same service to the West of the city.  Already explained. Live on my own. Son works abroad. No car. Getting older and feel the need to be more secure should an emergency arise, I have a phone, beside my bed, next door neighbor has my door key but would like emergency cover I can access myself without disturbing neighbors late at night.  Perhaps include mental health specialists so that those in mental health crisis dont need to go to A&E  The government needs to provide more funding! On the whole our nhs does a brilliant job with very limited resources, health care shouldn't be freely available for non UK citizens, we have to pay medical insurance to visit another country on a

Page 118 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 39

holiday, perhaps this is something that should be considered here unless it's an emergency situation, keep up the good work.  Bransholme is miles away from..o many people i would have to take 2 buses to get there. How is that a good idea??? Keep services central!!  I agree more needs to be done to take away the bad practices of using a & e. These visits often occur due to there not being access to other services. Educating the public is one thing, availability of services at point if need is another  Hull need an urgent out of hours crisis service for vulnerable young children & young adolescents  Medical care is a right and should not be seen as a luxury, or an either/or situation, providing these services 24hrs a day is vital to ensure the health and wellbeing of all. Services should be easily accessible to all, good transport links are vital, public transport needs reviewing to ensure all are able to attend these centres for those who do not own their own car or have funds for taxis, if these services are to be inclusive for all. We must ensure that changes made do not disadvantage the most vulnerable in our society.  Get ppl seen , inform ppl , smile be friendly !  Who decides what is 'urgent'? It's not about spending money and developing sites. The key thing that's lacking is mainly CARE - care about patients, treatments, investigations, admin tasks, the whereabouts of patient records - real CARE does not cost more in monetary terms - it's about the culture and the ethos!!!  This is an important service and I would like to see any changes made to be the best for the city.  lets wait and see! anything that reduces pressure on A&E is a good thing as long as the services is fit for purpose  "maintain a good level of Ambulance availability"  i support the proposed changes  Bransholme is the worst place in Hull to have this centre it should be located nearer east Hull on Holderness Road which as good access for cars and local bus service  need to increase the facilities in north hull due to continued expansion of population in Kingswood. some need for east hull not impressed with GP out of hours services. this can be covered by urgent care !!  Does the proposal for Bransholme mean the gp ooh services at Westbourne will be relocated? To save staffing costs as this would be unfair for West hull residents to travel and I have a new born baby who has recently accessed Westbourne  the west of the city does not have access to an alternative to A&E at HRI. move to the east and people in west hull will glogg up A&E  a definite need for x-ray facilities away from A&E at the hosptal  Why isn't the care centre more central it's difficult for some to get to East Hull  Princess royal hospital should have been modernized  Have any of the ccg used A&E or minor injuries? Have you ever gone to Story St and sat there for 4 hours?  See previous answer  What about West Hull people  Dementia friendly services & accessible ie hoists & changing areas.  very biased to your preference if more travel, some option too far away for many  "Diadem Grove is my local surgery so I would not like to see GP OOH service move.  I used the GP OOH at Diadem Grove on a Sunday earlier this year + was impressed that it was open till midnight on a Sunday. I didn't have to go further away.  The only thing was I was given a 12:30 slot by NHS 111, + it was 2pm before I was seen; nothing happened for an hour."  "I work in A+E and I see so much in there that shouldn't be there people need to man up and use the appropriate pathways!! How about have paramedics triage patients + some would come to urgent care rather than A+E it doesn't need urgent diagnosis like CT scan/

Page 119 of 220 Page 40  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

X Ray/ MRI/ US etc... You get lots of stuff at A+E that needs some tests like urine dip could be done somewhere else.  You need a consultant geriatrician at urgent care centre also team MDT eg PT/ OT involved too 24/7 "  Decrease in GP waiting times at surgeries  "Drunks use A&E incorrectly  Like idea- as long as A&E move there as quickly as possible  Is there a danger to delay?"  although there has been lots of advertising it's still not clear to many people to use 111 and people must be aware they aren't speaking to someone local  think making Bransholme Health Centre 24 hours will take help take the pressure from HRI  "We have never had a problem with MIU or OOH provision. It has always been great.  Centralisation is not always the answer. That said, if pooling resources is what is required, in my opinion Bransholme is not a very convenient location for much of the city. Freedom Centre is much closer to the city centre and surely a better option."  "Listen to the staff ideas and respond to their ideas they often have the best ideas and not the managers who mess around ...  People don't know we're to go or how to access services that's half the battle and they turn up at HRI - Traige them quick at HRI and send them to the approx ate in house area .... Instead of people just turning up and creating massive back log of waiting times - HRI and CHH will always be main points of call for people as they know them  Pop up new services and health centres don't have the step up care or resources if needed ...... Utilise the central hospitals better !!!!! Just "  Training to improve all services  I fear that this will end up being just as busy as A&E with just as many pressures. North point is not easy to get to using public transport so people will still go to A&E.  There is a risk that West Hull residents may still tend to access HRI A&E if provision is wholly transfered to Bransholme even though not an emergency need. Therefor some provision still at The Freedom Centre would address this with Ambulatory care at HRI. Would the CCG consider collaboration with Humber Trust to co utilise Beverley Community Hospital?  one large unit, well staffed with apprpriately trained people is better than lots of smaller units which can't give a full service. the public can't have afull service on their doorstep and we should be honest with them about this. they are able to travel to watch their children play sporrt or on a night out so they will be able to do the same for a minor injury /illnees.  We want a special unit/hospital in East Hull. Everybody does not live in West Hull.  I believe we need to have care centre 24/7 in south east Hull!!  as someone with no transport how do I get to Bransholme-(miles away) out of hours??as a pension- I can't afford the very expensive taxis and may not want to call an ambulance depending on what the problem is. Why not HRI where you already have everything you need  It would be very helpful to expand the services available at Bransholme health centre especially diagnostic equipment and Doctor cover. Have taken children (in the past) to get checked out for possible fractures and had to then go on to A&E to have them x- rayed. The staff do an amazing job just need more support.  I think it's good to have a centre like the one proposed in Bransholme centre. However, I think that there should be more money for all health centres and instead of closing old ones we should open near ones.  "Definitely keep some medical services at Freedom centre.  Eg Run clinics as at present (dermatology) & More if possible  Please= please keep warfarin clinics at freedom centre - it is used + convenient for many elderly patients who need regular monitoring. Page 120 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 41

 Any alternative is costly taxi rides!!"  If the move from the freedom centre overall will be more supportive of hri and the local nhs system, then so be it. If I lived near the freedom centre and needed to be seen as a matter of urgency, a bit more travelling would be no bother considering the better and more comprehensive quality of care that would be received.  Have GPS in a and e or have urgent care near hospital so can redirect patients  I think there should be a dedicated Elderly Urgent Care facility as A & E is often under pressure from elderly patients and it's not always good for them.  "It would be 2 buses to get to Bransholme.  Freedom centre is local.  Diadem 1 bus ride I have no access to any car so it has to be bus."  "Keep the minor injuries unit at the freedom centre people do not have transport to get to Bransholme.  Should be made more accessible. I have sat at Wilberforce drop in & they turn people away obviously due to closing. People have made special arrangements to get there because they or someone else is ill!! "  24 hr urgent care is needed, currently i have no idea what/where i should go if i feel i need to see a doctor but feel i do not need to go to A&E. Everything under 1 roof, open 24 hrs, would makes it simpler  We do need a 24/7 urgent care facility as A+E just isn't the right place. It needs to be option1.  It would have been unspent for me if there had been facility for X-Rays at Bransholme minor injuries. It would have obliterated the need for the visit to A&E Hull Royal and could have been given an appointment directly to fracture clinic.  Would people from the west side of Hull go to the Bransholme or Freedom centre?  Provision of transport for those in need.  The integrated semra idea is good. Security day night at the proposed location is of major emcem  Please leave it is but the distance is not convenient for all buses can delay the treatment one needs.  Absolutely agree that we need 24/7 services to take weight off HRI in our communities we are densely populated in East Hull + have fewer car owners due to the nature of the income levels East of the city. Accessibility is key otherwise they will go to HRI anyway not Bransholme.  its a great idea to open Bransholme Health Centre 24/7 as it is ridiculous at A & E  Chemist needs to be open close by, especially oohs when you see Drs/GP oohs needs to be close by and accessible.  I believe more knowledge to the residents of Hull on what services are where will fix dot of other problems for example the waiting times. Often people wait for hours when if they'd have gone to the right place would be seen sooner.  See previous note  Must have accessible east and west Base...... cannot expect patients to be able to travel an hour across hull to Bransholme when unwell.  urgent care in general has to contain available GP or specialist consultant, x-ray, MRI pharmacy  I feel like I have nowhere to go sometimes and unsure who to contact regarding minor injuries. I feel like people are too busy to see me and want me out of there ASAP.  If new centre is agreed, a leaflet should be delivered to every house detailing opening hours and services provided  we need to provide a proper but for purpose 5 day service first and foremost. we need more doctors and nurses to ensure the 7 day 24 hours care that already exist can be staffed properly. we cannot extend the service if we do not have the medical staff. fund the service properly. cut the payout to the private sector

Page 121 of 220 Page 42  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

 i live in HU5 and Bransholme is not usually accessible, i drive but did not due to accident or illness a two bue journey would be daunting, i would be more likely to attend A&E pointless having urgent care without x-ray having cared for a frail elderly parent i believe a home visit option from a qualified practitioner should always be an option available  removal of choice will increase the number of people attending A&E not reduce, people travelling in from west or East will virtually pass A&E to navigate Hull streets to Bransholme  Not everything that is done will please everybody, but in cases were transport is not available to the person a lot of thought needs to go into the cost of getting to the centre were the services will be located.  Shorter waiting times quicker doctor refects to reduce pressure on A7E  As above please see.  Ambulance service would be good.  "People manage to get to A/E AT HRI  So they can access the alternate place Bransholme accessible good for parking but if not advertised people will still go to HRI A/E "  Had very good care at minor injuries but appalling service at A/E  Go back to how it was & replace CCG'S & pay junior doctors appropriatley  We need help available locally and not everyone can travel so far away & afford buses or taxis to get there. Also it prevents long waits & people having to take more time off work.  We need help available locally and not everyone can travel so far away & afford buses or taxis to get there. Also it prevents long waits & people having to take time off work.  We like things as they are because we live near the Diadem health centre we have no transport to get to Bransholme.  Same as Q10 for GP out of hours (Westbourne Avenue)  Not everyone has a car or can afford taxis to travel to Bransholme- see above a more central location preferred.  "Need to do more checks on patient not just temperature and blood pressure.  Bloods never checked at doctors or Hull Royal Infirmary."  "A cleaner triage system in A+E.  - walk in centre not in A+E so patients can be directed straight there.  I would like answer machines at G.P's to direct me to out ofhours centre rather than just 111, 999."  Have blood donations performed at Bransholme Health Centre if too far away.  "Due to the current situation the issue needs serious discussion and consultation  Training more practitioners will be essential if this is to be successful "  I think one reason things are strained in A&E as we appear to live in a society where a small (ish) group of people think A&E stands for 'Anything & Everything!!  Needs to go back to being provided by your own gp surgery  How will mental health be factored into this review. Mental Health crisis services are already facing a significant challenge and their review needs to be incorporated into this. Having separate urgent care centre for acute and mental healthcare is confusing and risks replicated the problems MH care in A&E.  I was against the change until I attended an urgent care consultation which fully explained the reasons. As there is a minor injuries department at HRI, it does seem logical to gave urgent care at Bransholme, especially with X Ray facilities.  Sounds like a good idea to help alleviate pressure on A&E services. Will obviously need to be carefully planned and thought through.  All facilities are rather in Hull, Beverley or Castle Hill it would be nice if you gave some of these facilities to the people to the East of the city, ie to Hedon so all the outlaying communities do not have a travel distance between 20-40 mls, I would imagine very few people like my self would travel to use any of these facilities, please look for the East than Holderness road.

Page 122 of 220 Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report  Page 43

 It's not fair if the freedom centre miu is closed or minimalized as the people in that area maybe cannot reach anywhere else. The Bransholme centre may be put under strain with the new influx of stuff+ visitors. Does it have enough space? parking? use an old building and refurb for an out of hours urgent care team.  It is essential that it remains in the control of NHS and no privatisation of the service.  "1. pharmacy required 2.publisice what is available and when? 3.transport links?"  Bransholme Health centre neither accessible or re assuring. Have faith in A+E, experience of Bransholme very poor- difficult to find, no- one there hardly, advice extremely poor if not dangerous.  People need services local do not have money to travel.  These things should have been addressed years ago I've known people to wait hours and hours to be seen to and it shouldn't have to be like that.  "HRI would be nearer  How about Freedom centre & Bransholme"  Ask people what they want don't just decide because sat in office- get into real world stop closing MIV as Freedom used on regular bases, nurse's staff are so fantastic& also reception staff- very helpful.  I feel some provision for health care should be kept at the Freedom Centre and Diadem as not all residents can casually access Bransholme.  Will the urgent care be a walk in centre or is it more numbers to ring first? Making sure low income families can access 24 hours- if live in West Hull its a longway away  It would be great to be seen to stead of trying to get to see a doctor, when you can't get an appointment and you are worried about what is wrong with you or a family member.  I am not sure whether people will use this facility instead of going to "A&E". At "A&E" people are accessible to a blood test and results while they wait! There is no mention of this happening at the proposed new facility!  I feel the proposed changes will make a huge difference to the present system. Having visited a&be with my husband recently, I was shocked at the number of people coming in with very minor problems which could easily have been treated at home or with the assistance of a pharmacist.  I feel some provision for health care should be kept at the freedom centre and Diadem as not at all residents can casually access bransholme.  Will the urgent care be a walk in centre or is it more numbers to ring first? Making sure low income families can access 24 hours - if in West Hull it's a longway away.  At the moment the dr's we have we see different ones every time we go how do you go continuing with diagnosis's and treatment.  We used the minor injuries unit and the waiting time was 2.5 hrs this needs to be reduced by providing more healthcare professionals.  bransholme  I've ticked where to re-locate but really it depends if those services are being well used. Are they not being used because people dont know they are there + what they offer? Local services are important for people who are ill and can't travel.  Not out of the way and to the way of the city as well.  Kingswood is now such a large a growing population 24/7 at Bransholme would be ideal  "Gentleman thinks one should be built at Castlehill, because they have all that land and all they want to do is put car parking on it. Also he thinks it should be built where the old General Hospital was on Beverley Rd.  Gentleman stated he went to the freedom centre regarding his ears was told they dont do this and he had to go to AE sat there for 6 hrs told it was not their job and it was his GP. who had to do it."  It isn't clear why the reorganising is taking place. Is it to save money or improve services?  An urgent care unit is very much needed - there is too much distinction between what can and can't be treated at an MIU or a WIC, having one place to go to for everything works

Page 123 of 220 Page 44  Urgent Care In Hull: Public Consultation Report

much better and is easier for people to understand and use, and hopefully would take some pressure of A&E leaving it free to do its job and deal with emergencies.  Just call it A&E and let the health care professionals do the diagnosing.  Improve ECP repsonse and performance to falls by including rapid assess team that includes AHP assessement and increased access to communtiy rehab beds for such patients (extra capacity) reducing acute admissions  As mentioned in my response to the previous question, a greater provision in West Hull may have a positive effect on A&E waiting times.  "I, fully understand where you are heading in the changes you need to make in delivering health care for the future of patients, but some caution needs to be taken into account, as 24/7 will change how and when you see a doctor, and not always of your choice, or named doctor/ practice as now! This will be frightening for many who are settled in the way they do things, due to age, health, mental health, fear, panic attacks and depression due to their illnesses, being set in ones ways is comforting and a secure way of coping, none of this is covered in the questioner!  I, think you need to have a proceeder in place for vulnerable patients with the above health issues, those who need to see their own doctor as now, this has to be accommodated where possible, with the understanding of the patient that they may/could have to wait until their doctor is on duty, again with the understanding that if their illnesses need immediate attention, then like now in A&E you're seen by the duty doctor and consultant on duty at that time!  It is vital when selling this to patients/public it is done in and honest, understanding and sympathetic way, demonstrating you are willing to listen and accommodate where possible.  I, hope this has been of some help. "  As previously stated. No further comments.  I think having services in one place is a good idea and I think it would encourage people away from a&e and reduce waiting times.  Again no thought to other areas of Hull. East and North yet again. What about Westbourne? Is that closing for OOH?  A cab fare to Bransholme from the West of Hull would be prohibitively expensive. I suspect the pressure on HRI would be much reduced if there was an alternative in West Hull  people who are scared of getting lost or have not transport with ring ambulance instead. A location need to anywhere but bransholme as you are going help bransholme residents not the majority of patients who use hull nhs service.

Page 124 of 220

Briefing to the North Carr Area Committee Wards – Bransholme 18th January 2017 East, Bransholme West and Kings Park

Waste and Open Spaces Quarterly Performance Update

Briefing of the City Streetscene Manager

1. Purpose of the Briefing Paper and Summary

1.1 To provide a quarterly performance report relating to waste collection, recycling performance, street cleansing and grounds maintenance in the North Carr area.

2. Introduction

2.1 This briefing is part of the ongoing performance reporting framework, providing quarterly performance information for Waste and Open Spaces.

3. Measures of Performance

3.1 The city wide number of missed collections for December 16 was 930 out of 768,075 scheduled collections which equates to 0.12% of collections missed citywide.

3.2 The following graph shows the number of reported missed collections since November 15 across North Carr broken down by Ward.

Page 125 of 220 1

3.3 The number of missed collections in North Carr reported in December 16 was 95.

3.4 The average number of daily reported missed collections by Ward in December was as follows:

• Bransholme East – 3.5 bins reported missed out of 1,509 collections per day • Bransholme West – 1.8 bins reported missed out of 1,325 collections per day • Kings Park – 2.8 bins reported missed out of 1,968 collections per day • The city wide Ward average was 2.6 bins reported missed per day

3.5 The level of missed collections has stabilised since Jul 16 and are inline or below citywide percentage rates.

3.6 The current level of missed assisted collections for December 2016 is outlined below:

Page 126 of 220 2

• Bransholme East 11 missed collections 944 scheduled assisted collections 98.83% of assisted collections made

• Bransholme West 5 missed collections 925 scheduled assisted collections 99.46% of assisted collections made

• Kings Park 1 missed collection 195 scheduled assisted collections 99.49% of assisted collections made

3.7 Cleansing Performance Update – Levels of litter and graffiti are now monitored city-wide on a monthly basis using a system that is based upon NI195 called The Land Audit Management System or LAMs for short. This is in line with corporate performance indicators. The trend in relation to levels of litter and graffiti across the city is shown below. Figures below are based upon 163, 50 metre random transects, measured since April 2016.

3.8 Current levels of litter are below the target of 6%. Keep Britain Tidy’s latest annual national local environmental quality survey results; show the national unacceptable levels of litter at 10%. The above graph is showing the standards for litter on hard surfaces.

3.9 The level of graffiti is shown on the graph below Page 127 of 220 3

3.10 The levels of graffiti are well below the 4% target.

3.11 The standards for Grounds are shown in the graph below.

3.12 The standard for Grounds Maintenance is a much more complex measurement taking into account many different factors. These include but are not limited to ‘has grass been cut’, ‘is grass uniformly cut’, ‘are hard Page 128 of 220 4 surfaces free of grass cuttings’, ‘have shrubs/roses been properly pruned’, ’are beds and verges free from litter’, ‘are beds free of weeds’. As there are multiple factors there is a significantly higher failure rate as any factor can bring the standard down. The figures shown in the graph above indicate a percentage failure rate. Currently there is no set target for grounds maintenance standards. An appropriate and achievable figure needs to be developed.

3.13 Although still ahead of target, the level of litter has started to increase which reflects the reduction in resources during the last year. A zonal approach to cleansing and grounds maintenance has been in place for 9 months which is aimed at ensuring standards are maintained at their current level, or to improve them. This zonal approach started April 4th 2016. Graffiti remains well below target. Grounds Maintenance standards continue to be monitored closely so that improvements can be made.

3.14 The number of reported fly-tipping incidents in the North Carr Area averaged approximately 52 per month between November 15 and December 16. A comparison with city-wide reports is outlined below.

3.15 The level of flytipping during the period Jan 16 to Dec 16 has risen by 1269 reported fly tips when measured against the same period in 2015 which is a rise of 27%. This is a national trend thought to be linked to the cost of waste disposal and the reduction in the value of recyclable commodities.

3.16 To illustrate the level of contact from residents with regard to street cleanliness, the number of service requests through the call centre is shown on the graph below.

Page 129 of 220 5

3.17 The average number of requests from residents in the North Carr Area is 25 per month. The graph below shows the breakdown of service request types for the North Carr Area.

3.18 To illustrate the level of contact from residents with regard to grounds maintenance and parks, the number of service requests through the call centre is shown on the graph below. Page 130 of 220 6

3.19 The average number of requests from residents in the North Carr Area is 45 per month and follows a seasonal trend. The increase in contact during May and June reflects the reduction in resources combined with good growing conditions impacting on the standard of grass cutting. Steps were taken to improve the situation which led to an improvement in standards in the latter part of the growing season. This is reflected in the graph above.

3.20 The graph below shows the breakdown of service request types for the North Carr Area.

Page 131 of 220 7

4 Summary and Next Steps

4.1 Key operational issues will be summarised in future reports.

4.2 The waste collection service continue to monitor trends in reported missed collections, with the emphasis on reducing the number of repeat and missed assisted collections to improve performance. Improving the quality of materials collected in the blue bin recycling scheme is also a key priority.

4.3 The LAMs measurement system has been introduced so that there is continuous measurement of grounds and street cleansing standards to help drive performance improvements.

Andy Burton City Streetscene Manager

Contact Officers: Doug Sharp and Adam McArthur, Streetscene Services

Telephone No: 01482 614032 or 318536

Background Documents – None

Page 132 of 220 8

Briefing Paper to the North Carr Area Members Wards:All 18 th January 2017

Briefing Paper North Carr Area Housing Performance for the period up to the end of November 2016

Briefing Paper of the City Neighbourhoods and Housing Manager

1. Purpose of the Paper and Summary

To brief the North Carr Area Committee on the performance of the North Carr Landlord Services and the Housing Investment Team for the period ending 30 th November 2016 as contained in Appendix A.

2. Background

The Area and Neighbourhood agenda places responsibility for ensuring effective performance of Council services at a local level with Area Committees. The information within the Briefing and appendices capture the relevant information to enable the Area Committee to fulfil its monitoring role in relation to local delivery of Housing Services.

Page 133 of 220 3. Summary of Performance . 3.1 Responsive Repairs

At the end of November 2016 performance for repairs appointments made and kept was at 96.2% (4 th ) and for the year to date, 98.5% (3 rd ). This was below the city wide average of 97.6%, however the year to date performance has exceeded the performance target of 90%. 99.9% of all repairs were completed in time, the average non-urgent days for repair were at 11.5, better than the City average of 12.5 and significantly under the target of 15.

3.2 Repairs Completed Right First Time

56 tenants responded to the repairs completed right first time questionnaire in North Carr. Of these 86.3% (5 th ) were happy, below the City wide average of 89.3% but above the 85% target.

3.3 Gas Repairs and Gas Servicing

Emergency gas repairs figures for November in North Carr were at 100% completed in time, with urgent repairs at 99.4%, the best in the City. Non urgent repairs were at the 100% achievable. All of these performance figures met or exceeded the citywide averages. At the end of November 2016, 99.93% (2 nd ) of all Council properties in North Carr had a valid gas safety certificate with only 2 properties without.

Updated Gas Servicing information as at 6 January 2017 we are pleased to report there are no outstanding cases for the North Carr area.

3.4 Progress on Outstanding Rewires

Three cases currently outstanding.

Page 134 of 220

3.5 Empty Council Properties

The number of empty properties at the end of November 2016 was 36, making up only 1.2% of total stock, the lowest rate in the City; of these 13 were ready for letting and 21 were for repair. 1 property was categorized as bringing back into use and 1 was categorized as with regen improvement .The average number of days the contractor took to complete the void repairs in November 2016 was 19.9 days (6 th ) compared to 12.2 days, the best in the City, in October 2016. This is slightly above the citywide figure for November of 18.3 days. The year to date figure is 18 days (3 rd ) which is still slightly below the City wide performance of 18.2 days and below the target of 19 days.

3.6 Average Re-let Time

The average re-let time during November 2016 was 23 days, the best in the City, giving a year to date figure of 21 days. The Citywide figure for the year to date was 31 days with North Carr performing the best in the City. Rent lost due to properties being empty during November was 2.01% (5th ), which is above the citywide average of 1.82% and the target of 1.95%. As at the end of November the percentage of new tenancy visits completed in the North Carr area was 74%.

3.7 Bidding and Refusals

There were 7 refusals during November: for the following reasons: • No contact from applicant - 1 • Wrong location in area - 2 • Local area/perceptions - 1 • Change in circumstances – 1 • Financial hardship – 1 • Situation of Property - 1

ALL OFFERS – % % % Still Accepted Refused Withdrawn Total Under Apr-Nov 2016 Accepted Refused Withdrawn Offer North Carr 117 66 34 217 53.9% 30.4% 15.7% 20

With the exception of larger houses most properties are reasonably popular with current demand, whilst adapted properties are very difficult to let or match with a suitable applicant.

Page 135 of 220

The number of bids received in the North Carr Area, from April 2016 to November 2016 is as follows:

2-bed 3-bed 4-bed 1-bed 1-bed 1-bed 2-bed 0-bed Grand Bids HSE HSE HSE BNG FL2 MSF MSF LBS Total North Carr 1,339 1,093 83 331 2,252 46 49 52 5,245

North Carr had 19 confirmed voids during November 2016. Of these 2 were for major repair.

The latest information as at January 2017, on properties undergoing major repairs in the North Carr area is as follows:

Maj Estimated Date Maj Date Address Type Type Comment of Return 21/11/16 142 SHELDON CLOSE House MAJ1 Asbestos survey comp work to start w/c 16/1 3/3/17 28/11/16 175 AXMINSTER CLOSE Flat low rise MAJ1 Awaiting new gas supply Not Known 19/12/16 104 PATRINGTON GARTH House MAJ1 Asbestos survey comp work to start w/c 16/1 28/2/17 12/12/16 54 HUCKNALL GARTH Bungalow MAJ1 Work in progress back shortly 1/2/17 07/12/16 52 UPAVON GARTH House MAJ1 Work in progress back shortly 1/2/17 31/10/16 4 BLISLAND CLOSE Bungalow MAJ1 14 Nov 2016: R&D Survey and isolator required 25/1/17 01/08/16 36 KINGSCOTT CLOSE House MAJ1 12 Aug 2016: Awaiting HIS regarding concrete flr Not Known 17/10/16 14 KINGSCOTT CLOSE Link bedsit MAJ1 21 Oct 2016: R&D survey required 16/1/17 10/10/16 83 PADSTOW HOUSE Flat 10+ storey MAJ1 13 Oct 2016: isolator required 16/1/17

There have been 24 rights to buy properties since April 2016 in the North Carr Area, with 4 of those during November 2016.

Page 136 of 220

Lettable properties – November 2016:

North Carr Total Register - Choice Based 85 Lettings Transfer - Choice Based 8 Lettings Sheltered Choice Based 3 Lettings Regeneration Register List 0 Regeneration Transfer List 0 Direct Let Register List 8 Direct Let Transfer List 11 Adapted Properties List 7 Total 122

Bids by property type from April 2016 to December 2016:

North Band Band Band Band Band Total Carr A B C D E House 4 320 1,735 342 113 2514 Bungalow 0 23 176 103 29 331 Maisonette 0 0 0 0 0 0 Flat 1 81 1,802 273 190 2347 Bedsit 0 2 42 3 5 52 Total 5 426 3,755 721 337 5244

Page 137 of 220

NORTH CARR AREA - PROPERTIES ADVERTISED Dec 16

Bransholme East Bids per Property Type Bedrooms Voids Advertised property HSE 2 1 63.0 HSE 3 1 68.0 HSE 4 0 0.0 HSE 5 0 0.0 BNG 1 1 10.0 BNG 2 0 0.0 BNG 3 0 0.0 FL2 1 0 0.0 MSF 1 0 0.0 MSF 2 0 0.0 TOTAL 3 47.0

Bransholme West Bids per Property Type Bedrooms Voids Advertised property HSE 2 1 53.0 HSE 3 0 0.0 HSE 4 0 0.0 HSE 5 0 0.0 HSE 6 0 0.0 BNG 1 2 16.5 BNG 2 0 0.0 BNG 3 0 0.0 FL2 1 3 60.3 FL2 2 0 0.0 MSF 1 0 0.0 MSF 2Page 138 of 220 1 4.0 LBS 0 0 0.0 TOTAL 7 38.7

NORTH CARR AREA - PROPERTIES ADVERTISED APR 16 to DEC 16

Bransholme East

Property Type Bedrooms Voids Advertised Bids per property HSE 2 7 58.7 HSE 3 9 69.8 HSE 4 0 0.0 HSE 5 0 0.0 BNG 1 4 15.5 BNG 2 0 0.0 BNG 3 0 0.0 FL2 1 10 45.7 MSF 1 2 23.0 MSF 2 6 3.5 TOTAL 38 42.8

Bransholme West

Property Type Bedrooms Voids Advertised Bids per property HSE 2 14 66.3 HSE 3 9 51.7 HSE 4 2 41.5 HSE 5 0 0.0 HSE 6 0 0.0 BNG 1 12 22.4 BNG 2 0 0.0 BNG 3 0 0.0 FL2 1 34 52.8 FL2 2 0 0.0 MSF 1 0 0.0 Page 139 of 220 MSF 2 6 4.7 LBS 0 1 52.0 TOTAL 78 46.4

3.8 Customer Satisfaction – New Homes

Customer satisfaction with their new home stands at 93.7% (4 th ) for November, from a return of 79 from the tenant survey. This is only very slightly lower than the City wide average of 93.8% but still above the 90% target.

3.9 Estate Issues

Please see Appendix B for details by Hub. North Carr have only recently begun to capture the ongoing information regarding the estate in general very recently, and therefore this Appendix is a work in progress, although still attached for information.

3.10 Neighbourhood Nuisance – ASB

There was a 100% response to service requests within timescale and 245 calls for service year to date. The main reasons given were for of ‘Intimidation/Harassment/Verbal Abuse’ and ‘Noise’.

3.11 Capital and Other Completed Planned Outputs

Appendix A shows the types of work done and the numbers of both planned work and those works done when properties are empty or as a responsive repair. Those repairs in reference numbers 8 to 10 are all planned works, whilst adaptations are all reactive works depending on the needs of residents. During the period April to November 2016, there were 954 jobs completed in the North Carr Area .

4. Income Management

4.1 Rent Collection

The Landlord Services Team performance of 96.07% (7th ) for November 2016 was slightly lower than the citywide average of 96.79%.

Page 140 of 220 The most recent figures for rent collection by patch are noted below:

Base Arrears FTAs Net Payments % Rent Change Number £ Rent Arrears as at Average added Change on FTAs % FTAs collected NHO Patch against of received (3rd Apr Arrears year-to- added in collected year-to- Base Cases against year-to-date 2016) 18 /1 2/16 date Base year date Patch 1 £10,965 £13,336 £2,371 43 £310 £4,179 £6,550 £0 0.0% 96.7% £381,618 Patch 2 £19,707 £19,778 £71 66 £300 £4,694 £4,765 £435 9.3% 97.9% £855,720 Patch 3 £30,488 £28,563 -£1,925 105 £272 £8,201 £6,276 £592 7.2% 96.6% £816,957 Patch 4 £30,607 £35,397 £4,790 111 £319 £9,355 £14,145 £404 4.3% 95.5% £858,327 Patch 5 £22,331 £26,385 £4,054 93 £284 £1,230 £5,283 £511 41.5% 96.8% £716,943 Patch 6 £18,327 £22,544 £4,216 75 £301 £10,874 £15,091 £829 7.6% 97.0% £905,130 Patch 7 £14,972 £15,193 £221 70 £217 £1,489 £1,170 £1,166 78.3% 98.3% £835,501 Patch 15 £37,598 £61,282 £23,684 124 £494 £4,125 £27,810 £590 14.3% 93.9% £861,527 Patch 16 £28,076 £34,099 £6,023 66 £517 £373 £6,396 £157 42.1% 95.3% £571,113 Patch 17 £15,781 £16,895 £1,114 72 £235 £8,251 £9.366 £0 0.0% 96.2% £576,583 Patch 18 £13,279 £23,496 £10,217 81 £290 £4,779 £14,996 £1,489 31.2% 96.1% £632,043 Patch 19 £32,547 £36,506 £3,959 79 £462 £11,157 £15,115 £297 2.7% 95.1% £747,257

Team Total £274,678 £333,474 £58,796 985 £339 £68,707 £127,503 £6,470 9.4% 96.3% £8,760,692

CITYWIDE £1,985,689 £2,325,334 £339,645 7,514 £309 £477,390 £817,035 £56,459 11.8% 96.8% £69,883,580

4.2 Arrears

The total level of arrears for the North Carr Area as at the 18 December 2016 is £333,474. This was an increase of £58,796 since the 4 th April 2016, but a decrease of £13,573 for the same period previous month.

There are currently 985 tenants in rent arrears in the North Carr area (this figure includes tenants that pay in arrears but clear the account when a payment is made i.e., calendar monthly payments in arrears).

The average value of arrears for each case is £339

Page 141 of 220

Latest figures, for legal actions, as at the end of November 2016 show:

Current Month = Nov-16 Arrears Actions (Year to Current Rent Arrears Date) Lets Tenanted RTB Sales (Year Propertie Lettable No. % in NOPPs/ Court in last 12 to Stock s Voids Voids Cases arrears Value NOSPs Orders Evictions Turnover months Date) Citywide 24,594 23,988 606 258 8,397 35.0% £2,350,514 1,596 325 51 8.4% 267 1,180

East 4,574 4,460 114 43 1,481 33.2% £375,746 251 103 9 8.2% 40 247 North Carr 3,050 3,014 36 35 1,084 36.0% £331,788 238 37 14 6.3% 34 123 Northern 3,975 3,909 66 19 1,598 40.9% £461,559 355 46 9 8.0% 49 207 West 2,910 2,827 83 46 963 34.1% £287,070 148 17 2 9.3% 30 131 Wyke 875 863 12 8 253 29.3% £55,341 34 3 1 7.3% 15 36 Park 3,973 3,774 199 40 1,349 35.7% £308,033 229 49 4 9.9% 40 140 Riverside 5,237 5,141 96 67 1,669 32.5% £530,976 341 70 12 7.6% 59 296

The percentage of tenants with more than 7 weeks of arrears in the North Carr Area is as follows:

• April 3.97% • May 4.20% • June 4.33% • July 4.41% • August 4.52% • September 4.66% • October 4.75% • November 4.86%

Page 142 of 220 The North Carr Area is the third lowest performing in terms of having arrears cases of over 7 weeks in duration, as shown below:

Percentage of current tenants with more than 7 weeks rent arrears

Direction Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 TARGET Year to Date Ranking of Travel

Citywide 4.33% 4.40% 4.46% 4.46% East 3.73% 3.78% 3.81% 3.81% Park North Carr 4.66% 4.75% 4.86% 4.86% Wyke Northern 5.73% 5.72% 5.66% 5.66% East West 4.29% 4.39% 4.53% 4.53% West North Wyke 3.44% 3.50% 3.51% 3.51% Carr Park 3.03% 3.12% 3.20% 3.20% Riverside Riverside 4.72% 4.85% 4.91% 4.91% Northern

4.3 Evictions

To date the North Carr area has carried out 14 evictions to date since April 2016. There were 5 evictions carried out in November 2016.

4.4 Social Sector Size Criteria (SSSC)

As at the 1/12/2016 the North Carr Area have 336 tenancies affected by SSSC. Of those:

174 pay in full 159 make a partial payment 3 are not paying.

Of the 3 cases identified who are not paying, 1 is a new tenant waiting for housing benefit issues to be resolved. 1 has an arrangement in place for payment following an eviction suspension hearing, and 1 is in the process of having legal action taken. Page 143 of 220

The North Carr Area has the third lowest concentration of tenancies affected by SSSC across the City. As can be seen below, the latest collection rates show that North Carr is performing second best in the City for % collected in full, and joint lowest for the % of tenants paying nothing towards their charge.

Full Partial None Total Full Partial None Total East 219 238 5 462 East 47.4% 51.5% 1.1% 462 North Carr 174 159 3 336 North Carr 51.8% 47.3% 0.9% 336 Northern 294 284 5 583 Northern 50.4% 48.7% 0.9% 583 West 133 156 8 297 West 44.8% 52.5% 2.7% 297 Wyke 40 28 1 69 Wyke 58.0% 40.6% 1.4% 69 Park 223 282 7 512 Park 43.6% 55.1% 1.4% 512 Riverside 333 362 14 709 Riverside 47.0% 51.1% 2.0% 709 Total 1,416 1,509 43 2,968 Citywide 47.7% 50.8% 1.4% 2,968

4.5 Universal Credit

The North Carr area currently has 33 tenants receiving universal credit.

4.6 Top 100 Rent Arrears Cases

As at the end of December 2016 the North Carr Area Team have 19 cases in the top 100 – a decrease of 3 in the last month.

The highest ranked case is 3rd in the City and the lowest ranked case is at 99.

Balance details of all top 100 North Carr cases are as follows:

Page 144 of 220 North Carr top 100 arrears cases as at 1/1/17

Previous Current Balance Rank Rank Patches Amount 3 3 North Carr Team Patch 16 £4,527.25 7 7 North Carr Team Patch 15 £4,085.05 9 10 North Carr Team Patch 19 £3,791.56 17 17 North Carr Team Patch 15 £3,561.45 27 26 North Carr Team Patch 16 £3,048.74 28 27 North Carr Team Patch 19 £3,037.59 34 30 North Carr Team Patch 5 £2,873.60 35 31 North Carr Team Patch 19 £2,861.04 40 35 North Carr Team Patch 4 £2,803.19 53 52 North Carr Team Patch 16 £2,550.20 62 54 North Carr Team Patch 16 £2,524.91 69 67 North Carr Team Patch 17 £2,453.77 77 70 North Carr Team Patch 19 £2,446.07 87 78 North Carr Team Patch 1 £2,352.31 88 79 North Carr Team Patch 18 £2,350.40 91 83 North Carr Team Patch 16 £2,325.38 90 88 North Carr Team Patch 15 £2,291.89 64 92 North Carr Team Patch 4 £2,261.61 new 99 North Carr Team Patch 3 £2,196.24

Page 145 of 220

5. North Carr Area Financial Budgets

Total Spent: £696.04

Balance Remaining: £6,335.96

Percentage Remaining: 90% G1261 4153 G282 Estate Management Oracle / Date Authoris PO No. Req No. Company Description Cost Completed Paid Internal Ordered ed By Building NCA00073 Internal 06/04/2016 Cleaning £25.00 JI April 2016 April 2016 Cleaning Area 834046 781092 Oracle 06/07/2016 Tony Cook Fencing £202.79 28/07/2016 19/08/2016 Cttee August August NCA00079 Internal 20/07/2016 Pest Control wasp nest in roof space £53.00 SH 2016 2016 Area October October NCA00080 Internal 22/09/2016 Pest Control remove wasp nest from top of the block of flats £53.00 Cttee 2016 2016 Area 848235 793423 Oracle 22/11/2016 Dryden line marking for disabled space £150.00 Cttee Area 793757 Oracle 24/11/2016 Tony Cook Fencing £212.25 848703 Cttee

Total Spent: £1,250.85

£13,149.1 Balance Remaining: 5

Percentage Remaining: 91%

Page 146 of 220

G1262 4153 G282 Enhanced Environmental Works

PO Oracle / Date Authorise Complete Req No. Company Description Cost Paid No. Internal Ordered d By d 82738 03/05/201 Area 20/10/201 6 775030 Oracle 6 Tony Cook Tree works £992.85 Cttee 6 05/10/201 Parks & Area NCA00081 Internal fell & treat 2 sycamores £258.00 6 Gardens Cttee

Total Spent: £2,943.41

Balance Remaining: £19,436.59

Percentage Remaining: 87%

G1260 4153 G282 Area Based Spend

Oracle / Date PO No. Req No. Company Description Cost Approved Completed Paid Internal Ordered Area 835708 782505 Oracle 20/07/2016 Tony Cook Fencing £1,145.66 20/10/2016 08/11/2016 Cttee Area 835707 782514 Oracle 20/07/2016 Tony Cook Fencing £270.17 25/08/2016 13/09/2016 Cttee Area 835706 782537 Oracle 20/07/2016 Tony Cook Fencing £169.00 25/08/2016 13/09/2016 Cttee Waste Area NCA00082 Internal 11/10/2016 Bring out your rubbish day £1,250.25 Management Cttee Area 848233 793431 Oracle 22/11/2016 VPS cut & clear land £108.33 Cttee

Page 147 of 220 6. Next steps

6.1 That North Carr Area Committee notes the Briefing Paper and requests further information if required.

Dave Richmond City Neighbourhoods and Housing Manager

Contact Officer: Michelle Evans/Louise Holmes

Telephone No: 01482 613650

Officer Interests: None

Background Documents: -

1. Performance Information

Page 148 of 220 Housing Performance Report Period Ending November 2016

Page 149 of 220 RESPONSIVE REPAIRS

% Appointments Made and Kept Performance Target 90%

Direction of Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 2016/17 Notes Travel East 89.4% 94.8% 92.4% ‰ 95.9% The appointments figures relate to the number of North Carr 92.1% 96.6% 96.2% ‰ 98.5% appointments kept of all those that should have been made (i.e. repairs that had an appointment plus repairs Northern 91.3% 92.5% 99.0% „ 98.3% which should have had an appointment but didn't). West 99.1% 94.6% 97.4% „ 99.2% Wyke 105.2% 91.1% 79.7% ‰ 94.5% Performance exceeds 100% when the number of Park 92.7% 92.3% 85.2% ‰ 96.1% appointments attended in the month is greater than the Riverside 89.9% 95.4% 101.6% „ 98.8% number made in the month. CITYWIDE 92.5% 94.2% 94.7% „ 97.6%

Repairs Completed In Time 2016/17 Performance Target 99% / 15 days

Emergency Urgent Non-Urgent Non-Urgent COMMENTARY % In Time % In Time % In Time Average Days East 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 12.8 North Carr 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 11.5 Northern 100.0% 100.0% 99.6% 13.2 West 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 12.5 Wyke 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 13.1 Park 100.0% 100.0% 99.6% 12.5 Riverside 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 11.8 CITYWIDE 100.0% 100.0% 99.6% 12.5

Page 150 of 220

Page 2 REPAIRS COMPLETED RIGHT FIRST TIME

Oct-16 Nov-16 D. o. T. 2016/17 Oct-16 Nov-16 D. o. T. 2016/17

EAST WYKE Number of Responses 111 105 ‰ 758 Number of Responses 27 18 ‰ 159 Did operatives attend as arranged? 97.3% 97.1% ‰ 97.0% Did operatives attend as arranged? 96.2% 82.4% ‰ 96.8% Was repair completed to your satisfaction? 95.2% 93.1% ‰ 95.1% Was repair completed to your satisfaction? 100.0% 88.2% ‰ 96.1% Did operatives solve the problem first time? 89.7% 90.1% „ 90.5% Did operatives solve the problem first time? 100.0% 82.4% ‰ 92.7% Repairs Completed Right First Time 90.2% 89.8% ‰ 90.5% Repairs Completed Right First Time 96.0% 81.3% ‰ 91.3%

NORTH CARR PARK Number of Responses 58 56 ‰ 340 Number of Responses 75 59 ‰ 431 Did operatives attend as arranged? 94.6% 98.2% „ 96.7% Did operatives attend as arranged? 100.0% 100.0% 1 98.1% Was repair completed to your satisfaction? 91.2% 94.2% „ 94.8% Was repair completed to your satisfaction? 97.1% 96.4% ‰ 96.0% Did operatives solve the problem first time? 87.7% 86.8% ‰ 91.5% Did operatives solve the problem first time? 97.1% 82.8% ‰ 91.9% Repairs Completed Right First Time 87.5% 86.3% ‰ 91.0% Repairs Completed Right First Time 97.1% 85.2% ‰ 92.5%

NORTHERN RIVERSIDE Number of Responses 61 78 „ 386 Number of Responses 105 147 „ 874 Did operatives attend as arranged? 93.2% 96.1% „ 95.3% Did operatives attend as arranged? 96.2% 98.6% „ 98.3% Was repair completed to your satisfaction? 91.7% 95.9% „ 93.0% Was repair completed to your satisfaction? 95.0% 92.9% ‰ 95.5% Did operatives solve the problem first time? 86.7% 90.7% „ 90.4% Did operatives solve the problem first time? 92.1% 88.1% ‰ 92.6% Repairs Completed Right First Time 82.8% 91.7% „ 89.9% Repairs Completed Right First Time 93.8% 87.7% ‰ 92.7%

WEST CITYWIDE Number of Returns 62 78 „ 546 Number of Returns 499 541 „ 3,494 Did operatives attend as arranged? 100.0% 97.4% ‰ 98.9% Did operatives attend as arranged? 97.0% 97.3% „ 97.5% Was repair completed to your satisfaction? 92.2% 100.0% „ 93.8% Was repair completed to your satisfaction? 94.4% 94.8% „ 94.9% Did operatives solve the problem first time? 89.1% 98.7% „ 90.9% Did operatives solve the problem first time? 91.1% 89.5% ‰ 91.4% Repairs Completed Right First Time 88.5% 96.1% „ 90.5% Repairs Completed Right First Time 90.8% 89.3% ‰ 91.3% 2016/17 Right First Time target = 85%

Notes "Right Fist Time" is analysed from repair receipt returns: Numerator - the number of tenants who answer “Yes” to ALL THREE of the following questions: “Did the operatives attend as arranged?”; “Was your repair completed to your satisfaction?”; and “Did the operative who attended solve the problem you reported first time?” Denominator - the number of tenants who gave valid answers to ALL THREEPage questions. 151 of 220

3,494 responses from 44,059 repairs so far this year gives us a margin of error of 0.7% at the 95% confidence level. Page 3 GAS REPAIRS

Repairs Completed In Time 2016/17 Completed Right First Time Notes

Emergency Urgent Non-Urgent Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 D. o. T. 2016/17 "Right Fist Time" is analysed from repair East 100.0% 98.8% 100.0% East 85.0% 90.6% 86.9% ‰ 90.9% receipt returns: Numerator - the number of North Carr 100.0% 99.4% 100.0% North Carr 100.0% 100.0% 90.5% ‰ 90.9% tenants who answer “Yes” to ALL THREE of the following questions: “Did the operatives Northern 100.0% 98.9% 100.0% Northern 91.7% 84.2% 96.3% „ 87.8% attend as arranged?”; “Was your repair West 100.0% 98.2% 100.0% West 83.3% 84.6% 88.9% „ 88.3% completed to your satisfaction?”; and “Did the Wyke 100.0% 98.5% 100.0% Wyke 100.0% 78.6% 81.8% „ 86.2% operative who attended solve the problem you Park 100.0% 98.4% 100.0% Park 80.0% 84.0% 89.7% „ 83.5% reported first time?” Denominator - the Riverside 100.0% 98.3% 100.0% Riverside 95.0% 94.4% 98.2% „ 92.1% number of tenants who gave valid answers to ALL THREE questions. CITYWIDE 100.0% 98.7% 100.0% CITYWIDE 89.1% 88.6% 91.2% „ 89.0%

GAS SERVICING Week Ending 4/12/16

Total Failures Total with % with Properties Total in the AREA current Current % Overdue Requiring Overdue Managed L.G.S.R. L.G.S.R. L.G.S.R. Process

East 3,923 3,911 99.69% 12 0.31% 0 GAS SERVICING PERFORMANCE INFORMATION UNDER North Carr 2,715 2,713 99.93% 2 0.07% 0 DEVELOPMENT Northern 3,830 3,819 99.71% 11 0.29% 0 West 2,494 2,486 99.68% 8 0.32% 0 Wyke 849 849 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 Park 3,629 3,618 99.70% 11 0.30% 0 Riverside 4,044 4,030 99.65% 14 0.35% 0 CITYWIDE 21,484 21,426 99.73% 58 0.27% 0

COMMENTARY

Gas Servicing: At the end of November 2016 99.73% (21,426) properties had a valid Landlords gas safety certificate. The remaining 58 properties are presently at various stages of the managed control measures for dealing with problematic Gas access. The coordinated partnership working between Housing Investment, KWL and the Area Housing teams ensures that properties with access issues are continually identified and actioned.Page It remains 152 aof priority 220 to ensure that the Councils stated Gas Access Procedures are applied and that the Authority demonstrates that all REASONABLE STEPS have been taken to achieve access for Landlords Gas Safety Inspections.

Page 4 EMPTY COUNCIL PROPERTIES

Total Empty Properties

Direction % Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 COMMENTARY of Travel Empty East 139 134 114 „ 2.5% North Carr 20 32 36 ‰ 1.2% 258 properties are currently awaiting/undergoing repairs or awaiting relet - this is higher than the 243 at the end of March 2016; 3 are undergoing option appraisal by the Housing Strategy Team; 224 are scheduled for Northern 89 80 66 „ 1.7% demolition in regeneration areas plus 47 empty flats at Gorthorpe; and 74 regeneration properties to be West 65 68 83 ‰ 2.9% brought back into use. Wyke 9 11 12 ‰ 1.4% Park 179 185 199 ‰ 5.0% UPDATE: Demolition at Gorthorpe is now complete and the 47 properties will come off the figures for Riverside 103 100 96 „ 1.8% December. Citywide 604 610 606 „ 2.5%

Area Management Housing Investment Services Housing Strategy and Renewal Properties Ready For Relet Properties For Repair Properties for Options Appraisal and Transfer/Disposal Grand Nov-16 Bringing Awaiting Agreed CLG Routine Sheltered Routine Major Option Planned Regen. Regen Total Total back into Financial Total transfer/ Total Decommis Voids Voids Voids Repairs Appraisal Demolition Improvem't Demolition use Allocation sale sioned East 21 4 25 7 10 1 0 18 2 0 0 1 68 71 114 3 North Carr 12 1 13 14 7 1 0 22 0 0 0 1 0 1 36 0 Northern 6 1 7 6 6 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 47 47 66 0 West 17 3 20 16 10 0 0 26 1 0 0 36 0 37 83 0 Wyke 6 0 6 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 4 12 0 Park 13 1 14 7 19 0 0 26 0 0 0 5 154 159 199 0 Riverside 45 0 45 12 10 0 0 22 0 0 2 27 0 29 96 0 Citywide 120 10 130 64 62 2 0 128 3 0 2 74 269 348 606 3

Average Time For Void Repairs Completed In Month COMMENTARY

Direction Target 2016/17 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 of Travel Days Year East 15.1 16.7 16.9 ‰ 19 18.3 North Carr 13.8 12.2 19.9 ‰ 19 18.0 Northern 18.8 16.0 16.2 ‰ 19 17.3 West 22.3 17.8 17.1 „ 19 18.5 Wyke 16.0 17.7 15.3 „ 19 16.7 Park 19.6 18.9 18.2 „ 19 20.0 Page 153 of 220 Riverside 18.6 21.4 20.5 „ 19 18.1 CITYWIDE 17.8 17.7 18.3 ‰ 19 18.2 Page 5 AVERAGE RELET TIME (calendar days)

Direction 2016/17 Position at Average Relet Time 2016-17 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 of Travel Year Mar 2016 40 East 33 51 31 „ 37 30 35 30 North Carr 13 23 23 ‰ 21 23 2531 Northern 22 22 26 25 25 20 ‰ 1531 West 27 30 35 ‰ 30 27 10 Wyke 105 38 26 5 26 „ 30 0 Park 29 26 31 ‰ 27 24 Riverside 39 34 42 ‰ 36 32 31 CITYWIDE 30 32 31 „ 31 28 31 31 Notes COMMENTARY Direction of Travel 1 No change BV212 definition: the time in calendar days There have been 1,295 relets citywide April to November 2016. „ Improving from the date when the tenancy is ‰ Worsening terminated up to and including the date when the new tenancy agreement starts. Major repair time is not included. Citywide Target 2016/17 23 days

Rent Loss

Direction 2016/17 2016/17 Notes Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Target of Travel Year TO DATE £ CITYWIDE 1.77% 1.87% 1.82% „ 1.79% £1,216,332 < 1.95% Rent loss calculates the amount of rent lost through properties being empty as a percentage of the total rent East 2.31% 2.36% 1.86% „ 2.38% £301,545 roll (the total amount of potential rent collectable for the North Carr 1.65% 1.80% 2.01% ‰ 1.69% £144,603 period if all dwellings had been occupied). This includes Northern 1.63% 1.49% 1.14% „ 1.36% £153,316 all empty dwellings except those that are not expected to West 1.80% 1.89% 2.24% ‰ 1.86% £151,178 be let as dwellings again - these properties are excluded Wyke 1.36% 1.55% 1.93% ‰ 1.64% £40,228 from both the numerator and denominator of the Park 1.30% 1.48% 1.47% „ 1.50% £159,372 calculation. Riverside 1.86% 2.08% 2.20% ‰ 1.85%Page 154 £266,091 of 220

Page 6 NEW TENANT SATISFACTION - PROPERTY CONDITION

Direction Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 2016/17 of Travel Satisfaction - Property Condition East 100.0% 100.0% 90.0% ‰ 98.2% 100% North Carr 100.0% 50.0% 100.0% „ 93.7% 95% Northern 95.5% 89.5% 100.0% „ 91.5% West - - - 1 100.0% 90% Wyke - - - 1 0.0% 85% Park 93.8% 93.3% 100.0% „ 91.8% Riverside - - - 1 100.0% 80% CITYWIDE 95.7% 89.4% 97.9% „ 93.8% 75%

Notes Citywide Target 70% Satisfaction figures are taken from the new 2016/17 90.0% tenant survey. Only those "very satisfied" or 65% "satisfied" are classed as satisfied. Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Direction of Travel 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 1 No change 438 responses from 1,295 relets this year gives us a margin of error of 1.8% at the 95% „ Improving confidence level. ‰ Worsening

Overall, how satisfied were you with the condition of your new home when you moved in?

East North Carr Northern West Wyke Park Riverside CITYWIDE 2016/17 No % No % No % No % No % No % No % No % Very Satisfied (A) 108 96.4% 62 78.5% 74 56.9% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 88 80.0% 5 100.0% 339 77.4%

Fairly Satisfied (B) 2 1.8% 12 15.2% 45 34.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 11.8% 0 0.0% 72 16.4% Neither Satisfied nor 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 3 2.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 5 1.1% dissatisfied (C ) Fairly Dissatisfied (D) 1 0.9% 3 3.8% 5 3.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2.7% 0 0.0% 12 2.7%

Very Dissatisfied (E) 1 0.9% 1 1.3% 3 2.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 4.5% 0 0.0% 10 2.3%

TOTAL 112 100% 79 100% 130 100% 2 100% 0 0% 110 100% 5 100% 438 100%

% Satisfied (A+B) 110 98.2% 74 93.7% 119 91.5% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 101 91.8% 5 100.0% 411 93.8% Page 155 of 220 % Dissatisfied (D+E) 2 1.8% 4 5.1% 8 6.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 7.3% 0 0.0% 22 5.0% Page 7 RENT COLLECTION

Direction of 2016/17 Position at Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Rent Collection 2016-17 Travel Year Mar 2016 100% East 94.62% 99.01% 97.35% ‰ 97.16% 97.73% 97.50%99% 98% North Carr 95.00% 98.69% 96.07% ‰ 96.39% 97.26% 97.50% City Target 97% 97.38% Northern 94.86% 100.38% 96.25% ‰ 96.37% 97.50%96% West 94.17% 98.35% 96.51% ‰ 96.59% 97.61% 97.50%95% Wyke 95.86% 100.25% 98.95% ‰ 97.68% 98.70% 97.50%94% Park 95.92% 99.43% 96.92% ‰ 97.41% 98.05% 97.50% Riverside 94.30% 98.94% 96.84% ‰ 96.51% 97.05% 97.50% CITYWIDE 94.83% 99.21% 96.79% ‰ 96.78% 97.54% 97.50%

Notes COMMENTARY Direction of Travel 1 No change BV 66a definition: the numerator for the „ Improving calculation is made up of the total rent ‰ Worsening collected (including arrears) from current tenants. The denominator is the total rent available. This is made up of the rent Citywide Target available to be collected on all occupied 2016/17 97.50%

Former Tenant Arrears Created 2016/17 Evictions For Rent Arrears

Tenancies No. in % in Arrears FTA 2016/17 % evicted Ceased Arrears Arrears Created (£) Payments East 341 175 51.3% £70,289 £18,733 East 9 0.30% North Carr 198 96 48.5% £60,803 £29,638 North Carr 14 0.69% Northern 265 146 55.1% £74,634 £24,646 Northern 9 0.34% West 191 111 58.1% £40,606 £15,496 West 2 0.11% Wyke 57 23 40.4% £6,801 £3,010 Wyke 1 0.17% Park 296 153 51.7% £48,012 £22,098 Park 4 0.16% Riverside 396 226 57.1% £136,113Page £33,325 156 of 220 Riverside 12 0.35% Citywide 1,744 930 53.3% £437,257 £146,946 Citywide 51 0.32%

Page 8 RIGHT TO BUY SALES

Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 2016/17 Monthly Right to Buy Sales

East 2 6 5 30 40 North Carr 7 5 4 24 30 Northern 3 9 6 41 West 5 1 1 18 20 Wyke 2 1 1 10 Park 6 3 1 23 10 Riverside 3 5 4 44 0 CITYWIDE 28 30 22 190

2016/17 Right to Buy Sales Detail

Property Type Beds East North Carr Northern West Wyke Park Riverside House 2 10 8 9 4 3 8 8 House 3 14 13 28 13 6 14 19 House 4 4 2 4 1 1 1 Bungalow 1 1 Bungalow 2 1 Flat (2 Storey) 1 1 1 1 2 Flat (2 Storey) 2 4 Flat (3-5 Storey) 2 5 Flat (6-9 Storey) 2 3 Flat (10+ Storey) 2 1

COMMENTARY

Page 157 of 220

Page 9 NEIGHBOURHOOD NUISANCE - ASB

This performance information has been generated by the Neighbourhood Nuisance Team database, it is a summary of the Neighbourhood Nuisance team's activity and the information is cross tenure.

Table 1: Respond To Service Requests Within Published Timescale (Target 90%)

Total D.o.T. Number of ASB Incidents Reported Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Year Requests East 100.0% 100.0% 97.3% ‰ 99.4% 496 450 400 North Carr 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1 100.0% 245 350 Northern 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1 99.8% 429 300 West 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1 100.0% 286 250 Wyke 96.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1 98.5% 133 200 Park 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1 100.0% 351 150 Riverside 100.0% 99.0% 100.0% „ 99.5% 599 100 CITYWIDE 99.0% 99.0% 99.4% „ 99.6% 2,539 50 0 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Table 2: ASB Incidents Reported - Year to date by area and type

East North Carr Northern West Wyke Park Riverside Total COMMENTARY Street Drinking/Drunken Behaviour 21 3 12 5 15 11 24 91 Intimidation/Harassment/ Table 1 shows the total number of ASB 110 54 115 62 30 96 160 627 Verbal Abuse incidents reported and the % responded to Begging & Vagrancy 1 0 1 0 4 0 9 15 within the agreed targets for each month of Criminal Behaviour 47 14 32 12 14 28 33 180 the last quarter. The target for responding to incidents reported is 2 working days. This Drugs - Not Alcohol 33 20 20 16 7 26 56 178 response will usually be a telephone call to Environmental Nuisance 2 1 1 2 1 0 10 17 the customer and if this is not successful a Throwing missiles 37 32 33 31 13 44 42 232 letter and information pack is automatically Neighbour Dispute 23 8 33 13 12 19 33 141 sent within the 2 day target. Noise 143 73 116 86 27 75 135 655 Nuisance From Pets / Animals 31 14 22 18 6 16 28 135 Nuisance from Property 18 21 27 26 2 14 37 145 Prostitution & Soliciting 3 0 1 1 0 0 9 14 Vehicle Related Nuisance 24 3 13 10 3 20 18 91 Page 158 of 220 Domestic Violence & Abuse 3 1 3 2 0 2 7 18 Total 496 244 429 284 134 351 601 2,539 Total Last Year (2015/16) 579 374 531 371 153 528 835 3,371 Page 10 CAPITAL AND OTHER COMPLETED PLANNED OUTPUTS Investment Period - April to November 2016 Original Cumulative Forecast to Ref. Work Element Outputs Delivered East North Carr Northern West Wyke Park Riverside Annual to 30 Nov 30 Nov Forecast Planned 16 221 10 18 37 1 330 633 747 1,200 1 Heating Void/Responsive 28 18 36 22 8 28 35 175 117 200 Total 44 239 46 40 45 29 365 808 864 1,400 Planned 10 4 7 4 1 6 39 71 59 100 2 Rewires Void/Responsive 7 7 9 2 1 9 11 46 77 120 Total 17 11 16 6 2 15 50 117 136 220 Planned 1 2 11 5 7 5 21 52 18 40 3 Kitchen Void/Responsive 42 17 41 27 12 50 45 234 478 770 Total 43 19 52 32 19 55 66 286 496 810 Planned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Bathroom Void/Responsive 15 6 26 8 5 38 14 112 156 240 Total 15 6 26 8 5 38 14 112 156 240 Planned 43 0 0 51 288 137 78 597 420 700 5 Roof Void/Responsive 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 43 0 0 51 288 137 78 597 420 700 6 Insulation Planned 5 8 4 3 3 7 8 38 80 200 Planned 2 1 1 2 0 0 4 10 0 0 7 Door Void/Responsive 135 113 140 50 11 152 70 671 813 1,500 Total 137 114 141 52 11 152 74 681 813 1,500 8 Window Planned 11 3 10 1 1 14 3 43 31 65 9 Electrical Inspection Planned 660 126 563 390 74 586 324 2,723 2,336 3,500 10 Pre-paint repairs & Painting Planned 730 275 124 390 74 586 324 2,503 2,503 tbc 12 CSDPA Reactive Adaptations 257 153 215 177 48 186 214 1,250 1,439 2,285 Total Outputs/Area 1,962 954 1,197 1,150 570 1,805 1,520 9,158 9,274 10,920

Page 159 of 220 Page 11

Page 160 of 220 Fly tipping, litter and garden action Date reported & who to Date escalated Escalated 2nd Escalated 3rd Date Date Address Issue include service request 1st - Action time - Action time - Action completed number Taken Taken Taken general rubbish and electric 18.11.16 street scene email scooter 22.11.16 9 bonfire sites street scene email 22.11.16 remove pile of wood street scene email rear communal garden, 24.11.16 HFS email double matteress lots of rubbish bags to rear garden letter 1 24.11.16 21.11.16 srn 6829572 26.11.16 garden sent 24.11.16 30.11.16 2 x leather chairs HFS email report of bags of support worker service 7.12.16 rubbish,rugs communal request 6839719. sent to garden HFS email 8.12.16 bags dog mess rear garden srn 6841145

Key: Escalated at least twice at 1st escalation Completed

Page 161 of 220 Fly tipping, litter and garden action Date reported & Date escalated Escalated 2nd Escalated 3rd who to - include Date Date Address Issue 1st - Action time - Action time - Action service request completed Taken Taken Taken number 27.10.16 Rubbish filling entire garden

Key: Escalated at least twice at 1st Completed

Page 162 of 220 Fly tipping, litter and garden action Date escalated - Escalated 2nd Escalated 3rd Date Address Issue Date reported Date Completed 1st time time

.first garden letter visit done photos sent and photos taken and second third garden fourth garden 25/10/2016 14 upavon garden furniture and general rubbish 25/10/2016 taken letter sent letter sent letter sent visit done and agreed to visit 22/11/2016 54 Kinloss Garth rubish in garden 22/11/2016 again 8/12/16

02/12/2016 28 cosford Garth rubbish and possible non occupation 02/12/2016 On agenda for patchwalk in 14/12/2016 85 Yeadon Garth Rubbish and worktops etc 14/12/2016 January 2017 On agenda for Rubbish in communal area, letter to patchwalk in 14/12/2016 26-32 Biggin all tenants in block 14/12/2016 January 2017 On agenda for Rubbish and TV, wheel and broken patchwalk in 14/12/2016 52 Biggin Avenue garden furniture 14/12/2016 January 2017 Premier to remove if not 20 Tyres in communal area, letter done so by 14/12/2016 8 - 14 Biggin Avenue sent to remove 14/12/2016 21/12/2016 On agenda for Private tenant - polite letter to patchwalk in 15/12/2016 121 Oakington Garth remove items stored in garden 14/12/2016 January 2017 front 55 Haydock 20/12/16 20/12/2016 Garth Contaminated brown bin 6855566 20/12/16 20/12/2016 Side 108 Digby Garth Double mattress 6855579 Page 163 of 220 Side 18 Cosford 20/12/16 20/12/2016 Garth T.V. & fish tank 6855584 Rear 15 Cosford 20/12/16 20/12/2016 Garth Contaminated brown bin 6855504

20/12/2016 Double mattress 20/12/16 655609

20/12/2016 Burnt out car seat & bonfire remains 20/12/16 655618 04/01/2017 Broken T.V. & bed frame 04/01/2017 04/01/2017 Buggy & 2 bags of rubbish 04/01/2017 04/01/2017 Bed frame filled with rubbish 04/01/2017

Key: Escalated at least twice at 1st escalation Completed

Page 164 of 220

Report to the North Carr Area Committee Wards : Bransholme East, 18 January 2017 Bransholme West, King’s Park

North Carr Area Funds

Report of the City Neighbourhoods and Housing Manager

This item is not exempt Therefore exempt reasons are not applicable

This is a Non-Key Decision

1. Purpose of the Report and Summary

1.1 To update Members on the Ward Budget Revenue and Capital unallocated funds remaining for 2016/17 for each ward.

1.2 To inform members of the decisions taken by the Area Committee and under delegated powers from 1 April 2016 to 14 December 2016.

1.3 To seek a decision on the new applications from URBaN and North Carr Carers which cannot be considered under delegated powers as ward members are members of the board of URBaN and North Carr Carers.

1.4 To inform members of S106 monies available in Kings Park ward and to seek members views on the best use of these monies as per paragraph 6.7 – 6.18 below.

2. Recommendations

2.1 That the budget balance for each Ward for the remainder of year 2016/2017 be noted.

2.2 That the Area Committee notes the delegated decisions taken by ward members as set out in Appendices 1 and 2.

2.3 That the Area Committee agrees to fund the two applications from North Carr Carers but that funds are only released on receipt of a signed funding agreement and that there is no outstanding monitoring from any previous funding awarded through the Ward Budget.

Author: Page 165 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 1 of 12 2.4 That the Area Committee agrees to fund three applications from URBaN but that funds are only released on receipt of a signed funding agreement and that there is no outstanding monitoring from any previous funding awarded through the Ward Budget.

2.5 That approval of the Easter event also be subject to the Area Team first receiving written confirmation from the landowner that the event can be held on the named site and confirmation that URBaN has notified ESAG (Event Safety Advisory Group) of that event and received details of how they will implement any ESAG recommendations.

2.6 That the sum of £58,347.21 from s.106 funds (Application Ref:31155B, Legal File Ref: 79585/211B) be approved as a contribution towards improvements at Bude Park.

2.7 That the sum of £97,226 from s.106 funds (Application Ref:31155B, Legal File Ref: 79585/211B) be approved as a contribution towards the Foredyke/Wilberforce Woods project

3. Reasons for Recommendations

3.1 The use of Ward Budget funding is to support schemes within local neighbourhoods for the betterment of local communities. This contributes to the Council’s aims and objectives insofar as projects are consistent with local priorities as may be identified from time to time.

3.2 This report relates to five applications from URBaN and North Carr Carers as Ward Members are also board members of URBaN and North Carr Carers they cannot determine the applications due to the conflict of interest, so they have been referred to the Area Committee for a decision. 3.3 The s.106 Planning Obligation Protocol, December 2014 (updated December 2015) requires project details and costings to be endorsed by Planning Services and then confirmed by the Area Committee.

4. Impact on other Executive Committees (including Area Committees)

4.1 The matter relates solely to North Carr Area Committee.

5. Background

5.1 The process for considering applications was agreed by this Committee on 19 November 2014.

The Committee agreed that the Assistant City Manager (Neighbourhoods) be authorised to approve all applications for funding from the Ward

Author: Page 166 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 2 of 12 Budgets following consultation with the relevant ward members, except:

a) where applications relate to more than one ward, or b) where unanimous agreement cannot be reached by relevant ward councillors, in which cases the application will be submitted to the relevant Area Committee for consideration

5.2 The process for considering applications for funding from s.106 monies was approved by the Planning Committee on 16 th December 2008, amended November 2015. Planning Committee delegated the allocation of sums received in connection with s.106 Agreements (for the provision or enhancement of public open space and /or children’s play space) to Area Committees.

5.3 The Legal Agreement made under s.106 states what money is to be used for and specifies timescales in which it must be used. If they are not used in accordance with the terms of the agreement, it could be challenged and the Council be required to repay the money (plus interest), so it is essential to follow these criteria:-

(i) it is used for the purpose specified only, e.g. provision or enhancement of public open space and/or children’s play space in the vicinity of the development;

(ii) the allocated project should be carried out within the timescale specified in the Agreement;

(iii) it does not include any provision for future maintenance;

(iv) it should not be used to pay for schemes that have already been carried out.

6. Issues for Consideration

6.1 Remaining funds for each ward are set out below. The Community Safety Fund has now been merged with the Capital Ward Budget and any unallocated funds from the Community Safety Fund are included in the tables. The balances detailed do not include the new applications that have been submitted for consideration at this meeting.

Author: Page 167 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 3 of 12 6.2 Bransholme East Ward

Fund Unallocated Funds remaining 2016/17

Capital £5,610.92

Revenue £8,721.26

Section 106 £12,149.82

6.3 An application has been received from North Carr Carers for £1,025.98 from Bransholme East Capital to purchase IT Equipment (computer, printer, software and licences) to be used for administration and a further application for £3,000.00 from Bransholme East Revenue to add to existing funding to continue the North Carr Carers Service for the period January 2017.

6.4 Three applications have been received from URBaN: • £2,216.32 from Bransholme East Capital to purchase IT Equipment (computer, printer, software and licences) to be used for administration purposes and to purchase 20 folding tables to be used by URBaN for events • £700.00 from Bransholme East Revenue Budget to establish a food bank piloting on North Bransholme for residents to access discounted food produce, and • £2,000.00 from the Bransholme East Revenue Budget a further application to deliver an Easter family fun day on North Bransholme to include an Easter egg hunt, Easter bonnet parade, fairground rides, crafts and other fun activities for local families.

6.5 Bransholme West Ward

Fund Unallocated Funds remaining 2016/17

Capital £45,782.73

Revenue £4,849.04

Section 106 £10,625.94

There are no applications that require Area Committee consideration.

Author: Page 168 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 4 of 12 6.6 Kings Park Ward

Fund Unallocated Funds remaining 2016/17

Capital £13,893.88

Revenue £521.89

Section 106 £155,573.21

6.7 Greenspace and sports provision Bude Park

Section 106 monies have previously been allocated to Bude Park to provide five sports pitches, to include pitch renovation, changing facilities and toilets, using renewable energy to keep onward revenue costs to a minimum.

It is proposed that in addition, part of the s106 funding from the Netto scheme (after Foredyke/Wilberforce Woods allocation) of £58,347.21 is also allocated to the Bude Park project . The purpose of this is to add a footpath from entrances at Ennerdale and the Kingswood retail area. The total s106 fund sought for Bude Park monies equates to £408,002.52.

Legal ref. Amount A/C record 52223/19 (part) £146,395.64 18/11/15 minute 47 78716 £40,912.20 19/9/12 minute 42 18/11/15 minute 47 52223/19 (part) £130,000.00 18/9/13 minute actual figure 42 received 18/11/15 minute £162,347.00 47 79585/211B £58,347 TBD (part) Approval 31155B Total £408,002.52

6.8 A breakdown of costs for this project is as follows:

• Feasibility work - £8K • New changing rooms/toilet block facility (but not forming part of a Rangers Office) - £145,000 Author: Page 169 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 5 of 12 • Refurbishing of existing building to provide toilets - £38,000 • Sports pitch improvements to 5 pitches including re-turfing and reseeding/levelling as appropriate - £68,308 • Footpaths – £58,347 • Detailed design/procurement fees including 16.05% NPS (excluding the fees for planning application) - £56,347.52 • Contingency - £25K • Construction inflation - £9,000 • Total costs (from above) – £408,002.52

6.9 Funding is anticipated to be released on a phased basis and on satisfactory completion of works, to be determined by the Area Team in conjunction with the Area Committee. Details will be provided as part of the tender submission. Consultation on Bude Park works has been ongoing since a master plan was produced in 2011.

6.10 Planning Services have been consulted and have made the following comments “Significant s106 funds are derived from development at Kingswood and the resulting planning obligations embedded as part of the 2004 planning permission. The scheme is supported in principle by Planning Services, as it delivers much needed sports facilities in serving the northern part of the city and the growing community needs of new occupants at Kingswood. It addresses important health and well-being objectives. They also accord with the current updated aspirations embedded in the Kingswood Area Action Plan, recently endorsed by the City Council”.

6.11 Foredyke/Wilberforce Woods (Wilberdyke)

S106 monies available through the former Netto site include £31,115.05 towards public art and £124,458.16 towards local open space, a total of £155,573.21 (Legal Ref 31155B). £58,347 is allocated to Bude Park leaving £97,226 towards this project . A feasibility study has been undertaken for the land behind the former Netto store to develop a section of land to connect Foredyke Green and Wilberforce Woods to include an amphitheatre, mound, grassland paths, culverts, furniture, interpretation boards and tree planting. Flood risk works that form part of the scheme are separately funded.

6.12 Total estimated costs were £81,338 (including contingency) as at October 2016, but adjustments are needed, as follows:

• Preliminaries – £6,846.70 • Amphitheatre and mound construction – £10,305 • Street furniture and interpretation boards – £24,450 • Footpaths – £11,012

Author: Page 170 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 6 of 12 • Planting – £22,700 • Contingency - £6,025.10 • 3% construction inflation (£2,440) since feasibility study (source NPS) • Fees £13,446 • Total new estimated project costs - £97,225

6.13 Planning services have been consulted and have commented as follows “The Kingswood AAP (Policy KAAP12) suggests the involvement of residents in the development of detailed proposals’. This appears to have occurred but it would be useful to know how/why the proposals turned out this way and the strength of public opinion on options?

All weather perimeter paths were also suggested as a priority as part of this scheme, but these do not appear to feature in the draft, presumably because the costs are too great or these are planned for subsequent phases of improvement.

Elements of the Wilberdyke scheme include new trees and planting that will add visual and nature conservation interest. The flood relief element of the project also seems appropriate in dealing with run-off from the roundabout but further details about its capacity to absorb water should be detailed as part of any submission for planning permission. There are some concerns about the choice of timber material for the entrance and seating, so replacement/repair contingency is suggested. I would also dispute the cost increase of 3% since October 2016”.

6.14 To address these comments it is proposed that ongoing maintenance for the first five years will be taken on by the Kingswood Residents Association through volunteering opportunities and by raising funds through grant opportunities.

6.15 Consultation on the project has been through the July edition of Kings Park News and through the Kingswood Residents Association and their Facebook page. This confirmed support for the project through over 100 responses received, with a summary of what was said in appendix 4. Consultation will be ongoing and form part of the next Kings Park newsletter for spring 2017 to ensure that local opinion can be accommodated. 6.16 During detailed design the choice of materials will be considered to achieve longevity and eliminate or reduce the need for short term replacements.

The omission of a path network on the wider site is deemed not affordable at this stage of the project. Attempts are being made to

Author: Page 171 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 7 of 12 6.17 attract further funding to consider this at a later date.

The suggested 3% cost increase through inflation will be tested through a robust competitive tendering exercise once detail designs have been agreed.

7. Options and Risk Assessment

7.1 The URBaN applications for funding are in keeping with a tenants and residents group wishing to promote services and deliver events and activities within the Bransholme East Ward. Urban wish to purchase IT equipment, create a foodbank and to host an Easter event. URBaN have the volunteers with the skills and abilities to fulfil the request and deliver events.

7.2 In respect of the application from North Carr Carers for funding towards continued funding for staff wages and running costs, including the purchase of IT equipment. This service is a free service with no other income and is wholly grant dependant. This service is to help reduce social isolation for elderly and vulnerable adults to be delivered by the paid workers known to their clients.

7.3 The options for both applicants and each of the five applications are to support, reject or consider in part.

8. Risk Assessment

8.1 URBaN is an established tenants and residents group who have delivered a number of events in the ward. URBaN was instrumental in enabling the community led stock transfer in North Bransholme.

8.2 The performance risk will be mitigated by the Area Team insisting on a funding agreement being completed prior to any funding being released, with all outstanding monitoring completed for any previous funding. The Area Team will also monitor any new project in line with the ward budget criteria.

8.3 In addition any event needs evidence that the event is registered with ESAG and there is written permission of the land owner for the event to take place as a pre requisite of funding. The event organiser will need to evidence that it can comply with all ESAG recommendations before funding is released

Author: Page 172 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 8 of 12 8.4 The event organiser needs to provide a site plan, risk assessment and public liability insurance, in advance of the event taking place.

8.5 For all applications the purchase of equipment must follow the procurement rules laid down in the grant guidance note criteria, seeking sufficient competitive quotes.

8.6 North Carr Carers is a relatively new social enterprise and was awarded £9,788.50 in March 2016 and £2,000 in November 2016 from Bransholme East Revenue Budget, making this the third application in 12 months. In December 2016 they have applied for £15,000 from the Leader’s Contingency Budget and have been awarded £24,700 from Public Health. The request for £3000 will sustain the service for a short time until the end of January 2017.

8.7 There is no mechanism to generate income, as the service is provided free to all, so this service will remain grant dependant. The project will not be sustainable without further grant funding. It is likely that further applications will be made for ward funds in the future to sustain the project.

8.8 The Area Team require a signed funding agreement prior to any funding being released for all applications with all outstanding monitoring completed for any previous funding and will monitor any new project in line with the ward budget criteria.

8.9 For all applications the purchase of equipment must follow the procurement rules laid down in the grant guidance note criteria, seeking sufficient competitive quotes.

9. Consultation

9.1 Consultation has been undertaken with relevant ward members and the Parks & Open Spaces Development Manager of Hull City Council.

10. Comments of the Town Clerk (Monitoring Officer)

10.1 Funding may be made available to support the applications recommended for approval under S. 1 Localism Act 2011. However, Members’ attention is drawn to paragraph 2.6 of the Ward Budget Criteria, which advocates against creating a reliance on Ward budgets for year-on-year funding. It is not clear that the North Carr Carers application meets all of the criteria. Author: Page 173 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 9 of 12

The schemes described in the report would appear to be an appropriate use of S. 106 funding.

11. Comments of the Section 151 Officer

11.1. The Section 151 Officer notes the report and has no further comments.

12.Comments of HR City Manager and compliance with the Equality Duty

12.1 The City HR Manager notes this report.

13. Comments of Overview and Scrutiny

13.1 This report has not been subject to scrutiny. (Sc4096)

14 Comments of the Portfolio Holder

14.1 This report is a non-executive decision therefore comments are not required.

Dave Richmond City Neighbourhoods and Housing Manager

Contact Officer: Chris Craven Telephone No: 616906

Officer Interests: None

Appendices

Appendix 1 Ward Budget Capital Spend 2016/17 Appendix 2 Ward Budget Revenue Spend 2016/17 Appendix 3 New Funding Applications Appendix 4 Community response to consultation on the Foredyke Green Author: Page 174 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 10 of 12 Appendix 5 North Carr 106 tables

Background Documents:

Ward Budget Project Applications & Summary Sheets North Carr 106 tables

Implications Matrix

This section must be completed and you must ensure that you have fully considered all potential implications

This matrix provides a simple check list for the things you need to have considered within your report

If there are no implications please state

I have informed and sought advice from HR, Yes Legal, Finance, Overview and Scrutiny and the Climate Change Advisor and any other key stakeholders i.e. Portfolio Holder, relevant Ward Members etc prior to submitting this report for official comments I have considered whether this report Yes requests a decision that is outside the Budget and Policy Framework approved by Council Value for money considerations have been Yes accounted for within the report

The report is approved by the relevant City Yes Manager I have included any procurement/commercial Yes issues/implications within the report

I have considered the potential media interest Yes in this report and liaised with the Media Team to ensure that they are briefed to respond to media interest. I have included any equalities and diversity Yes implications within the report and where necessary I have completed an Equalities Impact Assessment and the outcomes are included within the report Any Health and Safety implications are Yes included within the report

Author: Page 175 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 11 of 12 Any human rights implications are included Yes within the report I have included any community safety Yes implications and paid regard to Section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act within the report I have liaised with the Climate Change No Advisor and any environmental and climate change issues/sustainability implications are included within the report I have included information about how this Yes report contributes to the City Plan/ Area priorities within the report

Author: Page 176 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 12 of 12

Appendix 3 Page 1 of 1

WARD Budget - SUMMARY OF APPLICATIONS

New Applications: For consideration by the Area Committee – 18 January 2017

APPLICANT PROJECT TARGET REQUESTED ALLOCATION

1. To establish a food bank URBaN To establish a food bank piloting on North Residents of the £700 Bransholme East on North Bransholme Bransholme for residents to access Bransholme East Ward Revenue Budget discounted food produce 2. To purchase I.T URBaN To purchase I.T Equipment (computer, Residents of the £2,216.32 Bransholme Equipment and folding printer, software and licence fees) to be Bransholme East Ward East Capital Budget tables used for Administration purposes and to purchase 20 folding tables to be used by Urban for events 3. Easter Event 2017 URBaN To deliver an easter family fun day on The local community £2,000 Bransholme East North Bransholme to include an easter egg Revenue Budget hunt, easter bonnet parade, fairground rides, crafts and other fun activities for local families 4. To purchase I.T North Carr To purchase I.T Equipment (computer, Users of the North Carr £1,025.98 Bransholme Equipment Carers printer, software and licences) to be used for Carers Service East Capital Budget administration purposes 5. Continuation of the North Carr To add to existing funding to continue the Users of the North Carr £3,000 Bransholme East North Carr Carers Carers North Carr Carers Service for the period Carers Service Revenue Budget Service January 2017

Page 177 of 220

Page 178 of 220 Bransholme East - CAPITAL CIB

BRANSHOLME EAST WARD CAPITAL BUDGET 2016/2017 Projects still current from previous years

Commitment Actual Spend brought forward per Oracle Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date from prev year 16/17 Commitment BHEA025 - CAP Urban Monks Trail community project 31.03.16 9,693.03 9,693.03 0.00

Total Commitments from prev financial year 9,693.03

Projects 2016/17 - Bransholme East Transfer of underspend budget 2015/16 9,693.03

Budget to allocate 2016/17 17,069.00

Actual Spend Amount Awarded per Oracle Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date £ (Commitment) 16/17 Commitment BHEA023 - CAP Bodmin Road Church (BHE43) Renovation of the former Pennine Rambler 25.04.16 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 To build and install a cross and path at the BHEA024 - CAP Urban (BHE45) memorial site on Grampion Way 16.06.16 690.00 690.00 0.00 BHEA025 - CAP Urban (BHE42) Monks Trail project 15.06.16 at Area Committee 2,562.97 2,562.97 0.00

Contribution towards the refurbishment of the BHEA026 - CAP Alpha Education Community Trust North Bransholme Community Centre 29.09.16 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 To produce & install 2 finger signposts near the BHEA027 - CAP North Carr Area Team (BHE59) new Urban bridge 23.09.16 1,145.00 1,145.00 Noddle Hill Nature Reserve Angling BHEA028 - CAP Club (BHE62) Presentation trophies for the presentation event 20.10.16 183.45 183.45 0.00 To develop the Bespoke Centre Community BHEA029 - CAP North Carr Area Team (BHE63) Garden 07.11.16 376.66 376.66

To install external security shutters at the Pennine BHEA030 - CAP Bridges Hull Centre 17.11.16 500.00 500.00 0.00

Balance unallocated 16/17 5,610.92 Total balance unallocated / uncommitted 5,610.92 Actual Oracle Spend 19,629.45 Page 179 of 220 Actual Spend Amount Awarded per Oracle Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date £ (Commitment) 16/17 Commitment Outstanding Commitments (allocated) 1,521.66

Page 180 of 220 Bransholme West - CAPITAL CIB Bransholme West - CAPITAL CIB 2016/17

Projects still current from previous years

Commitment Actual Spend brought forward per Oracle Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date from prev year 16/17 Commitment CIB CAP BW11 13/14 NCACT CCTV For the Stroud Crescent East play area 10.03.14 BHWE 002 - CAP NCACT Landscaping adjacent to 25 Deerhurst Grove 19.08.14 1,522.20 1,522.20 BHWE015 - CAP NCACT (BHW24a) Schools project linked to city of culture 04.03.16 20,000.00 8,350.00 11,650.00 Schools project linked to city of culture - Northcott BHWE015 - CAP NCACT (BHW24b) Special School

Total Commitments from prev financial year 21,522.20

Projects 2016/17 - Bransholme West Transfer of underspend budget 2015/16 31,506.18

Budget to allocate 2016/17 36,361.00

Actual Spend Amount Awarded per Oracle Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date £ (Commitment) 16/17 Commitment Bollards to rear of footpath on Littleham & rear of BHWE016 - CAP North Carr Area Team Sofham Farm to prevent vehicular access 05.04.16 350.00 350.00 0.00 BHWE017 - CAP North Carr Area/Housing Team Fencing at 28 Exton Close 23.11.16 212.25 212.25 0.00

Balance unallocated 16/17 35,798.75 Total balance unallocated / uncommitted 45,782.73 Actual Oracle Spend 8,700.00 Outstanding Commitments (allocated) 13,384.45

Page 181 of 220 Kings Park - CAPITAL CIB 2016/2017

Projects still current from previous years

Commitment Actual Spend brought forward per Oracle Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date from prev year 16/17 Commitment

KINGS002 CAP NCACT Bowmont Way Staple Barriers 04.07.14 84.77 84.77

To install new landscaping, birds mouth fencing KINGS010 - CAP NCACT (KP16) and planting to the green space on Bushey Park 18.09.15 1,142.00 1,142.00 0.00

3 signs on the Asda spine path naming the path KINGS011 - CAP NCACT (KP17) as Chalky Path 1M high 18.09.15 645.00 645.00 0.00

To look at a collection of TRO requests through Kingswood to include Poolsbrook, Kesteven/Ings Lane crossing for open vision, Attringham Park, KINGS012 - CAP NCACT Sovereign Way, Templewaters, Bushey Park 02.11.15 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00

To install a manual telescopic bollard at Woodheys to prevent vehicular access on the KINGS020 - CAP NCACT (KP23) Chalky Path 06.11.15 440.00 440.00 0.00 To react to the outcome of speed surveys and resident requests through highway safety KINGS021 - CAP North Carr Area Team (KP33) improvements throughout Kingswood 04.03.16 15,000.00 6,694.69 8,305.31

Total Commitments from prev financial year 21,311.77

Projects 2016/17 - Kings Park Transfer of underspend budget 2015/16 23,035.65

Budget to allocate 2016/17 37,530.00

Actual Spend Amount Awarded per Oracle Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date £ (Commitment) 16/17 Commitment To develop Wilberforce Woods/Foredyke Green Kingswood Residents Association mound area following completion of a feasibility KINGS022 - CAP (KP41) study 15.06.16 12,000 12,000 0.00

KINGS023 - CAP NCACT (KP42) Bollards on Ennerdale/Littondale junction 23.09.16 3,360.00 3,360.00 Highway buildout scheme on Kesteven Way KINGS024 - CAP North Carr Area Team (KP44) opposite the path leading to Marbury Park 11.10.16 10,000.00 10,000.00

Page 182 of 220 Balance unallocated 16/17 12,170.00 Total balance unallocated / uncommitted 13,893.88 Actual Oracle Spend 24,921.69 Outstanding Commitments (allocated) 21,750.08

Page 183 of 220

Page 184 of 220 Bransholme East - REVENUE CIB 2016/2017

Projects still current from previous years

Commitment brought forward Actual Spend Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date from prev year per Oracle 15/16 Commitment Bespoke Centre Community Garden - Purchase tools and CIB REV BE15 13/14 NCACT plants etc 03.02.14 29.45 29.45 BHEA 010 - REV NCACT To provide an A4 colour ward newsletter 18.11.14 163.00 163.00

BHEA021 - REV NCACT To fund a 4 page colour ward newsletter for January 2016 13.01.16 135.00 135.00 Noddle Hill Nature Reserve Angling 2nd contributuion towards the pond maintenance project BHEA025 - REV Club (BHE28) (BHEA016 REV) 31.03.16 412.00 412.00 0.00

Total Commitments from prev financial year 739.45

Projects 2016/17 - Bransholme East Transfer of underspend budget 2015/16 606.69

Budget to allocate 2016/17 33,119.00

Amount Awarded Actual Spend Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date £ (Commitment) per Oracle 16/17 Commitment

BHEA026 - REV Friends of Furness (BHE40) Groups Insurance 19.04.16 403.38 403.38 0.00 To produce a newsletter to North Bransholme & parts of BHEA027 - REV Urban (BHE41) the garths 11.05.16 at Area Committee 1,750.00 1,750.00 0.00 Garden party to celebrate the Queens 90th Birthday on BHEA028 - REV North Carr Carers 10th June 11.05.16 at Area Committee 789.60 789.60 0.00 Urban Bransholme Beach Day BHEA029 - REV (BHE47) To host a free family beach day on 10th August 2016 15.06.16 at Area Committee 2,236.00 2,236.00 0.00 To commission a bid writer to produce application for City BHEA030 - REV Urban (BHE46) of Culture 15.06.16 at Area Committee 250.00 250.00 0.00 BHEA031 - REV North Carr Area Team (BHE48) To produce a 4 page colour ward newsletter 09.06.16 300.00 165.00 135.00 To host a Halloween event on North Bransholme for the BHEA032 - REV Urban (BHE50) local community in the Ash Plantation 21.09.16 at Area Committee 2,800.00 2,800.00 0.00 To host a firework display on 5th November on North BHEA033 - REV Urban (BHE51) Bransholme for the local community at Dales Centre 21.09.16 at Area Committee 5,776.00 5,776.00 0.00 To host a festival of light event for the local community in BHEA034 - REV Urban (BHE52) the Ash Plantation 21.09.16 at Area Committee 5,250.00 5,250.00 0.00 To provide a Christmas Meal for the Elderly vulnerable BHEA035 - REV Urban (BHE53) residents within the ward 21.09.16 at Area Committee 900.00 900.00 0.00 To provide Christmas food hampers to elderly vulnerable BHEA036 - REV Urban (BHE54) residents within the ward Page 185 of 21.09.16220 at Area Committee 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 To add existing funding for the continuation of the North BHEA038 - REV North Carr Carers (BHE56) Carr Carers service until 31st December 2016 21.09.16 at Area Committee 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 To hire a van for 3 events Halloween, Firework Event & BHEA039 - REV Urban (BHE64) Festival of light to transport equipment 16.11.16 at Area Committee 560.00 560.00 To transport and accompany young people to weekly BHEA040 - REV Bridges Hull swimming lessons at Ennerdale Leisure Centre 21.11.16 250 250 0.00

Balance unallocated 16/17 8,854.02 Total balance unallocated / uncommitted 8,721.26 Actual Oracle Spend 23,981.98 Outstanding Commitments (allocated) 1,022.45

Page 186 of 220 Bransholme West - REVENUE CIB 2016/2017

Projects still current from previous years

Actual Commitment Spend per brought forward Oracle Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date from prev year 15/16 Commitment To commission Highways to undertake a site survey on Holwell CIB REV BW01 14/15 NCACT Road 12.06.14 675.00 675.00

Total Commitments from prev financial year 675.00

Projects 2016/17 - Bransholme West Transfer of underspend budget 2015/16 3,188.04

Budget to allocate 2016/17 7,017.00

Actual Spend per Amount Awarded Oracle Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date £ (Commitment) 16/17 Commitment

BHWE008 - REV North Carr Carers (BHW27) Continuation of the Befriending service (July-mid August 2016) 16.06.16 3,000.00 3,000.00 0.00

BHWE009 - REV NCACT (BHW29) Fencing at 111 Roborough Close 07.10.16 430.75 430.75

BHWE010 - REV NCACT (BHW30) Bring out your rubbish day event to be held on 12.11.2016 07.10.16 1,250.25 60.00 1,190.25

Balance unallocated 16/17 2,336.00 Total balance unallocated / uncommitted 4,849.04 Actual Oracle Spend 3,060.00 Outstanding Commitments (allocated) 2,296.00

Page 187 of 220 Kings Park - REVENUE CIB 2016/2017

Projects still current from previous years

Actual Commitment Spend per brought forward Oracle Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date from prev year 16/17 Commitment KINGS 002 - REV NCACT To provide an A4 colour ward newsletter 18.11.14 172.00 172.00

KINGS006 - REV NCACT To carry out a PV2 on Kesteven Way near to the roundabout to establish the need for a crossing 06.05.15 157.50 157.50 (Previously Summer fair to be held on 12th June 2016)This has been re-allocated for the clearance Kingswood Residents Association of the brambles and brash to the mound area on wilberforce woods/foredyke green to better inform KINGS012 - REV (KP31) the feasibility study 04.03.16 1,642.00 1,642.00 0.00 KINGS013 - REV (KP22) NCACT To produce a colour 4 page newsletter - Delivery Feb 16 02.11.15 136.00 136.00

Total Commitments from prev financial year 2,107.50

Projects 2016/17 - Kings Park Transfer of underspend budget 2015/16 3,460.39

Budget to allocate 2016/17 7,246.00

Actual Spend per Amount Awarded Oracle Outstanding Project Number Name of organisation Project Details Approval Date £ (Commitment) 16/17 Commitment To repair 3 notice boards at Thorndale, rear of Asda and Bude allotments and to re-locate the Bude KINGS014 - REV North Carr Area Team (KP36) allotment board due to continued vandalism 08.04.16 535.00 535.00 0.00 KINGS015 - REV North Carr Area Team (KP37) Play area painting Chalky Path 14.04.16 3,657.00 3657.00 0.00 KINGS016 - REV North Carr Area Team (KP38) Feasibility study for foredyke green/Wilberforce Woods 28.04.16 3,200.00 2501.66 698.34 KINGS017 - REV North Carr Area Team (KP39) Design and print of 4,800 ward newsletter 4 page colour 18.05.16 300.00 123.00 177.00 KINGS018 - REV North Carr Area Team (KP45) To remove rotten birds mouth post and 2 rails and fill gap with planting on Bushey Park 28.10.16 85.00 85.00

KINGS019 - REV North Carr Area Team (KP43) To provide a 4,900 4 page colour newsletter to all residents within the ward to be delivered Feb 2017 30.09.16 300.00 300.00

Balance unallocated 16/17 -831.00 Total balance unallocated /uncommitted 521.89 Actual Oracle Spend 8,458.66 Outstanding Commitments (allocated) 1,725.84

Page 188 of 220 Kingswood - Foredyke/Wilberforce Woods - Resident survey Currently we have the following ideas. Which would you most like to see in this area? (Please tick all that you like) Response Answer Options Response Count Percent Woodland Walks 86.8% 33 Nature Trails 86.8% 33 History Routes/Trails 21.1% 8 Sculptures 28.9% 11 Outdoor Classroom 21.1% 8 Reflection/Prayer Area 2.6% 1 Reflection/Prayer Area 10.5% 4 Orchard 42.1% 16 Events/Sports Area 21.1% 8 Viewing Platform 7.9% 3 Outdoor Amphitheatre 57.9% 22 Sensory Area 23.7% 9 Additional Pond Areas 31.6% 12 Picnic Benches 63.2% 24 Decorative Lighting (Night Walks) 50.0% 19 Interactive Sculptures 28.9% 11

Currently we have the following ideas. Which would you most like to see in this area? (Please tick all that you like)

1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 (NightWalks) WoodlandWalks DecorativeLighting Events/SportsArea OutdoorClassroom HistoryRoutes/Trails OutdoorAmphitheatre Additional PondAreas Reflection/PrayerArea

Page 189 of 220

Page 190 of 220 Section 106 Money

North Carr Area Committee

Bransholme East Bransholme West Kings Park

TABLE 1 - MONEY AVAILABLE

Application Number Legal File Reference Address Money Available Date to be used by Ward To be used for (as specified in the s.106 Notes agreement) 29450A 79585/108A Zeals Garth £1,104.76 01/01/2018 Bransholme East Urban greenspace within near vicinity Part payment via instalments made from a total of £4,060. No further funds to be received via probate but ownership transfer could result in funds being recouped from new owners. 29450 79585/108 Zeals Garth £6,417.60 20/12/2019 Bransholme East Urban greenspace and play provision in the Payment made. near vicinity 7073A 79585/213 Roxburgh House Wawne Road £3,381.74 12/09/2019 Bransholme East Urban greenspace within near vicinity 32317 79585A Truro Close, Leads Road £10,625.94 30/11/2025 Bransolme West Urban greenspace within near vicinity 32075 79585/299 13 Leitholm Close £1,245.72 07/07/2019 Bransolme East Urban greenspace/play space in the vicinity

£22,775.76 Total available money Bransholme East £12,149.82 Bransholme West £10,625.94 Kings Park Total available money £22,775.76

TABLE 2 - PROJECT ALLOCATIONS/STATUS

Project name Ward Legal reference Area Committee Project description and Planning application Status Target Date to Spend s106 funds s106 remaining Notes record costs source (Concept/Procurment/Start/Completed) commitment and date Wilberdyke Park Kings Park 79585/211B (part) AC awaited Feasibility report details 25767B, Bude Road (Netto Procurement 13/04/2026 £96K £124,458.16 for public open space/play new mound, paths, trees, Scheme) in vicinity and £31,115.05 for public art planting and seating but £10K maintenance from ward budget. Bude park improvements Kings Park 78716, 52223/19 (x 2), 19/9/12. Minute 52. Sports provision 25767B Procurement 06/06/2022 40912.2, £146,395.64, Further details of scheme awaited from 79585/211B (part) (£40,912.20) and improvements, toilet and £162,347.00, Area Team 18/11/15 minute 47. changing room £49573.21 = Awaiting confirmation £399,228.05 from next AC about final allocation

TABLE 3 - PROJECT COMPLETIONS

Project name Ward Legal reference Area Committee Project description and Planning application Status Target Date to Spend s106 funds s106 remaining Notes record costs source (Concept/Procurment/Start/Completed) commitment and date Foredyke Green sports pitch Kings Park 52223/19 Pitch and drainage 25717B Completed £86,350 First stage payment from KPDC was improvements improvements (£86,350) an overpayment of £86,350 Heartlands Park Kings Park 79585/101 Improvements to park 7035S Completed June 2011 £15K including new play equipment (£15K) Kingswood Primary School Kings Park 52223/19 Not applicable New primary school 25717B Completed £3.9m New primary school funded though s106 totalling £3.9m Noddle Hill Park Bransholme East 79585/36, 84 and 97 BMX track and play 18541T, W and U and Completed £166K Total for all works £172K but mainly equipment including 28763C funded via s106 (£166K) outdoor table tennis Pennine Way skate park Bransholme East 79585/280 Not applicable Skate Park and play area 31846Page 191 of Skate 220 Park completed and play area Not applicable Works completed in lieu of s106 improvements improvements at procurement stage payments. S106 would generate £75,882 Total completions £4,167,350

TABLE 4 - PLANNING PERMISSIONS WITH s106

Date of Agreement Legal File No. App No Address For Payment due Date Receipt use by Ward Amount £ Notes 25/05/2004 52223/19 25717B Kingswood Kings Park Payment of s106 for public transport provision awaited. 21/12/2011 79585/108A 29450A Zeals Garth Provision, improvement or 12 months following Within 10 years Bransholme East £4,060 total required by Payments by agreed instalments being enhancement of urban commencement or no received £1,104 made but property subject to probate. greenspace in the vicinity latewr than occupation of No furthe rpayments anticiapted via of the development the 2nd dwelling probate but new owners would become liable once ownership is transferred.

16/08/2016 UU 16/00740/Full Bodmin Road Provision, improvement or Within 6 months of first Within 10 years Bransholme West £41,108 No development at sv 14/9/16 enhancement of urban occupation or 2 years from greenspace/play space commencment which ever within 1km of the is earliest. development

Note 1 - As of 1 April 2015 no more than 4 x s106's can be used for any 1 project location as required under Planning Obligation regulation changes unless these were signed prior to April 2010. Note 2 - Urban greenspace nearby usually means within 1km of the planning application site or further should a project involve a park. Child play provision should also be provided less than 500m and without need to cross major roads or other barriers accessed from the planning application site. Note 3 - In using s106 funds it must be demonstrated (as part of the bid for s106) how the residents of new housing derived from the planning approval and related s106 will benefit from the works/project indicated. Updates 22/01/2015 and circulated to Area Team 26/3/2015 and circ to Area Team 3/6/15 and circ to Area Team 12/10/15 and circ the Area Team 22/3/16 and circ Area Team 08/04/2016 09/09/2016 16/10/2016 6/11/16 and circ Ateam

Page 192 of 220

North Carr Area Committee 18 January 2017 Wards: Bransholme East Bransholme West and Kings Park

North Carr Area Neighbourhood Management Update

Briefing Note of the City Neighbourhood’s and Housing Manager

1. Purpose of the Briefing Note and Summary

1.1 To provide an update to the North Carr Area Committee on ward activity across the Area.

2. Bransholme East Ward Update

Achievements

2.1. The annual Festival of Light event saw hundreds of families participate in a candle lit procession through the streets led by Santa and Bagpipers. The procession finished at Ash Plantation which had been transformed into a Winter Wonderland and children enjoyed rides, face painting, met Santa and got a selection box.

2.2. 160 Christmas hampers crammed with food supplies were prepared by URBaN and delivered to local elderly and vulnerable residents in Bransholme East.

2.3. North Carr Carers were awarded a grant of £24,700 from the Hull City Council Health and Wellbeing fund to continue delivering their elderly befriending services. The project provides a free, befriending service to 686 elderly and vulnerable residents in the North Carr area to help promote health and wellbeing and reduce social isolation.

Progress Updates

2.4 The former North Bransholme Community Centre, now run by Alpha Education, is steadily expanding its range of activities for the local community and now holds a weekly women’s only fitness class for mums and babies through the US Girls initiative. They held a well-attended Christmas Fair with tombolas, raffles and a bake off competition to help raise their profile and fundraise for further refurbishments to the centre.

2.5. A programme of target hardening measures is planned around the Holderness Drain bank area to tackle the growing problem of nuisance motorbikes. These are based on recommendations of a joint working party comprising representatives from the North Carr and East AreaPage Teams, 193 Localof 220 Police, HCAL, ASB Team and HCC Parks and Open Spaces. The work will include new/replacement fencing, gates and strategically placed tree logs at vulnerable areas to deter motorbike access. Costs are being met by a mixture of Ward Budget funding from the 4 directly affected wards (Bransholme East, Longhill, Ings and Sutton) as well as contributions from the North Carr and East Housing Revenue Account budgets.

2.6. Achieve Potentials are now delivering free football sessions for 12-25 year olds at Kingswood Academy on a Tuesday, 8-9pm after securing funding from the Bransholme Trust.

Future Plans

2.7 URBaN are organising their first ever Easter community event on North Bransholme following many requests from local residents. Funded through the Bransholme East Ward Budget, there will be an Easter bonnet parade, egg hunt, arts/crafts and other family fun activities.

2.8 Bridges Hull has secured funding from the Bransholme East Ward Budget to compete in this year’s Rock Challenge event which is hugely popular with the local young people.

2.8. URBaN are planning to establish a food bank based on North Bransholme to help provide discounted food for local residents. They are working in partnership with FareShare, a national charity which delivers successful foodbanks throughout the UK.

3. Bransholme West Ward Update

Achievements

3.1. Cleeve Primary School have installed their unique Community Tree Sculpture. It is three metres high and takes pride of place in the school’s outdoor learning centre, it has a nautical theme and is made from ship’s rope. It highlights the link between the first families from Hessle Road who moved to the estate. Pupils helped build the tree which they will be adding to throughout 2017 to acknowledge their families. The Bransholme West Ward Budget funded 5k towards the project to celebrate Bransholme 50 and City of Culture.

3.2 The recent Bring Out Your Rubbish Day event funded by Bransholme West Ward Budget covering 922 properties at Axminster, Dalwood, Sheldon, Littleham and Roborough Closes collected 12,080 kg of rubbish and eight fridges.

3.3. Bude Road/Kingscott Close recently received a clear up at the underpass –plants were cut back, rubbish removed and the area swept.

Progress Updates

3.4. Bransholme 50 Partnership Meeting continues to meet regularly supported by the Area Team and a programme of events for 2017 is developing. Twenty large banners have been created and are available for display at events, residents’ pop up poetry has started to be displayed in public areas and film, theatre, music and exhibitions are planned for North Point Shopping Centre. The group has a local film maker creating a film about Bransholme at 50. The group have created their own Bransholme 50 logo to marketPage the 194 programme of 220 of events.

3.5. The proposed first phase development at the Roebank Arcade Development to replace the existing centre with a parade of three new retail units was granted planning permission last summer. Changes are beginning to take place as the developer begins work in the area.

3.6. St Mary’s Queen of Martyrs Academy have been supported through the Ward Budget to also deliver a lasting legacy for 2017 City Of Culture and the Area Team is working with them to create a peace garden to include children’s artwork and pottery depicting the history of Hull and pupils wishes for the future.

Future Plans

3.7 The Area Team have met the Open Spaces Officer on site and discussed upgrade works at Hartland Park in order to allocate the 106 income from the Roebank Arcade Development. Options include installing a new inclusive roundabout, installing timber retaining boards for play mulch areas adjacent to the paths, replacing the mulch surface with a rubber crumb surface and planting 10 mature trees. In addition the 106 income from the Truro Close Development is £10,625 and plans that meet the criteria are to be established with Ward Councillors.

3.8 The Area Team will work with Members to best consider how to use the Ward Budget.

3.9 Ward newsletters are being prepared Bransholme West Ward for delivery in early 2017, with all ward stakeholders being asked to contribute.

4. Kings Park Ward Update

Achievements

4.1. Problems with shrub planting at the end of Chalky Path have been addressed with new plants being planted where some have failed.

4.2 Ward meetings where Ward Members invited key stakeholders of the Ward along with Council Officers to help direct and shape the Ward have now been made regular every month.

4.3. The 5 sets of gates along Ings Lane have had new locks fitted and some repairs to enable them to be secured in the closed position. This follows ongoing anti-social behaviour and the misuse of the Lane by motorcycles.

Progress Updates

4.4 Kingswood Residents Association have requested that bollards at the end of Chalky Path, put in place by Kingswood Developments remain and are turned into some form of art/planting area. Plans are to be progressed by Kingswood Residents Association.

Page 195 of 220 4.5. Notice boards are being populated by Kingswood Residents Association and St Andrews Community Centre, some maintenance requests will be looked at in the new financial year

4.6 Ward news letters are being prepared, for delivery spring 2017, all ward stakeholders have been asked to contribute and further consultation will be invited on the Wilberforce Woods / Foredyke Green (Wilberdyke) project.

Future Plans

4.7 To progress a Bude Park project to improve sports provision using section 106 income as per the wishes expressed by Members, following the allocation of 106 funds.

4.8 To progress the Wilberdyke project once 106 funds have been allocated.

4.9 The Area Team will work with Members to best consider how to use the Ward Budget. .

Dave Richmond City Neighbourhoods and Housing Manager

Contact Officer: Caroline Barnes Tel No: 616903 Officer interests: None

Page 196 of 220

Report to the North Carr Area Committee Wards : Bransholme East, 18 January 2017 Bransholme West, Kings Park

Street Naming Decision

Report of the Assistant Head of ICT Resources Directorate

This item is not exempt Therefore exempt reasons are not applicable

This is a Non-Key Decision

1. Purpose of the Report and Summary

1.1 A Leader Decision Record dated May 2011 delegates to Area Committees all executive decisions on matters that exclusively affect their area. This allows Area Committees to deal with street naming requests within their boundaries.

1.2 This report makes recommendations about three new street names for a new residential development of 166 houses on Kingswood Parks, Parcel H21 between Grosvenor Road and Richmond Lane, Hull.

2. Recommendations

2.1 That Bounty, Crane and Viola are agreed as street names for the new residential development of 166 houses on Kingswood Parks, Parcel H21 between Grosvenor Road and Richmond Lane, Hull

3. Reasons for Recommendations

3.1 This is a statutory function under the Public Health Act 1925 that has been delegated to Area Committees.

3.2 The proposed names are the only ones suggested by the developer

Author: Page 197 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 1 of 9 that are free from duplication or other concerns.

4. Impact on other Executive Committees (including Area Committees)

4.1 No impact on other Executive Committees.

This Development is wholly within the North Carr Area Committee Boundary

5. Background

5.1 Street naming is carried out under the provisions of the British Standards BS7666-1:2006 and BS7666-2:2006. This is intended to provide a nationally consistent system for identifying each area of the country by address within a grid reference point.

5.2 The statutory provisions regarding street naming are found in Sections 17 – 19 of the Public Health Act 1925

5.3 The Council is contractually a member of the Public Services Mapping Agreement (PSMA) through which it receives all its mapping data, and the national Data Cooperation Agreement (DCA) which requires the Council to provide street and property data to a national hub in accordance with published nationally recognised Data Entry Conventions Documents.

5.4 Accurate meaningful and timely street naming is of critical importance to the emergency services in delivering their services.

5.5 In practical terms the Data Entry Conventions are interpreted by the Council so that street names and numbers comply with the following constraints:

• That a street will not normally be named after a living person except in exceptional circumstances. • Use of the names of the deceased must have acceptance from the family or estate administrators. Prior to use. • That streets would not normally be named after a locality, town or settlement; • That street names would not normally duplicate another name in use either within the boundary or in the same post town, or in close proximity in an adjacent authority. • Names that construe marketing are not acceptable. • The use of numbers in street names which could be misconstrued should be avoided. e.g., 20 Seven Foot Lane sounds like 27 Foot Lane. • Cannot be longer than 100 characters. • Abbreviations should not be used other than St for Saint. • Pedestrian streets should only be suffixed Walk, Path, Way or Mall. Author: Page 198 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 2 of 9 • Must not end in ‘s if it can be construed as possessive or plural.

5.6 Membership of the PSMA stipulates that naming proposals comply with these constraints, therefore the requirement is contractual rather than statutory.

6. Issues for Consideration

6.1 Following consultation with the developer the street naming and numbering officer has suggested that the new streets be named in keeping with the history of the area.

The developer has proposed the following street names derived from historic Hull based shipping companies for the new streets :

HELLYER - Hellyers Court, Hessle Road;

HAMLING - Hamling Way, Hessle Road; Hamlyn Avenue, Anlaby Road; Hamlyn Drive, Anlaby Road;

EARLES - Earles Road, Hedon Road; Earlscourt, Courtland Road; Earlsmere Villas, Albert Avenue; Earls Court, Henry Boot Way;

WILSON - Wilson Row, Wincolmlee (footpath, no addresses); Wilson Street, Clarence Street, (no addresses);

ELLERMEN - Ellerman Wharf, Kingston Street;

We hold duplications of all these street names. Apart from Earles Road and Wilson Street, the existing streets are all in west Hull, so all may be considered for the new development.

The Developer has also proposed the following street names derived from historic ships with a connection to Hull.

BOUNTY - We have no current Bounty street names. Bounty was originally known as collier Bethia, built in 1784 at the Blaydes shipyard in Kingston upon Hull, East Yorkshire, England. The vessel was purchased by the Royal Navy and renamed Bounty. The ship was sent to the Pacific Ocean under the command of William Bligh to acquire breadfruit plants and transport them to British possessions in the West Indies. That mission was never completed due to a mutiny led by Acting Lieutenant Fletcher Christian. This was the famous Mutiny on the Bounty.

CRANE – We have no current Crane street names.

Author: Page 199 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 3 of 9 I have not found information linking any ship named Crane with Hull.

NORLAND – Existing street name, Norland Avenue, Anlaby Road; The Norland was a P&O roll-on/roll-off ferry operating between Kingston upon Hull in Yorkshire, UK, and Rotterdam Europoort, Netherlands, and then Zeebrugge, Belgium. During the Falklands War, the Ministry of Defence requisitioned the Norland to be used as a troopship in the Task Force sent to retake the Falkland Islands from Argentina. Norland was among the ships to enter San Carlos Water during the amphibious landings of Commandos and Paratroopers. The ship survived attack from the Argentine Air Force, and at the end of the war repatriated the defeated Argentine troops back home, alongside the Canberra. For this service Norland received the battle honour "Falkland Islands 1982," which for many years was displayed in one of the passenger lounges, with a painting of the ship in San Carlos Water.

ALEXANDER – We have six existing Alexandra street names which may cause confusion and we therefore do not recommend.

HECLA – We have no current Hecla street names. Spelling might be an issue for emergency services taking calls i.e. Heckler.

HMS Hecla was a Royal Navy Fury-class bomb vessel launched in 1815 by Barkworth & Hawkes, North Barton, Hull. Like many other bomb vessels, was named for a volcano, in this case Hekla in Iceland. She served at the Bombardment of Algiers. In early 1819 she was converted to an Arctic exploration ship and made three journeys to the Arctic in search of the Northwest Passage, and made one attempt on the North Pole, all under Lieutenant William Edward Parry or Commander George Francis Lyon, and spent many winters iced in without serious damage. She then served as a survey vessel on the coast of West Africa until she was sold in 1831.

GAUL – This may be considered too recent an event and not fitting. Relatives of the crew are still grieving;

HMS ROSE - Duplication, We hold fourteen versions of Rose as existing street names which may cause confusion and we therefore do not recommend.

VIOLA – We have no current Viola street names. The Viola is a steam trawler built in 1906 at Hull. During her long career, she was known as HMT Viola, Viola III, Kapduen, and Dias. She is currently beached at Grytviken in South Georgia, though there are currently plans afoot to return her to Hull.

The Developers have not stated a preference for any new street name.

Author: Page 200 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 4 of 9 7. Options and Risk Assessment

7.1 Choose three of the names suggested by the developer in 4.1, at the developer’s invitation.

7.2 Object to any or all of the names.

7.3 Not select a name.

8. Risk Assessment

Risks are

Opt 1: The names needs to comply with the Data Entry Conventions – this has been checked by the Business and Information Systems Operations Team and they are all satisfactory in this respect.

Opt 2: The Developer can appeal against the objection to the Magistrates Court – risk to objection being upheld is that the proposed name complies with the conventions therefore there was no justification in objecting and court costs have been incurred unnecessarily.

Opt 3: The developer may propose his own choice – risk is that the Committee does not like the developer’s own selection, mitigation is that an objection can be made, but implications are as Opt 2 above.

9. Consultation

9.1 Consultation has taken place with the developer who agreed the suggested choice of names.

10. Comments of the Town Clerk (Monitoring Officer)

10.1 The Council has power under S. 17 Public Health Act 1925 to object to the proposed naming of a street. In the event of an objection, the developer may appeal the Council’s decision to a magistrates court. In practice, if the proposed name complies with the Data Entry Conventions referred to above, there is no overriding reason to object to a proposal and the Council and, as in this case, Members are regularly involved by developers in the choice of street names and are offered a choice. Once a name has been selected, the Council has a duty under S. 19 of the same Act to ensure that a street nameplate is erected and subsequently maintained. [CA]

11. Comments of the Section 151 Officer

Author: Page 201 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 5 of 9 11.1 The Section 151 Officer notes the report but in the absence of any financial implications has no further comments.

12. Comments of HR City Manager and compliance with the Equality Duty

12.1 This report is noted by the City HR Manager.

13. Comments of Overview and Scrutiny

13.1 This report has not been subject to scrutiny (Sc4106).

14. Comments of the Portfolio Holder

14.1 Not an Executive Decision

Author: Page 202 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 6 of 9

Report of the Assistant Head of ICT, Finance, Infrastructure and Transformation Directorate

Contact Officer: Glen Dobson – Team Manager Business and Information Systems Operations Telephone No.: 01482 614599

Officer Interests: None

Background Documents: - A list of background documents must be included. These documents are then available (if not exempt) for public inspection.

H21 – Site Location.pdf Layout plan provided by the developer.

Northern_area_masterplan_H21.pdf Site Location plan.

Author: Page 203 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 7 of 9 Implications Matrix

This section must be completed and you must ensure that you have fully considered all potential implications

This matrix provides a simple check list for the things you need to have considered within your report

If there are no implications please state

I have informed and sought advice from HR, Yes Legal, Finance, Overview and Scrutiny and the Climate Change Advisor and any other key stakeholders i.e. Portfolio Holder, relevant Ward Members etc prior to submitting this report for official comments I have considered whether this report Yes requests a decision that is outside the Budget and Policy Framework approved by Council Value for money considerations have been Yes accounted for within the report

The report is approved by the relevant City Yes Manager I have included any procurement/commercial Yes issues/implications within the report

I have considered the potential media interest Yes in this report and liaised with the Media Team to ensure that they are briefed to respond to media interest. I have included any equalities and diversity Yes implications within the report and where necessary I have completed an Equalities Impact Assessment and the outcomes are included within the report Any Health and Safety implications are Yes included within the report Any human rights implications are included Yes within the report I have included any community safety Yes implications and paid regard to Section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act within the report I have liaised with the Climate Change Yes Advisor and any environmental and climate change issues/sustainability implications are

Author: Page 204 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 8 of 9 included within the report

I have included information about how this Yes report contributes to the City Plan/ Area priorities within the report

Author: Page 205 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 9 of 9

Page 206 of 220 Page 207 of 220

Page 208 of 220 Page 209 of 220

Page 210 of 220

Briefing Paper to the North Carr Area Committee Wards : Bransholme East, Bransholme West, 18 th January 2017 King’s Park

Resolution List

Briefing Paper of the of Head of Service Community and Scrutiny Manager

1. Purpose of the Paper and Summary

The purpose of this briefing paper is to update the North Carr Area Committee on the progress of outstanding actions.

2. Background

The appendix attached provides an update on the progress of outstanding actions previously raised at Area Committee meetings.

3. Issues for consideration

The North Carr Area Committee notes any updates provided and requests further information as it requires.

4. Next steps

The Democratic Services Officer maintains the Resolution List for future meetings and pursues any outstanding actions.

Briefing Paper of Alex Holgate, Committee and Scrutiny Manager

Contact Officer: Dorinda Guy Telephone No. : 01482 613416

Officer Interests:- None

Background Documents: - None

Author: Page 211 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 1 of 1

Page 212 of 220 Action allocated by Committee - North Carr Area Committee Resolution List 2016/17 RED (R) pending action

Matter is ongoing/outstanding Chair: Councillor P D Clark AMBER (A) further information. Action is complete/proposed for Democratic Services Officer : Dorinda Guy Ext 3416 GREEN (G) deletion. WP Work Programme

New Items/ Quarterly RAG (Action Meeting Minute Items and Agenda Items Reason for submission and Actions arising Outcome Actioning Officer Status Status + Date Number Procedural Relevant Code) (N/Q/A/P)

16.04.14 N Resolution List 143 A

That the meeting regarding replacement kerbs on North Bransholme be pursued and organised at the earliest opportunity.

(Minute 148c – 17.04.13) - that the problems with the replacement kerbs on 143c Ken Upshall Monitor A North Bransholme be investigated and reported back to the Bransholme East Ward Members.

Some priority work has been completed.

17.06.15 Q Streetscene Service Highways Key Scheme Update 10 A Shelia Being looked into and will update Members. 10f That the road markings on Little Kingswood are re-painted. Henley/Graham Monitor A (Email 05.04.16) Hall

11.05.16 N Road Classification Kingswood 88 A

The road classification in the Kingswood Area will be reconsidered in the That the officer re-considers the non-classified roads in the Kingswood future, this will be done once the new development that links Wawne Road to 88b Dean Rolstone Monitor A area with a view to converting them to classified roads. Kingswood is complete. Construction of this large development is scheduled to begin later this year.

15.06.16 N Local Plan Publication Area Committee Report 9 R

That Hull City Council facilitates arrangement for local residents to 9b undertake grass cutting of open green spaces on the understanding this is Paul Fincham R at residents’ own risk.

Waste and Opens Spaces Quarterly Performance 21.09.16 Q 19 A Update

The area near the New Link Road has not been formally handed over to Streetscene. Arrangements have been made to measure up the area and have agreed to carry out an initial cut to tidy the area up. This will then be That the officer looks in to having the grassed areas near the New Link added to schedules for the 2017 grass cutting season. 19d Road, Dales Fitness Centre, Highland Primary School and Lemon Tree Mike Brigden Monitor A Dales Fitness Centre - Maintenance is the responsibility of NPS for the area. cut. Lemon Tree area has been visited with the Streetscene Operational Manager. When attended the field looked like it was regularly being cut and the football pitch was marked out.

That the officer discusses Members’ concerns about the replacement of This will be raised with the Parks Manager at the next Liaison meeting on 19e Mike Brigden Monitor A bins in parks with the Hull Culture and Leisure Parks Manager. 17.10.16 and information will be fed back to the Area Committee.

21.09.16 P Community Safety 20 R

Inspector That the officer provides off agenda individual statistics on both Domestic 20a Ogden/Inspector R Violence and violence out of the home such as racial attacks. Peasgood Inspector That the officer provides off agenda what percentage of damage was 20b Ogden/Inspector R actual vehicle damage. Page 213 of 220 Peasgood That the officer investigates and feeds back to Members off agenda Inspector 20c whether the incident that took place on the Jar-In Hand Public House car Ogden/Inspector R park has been resolved. Peasgood 21.09.16 Q Streetscene Service Highways Quarterly Update 23 A

Kesteven Way - Forwarded to the engineer dealing with the scheme who has That the officer provides an update on the Kesteven Way - Build out near subsequently liaised with the local councillors. 23b playground scheme and the Wawne Road (Holwell Roundabout – Tim Binnington Monitor A Wawne Road - this is in the 2017/18 Highways Capital Programme however Cumbrian Way Roundabout) development off agenda. no specific start date can be set until budget levels are known.

21.09.16 P Area Neighbourhood Management Update 27 A

That the officer investigates why the Kings Park newsletter had not been Taken off the area, but will re-check again reason as to why newsletter had 27b Ken Upshall Monitor A delivered in parts of the ward. not been delivered in parts of the ward.

16.11.16 P Public Questions 34 R

That the Police and Crime Commissioner be invited to the next North Carr 34a Jane Price R Area Committee in January 2017.

That the dumped mattresses, litter and remains of bonfires be 34b Adam McArthur R investigated.

16.11.16 N North Carr Area Urgent Care Consultation 36 R

That the officer provides a further update to the North Carr Area Erica Daley/Colin 36b R Committee in January 2017. Hurst

16.11.16 N Open Spaces Strategy 39 R

That the length of time before consecrated ground can be reused is 39c Andrew Wilson R investigated and fed back to Members off agenda.

That public consultation regarding removing the bus turning circle on 39d Andrew Wilson R Kesteven Way is investigated. That the officer investigates options for creating more pathways on the 39e Noddle Hill Way Nature Reserve to link North Bransholme through to the Andrew Wilson R Nature Reserve at the rear of Kingswood Academy. That the spelling of ‘Cambrian’ Reference N4 on Page 109 be amended 39f Andrew Wilson R to ‘Cumbrian’.

Waste and Open Spaces Quarterly Performance 16.11.16 Q 41 R Update

That the officer investigates the missed bin collection at the resident’s 41b Andrew Wilson R address provided.

16.11.16 Street Cleansing and Grounds Maintenance 42 R

That the new geographical zonal street cleansing and grounds 42a Adam McArthur R maintenance schedules and maps be provided off agenda.

42b That the car petrol on Navenby Grove be investigated. Adam McArthur R

16.11.16 P Area Neighbourhood Management Update 44 R

That the job descriptions for the Director and Development and Funding 44a Ken Upshall R Manager of Achieve Potentials be provided to Members off agenda.

That a meeting be arranged with Achieve Potentials to discuss their 44b Ken Upshall R concerns.

16.11.16 P Resolution List 45 R

That minute19c be investigated as to whether the work has been carried 45c Email sent 29.11.16 Dorinda Guy Monitor A out by the Arboricultural Officer. Page 214 of 220 That the Anti-Social Behaviour Officer be invited to the next North Carr 45d Area Committee meeting in January 2017 under item North Carr Area Ken Upshall R Housing Performance Update. That the Community Manager – North investigates why the Kings Park 45e Ken Upshall R newsletter had not been delivered in parts of the ward.

Page 215 of 220

Page 216 of 220

Briefing Paper to the North Carr Area Committee Wards : Bransholme East, Bransholme West, 18 th January 2017 King’s Park

Work Programme

Briefing Paper of the of Head of Service Community and Scrutiny Manager

1. Purpose of the Paper and Summary

The purpose of this briefing paper is to update the North Carr Area Committee on the Work Programme.

2. Background

The appendix attached provides an update on the Work Programme and provides further opportunity for Members to suggest future agenda items for discussion.

3. Issues for consideration

The Work Programme is noted and suggestions made for future agenda items for discussion by the North Carr Committee Area.

4. Next steps

The Democratic Services Officer maintains the Work Programme for future meetings.

Briefing Paper of Alex Holgate, Committee and Scrutiny Manager

Contact Officer: Dorinda Guy Telephone No. : 01482 613416

Officer Interests:- None

Background Documents: - None

Author: Page 217 of 220 Status: Date: 10/01/2017 Page 1 of 1

Page 218 of 220 North Carr Area Committee Work Programme 2016/17 RED (R) Action allocated by Committee - pending action

Chair: Councillor P D Clark AMBER (A) Matter is ongoing/outstanding further information.

Democratic Services Officer : Dorinda Guy Ext 3416 GREEN (G) Action is complete/proposed for deletion.

WP Work Programme

New Items/ Upload Quarterly RAG (Action Meeting Responsible Date Items and Agenda Items Contact Officer Reason for submission and Actions arising Status + Date Officer (H) Procedural Relevant Code) (N/Q/A/P) Democratic To receive apologies from those Members who are unable to attend the P Apologies Dorinda Guy WP Services Officer meeting. To remind Members of the need to record the existence and nature of any Democratic P Declarations of Interest Dorinda Guy personal and prejudicial interest in items on the agenda, in accordance WP Services Officer with the Member Code of Conduct. Democratic P Minutes of Previous Meeting Dorinda Guy To approve the minutes as a true and correct record. WP Services Officer Democratic P Public Questions Dorinda Guy To receive public questions. WP Services Officer Democratic To update Members on the Work Programme and provide further P Work Programme Dorinda Guy WP Services Officer opportunity for Members to suggest future agenda items for discussion. Democratic P Resolution List Dorinda Guy To update Members on the progress of outstanding actions. WP Services Officer Assistant City To provide an update to the North Carr Area Committee on ward activity P Area Neighbourhood Management Update Manager - Jane Price WP across the area. Neighbourhoods

Assistant City To update Members on the consolidated budget position for the North Carr P North Carr Area Funds Manager - Jane Price WP Area in relation to Ward Budgets. Neighbourhoods Verbal update on policing activities in the North Carr area, to include Inspector Mark P Community Safety Humberside Police details of the number of anti social behaviour teenage drink related WP Peasgood incidents.

P Appointment of Authority Governors to Hull Schools SEO Governors David Beilsten As and when required. WP

June City Sept North Carr Area Housing Performance Update Neighbourhoods Q Louise Holmes To provide Members with the Housing Performance update. WP Jan (15.06.16, 21.09.16, 18.01.17, 19.04.17) and Housing April Manager June City Sept HRA Budgets Update Neighbourhoods To update Members on the current Housing Revenue Account budget Q Louise Holmes WP Jan (15.06.16, 21.09.16, 18.01.17, 19.04.17) and Housing position. April Manager June Safety, Transport Sept Highways Quarterly Update Richard Townend To update Members of the progress of highway related projects and Q and Network HUB WP Nov (15.06.16, 21.09.16, 18.01.17, 15.03.17) Page 219cc Julie of 220Ellis schemes together with anticipated dates for completion and costs. Manager March June To provide a quarterly performance report relating to waste collection, Sept Waste and Open Spaces Performance Update City Streetscene recycling performance, street cleansing and grounds maintenance in the Q Mike Brigden WP Jan (15.06.16, 21.09.16, 18.01.17, 19.04.17) Manager North Carr area. April (Graphs to be provided to Members off Agenda before each meeting) June Youth & Sept Youth Development Service Team Update Community To provide Members with an update on the Youth Development Provision. Q Lynne Scott WP Jan (15.06.16, 21.09.16, 18.01.17, 19.04.17) Development Update to be provided in March and June 2017. April Worker To submit an annual report on learning and skills to include the following: • sporting activities undertaken by pupils • community use of the facilities • future schools being built • how many places there are in schools and nurseries including any new Graham Talbot/Jan schools Jan A School Performance in North Carr Area Alyson Milner (cc) WP Campbell • number of children who got 1st choice • Ofsted reports • school improvement plans • how many 2 and 3 year olds places have been taken up in the North Carr area • GCSE results for this year compare to last year

Assistant City Manager, Children, Looked After Children Annual Report to include feedback from the Young March A Strengthening the Corporate Parenting Role Michelle Priest WP Young People and Voices Influencing Care Group (Hull's Children in Care Council) Family Services City Neighbourhoods Sept A Area Team Annual Report Ken Upshall To provided Members with Area Priorities. WP and Housing Manager

Proposed Dates for the North Carr Area Committee Committee and To provide the North Carr Area Committee with the proposed dates for March '17 N Dorinda Guy WP 2017-18 Scrutiny Manager 2017-18.

Funding and TBC N Affordable Warmth Strategy 2016-2021 Appraisals Ross Ferguson WP Programme Leader City Property and Assets Manager/ Nick Howbridge/John TBC N Development site at Bude Road To provide Members with an update on the development site. WP Principal Property Haymes Manager

Page 220 of 220