Protected Areas Final List Cleared For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Protected Areas Final List Cleared For Natura 2000 sites,Poland Emerald Network sites, Belarus and Ukraine Country Name Natura 2000 Emerald Network Size (ha) Location Website / SDF Longitude Latitude Belarus Strelskiy BY0000082 13818,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=BY0000082&release=2 29.460000 51.930000 Longitude Latitude Belarus Lower Prypiats BY0000060 218273,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=BY0000060&release=2 29.895800 51.623800 Longitude Latitude Belarus Mukhovets floodplain BY0000068 656,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=BY0000068&release=2 23.727800 52.082400 Polesye Valley of the Bug Longitude Latitude Belarus BY0000035 23158,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=BY0000035&release=2 River 23.629300 51.769100 Longitude Latitude Belarus Divin-Vielikiy Lies BY0000040 20470,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=BY0000040&release=2 24.610000 52.060000 Longitude Latitude Belarus Zvanets BY0000004 16046,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=BY0000004&release=2 24.863600 52.056400 Longitude Latitude Belarus Izin BY0000073 1176,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=BY0000073&release=2 25.915300 52.027900 Longitude Latitude Belarus Srednyaya Pripyat BY0000005 95554,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=BY0000005&release=2 27.006800 52.124000 Longitude Latitude Belarus Pripyatskiy BY0000007 90849,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=BY0000007&release=2 28.000000 52.000000 Longitude Latitude Belarus Lower Pripyat Valley BY0000162 43125,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=BY0000162&release=2 28.897000 52.130000 Longitude Latitude Belarus Mozyrskiye Ovragi BY0000026 941,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=BY0000026&release=2 29.300000 52.010000 Longitude Latitude Belarus Prostyr BY000005o 10111,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=BY0000050&release=2 26.080000 51.930000 Dolina Dolnej Wisly Longitude: 18.737100 Poland PLB040003 33559,04 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLB040003 Lower Vistula River Valley Latitude: 53.487200 Dolina Srodkowego Bugu Longitude: 23.632900 Poland PLB060003 28059,74 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLB060003 Middle Bug River Valley Latitude: 51.353300 Longitude: 22.808000 Poland Tyśmienica Valley PLB060004 (v2, v3) 7362,13 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLB060004 Latitude: 51.606900 Dolina Dolnego Bugu Longitude: 22.565400 Poland PLB140001 74321,75 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLB140001 Lower Bug River Valley Latitude: 52.424300 Longitude: 21.977800 Poland Dolina Liwca PLB140002 (v1) 27438,11 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLB140002 Latitude: 52.346900 Longitude: 21.056500 Poland Dolina Pilicy PLB140003 (v2, v3) 35391,78 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLB140003 Latitude: 51.689300 Dolina Srodkowej Wisly Longitude: 21.224400 Poland PLB140004 (v2, v3) 30806,06 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLB140004 Middle Vistula River Valley Latitude: 51.995200 Longitude: 21.495700 Poland Ostoja Kozienicka PLB140013 (v3) 68347,81 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLB140013 Latitude: 51.513300 Longitude: 18.796600 Poland Ujscie Wisly PLB220004 1750,56 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLB220004 Latitude: 54.361400 Natura 2000 sites,Poland Emerald Network sites, Belarus and Ukraine Country Name Natura 2000 Emerald Network Size (ha) Location Website / SDF Longitude: 18.841300 Poland Dolna Wisła PLH220033 10388,70 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLH220033 Latitude: 53.829400 Longitude: 18.279400 Poland Solecka Dolina Wisły PLH040003 7039,52 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLH040003 Latitude: 53.246000 Longitude: 18.414100 Poland Dybowska Dolina Wisły PLH040011 1393,92 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLH040011 Latitude: 53.036900 Longitude: 18.727800 Poland Nieszawska Dolina Wisły PLH040012 3891,72 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLH040012 Latitude: 52.924100 Longitude: 18.983800 Poland Włocławska Dolina Wisły PLH040039 4763,76 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLH040039 Latitude: 52.753400 Dolny Wieprz Longitude: 22.081500 Poland PLH060051 (v3) 8183,94 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLH060051 Lower Wieprz Latitude: 51.568500 Longitude: 22.546400 Poland Ostoja Nadbużańska PLH140011 46040,21 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLH140011 Latitude: 52.426300 Longitude: 21.041500 Poland Dolina Dolnej Pilicy PLH140016 (v2, v3) 31853,85 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLH140016 Latitude: 51.691100 Longitude: 20.581500 Poland Kampinoska Dolina Wisły PLH140029 20659,11 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLH140029 Latitude: 52.426300 Longitude: 21.977700 Poland Ostoja Nadliwiecka PLH140032 (v1) 13626,60 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLH140032 Latitude: 52.367300 Longitude: 18.789800 Poland Ostoja w Ujściu Wisły PLH220044 884,75 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=PLH220044 Latitude: 54.361600 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Stokhid-Nobel UA0000168 41602,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000168&release=2 51.531053 25.366777 Prypiat-Stokhid National Longitude Latitude Ukraine UA000044 38672,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000044&release=2 Nature Park 51.850876 25.320824 Chornobylskyi Biosphere Longitude Latitude Ukraine UA0000046 227116,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000046&release=2 Reserve 51.191689 30.337568 Mizhrichynskyi Regional Longitude Latitude Ukraine UA0000047 102368,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000047&release=2 Landscape Park 51.117367 30.733598 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Kyivske Reservoir UA0000094 54378,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000094&release=2 50.863088 30.469230 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Kyivske Podesennia UA0000233 20607,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000233&release=2 50.730568 30.703022 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Kanivske Reservoir UA0000111 67234,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000111&release=2 49.980421 31.271981 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Ponyzia Stuhny UA0000175 6824,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000175&release=2 50.145061 30.597099 Holosiivskyi National Longitude Latitude Ukraine UA0000043 11071,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000043&release=2 Nature Park 50.289239 30.569377 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Kanivskyi Nature Reserve UA0000012 8663,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000012&release=2 49.724345 31.485777 Natura 2000 sites,Poland Emerald Network sites, Belarus and Ukraine Country Name Natura 2000 Emerald Network Size (ha) Location Website / SDF Longitude Latitude Ukraine Kremenchutske Reservoir UA0000110 222513,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000110&release=2 49.321959 32.592450 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Mykhailivskyi UA0000256 4778,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000256&release=2 49.629015 31.560623 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Cherkaskyi Bir UA0000254 55441,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000254&release=2 49.397012 31.759065 Kremenchutski Plavni Longitude Latitude Ukraine UA0000087 5098,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000087&release=2 Regional Landscape Park 49.044962 33.412917 Dniprodzerzhynske Longitude Latitude Ukraine UA0000135 53994,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000135&release=2 Reservoir 48.786685 34.098388 Nyzhnovorsklianskyi Longitude Latitude Ukraine UA0000072 23187,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000072&release=2 Regional Landscape Park 48.868570 34.150133 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Dniprovske Reservoir UA0000093 39468,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000093&release=2 48.301338 35.158862 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Kakhovske Reservoir UA0000106 218040,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000106&release=2 47.459870 34.312245 Velykyi Luh National Nature Longitude Latitude Ukraine UA0000037 16745,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000037&release=2 Park 47.497752 35.144863 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Lower Dnipro UA0000192 52383,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000192&release=2 46.728520 32.925464 Longitude Latitude Ukraine ?Oleshkivski Pisky UA0000107 46258,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000107&release=2 46.532901 32.989448 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Dniprovsko-Buzkyi Lyman UA0000109 71262,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000109&release=2 46.591257 31.985403 Longitude Latitude Ukraine Kinburnska Kosa UA0000215 46580,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000215&release=2 46.411415 32.179469 Black Sea Biosphere Longitude Latitude Ukraine UA0000017 115848,00 http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Emerald/SDF.aspx?site=UA0000017&release=2 Reserve 46.302784 31.862871 Total area 2540070,06 Ramsar sites Country Ramsar site Link National legal designation Size (ha) BY Zvanets https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/1219
Recommended publications
  • Lake Baikal Russian Federation
    LAKE BAIKAL RUSSIAN FEDERATION Lake Baikal is in south central Siberia close to the Mongolian border. It is the largest, oldest by 20 million years, and deepest, at 1,638m, of the world's lakes. It is 3.15 million hectares in size and contains a fifth of the world's unfrozen surface freshwater. Its age and isolation and unusually fertile depths have given it the world's richest and most unusual lacustrine fauna which, like the Galapagos islands’, is of outstanding value to evolutionary science. The exceptional variety of endemic animals and plants make the lake one of the most biologically diverse on earth. Threats to the site: Present threats are the untreated wastes from the river Selenga, potential oil and gas exploration in the Selenga delta, widespread lake-edge pollution and over-hunting of the Baikal seals. However, the threat of an oil pipeline along the lake’s north shore was averted in 2006 by Presidential decree and the pulp and cellulose mill on the southern shore which polluted 200 sq. km of the lake, caused some of the worst air pollution in Russia and genetic mutations in some of the lake’s endemic species, was closed in 2009 as no longer profitable to run. COUNTRY Russian Federation NAME Lake Baikal NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SERIAL SITE 1996: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria vii, viii, ix and x. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE The UNESCO World Heritage Committee issued the following statement at the time of inscription. Justification for Inscription The Committee inscribed Lake Baikal the most outstanding example of a freshwater ecosystem on the basis of: Criteria (vii), (viii), (ix) and (x).
    [Show full text]
  • Gap Analysis in Support of Cpan: the Russian Arctic
    CAFF Habitat Conservation Report No. 9 GAP ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF CPAN: THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC Igor Lysenko and David Henry CAFF INTERNATIONAL SECRETRARIAT 2000 This report, prepared by Igor Lysenko, World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) and David Henry, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Global Resource Information Database (GRID)-Arendal, is a technical account of a Gap Analysis Project conducted for the Russian Arctic in 1997-1999 in support of the Circumpolar Protected Areas Network (CPAN) of CAFF. It updates the status and spatial distribution of protected areas within the CAFF area of the Russian Federation and provides, in 22 GIs based maps and several data sets, a wealth of information relevant for present and future management decisions related to habitat conservation in the Russian Arctic. The present Gap Analysis for the Russian Arctic was undertaken in response to the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan requirement for countries to identify gaps in protected area coverage of ecosystems and species and to select sites for further action. Another important objective was to update the Russian data base. The Analysis used a system of twelve landscape units instead of the previously used vegetation zone system as the basis to classify Russia's ecosystems. A comparison of the terrestrial landscape systems against protected area coverage indicates that 27% of the glacier ecosystem is protected, 9.3% of the tundra (treeless portion) and 4.7% of the forest systems within the Arctic boundaries are under protection, but the most important Arctic forested areas have only 0.1% protection. In general, the analysis indicates a negative relationship between ecosystem productivity and protection, which is consistent with findings in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Grassland Vegetation of Central Podolia (Ukraine) - a Preliminary Overview of Its Syntaxonomy, Ecology and Biodiversity 391-430 Tuexenia 34: 391–430
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Tuexenia - Mitteilungen der Floristisch-soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Jahr/Year: 2014 Band/Volume: NS_34 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kuzenko Anna A., Becker Thomas, Didukh Yakiv P., Ardelean Ioana Violeta, Becker Ute, Beldean Monika, Dolnik Christian, Jeschke Michael, Naqinezhad Alireza, Ugurlu Emin, Unal Aslan, Vassilev Kiril, Vorona Evgeniy I., Yavorska Olena H., Dengler Jürgen Artikel/Article: Dry grassland vegetation of Central Podolia (Ukraine) - a preliminary overview of its syntaxonomy, ecology and biodiversity 391-430 Tuexenia 34: 391–430. Göttingen 2014. doi: 10.14471/2014.34.020, available online at www.tuexenia.de Dry grassland vegetation of Central Podolia (Ukraine) – a preliminary overview of its syntaxonomy, ecology and biodiversity Die Trockenrasenvegetation Zentral-Podoliens (Ukraine) – eine vorläufige Übersicht zu Syntaxonomie, Ökologie und Biodiversität Anna A. Kuzemko1, Thomas Becker2, Yakiv P. Didukh3, Ioana Violeta Arde- lean4, Ute Becker5, Monica Beldean4, Christian Dolnik6, Michael Jeschke2, Alireza Naqinezhad7, Emin Uğurlu8, Aslan Ünal9, Kiril Vassilev10, Evgeniy I. Vorona11, Olena H. Yavorska11 & Jürgen Dengler12,13,14,* 1National Dendrological Park “Sofiyvka”, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyivska Str. 12a, 20300 Uman’, Ukraine, [email protected];2Geobotany, Faculty of Geography and Geosciences, University of Trier, Behringstr. 21, 54296 Trier, Germany, [email protected];
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL PROTECTED AREAS of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION: of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION: AREAS PROTECTED NATIONAL Vladimir Krever, Mikhail Stishov, Irina Onufrenya
    WWF WWF is one of the world’s largest and most experienced independent conservation WWF-Russia organizations, with almost 5 million supporters and a global network active in more than 19, bld.3 Nikoloyamskaya St., 100 countries. 109240 Moscow WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a Russia future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by: Tel.: +7 495 727 09 39 • conserving the world’s biological diversity Fax: +7 495 727 09 38 • ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable [email protected] • promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. http://www.wwf.ru The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy - the leading conservation organization working around the world to The Nature Conservancy protect ecologically important lands and waters for nature and people. Worldwide Office The mission of The Nature Conservancy is to preserve the plants, animals and natural 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100 NNATIONALATIONAL PPROTECTEDROTECTED AAREASREAS communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters Arlington, VA 22203-1606 they need to survive. Tel: +1 (703) 841-5300 http://www.nature.org OOFF TTHEHE RRUSSIANUSSIAN FFEDERATION:EDERATION: MAVA The mission of the Foundation is to contribute to maintaining terrestrial and aquatic Fondation pour la ecosystems, both qualitatively and quantitatively, with a view to preserving their biodiversity. Protection de la Nature GGAPAP AANALYSISNALYSIS To this end, it promotes scientific research, training and integrated management practices Le Petit Essert whose effectiveness has been proved, while securing a future for local populations in cultural, 1147 Montricher, Suisse economic and ecological terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus, 1990
    Mammals of Belarus VLADIMIR DINETS Belarus is a large, very flat, 40% forested country. It lost almost a third of its population during WWII; the following decades saw mass migration of rural residents into cities, which accelerated after the country received most of Chernobyl nuclear fallout. In post-Soviet years Belarus rejected the siren song of IMF, so its economy remained in relatively good shape, but the birthrate was low, and many people emigrated. The result of all this is that the countryside is sparsely populated, particularly in the south where some of Europe’s largest wetlands are located. Tiny outlying villages (khutors), with just a few aged residents and plenty of abandoned houses, provide excellent bases for exploring forests and swamps. There are no endemics or “specialties”, but mammals are generally abundant, particularly in nature reserves. Belarus is often called “Europe’s last dictatorship”; this is only correct because Russia is no longer part of Europe. For twenty years President Lukashenko secured massive discounts on oil and gas by proclaiming loyalty to Russia and gradually sacrificing Belarus’s sovereignty. In 2014, Russian invasion of Ukraine alerted him to the danger of getting too cozy with such a predatory neighbor, so now he is trying to court the EU as well. As an East Slavic proverb goes, “a gentle calf suckles from two cows”. One consequence of this shift is that the country is reportedly becoming more Westerner-friendly (although even before 2014 it wasn’t a particularly inhospitable place, as long as you refrained from political discussions). Tourism is still virtually non-existent, but this might change in the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. Mckinleyville, CA
    OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages 22 THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages O v e r v i e w 23 OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages 24 THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages O v e r v i e w 25 OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages 26 THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages O v e r v i e w 27 OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages 28 THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST OVERVIEW OVERVIEW permafrost becomes swampy, however, organic matter quick- Ecology ly decomposes, releasing trapped methane and CO2 from the plant matter and soil. Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas Josh Newell and Vladimir Dinets with a warming effect ten to twenty times higher than that of Researchers and scholars have written extensively on the envi- CO2. Logging, mining, and other industrial activity can also ronmental destruction that occurred under the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Draft Code for Transboundary Protected Areas in Times of Peace and Armed Conflict
    4. Draft Code for transboundary protected areas in times of peace and armed conflict Explanatory notes This Draft Code is offered to neighbouring States, jurisdictions and other stakeholders concerned with the establishment and management of TBPAs. It may be used in its present form or as a basis for developing a comparable code suited to the particular needs of a country or region. IUCN would welcome requests for technical assistance in interpreting the Draft Code and applying it to particular local or regional circumstances. It is recommended that the Draft Code be made widely available to protected area authorities, key sectoral agencies, the armed forces (including border and coast guards), local governments, relevant non-governmental organisations, the media and other inter- ested parties, especially in border regions. A supportive education programme will be needed for this Draft Code to reflect the aims and guide the actions of all concerned interests. Awareness-building should be carried out on a continuing basis with all sectors of society, to foster broad acceptance of the need to conserve biodiversity and ecosystem services and to protect the integrity of TBPAs, even in emergency situations. Rationale for the Draft Code The Draft Code aims to contribute to the progressive development of legal and insti- tutional frameworks for the establishment and management of TBPAs in times of peace or armed conflict. Context Many States, sub-national units and autonomous areas share at least one land, freshwater or marine boundary. These boundaries were usually established for political or other social reasons, without reference to land or water systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands in Russia
    WETLANDS IN RUSSIA Volume 4 Wetlands in Northeastern Russia Compiled by A.V.Andreev Moscow 2004 © Wetlands International, 2004 All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism, or review (as permitted under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988) no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrical, chemical, mechanical, optical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the copyright holder. The production of this publication has been generously supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, The Netherlands Citation: Andreev, A.V. 2004. Wetlands in Russia, Volume 4: Wetlands in Northeastern Russia. Wetlands International–Russia Programme.198 pp. ISBN 90-5882-024-6 Editorial Board: V.O.Avdanin, V.G.Vinogradov, V.Yu. Iliashenko, I.E.Kamennova, V.G.Krivenko, V.A.Orlov, V.S.Ostapenko, V.E.Flint Translation: Yu.V.Morozov Editing of English text: D. Engelbrecht Layout: M.A.Kiryushkin Cover photograph: A.V.Andreev Designed and produced by KMK Scientific Press Available from: Wetlands International-Russia Programme Nikoloyamskaya Ulitsa, 19, stroeniye 3 Moscow 109240, Russia Fax: + 7 095 7270938; E-mail: [email protected] The presentation of material in this publication and the geographical designations employed do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Wetlands International, concerning the legal status of any territory or area,
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage 25BUR
    World Heritage 25BUR Distribution limited WHC-2001/CONF.205/INF.5 Add Paris, 22 June 2001 Original : English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE BUREAU OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Twenty-fifth session Paris, UNESCO Headquarters, Room X 25 – 30 June 2001 IUCN evaluation of nominations of natural and mixed properties to the World Heritage List: Addendum TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATIONS OF: •= Holy Tops (Ukraine) ..................................................................................................................................p. 3 •= Polissian Swamps and Slovechno-Ovruch Ridge (Ukraine)........................................................................p. 9 •= Kaniv’s Hills (Ukraine) .............................................................................................................................p. 15 •= Karadag (Ukraine).....................................................................................................................................p. 21 •= Podillian Ridge (Ukarine)..........................................................................................................................p. 27 •= Kaieteur National Park (Guyana) ..............................................................................................................p. 33 WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION – IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS UKRAINE During April 2001, IUCN undertook evaluations of five nominations
    [Show full text]
  • Proc16 Net.Pdf
    RESEARCH IN FOREST RESERVES AND NATURAL FORESTS IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES Country Reports for the COST Action E4: Forest Reserves Research Network Edited by Jari Parviainen, Declan Little, Marie Doyle, Aileen O'Sullivan, Minna Kettunen and Minna Korhonen EFI Proceedings No. 16, 1999 European Forest Institute European Commission European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research EFI Proceedings No. 16 Research in Forest Reserves and Natural Forests in European Countries Edited by Jari Parviainen, Declan Little, Marie Doyle, Aileen O'Sullivan, Minna Kettunen and Minna Korhonen Cover photo: Erkki Oksanen / METLA Layout: PihkaPojat Oy Printing: Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy Saarijärvi 1999 Publisher: European Forest Institute Series Editors: Ian Hunter, Editor-in-Chief Minna Korhonen, Technical Editor Brita Pajari, Seminar Co-ordinator Editorial Office: European Forest Institute Phone: +358 13 252 020 Torikatu 34 Fax. +358 13 124 393 FIN-80100 Joensuu, Finland Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.efi.fi/ Disclaimer: The papers in this book comprise the country reports of the COST Action E4: For- est Reserves Research Network. They reflect the authors' opinions and do not nec- essarily correspond to those of the European Forest Institute. © European Forest Institute 1999 ISSN 1237-8801 ISBN 952-9844-31-X TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ........................................................................................................ 5 Jari Parviainen Strict forest reserves in Europe – efforts to enhance biodiversity and strenghten
    [Show full text]
  • Special Natural Protected Areas System: the Nature Conservation of Baikal Region
    J. Wetlands Biodiversity (2014) 4: 73-95 SPECIAL NATURAL PROTECTED AREAS SYSTEM: THE NATURE CONSERVATION OF BAIKAL REGION Arkady D. Kalikhman and Tatyana P. Kalikhman Received: 16.07.2014 / Accepted: 07.11.2014 Abstract: Specially protected natural territories of the Baikal region have typically used either the basin or administrative approach. In article propose an integrated approach that allowing us to overcome shortcomings of the basin and administrative approaches. The integrated approach strives to navigate the political and economic barriers to an effective conservation plan. Keywords: administrative approach, basin approach, integrated approach, lake Baikal, nature conservation, protected areas. Introduction:1 of Lake Baikal" was passed. This is Russia's only law regarding the management of the Lake Baikal is one of the most unique places lake and the Baikal region. on Earth. This is the oldest and deepest lake The main way to preserve, maintain and in the world. It contains 20 % of the world’s restore the biotic and landscape diversity is fresh water and it is home to more than 2,000 through territorial nature conservation. The endemic species of plants and animals. territorial nature conservation activities Therefore, the current conservation of the comprise all the efforts to protect areas of waters of Lake Baikal and the surrounding different categories, status and regimes of region affects the state of its ecosystem. In protection. In accordance with the federal 1996, the Baikal area and its immediate law "On specially protected natural areas", surroundings were included in the list of the main categories of protected areas are World Natural Heritage Sites by UNESCO.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of Degraded Steppe Lands
    Alterra is part of the international expertise organisation Wageningen UR (University & Research centre). Our mission is ‘To explore the potential of nature to improve the quality of life’. Within Wageningen UR, nine research institutes – both specialised and applied – have joined forces with Wageningen University and Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences to help answer the most important questions in the domain of healthy food and living environment. With approximately 40 locations (in the Netherlands, Brazil and China), 6,500 members of staff and 10,000 students, Wageningen UR is one of the leading organisations in its domain worldwide. The integral approach to problems and the cooperation between the exact sciences and the technological and social disciplines are at the heart of the Wageningen Approach. Restoration of degraded steppe lands Alterra is the research institute for our green living environment. We offer a combination of practical and scientific research in a multitude of disciplines related to the green world around us and the sustainable use of our living environment, such as flora Opportunities for Lugansk Oblast, Eastern Ukraine and fauna, soil, water, the environment, geo-information and remote sensing, landscape and spatial planning, man and society. Alterra Report 1935 ISSN 1566-7197 More information: www.alterra.wur.nl/uk T. van der Sluis, J.M.J. Gosselink, P.A. Slim, A. Verhagen and H. van Keulen Restoration of degraded steppe lands The research was commissioned by the Agricultural Counsellor of the Royal Netherlands Embassy in Kieve, Ukraine. The research was funded by the Ministry of Agriculture under the ‘BOCI’ programme.
    [Show full text]