DOCSLIB.ORG

E I G H T H R E G I M E N T , I N F a N T R Y . 831 While There

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EIGHTH REGIMENT, INFANTRY. 831 While there the regiment performed the usual duties in. camp and also outpost and picket duty, and received in June and July three hundred and thirty-seven recruits. The regiment left Camp Thomas, September 6th, at 4:30 p. m., under orders from the war department, and proceeded via Penn• sylvania railroad to Jersey City, N. J., where it arrived in four sections, between 7 p. m., September 8th, and 2 a. in., September 9tli. and marched to its armory in New York city. The regiment was granted thirty days' furlough from October 1st, and was mustered out of the United States service at the armory, Novem• ber 3. 1898, by Captain William Lassiter, Sixteenth United States Infantry. Commissioned Officers. COLONEL: Henry Chauncey, Jr., May 2 to November 3, 1898. LIEUTENANT-COLONEL : James Morgan Jarvis, May 2 to November 3, 1898. MAJORS: Henry Grata cap Ridabock. May 2 to November 3, 1898. Isaac Freeman, May 2 to November 3, 1898. John Edward Kerby, May 2 to November 3, 1898. REGIMENTAL ADJUTANT: Wainwright Parish, May 2 to November 3, 1898. BATTALION ADJUTANTS : Joseph Aloysius Holohan, May 2 to November 3, 1898. Abraham Jacobson, May 2 to November 3, 1898. Eben Elisha Acker, May 14 to November 3, 1898. QUARTERMASTER: George L. Wentworth, May 2 to November 3, 1898. SURGEON: Lewis Knode Neff, May 2 to November 3, 1898. 832 NEW YORK IN SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR. ASSISTANT SURGEONS: Whitmore Steele, May 2 to June 10, 1898. Herman Arthur Haubold, May 2 to November 26,1898. George W. Lindheim, July 1 to September 16, 1898. CHAPLAIN : Franklin Nelson S trader, June 11 to November 3, 1898. COMPANY A. CAPTAIN : Henry Melville, May 2 to November 3, 1898. FIRST LIEUTENANTS: Louis Agostini, May 2 to June 15, 1898. Theodore Burnett Taylor, July 6 to September 27, 1898. SECOND LIEUTENANTS: Theodore B„ Taylor, May 2 to July 6, 1898. Anthony Homam July 6 to November 3, 1S98. COMPANY" B. CAPTAIN : Robert Edwards, Jr., May 2 to November 3, 1898. FIRST LIEUTENANT: William John Smith, May 2 to November 3, 1898. SECOND LIEUTENANT: Joseph Cipollari, May 2 to November 3, 1898. COMPANY O. CAPTAIN : • John Clifford Brown, May 2 to November 3, 1898. FIRST LIEUTENANTS : William Henry Hallock, Jr., May 2 to July 14, 1898. Charles Levy, August 6 to November 3, 1898. EIGHTH REGIMENT, INFANTRY. 888 SECOND LIEUTENANTS: Richard Sullivan Fay, May 2 to August 5, 1898. David Carnagie, August 5 to November 3,1898. COMPANY D. CAPTAIN : Frank Olen Sauvan, May 2 to November 3, 1898. FIRST LIEUTENANT: Oscar Ehinan, May 2 to November 3, 1898. SECOND LIEUTENANT: Abraham L. McKenzie, May 11 to November 3, 1898. COMPANY E. CAPTAIN : Theodore Edward Lyon, May 2 to November 3, 1898. FIRST LIEUTENANT : George Fisher Jacoby, May 2 to November 26, 1898. SECOND LIEUTENANT: Dudley Warner Frost, May 2 to November 3, 1898. COMPANY F. CAPTAIN : Edward Terence Donnelly, May 2 to November 3, 1898. FIRST LIEUTENANT: Hayden James Bates, May 2 to November 3, 1898. SECOND LIEUTENANT: George Hiecke, May 2 to November 3, 1898. COMPANY G. CAPTAIN : Ambrose Maria Lock, May 2 to November 3, 1898. 881 NEW YORK IN SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR. FIRST LIEUTENANT: John Kearney, May 2 to November 3, 1898. SECOND LIEUTENANT: Arthur Jost, May 2 to August 8, 1898. COMPANY H. CAPTAIN: George Livingston Baker, Jr., May 2 to November 3, 1898. FIRST LIEUTENANT : James Darius Benham, May 2 to November 3, 1898. SECOND LIEUTENANT: William Lewis Reed, May IS to November 3, 1898. COMPANY I. CAPTAIN : Alfred A. Mitchell, May 2 to November 3, 1898. FIRST LIEUTENANT.: George Frederick Frost, Jr., May 2 to November 3, 1898. SECOND LIEUTENANT: George Reith, May 2 to November 3, 1898. COMPANY K. CAPTAIN : Knight Neftel, May 2 to November 3, 1898. FIRST LIEUTENANTS: Charles Levy, May 2 to August 6, 1898. Richard Suliivan Fay, August 7 to November 3, 1898. SECOND LIEUTENANTS: Alexander Stevens, May 2 to July 13, 1898. Oscar L. Foley, August 5 to November 3, 1898. EIGHTH REGIMENT, INFANTRY. 835 COMPANY L. CAPTAIN: Charles P. Staubaeh, May 2 to November 3, 1898. FIRST LIEUTENANT: Dean Nelson, May 2 to November 3, 1898. SECOND LIEUTENANT: Leon Mayer, May 2 to November 3, 1898. COMPANY M. CAPTAIN: Frank Russell Curtis, May 2 to November 3, 1898. FIRST LIEUTENANT: Joseph Parker Mulford, May 2 to November 3, 1898. SECOND LIEUTENANT: Duncan McRa. Livingstone, May 2 to December 2, 1898. RECORDS OF THE OFFICERS AND ENLISTED MEN. ACKER, EBEN ELI SUA.—Age, 34 years. Enlisted. May 2,1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as sergeant- major, May 14, 1898; as first lieutenant and battalion adjutant, same date; mustered out with regiment, November 3, 1898, at New Y'ork city; commissioned battalion adjutant, May 19, 1898, with rank from same date, original. ACKLEY, JOHN V.—Age, 26 years. Enlisted, May 2, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. G, May 17, 1898; mustered out with company, November 8, 1898, at New Y'ork city. AGOSTINI, LOUIS.—Age, 24 years. Enrolled, May 2, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as first lieu• tenant, Co. A, May 14, 1898; discharged for disability, June 15, 1898; commissioned first lieutenant, May 14, 1898, with rank from same date, original. S36 NEW YORK IN SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR. AHMENTZ, JR., WILLIAM.—Age, 33 years. Enlisted, May 12, 1898, at New York cityy to serve two years; mustered in a,s pri• vate, Co.B, May 11, 1898; transferred to First Division Hospital, June 16, 1898; no further record. ALBRECHT, ALFRED P.—Age, — years. Enlisted, July 28, 1898, at Chickamauga Park, Ga., to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. M, same date; transferred to band, August 12, 1898; mustered out with regiment, November 3, 1898, at New York city. ALMY, FREDERICK C—Age, 31 years. Enlisted, May 14, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. H, May 17, 1898; mustered out with company, November 3, 1898, at New York city. AM ANN, CHARLES.—Age, 21 years. Enlisted, May 2, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. K, May 19, 1898; promoted corporal, May 20, 1898; mustered out with company, November 3, 1898, at New York city. AM A N X. JACOB.—Age, 38 years. Enlisted, May 10, 1898,^ at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. A, May 14, 1898; died of typhoid fever, September 3, 1898, at Camp Thomas, Chickamauga Park, Ga. ANCHOR, ROBERT.—Age, — years. Enlisted, June 16, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. F, same date; mustered out with company, November 3, 1898, at New York city. ANDERSON, JOHN E.—Age, 25 years. Enlisted, May 2, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as corporal, Co. E, May 17, 1898; deserted, July 15, 1898, at Camp Thomas, Chickamauga Park, Ga. ANDERSON, LOUIS II.—Age, 22 years. Enlisted, May 2, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. E, May 17, 1898; mustered out with company, November 3, 1898, at New York city. ANDREWS, CHARLES F.—Age, — years. Enlisted, June 16, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Go. M, same date; mustered out with company, Novem• ber 3, 1898, at New York city; subsequent service as second lieutenant, Forty-third Regiment, United States Volunteer Infantry. EIGHTH REGIMENT, INFANTRY. 837 ANDREWS. WILLIAM H.—Age, — years. Enlisted, June 16, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. M, same date; mustered out with company, Novem• ber 3, 1898, at New York city. APPLEGATE, GEORGE W.—Age, 21 years. Enlisted, May 2, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. F, May 17, 1898; promoted corporal, July 23, 1898; mustered out with company, November 3, 1898, at New York . city. ARMSTRONG. GEORGE W.—Age, — years. Enlisted, June 16, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. M, same date; mustered out with company, Novem• ber 3, 1898, at New York city. ASCHEMOOR, AUGUST H.—Age, 35 years. Enlisted, May 12, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. F, May 17, 1898; mustered out with company, November 3, 1898, at New York city. ASHBY, HORACE.—Age. 26 years. Enlisted, May 2, 1898, at New Y'ork city, to serve two years; mustered in as wagoner, Co. M, May 19, 1898; returned to ranks, June 15, 1898; mus• tered out with company, November 3, 1898, at New York city. ASPROOTH, CHARLES.—Age, 27 years. Enlisted, May 2, 1898, «t New Y'ork city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. K, May 19, 1898; mustered out with company, November 3, 1898, at New York city. BACK, HENRY, see Henry Boch. BACK, JACOB.—Age, — years. Enlisted, June 20, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co. H, same date; mustered out with company, November 3, 1898, at New York city. BADENHAUSEN, HARRY W.—Age, 27 years. Enlisted, May 2, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as sergeant, Co. M, May 19, 1898; mustered out with company, November 3, 1898, atNew York city. BAKER, FRANCIS A.—Age, 25 yebrs. Enlisted, May 2, 1898, at New York city, to serve two years; mustered in as private, Co.
Recommended publications
  • •· Congressional Record-House

    •· Congressional Record-House

    . \ · ~ . ' • I t. " ' 2438 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. MARCH 20, PROMOTION IN TIIE ARMY. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. Fifth Regiment of .Artillery. THURSDAY, March 20, 1890. Additional Second Lieut. William Lassiter, of the Fourth Artillery, to be second lieutenant, February 10, 1890. The Honse met at 12 o'clock m. Prayer by Rev. GEORGE ELLIOTT, POSTMASTERS. o!Washington, D. C. .Asias Willison, to bo postmaster at Creston, in the county of Union ORDER OF BUSINESS . and State of Iowa. The SPEAKER. The Clerk will cause the Journal of the proceed­ Lewis P. Summers, to be postmaster n.t Abingdon, in the county of ings of yesterday to be read. Washington and State of Virginia. l\lr. OUTHWAITE. Mr. Speaker, there is evidently no quorum John A. Reynolds, to be postmaster n.t Rochester, in the county of present, and I ask a call of the roll. Monroe and State of New York. The SPEAKER (having counted the House) announced the presence John Pittenger, to be postmaster at Washington, in the county of of 75 members. · Warren and State of New Jersey. Air. OUTEIWAITE. I move a call of the Hoose. Miss Ovie Smedley, to be postmaster at Harrodsbnrgh, in the county Mr. ATKINSON, of Pennsylvania. On that I demand a division. of Mercer and State of Kentucky. The House divided; and there were-ayes 53, noes 8. William H. Overby, to be postmaster at Henderson, in the county of So a. call of the House was ordered. Henderson and State of Kentucky. The Clerk proceeded to call the roll. when the following membera Charles S.
  • The Field Artillery Journal Vol

    The Field Artillery Journal Vol

    No. 6, November-December, 1931 A Very Modern Piece of Heavy Field Artillery—The 155mm Gun— 8-inch Howitzer ...................................................................Frontispiece The Annual Report of the Chief of Field Artillery ................................. 577 General Braxton Bragg............................................................................. 600 Lieut. R. T. Bennison, F. A., D. O. L. General Lassiter Retires............................................................................ 612 Field Artillery R. O. T. C. at Oregon State College................................ 615 Major F. W. Bowley, F. A. Type Problems ........................................................................................... 622 Heavy Artillery vs. Rockets ...................................................................... 625 Captain M. A. Stuart, F. A. An Auxiliary Range Disk for Use With 37mm Sub-Caliber Tubes on 75mm Gun, Model of 1897 (French) ................................................ 641 Major J. E. Lewis, F. A. The Field Artillery Pistol Team, 1931...................................................... 646 Foreign Military Journals: A Current Resume ...................................... 647 Field Line Construction ............................................................................ 655 Major W. P. Evans, Signal Corps Old Post Chapel at Fort Sill...................................................................... 659 Chaplain Milton O. Beebe, U. S. Army 155mm Gun—8-inch Howitzer (Illustrations) .......................................
  • General Lesley J. Mcnair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S

    General Lesley J. Mcnair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S

    General Lesley J. McNair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S. Army By [Copyright 2012] Mark T. Calhoun Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Dr. Theodore A. Wilson ________________________________ Dr. Robert F. Baumann ________________________________ Dr. Christopher R. Gabel ________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey P. Moran ________________________________ Dr. Brent J. Steele Date Defended: April 6, 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Mark T. Calhoun certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: General Lesley J. McNair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S. Army ________________________________ Dr. Theodore A. Wilson Date approved: April 6, 2012 ii ABSTRACT General Lesley J. McNair demonstrated an innovative spirit and exceptional intellectual capacity in his efforts to organize and train the U.S. Army for World War II. The influence he exerted on Army doctrine, training, equipment development, unit organization, and combined arms fighting methods placed him among the handful of generals most responsible for both the effectiveness and the flaws of the force that the United States sent to war in 1942. Through his strong views and aggressive leadership, McNair played a key role in guiding the Army’s interwar mechanization and doctrinal development efforts. Many studies of this period have described aspects of his participation in that process. However, no comprehensive study of McNair’s forty-year military career exists, largely because he did not survive the war, and he left behind no personal memoirs or diaries when he died of wounds inflicted by errant American bombs in Normandy on July 25, 1944.
  • WILLIAM TELL GARST at WORK As Cattle Order Buyer on the Kansas

    WILLIAM TELL GARST at WORK As Cattle Order Buyer on the Kansas

    WILLIAM TELL GARST AT WORK As cattle order buyer on the Kansas City Livestock Market, where he has spent more than fifty years of his life-a pioneer in this line of work-since he was the first man ever to be put on a straight salary on any public livestock market. OUR GARST FAMILY in America Compiled and Published by WILLIAM TELL GARST KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI All Material Edited and Arranged and Typed for the Printer by CLAUDIA COVINGTON GARST First Edition BROWN-WHITE-LOWELL PRESS KANSAS CITY 1950 COPYRIGHT, 1950 By WM. T. GARST Printed in the United States of America DEDICATION Lovingly dedicated to the memory of Benja­ min Franklin Garst and Arminta Hackett Garst, my well-beloved and very worthy parents. FOREWORD Philadelphia, the City of Brotherly Love, was the only specific destination for our earliest ancestors, when they boarded those slow­ moving ships, "Patience," "Molly," James Goodwill," "Isaac," et al, and came in search of freedom and justice. Next we hear of them located in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Bethel Township was to be their home. At that time Lancaster County was a wilderness. In 1785 the northern part of Lancaster County was cut off and called Dauphin County, with Harrisburg as the county seat, and in 1813 the eastern part of Dauphin County was cut off and called Lebanon County with Lebanon as the county seat. Hence records of Bethel Township are in Lebanon County, Pennsylvania. It is said that the early settler came with a gun on his shoulder, an axe in his hand, and a Bible in his pocket-the gun for protection from savages and wild beasts, the axe to clear the forest and build log houses, churches and schools, and the Bible to strengthen faith and lend spiritual guidance and courage for the task ahead.
  • Congressional Record-Senate. 31

    Congressional Record-Senate. 31

    1901. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. 31 . INFANTRY ARM. Walter T. Duggan, Tenth Infantry. Lieut. Col. Stephen P. Jocelyn, Twenty-fifth Infantry, to be Leon A. Matile, Fourteenth Infantry. colonel, February 28, 1901, vice Wheaton, Seventh InfantryJ ap­ Butler D. Price~ Fourth Infantry. pointed brigadier-general, United States Army. QUARTERMASTER'S DEPARTMEYT, Lieut. Col. Charles Keller, Twenty-second Infantry, to be colo­ nel, February -8, 1901, vice Davis, Twenty-third infantry, ap­ Capt. John T. French, jr., to be quartermaster with the rank pointed brigaruer-general, United States Army. of major. Lieut. Col. WilJiam F. Spurgin, Sixteenth Infantry, to be REGISTER OF THE LAND OFFICE, colonel, March 1, 1901, vice Hall, Fourth Infantry, appointed John W. Miller, of Wisconsin, to be register of the land office brig11dier-general, United States AJ:my. at Wausau, Wis. Lieut. Col. Charles .A. Coolidge, Ninth Infantry, to be colonel. POSTMASTER. March 2, 1901, vice Daggett, Fourteenth Infantry, appointed brjgadier-general, United States Army. Ira R. Allen, to be postmaster at Fairhaven, Vt. Lieut. Col. Charles A. Dempsey, First Infantry, to be colonel, March 4, 1901, vice Bates, Second Infantry, appointed brigadier­ general, United States Army. Lieut. Col. William E. Dougherty, Seventh Infantry, to be SENATE. colonel, March 5, 1901, vice Randall, Eighth Infantry, api>Ointed SATURDAY, brigadier-general, United States Army. March 9, 1901. Maj. William V. Richards, Seventh Infantry, to be lieutenant­ Prayer by the Chaplain, Rev. W. H. MILBURN, D. D. colonel, February 28, 1901, vice Jocelyn, Twenty-1ifth Infantry, The Secretary proceeded to read the Journal of yesterday's pro­ promoted. ceedings. Maj.
  • Comparison of Program Activities and Lessons Learned Among 19 School Resource Officer (SRO) Programs

    Comparison of Program Activities and Lessons Learned Among 19 School Resource Officer (SRO) Programs

    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Comparison of Program Activities and Lessons Learned among 19 School Resource Officer (SRO) Programs Author(s): Peter Finn, Michael Shively, Jack McDevitt, William Lassiter, Tom Rich Document No.: 209272 Date Received: March 2005 Award Number: 2000-IJ-CX-K002 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Comparison of Program Activities and Lessons Learned among 19 School Resource Officer (SRO) Programs February 28, 2005 Prepared for Brett Chapman National Institute of Justice 810 7th Street NW Washington, DC 20531 Prepared by Peter Finn, Abt Associates Michael Shively, Abt Associates Jack McDevitt, Northeastern University William Lassiter, Center for the Prevention of School Violence Tom Rich, Abt Associates This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department.
  • Case Studies of 19 School Resource Officer (SRO) Programs

    Case Studies of 19 School Resource Officer (SRO) Programs

    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Case Studies of 19 School Resource Officer (SRO) Programs Author(s): Peter Finn, Jack McDevitt, William Lassiter, Michael Shively, Tom Rich Document No.: 209271 Date Received: March 2005 Award Number: 2000-IJ-CX-K002 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Case Studies of 19 School Resource Officer (SRO) Programs Cambridge, MA Lexington, MA Hadley, MA Bethesda, MD February 28, 2005 Washington, DC Chicago, IL Cairo, Egypt Johannesburg, South Africa Prepared for Brett Chapman National Institute of Justice 810 7th Street NW Washington, DC 20531 Prepared by Abt Associates Inc. Peter Finn, Abt Associates 55 Wheeler Street Jack McDevitt, Northeastern Cambridge, MA 02138 University William Lassiter, Center for the Prevention of School Violence Michael Shively, Abt Associates Tom Rich, Abt Associates This document is a research report submitted to the U.S.
  • The U.S. Air Service in World War I While Singing the Praises of Heroes Like Rickenbacker and Luke

    The U.S. Air Service in World War I While Singing the Praises of Heroes Like Rickenbacker and Luke

    Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: The US. Air Service in World War I. CONTENTS: v. 1. Final report of the Chief of Air Service, AEF. A tactical history of the Air Service, AEF.-v. 2. Some early concepts of military aviation. Includes index. 1. European War, 1914-1 91 8-Aerial operations, American. 2. United States. Army. A.E.F., 1917-1920. Air Service. 3. Aeronautics, Military-United States-History. I. Maurer, Maurer. 0606. U54 940.4 4973 75-42296 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 008-070-00362-7 iii United States Air Force Historical Advisory Committee (As of September 1975) Dr. 1. 8. Holley, Jr Lt. Gen. James R. Allen Dr. Henry F. Graff Duke University Superintendent, USA F Columbia University Academy Dr. Robert F. Byrnes Dr. Louis Morton Indiana University Dartmouth College Lt. Gen. Albert P. Clark Dr. Forest C. Pogue USA F (ret.) Director, Dwight D. Eisenhower Institute for Historical Research Lt. Gen. Raymond B. Furlong Mr. Jack Stempler Commander, Air University General Counsel, USA F Office of Air Force History Maj. Gen. John W. Huston Stanley L. Falk Carl Berger Chief Chief Historian Chief, Histories Division Max Rosenberg Lawrence J. Paszek Deputy Chief Historian Senior Editor V FOK~OK~ There has been a tendency to belittle the work of the U.S. Air Service in World War I while singing the praises of heroes like Rickenbacker and Luke. Compared with the bombing of the U.S. Eighth Air Force in World War II or the B-52's in Southeast Asia, the 138 tons of bombs dropped by the U.S.
  • The Right to Appointed Counsel in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: the State's Response to Lassiter

    The Right to Appointed Counsel in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: the State's Response to Lassiter

    Touro Law Review Volume 14 Number 1 Article 8 1997 The Right to Appointed Counsel in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: The State's Response to Lassiter Rosalie R. Young Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Family Law Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Young, Rosalie R. (1997) "The Right to Appointed Counsel in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings: The State's Response to Lassiter," Touro Law Review: Vol. 14 : No. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol14/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Touro Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Touro Law Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Young: Parental Rights THE RIGHT TO APPOINTED COUNSEL IN TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS: THE STATES' RESPONSE TO LASSITER Rosalie R. Young' In 1981, the United States Supreme Court held in Lassiter v. Department of Social Services2 that there was no constitutional right to counsel for indigent parents facing involuntary termination of parental rights.3 The Lassiter Court mandated a case by case evaluation of the need for counsel based upon the balancing test described in Mathews v. Eldridge4 which requires a consideration of the private interests, the interests of the state, and the risk of an erroneous deprivation.5 Observers worried that ' B.A. (Pennsylvania State University); M.S.S.W. (Columbia University School of Social Work); M.A., Ph.D.
  • CHILE, PERU and the TREATY of 1929: the FINAL SETTLEMENT Ronald Bruce St John

    CHILE, PERU and the TREATY of 1929: the FINAL SETTLEMENT Ronald Bruce St John

    Articles Section 91 CHILE, PERU AND THE TREATY OF 1929: THE FINAL SETTLEMENT Ronald Bruce St John INTRODUCTION Long-standing territorial disputes in the Atacama Desert led to an outbreak of hostilities in 1879 which pitted Chile against the combined forces of Bolivia and Peru.1 The War of the Pacific (1879-1883) was the result of ongoing competition for The resolution of economic and political hegemony on the Pacific Coast of South America, a rivalry Bolivia's long-time complicated by a deep antipathy between Chile and Peru. In this milieu, the quest for improved access to the Pacific vagueness of the boundaries between Bolivia, Chile, and Peru, coupled with the Ocean remains at discovery of valuable guano and nitrate deposits in the disputed territories, combined 2 the centre of a to produce a diplomatic conundrum of insurmountable proportions. Contentious comprehensive issues remained between Chile and Peru even after they concluded the Tacna and solution to all of the Arica Treaty and Additional Protocol in 1929 and were only resolved seven decades diplomatic, later in December 1999. While Bolivia was not a party to the 1999 Acta de economic and Execución and thus is not included in the title of this article, the resolution of political issues Bolivia's long-time quest for improved access to the Pacific Ocean remains at the stemming from the centre of a comprehensive solution to all of the diplomatic, economic and political War of the Pacific. issues stemming from the War of the Pacific. BACKGROUND After four trying years of conflict, the Treaty of Ancón, concluded by Chile and Peru in October 1883, re-established peace along the west coast of South America.
  • 2017–2018 Annual Report & Honor Roll of Donors

    2017–2018 Annual Report & Honor Roll of Donors

    2017–2018 ANNUAL REPORT & HONOR ROLL OF DONORS 2017–2018 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Earl W. Worley, Jr., Chair MISSION STATEMENT Jean M. Averette Lloyd W. Jones, Jr. Wesley E. Beddard Robert B. Kornegay The University of Mary H. Drummond Donnie E. Lassiter De Wayne Eakes Jerilyn J. Lee Mount Olive is a Albert Elrod J. Bryan Martin Christian faith-based, Benjamin D. Forrest David L. McPherson values-centered private Christine J. Greene Charles W. Pittman III H. Adrian Grubbs Emmett Judson Pope III institution rooted in Stanley C. Harrell Kim Quinn the liberal arts tradition. John E. Hill, Jr. Charles L. Renfrow C. Darrell Horne Donald A. Ribeiro We serve our students, Carolyn F. Jernigan Lawrence L. Rouse our founding church, Gene T. Jernigan Howard F. Scott and our communities. Bobby Kenneth Jones II FWB Representative to the Board Ronnie V. Hobgood FROM THE PRESIDENT //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Dear Friends of the University of Mount Olive, Thank you for your generosity and for being a part of this great institution that we call the University of Mount Olive. As you read through this report that covers the fiscal year July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, you may never fully know the measure of your gifts. However, trust me when I tell you that education is powerful and what you, our donors, are doing for UMO is truly life changing. Because our alumni and friends continue to invest in UMO, we are able to transform the lives of those who are committed to higher education. In turn, our students and alumni are returning to their hometowns and communities to make positive impacts of their own.
  • “Battles Were Not Fought in Lines”: Nationalism, Industrialism and Progressivism in the American Military Discourse, 1865-1918

    “Battles Were Not Fought in Lines”: Nationalism, Industrialism and Progressivism in the American Military Discourse, 1865-1918

    “Battles Were Not Fought In Lines”: Nationalism, Industrialism and Progressivism in the American Military Discourse, 1865-1918 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Leif A. Torkelsen, A.B., M.A., J.D. Department of History The Ohio State University 2018 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Geoffrey Parker, Adviser Dr. Nathan Rosenstein Dr. Bruno Cabanes Copyright by Leif A. Torkelsen 2018 Abstract Although notably modest in size compared to its European counterparts, the United States Army was still acutely aware of the technological and tactical developments occurring overseas in the decades prior to the First World War. Nonetheless, in the years 1914-17, US military planners were stubbornly reluctant to accept the extraordinary innovations then taking place on the battlefields of Europe. Worse still, when the United States finally did enter the war, the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) in France resisted adopting the techniques and tactics of their allies, developed in battle at such great cost. Instead, the U.S. Army’s Field Service Regulations clung to a vision of lines of riflemen, advancing in open order, overcoming all resistance with controlled rifle fire followed-up with the bayonet. Trained in such outmoded and linear tactics (“open warfare”, as Pershing called it), the American troops fighting in France needlessly suffered heavy losses. This, despite the fact that the American army possessed a modern general staff, numerous service schools and journals, military attachés and observers the world over. The reasons for this failure lay in the development of the military discourse developed by the U.S.