DOCSLIB.ORG

July 15 Gülenist Coup Attempt That Had 240 People Martyred with 2,200 Others Injured

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
July 15 Gülenist Coup Attempt That Had 240 People Martyred with 2,200 Others Injured JULY 15: Gülenist coup attempt REPORT ISSUE 3, JULY 2016 Daily Sabah Centre for Policy Studies is an Istanbul-Ankara-based, non-proft institute which focuses on Turkey’s vibrant socio-political landscape and its refections and wider implications both at the regional and global levels. DS Centre was founded in February 2015 as the think-tank extension of the English-language newspaper Daily Sabah, published in Turkey. DS Centre’s aim is to provide cohesive and extensive understanding on national and international affairs via reports, publications, frequent conferences, round table meetings and workshops. DS Centre endeavors the dissemination of knowledge. The centre’s events serve as a platform for prominent academics, researchers, policy-makers and experts of the subject matter to present their perspectives and analyses to ensure coherence and reliability. DS CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES Istanbul Offce Barbaros Bulvarı, No:153, Cam Han, Beşiktaş Ankara Offce Çetin Emeç Bulv. No:117 Balgat, Çankaya www.dailysabahcentre.com [email protected] +90 212 354 3432 facebook.com/DSCentreforPolicyStudies @ds_cfps @ds_centre www.dailysabahcentre.com © Daily Sabah Centre for Policy Studies. All rights reserved. Publisher Daily Sabah Centre for Policy Studies Director Pınar Kandemir Contributors Sena Alkan, Semanur Pekkendir, Nejat Başar, Madeline Zutt, Mehmet Solmaz, Batuhan Takış, Merve Baran, Fatih Şemsettin Işık Cover Ümit Oğuz Art Director Berrak Türkmen Cover photos by Reuters and AP Printed by Turkuvaz Haberleşme ve Yayıncılık A.Ş. www.dailysabahcentre.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 3 5WS & 1H 4 Chronology of the Failed Coup 8 Strategic Locations of the Attempted Coup 12 Eyewitness Accounts of the Coup Night 18 National Reactions 20 Democracy and Martyrs’ Rally 22 International Reactions 24 The Man Behind The Coup: A Life in Shadows 25 Decoding the Gülenist Terror Group 28 FETO Dictionary 30 Evidence 32 Post-Coup Era in Turkey JULY 15, GÜLENIST COUP ATTEMPT www.dailysabahcentre.com INTRODUCTION On July 15, Turkey descended into a night soldiers, managed to land safely in Istanbul of chaos and violence as a failed bloody after skirting past F-16s that were trying coup attempt gripped the country, killing to take down his plane. While this coup 238 civilians and police officers. The group attempt rocked a nation that has a history responsible for the coup belonged to a of military coups, it also showed the world small faction within the Turkish military. the resolve, heroism and determination Within this faction was a group of renegade of the Turkish people who rallied for their soldiers who orchestrated a number of leader and defended democracy. Recep coordinated attacks in both Ankara and Tayyip Erdoğan’s upright stance against Istanbul in an illegitimate attempt to seize the coup as well as his call to the nation key government institutions, including the to take to the streets to resist the heinous Presidential Compound and the National attempt were, without a doubt, the most Intelligence Agency (MİT). The Parliament critical and important steps leading to this was bombed 11 times during the night of victory. The resistance of political parties, the attempted coup while deputies from NGOs and civilians in Turkey has shown both the ruling party and the opposition that democracy is a non-negotiable value were inside. Tanks and troops blocked the beyond any argument. Bosporus Bridge in Istanbul while bombs fell on Ankara from F-16 jets. In an effort Testimony given by junta soldiers and other to control the media, putschists stormed pieces of tangible evidence so far point to into the buildings of CNN Turk and TRT, Fethullah Gülen, the leader of Fethullah Turkey’s public broadcaster, where a TRT Terror Group (FETO) as the mastermind anchorwoman was forced with a gun to her behind the unsuccessful coup. In the wake head, to read the coup announcement on of the putsch, the response of the Turkish live television. government - like that of many other European countries that face terrorist Both Turkish President Recep Tayyip attacks -- has declared a three month Erdoğan and Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım state of emergency in the country and has condemned the coup as an illegal act demanded that the U.S. extradite Gülen and ordered security and police forces to to Turkey so he can be brought to a fair restore order. President Erdoğan — who trial in the Turkish criminal court system. had been on vacation in the western coastal Cleansing every cell in the state from the city of Marmaris — used the FaceTime app influence of this terorist organization, as on his iPhone to connect to CNN Turk. well as the extradition of its leader Gülen Moments after CNN Turk broadcasted to Turkey in accordance with an existing Erdoğan’s speech on live television, the agreement between the U.S. and Turkey, junta soldiers invaded the channel’s will be a permanent and important step for building. During his speech, the President Turkish democracy. This report, prepared called on the Turkish people to resist the by the Daily Sabah (DS) Centre, is a compiled coup and march into the streets to defend work that includes a timeline, locations and and protect democracy. All political parties profiles of eyewitness detailing the events in the Parliament denounced the coup as of the coup on the night of July 15 as well people began flooding the streets to stop as detailed information about FETO. the putschists from seizing power. Erdoğan leaving a Marmaris hotel about 15 minutes Daily Sabah Centre for Policy Studies before it was stormed by assassin coup 1 JULY 15: GÜLENIST COUP ATTEMPT www.dailysabahcentre.com PHOTO BY AA On the night of July 15, a small military junta linked to the The coup attempt started on the night of July 15 Fethullah Gülen Terrorist Group (FETO) attempted a coup around 10 p.m. when a road to the Bosporus Bridge d’etat against the elected Turkish government and President was blockaded by coup plotters and F-16 warplanes Recep Tayyip Erdoğan that ultimately failed. The coup plotters started flying low over Ankara. The attack by the tried to seize key provinces in Turkey including Istanbul and putschists was taken under control around 8 a.m. Ankara. Police forces, a vast majority of the army, the Turkish on July 16. The schedule of the coup attempt was National Intelligence Organization (MİT) and members of the moved in an earlier hour after MİT officials realized a bureaucracy stood against the coup attempt, raising their hustle in the army around 4 p.m and the key figures voices after the President’s call to nation to take streets. A in the army were informed by MİT chief Hakan Fidan. total of 238 lost their lives and 2190 injured. The allegations of a coup attempt started circulating the governmental institution and for this reason, coup plotters initiated their assault around 10 p.m. instead of after midnight at 3 a.m. as initially planned. Putschits attacked Key Turkish cities, civilians with tanks and including Istanbul and helicopters and shot at WHAT Ankara, were invaded civilians who resisted, HAPPENED? WHEN by putschists as they striking innocent tried to occupied key people on roadways DID IT TAKE PLACE? state institutions, using snipers and media outlets and alternating their military bases with methods in key tanks and warplanes. strategic points. The western district F-16s controlled by of Marmaris where putschists bombed HOW Erdoğan was on Parliament, the DID IT HAPPEN? vacation was also Presidential bombed by Compound and putschists in efforts many other critical WHERE to capture the institutions. DID IT TAKE PLACE? president and some Despite being faced other provinces in with certain death, Turkey were used as Turkish civilians took bases for the coup to the streets, facing plotters. Nationwide deadly bullets and protests increased demanding that putschists WHY throughout the night surrender for the sake of DID IT HAPPEN? in the affected Turkish democracy. WHO provinces. IS RESPONSIBLE? Fugitive imam Fethullah Gülen, The Gülen Movement tried to seize power over the Turkish state, with who lives in self-imposed exile followers of the Movement infiltrating key state institutions since the 1970s. in rural Pennsylvania and runs Gülen desired to arrive in Turkey as a savior if the coup had succeseed, as the FETO Terrorist Group, is Ayatollah Khomeini did in 1979 after the Iranian Revolution. The Turkish the leader of the coup attempt, Government began to eliminate FETO-related figures within the state which was planned and staged when the malicious aim of the Movement came to the fore a few years by his followers, although he was ago. In recent years, the Turkish State has declared the Gülen Movement quick to deny any responsibility. a Terrorist Group. FETO-linked soldiers within the military attempted Testimony and evidence obtained to conduct the coup on July 15 after being informed by FETO infiltrators from coup plotters point to Gülen in the judiciary. Nearly 60 FETO-linked generals who are related with as the mastermind behind this the Military Espionage Case, were expected to be arrested while nearly failed coup attempt. Turkey 800 FETO-linked soldiers who were found out through the MİT’s Bylock demands the extradition of program, were expected to be removed from their posts. The tipoff resulted Fethullah Gülen, a Turkish in FETO members launching the coup attempt in a desperate last move citizen, from the U.S. to overthrow the Turkish government and evade being dishonorably discharged from their posts. 3 JULY 15: GÜLENIST COUP ATTEMPT CHRONOLOGY OF THE FAILED COUP JULY 15, 2016 FRIDAY 4:00 p.m. General Staff members evaluate intelligence about a coup attempt provided by the National Intelligence Organization (MİT).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Erdogan's Islamist Foreign Policy at the Crossroads Kushal Agrawal
    MP-IDSA Issue Brief Erdogan's Islamist Foreign Policy at the Crossroads Kushal Agrawal March 17, 2021 Summary Even as he continues to work towards reviving the Ottoman glory and 'Ittihad-I Islam' ('Unity of Islam'), there are significant limitations and vulnerabilities in Erdogan pursuing his Islamist approach to statecraft abroad. The Turkish President will have to choose between a pragmatic and an Islamist foreign policy. If the Turkish economy returns to high growth rates, Erdogan's domestic position will be strengthened and he might still return to his pet Islamist adventures overseas. ERDOGAN’S ISLAMIST FOREIGN POLICY AT THE CROSSROADS In his quest to become the leader of the Muslim world, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has in the recent past vehemently opposed the European Union (EU) governments as well as West Asian and North African countries for their policy positions on Islamic issues. Erdogan, for instance, went on an offensive against French President Emmanuel Macron for the latter’s perceived Islamophobic stance in the aftermath of beheading of Samuel Paty on October 16, 2020 in Paris. On October 24, 2020, Erdogan spoke against German authorities for raiding the Mevlana mosque in Berlin, closely associated with the Turkish Milli Gorus movement. Turkey’s relations with key Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia and Egypt have also been fraught, given Erdogan’s support for the Muslim Brotherhood. Since December 2020, however, Erdogan has been trying to reach out to the European Union and the West, in a possible effort to transform his pan-Islamist foreign policy outlook to a pro-Western Kemalist worldview.
    [Show full text]
  • Haber Değeri Kavraminin Değişmesi Sürecinde Basin
    T.C. İSTANBUL ÜN İVERS İTES İ SOSYAL B İLİMLER ENST İTÜSÜ RADYO-TELEV İZYON-SİNEMA ANA B İLİM DALI Yüksek Lisans Tezi HABER DE ĞER İ KAVRAMININ DE ĞİŞ MES İ SÜREC İNDE BASIN KURULU ŞLARI MÜLK İYET İNİN ETK İSİ Nur Esra Atmaca 2501050494 Tez Danı şmanı Doç.Dr. Ne şe KARS İstanbul 2009 HABER DE ĞER İ KAVRAMININ DE ĞİŞ MES İ SÜREC İNDE BASIN KURULU ŞLARI MÜLK İYET İNİN ETK İSİ Nur Esra Atmaca ÖZ Çe şitlenen ileti şim araçlarının medya holdinglerine dönü şmesi ve bunların sahiplerinin medya dı şında ticari faaliyetler yürütmesi haberi ticari bir meta haline getirmi ştir. Haber kitlelere dezenforme edilerek ula şmaya ba şlamı ştır. Medya kurulu şlarının sınırlı etkileri olsaydı onlarca medya kurulu şunun sadece bir kaç ki şinin kontrolünde olması yani medyanın tekelle şmesi bir sorun olarak görülmezdi. Dünyanın her yerinde belli ba şlı medya organlarının yine belli ba şlı holdinglerce yönetilmesi insanlara ula ştırılan “haber”in güvenilirli ği üzerinde ciddi endi şelere neden olmaktadır. Tezimizde kitle ileti şim araçlarının yarattı ğı etki medya mülkiyeti sürecinde ele alındı. ABSTRACT Disscussing ownership of media how efects news is the question we ask and search for an answer. If the media have limited efects, as some argue, then the fact that a small number of people control the media is relatively unimportant. We will see in our thesis that how media ownership becomes a very significant matter. We feel the media must have must have profound efects on news and in our theses, we study this. 2 HABER DE ĞER İ KAVRAMININ DE ĞİŞ MES İ SÜREC İNDE BASIN KURULU ŞLARI MÜLK İYET İNİN ETK İSİ ÖZ-ABSTRACT.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey: Background and U.S. Relations
    Turkey: Background and U.S. Relations Updated November 9, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R41368 SUMMARY R41368 Turkey: Background and U.S. Relations November 9, 2020 U.S.-Turkey tensions have raised questions about the future of bilateral relations and have led to congressional action against Turkey, including informal holds on major new Jim Zanotti arms sales (such as upgrades to F-16 aircraft) and efforts to impose sanctions. Specialist in Middle Nevertheless, both countries’ officials emphasize the importance of continued U.S.- Eastern Affairs Turkey cooperation and Turkey’s membership in NATO. Observers voice concerns about the largely authoritarian rule of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Clayton Thomas Turkey’s polarized electorate could affect Erdogan’s future leadership. His biggest Analyst in Middle Eastern challenge may be structural weaknesses in Turkey’s economy—including a sharp Affairs decline in Turkey’s currency—that have worsened since the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic began. The following are key factors in the U.S.-Turkey relationship. Turkey’s strategic orientation and U.S./NATO basing. Traditionally, Turkey has relied closely on the United States and NATO for defense cooperation, European countries for trade and investment, and Russia and Iran for energy imports. A number of complicated situations in Turkey’s surrounding region—including those involving Syria, Libya, Nagorno-Karabakh (a region disputed by Armenia and Azerbaijan), and Eastern Mediterranean energy exploration—affect its relationships with the United States and other key actors, as Turkey seeks a more independent role. President Erdogan’s concerns about maintaining his parliamentary coalition with Turkish nationalists may partly explain his actions in some of the situations mentioned above.
    [Show full text]
  • FEATURE Yemeni Activist on Her Homeland, Politics, Terror, Democracy FEATURE Daily Sabah > Life > Feature Yemeni Activist on Her Homeland, Politics, Terror, Democracy
    2/21/2018 Yemeni activist on her homeland, politics, terror, democracy - Daily Sabah FEATURE Yemeni activist on her homeland, politics, terror, democracy FEATURE Daily Sabah > Life > Feature Yemeni activist on her homeland, politics, terror, democracy HILAL KAPLAN @hilal_kaplan ISTANBUL Published February 14, 2018 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Tawakkol Karman of Yemen smiles during a news conference as part of the Nobel Women’s Initiative to gather a first­hand account of the ongoing violence against women, Tegucigalpa, Honduras, Oct. 24, 2017. Activist, politician, journalist and Nobel Peace Prize laureate are only some of the terms used to describe Tawakkol Karman, who dares to stand against unjust interventions of the United Arab Emirates in Yemen nown as the "Mother of the Revolution," Yemen's Tawakkol K Karman is one of the most influential women in the Arab world. She was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2011, at the age of 32, in recognition of her work in nonviolent struggle for the safety of women, women's rights and for her full participation in peacebuilding work in Yemen. Daily Sabah columnist Hilal Kaplan met with Karman to talk about the United Arab Emirates' influence and policies in Yemen as well as Saudi officials' remarks on President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Turkey's stance regarding the status of Jerusalem, Operation Olive Branch, the coup attempt of the Gülenist Terror Group (FETÖ) and Turkey's fight for democracy. Daily Sabah: Ms. Karman, you have stated that the United Arab Emirates is destabilizing Yemen. You have even gone further to say that "the UAE is only a collapsible paper tower." Can you explain how you see the UAE's role in Yemen? Tawakkol Karman: Every step taken in Yemen by the UAE is against Yemen's interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Country Report – Update November 2017 [3Rd Edition]
    21 November 2017 (COI up to 11th September 2017) Turkey Country Report – Update November 2017 [3rd edition] Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Main Developments since the attempted Coup d’état (July 2016) a. Overview of major legislative and political developments: i. Recent legislative developments incl. new amendments or decrees 1. State of Emergency 2. Emergency decrees a. Decree of 22 July 2016 (KHK/667) b. Decree of 25 July 2016 (KHK/668) c. Decree of 31 July 2016 (KHK/669) d. Decrees of 17 August 2016 (KHK/670 and 671) e. Decrees of 1 September 2016 (KHK/672, 673 and 674) f. Decrees of 29 October 2016 (KHK/675 and 676) g. Decrees of 22 November 2016 (KHK/677 and 678) h. Decrees of 6 January 2017 (KHK/679, 680 and 681) i. Decrees of 23 January 2017 (KHK/682, 683, 684 and 685) j. Decree of 7 February 2017 (KHK/686) k. Decree of 9 February 2017 (KHK/687) l. Decree of 29 March 2017 (KHK/688) m. Decrees of 29 April 2017 (KHK/689 and 690) n. Decree of 22 June 2017 (KHK/691) o. Decree of 14 July 2017 (KHK/692) p. Decrees of 25 August 2017 (KHK/693 and 694) 3. 2016: Observations by the Council of Europe Committee, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the Council of Europe’s Venice Commission 4. January – September 2017: Observations by the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly, the Council of Europe’s Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe, and the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Muhafazakâr Basinda Hegemonya Uğraklari: 12 Eylül 2010 Referandumu Ve Yeni Anayasa Tartişmalari
    MUHAFAZAKÂR BASINDA HEGEMONYA UĞRAKLARI: 12 EYLÜL 2010 REFERANDUMU VE YENİ ANAYASA TARTIŞMALARI Çağdaş CEYHAN DOKTORA TEZİ Basın Yayın Anabilim Dalı Danışman: Prof. Dr. Nejdet ATABEK Eskişehir Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Kasım, 2014 ii Doktora Tez Özü MUHAFAZAKÂR BASINDA HEGEMONYA UĞRAKLARI: 12 EYLÜL 2010 REFERANDUMU VE YENİ ANAYASA TARTIŞMALARI Çağdaş CEYHAN Basın Yayın Anabilim Dalı Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kasım 2014 Danışman: Prof. Dr. Nejdet ATABEK Muhafazakârlık üzerine tartışmalar Cumhuriyetin kuruluşundan beri yapılmaktadır. Kendini muhafazakâr demokrat bir parti olarak tanımlayan AKP’nin 2002 yılında iktidara gelmesiyle beraber sosyal bilimlere ait disiplinlerde bir araştırma nesnesi olarak muhafazakârlığa olan ilgi artmıştır. Bu çalışma muhafazakâr söylemin muhafazakâr gazetelerin köşe yazarlarınca nasıl kurulduğuna odaklanmıştır. Bunu yaparken Laclau ve Mouffe’un Gramsci’nin hegemonya kavramını radikalleştirerek kullandıkları ve ucu açık bir süreç olarak ele aldıkları şekliyle hegemonya kavramını kullanmıştır. Muhafazakâr hegemonya bir oluş ve eklemlenme ilişkileri pratiği içinde ele alınıştır. Çalışma bu yönüyle muhafazakâr hegemonyaya alternatif bir bakış açısı geliştirmeye çalışmıştır. Çalışma iki temel uğrak üzerinden yapılandırılmıştır. İlkin, muhafazakâr hegemonyanın bütünüyle tesis edildiği bir tarihsel moment olan 12 Eylül 2010 Referandumu incelenmiştir. 1 Eylül ve 20 Eylül 2010 tarihleri arasında Yeni Şafak ve Zaman gazetelerinin köşe yazarları incelenmiştir. İkinci bir tarihsel
    [Show full text]
  • BPC 150502 PG3 C National Security White Paper.Indd
    New Turkey or New Government? The June 2015 Parliamentary Election June 2015 Task Force Co-Chairs Ambassador Morton Abramowitz Ambassador Eric Edelman Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Task Force Members Henri Barkey Aaron Lobel Bernard L. and Bertha F. Cohen Founder and President, America Abroad Media Professor of Internal Relations, Lehigh University Alan Makovsky Svante Cornell Former Senior Professional Staff Member, Research Director, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and House Foreign Affairs Committee Silk Road Studies Program Admiral (ret.) Gregory Johnson Ambassador Paula Dobriansky Former Commander of U.S. Naval Forces, Europe; Former Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs Senior Advisor, Bipartisan Policy Center John Hannah General (ret.) Charles Wald Former Assistant for National Security Affairs to the Vice President Former Deputy Commander, U.S. European Command; Bipartisan Policy Center Board Member Halil Karaveli Senior Fellow, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program David Kramer Senior Director for Human Rights and Human Freedoms, McCain Institute for International Leadership National Security Program Staff Blaise Misztal Jessica Michek Project Director Project Assistant 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report would not have been possible without the substantive contributions of Barın Kayaoğlu. We also gratefully acknowledge the assistance of BPC intern Seyma Akyol. DISCLAIMER This report is a product of BPC’s National Security Program. The findings expressed herein are those solely of the National Security Program, though no member may be satisfied with every formulation in the report. The report does not necessarily represent the views or opinions of BPC, its founders, or its board of directors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reconstruction of Armenian Identity in Turkey and the Weekly Agos*
    THE RECONSTRUCTION OF ARMENIAN IDENTITY IN TURKEY AND THE WEEKLY AGOS* BASKIN ORAN ABSTRACT I delivered this paper in March 2002 at the Turkish-Armenian conference in Ann Arbor, Michigan. "A lot of water has run under the bridges", as we say in Turkish, to mean that a lot has happened since I read it at that date. I'll not go into it because Agos has come to be internationally known since the loss of my great friend (and editor-in-chief) Hrant. I'll only say this much: Agos is now 24 pages, is sold throughout Turkey, is widely followed and respected in intellectual circles, is available on the Internet. Hrant has founded this paper, has placed it right in the middle of the Turkish ordeal for real democracy, and made it famous by his death. Martyrs accomplish more after they pass away. KEYWORDS Armenian identity, Agos, nationalism, minorities. *The title of this paper was inspired by a seminar paper in French prepared by Mehmet Timuc,in Hastas, student at Marmara University in Istanbul, for the academic year 1997-98, under the direction of Associate Professor Fusun Ustel: Agos ou La Reconstruction de I'Identite Armenienne. 124 THE TURKISH YEARBOOK [VOL. XXXVII Introduction: The Road to the Birth of Agos Since about five or six years the Armenian identity in Turkey has been going through a very radical process of reconstruction. This non-Muslim minority, to use the terms of the Lausanne Peace Treaty of 1923, has started to participate in the country's politico-cultural life very actively.
    [Show full text]
  • Türk Medyasinin Sermaye Yapisi Ve Siyasal Iktidarla Ilişkisi Üzerine Bir Inceleme
    Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Yıl 5, Sayı 1, Haziran 2012 (1-21) TÜRK MEDYASININ SERMAYE YAPISI VE SİYASAL İKTİDARLA İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME Onur DURSUN* Öz Kitle iletişim araçları, ekonomik ve politik güçler arasındaki çeşitli ilişkileri nedeniyle gerçekleri ifade etmede yetersiz kalabilmektedir. Haberi yorumlayarak yazma düşüncesi, Birinci Dünya Savaşından bu yana kabul edilmiş bir yöntemdir. Hatta köşe yazarlığının gelişmesinin temel gerekçelerinden birisidir. Okuru doğru bilgilendirme ilkesi doğrultusunda hareket edildiği sürece, haberi kurgulayan muhabir yorum dahi olsa habere müdahale etme hakkına sahiptir. Fakat hegemonik güçlerin beklentilerine yönelik kurgulanan metinlerde gerçekler doğrudan ifade edilememekte/edilmemektedir. Bu tür haber metinlerinde hegemonik güç eleştirileri ya kısmen vardır ya da yokluk düzeyindedir. Aynı tutum diğer haber metinleri için de geçerli olabilmektedir. Yani her türlü haber metni, bir şekilde söylem kısıtlamasıyla, oto-sansürle karşı karşıya kalabilmektedir. Özellikle liberal medyada, bu tavır kendisini hissettirmektedir. Bu çalışmada, sermaye yapılarının ve siyasi merkezlerin medyanın içeriğini etkilediği düşüncesiyle, Türkiye'deki medya organizasyonlarının sermaye yapıları ve siyasetle olan bağlantılarına dair, veriler doğrultusunda bir inceleme gerçekleştirilmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Medyanın Sermaye Yapısı, Söylem Sınırlılığı, Medyada Tekelleşme, İleti Seçimi, Haber Süzgeçleri. Analyzes on Turkish Media's Capital Structure and Its Relationship with Political Power Abstract The multidimensional relationship between economic and political powers, mass media have been inadequate to express the realities. The idea of writing news through readers' interpretation has been admitted as a method since World War I. This is the underlying rationale behind the development of column writing. If the readers are given accurate information, the journalist who designs or interprets the news, has the right to modify the news.
    [Show full text]
  • JULY 15: Gülenist Coup Attempt REPORT ISSUE 3, JULY 2016
    JULY 15: Gülenist coup attempt REPORT ISSUE 3, JULY 2016 Daily Sabah Centre for Policy Studies is an Istanbul-Ankara-based, non-profit institute which focuses on Turkey’s vibrant socio-political landscape and its reflections and wider implications both at the regional and global levels. DS Centre was founded in February 2015 as the think-tank extension of the English-language newspaper Daily Sabah, published in Turkey. DS Centre’s aim is to provide cohesive and extensive understanding on national and international affairs via reports, publications, frequent conferences, round table meetings and workshops. DS Centre endeavors the dissemination of knowledge. The centre’s events serve as a platform for prominent academics, researchers, policy-makers and experts of the subject matter to present their perspectives and analyses to ensure coherence and reliability. DS CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES Istanbul Office Barbaros Bulvarı, No:153, Cam Han, Beşiktaş Ankara Office Çetin Emeç Bulv. No:117 Balgat, Çankaya www.dailysabahcentre.com [email protected] +90 212 354 3432 facebook.com/DSCentreforPolicyStudies @ds_cfps @ds_centre www.dailysabahcentre.com © Daily Sabah Centre for Policy Studies. All rights reserved. Publisher Daily Sabah Centre for Policy Studies Director Pınar Kandemir Contributors Sena Alkan, Semanur Pekkendir, Nejat Başar, Madeline Zutt, Mehmet Solmaz, Batuhan Takış, Merve Baran, Fatih Şemsettin Işık Cover Ümit Oğuz Art Director Berrak Türkmen Cover photos by Reuters and AP www.dailysabahcentre.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
    [Show full text]
  • “Freedom” of the Press in Turkey: Journalist Imprisonments During the Last Decade, 2002-2012
    “FREEDOM” OF THE PRESS IN TURKEY: JOURNALIST IMPRISONMENTS DURING THE LAST DECADE, 2002-2012 By Duygu Kanver A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Journalism – Master of Arts 2013 ABSTRACT “FREEDOM” OF THE PRESS IN TURKEY: JOURNALIST IMPRISONMENTS DURING THE LAST DECADE, 2002-2012 By Duygu Kanver The noticeable increase in the number of imprisoned journalists in the past three years drew national and international attention to the problems of press freedom in Turkey. Arrests of distinguished reporters of Turkey’s mainstream media, along with the ongoing limitations on the freedom of Kurdish and socialist press, caused the country to be referred as “the world’s biggest prison for journalists” by the non-governmental press freedom organizations such as Reporters Without Borders and the Committee to Protect Journalists. Statements of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government authorities claiming that the imprisoned journalists are “not journalists but terrorists,” and their reluctance to amend the laws that cause hundreds of journalists to be jailed led to questioning the influence of politics on journalist imprisonments. This study explores the problems of press freedom with a focus on imprisoned journalists. Based upon in-depth interviews with journalists who were behind bars in the last decade, this study aims to answer the questions of what has changed in terms of freedom of expression in the last decade under AKP rule, for what obvious and underlying reasons the journalists are imprisoned, whether censorship has been a part of the problems of press freedom in the last decade, and how limitations on the freedom of expression affect the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey: State of Emergency, State of Arbitrary 2
    #TURKEY STAte OF EMERGENCY stAfter alreadyA crackingTE down onOF freedom of informationAR in BIrecent years,TR PresidentA Erdoğanry has taken advantage of the abortive coup d’état and the state of emergency in effect since 20 July to silence many more of his media critics, not only Gülen movement media and journalists but also, to a lesser extent, Kurdish, secularist and left-wing media. RSF, 19 September 2016 d’Etat manqué du 15 juillet 2016, mais aussi des représentants des médias pro-kurdes, laïcs et de gauche TURKEY: STATE OF EMERGENCY, STATE OF ARBITRAry 2 Taksim Square, Istanbul, on the night of 15 July 2016. / Ozan Kose AFP © Foreword Checks and balances swept away THE TURKISH PEOPLE took to the streets to face of a state of emergency on 20 July ushered in an tanks on the night of 15 July 2016, a few hours after unprecedented purge of the Turkish media. a sector of the army, backed by armoured units and First page photos: fighter planes, went on to the streets of Ankara and Claiming to be combatting a threat to “national Soldiers Istanbul as part of a bid to seize power. The putschists security and unity” and blaming the coup attempt and police were soon thwarted. The people had been on alert, on the movement founded by the US-based cleric during the 17 July coup and the media too. But the media paid a high price Fethullah Gülen, the government has issued decrees / police and for their loyalty to democracy, for continuing to cover that undermine the foundations of the rule of law, demonstrators developments during those dark hours on the night opening to the way to arbitrary conduct by officials during the when the country’s future hung in the balance.
    [Show full text]