Fact Sheet Syria
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Access Resource
The State of Justice Syria 2020 The State of Justice Syria 2020 Syria Justice and Accountability Centre (SJAC) March 2020 About the Syria Justice and Accountability Centre The Syria Justice and Accountability Centre (SJAC) strives to prevent impunity, promote redress, and facilitate principled reform. SJAC works to ensure that human rights violations in Syria are comprehensively documented and preserved for use in transitional justice and peace-building. SJAC collects documentation of violations from all available sources, stores it in a secure database, catalogues it according to human rights standards, and analyzes it using legal expertise and big data methodologies. SJAC also supports documenters inside Syria, providing them with resources and technical guidance, and coordinates with other actors working toward similar aims: a Syria defined by justice, respect for human rights, and rule of law. Learn more at SyriaAccountability.org The State of Justice in Syria, 2020 March 2020, Washington, D.C. Material from this publication may be reproduced for teach- ing or other non-commercial purposes, with appropriate attribution. No part of it may be reproduced in any form for commercial purposes without the prior express permission of the copyright holders. Cover Photo — A family flees from ongoing violence in Idlib, Northwest Syria. (C) Lens Young Dimashqi TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Major Violations 7 Targeting of Hospitals and Schools 8 Detainees and Missing Persons 8 Violations in Reconciled Areas 9 Property Rights -
Issue Brief Syria
ISSUE BRIEF - SYRIA May 2020 Advocacy Durable Solutions / Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) After almost nine years of conflict in Syria, new displacements(1) continue to substantially surpass returns. Before the 2019 escalations in both the north- Facts & Figures west and north-east of Syria, more than 6 million Syrian people were internally displaced,(2) many of The living conditions in Syria are dire. In the latest them more than once. Syria’s north-east, for instance, Humanitarian Needs Overview, based on data already hosted 710,000 internally displaced people from before the outbreak of COVID-19, the UN from other phases of the conflict(3) when the October estimated that: 9th military incursion forced 200,000 people(4) to move.(5) Moreover, from April 2019 the north-west of ■ 11,7 million people are in need of humanitarian Syria saw intensified aerial attacks leading to almost 1,5 million new displacements by the end of the assistance, with 5 million in acute need; (6) year. Overall more than half of the population of Syria ■ 11,5 million people are at risk of explosive is displaced, either internally or in Syria’s neighbouring hazards;(1) countries, where there are more than 5,5 million Syrian refugees.(7) ■ 6,5 million people are food insecure, and there was a 100 percent increase in acute malnutrition The possible ‘durable solutions’ for refugees are among pregnant and lactating women from 2017 three-fold: 1/ voluntary repatriation (return to Syria); to 2018; 2/ local integration (in the country of first asylum); and 3/ resettlement (to a third country). -
Wash Needs in Schools Iraq
COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW WASH NEEDS IN SCHOOLS OF KEY INDICATORS Note: Findings derived from WFP data are December 2019 IRAQ presented in turquoise boxes. Methodology Water Hygiene Sanitation 1 3 2 REACH Number of HH surveys conducted by Number of schools assessed by WFP Drinking water from a water source is available Drinking water from a water source is available Drinking water comes from an improved water source The water quality is perceived to be acceptable The main water source is at the school's premises Has access to handwashing facilities Has access to handwashing facilities of which is having water and soap available of which is functional of which is having soap Has access to improved sanitation facilities number of Average functional student toilets per school building number of toilets Average for students number of Average students per toilet Has access to student toilets separated by gender Has access to student toilets separated by gender Has unusable toilets Is having a good structural condition of student toilets Is having a good hygienic condition of student toilets Al-Falluja 115 88% 100% 78% 93% 100% 97% 100% 9,1 82% 0% Al-Ramadi 80 83% 98% 81% 98% 100% 100% 100% 8,6 93% 0% Al-Anbar Ana 74 31 44% 65% 87% 49% 72% 94% 94% 64% 66% 62% 94% 5,8 5,4 36 90% 90% 23% 100% 71% Heet 87 72% 100% 60% 100% 93% 97% 100% 9,0 88% 0% Shat Al-Arab 98 12% 92% 83% 11% 7,2 91 77% 56% 46% Al-Basrah Al-Khidhir 70 50% 66% 76% 11% 5,8 69 79% 74% 32% Al-Muthanna Al-Kufa 120 21% 46% 71% 99% 100% 23% 99% 6.5 71% 27% Al-Najaf Al-Najaf 94 2% 95% 98% -
Occurrences of Metallic Deposits in the Kurdistan Region - Iraq
OCCURRENCES OF METALLIC DEPOSITS IN THE KURDISTAN REGION - IRAQ Kurdistan Region - Iraq OCCURRENCES OF METALLIC DEPOSITS IN THE KURDISTAN REGION - IRAQ June 2016 OCCURRENCES OF METALLIC DEPOSITS IN THE KURDISTAN REGION - IRAQ TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction…………………….…………………………….………………….………..…….....…….4 Duhok Governorate…………………………….…………………………………………..…...…..….8 Block 1…………………..…………………………………..……………..……….………..……....……9 Block 2 .……………….…………………………………………………........….……….….……....…15 Erbil Governorate…………..…………………………………………....…………………..…..……20 Block 3 …….…………………………………………………………...……….….……………....……21 Block 4 ………………....……………………………………………….……….…...………………....26 Sulaymania Governorate……………………………………...….………....……………….…..…..31 Block 5 ……………………...……………………………………………..…………......................….32 Block 6 ………..………………………………………………………….…………........................….37 Block 7 ………………………..………………………………………….….……..…………..….....…42 Annex A: References ……………………………………………..………......................................48 Annex B: Chemical Composition of the Minerals………………...........………..…………....…....55 Page 1 of 57 OCCURRENCES OF METALLIC DEPOSITS IN THE KURDISTAN REGION - IRAQ LIST OF FIGURES Figure A Mineral Blocks of Kurdistan…………….……………...….…......................................…5 Figure B Mineral Blocks of Kurdistan (Satellite)…………….…………....................................…6 Figure C Mineral Blocks of Kurdistan Based on Governorates…...........................................…7 Block 1 Figure 1.1 Block1 Boundary…………….…………..………………………….….……........…...…11 Figure 1.2 Block1 -
Syria Crisis Countries
Issa - Syria Aleppo. Crisis 2016 Humanitarian Results ©UNICEF/ Syria 2016/ Aleppo/ Khudr Al Khudr Aleppo/ 2016/ Syria ©UNICEF/ Following intense fighting in east Aleppo, a UNICEF UNICEF a Aleppo, east in fighting intense Following supported mobile nutrition team screens children Jibreen, in malnutrition for ANNUAL 2016: SYRIA, JORDAN, LEBANON, IRAQ, TURKEY AND EGYPT SITUATION IN NUMBERS Highlights In Syria In 2016, there were verified reports of over 2,300 grave violations 5,800,000 against children by armed forces and groups throughout Syria. Of # of children affected these, killing and maiming of children and recruitment and use of children were the most prevalent violations. The actual numbers are 13,500,000 likely to be much higher. # of people affected (HNO, 2017) UNICEF has supported the coordination of the No Lost Generation across the Syria crisis countries. The scale up of education support by Outside Syria sector partners inside Syria has contributed to a decrease in the number of out-of-school children from 2.12 million (40%) in 2014/15 to 1.75 million 2,308,897 (32%) in 2015/16. UNICEF and partners reached over 1 million children with # of registered Syria refugee children structured psychosocial support, and expanded programming for adolescents and youth, including social cohesion and life skills. 4,860,897 # of registered Syrian refugees UNICEF has scaled up cash based programming across the Syria crisis (UNHCR, 5 January 2017) countries in 2016, including providing 12,963 Syrian teachers with incentives in Turkey, and supporting over 21,000 vulnerable households in Jordan, Iraq and Syria with regular cash to support their basic needs. -
The 2021 Syrian Presidential Election
July 2021 The 2021 Syrian Presidential Election Political deadlock and Syrian Burnout Hadia Kawikji Introduction The legitimacy of any position is based on two main elements, first the manner in which the individual attained the position, and second is the ability of the individual to fulfill the related responsibilities. For the first point, Bashar al-Assad’s Presidency in Syria was attained through heredity within a ludicrous system following his father who seized the power via a military coup. Both father and son ruled Syria for the last half a century with de-facto legitimacy, through nominal referendums completely dominated by the Ba’ath party. This was instead of an election that reflects the Syrian people’s will. In terms of the ability to fulfill the responsibilities of the presidency, many indicators showcase the regime’s failures to the Syrians. The recent years have witnessed the collapse of the Syrian pound to unprecedented levels, along with the displacement of more than half of the Syrian population,1 and the rise of extreme poverty to 82%,2 with the fact that 37% of the Syrian territories are outside of the regime’s control. Additionally, the violation of the Syrian decision is evidenced by the control of the Lebanese “Hezbollah”, Iranian militias, and Russian troops controlling over roughly 85% of the Syrian borders, finally yet importantly, the Syrian regime’s inability to protect its territory is illustrated by the haphazard attacks by Israel on Syrian land at any given time. In March 2011, the majority of the Syrian people called for the removal of the Assad regime and the transition to a democratic country. -
Suggested Format of Humanitarian Country
Year 2020 Ref. Ares(2020)2921181 - 05/06/2020 Version 02– 26/05/2020 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) SYRIA REGIONAL CRISIS The full implementation of this version of the HIP is conditional upon the necessary appropriations being made available from the 2020 general budget of the European Union AMOUNT: 260,000,000 The present Humanitarian Implementation Plan (HIP) was prepared on the basis of financing decision ECHO/WWD/BUD/2020/01000 (Worldwide Decision) and the related General Guidelines for Operational Priorities on Humanitarian Aid (Operational Priorities). The purpose of the HIP and its annexes1 is to serve as a communication tool for DG ECHO2’s partners and to assist in the preparation of their proposals. The provisions of the Worldwide Decision and the General Conditions of the Agreement with the European Commission shall take precedence over the provisions in this document. First modification – 26 May 2020 The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the Covid-19 outbreak a public health emergency of international concern on 30 January 2020 and a pandemic on 11 March 2020. The pandemic continues to spread across the region, causing additional humanitarian needs in particular for vulnerable populations.3 In Syria, after more than 9 years of conflict, the health system and water and sanitation infrastructure is particularly inadequate to cope with the pandemic. Densely populated areas in Northwest Syria, including over-crowded IDP camps and informal settlements, are particularly exposed to an outbreak, as access to basic health and WASH services remain scarce, testing capacities extremely low, medical equipment and disposables difficult to procure and humanitarian access particularly challenging. -
Operation Inherent Resolve, Report to the United
OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS JULY 1, 2019‒OCTOBER 25, 2019 ABOUT THIS REPORT In January 2013, legislation was enacted creating the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) framework for oversight of overseas contingency operations. This legislation, which amended the Inspector General Act, requires the Inspectors General of the Department of Defense (DoD), Department of State (DoS), and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to provide quarterly reports to Congress on overseas contingency operations. The DoD Inspector General (IG) is designated as the Lead IG for Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR). The DoS IG is the Associate IG for OIR. The USAID IG participates in oversight for the operation. The Offices of Inspector General of the DoD, DoS, and USAID are referred to in this report as the Lead IG agencies. Other partner agencies also contribute to oversight of OIR. The Lead IG agencies collectively carry out their statutory missions to: • Develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight of the contingency operation. • Ensure independent and effective oversight of programs and operations of the Federal Government in support of the contingency operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, and evaluations. • Report quarterly to Congress and the public on the contingency operation and activities of the Lead IG agencies. METHODOLOGY To produce this quarterly report, the Lead IG agencies submit requests for information to the DoD, DoS, and USAID about OIR and related programs. The Lead IG agencies also gather data and information from open sources, including congressional testimony, policy research organizations, press conferences, think tanks, and media reports. -
Transformations in United States Policy Toward Syria Under Bashar
Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Department of Conflict Resolution Studies Theses CAHSS Theses and Dissertations and Dissertations 1-1-2017 Transformations in United States Policy toward Syria Under Bashar Al Assad A Unique Case Study of Three Presidential Administrations and a Projection of Future Policy Directions Mohammad Alkahtani Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] This document is a product of extensive research conducted at the Nova Southeastern University College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences. For more information on research and degree programs at the NSU College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, please click here. Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_dcar_etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Share Feedback About This Item NSUWorks Citation Mohammad Alkahtani. 2017. Transformations in United States Policy toward Syria Under Bashar Al Assad A Unique Case Study of Three Presidential Administrations and a Projection of Future Policy Directions. Doctoral dissertation. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences – Department of Conflict Resolution Studies. (103) https://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_dcar_etd/103. This Dissertation is brought to you by the CAHSS Theses and Dissertations at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Department of Conflict Resolution Studies Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. -
Economic Sanctions Case 2011-2: EU, US V. Syrian Arab Republic (2011
Case Studies in Economic Sanctions and Terrorism Case 2011-2 EU, US v. Syrian Arab Republic (2011– : human rights, democracy) Gary Clyde Hufbauer, Peterson Institute for International Economics Jeffrey J. Schott, Peterson Institute for International Economics Kimberly Ann Elliott, Peterson Institute for International Economics Julia Muir, Peterson Institute for International Economics July 2011 © Peterson Institute for International Economics. All rights reserved. See also: Cases 86-1 US v. Syria (1986– : Terrorism) Additional country case studies can be found in Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, May 2008 Summary Post‐2000 the United States has imposed three rounds of sanctions against Syria, in response to: (1) Syria’s support for terrorist groups and terrorist activities in Iraq; (2) its pursuit of missiles and weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs; and (3) the occupation of Lebanon. In May 2004, President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13338, implementing the provisions in the Syria Accountability Act, including a freeze of assets of specified individuals and a ban on munitions and dual use items, a ban on exports to Syria other than food and medicine, and a ban on Syrian aircraft landing in or overflying the United States. Sanctions also required US financial institutions to sever correspondent accounts with the Commercial Bank of Syria because of money laundering concerns. In April 2006, Executive Order 13399 was implemented, which designates the Commercial Bank of Syria, including its subsidiary, Syrian Lebanese Commercial Bank, as a financial institution of primary money laundering concern and orders US banks to sever all ties with the institution. In February 2008 the United States issued Executive Order 13460, which freezes the assets of additional individuals. -
Syria: Internally Displaced Persons, Returnees and Internal Mobility — 3
European Asylum Support Office Syria Internally displaced persons, returnees and internal mobility Country of Origin Information Report April 2020 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office Syria Internally displaced persons, returnees and internal mobility Country of Origin Information Report April 2020 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). ISBN: 978-92-9485-158-1 doi: 10.2847/460038 © European Asylum Support Office (EASO) 2020 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, unless otherwise stated. For third-party materials reproduced in this publication, reference is made to the copyrights statements of the respective third parties. Cover photo: © DFID - UK Department for International Development, Syrian women and girls in an informal tented settlement in the Bekaa Valley, Lebanon, 3 February 2017, (CC BY 2.0) https://www.flickr.com/photos/dfid/31874898573 EASO COUNTRY OF ORIGIN REPORT SYRIA: INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS, RETURNEES AND INTERNAL MOBILITY — 3 Acknowledgements EASO would like to acknowledge Sweden, Swedish Migration Agency, Country of Origin Information, Section for Information Analysis, as the drafter of this report. The following departments and organisations have reviewed the report: Denmark, Danish Immigration Service (DIS) ACCORD, the Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation It must be noted that the review carried out by the mentioned departments, experts or organisations contributes to the overall quality of the report, but does not necessarily imply their formal endorsement of the final report, which is the full responsibility of EASO. 4 — EASO COUNTRY OF ORIGIN REPORT SYRIA: INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS, RETURNEES AND INTERNAL MOBILITY Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ -
UK Home Office
Country Policy and Information Note Syria: the Syrian Civil War Version 4.0 August 2020 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: x A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm x The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules x The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules x A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) x A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory x A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and x If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.