DOCSLIB.ORG

Efapsurvey Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Efapsurvey Report EFAPSURVEY REPORT EUROPEAN FORUM FOR ARCHITECTURAL POLICIES SURVEY This Survey was an initiative of the European Forum For Architectural Policies in conjunction with The Government of The Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, in the framework of the Luxembourg Presidency of the European Union, during the first half of 2005. The Survey was overseen by the Co-ordination Group of the European Forum For Architectural Policies with the assistance of the Secretariat of the Forum, and the special assistance of the Architects’ Council of Europe and of the Luxembourg Government, notably for dissemination. The Survey was carried out by Michael O’Doherty former Principal Architect at the Office of Public Works in Dublin Ireland with the assistance of the Forum Secretariat Carole Schmit, Allen Smith B.Arch MRIAI, Claire Finglas of The Royal Institute of the Architects of Ireland. The European Forum for Architectural Policies is an informal network, which brings together Government Administrations, the profession and the cultural institutions in all EU Member States and at European level. Its objective is to encourage exchanges of views and experiences on the promotion of architectural policies designed to enhance building urban and landscape quality, and more generally the quality of the living environment, at both national and European level. The Forum can be contacted at www.architecture-forum.net June 2005 1 Contents Introduction………………………………………………………. 3 A Resolution for architectural quality in Europe……….......... Key extract 5 Executive summary……………………………………………... 6 National Structures……………………………………………… 9 2 Introduction In November 2000, under the French Presidency, the Ministers of Culture adopted a Resolution on Architectural Quality in the Urban and Rural Environments. The Resolution was formally adopted as a Council Resolution by the European Council on 12th February 2001 (OJEC – 2001/c 73/04). Since 2001 significant further initiatives by successive Presidencies have concurred to create today a favourable political environment to reinforce co-operation and co-ordination in the area of Architectural Policies and Urban Policies. Luxembourg Presidency of the EU The Luxembourg Presidency has included architectural policies as a priority on the official agenda of the activities of the Presidency during the first half of 2005, which include, in particular, a plenary session of the European Forum for Architectural Policies, on 27 and 28 June 2005. An informal session of the Council is scheduled to take place at Luxembourg at the time and it is planned that the Ministers of Culture will have an exchange with the Forum at that occasion. Five years after its adoption, it is intended that the Ministers of Culture of the EU-25 will review the impact of the Council Resolution on Architectural Quality in the Urban and Rural Environments and will assess the follow-up that has been given to the recommendations it contained, with a view to consider the adoption of a ministerial decision. In particular, it is envisaged that the Ministers of Culture could decide to establish a more formal, regular co-operation between them on architectural policies while fully respecting the national prerogatives and the subsidiary principle. Such a reinforced effort could draw on and benefit from the ongoing informal exchange within the Forum network. Moreover, it is hoped that the Ministers could also agree to seek to enhance notably inter-ministerial consultations in this policy area at both European level and in the Member States. Study/Survey In order to give concrete foundation to the intended decision of the Ministers of Culture it is necessary to rely on a thorough knowledge and assessment of the existing situation. For this purpose a study was undertaken of the political and administrative structures currently in place in the Member States, while illustrating in particular, the way in which architectural policy – as a vital element of a coherent and sustainable spatial development for the good of society - is integrated or not in the different States. The Study/Survey has never previously been done, at least not with having in mind the perspective of a reinforced, organised co-operation and co-ordination at ministerial level. Scope and purpose of the Study/Survey The study covered all the EU-25 and pursued two primary goals: Firstly, the review and the assessment of the impact of the Council Resolution on Architectural Quality in the Urban and Rural Environments to date, by surveying the actions and political developments that the Resolution has generated since its adoption. Secondly, the study sought to identify and describe the existing government structures responsible for architectural policy and the existing liaison and/or co-ordination procedures between the different ministerial departments or absence thereof. The study also researched existing agencies and other bodies, whether government ones or by delegation, which play a role in the formulation, development and implementation of any relevant aspects of architectural policies. Finally, it will describe the decision-making mechanisms. 3 Methodology A questionnaire was circulated to relevant and known organisations within each Member State. The Organisations targeted were the Cultural Ministries, other Ministries which hold or share responsibilities for Architectural policy, Agencies engaged in the procurement of architecture, Cultural Bodies and Professional Institutes/Orders. The information received has been processed and edited into two categories, a) Organisational and Administrative structures b) Actions and political developments. It should be noted that in the interests of brevity not all information provided was transposed, however all material has been retained for future reference. Acknowledgement The information provided by each country was, in most cases, comprehensive and detailed particularly with regard to the existing Government and Administrative structures and functions. Given the short timescale the European Forum for Architectural Policies wish to acknowledge the co- operation of all the organisations who responded and in particular the individuals in the Member State Administrations who co-ordinated and compiled the information. Michael O’Doherty Dip.Arch. FRIAI. June 2005. 4 A Resolution for architectural quality in Europe………….key extract Hereby affirms that: a architecture is a fundamental feature of the history, culture and fabric of life of each of our countries; that it represents an essential means of artistic expression in the daily life of citizens that it constitutes the heritage of tomorrow. b architectural quality constituent part of both the rural and urban environment. c the cultural dimension and the quality of the physical treatment of space should be taken into account in Community regional and cohesion policies; d architecture is an intellectual, cultural, artistic and professional activity. Architectural service therefore is professional service which is both cultural and economic; Hereby expresses its attachment to: a the common characteristics shared by European towns and cities, such as the importance of historical continuity, the quality of public areas, the social mix and richness of urban diversity; b the fact that good quality architecture, by improving the living context and the relationship between citizens, and their environment, whether rural or urban, can contribute effectively towards social cohesion and job creation, the promotion of cultural tourism and regional economic development. Hereby encourages the Member States to: a intensify their efforts to improve the knowledge and promotion of architectural and urban design, and to make contracting authorities and the general public more aware of and better trained in appreciation of architectural, urban and landscape culture. b take into account the specific nature of architectural service in the decisions and measures which require it; c promote architectural quality by means of exemplary public building policies. d foster and exchange of information and experience in the field of architecture. Calls on the Commission to: a ensure that architectural quality and the specific nature of architectural service are taken into consideration in all its policies, measures and programmes; b seek, in consultation with the Member States and in accordance with the rules governing the Structural Funds, ways and means of ensuring in the application of those Funds a wider consideration of architectural quality and the conservation of cultural heritage: c in the context of existing programmes: foster measures to promote, disseminate and raise awareness of architectural and urban cultures with due respect for cultural diversity, facilitate cooperation and networking between institutions devoted to upgrading cultural heritage and architecture and support incipient European scale events. encourage, in particular, the training and mobility of students and professionals and thus promote the dissemination of good practice. d keep the Council informed of the implementation of such measures. 5 Summary National Structures From the information in Part 1 of the questionnaire a substantial body of information has been assembled and is now available on the Political and Administrative structures with responsibility for Architectural Policy, procuring Architectural quality and also the promotion of Architectural quality within member States, including contact points. This database of key contact information is set out on a country
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anlage Statements / PDF, 686 KB
    824 der Beilagen XXII. GP - Ausschussbericht NR - Anlage Statements 1 von 110 Anlage B Anlage zum Bericht der parlamentarischen Enquete-Kommission zum Thema „Architekturpolitik und Baukultur in Österreich“ Statements Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite 1. Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Friedrich Achleitner 3 2. Dipl.-Ing. Markus Berchtold, Vorarlberger Architekturinstitut 5 3. Dipl.-Ing. Volker Dienst, Koordinator der Plattform für Architektur und Baukultur 9 Dipl.-Ing. Jakob Dunkl, Dipl.-Ing. Doris Burtscher, IG Architektur, 4. 15 Interessenvereinigung, Architekturschaffender Österreich 5. Mag. Dr. Barbara Feller, Architekturstiftung Österreich 19 6. Abg. Carina Felzmann, WKÖ, Sprecherin der ARGE Kreativwirtschaft 23 Dipl.-Ing. Ortfried Friedreich, Präsident der Kammer der Architekten und 7. 26 Ingenieurkonsulenten für Wien, Niederösterreich und Burgenland Univ.-Prof. Mag. Roland Gnaiger, Universität für künstlerische und industrielle 8. 27 Gestaltung Linz, Institut für Architekturkonzeption und Entwurf 9. Dipl.-Ing. Sabine Gretner, Stadtplanung, Architektur und Bauen, Wien 30 Dipl.-Ing. Martin Höbarth, Präsidentenkonferenz der Landwirtschafts-kammern 10. 32 Österreich Univ.-Prof. Mag. Hans Hollein, Präsident der Zentralvereinigung der Architekten 11. 35 Österreichs 12. Paula Huotelin, SAFA - The Finnish Association of Architects 37 13. Cilly Jansen, Architectuur Lokaal Holland, Direktorin 41 14. Univ.-Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Christian Kühn, Vorstand Architekturstiftung Österreich 44 Univ.-Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Rüdiger Lainer, Akademie der bildenden Künste Wien, Institut 15. 46 für Kunst und Architektur 16. Mag. Michaela Mischek, Mischek BAU AG 49 Dipl.-Ing. Georg Pendl, Vorsitzender der Bundessektion Architekten der Kammer der 17. 54 Architekten und Ingenieurkonsulenten Dipl.-Ing. Walter Raiger, KAG Steiermärkische Krankenanstalten Gesellschaft, 18. 59 Direktor 2 von 110 824 der Beilagen XXII. GP - Ausschussbericht NR - Anlage Statements 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki Music Centre Sounds Better with BIM
    MagiCAD at work Helsinki Music Centre sounds better with BIM The professional’s choice for Building Services Partners working in harmony Helsinki Music Centre – Musiikkitalo in Fin nish – is “The project is designed entirely in 3D. It gives the a large and prestigious project. The building will benefits of collision control between design disci - be home to the Sibelius Academy, the Helsinki Phil - plines, for example between HVAC and cable trays, harmonic Orchestra and the Radio Symphony even before installation. It also gives a visual pres - Orchestra. HVAC and electrical installations were entation which is very helpful. Working in 3D in designed in MagiCAD by the Finnish companies MagiCAD allows us to fit cable trays and switch - Granlund Oy and Lausamo Oy. boards in the building’s tight spaces. With 2D design, it would have been impossible or at least very hard Musiikkitalo will replace the current national con - to design and it would have needed more final cert hall built in 1971. Its grand opening is sched - checks at the worksite before installation,” says uled for 31 August 2011. For a building of this kind, Roni Leppänen, CAD manager at Lausamo. the acoustics are of course top priority. The world- renowned Japanese company Nagata Acoustics was brought in at an early stage, with planning begin - ning as far back as 1997. Acoustic requirements also affect the installations, with stringent demands placed on the ventilation system in particular. The main concert hall seats 1,700 people, and the building also has five smaller halls for 150-300 people. Air quality and temperature must provide maxi - mum comfort all year round, without generating disturbing noise – even when the music is played pianissimo .
    [Show full text]
  • Principaux Obstacles Juridiques S'opposant
    OD / novembre 2003 1 Le 1er décembre 2003 Mission « immobilier public » Dans le cadre de la politique de réforme de l’Etat, le Gouvernement entend moderniser la politique immobilière de l’Etat, qui est le premier propriétaire de France. L’Inspection générale des Finances a rédigé deux rapports très complets sur le sujet. Ceux-ci ont conclu à l’importance « d’une réflexion de l’Etat sur l’évolution de ses structures, de ses compétences et des outils susceptibles d’améliorer la gestion du parc existant et la conduite des opérations immobilières futures ». Ils ont identifié les facteurs explicatifs des faiblesses que présente la gestion du parc immobilier de l’Etat. Conformément à la lettre de mission, ce rapport soumet au Premier ministre les propositions opérationnelles qui doivent permettre de préparer les décisions du gouvernement sur les orientations de la politique immobilière de l’Etat et les modalités de sa mise en œuvre. C’est ainsi qu’il est proposé : - d’adapter le cadre juridique relatif au parc immobilier public, - de définir une politique immobilière globale de l’Etat - de mettre en place une Agence des propriétés immobilières de l’Etat. - d’arrêter le programme de cession d’actifs dans le cadre d’une stratégie de valorisation. * * OD / novembre 2003 2 * I – Adapter le cadre juridique relatif au parc immobilier public, I-1 Procéder au « déclassement » des immeubles à usage de bureaux La jurisprudence constante du Conseil d’Etat classe dans le domaine public tous les immeubles affectés à l’usage du public ou à un service public et spécialement aménagés à cet effet.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Description for Senate Properties - Service Portal
    Project description for Senate Properties - Service portal Niemelä, Juho 2017 Laurea Laurea University of Applied Sciences Leppävaara Project description for Senate Properties - Service portal Niemelä Petrus Degree Programme in Security Management Bachelor’s Thesis March, 2017 3 Laurea University of Applied Sciences Abstract Leppävaara Degree Programme in Security Management Niemelä, Juho Project description for Senate Properties – Service portal Year 2017 Pages 38 The purpose of this thesis is to describe the project that was done between September 2016 and January 2017. The project was done for Senate Properties. The project was a part of a broader content that Senate Properties is undertaking. The background of the project origi- nates form The Finnish government aim, which is to streamline the expenses of governmental departments. The project idea was to research, if there is a possibility to create a service portal for the estates safety and security services. The idea of the portals is to cross-connect safety and security services. Besides that, the idea was to research if it is possible to find cost effective solutions for the service portal. The theoretical framework of the thesis is Senate Properties own project model. The model is based on Risto Pelin book Projektihallinnan käsikirja,Otava 2011. The thesis is chronologically describing the project phases and research methods. The meth- ods that were used in this project has been: market research, business model canvas, service blueprint, customer journey, and an inquiry that has been made by using open-ended ques- tions method. The results of the project were that we identified that it is possible to create a service portal and there is a need for it in the market.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Public Sector Property Management Download
    Office politics Improving public sector property management A Deloitte Research Study Contents 1 Foreword 2 Executive summary 4 Introduction 6 Success factors for strategic property management 19 Conclusion About Deloitte Research Deloitte Research, a part of Deloitte Services LP, identifies, analyzes, and explains the major issues driving today’s business dynamics and shaping tomorrow’s global marketplace. From provocative points of view about strategy and organizational change to straight talk about economics, regulation and technology, Deloitte Research delivers innovative, practical insights companies can use to improve their bottom-line performance. Operating through a network of dedicated research professionals, senior consulting practitioners of the various member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, academics and technology specialists, Deloitte Research exhibits deep industry knowledge, functional understanding, and commitment to thought leadership. In boardrooms and business journals, Deloitte Research is known for bringing new perspective to real-world concerns. Foreword When John Locke said there exists a natural right to “life, liberty, and property,” he most likely was not including governments in that equation. Yet, today, governments have become some of the largest property holders in the world. But what advantage is there to government as landlord? And how well are these assets being managed? Most importantly, in a time of fiscal austerity, what can governments do to optimize functionality, strip out waste, and ensure real value for their citizens? In this report, we explore these questions and offer actionable steps governments can take to better manage their property portfolio. Some of these steps are operational — such as better data collec- tion and use of analytics to model property needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterthese 2012-04-15
    Die approbierte Originalversion dieser Diplom-/Masterarbeit ist an der Hauptbibliothek der Technischen Universität Wien aufgestellt (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at). The approved originalMSc version Program of this diploma or master thesis is available at the main library of the Vienna University of Technology (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/englweb/Immobilienmanagement). & Bewertung Ausgliederungen staatlicher Immobilien im europäischen Vergleich Master Thesis zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades „Master of Science” eingereicht bei Mag. Peter Höflechner MRICS Christian Huber 0226764 Wien, April 2012 Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich, CHRISTIAN HUBER, versichere hiermit 1. dass ich die vorliegende Master These, "AUSGLIEDERUNGEN STAATLICHER IMMOBILIEN IM EUROPÄISCHEN VERGLEICH", 109 Seiten, gebunden, selbständig verfasst, andere als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel nicht benutzt und mich auch sonst keiner unerlaubten Hilfen bedient habe, und 2. dass ich diese Master These bisher weder im Inland noch im Ausland in irgendeiner Form als Prüfungsarbeit vorgelegt habe. Wien, 17.04.2012 Unterschrift Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitendes Vorwort ...............................................................................................1 1.1. Terminologie ......................................................................................................4 2. Deutschland und die Bundesanstalt für Immobilienaufgaben (BImA) ................7 2.1. Ausgliederungsrechtsformen ...............................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Table of Contents
    www.concerto.uk.com www.concerto.uk.com Appendix – Table of Contents Appendix – Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Appendix 1 – List of Meetings ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Appendix 2 – Property Asset Management Delivery Plan current position and potential resource implications 5 Appendix 3 - Surveys ................................................................................................................................................... 17 Client Questionnaire – Results ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Staff Questionnaire – Results ......................................................................................................................................... 27 Appendix 4 – International Comparators .................................................................................................................... 60 Page 1 of 85 www.concerto.uk.com www.concerto.uk.com Appendix 1 – List of Meetings This Appendix includes the list of internal and external meetings carried by the project team both with OPW staff, clients and stakeholders. List of Internal Meetings Board Clare McGrath, Chairman Board John Sydenham, Commissioner Board John McMahon, Commissioner Corporate Services Eilís O'Connell,
    [Show full text]
  • BIM Trends and Future
    Experiences from the BIM adoption in Finland and UK – Clients as the drivers of innovation Prof Arto Kiviniemi School of Architecture School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2016 Background School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2016 BIM is nothing new... Same old concept, new name... Building Product Modelling Building Information Modelling First paper about BIM IAI 1st BIM requirements BIM becomes Chuck Eastman “The use of International Alliance GSA (USA) & mandatory in computers instead of drawings for Interoperability, now Senate Properties (Finland) in building design” (March 1975) buildingSMART public projects IFC 1.5.1 IFC 2x3 in the UK Early BIM research Increasing industry interest in BIM Announcements of ISO STEP 1st integrated (Standard for the Exchange UK Government’s of Product Model Data) BIM project BIM requirements HUT-600 in Finland ArchiCAD National BIM 1st BIM software Autodesk for PCs (Mac) Revit requirements in Finland Revit 1st IPD project in USA 1975 1984 1996 2000 2006 2010 2016 1998 2002 2007 2012 School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2016 Construction industry is slow to change School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2016 The industry needs a wake up call... ...which usually comes from the public clients School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2016 Finland Early BIM research and adoption School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2016 Long history of BIM activities in Finland Ratas 1983 Vera 1997 Sara 2003 PRE 2010 School of Architecture © Prof Arto Kiviniemi 2016 Source: Preliminary
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Government Premises Strategy 2020
    Proposed Government Premises Strategy 2020 Working group memorandum on Government Premises Strategy update 2a/2014 issues Budget Proposed Government Premises Strategy 2020 Working group memorandum on Government Premises Strategy update Ministry of Finance publications 2a/2014 Budget issues 441 729 Print product MINISTRY OF FINANCE PO Box 28 (Snellmaninkatu 1 A) FI-00023 GOVERNMENT FINLAND Tel. +358 295 16001 Internet: www.financeministry.fi Layout: Government Administration Department / Information Support and Publications Unit /Pirkko Ala-Marttila Description page Publisher and date Ministry of Finance, July 2015 Author(s) Pauliina Pekonen Working Group tasked with Updating Government Premises Strategy Title of publication Proposed Government Premises Strategy 2020, Working group memo- randum on Government Premises Strategy update Publication series and Ministry of Finance publications 2a/2014 number Distribution and sale The publication can be accessed in pdf-format in Finnish at www.vm.fi/julkaisut. Printed by ISBN 978-952-251-705-0 (print.) No. of pages Language ISSN 1459-3394 (print.) 56 English ISBN 978-952-251-706-7 (PDF) ISSN 1797-9714 (PDF) Abstract The Working Group has completed its update of the 2005 Government Premises Strategy and submits the following key proposals: - The Government Premises Strategy is aimed at maintaining continued access to premises that support effective performance. Development efforts are focused on improving performance and cost effectiveness in the workp- lace. All facilities and premises in use are designed with health and safety as well as government’s overall bene- fit and social responsibility in mind. - Today’s changing workplace requires environments that support collaboration and that provide facilities for both teamwork and jobs requiring focus and concentration.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortress of Suomenlinna – Unesco World Heritage Site 2020–2024 Contents
    A Prosperous Suomenlinna for Future generations ManageMent Plan, Fortress oF suoMenlinna – unesco World Heritage site 2020–2024 Contents Foreword: Suomenlinna for all! ..............................................................................................................................................................3 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................................4 The values of Suomenlinna as a World Heritage Site ..................................................................................................................... 5 Local values of Suomenlinna ...................................................................................................................................................................6 History .............................................................................................................................................................................................................11 Current state ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Sustainable development ........................................................................................................................................................................ 31 Priorities for the future ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Concrete Architecture of the 21St Century Seeks Clarity and Simplicity
    C ONCRETE A RCHITECTURE IN FINNISH CONCRETE ARCHITECTURE of the 21st century seeks clarity and simplicity. The nature of the material is now emphasised more than previously and the facades within the whole are unassuming and harmonious, and with carefully executed details. Also the F plasticity of concrete has been utilised: the sur- INLAND PHOTOGRA faces curve and bend – thin and slender struc- tures, as well as heavy structures, have found their place. Architectural photographer Jussi Tiainen has skilfully captured in his photographs the ver- CONCRETE satile nature of concrete, its smoothness and ARCHITECTURE IN FINLAND coarseness, strength and sensitivity, hardness and softness, and light and shadow. For this book he has photographed the best of Finnish PHOTOGRAPHED BY concrete architecture from recent years – 16 different buildings, ranging from public build- P HED BY JUSSI JUSSI TIAINEN ings to a single-family house, and from new buildings to remodelling projects. Among the architects’ offices included are JKMM Archi- tects, Lahdelma & Mahlamäki Architects, and Heikkinen & Komonen Architects. The arti- cle at the beginning of the book by architect Maritta Koivisto, edtior-in-chief of the Finnish T journal Betoni [Concrete], opens an interesting IAINEN angle on the uses of concrete in building and architecture. ISBN 978-951-682-888-9 www.rakennustieto.fi Rakennustieto www.rakennustieto.fi P.O. Box 1004, 00101 Helsinki Finland Phone + 358 207 476 400 Photographs: Jussi Tiainen Cover: front cover, Turku City Library; back cover, Housing Company Triadi The project texts have been written by the architects themselves, except for Helsingin Triadi, Helsinki Courthouse, Aleksanterinkatu Bridge, Helsingin Arabianvillat, Weegee House and Verkatehdas, which have been written by Maritta Koivisto.
    [Show full text]
  • Nordicum Real Estate Finland 2020
    NORDICUM Porvoo: Turku Brings Oulu Retools, Real Estate Annual Finland 2020 Guard Legacy, Ecosystem Re-energizes NORDICUM Embrace Future Edge Downtown RE Finland Real Estate Annual Finland 25th Anniversary Stordalen 12.-13.November 2020 Goes for the Crown Join the Finnish Real Estate summit in the city Registration fee 1390 e + VAT of Tampere and discover the vibrant Finnish Early bird discount – 25% until Real Estate Business. Be inspired. 11.6.2020 www.refinland.fi www.refinland.fi NORDICUM.com 2_ReFinland2020_210x277.indd 1 30.11.2019 11.23 1013 MARCH 2020 PALAIS DES FESTIVALS CANNES, FRANCE THE WORLD’S LEADING PROPERTY MARKET 26,800 real estate professionals 100+ countries 22,000 sqm exhibition area 6,380 investors 130+ conferences is a registered trademark of Reed MIDEM - All rights reserved trademark of is a registered ® - MIPIM BUSINESS RESIDENTIAL SERVICES BUSINESS LEVEL APARTMENT HOTEL IN CENTRE HELSINKI REGISTER NOW ON WWW.MIPIM.COM FROM 51 EUROS/NIGHT OR CONTACT OUR SALES TEAM [email protected] BUSINESS RESIDENTIAL SERVICES BUSINESS LEVEL APARTMENT HOTEL IN CENTRE HELSINKI FROM 51 EUROS/NIGHT Nordicum 3 NORDICUM Real Estate Annual Finland Spaceshifters Publisher PubliCo Oy Bringing various functions into a specific real estate project has Pälkäneentie 19 A FI-00510 Helsinki been a “go-to” move for industry players for a long time now. Finland This way, you can have public library or a healthcare center in a Phone +358 20 162 2200 shopping center with residential construction to boot. This type [email protected] of a mixed-use approach is attractive in the eyes of the inves- www.publico.com tors, as well, since it offers a certain diversification of space.
    [Show full text]