BIM Report Government Strategy October 2016 Prepared by Belinda Hodkinson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BIM Report Government Strategy October 2016 Prepared by Belinda Hodkinson BIM Report Government Strategy October 2016 Prepared by Belinda Hodkinson bhconsultants BIM Report – Government Strategy Document title: BIM Report – Government Strategy Document no. JR001 Revision: R1 Date: 20 October 2016 Prepared by: Belinda Hodkinson File name: AUTJ3AD0004_JR001_R1-Government Report.docx Belinda Hodkinson ABN 37 001 024 095 313 / 20 Convention Centre Place VIC 3006 T +61 4 19 303 764 www.bhconsultants.com.au COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Belinda Hodkinson. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Belinda Hodkinson constitutes an infringement of copyright. This report is provided to TBCITB pursuant to the brief issued, dated 25 May, 2016 If this report is received by anyone other than TBCITB, the recipient is placed on notice that the attached report has been prepared solely for TBCITB for their own internal use and this report and its contents may not be shared with or disclosed to anyone by the recipient without express written consent of TBCITB and Belinda Hodkinson. Belinda Hodkinson shall have no liability, and shall pursue all available legal and equitable remedies against recipient, for the unauthorised use or distribution of this report. ******** Any advice given in this report is not intended or written by Belinda Hodkinson to be used, and cannot be used, by a client or any other person or entity for the purpose of (i) avoiding (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matter addressed herein. Any advice in this document is limited to the conclusions specifically set forth herein and is based on the completeness and accuracy of the facts, assumptions and representations. If any facts, assumptions or representations herein is not entirely complete or accurate, it is imperative that Belinda Hodkinson be informed immediately, as the inaccuracy or incompleteness could have a material effect on our conclusions. In rendering our service, we are relying upon the relevant provisions of the information given to us at the time of the research. bhconsultants.com.au Doc#: AUTJ3AD0004_JR001_R1 Page 1 of 29 BIM Report – Government Strategy Preface This BIM and Digital delivery report has been produced for the BIMHub in Tasmania. The objective of the report is to give insights to what Government and Government Departments or Agencies find beneficial in the use of the construction technologies. This in return will be discussed at a strategy meeting to establish how the BIMHub may approach their government for the implementation of BIM. Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 4 BIM for Government and Government Agencies ................................................................................................ 5 World overview of BIM mandates ........................................................................................................................ 5 AMER – North America and South America ................................................................................................... 6 Canada ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Brazil ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 United States ............................................................................................................................................... 7 APAC – Asia Pacific and Japan ...................................................................................................................... 9 Australia ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 China............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Hong Kong ................................................................................................................................................... 9 Japan ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 New Zealand .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Singapore .................................................................................................................................................. 10 EMEA- Europe, the Middle East and Africa .................................................................................................. 11 Finland, Norway, Sweden and Netherlands .............................................................................................. 11 France ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 United Kingdom ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 Australian Advisory papers ................................................................................................................................ 15 BIM by Australian State Agencies and Councils ............................................................................................... 18 Australian BIM Advisory Board ...................................................................................................................... 18 National Digital Engineering Working Group ................................................................................................. 18 New South Wales .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Health Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................. 19 Transport for New South Wales ................................................................................................................ 19 Queensland ................................................................................................................................................... 20 Department of Housing and Public Works ................................................................................................ 21 bhconsultants.com.au Doc#: AUTJ3AD0004_JR001_R1 Page 2 of 29 BIM Report – Government Strategy 3D QLD ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 Department of Infrastructure Local Government and Planning ................................................................. 21 Department of Transport and Main Roads ................................................................................................ 22 South Australia .............................................................................................................................................. 22 Victoria ........................................................................................................................................................... 23 Future Industries ........................................................................................................................................ 23 Buildings and Infrastructure ....................................................................................................................... 23 Digital Cadastre ......................................................................................................................................... 24 Western Australia .......................................................................................................................................... 24 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 25 BIM for Tasmanian Government ....................................................................................................................... 25 What is documented ...................................................................................................................................... 25 Linking BIM to levels of Government ............................................................................................................. 25 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................. 26 Integrated State Government Taskforce ....................................................................................................... 27 Data Requirements ...................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Credit Suisse Anlagestiftung Wertschriftenverzeichnis Credit Suisse Anlagestiftung • Wertschriftenverzeichnis Per 30
    30. Juni 2018 Credit Suisse Anlagestiftung Wertschriftenverzeichnis Credit Suisse Anlagestiftung • Wertschriftenverzeichnis per 30. Juni 2018 (exkl. Verbindlichkeiten und Cash) Inhaltsverzeichnis in % des Gesamt- in % des Gesamt- Valor fondsvermögens Valor fondsvermögens Mischvermögen ...................................................................3 CSA Mixta-BVG Basic ......................................................3 CSA Mixta-BVG Defensiv .................................................3 CSA Mixta-BVG ................................................................3 CSA Mixta-BVG Maxi .......................................................3 CSA Mixta-BVG Equity 75 ................................................3 CSA Mixta-BVG Index 25 .................................................3 CSA Mixta-BVG Index 35 .................................................4 CSA Mixta-BVG Index 45 .................................................4 CSA Mixta-BVG Index 75 .................................................4 CSA BVG 25-45 Dynamic ................................................4 Festverzinsliche Vermögen ..................................................4 CSA Money Market CHF ..................................................4 CSA Swiss Bonds CHF ....................................................4 CSA Short Term Bonds CHF ...........................................7 CSA Foreign Bonds CHF .................................................7 CSA Mid Yield Bonds CHF ..............................................8 CSA Inflation Linked
    [Show full text]
  • 233 Małgorzata Rymarzak
    Małgorzata Rymarzak 35 Uniwersytet Gdański Wydział Zarządzania Katedra Inwestycji i Nieruchomości e ‑mail: [email protected] 2016, Vol. 15, No. 2016, Vol. Uwarunkowania zarządzania nieruchomościami publicznych uniwersytetów na przykładzie wybranych krajów UE DOI: 10.17399/HW.2016.1535012 STRESZCZENIE CEL NAUKOWY: Artykuł prezentuje wyniki badań nad uwarunkowaniami za‑ rządzania nieruchomościami publicznych uniwersytetów. Ich celem była próba przedstawienia różnych rozwiązań przyjętych w wybranych krajach UE odnoś‑ nie do tytułów prawnych przysługujących uczelniom do nieruchomości, a także form zarządzania nimi. PROBLEM I METODY BADAWCZE: Do prowadzonych rozważań wykorzy‑ stano literaturę przedmiotu, niepublikowane raporty komercyjnych firm oraz in‑ formacje zawarte na stronach internetowych poszczególnych zarządców nieru‑ chomości uczelnianych. PROCES WYWODU: Analizie poddano systemy „nieruchomościowe” szkol‑ nictwa wyższego przyjęte w Austrii, Niemczech, Holandii, Wielkiej Brytanii, Szwe‑ cji oraz Polsce. WYNIKI ANALIZY NAUKOWEJ: Wyniki badań wskazują, iż władze uniwer‑ sytetów publicznych w Europie nie ponoszą takiej samej odpowiedzialności za majątek, którym dysponują. Poszczególne państwa przyjęły własne rozwiązania zarówno w zakresie struktury własnościowej nieruchomości, zasad zarządzania, jak i wynajmu nieruchomości. WNIOSKI, INNOWACJE, REKOMENDACJE: Niezależnie od wielu różnic wy‑ stępujących w systemach akademickich państw europejskich można się poku‑ sić o wymienienie pewnych wspólnych cech. Austriackie, szwedzkie i niemieckie szkoły wyższe nie są właścicielami nieruchomości uczelnianych. Dostarczaniem odpowiedniej dla nich powierzchni na zasadach najmu, a także zarządzaniem majątkiem zajmują się specjalnie powołane do tego celu spółki. Z kolei w Holan‑ dii, Hiszpanii, Wielkiej Brytanii oraz Polsce uczelnie posiadają różne tytuły praw‑ ne do nieruchomości i zarządzają posiadanymi zasobami. → SŁOWA KLUCZOWE: szkolnictwo wyższe, majątek, struktura własności S u g e r o w a n e c y t o w a n i e: Rymarzak, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Anlage Statements / PDF, 686 KB
    824 der Beilagen XXII. GP - Ausschussbericht NR - Anlage Statements 1 von 110 Anlage B Anlage zum Bericht der parlamentarischen Enquete-Kommission zum Thema „Architekturpolitik und Baukultur in Österreich“ Statements Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite 1. Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Friedrich Achleitner 3 2. Dipl.-Ing. Markus Berchtold, Vorarlberger Architekturinstitut 5 3. Dipl.-Ing. Volker Dienst, Koordinator der Plattform für Architektur und Baukultur 9 Dipl.-Ing. Jakob Dunkl, Dipl.-Ing. Doris Burtscher, IG Architektur, 4. 15 Interessenvereinigung, Architekturschaffender Österreich 5. Mag. Dr. Barbara Feller, Architekturstiftung Österreich 19 6. Abg. Carina Felzmann, WKÖ, Sprecherin der ARGE Kreativwirtschaft 23 Dipl.-Ing. Ortfried Friedreich, Präsident der Kammer der Architekten und 7. 26 Ingenieurkonsulenten für Wien, Niederösterreich und Burgenland Univ.-Prof. Mag. Roland Gnaiger, Universität für künstlerische und industrielle 8. 27 Gestaltung Linz, Institut für Architekturkonzeption und Entwurf 9. Dipl.-Ing. Sabine Gretner, Stadtplanung, Architektur und Bauen, Wien 30 Dipl.-Ing. Martin Höbarth, Präsidentenkonferenz der Landwirtschafts-kammern 10. 32 Österreich Univ.-Prof. Mag. Hans Hollein, Präsident der Zentralvereinigung der Architekten 11. 35 Österreichs 12. Paula Huotelin, SAFA - The Finnish Association of Architects 37 13. Cilly Jansen, Architectuur Lokaal Holland, Direktorin 41 14. Univ.-Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Christian Kühn, Vorstand Architekturstiftung Österreich 44 Univ.-Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Rüdiger Lainer, Akademie der bildenden Künste Wien, Institut 15. 46 für Kunst und Architektur 16. Mag. Michaela Mischek, Mischek BAU AG 49 Dipl.-Ing. Georg Pendl, Vorsitzender der Bundessektion Architekten der Kammer der 17. 54 Architekten und Ingenieurkonsulenten Dipl.-Ing. Walter Raiger, KAG Steiermärkische Krankenanstalten Gesellschaft, 18. 59 Direktor 2 von 110 824 der Beilagen XXII. GP - Ausschussbericht NR - Anlage Statements 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki Music Centre Sounds Better with BIM
    MagiCAD at work Helsinki Music Centre sounds better with BIM The professional’s choice for Building Services Partners working in harmony Helsinki Music Centre – Musiikkitalo in Fin nish – is “The project is designed entirely in 3D. It gives the a large and prestigious project. The building will benefits of collision control between design disci - be home to the Sibelius Academy, the Helsinki Phil - plines, for example between HVAC and cable trays, harmonic Orchestra and the Radio Symphony even before installation. It also gives a visual pres - Orchestra. HVAC and electrical installations were entation which is very helpful. Working in 3D in designed in MagiCAD by the Finnish companies MagiCAD allows us to fit cable trays and switch - Granlund Oy and Lausamo Oy. boards in the building’s tight spaces. With 2D design, it would have been impossible or at least very hard Musiikkitalo will replace the current national con - to design and it would have needed more final cert hall built in 1971. Its grand opening is sched - checks at the worksite before installation,” says uled for 31 August 2011. For a building of this kind, Roni Leppänen, CAD manager at Lausamo. the acoustics are of course top priority. The world- renowned Japanese company Nagata Acoustics was brought in at an early stage, with planning begin - ning as far back as 1997. Acoustic requirements also affect the installations, with stringent demands placed on the ventilation system in particular. The main concert hall seats 1,700 people, and the building also has five smaller halls for 150-300 people. Air quality and temperature must provide maxi - mum comfort all year round, without generating disturbing noise – even when the music is played pianissimo .
    [Show full text]
  • Principaux Obstacles Juridiques S'opposant
    OD / novembre 2003 1 Le 1er décembre 2003 Mission « immobilier public » Dans le cadre de la politique de réforme de l’Etat, le Gouvernement entend moderniser la politique immobilière de l’Etat, qui est le premier propriétaire de France. L’Inspection générale des Finances a rédigé deux rapports très complets sur le sujet. Ceux-ci ont conclu à l’importance « d’une réflexion de l’Etat sur l’évolution de ses structures, de ses compétences et des outils susceptibles d’améliorer la gestion du parc existant et la conduite des opérations immobilières futures ». Ils ont identifié les facteurs explicatifs des faiblesses que présente la gestion du parc immobilier de l’Etat. Conformément à la lettre de mission, ce rapport soumet au Premier ministre les propositions opérationnelles qui doivent permettre de préparer les décisions du gouvernement sur les orientations de la politique immobilière de l’Etat et les modalités de sa mise en œuvre. C’est ainsi qu’il est proposé : - d’adapter le cadre juridique relatif au parc immobilier public, - de définir une politique immobilière globale de l’Etat - de mettre en place une Agence des propriétés immobilières de l’Etat. - d’arrêter le programme de cession d’actifs dans le cadre d’une stratégie de valorisation. * * OD / novembre 2003 2 * I – Adapter le cadre juridique relatif au parc immobilier public, I-1 Procéder au « déclassement » des immeubles à usage de bureaux La jurisprudence constante du Conseil d’Etat classe dans le domaine public tous les immeubles affectés à l’usage du public ou à un service public et spécialement aménagés à cet effet.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Owned Enterprises in the EU: Lessons Learnt and Ways Forward in a Post-Crisis Context
    ISSN 2443-8014 (online) State-Owned Enterprises in the EU: Lessons Learnt and Ways Forward in a Post-Crisis Context INSTITUTIONAL PAPER 031 | JULY 2016 EUROPEAN ECONOMY Economic and Financial Affairs European Economy Institutional Papers are important reports and communications from the European Commission to the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament on the economy and economic developments. LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this publication, or for any errors which, despite careful preparation and checking, may appear. This paper exists in English only and can be downloaded from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on http://europa.eu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 KC-BC-16-031-EN-N (online) KC-BC-16-031-EN-C (print) ISBN 978-92-79-54337-1 (online) ISBN 978-92-79-54336-4 (print) doi:10.2765/99224 (online) doi:10.2765/355315 (print) © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs State-Owned Enterprises in the EU: Lessons Learnt
    [Show full text]
  • Project Description for Senate Properties - Service Portal
    Project description for Senate Properties - Service portal Niemelä, Juho 2017 Laurea Laurea University of Applied Sciences Leppävaara Project description for Senate Properties - Service portal Niemelä Petrus Degree Programme in Security Management Bachelor’s Thesis March, 2017 3 Laurea University of Applied Sciences Abstract Leppävaara Degree Programme in Security Management Niemelä, Juho Project description for Senate Properties – Service portal Year 2017 Pages 38 The purpose of this thesis is to describe the project that was done between September 2016 and January 2017. The project was done for Senate Properties. The project was a part of a broader content that Senate Properties is undertaking. The background of the project origi- nates form The Finnish government aim, which is to streamline the expenses of governmental departments. The project idea was to research, if there is a possibility to create a service portal for the estates safety and security services. The idea of the portals is to cross-connect safety and security services. Besides that, the idea was to research if it is possible to find cost effective solutions for the service portal. The theoretical framework of the thesis is Senate Properties own project model. The model is based on Risto Pelin book Projektihallinnan käsikirja,Otava 2011. The thesis is chronologically describing the project phases and research methods. The meth- ods that were used in this project has been: market research, business model canvas, service blueprint, customer journey, and an inquiry that has been made by using open-ended ques- tions method. The results of the project were that we identified that it is possible to create a service portal and there is a need for it in the market.
    [Show full text]
  • MB16 Final Minutes
    ECDC Management Board MB16/Minutes 12 November 2009 Minutes of the Sixteenth Meeting of the ECDC Management Board Warsaw, 24-25 June 2009 Adopted by the Management Board at its Seventeenth meeting, 5-6 November 2009 Table of Contents Page Summary of decisions ............................................................................................. 1 Opening and welcome by the Chair ........................................................................ 2 Keynote address from Mr Adam Fronczak, Under Secretary, Minister of Health, Polish Ministry of Health ........................................................................................ 2 Presentation from Dr Jaroslaw Pinkas, Director, National Institute of Hygiene, Polish National Institute of Public Health .............................................................. 2 Item 1. Adoption of the Draft Agenda (and noting of the Declarations of Interest and proxy voting) (document MB16/2 Rev. 2) ........................................................ 2 Item 2. Adoption of the Draft Minutes of the Fifteenth meeting of the Management Board (Stockholm, 24-25 March 2009) (document MB16/4) ........... 3 Item 9. Director’s Briefing on ECDC’s Main Activities since the last meeting of the Management Board ........................................................................................... 3 Item 10: Technical Briefing on ECDC’s Work in the Influenza A(H1N1)v Pubic Health Emergency ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Public Sector Property Management Download
    Office politics Improving public sector property management A Deloitte Research Study Contents 1 Foreword 2 Executive summary 4 Introduction 6 Success factors for strategic property management 19 Conclusion About Deloitte Research Deloitte Research, a part of Deloitte Services LP, identifies, analyzes, and explains the major issues driving today’s business dynamics and shaping tomorrow’s global marketplace. From provocative points of view about strategy and organizational change to straight talk about economics, regulation and technology, Deloitte Research delivers innovative, practical insights companies can use to improve their bottom-line performance. Operating through a network of dedicated research professionals, senior consulting practitioners of the various member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, academics and technology specialists, Deloitte Research exhibits deep industry knowledge, functional understanding, and commitment to thought leadership. In boardrooms and business journals, Deloitte Research is known for bringing new perspective to real-world concerns. Foreword When John Locke said there exists a natural right to “life, liberty, and property,” he most likely was not including governments in that equation. Yet, today, governments have become some of the largest property holders in the world. But what advantage is there to government as landlord? And how well are these assets being managed? Most importantly, in a time of fiscal austerity, what can governments do to optimize functionality, strip out waste, and ensure real value for their citizens? In this report, we explore these questions and offer actionable steps governments can take to better manage their property portfolio. Some of these steps are operational — such as better data collec- tion and use of analytics to model property needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterthese 2012-04-15
    Die approbierte Originalversion dieser Diplom-/Masterarbeit ist an der Hauptbibliothek der Technischen Universität Wien aufgestellt (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at). The approved originalMSc version Program of this diploma or master thesis is available at the main library of the Vienna University of Technology (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/englweb/Immobilienmanagement). & Bewertung Ausgliederungen staatlicher Immobilien im europäischen Vergleich Master Thesis zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades „Master of Science” eingereicht bei Mag. Peter Höflechner MRICS Christian Huber 0226764 Wien, April 2012 Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich, CHRISTIAN HUBER, versichere hiermit 1. dass ich die vorliegende Master These, "AUSGLIEDERUNGEN STAATLICHER IMMOBILIEN IM EUROPÄISCHEN VERGLEICH", 109 Seiten, gebunden, selbständig verfasst, andere als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel nicht benutzt und mich auch sonst keiner unerlaubten Hilfen bedient habe, und 2. dass ich diese Master These bisher weder im Inland noch im Ausland in irgendeiner Form als Prüfungsarbeit vorgelegt habe. Wien, 17.04.2012 Unterschrift Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitendes Vorwort ...............................................................................................1 1.1. Terminologie ......................................................................................................4 2. Deutschland und die Bundesanstalt für Immobilienaufgaben (BImA) ................7 2.1. Ausgliederungsrechtsformen ...............................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The USE-IT Project Journal #1
    December 2017 Author: Zeno Winkels UIA Expert The FED Project Journal N°1 Project led by the City of Gothenburg The FED project With this project, the city of Gothenburg aims to develop, demonstrate and replicate a novel district level energy system, integrating electric power, as well as heating and cooling. This solution embraces and enhances the use of technologies such as PVs, heat-pumps and wind into a larger system. To overcome the main challenges, the proposed solution contains advancements in system development and operation, business logistics, legal framework as well as stakeholders’ acceptance. The FED solutions consists of three cornerstones: FED demonstrator area – The selected demonstration is located at a campus with about 15 000 end-users. It has a well-balanced set of property owners, energy infrastructure, and users, including prosumers as well as buildings with different needs and usage profiles. The area is exempted from the law of concession for electricity distribution, providing the opportunity to test and validate a local energy market. The prerequisites to optimize the use of primary and secondary energy using intermediate storage are well developed, as they are for generation, storage and distribution. FED System solution – Our solution will optimise the use of low-grade energy to replace primary energy. Adding fossil-free energy sources while optimising different buildings usage profiles; one building’s energy needs will be balanced with the surplus of another. Intermediate storage, fundamental to be a success, consists of heating/cooling storage in the building’s structure, accumulation tanks or geothermal heat pumps, and batteries for electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Table of Contents
    www.concerto.uk.com www.concerto.uk.com Appendix – Table of Contents Appendix – Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Appendix 1 – List of Meetings ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Appendix 2 – Property Asset Management Delivery Plan current position and potential resource implications 5 Appendix 3 - Surveys ................................................................................................................................................... 17 Client Questionnaire – Results ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Staff Questionnaire – Results ......................................................................................................................................... 27 Appendix 4 – International Comparators .................................................................................................................... 60 Page 1 of 85 www.concerto.uk.com www.concerto.uk.com Appendix 1 – List of Meetings This Appendix includes the list of internal and external meetings carried by the project team both with OPW staff, clients and stakeholders. List of Internal Meetings Board Clare McGrath, Chairman Board John Sydenham, Commissioner Board John McMahon, Commissioner Corporate Services Eilís O'Connell,
    [Show full text]