The Finnish Property Market 2012 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Finnish Shopping Centers 2020 Centers Shopping Finnish Finnish Councilfinnish of Shopping Centers • Suomen Kauppakeskusyhdistys Ry
Succesful and evolving shopping center business – the beating heart of community! Menestyvä ja kehittyvä Finnish Shopping Centers 2020 kauppakeskusliiketoiminta – yhdyskunnan sykkivä sydän! Kauppakeskukset Finnish Council of Shopping Centers Annankatu 24, 2. krs. 00100 Helsinki puh. +358 9 4767 5711 www.kauppakeskusyhdistys.fi Finnish Shopping Centers 2020 Centers Shopping Finnish Kauppakeskukset Finnish Shopping Centers 2014 Centers Shopping Finnish Kauppakeskukset www.kauppakeskusyhdistys.fi Finnish Council of Shopping Centers • Suomen Kauppakeskusyhdistys ry Finnish Shopping Centers 2020 Kauppakeskukset 4 5 Introduction The Finnish Shopping Centers 2020 industry review transparency and knowledge of the sector among they are conveniently accessible. The business mix centers is as part of a community structure which is compiled by the Finnish Council of Shopping investors, customers, traders, and the main stake- changes constantly according to customer needs. is conveniently accessible. The key is to create rele- Centers. It provides a package of information on holders in the sector, both in Finland and abroad. Business proprietors are able to operate in an eco- vant spaces for people and to provide a community shopping centers for everyone interested in the logically and socially responsible way. The shopping hub. The ongoing trend is to provide non-retail uses sector. This is already the fourteenth annual review. Shopping centers are adapting to center business in Finland has reached its 30-year by increasing leisure in shopping centers and also Shopping Centers 2020 contains key figures about continuous change anniversary. It is not yet a mature sector, but it is in town centre regeneration. The mixed-use town the business sector as well as standardised intro- an area with continuous development. -
Anlage Statements / PDF, 686 KB
824 der Beilagen XXII. GP - Ausschussbericht NR - Anlage Statements 1 von 110 Anlage B Anlage zum Bericht der parlamentarischen Enquete-Kommission zum Thema „Architekturpolitik und Baukultur in Österreich“ Statements Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite 1. Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Friedrich Achleitner 3 2. Dipl.-Ing. Markus Berchtold, Vorarlberger Architekturinstitut 5 3. Dipl.-Ing. Volker Dienst, Koordinator der Plattform für Architektur und Baukultur 9 Dipl.-Ing. Jakob Dunkl, Dipl.-Ing. Doris Burtscher, IG Architektur, 4. 15 Interessenvereinigung, Architekturschaffender Österreich 5. Mag. Dr. Barbara Feller, Architekturstiftung Österreich 19 6. Abg. Carina Felzmann, WKÖ, Sprecherin der ARGE Kreativwirtschaft 23 Dipl.-Ing. Ortfried Friedreich, Präsident der Kammer der Architekten und 7. 26 Ingenieurkonsulenten für Wien, Niederösterreich und Burgenland Univ.-Prof. Mag. Roland Gnaiger, Universität für künstlerische und industrielle 8. 27 Gestaltung Linz, Institut für Architekturkonzeption und Entwurf 9. Dipl.-Ing. Sabine Gretner, Stadtplanung, Architektur und Bauen, Wien 30 Dipl.-Ing. Martin Höbarth, Präsidentenkonferenz der Landwirtschafts-kammern 10. 32 Österreich Univ.-Prof. Mag. Hans Hollein, Präsident der Zentralvereinigung der Architekten 11. 35 Österreichs 12. Paula Huotelin, SAFA - The Finnish Association of Architects 37 13. Cilly Jansen, Architectuur Lokaal Holland, Direktorin 41 14. Univ.-Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Christian Kühn, Vorstand Architekturstiftung Österreich 44 Univ.-Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Rüdiger Lainer, Akademie der bildenden Künste Wien, Institut 15. 46 für Kunst und Architektur 16. Mag. Michaela Mischek, Mischek BAU AG 49 Dipl.-Ing. Georg Pendl, Vorsitzender der Bundessektion Architekten der Kammer der 17. 54 Architekten und Ingenieurkonsulenten Dipl.-Ing. Walter Raiger, KAG Steiermärkische Krankenanstalten Gesellschaft, 18. 59 Direktor 2 von 110 824 der Beilagen XXII. GP - Ausschussbericht NR - Anlage Statements 19. -
Helsinki Music Centre Sounds Better with BIM
MagiCAD at work Helsinki Music Centre sounds better with BIM The professional’s choice for Building Services Partners working in harmony Helsinki Music Centre – Musiikkitalo in Fin nish – is “The project is designed entirely in 3D. It gives the a large and prestigious project. The building will benefits of collision control between design disci - be home to the Sibelius Academy, the Helsinki Phil - plines, for example between HVAC and cable trays, harmonic Orchestra and the Radio Symphony even before installation. It also gives a visual pres - Orchestra. HVAC and electrical installations were entation which is very helpful. Working in 3D in designed in MagiCAD by the Finnish companies MagiCAD allows us to fit cable trays and switch - Granlund Oy and Lausamo Oy. boards in the building’s tight spaces. With 2D design, it would have been impossible or at least very hard Musiikkitalo will replace the current national con - to design and it would have needed more final cert hall built in 1971. Its grand opening is sched - checks at the worksite before installation,” says uled for 31 August 2011. For a building of this kind, Roni Leppänen, CAD manager at Lausamo. the acoustics are of course top priority. The world- renowned Japanese company Nagata Acoustics was brought in at an early stage, with planning begin - ning as far back as 1997. Acoustic requirements also affect the installations, with stringent demands placed on the ventilation system in particular. The main concert hall seats 1,700 people, and the building also has five smaller halls for 150-300 people. Air quality and temperature must provide maxi - mum comfort all year round, without generating disturbing noise – even when the music is played pianissimo . -
Principaux Obstacles Juridiques S'opposant
OD / novembre 2003 1 Le 1er décembre 2003 Mission « immobilier public » Dans le cadre de la politique de réforme de l’Etat, le Gouvernement entend moderniser la politique immobilière de l’Etat, qui est le premier propriétaire de France. L’Inspection générale des Finances a rédigé deux rapports très complets sur le sujet. Ceux-ci ont conclu à l’importance « d’une réflexion de l’Etat sur l’évolution de ses structures, de ses compétences et des outils susceptibles d’améliorer la gestion du parc existant et la conduite des opérations immobilières futures ». Ils ont identifié les facteurs explicatifs des faiblesses que présente la gestion du parc immobilier de l’Etat. Conformément à la lettre de mission, ce rapport soumet au Premier ministre les propositions opérationnelles qui doivent permettre de préparer les décisions du gouvernement sur les orientations de la politique immobilière de l’Etat et les modalités de sa mise en œuvre. C’est ainsi qu’il est proposé : - d’adapter le cadre juridique relatif au parc immobilier public, - de définir une politique immobilière globale de l’Etat - de mettre en place une Agence des propriétés immobilières de l’Etat. - d’arrêter le programme de cession d’actifs dans le cadre d’une stratégie de valorisation. * * OD / novembre 2003 2 * I – Adapter le cadre juridique relatif au parc immobilier public, I-1 Procéder au « déclassement » des immeubles à usage de bureaux La jurisprudence constante du Conseil d’Etat classe dans le domaine public tous les immeubles affectés à l’usage du public ou à un service public et spécialement aménagés à cet effet. -
Citycon Annual Report 2007 Annual Report Citycon Business and Property Portfolio
Pohjoisesplanadi 35 AB Tel. +358 9 680 36 70 www.citycon.fi FI-00100 Helsinki, Fax +358 9 680 36 788 [email protected] Finland Annual Report 2007 Contents 2007 Citycon in Brief .....................................................................................................................................1 Citycon as an Investment and Information for Shareholders .............................2 CEO’s Review ...........................................................................................................................................4 Business Environment .....................................................................................................................6 Citycon Annual Report Annual Report Citycon Business and Property Portfolio ...............................................................................................9 Finland ....................................................................................................................................................27 Sweden ...................................................................................................................................................30 Baltic Countries ................................................................................................................................32 Human Resources ...........................................................................................................................34 Profit Performance and Financial Position ..................................................................37 -
Project Description for Senate Properties - Service Portal
Project description for Senate Properties - Service portal Niemelä, Juho 2017 Laurea Laurea University of Applied Sciences Leppävaara Project description for Senate Properties - Service portal Niemelä Petrus Degree Programme in Security Management Bachelor’s Thesis March, 2017 3 Laurea University of Applied Sciences Abstract Leppävaara Degree Programme in Security Management Niemelä, Juho Project description for Senate Properties – Service portal Year 2017 Pages 38 The purpose of this thesis is to describe the project that was done between September 2016 and January 2017. The project was done for Senate Properties. The project was a part of a broader content that Senate Properties is undertaking. The background of the project origi- nates form The Finnish government aim, which is to streamline the expenses of governmental departments. The project idea was to research, if there is a possibility to create a service portal for the estates safety and security services. The idea of the portals is to cross-connect safety and security services. Besides that, the idea was to research if it is possible to find cost effective solutions for the service portal. The theoretical framework of the thesis is Senate Properties own project model. The model is based on Risto Pelin book Projektihallinnan käsikirja,Otava 2011. The thesis is chronologically describing the project phases and research methods. The meth- ods that were used in this project has been: market research, business model canvas, service blueprint, customer journey, and an inquiry that has been made by using open-ended ques- tions method. The results of the project were that we identified that it is possible to create a service portal and there is a need for it in the market. -
Citycon Vuosikertomus 2008
Vuosikertomus 2008 Sisältö Citycon ja vuosi 2008 lyhyesti 2 Toimitusjohtajan katsaus 4 Toimintaympäristö 8 Strategia 12 Kiinteistöomaisuus 14 Liiketoimintayksiköt 22 Suomi 24 Ruotsi 28 Baltia 32 Henkilöstö 34 Talous ja rahoitus 37 Riskit ja riskienhallinta 39 Corporate Governance 42 Citycon sijoituskohteena ja tietoja osakkeenomistajille 48 Tilinpäätös 51 Cityconin kauppakeskukset Suomessa Cityconin kauppakeskukset Ruotsissa ja Baltian maissa on esitelty takasisäkannessa. Keskustojen kohtaamispaikat IsoKarhu Sampokeskus Paikalliskeskukset Pori Rovaniemi Sujuvan arjen kumppanit Cityconin vuokrattava Cityconin vuokrattava pinta-ala 14 800 m2. pinta-ala 14 000 m2. Kauppakeskusten ryhmittelystä kerrotaan lisää sivulla 25. Rakennusvuosi Rakennusvuosi 1972/2001. 1989/1990. Uudistus- ja/tai laajennusvuosi 2004. Forum IsoKristiina Torikeskus Jyväskylä Lappeenranta Seinäjoki Cityconin vuokrattava Cityconin vuokrattava Cityconin vuokrattava pinta-ala 17 500 m2. pinta-ala 18 700 m2. pinta-ala 11 500 m2. Rakennusvuosi Rakennusvuosi Rakennusvuosi 1992. 1953/1972/1980. 1987/1993. Uudistus- ja/tai Uudistus- ja/tai laajennusvuosi 2007. laajennusvuosi 1991. Galleria Jyväskeskus Trio Oulu Jyväskylä Lahti Cityconin vuokrattava Cityconin vuokrattava Cityconin vuokrattava pinta-ala 3 500 m2. pinta-ala 5 800 m2. pinta-ala 45 700 m2. Rakennusvuosi 1987. Rakennusvuosi 1955. Sis. Hansa Uudistus- ja/tai Rakennusvuosi 1987. laajennusvuosi 1993. Uudistus- ja/tai laajennusvuosi 1992/2008. Heikintori Koskikeskus Iso Omena Espoo, Tapiola Tampere Espoo, Matinkylä Cityconin vuokrattava Cityconin vuokrattava Cityconin vuokrattava pinta-ala 5 800 m2. pinta-ala 26 100 m2. pinta-ala 60 600 m2. Rakennusvuosi 1968. Rakennusvuosi 1988. Rakennusvuosi 2001. Uudistus- ja/tai laajennusvuosi Kauppakeskus Iso Omenaa 1995/2007. ei ole ryhmitelty. Columbus Myyrmanni Espoontori Helsinki, Vuosaari Vantaa, Myyrmäki Espoo, Espoon keskus Cityconin vuokrattava Cityconin vuokrattava Cityconin vuokrattava pinta-ala 21 100 m2. -
Improving Public Sector Property Management Download
Office politics Improving public sector property management A Deloitte Research Study Contents 1 Foreword 2 Executive summary 4 Introduction 6 Success factors for strategic property management 19 Conclusion About Deloitte Research Deloitte Research, a part of Deloitte Services LP, identifies, analyzes, and explains the major issues driving today’s business dynamics and shaping tomorrow’s global marketplace. From provocative points of view about strategy and organizational change to straight talk about economics, regulation and technology, Deloitte Research delivers innovative, practical insights companies can use to improve their bottom-line performance. Operating through a network of dedicated research professionals, senior consulting practitioners of the various member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, academics and technology specialists, Deloitte Research exhibits deep industry knowledge, functional understanding, and commitment to thought leadership. In boardrooms and business journals, Deloitte Research is known for bringing new perspective to real-world concerns. Foreword When John Locke said there exists a natural right to “life, liberty, and property,” he most likely was not including governments in that equation. Yet, today, governments have become some of the largest property holders in the world. But what advantage is there to government as landlord? And how well are these assets being managed? Most importantly, in a time of fiscal austerity, what can governments do to optimize functionality, strip out waste, and ensure real value for their citizens? In this report, we explore these questions and offer actionable steps governments can take to better manage their property portfolio. Some of these steps are operational — such as better data collec- tion and use of analytics to model property needs. -
Masterthese 2012-04-15
Die approbierte Originalversion dieser Diplom-/Masterarbeit ist an der Hauptbibliothek der Technischen Universität Wien aufgestellt (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at). The approved originalMSc version Program of this diploma or master thesis is available at the main library of the Vienna University of Technology (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/englweb/Immobilienmanagement). & Bewertung Ausgliederungen staatlicher Immobilien im europäischen Vergleich Master Thesis zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades „Master of Science” eingereicht bei Mag. Peter Höflechner MRICS Christian Huber 0226764 Wien, April 2012 Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich, CHRISTIAN HUBER, versichere hiermit 1. dass ich die vorliegende Master These, "AUSGLIEDERUNGEN STAATLICHER IMMOBILIEN IM EUROPÄISCHEN VERGLEICH", 109 Seiten, gebunden, selbständig verfasst, andere als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel nicht benutzt und mich auch sonst keiner unerlaubten Hilfen bedient habe, und 2. dass ich diese Master These bisher weder im Inland noch im Ausland in irgendeiner Form als Prüfungsarbeit vorgelegt habe. Wien, 17.04.2012 Unterschrift Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitendes Vorwort ...............................................................................................1 1.1. Terminologie ......................................................................................................4 2. Deutschland und die Bundesanstalt für Immobilienaufgaben (BImA) ................7 2.1. Ausgliederungsrechtsformen ...............................................................................8 -
Net Rental Income and Successful Redevelopment Projects
Citycon Presentation Q3 2007 Disclaimer This document and the information contained herein is strictly confidential and is being provided to you solely for your information. This document may not be retained by you and neither this document nor the information contained herein may be reproduced, further distributed to any other person or published, in whole or in part, for any purpose. These materials do not constitute an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy securities anywhere in the world. No securities of Citycon Oyj (the “Company”) have been or will be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Certain ordinary shares of the Company have been offered to “qualified institutional buyers” (as such term is defined in Rule 144A (“Rule 144A”)) under the Securities Act, in transactions not involving a public offering within the meaning of the Securities Act. Accordingly, such shares are “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 and may not be resold or transferred in the United States, absent an exemption from SEC registration or an effective registration statement. There will be no public offering of the securities in the United States. Subject to certain exceptions, neither this document nor any part or copy of it may be taken or transmitted into the United States or distributed, directly or indirectly, in the United States, or to any “U.S. Person” as that term is defined in Regulation S under the Securities Act. Neither this document nor any part or copy of it may be taken or transmitted into Australia, Canada or Japan, or distributed directly or indirectly in Canada or distributed or redistributed in Japan or to any resident thereof. -
Citycon Presentation
APRIL 28TH, 2017 CITYCON PRESENTATION LIPPULAIVA – STUDEN IDEA & DESIGN COMPETITION BREEFING MEETING THIS IS CITYCON LEADING OWNER, MANAGER AND DEVELOPER OF SHOPPING CENTRES IN THE NORDICS AND BALTICS – 51 shopping centres1) – 200 million visitors p.a. – 13 managed/rented assets – Market cap. EUR 2 billion – GLA 1.2 million sq.m. – Credit ratings: Baa1 & BBB FINLAND PORTFOLIO VALUE Estonia and Denmark NORWAY SWEDEN 20 7% 2 Finland 9 Sweden1) 19 ESTONIA 27% 36 % 5 EUR billion DENMARK 1 Norway 30% 3 Key figures 31 March 2017 1) Including Kista Galleria Number of shopping centres TRUE PAN-NORDIC LEADER 340 140 125 95 90 FINLAND SPONDA ELO KEVA IDEAPARK 300 260 210 155 150 #1 SWEDEN ATRIUM UNIBAIL- OLAV THON STEEN &STROM LJUNGBERG RODAMCO 970 #2 #3 #2 340 205 140 95 NORWAY OLAV STEEN & STROM SALTO SCALA THON 145 100 80 ESTONIA ASTRI LINSTOW Retail GLA (thousand sq.m.) Source: Company reports, Pangea Property Partners analysis, as per April 2017 and Finnish Shopping Centres 2017. Includes only majority-owned 4 shopping centres. Includes some assumptions on retail proportion out of total GLA, where retail data not available. URBAN CROSSPOINTS DRIVEN BY STRONG DEMOGRAPHICS CORE ASSETS: –Urban environments, located where people live and work –Strong population growth and natural footfall –Integrated with public transportation –Shared access to education, health care, culture, municipal services 5 STRONG GROCERY-ANCHORING ‒ OVER 100 GROCERY STORES1) 2% 1% 9% 24% 9% Home and leisure Fashion Rental income Groceries Services and offices 269 Health and beauty 13% Cafés and restaurants MEUR Specialty stores Department stores 24% 18% As per 31 December 2016 6 1) Including Kista Galleria (50%) 90% OF CITYCON’S SHOPPING CENTRES ARE LOCATED IN CAPITAL OR MAIN CITIES ISO OMENA, KISTA GALLERIA, LILJEHOLMSTORGET KOSKIKESKUS, HERKULES, HELSINKI AREA STOCKHOLM2) GALLERIA, STOCKHOLM TAMPERE SKIEN GLA, sq.m. -
Appendix – Table of Contents
www.concerto.uk.com www.concerto.uk.com Appendix – Table of Contents Appendix – Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Appendix 1 – List of Meetings ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Appendix 2 – Property Asset Management Delivery Plan current position and potential resource implications 5 Appendix 3 - Surveys ................................................................................................................................................... 17 Client Questionnaire – Results ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Staff Questionnaire – Results ......................................................................................................................................... 27 Appendix 4 – International Comparators .................................................................................................................... 60 Page 1 of 85 www.concerto.uk.com www.concerto.uk.com Appendix 1 – List of Meetings This Appendix includes the list of internal and external meetings carried by the project team both with OPW staff, clients and stakeholders. List of Internal Meetings Board Clare McGrath, Chairman Board John Sydenham, Commissioner Board John McMahon, Commissioner Corporate Services Eilís O'Connell,