DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Tuesday Volume 560 12 March 2013 No. 128 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 12 March 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 137 12 MARCH 2013 138 Sheila Gilmore (Edinburgh East) (Lab): Is it not House of Commons the truth that demand has been so sucked out of the economy by the Government’s policies that there just Tuesday 12 March 2013 is not the growth? Telling us how competitive we are is living in cloud cuckoo land, given that even the Office for Budget Responsibility says that growth is going to The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock be very slow, even in the coming year. Mr Osborne: To get a lecture from the Labour party PRAYERS on demand! The economy shrank by 6% when the shadow Chancellor was in the Cabinet, and we are [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] picking up the pieces of the mess he and his party left behind. One of those pieces was the deeply uncompetitive business tax system which meant that companies were BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS moving their headquarters out of the United Kingdom. Companies are now moving into the UK because of the LONDON LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND TRANSPORT FOR changes we have made. LONDON (NO.2)BILL [LORDS](BY ORDER) Consideration of Bill, as amended, opposed and deferred Mr Andrew Tyrie (Chichester) (Con): It is small businesses until Tuesday 19 March (Standing Order No. 20). in our constituencies that will hold the key to Britain’s economic revival. Does the Chancellor agree that they are simply not getting the support they need from the banks at the moment and that although the funding for Oral Answers to Questions lending scheme is good, most of the money is currently going into mortgages rather than businesses? I realise that he will not want to say much now, just before the Budget, but can he at least reassure the House that the TREASURY needs of small businesses are right at the top of his agenda for this Budget? The Chancellor of the Exchequer was asked— Mr Osborne: My hon. Friend has that assurance. The funding for lending scheme, joint with the Bank of Competitiveness England, is now supporting the small and medium-sized business sector as well as the mortgage market, and is 1. Claire Perry (Devizes) (Con): What recent assessment repairing the damage to the financial system caused by he has made of the UK’s business competitiveness. the financial crisis. He is also right to say that small [147123] businesses are the bedrock of our economic revival, which is why we have cut the small companies tax rate, The Chancellor of the Exchequer (Mr George Osborne): which before the general election the Labour party Under this Government, Britain has moved into the top wanted to put up. We have also carried on the relief for 10 of the most competitive places in the world to do small businesses from business rates, and in the autumn business, according to the World Economic Forum; our statement we increased tenfold the annual investment tax system is seen as one of the most pro-business in the allowance, so that small businesses can invest for the world; market interest rates are at record lows; red tape future and create jobs. The Government understand has been cut by almost £850 million in the past two that there needs to be a private sector recovery in order years; and exports to China, India and Brazil are up by not to repeat the mistakes of the past. almost two thirds since 2009. Catherine McKinnell (Newcastle upon Tyne North) Claire Perry: I thank the Chancellor for that reply. Is (Lab): The Chancellor boasts that all is going well for he aware that, according to accountants KPMG, Britain British business, but terrible figures out this morning is now the best place in the world to do business, for the show that manufacturing is down by 3% compared with first time ever? That is very welcome news for businesses last year’s figure. Business has lost all confidence to in my constituency, but what more do we need to do to invest, so when will he pull his head out of the sand and maintain and consolidate that position? see that his plan is clearly failing? Mr Osborne: My hon. Friend refers to the remarkable Mr Osborne: The manufacturing sector halved as a survey by KPMG that found that in the space of three share of the British economy when Labour was in office years Britain has gone from having one of the least and we had the fastest decline in British manufacturing competitive business tax systems in the world to having in British history. The steps that we have taken to the most competitive one; we are ahead of Ireland, the support manufacturers, to help with investment allowances Netherlands and Luxembourg, as well as, of course, the and to ensure that they have access to fast-growing United States, France and Germany. That is because of parts of the world, such as China and India, are all part the hard work we have done on corporation tax and on of rebalancing and rebuilding the British economy. I the controlled foreign companies regime. Of course, we was in the west midlands a couple of weeks ago, and have to go on making this country the most competitive there are 67,000 new private sector jobs in that region place to do business, so that we can succeed in the alone; I mention the region because private sector global race. employment fell during the boom years under the previous 139 Oral Answers12 MARCH 2013 Oral Answers 140 Labour Government. We must get behind the private Mr Osborne: Our benchmark was to restore the fiscal sector and we must get behind business: that is exactly credibility of this country and that credibility has earned what this Government are doing. us record low interest rates. The hon. Gentleman talks about wriggling out of things we did in the late period Credit Rating of the last decade, but he ran the leadership election campaign for the right hon. Member for Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath (Mr Brown)—he was the campaign 2. Nic Dakin (Scunthorpe) (Lab): What recent assessment manager—and he should apologise for that disastrous he has made of the UK’s credit rating; and if he will premiership and the chancellorship that preceded it, make a statement. [147124] which put this country in this mess in the first place. The Chancellor of the Exchequer (Mr George Osborne): Chris Leslie: We are all deeply moved by the Chancellor’s As I said to the House last month, the recent Moody’s remorse and contrition, but let me remind him of his decision was a stark reminder of the debt problems first benchmark test: facing Britain and the clearest possible warning to “We will safeguard Britain’s credit rating”. anyone who thinks we can run away from confronting them. We will not do that. He has failed on the other benchmark tests, too: he said that he would ensure greater availability of credit to small and medium-sized enterprises; he has failed on Nic Dakin: When he was shadow Chancellor in 2009 economic growth; he is failing on borrowing and the and Standard & Poor’s put the UK on negative watch, the deficit; and he is failing on living standards. After three right hon. Gentleman was unequivocal in calling for a years of failure, when will it dawn on the Chancellor general election. Now that the UK has lost its triple that his strategy is not working? A status on his watch, will he be consistent and urge his right hon. Friend the Prime Minister to go to the palace? Mr Osborne: We have cut the deficit by a quarter, a million new jobs are being created in the private sector Mr Osborne: The advice from the rating agency could and there is record employment in our economy, as well not be clearer: a reduced political commitment to fiscal as record female employment. We are rebalancing the consolidation would put Britain’s creditworthiness at British economy after all the problems of the past. The risk. That reduced political commitment would come hon. Gentleman talks about remorse and contrition, from the Opposition, who oppose every single spending but until we hear some remorse and contrition from cut, who have no credible economic policy and who, those on the Labour Front Bench about the economic despite having promised for two years to produce a mistakes they made, no one will pay the slightest attention deficit reduction plan, still do not have one. We hear to what they, and in particular the shadow Chancellor, that a draft Labour manifesto is coming this July; have to say. perhaps then we will see a proper plan to deal with the deficit Labour created. Stephen Williams (Bristol West) (LD): Given that the UK Government are able to borrow at historically low Mark Garnier (Wyre Forest) (Con): Does my right rates, may I urge my right hon. Friend to take advantage hon. Friend agree that the only true measure of of that position in order to prioritise capital investment, creditworthiness is the price paid by the Government to particularly in the housing market, to give a strong fillip borrow? Gilt yields are still 16 points lower today than to growth? before Moody’s downgrade.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uncorrected Transcript of Oral Evidence
    CORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 663-i HOUSE OF COMMONS ORAL EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT IN POLICY-MAKING TUESDAY 13 NOVEMBER 2012 DAVID BABBS, STEPHAN SHAKESPEARE AND TOM STEINBERG ROGER HAMPSON, CATARINA TULLY AND PROFESSOR BETH NOVECK Evidence heard in Public Questions 1 - 88 USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT 1. This is a corrected transcript of evidence taken in public and reported to the House. The transcript has been placed on the internet on the authority of the Committee, and copies have been made available by the Vote Office for the use of Members and others. 2. The transcript is an approved formal record of these proceedings. 1 Oral Evidence Taken before the Public Administration Committee on Tuesday 13 November 2012 Members present: Mr Bernard Jenkin (Chair) Alun Cairns Paul Flynn Robert Halfon David Heyes Kelvin Hopkins Greg Mulholland Lindsay Roy ________________ Examination of Witnesses Witnesses: David Babbs, Executive Director, 38 Degrees, Stephan Shakespeare, Founder and Global Chief Executive Officer, YouGov, and Tom Steinberg, Founder and Director, mySociety, gave evidence. Q1 Chair: Good morning and welcome to this first evidence session on open source policy-making. Could I welcome our witnesses, and ask each of you to identify yourselves for the record? Tom Steinberg: Tom Steinberg, the director of mySociety. David Babbs: David Babbs, director of 38 Degrees. Stephan Shakespeare: Stephan Shakespeare, CEO of YouGov. Q2 Robert Halfon: In essence, the kernel of this inquiry is to see how the Government’s digital engagement can move from being a very good encyclopaedia of information to being a Wikipedia, where people have genuine engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Letter to the Prime Minister
    HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDO sw 1A OAA Rt. Hon. David Cameron MP Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A2AA Dear Prime Minister, As Members of Parliament for Staffordshire, we write to express our deep concern at the withdrawal of 3rd Battalion, the Mercian Regiment (The Staffards) from the Order of Battle. The Battalion has a proud history which can be traced back to its first raising at the King's Head Inn, Lichfield, in 1705. It served in Martinique, South Africa, Flanders, Gallipoli, Anzio and Arnhem. More recently, photographs of 3 Mercian fighting in Basra, became defining images of the Iraq campaign. We all recognise the difficult financial climate and the constraints that imposes on the Ministry of Defence. We understand that savings must be made. However, we also know that the decision to withdraw 3 Mercian will be distressing for all those currently serving, particularly those that might face redundancy, for their families and for those former Staffards who proudly recall their service. We know that it is the responsibility of the Mercian Regiment, as reorganised, to decide how best to reflect its history and antecedents. But as there is no longer any senior former Stafford serving on its staff, we hope that you will do all you can to encourage the Regiment to preserve and cherish the symbols, traditions and heritage of 3 Mercian within its ranks. 2 Mercian is known now as the Worcester and Sherwood Foresters as a result of previous amalgamations and we hope that a similar formula can be found to remember the Staffords.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Other Half Shops Meet the Stores of St
    BUSINESS WITH PERSONALITY LONDON CALLING HOW THE OTHER HALF THE CITY’S OLDEST SHOPS MEET THE STORES BUILDER TAKES A OF ST JAMES’S STREET P8–9 LOOK BACK P25 WEDNESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2019 ISSUE 3,509 CITYAM.COM FREE BOLD MOVE Elon Musk to defend GOLDMAN himself in ‘pedo guy’ court case BULLISH ON SEBASTIANUK MCCARTHY MARKET Goldman economists have the upcoming ballot. @SebMcCarthy upgraded their growth forecasts for While the pound rose sharply on the next three years, predicting a Monday after one survey pointed to GLOBAL banking giant Goldman rise of 2.4 per cent in the second half an 80-seat majority for the Conserva- Sachs is advising its clients to snap up of 2020. tives, the latest poll showed a weaker stakes in British firms, taking a For 2021 the bank is expecting lead for Johnson, causing sterling to bullish stance on the future of the growth of two per cent, up from 1.6 fall back down 0.3 per cent yesterday. UK economy. per cent, and in 2022 it has raised its Both the Conservatives under Boris Buoyed by expectations of less forecasts from 1.8 per cent to 2.1 per Johnson and Labour under Jeremy Brexit uncertainty and block- cent, providing Brexit clarity Corbyn have promised a swathe of buster spending promises and fiscal stimulus can spending and tax cuts in areas such from both the major be delivered. as infrastructure while on the political parties, the US Investor hopes of a campaign trail. investment bank has Against the backdrop of its outlook STEFAN BOSCIA help rescuers access the boys, calling recommended a long The US giant thinks for growth, Goldman expects the @stefan_boscia it a “PR stunt”.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgery Reconfiguration Public Engagement Report
    Surgery Reconfiguration Public Engagement Report PB March 2015 Executive Summary After an extended period of public engagement, over 18 weeks from 16thOctober 2014 to 9th February 2015, the feedback has been collated in this report. Overall, there appears to be an acceptance that the Trust cannot continue to provide surgical services in the current form given the external factors influencing healthcare delivery and the evidence that centralisation of services improves clinical outcomes. It is clear that the population is passionate about the retention of their local hospitals and the proposal to keep all outpatient appointments and investigation services delivered locally is popular. Concern remains over transport and travel and whilst the Trust is exploring possible solutions to this there is a degree of public scepticism that the issues will be resolved satisfactorily, which is likely to remain until such time as concrete plans have been developed and implemented. There has been almost no feedback from patients or the public relating to how the changes will affect the likely outcomes of undergoing surgery. This was explained at events with provision of the evidence on the website and so the lack of feedback may indicate it is not a contentious issue. There is little difference between the feedback received from each site although there has been a better response from Good Hope in terms of numbers, possibly due to the additional awareness created by local lobby groups. Whilst there appears to be acknowledgement that redesigning surgical services is the right approach, it is likely that individuals will resist change when it directly affects them or the services they access.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications and Engagement Strategy
    Communications and Engagement Strategy Clinically Led, Quality Driven Communications and Engagement Strategy 3 Communication and Engagement Strategy Contents 1. Executive Summary 4 2. Background 5 3. Duty to Engage 8 4. Principles of Good Practice 10 5. Conclusion of our Situational Analysis 12 6. Engaging with Stakeholders 13 7. Key Messages 30 8. Positioning 32 9. Branding 33 10. Emergency Planning and Business Continuity 34 11. Risks 35 12. Roles and Responsibilities 36 13. Equality 37 14. Monitoring and Evaluation 38 15. Communications and Engagement Plan 39 Appendices A-H Appendix A: Stakeholder Analysis 44 Appendix B: PEST Analysis 46 Appendix C: Competitor Analysis 51 Appendix D: Mosaic Profiling 52 Appendix E: Measuring Our Effectiveness 55 Appendix F: Media Handling Protocol 57 Appendix G: Summary of Stakeholder Event September 2012 59 Appendix H: How Patient Insight and Engagement Informs 61 Decision-Making NHS South East Staffordshire & Seisdon Peninsula CCG 4 1. Executive Summary 1.1 This Communications and Engagement Strategy sets out how South East Staffordshire and Seisdon Peninsula Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) is and will in the future engage and communicate at all levels with its stakeholders. The Strategy sets a framework for current and intended communications and engagement that will support and achieve five key aims developed by the CCG, which are to: • Ensure that for all those involved in the work of the CCG that they buy into the principle of a ‘quality led organisation’ • Understand the profile of the local
    [Show full text]
  • Leisure and Library Trusts
    Leisure and library trusts ~ Researched and written by UNIloN_ Centre for Public Services Local Government Summary of key issues 2 Contents Glossary of terms 4 Introduction 5 Part 1: The trust model 7 Legal and organisational options Representation on the board Ownership of leisure facilities Provision of support services Council controls Community and social welfare objectives Part 2: Reasons for promoting leisure and library trusts 11 Leisure services trusts Library trusts Inclusion of other services The leisure trust experience Use of consultants Part 3: Reasons why councils rejected trusts 20 Reasons for rejecting leisure trusts Reasons for rejecting library trusts Part 4: Employment impact 24 Staff TUPE transfers Impact of transfer on jobs, terms and conditions Staff will have limited protection from TUPE Responsibility for employment policies Impact on trade union organisation Part 5: Guidelines for branches 27 Lessons learnt from campaigns Deciding strategies and tactics Trade union demands Wider issues Appendices Appendix 1: Financial assessment 30 Source of savings Doubts over continuation of savings Additional costs Economies of scale Income generation Access to capital Trusts and the Private Finance Initiative Appendix 2: Accountability and management issues 36 Corporate issues Accountability and loss of control Implementing corporate policies Possible loss of support services Economic viability as independent organisation •Evaluation process Achieving service improvements User and community involvement Best Value will apply to trusts Alternative organisational models The advantages of in-house services References 41 • Summary of key issues • An increasing number of local authorities are discussing transfer of leisure services to trusts. Twenty-one authorities have already established leisure trusts and a further 20 are either in the process of setting up trusts or are currently considering proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Referendum on Separation for Scotland
    House of Commons Scottish Affairs Committee The Referendum on Separation for Scotland Written evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee and accepted by the Committee as evidence for the inquiry into the referendum on separation for Scotland are included. List of written evidence Page 1 Professor Bernard Ryan, Law School, University of Kent 1 2 Francis Tusa, Editor, Defence Analysis 8 3 Professor Jo Shaw, University of Edinburgh 14 4 Dr Phillips O’Brien, Scottish Centre for War Studies, University of Glasgow 21 5 Electoral Commission 24 6 Rt Hon Michael Moore MP, Secretary of State for Scotland 28 7 Ministry of Defence 29 8 Brian Buchan, Chief Executive, Scottish Engineering 46 9 Babcock 47 Written evidence from Professor Bernard Ryan, Law School, University of Kent Introduction If Scotland were to become independent, its relationship with the United Kingdom would have to be defined in the fields of nationality law and immigration law and policy. This note offers a summary of the relationship between the Irish state1 and the United Kingdom in those fields, and some thoughts on possible implications for Scottish independence. 1. Nationality Law 1.1 The Irish case A new nationality The nationality law of a new state must necessarily provide for two matters: an initial population of nationals on the date of independence, and the acquisition and loss of nationality on an ongoing basis. In the case of the Irish state, the initial population was defined by Article 3 of the Irish Free State Constitution of 1922. Article 3 conferred Irish Free State citizenship upon a person if they were domiciled in the “area of the jurisdiction of the Irish Free State” on the date the state was founded (6 December 1922), provided (a) they had been resident in that area for the previous seven years, or (b) they or one of their parents had been born in “Ireland”.2 A full framework of nationality law, covering all aspects of acquisition and loss of nationality, was not then adopted until the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield City Council
    FORM 2 SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL Cabinet Report Report of: The Chief Executive and Executive Director, Resources ________________________________________________________________ Report to: Cabinet ________________________________________________________________ Date: 17 February 2016 ________________________________________________________________ Subject: Revenue Budget for 2016/17 ________________________________________________________________ Author of Report: Eugene Walker, Acting Executive Director of Resources ________________________________________________________________ Key Decision: YES ________________________________________________________________ Reason Key Decision: Expenditure/savings over £500,000 Affects 2 or more wards ________________________________________________________________ Summary: The City Council on 4 March 2016 meets to consider the Revenue Budget for 2016/17 and to determine the Council Tax for that year The report provides information to enable the Council to set a budget and determine the Council Tax. The proposals set out in this report provide for a balanced budget to be recommended to Council. ________________________________________________________________ Reasons for Recommendations: Please see above Form 2 – Executive Report Page 105 January 2014 _____________________________________________________________ Recommendations: The report contains recommendations to Council on 4 March 2016 _____________________________________________________________ Background Papers: Category of Report: OPEN If CLOSED
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SHEFFIELD CITY TRUST Management Report Relating To
    SHEFFIELD CITY TRUST Management Report relating to, and deemed to be part of, the annual financial report of Sheffield City Trust (the “charity”) for the year ended 31 March 2017 REPORT The trustees, who act as directors for the purpose of company law, present their management report for the period ended 31 March 2017. Purpose of the charity The objects of the charity are as detailed in the charity’s governing document, its Memorandum of Association. 1 An object of the charity is to promote the benefit of the inhabitants of South Yorkshire and surrounding counties by the provision of facilities for recreation and leisure time occupation in the interest of social welfare. The charity has continued in its policies of providing recreational and other leisure facilities of a high standard and as economically as possible. The charity seeks to encourage high levels of use by the community with policies that encourage wide public access. There has been no material change in these policies over the relevant period. 2 A further object of the charity is to promote and preserve good physical and mental health. The objective is pursued by encouraging high levels of use of recreational and leisure facilities by the community. In addition, the charity has a policy of carrying out ad hoc initiatives and giving financial support to appropriate projects which has been continued during the period. 3 Further objects of the charity include the encouragement of the arts and the acquisition, preservation, restoration and maintenance of buildings of historic
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • FDN-274688 Disclosure
    FDN-274688 Disclosure MP Total Adam Afriyie 5 Adam Holloway 4 Adrian Bailey 7 Alan Campbell 3 Alan Duncan 2 Alan Haselhurst 5 Alan Johnson 5 Alan Meale 2 Alan Whitehead 1 Alasdair McDonnell 1 Albert Owen 5 Alberto Costa 7 Alec Shelbrooke 3 Alex Chalk 6 Alex Cunningham 1 Alex Salmond 2 Alison McGovern 2 Alison Thewliss 1 Alistair Burt 6 Alistair Carmichael 1 Alok Sharma 4 Alun Cairns 3 Amanda Solloway 1 Amber Rudd 10 Andrea Jenkyns 9 Andrea Leadsom 3 Andrew Bingham 6 Andrew Bridgen 1 Andrew Griffiths 4 Andrew Gwynne 2 Andrew Jones 1 Andrew Mitchell 9 Andrew Murrison 4 Andrew Percy 4 Andrew Rosindell 4 Andrew Selous 10 Andrew Smith 5 Andrew Stephenson 4 Andrew Turner 3 Andrew Tyrie 8 Andy Burnham 1 Andy McDonald 2 Andy Slaughter 8 FDN-274688 Disclosure Angela Crawley 3 Angela Eagle 3 Angela Rayner 7 Angela Smith 3 Angela Watkinson 1 Angus MacNeil 1 Ann Clwyd 3 Ann Coffey 5 Anna Soubry 1 Anna Turley 6 Anne Main 4 Anne McLaughlin 3 Anne Milton 4 Anne-Marie Morris 1 Anne-Marie Trevelyan 3 Antoinette Sandbach 1 Barry Gardiner 9 Barry Sheerman 3 Ben Bradshaw 6 Ben Gummer 3 Ben Howlett 2 Ben Wallace 8 Bernard Jenkin 45 Bill Wiggin 4 Bob Blackman 3 Bob Stewart 4 Boris Johnson 5 Brandon Lewis 1 Brendan O'Hara 5 Bridget Phillipson 2 Byron Davies 1 Callum McCaig 6 Calum Kerr 3 Carol Monaghan 6 Caroline Ansell 4 Caroline Dinenage 4 Caroline Flint 2 Caroline Johnson 4 Caroline Lucas 7 Caroline Nokes 2 Caroline Spelman 3 Carolyn Harris 3 Cat Smith 4 Catherine McKinnell 1 FDN-274688 Disclosure Catherine West 7 Charles Walker 8 Charlie Elphicke 7 Charlotte
    [Show full text]
  • The Election
    Forecast error: what’s happened to the polls since the 2015 UK election? By Timothy Martyn Hill [originally published at significancemagazine.com] When British Prime Minister Theresa May called a snap election for 8 June 2017, it seemed like a smart move politically. Her Conservative Party was riding high in the opinion polls, with a YouGov poll in the Times giving them 44%, a lead of 21 points over her nearest rivals, the Labour Party[0514a]. Were an election to be held the next day (as surveys often suppose[0514b]) May looked to be on course for a convincing win and an increased majority in the House of Commons. But then came the obvious question: “Can we actually trust the polls?” The media seemed sceptical. Though they had not shied away from reporting poll results in the months since the 2015 general election, they were clearly still sore about the errors made last time, when survey results mostly indicated the country was heading for a hung parliament. So, can we trust the polls this time around? It’s not possible to say until we have election results to compare them to. But what we can do is consider the work that’s been done to try to fix whatever went wrong in 2015. There’s a lot to cover, so I’ve broken the story up by key dates and periods: • The election – 7 May 2015 • The reaction – 8-10 May • The suspects • Early speculation – 11 May-18 June • The Sturgis inquiry meets – 19 June • The investigation focuses – 20 June-31 December • Unrepresentative samples indicted – 1 January-30 March 2016 • The Sturgis inquiry report – 31 March • A heated debate – 1 April-22 June • EU referendum and reaction – 23 June-19 July • US presidential election and reaction – 20 July-31 December • The calm before the storm – 8 December 2016-18 April 2017 • Have the polls been fixed? The election – 7 May 2015 The night before the 2015 General Election, the atmosphere was tense but calm.
    [Show full text]