DOCSLIB.ORG

Pratt Institute School of Architecture Undergraduate Spring Rome Program Course Syllabus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pratt Institute School of Architecture Undergraduate Spring Rome Program Course Syllabus Pratt Institute School of Architecture Undergraduate Spring Rome Program Course Syllabus Arch 400i-402 Advanced Design Design Spring 2005 Class Credits: 5 Type of Course: Required Studio - Honor’s Program Class Meetings: T/TH 9AM-1PM & TH 2-6 PM Pratt Studio @ Santa Maria in Trastevere Prerequisites: Arch 301/ 302 or equivalent with at least a grade of “C” & Roman Form ARCH 420 – Honor’s Program Review Enrollment Capacity: 30 (2 sections of 15) Instructor’s Names: Anthony Caradonna - [email protected] / Richard Sarrach – [email protected] Course Overview: This course will initially focus on analysis of historic models to reveal distinct architectural patterns within Rome. Design processes will explore the transformation of Roman prototypes. Design issues include understanding urban form as an accommodation of the city's growth, and accretive intervention within a fragmented historic context. Studies will conclude with formal propositions within the context of the city fabric. Rome, the eternal city of cultural and historical treasures, inventions, influence and endless lessons, is a rite of passage for those privileged to reside in the midst of this living laboratory, and study, first-hand, the palimpsest of accumulated artistic, architectural and urban masterpieces framed and intertwined within the puzzle of the urban fabric. Pratt Institute's Spring Semester in Rome provides an opportunity for qualified students to live and study in this unique context. The lesson of Rome is one that goes beyond its strong architectural heritage. It presents a different culture, language and landscape, where history assumes a dominant role in the continuum of time. This is an environment, which generates particular responses, specifically toward people and toward an appreciation of urban place. The encounter with the city, a place foreign and yet familiar, profound and contradictory, is intended to site a reconsideration of design priorities. The investigation of the remains of antiquity and Rome's urban artifacts can offer a unique lesson; the interaction of physical cause and cultural effect on the built environment and its cumulative presence through time. The program undertakes an intensive study of the city's architectural and cultural history, providing the student with experiential insight into the precedents that have had an enormous impact on the development of architecture in the western world. This course engages the student in developing design strategies for architectural and urban intervention in a city which requires respect for the valued and respected integrity of its artistic heritage, yet yearns for and welcomes continuous investigation, reinterpretation and renewal. In the twenty-seven years that the program has been offered, it has always been intended that the contrast between New York and Rome would stimulate discourse and inspire re-evaluation of existing preconceptions. Learning Objectives: Conceptual translations: Ideas into space and material Accepting the platonic credo that the unexamined life is not worth living, the4th year studio challenges students to develop a personalized, reflective, self-guided, conceptually-driven, critical, rigorous design process that is, directed, regulated and revised by ideas and strategies and formulated through research, experimentation, evaluation and transformation. This articulated process is intended to assist students in developing an autodidactic approach to life-long architectural education. It also forms the basis of critical practice where research, inventive decision making and the translation of an overarching concept into culturally responsive, responsible and innovative architectural proposals can meaningfully contribute to the existing, built and developing environment. Urban Dichotomies = Parts to Whole The universal space of colonial, post industrial cities like New York, where the abstract grid provides a legible, simple and repetitive urban fabric based on the Cartesian coordinates and where the homogeneous space of the city sets all architectural works within a continuum of repetitive modulation; city blocks and vehicular streets, negligibility- quickly erasable and replaceable buildings, displacement by the electronic speed and demands of capitalism, real estate development and the technological culture of continuous obsolescence, expansion and transformation. In contrast, the figural space of the historical, pre-industrial, pilgrimage city is composed of unique individual built works and spaces which exist as recognizable, unique “places” defined by architectural elements- theatrically orchestrated, strategically located, interlocked and linked by a network of pedestrian pathways as destinations within the city. The identity and image of the city of Rome is understood through the inhabitation and interior experience of these very distinguishable and time-honored spatial and architectural fragments and pathways. Paradoxically the resulting palimpsest of the urban plan is an elusive and incomprehensible structure. Therefore, the urban fabric itself requires critical reading and reinterpretation and invites speculation, intervention and transformation. Students will engage in the architectural and urban discourse inherent in the spatial dichotomy of fluid, universal and figural space and develop strategies for researching, formulating a position, conceptualizing and proposing interventions that deal with these multiple readings of architectural space and develop approaches for addressing the enlightened past of the eternal city and the promising future of the twenty first century city. Students will investigate the relationship between the parts and the whole through the study of the historical transformation and layering of the architectural and urban form, through an understanding of urban infrastructure and its underlying organizational principles, through the relationship between buildings and urban space, and, through the study and transformation of specific roman building types and their constituent architectural components. The detailed development, planning and identification of physical elements and assembly strategies require a scalar focus that links ideas at telescoping levels, from the parts to the whole. Research & Analysis Students will capitalize on the wealth of historical examples at hand in the Roman built environment, through the focused study of existing, indigenous urban and architectural models, specific indigenous roman building types and precedents that have been examples of reuse, recombination, adaptation and transformation. The first month of the semester will be comprised of an emersion into two areas of research in preparation for developing interventional design strategies within the rich historical city fabric: The first month of the semester will be focused on examining the Pantheon in order to extract specific readings and lessons from the most influential building in ancient Roman building in architectural history. Reference to buildings influenced by the Pantheon will be cited and addressed where critical issues arise. The bulk of the semester will focus on the role of water and waterworks in the life and urban fabric of Rome. The Thermae and Balnae or public and private bath building types,specifically, in Rome, Ostia and Pompeii will be introduced and compared. Related water structures including the rivers, lakes, waterways, reservoirs, aqueducts, bridges, pools, fountains, piazzas, villas, gardens and sewers will be introduced to inform a more complete map of the ancient Roman hydro-infrastructure and of the rich context of life and history of water in the eternal city. Observational and analytical methods of drawing and modeling on-site and in-studio will cumulatively evolve into architectural and urban strategies for intervening on the site where the ancient Roman Pons Aemilius once spanned the Tiber River and its last remaining fragment now known as the Ponte Rotto still stands. Documentation and analysis of the project site will contribute to a deeper understanding of its past and potential development. Investigation A Architectural Research - KIT OF PARTS: Roman Instrumentatality PANTHEON STUDIES “As may be seen time and time again in a range of contexts, the Romans’ attitude to design was flexible: it was a matter of applying principles rather than fixed rules or recipes.” Mark Wilson Jones from, Principles of Roman Architecture The Pantheon is the crowning legacy of the development of the roman semicircular arch. The best-preserved monument of ancient Rome is also the most impressive symbol of the Roman Empire. It endures physically and continues to exert influence upon architecture as it has for almost two millennia. The first part of the semester students will study and disassemble the Pantheon in order to understand its component parts and how they contribute in framing this singular and unforgettably unique interior space in western architectural history. Phase 1 Disassembly: Skinning the Shell G.B.Piranesi’s infamous archaeological reconstructions and inventive analytical drawing techniques provide a useful tool for modeling the relationships of individual architectural components to a larger all encompassing work. His unwrapping of the mausoleum of Augustus?/Hadrian? flattens the circular drum structure into a linear elevation creating an unfolded reading of its shell and its constituent masonry units. Students will employ this strategy in order to explore the incremental, serial and episodic relationship
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bus Regulations
    BUS REGULATIONS PAYMENT The bus service is payable in full and in advance for the semester and regardless of the number of times the student(s) will utilize the service during the semester. Partial use of the bus service is not allowed, except under special circumstances approved by the Director of Operations. For organizational reasons, the only bus service options are ROUND TRIP; ​ ​ MORNING ONLY or AFTERNOON ONLY; LATE BUS ONLY 1 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Only students for whom AOSR has a signed parental authorization form on file are permitted to ride the school bus. The form is requested for all students under the age of 14. STUDENT BEHAVIOR Students are expected to follow bus rules at all times when riding school buses. The following is a list of bus regulations. If these are not followed, the bus driver/monitor will report the offense to the bus coordinator. Parents will be notified of the offending behavior and students will be suspended from riding the bus, at first temporarily, and if necessary, permanently. ● Students must follow the directions of the bus driver/monitor in a respectful manner. ● All students are required to wear their seat belts. ● Only one student per seat and students must remain seated at all times. ● Students must not put their arms, hands, or heads out of the windows. ● Loud talking, swearing, rough play, or fighting is forbidden. ● Smoking is not allowed at any time. ● Riders must refrain from any action that would distract the driver and pose a safety problem for all on the bus. This includes gestures, making loud noises, the use of electronic devices, and inviting attention from pedestrians and motorists.
    [Show full text]
  • TERRAIN VAGUE: the TIBER RIVER VALLEY Beatrice Bruscoli [email protected]
    TERRAIN VAGUE: THE TIBER RIVER VALLEY Beatrice Bruscoli [email protected] Figure 1: Bridge on Via del Foro Italico looking downstream Rome, the Eternal City, continues to be Rome—to really begin to know the an active model and exemplary location city—we must walk through it, taking to study and understand the dynamic our time. Arriving at a gate in the transformations taking place in contem- Aurelian Wall, we cross the threshold porary landscapes. In the process of and enter the Campagna (countryside) becoming “eternal,” Rome has been that surrounds Rome just as it has for continually—often radically—altered, millenea. while conserving its primordial image; Looking through the multitude of renewing itself over time, without losing images, paintings, and plans of Rome, its deeply rooted structure. we cannot help but notice that its Before urban form, forma urbis, primary characteristics have remained there is natural form. As Christian distinct and constant over the centuries. Norberg-Schultz informs us, the genius Gianbattista Nolli’s “La Pianta Grande loci of Rome does not reside in some di Roma” of 1748 is the city’s most abstract geometric order or a formalized well-known representation.2 (Plan 1) architectural space, but in the close and This remarkable figure-ground map continuous ties between buildings, voids, presents us with a view of Rome; of a and the natural landscape.1 Rome’s dense compact area of inhabitation, forma urbis was generated and shaped dotted with piazzas and courtyards, and by the natural morphology of its land- surrounded with vast unbuilt areas all scape.
    [Show full text]
  • Waters of Rome Journal
    TIBER RIVER BRIDGES AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANCIENT CITY OF ROME Rabun Taylor [email protected] Introduction arly Rome is usually interpreted as a little ring of hilltop urban area, but also the everyday and long-term movements of E strongholds surrounding the valley that is today the Forum. populations. Much of the subsequent commentary is founded But Rome has also been, from the very beginnings, a riverside upon published research, both by myself and by others.2 community. No one doubts that the Tiber River introduced a Functionally, the bridges in Rome over the Tiber were commercial and strategic dimension to life in Rome: towns on of four types. A very few — perhaps only one permanent bridge navigable rivers, especially if they are near the river’s mouth, — were private or quasi-private, and served the purposes of enjoy obvious advantages. But access to and control of river their owners as well as the public. ThePons Agrippae, discussed traffic is only one aspect of riparian power and responsibility. below, may fall into this category; we are even told of a case in This was not just a river town; it presided over the junction of the late Republic in which a special bridge was built across the a river and a highway. Adding to its importance is the fact that Tiber in order to provide access to the Transtiberine tomb of the river was a political and military boundary between Etruria the deceased during the funeral.3 The second type (Pons Fabri- and Latium, two cultural domains, which in early times were cius, Pons Cestius, Pons Neronianus, Pons Aelius, Pons Aure- often at war.
    [Show full text]
  • Ah Timeline Images ARCHITECTURE
    8. STONEHENGE 12. WHITE TEMPLE & ZIGGURAT, URUK c. 2,500 - c. 3,500 - 1,600 BCE 3,000 BCE monolithic Sumerian sandstone Temple henge present day present day Wiltshire, UK Warka, Iraq SET 1: GLOBAL PREHISTORY 30,000 - 500 BCE SET 2: ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN 3,500 - 300 BCE 17. GREAT PYRAMIDS OF GIZA 20. TEMPLE OF AMUN-RE & HYPOSTYLE HALL c. 2,550 - c. 1,250 BCE 2,490 BCE cut sandstone cut limestone / and brick Khufu Egyptian Khafre / Sphinx Menkaure temple present day Karnak, near Cairo, Egypt Luxor, Egypt SET 2: ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN 3,500 - 300 BCE SET 2: ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN 3,500 - 300 BCE 21. MORTUARY TEMPLE OF HATSHEPSUT 26. ATHENIAN AGORA c. 1,490 - 600 BCE - 1,460 BCE 150 CE slate eye civic center, makeup ancient Athens palette present day Egyptian Athens, Museum, Cairo Greece SET 2: ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN 3,500 - 300 BCE SET 2: ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN 3,500 - 300 BCE 30. AUDIENCE HALL OF DARIUS & XERXES 31. TEMPLE OF MINERVA / SCULPTURE OF APOLLO c. 520 - 465 c. 510 - 500 BCE BCE Limestone Wood, mud Persian brick, tufa Apadana temple / terra SET 2: ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN 3,500 - 300 BCE cotta sculpture Persepolis, Iran Veii, near Rome SET 2: ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN 3,500 - 300 BCE 35. ACROPOLIS ATHENS, GREECE 38. GREAT ALTAR OF ZEUS & ATHENA AT PERGAMON c. 447 - 424 c. 175 BCE BCE Hellenistic Iktinos & Greek Kallikrates, marble altar & Marble temple complex sculpture Present day Antiquities Athens, Greece Museum , Berlin SET 2: ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN 3,500 - 300 BCE SET 2: ANCIENT MEDITERRANEAN 3,500 - 300 BCE 39.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome Informational Booklet UCLA
    WHAT STUDENTS EXPERIENTIAL ARE SAYING LEARNING ROME TRAVEL STUDY: ROMAN HISTORY ZEHRA ABBAS History and Gender Studies & CLASSICS “As a history major, it was essential to do this study abroad trip, because it contextualized the things I had learned in my classes. It's di$erent to read about the Colosseum, but it's even better to actualy visualize the Colosseum.” GARRETT KAHRE Mechanical Engineering “My favorite part of this program is how the history seems to jump out at you. I remember one day towards the beginning of the program where! we literaly ran into the Pantheon. I mean how do you accidentaly run into one of the most famous Explore the city of Rome and History can quiet the polarizing subject. architectural buildings in the world!” learn about its ancient history and It’s one thing to read of centuries past in a monuments this summer.! textbook, an another to live among the ! city where it all took place.! FRANKLIN Study the politics and culture of SPENCER Rome from its earliest foundations African American on the Palatine hill to the triumph Studies INTERESTED IN LEARNING MORE of the new religion of Christianity, “I joined the Rome Study program because I plan on being FROM A STUDENT’S and the subsequent collapse of an PERSPECTIVE? a professor, and what a better way to get experience than empire almost 1200 years later.! Visit RomeTravelStudy.blogspot.com seeing the ancient ruins for yourself! This way I could explain a history lecture fom my own perspective.” for more information and tips! COURSE CREDITS PROGRAM FEATURES In this program, Rome is your actual classroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegato Capitolato Tecnico ELENCO STRADE MUN 1
    MUN. LOTTO Denominazione strada Note 1A 1 BELVEDERE ANTONIO CEDERNA 1A 1 BELVEDERE TARPEO 1A 1 BORGO ANGELICO 1A 1 BORGO PIO 1A 1 BORGO S. ANGELO 1A 1 BORGO S. LAZZARO 1A 1 BORGO S. SPIRITO 1A 1 BORGO VITTORIO 1A 1 CIRCONVALLAZIONE CLODIA 1A 1 CIRCONVALLAZIONE TRIONFALE 1A 1 CLIVO ARGENTARIO 1A 1 CLIVO DEI PUBLICII 1A 1 CLIVO DELLE MURA VATICANE 1A 1 CLIVO DI ACILIO 1A 1 CLIVO DI ROCCA SAVELLA 1A 1 CLIVO DI SCAURO 1A 1 CLIVO DI VENERE FELICE 1A 1 FORO ROMANO 1A 1 FORO TRAIANO 1A 1 GALLERIA GIOVANNI XXIII 1A 1 GALLERIA PRINCIPE AMEDEO SAVOIA AOSTA 1A 1 GIARDINO DEL QUIRINALE 1A 1 GIARDINO DOMENICO PERTICA 1A 1 GIARDINO FAMIGLIA DI CONSIGLIO 1A 1 GIARDINO GEN. RAFFAELE CADORNA 1A 1 GIARDINO PIETRO LOMBARDI 1A 1 GIARDINO UMBERTO IMPROTA 1A 1 LARGO ANGELICUM 1A 1 LARGO ARRIGO VII 1A 1 LARGO ASCIANGHI 1A 1 LARGO ASSEN PEIKOV 1A 1 LARGO BRUNO BALDINOTTI 1A 1 LARGO CARLO LAZZERINI 1A 1 LARGO CERVINIA 1A 1 LARGO CORRADO RICCI 1A 1 LARGO CRISTINA DI SVEZIA 1A 1 LARGO DEGLI ALICORNI 1A 1 LARGO DEI MUTILATI ED INVALIDI DI GUERRA 1A 1 LARGO DEL COLONNATO 1A 1 LARGO DELLA GANCIA 1A 1 LARGO DELLA POLVERIERA 1A 1 LARGO DELLA SALARA VECCHIA 1A 1 LARGO DELLA SANITA' MILITARE 1A 1 LARGO DELLA SOCIETA' GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA forse parco 1A 1 LARGO DELL'AMBA ARADAM 1A 1 LARGO DELLE TERME DI CARACALLA 1A 1 LARGO DELLE VITTIME DEL TERRORISMO 1A 1 LARGO DI PORTA CASTELLO 1A 1 LARGO DI PORTA S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mais Où Est Donc Passé Le Moyen-Âge ? ; Le Récentisme
    « Où est donc passé le Moyen-Âge ? » C.E.R.B.I. : http://perso.orange.fr/initial.bipedalism/25ma.htm « Où est donc passé le Moyen-Âge ? » L'invention de l'ère chrétienne par François de SARRE TABLE DES MATIERES : Introduction ……………………………………………………… 3 Chapitre 1 Les bizarreries du calendrier …………….. 10 Chapitre 2 Fomenko et les "récentistes" ……………... 17 Chapitre 3 Les cieux nous sont tombés sur la tête ….. 25 Chapitre 4 Quelques problème de dates ……………... 33 Chapitre 5 Les "siècles fantômes" du Moyen-Âge ….. 49 Chapitre 6 Charlemagne : un héros de légende ……… 64 Chapitre 7 Le Christianisme est-il né en Avignon ? …. 68 Chapitre 8 L'histoire des trois églises ………………... 83 Chapitre 9 Qui a bien pu avancer l'heure ? …………… 93 Chapitre 10 En quel siècle sommes-nous donc ? ……… 104 Chapitre 11 Essai de reconstruction historique ………... 125 Épilogue ………………………………………………………… 133 Littérature et notes ……………………………………………….. 138 Glossaire ……………………………………………………...…. 143 Bibliographie générale ………………………………………….. 149 Dates importantes en anno domini ……………………………... 151 Page 1 sur 155 Copyright François de SARRE © 2006 All Rights Reserved Pour toute reproduction même partielle du texte, veuillez faire la demande auprès de M. François de SARRE : [email protected] « Où est donc passé le Moyen-Âge ? » C.E.R.B.I. : http://perso.orange.fr/initial.bipedalism/25ma.htm Représentons-nous une Histoire de France à laquelle il manquerait au bas mot une dizaine de siècles… « Inconcevable », allez-vous sans doute me dire ! Certes, je l'admets, c'est difficile
    [Show full text]
  • Borromini and the Cultural Context of Kepler's Harmonices Mundi
    Borromini and the Dr Valerie Shrimplin cultural context of [email protected] Kepler’sHarmonices om Mundi • • • • Francesco Borromini, S Carlo alle Quattro Fontane Rome (dome) Harmonices Mundi, Bk II, p. 64 Facsimile, Carnegie-Mellon University Francesco Borromini, S Ivo alla Sapienza Rome (dome) Harmonices Mundi, Bk IV, p. 137 • Vitruvius • Scriptures – cosmology and The Genesis, Isaiah, Psalms) cosmological • Early Christian - dome of heaven view of the • Byzantine - domed architecture universe and • Renaissance revival – religious art/architecture symbolism of centrally planned churches • Baroque (17th century) non-circular domes as related to Kepler’s views* *INSAP II, Malta 1999 Cosmas Indicopleustes, Universe 6th cent Last Judgment 6th century (VatGr699) Celestial domes Monastery at Daphne (Δάφνη) 11th century S Sophia, Constantinople (built 532-37) ‘hanging architecture’ Galla Placidia, 425 St Mark’s Venice, late 11th century Evidence of Michelangelo interests in Art and Cosmology (Last Judgment); Music/proportion and Mathematics Giacomo Vignola (1507-73) St Andrea in Via Flaminia 1550-1553 Church of San Giacomo in Augusta, in Rome, Italy, completed by Carlo Maderno 1600 [painting is 19th century] Sant'Anna dei Palafrenieri, 1620’s (Borromini with Maderno) Leonardo da Vinci, Notebooks (318r Codex Atlanticus c 1510) Amboise Bachot, 1598 Following p. 52 Astronomia Nova Link between architecture and cosmology (as above) Ovals used as standard ellipse approximation Significant change/increase Revival of neoplatonic terms, geometrical bases in early 17th (ellipse, oval, equilateral triangle) century Fundamental in Harmonices Mundi where orbit of every planet is ellipse with sun at one of foci Borromini combined practical skills with scientific learning and culture • Formative years in Milan (stonemason) • ‘Artistic anarchist’ – innovation and disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • 48. Catacomb of Priscilla. Rome, Italy. Late Antique Europe. C. 200–400 C.E
    48. Catacomb of Priscilla. Rome, Italy. Late Antique Europe. c. 200–400 C.E. Excavated tufa and fresco. (3 images) Orant fresco © Araldo de Luca/Corbis Greek Chapel © Scala/Art Resource, NY Good Shepherd fresco © Scala/Art Resource, NY 49. Santa Sabina. Rome, Italy. Late Antique Europe. c. 422–432 C.E. Brick and stone, wooden roof. (3 images) Santa Sabina Santa Sabina © Holly Hayes/Art History Images © Scala/Art Resource, NY Santa Sabina plan 50. Rebecca and Eliezer at the Well and Jacob Wrestling the Angel, from the Vienna Genesis. Early Byzantine Europe. Early sixth century C.E. Illuminated manuscript (tempera, gold, and silver on purple vellum). (2 images) Rebecca and Eliezer at the Well Jacob Wrestling the Angel © Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Gr. 31, fol. 7r © Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Gr. 31, fol. 12r 51. San Vitale. Ravenna, Italy. Early Byzantine Europe. c. 526–547 C.E. Brick, marble, and stone veneer; mosaic. (5 images) San Vitale San Vitale © Gérard Degeorge/The Bridgeman Art Library © Canali Photobank, Milan, Italy San Vitale, continued Justinian panel Theodora panel © Cameraphoto Arte, Venice/Art Resource, NY © Giraudon/The Bridgeman Art Library San Vitale plan 52. Hagia Sophia. Constantinople (Istanbul). Anthemius of Tralles and Isidorus of Miletus. 532–537 C.E. Brick and ceramic elements with stone and mosaic veneer. (3 images) Hagia Sophia © Yann Arthus-Bertrand/Corbis Hagia Sophia © De Agostini Picture Library/G. Dagli Orti/The Bridgeman Art Library Hagia Sophia plan 53. Merovingian looped fibulae. Early 54. Virgin (Theotokos) and Child medieval Europe. Mid-sixth century C.E. between Saints Theodore and George. Silver gilt worked in ftligree, with inlays Early Byzantine Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • A View of the Tiber Island and the Pons Cestius, with the Church Of
    Nicolas DELOBEL (Paris 1693 - Paris 1763) A View of the Tiber Island and the Pons Cestius, with the Church of San Bartolomeo all’Isola, Rome Pen and brown ink and brown and grey wash, over an underdrawing in black chalk, extensively heightened with white, on blue paper. Inscribed, dated and signed faite le 30 Septembre1729(5or 7?) / vue de la pointe del[‘ile?]d’/ que[?] pont[?] delobel(?) at the lower left. 241 x 391 mm. (9 1/2 x 15v 3/8 in.) ACQUIRED BY THE FONDATION CUSTODIA, PARIS. Indistinctly signed by the artist and dated 1729 (although the date can also be read as 1725 or 1727), the present sheet is among the earliest views of Rome by a pensionnaireat the Académie de France. The drawing depicts the small boat-shaped island in middle of the Tiber river, dominated by the 17th century church of San Bartolomeo all’Isola, seen from downstream. In the centre is the 12th century bell tower of the church and, just to the right, the fortified Torre Caetani, dating from the 10th century. At the left of the composition is the Pons Cestius, the ancient stone bridge linking the Tiber Island to Trastevere in the western part of the city; the bridge was reconstructed and widened in the late 19th century. The large tower in the foreground at the upper right of the composition, which no longer exists today, sat above an old water mill on the right bank of the Tiber. Delobel also made a drawing of the opposite view, looking downstream from the southern end of the Tiber Island towards the Temple of Hercules Victor and the campanile of the church of Santa Maria in Cosmedin.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Isole Tiberine
    233 Mem. Descr. Carta Geol. d’It. 108 (2021), pp. 233-246; figg. 31 Le isole tiberine: storie di inondazioni, rappresentazioni topografiche e artistiche Tiber islands: histories of floods, topographic and artistic representations GUARNERI ENRICO MARIA & NISIO STEFANIAs s e RIASSUNTO - L’Isola Tiberina è stata fondamentale per lo svi- ABSTRACT - The Tiber Island has been fundamental element luppo della città di Roma, perché sin dai tempi protostorici, ha for the developmentr of the city of Rome: because since proto- rappresentato l’unico punto relativamente agevole che potesse historical times represented the relatively easy point that could permettere l’attraversamento del Tevere. Essa era considerata allow the crossing of the Tiber. un luogo sacro e in epoca romana fu sede del tempio di Escu- It was considered a sacred place, and seat in Roman times of lapio; la sua caratteristica forma di nave, le fu conferita, in epoca the temple of Aesculapius; its characteristic shape of a ship classica. Accanto all'isola Tiberina, per un lungo periodo, è esi- was given to it artificially in the classical times. stita una seconda isola più piccola. La persistenza e la forma di However, there were actually two islands: next to the main is- entrambe è stata fortemente condizionata nel tempo dalle pal- land there was a second island whose persistence and shape luvioni del fiume. Durante la piena del Tevere del 1788, gli in- over time was conditioned by the floods of the river. genti apporti detritici unirono l’isolotto alla riva sinistra. Inoltre During the flood of the Tiber in 1788, the large debris flows nel corso dei millenni la forma dell’isola e i due rami del fiume united the islet to the left bank.
    [Show full text]