DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Vehicle Production and Sales by Manufacturer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Vehicle Production and Sales by Manufacturer Global vehicle production and sales by manufacturer Global vehicle production Global vehicle sales 2003 2002 2001 2003 2002 2001 General Motors1 8,244,000 8,277,000 7,786,000 General Motors1 8,594,605 8,550,258 8,564,480 Toyota Motor Corp.2 6,826,166 6,309,616 5,848,094 Toyota Motor Corp.2 6,783,463 6,167,703 5,927,568 Ford Motor Co.3 6,720,000 6,973,000 7,008,000 Ford Motor Co.3 6,541,562 6,819,594* 6,906,548* Volkswagen AG4 5,020,733 5,023,264 5,107,945 Volkswagen AG4 5,015,911 4,996,179 5,080,087 DaimlerChrysler AG5 4,264,700 4,471,900 4,424,200 DaimlerChrysler AG5 4,355,800 4,540,400 4,498,800 PSA/Peugeot-Citroen SA 3,309,100 3,262,100 3,136,300 PSA/Peugeot-Citroen SA 3,286,100 3,267,500 3,132,800 Hyundai Automotive Group6 3,085,836 2,887,213 2,517,719 Hyundai Automotive Group6 3,046,333 2,912,315 2,652,509 Honda Motor Co. 2,968,316 2,900,787 2,651,661 Nissan Motor Co. 2,968,357 2,735,932 2,580,328 Nissan Motor Co. 2,957,757 2,693,818 2,466,995 Honda Motor Co. 2,910,000 2,830,000 2,670,000 Renault SA7 2,385,087 2,343,954 2,375,084 Renault SA7 2,388,958 2,403,975 2,413,038 Fiat S.p.A.8 2,079,800 2,159,936 2,391,719 Fiat S.p.A.8 1,989,921 2,125,277 2,292,858 Suzuki Motor Co.9 1,904,903 1,798,089 1,619,304 Suzuki Motor Co.9 1,824,977 1,707,392 1,587,780 Mitsubishi Motors Corp.** 1,580,167 1,822,644 1,668,286 Mitsubishi Motors Corp.** 1,533,590 1,740,202 1,698,371 BMW Group10*** 1,118,940 1,090,258 946,730 BMW Group10*** 1,104,916 1,057,344 905,657 Mazda Motor Corp. 1,041,905 773,798 868,757 Mazda Motor Corp. 1,068,400 964,800* 968,324 Shanghai Automotive First Automotive Works† 861,439 571,061 250,623 Industry Corp.† 868,658 591,872 – Shanghai Automotive First Automotive Works† 865,692 569,037 216,549 Industry Corp.† 848,120 610,163 – AutoVaz 699,888 702,540 768,030 AutoVaz 710,000 683,000 775,612 Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.11 548,422 541,018 568,870 Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.11 544,235 554,911 570,816 Isuzu Motors Ltd. 512,381 455,615 454,553 Isuzu Motors Ltd. 510,514 456,119 461,116 Dongfeng Motor Corp.† 472,975 417,659 – Dongfeng Motor Corp.† 469,160 414,923 – GM Daewoo Auto & GM Daewoo Auto & Technology Co. Ltd.†† 400,597 286,401 – Technology Co. Ltd.†† 392,398 285,449 – Tata Motors Ltd. 285,483 209,746 179,021 Tata Motors Ltd. 288,947 209,327 172,667 AutoGaz 202,943* 198,135* 191,492 AutoGaz 216,035* 200,436* 198,654 Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corp.** 183,046 – – Bus Corp.** 179,952 – – Proton 174,373 237,024 233,297 Volvo Truck Corp.12 163,807 166,189 155,311 SsangYong Motor Co. Ltd. 159,282 161,016 125,026 Proton 159,174 217,737 209,514 Volvo Truck Corp.12 153,582* 154,094* 158,000* SsangYong Motor Co. Ltd. 154,307 161,042 125,440 MG Rover Group Ltd. 133,000 147,000 – MG Rover Group Ltd. 145,000 148,000 – Mahindra & Mahindra 97,911 76,766 62,020 Mahindra & Mahindra 104,173 70,193 63,612 Paccar13 93,000 92,300 78,700 Paccar13 93,000 92,300 78,700 Navistar International Corp. 85,136 86,000* 85,794 Navistar International Corp. 86,732 88,400* 94,064 Porsche AG 73,284 57,004 56,154 Porsche AG 66,803 55,124 54,787 MAN Nutzfahrzeuge Group 55,400 53,800 66,250 MAN Nutzfahrzeuge Group 55,900 53,900 68,850 Scania 51,276 45,145 48,129 Scania 50,794 44,669 48,331 Ashok Leyland 45,122 32,643 32,174 Ashok Leyland 45,547 33,445 30,706 Hindustan Motors Ltd. 15,801 23,629 24,063 Hindustan Motors Ltd. 16,408 23,328 24,300 Eicher Motors 13,965 11,513 9,197 Eicher Motors 14,063 11,305 9,046 Bajaj Tempo Ltd. 13,610 8,737 6,860 Bajaj Tempo Ltd. 12,993 8,663 7,648 Notes: 1 Includes Holden, Hummer, Opel, Vauxhall and Saab *Estimate 2 Includes Daihatsu. 2003 and 2002 include Hino (2001 Hino global production **Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corp. was spun off from Mitsubishi Motor Corp. in Jan. 2003 53,391, global sales 53,056) ***Rolls-Royce ownership was transferred to BMW in Jan. 2003 3 Includes Aston Martin, Jaguar, Land Rover and Volvo Car Corp. †Includes double counting from manufacturer’s joint ventures 4 2003 includes Audi, Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Skoda and Seat; in 2002 and ††Successor to Daewoo Motor Co. 2001 includes Audi, Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Rolls-Royce, Skoda and Seat Production includes minivehicles; passenger cars; light, 5 Includes Chrysler group, Freightliner, Mercedes-Benz, Setra, Smart, Sterling, medium and heavy commercial vehicles; and buses. Includes Thomas Built Buses and Western Star vehicles produced for sale by other manufacturers. 6 Includes Hyundai Motors and Kia Motors Sales includes minivehicles; passenger cars; light, 7 Includes Dacia and Samsung Motors medium and heavy commercial vehicles; and buses 8 Includes Alfa Romeo, Ferrari, Fiat, Iveco, Lancia and Maserati 9 2003 and 2002 includes Maruti Udyog Ltd. (2001 Maruti Udyog Ltd. global production 357,614, global sales 358,468) Source: Automotive News Data Center, Auto Resources Asia 10 2003 includes Mini and Rolls-Royce; 2002 includes Mini and Marketing Systems GmbH 11 Includes Subaru 12 Includes Mack Trucks and RVI 13 Includes Kenworth, Peterbilt, DAF, Leyland and Foden [email protected] 2004 Market Data Book Global vehicle production by region Africa production East Europe production Cars Trucks Total Total Percent Cars Trucks Total Total Percent 2004 2004 2004 2003 change 2004 2004 2004 2003 change Algeria 2,000 759 2,759 2,741 0.7 Belarus – 22,301 22,301 18,412 21.1 Egypt 50,450 18,218 68,668 53,444 28.5 Bulgaria – 300 300 400 –25.0 Ethiopia – 140 140 140 – Bosnia & Herzegovina 5,500 – 5,500 5,000 10.0 Ghana – 100 100 95 5.3 Czech Republic 443,049 5,305 448,354 441,521 1.5 Ivory Coast – 900 900 900 – Hungary 126,000 3,612 129,612 117,231 10.6 Kenya 2,000 2,909 4,909 4,839 1.4 Poland 510,000 72,207 582,207 372,356 56.4 Libya – 1,600 1,600 1,500 6.7 Romania 109,550 23,188 132,738 95,252 39.4 Morocco 12,450 10,845 23,295 30,808 –24.4 Russia 1,016,650 280,878 1,297,528 1,253,021 3.6 Mozambique – 30 30 35 –14.3 Serbia & Montenegro 18,000 – 18,000 15,000 20.0 Slovakia 204,300 54 204,354 211,890 –3.6 Nigeria 10,000 1,190 11,190 10,236 9.3 Slovenia 110,000 – 110,000 118,000 –6.8 South Africa 287,350 145,120 432,470 424,118 2.0 Ukraine 7,500 2,576 10,076 13,278 –24.1 Tanzania – 220 220 220 – Uzbekistan 64,133 5,100 69,233 45,405 52.5 Tunisia 1,000 5,054 6,054 6,200 –2.4 Zambia – 300 300 300 – TOTAL 2,614,682 415,521 3,030,203 2,706,766 11.9 TOTAL 365,250 187,385 552,635 535,576 3.2 West Europe production Cars Trucks Total Total Percent Asia-Pacific production 2004 2004 2004 2003 change Cars Trucks Total Total Percent Austria 200,052 21,382 221,434 115,978 90.9 2004 2004 2004 2003 change Belgium 864,888 39,868 904,756 904,214 0.1 Australia 340,000 73,985 413,985 411,515 0.6 Denmark – 200 200 200 – Burma (Myanmar) – 370 370 361 2.5 Finland 10,051 400 10,451 13,398 –22.0 Hong Kong – 4,693 4,693 3,826 22.7 France 3,155,681 421,020 3,576,701 3,618,801 –1.2 India 902,281 274,529 1,176,810 1,102,897 6.7 Germany 5,033,555 368,506 5,402,061 5,252,461 2.8 Indonesia 50,600 468,710 519,310 384,372 35.1 Ireland – 1,100 1,100 1,200 –8.3 Japan 8,720,385 1,791,133 10,511,518 10,286,318 2.2 Italy 833,000 309,362 1,142,362 1,321,629 –13.6 South Korea 3,122,600 346,864 3,469,464 3,177,870 9.2 Netherlands 187,597 46,684 234,281 211,187 10.9 Malaysia 364,852 104,600 469,452 424,107 10.7 Portugal 132,393 75,752 208,145 220,874 –5.8 P.R. of China 2,485,213 2,722,800 5,208,013 4,562,547 14.1 Spain 2,402,501 609,647 3,012,148 3,030,587 –0.6 Philippines 40,700 46,400 87,100 87,800 –0.8 Sweden 290,358 121,961 412,319 404,355 2.0 Taiwan 299,639 125,635 425,274 380,612 11.7 Switzerland – 100 100 600 –83.3 Thailand 232,396 623,732 856,128 691,574 23.8 United Kingdom 1,647,156 209,274 1,856,430 1,847,295 0.5 Vietnam 6,400 3,800 10,200 9,150 11.5 TOTAL 14,757,232 2,225,256 16,982,488 16,942,779 0.2 Other – 9,412 9,412 9,006 4.5 TOTAL 16,565,066 6,596,663 23,161,729 21,531,955 7.6 Middle East production Cars Trucks Total Total Percent Central and South America production 2004 2004 2004 2003 change Iran 682,800 86,823 769,623 716,091 7.5 Cars Trucks Total Total Percent 2004 2004 2004 2003 change Iraq – 100 100 100 – Argentina 171,400 89,882 261,282 169,788 53.9 Israel – 1,100 1,100 1,100 – Brazil 1,716,889 452,712 2,169,601 1,818,546 19.3 Pakistan 82,000 11,519 93,519 89,406 4.6 Chile 90 8,164 8,254 11,631 –29.0 Saudi Arabia – 1,300 1,300 1,200 8.3 Turkey 407,530 376,256 783,786 519,397 50.9 Colombia 35,803 83,703 119,506 104,716 14.1 TOTAL 1,172,330 477,098 1,649,428 1,327,294 24.3 Ecuador 13,175 5,845 19,020 19,187 –0.9 Trinidad & Tobago – 784 784 848 –7.5 Uruguay 20,002 – 20,002 23,058 –13.3 Venezuela 92,805 33,218 126,023 92,989 35.5 Global production summary Cars Trucks Total Total Percent TOTAL 2,050,164 674,308 2,724,472 2,240,763 21.6 2004 2004 2004 2003 change Asia-Pacific 16,565,066 6,596,663 23,161,729 21,531,955 7.6 West Europe 14,757,232 2,225,256 16,982,488 16,942,779 0.2 North America 6,540,639 9,746,621 16,287,260 16,277,303 0.1 North America production East Europe 2,614,682 415,521 3,030,203 2,706,766 11.9 Cars Trucks Total Total Percent 2004 2004 2004 2003 change Central and Canada 1,400,129 1,298,331 2,698,460 2,546,905 6.0 South America 2,050,164 674,308 2,724,472 2,240,763 21.6 Middle East 1,172,330 477,098 1,649,428 1,327,294 24.3 Mexico 903,774 663,810 1,567,584 1,585,261 –1.1 Africa 365,250 187,385 552,635 535,576 3.2 USA 4,236,736 7,784,480 12,021,216 12,145,137 –1.0 TOTAL 44,065,363 20,322,852 64,388,215 61,562,436 4.6 TOTAL 6,540,639 9,746,621 16,287,260 16,277,303 0.1 Source: Automotive News Data Center and R.L.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Automobile Industry Updates
    India Automobile Industry Updates In this issue: Automobile Industry Updates Effect of Recession GM Files For Bankruptcy Issue No 3 Shifts reduced at Bridgestone factory. May 2009 Press Release Effects of Recession Car Exports Up 42% in May Nashik strike a setback for GM Files for Bankruptcy Mahindra's Xylo It was once an icon for industry. Monday, General Motors became the largest Nashik strike causes production losses of Rs manufacturing company in U.S. history and fourth largest company ever to file for 150 crore to Mahindra's bankruptcy protection. vendors Senior administration officials said the government will provide $30 billion in financing Tata, M&M, Maruti join hands for hybrid models to help the automaker through bankruptcy. Those same officials said the Canadian government would provide $9.5 billion. Global car cos to take Maruti's route JLR to get 'conditional' More support only: UK Govt Shifts reduced at Bridgestone factory Audi aims 55 pc growth this fiscal from India Bridgestone has cut three production shifts at its Salisbury factory as demand slumps Ashok Leyland, Nissan for its truck and trailer tyres. The company told workers this week it needed to reduce venture delayed 6 months inventory levels to match sales, which have fallen during the economic downturn. UK Govt-JLR talks back on Workers will be given other duties during the seven-week hiatus, which will cut truck track and bus tyre production by 20 hours a week. TVS can make, sell original Flame: HC More Tata Motors plans Rs 4,200 cr debenture issue: Crisil Press Release Ford to Make India Export Hub for Small Cars Car Exports Up 42% in May Exports of passenger cars from the country soared 41.64 per cent in May, mainly on Natural rubber imports might double the back of robust performance by Maruti Suzuki, although domestic sales increased by a meager 2.48 per cent.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Johng-Sik-Choi-Mahindra-19-07
    Johng-sik Choi President and CEO- Ssangyong Motor Co Johng-sik Choi majored in business management at Seoul National University and earned his Master’s degree from the Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. He started his career at Hyundai Motors in 1977, serving as Head of Planning Office, Head of Marketing, Vice President & Director of Hyundai Motor Canada, and Executive Director of Hyundai Motor America. He joined Ssangyong Motor in January 2010 as Vice President and Head of Sales & Marketing, and successfully launched a series of face-lifted models and new products such as the Korando and Tivoli which reflected the customer needs and market trend. He plays a key role in helping the company regain market share. In 2013, Ssangyong recorded its highest-ever yearly revenue and exports volumes. Referred to as a global sales master and automotive expert with 40 years of experience in the automotive industry, he is credited with driving growth and presenting a future vision for Ssangyong as a prestigious global automaker. Thank you Connect with us at www.mahindra.com Disclaimer Mahindra & Mahindra herein referred to as M&M, and its subsidiary companies provide a wide array of presentations and reports, with the contributions of various professionals. These presentations and reports are for informational purposes and private circulation only and do not constitute an offer to buy or sell any securities mentioned therein. They do not purport to be a complete description of the markets conditions or developments referred to in the material. While utmost care has been taken in preparing the above, we claim no responsibility for their accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • MARKET LENS 15147 Intraday Pick MARUTI Resistance 15349 Intraday Pick SUNTV 15397 Intraday Pick BALKRISIND
    Institutional Equity Research NIFTY 15301 IN FOCUS May 27 2021 Support 15224 Stock in Focus BAJAJ FINANCE MARKET LENS 15147 Intraday Pick MARUTI Resistance 15349 Intraday Pick SUNTV 15397 Intraday Pick BALKRISIND EQUITY INDICES Indices Absolute Change Percentage Change Domestic Last Trade Change 1-D 1-Mth YTD BSE Sensex 51,018 380.0 0.8% 2.6% 6.8% CNX Nifty 15,301 93.0 0.6% 2.9% 9.4% S&P CNX 500 13,022 59.2 0.5% 4.0% 13.1% SENSEX 50 16,024 99.0 0.6% 3.0% 9.5% International Last Trade Change 1-D 1-Mth YTD DJIA 34,323 10.6 0.0% 1.5% 12.1% NASDAQ 13,738 80.8 0.6% (2.2%) 6.6% NIKKEI 28,469 (173.2) (0.6%) (2.0%) 3.7% HANGSENG 29,177 20.9 0.1% 0.4% 7.2% ADRs / GDRs Last Trade Change 1-D 1-Mth YTD Dr. Reddy’s Lab (ADR) 72.0 (0.8) (1.1%) 5.8% 1.0% STOCK IN FOCUS Tata Motors (ADR) 21.8 0.4 1.8% 6.5% 72.7% f BAF is focused on the mass-affluent segment. Additionally, it Infosys (ADR) 19.3 0.5 2.8% 5.7% 13.6% ICICI Bank (ADR) 18.0 0.3 1.7% 7.2% 20.9% enjoys significant pricing power in its shorter-tenor and small-ticket HDFC Bank (ADR) 74.0 1.0 1.3% (0.4%) 2.4% unsecured loans, as the change in EMI (for each percentage point Axis Bank (GDR) 50.6 0.4 0.8% 7.6% 19.6% increase in interest rate) is lower for the short-tenor small-ticket loans.
    [Show full text]
  • Motherson Sumi Systems (MSS IN)
    Motherson Sumi Systems (MSS IN) Rating: BUY | CMP: Rs62 | TP: Rs115 March 18, 2020 Shutdown in Europe while China resumed – Upgrade to BUY Company Update Quick Pointers: ☑ Change in Estimates | ☑ Target | ☑ Reco . MSS hosted a call where it indicated production shutdown in Europe for 15 Change in Estimates days while China has resumed considerably. Current Previous FY21E FY22E FY21E FY22E Rating BUY ACCUMULATE . With ~37% of SMRP BV revenues contribution consisting from European Target Price 115 153 Sales (Rs. m) 722,331 811,681 750,749 845,246 markets, where we see transitionary issues to persist at-least over 1QFY21. % Chng. (3.8) (4.0) EBITDA (Rs. m) 59,306 74,158 69,071 80,291 We cut FY20/21/22 EPS estimates by 8%/18%/11% to factor in for production % Chng. (14.1) (7.6) EPS (Rs.) 5.5 7.2 6.7 8.1 shut down in China and Europe due to COVID-19. ~37% of SMRP BV revenues % Chng. (18.7) (11.0) consisting from European markets, where we see transitionary issues to persist at-least over 1QFY21. However, on the positive side, operations in Key Financials - Consolidated China have recovered substantially with ~26 plants is now operational out of Y/e Mar FY19 FY20E FY21E FY22E total 27. Whereas other key markets like US, South America and UK hasn’t Sales (Rs. bn) 635 662 722 812 EBITDA (Rs. bn) 53 52 59 74 seen any shutdowns so-far. We believe, significant correction presents an Margin (%) 8.4 7.8 8.2 9.1 opportunity to buy this stock at an attractive valuation at 11x FY21 estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Hummer Versus Prius “Dust to Dust” Report Misleads the Media and Public with Bad Science
    Hummer versus Prius “Dust to Dust” Report Misleads the Media and Public with Bad Science Dr. Peter H. Gleick Pacific Institute May 2007 Abstract The CNW Marketing Research, Inc.’s 2007 “Dust to Dust: The Energy Cost of New Vehicles From Concept to Disposal” caught the interest of the media and the public with its claim that a Hummer H3 SUV has a lower life-cycle energy cost than a Toyota Prius hybrid. Closer inspection suggests that the report’s conclusions rely on faulty methods of analysis, untenable assumptions, selective use and presentation of data, and a complete lack of peer review. Even the most cursory look reveals serious biases and flaws: the average Hummer H1 is assumed to travel 379,000 miles and last for 35 years, while the average Prius is assumed to last only 109,000 miles over less than 12 years. These selective and unsupported assumptions distort the final results. A quick re-analysis with peer-reviewed data leads to completely opposite conclusions: the life-cycle energy requirements of hybrids and smaller cars are far lower than Hummers and other large SUVs. CNW should either release its full report, including methods, assumptions, and data, or the public should ignore its conclusions. Unfortunately, “Dust to Dust” has already distorted the public debate. Introduction In March 2007, an automotive marketing company CNW Marketing Research, Inc. (CNW) announced the release of a private study on the comparative life-cycle energy costs of a wide range of automobiles.1 The public version of the report2 included a remarkable conclusion: counting all lifetime energy inputs, the massive Hummer H1, H2, and H3 sport utility vehicles (and many other large SUVs) use less energy per mile driven than the highly touted Toyota Prius hybrid (and many other smaller vehicles).
    [Show full text]
  • From Import Substitution to Integration Into Global Production Networks: the Case of the Indian Automobile Industry Prema-Chandra Athukorala and C
    From Import Substitution to Integration into Global Production Networks: The Case of the Indian Automobile Industry Prema-chandra Athukorala and C. Veeramani∗ This paper examines the growth trajectory and the current state of the Indian automobile industry, paying attention to factors that underpinned its transition from import substitution to integration into global production networks. Market-conforming policies implemented by the government of India over the past 2 decades, which marked a clear departure from protectionist policies in the past, have been instrumental in transforming the Indian automobile industry in line with ongoing structural changes in the world automobile industry. India has emerged as a significant producer of compact cars within global automobile production networks. Compact cars exported from India have become competitive in the international market because of the economies of scale of producing for a large domestic market and product adaptation to suit domestic market conditions. Interestingly, there are no significant differences in prices of compact cars sold in domestic and foreign markets. This suggests that the hypothesis of “import protection as export promotion” does not hold for Indian automobile exports. Keywords: automobile industry, foreign direct investment, global production networks, India JEL codes: F13, F14, L92, L98 I. Introduction The global landscape of the automobile industry has been in a process of notable transformation over the past 3 decades. Until about the late 1980s, automobile production remained heavily concentrated in the United States, Japan, and Western Europe (known as the “triad”). While the leading automakers headquartered in the triad had assembly plants in many developing countries, most of these plants served domestic markets under heavy tariff protection.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X : in Re : Chapter 11 Case No
    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11 Case No. : MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, et al., : 09-50026 (REG) f/k/a General Motors Corp., et al. : : Debtors. : (Jointly Administered) : ---------------------------------------------------------------x DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR DEBTORS’ AMENDED JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 (212) 310-8000 Attorneys for the Debtors and Debtors in Possession Dated: New York, New York December 8, 2010 THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE PLAN. ACCEPTANCES OR REJECTIONS MAY NOT BE SOLICITED UNTIL A DISCLOSURE STATEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT. THE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT IS BEING SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL BUT HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO DATE. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 A. Definitions and Exhibits............................................................................ 1 1. Definitions...................................................................................... 1 2. Exhibits .......................................................................................... 1 B. Notice to Creditors..................................................................................... 1 1. Scope of Plan ................................................................................. 1
    [Show full text]
  • Automobile Industry in India 30 Automobile Industry in India
    Automobile industry in India 30 Automobile industry in India The Indian Automobile industry is the seventh largest in the world with an annual production of over 2.6 million units in 2009.[1] In 2009, India emerged as Asia's fourth largest exporter of automobiles, behind Japan, South Korea and Thailand.[2] By 2050, the country is expected to top the world in car volumes with approximately 611 million vehicles on the nation's roads.[3] History Following economic liberalization in India in 1991, the Indian A concept vehicle by Tata Motors. automotive industry has demonstrated sustained growth as a result of increased competitiveness and relaxed restrictions. Several Indian automobile manufacturers such as Tata Motors, Maruti Suzuki and Mahindra and Mahindra, expanded their domestic and international operations. India's robust economic growth led to the further expansion of its domestic automobile market which attracted significant India-specific investment by multinational automobile manufacturers.[4] In February 2009, monthly sales of passenger cars in India exceeded 100,000 units.[5] Embryonic automotive industry emerged in India in the 1940s. Following the independence, in 1947, the Government of India and the private sector launched efforts to create an automotive component manufacturing industry to supply to the automobile industry. However, the growth was relatively slow in the 1950s and 1960s due to nationalisation and the license raj which hampered the Indian private sector. After 1970, the automotive industry started to grow, but the growth was mainly driven by tractors, commercial vehicles and scooters. Cars were still a major luxury. Japanese manufacturers entered the Indian market ultimately leading to the establishment of Maruti Udyog.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Customer Satisfaction Towards Bharat Benz, Trident Automobiles Pvt Ltd, Bangalore by Dilip Kumar M 1IA17MBA18 Submitted To
    A Project Report (17MBAPR407) A study on Customer Satisfaction towards Bharat Benz, Trident Automobiles Pvt Ltd, Bangalore By Dilip Kumar M 1IA17MBA18 Submitted to VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, BELAGAVI In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Under the guidance of INTERNAL GUIDE EXTERNAL GUIDE Prof. Archana Vijay Mr. Harsha H Assistant Professor, Marketing Head Department of MBA, AIT Bharat Benz Department of MBA Acharya Institute of technology, Soldevanahalli, Hesaraghatta Main Road, Bengaluru March 2019 TRIDENT AUTOMOBILES PRIVATE LIMITED # 1, Lower Palace Orchards, Sankey Road , Bangalore - 560 003. Tel: 91-80-4343 3333 Fax: 91-80-2336 8152 CIN: U50500KA1997PTC023159 Date: 02-04-2019 TO WHOM SO EVER IT MAY CONCERN This is to certify that Mr. Dilip Kumar M (Reg No:llAl 7MBA18) who is pursuing his Post Graduation Degree in MBA from "Visvesvaraya Technology University" has successfully completed his Internship on "Customer Satisfaction Towards Bharath Benz" in our organization from the period of 03 rd January 2019 to 16th February 2019. His performance & conduct during the internship was good. We wish him all the very best for his future endeavor. Your's faithfully, For Trident Automobiles Pvt Ltd., Metha Nanjappa General Manager - HR URL : www.tridentautomobiles.com '!),zwe ,;ilOHU ,I ~~ /@) ACHARYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technolog ical Un iversity, Belagav i, Approved by AICTE, New Delh i and Accredited by NBA and NAAC) Date: 05/04/2019 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that Mr. Dilip Kumar M bearing USN HAI 7MBA18 is a bonafide student of Master of Business Administration course of the Institute 2017-19 batch, affiliated to Vi svesvaraya Technological Universit'J, Belagavi.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan State Police Tests 2003 Patrol Vehicles
    National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center BULLETIN A Program of the National Institute of Justice December 2002 Michigan State Police Tests 2003 Patrol Vehicles atrol vehicles are among the most results to State and local law enforcement critical purchases that a law enforce- agencies, NIJ helps these agencies select vehi- P ment agency makes. For both large cles that maximize their budgets and ensures and small agencies, patrol vehicle purchases that evaluated vehicles provide reliable and frequently represent the second largest ex- safe performance under the increased penditure, after personnel, in their annual demands of police service. operating budgets. Selecting a vehicle that The 2003 model year patrol vehicles were balances both budgetary and performance evaluated from September 21 through 23, requirements has become an increasingly 2002. For the purposes of the MSP evalua- challenging task for police fleet administra- tion, police-package vehicles are those that tors. Many agencies are painfully aware of are designed and manufactured for use in the consequences that result from being the full spectrum of law enforcement patrol “penny wise and pound foolish,” where service, including pursuits. A special-service vehicles with inadequate performance, such vehicle is a vehicle that may be used by law as regular production passenger vehicles not enforcement agencies for specialized use specifically designed for police service, are (e.g., off-road, inclement weather, K–9, or selected because they cost less than police- commercial vehicle enforcement), but is not package vehicles. Although some agencies designed or manufactured to be used in high have had limited success with nontraditional speed or pursuit situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Evaluation for Resource Efficiency and Re-Use of Secondary Raw Materials in the Automotive Sector
    Knowledge Partners: Market Evaluation for Resource Efficiency and Re-use of Secondary Raw Materials in the Automotive Sector Implemented by: On Behalf of: Imprint Published by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices: Bonn and Eschborn, Germany B-5/2, Safdarjung Enclave New Delhi 110 029 India T: +91 11 49495353 E: [email protected] I: www.giz.de Responsible Mr. Uwe Becker E: [email protected] Authors GIZ Abhijit Banerjee, Karan Mehrishi, Manjeet Singh Saluja, Rachna Arora, Uwe Becker TERI Jai Kishan Malik, Nitya Nanda, Shilpi Kapur, Souvik Bhattacharjya, Suneel Pandey IFEU Claudia Kamper, Juergen Giegrich, Monika Dittrich VDI Anke Niebaum Research Partner Ernst and Young New Delhi, India August 2015 Disclaimer: All information/data contained herein is obtained from authentic sources believed to be accurate and reliable. This report is based on the data and information gathered by conducting stakeholder consultation, data made available by ACMA and secondary desktop research of information available in public domain. Reasonable skill care and diligence exercised in carrying out analysis and report preparation. This report is not be deemed as any undertaking, warranty or certificate. This report is solely for Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH together with its knowledge partners TERI and IFEU and should not be used, circulated, quoted or otherwise referred to for any other purpose, nor included or referred to in whole or in part in any document without prior written consent.
    [Show full text]
  • Dashboard the Monthly Auto Update
    June 2014 Dashboard The Monthly Auto Update Data Track: June 2014 volume update of auto majors Speedometer Sector overview and outlook ........................................................... 2 June 2014 relative performance Hero MotoCorp ................................................................................. 3 Bajaj Auto .......................................................................................... 4 HMSI .................................................................................................. 6 TVS Motor .......................................................................................... 7 Maruti Suzuki .................................................................................... 9 Mahindra & Mahindra ..................................................................... 11 Tata Motors ...................................................................................... 13 Ashok Leyland ................................................................................. 15 Eicher Motors .................................................................................. 16 Sector Gauge: May 2014 update 12-month relative performance Two-wheelers ................................................................................. 17 Three-wheelers .............................................................................. 19 Cars and UVs .................................................................................... 21 Commercial vehicles......................................................................
    [Show full text]