DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 KALAMUNDA LOCAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY Technical Report October 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 KALAMUNDA LOCAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY Technical Report October 2020 Public Agenda Briefing Forum 8 December 2020 Attachments Attachment 10.2.1.2 City of Kalamunda Biodiversity Conservation Action Plan 2020 – 2030 2020 KALAMUNDA LOCAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY Technical Report October 2020 Prepared by Nam Natura Consulting 0 City of Kalamunda 852 Public Agenda Briefing Forum 8 December 2020 Attachments Attachment 10.2.1.2 Document Tracking Item Detail Project Name Review and update of the City of Kalamunda Local Biodiversity Strategy Client City of Kalamunda Prepared by Renata Zelinova Status Draft Technical Report Version 4 Number Last saved on Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between the City of Kalamunda and Nam Natura Consulting. The scope of services was defined in consultation with the client, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Nam Natura Consulting accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited. 1 City of Kalamunda 853 Public Agenda Briefing Forum 8 December 2020 Attachments Attachment 10.2.1.2 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................... 4 1 INTRODUCTION – WHY HAVE A LOCAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY? ............... 4 1.1 Benefits of conserving biodiversity locally .................................................................................. 6 1.2 Legislation and Policy supporting biodiversity conservation .................................................... 7 1.3 Local Biodiversity Strategy Scope .............................................................................................. 12 2 BIODIVERSITY ASSETS ........................................................................................ 14 2.1 Vegetation, threatened and priority ecological communities ............................................... 15 2.2 Conservation significance plants - Threatened and priority flora .......................................... 20 2.3 Fungi ............................................................................................................................................... 23 2.4 Conservation significance animals – Threatened and Priority Fauna .................................... 24 2.4 Wetlands and waterways ............................................................................................................ 29 3 THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY ................................................................................... 32 4 LOCAL BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION VISION AND OBJECTIVES ................... 38 5 IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................ 38 5.1 Identifying high conservation value areas ................................................................................ 38 5.1.1 Prioritisation of local natural areas....................................................................................... 38 5.1.2 Ecological linkages and vegetation connectivity ............................................................ 44 5.2 Towards local biodiversity conservation objectives ................................................................ 47 5.2.1 Opportunities to increase protection and retention of local natural areas ................... 51 5.2.2 MANAGEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT BIODIVERSITY ................................................................... 61 5.2.3 INTEGRATION OF BIODIVERSITY CONSIDERATION INTO LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUSINESS .......................................................................................................................................................... 67 5.2.4 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT .................................................................................................. 67 6 ACTION PLAN ................................................................................................... 69 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 0 GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................. 3 2 City of Kalamunda 854 Public Agenda Briefing Forum 8 December 2020 Attachments Attachment 10.2.1.2 LIST OF APPENDICES A: Vegetation Statistics B: Vegetation Complex Descriptions C: Maps D: Vegetation Connectivity Modelling E: Review of the 2008 Local Biodiversity Strategy Report F: City of Kalamunda Reserves Prioritisation G: Guide to viewing the Local Biodiversity Strategy mapping via LGmap. ABBREVIATIONS 2008 LBS Shire of Kalamunda Local Biodiversity Strategy as adopted in October 2008 DBCA Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (current) KEAC Kalamunda Environmental Advisory Committee EPP Environmental Planning Policy LPS 3 Local Planning Scheme No 3 PEC Priority Ecological Community TEC Threatened Ecological Community WALGA Western Australian Local Government Association WAPC Western Australian Planning Commission 3 City of Kalamunda 855 Public Agenda Briefing Forum 8 December 2020 Attachments Attachment 10.2.1.2 PURPOSE The purpose of this report and its Appendices is to document the data and methodologies used to inform the revised City of Kalamunda Local Biodiversity Strategy. 1 INTRODUCTION – WHY HAVE A LOCAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY? Biodiversity is the variety of all life forms —the different plants, animals and micro- organisms, the genes they contain, and the ecosystems they form. Biodiversity is usually considered at three levels: genetic diversity, species diversity and ecosystem diversity. The reasons why biodiversity conservation forms an important consideration in decision making go beyond the recognition of the great variety of unique or charismatic plants or animals. The interactions of these living entities, their contribution to functional values at the ecosystem level are well documented as being critical to human wellbeing. Many aspects of biodiversity conservation are regulated via legislation. For example, the protection of rare or threatened plants, animals or plant (ecological) communities is regulated at both State and Federal government levels. Yet, key findings of the latest Australian State of the Environment (SOE) Report (2016) showed the number of threatened species and ecological communities continue to increase, also there was no evidence of decreased pressures on biodiversity and that the cumulative impacts of multiple pressures amplify the threats to biodiversity. While protection of biodiversity via a network of formal reserves forms an important component of biodiversity conservation, the SOE report found the current network of protected areas is not yet comprehensive, representative or adequate (Cresswell and Murphy, 2016). The 2016 SOE report also highlighted many activities that significantly contribute to biodiversity conservation but sit outside regulatory process, such as the significant contribution of citizen scientists to improving our understanding of biodiversity and the management of the numerous threatening processes, demonstrating the need for a multi- stakeholder approach to biodiversity conservation, including Local Government and communities. Biodiversity conservation depends on a whole-of-community approach. While protection of representative natural areas via establishment of reserves can be legislated, the long-term viability of these protected features depends on adequate management and on the management of surrounding lands. A Local Biodiversity Strategy provides a process for assessing the significance of local natural areas in the broader landscape context, for identification of local conservation priorities and outlines a process for improving the conservation status of biodiversity by considering the local opportunities and protection constraints. 4 City of Kalamunda 856 Public Agenda Briefing Forum 8 December 2020 Attachments Attachment 10.2.1.2 A Local Biodiversity Strategy that considers local biodiversity values in the regional context and is integrated into the local land use planning aids transparency and consistency in decision making. The City of Kalamunda was one of three local governments piloting a local biodiversity conservation planning process developed via the Western Australian Local Government Association in 2004. When publishing its 2008 Local Biodiversity Strategy, the City was the first local government in Western Australia to adopt a strategy developed in accordance with the State Government endorsed methodology for biodiversity conservation planning at local level (Environmental Protection Authority 2008). Review of the City’s 2008 Local Biodiversity Strategy found the Strategy was not used effectively to support land use planning decisions or to increase the protection status of identified significant natural areas in the City. Since 2008, there was less than a 1% increase in formally protected areas recorded in the City (via conservation type Crown lands) and over 630 hectares of native vegetation lost (Appendix E). The key achievements of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Figure 8. Location of Potential Nest Trees As Classified According to Hollow-Score
    Bindoon Bypass Fauna Assessment Figure 8. Location of potential nest trees as classified according to hollow-score. See Appendix 11 for four finer scale maps. BAMFORD Consulting Ecologists | 41 Bindoon Bypass Fauna Assessment Figure 9. DBH profile of the potential black-cockatoo nesting trees surveyed. 4.3.1.1 Extrapolation of tree data The VSA areas presented in Table 7 were multiplied by the mean tree densities (Table 11) to estimate the total numbers of each (major) hollow-bearing tree species in the survey area. These values are presented in Table 13. Approximately 18 000 trees may support black-cockatoo nests within the entire survey area. Table 13. The estimated number of potential hollow-bearing trees (± SE) in the survey area. Note that not all VSAs were sampled. Vegetation and Substrate Jarrah Marri Wandoo Total Association > 500mm DBH > 500mm DBH >300mm DBH VSA 3. Marri-Jarrah woodland. 1664 ± 260 1366 ± 327 0 3030 ± 587 VSA 4. Marri-Jarrah woodland with little to no remnant 1702 ± 187 915 ± 46 0 2617 ± 233 understorey (e.g. grazed). VSA 5. Wandoo woodland (with 26 ± 26 1010 ± 616 2497 ± 700 3533 ± 1342 or without understorey). VSA 8. Paddocks with large 4535 ± 3354 3402 ± 1174 916 ± 916 8853 ± 5444 remnant trees. Overall 7927 ± 3827 6693 ± 2163 3413 ± 1616 18033 ± 7606 BAMFORD Consulting Ecologists | 42 Bindoon Bypass Fauna Assessment 4.3.2 Foraging The distribution of foraging habitat is mapped for Carnaby’s Black-Cockatoo and Forest Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo in Figure 10 and Figure 11 respectively (with finer scale maps presented in Appendix 12 and Appendix 13 respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK
    Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK APRIL 2015 suite 1, 216 carp st (po box 470) bega nsw 2550 australia t (02) 6492 8333 www.nghenvironmental.com.au e [email protected] unit 18, level 3, 21 mary st suite 1, 39 fitzmaurice st (po box 5464) surry hills nsw 2010 australia wagga wagga nsw 2650 australia t (02) 8202 8333 t (02) 6971 9696 unit 17, 27 yallourn st (po box 62) room 15, 341 havannah st (po box 434) fyshwick act 2609 australia bathurst nsw 2795 australia t (02) 6280 5053 0488 820 748 Document Verification Project Title: MEELUP REGIONAL PARK Project Number: 5354 Project File Name: Meelup Regional Park Level 2 Fauna Survey v20150115 Revision Date Prepared by (name) Reviewed by (name) Approved by (name) DRAFT 27/03/15 Shane Priddle Nick Graham-Higgs Nick Graham-Higgs (SW Environmental) and Greg Harewood Final 17/04/15 Shane Priddle Shane Priddle Shane Priddle (SW Environmental) (SW Environmental) (SW Environmental) nghenvironmental prints all documents on environmentally sustainable paper including paper made from bagasse (a by- product of sugar production) or recycled paper. nghenvironmental is a registered trading name of NGH Environmental Pty Ltd; ACN: 124 444 622. ABN: 31 124 444 622 suite 1, 216 carp st (po box 470) bega nsw 2550 australia t (02) 6492 8333 www.nghenvironmental.com.au e [email protected] unit 18, level 3, 21 mary st suite 1, 39 fitzmaurice st (po box 5464) surry hills nsw 2010 australia wagga wagga nsw 2650 australia t (02) 8202 8333 t (02) 6971 9696 unit 17, 27 yallourn st (po box 62) room 15, 341 havannah st (po box 434) fyshwick act 2609 australia bathurst nsw 2795 australia t (02) 6280 5053 0488 820 748 Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK CONTENTS LEVEL 2 FAUNA SURVEY .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue3.7 MB
    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
    [Show full text]
  • (Reptilia: Squamata: Scincidae) Species Group and a New Species of Immediate Conservation Concern in the Southwestern Australian Biodiversity Hotspot
    Zootaxa 3390: 1–18 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Molecular phylogeny and morphological revision of the Ctenotus labillardieri (Reptilia: Squamata: Scincidae) species group and a new species of immediate conservation concern in the southwestern Australian biodiversity hotspot GEOFFREY M. KAY & J. SCOTT KEOGH 1 Division of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia 1 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Ctenotus is the largest and most diverse genus of skinks in Australia with at least 97 described species. We generated large mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data sets for 70 individuals representing all available species in the C. labillardieri species- group to produce the first comprehensive phylogeny for this clade. The widespread C. labillardieri was sampled extensively to provide the first detailed phylogeographic data set for a reptile in the southwestern Australian biodiversity hotspot. We supplemented our molecular data with a comprehensive morphological dataset for the entire group, and together these data are used to revise the group and describe a new species. The morphologically highly variable species C. labillardieri comprises seven well-supported genetic clades that each occupy distinct geographic regions. The phylogeographic patterns observed in this taxon are consistent with studies of frogs, plants and invertebrates, adding strength to emerging biogeographic hypotheses in this iconic region. The species C. catenifer, C. youngsoni, and C. gemmula are well supported, and despite limited sampling both C. catenifer and C. gemmula show substantial genetic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report
    A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Report B: For practitioners of conservation planning Copyright text 2012 Southwest Australia Ecoregion Initiative. All rights reserved. Author: Danielle Witham, WWF-Australia First published: 2012 by the Southwest Australia Ecoregion Initiative. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright Cover Image: ©Richard McLellan Design: Three Blocks Left Design Printed by: SOS Print & Media Printed on Impact, a 100% post-consumer waste recycled paper. For copies of this document, please contact SWAEI Secretariat, PO Box 4010, Wembley, Western Australia 6913. This document is also available from the SWAEI website at http://www.swaecoregion.org SETTING THE CONTEXT i CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2 SETTING THE CONTEXT 3 The Southwest Australia Ecoregion Initiative SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT METHODOLOGY 5 STEP 1. IDENTIFYING RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS AND CLARIFYING ROLES 7 Expert engagement STEP 2. DEFINING PROJECT BOUNDARY 9 The boundary of the Southwest Australia Ecoregion STEP 3. APPLYING PLANNING UNITS TO PROJECT AREA 11 STEP 4. PREPARING AND CHOOSING SOFTWARE 13 Data identification 13 Conservation planning software 14 STEP 5. IDENTIFYING CONSERVATION FEATURES 16 Choosing conservation features 16 Fauna conservation features 17 Flora conservation features 21 Inland water body conservation features 22 Inland water species conservation features 27 Other conservation features 27 Threatened and Priority Ecological communities (TECs and PECs) 31 Vegetation conservation features 32 Vegetation connectivity 36 STEP 6. APPLYING CONSERVATION FEATURES TO PLANNING UNITS 38 STEP 7. SETTING TARGETS 40 Target formulae 40 Special formulae 42 STEP 8. IDENTIFYING AND DEFINING LOCK-INS 45 STEP 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography of the Vertebrates of the Cape Range Peninsula, Western Australia
    Biogeography of the vertebrates of the Cape Range peninsula, Western Australia Peter G. Kendrick Department of Conservation and Land Management, p.a. Box 835, Karratha, Western Australia 6714. Abstract Thirty mammals, 84 reptiles, tlve amphibians and about 200 birds are known from the Cape Range peninsula. Biogcographie pattems of the extant terrestrial vertebrate fauna of the peninsula, particularly among the herpetofauna and avifauna, arc significantly related to landfoITll units present on the peninsula. TIle mammal fauna of the Cape Range peninsula ha, suffered numerous reccnt extinctions, but is not yet completely known (particularly for bats). With the exception of Petrogale lateralis, the 11 ground dwelling native mammals arc common elsewhere in the arid and semi-arid north west of Westem Australia. Most of the bats are northern species, but two southern species are present (Tadarida australia and Chalinolobus gouldii). Introduced mammals arc well established in the area including goats and foxes. In addition to ubiquitous species, the bird and reptile faunas arc typical of the semi-arid and arid north west and interior, although some south western species arc also present. Many species are represented on Cape Range peninsula by populations isolated from the main part of their conspecific distribution. Despite this, levels of endemism on the peninsula are low. Only two species, Lerista allochira (a skink confined to the limestone of the Cape Range) and the Grey Shrike-thrush (Colluricincla harmonica rufiventris) show spec1flc and sub-specific endemism within the Cape Range peninsula area. Inter-tidal coastal flats and man!,'Tove habitats are significant to many bird species occurring on the peninsula, although many of these are migratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Assessment of Lots 107 & 108 Wattleup Road
    Fauna Assessment of Lots 107 & 108 Wattleup Road Hammond Park NOVEMBER 2016 Version 1 On behalf of: Emerge Associates Suite 4, 26 Railway Road SUBIACO WA 6008 T: 08 9380 4988 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 E: [email protected] LOTS 107 & 108 WATTLEUP ROAD - HAMMOND PARK – FAUNA ASSESSMENT – NOVEMBER 2016 – V1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 4 2. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL ............................................................................. 4 3. SCOPE OF WORKS ........................................................................................... 4 4. BIOGEOGRAPHICAL SETTING ......................................................................... 5 5. METHODS........................................................................................................... 6 5.1 POTENTIAL FAUNA INVENTORY – LITERATURE REVIEW ............................ 6 5.1.1 Database Searches ................................................................................... 6 5.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ......................................................... 6 5.1.3 Existing Publications .................................................................................. 8 5.1.4 Fauna of Conservation Significance .......................................................... 9 5.1.5 Likelihood of Occurrence – Vertebrate Fauna of Conservation Significance ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quenda Wetland Reserve Strategic Management Plan
    City of Melville Quenda Wetland Reserve Strategic Management Plan 08 August 2016 Executive Summary Quenda Wetland Reserve is a wetland reserve located within the City of Melville, in the suburb of Murdoch. The wetland is a conservation category sumpland with a man-made lake to collect extra stormwater runoff from surrounding development areas. Quenda Wetland Reserve is part of a regionally significant wetland and bushland ecological linkage that connects to other reserves throughout the Swan Coastal Plain region. These conservation values justify the need for a site-specific strategic management plan prepared in accordance with the Natural Areas Asset Management Plan (Waters A., 2011). The reserve consists of dryland and wetland vegetation that has intact vegetation structure, with minor disturbances present and floristic community types are considered well reserved and at low risk (Government of Western Australia, 2000). In addition to the open water body, the reserve has four distinct vegetation types as determined by Ecoscape (2015), namely: . Dry Shrubland . Melaleuca preissiana Woodland . Sedgeland . Wet Shrubland. Two species listed as at-risk by the City were recorded on site by Ecoscape (2015), including: . Low priority species – Hibbertia cuneiformis, which is considered to be dubious and not naturally occurring in the site . Very High priority species – Grevillea obtusifolia, which is at risk of being lost form this reserve and is poorly represented on the Swan Coastal Plain. Quenda Wetland Reserve provides habitat for several threatened or priority fauna species in decline on the Swan Coastal Plain, including: . Forest Red-tailed Cockatoos (Calyptorhynchus banksii naso), . Southern Brown Bandicoot or Quenda (Isoodon obesulus fusciventer) .
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Fauna Assessment at the Minninup Pool Project Development Investigation Area
    Targeted Fauna Assessment at the Minninup Pool Project Development Investigation Area Prepared for the Shire of Collie January, 2019 Greg Harewood Zoologist A.B.N. 95 536 627 336 PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 T/F:(08) 9725 0982 E: [email protected] Executive Summary This report details the results of a targeted fauna assessment the Minninup Pool Project Development Investigation Area (part of reserve 34343 - the subject site) on behalf of the Shire of Collie (the Shire). The Shire is considering the development of a nature- based hub at Minninup Pool, and have commissioned an assessment of the fauna (and flora) values of the subject site to determine the compatibility of the site for development. The scope of works was to carry out a survey for threatened fauna or habitat within and immediately adjacent to the proposed development area. To comply with this requirement a Level 1 fauna survey as defined by the EPA (EPA 2016) has been carried out. In accordance with these guidelines the assessment has therefore included a literature review and a field reconnaissance survey. Because some listed threatened species (e.g. several species of black cockatoo and the western ringtail possum) are known to occur in the general area, the scope of the survey work was expanded to include a targeted assessment of the site’s significance to these species (and others) as well. Daytime field survey work including camera trap deployment/retrieval and bat call recording were carried out on various days/nights between September 2018 to January 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny and Revised Classification of Squamata, Including 4161 Species of Lizards and Snakes
    BMC Evolutionary Biology This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:93 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-93 Robert Alexander Pyron ([email protected]) Frank T Burbrink ([email protected]) John J Wiens ([email protected]) ISSN 1471-2148 Article type Research article Submission date 30 January 2013 Acceptance date 19 March 2013 Publication date 29 April 2013 Article URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/93 Like all articles in BMC journals, this peer-reviewed article can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright notice below). Articles in BMC journals are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central. For information about publishing your research in BMC journals or any BioMed Central journal, go to http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/authors/ © 2013 Pyron et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes Robert Alexander Pyron 1* * Corresponding author Email: [email protected] Frank T Burbrink 2,3 Email: [email protected] John J Wiens 4 Email: [email protected] 1 Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G St.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Fauna Assessment.Pdf
    APPENDIX H BORR North and Central Section Targeted Fauna Assessment (Biota, 2019) Bunbury Outer Ring Road Northern and Central Section Targeted Fauna Assessment Prepared for GHD December 2019 BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna © Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2020 ABN 49 092 687 119 Level 1, 228 Carr Place Leederville Western Australia 6007 Ph: (08) 9328 1900 Fax: (08) 9328 6138 Project No.: 1463 Prepared by: V. Ford, R. Teale J. Keen, J. King Document Quality Checking History Version: Rev A Peer review: S. Ford Director review: M. Maier Format review: S. Schmidt, M. Maier Approved for issue: M. Maier This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified on the cover page and no representation is made to any third party. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd. This report has been designed for double-sided printing. Hard copies supplied by Biota are printed on recycled paper. Cube:Current:1463 (BORR North Central Re-survey):Documents:1463 Northern and Central Fauna ARI_Rev0.docx 3 BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna 4 Cube:Current:1463 (BORR North Central Re-survey):Documents:1463 Northern and Central Fauna ARI_Rev0.docx BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 9 1.1 Introduction 9 1.2 Methods
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Surveys (Level 2)
    Phase 1 and 2 Seasonal Fauna Surveys (Level 2) Yoongarillup Mineral Sands Project Doral Mineral Sands Pty Ltd AUGUST 2014 Report Number: SF 008335 VERSION 5 On behalf of: Doral Mineral Sands Pty Ltd Lot 7 Harris Road PICTON WA 6229 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist A.B.N. 95 536 627 336 PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 T/F: (08) 9725 0982 E: [email protected] YOONGARILLUP MINERAL SANDS PROJECT – SEASONAL FAUNA SURVEYS – AUGUST 2014 – V5 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .........................................................................................................III 1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................1 1.1 BACKGROUND.......................................................................................1 1.2 SURVEY SCOPE ....................................................................................1 1.3 BIOGEOGRAPHIC SETTING .................................................................2 1.4 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT...................................................................3 1.4.1 Climate ......................................................................................................3 1.4.2 Topography and Soils ...............................................................................4 1.4.3 Surface Hydrology.....................................................................................4 2. METHODS....................................................................................................5 2.1 FAUNA HABITAT ASSESSMENT
    [Show full text]