DOCSLIB.ORG

Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK APRIL 2015 suite 1, 216 carp st (po box 470) bega nsw 2550 australia t (02) 6492 8333 www.nghenvironmental.com.au e [email protected] unit 18, level 3, 21 mary st suite 1, 39 fitzmaurice st (po box 5464) surry hills nsw 2010 australia wagga wagga nsw 2650 australia t (02) 8202 8333 t (02) 6971 9696 unit 17, 27 yallourn st (po box 62) room 15, 341 havannah st (po box 434) fyshwick act 2609 australia bathurst nsw 2795 australia t (02) 6280 5053 0488 820 748 Document Verification Project Title: MEELUP REGIONAL PARK Project Number: 5354 Project File Name: Meelup Regional Park Level 2 Fauna Survey v20150115 Revision Date Prepared by (name) Reviewed by (name) Approved by (name) DRAFT 27/03/15 Shane Priddle Nick Graham-Higgs Nick Graham-Higgs (SW Environmental) and Greg Harewood Final 17/04/15 Shane Priddle Shane Priddle Shane Priddle (SW Environmental) (SW Environmental) (SW Environmental) nghenvironmental prints all documents on environmentally sustainable paper including paper made from bagasse (a by- product of sugar production) or recycled paper. nghenvironmental is a registered trading name of NGH Environmental Pty Ltd; ACN: 124 444 622. ABN: 31 124 444 622 suite 1, 216 carp st (po box 470) bega nsw 2550 australia t (02) 6492 8333 www.nghenvironmental.com.au e [email protected] unit 18, level 3, 21 mary st suite 1, 39 fitzmaurice st (po box 5464) surry hills nsw 2010 australia wagga wagga nsw 2650 australia t (02) 8202 8333 t (02) 6971 9696 unit 17, 27 yallourn st (po box 62) room 15, 341 havannah st (po box 434) fyshwick act 2609 australia bathurst nsw 2795 australia t (02) 6280 5053 0488 820 748 Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK CONTENTS LEVEL 2 FAUNA SURVEY ...................................................................................................................... 1 APRIL 2015 ......................................................................................................................................... 1 CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................................... I FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................ IV TABLES .............................................................................................................................................. V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................1 1.2 SURVEY SCOPE .....................................................................................................................................4 1.3 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................................................4 1.3.1 Biogeographic Setting ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3 Topography and Soils ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3.4 Surface Hydrology .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.3.5 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 DESKTOP REVIEW: FAUNA INVENTORY ............................................................................................ 10 2.1.1 Database Searches ............................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ..................................................................................................... 10 2.1.3 References ........................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 DESKTOP REVIEW: FAUNA HABITATS................................................................................................ 11 2.3 DETAILED SURVEY: FAUNA INVENTORY ............................................................................................ 11 2.3.1 Survey Timing and Weather ................................................................................................................ 11 2.3.2 Survey Team ........................................................................................................................................ 11 2.3.3 Site Selection and Habitat Assessment ................................................................................................ 12 2.3.4 Survey Methods ................................................................................................................................... 12 2.4 FAUNA OF CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANCE ....................................................................................... 21 2.4.1 State, Federal and International Fauna Status Classifications ............................................................. 21 2.4.2 Other Species of Significance ............................................................................................................... 22 3 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................... 22 4 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................. 25 4.1 DESKTOP REVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 25 5354 Final i Level 2 Fauna Survey MEELUP REGIONAL PARK 4.1.1 Local fauna records .............................................................................................................................. 25 4.1.2 Conservation significant fauna ............................................................................................................ 25 4.2 FAUNA HABITATS .............................................................................................................................. 25 4.3 FAUNA INVENTORY - DETAILED SURVEY ........................................................................................... 30 4.3.1 Ground Fauna Trapping and Opportunistic Surveys ............................................................................ 30 4.3.2 Infrared Cameras ................................................................................................................................. 30 4.3.3 Bird Census .......................................................................................................................................... 32 4.3.4 Nocturnal Surveys ................................................................................................................................ 32 4.3.5 Call Playback ........................................................................................................................................ 35 4.3.6 Acoustic Bat Recordings ...................................................................................................................... 35 4.3.7 Drainage Line Surveys and Invertebrate fauna .................................................................................... 35 5 FAUNA INVENTORY - SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 39 5.1 NON-VOLANT MAMMALS ................................................................................................................. 39 5.1.1 Non-Volant Mammal Assemblage ....................................................................................................... 39 5.1.2 Non-Volant Mammals of Conservation Significance ........................................................................... 39 5.2 BATS .................................................................................................................................................. 45 5.2.1 Bat Assemblage ................................................................................................................................... 45 5.2.2 Bats of Conservation Significance ........................................................................................................ 45 5.3 BIRDS ................................................................................................................................................. 47 5.3.1 Bird Assemblage .................................................................................................................................. 47 5.3.2 Birds of Conservation Significance ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Figure 8. Location of Potential Nest Trees As Classified According to Hollow-Score
    Bindoon Bypass Fauna Assessment Figure 8. Location of potential nest trees as classified according to hollow-score. See Appendix 11 for four finer scale maps. BAMFORD Consulting Ecologists | 41 Bindoon Bypass Fauna Assessment Figure 9. DBH profile of the potential black-cockatoo nesting trees surveyed. 4.3.1.1 Extrapolation of tree data The VSA areas presented in Table 7 were multiplied by the mean tree densities (Table 11) to estimate the total numbers of each (major) hollow-bearing tree species in the survey area. These values are presented in Table 13. Approximately 18 000 trees may support black-cockatoo nests within the entire survey area. Table 13. The estimated number of potential hollow-bearing trees (± SE) in the survey area. Note that not all VSAs were sampled. Vegetation and Substrate Jarrah Marri Wandoo Total Association > 500mm DBH > 500mm DBH >300mm DBH VSA 3. Marri-Jarrah woodland. 1664 ± 260 1366 ± 327 0 3030 ± 587 VSA 4. Marri-Jarrah woodland with little to no remnant 1702 ± 187 915 ± 46 0 2617 ± 233 understorey (e.g. grazed). VSA 5. Wandoo woodland (with 26 ± 26 1010 ± 616 2497 ± 700 3533 ± 1342 or without understorey). VSA 8. Paddocks with large 4535 ± 3354 3402 ± 1174 916 ± 916 8853 ± 5444 remnant trees. Overall 7927 ± 3827 6693 ± 2163 3413 ± 1616 18033 ± 7606 BAMFORD Consulting Ecologists | 42 Bindoon Bypass Fauna Assessment 4.3.2 Foraging The distribution of foraging habitat is mapped for Carnaby’s Black-Cockatoo and Forest Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo in Figure 10 and Figure 11 respectively (with finer scale maps presented in Appendix 12 and Appendix 13 respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 KALAMUNDA LOCAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY Technical Report October 2020
    Public Agenda Briefing Forum 8 December 2020 Attachments Attachment 10.2.1.2 City of Kalamunda Biodiversity Conservation Action Plan 2020 – 2030 2020 KALAMUNDA LOCAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY Technical Report October 2020 Prepared by Nam Natura Consulting 0 City of Kalamunda 852 Public Agenda Briefing Forum 8 December 2020 Attachments Attachment 10.2.1.2 Document Tracking Item Detail Project Name Review and update of the City of Kalamunda Local Biodiversity Strategy Client City of Kalamunda Prepared by Renata Zelinova Status Draft Technical Report Version 4 Number Last saved on Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between the City of Kalamunda and Nam Natura Consulting. The scope of services was defined in consultation with the client, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Nam Natura Consulting accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited. 1 City of Kalamunda 853 Public Agenda Briefing Forum 8 December 2020 Attachments Attachment 10.2.1.2 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................... 4 1 INTRODUCTION – WHY HAVE A LOCAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY? ..............
    [Show full text]
  • The Spectacular Sea Anemone 438 by U
    THE AUSTRAL IAN MUSEUM will be 150 years old in March 1977. TAMS has its 5th birthday at the same time. Like all healthy five year olds, TAMS is full of fun, eager to learn about the world and constantly on the go! 1977 is a celebration year. Members enjoy a full and varied programme, are entitled to a discount at the Museum bookshop and have reciprocal rights with many other Societies in Australia and overseas. Join the Society today. THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SOCIETY 6-8 College Street, Sydney 2000 Telephone: 33-5525 from 1st February, 1977 AUSTRAliAN NATURAl HISTORY DECEMBER 1976 VOLUME 18 NUMBER 12 PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM, 6-8 COLLEGE STREET, SYDNEY PRESIDENT, MICHAEL PITMAN DIRECTOR, DESMOND GRIFFIN A SATELLITE VIEW OF AUSTRALIA 422 BY J.F . HUNTINGTON A MOST SUCCESSFUL INVASION 428 THE DIVERSITY OF AUSTRALIA'S SKINKS BY ALLEN E. GREER BOTANAVITI 434 TH E ELUSIVE FIJIAN FROGS BY JOHN C. PERNETTA AND BARRY GOLDMAN THE SPECTACULAR SEA ANEMONE 438 BY U. ERICH FRIESE PEOPLE, PIGS AND PUNISHMENT 444 BY O.K . FElL COVER: The sea anemone, Adamsia pal/iata, lives ·com­ IN REVIEW mensally with the hermit crab, Pagurus prideauxi. (Photo: AUSTRALIAN BIRDS AND OTHER ANIMALS 448 U. E. Friese) A nnual Subscriptio n : $4 .50-Australia; $A5-Papua New Guinea; $A6-other E DITOR/DESIGNE R countr ies. Single copies : $1 ($1.40 posted Australia); $A 1.45-Papua New NANCY SMITH Guinea; $A 1.70-other countries. Cheque or money order p ayable to The ASSISTANT EDITOR Australian Museum should be sent to The Secretary, The Australian Museum, ROBERT STEWART PO Box A285, Sydney South 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Frogs & Reptiles NE Vic 2018 Online
    Reptiles and Frogs of North East Victoria An Identication and Conservation Guide Victorian Conservation Status (DELWP Advisory List) cr critically endangered en endangered Reptiles & Frogs vu vulnerable nt near threatened dd data deficient L Listed under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act (FFG, 1988) Size: of North East Victoria Lizards, Dragons & Skinks: Snout-vent length (cm) Snakes, Goannas: Total length (cm) An Identification and Conservation Guide Lowland Copperhead Highland Copperhead Carpet Python Gray's Blind Snake Nobbi Dragon Bearded Dragon Ragged Snake-eyed Skink Large Striped Skink Frogs: Snout-vent length male - M (mm) Snout-vent length female - F (mm) Austrelaps superbus 170 (NC) Austrelaps ramsayi 115 (PR) Morelia spilota metcalfei – en L 240 (DM) Ramphotyphlops nigrescens 38 (PR) Diporiphora nobbi 8.4 (PR) Pogona barbata – vu 25 (DM) Cryptoblepharus pannosus Snout-Vent 3.5 (DM) Ctenotus robustus Snout-Vent 12 (DM) Guide to symbols Venomous Lifeform F Fossorial (burrows underground) T Terrestrial Reptiles & Frogs SA Semi Arboreal R Rock-dwelling Habitat Type Alpine Bog Montane Forests Alpine Grassland/Woodland Lowland Grassland/Woodland White-lipped Snake Tiger Snake Woodland Blind Snake Olive Legless Lizard Mountain Dragon Marbled Gecko Copper-tailed Skink Alpine She-oak Skink Drysdalia coronoides 40 (PR) Notechis scutatus 200 (NC) Ramphotyphlops proximus – nt 50 (DM) Delma inornata 13 (DM) Rankinia diemensis Snout-Vent 7.5 (NC) Christinus marmoratus Snout-Vent 7 (PR) Ctenotus taeniolatus Snout-Vent 8 (DM) Cyclodomorphus praealtus
    [Show full text]
  • GBMWHA Native Reptiles Bionet - 16 May 2016 Lizards, Snakes and Turtles NSW Comm
    BM nature GBMWHA Native Reptiles BioNet - 16 May 2016 lizards, snakes and turtles NSW Comm. Family Scientific Name Common Name status status Lizards Agamidae Amphibolurus muricatus Jacky Lizard Agamidae Amphibolurus nobbi Nobbi Agamidae Intellagama lesueurii Eastern Water Dragon Agamidae Pogona barbata Bearded Dragon Agamidae Rankinia diemensis Mountain Dragon Gekkonidae Amalosia lesueurii Lesueur's Velvet Gecko Gekkonidae Christinus marmoratus Marbled Gecko Gekkonidae Diplodactylus vittatus Wood Gecko Gekkonidae Nebulifera robusta Robust Velvet Gecko Gekkonidae Phyllurus platurus Broad-tailed Gecko Gekkonidae Underwoodisaurus milii Thick-tailed Gecko Pygopodidae Delma plebeia Leaden Delma Pygopodidae Lialis burtonis Burton's Snake-lizard Pygopodidae Pygopus lepidopodus Common Scaly-foot Scincidae Acritoscincus duperreyi Eastern Three-lined Skink Scincidae Acritoscincus platynota Red-throated Skink Scincidae Anomalopus leuckartii Two-clawed Worm-skink Scincidae Anomalopus swansoni Punctate Worm-skink Scincidae Carlia tetradactyla Southern Rainbow-skink Scincidae Carlia vivax Tussock Rainbow-skink Scincidae Cryptoblepharus pannosus Ragged Snake-eyed Skink Scincidae Cryptoblepharus virgatus Cream-striped Shinning-skink Scincidae Ctenotus robustus Robust Ctenotus Scincidae Ctenotus taeniolatus Copper-tailed Skink Scincidae Cyclodomorphus gerrardii Pink-tongued Lizard Scincidae Cyclodomorphus michaeli Mainland She-oak Skink Scincidae Egernia cunninghami Cunningham's Skink Scincidae Egernia saxatilis Black Rock Skink Scincidae Egernia striolata
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Capital Territory & Yass Valley Reptiles
    Australian Capital Territory & Yass Valley Reptiles Geoff Robertson 4 June 2017 Turtle (1-2 species) Lizard Gecko (2) Legless lizard (4-5) Dragon (6) Gonna (2) Skink (32-35) Egernia group - chunky (9) Eugongylus group - striped (9-10) Sphenomorphus group - red (14) Snakes Blind (1) Total species = 57-66 Python (1?) Elapid (9-12) Murray (short-neck) turtle (above left) Emydura macquarii Eastern long-neck turtle (above right) Chelodina longicollis Lizards Monitors (goannas) Dragons Skinks Geckos Measuring length lizards & snakes: Legless TL - total length. lizards SVL - tip of the nose (snout) to vent. Dragons Physignathus lesueurii, Australia: 11 genera, 70 species. SVL 245 mm ACT/Yass: 5 genera, 6 species Common: Pogona barbata, Water dragon (top), Aust: 1 SVL 250 mm species. Eastern bearded dragon (bottom), Aust: 6 species. Jacky lizard or tree dragon. Three similar dragons Jacky (top), Nobbi (middle) and Mountain (bottom). SVL is Jacky - 120mm Nobbi - 84mm Mountain - 82mm However, all dragons (including water & bearded ) look similar when young. Photos top to bottom - Amphibolurus mutinous and A. nobbi, & Rankina diemensis. by Warren Saunders, John Wombey and Roger Farrow. Grassland earless dragon Eight earless dragon species in Australia. GED found in some natural grassland sites, climbs tussock grasses otherwise a ground dweller. Unlike other dragons, Tail slight/curls. Populations - ACT & southern Monaro. GED thought extinct, re-discovered, crashed in drought, captive breeding, future? Tympanocryptis pinguicolla. SVL 55mm. Bottom photo: Margaret Ning. Jacky dragon Bearded dragon Water dragon Nobbi dragon Mountain dragon Grassland earless dragon Gecko Australia: 18 genera & 111 species ACT/Yass: 2 species Stone gecko (right) Marble gecko (below) Diplodactylus vittatus, SVL 50mm Photo John Wombey Christinus marmaratus, SVL 70mm Photo Margaret Ning Legless lizards Related to geckos Australia: 7 genera & 38 species ACT/Yass: 2 genera & 5 species Unlike snakes: Lialis burtonis, SVL170mm Photo John Wombey • Large fleshy tongue (cf forked).
    [Show full text]
  • (Reptilia: Squamata: Scincidae) Species Group and a New Species of Immediate Conservation Concern in the Southwestern Australian Biodiversity Hotspot
    Zootaxa 3390: 1–18 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Molecular phylogeny and morphological revision of the Ctenotus labillardieri (Reptilia: Squamata: Scincidae) species group and a new species of immediate conservation concern in the southwestern Australian biodiversity hotspot GEOFFREY M. KAY & J. SCOTT KEOGH 1 Division of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia 1 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Ctenotus is the largest and most diverse genus of skinks in Australia with at least 97 described species. We generated large mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data sets for 70 individuals representing all available species in the C. labillardieri species- group to produce the first comprehensive phylogeny for this clade. The widespread C. labillardieri was sampled extensively to provide the first detailed phylogeographic data set for a reptile in the southwestern Australian biodiversity hotspot. We supplemented our molecular data with a comprehensive morphological dataset for the entire group, and together these data are used to revise the group and describe a new species. The morphologically highly variable species C. labillardieri comprises seven well-supported genetic clades that each occupy distinct geographic regions. The phylogeographic patterns observed in this taxon are consistent with studies of frogs, plants and invertebrates, adding strength to emerging biogeographic hypotheses in this iconic region. The species C. catenifer, C. youngsoni, and C. gemmula are well supported, and despite limited sampling both C. catenifer and C. gemmula show substantial genetic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report
    A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Report B: For practitioners of conservation planning Copyright text 2012 Southwest Australia Ecoregion Initiative. All rights reserved. Author: Danielle Witham, WWF-Australia First published: 2012 by the Southwest Australia Ecoregion Initiative. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright Cover Image: ©Richard McLellan Design: Three Blocks Left Design Printed by: SOS Print & Media Printed on Impact, a 100% post-consumer waste recycled paper. For copies of this document, please contact SWAEI Secretariat, PO Box 4010, Wembley, Western Australia 6913. This document is also available from the SWAEI website at http://www.swaecoregion.org SETTING THE CONTEXT i CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2 SETTING THE CONTEXT 3 The Southwest Australia Ecoregion Initiative SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT METHODOLOGY 5 STEP 1. IDENTIFYING RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS AND CLARIFYING ROLES 7 Expert engagement STEP 2. DEFINING PROJECT BOUNDARY 9 The boundary of the Southwest Australia Ecoregion STEP 3. APPLYING PLANNING UNITS TO PROJECT AREA 11 STEP 4. PREPARING AND CHOOSING SOFTWARE 13 Data identification 13 Conservation planning software 14 STEP 5. IDENTIFYING CONSERVATION FEATURES 16 Choosing conservation features 16 Fauna conservation features 17 Flora conservation features 21 Inland water body conservation features 22 Inland water species conservation features 27 Other conservation features 27 Threatened and Priority Ecological communities (TECs and PECs) 31 Vegetation conservation features 32 Vegetation connectivity 36 STEP 6. APPLYING CONSERVATION FEATURES TO PLANNING UNITS 38 STEP 7. SETTING TARGETS 40 Target formulae 40 Special formulae 42 STEP 8. IDENTIFYING AND DEFINING LOCK-INS 45 STEP 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Assessment of Lots 107 & 108 Wattleup Road
    Fauna Assessment of Lots 107 & 108 Wattleup Road Hammond Park NOVEMBER 2016 Version 1 On behalf of: Emerge Associates Suite 4, 26 Railway Road SUBIACO WA 6008 T: 08 9380 4988 Prepared by: Greg Harewood Zoologist PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 E: [email protected] LOTS 107 & 108 WATTLEUP ROAD - HAMMOND PARK – FAUNA ASSESSMENT – NOVEMBER 2016 – V1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 4 2. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL ............................................................................. 4 3. SCOPE OF WORKS ........................................................................................... 4 4. BIOGEOGRAPHICAL SETTING ......................................................................... 5 5. METHODS........................................................................................................... 6 5.1 POTENTIAL FAUNA INVENTORY – LITERATURE REVIEW ............................ 6 5.1.1 Database Searches ................................................................................... 6 5.1.2 Previous Fauna Surveys in the Area ......................................................... 6 5.1.3 Existing Publications .................................................................................. 8 5.1.4 Fauna of Conservation Significance .......................................................... 9 5.1.5 Likelihood of Occurrence – Vertebrate Fauna of Conservation Significance ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Fauna Assessment at the Minninup Pool Project Development Investigation Area
    Targeted Fauna Assessment at the Minninup Pool Project Development Investigation Area Prepared for the Shire of Collie January, 2019 Greg Harewood Zoologist A.B.N. 95 536 627 336 PO Box 755 BUNBURY WA 6231 M: 0402 141 197 T/F:(08) 9725 0982 E: [email protected] Executive Summary This report details the results of a targeted fauna assessment the Minninup Pool Project Development Investigation Area (part of reserve 34343 - the subject site) on behalf of the Shire of Collie (the Shire). The Shire is considering the development of a nature- based hub at Minninup Pool, and have commissioned an assessment of the fauna (and flora) values of the subject site to determine the compatibility of the site for development. The scope of works was to carry out a survey for threatened fauna or habitat within and immediately adjacent to the proposed development area. To comply with this requirement a Level 1 fauna survey as defined by the EPA (EPA 2016) has been carried out. In accordance with these guidelines the assessment has therefore included a literature review and a field reconnaissance survey. Because some listed threatened species (e.g. several species of black cockatoo and the western ringtail possum) are known to occur in the general area, the scope of the survey work was expanded to include a targeted assessment of the site’s significance to these species (and others) as well. Daytime field survey work including camera trap deployment/retrieval and bat call recording were carried out on various days/nights between September 2018 to January 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Landcorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey
    LandCorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey October 2016 Executive summary Introduction Through the Royalties for Regions “Growing our South” initiative, the Shire of Denmark has received funding to provide a second crossing of the Denmark River, to upgrade approximately 6.5 km of local roads and to support the delivery of an industrial estate adjacent to McIntosh Road. GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) was commissioned by LandCorp to undertake a biological assessment of the project survey area. The purpose of the assessment was to identify and describe flora, vegetation and fauna within the survey area. The outcomes of the assessment will be used in the environmental assessment and approvals process and will identify the possible need for, and scope of, further field investigations will inform environmental impact assessment of the road upgrades. The survey area is approximately 68.5 ha in area and includes a broad area of land between Scotsdale Road and the Denmark River and the road reserve and adjacent land along East River Road and McIntosh Road between the Denmark Mt Barker Road and South Western Highway. A 200 m section north and south along the Denmark Mt Barker Road from East River Road was also surveyed. The biological assessment involved a desktop review and three separate field surveys, including a winter flora and fauna survey, spring flora and fauna survey and spring nocturnal fauna survey. Fauna surveys also included the use of movement sensitive cameras in key locations. Key biological aspects The key biological aspects and constraints identified for the survey area are summarised in the following table.
    [Show full text]
  • Edith Cowan University, South West Campus, Bunbury Fauna Assessment
    EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY, SOUTH WEST CAMPUS, BUNBURY FAUNA ASSESSMENT Prepared for EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY Job: 07.154 Report: RP001 EDITH COWAN UNIVERISTY - Edith Cowan University, South West Campus, Bunbury, Fauna Assessment EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY, SOUTH WEST CAMPUS, BUNBURY FAUNA ASSESSMENT Prepared for EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY Prepared by ENV.Australia Pty Ltd Level 7, 182 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Phone: (08) 9289 8360 Fax: (08) 9322 4251 Email: [email protected] Prepared by: Greg Harewood Status: Final QA Review: Dr Mike Brewis Technical Review: Dr Mitchell Ladyman Content Review: Mr Matthew Love Date: 19 February 2008 07.154 RP001 Final V3 (19-2-2008).doc EDITH COWAN UNIVERISTY - Edith Cowan University, South West Campus, Bunbury, Fauna Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................III 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 1.1 THE PROJECT ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Objectives................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.2 Location................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Previous Biological Studies....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]